WEBVTT - Shrek, Is He Real?

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Flex and Fromes.

0:00:01.520 --> 0:00:06.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm Kit, Hello Bingchers, Welcome to the podcast Flex and Frons.

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:09.040
<v Speaker 3>We are so glad you're here. Today's gonna be a

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:12.119
<v Speaker 3>super juicy, juicy juicy one. We've been talking about this

0:00:12.280 --> 0:00:16.600
<v Speaker 3>phenomena that I've been seeing on TikTok with famous celebrities

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 3>like Doja Cat and Fka Twigs saying that their label

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:22.960
<v Speaker 3>is forcing them to go viral before they can drop

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:24.919
<v Speaker 3>new music. So super spooky.

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Sure, that's actually my demon paralysis being made to post

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 2>certain things. Imagine, I hate it. We're also going to

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 2>be talking about the most popular girls names. I was

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:36.840
<v Speaker 2>having this conversation with my sister yesterday.

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 4>It's giving Charlotte, it's giving Olivia. My sister's a great name.

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 4>I love the name Olivia. Oh thank you.

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:48.319
<v Speaker 2>Bitchy but hot, she's a bitch. And of course we're

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:50.160
<v Speaker 2>going to be talking about Shrek. Yeah, just a little

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:50.919
<v Speaker 2>tiny taste.

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 3>And you taught us about this morally motivated network, about

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 3>how there are a bunch of people who think that

0:00:57.200 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 3>their duty is to cancel people because it's motivated from this,

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 3>like Inna Vigilante, Are they the hero?

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 4>Are they the villain? Find out next Stay tuned, my

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:09.759
<v Speaker 4>little lovelies.

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>This is flex and frooms.

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to talk about a man and a woman

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 2>again it with any other you know, this is what

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 2>happens on FLEXA.

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 3>One thing about frooms. She loves a heterosexual relationship dilemma.

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 4>I don't see sexuality. It's really that simple. Yeah.

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 2>So this is a very very simple question that slid

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 2>into my DMS a week ago. I can't remember the

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 2>person's name, but I know that it's a woman, a

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 2>heterosexual woman.

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 4>Let's call her Maddie, Maddie, Thank you, Maddie.

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 2>See, I think these people want to be anonymous, but

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 2>we'll call her Maddie a good girlfriend.

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 3>One day, we'll talk about why people who have this

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 3>propensity to want to overshare to strangers want to be

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 3>anonymous at the same time. Pick one. Do you know

0:01:57.000 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 3>what I'm saying. It's very counterintuitive to be like, I

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 3>want to share this very intimate thing to you, for

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 3>you to share with hundreds of thousands of people the

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:08.359
<v Speaker 3>most not intimate thing you can do.

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean, anyway, go on gone. It makes sense to me,

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 4>So eat secret keepers. This is simple.

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 2>She goes a good girlfriend and I had a falling

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 2>out due to her thinking that I didn't like her

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 2>boyfriend when I had never said anything to allude to that,

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 2>and now she has blocked me.

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 4>What what do I do?

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 3>I have more questions than answers.

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 4>It's like, that's pretty simple, isn't it. It's like a

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 4>very simple love line. Yeah, no nuance to that.

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 3>As you would say, imagine your friend blocking you because

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 3>they think you don't like their partner.

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 2>I chose this love line, of course. Why I choose anything?

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Because I have a personal connection.

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:54.679
<v Speaker 4>You do, Yes, I have been in this situation.

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:58.519
<v Speaker 3>What you really have lived? This story? You keep sharing

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:00.959
<v Speaker 3>one incriminating sorry after another.

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 2>I'll share this one because I look like a saying

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 2>to it and I did nothing wrong.

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 3>As someone with an expressive face, I can imagine I

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 3>give people the impression that I hate things that I'm

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 3>indifferent about. Something about my facial structure can be real frowny,

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 3>real quick. And also the intonation of my voice.

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 4>Sarcastic at all times.

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but that's not even my humor. That's what gets me, Like,

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 3>I feel like when people think I'm being really facetious,

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm telling the truth.

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, what's your thoughts on that?

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 3>I think that the person Maddie, who we absolutely named,

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:33.799
<v Speaker 3>is lying.

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 4>I think she's lying.

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 3>You've never given your friend the impression that you hate

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 3>her boyfriend, yet she's gone out of her way to

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 3>block you. Either you lack self awareness and you've got

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 3>resting bitch face, or you've been flirting too much with

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 3>her boyfriend.

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 4>And she's like, no, no, no, no, no, no no no,

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm not doing this. I'm not doing this.

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm not doing this.

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Well, I'm going to give you the inside scope

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 2>of what it's like to be Maddie. And I actually

0:03:58.600 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 2>don't care if I say that.

0:03:59.480 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 4>Often.

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm telling stories and halfway through I'm thinking, oh no,

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 2>this can't go to air. I'm incriminating myself and others.

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 2>But with this one, I know I didn't do anything wrong,

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 2>so I'm going to say it. So twenty fifteen, you're

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 2>so good with date. Literally, in my mind, I don't

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:19.159
<v Speaker 2>remember anything except certain periods of time. I had a

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 2>best friend, very best friend since high school, and she

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 2>had a long suffering relationship with a man we're going

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:27.039
<v Speaker 2>to call Sam long suffering.

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 4>It was long suffering. They've been dating since she was

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 4>in year eight. He was three years older, bit edge,

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 4>But I digress.

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 3>That's your community though, what that's your community, is it? Yeah?

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 4>Okay, with a.

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 3>Boyfriend at the wedding and the Haviana sandals.

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:47.479
<v Speaker 2>If you want to hear the Havanna experience, you're going

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:49.720
<v Speaker 2>to have to go listen to our podcast and it's

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 2>all there. But basically, my very best friend, she had

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 2>a boyfriend who was by all accounts a bit of

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 2>a crap person, oo bad person, very mean to her.

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Would often like she would do things to throw back,

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 2>like kind of couple that would like put the truth

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 2>rush on the toilet.

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 4>That was the level of relationship we were dealing with.

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 3>Oh that's not that's not like a metaphor.

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 2>No no, no, yeah, literal really awful things, spreading rumors

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 2>about one another, then getting back together. So obviously this happened.

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, they're doing the cycle. We all know a

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 2>friend who does the cycle getting back together, and when

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 2>they're not together, she's vicious about him, coming over to

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 2>my house in front of my parents, spreading lies about

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:35.160
<v Speaker 2>his person, to which my parents even thought was a

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 2>bit weird. So anyway, they get back together. Fastholed to

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 2>twenty fifteen and.

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 3>She was started in twenty fifteen, so were we fast forwarded?

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 2>I was backtracking too year, right, Like, I'm working together

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 2>for like seven years by this point.

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.160
<v Speaker 4>It got it, got it finally back together. We're all

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 4>at a party. It's my friend's twenty first birthday, and

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 4>I rock up.

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm feeling amazing, my life is fantastic, YadA, YadA, YadA.

0:05:57.520 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 4>And I see.

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Sam and what we're doing. Names, Yeah, we're calling him Sam.

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 2>It's not as we are names.

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 4>Oh, but I'll say it if you asked me kindly enough.

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:11.559
<v Speaker 2>And I see him and obviously we have a funny

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 2>relationship because I was mean to him when he was

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 2>broken up with my friend.

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 4>So we have a fun you had to. I did

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 4>what I had to. I run up to him, I go, hey, Sam,

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 4>this is a photographer. I go, Sam, let's get a photo.

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 2>And I stand with him and I like, send me

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:28.359
<v Speaker 2>cock my leg up.

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 3>So I was like doing this like pretty princess vibes. Yeah,

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 3>like you I know something you don't know. We're in love.

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:40.159
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, album hits Facebook that Sunday. Get a terse message

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 2>from my friend. You're being very inappropriate and I don't

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 2>think we can be friends. You made Sam very uncomfortable.

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 2>You made it's uncomfortable, Okay, dol same boy that actually

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 2>was untoward to me at times of predator, So.

0:06:57.360 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 4>You killed him with kindness, I sondh backfire.

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:03.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I did, literally, So I know the experience of

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:07.360
<v Speaker 2>someone not liking you because you don't like their partner

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 2>or because there's like bad beef.

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 4>But I think Maddie should move on.

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 2>Me and that person aren't friends anymore because that was

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 2>really the nail on the coffin, because I hadn't done

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:16.559
<v Speaker 2>anything wrong.

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 3>This has taken so many turns. I'm gonna validate you

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 3>for that story. That sounds wholly traumatic, and I hate

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 3>that for you and all parties involved in this instance.

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 3>If you've been.

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 4>Blocked, how do you know what it's about?

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 5>Like?

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 3>How do you have enough information to go? I know

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 3>it because my friend thinks I don't like her boyfriend. Okay,

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 3>well then you know you did something like You've got

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 3>too much information for a blocked person.

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 4>Interesting.

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 3>The moral to all of these love lines, which I

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 3>love receiving never stop sending, is just go talk to

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 3>the person, because what if it was an accidental block? Now,

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 3>what if it was like, you know, out on the piss,

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 3>got a little bit hyped up, block them because you

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 3>felt some kind of way and just forgot to it.

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Flex and Frooms on DA.

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 2>A few weeks ago, we discovered that our producer Brook

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 2>has a tattoo of Shrek on her arm.

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, which is pretty full on. And then we discovered

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 4>that the Shrek looks exactly like you like me in

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 4>the most beautiful way possible. You look exactly the same.

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 2>And then a few days ago someone slid it into

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 2>my DMS to tell me this incredible fact that apparently

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Shrek is actually based off a real life man.

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 4>Cute and is that hearsay or do we have the evidence?

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:37.680
<v Speaker 4>M bit of both? It's four fourful yeah, bit of both.

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay speaking el, So this is actually what I'm going

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 2>to call a Shrek conspiracy. Love that supposedly it's based

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 2>on a real life man who was a boxer called

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Maurice Tillet who had the nickname the French Angel. Basically,

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:55.319
<v Speaker 2>when he was twenty years old, he noticed swelling in

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 2>his hands, feet and head, and after visiting a doctor,

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 2>he was diagnosed with our megali, which is a condition

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 2>usually caused by a benign tumor on the pituary gland,

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 2>which results in bone overgrowth and thickening. So basically, this

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 2>man's head grew in a way that was akin to Shrek.

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Thereius Slicks has got a photo that she's showing up here.

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 2>He is in kind of like old garb that you'd

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 2>wear as a box as wearing kind of like an

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:23.479
<v Speaker 2>oversized nappy style thing, and I got a handle.

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 3>That's the problem.

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:31.439
<v Speaker 4>He's cute. Yeah, but the man looks like Shrek. There's

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 4>no denying it.

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Shrek looks like him.

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 2>Facts, But I did a little bit more digging and

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 2>apparently DreamWorks never confirmed that it really was based on Shrek.

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:44.679
<v Speaker 3>Doesn't want to pay him?

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Oh, always going back to commerce, and I'm going to

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 2>pay you there, I reckon, you're right. Here's some more

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 2>pictures of him, and I mean, the man is Shrek.

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 4>There's no denying incredible.

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 2>Yes, So, Maurice Tillett the real life Shrek. If you

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:03.679
<v Speaker 2>want to tell someone if you're a big Shrek fan,

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to assume that you are.

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 4>If you're listening to this.

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Show, type in Morris Tilletts and show all of your

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 2>friends and you can say I knew the real life track.

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 3>And by Morris she means Maurice Fleck and Frooms. We

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 3>don't often talk about music marketing, which we should because

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 3>it's fascinating and it affects every single one of your

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 3>most favorite artists. There is so much more that goes

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 3>into you hearing the music right like before it gets

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:36.559
<v Speaker 3>to your little ear holes. There's all this red tape

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.679
<v Speaker 3>and bureaucracy that needs to be adhered to that honestly

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:42.679
<v Speaker 3>just ruins the vibe. Recently, on TikTok, a bunch of

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 3>artists came out with the same formula of TikTok, which

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 3>is them holding the camera to their face in selfie mode,

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 3>not speaking with their own music overlaid and words on

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 3>a scream that alludes to I'm so upset my label went,

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 3>let me release my next song unless I go viral.

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 3>On TikTok, Now, if one of them did, it would

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 3>have been like, okay, believable.

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 4>And the first one I'm just gonna interrupt you was

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:09.199
<v Speaker 4>Charli XCX.

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and then Halsey and then Doja Cat and Florence

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 3>the Machine. So yeah, if one person had done it,

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 3>I'd be like, oh, yeah, you're fine, but all of

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 3>them doing it, which is I don't really know if

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 3>I believe it. I don't gonna be cynical, you know.

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 3>But the thing that gets me is that these are

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 3>huge artists that have already proved to the world that

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 3>they are valuable. They can already make hits, they can

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 3>already muster up audience interests. Why would you tell like

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 3>a billion dollar artists they have to know multimillion dollar

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 3>artists they have to now go viral, this arbitrary metric

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 3>of success to release a song anyway.

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 4>Listen to this clip.

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 5>All right, So it's looking like a lot of artists

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:54.200
<v Speaker 5>signed the Capitol Records are calling them out for not

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 5>letting them release their new music unless it goes.

0:11:56.720 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 4>Viral on TikTok.

0:11:57.880 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 5>Now we all know hard it was the most reason

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:03.079
<v Speaker 5>one today we heard about Fja Twigs and Charlie Exists.

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 5>I think last week I believe, but now we're hearing

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:07.959
<v Speaker 5>from Florence. Well, I'm glad that ours are speaking out

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 5>on this because we, as the general publis I have

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 5>been talking about this for the last two years. Everyone

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 5>is trying to make money off of TikTok, and they're

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:17.960
<v Speaker 5>forcing their eyes in something that they don't want to do.

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 3>And so the thing about that is, I feel like

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 3>part of what I would love to see in music

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 3>and celebrity culture is a bit of a mystery. Like

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 3>I think that we have skewed a little bit too

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 3>far into authenticity culture, and now I'm having to be

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 3>accountable for what these artists are going through behind the scenes.

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 3>I love that you're being real, but just figure out

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:39.839
<v Speaker 3>how to go viral, babe, so.

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 4>I can hear the track.

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 3>Now I can't hear the music because you can't go viral.

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 4>Be better.

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 2>I swear Charlie XX did this like a year ago.

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 2>I believed her. Yes, she has always been real talk

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 2>in my experience. I've interviewed her before. She's giving me

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 2>a real talk kind of vibe. She's she's not ask Kissa,

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 2>She's here to do her job. Whereas, Yeah, the more

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 2>recent ones I struggled to believe. Even with Charlie XX,

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 2>Like I did have this little, tiny like voice in

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:11.080
<v Speaker 2>my head being like, there's no way that's real. Not

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 2>because I am like someone who's totally aware of like

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 2>marketing and stuff. I think your brain more goes there,

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 2>but more because like, if I was a label and

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 2>my artist was talking shit, I'd be like stop that.

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 2>I think they're much more likely to feel upset about

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 2>you bad noting them yeah, than you actually like needing

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 2>to do it.

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:33.320
<v Speaker 3>But interesting that you perceived. Charlie XCX is like a

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 3>real raw kind of artist because I remember back in

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 3>the early days, like in that boom Clap era, where

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 3>she was so obviously being a caricature of herself, like

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 3>this extra heightened version of herself, and then like had

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 3>a very distinct career change and a very distinct career change,

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 3>and even recently she said that due to the fact

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 3>that everybody is doing this hyper authentic thing, she's swinging

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 3>and she wants to be like a fembot like stiff,

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 3>not even stiff, but just like a highly curated type

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:09.319
<v Speaker 3>of brand now because there's no value in sharing everything

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 3>behind the scenes.

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 4>It doesn't add anything to your end result.

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 3>You just end up stressing more because now the whole

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 3>internet knows you're anxious. Times back from when Summer Walker

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 3>said that she didn't want to tour because she's really

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 3>anxious and she hates performing and she gets on stage

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 3>and she's like really stiff, and she's not looking at

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 3>the crowd and she looks very visibly just not comfortable.

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 3>And she told the audiences eventually she's like, I'm really anxious,

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Like nothing is more uncomfortable to me than doing this. Sorry,

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 3>And now people weaponize that against her, They're like, if

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 3>you're anxious, why you want to be a musician for

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 3>you knew what you.

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 4>Signed up for, just sing something skiff? Can't you just

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 4>take a little pill.

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 2>I do think that it hits a chord with people

0:14:57.800 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 2>on TikTok because I think a lot of people, especially

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 2>our age, we are.

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 4>At the very very end of gen z. I think

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 4>we're out of it. But nah, oh yeah, I think

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm a millennial. Yeah, I'll take it by one year

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 4>me that was very millennial.

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 2>I think that we can relate to the feeling of

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 2>not wanting to adopt a new platform. And I think

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 2>for a lot of people they think of TikTok as

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 2>the dancing app, Like there's so many people our age

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 2>that still think it's where teenagers got to do dancers.

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 2>It's totally a lot from that.

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 4>Like, yeah, there's that, there's more to it.

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot more to it, And so I think

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 2>in sharing that there's relatability to people who are afraid

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 2>of TikTok.

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but I just don't think it's an artist's role

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 3>to be relatable. And I also think my real issue

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 3>is why are these artists having to be in charge

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 3>of their marketing? Like is should the pressure not be

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 3>on the marketing managers to be like, you need to

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 3>make me go viral so I can drop this hit?

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 3>Like what is the marketer's job if the artist now

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 3>has the pressure to create a direct them, write the music,

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 3>dress themselves, build an audience, build a fan base, and

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 3>now go viral just to drop a track that doesn't

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 3>feel like it should be in the artists to remit,

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 3>especially because artists are the culmination of all the creative

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 3>brains that are working on them, from the label to

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 3>their management, to their photographers and their videographers. Like they

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 3>are the sum of so many other brains. Why are

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 3>they feeling like they're on their own when it comes

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 3>to releasing music, Like, shouldn't it be like, how are

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 3>we going to get you to go viral? Here are

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 3>some ideas, let's do it. I think it's very strange.

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 3>We've talked about this idea of celebrity relatability in the

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 3>long term. I don't think it does anything favorable for

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 3>an artist to know that the conditions that they're working

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 3>in are not conducive to them releasing music, because, contrary

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 3>to what these artists think, your fans do not want

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 3>to know that there are limitations between them and the

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 3>next hit. They want to know the music's coming. You

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 3>say the music is not coming. Okay, well, one way

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 3>I meant to do, like what do you need from me?

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 3>And I think that artists of twenty twenty two ask

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 3>for a lot from their fans. Pre save this, stream this,

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 3>come to the thing and buy the merge and then

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:17.159
<v Speaker 3>make sure you do this, and then come here. And

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 3>if you don't, if you don't do this by this time,

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 3>then I don't get this. And suddenly you have to

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:24.679
<v Speaker 3>opt in so heavily just to be a fan. And

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 3>also with how controversial a lot of artists are, Like

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 3>imagine saying you're a Kanye fan in twenty twenty two,

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:33.399
<v Speaker 3>you know you gotta do a whole campaign trail to

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:36.239
<v Speaker 3>justify that you can't just like the music anymore. You

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:38.920
<v Speaker 3>have to like them as people and all the things

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:42.399
<v Speaker 3>they're going through. Let's just let's put it in a

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:45.679
<v Speaker 3>nice thing little box. O kind let's work on the presentation.

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 4>See.

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 2>But I'm kind of the opinion if you're an artist

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 2>and you're a star, you are unrelenting and you want

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 2>to do everything yourself.

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but I think the whole point of being signed

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:58.359
<v Speaker 3>to a label is that you can do these things

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 3>by yourself with this of all these like with the

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 3>sport of an industry behind you, backing you and giving

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 3>you the push you need to do the things you

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 3>should want to do. If the artists have already written

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 3>the music and the labels like it's sitting there ready

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 3>to click process to the world, and you can't do

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:19.399
<v Speaker 3>it until you go viral on this platform, well that

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:20.119
<v Speaker 3>is just silly.

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 2>I think it's semi think that it could be true

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 2>because I feel like so many people that get record

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 2>deals these days are famous on TikTok. Pretty much all

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:31.640
<v Speaker 2>entertainers that are coming up from twenty two onwards need

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 2>a TikTok presence.

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, you need a TikTok presence.

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 3>But look that song you played.

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 4>Earlier, mean by whoever whoever, that song is so huge

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:40.400
<v Speaker 4>on TikTok.

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't know that girl's name, I don't know where

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:44.160
<v Speaker 3>she's from, I don't know what she does.

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 4>It's not resonating.

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:49.159
<v Speaker 3>Going viral on TikTok is like the first step to

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 3>a career that plateaus in three seconds because you literally

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:56.239
<v Speaker 3>cannot sustain that amount of height for any longer than

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 3>a season. You're not allowed to. Like the biggest artists

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:02.239
<v Speaker 3>in the world have an off period. Frank oceanwent am

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 3>I for five years because he could not sustain the hype.

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:06.439
<v Speaker 3>It's of what he created.

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 2>It's a three year trial that we were talking about

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 2>last time. Three years of fame, three years off, three fame,

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 2>three years off.

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 3>That's it. And so I think like this whole idea

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:17.720
<v Speaker 3>like go viral on TikTok, But what people aren't really

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 3>aware of is that, like you need to post viral strategy,

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:23.120
<v Speaker 3>like what are we going viral for people to look

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 3>at the song and never stream it. There are tons

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 3>of songs that I hear on TikTok that I will

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:30.919
<v Speaker 3>never stream. Why because the user path is confusing. I

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 3>don't know what to do.

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 4>Once I hear a thing, I like, I'm not getting

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:34.639
<v Speaker 4>off the app.

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Anyway, that was a Rant, that was two that

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 3>was two podcasts Rants and Randy Banshee. I just think

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 3>that all of these things like are so contrived in

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 3>a way that is making the general public too aware

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 3>that it's all fake. Like, leave some mystery so we

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 3>can just enjoy the music.

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 4>It's like seeing the sausage factory. Yeah, I don't want

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:04.679
<v Speaker 4>to know what's inside.

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 3>No more.

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>This is flex and frooms on Cada.

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Listen to this. Australia's most popular girl's name has changed

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 3>for the first time in seven years. Don't they also

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 3>say your hair texture changes every seven years.

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 4>Or all your cells are in new Yes? Can you

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 4>guess what the new most popular girl's name is?

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 2>So I knew the most popular before was Charlotte? Yes,

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 2>for some reason, I think it could be Can I

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 2>have three guesses?

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 4>Of course? Isabella?

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:42.400
<v Speaker 3>No, but I can see that. Yeah, it's not Isabella.

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 3>It's not Bella either.

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 4>What's the first letter?

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:45.439
<v Speaker 3>I can't tell you?

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 4>Come on, what do you give me the first letter? Please?

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 4>Because I know I'll get it if you give me

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:51.360
<v Speaker 4>the first letter.

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 3>Okay, it's I.

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 4>Oh right, you were closed. No, it's a girl's name?

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 4>Is it Uni?

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 2>Sex?

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 4>Maybe anything would be uni sex. You want it to

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 4>a gendered gender.

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Less genderless okay, three two one. It's not Indigo.

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:14.120
<v Speaker 4>How do you know? Because whose name is Indigo?

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:17.679
<v Speaker 3>I know two indigoes, well know of not my people?

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 3>Are we ready? Drummer ll please? Eiler is the new

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:30.119
<v Speaker 3>number one name, bumping longtime favorite Charlotte down to second place. Olivia, Amelia,

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:33.959
<v Speaker 3>and Ava are also in the top five. This is

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 3>just classic girl names, it really is, but for a

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:40.239
<v Speaker 3>particular young person because I don't really know. I know

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 3>you have an Olivia and your family Olivia, Amelia, and Ava.

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:46.159
<v Speaker 3>I don't think I know enough. But this is a

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:49.400
<v Speaker 3>different generation. These are you know, you're one to seven

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 3>year olds.

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:53.640
<v Speaker 2>And to me, it's kind of like how certain words

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 2>are certain colors, Like all of those names go together. Yes,

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 2>the imagine a sister Lilac, Yeah, all Lemon, five sisters,

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 2>all those names makes total sense.

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah yeah, same same lineage for boys, can I guess sure?

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:14.440
<v Speaker 3>I know in the top ten would be like Teddy, No,

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 3>but that's my nephew's name, or it's Theo Theodore, but Theo, which.

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:20.959
<v Speaker 4>I want it so badly.

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 3>Okay, it's not Cooper. Where are you getting Cooper from Jacob. No,

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:32.679
<v Speaker 3>I'm so surprised you'd say Cooper. That's like in an

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:37.399
<v Speaker 3>Australian accent as well. There's one that's so obvious, and

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, if you don't know one.

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 4>You are one John Jack Jack in any room Q hugo.

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:49.440
<v Speaker 4>Oh that's a good one.

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 3>But no, I'm sure I read a little Vice article

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 3>that said, like, in any group of seven, the it's

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 3>gonna be at least one Jack or something. If you

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 3>don't know one, you dated one, or you are one.

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 3>For boys, Oliver is still in the top spot, remaining

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 3>the firm favorite for the ninth year. Other popular names

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:14.200
<v Speaker 3>include Noah, Jack and Henry. However, William has been bumped

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:17.680
<v Speaker 3>down to sith after sitting at number two for a

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 3>number of two years.

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 4>William has I got to do with the royal family.

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm not really across the monarchy, but I'm sure there's

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 3>something there isn't that that's fun?

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:30.640
<v Speaker 4>Do you know another Lilian? I don't know. I don't

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:32.880
<v Speaker 4>think I know a double l. Lillian as a very

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 4>rogue name.

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:38.120
<v Speaker 2>And your brother's name is Rodney, Rodney and Maxwell, Yeah,

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:41.239
<v Speaker 2>what's going on? Fantastic name. They're great names, but I'm

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 2>not seeing them all together. Yeah, no synergy, No, they

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 2>make sense together.

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Rodney, liar and colonial, which is like it's a bit

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:50.159
<v Speaker 3>of that.

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:54.400
<v Speaker 4>They won't get into it. Your loose cinder. What is that?

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:58.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm has it not taken off?

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 3>It's giving grandma, Yeah, it's it's it's aged, but so

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 3>is Lilian. Lilian's a six year old woman with a pomeranium,

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, and Bengals.

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:08.400
<v Speaker 4>We often joke about this off air.

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Our next iteration of radio show is when we're going

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 2>to replace Jonesy and Amanda and Lacinda.

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:19.360
<v Speaker 4>It's perfect. The brand never has to stop anyway.

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 3>I love that. I just want to know more things

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 3>about names. I wish that we had more of, like

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:27.919
<v Speaker 3>the origin stories about names. Like let's say I googled,

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:30.679
<v Speaker 3>like what does Lilian mean? I need a real story,

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 3>not like it's Latin' so lily flower or ring.

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:37.879
<v Speaker 1>This is Flex and Froomes.

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Something that Flex talks about at length is moral dilemmas

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:46.119
<v Speaker 2>and like interpersonal relationships. I'm just here to really tell

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 2>incriminating stories about my life because I don't really critically

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:52.920
<v Speaker 2>think it's for balance. Yeah, we all have our strengths well,

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 2>today I'm coming to the table trying to level up

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:59.360
<v Speaker 2>and bring some moral thoughts and some lessons. That's really hard,

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 2>and this one is that see I've written it down,

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 2>so this is going to be a bit proscriptive because

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:05.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm not used to doing it.

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 4>Okay, I'm happy to close my eyes and listen.

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So I've been keeping up with the Johnny Depp

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 2>first Amber Heard debarcle.

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 4>We're not going to get into it today. It's a

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 4>it's a core case. It's not really entertained debarkle. Some

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 4>call it a circus, which I'm going to stop you

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:21.880
<v Speaker 4>right there.

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 2>And I'm interested in the discussion around it because obviously

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 2>you would have seen people like going die hard for

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Johnny Depp, people doing a lot of hate about Amber.

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:35.159
<v Speaker 2>And in my research I found out that what people

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:40.879
<v Speaker 2>do in these situations is create bots that disseminate fake information. So,

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:45.679
<v Speaker 2>for example, eleven percent of the awful kind of like

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 2>social media chatter around Amber heard is from bots.

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so you'll create and it's kind of like an

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 3>allegedly who would create these bots.

0:25:55.680 --> 0:26:03.440
<v Speaker 4>Allegedly far right in cell reddit types. I understand they're creating.

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 2>These pots and of course, we live online, so we

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:09.119
<v Speaker 2>often see things play out in the court of social media,

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:11.199
<v Speaker 2>and I find that a really interesting place to be,

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 2>especially in circles that we find ourselves in. I think

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 2>we are in like relatively progressive circles, and I've definitely

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:20.639
<v Speaker 2>seen it go both ways. I've seen very progressive people

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:25.120
<v Speaker 2>do savage takedowns, which I think when you first start

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 2>seeing it, it's quite entertaining. It's giving you shodden freud

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 2>or whatever. You're like, this would never be me. I

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 2>would never make that mistake, and so I find it

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:36.439
<v Speaker 2>really interesting the psychology behind why people get around it.

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 2>And I came across a paper which talks about morally

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 2>motivated networked harassment as a normative reinforcement.

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:45.440
<v Speaker 3>I like that.

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:46.640
<v Speaker 4>I know it's giving you.

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 2>So the study suggests that moral outrage is used to

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:54.440
<v Speaker 2>justify networked harassment on social media. In morally motivated networked harassment,

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:58.679
<v Speaker 2>a member of a social network or online community accuses

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:02.359
<v Speaker 2>a target a violating their network's norms. The way to

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 2>explain that is you've got a community flex Mummy's community,

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:09.679
<v Speaker 2>and you mobilize them to hate on frooms. Yes, because

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:12.919
<v Speaker 2>Froomes has said eat my pooh, and you're like, that

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:13.920
<v Speaker 2>is absolutely outrageous.

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 4>That's here pretty princesses would never say that, yeaol, audience

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:18.439
<v Speaker 4>comes against me.

0:27:18.600 --> 0:27:21.400
<v Speaker 3>The bit I love most is the morally motivated thing,

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:24.879
<v Speaker 3>right when people frame these takedowns as you know, I'm

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 3>upholding moral values. But in upholding this morality, you're doing

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:30.359
<v Speaker 3>very immoral things.

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Network members send harassing messages to the target, reinforcing their

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:39.439
<v Speaker 2>adherence to the norm and signaling network membership. So in

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 2>doing that, they're making their sense of belonging even stronger,

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:46.159
<v Speaker 2>making ties with the other members, and making sure that

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 2>they're never going to be on the outer. It's like

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 2>classic social study type of things. And basically now the

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 2>platforms nor legal regulations protect against this form of harassment.

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 2>And yes, so it's just going to continue kind of happening.

0:27:57.320 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how we're going to get around it.

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 3>I guess we don't. I think the most important thing

0:28:02.560 --> 0:28:06.879
<v Speaker 3>here is that everybody arms themselves with the gusto and

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 3>the confidence and the vocabulary to defend themselves. So if

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 3>you find yourself on the attack, you can justify why

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:17.680
<v Speaker 3>it is or is not appropriate. Like, for example, I

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 3>used to say I could never be canceled because one

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 3>thing about me. If you're going to heut me, I've

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 3>added myself.

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 4>Do you know what I mean?

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:25.919
<v Speaker 3>Like, I don't go on the internet and pretend I'm moral.

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:29.360
<v Speaker 3>I say I'm capitalism handmaiden. I say that I'm here

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 3>for my own self gain. So when I behave in

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:35.199
<v Speaker 3>that way, you can't be surprised. I already set it

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 3>up for you. I think in terms of morally motivated harassment,

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 3>the best way to manage that is to recognize that

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 3>not everybody's in a position to hold you accountable, and

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 3>not everybody is holding you accountable for your best interest.

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 3>Some people just want an opportunity to exercise power.

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Very hard to decipher between the two.

0:28:57.440 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 4>When you're under attack.

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 3>It is true, and I think you know when you

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 3>are quote unquote under attack. I think that phrasing frames

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 3>a victim and an oppressor really quickly, And sometimes being

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 3>under attack is just being called in, being reminded of

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 3>appropriate behavior, being reminded of social norms, Like it's not

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 3>always an attack just because I doesn't feel good. I

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 3>think framing things is like I'm under attack because I

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 3>was told that something isn't right by a bunch of

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 3>people is always going to frame you as a victim

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 3>and leaves very little room for either party to talk

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 3>comfortably about what to do next.

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 4>Very very interesting.

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 1>You've been listening to The Flex and Rooms catch Up

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 1>podcasts For more, Tune Indicata on DAB or check it

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 1>out right here on iHeartRadio.