WEBVTT - Are We Scared Of Misandry? 😬

0:00:01.560 --> 0:00:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Flex and Frooms, Flex and Frooms.

0:00:03.640 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 2>This is the Flex and Froomes catch up podcast.

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 3>Flex and Frooms on Cada. I hate to be bringing

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:12.879
<v Speaker 3>the conversation here, but I'm so happy we've arrived. We're

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:16.440
<v Speaker 3>talking about misogyny versus massandry.

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 2>I will say I never I'll never forget. When I

0:00:20.239 --> 0:00:22.240
<v Speaker 2>was in year eleven, I called my mom a Messandras

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 2>because she she showed some slight feminist qualities.

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>WHOA like Mom? No Messandras.

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:35.479
<v Speaker 3>So Google defines misogyny as the dislike of, or contempt for,

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 3>or ingrained prejudice against women, and then defines massandry as

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 3>a person who dislikes, despises, or is strongly prejudiced against men.

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 3>There's this TikTok creator who's made a name for herself

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:52.200
<v Speaker 3>by making this kind of reactionary content on the app,

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 3>so she's basically like a comedic Messandress. Gives her audience

0:00:56.440 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 3>tips and tricks, some ingest, some completely serious on how

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 3>to essentially undermine men by punching down right. And so

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:07.839
<v Speaker 3>I guess, like the reason why her content feels so

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 3>salacious is I can imagine when it comes to calling

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 3>out men, a lot of women have been told to

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 3>take the highroad, right, like, don't stoop, but she's like,

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 3>when they go low, I go lower. Here are the

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 3>tips and tricks, and it's quite funny, right, And so

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 3>I was thinking about how like when I read the

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 3>comments of these posts, there are people there who are

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 3>of the belief that it's the same, like misogyny is

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 3>the same as massandry. And as a woman, if you

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 3>are making fun of men in any way or using

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 3>the same tools and references that they use against them,

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 3>that you are succumbing to them, or you're what's the

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 3>word I'm looking for, like you're perpetuating, perpetuating them, or

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 3>you'll make your normalizing it. And it's counterintuitive. And if

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 3>you want misogyny to go away, then you need to,

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, fight fire with kindness, et cetera, et cetera,

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 3>et cetera. Now I have a lot of thoughts on that,

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 3>but I think the main one is I don't know

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 3>if people will be able to understand the humor in

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 3>massandry if they don't understand the real life impacts of misogyny.

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 3>I feel like a lot of people regard misogyny as

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 3>a thing that only the most extreme of terrible people

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 3>do like only that really outright in cell woman hater

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 3>would ever be misogynists. And I hate to be the

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 3>one to tell you, but if you were raised in

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 3>a patriarchy, you currently there's no doubt. I put money

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 3>on it. But we don't connoe gambling. We do not

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 3>that you are battling some kind of misogyny, internalized or otherwise.

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 3>And I feel that's why sometimes we don't really know

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 3>how to position, if, how and where massandry fits. Like,

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 3>is massandry a fair response for misogyny? Is it taking

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 3>it too far? Is exactly what we need to balance

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 3>the scales. I feel as though the reason why people

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 3>are so shocked when people are publicly massandrist is because

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:02.519
<v Speaker 3>they've found a way to play misogyny so far so

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 3>that suddenly you're seeing it for what it is. Sometimes

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 3>it can be brutal, unfair, uninformed, or like hit you

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 3>like whiplash, But you don't feel that when it comes

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 3>to misogyny, because it's become this very neutral thing. It's

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 3>very neutral for people to see women as being uninformed

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 3>or inferior, or not as powerful or not as capable

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 3>of wielding violence in the same way I think we'll

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.639
<v Speaker 3>have this conversation off air, you and I three me.

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 3>I think people should be way more scared of women.

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 3>I know a lot of women who make a conscious

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 3>effort to tamp down their violent nature, Like who suppress

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 3>it because it's not appropriate, right, or a lot of

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 3>women who have to talk themselves out of being as

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 3>crazy as they want to or as reactive as they

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 3>want to for the benefit of the greater vibe. And

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 3>if women worldwide weren't doing that, if every woman had

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 3>permission to be crazy like their male counterparts, what I

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 3>would be sad because you don't.

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 2>Know and you don't see you were saying that. This morning,

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 2>I watched a clip by Clementine Ford. She had stitched

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 2>with a guy, one of those like motivational self help

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of like guys, and he's like, when she's angry,

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 2>let your woman be in her feminine anger, right thing,

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 2>And like Clementine, as she always does, fantastically kind of

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 2>like pulled the argument apart and was like, if men

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 2>like this think that women getting angry is part of

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 2>like their feminine need, then it like totally discredits their anger.

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:34.479
<v Speaker 2>I do wonder though this TikTok credit that you're talking about.

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I know where. I like her. I think she's really funny.

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Do we think though, maybe pointing out like the things

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 2>that men do that are really shit and like doing

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:47.159
<v Speaker 2>it in a joke way, like we've all heard the

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 2>certain same things that are.

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Like like, what's an example, put.

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 3>Your hand on a smaller woman's back, call his interests stupid.

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, yeah, stuff like that.

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:01.799
<v Speaker 3>Tell him he needs to smile more, or ask him

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 3>if the reason why he didn't get a promotion at

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 3>work was due to the way that like he dresses

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 3>or something.

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>See that's amazing, but thank you, that was off the dome.

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:13.039
<v Speaker 2>I will say, there's a different type that's like pointing

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 2>out the bad stuff that like.

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>His receding hairline exactly.

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 2>And that makes me think, like, is pointing out this

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:23.599
<v Speaker 2>finally I've used like scribbling on my notepad for something

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.279
<v Speaker 2>I actually have a thought, Yeah, note to that is

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:30.600
<v Speaker 2>pointing out bad stuff that men do, or like negligent

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 2>things that men do, just reinforcing the idea that that's

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 2>in their nature. Do you think, like I wonder, like

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if some men would then watch that and

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:42.280
<v Speaker 2>be like, oh, yeah, all men are like that's why

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:43.720
<v Speaker 2>I can just continue to be like that, Yeah, it's

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 2>not good.

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 3>But do you feel the same way, like when you

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 3>see rhetoric on the internet being like women are inherently

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 3>feminine and empathetic and like all women just want to

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 3>find someone to fix and like caretake and you know

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 3>every woman I know wants to be looked after by

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 3>a strong man or whatever. Do you find yourself of

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 3>being like yeah, like I guess that is me, or

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 3>do you say like, oh, I can see that, but like, nah,

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 3>that's not for me.

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I think I can do that.

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 2>But the difference is they're mostly they're not like harmful

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 2>things that women do.

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 3>M I see what you're saying, Like I think in

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:19.479
<v Speaker 3>some instances, but I often think a lot of these

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 3>arguments become obsolete when we assume that the adult hearing

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 3>them is without agency for sure, And like I keep

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 3>going back, like men made patriarchy and capitalism and sexism

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 3>and racism, and these systems like work well like unfortunately,

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 3>well do you know what I mean, to the point

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 3>where you don't even know that you're participating, and you're like.

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Your front lines, you're recruiting.

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 3>So I just refuse to believe that we're like, well,

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 3>if we point out when so and so does so

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 3>and so, are we just normalizing. It's like no, I

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 3>think that the system like telling us so like to

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:55.159
<v Speaker 3>point it out is just it's it's a futile But

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 3>what I will say is that I feel like, make

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 3>the content do whatever, because I feel as though what

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 3>stops people from changing or evolving is they're getting shielded

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:07.160
<v Speaker 3>from the message they need to receive the most. So,

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, like when you're let's say, when you're in

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 3>high school whatever, and people like you don't talk about

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 3>periods in front of like people don't have periods, like

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 3>it's just inappropriate. It's like, well, now we're adults and

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 3>they don't have the information. You're kind of like, well,

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 3>when are they going to seek it out right? Or

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 3>let's not talk about sexism in front of the person

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 3>who's oppressing us, let's not talk about race with white people.

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 3>It's like, okay, so we can stop doing that. But

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 3>then we get to a point where these conversations to

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 3>reach boiling point and we have to start.

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>From scratch scratch sh.

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 3>And then what But while those conversations are happening, I

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 3>definitely think that like, not everyone can do this widespread work,

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 3>Like whether or not you think misogyny content massndry content

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 3>has a.

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Place to live.

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 3>The way that it's reaching a ton of people at

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 3>once and starting these like bubbling conversations all at once

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 3>need to happen only if we as individuals are finishing

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 3>the work. I know of a lot of people who

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 3>would be the first to make masondurie content and misogyny content,

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:08.559
<v Speaker 3>but wouldn't say anything in their own circles. And I'm like, wow,

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 3>what are we doing? What are we doing?

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I both relate to and see this happen in the wild.

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 3>In the wild, it is the feeline high value woman

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 3>tried to fertile.

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>After all the trade wife jokes.

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if I spoke about this last week,

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 2>but I actually went and did some googling on what

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 2>a trade wife means, and it's simply no laughing matter.

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm just like the idea of like chilling at home,

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 2>like I'm working from home guys thru me.

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 3>Actually did some research and you wouldn't believe what I found.

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:45.079
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I'm being serious.

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 3>But I'm with you.

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it is so funny how it's literally

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 2>so hard to do these things in practice. A because

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:57.199
<v Speaker 2>it's bothersome, b because it's uncomfortable.

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 3>Do you know when it stops getting hard, though, like

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 3>when you're actually impacted by it in a way that

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 3>you're like, oh, I wish I didn't have to go

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 3>through that. When I was finishing high school, I met

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:07.199
<v Speaker 3>a lot of women who were like, I'm not a feminist,

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 3>I could never be one. And it's like you just wait,

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 3>like you wait, your time will calm, Your time will

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 3>calm because while we all formed touchrap of being like

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't impact me, so I'm not gonna be bothered

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:19.319
<v Speaker 3>by it, and that everybody's prerogative.

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:20.319
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm down with that.

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of things to not care about in

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 3>life or to care a lot about. But and I've

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 3>been thinking about misogyny a lot because the older I get,

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 3>and I look at the lack of community, especially in womanhood,

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:33.439
<v Speaker 3>like I look at brotherhood a lot, I'm like, what

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:35.959
<v Speaker 3>do you people have to be so loyal about? Like

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 3>when I look at the connections between men and men,

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, you didn't.

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Even work for that.

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:42.439
<v Speaker 3>You need to work for that, And the rest of

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 3>us are putting in hard yards with our little sisterhoods

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 3>and being like, what is where's the friction coming from?

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Where's friction coming from? It's like, oh, because the friction

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:48.959
<v Speaker 1>is on the.

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 3>Path to like this like amazing utopia. But also there's

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 3>so much to learn about the way that we are

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 3>so neutral towards misogyny, or the way that it's laughable,

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.439
<v Speaker 3>the way that people don't laugh at missandry. So like,

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 3>let's talk, get out, giggles up, let's start giggling, gigle, giggle.

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 3>So when I say he's got a receding hairline, don't

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 3>start defending this imaginary man who's got a receding hairline

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 3>because it's coming Like I don't like that I talk

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 3>about some imaginary man receding hairline.

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:18.960
<v Speaker 1>People are up in arms, like, I don't know, it's mean,

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 1>it's mean. I'm in a mean camp.

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't exist, No, he does, though I don't know.

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 2>That's where I draw one but you.

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 3>But someone's like calls a woman like an empty head bimbo,

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 3>and everyone's like, what I mean?

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Is she?

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 3>So? Now we're now we're inquisitive. Does he have a

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 3>receding hairline? Potentially? Like I want people to go for

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 3>bat for women like they do for men.

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:44.599
<v Speaker 2>I do feel like the sisterhood comes easier than the brotherhood.

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 3>We have sisterhoods. I don't know if I can trust her,

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:49.319
<v Speaker 3>trust her?

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Can you trust him?

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 3>The becas going for inside that trust him and I

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 3>love him whoever he is.

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>You've been listening to the Flex and Rooms Daily podcast.

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:04.359
<v Speaker 3>For more, tune Indicator on DAB or stream it on iHeartRadio.