1 00:00:00,520 --> 00:00:04,360 Speaker 1: Already and this is the Daily This is the Daily OS. 2 00:00:05,120 --> 00:00:06,800 Speaker 2: Oh, now it makes sense. 3 00:00:14,640 --> 00:00:17,479 Speaker 3: Good morning, and welcome to the Daily OS. It's Thursday, 4 00:00:17,560 --> 00:00:19,799 Speaker 3: the twenty seventh of March. I'm Zara Seidler. 5 00:00:19,960 --> 00:00:20,959 Speaker 2: I'm Sam Kozlowski. 6 00:00:21,280 --> 00:00:24,160 Speaker 3: Earlier this week, the White House confirmed that a journalist 7 00:00:24,360 --> 00:00:27,400 Speaker 3: was accidentally added to a group chat where a number 8 00:00:27,560 --> 00:00:30,880 Speaker 3: of the most senior defense officials were discussing a planned 9 00:00:30,960 --> 00:00:34,760 Speaker 3: strike against the Houthi rebel group in Yemen. The Atlantics 10 00:00:34,880 --> 00:00:38,080 Speaker 3: editor in chief revealed in an exclusive article that he 11 00:00:38,320 --> 00:00:41,280 Speaker 3: was accidentally added to the signal group earlier this month, 12 00:00:41,640 --> 00:00:45,760 Speaker 3: which included Vice President JD Vance and Trump's National Security advisor. 13 00:00:49,520 --> 00:00:51,920 Speaker 2: I am so pumped to get into this story. 14 00:00:52,000 --> 00:00:52,919 Speaker 1: This is a medi one. 15 00:00:53,240 --> 00:00:56,960 Speaker 2: This is one that the Netflix producers are queuing up 16 00:00:57,080 --> 00:00:57,840 Speaker 2: to try and figure out. 17 00:00:58,000 --> 00:00:59,920 Speaker 1: Certainly some commissioning of new pieces. 18 00:01:00,160 --> 00:01:02,080 Speaker 2: It's going to be amazing. But I do want to 19 00:01:02,160 --> 00:01:05,560 Speaker 2: start by fully understanding how all of this happened, because 20 00:01:05,959 --> 00:01:08,800 Speaker 2: the idea of not only somebody being added to a 21 00:01:08,959 --> 00:01:10,960 Speaker 2: grip chat where they're discussing what we're going to tell 22 00:01:10,959 --> 00:01:13,559 Speaker 2: you about, but it being the editor of a huge 23 00:01:14,040 --> 00:01:17,360 Speaker 2: news outlet in America is wild. So This story begins 24 00:01:17,400 --> 00:01:20,959 Speaker 2: on Tuesday, March eleven. Yeah, why is that day important? 25 00:01:21,319 --> 00:01:24,920 Speaker 3: So that's the day that Jeffrey Goldberg says that he 26 00:01:25,240 --> 00:01:29,119 Speaker 3: was first sent a connection request on Signal from someone 27 00:01:29,360 --> 00:01:30,760 Speaker 3: called Michael Woltz. 28 00:01:30,920 --> 00:01:31,959 Speaker 2: So there's a few characters there. 29 00:01:32,000 --> 00:01:33,720 Speaker 3: I was going to say, that might sound like gibberish 30 00:01:33,800 --> 00:01:35,800 Speaker 3: to a lot of our listeners, So let's just unpack 31 00:01:35,880 --> 00:01:39,120 Speaker 3: it one by one. So let's start with Jeffrey Goldberg. 32 00:01:39,280 --> 00:01:43,320 Speaker 3: So Jeffrey Goldberg is the editor in chief of the Atlantic, which, 33 00:01:43,480 --> 00:01:47,080 Speaker 3: as you just mentioned, is an American media company known 34 00:01:47,160 --> 00:01:50,880 Speaker 3: mostly for magazines. He is the person who received a 35 00:01:50,960 --> 00:01:54,280 Speaker 3: request on Signal, which is a messaging app that has 36 00:01:54,440 --> 00:01:57,600 Speaker 3: a kind of higher level of security than, for example, texting. 37 00:01:58,360 --> 00:02:01,360 Speaker 3: A lot of journalists are on because it's a secure 38 00:02:01,400 --> 00:02:04,320 Speaker 3: way for them to communicate with sources and to get scoops. 39 00:02:04,440 --> 00:02:07,480 Speaker 1: And on that day he got a fairly random request. 40 00:02:08,040 --> 00:02:09,880 Speaker 2: So it's a Tuesday, a couple of weeks ago, and 41 00:02:10,160 --> 00:02:13,200 Speaker 2: the editor of The Atlantic gets a notification saying that 42 00:02:13,600 --> 00:02:15,440 Speaker 2: there was a request coming through that he'd be added 43 00:02:15,480 --> 00:02:18,200 Speaker 2: to a group. Ye who actually sent that request? 44 00:02:18,639 --> 00:02:23,600 Speaker 3: So that request came from a user called Michael Waltz. Now, 45 00:02:24,080 --> 00:02:28,000 Speaker 3: just for context, Michael Waltz is President Donald Trump's national 46 00:02:28,200 --> 00:02:33,560 Speaker 3: security advisor, and so naturally, when Goldberg, who is a journalist, 47 00:02:33,960 --> 00:02:35,360 Speaker 3: received the request. 48 00:02:35,160 --> 00:02:37,160 Speaker 2: He thought it was fake, as we would, to be 49 00:02:37,240 --> 00:02:37,760 Speaker 2: honest with you. 50 00:02:37,960 --> 00:02:40,320 Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean, he said, and I'll quote directly from 51 00:02:40,320 --> 00:02:42,959 Speaker 3: the article. I would implore anyone listening to go read 52 00:02:43,040 --> 00:02:46,280 Speaker 3: that article. It is incredibly well written and a very 53 00:02:46,320 --> 00:02:49,640 Speaker 3: good read. But he says, and I quote here, Trump's 54 00:02:49,680 --> 00:02:54,160 Speaker 3: contentious relationship with journalists and Trump's periodic fixation on me 55 00:02:54,280 --> 00:02:57,920 Speaker 3: specifically was what built this doubt that the request was real. 56 00:02:58,560 --> 00:03:02,280 Speaker 3: But regardless of the hesitations, Goldberg said he accepted the 57 00:03:02,320 --> 00:03:05,600 Speaker 3: request and hoped that Waltz, who as I said, is 58 00:03:05,639 --> 00:03:08,480 Speaker 3: Trump security advisor, wanted to talk to him about Ukraine 59 00:03:08,760 --> 00:03:12,440 Speaker 3: or Iran or as he said, some other important matter. 60 00:03:12,360 --> 00:03:15,720 Speaker 2: That's really interesting. So his initial gut feel after he 61 00:03:16,160 --> 00:03:18,800 Speaker 2: entertained whether it was false, was maybe this guy's a source. 62 00:03:19,200 --> 00:03:22,120 Speaker 2: Maybe this guy could be leaking something to me. So 63 00:03:22,240 --> 00:03:25,079 Speaker 2: he accepts the message, but then it definitely does not 64 00:03:25,200 --> 00:03:26,520 Speaker 2: go in the way that he expected. 65 00:03:26,800 --> 00:03:30,239 Speaker 3: No, So after that, Goldberg receives a notification that he's 66 00:03:30,320 --> 00:03:32,760 Speaker 3: been added to a signal group Chat. 67 00:03:33,360 --> 00:03:36,760 Speaker 1: That group chat is called the Huthy PC Small Group. 68 00:03:36,840 --> 00:03:38,800 Speaker 2: And we have talked about the Huthis number of times 69 00:03:38,880 --> 00:03:41,040 Speaker 2: on this pod, but for people coming in fresh, give 70 00:03:41,120 --> 00:03:42,920 Speaker 2: me a sense of who the Houthis are. 71 00:03:43,440 --> 00:03:46,600 Speaker 3: So, the Huthis are an Iran backed group based out 72 00:03:46,720 --> 00:03:49,360 Speaker 3: of Yemen. They've been fighting in a civil war in 73 00:03:49,440 --> 00:03:54,320 Speaker 3: Yemen since twenty fourteen. Hoothy forces control parts of the country, 74 00:03:54,520 --> 00:03:57,880 Speaker 3: and Yemen specifically borders the Red Sea, which is a 75 00:03:57,960 --> 00:04:02,080 Speaker 3: popular trade route for international commercial vessels, accounting for roughly 76 00:04:02,320 --> 00:04:07,480 Speaker 3: twelve percent of global trade. Importantly, since just after October 77 00:04:07,640 --> 00:04:10,680 Speaker 3: twenty twenty three, the Houthis have been launching these kind 78 00:04:10,720 --> 00:04:14,320 Speaker 3: of sporadic attacks on military and commercial ships in the 79 00:04:14,400 --> 00:04:18,040 Speaker 3: Red Sea, as well as directly at Israel and ships 80 00:04:18,160 --> 00:04:21,680 Speaker 3: linked to Israel. The UN has previously said that these 81 00:04:21,720 --> 00:04:24,480 Speaker 3: attacks are designed to support Hummas. 82 00:04:24,560 --> 00:04:27,640 Speaker 2: And so the US have had the Houthis in their 83 00:04:27,800 --> 00:04:31,040 Speaker 2: line of sight for a while now, particularly since October 84 00:04:31,400 --> 00:04:33,880 Speaker 2: twenty twenty three. And so that group chat name the 85 00:04:34,000 --> 00:04:37,320 Speaker 2: houthy PC Small Group. Yeah, how is that actually connected 86 00:04:37,360 --> 00:04:38,040 Speaker 2: to the Hoothies. 87 00:04:38,640 --> 00:04:42,800 Speaker 3: So apparently the houthy PC Small Group was, as we 88 00:04:42,920 --> 00:04:45,640 Speaker 3: later found out a chat designed to pull together a 89 00:04:45,720 --> 00:04:49,480 Speaker 3: group of the most senior decision makers in the US 90 00:04:50,000 --> 00:04:54,800 Speaker 3: to coordinate an impending US attack on the Houthis in Yemen. 91 00:04:54,600 --> 00:04:56,839 Speaker 2: Which we reported on. So this is like this really 92 00:04:56,920 --> 00:05:00,479 Speaker 2: interesting thing reading this story knowing that we actually covered that. 93 00:05:00,760 --> 00:05:02,640 Speaker 1: We covered the attack. Yeah, yeah, exactly. 94 00:05:02,839 --> 00:05:05,880 Speaker 3: And so in this article, Goldberg says that the group 95 00:05:06,000 --> 00:05:09,120 Speaker 3: was created by Waltz, the Advisor, and he says that 96 00:05:09,480 --> 00:05:13,719 Speaker 3: the group chat members as they were were VP jd Vance, 97 00:05:13,880 --> 00:05:18,160 Speaker 3: Secretary of State Marco Rubio, National Intelligence head Telsey Gabbard, 98 00:05:18,400 --> 00:05:19,359 Speaker 3: and a whole string. 99 00:05:19,480 --> 00:05:21,000 Speaker 1: I mean, I could list off. 100 00:05:20,960 --> 00:05:22,720 Speaker 3: All of them, but I just want you to understand 101 00:05:23,120 --> 00:05:25,280 Speaker 3: they were really really senior people here. 102 00:05:25,720 --> 00:05:29,560 Speaker 2: And so basically this group was assembled on signal to 103 00:05:29,960 --> 00:05:32,720 Speaker 2: plan how the US was going to attack the who 104 00:05:32,760 --> 00:05:34,800 Speaker 2: he's in Yemen. Yeah, I mean it's the main point 105 00:05:34,839 --> 00:05:36,400 Speaker 2: of communication almost. Yeah. 106 00:05:36,600 --> 00:05:40,039 Speaker 3: So it wasn't even just how they were going to attack, 107 00:05:40,120 --> 00:05:42,120 Speaker 3: but whether or not they should attack. All of that 108 00:05:42,320 --> 00:05:44,480 Speaker 3: kind of as we understand it now played out in 109 00:05:44,640 --> 00:05:48,960 Speaker 3: this group message. So the article that Goldberg wrote included 110 00:05:49,120 --> 00:05:51,679 Speaker 3: some of the bits of the chat that he believed 111 00:05:51,760 --> 00:05:54,599 Speaker 3: were important to report on. He did leave out sensitive 112 00:05:54,680 --> 00:05:58,200 Speaker 3: kind of national security things like CIA officials names and 113 00:05:58,320 --> 00:05:59,960 Speaker 3: things like that. So we don't have a full picture, 114 00:06:00,440 --> 00:06:02,560 Speaker 3: but what we do understand is that there was this 115 00:06:02,680 --> 00:06:05,160 Speaker 3: kind of to and fro about whether or not to 116 00:06:05,440 --> 00:06:08,520 Speaker 3: attack the Hoothies and some emojis and some emojis, So 117 00:06:08,600 --> 00:06:11,479 Speaker 3: we understand that JD. Vance, as I said, the Vice 118 00:06:11,520 --> 00:06:15,200 Speaker 3: President was questioning in that chat, whether attacking the Hoothies 119 00:06:15,560 --> 00:06:18,520 Speaker 3: was a mistake. He was saying things like Europe would 120 00:06:18,520 --> 00:06:20,800 Speaker 3: benefit more than the US, and he said, I just 121 00:06:20,920 --> 00:06:24,400 Speaker 3: hate bailing Europe out again. But then, according to Goldberg, 122 00:06:24,640 --> 00:06:26,920 Speaker 3: the text debate, so people were debating whether or not 123 00:06:27,040 --> 00:06:31,200 Speaker 3: this should happen, but it ultimately ended when Trump's deputy 124 00:06:31,279 --> 00:06:34,240 Speaker 3: chief of Staff, Stephen Miller wrote, as I understand it, 125 00:06:34,400 --> 00:06:38,080 Speaker 3: the President was clear green light. And then the following day, 126 00:06:38,560 --> 00:06:42,480 Speaker 3: US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth sent a message titled 127 00:06:42,640 --> 00:06:48,360 Speaker 3: Team Update, reportedly detailing strike targets, weapons, and operational plans. 128 00:06:48,680 --> 00:06:50,839 Speaker 2: And so Goldberg gets all of these messages. He's still 129 00:06:50,920 --> 00:06:54,120 Speaker 2: in the group. Yeah, it's evident from the chat that 130 00:06:54,200 --> 00:06:57,120 Speaker 2: nobody's actually noticed that he's in the group. Yeah, but 131 00:06:57,240 --> 00:06:58,040 Speaker 2: things really, I did. 132 00:06:57,960 --> 00:06:59,840 Speaker 1: Ask you if you would notice if there was some 133 00:07:00,120 --> 00:07:01,679 Speaker 1: one in a group chat and you told. 134 00:07:01,520 --> 00:07:04,120 Speaker 2: Me that you would, I think I would. I feel 135 00:07:04,160 --> 00:07:06,440 Speaker 2: like I would know, especially if there was some serious 136 00:07:06,600 --> 00:07:11,120 Speaker 2: sort of confidential information being passed around. You'd hope that. 137 00:07:11,240 --> 00:07:13,360 Speaker 2: I mean, this wasn't a group of hundreds and hundreds, No, 138 00:07:13,640 --> 00:07:16,080 Speaker 2: it was a select group. Nonetheless, they didn't know Goldberg 139 00:07:16,160 --> 00:07:19,080 Speaker 2: was there by this point. But the contents of the 140 00:07:19,120 --> 00:07:21,360 Speaker 2: message is really escalated, right, Yeah. 141 00:07:21,480 --> 00:07:24,600 Speaker 3: So Goldberg writes in his article that after he read 142 00:07:24,640 --> 00:07:27,520 Speaker 3: that message about those operational plans, things that included like 143 00:07:27,680 --> 00:07:28,920 Speaker 3: timings and what was going. 144 00:07:28,840 --> 00:07:31,720 Speaker 1: To happen, he really started to believe that the group 145 00:07:31,840 --> 00:07:32,840 Speaker 1: was real for the first time. 146 00:07:32,920 --> 00:07:34,880 Speaker 2: Wow. So he was still thinking that this could have 147 00:07:34,920 --> 00:07:35,280 Speaker 2: been fake. 148 00:07:35,400 --> 00:07:37,960 Speaker 3: I mean, I think every journalist has a healthy kind 149 00:07:38,000 --> 00:07:41,280 Speaker 3: of skepticism built into them, and that was very active here. 150 00:07:41,840 --> 00:07:44,440 Speaker 3: He wrote that the last message implied that the attacks 151 00:07:44,520 --> 00:07:48,400 Speaker 3: on the Huthies would start two hours after that last message, 152 00:07:48,720 --> 00:07:50,760 Speaker 3: and so he sat, he said, in a car park, 153 00:07:50,960 --> 00:07:54,720 Speaker 3: and he waited, and then at one fifty five pm 154 00:07:55,000 --> 00:07:58,200 Speaker 3: local time, ten minutes after the attack was planned according 155 00:07:58,200 --> 00:08:01,680 Speaker 3: to that last message, Goldberg said, he logged onto x 156 00:08:01,920 --> 00:08:04,480 Speaker 3: and he saw that lo and behold, explosions were being 157 00:08:04,560 --> 00:08:08,360 Speaker 3: heard across Yemen's capital city. He says at that point 158 00:08:08,480 --> 00:08:11,200 Speaker 3: he checked the signal channel and said he read messages 159 00:08:11,320 --> 00:08:14,840 Speaker 3: calling the attacks an amazing job, a good start. And 160 00:08:15,320 --> 00:08:17,840 Speaker 3: as you mentioned earlier, there were a few emojis that 161 00:08:17,920 --> 00:08:20,160 Speaker 3: went alongside those messages, and so. 162 00:08:20,360 --> 00:08:23,120 Speaker 2: To bring things from the group chat into the real world, 163 00:08:23,200 --> 00:08:25,240 Speaker 2: we know that these attacks on who he targets in 164 00:08:25,360 --> 00:08:28,520 Speaker 2: Yemen have continued this week. Yeah, and that kind of 165 00:08:28,600 --> 00:08:30,800 Speaker 2: brings us to today. And while we're talking about not 166 00:08:30,880 --> 00:08:34,800 Speaker 2: only the release of this group chat and Goldberg's piece, 167 00:08:34,880 --> 00:08:39,040 Speaker 2: but also the actual US activity in Yemen, Jeffrey Goldberg 168 00:08:39,080 --> 00:08:42,680 Speaker 2: published this amazing article on Monday. What's the response been 169 00:08:42,920 --> 00:08:44,240 Speaker 2: since then? Yes. 170 00:08:44,480 --> 00:08:47,360 Speaker 3: So at the end of Goldberg's article, he basically explains 171 00:08:47,400 --> 00:08:51,280 Speaker 3: the steps that he took then to verifying the story itself. 172 00:08:51,360 --> 00:08:53,760 Speaker 3: So he says that he left the chat, and then 173 00:08:54,080 --> 00:08:56,160 Speaker 3: shortly after leaving the chat, he says he can't believe 174 00:08:56,200 --> 00:08:58,079 Speaker 3: no one even noticed that he then left the chat 175 00:08:58,160 --> 00:08:58,839 Speaker 3: let alone. 176 00:08:58,640 --> 00:08:59,319 Speaker 1: Was in it to begin with. 177 00:09:00,000 --> 00:09:02,040 Speaker 2: It's funny for me because you get then he was 178 00:09:02,080 --> 00:09:04,600 Speaker 2: saying that there's a line that emerges in the group 179 00:09:04,679 --> 00:09:07,839 Speaker 2: chat saying, yeah, his phone number has left the chat. Yeah. 180 00:09:07,880 --> 00:09:10,480 Speaker 3: But he says that after he left, he contacted some 181 00:09:10,840 --> 00:09:15,160 Speaker 3: of the officials in the group directly and he asked 182 00:09:15,200 --> 00:09:16,480 Speaker 3: them to confirm whether or. 183 00:09:16,480 --> 00:09:17,520 Speaker 1: Not the group was real. 184 00:09:18,320 --> 00:09:21,160 Speaker 3: He says that a spokesperson for the National Security Council 185 00:09:21,400 --> 00:09:25,920 Speaker 3: responded to him directly and ultimately confirmed the veracity of 186 00:09:26,080 --> 00:09:29,400 Speaker 3: the group. The spokesperson said, and I quote here, this 187 00:09:29,520 --> 00:09:32,000 Speaker 3: appears to be an authentic message chain, and we are 188 00:09:32,080 --> 00:09:35,720 Speaker 3: reviewing how an inadvertent number was added to the chain. 189 00:09:36,440 --> 00:09:39,840 Speaker 3: Then on Monday, after this expose was published, we did 190 00:09:39,920 --> 00:09:42,520 Speaker 3: have the White House come out and publicly confirm again 191 00:09:42,800 --> 00:09:44,240 Speaker 3: that the group was authentic. 192 00:09:44,679 --> 00:09:47,280 Speaker 2: And so that all happened on Monday. We're now sitting 193 00:09:47,320 --> 00:09:51,520 Speaker 2: here on Thursday morning. How has the president but also 194 00:09:51,679 --> 00:09:55,000 Speaker 2: his administration more broadly responded to what is one of 195 00:09:55,040 --> 00:09:57,680 Speaker 2: the most significant pieces of journalism I think in yeah, 196 00:09:57,720 --> 00:09:59,000 Speaker 2: the last couple of years at least. 197 00:09:59,480 --> 00:10:04,080 Speaker 3: Yes, So, so the administration has downplayed the incident. They 198 00:10:04,240 --> 00:10:08,360 Speaker 3: called the chat a sign of deep and thoughtful policy coordination. 199 00:10:08,760 --> 00:10:11,000 Speaker 3: So rather than I guess, focusing on the fact that 200 00:10:11,040 --> 00:10:13,360 Speaker 3: there was a journalist who was accidentally added to it, 201 00:10:13,480 --> 00:10:17,000 Speaker 3: they're more focusing on the to and fro that were 202 00:10:17,040 --> 00:10:20,120 Speaker 3: in these messages about how they were discussing approaching the 203 00:10:20,240 --> 00:10:21,800 Speaker 3: issue of the who thy's. 204 00:10:22,440 --> 00:10:25,319 Speaker 1: But then inside of that, it does seem like Mike Waltz, 205 00:10:25,320 --> 00:10:25,960 Speaker 1: who again. 206 00:10:25,920 --> 00:10:28,959 Speaker 3: Was the person who added Jeffrey Golberg to the group, 207 00:10:29,040 --> 00:10:32,400 Speaker 3: that he has taken most of the blame here. He 208 00:10:32,559 --> 00:10:36,839 Speaker 3: has taken full responsibility at the time of recording. He 209 00:10:37,000 --> 00:10:40,439 Speaker 3: has not stepped down, however, and we understand that he 210 00:10:40,559 --> 00:10:43,679 Speaker 3: still has the support of the president. In terms of 211 00:10:43,760 --> 00:10:47,240 Speaker 3: the president himself, Trump has denied knowledge of the chat, 212 00:10:47,320 --> 00:10:49,520 Speaker 3: and again there was nothing in that chat that implied 213 00:10:49,559 --> 00:10:51,280 Speaker 3: that he would have known about it. 214 00:10:51,880 --> 00:10:52,559 Speaker 2: But we do know it. 215 00:10:52,679 --> 00:10:55,439 Speaker 3: As I said a bit earlier, that Jade Vance was 216 00:10:56,040 --> 00:10:59,120 Speaker 3: in that conversation perhaps taking a different position to the 217 00:10:59,200 --> 00:11:01,959 Speaker 3: President when it came to how to respond to the 218 00:11:02,040 --> 00:11:05,920 Speaker 3: who thies. Since that time, Events spokesperson has insisted that 219 00:11:06,040 --> 00:11:09,920 Speaker 3: he fully supports the President's policies. Of course, if we 220 00:11:10,040 --> 00:11:12,559 Speaker 3: go to the other side of the aisle, the Democrats 221 00:11:12,640 --> 00:11:16,199 Speaker 3: have been very vocal in their condemnation of what happened here. 222 00:11:16,679 --> 00:11:19,040 Speaker 3: We had a member of the Armed Services Committee calling 223 00:11:19,080 --> 00:11:22,559 Speaker 3: it one of the most egregious failures of operational security 224 00:11:22,679 --> 00:11:24,760 Speaker 3: and common sense that I have ever seen. 225 00:11:25,160 --> 00:11:27,760 Speaker 2: And it's not just those in Congress and the House 226 00:11:27,840 --> 00:11:31,079 Speaker 2: that are condemning this. I mean, you've got Hillary Clinton, 227 00:11:31,120 --> 00:11:35,400 Speaker 2: who was famously brought into a serious leak of her 228 00:11:35,480 --> 00:11:39,520 Speaker 2: own emails that had confidential information. Arguably some would say 229 00:11:39,559 --> 00:11:42,319 Speaker 2: that ended her prospects of becoming president because of the 230 00:11:42,320 --> 00:11:45,400 Speaker 2: way it was used so effectively by President Trump in 231 00:11:45,679 --> 00:11:48,199 Speaker 2: the debates. She tweeted, You've got to be kidding me, 232 00:11:48,640 --> 00:11:52,679 Speaker 2: and so there's a lot of anger around. Interestingly, the 233 00:11:52,800 --> 00:11:57,280 Speaker 2: House and Senate Intelligence committees were scheduled to meet anyway, 234 00:11:57,760 --> 00:12:00,280 Speaker 2: and so those hearings over the last couple of days 235 00:12:00,320 --> 00:12:02,719 Speaker 2: have turned into an interrogation of these key figures. What 236 00:12:02,880 --> 00:12:05,800 Speaker 2: did you know and when? Zara A really amazing story, 237 00:12:05,920 --> 00:12:07,679 Speaker 2: especially when you think of how many things have had 238 00:12:07,720 --> 00:12:09,640 Speaker 2: to come together to make this story happen. Thank you 239 00:12:09,720 --> 00:12:12,319 Speaker 2: for taking us through it. And we'll be tracking this 240 00:12:12,400 --> 00:12:14,199 Speaker 2: one because I don't think this is the last we're 241 00:12:14,200 --> 00:12:15,959 Speaker 2: hearing of it. And that's all we've got time for 242 00:12:16,120 --> 00:12:18,599 Speaker 2: on today's edition of The Daily OS. If you enjoyed it, 243 00:12:18,720 --> 00:12:20,320 Speaker 2: the best thing you can do to help us as 244 00:12:20,360 --> 00:12:22,760 Speaker 2: an independent media company is to shoot this to a friend. 245 00:12:23,040 --> 00:12:25,840 Speaker 2: This is a really interesting story and we think you've 246 00:12:25,880 --> 00:12:28,000 Speaker 2: got a friend who might like it. We'll be back 247 00:12:28,040 --> 00:12:30,599 Speaker 2: again with your headlines in the afternoon. Until then, have 248 00:12:30,800 --> 00:12:37,079 Speaker 2: a great date. My name is Lily Maddon and I'm 249 00:12:37,080 --> 00:12:41,559 Speaker 2: a proud Arunda Bunjelung Kalkutin woman from Gadigol Country. The 250 00:12:41,640 --> 00:12:44,719 Speaker 2: Daily oz acknowledges that this podcast is recorded on the 251 00:12:44,800 --> 00:12:47,440 Speaker 2: lands of the Gadighl people and pays respect to all 252 00:12:47,640 --> 00:12:50,680 Speaker 2: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island and nations. We pay our 253 00:12:50,720 --> 00:12:53,839 Speaker 2: respects to the first peoples of these countries, both past 254 00:12:53,960 --> 00:12:54,440 Speaker 2: and present.