WEBVTT - When A Facebook Group Turns On Its Leader, Steph Pacca's Dangerous Tanning Boost & Shani Sparks Break Up Rumours

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>This is Outspoken. The podcast is not afraid to say

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>exactly what you're thinking. Our names are.

0:00:06.080 --> 0:00:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Amy Kate and Sophie Torbor.

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:11.880
<v Speaker 1>We're identical triplets, but we often don't have identical opinions,

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>so sometimes things can get heated. Outspoken covers all things

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>reality TV, influences, entertainment, and issues facing women. That is

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>so fetch Thank you, Welcome back to Outspoken Now. Sophie,

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I know you've had an amazing morning and for a

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>very very sad reason. Yeah, was actually so excited because

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I have got a rare ushi.

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>This is so terribly sad because I did my big

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>shop with Brandon, and we always pay for things separately

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>because I'm vegetarian, he's immediated. We buy different things for

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 1>a weekly shop. Anyway, I said to make sure that

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 1>you asked for the ushies when you put your grocery through. Anyway,

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>so we had about nine of them. I joke that

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>it was for my son Archie, which is my dog. Anyway,

0:00:57.440 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I rushed back to the car. I had to open

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>all of them immediately. So sad, what are you like? Five? No,

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm just joking. I did the same thing anyway, and

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:08.679
<v Speaker 1>I said to Brandon, I think that this is a

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:10.639
<v Speaker 1>rare one. It's one of the ones with the glitter

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>on it. Anyway, can I give context? Can I give context?

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I get a frantic call, Oh my god, I think

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I've got one of those valuable Sushies are worth ten

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:22.119
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars. I said, calm down, what is that ushi?

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Can you send it to me? It's one of those

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>glittery ones. And I was sort of like, what an idiot?

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Then I realized that I owned a glittery one too,

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and suddenly I was like, so involved in this conversation.

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Now as you do, Amy, you jumped on Marketplace. Now,

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>apparently these Glitterybaes or eBay are only worth about thirty

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:39.959
<v Speaker 1>to forty dollars, But too bad. I have to say,

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that the value is extended if you have

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 1>them in a whole catalog. So I think that the

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>three of us should team up and make the best collection.

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>We've already got two glittery ones. This could be worth

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Now this is like bog buying on a

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>different level. This is like not pandemic bolt buying, but

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 1>this is ushi bolg buying. Can I say I just

0:01:57.600 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>had this thought. I just cannot believe a thirty one

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>year old talking about collecting ushies to.

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Pretend it's for the kid.

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it's competition season because Monopoly McDonald's is

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>also bad, and I feel like it's a tactic of

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>them to do it, because of course it's a tactic, no,

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 1>but I'm saying they always do it when spring is

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 1>about to start, because it's when you're to die.

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 2>It's a time where people don't want to be eating

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 2>that crap.

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, I want to hear if anyone else is in

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 1>their late twenties or early thirties or forties or whatever

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>and you don't have kids and you're collecting ushies, we

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>want to hear. So go to our Facebook community, which

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:31.519
<v Speaker 1>is outspoken the podcast community, and tell us if you're collectingshes.

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>And it also add if you were incredibly embarrassed to

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.359
<v Speaker 1>be asking for these, because I think it's it's awkward

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 1>where you've got to show your receipt. Just before we

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:42.360
<v Speaker 1>get into the main topic, there was a little bit

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:45.079
<v Speaker 1>of confusion. Some people were asking us whose voice is

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>whose voice? And I don't really know how to say this.

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>This is Amy's voice, So I think that you apparently

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 1>have the kind of middle of the range in the

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>deep category.

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 2>Is that right?

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Someone s actually at the deepest, So I don't know, okay,

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>And then this is Kate. I don't know. My voice

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:03.919
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been professionally trained, which is what Amy and Sophie

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:04.639
<v Speaker 1>like to tell me.

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 2>All the time.

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't get to read the intros out very much.

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>But that was a burn, so I don't this is

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>my voice, This is Sophie. I don't know.

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:13.679
<v Speaker 2>I think your voice is the deepest.

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>It's probably deep at the moment because we've had a

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:18.920
<v Speaker 1>bit of an argument before we got into this. But

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:21.239
<v Speaker 1>I think something that will help people be able to

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>tell us apart is we're actually going to be putting

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>together a video about how to make a podcast, and

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be putting that on YouTube.

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 2>So I suppose you'll be able to put a face

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 2>to the voice.

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>That's not going to help people when they listen to

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, but well, they might feel like they know

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>us a bit more. I don't know. All right, Well,

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>now hopefully everyone's got the voices downpacked, we'll get into

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the first topic. Abby Chatfield's Facebook group is the latest

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>group to implode the It's a Lot Podcast group was

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>archive this week following backlash from Abby's listeners. Sophie, for

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>those who aren't across the drama, can you tell me

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>exactly what happened? Well, just two weeks ago, Abby told

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>her twenty three thousand followers in the It's a Lot

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Podcast group that she would be changing the Facebook group

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to purely group that discusses the podcast. So we actually

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>spoke about this on our podcast two weeks ago. We

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>will put it in the show notes if you want

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>to have a look. So what has happened since is

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Abby has appeared on flex Mammy's podcast, which is called

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Whatever I Want Podcasts, and basically she was talking about

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the decision to put parameters in the group.

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 2>So it has imploded.

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's safe to say there were members of that

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>group who took offense to some of the comments that

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>were made. I think first we should go through what

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>was actually said. Yeah, there was quite a lot of backlash,

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.479
<v Speaker 1>which then resulted in the group to be archived, which

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:34.920
<v Speaker 1>basically means no one can post anything comment like, but

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the posts can still be viewed that were previously written.

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>So basically the same thing that happened to Shameless's podcast group. Yeah,

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:45.719
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly right. There has been a huge amount of backlash,

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>particularly on the episode thread where Abby was talking about

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>her episode with Flex. So on the thread, people basically

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 1>accused Abby of trash talking the listeners, and they were

0:04:56.960 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>saying that they were very annoyed that she said that

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 1>critical things because are usually very angry and defensive. Now,

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>to Abby's credit, we're going to play exactly what she

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>said about critical thinkers now.

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 4>And the issue that I find as well is that

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 4>the people who are the critical thinkers then get overly

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 4>angry and defensive, and then they are like, why don't

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.719
<v Speaker 4>you think like this? And while I may agree with

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 4>their point, I can't go in and then just block

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:22.479
<v Speaker 4>someone who has a different opinion to you. I can't

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:24.599
<v Speaker 4>just delete everyone, because then it becomes an echo chamber,

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 4>and then what are we doing. We're yelling at each

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:30.479
<v Speaker 4>other about the same thing and there's no discussion happening.

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:32.359
<v Speaker 1>And to be honest, I think she raised quite a

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:34.479
<v Speaker 1>valid point with this, and one that we're seeing with

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:37.599
<v Speaker 1>a lot of groups. Aren't these groups there so that

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 1>people can be educated and people can share their different opinions? Yeah,

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think Abby was saying that she doesn't

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:46.919
<v Speaker 1>like critical thinkers. There were a lot of critical thinkers

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>in that group that makes some amazing points, but it's

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>just the way that some of them then react if

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>people do not agree with their point of view, which

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:57.280
<v Speaker 1>we have seen now because Abby has stood up and

0:05:57.320 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 1>sort of said what she actually really thought of the group,

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and then it has coincided with complete backlash and people

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:05.720
<v Speaker 1>turning on her. And that's exactly what we said in

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>our episode the other week that Abby's in a strange

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 1>predicament because if she is to go in and police

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the group, people are going to turn against her. And

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:16.360
<v Speaker 1>she has made her feelings clear on this podcast, and

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:19.799
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly what people have done. There was also criticism

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>around the fact that people are saying that Abby is

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:24.919
<v Speaker 1>not an intersectional feminist and that she was trying to

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 1>silence women of color. Now, I found this actually ridiculous

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>because we've got to put it into perspective. Abby is

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:36.479
<v Speaker 1>a twenty five year old woman that was on the Bachelorette. Yes,

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>she was very woke for being a bachelor contestant, but

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like there's so much pressure on her.

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 1>As she also said on the podcast, to be perfect.

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Why are we expecting so much from these people? It's

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:50.840
<v Speaker 1>just making influences or people in the public eye not

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>want to stand for anything at the moment because it

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:54.839
<v Speaker 1>appears if you stand for something, you're going to be

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:58.160
<v Speaker 1>dragged down for every single issue. So the validity of

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>any of the amazing commentary has made about the feminism

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:05.119
<v Speaker 1>movements all rubbished because oh, she's wearing a boohoo dress.

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>That's what annoys me in this day and age is

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>that people are just so willing to tear one another down,

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and they're not actually willing to praise people who are

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to make a difference. And in one particular area.

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>You have to be an expert on everything, but you'll

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>be criticized. I think it's impossible to be across every

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>single issue these days. And I'd like to see some

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>of these individuals in this group who are throwing absolute

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>shade at Abby, I'd like to see them start their

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>own podcasts. I'd like to see them put themselves out

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>there instead of hiding behind their keyboards and acting like

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 1>they're thinking experts on everything.

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 2>We actually had a listener.

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>In our group make some very valid points. Now he

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>was discussing the fact that a lot of these podcasts

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>come out and they're kind of, you know, shameless. They're

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>focused on pop culture. Oh Abby is focused on feminism

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and sex, and basically, as the podcast evolves in the

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>community gets bigger, they start wanting to discuss bigger topics

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that are obviously going to create discussion and sometimes they're

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>going to create controversy. And unfortunately, as we are all

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>huge humans, our opinions are not going to match up

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>with each other. So what do you guys think? Do

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>you think that people should be shying away from these

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>discussions and kind of sticking to their lane or should

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>we be allowing these discussions to be had, But do

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>we then need to make sure that we moderate them properly.

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I think people just need to calm down. I think

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:19.239
<v Speaker 1>that people need to realize that everyone's got a different

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>opinion and just because you don't agree with someone's opinion

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that's the wrong opinion. That's just their opinion.

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>And also people should be able to have a fair discussion. Yeah,

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I did agree with what Flex was saying

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that she was kind of having an internal discussion whether

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 1>she should be moderating it and who is she to

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>set the tone of what is appropriate and inappropriate? And

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I could not agree more. It is really hard because

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>there are people that have had lived experiences that are

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to talk on a completely different

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>level to what you may be talking about. And it's

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>really sad that these conversations then cannot happen because people

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>are getting too aggressive in the community. I think we also,

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>whenever we're speaking in one of these groups, we wi

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>should remember that there is a person on the other

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>end of that keyboard, Like, yeah, would some of these

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>people ever speak to someone in real life like that?

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>For instance, not even just to a community member, but

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>if one of these people were to see Abby in

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>real life, would they be so vocal and aggressive to

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>her as they are being on this group? Also also,

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean I was a part of that group and

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I ended up leaving it because I couldn't stand to

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>read some of the commentary and the arguments and bullying

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that were going on, So I just left. And Abby

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>made the perfect point. If you're unhappy in the group,

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:30.959
<v Speaker 1>just leave it if it's causing you so much unhappiness.

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:32.559
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's what people should do if it's

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:34.679
<v Speaker 1>a negative space then leave the group. Well, I think

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>that's what a lot of listeners found defense to the

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>fact that she was saying that she wished she could

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>leave the group, and I feel like some people maybe

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>thought she was trying to shirk responsibility for moderating that group.

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 1>And it's quite an interesting thing to analyze, which we

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>were discussing, because obviously they spoke about the fact that

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Shameless kind of almost overmoderated to the sense that people

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>were saying, hey, this is not right. All our comments

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 1>are getting deleted, whereas Flex's grew, they say they've just said, look,

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>you guys are adults, you have your discussions. And I

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>think Abby was very torn about what to do, and

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:09.440
<v Speaker 1>then it seems like she has tried to delete comments,

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:11.559
<v Speaker 1>and then that's created controversy.

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 2>So I can see both sides.

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in a couple of podcasts ago, Sophie and

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:18.199
<v Speaker 1>I were discussing how we were quite active members on

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:20.559
<v Speaker 1>the Dean Guya forum, and I can imagine if Dean

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Guya came out and said something negative about that space,

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Wo'd be like quite offended. So I can see why

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>people are offended a little bit. But then I think

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Abby was well, in her rights, it's her space that

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 1>she's created. I think the thing is, I feel like

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people in this community would look at

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:39.959
<v Speaker 1>Abby as being their friend. So I suppose you can

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of see that her talking to Flex in such

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>a way about the community, it would be quite personal

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>if you were part of it. But I do think

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:49.199
<v Speaker 1>that there are a lot of amazing people that are

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>in that community and they shouldn't.

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 2>All be grouped together.

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 1>But it's quite funny because maybe the ones who are

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 1>being most vocal about it do feel a little bit

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>guilty about their participation in it and might have been

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the ones that were causing trouble.

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:02.680
<v Speaker 2>They're the ones that might have taken the great offense.

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, I think Flex made a really good point

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>in the podcast, which we're gonna insert here, where she

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:10.840
<v Speaker 1>spoke about that personal nature that podcasts seems to build

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>between the listener and the podcaster.

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:17.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, I guess it's also because, and I forget this sometimes,

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 3>but there might be like twenty or so individual people

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:22.559
<v Speaker 3>who follow us that we can recognize by user name

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 3>and face, and we can DM them back and forth

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 3>and there's a relationship. But for the most part, when

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:31.199
<v Speaker 3>we're publishing information. Everyone thinks it's for them. They listen

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:33.559
<v Speaker 3>to the podcast, We're speaking right to them. It feels

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:36.439
<v Speaker 3>very personal, and as they learn things about us, they

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 3>build an allegiance like that's my bitch. Abby's got me.

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 3>You know, she sees some fuck shit, She's gonna handle

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 3>it for me. And it might feel that way, but

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:45.560
<v Speaker 3>it's not that way in reality. And I feel a

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 3>sense of entitlement in the group because hierarchies create themselves

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 3>in Facebook groups based on who posts the most often. Yes,

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 3>you know people who just love to post for posting sake,

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 3>and you everyone knows their name. Everyone knows like that's

0:11:57.440 --> 0:12:00.319
<v Speaker 3>the person who'll start them, he'll call you out. That's

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:02.559
<v Speaker 3>the person who post about relationships. Oh yeah, we know

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 3>about her job update. There are people who've gained social

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 3>clout from being active posters, and that social cloud gives them,

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 3>gives them authority because people look to them. Okay, Bobo

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 3>and Flex won't say anything, but so and so will.

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 3>Why don't we ask them?

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 1>And so?

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 3>You see the way people want to demand and justify

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 3>the power they have within those group dynamics.

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I just felt like she summarized it so well when

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>she was talking about this social cloud that people get

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>in the group, because essentially she was explaining how her

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and Bobo they actually don't moderate in the group at all,

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and it seems to be that the people that post

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the most and are well known in the group, they

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of then set the tone. So it's kind of

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 1>like Flex and Bobo don't actually own that group anymore.

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think that was happening in Abby's group, even

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>she was feeling intimidated to share her opinion because there

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 1>were figures in that group that were setting the tone.

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>And Abby explained herself that sometimes if someone that posted

0:12:57.320 --> 0:12:59.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot in her group posted, she could even predict

0:12:59.880 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 1>how the conversation would go because it was just based

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:07.199
<v Speaker 1>on whatever they wanted, and if anyone dared to even say, oh,

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm nervous to say this, but have you looked at

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 1>it this way, they would get completely torn to shreds.

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:14.679
<v Speaker 1>From a pr perspective, I actually think it's a good

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>move from Abby. I mean, we did have a little

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 1>bit of a debate whether Shameless did the right thing,

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>but by closing down their group, and it actually seems

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>like it has.

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 2>Been a positive thing because I've heard lots.

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Of commentary in recent times about how much people are

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 1>enjoying Shameless because they don't associate the toxic Facebook group

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 1>that once was the Shameless podcast group with the podcast itself.

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like maybe people were associating the toxic

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>nature of Abby's group with her podcast too, and with

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Abby as an influence. I'm gonna say I haven't been

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>listening to Abby's podcast as much because I still followed

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the group.

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm still a part of it.

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I know you guys left it, but I think that

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>could have subconsciously been a reason why I wasn't tuning in.

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>But also, going back to your comments on Shameless Amy,

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that Shameless were being swayed by people's commentary

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>in that group as well, and they were too afraid

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to be saying their own opinion, which again is it

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>has been happening with Abby, as you were saying. So

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it is a really positive move for them

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:06.679
<v Speaker 1>to do it. I mean, it makes us reflect in

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 1>our own Facebook community. I think we've got over five

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred people in there at the moment, and because it

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:14.079
<v Speaker 1>is a smaller community, it's such a beautiful vibe in there,

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:16.319
<v Speaker 1>and that's such lovely people, and I think that all

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of this happening, it really makes us want to make

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>sure that we continue that, and I think the way

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to do that is by only allowing people who are

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>actually interested in your podcast to be in there. That's

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>really hard though, when it gets past ten thousand. I

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>think that's what Abby and the Shameless Girls are saying

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 1>was the kind of point where things turned bad. But

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 1>as I mean, Flex pointed that out on her podcast.

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>She was saying, the issue that happened with her group

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>as well is that people who didn't listen to her

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>podcast heard about the group, heard about the funny chats,

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and they wanted to join. So I think that in

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that sense, that common ground of liking the same thing

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>was gone. One thing I found really interesting was this

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>concept Flex brought up, and it's called baby wokeness. Now

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll just play a clip of what she said about it,

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>because she articulated it so well.

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 3>Like I know that like people say the N word,

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 3>I just and I've grown past it. So I feel

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 3>like there's this like baby woke I like you know,

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 3>I yeah, which is like very pointy and like it

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 3>needs to be fixed today, like find all the racists

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 3>kill them today is like baby woke.

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, I really couldn't have agreed more with her definition

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 1>on this, and I thought it was articulated so well.

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think that, you know, I personally have been

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>seeing quite a performative nature from people in that group,

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and I think that people are getting clout from being

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>so socially aware and so socially outraged by certain things.

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 1>It's trendy, it's trendy and twenty twenty to be woke,

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's what Abby also said. She said, I'm pretty

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>far left wing, but there have been things that I

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>see that I think are not productive either. And I

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's also performative. And I think it's often people

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>in a position of privileged posting these to say I'm

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>actually a good one. And I think that also summarized

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>it so well, because I know, for one, sometimes I

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>get worried to say things, even on this podcast, because

0:15:57.760 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I feel like there are people out there that are

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 1>listening to try and trip you up and to say

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>that you aren't woke enough to be talking about that,

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>or because you said this, you can't agree with that.

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you look at our reviews, I think

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the term white feminist has been thrown around a lot

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>to describe us, which it's been used to describe Abby

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>as well. It's ridiculous and the people that are using

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I feel like saying, you've probably just learnt this term

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>last week. And I think we need to remember that

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 1>we're all we're all pretty much on the same page.

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, we might not all be as educated on

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>all of these topics, but I think that you've got

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to give people some slack.

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 2>People all trying their best.

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>We all can't be perfect. And how by bullying someone

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>that isn't as educated on a topic, how is that

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>going to make them want to learn more about it.

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>It's actually going to do the opposite, and it's going

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 1>to make them feel more valid in their view. That's

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>probably not correct. And I'm pretty sure if we dug

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 1>into everybody's life, there would be people would be doing

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff that they weren't aware of it. You know, people

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>who've got Kmart furniture in their house, as Abby said,

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>who are preaching about.

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 2>People wearing boohoo.

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>There are things that everyone could improve on, but it

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that your opinion on a topic is less valid. Well,

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:05.439
<v Speaker 1>no one's perfect, and I think it feels like a

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:08.199
<v Speaker 1>lot of the commentary in these groups are saying that

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:10.879
<v Speaker 1>everyone must be perfect and if they are not, we're

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:13.159
<v Speaker 1>going to pick everything apart that they do. It's a

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 1>complete headfu I feel so so fabby. It's a complete

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 1>headfight what she's gone through. I think as well. It's

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:20.879
<v Speaker 1>really interesting because you know, we spoke about in our

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:23.919
<v Speaker 1>previous episode about that how Facebook wanted to grow this

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 1>sense of community. Now this sense of community is not

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>a community to me. This is a destructive group that

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>is turning on one another, like even on the person

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:38.239
<v Speaker 1>that they all came about and joined in because they

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:40.399
<v Speaker 1>liked her. They've now turned on the person that created

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the group. It's funny though, because a lot of these

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>things seem to be happening to podcast group where discussion

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 1>is promoted. But there is a podcast group their Life Uncut,

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:51.479
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think they're having the same issues now.

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I would be interesting to know how

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:56.159
<v Speaker 1>they're choosing to moderate the conversations within that group. But

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I was also thinking.

0:17:57.400 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 2>Is it an age thing?

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Because I know with Laura and Brittany they're in their thirties,

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:03.639
<v Speaker 1>and I also am a part of that group, and

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>it seems like there is a more mature audience in there.

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 1>But do you think it's also as one of our

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>community members said that, because they're not setting the tone

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 1>of talking about controversial issues. But that's why it's not

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>happening by one hundred percent, think that that's what it is.

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Their topics are almost safe in a way. They're about

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 1>relationships and they're always sort of the good.

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Guys in the conversations.

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I feel like they've created this amazing sense of community

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 1>in their group, But if they were to start discussing

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>controversial things, I could see the tone completely changing. And

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 1>do you know what, the people in the Abbey Chatfield

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>group are going to be seeking out a new group

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to talk in, so it'll be interesting to see where

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>they do go. Well. My prediction is on the Bob

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 1>and Flex group because it's unmoderated, there's a lot of

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>people in there. I feel like it's important to say though,

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that everyone in that group is a

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>troublemaker and should be sort of painted with the same

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>brush you guys were part of the group.

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 2>There are some really nice.

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 1>People and I think that's what people took offense to

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 1>when they heard the podcast, they were assuming that she

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 1>was talking directly to them and that they were the problem,

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 1>when there were a lot of critical thinkers in that

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 1>group who were kind to others.

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Hows when your joy, you're getting ready, you do put

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:06.879
<v Speaker 2>a lot of effort in.

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 1>So for the thank for me, that is getting a

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:09.880
<v Speaker 1>show out, that is getting tarn that he is putt

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>in bronzeois. With summer just around the corner, fitness influencers,

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:16.639
<v Speaker 1>Steph Packer decided it was the perfect time to launch

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>a melanin boosting tanning oil. The post was met with

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 1>approval from a range of well known influencers. Despite recent

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>moves to educate women on the dangers of skin cancer,

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:28.880
<v Speaker 1>in the past few years, social media has been used

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 1>as a tool to change millennials and jenz's perceptions on

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:35.359
<v Speaker 1>a tan being healthy with campaigns like I Pledge and

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>call time on Melanoma. Yet, with no bands currently on

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 1>tanning oils and melanin producing agents, what can we do

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to stop the ignorant and dangerous messages continuing to fill

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>our feed this summer? So can you tell us first,

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 1>just who is Steph Packer? Yeah? Well, Steph is a

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 1>fitness influencer, and it surprised me to see she actually

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 1>has over eight hundred and ninety one thousand followers because

0:19:57.520 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't heard about her before. Yeah, I didn't know

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 1>who she she was either, to be honest, and we

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:03.120
<v Speaker 1>did a little bit of digging. We had a look

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 1>at some of the content that she's been putting out,

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and she has been known to promote plastic surgery abroad.

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:10.920
<v Speaker 1>She's been very vocal on talking about her nose job

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:13.879
<v Speaker 1>that she got overseas as well as breast implants. So

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 1>is that plastic surgery as you said, she's got herself

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and then has done like a vlog about how she's

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>gotten it done. Well. Yeah, So she doesn't actually have

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a YouTube channel, but if you type her name into YouTube,

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a number of videos come up where she is the

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>ambassador for companies I suppose at a promoting travel to

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 1>places like Pouquette for breast.

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 2>Augmentation and nose jobs and that kind of thing.

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:37.199
<v Speaker 1>So she has detailed her experience through these companies. Now,

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Steph took to her Instagram last week to announce her

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>followers that she is launching a new company called The Skin. Now,

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:45.920
<v Speaker 1>what is most disturbing about this new touch not honor

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 1>in the intro amy is that she is promoting a

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>melon and boosting tanning oil. She had the caption on

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:53.679
<v Speaker 1>her Instagram twenty twenty has been a whirl win. But

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 1>what doesn't challenge you doesn't change you. So excited for

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>what's to come and tagged at skincoat. This was met

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:03.920
<v Speaker 1>by influencers like Sky Wheatley and Lexi Murray, leaving very

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 1>very positive comments like yes and praising hands. This is

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 1>deeply disturbing that these influencers are happy to sit by

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and have her promote this product that is so dangerous

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and harmful for women. Well, not only did they leave

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:22.159
<v Speaker 1>glowing comments on the new Instagram account, they also shared

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:26.119
<v Speaker 1>STEP's Insta story, so influencers like Talia Scaines shared it

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 1>to her over five hundred thousand followers. I did a

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>little calculation and this post was shared to over one

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 1>point five million people just from her influence of friends

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>sharing it. Yet surprisingly the page only has about two

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred followers.

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 2>Oh wow.

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 1>Well, It's the most disturbing thing is those sorts of

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>influencers have such young and impressionable followers that probably think, oh,

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:50.880
<v Speaker 1>this is a really good thing for me to purchase.

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the messaging that I found most troubling was

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the fact that she's saying coming right in time for

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>summer twenty twenty. At the moment, we've seen such great

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:01.239
<v Speaker 1>campaign talking about the day of skin cancer, but then

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 1>these people are being seeming so ignorant and dumb to say, oh,

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 1>let's get our bodies tanned for summer. So, just to

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>explain for those who might not understand what this product

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:14.200
<v Speaker 1>is supposed to do, it boosts the melanin in the skin.

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>So melanin is actually a pigment or color in a

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:20.120
<v Speaker 1>person's skin, hair, and eyes. So in general, people who

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:23.160
<v Speaker 1>have darker skin tones actually have more melanin than those

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>with lighter skin tones. So essentially a person's genetics determines

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 1>their skin color and melanin levels. And the thing is,

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.160
<v Speaker 1>there is so much confusion around the use of these

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:35.159
<v Speaker 1>melanin boosters because a lot of the companies actually are

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 1>promoting that melanin is you know, oh, it's a natural

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>skin protectory and you know it's protecting against UV and

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:44.719
<v Speaker 1>that's actually not true because if you're using an oil,

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>it's counteracting the protection. This melanin is giving you, it's

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>just burning you. And the FDA have come out and

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>said there is no research to prove that foods or

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:57.400
<v Speaker 1>supplements can increase a person's melanin levels. So if you're

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 1>buying this product, you're essentially just buying an oil and

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:02.160
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking that it's protecting.

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 2>Your skin and it's not.

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:06.120
<v Speaker 1>It's just attracting the sun to then damage your skin. Exactly. Well,

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>one professor explained it really well. He said, you have

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 1>two opposing things happening at the same time. So melanin

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 1>is protecting you and then melanin is damaging you. There's

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 1>a race going on between melanin blocking and protecting you.

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>So overall it is causing some damage and leading to

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>lesions that can potentially turn into mutations then thus causing

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>obviously melanoma. Well, the scariest thing is the power of

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Steph Packer. I mean, we've all said we haven't heard

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>of her before, but she is incredibly influential her you know,

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 1>just her powerful friends. It has infiltrated my newsfeed because

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:42.679
<v Speaker 1>I do follow people like Tylia Skains and Skywheatly. So

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:45.159
<v Speaker 1>even though we might not know of her, she has

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:48.160
<v Speaker 1>a powerful network that means actually heard about it legitimately.

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 2>She is quite.

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Powerful in her own sense, same as you were. Yeah,

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>she is extremely powerful. Me She's got over eight hundred

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 1>thousand followers. But she also recently did a collab with Stacks,

0:23:57.520 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 1>which is an active wear line, and they release these

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:03.680
<v Speaker 1>bike shorts. These bike shorts, which are in collaboration with Steph,

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 1>sold out in thirty minutes and made the company two

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty thousand dollars. So I feel like, looking

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 1>at how powerful she is if she's pushing this product,

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:15.399
<v Speaker 1>how quickly is this tanning product going to sell? And

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 1>how many people are going to expose themselves to dangerous

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>UV rays because of it? I think it is incredibly

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 1>frightening that someone as ignorant as this has a platform

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 1>that large and is using in this negative way, Because

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:32.479
<v Speaker 1>if you look at how influential influencers are to young people,

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>why can't they be doing some good and promoting sun safety.

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it is disgusting that this woman is purely

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to make money off something that's going to harm

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 1>so many young women. Well, exactly do you think Stacks

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>should pull their advertising dollars from an influencer like Steph Packett. Well,

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a really hard one because I think that if

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 1>we take a look at the current rules regarding sun

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:55.919
<v Speaker 1>tanning and promotion of sun tanning, there aren't hard and

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 1>fast rules to be truthful in doing research for this topic,

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's so difficult to actually find what the rules are.

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 1>But even if there aren't rules, what about the morals

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 1>of it? If I was a company, I don't want

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to be giving this person money for promoting my product

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:13.160
<v Speaker 1>when they're selling this disgusting product to.

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 2>Young, impressional people.

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the issue is there's so much confusion around

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:19.119
<v Speaker 1>what is a safe sun tan I mean, I remember

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>seeing no tanas, yes, but I remember seeing Sky Wheatley saying, oh,

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:25.879
<v Speaker 1>look at how tanned. So she posted a picture of

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>herself looking extremely tanned back in summer, and she goes, oh,

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to try and get to this level, but

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:34.439
<v Speaker 1>don't worry, guys, I'm going to use suncream. It seems

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to be that people think that if they tan in suncream,

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:40.439
<v Speaker 1>then they're going to be somehow protected from getting skin cancer,

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 1>which is completely untrue. Of course, suncream is there to

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>protect your skin, but if you are continuously sun baking

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to the point where your melanin is so dark in

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 1>your skin that means it's damaged. That means that things

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:54.120
<v Speaker 1>are starting to happen. I think we should probably before

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>we go and take a look at what the rules are.

0:25:56.760 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>As I said, it was very, very difficult to find

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>hard and fast rules in regards to this, so I

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>took a look at the social media ad standards and

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:06.920
<v Speaker 1>it outlined rules in regards to alcohol, food and beverage,

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:12.120
<v Speaker 1>advertising to kids, gambling, nudity, violence, and health and safety.

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:14.919
<v Speaker 1>So sun safety doesn't have its own regulation, but it

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:17.880
<v Speaker 1>falls into the category of health and safety. So basically,

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I found a number of different case studies where they

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>were talking about plaints consumers had made about certain adverts

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>for tanning products that are gone online. So I took

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>a look online at some of the examples where consumers

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 1>had made complaints about particular tanning products or even phrases

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 1>used in marketing, and it stated that encouraging someone to

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>get a tan is against prevailing community standards on health

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:43.919
<v Speaker 1>and safety. So it's quite a broad guideline. The thing is,

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the rules are really caught up with

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the technology. There aren't specific rules stating on social media

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>you can or cannot do this. It's very broad, as

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you said, which causes a lot of confusion, and there's

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 1>no fines being handed out for anything, So people are

0:26:57.440 --> 0:27:00.080
<v Speaker 1>just getting away with murder. Yeah. And while this is

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>incredibly disappointed to see this post by Steph, I think

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 1>what has been so encouraging is in the past few

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:08.399
<v Speaker 1>years we have seen a savvier audience who were picking

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>up on these disgusting messages, and I suppose savvier influencers

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:12.119
<v Speaker 1>as well.

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:12.640
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, even when you reflect on sun

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>safety at a young age, I suppose growing up in

0:27:17.080 --> 0:27:19.719
<v Speaker 1>Australia we were always told to slip, slop, slap and

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:22.920
<v Speaker 1>rap and rap. But then as a teenager, I feel

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 1>like we were teenagers in the early two thousands. As

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a teenager, it seemed very uncool to wear sun cream.

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:31.199
<v Speaker 1>Like I even remember at school Mum would force us

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:32.480
<v Speaker 1>to put sun cream on in you eight and I

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>remember standing in the locker room and someone's like, who's

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:37.359
<v Speaker 1>most like suncream? And it was like embarrassing to be

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 1>wearing suncream. And I also remember being that teenager that

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:44.160
<v Speaker 1>actually would then like if we went overseas on holiday.

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I remember tanning several times, and now it actually makes

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:49.640
<v Speaker 1>me feel sick thinking about it. Even though you knew

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 1>deep down about sun's safety, there was still that thing where, oh,

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 1>this is okay because I'm only tanning on a holiday. Yeah.

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:58.400
<v Speaker 1>As you said, Sophie, it's now kind of become trendy

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to wear suncream because a lot of influencers have included

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>wearing suncream in their beauty routines. And also there's been

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:07.879
<v Speaker 1>some amazing work from influencers like Courtney Mangan who have

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:10.439
<v Speaker 1>shone a light on just how important it is to

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>wear suncream when you're out in public. Well, for those

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:15.399
<v Speaker 1>who don't know, Courtney Mangan has been very open and

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 1>honest about her journey with stage four melanoma, and she

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:21.719
<v Speaker 1>actually went into detail last week about everything to do

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 1>with that journey on her podcast she was the Fire.

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to add that to the show notes

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:29.120
<v Speaker 1>because I highly recommend listening to that. There's also been

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 1>great movements from Shameless called Eye Pledge, and also movements

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>like call Time or Melanoma, which have been so influential

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 1>in making women really change their perspective on a tan

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>being considered healthy. Well, what does everyone think? Do you

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>think that people should be embracing their natural skin. I

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>think it's really tough for people to just all of

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a sudden embrace their natural skin because there have been

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 1>so many years where we've been consuming that tanned skin

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 1>is the skin that everyone wants and is the healthy

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and beautiful skin. I mean, I know myself, now that

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 1>it's getting warmer, I feel urge to start fake tanning

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 1>more often. Another interesting concept about that, though, is how

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 1>these products like tan or even suncream are being marketed

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 1>towards us, because it is all based on our desire

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to still be beautiful. If you look at suncream, it's

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 1>all about it's marketed in a way where it's preventing

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 1>age spots and fine lines and wrinkles, but it's not

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 1>actually saying, hey, this is sun safety.

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Well I think that's good.

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think it's clever to do that because obviously

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the stuff about tanning is coming from

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 1>a place of vanity. But if you look at it,

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 1>because it's so hard in regards to your question aming

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 1>about pale skin, I suppose it's so ingrained in our

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:39.280
<v Speaker 1>ideology that it's beautiful to have tann skin, but it's

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 1>slimming to have tann skin.

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but do you know what I mean?

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 1>How many products have influences made cool that you would

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 1>probably look at before and go that's really ugly. Well,

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I'd be really interested to see if a lot of

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the big name influences hopped on and embrace their natural

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:54.959
<v Speaker 1>skin whether people would do so, because there are so

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 1>many products that influencers have spooked recently that are pretty

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>ugly clothing and they sell out. Well, look at Sharni

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Grimman dissolving her lip filler and everyone's come out and said,

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 1>oh my gosh, I prefer you natural. Imagine if people

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 1>were then promoting, you know, this is my skin normally.

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 1>The whole issue, though, is that the whole beauty industry

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 1>is based around telling us we're not good enough as

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 1>we are. So they're not going to say, oh, you're

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 1>good with the skin that you have. We're constantly being

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 1>told we need to purchase something to make us better. Well.

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>That reminds me because a couple of years ago, when

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 1>we visited Singapore, I was actually trying to find some

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 1>fake tan and I went into one of the chemists

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and it was literally the opposite. It was bleaching agent

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 1>for your skin to make your skin whiter. And it's

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of the complete opposite because a lot of people

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 1>in Singapore and Malaysia have beautifully tanned skin, but it's

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 1>seen as culturally like if you have lighter skin, like

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 1>you are more of the Chinese culture, then you're considered rich. Well,

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 1>back in the day, people with pale skin were seen

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>as being wealthy because they were inside and everyone who

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 1>was outside with tan skin were laborers, So it was

0:30:57.160 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 1>actually more desirable to have pale skin. Yea seem to

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 1>see if it actually goes back to that now. On

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 1>a different note, I suppose while women seem to be

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 1>gradually becoming more educated on this topic, I think it's

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 1>really worrying because I feel.

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Like men are being left behind.

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I know, because like, oh, say to Reese, can you

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 1>put some suncream on? And like even with Dad, and

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 1>men are just so anti putting sun cream on. I

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 1>feel like they don't need it, they just don't want

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 1>to be uncomfortable as well. I suppose as women were

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 1>used to putting on all these potions and different oh

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 1>my god, they should driving a girl for a day.

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 2>A sun cream is nothing.

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:27.480
<v Speaker 5>But what do you.

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Guys think about Do you think that we should be

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 1>promoting more men to wear fake tan and it to

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 1>be acceptable.

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, I have to.

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Admit I did see Kierra Maguire. She put a video

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 1>up on an Instagram of her boyfriend Matt from Love

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Island and he was using her fake tan, and I

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 1>did naturally go, oh, oh my god, you know a

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 1>guy wearing fake tan, And I thought, no, that's so

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 1>bad of me, because they should be wearing fake tan.

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:51.840
<v Speaker 1>But are we contradicting ourselves? We were just saying that

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 1>people should embrace their natural skin. Are we then creating

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a cycle for men that then? I'm not saying that

0:31:57.240 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 1>they can't embrace natural skin. But if you're a man

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and you actually want to be tanned, rather than burning

0:32:02.120 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>yourself and giving yourself melanoma, why don't you just put

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 1>on a fake But that's the whole argument. Though. I

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 1>don't think that we as a society who are so

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 1>obsessed with appearance. I don't think we are just going

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to accept our power skin. I think we're going to

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 1>want to use things like fake tan to get that look,

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 1>but in a safe way. The thing is, I don't

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 1>feel like there is an immense pressure on men to

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:21.960
<v Speaker 1>have a tan as much as there is on women. Like,

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 1>think about it. When you are getting ready to, say,

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:26.719
<v Speaker 1>go to a wedding, The first thing I think is, okay,

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 1>well two days out, I need to do my fake tan.

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 1>The brides are getting fake tan. But I don't think

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 1>necessarily men are thinking obviously because then we'll cover it up.

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that's true at all.

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I think there are pressures for young boys to be tanned.

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you go down to the beach and

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 1>you're very pale, boys pay each other out for that

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff. I've heard young boys talking and they

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 1>are concerned about whether they're tanned or not. But I

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know if any of them would actually feel brave

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 1>enough to get a fake tan for fear of being

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:54.239
<v Speaker 1>paid out. Do you know what, though, I think that

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 1>in places like England and in Europe, it is more

0:32:57.200 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 1>acceptable for men to wear makeup and fake tan. You

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 1>look at the guys off Jeordie Sure, and that was

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>probably like seven years ago now, they were all rocking

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the fake tans. They were solarium tans, which of course

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 1>have been banned now. Well, I actually think It would

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 1>be really beneficial for somebody to create a male tanning product,

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:16.720
<v Speaker 1>but get some really strong athletic men behind it, you know,

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 1>like a footballer or some something that honey badger, Yeah,

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the honey somebody like that who you wouldn't actually think

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:26.560
<v Speaker 1>would wear fake tans. There are actually a number of

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 1>fake tans on the market for men, predominantly in the UK,

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 1>which is really interesting. It will be interesting take a

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 1>look at their marketing. But I think the thing that

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 1>we really needed if I was producing a tanning product

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 1>for men, I think it needs to be low maintenance.

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 1>For me, I fake tan every week, and I don't

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 1>think my boyfriend could put up with the constant exfoliation

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of the skin and the constant maintenance.

0:33:45.760 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, if there is a.

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Low maintenance tan, can I please have it as well,

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 1>because I cannot keep up with about it?

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:51.280
<v Speaker 2>Do you know what I reckon?

0:33:51.320 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Maybe like a body butter that did a gradual tan

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>would be really good for men because then they could

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 1>start wearing it in spring and then when they go

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to the moisturize, though some men do. I think maybe

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a spraytan. I think that's probably the easiest thing, But

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 1>what about their face Yeah, you can spray town a face. Yeah,

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:09.240
<v Speaker 1>but that's what looks weird if you're all one color.

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 1>We would love to hear what you guys think about

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:14.239
<v Speaker 1>the topic. Please head to our Facebook group which is

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Outspoken the podcast and join in on the conversation. Now,

0:34:17.800 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 1>let's get into our influencer rap and we'll start it

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 1>with rumors that are circulating that Shanni Grumman is about

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to announce her split from former AFL player Tommy bug.

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I've seen this one coming for a while, especially I

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 1>suppose because she has moved from Melbourne to Brisbane and

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:35.439
<v Speaker 1>I did a bit of scrolling, a bit of stalking. Now,

0:34:35.520 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the last post that he uploaded of Shanny was in

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 1>April and her last post was in May, so there

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 1>are a number of months that they have not been

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:48.920
<v Speaker 1>posting one another Devil's Advocate that has been during lockdown,

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and there's not really a lot of photo ops on

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that time. Well, I think the biggest alarm bells for

0:34:54.440 --> 0:34:57.360
<v Speaker 1>this relationship ending would be the fact she's just moved

0:34:57.400 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 1>into a new home with her friend Joshua Head, who

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:03.680
<v Speaker 1>appeared in a recent video on Shanee's YouTube channel called

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:06.719
<v Speaker 1>Meet My Roommate. Let's just say I didn't realize there

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 1>were rumors going on that they'd split, and I was thinking,

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I wonder what Tommy thinks of her living with this guy.

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Did well, she did address it in the video. She said,

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 1>before anyone says anything, we're just friends. We've been friends

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:17.799
<v Speaker 1>for a number of years. But I am loving the

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 1>inclusion of him in it.

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Voggs. It feels very old school Shanny.

0:35:20.480 --> 0:35:22.719
<v Speaker 1>At the moment, I'm predicting he will be he will

0:35:22.840 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 1>rise in popularity. Here's thirty thousand followers at the moment.

0:35:26.040 --> 0:35:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm predicting he will be some sort of new Michael

0:35:28.520 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Finch character on the show. Well, the thing is, the

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:33.320
<v Speaker 1>day that she put the video out with him, he

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:36.880
<v Speaker 1>scored one seven hundred and ninety new followers just on

0:35:36.920 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that day, and he's gone up I think by five

0:35:40.280 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand in a week, which is a.

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 2>Big rise on social media.

0:35:44.280 --> 0:35:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, whilst talking out Shani's housemates Instagram, we did notice

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:51.759
<v Speaker 1>a cheeky like from Shanni Grimman's ex, Jonathan Sawyer, who

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 1>is currently dating Madison Woolly. Now, the photo was of

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:58.080
<v Speaker 1>both Josh and Shani. What do you guys think about that? God,

0:35:58.120 --> 0:36:00.080
<v Speaker 1>I would not be happy if I was Madison. This

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:02.800
<v Speaker 1>comes off the back of Jonathan releasing a YouTube video

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:06.480
<v Speaker 1>where he and Madison were away in Threadbow and things

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:09.200
<v Speaker 1>seemed to be icy. So is that a pun because

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:12.000
<v Speaker 1>they were both? Is it wrong that, like some part

0:36:12.000 --> 0:36:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of me would love Shanni and Jonathan to get back together.

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I preferred the Jonathan because she hold up with this She's.

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Gonna hook up with this Josh.

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 1>She can't hook up with her roommate. That's just gonna

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:24.280
<v Speaker 1>be She's gonna have to move again.

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Well do you know what.

0:36:25.239 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering what this actually means for Tommy's business because

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:32.360
<v Speaker 1>he's he owns influencer management group Zoots and Shanny is.

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I would say she was the number one influencer on

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:39.280
<v Speaker 1>their book. It also manages influencers like Rannie, Michael Finch,

0:36:39.360 --> 0:36:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Tylie Escaines who were all friends of Shanny. So if

0:36:41.880 --> 0:36:44.720
<v Speaker 1>this is not an amicable split, it could be really

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:47.120
<v Speaker 1>bad business. I feel like it could be an amicable

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 1>split if they have split up, because they are still

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:52.560
<v Speaker 1>following each other. Tommy did like her photo three days ago,

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:55.320
<v Speaker 1>so maybe now they're a little bit older, more mature.

0:36:55.440 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 1>But that's what happens with has split with Jonathan. Remember

0:36:58.200 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 1>when they split up, Jonathan was still her manager. Then

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:03.480
<v Speaker 1>they got to back together, then Jonathan was still their

0:37:03.560 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 1>manager for a while, and then things got awkward.

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 2>She needs to stop dating her managers.

0:37:08.719 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, she's dating them first and then making them her manager. Well.

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:14.360
<v Speaker 1>The other thing is, I'm certain that she's going to

0:37:14.400 --> 0:37:16.759
<v Speaker 1>announce a split soon because normally you make sort of

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 1>changes that you get a new haircut if you break up.

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:21.200
<v Speaker 1>And we've got to remember when she broke up with Jonathan,

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 1>she got her boobs done, and now she's got her

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 1>lips dissolved. It seems after the split from Tommy. Yeah,

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 1>there's something not quite right. I will wait with baited

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:31.760
<v Speaker 1>breath to see the announcement soon. It will be interesting

0:37:31.760 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to see if it is a whole video like she

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 1>did with Jonathan, because that attracted a huge I feel

0:37:38.680 --> 0:37:40.759
<v Speaker 1>she probably shouldn't bother because she never had him on

0:37:40.800 --> 0:37:43.240
<v Speaker 1>her I was going to say it wasn't as public,

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:45.799
<v Speaker 1>so I feel like, you know, maybe it won't now.

0:37:45.800 --> 0:37:47.640
<v Speaker 1>The next one I want to get onto is Tylie

0:37:47.760 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Escan's flog that she released last week. It is actually

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:53.200
<v Speaker 1>trending at the moment on YouTube, and the reason I

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:56.280
<v Speaker 1>really liked it is because it was actually so real

0:37:56.360 --> 0:37:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and raw. Well, she opened up about her issues with

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:01.640
<v Speaker 1>their skin, so it was something that we don't really

0:38:01.719 --> 0:38:05.800
<v Speaker 1>see on Talia's channel. Normally it's about her overseas travel

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:07.839
<v Speaker 1>or her glamorous life, but this was where she just

0:38:08.080 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 1>she burst into tears talking about the struggles with her acne,

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and I thought it was so brave to share. And

0:38:13.080 --> 0:38:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's so refreshing because I suppose we see

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:19.440
<v Speaker 1>such a curated and kind of fake side to her.

0:38:19.520 --> 0:38:22.319
<v Speaker 1>She's always doled up to the MAC, She's always looking incredible,

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think it was really good for a follower

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 1>or someone else who's struggling with their skin to see

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:29.400
<v Speaker 1>that this person who we all deem as being perfect

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:32.160
<v Speaker 1>is having their own internal battles with how they look

0:38:32.200 --> 0:38:32.560
<v Speaker 1>as well.

0:38:32.600 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 2>It's so relatable.

0:38:33.640 --> 0:38:36.120
<v Speaker 1>And I suppose it's someone that's probably known for face

0:38:36.160 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 1>tuning and photoshopping her photos, so for her actually to admit, hey,

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I've got acne, that's a huge step for her. Well.

0:38:41.960 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I really hope that this is a trend for her.

0:38:43.680 --> 0:38:45.399
<v Speaker 1>I hope we do see some more real and raw

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:47.480
<v Speaker 1>videos like this because I'm really enjoying them.

0:38:47.680 --> 0:38:51.720
<v Speaker 5>Take this object, but beware, it carries a terrible curse.

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Ooh, that's bad.

0:38:53.800 --> 0:38:56.360
<v Speaker 5>Like it comes for a free fro gut. That's good.

0:38:56.760 --> 0:39:00.399
<v Speaker 5>The fro gut is also cast, that's bad. You get

0:39:00.440 --> 0:39:04.680
<v Speaker 5>your choice of topping, it's good. The toppings contain potassium

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 5>benzo week, that's bad. Can I go? Now?

0:39:09.719 --> 0:39:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's get into our reality recommendations. Now, what have you

0:39:13.040 --> 0:39:15.120
<v Speaker 1>guys been watching this week that you want to recommend?

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:17.959
<v Speaker 1>I started watching ninety Day Fiance. I'm only a few

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:20.799
<v Speaker 1>episodes in, but I remembered why I loved this show

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:23.160
<v Speaker 1>so much. It feels like nine to now have just

0:39:23.200 --> 0:39:26.800
<v Speaker 1>decided to give us so many good reality TV shows.

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:28.799
<v Speaker 1>I really didn't know what to choose from because they've

0:39:28.800 --> 0:39:31.640
<v Speaker 1>also got us Love Island, which I haven't started watching.

0:39:31.680 --> 0:39:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, I'm watching it. It is so good.

0:39:33.560 --> 0:39:35.359
<v Speaker 1>I was a little bit put off because people said

0:39:35.440 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't as good as the Australian Love Island, and

0:39:37.680 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I thought the Australian Love Island was trash. I can

0:39:40.280 --> 0:39:42.960
<v Speaker 1>say it's better than the Australian Love Island. It's, of

0:39:43.000 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 1>course not as good as UK Love Island. But if

0:39:45.239 --> 0:39:48.160
<v Speaker 1>it's hard when as perfection, Yeah, but I'm actually really

0:39:48.239 --> 0:39:50.719
<v Speaker 1>enjoying it. Is anyone else feeling nostalgic and going to

0:39:50.760 --> 0:39:52.799
<v Speaker 1>go back and watch them Keeping Up with the Kardashians

0:39:52.840 --> 0:39:55.959
<v Speaker 1>Because I was really upset to hear that twenty twenty

0:39:55.960 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 1>one is going to be the last season. Look, I'm

0:39:58.040 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 1>going to call it. I don't think this is the

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:02.879
<v Speaker 1>end of Keeping Up with the Kardashians. They clearly didn't

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 1>get their contracts renewed. I think that somebody else could

0:40:05.560 --> 0:40:07.600
<v Speaker 1>pick it up, or will have a spin off show

0:40:07.680 --> 0:40:10.760
<v Speaker 1>from either Chloe or from Chris Jenner or whoever haven't involved,

0:40:10.800 --> 0:40:12.520
<v Speaker 1>or will have a spin off show when all of

0:40:12.520 --> 0:40:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the kids are old enough and they're in their teenage.

0:40:14.719 --> 0:40:17.799
<v Speaker 1>That must definitely happen. What about I'm wondering because a

0:40:17.840 --> 0:40:19.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are saying that the fact that they

0:40:19.440 --> 0:40:22.120
<v Speaker 1>shared so much on social media kind of made the

0:40:22.120 --> 0:40:24.919
<v Speaker 1>show not so popular because it was really outdated once

0:40:24.960 --> 0:40:27.040
<v Speaker 1>we got to see it. I wonder if they could

0:40:27.120 --> 0:40:30.000
<v Speaker 1>start vlogging or doing a YouTube series, that would be

0:40:30.040 --> 0:40:32.200
<v Speaker 1>really cool. You know, I don't even think they share

0:40:32.280 --> 0:40:35.600
<v Speaker 1>that much on their Insta stories. It's always really curated pictures.

0:40:35.680 --> 0:40:37.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not so much of that, but it's like the

0:40:37.040 --> 0:40:39.239
<v Speaker 1>paparazzi caught up with them, so we knew all the

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:41.080
<v Speaker 1>drama before it was on the show. Do you know

0:40:41.080 --> 0:40:44.160
<v Speaker 1>it will be interesting when the show is finally over.

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Before every series, we always see that push if something

0:40:46.800 --> 0:40:48.799
<v Speaker 1>dramatic happening. It will be interesting to see if their

0:40:48.880 --> 0:40:50.600
<v Speaker 1>vibes are a lot quiet and now they don't have

0:40:50.640 --> 0:40:52.680
<v Speaker 1>a TV show. Well, I'm wondering if they're still going

0:40:52.719 --> 0:40:54.439
<v Speaker 1>to be relevant and if people are going to buy

0:40:54.480 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 1>their products now the show's over, because we've seen YouTubers

0:40:57.680 --> 0:41:00.239
<v Speaker 1>who bring up products they suddenly don't post any more

0:41:00.239 --> 0:41:02.960
<v Speaker 1>content and then people aren't interested in them anymore. Yeah,

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 1>but they've got like forty million followers on their Instagram.

0:41:05.560 --> 0:41:07.359
<v Speaker 1>I think they're still going to be relevant. There's still

0:41:07.360 --> 0:41:09.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be influencers at the end of the day.

0:41:09.040 --> 0:41:10.680
<v Speaker 1>They're still going to be in the media as well.

0:41:10.960 --> 0:41:14.520
<v Speaker 5>Oh and by the way, why o you apostrophe r

0:41:14.960 --> 0:41:18.239
<v Speaker 5>means you are? Why do you means your Well?

0:41:18.239 --> 0:41:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that's all we've got time for. Thank you

0:41:19.880 --> 0:41:22.120
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us for today's episode. If you

0:41:22.239 --> 0:41:24.439
<v Speaker 1>have enjoyed it, it would be incredible if you could leave

0:41:24.800 --> 0:41:27.840
<v Speaker 1>us a rating and a review, and if you haven't already,

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:30.319
<v Speaker 1>we'd love if you could join our Facebook community, which

0:41:30.400 --> 0:41:33.880
<v Speaker 1>is just outspoken the podcast community