WEBVTT - COURTNEY TENNIS LATELY?

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Guess who's back. He goes back a friend. He gets no, no, no, back.

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry that.

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 2>He's just like, what what am I listening to?

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>We have a very well respected tennis journalist, Courtney Walsh

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>is here.

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 2>He is questioning his choices this morning.

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I like that.

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm like one of those clowns at a carnival with

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:38.239
<v Speaker 3>my mouth wide open, moving from one side to the other,

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 3>going what are they going on?

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 2>People? Okay, they seem quite normal when we were talking before.

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well I think we're more clowns at a carnival

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and your respected journey.

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it depends on who you talk Tory for about

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 3>ten minutes and and there was a couple of inquisitive

0:00:57.320 --> 0:01:01.279
<v Speaker 3>looks my way, what the hell are you doing here?

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 3>And who you want to to the site?

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 2>Is this going to be another banded episode?

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Have you ruffled any feathers in your career? Can you

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>talk about it or.

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 3>I'll going back? I mean it's not for a few years.

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 3>And I think one of the pleasures of my year

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:19.759
<v Speaker 3>has always been part of the AO radio team, which

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's a great sort of fortnite here and

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 3>being able to commentate and when you're walking around and

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:29.680
<v Speaker 3>listening during the Austrain Open. But no, it's certainly at

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 3>different stages. I've written some pieces that haven't necessarily gone

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 3>down as well as what you might expect. But I always,

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, hold firm and I saw one of the

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:43.319
<v Speaker 3>one of the people in the in the lift. We

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:46.119
<v Speaker 3>always have a little round about it Wimbledon each year

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 3>where we go over old ground and in the end

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 3>shake and have a beer. And I think it's a

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 3>great reason to be able to do this back and forth.

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 3>That's what you're supposed to do.

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>You're meant to have a take an opinion, right Otherwise

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>it's just dry recounting of scores, and you know that's

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 1>not good.

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 3>What's my mind is more, you know, you delve into

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 3>the I suppose some of the inner workings, you know.

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 3>Opinion wise, I'm not necessarily someone that's going to come

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:14.119
<v Speaker 3>and slag a player, because I think it's pretty incredible

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 3>to even get to a grain slam. I think it's

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 3>an astonishing thing. So I'm not going to pan a

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 3>player necessarily unless you want me to.

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes, please, that's what we're all about.

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>On most Overrated player of all time and go.

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 3>Oh, boy where he start. Didn't that guy rafter like

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:37.360
<v Speaker 3>number one in the world for like a week? I

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 3>mean it was a week, Yeah, it was a week.

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 2>We asked him about it, he laughed, that's.

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>A good story.

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 3>I've got a bone to pick with the because I

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 3>played a bit of paddle in my time, nowhere near

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 3>as good as Pat. But he's stolen my pedal partner.

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:55.920
<v Speaker 3>Now Midtlely haven't played for a couple of years, but

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 3>he's stolen my peddle partner, his double's partner in the

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 3>pedal Championship around Australia.

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>So can you just outrageous? Can you go watch like

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:08.360
<v Speaker 1>a paddle cuck?

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Through the glass?

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's rough.

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 3>Man, it's outrageous. No, he is one of the greater

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 3>many tennis as we all know. I don't really have

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 3>And if I was my mate, Rob, you had the

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:27.919
<v Speaker 3>choice between a guy who is a radick and inconsistent

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 3>like myself, or a Jewel Grand Slam champion Davious Cup legend,

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 3>world number one. I think he's made the right call.

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 3>And in terms of the talent level as well, it's

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm in a flat line a little bit. Pats, even

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 3>his fifties his rate of improvement just goes. Ugh. I

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 3>mean that's still not happy though.

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>That's no. I mean I wouldn't be either. That's brutal stuff.

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>But I mean this is what you're seeing though. You're

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>seeing people make the pivot into whatever pickleball. Maybe Jack

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Soarker is doing good things, but a lot of them

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>like go to pad l or something and it's like

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>they're crushing.

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 2>It's a bit more respectable, I think. Yeah, for sure,

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 2>it was a little bit more skill involved. Yeah, it's fair.

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 3>I must put down the cans and walked out when no,

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm joking people. I'm very happy to see people on

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 3>the pickle court. Anyone with a racket in hand is

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 3>a is a good thing for mine.

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 1>But that's true.

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 3>You see some you see some really really good players

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 3>from tennis players who have made the transition. But it's

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 3>a different sporting Thailand. It's really hard.

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I think what osteo surgeons in America are

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>booming at the moment because of all people playing peckle ball,

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>so good for them.

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:43.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:47.480
<v Speaker 3>I jumped into Paul Kilderry, who's the head of tennis here,

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 3>and he said he'd been on the pedal court last

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 3>week and he said he still felt sore from really

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 3>hips all the way down to the tip of his

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 3>big toe.

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 2>So what else did Paul say?

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Joking, dude, it's so good to have you in Courtney.

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 1>We're very jealous. You're off to the French Open this week.

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's your favorite favorite slam.

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 3>I think even wimbled and I think of that too.

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, look, I love here, but in case, we

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 3>all know when you're working here, it's it's working there long, long,

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:24.480
<v Speaker 3>long days and everything that's brilliant about the Australia Open,

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 3>the tennis, but also the music in the the and

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:29.919
<v Speaker 3>the beer guarden, et cetera. Yeah, don't really get the

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 3>chance to enjoy that.

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, we found with the players that come in,

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>if we have them what their favorite slam is. It's

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>like talking about their children. You gotta go. I love

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>them all equally, you know, they all have different aspects

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:44.799
<v Speaker 1>that I like. And it's like, just say you hate

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the US Open. We all know your thinking.

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:51.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they all said that the Australian Open was their favorite.

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah it is. I mean it's fun. It's called the

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>happiest Slam for a reason, and it checks out and

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>it's the most party vibe one I've been to. I

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:02.479
<v Speaker 1>haven't been to the French. Yeah, good energy, great grounds.

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>But like going to the French, what do you love

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 1>about it there? Because it is totally different than the

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>other three.

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it really is. And it goes from I mean,

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 3>look that the focus is really on the tennis. So

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 3>qualifying week will be you know, start Monday. There's no

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 3>one point Slam like there was here. There's no mixed

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 3>doubles extravaganza like there was in New York last year

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 3>with all those stars. It is a real focus on

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 3>the tennis. Tennis and they love the tennis. But you go,

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 3>you walk into the grounds and and look at the

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 3>stadiums themselves. The Philip Chetrier, which is the main stadium,

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:42.279
<v Speaker 3>I mean it's it's named after the administrator, a famous

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 3>tennis administrator. You know, it's a that's a different thing

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 3>to start with, and it's this beautiful art deco sort

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 3>of design initially tennis administrator.

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:54.799
<v Speaker 1>So like, who would who's the equivalent for the AO

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that if they named a stadium.

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:59.799
<v Speaker 3>After Craig Craig Tiler, Yeah.

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Stadium, I guess yeah, it works, it works. Yeah, it's

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>so shatter. It was the same level of tournament director

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:08.040
<v Speaker 1>type thing.

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah yeah, and very influential globally as well. So yeah,

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 3>well respected. And you know they had like we we've

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 3>got all their golden generation. They had the Musketeers and

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 3>there's statues and the Musketees. When you walk in this

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 3>this is great sort of big statue of raffa large

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 3>and then life. I still think it's one of the

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 3>most amazing things. To go to a tournament and Raff

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 3>is still in the drawer plane and there's this gigantic

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 3>statue of him swinging this wild whipping forehands.

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Right, and it's like that kind of silver like shards. Yeah, yeah,

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>it looks fantastic. It's not like the who's the soccer

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>player they made the bust of and it like looks Ronaldo.

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>That one is atrocious.

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:53.239
<v Speaker 3>Oh this is huge.

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 2>It is it's ten foot.

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, which is amazing. And then there's this new court.

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 3>Well not so now, but it was built for the

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 3>Olympics initially. Simone Mathews is the court. Susan long long

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 3>than it's a iconic champion in the twenties and the

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 3>thirties over there, who was just a magnificent player, Simone Mathew.

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 3>Is this third stadium court so I especially the equivalent

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 3>of our John Kaine Arena. But you walk in there

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 3>and it's got it's basically a glasshouse. There's plants all

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 3>the way around. It's been designed specifically because it's in

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 3>a botanical garden that just before you get to the site.

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 3>So it's this magnificent, beautiful, very different court to what

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:37.440
<v Speaker 3>you would normally experience. So those elements and even to

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 3>the extent of seri chic, the you know, the staff

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 3>as you know in Australia we have, although in australia's

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 3>improved a lot. In the US, for example, you might

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 3>have the plain blue polo and the black pants Paris Wimbledon,

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 3>pretty stylish. All the staffers, the young staffers are very

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 3>stylish there. They're wearing there, you know, their hats there,

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 3>they're they're very stylish trousers. So it's it's there's a

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 3>lot difference about it, very difine.

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Very cool because everyone in the crowd too is wearing

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 2>the Panama hat. Is that something you get on arrival?

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 2>You have to do they just hand them out. What's

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 2>going on.

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 3>There's good reason that I in particularly needed very handy

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 3>for my hairline. You do see them though, And I

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 3>was just flicking through a magazine yesterday which is soon

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 3>to be launched a different sort of brand, and they

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:31.679
<v Speaker 3>had some of the shots from you know that make

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 3>rolling gross what rolling Garros is, and the Panama hat

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 3>is one of them. And it's this great photo and

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 3>just all around the court of people wearing the Panama hats.

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 3>Shot from above. You know you've got the bag, like

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:46.839
<v Speaker 3>if you've played in Melbourne on Oti car courts well

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:50.719
<v Speaker 3>Clay is very you know, it's similarities, but you know,

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 3>finer surface. But photos of the people bagging you get

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 3>the dust sort of kicking up. It's and the crowd,

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's not so much the Oi oi, which

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 3>I've got to say, thank god.

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 1>It's.

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 2>What's the.

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely and if a French player is in action, it

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:17.479
<v Speaker 3>is deafening, oh man, insane, Like the crowd goes blistic

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:23.079
<v Speaker 3>right into it.

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Fritz Render Kanesh match from last year two years

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>ago amazing, like the craziest atmosphere and Taylor's were eventually

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:35.199
<v Speaker 1>coming out on top and then just like was he

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:38.079
<v Speaker 1>blowing kisses to the crowd and they were puting the

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:41.959
<v Speaker 1>hell out of him and it was amazing. Yeah, just

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>like the French crowd goes nuts.

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 3>It's and and that adds to it, like I love

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:48.439
<v Speaker 3>the partisan In fact, you see it all the way

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 3>through the clay swing. We know there's been some complaints

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 3>sort of like in Rome where young wolf On Sekah

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:58.319
<v Speaker 3>was was sort of up in. The Brazilians were right

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:01.559
<v Speaker 3>into him with me Jenivick and Vick you see those

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 3>sort of things. But in France it really is for

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 3>the French. One of the things about Rafa who were

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 3>talking about is that he was booed at different stages

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 3>in the infancy of his career. It's not until he

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:13.959
<v Speaker 3>won fourteen of them, but he really well ten or

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 3>so he started to really win them over and they

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 3>loved him after that. But it took him a while

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 3>because he was Spanish and you know, to win over

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 3>that crowd. I'm just trying to.

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Think which French players Rafa would have been playing in

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the infancy of his career. Who was the big Was.

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 3>It gas Guay with the magnificent one handed back end

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 3>and they both you know this, they basically came through

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 3>at the same stage and gas Gay was the great

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 3>hope because Yannick Noah was the last french Man to

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 3>win at rollingdo I saw all the way back at

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:47.079
<v Speaker 3>the tournaments. I think he debuted at fifteen and he

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 3>got to world number seven. He made semi finals, a

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:52.679
<v Speaker 3>couple of three Grand Slam semi finals. So he had

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 3>a really really good career and only retired, you know,

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 3>last year, the last year. But you know, gas Gay

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 3>was his came along with him, so did on Fees,

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, another unbelievable talent and he's still going and

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:09.319
<v Speaker 3>this is his farewell tour and Joe Joe Wilfrid's song,

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 3>it was another one that came through and Jill Simon.

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 3>So Franz had some great players, really good players, Rafa.

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 3>He just blunted the blunted the hopes every year of

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:19.199
<v Speaker 3>them and everyone else.

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, when you start dominating like he did, I mean

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:24.079
<v Speaker 1>it's hard not to just get behind him. And then

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>obviously he's you know, has the statue there do they

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:31.199
<v Speaker 1>have statues of French players the musketees? Okay, going back

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>to back to the nineteen twenties. Yeah, so there's no

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:35.479
<v Speaker 1>Gui fourger.

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 3>Always it always used to trick me, you know, guy

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Forget when I didn't this guy Forget a great player

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 3>and tournament director. Yeah, well it could have been the

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 3>Fourget stadium.

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Wow, yeah they should. The French should have just gone

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>with like French people everyone knows, like the Gerard des

0:12:56.440 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>bardous Dady, Yeah, the peppy. Well, we should say for

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>our listeners that as of recording, we're at the quarterfinals

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>of the REALM Italian Open, and so that are obviously

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>knowledge of what happens in the tournament will be limited,

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>but as it stands right now, we did the Ego

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Shavontek song at the start because she looks like she's

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>informed and she looks scary going into the French Like

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll start with the women's side of things. Who do

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 1>you like, who do you think is going to be

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>a contender? Who do you think is maybe having a

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:41.319
<v Speaker 1>rough season? Sebolonca and uh or not? Well? Indian wells

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>in the AO obviously huge, but then she's losing a

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 1>bunch of matches in the lead up, Like.

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 3>It's if you could have a small dartboard with a

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 3>few names on it. Yeah, so I think it's a

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 3>small group that can win it. Yeah, but I could

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 3>not pick with any certainty who that is, and that

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 3>includes I think she's been so inconsistent. I don't think

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:04.439
<v Speaker 3>she I know we're saying she might be back. I

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 3>don't think she's back yet. But she's an infancy of

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 3>a new coaching sort of partnership. He snapped his achilles

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 3>tendon last week playing yes, leading in front Roy, which

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 3>is not a great thing to do, but he so.

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 3>But whether that affects her on the court, I don't

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 3>don't necessarily think so. Still, the strategy sort of part

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 3>of it.

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>She stamped Osa the other absolutely did the vision of

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>her hitting with Rafa at the Academy. I mean, there's things,

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and she her you know, past forum on clay obviously

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>has to be a huge factor.

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 3>So you would still have her as I think you

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 3>would have her as a favorite. But that what troubles

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 3>me is that she hasn't won a clay court tournament

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 3>through the through the summer, and so she's winning matches absolutely,

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 3>but she's not as dominant. She's not the dominant player

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 3>she was post sash Barti's retirement. Without without I think

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 3>that's indisputable. She's just not the not the same dominance.

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 3>Now that's probably because other players have continued to rise,

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 3>and the sable Anka, you know, finding her consistency extra

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 3>trying to take that next step on clay for Sablenka

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 3>is the big things. She was very close last year

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 3>in that final. I really liked the way Coco Goff

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 3>is going about it. You know, she won. I mean

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 3>people were saying that was a bad final last year.

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 3>I loved it because she played ugly and won. Like

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 3>she You're up against someone who's powerful as and it's

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 3>awesome and as formidable as what arounda Sablenka is, and

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 3>it was really difficult condition. So Coco adjusted. She she

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 3>played ugly, but she hid enough balls, back, drew enough

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 3>errors and had the fortitude at the end to win

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 3>the second Grand Slam. And she had a good win

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 3>in Rome overnight as well against Dreva, who I think

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 3>her form. I think it will come for her. You know,

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 3>last year she left in tears and despair after losing

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 3>to the local favorite Boisson, who we haven't seen basically

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 3>since after that amazing run to the semifinals. But I

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 3>think mirror is certainly right there and Coco, I think

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Arena mirrors.

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>People forget she's only ninety so she's a.

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Big emotional swings, but I kind of love that. Yeah,

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 2>they show the passion.

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, like and that's fine, like you're a young players

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 3>and in the other and with Coco, it's it's amazing.

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 3>The other day she went up against an American who

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 3>he saw here, Shoviku was so good and made it

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 3>through to the I think the quarter finals here in January,

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 3>Coco was the grand old lady. It's twenty two, yeah, crazy, yeah,

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 3>and Jo got a match point yeah, and then yeah,

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 3>just Coco.

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 1>A lot of comeback wins for Coco, right, and for golf,

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>it all comes down to how she's serving on any

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>given day, right, that's her biggest achilles. Oh no, you don't,

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>you don't. I can't believe.

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 2>That's just I'm so sorry.

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>And so like if I don't know, I know she's

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 1>got a new serving coach, is that right there?

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 3>I think they're working on the biomechanics. It's amazing that

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 3>she's already got two Grand Slams. I think she sets

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 3>a record. Nipo been the first for the youngest of

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 3>fifteen quarterfinals at this at the lastest level. Just as

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 3>and you're evers at one the other days the youngest

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:11.439
<v Speaker 3>to ten sort of quarter finals, so it might be

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 3>fifteen semi finals at that level. But yeah, they are

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 3>record breaking plays in some regards. And that's the time

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 3>when you have got a Spiontic, you have got a Sablenka.

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 3>Jess Bagoula is playing well. I love just glancing through results.

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:27.160
<v Speaker 3>She's playing with Storm Hunter this week and they're through

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 3>to the quarters in Roman. Really, I love watching like

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:34.199
<v Speaker 3>Jess play and Storm and Storms a ripper, such a

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 3>such a great Aussie talent. So yeah, I love watching

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 3>the women's tennis, I think, and I think the fact

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 3>that you can't identify the winner with any certainty makes

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 3>it really interesting.

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 1>We haven't even mentioned so I mean another huge contender

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>for the title. I mean I'd love to see we

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 1>love the mooch here.

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:54.400
<v Speaker 2>The move.

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Just her style of player is awesome to watch. And yeah,

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean Coco obviously moves on the clay. I think better, well,

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Ego's movement. It's her Coco for like, best movers on

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the dirt. I think. So Eddie dark horses on the

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>women's side, do you think.

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 3>Uh, well, let's go to the mook because she did

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 3>make the what the final two years ago? Yeah, was

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 3>it two years ago? Three years ago?

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 3>The semi I mean she's such a sublime player, dark horses.

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 2>What about that Sertsi Certsy Christia Cristaia. Yeah, like is

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:43.400
<v Speaker 2>it Sertsy? I mean it's a tricky yeah.

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, she Well, I mean it's an amazing career resurgence

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 3>and her last year on the tour. She's thirty six,

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 3>and here she's into a semi final of a of

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 3>the Italian Open. Her career high, I think is twenty one.

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 3>I think that if she wins, she gets twenty one

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 3>no points to defend. Sort of through the grass season,

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 3>she s announce it's going to be a retiring year,

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:08.680
<v Speaker 3>and here she's playing the best tennis of her life.

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:11.680
<v Speaker 3>It often makes me wonder, do you go back to

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 3>the well again? Or is this is that the reason

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm playing well? Because well, I've got nothing to losing.

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 3>Saying goodbye to each of these big, great cities of

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 3>the world.

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I think. So, I mean, hasn't she said if she

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:24.440
<v Speaker 1>wins Roalm the Serana Christia, that she's going to stay

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:27.119
<v Speaker 1>on tour for another year or two years whatever. So,

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean that would be an awesome storyline, but Rome

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 1>will be interesting. I mean some huge quarter. They're through

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:36.400
<v Speaker 1>to the Semis now in is that right?

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 3>Or Semis and the women's well, sorry, two semi finalists

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 3>are through. You know these weird Fortnite Masters where the

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 3>draw gets all out of wax. I think we've still

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 3>got the where we're recording at the time where the

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 3>four men's courters are to be played. There's still a

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 3>couple of women's quarters to be played, but we're basically

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 3>from tomorrow will hit the hit the regular sort of

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 3>where it's a little easy to comprehend what's going on

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 3>into yeah, to try and take note of who's dount

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 3>what and where.

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I mean it's fascinating. Like you said, the

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 1>women's draw, it's like a handful of players that could

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>all take it out, or someone could just have a

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>crazy tournament and you know, all of a sudden, Barbara Chikova,

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:21.439
<v Speaker 1>we're all pronouncing it wrong today except for the pro

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>or you said jo Dar before and I've only heard

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 1>Hoda Hoda. Are you Are you an Alcoraz or an

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:33.160
<v Speaker 1>alcareth man?

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:34.919
<v Speaker 3>It depends on who I'm talking to him.

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, we we've shown that Lizzie is a serce Hoda.

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 2>That sounds very game that is, yeah, I guess, and

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:48.400
<v Speaker 2>he could.

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean he would be a game of throwing to

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:51.360
<v Speaker 3>start character with that forehand.

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, do you think his game is very

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 1>similar looking to Sinner's game? When I watch him play,

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:02.479
<v Speaker 1>it just seems like kind of the just world class

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:05.440
<v Speaker 1>obviously ground is and then just putting people in corners

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and whipping fourhands and cross cord. I just see a

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of center in his style. Would you agree?

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 3>I want to see him on hard court small before,

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:17.359
<v Speaker 3>because I mean the movement for Cinner is what I

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 3>think he's probably underrated that we know when he's walking,

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:25.159
<v Speaker 3>he's got that. So it's quite an ungainly gate old man, or.

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:27.919
<v Speaker 2>It's a real old man instead of I just got up.

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:30.239
<v Speaker 3>It really does.

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 2>Look at it.

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 3>And then you see him in the point and he glides,

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:35.719
<v Speaker 3>it's like it's like he's skiing like you watched him

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 3>on hard court, and just his ability to get forward

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:40.920
<v Speaker 3>to to move like he's he's working a slalem run

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 3>getting back to the basement. So I want to see

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:48.399
<v Speaker 3>Da on Yoda. Let's just go with Rafa.

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>That will confused anyone Spanish raffer I like Raffa for

0:21:57.240 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the French. Are you are you actually a tennis you

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 1>know he retired.

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I wouldn't put it past him, but no, I'd

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:09.919
<v Speaker 3>like to see him on the rest. But I think

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:12.440
<v Speaker 3>what you're saying is, I mean, the forehand is formidable

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 3>and his results for someone who was in college. You know,

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:18.160
<v Speaker 3>we know he walked out of it and is still

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Speaker 3>so young and so powerful. It's a phenomenal transition so

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 3>swiftly to get to where he is. And I think

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 3>if he wins another actually we see him in the

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:30.639
<v Speaker 3>top twenty four, and he's played, you know, at the

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:32.160
<v Speaker 3>top level. I mean, he was really good in canber

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 3>obviously before the ass Open, winning winning that challenger, and

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 3>that challenger leading into the austral Open tends to produce

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:42.159
<v Speaker 3>some really really good players guys to keep an eye on,

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:45.199
<v Speaker 3>and he won there. But I'd like to see him

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 3>just more on the hard courts. And I'd like to

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:49.639
<v Speaker 3>see him over five sets as well, because he's been

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:52.400
<v Speaker 3>winning over three sets against all these guys. See whether

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 3>it's sustainable over five sets. I mean the way he's

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 3>been winning so quick, so you'd think it's sustainable, But

0:22:58.440 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 3>just to see how it goes when he's in a

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 3>real dog dog fight, let's hope against a French player

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 3>in a fortnight. Oh, just see how he handles that

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:10.120
<v Speaker 3>sort of that sort of Occasion'll he'll learn and he'll

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 3>get better and better. But that's the sort of challenge

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:14.879
<v Speaker 3>at nine am, we think, yeah, because it took in

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 3>that period to sort of break through. He made it.

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 3>He made a quarter final imparisons a ninety year old,

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 3>and then it took him another three years to break through.

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 3>Alcor al Craze was however, he swings mighty fine. He

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 3>was nineteen, but it took him another couple of years

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 3>after that. Novak one here at nineteen and it took

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:42.479
<v Speaker 3>him a few years. So you know, it'll be interesting

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:45.160
<v Speaker 3>to see what happens with me so jealous.

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Of him, going yeah, I've been predicting Eager winning the

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 1>French since January. So I mean, before we get into

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the men's draw proper, I'm going to pin you down

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:58.679
<v Speaker 1>and who are you picking for the French On.

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:02.920
<v Speaker 3>The women's I'm going to go the back to back champion. Okay,

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 3>I'll go with Coco.

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Nice all right.

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 2>I was thinking Cocoa too, You're going coco.

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was thinking, I wonder what was your prediction

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>in January though, let's go back and revisit.

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Let's go French double anka again.

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:19.640
<v Speaker 3>Did you do all full?

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Yeah, what did I do?

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It was probably like Sercy or.

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 3>Something, my best place.

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:31.159
<v Speaker 2>Uh No, I probably said.

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>You do love Svidelina and she is Is this her

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:37.119
<v Speaker 1>last year? Has she said that?

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 3>No, It's Gal's last year. Oh yeah, I think he'll

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:41.880
<v Speaker 3>do some at home parenting in the next little while.

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Well, he's got the wild card as well

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>as Stan Varenka fun so, I mean that's awesome.

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's fun.

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Even if they win, just the first round match would

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:56.119
<v Speaker 1>just be so exciting and great. Obviously Gale will and

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I think Stan will get that crowd response as well.

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:01.400
<v Speaker 3>It's a fuller champion, I think, so on a finalist

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 3>and what and what they do really well in Paris

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 3>is the farewell ceremonies, particularly with the French players, and

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 3>when they did it with Rafa last year, which was

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 3>a beautiful touch and they had the little plarque beside

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 3>the court. But with the French players, they will out

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 3>the modern day musketeers that have played alongside them. So

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 3>we'll see gas Gay, we'll see we'll see song and

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 3>we'll see some on They'll all be standing, you know,

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:28.160
<v Speaker 3>they'll always caught side. Emily Maresmo's the tournament director, shall

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 3>have something and it's just a really really lovely touch

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:35.159
<v Speaker 3>in a great way in the crowd because they are

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 3>real tennis lovers, they they get great applause, so that

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 3>when those two go out, I think it'll be a

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 3>really nice moment in tennis. You know, when they depart,

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 3>rolland Garross, I know, I know they'll keep playing, but

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:50.920
<v Speaker 3>I think here in particular is where they'll get the

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 3>best receptions.

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the crowd's going to be and it will be

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 1>emotional and there will be a lot of like great

0:25:56.840 --> 0:25:59.640
<v Speaker 1>crowds Aboart. It be awesome matches to watch. The one

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:02.360
<v Speaker 1>guy I'm going to make sure to set a time

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 1>aside to watch is going to be Quarantine Moute throughout

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the French because he revs the crowd up. He's just

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>crafty as hell out there and it's just an awesome player,

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, just from the spectator point of view, and

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I think he'll be revving up the crowd to mess

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>with his opponent.

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 3>He's a maestro. Yeah, he's just marvelous to watch. I mean,

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 3>he saw him here on CNNY court not that long ago,

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 3>four months ago, when he was you know, he got beaten.

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:37.399
<v Speaker 3>But it's a pleasure watching him and get beaten. The

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 3>way he plays, not not not not that yeah, you know,

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean some players he absolutely riles and rubs people

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:46.159
<v Speaker 3>up the wrong way on court, but just watching him

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 3>just to touch the angles, the flare, the what is

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 3>this guy going to do next? It's wonderful to watch.

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:55.119
<v Speaker 1>It's like exhibition tennis. Half the time he's hitting shots

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:57.439
<v Speaker 1>that you're like, that's no coach told you.

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 3>So.

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>In the men's side, obviously kind of the opposite to

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the women's where it's just one guy who everyone's like, oh,

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 1>it's aforegone conclusion. I mean, do you feel that way,

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel like there's actual contenders to push center

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 1>or is it just kind of like, well, just give

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>him the trophy now we know it's going to happen.

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm always really reluctant to say that they've got to

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 3>get to a fortnight. There's seven matches, five sets, and

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 3>he was beaten here in January by an old guy

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 3>middlely an old guy who can play in Djokovic. But

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 3>he has been remarkable through this clay season and I

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:45.639
<v Speaker 3>was very, very lucky to be there last year for

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 3>that rolling gross final where he played one of the

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 3>greats of all time and he had he had Alkroth.

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:54.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm so jealous you are out that obviously it looks

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 3>still still final. Yeah, and like one of the all

0:27:57.680 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 3>times were.

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 1>You wearing your big Panama hat again? Back to the

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Panama hats. It's annoying to give out a big hat

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to spectators for a crowd. Don't you think someone in

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 1>front of you wearing a giant hat is the most

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>annoying thing at a tennis.

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 3>Oh, it's like that the person he's quite toll in

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 3>front of you. It's like.

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:21.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like I don't know. It's like next year for

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the AO, we give out sobreros for everyone having fun it.

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>That's it shows such a lack of appreciation for fans

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>in the stands.

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:34.440
<v Speaker 2>I think the Australian Open version would be like a

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 2>big Bunnings hat. Have you seen like just big outdoor

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 2>straw hats?

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh right right, no, no, no, I think yeah, we

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 1>give out shoes for people to drink beers out of.

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 3>Good new beer coming on. I can't remember.

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh maybe no, I don't know major announcements.

0:28:57.360 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 3>Take binding that back right now, security outside. So you

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 3>were at the front op and final last year. One

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 3>of the best ever. I think Grand slams. I don't

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 3>even think that's recency bias. I think that's right up

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 3>there with the top five or so of all time,

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 3>and given given the two combatants, and you know the

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 3>time in tennis, the transition from the big three into

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 3>these two are just superstars of the sport. And Sinner

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 3>was amazing and had those match points and was in

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 3>control against the guy that I think is well not

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 3>the greatest clay court player of all time, given but

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 3>he would be in the top five already. I think

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 3>in Grand Slam. You know, he's defended Ross. It's an

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 3>incredible thing to be able to defend the rolling gross title.

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 3>Bags done it. Obviously Raff has done it, but you

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:46.480
<v Speaker 3>know it's exceptionally hard to do. Carlos has done that,

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 3>but he took him. He was right on the very

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:51.959
<v Speaker 3>brink of defeat against Sinner, and then we've seen him

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 3>through this clay court season touch wood. We don't know

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 3>what's going to happen in the next couple of days,

0:29:57.360 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 3>but he's already said a record in terms of us

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 3>as wins. Sorry, he's level with Novak as we speaking

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:07.840
<v Speaker 3>on thirty one. And if he wins, then this new record.

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>How old was Novak when he sat there?

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 3>Older like Novak's records are older like some And I mean,

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, I think the masses the five or four

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 3>in a row was twenty eight or twenty nine. So

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, he's well ahead of you know, in terms

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 3>of you know, we're in terms of age, ahead of

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 3>the curve in that regard, as Carlos is in a

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 3>lot of the things he's doing. So we're seeing two

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 3>guys who, after an amazing generation at breaking new records,

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 3>are sitting new ground. Got a long way to go

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 3>to match the longevity. But I would think, and what

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 3>we've seen so far given you probably think that Zeverev

0:30:44.160 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 3>is the second best clay court player in the world,

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 3>and he got beaten overnight. But right by Dardario think.

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:56.320
<v Speaker 1>He's just got an Italian guy problem because sinners like

0:30:56.880 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, ruined his brain because he lost to Kabali

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>And now Dardaeri and so he just sees Italian. Yeah,

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 1>he like drives by a pizza players and has a panic.

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 3>Attack affording the pastor.

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know he's there of to me how

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 1>he looks lately because he got did he get bageled

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>in the final set against Darderry.

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 3>He did, but he also made a final yeah, you know,

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 3>two weeks ago. Like in his form on clay Stax,

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:27.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean his form has actually been very impressive aside

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 3>from the Italians. Like I think he's he's recording last

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 3>few months, he's lost to the Italians and no one else.

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 3>So but given that, you think, well, Sinner, who also

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:40.560
<v Speaker 3>has an Italian problem. I think he's won over ninety

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:42.920
<v Speaker 3>when he's nineteenth straight match against an Italian rival. So

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 3>he gives no love to his compatriots, no love to

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 3>many people actually.

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, well that's fascinating because during the Australian Open,

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it was Dardari that Cinner was playing, and

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>so there's a lot of Italian fans and they seem

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 1>to be backing Dardari more in the.

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 3>It's that curious part of Italy.

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, the part of that, but the geography.

0:32:07.840 --> 0:32:11.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no north and sort of closer to Austria and Austria.

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he looks more Austrian then.

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 2>Imagine the Italians here are probably more southern.

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and they see Baratini in they're like that it's Italian,

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you know. Okay, So I mean who do you like

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that could possibly push center for the French? I mean

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the names that are touted or Fonseka Fees now hod

0:32:38.000 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 1>are I mean outside of Zverev? Are you just backing

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Djokovic to get deep or are you worried about his forum?

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 3>What do you think? I don't think we've seen enough

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 3>of him, but we know that when Novak arrives at

0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 3>Rolling US, it's similar to raffering terms of he tends

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:58.800
<v Speaker 3>to perform and he tends to push deep. Yeah, and

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 3>he's the type of playing the only needs to he

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 3>can get there and work his way into form in

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 3>a match. So I would think, yeah, you think he

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 3>probably He won Paris two years ago as that great

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 3>Olympic triumph to cap his career. So he's you know,

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 3>he's got the Rolling Gross title and he's got the

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 3>careers you know, the career Grand Slam there. You know,

0:33:19.080 --> 0:33:21.480
<v Speaker 3>he drew the big love hard after he finally broke

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 3>through and won there, Yeah.

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:25.160
<v Speaker 1>But how badly does he want twenty five?

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 3>He wants that, and with the two of them out,

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 3>that's sorry. With one of them out, this is a chance.

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 3>It's like it's like they used to say. He used

0:33:36.040 --> 0:33:38.959
<v Speaker 3>to say, you go up against Andy Murray and if

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:42.720
<v Speaker 3>you beat Andy Murray, then you'd have Jokovic or Nadal

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:44.239
<v Speaker 3>or Fetter, And if you manage to beat one of those,

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 3>then there'd be another one still there waiting. And to

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:48.240
<v Speaker 3>try and get through three of them were so hard

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:51.320
<v Speaker 3>with these guys. He beats in here, but then he

0:33:51.440 --> 0:33:53.360
<v Speaker 3>runs into a brick wall, but it took him such

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 3>an amazing amount of energy to get through. He runs

0:33:56.680 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 3>into the brick wall against alcraz in the.

0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Final, he readlined the first one that and then just

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:02.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of keep it up.

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 3>So it's sort of so with one of them one

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 3>less there, well, then you know he does fancy his chance.

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:10.799
<v Speaker 3>But then you think, you know, those young guys are

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:14.400
<v Speaker 3>coming and they're really exciting. It's they are great talents.

0:34:14.800 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 3>Will they make a step here? Who knows? It's it's

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:20.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's a real chance without again, because Carlos

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 3>is not there, there's a there's a chance for someone

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:25.719
<v Speaker 3>to push deep or will it be an established as

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 3>very on the other side of that, or he said

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:31.160
<v Speaker 3>he's injured, so I don't think it'll be him. Yeah, Alex,

0:34:31.200 --> 0:34:32.719
<v Speaker 3>I'd love to demon or I'd love to say but

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:34.960
<v Speaker 3>he hasn't been playing great, but I can see him

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 3>in the second week. Well, whether it's further look, I

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:41.320
<v Speaker 3>think on Clay is going to be an issue, but

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:43.720
<v Speaker 3>there's there's an opportunity and that makes it exciting.

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:47.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, before we talk about the AUSSI players, who

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of those names do you think the hope is the

0:34:51.120 --> 0:34:56.839
<v Speaker 1>most for real? Like Arthur, Yeah, fun Taka Hod are

0:34:57.080 --> 0:35:00.480
<v Speaker 1>like that. You've watched maybe not enough of Hod to

0:35:00.560 --> 0:35:02.920
<v Speaker 1>make a proper assessment, but like, who do you think

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:05.919
<v Speaker 1>is going to be if there is a big three

0:35:06.000 --> 0:35:09.319
<v Speaker 1>in the future going forward? Who takes that man?

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 3>Who takes the third spot? I really like Fees, but

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:18.440
<v Speaker 3>he's a couple of years older than them. But his explosiveness,

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:25.000
<v Speaker 3>his shot making, his athleticism is extraordinary and when he's

0:35:25.120 --> 0:35:28.640
<v Speaker 3>up and going, like Alex played him win more than

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 3>a couple of years ago, the match where he got

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 3>injured basically on match point. But it was a great

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 3>match and Alex was playing unbelievably well and I thought

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 3>he would be a really strong chance against Novak in

0:35:39.080 --> 0:35:41.320
<v Speaker 3>the next match. So well was he playing, and Fees

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 3>pushed him really close then, And we're now two years on.

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 3>He was injured obviously for a lot of last year,

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:49.879
<v Speaker 3>but I think what we've seen since he's been back

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:52.879
<v Speaker 3>has been really exciting. Touchwood of course that we hope

0:35:52.920 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 3>that that most recent setback is not a thing, but

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:59.160
<v Speaker 3>I really like what he's got. The other tour have

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 3>got all the tools and all the weaponry, but they're

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:04.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, they're they're still teenagers. Yeah, Visus sort of

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 3>like twenty one to twenty two. So if they get there,

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:09.319
<v Speaker 3>I think he gets there first, and he's he's almost there.

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:11.479
<v Speaker 1>I want to see a fan Teka have a deep

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 1>run and run into some French players because the Brazilian

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 1>crowd versus the French crowd is going to be dynamical. Yeah,

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 1>great stuff. Ozzie wise dem and ours kind of had

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a rough season, like we touched on, but do you

0:36:26.880 --> 0:36:30.160
<v Speaker 1>see anyone else maybe push into a second week? How

0:36:30.200 --> 0:36:31.080
<v Speaker 1>do you feel well?

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:35.359
<v Speaker 3>You mentioned Alexi off off camera and you know he's

0:36:35.480 --> 0:36:38.759
<v Speaker 3>credentials on clay are decent. You know you spoke about him.

0:36:38.800 --> 0:36:41.919
<v Speaker 3>I was there when he won the Junior French Roland

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:44.719
<v Speaker 3>Garris and that's always a pointed to being top line

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 3>of coming through with the old bull ring, this fabulous

0:36:47.239 --> 0:36:50.120
<v Speaker 3>old court that's no longer there. But he won that.

0:36:50.640 --> 0:36:52.560
<v Speaker 3>You know you've seen him win. But his form has

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:58.720
<v Speaker 3>been really not great for quite a quite a period. Alexi.

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm glad that he won a couple of matches in Rome.

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 3>I think that's that's important, and you know that gives

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:07.960
<v Speaker 3>him a bit of confidence letting in. I think that's important.

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:10.680
<v Speaker 3>But he did get his pants pulled down by Yannick Sinner,

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:13.440
<v Speaker 3>who's done that between before, and I think that's just

0:37:13.520 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 3>a bad matchup for Alexei. In a lot of it's

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:18.399
<v Speaker 3>a bad match up for everyone basically apart from maybe

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:20.800
<v Speaker 3>al Grath, but it's a bad, bad matchup for Alexi.

0:37:21.120 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 3>But he won a couple of matches, so I think

0:37:23.280 --> 0:37:26.279
<v Speaker 3>ideally you see him sort of arriving. We know he

0:37:26.320 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 3>can play on clay if he's confident and it's warm,

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 3>I think he's a chance to make it sort of

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:33.319
<v Speaker 3>through to the last city two, last sixteen, and then

0:37:33.360 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 3>you don't know. Again. With Alex it's an interesting one

0:37:36.520 --> 0:37:38.320
<v Speaker 3>because you look at his recent run of form and

0:37:38.400 --> 0:37:40.920
<v Speaker 3>you think, oh, what's going on, and you know he

0:37:41.040 --> 0:37:42.480
<v Speaker 3>has got a lot in his mind. He is, you know,

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:44.399
<v Speaker 3>they're getting married. It's it's all about.

0:37:44.440 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 2>But then table settings, Yeah, yeah, center piece, centerpieces, flowers,

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:51.680
<v Speaker 2>all the things.

0:37:52.600 --> 0:37:54.640
<v Speaker 3>And I'll be intrigued to see what he actually wears

0:37:54.719 --> 0:38:03.000
<v Speaker 3>and wears Wilson sponsor, Oh, no doubt, color than that shirt.

0:38:04.280 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 3>But but but then you go. He did make an

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:08.920
<v Speaker 3>Australian Open quarterfinal. There's only been one Grand Slam this year.

0:38:09.239 --> 0:38:12.560
<v Speaker 3>He made the quarter finals of it. He won Rotterdam,

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:15.560
<v Speaker 3>which is a really hard good five hundred in February.

0:38:15.960 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 3>So if you if you make a Grand Slam quarter

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:20.040
<v Speaker 3>final and win a win a decent not not a Master's,

0:38:20.080 --> 0:38:22.680
<v Speaker 3>but but the next year down a title. He's sitting

0:38:22.760 --> 0:38:24.480
<v Speaker 3>eight in the world, and he's sitting eight in the race.

0:38:24.560 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 3>It's it's not bad. He was okay in the first

0:38:27.719 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 3>tournament on clay, but as I said, the last couple

0:38:29.960 --> 0:38:34.759
<v Speaker 3>of mean so so. But Hoder in Madrid, it's it's

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:37.600
<v Speaker 3>it's an altitude. So that's one where Alex is not

0:38:37.680 --> 0:38:40.680
<v Speaker 3>going to play necessarily that well. Given the way he

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:43.359
<v Speaker 3>hits the ball, you know, it's flattering, it will fly.

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:47.160
<v Speaker 3>It's just I don't think it suits him as well. Rome.

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:49.359
<v Speaker 3>He wasn't that far away. He just had a couple

0:38:49.400 --> 0:38:51.839
<v Speaker 3>of bad games. So I hope, I mean again, if

0:38:51.880 --> 0:38:53.760
<v Speaker 3>he if he can get through his first couple of rounds,

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 3>I'd be fine with it. And it's just it's just

0:38:56.560 --> 0:38:58.279
<v Speaker 3>if he can. But I think if he does, he's

0:38:59.239 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 3>I'd be hoping. He'd be wishing too. The quarter finals again, right,

0:39:02.239 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 3>all right, Well, just.

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:06.239
<v Speaker 1>To wrap up the French open talk, then I guess

0:39:06.320 --> 0:39:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the prediction on the men's side, who plays center and

0:39:09.560 --> 0:39:13.799
<v Speaker 1>loses in the final. I'll make my call. I'm gonna

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:14.680
<v Speaker 1>say Casper Rude.

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:17.879
<v Speaker 3>He was really good. It was a good win.

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I like, and he's always the bridesmaiden of the bride, Casper,

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, a little resurgence.

0:39:25.680 --> 0:39:29.480
<v Speaker 3>Look, I still think that Verriv is probably the the

0:39:29.600 --> 0:39:32.000
<v Speaker 3>next one, the next clay quarter, the next best clay

0:39:32.080 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 3>quarter outside of Novak. If Novak's fit, well then but yeah,

0:39:36.640 --> 0:39:39.480
<v Speaker 3>I think it's very of on form even given what

0:39:39.560 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 3>happened every night?

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Great Lizzie Novak or Fees Yeah, yeah, that would be

0:39:48.520 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 2>really cool.

0:39:49.080 --> 0:39:50.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah you got your coming back?

0:39:51.600 --> 0:39:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Where was all right? The segment we all love and enjoy.

0:39:56.760 --> 0:39:58.360
<v Speaker 1>What's the second time we've done it?

0:40:00.920 --> 0:40:04.440
<v Speaker 2>It's got Quizzy who yes, yeah, and we've got too

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:12.720
<v Speaker 2>sorry dance a demand from thank you for dancing with recording.

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:15.440
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate that I've got a lovely prize to give away.

0:40:16.040 --> 0:40:18.799
<v Speaker 1>So for the listener who answers a question that neither

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I or Courtney could answer, Yeah.

0:40:21.080 --> 0:40:26.120
<v Speaker 2>And they have to email Pola Rena pod La, I

0:40:26.160 --> 0:40:28.719
<v Speaker 2>don't know the podlavor at Tennis dot com dot a

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:32.680
<v Speaker 2>U and I will give you my coffee cup with

0:40:33.280 --> 0:40:34.160
<v Speaker 2>a few drags in it.

0:40:34.960 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Wow, was a good coffee.

0:40:36.840 --> 0:40:41.240
<v Speaker 2>It was a beautiful coffee. And you can sip my dregs.

0:40:42.920 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Discussing dregs. But there also might be some kind of

0:40:48.239 --> 0:40:49.040
<v Speaker 1>nice prize.

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Back as well, So it's actually a real prize. That's

0:40:51.160 --> 0:40:54.120
<v Speaker 2>a fake prize something from the merch storm.

0:40:54.440 --> 0:40:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Maybe all right, we'll hit us with.

0:40:56.280 --> 0:40:59.960
<v Speaker 2>The okay question one? Who are the last two Australia

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 2>and OZ Open Men's and women's singles champions, it's.

0:41:06.000 --> 0:41:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Going to be an old like the last two Australians

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:09.879
<v Speaker 3>or the last two Australian Open.

0:41:10.480 --> 0:41:14.560
<v Speaker 2>No, who are the last two Australian OZ Open Men's

0:41:15.320 --> 0:41:17.400
<v Speaker 2>and women's singles champions?

0:41:17.520 --> 0:41:21.440
<v Speaker 1>So Australians is it Margaret Court on the women's I know,

0:41:22.320 --> 0:41:27.640
<v Speaker 1>oh ash Barti, Ashbarty and then the men's side mark edmonson?

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:31.279
<v Speaker 1>What year was that? Wow?

0:41:31.520 --> 0:41:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Correct? Correct?

0:41:33.680 --> 0:41:36.440
<v Speaker 3>So I have written that lots and lots and lots

0:41:36.480 --> 0:41:38.800
<v Speaker 3>because she just had another year. It's been X amount

0:41:38.840 --> 0:41:43.880
<v Speaker 3>of years of course, so is Mike out now? He?

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:52.839
<v Speaker 2>Question two? What year did Nick Kurios and Tanasi Kokanakas

0:41:52.920 --> 0:41:54.800
<v Speaker 2>win the men's doubles.

0:41:54.400 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Title twenty twenty twoies?

0:41:59.160 --> 0:41:59.359
<v Speaker 3>Yep?

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah correct? Correct?

0:42:04.320 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 3>Attention.

0:42:06.160 --> 0:42:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Question three? How many different court surfaces has the Australian

0:42:10.280 --> 0:42:10.879
<v Speaker 2>Open had?

0:42:12.520 --> 0:42:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Three?

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:18.960
<v Speaker 3>I'd say three so grass, rebound, ace and green said.

0:42:20.680 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Bump bone.

0:42:22.960 --> 0:42:25.400
<v Speaker 1>More I'm not saying.

0:42:25.719 --> 0:42:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Please email pod Labor at Tennis dot com dot au

0:42:29.239 --> 0:42:33.640
<v Speaker 2>with your answer to how many different court surfaces has

0:42:33.719 --> 0:42:35.000
<v Speaker 2>the Australian.

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Hat and name them all and bid Yeah, if.

0:42:37.440 --> 0:42:40.680
<v Speaker 2>You can name it all, we'll throw in another hat like.

0:42:40.800 --> 0:42:45.960
<v Speaker 3>Was there an back in the nine.

0:42:45.760 --> 0:42:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Because the listener that gets Lizzie's dregs.

0:42:48.920 --> 0:42:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, yeah, I don't want to give anything away, and

0:42:53.719 --> 0:42:56.920
<v Speaker 2>that was Quizzy who Dance.

0:42:56.760 --> 0:43:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Corny Courtney Walsh. Thank you so much for coming.

0:43:03.000 --> 0:43:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Appreciate it.

0:43:04.360 --> 0:43:07.080
<v Speaker 1>And if you want, if you want company for the

0:43:07.160 --> 0:43:09.080
<v Speaker 1>French Open and want to pay for all my air

0:43:09.120 --> 0:43:11.399
<v Speaker 1>for an accommodation, I'd be happy to hang out.

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:15.359
<v Speaker 3>More than happy to buy a beginn or a a bail.

0:43:17.160 --> 0:43:18.759
<v Speaker 1>Bring Lizzie back a Panama hat.

0:43:19.160 --> 0:43:20.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I would love that.

0:43:21.200 --> 0:43:22.399
<v Speaker 1>It's not an annoying thing.

0:43:22.360 --> 0:43:26.000
<v Speaker 2>To put me. Bring back this person you met once

0:43:26.440 --> 0:43:28.040
<v Speaker 2>briefly a gift.

0:43:28.320 --> 0:43:30.960
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Thank you so much. It's been an absolute delight.

0:43:31.400 --> 0:43:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Gotny, thanks for coming in.

0:43:32.680 --> 0:43:33.320
<v Speaker 1>We'll get you back in

0:43:34.440 --> 0:43:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Sip my dregs.