WEBVTT - My Favourite Tip: Richard Wiseman - Add a bit of magic to your presentations

0:00:00.680 --> 0:00:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you know any magic tricks? If you don't, perhaps

0:00:05.080 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>it's time to learn one, because it might improve the

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>way that you work. And that's certainly been the case

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>for psychology professor Richard Wiseman. Scientific American described Richard as

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the most interesting and innovative experimental psychologists in

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:25.639
<v Speaker 1>the world, and Richard's love of magic has improved his

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>work as a psychologist in some unexpected ways. Of course,

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:34.159
<v Speaker 1>it's helpful when he's conducting experiments or research into the

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 1>psychology of magic and illusions, but the lessons magic teachers

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>about performance and holding an audience's attention have been just

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:48.639
<v Speaker 1>as valuable. So how has magic helped Richard learn how

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to craft remarkably better presentations? My name is doctor amanthe Imber.

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm an organizational psychoicist and the founder of behavioral science

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:06.320
<v Speaker 1>consultancy Inventium. And this is how I work, a show

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>about how to help you do your best work. On

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>today is my Favorite Tip episode. We go back to

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>an interview from the past and I pick out my

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 1>favorite tip from the interview. In today's show, I speak

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>with Richard and we start by discussing how magic has

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 1>made him a better psychologist.

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:28.479
<v Speaker 2>I think magic's quite unique because the solutions tricks are

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 2>normally brilliantly elegant and simple, and normally for any what

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 2>magician would call an effect, like a levitation for example,

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 2>that's an effect. Then you have method, which is how

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 2>it's done. There's always another way. You learn there's always

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 2>another way, and that magic evolves. So the way magicians

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 2>float people now is not the same as it was

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 2>thirty years ago, certainly not the same as it was

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 2>one hundred years ago. So you'd learn there's always another way,

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 2>and that if you can find that way, then you

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 2>can perform the trick in a new kind of new

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:08.639
<v Speaker 2>new way. So I think that's important obviously that most

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:10.960
<v Speaker 2>of the solutions are lateral. You know, there is a

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 2>reason why audiences don't think of them is because they're

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:16.800
<v Speaker 2>a bit like those lateral thinking puzzles where you've made

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:19.519
<v Speaker 2>assumptions and trapped yourself in a in a little box.

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:26.519
<v Speaker 2>I think that's helpful. So I think those are the

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 2>sort of obvious strategic ones. There is also with magic.

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 2>If you perform a lot, you have to keep an

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 2>audience with you, and I think that skill, obviously for

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 2>live is useful. But even writing wise, you just think

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 2>how can I make how can I keep an audience

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:46.959
<v Speaker 2>with me? And certainly when I'm writing lay books of

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 2>non technical books, how do you keep an audience with you?

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 2>So I always remember the first time I wrote I

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 2>think it was one of the drafts of The Luck Factor.

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 2>I'd written something like, I don't know one of my

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 2>studies that lucky people miss opportunities. Sorry, lucky people spot opportunities.

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 2>We brought them into the lab, we got them to

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:09.800
<v Speaker 2>do this, and my editor said, you've just given away

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 2>the goods too soon that first line. You've told us

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 2>what the experiment was all about, right, instead of that Right,

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:21.959
<v Speaker 2>we did an experiment to discover if lucky people tended

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 2>to spot opportunities, and the results were astonishing, And now

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 2>you're hooked. Now you're like, oh, what did you do?

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 2>And it's a very simple thing, but you suddenly realize

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 2>that often as writers or speakers, we tell people the

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:38.119
<v Speaker 2>answer and then we explain the answer, and you think

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 2>it's way better to hook people. And magicians are good

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 2>at that kind of thinking.

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 1>What are some other principles that you've learned as a

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>magician and mastered it as a magician? That you've found

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>have been really useful in making your other work, your

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>main work, more engaging.

0:03:57.720 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, so it's tactical because I do work on

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 2>the psychology of magic, so obviously you have to know

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 2>magic to do that. And so they've had one of

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 2>the most successful things, which is the Quacology YouTube channel,

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 2>which started really early within two years of YouTube being

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 2>out there, and we did it just because it was

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 2>a fun way of sharing content. But I certainly weren't

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 2>doing it for money. And that's another big driver on

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 2>this is I always think you can tell passion projects

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 2>from projects the person's getting paid for and doesn't really

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 2>want to do it. It has a flavor and you

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 2>can tell, you know with it. I don't know what

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 2>it is, but within seconds of somebody starting to give

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 2>a talk, you can tell where they want to be

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 2>there or not, and if they don't want to be there,

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:49.119
<v Speaker 2>you start to think, well, I'd rather it wasn't as well,

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 2>so because it's hard when you're giving the same talk

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 2>again and again and again and again. And so one

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:01.599
<v Speaker 2>of the tips actually actually comes from magician I shouldn't.

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Rea is a very famous magician, but I won't say

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 2>who that the problem you've got as a speaker is

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 2>you're going to walk out and give this talk. In

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 2>fact that I'm doing at the weekend, doing the Lucky Talk.

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 2>I've been doing that talk for twenty something years. You

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 2>have to walk out and it has to feel to

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 2>that audience like this is the first time you've given it,

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 2>and you're giving it for them. And I said to

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:29.119
<v Speaker 2>my friend, his magician, how do you cultivate that actor?

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:31.919
<v Speaker 2>You're doing your act twice a day, and they said,

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:35.840
<v Speaker 2>it's really straightforward. I stand in the wings and I

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:39.040
<v Speaker 2>tell myself the truth, and the truth is that one

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 2>day I won't be doing this. I'll be too old,

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:47.160
<v Speaker 2>or the audience won't turn up, or I'll have an

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 2>accident or whatever it is, I won't want it. One

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 2>day I will not be doing this. And he said,

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 2>I let the sadness of that go into my bones,

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 2>and then I think it's not today, though, and I

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 2>walk out and I do that now. I do it

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:06.679
<v Speaker 2>because you, and that keeps you in that moment, because

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 2>you won't be anything you do where it's writing books

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 2>or making videos, where I will not be doing it forever.

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 2>There'll come a day when I'm not doing it, and

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 2>we all assume these things are going to continue. They won't.

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 2>They won't. So live in the moment and enjoy at

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 2>that moment and for a live event that I think

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 2>carries So I think those are all kind of magiciany

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:34.679
<v Speaker 2>thinking things. Magicians tend to be quite a thoughtful lot.

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:40.239
<v Speaker 1>I hope you enjoyed this little extract from my chat

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 1>with Richard Wiseman. If you're keen to listen to the

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>full interview, there is a link to that in the

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>show notes. If you're looking for motives to improve the

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>way that you work, I write a short fortnightly newsletter

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:57.159
<v Speaker 1>that contains three cool things that I've discovered that helped

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>me work better, ranging from software there and gadgets that

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:04.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm loving through to interesting research findings. You can sign

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:07.360
<v Speaker 1>up for that at Howiwork dot com. That's how I

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Work dot co. How I Work is produced by Inventium

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>with production support from Dead Set Studios. And thank you

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>to Matt Nimba, who does the audio mix for every

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>episode and makes everything sound so much better than it

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>would have otherwise. See you next time.