WEBVTT - 20: Confirmation Bias

0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>This podcast contains information and details relating to suicide. We

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:11.760
<v Speaker 1>urge anyone struggling with their emotions to contact Lifeline on

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 1>thirteen eleven fourteen thirteen eleven fourteen or visit them at

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>lifeline dot org dot au. A twenty four year old

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>devoted mother of two fleeing a violent relationship as a

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:45.200
<v Speaker 1>mom bags pack car running her daughters strapped into the backseat.

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Mom told me that she needed to go back inside

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:49.839
<v Speaker 2>to grab something.

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 3>Panic.

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:53.199
<v Speaker 4>Amy is dead, sir By, Amy's Dead?

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 3>Eight Confusion World.

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 4>About five minutes they said, N's a suicide. One hundred percent.

0:00:58.160 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 5>This is emmersing.

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:05.399
<v Speaker 1>What do you think is really the honest truth about Amy?

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 6>The Truth About Amy.

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 3>Episode twenty.

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:23.040
<v Speaker 7>I'm Liam Bartlett and I'm Alison Sandy.

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 1>So our friends at seven News and The West Australian

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>have hit up Police Minister Reese Whitby about Amy Wensley's

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>case at a recent doorstop, and as a result they

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:42.320
<v Speaker 1>published an article in the newspaper the following day saying this.

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 8>Police Minister Reese Whitby has refused to be drawn on

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 8>whether he thought the Corruption and Crime Commission should launch

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 8>its own investigation into the death of Amy Wensley after

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 8>her family called for a fresh probe in a letter

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 8>accusing WA police of attempting to cover up mismanagement of

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 8>the case. When asked on Monday whether he agreed with

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 8>miss Wensley's families call for a Triple C investigation, mister

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 8>Whitby said it wasn't a decision for him. That's a

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 8>matter for the Triple C. I'm not going to enter

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 8>into their area, he said. The Triple C is distinct

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:24.079
<v Speaker 8>and independent of government, and they make their own decisions.

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 8>What I will say is there is a current police

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 8>investigation into that death, and there's also a one million

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 8>dollar reward available. So police are still taking this seriously,

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 8>still pursuing the issue. I'd urge anyone if you have

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 8>any information, if you have any evidence that could solve

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 8>this issue, please do so. When asked whether he believed

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 8>police had mishandled the original investigation, mister Whitby said investigators

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 8>were taking the cold case very seriously. In the letter

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 8>to Triple C Commissioner John mckeckney, obtained by Channel seven's

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 8>Invasigitive podcast The Truth about Amy, miss Wensley's aunt Anna Davy,

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 8>accused officers of applying bias to try to manipulate as

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 8>suicide finding.

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>So that's the letter that Anna read out in episode seventeen. However,

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>we did have to redact a little bit of it

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>for legal reasons. But all of you who have been

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:26.360
<v Speaker 1>following this podcast and listening throughout would be very aware

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that Anna Davey, Amy's aunt, calls a spade a shovel.

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>There's no sugarcoating anything she says, is there.

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 6>I urge you to please undertake a new investigation into

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 6>Western Australian Police's handling of the case of Amy Wensley

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 6>relating to Operation Junde, the Homicide Squad's attempt to have

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 6>an officer in charge of the coronial investigation treat Amy's

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 6>case as non suspicious, and the obvious bias by senior

0:03:56.880 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 6>police officers displayed at the coronial inquest.

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 7>Yes, Liam, Anna's no shrinking Violet, which makes me wonder

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 7>whether she actually is your art.

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:13.119
<v Speaker 1>Well funny that I have thought about adopting her officially

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>through the channels. I mean, I'm more than happy to

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:19.919
<v Speaker 1>extend the family for Anna's purposes, solely to take her on.

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:22.719
<v Speaker 1>I love Anna, I think she's fantastic She's a smart,

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 1>strong woman with strong opinions and she doesn't hold back.

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 3>I think it's fantastic.

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:31.279
<v Speaker 1>Now, Al, I've viewed the footage of the presser, the

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>press conference, and while I wouldn't exactly call Reese Whitby

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 1>dismissive or evasive, I wouldn't go that far. It is

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:41.159
<v Speaker 1>clear though that he wouldn't be drawn on what he

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:46.039
<v Speaker 1>thought of the allegations of police misconduct and of course

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the serious implications of that.

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 9>Have a listened to yourself, Abe Wensley, who the evidence

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 9>points two was murdered, Yes, three, Policing force split off

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 9>the points to the factor not murder. The family wants

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 9>a triple see you investigate. Would you support that?

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:04.359
<v Speaker 10>Well, that's a matter for the Triple C. I'm not

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 10>going to enter into their area. It's a distinct. The

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 10>Triple C is distinct and independent of government, and they

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 10>make their own decisions. I will say there is a

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 10>current police investigation into that death, and there's also a

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 10>one million dollar reward available, so police are still taking

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 10>this seriously, still pursuing the issue, and if the Triple

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 10>C are remind to investigate, that is a matter for them.

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 9>Do you accept that the police didn't cover themselves in

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 9>glory in those investigations, these earlier investigations.

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 10>I'm not going to go through the issues of the investigation.

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 10>There is a live investigation currently and I'd urge anyone

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 10>if you have any information, if you have any evidence

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 10>it could help to solve this issue, please do so.

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 10>There is a million dollar reward out which is an

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 10>indication of the seriousness that is this issue is being regarded.

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 10>But as for the Triple C, that's matter for them.

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 9>You're the new minister, right, No, but have you been

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:10.919
<v Speaker 9>briefed on that case, on her death and those earlier

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 9>inquiries and the mistakes that were made.

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I had.

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 9>So is it your judgment that they did bugger it up?

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 3>Jeff.

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 10>I'll hold my own counsel. I have my own communications

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 10>with the commissioner. But I think when there's an issue

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 10>that is live, it's best that the police be allowed

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:31.279
<v Speaker 10>to get on and make their investigation. And if the

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 10>Triple C c fit to make an inquiry or look

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 10>at anything in particular, that's a matter for them.

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:40.840
<v Speaker 7>Great job to Jeff Parry from the Seven Years Room

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:42.359
<v Speaker 7>for his persistence there.

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So that's the police Minister Whitby, the new Police Minister,

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>at the press conference, as we said, now just before

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>we go on, let's go back to what we've just

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>told you about the report on mister Whitby and how

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 1>he was quoted originally, and he said, just to remind you,

0:06:56.839 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>mister Whitby said investigators were taking the cold very seriously. Well,

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>how would you know that if he doesn't want to

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 1>get involved. I mean, he said at the start of

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the report to our reporters from seven Years and from

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the West Australian. He made a point of saying, look,

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>this is a matter for the Triple C. I'm not

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>going to enter into their arena. That's not for me

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>as a police minister and go through with the whole

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Charter and all their obligations not only under the Act,

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>but you know, basically to make sure every single policeman,

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>man or woman in the state does their job properly.

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>And he is the minister, so he's got the ultimate responsibility.

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>That's why he gets paid the big bucks. That's why

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>ministers get extra money on top of back benches, right

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>because they've got all this extra responsibility. So here's the

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>new Police Minister getting quite hoity toity about his role

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>in the scheme of things. Oh, I'm not going to

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>really interfere. It's not my job to interfere. It's your

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>job to make sure the police do the right thing.

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:00.040
<v Speaker 1>And a member of the public, someone who helps to

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>pay your way, just come along and point it out

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>some very very serious issues about what they say is

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>manipulation by the police. So later on he says, but

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>hang on a minute, I know that the police are

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>taking this cold case very seriously. Well, that's very interesting,

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>because if you think that it's absolutely someone else's territory,

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 1>what conversations have you had, Minister, with the police about

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 1>this case in order to support them, not the members

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>of the public. What conversations have you had. What sort

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:39.079
<v Speaker 1>of assurances have the police given you who are reinvestigating

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>this case, to allow you to be able to say,

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>don't worry, the investigators are taking this very seriously. Has

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>he talked to the investigators themselves in order to form

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:52.839
<v Speaker 1>the confidence to be able to come out and say

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:58.199
<v Speaker 1>the investigators were taking the cold case very seriously. What

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of experience does he have with investigative procedures to

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>know that they are very serious? I mean there's a

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>whole raft of questions that come out from that statement.

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>But in the meantime he doesn't want to get involved

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>with the Triple C. As a minister, if you don't

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:17.079
<v Speaker 1>think that a member of the public is being treated fairly,

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>especially in a judicial sense, and you have authority in

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 1>that area, then you could take all sorts of measures

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>to make sure to make sure, doubly sure, triply sure

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>that everything is in order. The government have the power

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and often exercise it in many, many other ways, mostly

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>for their own reasons, for their own political reasons, to

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>jump up and say this demands a parliamentary inquiry, or

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:48.439
<v Speaker 1>let's have a judicial inquiry because we need to get

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>to the bottom of this. They can do all that

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>and more.

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 7>Well, it's not unprecedented either, is it. I mean, I've

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 7>seen it in other states.

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:58.959
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, absolutely, totally, totally. You're one hundred percent right.

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 7>Well, we'll get to a bit more of that later.

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 7>For me, I still haven't heard back from Waypole, even

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 7>though I was assured that they would get back to me.

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 7>But again, not surprised or the Attorney General quickly's no

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 7>longer there. There's a new attorney general. This is like

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 7>kryptonite for Superman. I think not that any of them

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:21.559
<v Speaker 7>are Superman, but nobody wants to touch this. I did, though,

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 7>get a response kind of from the Crime and Corruption

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 7>Commission in that I was advised there wasn't a response

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 7>as a Triple C doesn't comment on what it is

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 7>and isn't investigating. That's completely consistent with agencies of that

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 7>nature throughout the nation. But it doesn't stop me trying.

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 7>And I would be negligent in my duty if I

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 7>didn't go to them. So that's the latest communication from

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 7>authorities I've had on Amy Wensley. Now a completely different

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 7>story in relation to Courtney Anderson. Liam you'll remember this

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 7>case from last week. Sure listeners will recall her family

0:10:56.840 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 7>going into great detail with us.

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 11>They're saying she suffered a decade of physical and emotional abuse,

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 11>which they don't believe was fully considered.

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:06.680
<v Speaker 12>And the phone calls would start and it would just

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 12>go and go and go and go, and it was

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 12>just argument after argument after argument. Who are you with?

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 12>You're not with your parents, You're cheating on me. He

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 12>would choke her with his hand round her throat while

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 12>he was driving.

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 7>It's one of those cases that really gets under your skin,

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 7>particularly given their history. Courtney was fourteen when she met

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 7>Ashley Campbell fourteen, who was about twenty or twenty one

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 7>at the time. Her family discussed how she'd written in

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 7>her diary how he'd take her out, and she was

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 7>excited about that. He was Courtney's first real boyfriend and

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 7>much older than her.

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 3>A bit of an imbalance, there, isn't that.

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.079
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, Well, it's not hard to imagine what the power

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 7>dynamic would have been like in their relationship, particularly after

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 7>eleven years. And then there's the circumstances of her death.

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 12>As soon as we knew he was in the car,

0:11:58.040 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 12>alarm bells were ringing.

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 11>Courtney paid Anderson died on April first last year. The

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 11>official police release said she exited a moving car on

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:07.079
<v Speaker 11>the Bruce Highway.

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 7>Anyway, I reached out to the Queensland Attorney General Deb

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 7>Frecklington liamb and you know what happened. Her chief of

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 7>staff called me, discussed the background he had from the department.

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:20.319
<v Speaker 7>I gave him a description of what the family told

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 7>me and fought it through the documents they provided on

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 7>the case. And guess what the family met with the

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:27.959
<v Speaker 7>Attorney General a week later.

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Wonders never cease. So Deb Frecklington, the Attorney General of

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Queensland's doing a job properly. It's being professional, isn't it.

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:37.079
<v Speaker 3>Isn't it?

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean Attorney General Frecklington has a very important position, yea,

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the state's top law officer. It's really crucial, you know,

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:47.079
<v Speaker 1>like a huge responsibility.

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 3>But there you go.

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>She finds time to deal with a constituent who was hurting.

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah right, family members who are drowning in all sorts

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 1>of emotions, and she does the right thing and she

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>sits down and she talks to them and she provides

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>an avenue for them to meet the person at the top. Fantastic.

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:09.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's called doing your job. And you can

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:12.599
<v Speaker 1>have the same position in two different states, operating on

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 1>a completely different basis. So what is that That's down

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to the person, isn't it. It's down to personal attitudes

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and ethics. And dare I say integrity?

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 7>Funnily enough that you mentioned integrity Lamb because she is

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 7>actually also the Minister for integrity.

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>H then go, but hang on, wait there's more. There

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>is no Minister for Integrity in the West Australian cabinet.

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>That portfolio doesn't exist.

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:42.560
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I don't know if it's ever existed, has it?

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 3>Liam? No, not that you have to be called that

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 3>to have it.

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I mean they don't have a Minister for

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 1>emotion or you know, minister for seriousness or a Minister

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>for jocularity or a Minister for ridiculousness either. But still

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:56.319
<v Speaker 1>people manage to go through that gamut of emotions in parliament.

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 3>I've seen it. I've witnessed it.

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:01.200
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, maybe, you know, I don't know, maybe people

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>would take it more seriously. But again, you know, good

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 1>on the deb Frecklington. I think that's fantastic. You know,

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>we should see more of it. That's very human and

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 1>coming from that position in parliament terrific.

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 7>If there was a Party of Integrity, I would vote

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 7>for them every election. But anyway, a disclaimer, I should

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 7>mention this disclaim.

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 4>I do.

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 7>Oh yes, I do know Frecklington's chief of staff because,

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 7>like Reese Whitby, he used to work at seven Except

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 7>Ben Murphy is approachable and we often talk about going

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 7>over to the dark side when people move into politics

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 7>and political advisors or media advisors for politics or business

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 7>and things like that. We often joke about it. But

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 7>many of them really do change when they move over,

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 7>don't they.

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, oh yeah.

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 7>Well some of them, I will say, and I'm not

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 7>pointing to anyone, but some of them become ego driven,

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 7>self indulgent gatekeepers of information that they dispense sparingly in

0:14:57.120 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 7>an attempt to manipulate and control what and how news

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 7>is reported. I mean, we're not the paparazzi here. We're

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 7>not trying to get a picture of some Hollywood style

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 7>at skinny dipping or something. We're just trying, Limb, to

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 7>provide a voice for people who have been screwed over

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 7>by the system, for families whose loved ones have been

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 7>lost in the most terrible way and deserve to have

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 7>their deaths investigated properly and treated fairly by authorities. Shouldn't

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 7>we all be wanting to help these people, Limb, Everyone

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 7>can win out of this situation, except the baddies. Isn't

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 7>that something we can all be proud of? I just

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 7>don't understand why this is an US and them situation?

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 7>Why can't we work together? Why are people with power

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 7>blinded by arrogance and what I can only imagine are

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 7>selfish motives?

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>That's an interesting question al. Yeah, I'll take that as

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>rhetorical because I don't understand either. I don't understand either.

0:15:58.200 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 3>I think we know in.

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>These sort of said suations, if we get a result,

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that's the whole point, isn't it. Yeah, it does matter

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>who claims credit. But I think a lot of times

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's all about claiming credit. I think that's

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the way people perceive it to be, which is a shame.

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 7>Sorry, sad Well, I'm happy to give them complete credit,

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 7>should they take it seriously. I mean, because as we've

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 7>seen right through this, there are some really good officers

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 7>who you know, you can shine a spotlight on and

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 7>say well done. Unfortunately the organization hasn't done that. But

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 7>before we move on, let me update you with some correspondents.

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 7>The family also received from the former Attorney General Shannon Fentaman,

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 7>who's now in opposition, as well as offering support from

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 7>her office to help frame the letter to the state

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 7>coroner seeking inquest. Miss Fenterman said she'd also write one

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 7>herself supporting this. My last response on Courtney Anderson's case

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 7>was from Queensland Police Service, which stated.

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 13>Police have finalized their investigation into the death of a

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 13>twenty eight year old woman. No criminal charges have been laid.

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 13>The matter was referred to the coroner and as such

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 13>it would be inappropriate for Queensland Police Service to comment further.

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:11.920
<v Speaker 7>I replied that I was actually asking about the apparent

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 7>internal investigation into the handling of the case, and then

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:19.159
<v Speaker 7>was told there was quote no current internal complaints or

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 7>investigations in relation to this matter and the matter had

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:26.680
<v Speaker 7>been reviewed, but the investigation would not be reopened at

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 7>this time.

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:30.679
<v Speaker 1>Well it's pretty stock standard, isn't it. Yeah, but that

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean that could that could change on the you know,

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>in the blink of an eye.

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 7>Yeah. I think that this will definitely get an in

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 7>question Liam. I have no doubt in my mind that

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 7>it meets the criteria.

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 3>Criteria absolutely, yeah.

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and the criteria is unexplainable, very strange, weird, mysterious

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and should be explained. Further questions to be answered that

0:17:53.160 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 1>that category are Yeah. Anyway, now moving on, Given the

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:09.120
<v Speaker 1>scope of Amy's story, I think it's good to get

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>perspective from someone who has not only been a police

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>officer but also a private investigator and a journalist talking

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:21.199
<v Speaker 1>about Duncan McNabb and Duncan's career has spanned something like

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:24.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty years. He's also a renowned author and has covered

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>current affairs and news investigations for the ABC for nine

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and for the Seven network. Duncan is author of many

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 1>of our listeners will relate to at least one of these.

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Duncan has authored The Usual Suspect, The Life of Abe Saffron,

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:42.680
<v Speaker 1>That was a Ripper Getting Away with Murder, and most

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>recently Roger Rogerson from hero cop to convicted Murderer.

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, this was great talking to Duncan. Well, thank you

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 7>so much, Duncan. So first of all, I'd like to

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 7>ask a little bit about your background.

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:57.120
<v Speaker 4>I started off in law school and the courts actually,

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 4>and after failing law skill comprehensively, I thinkrobably been kicked

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 4>out more law skills than anyone else in Australia history.

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:05.920
<v Speaker 4>Probably a good idea really. I joined the New South

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 4>Wales Cops, spent nine years there, stepped across to do

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 4>criminal defense afterwards because it's very hand little a lot

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:16.360
<v Speaker 4>of major criminal defense work, and that sort of gave

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:19.120
<v Speaker 4>me a taste of how involved the media are in

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 4>prosecutions and in defense for that matter. So that's how

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 4>I sort of ended up in the media thirty eight

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 4>years ago.

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 7>Not many of us in the media have been police officers.

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 7>So can you tell me why you didn't stay a

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 7>police officer.

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:32.919
<v Speaker 4>Well, I didn't stay at police officer because I was

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 4>in New South Wales at the time of staggering corruption,

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 4>and I was working at internal affairs at the very

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 4>end of it, and I was seeing things happening, and

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 4>I was seeing how it was being swept under the carpet,

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 4>and in particular the matter of Roger Rogerson, who I've

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:47.879
<v Speaker 4>written about on a couple of occasions. And in nineteen

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 4>eighty four I remember standing in my boss's office when

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 4>a dying deposition from Mick Drury, who'd been shot by

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 4>Christopher Flannery, the well known hitman who went missing forty

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:01.120
<v Speaker 4>years ago last week and we haven't found career. Flannery

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 4>had tried to bump off Mick Drury, who had survived.

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 4>The dying declaration deposition I'm sorry from Mick Drury in

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 4>part said that Roger Rogerson was at the heart of

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 4>it all, and my boss nodded his head safely and

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 4>said it couldn't be Roger. He's too good a blog,

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:20.719
<v Speaker 4>and what followed was a shamer of an investigation, and

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 4>I thought, well, that's how you guys really treat the

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 4>attemptment of a fellow police officer. I'm not hanging around.

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 4>See you later. I had parted, and it spent a

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 4>couple of years defending some people who were wrongly accused

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 4>of terrible, terrible crimes on briefs of evidence, in one

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 4>in particular, which is just a complete and utter sham,

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 4>and it looked good on paper until we sort of

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 4>delved into it slightly and we realized that none of it,

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:48.919
<v Speaker 4>none of it hooked together. The chronology failed the case,

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 4>and our clients were exonerated fortunately and didn't go to

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 4>jail for a long time for a horrible crime. Mate,

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 4>it's likely the crime had never even happened, let alone

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 4>been committed by any and in crime, first of all,

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 4>prove you've got a crime.

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 7>So Juhnt can explain to me why do they get

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 7>it so wrong so often in relation to saying that

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 7>somebody is guilty when they're not, all saying that they're

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 7>innocent when they're not.

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 4>Well on paper, the cops aren't as supposed to decide

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 4>good enough. We reckon he's guilty. All they need is

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 4>reasonable cause to suspect and then it goes up to

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:26.919
<v Speaker 4>judging jury basically at some stage. But the costs have

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 4>got a huge onus on them to make sure that

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 4>the case is absolutely sound. And the fundamental problem, well,

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 4>there're a couple of problems in policing. It's very very easy.

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 4>Back in the old days, it was very easy to

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 4>decide on someone you didn't like and make sure that

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 4>evidence fitted them. That's bad our corrupt does. But the

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 4>greatest problem with any investigation, and that whether it's done

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:51.680
<v Speaker 4>by cops, whether it's done by journalists for that matter,

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 4>is deciding what the result might look like and working

0:21:55.600 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 4>towards it. It's sort of confirmational bias. It can happen deliberately,

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:03.399
<v Speaker 4>as I've seen quite a number of occasions, or it

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 4>can happen by accident and you decide, well, this person

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 4>looks good to me. Let's work towards that. And the

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 4>moment you have confirmation or bias in your investigation, your

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:14.879
<v Speaker 4>investigation is perilous. It means that you're going to stuff

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:18.160
<v Speaker 4>it up. It also means that someone innocent might get

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 4>convicted or railroaded. Towards a conviction. And it also means

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 4>that the victims of the crime aren't properly served by

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:29.159
<v Speaker 4>the investigators. So investigation is a jigsaw puzzle, usually analogy.

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:31.359
<v Speaker 4>You throw all the pieces of the jigsaw on the

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 4>table and work towards systematically till you get a result.

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:37.239
<v Speaker 4>And that's what coppers and journalists need to do. You

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:40.439
<v Speaker 4>can't say, oh, this person looks good, let's work towards that.

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 4>In New South Wales recently the William Tyrell case, I

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:47.639
<v Speaker 4>think about one point five million dollars compensation paid to

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:51.160
<v Speaker 4>a blood who was falsely the focus of an investigation,

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.679
<v Speaker 4>and that investigation decided on him by the look of

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 4>it and work towards it. He picked up one point

0:22:56.600 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 4>five million dollars. His life was devastated. The fundamentals and

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:02.879
<v Speaker 4>that is he actually could prove as I recall that

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 4>he was somewhere else at the time he was accused

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 4>of chasing William Tyrell. He was in a cafe with

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 4>his wife for a memory. Good luck with that. So

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:14.639
<v Speaker 4>confirmational bias is perilous in investigations and it damages so

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 4>many people, not only the accused, but the families and

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 4>all those people involved in them as well. So bottom

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:23.680
<v Speaker 4>lineers don't assume work towards it. Let the evidence guide

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 4>you to the result. And that's the classic problem. I

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 4>think that another thing and in the chronology also has

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 4>to work. And these are two important parts of an

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:38.360
<v Speaker 4>investigation that are sometimes overlooked willfully, sometimes accidentally, sometimes with enthusiasm.

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:41.639
<v Speaker 4>Inexperience also comes into play as well, or in some

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 4>investigations I've seen, they just can't be damned.

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 7>But it seems like detective school one oh one that

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 7>you let the evidence guide you.

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, if you're trained as a detective. I don't

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:54.160
<v Speaker 4>know what training around Australia is like, but certainly when

0:23:54.200 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 4>I was trained to spend three years on the job

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 4>learning with people who are supposed to know what they're doing,

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 4>I've had some great mentors, I have to say once

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:05.399
<v Speaker 4>it weren't that's so great over but some really fantastic people.

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 4>And at the same time you then spend in our

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 4>days three months in the classroom learning it, making sure

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 4>that it is driven hard into your head so you

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:17.920
<v Speaker 4>don't stup. What happens after that, that's where things can

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 4>get interesting, but it shouldn't happen. But it does, and

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 4>all sorts of things come into play. But you know,

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:27.879
<v Speaker 4>from laziness through to criminality, there's a whole range of

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:32.919
<v Speaker 4>reasons why these investigations stuff up. And sometimes it's Friday

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:35.159
<v Speaker 4>after and in Jesus Christ, I can't be bothered. We

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:37.399
<v Speaker 4>don't want to go with the weekend. Let's piss this

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:39.960
<v Speaker 4>off and move on to the weekend. It can be

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:41.200
<v Speaker 4>something as simple as that.

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 7>Which seems like the case with Amy Wensley right going

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 7>on holiday.

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:47.159
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, with Amy Wensley, it's an unusual case from what

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:51.200
<v Speaker 4>I can see the chronology. The uniform people have turned

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:54.479
<v Speaker 4>up and that one look at them that I mean

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 4>a confronting crime scene as well. I mean if the

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:02.360
<v Speaker 4>injuries from a shotgun devastating, so the crime scene would

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 4>have been quite confronting for the cops, and the uniform

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:10.120
<v Speaker 4>blacks are quite reasonably worried about it. I've just read

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:15.159
<v Speaker 4>the coroners the inquest summary, and the uniform cops have

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:17.680
<v Speaker 4>done exactly what they should have done, and they've called

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 4>the detectives because you've walked in and the first thing

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 4>you do at a crime scene is make sure you

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 4>have an open mind and don't tread on too much,

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:27.200
<v Speaker 4>and the uniform cop has struck me as having done

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 4>a really good job. They've had a look and thought one,

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:35.160
<v Speaker 4>it's an extraordinary violent crime scene. And secondly we have questions.

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 4>For my mind, they've done exactly what they should have

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 4>done and got on them for doing it. They've called

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:43.639
<v Speaker 4>the detectives who haven't from what I've seen from the

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 4>coroner's summary, done a spectacular job in the first place.

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 4>I don't know. I don't know what day of the

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 4>week this was. Was it before a long weekend or

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:56.399
<v Speaker 4>they just couldn't be bothered. I don't know what it is.

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 4>But when you go to a crime scene, and I

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 4>mean as an investigation I've done it, as a journalist,

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 4>I've done it, and as a defense person, you go

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 4>through it with a fine tooth. Came to see where

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 4>the police went right and where they went wrong. Especially

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 4>in cold cases, when we review them, the first thing

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 4>you do is not assume the police got it right

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 4>or they got it wrong. We go back and walk

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:20.200
<v Speaker 4>out way through it ourselves. Not only we've got fresh eyes,

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:23.440
<v Speaker 4>but we also have newer science that we can also.

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:25.400
<v Speaker 4>Does that come to bear, you know something we didn't

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 4>have twenty years ago. Can that be useful looking at

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:30.960
<v Speaker 4>the summaries from the corner, the uniform bolgs have done

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 4>the right thing. The detectives have arrived, and they haven't.

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:37.119
<v Speaker 4>They've made a mistakes. They've made a classic mistake. They

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 4>haven't assumed that foul play and worked backwards to eliminate

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 4>whether there was foul play or whether it was suicide.

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 4>They seem to have readily just assumed it was suicide.

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:49.879
<v Speaker 4>And this is something I noted in the current summary

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 4>without my glasses on something that struck me as being unusual.

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 4>The review concluded that there was insufficient evidence to establish

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 4>the involvement of another person, so he's death. When I

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 4>read that, my first thought was, shouldn't it be the reverse?

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 4>Is there insufficient evidence to it out whether it was

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:12.399
<v Speaker 4>it in fact suicide. I mean, my assumption is you

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 4>assume if oul play and work backwards, you know, keep

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 4>your mind really open so you don't miss anything. But

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 4>if it happens, you work it backwards and suicide becomes obvious,

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:24.439
<v Speaker 4>then fine, you've got a decision. But so when I

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 4>saw it's bizarre insufficient evidence to establish the involvement of

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 4>another person, that strikes me as being the reverse of

0:27:32.840 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 4>what should have been said.

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 7>Well, particularly when you have three mechanics well at the

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 7>time two by a mechanic experts saying that the evidence

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 7>is highly consistent with having her being shot by somebody else.

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:48.359
<v Speaker 7>So yeah, it was really odd. But the lead detective

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:49.959
<v Speaker 7>was going on holidays.

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 4>It's used to affect police thinking when I was young,

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 4>not that you'd pass a murder of but you're thinking, God,

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:58.200
<v Speaker 4>I want to pay day, let's get to the pub,

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 4>going on holidays? Do I want? There's lingering on. I

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 4>find their attitude very unusual. Don't put it that way. Yes,

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 4>I would have thought. You walk into that scene as

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 4>a detective and the first thing you do is start

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 4>thinking what's wrong with it, not what's right with it.

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 4>And I'm fascinated too that they've made their decision yet

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 4>according to some of the evidence I've looked at, someone

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:24.159
<v Speaker 4>has actually gone there and moved the shotgun. That in

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 4>itself is unusual. Why would you do that? I mean,

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm getting question at the moment I looked my good

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:35.120
<v Speaker 4>questions said the dignity of covering up slightly. I can

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 4>understand that. What I can't understand is why you choose

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 4>to move the shotgun? What purpose does that have in you?

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm thinking, well, okay, the shotguns. And it comes back

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 4>to what you were mentioning earlier, the biomechanics of it.

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 4>Surely you would reconstruct the crime scene to make sure

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:55.719
<v Speaker 4>that it was that there was possibly if suicide was

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 4>either included or eliminated. Could she have actually done what

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 4>she has alleged done in and as she did it. Yeah,

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 4>that's where the lynch penable is to move on very

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 4>very quickly without possibly giving that due consideration and asking

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 4>questions about why someone would choose just purely to move

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 4>the shotgun. That's all too simple acts by one person.

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 4>For me, this has got alarm bells ringing all over it.

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 4>And then you consider a couple of questions later, you

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 4>consider the antecedents of both people involved in it, and

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 4>you start thinking you'd be getting the hair standing up

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 4>on the back of your neck. I would have thought, no,

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 4>that's not normal. No, unfortunately happens far too often, but

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 4>it isn't normal.

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 7>So yeah, it's the world they live in. It was

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 7>the socioeconomic factors as well. Some people say or have

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 7>somemise that maybe he was an informant. Maybe that was

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 7>why they went lightly on him. So, but I think,

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 7>as you probably find with all these cases, Duncan, it

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 7>usually comes down to laziness more than conspiracy.

0:29:56.600 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Look and classic in every investigation, never ever, always

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 4>put up and put it politely in two versions, fuck

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 4>up before conspiracy, and I always lean on the film

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 4>rather than the latter. Conspiracies are wonderful and it's great

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 4>stuff to have a talk about over glass of wine

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 4>at night. But the reality, as we go back to

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 4>what I said at the very beginning, it's chronology, and

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 4>it's keeping that open mind and or have your mind

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 4>opened certainly to other things. Sure, but she wiz, the

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 4>simplest route is usually the accurate one. Just do your job,

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 4>step by step.

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:31.480
<v Speaker 7>I think the problem with this one, Duncan, is what

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 7>happened is they then launched an operation the next day,

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 7>and so the detectives came back, not the same detectives,

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 7>another operation JUNDI, the homicide squad. They came back major crime.

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 7>It was then because they went back, so they came back,

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:49.959
<v Speaker 7>they did their own investigation, but for whatever reason, they

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 7>ended up coming to the conclusion of suicide as well.

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:55.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there may be a couple of things in play

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 4>here too, because I noticed the crime senate also being

0:30:57.640 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 4>cleaned to that happened before the homicide squad. Well, this

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 4>is where you have a fundamental problem with the entire case.

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 4>The crime scene was cleaned up very very quickly. So

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 4>when the so called experts or perhaps experts from Perth

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 4>and Serpentines on the edge of Perth as well, it's

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 4>not a huge schlep away. When I first looked at

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 4>that Serpentine roadhouse, well will that be? It's about fifty

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 4>on k's out of Perth. It's not a massive schlep. Well,

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 4>you might actually want to live out there and commute

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 4>in to town. So we're not talking remote Western Australia

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 4>at all. If the detectives had chosen to cal the homicides,

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 4>god well, surely the homicide squad first up would have

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 4>said preserve the scene what you do so we can

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 4>have a look at it. But that didn't happen for

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 4>some reason, I don't know why. Instead that not only

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 4>was the scene not preserved, even though the uniform blacks

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 4>were saying we don't like this, the scene wasn't preserved,

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:55.680
<v Speaker 4>and in fact that someone very kindly gave the owner

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 4>of the property the telephone number of someone who forensic

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 4>cleaners to come out and give the place a runover.

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, maybe it's more current, but certainly when

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 4>I was a young copper, which is quite some time ago,

0:32:06.600 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 4>we didn't immediately have forensic cleaning services at our beck

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 4>and calls oh yeah, I've got a number in my

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 4>pocket here. No, I'd be curious to see how quickly

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 4>the forensic cleaners are in fact called to the scene.

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 4>So when the homicide squad the experts have arrived the

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 4>next morning, they see a pristine, non crime scene, So

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 4>they have to make their decision on suicide based on

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 4>what they're told by their colleagues, who've already written it

0:32:30.160 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 4>off as suicide. So you can see already the problem starting.

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 4>They might have gone there with fresh eyes, but they've

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 4>got nothing to see. So how can they reasonably say

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:44.560
<v Speaker 4>we've independently reviewed the investigation because the crime scene's gone.

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 4>How can we actually say that they've done it. They've

0:32:46.600 --> 0:32:48.800
<v Speaker 4>relied on what their mates have told them, or their

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:51.880
<v Speaker 4>colleagues have told them, and they've drawn that conclusion from

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 4>what their colleagues have told them. So unless they've had

0:32:56.000 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 4>eyes on the crime scene, have walked around and done

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 4>their bits and pieces, use their expertise, they're relying on

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 4>what they were told and they ain't gonna work.

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 7>Yes at all, that makes perfect sense.

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 4>It's fund a metal floor in the review.

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 7>Yes, but it was a reportable event, so as you know,

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 7>and that's where the coroner gets involved, and that's why

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 7>it was reopened a third time. And you of course

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 7>know Evil and Bigger.

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. I've known evil And for years and her partner

0:33:20.960 --> 0:33:23.200
<v Speaker 4>is probably my oldest friend, and he and I worked

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 4>together in the New South Well's Cops. These people have

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 4>extraordinary careers. I mean, Evil and had a great career

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:33.720
<v Speaker 4>as a prosecutor. She was a fabulous coroner. Her views

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 4>on this are spot on the money. She's done what

0:33:36.360 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 4>a good detective would do. She looked at it and thought,

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 4>this doesn't smell right, and I noticed it's now become

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 4>an open finding. I'm still troubled by the other coroner,

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 4>who Coronel Linton. I think it was in the summary

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 4>just saying insufficient evidence to establish the involvement of another person.

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 4>Call me pessimistic, I'd be wreaking the reverse way let's

0:33:56.760 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 4>have a look at it. Yeah, so evil the money.

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 4>She looked at it, and the first thing I would

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:05.040
<v Speaker 4>imagine her noses wrinkled in the hairs that stood up

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:08.360
<v Speaker 4>on the back of her head. This doesn't work. And

0:34:08.400 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 4>then you go down to the biomechanics of it all.

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:12.759
<v Speaker 4>I mean, can it have happened in the way the

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 4>police believed that led them to suicide? Well what did

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 4>they do? Did they just walk in, have a look around,

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 4>put their hands in their pockets, say this looked like

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:23.799
<v Speaker 4>a suicide. Walk up the door, the old detective trick,

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 4>your hands in pockets so you don't touch anything. You

0:34:26.239 --> 0:34:28.239
<v Speaker 4>walk around, have a look around. Yeah right, fine, it

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 4>looks like a suicide to me. Job done. I don't

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 4>know whether it was that casual. But I'd also be

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:36.840
<v Speaker 4>concerned if I've got a couple of uniform coppers saying

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:38.799
<v Speaker 4>this doesn't work, there's something wrong here.

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:41.080
<v Speaker 7>Well, that's rare, right, that's really rare.

0:34:41.719 --> 0:34:44.800
<v Speaker 4>It's really rare. And good on them for taking that stand.

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 4>But that's the hierarchy of policing. You know, it's not

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:50.200
<v Speaker 4>a uniform matter. It's a detective matter. The detectives are spoken.

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:53.200
<v Speaker 4>Thus it is, and it's curious that our reviewers ensued

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:55.760
<v Speaker 4>twenty four hours later. But by that stage there's nothing

0:34:55.800 --> 0:34:56.280
<v Speaker 4>to review.

0:34:56.600 --> 0:35:00.879
<v Speaker 7>Yes, but luckily, luckily, the uniform officers did do quite

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:03.320
<v Speaker 7>a bit before the detectives got there. So they took photos.

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:05.560
<v Speaker 7>So they've had those photos. They've seen the position of

0:35:05.560 --> 0:35:07.279
<v Speaker 7>the body, they've seen the position of the gun, so

0:35:07.360 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 7>it wasn't lost.

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:11.000
<v Speaker 4>That's incredibly important. It would have been even better if

0:35:11.040 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 4>they'd had a forensic scientist turn up and examine the

0:35:14.120 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 4>crime scene rigorously. I know, I don't know whether that

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 4>actually ever happened.

0:35:17.640 --> 0:35:20.759
<v Speaker 7>No, that was a problem because I said, you know,

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:23.600
<v Speaker 7>by then it was getting late. The detectives had turned up,

0:35:23.600 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 7>and then they took over and said, no, no, let's

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:27.720
<v Speaker 7>clean up the crime scene.

0:35:27.760 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 4>Well call me old fashioned, but I would have thought

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:33.359
<v Speaker 4>you turn up, But this did. Uniform cops called the detectives.

0:35:33.520 --> 0:35:35.800
<v Speaker 4>The detectives had turned up, and I would imagine forensics

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 4>should have been summoned at the same time. Let's capture

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:41.319
<v Speaker 4>the video of the scene. We've got contemporary technology. Let's

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:45.560
<v Speaker 4>get still photographs, position of the body, position of the gun, which,

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:47.400
<v Speaker 4>of course by that stage was tricky because it had

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 4>been moved. Blood spatter pattern analysis critical in crime scenes

0:35:51.760 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 4>like this, so you can make sure that it actually

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:54.839
<v Speaker 4>happened on the way it did with there are other

0:35:54.880 --> 0:35:57.360
<v Speaker 4>fingerprints at the scene, what's on the gun? Did anyone

0:35:57.400 --> 0:35:59.480
<v Speaker 4>look at the gun for other fingerprints and or DNA?

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:02.719
<v Speaker 4>Did they examine any of the people adjacent to it

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:04.719
<v Speaker 4>to see if they had some gunshot residue? All those

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:06.920
<v Speaker 4>sorts of things don't appear to have happened.

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 7>So evil and started asking questions. And then there was

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 7>an officer who was appointed as head of the coronial investigation,

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 7>and that was Senior Constable and Lahane. So she was

0:36:19.760 --> 0:36:23.280
<v Speaker 7>told by the homicide Squad Major crime squad at the time.

0:36:23.880 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 7>She was told to treat it as non suspicious.

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 4>Is that usual? I would have thought that the person

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:30.600
<v Speaker 4>in the courner's office would be the very end of

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 4>the game. The homicide squad should have been handling it.

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:36.279
<v Speaker 4>I'm not too sure how Perth works. West Australia works

0:36:36.280 --> 0:36:39.400
<v Speaker 4>in ways that have often found mysterious. I would imagine

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:41.760
<v Speaker 4>the person at the coroner's office was just basically handling

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 4>the paperwork. The conduct of the bread detectives said nothing

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:47.279
<v Speaker 4>to see her homicide squad have said nothing to see here,

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:49.360
<v Speaker 4>So then it goes to the coroner's office, and this

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:52.960
<v Speaker 4>is just basically the mechanics of getting the coronial in

0:36:53.040 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 4>quest in progress, not actually investigating. The investigation was done,

0:36:57.760 --> 0:37:00.800
<v Speaker 4>so I take a pumpet. By the time the senior

0:37:00.800 --> 0:37:05.279
<v Speaker 4>constable assisting the coroner's got involved, well game over. They're

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:07.839
<v Speaker 4>just presenting the paperwork has provided to them by their

0:37:07.880 --> 0:37:10.960
<v Speaker 4>fellow officers, so not a lot of skin in the

0:37:10.960 --> 0:37:12.800
<v Speaker 4>game as an investigator.

0:37:12.360 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 7>By that stage. She then got reprimanded. She told me

0:37:16.239 --> 0:37:20.440
<v Speaker 7>how she got called into a senior homicide detective who

0:37:20.520 --> 0:37:24.600
<v Speaker 7>yelled at her for questioning his detectives to the point

0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:26.920
<v Speaker 7>that she could feel spit on her face. So that

0:37:27.320 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 7>probably you So she wasn't seen as a team player,

0:37:29.719 --> 0:37:30.839
<v Speaker 7>so she was punished for that.

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:33.239
<v Speaker 4>No, well, she's the endgame. Presumably she's the person then

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:36.440
<v Speaker 4>takes it to the coroner works for the coroner, and

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:39.320
<v Speaker 4>she's looked at it and thought this doesn't smell right either,

0:37:40.520 --> 0:37:42.839
<v Speaker 4>and she's taken a fairly ballsy iView have gone back

0:37:42.840 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 4>to probably some senior detectives who don't like that interference.

0:37:46.160 --> 0:37:49.719
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we're the experts. Why are you questioning it.

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:52.879
<v Speaker 4>But like any good review of a brief, and that'd

0:37:52.920 --> 0:37:54.400
<v Speaker 4>be the same if you take a conal brief to

0:37:54.400 --> 0:37:57.439
<v Speaker 4>the Director of Public Prosecutions, they will review the brief

0:37:57.520 --> 0:38:01.360
<v Speaker 4>and think there's bits missing here, this is problematic. Fix this,

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 4>there's a gap here. I don't understand this. Can you

0:38:04.000 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 4>explain why? And I think that sounds like what her

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:10.960
<v Speaker 4>wrong was. She's putting the paperwork together, she's reviewing it

0:38:11.040 --> 0:38:14.040
<v Speaker 4>before it goes to Corona. She's finding what she perceives

0:38:14.040 --> 0:38:17.080
<v Speaker 4>the problems with the investigation, and she's gone back to

0:38:17.120 --> 0:38:20.040
<v Speaker 4>them say what's the score. So rather than actually think, yeah,

0:38:20.040 --> 0:38:22.960
<v Speaker 4>you're right, there are problems here that you're reviewing it,

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 4>you've got problems with it. Very common in policing is

0:38:26.080 --> 0:38:27.799
<v Speaker 4>not to say, well, yeah, I see what you mean.

0:38:28.120 --> 0:38:31.400
<v Speaker 4>Very common in policing is to say congratulations, do what

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:34.799
<v Speaker 4>you're told. And that seems to be what has happened here.

0:38:35.640 --> 0:38:39.400
<v Speaker 4>So look, it happens in policing around the country and

0:38:39.440 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 4>we see cases like this where things have been gloriously

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:45.080
<v Speaker 4>stuffed up. We don't want to accept we've made a mistake.

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:47.920
<v Speaker 4>Rather than except we've made a mistake, we'll just push

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 4>on hard copplers around the country, and I think internationally

0:38:50.760 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 4>to that matter, seldom say ooks, we've got it wrong.

0:38:54.200 --> 0:38:56.200
<v Speaker 4>They have to be forced into that position and that's

0:38:56.239 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 4>always unwilling.

0:38:57.360 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 7>So Duncan, you wouldn't be surprised that she also told

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:02.319
<v Speaker 7>me that it killed her career. She's no longer with

0:39:02.400 --> 0:39:02.879
<v Speaker 7>way Pong.

0:39:03.120 --> 0:39:04.680
<v Speaker 4>Oh, it wouldn't surprise me at all. In fact, I

0:39:04.719 --> 0:39:08.080
<v Speaker 4>could see it happening very very quickly. My dealings with

0:39:08.160 --> 0:39:11.240
<v Speaker 4>the Western Australian Police have been a couple of them.

0:39:11.400 --> 0:39:13.520
<v Speaker 4>Some great people I've dealt with over the years when

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:16.839
<v Speaker 4>we did the Bernie story for Channel seven, but other

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:19.479
<v Speaker 4>horror stories as well, and you get them throughout around

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:21.880
<v Speaker 4>the countryside, and I've been doing this for fifty odd years.

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:25.960
<v Speaker 4>Some great stories about fabulous policing, but some terrible stuff,

0:39:26.400 --> 0:39:30.600
<v Speaker 4>and the whistleblower or the dissenter is often just crushed

0:39:31.520 --> 0:39:33.239
<v Speaker 4>because we don't want to bite the bullet and say

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:37.560
<v Speaker 4>we stuffed up, Whereas my view is if you're stuffed up,

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:39.600
<v Speaker 4>you take it on the chin and fix it.

0:39:39.880 --> 0:39:44.439
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I know, like it's really been drag kicking a straight.

0:39:44.719 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 4>I always go back to West Australia's police's greatest greatest achievements.

0:39:49.040 --> 0:39:52.719
<v Speaker 4>It was the Clermont disaster for years, yes, but the

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:55.120
<v Speaker 4>one that always sticks in my mind from Western Australia

0:39:55.239 --> 0:39:58.120
<v Speaker 4>is the Scott Ostick case. We did it seven all

0:39:58.120 --> 0:39:58.839
<v Speaker 4>those years ago.

0:40:02.440 --> 0:40:05.200
<v Speaker 2>The actions of WA police have been placed under an

0:40:05.280 --> 0:40:08.920
<v Speaker 2>uncomfortable spotlight as an appeal against a decade old murder

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:12.520
<v Speaker 2>conviction got underway today. Today, Ostik's defense told the court

0:40:12.600 --> 0:40:16.080
<v Speaker 2>there are problems with key pieces of evidence, in particular

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:19.759
<v Speaker 2>a packet of Winfield Blue cigarettes allegedly stained with miss

0:40:19.840 --> 0:40:22.319
<v Speaker 2>Thorn's blood, which was nowhere to be seen in the

0:40:22.320 --> 0:40:26.160
<v Speaker 2>initial forensic photographs of Ostick's house, but then appeared in

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:29.880
<v Speaker 2>more police photographs taken days later. Then there's the alleged

0:40:29.960 --> 0:40:33.279
<v Speaker 2>murder weapon, a pocket knife missed by Sees volunteers when

0:40:33.320 --> 0:40:36.120
<v Speaker 2>they searched a paddock near the murder scene, but discovered

0:40:36.200 --> 0:40:37.799
<v Speaker 2>days later by detectives.

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:41.000
<v Speaker 4>Here's a bloke who was a rail roaded into a prosecution.

0:40:41.160 --> 0:40:45.200
<v Speaker 4>In my view, Stacy Thornt murdered, stabbed to death in

0:40:45.239 --> 0:40:48.279
<v Speaker 4>her home. They arrest Scott Ostick, her occasional sort of

0:40:48.680 --> 0:40:51.640
<v Speaker 4>boyfriend for what it might have a better term. Scott

0:40:51.800 --> 0:40:54.600
<v Speaker 4>is convicted. I don't think his defense was particularly good.

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:58.200
<v Speaker 4>Scott has convicted. He's insight for twelve years before some

0:40:58.239 --> 0:41:01.840
<v Speaker 4>people like Malcolm McCusker and other crew from Western Australia

0:41:02.120 --> 0:41:04.560
<v Speaker 4>start looking into it. Came to us with the story

0:41:04.640 --> 0:41:06.680
<v Speaker 4>where looking the first thing I do, I wouldn't think

0:41:06.880 --> 0:41:10.160
<v Speaker 4>this just doesn't work and you go back to the

0:41:10.200 --> 0:41:12.200
<v Speaker 4>crime scene again. It comes back to the mechanics of

0:41:12.239 --> 0:41:16.520
<v Speaker 4>the crime scene. Stacy I think was there were murdered.

0:41:16.600 --> 0:41:18.879
<v Speaker 4>There was blood everywhere as you could expect. There are

0:41:18.880 --> 0:41:21.920
<v Speaker 4>two sets of footprints in the blood, one is hers

0:41:22.080 --> 0:41:25.520
<v Speaker 4>and the other presumably as a perpetrator. There's a small

0:41:25.560 --> 0:41:29.000
<v Speaker 4>feed and Scott isiac's got a bloody big feet, So

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:33.799
<v Speaker 4>that doesn't work. In reviewing the case independently years yell

0:41:33.800 --> 0:41:36.120
<v Speaker 4>out later, not only is there things like that, there's

0:41:36.160 --> 0:41:38.799
<v Speaker 4>suggestions that the metadata might have been problematic in some

0:41:38.840 --> 0:41:42.160
<v Speaker 4>of the visions they've got, and simple things like footprints

0:41:42.600 --> 0:41:45.440
<v Speaker 4>and the part that always also dragged my attention is

0:41:46.000 --> 0:41:50.200
<v Speaker 4>an independent and incredibly capable pathologist. I think Richard Sheppard

0:41:50.200 --> 0:41:53.759
<v Speaker 4>from Memory the UK blog, who did the Princess Die autopsy,

0:41:54.080 --> 0:41:56.279
<v Speaker 4>looks at the murder weapon, looks at the results and

0:41:56.320 --> 0:42:01.080
<v Speaker 4>says this isn't the murder weapon. It's not long enough yet.

0:42:01.160 --> 0:42:04.120
<v Speaker 4>This poor bloke's done twelve years in jail. The Western

0:42:04.120 --> 0:42:09.839
<v Speaker 4>Australian Government begrudgingly eventually it goes to appeal. They order

0:42:09.880 --> 0:42:13.360
<v Speaker 4>a retrial. The government does a retrial. The retrial takes

0:42:13.360 --> 0:42:15.439
<v Speaker 4>a couple of weeks. The jury are out for time

0:42:15.480 --> 0:42:17.080
<v Speaker 4>to pour a cup of coffee and have a Scotch

0:42:17.120 --> 0:42:20.279
<v Speaker 4>finger biscuit before they ac quit. Scott Austik he's lost

0:42:20.280 --> 0:42:22.640
<v Speaker 4>twelve years of his life. His father's died whilst he's

0:42:22.680 --> 0:42:25.640
<v Speaker 4>in jail, his daughter's grown up while he's been in jail,

0:42:26.160 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 4>and he's now out. But gee is the battle to

0:42:28.600 --> 0:42:31.600
<v Speaker 4>get it done all because the crime scene was originally

0:42:32.000 --> 0:42:34.680
<v Speaker 4>not terribly well looked at, and no one ever wanted

0:42:34.719 --> 0:42:36.400
<v Speaker 4>to say books, we've made a mistake.

0:42:36.920 --> 0:42:40.879
<v Speaker 7>Sounds so familiar. Well Waypole has launched a new investigation

0:42:41.080 --> 0:42:43.920
<v Speaker 7>off the back of our podcast in the Spotlight episode,

0:42:44.200 --> 0:42:47.760
<v Speaker 7>and they're reinvestigating Amy's case of the fourth time this time,

0:42:48.239 --> 0:42:52.799
<v Speaker 7>and they're updating the brief for the Director of Public Prosecutions.

0:42:53.160 --> 0:42:58.080
<v Speaker 7>But the family is concerned that given they keep pushing

0:42:58.239 --> 0:43:03.640
<v Speaker 7>the suicide angle, you know, sort of favored result. And

0:43:03.680 --> 0:43:05.719
<v Speaker 7>I don't think it's drawing a long vote to say

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:09.520
<v Speaker 7>that there is bias within the ranks. They're really good

0:43:09.560 --> 0:43:13.320
<v Speaker 7>police officers, but also some officers who don't want to

0:43:13.360 --> 0:43:16.239
<v Speaker 7>admit they're wrong. So they're going through the process now.

0:43:16.719 --> 0:43:18.799
<v Speaker 7>The biggest fear from the family and they've called them

0:43:18.800 --> 0:43:21.880
<v Speaker 7>the Triple Cee to oversee it as well. John mc

0:43:21.960 --> 0:43:26.240
<v Speaker 7>keeckney used to be a DPP himself, and obviously Rob Owen,

0:43:26.440 --> 0:43:29.759
<v Speaker 7>who's the DPP now. I mean, all ways are on

0:43:29.840 --> 0:43:32.520
<v Speaker 7>them and I don't know if the Scott Austic case

0:43:32.600 --> 0:43:34.759
<v Speaker 7>at the time did it have a spotlight shone on

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:35.879
<v Speaker 7>it when that was.

0:43:36.040 --> 0:43:38.239
<v Speaker 4>Nothing to see here. It was only until he'd been

0:43:38.280 --> 0:43:41.920
<v Speaker 4>in jar for about twelve years and basically saying I

0:43:41.960 --> 0:43:45.560
<v Speaker 4>didn't do it, that he was fortunately scooped up by

0:43:45.680 --> 0:43:49.120
<v Speaker 4>a good barrister, a good solicitor, and then the former governor,

0:43:49.920 --> 0:43:53.560
<v Speaker 4>a distinguished lawyer himself, gets behind the exactly as you're

0:43:53.560 --> 0:43:55.920
<v Speaker 4>seeing in this case, it smells what can we do

0:43:56.000 --> 0:43:59.640
<v Speaker 4>about it quickly? There's a parallel in what you're seeing

0:43:59.640 --> 0:44:01.960
<v Speaker 4>at the we had in Sydney, the case of Scott

0:44:02.040 --> 0:44:06.600
<v Speaker 4>Johnson whose death in nineteen eighteen nine he set off

0:44:06.600 --> 0:44:09.000
<v Speaker 4>the top of his head, was passed up quickly as

0:44:09.000 --> 0:44:13.040
<v Speaker 4>a suicide. There was a rudimentary investigation. Day one Scott

0:44:13.040 --> 0:44:15.480
<v Speaker 4>was sound naked at the bottom North headed Citny. Yes,

0:44:15.719 --> 0:44:18.040
<v Speaker 4>this one, yes, and it's very similar to what you're

0:44:18.080 --> 0:44:21.360
<v Speaker 4>looking at now. The police said our suicide bank.

0:44:21.280 --> 0:44:24.279
<v Speaker 14>In nineteen eighty eight to the American's naked body was

0:44:24.280 --> 0:44:27.680
<v Speaker 14>found at the bottom of cliffs in Manly, originally ruled

0:44:27.719 --> 0:44:31.719
<v Speaker 14>a suicide. That theory changed following three inquests.

0:44:31.920 --> 0:44:34.239
<v Speaker 4>There was review a couple of weeks later which put

0:44:34.280 --> 0:44:37.720
<v Speaker 4>a map by detectives who weren't at the scene. Massive

0:44:37.800 --> 0:44:40.799
<v Speaker 4>rubber stamp put on saying suicide. Feel later nothing to

0:44:40.840 --> 0:44:44.000
<v Speaker 4>see here. Years later, when his brother went from being

0:44:44.040 --> 0:44:47.040
<v Speaker 4>a pauper basically his bum hanging out of his trousers

0:44:47.280 --> 0:44:51.080
<v Speaker 4>to suddenly a multimillionaire because he invented very cleverly the

0:44:51.120 --> 0:44:54.400
<v Speaker 4>algorithm to sent a picture down the Internet. All of

0:44:54.440 --> 0:44:57.640
<v Speaker 4>a sudden, Big brothers wealthy. He sees the cases in

0:44:57.640 --> 0:45:00.800
<v Speaker 4>Sydney about gay, Hey crime, you thinks is my brother

0:45:00.840 --> 0:45:04.400
<v Speaker 4>one of those? He funds an investigation. Now for almost

0:45:04.480 --> 0:45:08.480
<v Speaker 4>thirty years, the New South Wales Police Force stood steadfastly

0:45:08.560 --> 0:45:11.680
<v Speaker 4>behind their original decision that it was suicide, and it

0:45:11.719 --> 0:45:15.239
<v Speaker 4>wasn't until twenty sixteen that a coroner said, I don't

0:45:15.239 --> 0:45:15.719
<v Speaker 4>think it is.

0:45:16.000 --> 0:45:19.720
<v Speaker 7>That's Michael Barnes, right, Michael Barnes, yes, yes, he spoke

0:45:19.719 --> 0:45:20.080
<v Speaker 7>about this.

0:45:20.239 --> 0:45:23.400
<v Speaker 10>Scott Johnson died as a result of a gay hate attack.

0:45:23.840 --> 0:45:27.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Barnes dropped this fairly large bombshell at the coroner's court.

0:45:27.520 --> 0:45:30.080
<v Speaker 4>And I was there that morning, thinking, at last someone

0:45:30.560 --> 0:45:33.319
<v Speaker 4>has done what had to be done. And I was

0:45:33.400 --> 0:45:37.680
<v Speaker 4>adjacent outside to a member of the unsolved homicide mob

0:45:38.040 --> 0:45:42.240
<v Speaker 4>and a couple of blokes and Steve Johnson, who's Scott's brother,

0:45:42.440 --> 0:45:45.880
<v Speaker 4>was there. Steve Paige, a great detective who led the

0:45:45.920 --> 0:45:51.120
<v Speaker 4>investigations that originally uncovered the hate crimes. Fabulous detective. They think,

0:45:51.160 --> 0:45:54.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, let's chat a chapter the senior homicide squad

0:45:54.480 --> 0:45:56.880
<v Speaker 4>detective and just see if we can make amends and

0:45:56.920 --> 0:46:00.319
<v Speaker 4>get on with the business of investigating the crime. This

0:46:00.440 --> 0:46:03.560
<v Speaker 4>senior detective turned around basically and said, up yours, I

0:46:03.560 --> 0:46:07.200
<v Speaker 4>think the coroner's wrong and walked away. So they clung

0:46:07.280 --> 0:46:10.080
<v Speaker 4>to that original decision for years and years and years,

0:46:10.120 --> 0:46:13.280
<v Speaker 4>and curiously enough, some fresh set of cop has finally

0:46:13.280 --> 0:46:16.080
<v Speaker 4>put on the case, have arrested somebody and is in jail.

0:46:16.320 --> 0:46:20.080
<v Speaker 14>Thirty three years after Scott Johnson was murdered, Scott White

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:24.920
<v Speaker 14>finally admitted what he'd done. Guilty. I am guilty, guilty.

0:46:25.280 --> 0:46:27.960
<v Speaker 14>His outburst mid court hearing came as a shock to

0:46:28.000 --> 0:46:31.520
<v Speaker 14>his own lawyer, police and his victim's brother who'd flown

0:46:31.560 --> 0:46:32.640
<v Speaker 14>here to face him.

0:46:32.800 --> 0:46:36.239
<v Speaker 4>So we've gone from suicide to a murder conviction for

0:46:36.400 --> 0:46:39.719
<v Speaker 4>manslor I think it was. It's taken thirty odd years

0:46:39.719 --> 0:46:41.880
<v Speaker 4>to get there, and it's been a battle every step

0:46:41.880 --> 0:46:45.919
<v Speaker 4>of the way. But it's been done and it may

0:46:46.000 --> 0:46:50.080
<v Speaker 4>give some hope to the victims here are the victim's

0:46:50.120 --> 0:46:52.920
<v Speaker 4>family that it can be done. It just requires the

0:46:52.960 --> 0:46:55.080
<v Speaker 4>cops to change their thinking absolutely.

0:46:55.160 --> 0:46:57.360
<v Speaker 7>And this is make or break time. I mean, I

0:46:57.560 --> 0:47:01.960
<v Speaker 7>know duncan that if if they don't do something now,

0:47:02.239 --> 0:47:04.399
<v Speaker 7>it will eventually be done. Because it has to be

0:47:04.520 --> 0:47:06.960
<v Speaker 7>like that. There will have to be a goodie down

0:47:07.120 --> 0:47:10.000
<v Speaker 7>the track now. Michael Barnes, you know, I'm glad you

0:47:10.040 --> 0:47:12.480
<v Speaker 7>mentioned that because he spoke about that case too, and

0:47:13.800 --> 0:47:17.080
<v Speaker 7>you know he had a suicideologist also gave their advice

0:47:18.040 --> 0:47:22.920
<v Speaker 7>and I think at the time the Director of Public Prosecutions,

0:47:22.960 --> 0:47:27.120
<v Speaker 7>because the police weren't pushing for charges to be laid,

0:47:27.680 --> 0:47:30.959
<v Speaker 7>didn't they charges? And that's the problem. And so if

0:47:30.960 --> 0:47:34.560
<v Speaker 7>the police in Aimy's case provide an updated brief of

0:47:34.600 --> 0:47:38.799
<v Speaker 7>evidence and then the cover sheet says we don't think

0:47:38.960 --> 0:47:42.160
<v Speaker 7>charges should be laid, then we're kind of in And

0:47:42.400 --> 0:47:44.080
<v Speaker 7>of course their decisions aren't reviewable.

0:47:44.640 --> 0:47:46.480
<v Speaker 4>I think in Scott's case it was a little bit

0:47:46.440 --> 0:47:49.320
<v Speaker 4>it was simplified. The Commissioner actually at the time realized

0:47:49.640 --> 0:47:52.680
<v Speaker 4>that it was probably proven to have another look at it,

0:47:52.680 --> 0:47:55.760
<v Speaker 4>and he appointed a group of detectives who are fabulous people.

0:47:56.239 --> 0:47:58.160
<v Speaker 4>I've had the joy of meeting them, and they just

0:47:58.200 --> 0:48:00.279
<v Speaker 4>took to the case and thought, yeah, this does think,

0:48:00.360 --> 0:48:03.000
<v Speaker 4>let's go and do something. So when they by the

0:48:03.040 --> 0:48:05.920
<v Speaker 4>time they got to the DPP in Scott's case, they

0:48:05.960 --> 0:48:07.680
<v Speaker 4>were convinced that they had the right blow and they

0:48:07.680 --> 0:48:10.759
<v Speaker 4>should prosecute him. But it took an enormous amount of

0:48:10.880 --> 0:48:13.880
<v Speaker 4>navigation to get to that point and the involvement of

0:48:13.920 --> 0:48:16.840
<v Speaker 4>the then commission Nick Fuller, saying yeah, we've got to

0:48:16.880 --> 0:48:19.719
<v Speaker 4>fix this, and you need that high level to come

0:48:19.760 --> 0:48:22.239
<v Speaker 4>in and kick this. Maybe that's what Amy deserves this,

0:48:22.360 --> 0:48:24.840
<v Speaker 4>it's got to be done right. Yes, there is a

0:48:24.840 --> 0:48:26.560
<v Speaker 4>problem with the crime scene. We had the same problem

0:48:26.600 --> 0:48:29.320
<v Speaker 4>with Scott Johnson. The only story we have about Scott

0:48:29.360 --> 0:48:32.160
<v Speaker 4>Johnson is that of the blog who finally confessed. Whether

0:48:32.160 --> 0:48:33.880
<v Speaker 4>you're not believed that, but he's in jail, which is

0:48:34.160 --> 0:48:36.399
<v Speaker 4>a result which we didn't think we'd get.

0:48:36.480 --> 0:48:38.680
<v Speaker 7>Did you need the champion, don't you? And Nick Fuller

0:48:38.719 --> 0:48:42.919
<v Speaker 7>did come to the party with obviously the chrystalson case.

0:48:43.000 --> 0:48:47.239
<v Speaker 4>Ga Fuller made some various stute decisions and they're a

0:48:47.280 --> 0:48:50.120
<v Speaker 4>stute decision that impact very heavily on the victims of crime.

0:48:50.600 --> 0:48:53.800
<v Speaker 4>And maybe they're there's little beacons that make other detectives

0:48:53.880 --> 0:48:57.680
<v Speaker 4>or other senior coppers start thinking, well, instead of saying no, no, no,

0:48:57.840 --> 0:49:01.520
<v Speaker 4>forget the past, to deal with the past and get

0:49:01.560 --> 0:49:04.960
<v Speaker 4>these crimes fixed. And that's where Amy's case is so significant.

0:49:05.719 --> 0:49:08.320
<v Speaker 4>Maybe at that higher level, someone in the West Australian

0:49:08.320 --> 0:49:10.279
<v Speaker 4>policing and or government will say, well, we need to

0:49:10.320 --> 0:49:13.239
<v Speaker 4>fix this. It doesn't work, it's not right. Let's go

0:49:13.320 --> 0:49:14.359
<v Speaker 4>back and get it right.

0:49:14.520 --> 0:49:18.440
<v Speaker 7>Well, I hope so, I mean Robo and sc I'm

0:49:18.480 --> 0:49:21.600
<v Speaker 7>really hopeful that he'll be the one, because I don't

0:49:21.719 --> 0:49:23.680
<v Speaker 7>have a lot of faith in cole Blanche at this

0:49:23.760 --> 0:49:27.880
<v Speaker 7>stage given the track record and he's handling on the

0:49:27.920 --> 0:49:28.560
<v Speaker 7>bombar right.

0:49:29.440 --> 0:49:32.239
<v Speaker 4>From a pr side of thing, I would pr is

0:49:32.280 --> 0:49:34.839
<v Speaker 4>what it is. The political side is, here's the chance

0:49:34.840 --> 0:49:37.120
<v Speaker 4>for you to get in front of something. Here's the

0:49:37.200 --> 0:49:38.800
<v Speaker 4>chance for you to be seen as someone doing the

0:49:38.880 --> 0:49:41.520
<v Speaker 4>right thing. Yes, a couple of rank and file might

0:49:41.600 --> 0:49:44.799
<v Speaker 4>squawk loudly about it, but you're a leader leader.

0:49:56.440 --> 0:49:59.120
<v Speaker 7>Well much like you don't can see it all Liam.

0:49:59.520 --> 0:50:02.200
<v Speaker 7>But as it talked about New South Wales Police Commissioner

0:50:02.200 --> 0:50:05.080
<v Speaker 7>Mick Fuller, I was feeling a bit sad that to

0:50:05.120 --> 0:50:08.520
<v Speaker 7>this point there's been no evidence in relation to Amy's

0:50:08.560 --> 0:50:12.279
<v Speaker 7>case that cole Blanche or another senior ranking member of

0:50:12.320 --> 0:50:15.319
<v Speaker 7>Waypole has had that level of commitment into the case.

0:50:15.400 --> 0:50:19.040
<v Speaker 7>So far, there haven't been any favorable murmurings about the

0:50:19.080 --> 0:50:23.160
<v Speaker 7>case being taken seriously. That said, we won't know for

0:50:23.239 --> 0:50:26.799
<v Speaker 7>sure until we hear back after the DPP has been

0:50:26.840 --> 0:50:29.839
<v Speaker 7>provided a copy of the new brief of evidence and

0:50:29.880 --> 0:50:30.760
<v Speaker 7>made its decision.

0:50:31.320 --> 0:50:33.480
<v Speaker 1>It is interesting, isn't it that we haven't really heard

0:50:33.480 --> 0:50:38.640
<v Speaker 1>from any senior ranking police publicly about making comments they

0:50:38.760 --> 0:50:41.400
<v Speaker 1>just no one in a position of power wants to

0:50:41.400 --> 0:50:43.879
<v Speaker 1>dip their toe into the water, do they. And I'm

0:50:43.880 --> 0:50:46.560
<v Speaker 1>not sure. I'm not sure whether that's just about the

0:50:46.560 --> 0:50:49.960
<v Speaker 1>investigative schedule, if I can put it that way, I'm

0:50:50.000 --> 0:50:52.279
<v Speaker 1>not sure about that. I get the distinct impression they're

0:50:52.320 --> 0:50:54.440
<v Speaker 1>just they're holding back because they don't want to commit

0:50:54.480 --> 0:50:57.759
<v Speaker 1>to anything, anything at all, which is interesting. I think

0:50:58.320 --> 0:51:02.560
<v Speaker 1>it's quite strange because only only a couple of weeks

0:51:02.560 --> 0:51:05.520
<v Speaker 1>ago we had a situation where the police Commissioner Cold

0:51:05.560 --> 0:51:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Blanche came out and you know, furiously defended the force's

0:51:09.040 --> 0:51:12.160
<v Speaker 1>position on domestic violence, which as we know, is very

0:51:12.280 --> 0:51:15.279
<v Speaker 1>very much the case with Amy Wensley in terms of

0:51:15.320 --> 0:51:18.360
<v Speaker 1>experiencing domestic violence. We've got, you know, photographic proof, and

0:51:18.400 --> 0:51:23.160
<v Speaker 1>we've got you know, eyewitness proof and eyewitness recollections from

0:51:23.239 --> 0:51:25.399
<v Speaker 1>her close friends. I mean, you know, we know it's

0:51:25.400 --> 0:51:27.640
<v Speaker 1>all part of it, and yet for some reason that

0:51:27.640 --> 0:51:31.239
<v Speaker 1>seems to be just forgotten about, you know. So here

0:51:31.280 --> 0:51:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to draw a parallel and I'm just going

0:51:33.440 --> 0:51:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to go ahead and say this because I think it's

0:51:37.000 --> 0:51:39.960
<v Speaker 1>a very firm link to me. Anyway, the fantastic speech

0:51:40.000 --> 0:51:43.320
<v Speaker 1>given by Ariol Bombara. Listeners to this podcast will remember

0:51:43.360 --> 0:51:47.719
<v Speaker 1>it well, so well spoken and sew together for what

0:51:47.840 --> 0:51:52.320
<v Speaker 1>she's been through and her father, Mark Bombara obviously committed

0:51:52.320 --> 0:51:55.799
<v Speaker 1>that heenus double murder and is now dead himself. But

0:51:56.719 --> 0:52:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, Cold Blanch the police commissioner came out, as

0:52:01.080 --> 0:52:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I say, just recently and said, we now have a

0:52:03.920 --> 0:52:07.560
<v Speaker 1>zero tolerance approach. He infers, it's not going to happen

0:52:07.600 --> 0:52:10.640
<v Speaker 1>again because they've changed the culture, or they've started to

0:52:10.640 --> 0:52:14.120
<v Speaker 1>help change the culture. Now, what we know, and we've

0:52:14.120 --> 0:52:16.839
<v Speaker 1>only found this out recently, is that no less than

0:52:16.920 --> 0:52:20.960
<v Speaker 1>eight police officers, and this is all from bodycam footage

0:52:21.000 --> 0:52:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and other substantive sort of evidentrary chain from the police themselves,

0:52:26.120 --> 0:52:31.120
<v Speaker 1>eight police officers failed in their duty. Not one of

0:52:31.160 --> 0:52:35.520
<v Speaker 1>them was sacked, not one lost their job, not one,

0:52:35.840 --> 0:52:38.800
<v Speaker 1>but they failed in their duty. Now is that sounding

0:52:38.840 --> 0:52:40.640
<v Speaker 1>familiar to the two detectives who were first on the

0:52:40.640 --> 0:52:43.680
<v Speaker 1>scene to the Amy Wensley case. But Cole Blanche's police

0:52:43.680 --> 0:52:45.920
<v Speaker 1>commissioner comes out now and says, because there's been so

0:52:46.000 --> 0:52:48.919
<v Speaker 1>much public pressure as a result of the Bombarer case,

0:52:49.120 --> 0:52:53.960
<v Speaker 1>he says, look from now on, zero tolerance. So, in

0:52:54.000 --> 0:52:57.080
<v Speaker 1>other words, wouldn't happen again. If any of those eight

0:52:57.280 --> 0:53:01.080
<v Speaker 1>came before my desk, I'd sack them. He actually has

0:53:01.120 --> 0:53:03.759
<v Speaker 1>said that in public, you know, sack I'd sack the

0:53:03.760 --> 0:53:05.919
<v Speaker 1>officers if I find them not to have done their job.

0:53:06.239 --> 0:53:09.359
<v Speaker 1>You can say what you want in public to try

0:53:09.360 --> 0:53:11.800
<v Speaker 1>and shore up the sort of public confidence in the force.

0:53:12.360 --> 0:53:14.680
<v Speaker 1>But if you're not doing the bottom line stuff from

0:53:14.800 --> 0:53:17.239
<v Speaker 1>day to day, and you're not actually showing people that

0:53:17.520 --> 0:53:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you are prepared to go the whole hog, then what

0:53:21.000 --> 0:53:23.840
<v Speaker 1>does it all mean? And that comes back to the

0:53:23.880 --> 0:53:26.080
<v Speaker 1>point you've just made about the fact that it is

0:53:26.160 --> 0:53:28.759
<v Speaker 1>sad that more senior police officers haven't come out and

0:53:28.800 --> 0:53:34.480
<v Speaker 1>stated publicly a position on the Amy Wensley case. You know,

0:53:34.600 --> 0:53:37.400
<v Speaker 1>in various I'm not talking about, you know, making comments

0:53:37.400 --> 0:53:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that are sub judas or whatever or potentially you know,

0:53:40.200 --> 0:53:43.480
<v Speaker 1>a problem legally. I'm just talking about the way that

0:53:43.560 --> 0:53:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Duncan McNabb was talking about Mick Fuller, the former New

0:53:47.680 --> 0:53:51.080
<v Speaker 1>South Wales commissioner. Yeah, and it does strike me again.

0:53:51.160 --> 0:53:54.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's like the difference between the Queensland Attorney

0:53:54.920 --> 0:53:59.360
<v Speaker 1>General and the WA Attorney General. Same position, totally different response,

0:53:59.440 --> 0:54:03.879
<v Speaker 1>totally different reaction. Totally different public stance. So I think

0:54:03.880 --> 0:54:05.880
<v Speaker 1>it's very enlightening.

0:54:06.160 --> 0:54:08.879
<v Speaker 7>But you can say what you want, though, Liam. That's

0:54:08.880 --> 0:54:11.279
<v Speaker 7>the thing. It's like between the theory and the practice.

0:54:11.480 --> 0:54:14.759
<v Speaker 7>So come out and say the media that I'm going

0:54:14.800 --> 0:54:18.280
<v Speaker 7>to have a zero tolerance approach and we're going to

0:54:18.320 --> 0:54:23.400
<v Speaker 7>not let this happen again, but then ignore seemingly the

0:54:23.480 --> 0:54:26.200
<v Speaker 7>Amy Wensley case. I've asked him, I think a dozen

0:54:26.280 --> 0:54:29.400
<v Speaker 7>times to come on this podcast to talk about Amy Wensley,

0:54:29.960 --> 0:54:33.080
<v Speaker 7>and you've seen some of the replies I've got, which

0:54:33.160 --> 0:54:36.360
<v Speaker 7>are kind of a bit sarcastic really, and you're just like, well,

0:54:36.480 --> 0:54:39.560
<v Speaker 7>I mean, really, is what I'm asking unreasonable?

0:54:40.000 --> 0:54:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, no, it's not unreasonable. But you don't expect to

0:54:42.560 --> 0:54:45.759
<v Speaker 1>make friends of any of those people either, do We're

0:54:45.800 --> 0:54:47.799
<v Speaker 1>not inviting them over to your place for Christmas lunch

0:54:47.880 --> 0:54:50.319
<v Speaker 1>this year, So it doesn't matter. I mean, what you're

0:54:50.320 --> 0:54:52.799
<v Speaker 1>trying to do is what you're trying to do is

0:54:52.880 --> 0:54:57.520
<v Speaker 1>help a family and obtain justice one way or the other, right,

0:54:58.000 --> 0:55:01.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's very noble action, ol, and you need to

0:55:01.600 --> 0:55:05.480
<v Speaker 1>just concentrate on that and just forget about all the tinsel, really,

0:55:05.480 --> 0:55:06.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, forget about it.

0:55:06.320 --> 0:55:08.279
<v Speaker 3>But I understand what you mean. It is.

0:55:08.480 --> 0:55:12.239
<v Speaker 1>It's an immature reaction. But there's three different things. You

0:55:12.280 --> 0:55:15.880
<v Speaker 1>can sound tough, and you can look tough, or you

0:55:15.920 --> 0:55:19.840
<v Speaker 1>can just be tough. And clearly the trifecta is not

0:55:19.880 --> 0:55:23.520
<v Speaker 1>happening in the WA Police force. And surrounding all that

0:55:24.200 --> 0:55:27.879
<v Speaker 1>is transparency and accountability, and I think that's all. That's

0:55:27.880 --> 0:55:30.279
<v Speaker 1>all we ask for because if this happened to you,

0:55:31.120 --> 0:55:33.120
<v Speaker 1>or if this happened to a member of your family

0:55:33.600 --> 0:55:36.719
<v Speaker 1>or extended family or a very close friend, you would

0:55:36.760 --> 0:55:40.799
<v Speaker 1>want the absolute best reaction, most professional approach. You'd want

0:55:40.840 --> 0:55:42.920
<v Speaker 1>people to really go out of their way to make

0:55:42.960 --> 0:55:45.640
<v Speaker 1>sure that they were doing a job properly, to put

0:55:45.680 --> 0:55:48.640
<v Speaker 1>things right. That's all you ask you know, it's not

0:55:48.680 --> 0:55:51.479
<v Speaker 1>a question of any other function. You just want justice

0:55:51.520 --> 0:55:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to be served and you want a police force that

0:55:53.040 --> 0:55:55.879
<v Speaker 1>does their job properly. And it's as simple as that.

0:55:56.280 --> 0:55:58.960
<v Speaker 7>Yes, have a bit of an update. So it's not

0:55:59.040 --> 0:56:02.319
<v Speaker 7>just Joshua bright And who's reached out recently, Liam, We've

0:56:02.360 --> 0:56:07.239
<v Speaker 7>also had Gareth Price. He initially sent a message to

0:56:07.280 --> 0:56:11.720
<v Speaker 7>Amy's best friend Aaron Gower on Facebook Messenger. He offered

0:56:11.719 --> 0:56:14.200
<v Speaker 7>to catch up with her one day so she could

0:56:14.239 --> 0:56:18.080
<v Speaker 7>hear what he had to say. Aaron replied, I definitely

0:56:18.160 --> 0:56:20.359
<v Speaker 7>want to hear what you have to say, Gareth, thanks

0:56:20.400 --> 0:56:21.080
<v Speaker 7>for reaching out.

0:56:21.560 --> 0:56:23.360
<v Speaker 6>Are you willing to talk to Alison of the phone.

0:56:23.800 --> 0:56:26.719
<v Speaker 7>Aaron offered to pass on his number to me, but

0:56:26.840 --> 0:56:29.800
<v Speaker 7>he requested I text him on Facebook, Messenger and step

0:56:30.000 --> 0:56:32.799
<v Speaker 7>which I did anyway, a bit more betuing and rowing,

0:56:32.840 --> 0:56:35.399
<v Speaker 7>but later that day I made friends with Gareth and

0:56:35.760 --> 0:56:39.560
<v Speaker 7>I called him. We spoke for about an hour limb

0:56:40.080 --> 0:56:43.480
<v Speaker 7>about him doing a sit down interview for Spotlight, which

0:56:43.680 --> 0:56:45.680
<v Speaker 7>you know, I thought would be better, so we're not

0:56:45.800 --> 0:56:47.440
<v Speaker 7>kind of rushing, and he's.

0:56:47.600 --> 0:56:49.759
<v Speaker 3>You know, I'd like that. Yeah, that'd be good.

0:56:49.840 --> 0:56:52.399
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I think so. He was a bit confused about you, actually, Liam,

0:56:52.800 --> 0:56:54.839
<v Speaker 7>because he seemed to think that you were some big

0:56:54.840 --> 0:56:58.600
<v Speaker 7>week from Sydney, but you're just a big week from Perth.

0:57:00.200 --> 0:57:04.319
<v Speaker 3>Local. I'm gonna hear wig anyway.

0:57:04.920 --> 0:57:07.600
<v Speaker 7>Anyway, he were the take homes From my end, he

0:57:07.719 --> 0:57:10.800
<v Speaker 7>reiterated what he told you about David not having pulled

0:57:10.800 --> 0:57:13.560
<v Speaker 7>the trigger. Now. I pushed him on this and asked,

0:57:13.600 --> 0:57:17.160
<v Speaker 7>how does he know Simmons was firing the gun all afternoon?

0:57:17.560 --> 0:57:20.600
<v Speaker 7>He didn't see Amy shoot herself Simmons went into the

0:57:20.600 --> 0:57:24.240
<v Speaker 7>bedroom on his own, So how did Gareth know that

0:57:24.320 --> 0:57:27.840
<v Speaker 7>this thud they both heard after he came back outside

0:57:28.800 --> 0:57:31.320
<v Speaker 7>was Amy being shot? You know, when they were shooting

0:57:31.320 --> 0:57:33.840
<v Speaker 7>all afternoon, what's to say that she wasn't shot on

0:57:34.040 --> 0:57:37.280
<v Speaker 7>any of those earlier occasions. Gareth didn't seem to really

0:57:37.280 --> 0:57:39.280
<v Speaker 7>comprehend what I was saying there, because he kept telling

0:57:39.280 --> 0:57:42.240
<v Speaker 7>me that Simmons wasn't the Flash or Superman, but then

0:57:42.320 --> 0:57:44.880
<v Speaker 7>later admitted it only takes a milli second to fire

0:57:44.920 --> 0:57:49.360
<v Speaker 7>a shot. I told him three biomechanic experts say Amy

0:57:49.400 --> 0:57:52.760
<v Speaker 7>didn't shoot herself and the evidence is highly consistent with

0:57:52.880 --> 0:57:56.360
<v Speaker 7>her having been shot by someone else. He said he

0:57:56.440 --> 0:57:59.040
<v Speaker 7>had a certificate or documents or report or something in

0:57:59.080 --> 0:58:01.840
<v Speaker 7>his room which said Amy killed herself, and that's what

0:58:01.880 --> 0:58:04.800
<v Speaker 7>the police told him, so I'm assuming he's referring to

0:58:04.880 --> 0:58:09.040
<v Speaker 7>the conclusion of Operation Junde. He kept repeating this and

0:58:09.080 --> 0:58:11.760
<v Speaker 7>didn't understand that the coroner didn't agree with the police

0:58:11.760 --> 0:58:15.280
<v Speaker 7>and ruled an open finding. So then I asked him

0:58:15.400 --> 0:58:18.400
<v Speaker 7>how he didn't have any blood transfer from patting down

0:58:18.520 --> 0:58:22.640
<v Speaker 7>Amy's body looking for her phone. He said the blood

0:58:22.680 --> 0:58:25.480
<v Speaker 7>was just on the wall and Amy's face. But I said,

0:58:25.520 --> 0:58:28.080
<v Speaker 7>that's not true, because we all know that head wounds

0:58:28.200 --> 0:58:32.040
<v Speaker 7>bleed profusely. But not only that, the police report said

0:58:32.240 --> 0:58:35.520
<v Speaker 7>she was in a pool of blood. The blood had

0:58:35.560 --> 0:58:39.400
<v Speaker 7>seek down or all over her. Gareth said he checked

0:58:39.400 --> 0:58:43.040
<v Speaker 7>Amy's pockets, including her back pocket, and flipped her to

0:58:43.080 --> 0:58:48.160
<v Speaker 7>do this, so he's touching her body, the blood has

0:58:48.240 --> 0:58:51.440
<v Speaker 7>come down. You know, we know that she was sitting

0:58:51.480 --> 0:58:52.000
<v Speaker 7>in blood.

0:58:52.160 --> 0:58:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't make sense. Well, I'm sorry, that doesn't make any sense.

0:58:56.120 --> 0:58:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's no way in the world, in the

0:58:58.160 --> 0:59:00.600
<v Speaker 1>human world, that he would not get blood on his

0:59:00.600 --> 0:59:05.720
<v Speaker 1>clothes or on his hands, arms, forearms, And that was

0:59:05.760 --> 0:59:09.400
<v Speaker 1>an incredibly bloody scene. Yeah, by anybody's estimation, in fact,

0:59:09.400 --> 0:59:12.240
<v Speaker 1>anybody who dies in that manner, there's no way that

0:59:13.120 --> 0:59:15.560
<v Speaker 1>he would not get blood on him, especially if he

0:59:16.040 --> 0:59:18.520
<v Speaker 1>as he describes to you, he flipped her like and

0:59:18.560 --> 0:59:19.920
<v Speaker 1>he's searching through her pockets.

0:59:20.320 --> 0:59:23.440
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely ridiculous. Sorry, I've got to say.

0:59:23.680 --> 0:59:26.400
<v Speaker 7>That's the thing though, Lamb. See, I got the feeling

0:59:26.840 --> 0:59:30.200
<v Speaker 7>that that question was a question he had never been

0:59:30.240 --> 0:59:34.400
<v Speaker 7>asked before, never been asked that question. I wonder whether

0:59:34.440 --> 0:59:38.080
<v Speaker 7>the new investigation has asked him that question. Surely surely

0:59:38.400 --> 0:59:41.920
<v Speaker 7>really scare me. There's a lot that scares me about

0:59:41.920 --> 0:59:44.760
<v Speaker 7>this so called new investigation. But anyway, it may not

0:59:44.800 --> 0:59:49.160
<v Speaker 7>be as poorly handled again as what I've been told.

0:59:49.680 --> 0:59:52.080
<v Speaker 7>But it's different when you ask When you were talking

0:59:52.080 --> 0:59:54.920
<v Speaker 7>to him and asking about what happened the THOD, and

0:59:54.960 --> 0:59:58.560
<v Speaker 7>he's consistent telling that story. That's something he said a lot.

0:59:58.760 --> 1:00:02.120
<v Speaker 7>And he's talked about the type of gun that was used,

1:00:02.120 --> 1:00:05.640
<v Speaker 7>a four ten Buoi too. He repeats that same thing.

1:00:06.160 --> 1:00:09.480
<v Speaker 7>But when you ask him something that he hasn't been

1:00:09.520 --> 1:00:12.560
<v Speaker 7>asked before, it's different. He tries to answer it. I

1:00:12.640 --> 1:00:16.080
<v Speaker 7>then told him there's no way he would have been

1:00:16.080 --> 1:00:18.720
<v Speaker 7>able to do that without getting blood on him anyway.

1:00:18.760 --> 1:00:20.920
<v Speaker 7>He didn't really have a response for that. But then

1:00:20.960 --> 1:00:23.920
<v Speaker 7>I mentioned how Josh said they burned their clothes, and

1:00:24.040 --> 1:00:27.920
<v Speaker 7>he replied that was after the police handed them back,

1:00:28.040 --> 1:00:33.000
<v Speaker 7>so again a question that seemingly he hadn't been asked before,

1:00:33.600 --> 1:00:37.080
<v Speaker 7>so he was thinking on his feet. He didn't deny

1:00:37.360 --> 1:00:39.680
<v Speaker 7>them burning the clothes, which is what I was expecting,

1:00:40.080 --> 1:00:43.040
<v Speaker 7>but stated they were the ones they'd handed to police.

1:00:43.080 --> 1:00:45.120
<v Speaker 7>And I said, well, that doesn't make any sense. Why

1:00:45.160 --> 1:00:49.600
<v Speaker 7>would you burn those ones? He then argued the biomechanic

1:00:49.720 --> 1:00:53.680
<v Speaker 7>experts were delusional. Yes, that's the word he used, and

1:00:53.720 --> 1:00:57.520
<v Speaker 7>we rely too much on technology. I also mentioned how

1:00:57.640 --> 1:01:01.280
<v Speaker 7>after the car accident she couldn't move her body while

1:01:01.280 --> 1:01:03.840
<v Speaker 7>he explained how he pulled the gun off her lap

1:01:03.880 --> 1:01:06.560
<v Speaker 7>and it was pointing towards her mouth. So Gareth doesn't

1:01:06.560 --> 1:01:09.120
<v Speaker 7>seem to understand that she was shot in her temple.

1:01:09.200 --> 1:01:13.040
<v Speaker 7>He seems to think that she somehow shot herself up

1:01:13.120 --> 1:01:16.640
<v Speaker 7>through the mouth, so he doesn't even recognize that she'd

1:01:16.640 --> 1:01:19.360
<v Speaker 7>have to be contautionous to have shot herself in that position.

1:01:20.400 --> 1:01:23.360
<v Speaker 7>And that's a problem Liam. Gareth doesn't understand the facts

1:01:23.400 --> 1:01:26.240
<v Speaker 7>of the case and is just totally reliant on what

1:01:26.320 --> 1:01:29.400
<v Speaker 7>he's being told. So I've got two more items of

1:01:29.520 --> 1:01:32.920
<v Speaker 7>note with what Gareth Sedlimb. Firstly, I talked about the

1:01:32.920 --> 1:01:36.960
<v Speaker 7>physical abuse by David Simmons, which as you know, reportedly

1:01:37.040 --> 1:01:41.160
<v Speaker 7>included placing Amy in a headlock that afternoon, and Gareth

1:01:41.200 --> 1:01:43.960
<v Speaker 7>replied she was beating him up, not the other way round.

1:01:44.320 --> 1:01:47.280
<v Speaker 7>I mentioned the headlock and him strangling her, and he

1:01:47.360 --> 1:01:51.200
<v Speaker 7>replied not there, as if it happened another time, but

1:01:51.280 --> 1:01:55.120
<v Speaker 7>not that afternoon. I then said she wasn't big enough

1:01:55.160 --> 1:01:57.480
<v Speaker 7>to beat him up, and he asked me if I

1:01:57.560 --> 1:02:00.080
<v Speaker 7>was married and if I'd ever been hit. I told him, oh,

1:02:00.560 --> 1:02:03.000
<v Speaker 7>nobody had ever laid a hand on me, because that's

1:02:03.080 --> 1:02:06.400
<v Speaker 7>not normal in a relationship. He was surprised by that

1:02:07.120 --> 1:02:09.920
<v Speaker 7>and replied, what is normal? I get bit up all

1:02:09.920 --> 1:02:12.720
<v Speaker 7>the time, he said, But I guess that's why neither

1:02:12.760 --> 1:02:16.880
<v Speaker 7>he nor Josh intervened in the physical fight between Amy

1:02:17.320 --> 1:02:21.760
<v Speaker 7>and David Simmons. He continued to defend Simmons, saying Amy

1:02:21.960 --> 1:02:24.560
<v Speaker 7>was a love of his life. I said, telling her

1:02:24.600 --> 1:02:26.760
<v Speaker 7>to erf off to a mum's and calling her the

1:02:26.840 --> 1:02:31.000
<v Speaker 7>sea word, not to mention the violence were not signs

1:02:31.000 --> 1:02:34.120
<v Speaker 7>of love. And lastly, the black gun with the scope

1:02:34.160 --> 1:02:37.080
<v Speaker 7>that Naa saw Simmons bring back into the room. When

1:02:37.120 --> 1:02:39.960
<v Speaker 7>I mentioned this to Gareth, he was familiar with that

1:02:40.000 --> 1:02:42.480
<v Speaker 7>gun and didn't deny this happening. He went on to

1:02:42.520 --> 1:02:45.120
<v Speaker 7>say that Simmons had all the guns out because he

1:02:45.320 --> 1:02:48.480
<v Speaker 7>was cleaning them. Naya, who was seated in the back

1:02:48.520 --> 1:02:50.720
<v Speaker 7>seat of the car at the time waiting for her

1:02:50.800 --> 1:02:54.040
<v Speaker 7>mum to come out, said she saw David put that

1:02:54.160 --> 1:02:58.480
<v Speaker 7>gun with the scope into the wardrobe, which is exactly

1:02:58.520 --> 1:03:02.760
<v Speaker 7>where it was found. So it's just interesting when you're

1:03:03.080 --> 1:03:07.400
<v Speaker 7>dealing with Gareth about things that he hasn't seemingly memorized.

1:03:07.440 --> 1:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like a muscle memory thing, isn't it this stage?

1:03:10.480 --> 1:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>And you just don't know how many times he's repeated

1:03:12.600 --> 1:03:13.360
<v Speaker 1>that same story.

1:03:13.520 --> 1:03:16.440
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, Well, in that interview with you, he kept trying

1:03:16.440 --> 1:03:18.959
<v Speaker 7>to get a word perfect. He'd go back and it's

1:03:19.160 --> 1:03:22.440
<v Speaker 7>like he's learned a line and he wanted to make

1:03:22.480 --> 1:03:24.520
<v Speaker 7>sure that he repeated it exactly.

1:03:24.640 --> 1:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it'd be interesting to see him sitting in

1:03:27.040 --> 1:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>a seat. And there's a lot too with facial expressions.

1:03:30.440 --> 1:03:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that go with the answer that you can

1:03:33.040 --> 1:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>interpret and interpolate one way or the other. Now, a

1:03:37.360 --> 1:03:39.919
<v Speaker 1>reminder ol this is the final episode of season two,

1:03:40.160 --> 1:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>but shortly it will appear on YouTube as a vodcast,

1:03:43.160 --> 1:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>so stay tuned for that. Will provide updates on social

1:03:45.640 --> 1:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>media and put out a notification wherever you're listening to

1:03:49.480 --> 1:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>this podcast. Meanwhile, we also have some bonus episodes coming

1:03:53.400 --> 1:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>up to coincide with another episode in Spotlight on Sunday

1:03:58.480 --> 1:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Nights and as more events relating to the current reinvestigation

1:04:02.120 --> 1:04:06.520
<v Speaker 1>by Waypole into Amy's death unfold and we'll keep you

1:04:06.600 --> 1:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>up to date on that, and this will include details

1:04:09.280 --> 1:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>of the brief of evidence being provided to the DPP,

1:04:12.640 --> 1:04:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the Director of Public Prosecutions, and any subsequent updates, revelations

1:04:16.800 --> 1:04:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and or announcements. The whole grab bag will stay across it,

1:04:20.480 --> 1:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and if we get any more information from other other

1:04:22.480 --> 1:04:25.600
<v Speaker 1>listeners or anyone close to the case, obviously that is pertinent,

1:04:25.600 --> 1:04:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and we can advance Amy's case in other ways. Of course,

1:04:31.600 --> 1:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>it goes without saying.

1:04:32.720 --> 1:04:36.760
<v Speaker 7>We will, So thank you all for listening and coming

1:04:36.800 --> 1:04:39.360
<v Speaker 7>on this journey with us and remaining to the end

1:04:40.040 --> 1:04:44.400
<v Speaker 7>when the entire truth about Amy is finally realized. So

1:04:44.560 --> 1:04:46.760
<v Speaker 7>this isn't the end completely, but it's the end of

1:04:46.760 --> 1:04:50.680
<v Speaker 7>season two. We're at a crucial moment as WA Police's

1:04:50.880 --> 1:04:54.400
<v Speaker 7>cold case team finishes up its investigation, which has gone

1:04:54.440 --> 1:04:57.640
<v Speaker 7>on for much longer than they initially expect it apparently

1:04:58.520 --> 1:05:02.000
<v Speaker 7>hopefully that's a good thing. And all the information is there,

1:05:02.080 --> 1:05:08.720
<v Speaker 7>including independent expert advice from a criminologist, a suicideologist, an

1:05:08.720 --> 1:05:13.480
<v Speaker 7>independent psychologist not just the police psychologist they used initially,

1:05:13.680 --> 1:05:17.960
<v Speaker 7>which as you know, has been debunked, and a domestic

1:05:18.080 --> 1:05:19.280
<v Speaker 7>violence specialist.

1:05:19.640 --> 1:05:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, also Scott Rhoda not to be forgotten, and Scott's

1:05:24.200 --> 1:05:29.160
<v Speaker 1>ongoing participation in the case. He has helped an amazing

1:05:29.240 --> 1:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>number of jurisdictions and police agencies in the United States,

1:05:33.960 --> 1:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>being an American himself, with some very very big cases.

1:05:37.960 --> 1:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Among all the other new evidence that we've uncovered, of

1:05:40.280 --> 1:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>course from key witnesses we've identified, and that which was

1:05:43.440 --> 1:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>previously ignored, such as you only mentioned it a little

1:05:47.560 --> 1:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>while ago, the fact that the clothes the police received

1:05:51.760 --> 1:05:54.920
<v Speaker 1>from Gareth Price and David Simmons could not have been

1:05:54.920 --> 1:05:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the ones they were wearing when Amy died.

1:05:58.880 --> 1:06:02.080
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, absolutely, pinly the ones that they were wearing at

1:06:01.800 --> 1:06:05.440
<v Speaker 7>the roadhouse, but they weren't the ones that they were

1:06:05.480 --> 1:06:09.640
<v Speaker 7>wearing when Amy died. And of course that the gun

1:06:09.760 --> 1:06:13.520
<v Speaker 7>was placed in the position Gareth founded in it was

1:06:13.600 --> 1:06:17.760
<v Speaker 7>placed there, it could not have landed there. Amy's daughter Naya,

1:06:17.960 --> 1:06:20.560
<v Speaker 7>saw David Simmons in the room with Amy after she

1:06:20.640 --> 1:06:24.360
<v Speaker 7>went back inside and before the so called bud And

1:06:24.680 --> 1:06:27.160
<v Speaker 7>that's just to name a few key details which we

1:06:27.360 --> 1:06:31.760
<v Speaker 7>provided painstaking detail on throughout the duration of this podcast.

1:06:32.200 --> 1:06:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I guess we now put our faith in

1:06:33.720 --> 1:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the Director of Public Prosecutions and his team carefully analyzing

1:06:37.800 --> 1:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>it and following up on any holes in the evidence,

1:06:40.560 --> 1:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>overall in the hope that a criminal trial is the

1:06:43.520 --> 1:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>ultimate goal. Hopefully they'll listen to this podcast.

1:06:47.720 --> 1:06:51.520
<v Speaker 7>It certainly can't hurt Liam. It's essential listening given the

1:06:51.560 --> 1:06:54.360
<v Speaker 7>responsibility of the position. They are intrusted.

1:06:54.560 --> 1:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all eyes on them. There was a famous quote

1:06:57.520 --> 1:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>from the thirty fourth President of the United States, Al

1:07:01.120 --> 1:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Dwight D. Eisenhower, and it goes like this, The supreme

1:07:04.840 --> 1:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>quality for leadership is unquestionably integrity. Without it, no real

1:07:12.360 --> 1:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>success is possible, no matter whether it is on a

1:07:16.280 --> 1:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>section gang football field, in an army, or in an office.

1:07:22.720 --> 1:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I think Dwight was referring to a police office at

1:07:26.560 --> 1:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the end. He just missed out that word, but it's appropriate.

1:07:29.800 --> 1:07:33.360
<v Speaker 7>Sure is. Thanks Leam, Thanks thankslessness.

1:07:43.440 --> 1:07:58.440
<v Speaker 5>Lasimus so deation. We would know the nasty kill me.

1:08:02.080 --> 1:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Say if you knew Amy and have information, any information

1:08:13.280 --> 1:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>about her death, we'd love to hear from you. Just

1:08:18.000 --> 1:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>email us at the Truth about Amy at seven dot

1:08:23.439 --> 1:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>com dot au. That's s E v E N The

1:08:27.920 --> 1:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Truth about Amy at seven dot com dot au, or

1:08:34.520 --> 1:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>visit our website sevenews dot com dot au. Forward slash

1:08:39.280 --> 1:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the Truth About Amy. You can also send us an

1:08:42.680 --> 1:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>anonymous tip at www dot the Truth about Amy dot com.

1:08:50.880 --> 1:08:54.080
<v Speaker 1>If you're on Facebook or Instagram, you can follow us

1:08:54.080 --> 1:08:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to see photos and updates relevant to the case, but

1:08:58.160 --> 1:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>for legal reasons, unfortunately Lee, you won't be able to

1:09:01.040 --> 1:09:07.639
<v Speaker 1>make any comments. And remember, if you like what you're hearing,

1:09:08.040 --> 1:09:12.240
<v Speaker 1>don't forget to subscribe. Please rate and review our series

1:09:12.600 --> 1:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>because it really helps new listeners to find us. Presenter

1:09:20.040 --> 1:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and executive producer Alison Sandy, Presenter and investigative journalist Liam Bartlett,

1:09:29.120 --> 1:09:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Sound design Mark Wright, Assistant producer Cassie Woodward, Graphics Jason Blandford,

1:09:38.240 --> 1:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and special thanks to Brian Seymour and Jessica Evanson. This

1:09:54.400 --> 1:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>is a Seven News production.