WEBVTT - The Eye Witness

0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Just before nine o'clock last night, the jury returns guilty

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>verdicts against all three defendants. It was absolutely shambles, to

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>tell you the truth, just absolutely really color blood on

0:00:12.720 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>his clothing the day after the alleged a top.

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 2>On a shallow mud bank and it fits Roy River. Basically,

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 2>I think most of the people are used to me.

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Where are good people?

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:23.280
<v Speaker 2>I think a really important question we need to ask

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 2>is how many Indigenous prisoners in Australia are innocent.

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>This is Curtain, a podcast where we pull back the

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>blinds to shine a light on the darkest parts of

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:36.240
<v Speaker 1>our justice system and ask who are the victims. I'm

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Amy Maguire and.

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm Martin Hodgson, a senior advocate for the Foreign Prisoner

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Support Service. And a warning. This series contains the names

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:50.839
<v Speaker 2>of deceased peoples and has distressing content that might upset

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 2>some listeners.

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 3>This week a special warning This episode will contain distressing

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 3>content and maybe particularly upsetting for those who know the

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:07.959
<v Speaker 3>case and are familiar with what happened back twenty five

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 3>years ago.

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Now. Earlier last week we were planning on telling you

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>more about Kevin Henry's parole and the Independent expert report

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>we have received which shows the forensic analysis in this

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>case was overly simplistic. But before we turned off the

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>recorder last week, this happened.

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 3>Sorry to cut you off before we go. I have

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 3>just got a message and it's gotten attachment what and

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:42.479
<v Speaker 3>it's oh man, we've got them.

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>What does it say?

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 3>Amy? As soon as we go off air, I'll tell

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 3>you what I've received, and listeners next week you will

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 3>hear what I've just received in an email and it's explosive.

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Now, when we went off air and Martin told me

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the details of that, I knew he was an exaggerating.

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>This was explosive.

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 3>But first we need to provide you with a bit

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:13.360
<v Speaker 3>of background. Late last year, I became aware of a

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 3>piece of evidence that could prove absolutely essential to Kevin

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:23.359
<v Speaker 3>Henry's case. I've spent months searching for that piece of evidence.

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 3>The evidence had come to light more than a decade ago.

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 3>But despite it being sent to a number of different people,

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 3>those who are actually funded to help prisoners like Kevin,

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:41.519
<v Speaker 3>it had been buried. In some cases, it had been destroyed.

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:46.360
<v Speaker 1>And what does this piece of evidence refer to? Well,

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>it's the question that many people have asked ever since

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>we began telling you the details of this case, back

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>from the very first episode, remember when we started by

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 1>telling you about the tides.

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 3>An analysis of historic tide record woods from that night,

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 3>as well as a long one hundred and fifty meter

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 3>line in the mud parallel to the river bank, means

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 3>we can be very certain that Linda, the beautiful mother

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 3>of four who tragically lost her life, had been placed

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 3>in the river on the racecourse side that is opposite

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 3>to the Tanuba House side where police say Kevin Henry

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 3>had placed her body.

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:31.079
<v Speaker 1>Now, if you've ever been to rock Hamden, I'll tell

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:32.959
<v Speaker 1>you what Kevin would have had to do to make

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>this story applausebore. Sometime in the fifteen minute window, when

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>he was alone, he would have had to have found

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a car, would have had to place Linda in it

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>at a time when no mode at Tanuba House could

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>have seen him. He would have had to have driven

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>through the main center of rock Hampden and over one

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>of the town's two bridges. We have the old and

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the new bridge, to the opposite side of the river

0:03:56.640 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 1>where there's a racecourse, and then up further soccer and

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>touch football fields.

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 3>Now, when we launched our first episode, we told you

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 3>all of this, and immediately you began to ask questions.

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 3>The main question is if Kevin didn't do it, who

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 3>did and how did they do it? Did they do

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:22.359
<v Speaker 3>it by boat or did they have a car.

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>This evidence helps answer that question. It provides another story

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>about what happened that night from a young woman who

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>was there and who came forward to give her statement

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>more than a decade ago. She has since passed away,

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>but we will protect her identity. Today we will refer

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 1>to her as Witness X.

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 3>Now. Witness X is an Aboriginal woman who was a

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 3>teenager the night of Linda's murder. After Linda was found,

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 3>she says she was intimidated by two men who threatened

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 3>her her and told her to leave town. Out of

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 3>fear for her safety and the safety of her family,

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:14.159
<v Speaker 3>she left Rockhampton, but roughly ten years ago she decided

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:18.359
<v Speaker 3>to come forward. She gave a detailed statement about what

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 3>happened that night to a lawyer. The statement tells us

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 3>what really happened that night.

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:29.479
<v Speaker 1>Now, for legal reasons, we can't give you all of

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the details of her statement, but we can read out

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 1>on air what this witness told a rock Hampden lawyer

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 1>about what happened after Linda was assaulted. Now, Martin is

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>going to read the statement to you, and he's going

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to pick up from the point. Witness X walks back

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 1>down to Tanuba House after the assault has taken place.

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 3>Now this is Witness X. I walked down the stairs

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:01.159
<v Speaker 3>slow because it was dark, not much lighter round Tanuba House.

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 3>I found a door and walked in kicked something on

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 3>the floor. I could not see what it was. This

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:13.919
<v Speaker 3>thing on the ground was a person, I realized with

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 3>a fright because the person grabbed me on the leg.

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:21.599
<v Speaker 3>I bent down to see who grabbed my leg, and

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 3>all I could see was the eyes that rolled back.

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 3>I then asked the person if he she was all right,

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 3>and this person tried to talk, but I couldn't hear properly.

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:41.159
<v Speaker 3>I then immediately walked into the next room, where I

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 3>saw the same crowd that was up at the Crown

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 3>in the room.

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Now, for legal reasons, we can't name everyone that the

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Witness X mentions next, but we can say they include

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>all of the three women who were convicted over the assault,

0:06:57.440 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and also Kevin.

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 3>Henry Curtin, Kevin Henry was asleep on a mattress. I

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 3>asked them if that person in the other room was

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 3>taking a fit. Someone said that she was okay, she'd

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 3>come out of it soon. She does that all the time.

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 3>I asked them if someone was going to ring the

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 3>ambulance or police. No one answered me.

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Now another note, we have to conceal yet another identity.

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>We will call her Witness Why.

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 3>I then asked Witness Why for a smoke and asked

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 3>which way to go out. They told me to leave

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 3>through another door. I did and that led me up

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 3>towards a big tree. I then ran into C H

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 3>who was walking towards tenuber house. He asked me where

0:07:53.680 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 3>Curtain was and I said, he's down there asleep. Just

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 3>kept walking as fast as I could away from that house.

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 3>When a green car came alongside of me, Witness Why

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 3>sang out from the back seat and asked if I

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 3>wanted to go for a ride. I said, where are

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 3>you going? Witness Why said to the other side of

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 3>the river to dump rubbish. I was going to jump

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 3>into the back seat with her, but c jumped out

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:35.920
<v Speaker 3>of the front and told me to sit in the

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 3>front so he could sit in the back. With Witness why.

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 3>The man driving was Willy West, who then drove over

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 3>the bridge. Then I remember under a bridge. When we

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 3>pulled up, Willie reversed back and there was a very

0:08:54.880 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 3>bright light in front of us. C and Willie got

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 3>out of the car to dump the rubbish. I asked

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 3>if they wanted any help. Witness why, I tapped me

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 3>on the shoulder and said, let the brothers do it.

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 3>As we were waiting, I asked Witness why where the

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 3>bright light was coming from. She said from the touch

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 3>football grounds. Witness Why. I kept talking about different things,

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 3>but I could hear water behind us. It took a

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 3>fair while for See and Willie to get back into

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:35.959
<v Speaker 3>the car. When we left, they dropped me off at

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 3>the road thunder and no one was there. A couple

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 3>of days later, C and Willie West came to my

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 3>house in Warabinda and they told me to keep my

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:50.719
<v Speaker 3>mouth shut because if I tell anyone, they're going to

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 3>rape me and kill me the same way as the

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 3>other woman. I moved away soon after this because I

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 3>was afraid of what would happen to me and my kids.

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Martin, is that how the statement ends?

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 3>Yes, so that's the way the witness's statement ends, and

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 3>then at the bottom I will read for our listeners

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 3>how an official statement that was taken then in Queensland

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 3>finishes Justices Act eighteen eighty six. I acknowledge, by virtue

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 3>of section one hundred and ten A five c two

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 3>of the Justices Act eighteen eighty six that one, this

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 3>written statement by me, dated the thirtieth of the ninth,

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and two, and contained in the pages numbered,

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.200
<v Speaker 3>is true to the best of my knowledge and belief.

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 3>And I make this statement knowing that if it were

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 3>admitted as evidence, I may be liable to prosecution for

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 3>stating in it anything I know is false. This was

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:06.839
<v Speaker 3>signed by the witness, signed in Rockhampton on the thirtieth

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 3>of September two thousand and two, and signed by the

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 3>barrister who took and witnessed the statement.

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>So, Martin, there's quite a lot in that statement, and

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>it was taken down a considerable time amount of time

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>after the crime actually took place. How can we be

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>certain that Witness X is a reliable witness?

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So, based on what we've just heard, some of

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 3>our listeners may be a little bit confused because we

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 3>did have to conceal some identities. But the statement is

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 3>from someone who we will continue to refer to as

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 3>Witness X, and the important part of their statement is

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 3>that while some people saw little bits and pieces of

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 3>what happened that night, some were witnesses to the assault.

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:02.679
<v Speaker 3>Some people saw Kevin Henny throughout the night in different places.

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 3>Other people saw and could place other people that were

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 3>there that night at certain times at perhaps t Enuba

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 3>or the Crown Hotel. This witness was able to see

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 3>absolutely everything from start to finish. And when I say everything,

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:27.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean all the crucial incidents. So this witness was

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 3>able to see what happened to Linda, as in when

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 3>she was still alive. This witness was able to see

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:43.839
<v Speaker 3>what happened to Linda as best as possible, as you

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:48.560
<v Speaker 3>heard at the very end. And really this witness is

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 3>quite unique in that circumstance. Now, how can we be

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 3>know they're telling the truth. Well, this witness gave this statement,

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:01.199
<v Speaker 3>as you said, quite some time after the event and

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 3>quite some time ago. All the evidence they gave is

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 3>either corroborated by other witnesses, is corroborated by the forensic evidence,

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 3>or is corroborated by our own investigation. It's also important

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 3>to know this witness had no involvement whatsoever in what

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 3>happened that night, and it was never alleged that they did,

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 3>and that this witness had absolutely no need or reason

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 3>to lie. This person came forward because they wanted the

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 3>truth to be known. And basically the two things they

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 3>wanted to be known is they knew where Kevin Henry

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 3>was that night, and they knew who put the body

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 3>in the river, Linda's body, and it was not, as

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 3>you heard, Kevin Henry on the Tanuba House side of

0:13:56.960 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 3>the river. It was other individuals on the racecourse side

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 3>of the river who did have access to a car.

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Now, this is a completely different version of events we're

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>hearing from what the police actually alleged happened. But does

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Witness x's version of events fit with the logistics of

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>where Linda's body was found and the timing of what

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>was happening that night at Tanuba.

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 3>House, Yes, it does. I think one thing that everybody

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 3>who's looked at the case over the years, and there's

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 3>been quite a number of lawyers who have looked at it,

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 3>is the timeline and the logistics just don't match up.

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 3>There's no sense to be made and it can't be proven,

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 3>and never was that Kevin Henry had access to a car,

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 3>had time to find a car, was able to place

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 3>a body either on the other side of the river,

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 3>which is what the forensic information would show, or on

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 3>the Tanuba House side of the river, which would have

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 3>required him to get completely wet and covered in mud

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 3>and have the blood all over his body. So this

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 3>witness and what they say fits with the much more

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 3>reasonable logical scenario and the scenario that is backed up

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 3>by the forensic evidence, which is that the people needed

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 3>a car, and she gives us that those people had

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 3>a car that they needed to drive to the other

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 3>side of the river. Now, as people will have heard

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 3>in earlier episodes, you re enacted driving to the other

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 3>side of the river and to this day as it

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 3>required back then it meant going over one bridge and

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 3>under another. So this is just a little detail that

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 3>this witness included that had to take place if what

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 3>they said was true, and that witness did include that.

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 3>And so there's a lot of little things in this statement,

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 3>and trust me, I've picked through it like a fine

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 3>tooth comb. That there's little bits of evidence that someone

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 3>who didn't see what happened wouldn't know. But this witness

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 3>clearly knows and clearly saw what they saw, and yes,

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 3>the logistics of what they describe fits absolutely with the

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 3>evidence and absolutely with what I believe took place that night.

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>The interesting thing to me is how you began the

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>statement when you recited it, and it was the event

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>where she's actually tripped over almost a body that's obviously

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>in a very bad state. We don't know who that

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>body is, but it does sound a lot like Linda.

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>What does that say about the potential of Linda being

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 1>alive before she was put in the water, or whether

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>she may have died before she was put in the water.

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 3>I think that it's a really hard thing to know

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 3>from that statement alone. But obviously, again we can go

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 3>back to the forensics. We have one thing we never

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 3>really had, was a witness who could tell us what

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 3>really happened to Linda after the assault. There's always been

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 3>this huge gap, and even the police never really attempted

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:27.440
<v Speaker 3>to fill that gap. They purely just said, at some point,

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 3>Kevin has dragged Linda down to the water. Now, there's

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 3>no forensic evidence for that, and nobody saw that. But

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 3>what this witness says is that there was somebody under

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:46.120
<v Speaker 3>Tanuba who was in a very bad way, and this

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 3>would match obviously with the fact we know that an

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 3>assault had occurred, and this witness was clearly concerned about

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 3>this individual because they inquired if anyone had called the police,

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 3>had anyone called an ambulance. So we can't be one

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 3>hundred percent sure that this person was Linda who they saw,

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 3>but I think it's a fair guess that that's who

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 3>they saw, and it does suggest to us that while

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:21.159
<v Speaker 3>Linda was still alive at that point, she was in

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 3>a very bad way, and that would have been following

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 3>the assault. And we do know from the forensic evidence

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 3>both presented at trial and that we have now that

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 3>the assault committed by the three women was horrific and

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 3>would have left Linda in this sort of state where

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 3>she may have appeared to be having a fit or

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:47.680
<v Speaker 3>be slipping in and out of consciousness as it appeared

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 3>this person discovered.

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 1>The other interesting thing I thought was Witness X describes

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the lights from the Touch Football grounds and she also

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>describes hearing water behind us as witness why is talking?

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Does that sort of give us any indication of where

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 1>this drop off point could have been in relation to

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Linda's body.

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and I think, as we pointed out very early

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 3>in this series, that the forensic evidence always suggested that

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 3>Linda's body was placed on the racecourse side of the river. Now,

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 3>police never explored that scenario and never countenanced it as

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 3>a possibility, but we certainly did because we looked at

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:38.959
<v Speaker 3>the forensic evidence. And so what those lights from the

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 3>touch football ground shows and the water that was behind

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:47.160
<v Speaker 3>the car would place the car in the exact position,

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:51.959
<v Speaker 3>with the back of the car to the river and

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 3>the front of the car facing towards those fields, is

0:19:56.080 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 3>the exact position where we months ago believe believed Linda's

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 3>body was placed in the water. Now, at that time,

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:07.199
<v Speaker 3>we did not have access to this statement and we

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 3>did not know its contents. What we were using was

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 3>absolute forensic data. And so what we have here now

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 3>is an eyewitness whose statement backs up what that data

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 3>showed us, and it does so in an incredibly accurate manner.

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 3>And it's quite disturbing to read it for the first time,

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 3>for the first few times to realize that so much

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 3>of this could have been solved by the police in

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:45.159
<v Speaker 3>those very early days, had they done the basic work

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 3>that we did when we first examined this case.

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:52.919
<v Speaker 1>What does the whole statement say about Kevin. You've mentioned

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>a few places where the witness has talked about Kevin

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Henry being asleep. Is that the only mention she makes

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of Kevin Henry in this statement.

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 3>No, So, for the purpose of protecting people's identity who

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 3>have no involvement in the crime whatsoever, we did leave

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:16.359
<v Speaker 3>out some sections of the statement that were really just

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 3>background information. But the witness does describe where Kevin was

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:27.200
<v Speaker 3>throughout that day, and it matches up very much with

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 3>what we know happened to Kevin that day, which is

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:35.680
<v Speaker 3>that he consumed a large amount of alcohol and then

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 3>he spent most of the afternoon and the evening asleep.

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 3>So this witness saw Kevin come across the road and

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 3>sleep next to a gum tree. This witness saw Kevin

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 3>Henry at the Crown, And we have to remember that

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:58.400
<v Speaker 3>this is something we've raised before, that part of Kevin's

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:00.679
<v Speaker 3>alibi is that he was at the Crown, and if

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:04.440
<v Speaker 3>he was, he couldn't possibly have committed the murder. And

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 3>so this witness did, like others see Kevin Henry at

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 3>the Crown and at the time the body was placed

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 3>in the river, this witness saw Kevin Henry asleep under

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:22.159
<v Speaker 3>Tenuba House. Now, again, all of this matches with the

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 3>fact that, by Kevin's own admission, he drunk a considerable

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 3>amount of alcohol that morning, and that he spent most

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 3>of the rest of the day asleep and a brief

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 3>period of time at the Crown Hotel, And all of

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 3>this is confirmed by an eyewitness.

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Now we've got two other men who Witness X says

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>she saw dumping Linda's body in the river. One of

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 1>these men we've concealed the identity, we've called him c

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 1>But another man, Willie West. What do we know about him?

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>And why have we chose and to say his name

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>in full?

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 3>Okay, The reason we've decided to say his name in

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 3>full is that his name was raised as a potential

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 3>suspect at the initial trial. Now, that name was raised

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 3>both by lawyers for the women and the lawyer for

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 3>Kevin Henry, And that name was raised in full to

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 3>the police in particular, and also to others who were

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 3>there that day. This is not the first witness to

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 3>place Willy West at the scene. We have other witnesses

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 3>who say that Willy West was at Tanuba House. We

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 3>have other witnesses who say that Willy West was at

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 3>the Crown Hotel. And the reason this is important is

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 3>because the police deny all knowledge of this individual, and

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 3>the police claimed that they did not take a statement

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:05.160
<v Speaker 3>from this individual, and that is despite the fact that

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 3>multiple witnesses raised this person's name. Now, based on what

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 3>we know from this witness testimony, it appears this person,

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 3>according to witness X, drove the car and was one

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 3>of two men to place Linda's body in the river.

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:28.680
<v Speaker 3>So I think we can very reasonably understand why the

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:34.399
<v Speaker 3>lawyers for the women and particularly Kevin Henry, repeatedly brought

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:39.160
<v Speaker 3>up the name Willie West and asked the police if

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 3>they'd investigated that individual, had they taken a statement from

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 3>that individual, and in fact, did they even know who

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 3>that individual was. Now, again, the police denied knowing who

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:56.679
<v Speaker 3>this person was, nor ever having taken a statement. But

0:24:57.520 --> 0:24:59.959
<v Speaker 3>I think it's fair to know that the lawyers at

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:04.399
<v Speaker 3>the time knew something was up with this individual, and

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 3>that's why they raised that person's name. And now we

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:11.679
<v Speaker 3>have the evidence about that individual.

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the fact that he seems like he's one

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>of the very few people at Tanuba House to have

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 1>a car should have raised alarm bell bell straight away,

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>because even from the very moment we knew that this crime,

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 1>you would have needed some sort of vehicle in order

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 1>to actually do this the way Linda's body was found,

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 1>you would have had to have some sort of vehicle

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:33.640
<v Speaker 1>of some sort.

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:36.880
<v Speaker 3>That's exactly right. And I think again that was one

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:41.920
<v Speaker 3>of those points that seems obvious to absolutely everybody involved

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 3>from twenty five years ago until today, except for the

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 3>investigating officers, that a car would have been required. And

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 3>this is the only person that we know of and

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 3>that was mentioned by witnesses to have access to a car.

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 3>So I think that's why it stretched credulity for the

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 3>lawyers to believe that the police had not interviewed this

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:11.119
<v Speaker 3>person nor knew who they were. And we have to

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:16.680
<v Speaker 3>remember that absolutely everybody was interviewed. Anyone that was at

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 3>ten Uber House was questioned at least once and up

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:25.199
<v Speaker 3>to five times by police. And as we've mentioned in

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 3>previous episodes, some witnesses who were at t Uber House

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 3>but had nothing whatsoever to do with the crime were

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 3>followed for months, including a mister Wayne Saunders, who was

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 3>followed out to the Rockhampton prison and he gave a

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:49.639
<v Speaker 3>statement he was accused of committing the crime and he

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:55.160
<v Speaker 3>had no involvement whatsoever. But this individual Willie West, who

0:26:55.240 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 3>this witness names, who clearly other witness name, and to

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Lawyer's raise, was not once interviewed by police. And I

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 3>think that raises very serious doubts as to the quality

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 3>of the investigation and to whether that investigation really found

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:18.400
<v Speaker 3>or sought to find the truth of what happened that night.

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>And not only that, this is just another piece of evidence,

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 1>along with everything else we've provided you with over the

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>past year that points towards Kevin Henry or Curtin's innocence.

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Join us next week for Curtain