WEBVTT - Are These Unconventional Dating Rules Too Much? 💑

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Flex and Frooms, Flex and Frooms. This is the Flex

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 1>and Frooms catch up podcast. It is Flex and Rooms

0:00:10.680 --> 0:00:11.639
<v Speaker 1>on Cada.

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 2>We are dating conversations about X red flags and like

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 2>dating app profiles lame, it's redundant and we need.

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:21.280
<v Speaker 1>To shake it up.

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 2>What I will say, though, is when I see the

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 2>phrase unconventional prefacing another phrase like dating rules, I say, yeah,

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm listening. I'm listening by the tape DJ.

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 3>Because you guys loved the first one so much. Here

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 3>are some other unconventional rules. Me and my girlfriend have

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:41.519
<v Speaker 3>same disclaimer as before. I don't actually think they're that unconventional,

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 3>but a lot of you in the comments were like,

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 3>is this even normal? But they can be unconventional. You know,

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:48.880
<v Speaker 3>different strokes, different folks, different folks, different strokes.

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Anyway.

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 3>Number one, we share each other's location. I just think

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 3>this is genius. I can know when to get dinner ready.

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 3>I can know how far away she is without having

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 3>to text her when she's driving. So that's safer, so convenient.

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 3>Love it amazing? Why wouldn't you?

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>But two, of course, we know each other's.

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 3>Lock code and passwords to everything, not because I actively

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 3>have gone out to seek it. But because it's just

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:16.479
<v Speaker 3>a convenience thing. And I would think it's really weird

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 3>that if you and your partner like live together and

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 3>we're in a long term relationship and there was never

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:23.399
<v Speaker 3>a situation where you would open their phone or they

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't give you that pass code, Like, to me, that

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 3>is a bit of a red flag. We talk to

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 3>each other in baby voice all the time.

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 1>This isn't actually a rule, but I.

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:32.119
<v Speaker 3>Feel like it's such a taboo topic that.

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>People are really ashamed of. But I actually think let's

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>reclaim it.

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 3>It's not like we do it all the time, but

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:39.039
<v Speaker 3>we are pretty comfortable with it if we're alone at home.

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't even talk to babies in baby voices.

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I say, can you get that for me? Please? Thank you?

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I say, what are you feeling today? It's hired? Yeah, Sam,

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>would you like some breast milk? Let him know.

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 2>Because you talk to kids in baby voices, they only

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 2>respond in baby voices.

0:01:56.880 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>You're like, no, Lucinda, she's never heard that tone before.

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know. You're mad. She's a boss baby

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>now in the no listen, the no, you'll sick, you're sick.

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 2>What I will say though, the passwords. Yeah, I use

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 2>a password manager for these reasons. Hackers are everywhere.

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>So do I one password? Okay? Sorry?

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 2>Sor the lock code. I'm fine with know the lock code.

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 2>It's all good.

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's not get down into the granular.

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 2>You don't need to know that, the Apple ID, the

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 2>Spotify LEMN, you don't need to know all that. And

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 2>if there's a situation where you need my lock code,

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:36.799
<v Speaker 2>give me a.

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Ring, Give me a ring.

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 4>I gotta say, if there was ever an excuse to

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 4>have all different passwords, it's when you have to share

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 4>one password. For a long time, I was dealing with

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 4>one password across all platforms.

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>We've been there, Spotify, ten Play, Apple.

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 4>I want to give the password away, but I shouldn't

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 4>because it's still on some platforms. But I don't believe

0:02:58.200 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 4>in sharing passwords full stock.

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I he my first password from my brother.

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:02.959
<v Speaker 4>What was it?

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell you. That's kind of it, that's not it.

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 2>But like I didn't really know what a password could be,

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 2>and I was stressing out, and I was like, if

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 2>I just use his password, then I just make them

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 2>more derivative of that password.

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 4>You know what. I think he's one of the worst

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:19.639
<v Speaker 4>how do I say Injustices of Life? Well, is that

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:21.639
<v Speaker 4>I think one of the best ways to figure out

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 4>who a person is is by knowing their password, because

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:26.839
<v Speaker 4>you picked the most random stuff that scams good.

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:29.519
<v Speaker 2>One of the best ways to connect with each other

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 2>is if we share personal details.

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>You go fast, What is your.

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 2>BSP and would you put the account number directly below

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 2>or next to that? Okay, cool, great, you've lost it.

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't know I'm the one when I get this.

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 2>I got a scam text recently. This is one you've

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 2>got to be mindful of. From New South Wales revenue

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 2>fines right now.

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>When my mum told me.

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 2>That she predicted I be a speed demon on the road,

0:03:58.560 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 2>I said, no, babe, I'm cautious.

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not cautious, actually will.

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 2>But so when I got this text message, it's Sam,

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 2>you have like thirty one days to pay this fine

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 2>unless or else you lose your license, I was like,

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 2>did I do anything wrong the to just click this

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:17.480
<v Speaker 2>link and pay here? No, thank you, I'm not clicking

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 2>links from strangers. I went to my service New southal

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:22.840
<v Speaker 2>was app. I checked my demerits.

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>We don't have all of them. But I didn't have

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:26.119
<v Speaker 1>a fine.

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 4>Can you check your demerits on New South Wales Gov?

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah you can go here, Here we go. You've been

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Flex and Frooms Daily podcast.

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 3>For more, tune Indicator on DAB or stream it on iHeartRadio.