1 00:00:00,560 --> 00:00:03,440 Speaker 1: Mix one O four point nine dot com for all 2 00:00:03,480 --> 00:00:07,360 Speaker 1: the latest news and information Now three sixty with Katie Wolf. 3 00:00:07,560 --> 00:00:10,920 Speaker 1: Everyone is listening Mix one oh four point nine, one 4 00:00:11,000 --> 00:00:11,960 Speaker 1: hundred percent ant. 5 00:00:12,280 --> 00:00:14,960 Speaker 2: Now it is being reported that Danilla Dilba are set 6 00:00:15,000 --> 00:00:18,040 Speaker 2: to take legal action to overturn the decision to approve 7 00:00:18,079 --> 00:00:21,240 Speaker 2: the Dan Murphy's development. And joining me on the line 8 00:00:21,320 --> 00:00:25,920 Speaker 2: right now from Morris Blackburn, lawyer's special counsel, Jacinta Lewin. 9 00:00:26,000 --> 00:00:29,840 Speaker 2: Good morning, Jacinta, Hi, good morning, Thank you for your 10 00:00:29,840 --> 00:00:32,760 Speaker 2: time this morning. Can you talk me through what is happening. 11 00:00:34,720 --> 00:00:37,040 Speaker 3: Yes, So, we obviously act on behalf of Danilla Dilba 12 00:00:37,320 --> 00:00:40,600 Speaker 3: and they've been asked asked us to help commence legal 13 00:00:40,640 --> 00:00:43,920 Speaker 3: proceedings in the Northern Territory Supreme Court to challenge the 14 00:00:44,000 --> 00:00:47,640 Speaker 3: decision made by the Director of Director of Liquor Licensing 15 00:00:47,680 --> 00:00:49,920 Speaker 3: to approve a Dan Murphy's liquor store. 16 00:00:51,080 --> 00:00:53,800 Speaker 2: And so why have they decided to take this action 17 00:00:53,880 --> 00:00:55,040 Speaker 2: and go down this path? 18 00:00:56,520 --> 00:00:58,600 Speaker 3: Yeah, that's a good question. So that the matter has 19 00:00:58,640 --> 00:01:00,360 Speaker 3: a long history is and I'm sure every one will 20 00:01:00,360 --> 00:01:03,320 Speaker 3: know it's been through a number of legal processes. But 21 00:01:03,360 --> 00:01:05,400 Speaker 3: they've decided to take this action because they want to 22 00:01:05,440 --> 00:01:07,839 Speaker 3: ask the court to ensure that the decision that affects 23 00:01:07,880 --> 00:01:10,200 Speaker 3: the rights and interests of the community is lawful, and 24 00:01:10,240 --> 00:01:12,920 Speaker 3: they're concerned about the impacts of the Dan Murphy's on 25 00:01:13,000 --> 00:01:15,560 Speaker 3: alcohol related harm in the communities that they service. 26 00:01:16,080 --> 00:01:18,480 Speaker 2: So, Jacinda, can you talk us through what steps will 27 00:01:18,520 --> 00:01:21,720 Speaker 2: have to be taken now, you know from your perspective 28 00:01:21,760 --> 00:01:23,720 Speaker 2: obviously on this legal action. 29 00:01:25,120 --> 00:01:27,600 Speaker 3: Yeah. So obviously it's very early days. The matter has 30 00:01:27,720 --> 00:01:31,200 Speaker 3: just been commenced before the Supreme Court and the next 31 00:01:31,240 --> 00:01:34,120 Speaker 3: step is that the parties will have an opportunity to 32 00:01:34,200 --> 00:01:36,399 Speaker 3: come to the court and talk about the timetabling of 33 00:01:36,440 --> 00:01:38,399 Speaker 3: the matter for a hearing before a judge. 34 00:01:38,920 --> 00:01:42,160 Speaker 2: And what grounds will the action be taken on? Again, 35 00:01:42,400 --> 00:01:44,000 Speaker 2: I mean, you did just touch on it, but what 36 00:01:44,040 --> 00:01:45,000 Speaker 2: grounds will it be on? 37 00:01:46,080 --> 00:01:48,960 Speaker 3: Yeah, it's a good question, So visit judicial review proceedings. 38 00:01:48,960 --> 00:01:51,400 Speaker 3: So it's important to understand that this challenge isn't about 39 00:01:51,400 --> 00:01:54,040 Speaker 3: whether the decision is right or wrong. What we're asking 40 00:01:54,040 --> 00:01:55,680 Speaker 3: the court to look at is to look at whether 41 00:01:55,720 --> 00:01:58,600 Speaker 3: the decision that the Director of Liquor License made was 42 00:01:58,680 --> 00:02:01,520 Speaker 3: lawfully valid. So did he consider all the relevant factors, 43 00:02:01,560 --> 00:02:03,400 Speaker 3: did he have the power to make the decision? When 44 00:02:03,400 --> 00:02:05,480 Speaker 3: he made it, did he look at all the relevant 45 00:02:05,480 --> 00:02:07,920 Speaker 3: bits of the evidence and what about. 46 00:02:07,720 --> 00:02:10,000 Speaker 2: The fact I don't know whether it would be looked into, 47 00:02:10,120 --> 00:02:12,720 Speaker 2: but you know that the legislation had sort of changed 48 00:02:12,880 --> 00:02:13,840 Speaker 2: very late in the piece. 49 00:02:15,200 --> 00:02:17,920 Speaker 3: Yeah, look, that's a very good question. It is a 50 00:02:17,960 --> 00:02:21,120 Speaker 3: background piece to this decision because, as we know, normally 51 00:02:21,160 --> 00:02:23,760 Speaker 3: decisions would have gone through a commission process where people 52 00:02:23,800 --> 00:02:26,600 Speaker 3: had the chance to be heard and give evidence, and 53 00:02:26,680 --> 00:02:29,440 Speaker 3: this process involved the director of the liquor licensing making 54 00:02:29,440 --> 00:02:32,840 Speaker 3: the decision. Without that process just seem to how. 55 00:02:32,639 --> 00:02:35,840 Speaker 2: Long do you anticipate that this whole process now is 56 00:02:35,880 --> 00:02:36,480 Speaker 2: going to take? 57 00:02:38,520 --> 00:02:41,760 Speaker 3: Look, the core process itself can range anywhere between six 58 00:02:41,800 --> 00:02:44,720 Speaker 3: to twelve months, and that will depend on the court's timetables. 59 00:02:45,080 --> 00:02:49,160 Speaker 2: And can it actually delay the project or realistically, you know, 60 00:02:49,320 --> 00:02:52,120 Speaker 2: can will Worth still continue on with the project given 61 00:02:52,120 --> 00:02:53,880 Speaker 2: the fact that they do have that approval. 62 00:02:55,800 --> 00:03:00,399 Speaker 3: So it's not a proceeding to stop the building of anything. Really, 63 00:03:00,440 --> 00:03:02,880 Speaker 3: looking at is we're asking the courts to check that 64 00:03:02,960 --> 00:03:05,760 Speaker 3: the decision making process and the powers of the director 65 00:03:06,320 --> 00:03:07,760 Speaker 3: have been appropriately used. 66 00:03:08,160 --> 00:03:12,200 Speaker 2: And so what outcome I suppose is is Danilla Dilber hoping. 67 00:03:11,960 --> 00:03:15,480 Speaker 3: For so I think the best outcome would be that 68 00:03:15,480 --> 00:03:18,160 Speaker 3: the decision equashed, so that does a decision be set 69 00:03:18,200 --> 00:03:20,720 Speaker 3: aside in some way and that a new decision making 70 00:03:20,760 --> 00:03:23,800 Speaker 3: process occur that isn't infected with legal error, that allows 71 00:03:23,840 --> 00:03:26,880 Speaker 3: the community concerns in relation to alcohol related harm to 72 00:03:26,919 --> 00:03:29,440 Speaker 3: be more central in the decision making process. 73 00:03:29,800 --> 00:03:34,040 Speaker 2: Now I know Willworts are currently obviously undertaking their consultation 74 00:03:34,160 --> 00:03:37,480 Speaker 2: in Darwin. They've got the independent panel review happening. Is 75 00:03:37,520 --> 00:03:39,800 Speaker 2: that adequate? So? 76 00:03:39,920 --> 00:03:43,160 Speaker 3: Look, the independent panel is a start. It means that 77 00:03:43,160 --> 00:03:46,040 Speaker 3: there's better consultation. But what we're really asking for is 78 00:03:46,080 --> 00:03:48,960 Speaker 3: independent review of this decision by the Supreme Court. We 79 00:03:49,000 --> 00:03:51,440 Speaker 3: want the courts to look at a decision by a 80 00:03:51,480 --> 00:03:54,680 Speaker 3: director by an anti government official to see if it's valid. 81 00:03:55,320 --> 00:03:56,080 Speaker 1: Well, I'll tell you what. 82 00:03:56,360 --> 00:04:00,920 Speaker 2: It's another chapter, I guess to this story. It's been 83 00:04:00,960 --> 00:04:03,320 Speaker 2: a long time in the making, there's no doubt about it. 84 00:04:03,840 --> 00:04:05,680 Speaker 2: We really appreciate your time this morning. 85 00:04:05,760 --> 00:04:09,400 Speaker 3: Jacinta, Oh, thanks very much, Katie, thanks for having me. 86 00:04:09,440 --> 00:04:12,800 Speaker 2: Thank you. That's Jacinta Lewin there, who is from Morris Blackburn, 87 00:04:12,880 --> 00:04:16,479 Speaker 2: lawyer's special counsel who's going to be representing Danilla Dilber 88 00:04:16,920 --> 00:04:19,680 Speaker 2: and as you've heard they are obviously set to take 89 00:04:19,720 --> 00:04:23,040 Speaker 2: that legal action to overturn the decision to approve the 90 00:04:23,120 --> 00:04:27,479 Speaker 2: Dan Murphy's development. As I understand it, that has now 91 00:04:28,000 --> 00:04:32,080 Speaker 2: well it's going to go. I believe it will go 92 00:04:32,200 --> 00:04:36,440 Speaker 2: before the Supreme Court, the Darwin Supreme Court. So it's 93 00:04:36,440 --> 00:04:40,559 Speaker 2: been launched in the Darwin Supreme Court. Like I said, 94 00:04:40,920 --> 00:04:43,400 Speaker 2: it's certainly another chapter to add to what has been 95 00:04:43,440 --> 00:04:46,039 Speaker 2: a long saga. There's no doubt about it. I know 96 00:04:46,160 --> 00:04:48,400 Speaker 2: that a lot of our listeners really want to see 97 00:04:48,480 --> 00:04:51,600 Speaker 2: Dan Murphy's move forward and go ahead, but there is 98 00:04:51,680 --> 00:04:55,400 Speaker 2: still definitely from what we've heard there there is definitely 99 00:04:55,440 --> 00:04:59,479 Speaker 2: still concerns from various groups including Danilla Dilba. Now for 100 00:04:59,480 --> 00:05:02,120 Speaker 2: those who I don't know who Danila Dilbar are, they 101 00:05:02,120 --> 00:05:05,520 Speaker 2: are indeed the Health Service, the Indigenous Health Service, and 102 00:05:05,600 --> 00:05:08,080 Speaker 2: theyve as you've heard, launched that legal action in the 103 00:05:08,200 --> 00:05:12,800 Speaker 2: Darwin Supreme Court. It's against both the director and also 104 00:05:12,880 --> 00:05:16,120 Speaker 2: the Woolworths Group. So we'll be keeping a very close 105 00:05:16,279 --> 00:05:16,839 Speaker 2: eye on that