WEBVTT - The TikTok Blood Bath 

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to Outspoken. It's your dose of the

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:09.119
<v Speaker 1>hottest influenza and pop culture news twice a week. I'm

0:00:09.160 --> 0:00:12.559
<v Speaker 1>Amy Torber and coming up on today's show, The Kate

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:17.079
<v Speaker 1>Forster and Sarbi Store TikTok blood Bath, Michael Finch opens

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>up about hitting rock bottom, and Andre Ribello is found

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:24.439
<v Speaker 1>guilty of murdering his mother. But first, Tammy Hembro and

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Matt Zakowski have surprised their followers by opting for a

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 1>winter honeymoon in Lapland. It looks so Christmasy and magical there.

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:34.160
<v Speaker 1>It is the perfect time of year to go to Lapland.

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>But I did think that they might go back to

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the Maldives, Yeah, because that's where they got engaged. I

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>think everyone thought that they would opt for a hot honeymoon.

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 1>But it sort of makes sense because they're from the

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Gold Coast. They travel whenever they want. You know, Tammy's

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>got the money to do so, so they're probably thinking,

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:51.639
<v Speaker 1>what's something a little bit different. I also think they

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:53.599
<v Speaker 1>wanted to make a bit of a statement with their

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>choice of honeymoon location. I mean, their whole wedding has

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>been a statement so far, and the fact that They're

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>doing something so different is creating a lot of attention

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and engagement. Surely there is some kind of sponsorship agreement

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>going on, even if it was just Lapland's Tourism Commission

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:12.400
<v Speaker 1>sponsoring this holiday. Because there have been so many epic

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>tiktoks that Tammy has shared, it's made me feel like

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 1>I need to go to Lapland. Like the shots they

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>got of the northern lights at their resort. I also

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>want to know did they have someone following them around.

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Filming these videos.

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>It's funny you say that, because they actually ended up

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>getting locked out of their cabin because they wanted to

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>do a little photo shoot. So Tammy asked Matt to

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:34.320
<v Speaker 1>take some photos of her, and she reminded him to

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:36.959
<v Speaker 1>grab the key card, but he forgot and they ended

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>up being stranded for quite some time outside.

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 2>They actually had to seek.

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Refuge in this half built cabin because it was so cold.

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:47.119
<v Speaker 1>This happened to some friends of mine who were holidaying

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>in the snow. So they went out to have a

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>spa and decided to skinny dip and they got locked

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>out of their chalet. And it was only out of

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>luck that the person who owned the Airbnb popped by

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to see if they're okay.

0:01:57.080 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 2>They're like, we could have died. That is my worst man.

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Going back to whether this is a sponsored trip or

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>there's elements that are gifted, I think it could be

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>because Tammy has posted the name of the accommodation a

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:11.639
<v Speaker 1>number of times, so they're staying at the Aurora Collection

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:15.079
<v Speaker 1>Laplan Resort, and the Daily Mail is reporting that the

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>accommodation is costing as much as one thy one hundred

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>per night, which I actually thought was low balling it

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>because I definitely think that they're spending a lot more.

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:27.119
<v Speaker 1>I had a look on the accommodation's website and they

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>offer a four night package, so for four nights is

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 1>two nine hundred and sixty five dollars per person, and

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>with that it includes a lot of the activities that

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>they're doing. So the activities range from a husky safari,

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:43.359
<v Speaker 1>a reindeer safari, and also Arctic ice karting. I've seen

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 1>them do a couple of those activities so far. What

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>they seem to be spending most of their time doing

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 1>is watching Christmas movies, though which I can get around.

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>It looks so magical. It's quite romantic as well. A

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of people were calling Tammy and Matt's wedding the

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>content wedding, and I needed a palate cleanser from them,

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 1>and this honey moon has provided the goods. I'm really

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>enjoying seeing it, but it may get to a point

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>where I'm sick of it. I think that happens with

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:06.919
<v Speaker 1>when anyone.

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 2>Goes on holiday.

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Though you enjoyed the first couple of bits of content

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and then you're like, can you just get back? It

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:13.360
<v Speaker 1>was getting mass views on TikTok, and it makes me

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>think that it was a strategy to choose somewhere that

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>was out of the norm. Like if they went to

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the Maule Dives again, everyone would.

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Be like yawn.

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that they've gone somewhere like Finland, which

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>you don't often hear about it looks so magical. But

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>surely they're not sitting around saying, oh my god, let's

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>pick our honeymoon location based.

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:32.639
<v Speaker 2>On what will shop TikTok. These people are content creators.

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, yes, it's not their whole reason for

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>doing so, but I think it would take up some

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>of their thinking. Matt literally referred to his wedding photography

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and videography as content, Like, of course they're thinking what

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to create the best content, and they have

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>hit the nail on the head with this one. I

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>actually think they're winning people over a little bit with

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>their very cutesy, romantic content because there's been a lot

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>more positive comments about Matt in particularly see. I actually

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of found it funny because it looked like they

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>were getting on each other's nerves because everyone says that

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the honeymoon, Like, I'm actually not referencing my honeymoon here

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>because I did recently get back. But it's funny because

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the time, honeymoons can be actually the

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>place where a lot of arguments happen, because you know,

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>all of the hype from the wedding has ended and

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>it's just the two of you now focusing on maybe

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>each other's little quirks. And there were instances where I

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>was wondering, I wonder if they're getting on each other's

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:24.239
<v Speaker 1>nerves because Tammy didn't look too pleased about getting locked

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:26.039
<v Speaker 1>out of the cabin due to me. People are just

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>surprised that the marriage has lasted to the honeymoon.

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 3>Hi, Tim, and welcome to fag town. So what I'm

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 3>going to do here is put all the shit up

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:38.280
<v Speaker 3>that I can't put up on fucking TikTok because I

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 3>hope are annoying.

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>TikTok is divided after author Kate Forster pointed out that

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>local clothing brand Sabi is following Donald Trump in what's

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>been described as an internet blood bath. The latest controversy

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>has sparked death threats, mass reportings, and cancelation. Now, so

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>before we get into the drama, can you get listeners

0:04:58.279 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>up to speed.

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 2>With who Kate Forster is.

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:03.720
<v Speaker 1>She is an author who has really exploded in popularity

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok this year. In the space of a few months,

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>she gained ninety five thousand followers on TikTok. And what

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>really makes her stand out is that she's not afraid

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>to share her opinion, which I think all of us

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:18.919
<v Speaker 1>have found really refreshing this year because she's so funny.

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:22.279
<v Speaker 1>She doesn't take herself too seriously, and she doesn't play

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 1>into a lot of the games that we see influencers

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:27.599
<v Speaker 1>or TikTokers playing into, like you know, those people who

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>just want to keep their little click happy and try

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and say the right thing. I think That's why she

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>is so divisive and people are so threatened by her

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 1>at the moment because she doesn't just fit into this

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 1>influencer click that we've come to know, and she doesn't

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>care who she upsets. Well, yeah, you don't know what's

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>coming out of her mouth neck, but you know that

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>what she's saying she has conviction in and actually believes in. Now,

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 1>she's also known for sharing fashion reviews and also encouraging

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 1>her audience not to be sheep and to support local businesses.

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:01.279
<v Speaker 1>So she's all about encouraging her followers to not just

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>buy the brands that fashion influencers are promoting and getting

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>kickbacks from. Yeah, and she gained a massive amount of

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>traction back in August when she called out the viral

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Henny cardigan. So we covered that story in death. But

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>at the time, the fifty three year old simply question

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>why young people all want to look the same and

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 1>are wearing this specific cult cardigan, which was created by

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 1>influencer Nadia Bartel's label Henny Now. This led to Kate

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:30.280
<v Speaker 1>receiving prank calls and even death threats. It also resulted

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 1>in her developing an even stronger follower base. I know

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I followed her after this drama. Yeah, a lot of

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:39.479
<v Speaker 1>people did. Now let's get into this latest controversy. And

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>as we touched on, Kate often creates fashion reviews and

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 1>she received an influx of messages from followers asking her

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:49.720
<v Speaker 1>to look into a local brand called Sabi. And this

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 1>brand is known for selling oversized T shirts with positive

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>affirmations across them, and it's owned by a husband and

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>wife team called Jace McDonald and Ashtadu who live in

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Queen Now, some of Kate's followers had noticed that a

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>growing number of Mummy influencers had started wearing Sarb's shirts,

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and all of those influences held very far right views.

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Now it is unclear if those influences were gifted the

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 1>shirts or if they were just organically wearing them, And

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>this led Kate to do some research into SARB and

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>she quickly discovered that one of the owners, Jace, was

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>following Donald Trump on his personal account. Now he was

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>also following podcaster Joe Rogan, who heavily supported Trump's campaign. Now,

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>this led Kate to create a TikTok video connecting the dots,

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>saying it kind of seems like the brand's co owner

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>is a Trump supporter. She then referenced the problematic Mummy

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>influencers who were wearing the brand and explained that a

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of them share anti vax and also anti suncream views. Now,

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>she didn't blame Sarby for it, but she pointed out

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>that if Sarb's views don't align with these influences very

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>far right views, then they should touch with them and

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>say don't wear ushirt. I don't know if you can

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 1>tell someone not to wear your brand if they've purchased it.

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean you can obviously say, look, if we've gifted

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>you something and you're going to be spouting our offensive things,

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>we prefer you not to wear our clothes. I mean

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>that is very dependent on what the relationship is between

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the brand and the influencer. And I think that's why

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Kate has used this as an example, because she must

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 1>know that this brand has gifted these influences these T shirts,

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and she's trying to point out that clearly they all

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 1>have the same views and all their views aligned, and

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>that's why they're wearing.

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 2>The T shirt.

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, and that's the thing, because if these influencers

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>have been organic customers and purchased them themselves. I don't

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 1>think that the brand necessarily has the right to tell

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>people that you're not allowed to wear, and it would

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 1>be very difficult for a brand to say, actually, don't

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>wear that, Like what control do they have over people

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:46.319
<v Speaker 1>wearing their items of clothing?

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 3>Now?

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>As always on TikTok, the response was very mixed to

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Kate's video, so there were some followers who immediately started

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 1>accusing Ash and Jason being Trump supporters and threatening to

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:03.319
<v Speaker 1>boycott the brand. TikTok videos also started surfacing of Sarbi

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>customers clarifying that whilst they have worn the t shirts

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>in the past, they have left leaning views. They were

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>quite funny on the flip side, Kate started receiving an

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>influx of hate from some Sabi supporters and.

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 2>Also death threats.

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's so wild that this woman has

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 1>received so many death threats for simply pointing out who

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the brand is followed. But I think it's much greater

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:31.079
<v Speaker 1>than that in terms of it's not just about fashion.

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>This is about politics and how fashion and politics intersect,

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's.

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Why people are so upset.

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 1>It is being alleged that one of the Sabi owners

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>posted a TikTok in response to Kate's video threatening her.

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Now those claims have come from Internet sleuths who say

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that the video was quickly taken down, So I want

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 1>to reiterate that is just an allegation. There is no

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 1>proof of this video still being online. I had actually

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>never heard of the brand Sabi until this TikTok drama.

0:09:57.440 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 1>But all I could think of was the Sabi and

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Soul who were caught up in that Moroccan pillow drama

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:03.719
<v Speaker 1>with Sarah's Dave Rember that a.

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Few years ago.

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh no, these poor bastards. Have they

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>been dragged into something again. But I can confirm this

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 1>is a completely separate business. This is the danger with

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>TikTok and how quickly things spread. And also when you

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>like I think I've heard of that brand, I actually

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>thought of Sabo skirt, which are not in any way

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>attached to this brand.

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 2>Eiough Well.

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Sabi have addressed the controversy on their Instagram account, so

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>they wrote legends we just wanted to quickly address some

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 1>things that are currently going on. We really didn't want

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>to get involved and it goes against everything we stand

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 1>for here at Sabi. We would never condone bullying people

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>or brands online. So this is the one and only

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>statement we will be making. Our entire brand is built

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 1>upon building people up and helping them feel happy and

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>confident while wearing our brand. These comments and the video

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that have been shared by people online are not a

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>true representation of myself and Jas. It's unfortunate that people

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>can take things out of context and spread rumors and

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>missing information about us online. Our little brand means the

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>world to us and our customers mean the world to us,

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and we know there are a lot of you all

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>standing up for us on these posts.

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:11.559
<v Speaker 2>We appreciate you, but.

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Ultimately all we want is for everyone to interact in

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a positive way that doesn't tear others down. We just

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>hope everyone can choose their words wisely as words have

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:22.679
<v Speaker 1>power and our actions are online forever.

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Big love, Jace and Ash.

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:24.559
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>The reason why that statement has been included in full

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>is because the one thing that stood out to me

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 1>is that nowhere did they say we do not politically

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 1>align with Donald Trump, and one follower called them out

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>on the obvious admission, saying, maybe you should make it

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 1>clear if you actually support Trump and right wing views

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>or not now. Sabi responded, saying this, we didn't want

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>to talk about our political views because we aren't political.

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Jace in no way supports his views and values. Back

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>when he first got into government, he was threatening to

0:11:56.840 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>put tariffs on clothing importations to protect the US ACA

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Jays had a factory in China with huge US orders,

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 1>as if we wouldn't want to know everything and anything

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to do with it. Also, he is now sitting there

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 1>culling who he follows and who he doesn't years later.

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>It's absolutely insane that people jump to conclusions. Jace is

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:17.439
<v Speaker 1>pro you and whoever you want to be, and all

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 1>about leaving a positive impact on the world. To me,

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.839
<v Speaker 1>I think that they originally didn't touch on who they

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>support because they didn't want to offend any customers who

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:30.560
<v Speaker 1>may support Donald Trump, because they would be ostracizing a

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:32.959
<v Speaker 1>collection of their customers. Well, it's a pretty common thing

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>not to get political when it comes to business, because

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a lot of companies having to backflip, Like recently,

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>there was a chain of pubs that came out and

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>said that they were would not be supporting Australia Day

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and not be having any celebrations in their pubs literally

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hours after they had to backflip because they

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 1>got so many complaints. So I understand why they didn't

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>initially put it in the statement. However, the way TikTok

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>works is that the audience were never going to be

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>happy with that statement. I actually disagree from a pr perspective.

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it was incredibly important for the owners of

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the brand to refute these claims and say, just because

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Jason's following Donald Trump, it doesn't mean that he supports

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump's policies. Because Donald Trump is obviously known for

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 1>not caring about women's rights, He's made homophobic, racist comments

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:21.080
<v Speaker 1>if but no one's here saying that Donald Trump is

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a good guy. Like It's obviously not a great brand

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>move to align, particularly from a female brand, to align

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>with Donald Trump. But the issue is that I think

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:31.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people on TikTok and in the world,

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:33.319
<v Speaker 1>and this is why everyone a lot of people were

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 1>shocked by the election result. Is they operate in silos

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 1>where people think, oh, Donald Trump is the devil. Of course,

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 1>no one would ever want to support him, but I mean,

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the guy got voted in. There are a lot of

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:46.439
<v Speaker 1>people that support him and the business wouldn't have wanted

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:49.559
<v Speaker 1>to come out and offend those people that did. Particularly,

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:52.319
<v Speaker 1>it seems like they do a line. But does it

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>mean now that if you follow somebody on social media

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that means you one hundred percent support them. Because Abby

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:01.199
<v Speaker 1>Chatfield has also weighed into this debate, and we will

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 1>get into what she has said later, but I remember

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Abby had to come out and say, oh my god,

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I follow all of these people who I don't actually

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>support their views, but I followed them because I want

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to be up to date on what's happening in the world.

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, for example, a lot of journalists would be

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>following Donald Trump. It doesn't mean that they support him

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and believe in his views. It's to keep track of

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>what he's doing. Well, I went and looked at who

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>followed Donald Trump from Outspoken's name, and quite a number.

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Of high profile people did.

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Again, I think that that is something that they should

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 1>have touched on in the statement, because you know their

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>point of view. Saying, oh, Jase's following him because of

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the tariffs that he's putting on clothing. That seem like

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>a pretty fair enough statement. But that's something that should

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 1>have been mentioned in the initial statement, not as a

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>response to someone's question. They just thought, from a pr perspective,

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 1>it's best not to actually touch on this controversial part.

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm always really fascinated to hear what actually goes on

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes when someone finds themselves in the middle

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>of an Internet controversy like this. And Ash and Jace

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>were interviewed by news dot com and they said that

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>they were shocked when they first learned of the backlash.

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>So they were sitting at their desk and they got

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a call from a Stockers who was like, people are

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>debating onliner. You guys right wing or left wing? And

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the Stockers then said, apparently you guys followed Donald Trump.

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>And they said they were so confused because Sabi itself

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't follow Donald Trump, and Ash's account didn't follow Donald Trump.

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>And then of course they worked out that Jase has

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>been following him and had been following him.

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 2>For over a decade.

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Ash got really overwhelmed because it got to the point

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>where people were trawling through their personal Facebook accounts and

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>looking for clues about their political alignment. And she said

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>she felt sick all weekend and couldn't eat. Now, this

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 1>just really demonstrates the toll that it took on her,

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and Jay said he found the backlash ridiculous and couldn't

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 1>believe there was discussion around who or who didn't buy

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and wear the t shirts. He said, it's hard you're

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>always offending somebody. Why do people need to know our

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>political beliefs to buy our clothes? He continued, saying if

0:15:57.120 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>he believed in Donald Trump, he'd come out and say

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>sober in gen he said, I don't care if you

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>do or not. Now, I do want to point out

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 1>that the article did state that the couple do not

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>support Trump, but there wasn't a direct quote from Jay

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>saying it. And this controversy has gone viral on TikTok,

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>with creators weighing in on the drama and picking if

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>their team Kate or Team Sarby. It's even led to

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 1>high profile names in the media and influencer landscape also

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>weighing in. Yeah, so she's on the money. Podcast host

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Victoria Devine shared her views on the controversy, and she

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>appeared to be shocked that some corners of the internet

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>were siding with Kate Forster.

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 2>Here's what she said.

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm so done with people coming in to defend someone

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 4>who has made their entire brand snarking other women, like

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 4>why are you coming in and being like, oh, well,

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 4>she never said that exactly, or no, she never knew

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 4>who that person was to begin with, or she never

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 4>meant it that way. Didn't you watch her entire five

0:16:56.400 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 4>to ten minute rant, like I'm sorry. That content made

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:04.399
<v Speaker 4>with the intention of bringing other women down. It was

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 4>made with the intention of making them feel bad about

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 4>what they're wearing or what they're doing, or how that

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 4>they are doing it, and calling them sheep or calling them,

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:15.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, copy pastes of other.

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 2>People, like it's actually just ick.

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 4>That content wasn't made with the intention of lifting women

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 4>up and making them feel good about themselves or helping

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 4>them be in a better position. It was literally made

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 4>with the intention of making you snarky against other women.

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 4>And now you're defending the person who said that.

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Victoria continued saying she's not naming names because she can't

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:39.439
<v Speaker 1>be bothered. But if followers were going to draw the

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:43.119
<v Speaker 1>inference about what she's talking about, then the shoe probably fits.

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:43.360
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:46.680
<v Speaker 1>This isn't the first time Victoria has commented on online

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>controversies surrounding Kate Forster. So during the viral Henny Cardigan's saga,

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Victoria showed her support for a fashion TikToker who came

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 1>up against Kate, writing under the post, it's not even

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>being passive aggressive, she's being a bully. I can't believe

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:04.360
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty four so many people are supportive of

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>her content. I think there has been a bit of

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>back and forth between the two and they both won't

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:12.919
<v Speaker 1>name one another when talking about one another. Victoria had

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a pretty mixed response in her comment section. There were

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>some people who supported her sentiment, whilst others strongly disagreed.

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>So one user wrote, I don't agree with this. I

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:24.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think Kate was ever trying to tear women down

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 1>at all. She is a critical thinker on TikTok and

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I actually quite like her approach to talking about fashion.

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I watched her video. It wasn't that deep. She never

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:35.679
<v Speaker 1>tore down an individual person, just had an interesting perspective

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:37.880
<v Speaker 1>on a brand. I think the backlash of the comments

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:41.400
<v Speaker 1>is what's gotten out of hand. Whilst another commented the

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:44.479
<v Speaker 1>irony of a woman ragging on another woman for ragging

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 1>on another woman. Come on, ladies, see I thought that

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:50.399
<v Speaker 1>when I was watching it, because I find it a

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>very lazy argument that whenever a woman critiques or analyzes

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>another woman's behavior, that people go, oh, shouldn't women be

0:18:57.800 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>supporting women? I mean, we cop it a lot, so

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that's why I'm a little bit defensive about it. Just

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>because you're a woman, it doesn't mean you have to

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 1>blindly agree with all women, because funnily enough, women all

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 1>share different opinions and points of view, and it's actually

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 1>unfeminist just to support someone because you're the same gender. Like,

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I just find it such an interesting argument. I think

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 1>people forget that feminism is about equality, so we can

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 1>equally critique men and women if.

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:23.919
<v Speaker 2>We are a woman.

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:27.199
<v Speaker 1>Now. Abby Chatfield was also asked to weigh in on

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the drama, and she strongly threw her support behind Kate Forster,

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:34.639
<v Speaker 1>calling her her very own Julian Assange. Let's listen to

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 1>part of what she said.

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:40.120
<v Speaker 6>It's just interesting that Kate pointing out that someone follows

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 6>a political leader is so scary to people because they

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 6>know she's.

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 5>An awful person.

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 2>They know that it isn't the right thing to do.

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:53.440
<v Speaker 6>So instead of being like, hmm, maybe me, a commenter

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:57.719
<v Speaker 6>should think about where my morals lie. They instead attack

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 6>Kate and get mad at her. Main thing is that

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:02.919
<v Speaker 6>no one should be sending Kate force to death threats

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:06.439
<v Speaker 6>or threats of violence because she pointed out something that

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 6>was a fact. She didn't lie, she didn't make anything up.

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:12.920
<v Speaker 6>She just noticed something and she pointed it out. It's

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:15.400
<v Speaker 6>not really fair to shoot the messenger. And if you're

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:18.679
<v Speaker 6>commenting anything abusive to Kate or making videos saying that she's.

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 5>A bully, I really want you to check your internalized misogyny.

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 6>I really want you to maybe look into what activism

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:30.880
<v Speaker 6>is a little bit, and I want you to reevaluate

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 6>your own.

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:35.639
<v Speaker 5>Moral coumbas seems extreme, but I want you to reevaluate

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 5>your own value system and why you're so angry that

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:43.120
<v Speaker 5>someone pointed out the truth like it's giving persecuting Juliane Massange.

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:45.919
<v Speaker 6>Kate is mine, Julie Massage, you know what I mean.

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 6>She's a wiki leaks right now, not her fault that

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 6>they did it.

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I find it very interesting the vitriol that is thrown

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 1>at people like Abby Chatfield and Kate Forster, because I

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people don't know what to do

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>with them because they don't want to align with a

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>group of influencers or a group of media personalities. They

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>don't care who they piss off, and that is very

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>threatening to a group of people who don't want to

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.400
<v Speaker 1>be called out. And there is a click of influencers

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:20.639
<v Speaker 1>that We've spoken about this a lot, you know, Clementine

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Ford has spoken about the cool group, whatever you want

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to call this group of people. It gets bigger and

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>bigger to the point where if anyone ever says anything

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>against these people, they've got a bunch of other high

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>profile people to back them up.

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:35.919
<v Speaker 2>And that's not what we want either.

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's interesting because even when you look at the

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>fact that Kate Forster called out a lot of influencers

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 1>for all wearing the Henny cardigan, it seemed like it really.

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Hurt their feelings.

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there was a lot of offense, like oh my god,

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 1>when in actual fact, what they probably didn't like Kate

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:55.159
<v Speaker 1>pointing out is that they all get kickbacks for promoting

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that cardigan constantly through their affiliate leaks. And what I

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:01.400
<v Speaker 1>find funny is people will call Abby or Kate bullies,

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>but to me, a bullying behavior is when you gang

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>up on someone and leave people out, and that's what's

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:11.719
<v Speaker 1>been happening online. And there was no bullying or snark

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 1>in Kate's post about Sarbi anyway. I hate the way

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:17.360
<v Speaker 1>that the word bullying is being thrown around because all

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:20.879
<v Speaker 1>she did was review a local brand that she was

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>asked to review, and in this instance, I think her

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>intention was to help her audience make informed choices about

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 1>who they want to support with their funds. And let's

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 1>be honest, it wasn't just the fact that this owner

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>was following Donald Trump. She was connecting the dots of

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 1>quite controversial right wing influences suddenly popping up wearing these

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:44.199
<v Speaker 1>positive affirmation tis who most probably were gifted those T

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>shirts from the brand. Now Abby then offered up some

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 1>free pr advice, saying, if Sarbi don't actually support Donald Trump,

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>then create a TikTok clarifying it.

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Here's what she said.

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:59.160
<v Speaker 6>Who knows if them following Donald Trump means they support him,

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:00.920
<v Speaker 6>It could just mean it follow him because they think

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 6>he's so horrific.

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 2>If that is the case, they could do a video.

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:07.160
<v Speaker 6>If you're watching this, if you don't actually support him,

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 6>I reckon do a video and just be like guys,

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 6>we follow him because he's so cozy, like just I.

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:13.360
<v Speaker 5>Think that could be cleared up very easily.

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 6>So there is a chance that them following Donald Trump

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 6>isn't them supporting him.

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I think she's right because they've sort of been tiptoeing

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:25.159
<v Speaker 1>around who they support and who they don't support. Have

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:27.199
<v Speaker 1>seem like they don't want to offend anyone, but at

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the same time, being neutral is offending both parties almost,

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>like I think it looks like they have something to

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.440
<v Speaker 1>hide when maybe they don't. That's why it's really dangerous

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 1>for brands to be on TikTok if they haven't fully

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>formulated what they stand for as a brand, if they

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:43.439
<v Speaker 1>don't know their core values inside out, if they're not

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:47.120
<v Speaker 1>picking the right influences, because if you're marketing your product

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:50.400
<v Speaker 1>at young women, then you have to be very careful

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 1>because they are expecting more and more from brands. Well,

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:55.920
<v Speaker 1>it's because people find it hypocritical to have these positive

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>affirmations splashed across a T shirt but then be potentially

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:02.639
<v Speaker 1>supporting some who was so negative. It's crazy as well

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:05.199
<v Speaker 1>that this isn't even a US company, like this is

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:08.639
<v Speaker 1>happening in Australia. It shows you how strongly people feel

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 1>about Donald Trump and it just actually has been elected.

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:14.359
<v Speaker 1>But also it is a statement the influencers you choose. Now,

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>they haven't come out and said whether they hand selected

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 1>these influences or if they organically wore the T shirts,

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>but if it is the case and they have selected them,

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that sends a statement of what your core values are.

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 2>It's more complicated these days to have a business now.

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Following this shit storm, Kate Forster lost every single video

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>on her TikTok account, so her page was mass reported

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:39.400
<v Speaker 1>in what really seemed like an attempt to silence her. Yeah,

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 1>she told her followers that she spoke to the team

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 1>at TikTok in length and they informed her that it

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>was mass fake reporting which lost all of her video

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>So apparently that triggers every single video to be removed.

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>It's not like a bot. Then someone's paid for a

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:57.160
<v Speaker 1>bot to report her page. Sounds like it. I really

0:24:57.200 --> 0:25:00.120
<v Speaker 1>feel for her because she has spent months and months

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>creating this content, and she's had so many clever videos

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 1>which are either comedic or There's been a lot of

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:09.399
<v Speaker 1>time invested in these reviews, and she's really built a

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>community by people sending those videos on so many people

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>are asking her, can you please recreate some of the videos,

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:18.199
<v Speaker 1>but she said there's all this weird copywriting around it,

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>so if she uploads a video that was similar, it

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 1>gets removed. Now she ended up switching her account to

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>private to stop people from reporting her, and it's unclear

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>what she's going to do moving forward because this seems

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to be a real issue for her. People want to

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 1>silence her, and people seems like they don't want women,

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>particularly older women with a strong opinion. It's actually really

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 1>disturbing that there's been this orchestrated effort to silence her,

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:43.639
<v Speaker 1>and now this is going to be an example of

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:45.879
<v Speaker 1>what you can do if you don't agree with someone's opinion.

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, people are having a problem with her pointing

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 1>out that this brand follows Trump. Isn't the behavior that

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you've just exhibited very trumpest.

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 3>From appearing to live a glamorous life to the inside

0:25:56.720 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 3>of a jail cell Andre Rabella is now facing a

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 3>life life prison term.

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeer Andre Rebello has been found guilty of murdering his mother.

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 1>A jury took two days to deliberate after the eight

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>week trial. Prosecutors say Rebello killed his mother for money

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:17.440
<v Speaker 1>after taking out three life insurance policies in her name

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>just days earlier. He'll be sentenced in April next year

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:24.439
<v Speaker 1>and is expected to get life in prison. Was anyone

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 1>else pretty surprised to hear the news? Like from the onset,

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I thought he probably was guilty, but to actually have

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:35.639
<v Speaker 1>confirmation that this man murdered his mother, it just rocked

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 1>me to my call that anyone.

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 2>Could do that.

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't shocked, but I think it really did hit

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a nerve to know that this is actually what has happened,

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>to know for a fact this is what happened, and

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>more gruesome details have come out about the day. So

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 1>it started off as a very normal day for Colleen Rebello.

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:54.479
<v Speaker 1>So she had dropped her son off at work at

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>ten am and she came home and was visited by

0:26:57.400 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 1>andre So he originally denied his mum on the day

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of her death. However, in court he revealed he did

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 1>in fact visit her, but he said he just chatted

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 1>about Gracie and their son over a coffee. Now prosecutors

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 1>say that Andrea murdered his mother during this visit. Now,

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Colleen's cause of death was actually ruled inconclusive by the coroner,

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's alleged that Andre suffocated her with a pillow.

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>It's then believed he removed his mother's clothes and placed

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>her body in the shower to make it look like

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:30.159
<v Speaker 1>she'd had a medical episode and died of natural causes.

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:32.119
<v Speaker 1>And the saddest part is that at the time of

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:34.920
<v Speaker 1>her death she was happy and healthy. There was no

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>animosity between her and her son. Can you imagine how

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:41.479
<v Speaker 1>horrifying her final moments would have been for her and

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 1>how scarring this also was for Andre's brother, Fabian, because

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>his mum was meant to go and pick him up

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>from work at two pm, and when she didn't arrive,

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Fabian then returned home to discover her dead in the shower,

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:58.200
<v Speaker 1>so he called paramedics before calling his three siblings, and

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:01.399
<v Speaker 1>Andre was the last sibling to be called. Now, he

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 1>ended up joining his siblings at their mother's home as

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 1>police arrived, and at no point did Andre mention that

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 1>he had seen his mum alive and well that day.

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 1>What really shocked me is that police set up surveillance

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 1>on Andre, so they planted a listening device in the

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 1>bedroom that he shared with Grace Episcopo and also a

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:22.640
<v Speaker 1>camera with audio in their loundroom, so they were listening

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 1>into conversations for over three months.

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:28.879
<v Speaker 1>Apparently these recordings made it very clear that Gracie was

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>unaware that Andre had murdered Colleen, so that's why she

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 1>was ruled out of this investigation. Now, I do want

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the reporting because, as we have previously discussed,

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:41.479
<v Speaker 1>Gracie has been front and center despite having nothing to

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 1>do with the murder. And of course a murder trial

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>of this nature, when a son kills their mother, it's

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>going to have a bit of interest, but the interest

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 1>was next level due to Gracie's profile. And it also

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 1>has a lot to do with the motive that the

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors were pushing, because during the trial, the prosecutors alleged

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that the reason Andre killed his mond was to get

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 1>money to fund the couple's lavish lifestyle, and this was

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 1>an angle very much focused on by the media. Well,

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not surprised because I watched quite a number of

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 1>TV reports about this, and they had the perfect overlay

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>for all of those claims. So they used a lot

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:18.560
<v Speaker 1>of vision from YouTube of Andre and Gracie on these

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 1>extravagant holidays in the mal dives that showed him living

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the life, but it perfectly pictured his fall from Grace

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 1>as well.

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 5>Well.

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Also the fact that he was.

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>A reported cryptocurrency trader, like it just fit into that

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>profile and that story. The reality of the situation is, yes,

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 1>he was doing crypto on the side, but it was

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 1>making him no money. He previously was actually a delivery

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 1>driver for Coals and he was studying, and in his

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 1>final year of study he gave it up to be

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Gracie's assistant and also to be the primary caregiver of

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 1>their son. So Gracie was the breadwinner in this relationship.

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think I shocked a lot of people because

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 1>his background, you know, working for Coals and studying wasn't

0:29:57.960 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 1>really publicized.

0:29:58.920 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 2>It was almost like, oh.

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>He's this cryptocurrency bro who's very successful. And in the trial,

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the prosecutors tried to play up that there was this

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 1>power in balance in Andrea and Gracie's relationship. So it

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:14.720
<v Speaker 1>was reported that Gracie was making six figures by twenty twenty,

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 1>but the court was told the couple were spending more

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 1>than they were actually making. Yeah, And it was at

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 1>this point that Gracie's influencing career was taking off. She

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>had a million followers on Instagram and was making good money. However,

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 1>she had to support Andre and their son, And if

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you cast your mind back to twenty twenty, everyone was struggling.

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Brands were cutting marketing budgets.

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Everyone was losing their jobs.

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>And it was at this point that Grace and Andre

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 1>they were renting a house for eight eighty a week.

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 1>This was this was before COVID, so that was very

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 1>expensive at the time, and they all still expensive and

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>they also had a big car loan for a Range Rover.

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 1>And it's interesting because when you are an influencer with

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 1>a million followers on Instagram, it does come with a

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 1>certain expectation and an image to uphold. And Gracie is

0:30:59.800 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>a lifestyle influencer and her content is about promoting an

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 1>enviable lifestyle with a nice home, clothes.

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 2>And holidays.

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 1>So she did have this image to uphold, and it's

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>believed that Andre was feeling a lot of pressure about that.

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 1>What does make me feel uncomfortable about some of this coverage, though,

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 1>is the implication that Gracie was pushing this lifestyle or

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 1>that she had anything to do with this murder because it's.

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 2>So far from the truth.

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Katie obviously got involved in his own lives, like if

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 1>he was making up lives that he's made all of

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 1>this money off crypto. There are a lot of skeletons

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 1>obviously in his closet. And I think it's really unfair

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:39.200
<v Speaker 1>that Gracie isn't being portrayed as a victim in this case.

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 1>She's a young mum who now her partner of eight

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>years has been found guilty of the worst possible crime,

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 1>but her baby daddy as well, and instead of feeling

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 1>sorry for her, I feel like the media are trying

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to portray her as being part of the problem.

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:50.719
<v Speaker 4>Yea.

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think that really speaks a lot to how

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>society views influences at the moment. We want to believe

0:31:57.200 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the worst in people.

0:31:58.360 --> 0:31:59.560
<v Speaker 2>And so women as well.

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:02.240
<v Speaker 1>And if you think about how the media has covered

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 1>this story, you know they've used a lot of photos

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of Gracie and it's because the media rely on clicks

0:32:07.840 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and engagement and they know that using an image of

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 1>this beautiful girl with this guy and saying he murdered

0:32:13.120 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 1>his mum to fund this lifestyle, people are gonna hate

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:19.160
<v Speaker 1>on her. People are going to write disgusting things when

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 1>it didn't even have anything to.

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Do with her.

0:32:21.800 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Look On a different level, I do understand why the

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 1>media is reporting it in this way from working there

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 1>for many years. It's the perfect story for them. It's

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 1>got all of the right ingredients to sell papers. Not

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>saying it's the right thing to do, but I totally

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>understand it. Before we get into the next topic, we

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 1>want to issue a trigger warning as we do touch

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:44.560
<v Speaker 1>on issues surrounding alcohol and drug use, as well as suicide.

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Freshman taking out food Creator of the Year at the

0:32:47.160 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 1>TikTok Awards, Michael Finch has opened up about hitting rock

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:53.680
<v Speaker 1>bottom and losing his passion for makeup. In the raw

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 1>interview on his best friend Amy Jane Brand's podcast Emotional Content,

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Michael spoke about suffering from drug and alcohol addiction. I

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 1>found this interview fascinating because a lot of our listeners

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:06.720
<v Speaker 1>will know that we did a deep dive into Michael's

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 1>career and also his social media transformation last year, and

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 1>this filled a lot of blanks for us about what

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>was going on in the background.

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 2>He might have to redo that.

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and this was Michael's first ever podcast interview and

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a bit sad that it didn't take place on our podcast,

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 1>But I think the fact that he did it with

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:24.719
<v Speaker 1>his best friend it really helped him feel comfortable and

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 1>also safe to open up, and he really.

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 2>Did bear all.

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 1>In this interview, he spoke about gradually losing his passion

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:34.960
<v Speaker 1>for makeup. He said he became hyper aware of the

0:33:35.280 --> 0:33:38.640
<v Speaker 1>ingredients going into some makeup brands and no longer felt

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:41.600
<v Speaker 1>comfortable putting on his skin every day. When I first

0:33:41.760 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 1>heard this, my first thought was, I wonder how all

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 1>of those makeup brands feel that have worked with him

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 1>over the years. It's interesting because a part of his

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:52.360
<v Speaker 1>job was to influence people to buy that makeup, and

0:33:52.400 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 1>if he's worried about what's in it and he's telling

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 1>people to buy it as well, I mean ethically, he

0:33:57.200 --> 0:33:58.480
<v Speaker 1>might have a bit of a hang up about it.

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Well, that kind of makes more sense why.

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 1>He's deleted a lot of his old videos over the years,

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 1>because he's really wiped his YouTube channel, and maybe it's

0:34:06.000 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 1>because he doesn't want to encourage something that he no

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:12.719
<v Speaker 1>longer supports. Wow in influencer actually taking accountability for the

0:34:12.719 --> 0:34:15.000
<v Speaker 1>past mistakes that they've made, you know. I mean he's

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 1>deemed the mistakes and clearing it off the internet and

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:18.759
<v Speaker 1>not making ad revenue off it.

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 2>Wow, that is an absolute shot. Yeah, it's fair on him.

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:22.239
<v Speaker 2>It's very refreshing.

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Now, as he started falling out of love with makeup,

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Michael said he stopped creating content altogether. Now, this was

0:34:28.960 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>around twenty nineteen, and he said he quickly ran out

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of money and found himself in debt. So he started

0:34:35.000 --> 0:34:38.240
<v Speaker 1>working at a friend's nursery. Now, he ended up working

0:34:38.280 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 1>there for over six months, and then COVID hit. I

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 1>specifically remember this period of time and I was thinking, God,

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I hope he's okay. Yeah, let's listen to what he

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:48.800
<v Speaker 1>said about that time.

0:34:50.120 --> 0:34:52.719
<v Speaker 7>COVID happened after that, and then I didn't want to

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:54.839
<v Speaker 7>put that shit on my skin anymore. Like, you know,

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:56.759
<v Speaker 7>a lot of people had like where they call it

0:34:56.800 --> 0:35:00.040
<v Speaker 7>like an awakening before like COVID happened or whatever. I

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:01.960
<v Speaker 7>guess I kind of had that and just like looked

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:03.760
<v Speaker 7>into a lot of the shit that was in makeup

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:05.359
<v Speaker 7>and just was just like, I don't want to put

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:07.520
<v Speaker 7>this shit on my skin anymore. I learnt a lot.

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Michael also said he became totally disillusioned by the industry,

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and he was rapidly losing followers and relevance from not

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 1>posting content, and he knew that the only way to

0:35:17.760 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 1>get attention was to insert himself into some type of drama.

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 2>But this wasn't for him.

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 1>He said, he found it gross and took a further

0:35:24.680 --> 0:35:27.560
<v Speaker 1>six month hiatus to try and find himself. Yeah, and

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 1>he said during that time he went completely off the

0:35:30.680 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 1>rails and became heavily addicted to drugs and alcohol.

0:35:34.440 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Here's a bit of what he said.

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 7>There was a point where I really hit rock bottom

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 7>where I was just like a four blown alcoholic and

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 7>I was so addicted to that. I don't know if

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:43.920
<v Speaker 7>anyone knows, but there was like this thing that you

0:35:44.000 --> 0:35:45.239
<v Speaker 7>used to be. I'm pretty sure. I don't know if

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 7>you can still get it, but I used to get

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 7>this weed oil, but it was like fake weed oil,

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 7>and it was like one hundred anesthetic, yes, synthetic. It

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:52.640
<v Speaker 7>was like one hundred and ten dollars for like a

0:35:52.640 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 7>little bottle of oil. And used to put it through

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 7>a veight that used to get up to two hundred

0:35:56.520 --> 0:35:59.239
<v Speaker 7>degrees celsius. And I used to just rip that all day,

0:35:59.280 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 7>every single day. My rock bottom was that smoking that

0:36:02.239 --> 0:36:05.760
<v Speaker 7>getting addicted to bricks. You know, bricks are fucking those bricks.

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:07.799
<v Speaker 7>I don't know what the real name is, but I don't.

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:10.400
<v Speaker 7>But wait, but like the pharmaceuticals, like the bricks and

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:13.719
<v Speaker 7>the xanax. Yeah, I don't know bricks. I don't know

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 7>if bricks and zannies the same thing. I'm pretty sure

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 7>it is. Yeah, I got so addicted to them.

0:36:19.120 --> 0:36:22.840
<v Speaker 1>This actually really shocked me because I know he's tiptoed

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:25.600
<v Speaker 1>around having some sort of issues with alcohol and maybe

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 1>dabbled in drugs, but the extent of what he was

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:31.760
<v Speaker 1>going through, I had no idea. And he did reference

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 1>one occasion where he thought he might not wake up

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 1>from his drug binge. And this was very upsetting for

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the host, Amy jayden Brand, because she said that she

0:36:39.280 --> 0:36:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and Michael had lost contact at that time. They had

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a falling out, and it was really

0:36:44.239 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 1>upsetting to hear that things had gotten so bad for

0:36:46.719 --> 0:36:49.759
<v Speaker 1>Michael like that. It's really sad and it just demonstrates

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the lack of support influencers have because like child stars

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Michael Finch, Shiny Grimman.

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:58.279
<v Speaker 2>They're the first lot of child.

0:36:58.080 --> 0:37:02.279
<v Speaker 1>Teenage influencers who have had this level of fame and

0:37:02.360 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 1>money given to them at this young age, and it's

0:37:05.080 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 1>clear that it's been very hard for Michael to navigate

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 1>that well. In this interview, he went into a lot

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:13.280
<v Speaker 1>of detail how he actually developed anxiety from being followed

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:15.840
<v Speaker 1>around by fans. He said he didn't have a problem

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:18.760
<v Speaker 1>with people asking for photos, but what became a problem

0:37:18.840 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 1>was that feeling of being followed. And this happened a

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 1>lot to them at nightclubs as well, because at the time,

0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:28.359
<v Speaker 1>Michael said that he was secretly smoking. So he said

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 1>that Shanny, his best friend at the time, didn't even

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:32.799
<v Speaker 1>know that he was smoking, but he would try and

0:37:32.880 --> 0:37:35.280
<v Speaker 1>have a sneaky cigarette when he was out and about,

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and he mentioned that someone tried to snap a photo

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:40.840
<v Speaker 1>of him smoking and his manager at the time. I

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:42.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know if this was me a pleasure, but they

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:46.839
<v Speaker 1>apparently grabbed the fans phone and threw it across the room.

0:37:47.920 --> 0:37:50.400
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like maybe something me a plasic would allegedly do.

0:37:50.560 --> 0:37:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know if that would be worse

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:56.080
<v Speaker 1>pr someone a manager smashing someone's phone or a photo

0:37:56.160 --> 0:37:58.080
<v Speaker 1>of him smoking. I don't know. I think that just

0:37:58.080 --> 0:37:59.880
<v Speaker 1>demonstrates to people who didn't grow up in the ear

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:01.920
<v Speaker 1>of Michael Finch just how big he.

0:38:01.840 --> 0:38:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Was at the time.

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Now, going back to this really difficult time that Michael

0:38:05.280 --> 0:38:07.760
<v Speaker 1>found himself in, he said that things were so dire

0:38:07.880 --> 0:38:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that he thought he was going to have to move

0:38:09.560 --> 0:38:12.279
<v Speaker 1>back to his hometown with his parents. He said he

0:38:12.280 --> 0:38:14.400
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of support, though his parents ended up

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:17.440
<v Speaker 1>loaning him fifty thousand dollars to get back on his feet.

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:20.520
<v Speaker 1>He also said some of his influencer friends loaned him money.

0:38:20.520 --> 0:38:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if that were Shiny Grimmond, but interesting

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that they were very kind enough.

0:38:24.719 --> 0:38:27.120
<v Speaker 2>To do that. He also said he sold.

0:38:26.920 --> 0:38:29.759
<v Speaker 1>A ton of his designer stuff and all of his furniture,

0:38:29.800 --> 0:38:32.400
<v Speaker 1>which at the time sparked a lot of speculation. I

0:38:32.480 --> 0:38:34.759
<v Speaker 1>remember talking about it on the podcast. He said it

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:37.279
<v Speaker 1>was so awkward because he's like, everyone's like, why are

0:38:37.360 --> 0:38:39.880
<v Speaker 1>you selling it? And he's like, oh, it's a secret.

0:38:40.040 --> 0:38:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Like he didn't want to say that he had no money,

0:38:42.719 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and he said that his motivation for getting out of

0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:47.920
<v Speaker 1>such a dark place was survival. He said he needed

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to make money to keep afloat, and this is really

0:38:51.000 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 1>how he made his grand return with food. He said

0:38:54.239 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 1>it was scary to totally change his content because he

0:38:57.080 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 1>said he'd grown his followers by sharing about superficial content

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:03.000
<v Speaker 1>like makeup and design a gear, and he knew that

0:39:03.080 --> 0:39:05.520
<v Speaker 1>he was going to get a lot of his followers

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:08.160
<v Speaker 1>dropping off, but he knew that he needed to try

0:39:08.160 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and get new people in. This just makes it even

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:13.440
<v Speaker 1>better that he has become so successful in that area,

0:39:13.520 --> 0:39:17.200
<v Speaker 1>because it's just such an incredible transformation going from a

0:39:17.239 --> 0:39:21.000
<v Speaker 1>makeup guru to TikTok's best chef. Yeah, I mean, the

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:23.160
<v Speaker 1>fact that he won the TikTok Creator of the Year

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:25.840
<v Speaker 1>for food is incredible. And he said it's really paid

0:39:25.880 --> 0:39:28.560
<v Speaker 1>off making the switch because he's now making more money

0:39:28.560 --> 0:39:31.360
<v Speaker 1>from his cooking videos than he ever was with Maybe

0:39:32.040 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that's surprising. And he also has said that he has

0:39:35.080 --> 0:39:37.480
<v Speaker 1>resided himself to the fact that he will always be

0:39:37.560 --> 0:39:40.680
<v Speaker 1>an addict, whether it's with cigarettes, alcohol, or weed, but

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:43.000
<v Speaker 1>it's just about managing it. That is all we have

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:45.280
<v Speaker 1>time for today, though, thank you so much for joining

0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:48.120
<v Speaker 1>us for another episode. If you have enjoyed it, could

0:39:48.120 --> 0:39:51.359
<v Speaker 1>you please please please leave us a positive review and

0:39:51.440 --> 0:39:54.760
<v Speaker 1>also make sure you are subscribed on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

0:39:54.920 --> 0:39:57.759
<v Speaker 1>This episode was recorded on the traditional land of the

0:39:57.800 --> 0:40:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Ghana people of the Adelaide Planes. We pay respect to

0:40:00.520 --> 0:40:01.720
<v Speaker 1>elders past and present.