WEBVTT - What is a sovereign citizen?

0:00:00.520 --> 0:00:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Already and this is the Daily This is the Daily OS. Oh,

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>now it makes sense. Good morning, and welcome to the

0:00:16.480 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Daily OS. It's Monday, the first of September.

0:00:19.160 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm Lucy Tassel and I'm a Cholla Rock.

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Last week, two police were shot dead while trying to

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>serve an arrest warrant at a rural property near the

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>northeast Victorian town of Poor Punker. A third was wounded

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and is recovering in hospital. The man police alleged murdered

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 1>their colleagues is believed to be a sovereign citizen, a

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>person who does not believe in standard laws and governments.

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:44.559
<v Speaker 1>In today's episode, we'll explain what you need to know

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:48.559
<v Speaker 1>about sovereign citizens and their beliefs. Before we get into it,

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>a quick word from our sponsor, Lucy.

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 2>You and I have been researching sovereign citizens this week,

0:00:56.760 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 2>following those developments in Victoria that you mentioned. Before we

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 2>get into who these people are and what they believe in,

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:06.040
<v Speaker 2>can we talk about what brought this to our attention?

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Absolutely. This came to our attention as a few

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>kinds of stories do, which is that we saw it

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>come up on the TVs that we have mounted on

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:17.199
<v Speaker 1>the wall of the newsroom that we have multiple channels

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 1>running on all day, every day, and all we need

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:22.759
<v Speaker 1>to start with was that there was a police operation

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>happening in northeast Victoria. Now that caught my attention because

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:31.959
<v Speaker 1>big news networks don't typically cover police operations while they're

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>happening unless something really big is happening, like something has

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>been leaked that suggests that there's a really big deal happening.

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Possibly someone has been killed, someone has a weapon. That's

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the sort of thing that tends to pass the threshold

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>for Australian news networks to be like, there's a big

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>police operation happening right now and we don't know much

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>more about it than that. So that immediately kind of

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>tipped me and the whole newsroom off to the fact

0:01:57.040 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>that something really big was happening.

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Now, I remember that day. It felt so chaotic and

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 2>so much was happening. Now, when did we start understanding

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 2>what exactly was going on?

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So, over the course of the day we got

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:12.360
<v Speaker 1>little dribs and drabs of information from the police in

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 1>various forms. Understandably, the situation was developing. They could only

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:19.639
<v Speaker 1>give us so much information. But by that night, that's

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday night, we had a press conference from the chief

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>of Police in Victoria. He said that ten police officers

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>had gone to a property in northeast Victoria to execute

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>a search warrant, that seven of those officers were physically okay,

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>but had been traumatized, that two had been shot dead,

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and that a third was wounded like a gunshot wound,

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 1>so quite serious. And then he started talking about someone

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>that he at that point only referred to as the offender.

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Now, can you break down what we do know at

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:55.399
<v Speaker 2>this stage about what police are calling the offender.

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 1>We know his name is Desi Freeman. We know he's

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>fifty six years old. We know he has a and

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>kids because they actually presented to police officers later on

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that Tuesday night. And crucially what we know is that

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>he is someone who is called a sovereign citizen. And

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>we also know that in the past, this belief system

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>that he subscribes to has led to him being involved

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 1>in an unsuccessful attempt to sue former Victorian Premier Dan

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:26.399
<v Speaker 1>Andrews for treason in twenty twenty one.

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Now, I feel like we've heard the word treason a lot,

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 2>but what does that specifically mean? Yeah.

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. The crime of treason is maybe the most serious

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>crime there is other than murder in terms of how

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the legal system treats it in Australia. It can cover

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a range of fences. It could include killing the head

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>of state. It could look like launching war against Australia

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>as an Australian or helping an enemy of Australia to

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>harm Australia. Sorry to say Australia so many times, but

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>it really is about nations and what you, as a

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>citizen of a nation do to that nation. Victorian law

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>talks specifically about killing the sovereign, harming the sovereign. They

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>keep saying, quote the sovereign, maiming, wounding, imprisoning, restraining the sovereign.

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:16.679
<v Speaker 2>I've lost count of how many times you said sovereign. Yeah.

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 2>But under the Victorian legal context, who specifically is that

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 2>referring to.

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So that's referring to King Charles the Third, who

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 1>is our head of state. His power is exercised by

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:30.839
<v Speaker 1>Governor General Sam Mostyn. So under Australian law, the sovereign

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 1>that phrase means the king or the Queen of the day.

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>There's also this idea that a nation can have sovereign

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>tea so basically control over its own government, setting its

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>own rules. In Australia, this manifests as we have our

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 1>own independent government. We're part of the Commonwealth, but we

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>still we have our government. It makes its own rules

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and its members are elected by us. So in a sense,

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the nation of Australia has control over the nation of Australia.

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Another country invading us to take over would be a

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>violation of sovereignty. And there's another context. You might have

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:07.039
<v Speaker 1>heard the word sovereignty or sovereign and that's in the

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>phrase sovereignty was never ceded, So that's referring to the

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>fact that Australia's first nations never agreed to hand over

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>their land to the British Empire. That, of course, is

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 1>a legitimate idea, while sov CITs ideas are not.

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:25.040
<v Speaker 2>So to bring it back to the topic of today's podcast, Yeah,

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 2>what would you say are the top three things people

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 2>should know about sovereign citizens?

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:32.719
<v Speaker 1>So sob CITs we can call them solvi sits. That's

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:36.599
<v Speaker 1>probably just faster. They have this idea of sovereignty that

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:39.919
<v Speaker 1>is somewhere between the ideas of sovereignty being a single

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>person and sovereignty being something about government power. So I

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>think that's part of the first thing that I think

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:47.160
<v Speaker 1>people should know, which is they should know about their

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:49.919
<v Speaker 1>ideology and where it came from. Second, I think the

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>listeners should know about what they're up to in Australia.

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>And third, I think TDA listeners should know how and

0:05:56.600 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>why this belief system could lead to violence against police

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>officers specifically, since that's kind of what's brought it to

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 1>our attention this time around.

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 2>And to bring it back to your first point, what

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 2>do self sits believe in?

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's a variety and a diversity of beliefs, but

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I think broadly speaking, they reject government authority and the

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>rule of law, and they don't participate in traditional societal structures.

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>They instead perpetuate this thing called pseudo law, so fake law,

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>which is like a mishmash of legal jargon that can

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of differ from person to person or from group

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to group. It has, though a fundamental lack of clarity

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>that is quite easy to identify once you know what

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 1>you're listening for. There are certain catch phrases and words

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>like obviously sovereign, things like natural person, things like saying

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm traveling instead of driving. That it's kind of hard

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:55.159
<v Speaker 1>to get into and it's quite complicated, but basically you'll

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>know it like you know when you hear it. There

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>are lots of examples online of that, primarily from so

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>of CITs who have been pulled over by police for

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>various traffic violations. And then again, I would say, another

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 1>crucial aspect of the belief system I would say is

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>this idea that at some point in history, governments, starting

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>with the US government, took away or sold the rights

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of individual citizens and became corporations. Sovereign citizens tend to

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>believe that they have figured out a way to get

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 1>their original rights back from before governments became corporations, and

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>that this means that they don't have to pay taxes

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>or comply with laws, because all of these things are

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>part of the fake corporation government, not the true government.

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Now, Lucy, you've touched lightly on the historical context of

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 2>this movement. Can you tell us a little bit about

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 2>where this ideology came from.

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it came from a few different groups in the

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:52.239
<v Speaker 1>US in the mid twentieth century who were generally speaking

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 1>against paying taxes. It also stems from a group called

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Posse Commatatis, which is a far right extremist, antisemitic, aca

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and racist group that formed in the late nineteen sixties.

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>That group's beliefs were also strongly anti government and anti laws,

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>and involved the idea that the US Constitution was being

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>wrongly interpreted and that the government had no rights over

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>sovereign individuals or the money they earned. Again coming back

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>to paying taxes, So there's these kind of different streams

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>of ideas that are fairly united by this idea that

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>we shouldn't have to pay taxes to a government that

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 1>has no control over us.

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 2>So you've broken it down in the US context and

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:35.719
<v Speaker 2>bringing it home here in Australia, how has that manifested?

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:38.679
<v Speaker 1>So something that was really interesting to me, the kind

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>of sovereign citizen idea, came broadly to Australia in the

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:45.440
<v Speaker 1>late nineteen nineties, which is also around the time that

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I realized I first heard of things like sovereign citizens.

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 1>But it was sort of presented to me as a

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>fun fact because I was thinking about the idea of

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 1>principalities or mini nations within Australia. I remember learning as

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 1>a fun fact in primary school. Oh there's a man

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>in this state and he calls himself the prince of

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 1>some made up nation, and he rules over a patch

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 1>of land, or he has an island. So that was

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>always presented to me as very lighthearted, like, there's this guy,

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 1>he lives in this place and he says he's the prince.

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>During the COVID nineteen pandemic, particularly during the lockdowns which

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 1>forced people online as their primary form of socialization, that's

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 1>when kind of SOBCIT ideologies really flourished in this country.

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 1>It was a kind of a perfect storm. The isolation

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:34.319
<v Speaker 1>combined with repeated government orders to stay inside, as well

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>as a significant amount of mis and disinformation about the

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>safety of vaccines and government orders to get a vaccine

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and tell the government so that you could participate in

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 1>public life. All of this kind of combined to for

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people pushed them towards this anti government,

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>anti law ideology. And as I've said, it was during

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that time that we saw that attempt to sue Dan Andrews,

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>so late twenty twenty one.

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:02.199
<v Speaker 2>See, now that's one kind of attempt on authority. Yeah,

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 2>and last week we saw another, you know, a very

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 2>aggressive one, the killing of two police officers, So what

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 2>do we know about sob CITs and the police that

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 2>relationship there.

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>In last week's case, the man suspected of killing those

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>officers had made several anti police social media posts over

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the years. I think the first time this kind of

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>broke into the public consciousness though, was the terrorist attack

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 1>on police in Queensland in December twenty twenty two. The

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>attackers in that case believed SOBCIT ideologies. They also had

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 1>beliefs associated with Christian extremism which led them to murder

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>two police officers and their neighbor. But just to say

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that sovereign citizenship was part of that.

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 2>As you've mentioned, we've seen multiple examples of these attacks

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 2>against police officers. Why do you think that, you know,

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 2>these beliefs have led people to extreme violence against them?

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:56.199
<v Speaker 1>My kind of thinking, my analysis is that police are

0:10:56.200 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the most visible and like accessible representation of everything that

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:06.079
<v Speaker 1>sovereign citizens don't believe in, the fake government, the laws

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>that they don't accept, even like the tax dollars that

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>they refuse to pay. Because obviously police are a state

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 1>entity that gets government funding, which and government funding comes

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>from our taxes, so I can understand why in their ideology.

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Police would be kind of the most visible representation of

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 1>everything they're against. The other thing about police is that

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 1>they're accessible. You can call them, They're visible on a

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 1>street corner, and as we've seen happen tragically now in

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Queensland and Victoria, they can come to your home. They

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>can have a legitimate reason to come to your property.

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Wow, that's really interesting. Thank you so much for explaining

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 2>that to us, Lucy.

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Atop.

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:49.439
<v Speaker 2>We'll be back again this evening with the day's headlines

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 2>and then with another deep dive tomorrow morning. Until then,

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 2>have a great day. My name is Lily Madden and

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm a proud Aranda Banjelung Kalkadin woman from Gadighl country.

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 2>The Daily oz acknowledges that this podcast is recorded on

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 2>the lands of the Gadighl people and pays respect to

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 2>all Aboriginal and Torrestrate island and nations. We pay our

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 2>respects to the first peoples of these countries, both past

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:16.959
<v Speaker 2>and present.