WEBVTT - One-Day Cup final preview, Sanju Samson's enhances 'big-game player' reputation 0:00:00.000 --> 0:00:03.080 The Unplayable Podcast is proudly presented by Quantus, the official 0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:06.359 podcast partner and the official airline partner of Cricket Australia. 0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:08.600 Once again this season, Quantus is proud to be flying 0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:17.680 Australia's cricketers as they take on the world. Hey everyone, 0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:20.600 welcome to another episode of The Unplayable Podcast. We've got 0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:23.280 a big show for you today as always, Kane Richardson here, 0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:25.599 josh On I think is my name? And rich O 0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:29.400 being told to move on by any former Australian lead spinners. 0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:31.200 This week, I hasn't been a pretty quiet week for you? 0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:36.160 Pretty quiet week? Yeah, I'm all about the podcast Love today. 0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:39.080 There's been a little bit going on where, you know, 0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:42.120 people have been bickering and even other other hosts have 0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:44.000 been throwing their mates under the bus. So I'm all 0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:46.720 about just us being as tight as we can be today. 0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:49.800 Friendship Podcast Love. So it was actually my weekly We 0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:51.839 know you've jumped the gun there, but that was going 0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:54.280 to be my weekly winn, just bringing back the love 0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:57.680 in podcasting. Oh you know what, when my kids would 0:00:57.720 --> 0:00:59.360 dream about doing this one day and we do it 0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:02.400 for the love Okay, So let's remember that friendship. We're 0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:05.119 here together, we're a team. We work together at all time. 0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:07.000 So thanks for the segue. 0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:10.200 But wow, okay, yeah, yeah, that was not set up 0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:11.120 at all, So it wasn't. 0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:14.200 We actually haven't spoken until we got in here. We're 0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:16.800 saving our material for this podcast. But I just wanted 0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:18.000 you to know that I want to get on the 0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:19.840 front foot and get it out there for everyone, but 0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:22.559 for yourself, that we're a team, we're equal. 0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:23.280 Thank you. 0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:25.400 Yep, you're welcome anyway, move on. 0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:28.160 I think it's about the third time you even wanted 0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:30.880 it to me as well, So nice that's to us. 0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:32.640 Okay, we're going to give it to us. 0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:35.520 I like that. And because cricketers always say that they 0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:39.399 play get the best results when they're enjoying the game, 0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:42.000 and they you know, they haven't fallen out of clubs, 0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:43.479 so that makes sense. We're going to get our best 0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:45.600 results on this pot if we're just feeling the love like. 0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:47.280 We did when we're kids, and we did this. 0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:50.920 Absolutely my likely winner. I'm going over to New Zealand 0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:53.680 first class cricket. Did you see this during the week 0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:57.680 Brett Randell Randell sorry, Brett Randall, got to get his 0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:00.280 name right. Five wickets in five balls, the first time 0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:04.640 that's happened in first class history. Central Stags against the 0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:07.560 Northern Districts. He finished with seven to twenty five, three 0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:10.280 handy figures. But five in five doesn't get much better 0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:11.000 than that, does it? 0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:14.240 Well in six from six would be better. I did. 0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:16.120 I actually watched it because you sent it to me 0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:17.960 because I wasn't following the live stream. 0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:21.120 Actually just turned it off before that happened. 0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:24.280 But to be fair, the way the mode of dismissal, 0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:26.400 and I've read the comments is a little bit of 0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:30.239 conjecture over the hat trick dismissal. But he had it moving, 0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:33.440 he had the ball talking, didn't he. So remember the name. 0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:36.480 You actually got it wrong there, So let's make sure 0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:38.040 from now on we never get his name. 0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:40.200 Wrong, which is Rendell. 0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:45.440 Randell made the same mistake, Remember the name, But pretty 0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:46.200 impressive start. 0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:48.519 Yeah, and maybe the umpire got a little bit caught 0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:50.400 in the moment with that third one, But you know 0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:52.040 that's okay, isn't it, Because at the end of the 0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:53.680 day he goes and gets two more. 0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:56.160 So part of history. Yeah, I actually was surprised that's 0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:59.359 never been done. Like you think of how long we've 0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:02.040 been playing first US cricket. Isn't there records back in 0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:04.800 the thirteen like thirteen hundreds or whatever it was, We 0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:08.079 had pictures with where guys take fifteen hundred wickets over 0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:10.160 their career and average one point two with the ball. 0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:13.680 So I'm actually surprised that that never happened. So yeah, 0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:16.040 at least the umpire is part of history. Whether that 0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:18.080 dismissed was wrong or right, it's in the in the 0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:18.920 record books forever. 0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:21.280 Amazing. One of the comments I saw, can you imagine 0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:24.960 the at a confusion and chaos in the change rooms 0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.520 when the number sevens padding up even though it wasn't 0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:31.000 you know, a couple of overs into the match. 0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:32.200 It's like that bad dream. 0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:33.440 I don't know if you've ever had it, but a 0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.600 lot of cricketers have had that dream where you're next in, 0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:38.920 you're not even padded up, you're wearing like flip flops 0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:42.520 walking around there outside of the ground. That's that's that 0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:44.960 running between the wickets, when you're stuck in the mud. 0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:48.120 That's the cricketers get. So you're right, that probably would 0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:49.560 have been a real life bad dream for a lot 0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:50.839 of that middle order. 0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:53.400 Yeah, because getting timed out. We don't see that a lot, 0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:55.839 but I mean this is a prime case. 0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:57.520 Is that how the sixth wicket felt? 0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:02.200 Maybe we had some responses to our Big four from 0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:06.640 last week, which was the best part time bowlers. So 0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:09.160 thank you to everyone who got involved on Instagram and 0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:13.720 at podcasts dot cricket dot and at the email addressed 0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.080 podcast at cricket dot com dot. You'll get that right. 0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:19.440 One day, Travis Head was mentioned a lot and a lot. 0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:21.680 We didn't give him any laugh. He was, he was 0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:23.320 in the notes, He was in the notes, but we 0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:27.479 didn't officially nominate him. Michael Clark of course, Michael Bevan 0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:31.960 left risties and Steve Spith of course, with right wrist 0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:34.200 spin he got a lot of bluff, as did Sashinton Duoka, 0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:37.000 who yeah, took a lot of wickets, But of course 0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:38.720 he's known for his batting xpos, isn't he. 0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:42.760 So they're interesting. Michael Bevan under an under used bowler, 0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:45.880 but I wouldn't. He didn't bowl March, did he like? 0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:50.039 Even in white Pool Cricket not a he Yeah, I'm 0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:52.080 just going off without looking at stats, but I feel 0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:53.520 like I never really got to see him, but I 0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:56.560 remember him bowling but not, it wasn't It wasn't enough 0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.680 to even be a part timmy. He was, what's what's 0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:04.920 the next category? Well, yeah, what's below part timer? Minimal 0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:06.720 time occasional. 0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:12.520 We have an answer from Dawsy as well. He said 0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:15.159 I want to see Manus bowl Moore, but hear me 0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:16.799 out more as an off spinner. 0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:20.239 An off spinner. Yeah, has he even bowled that before? 0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:21.520 I think we saw him did a little bit for 0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:23.200 Glamorgan maybe a year raw ago. 0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:26.440 That's on the counter ground. Anything, it's a different game. 0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:31.040 Anything can happen and acceptable. Yeah, I'm not sure about that. 0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:33.599 Declaration bowling in counting cricket is a common thing, so 0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:35.080 maybe he was declaration bowling. 0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:35.720 We don't want that. 0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:39.800 That's a bad look. So and of course one other 0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:42.960 shout out to Curtis Patterson, the new South Wales veteran 0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:45.920 who got his first wicket in professional cricket last week. 0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:49.600 It was a can't really say an unplayable delivery to 0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:51.039 get rid of base and Sanger, but it was a 0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:53.120 full toss and Sanger, who was one hundred and fifteen 0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:55.720 at the time, hit it straight to Charlie Stobo at 0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:58.440 short leg sorry square leg, but it doesn't matter, doesn't It. 0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:01.039 Does not matter that it must have been an amazing feeling, 0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:03.360 like he clocked up one hundred first GUSS games to 0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:06.000 New South Walest recently and you said it's first week 0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:10.200 in all fourmats and he's yeah, mid approaching mid thirty. 0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:12.800 So he probably would have those sleepless nights thinking is 0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:15.000 it ever going to happen? And there you go to do 0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:17.560 it to get his ex team made out. They lost 0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:18.800 the game, but I think he would have been the 0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:21.919 happiest man in Australia when they hit the postgame drinks. 0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:23.040 So well done, KP. 0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:25.480 Yeah, well on KP. And we'll touch a little bit 0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:27.160 more on KP in New South Wales as we get 0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:29.960 into the One Day Cup preview that's coming up after 0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:31.800 this short break. There's also been a T twenty World 0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:35.200 Cup Women's cricket and a Shield final to come up, 0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:41.800 so after this we'll be right back. It's the One 0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:44.320 Day Cup Final this week. Rich O March eleven on 0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:47.680 Wednesday's Tasmania hosting New South Wales. A great chance of 0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:51.479 the Tigers to win their first title in sixteen seasons. 0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:53.400 They haven't won it since two thousand and nine. To 0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:57.239 ten and they've got some big inclusions as well, Nathan Allis, 0:06:57.240 --> 0:07:00.159 Matt Koneman and Matthew Waiter all in the equation to 0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:02.880 return to the eleven. They've had a great season so far. 0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:04.839 They won their first five games, a little bit of 0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:08.000 a stumble just after Christmas, losing their last two, but 0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:11.320 you'd have to say they've been the most dominant side 0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:13.840 this year and they were nominated by you right at 0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:15.920 the start of the season to be run up there 0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:17.160 at the end of the At the end of the. 0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:20.400 Year they were probably wasn't for the One Day Cup, 0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:23.200 but when you look at their team and the inclusions 0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:25.239 to come back in, you can see why they started 0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:28.440 the season so well. Jordan Silk was joking over the 0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:31.840 Big Bash that is the Hobart Hurricanes Academy, and he's 0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:34.480 one of the overseas being from the Sydney Sixers, so 0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:36.840 Matt Cooeman is obviously the other. I don't think there's 0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:38.800 anyone else that plays for another Big Bash team. Wow, 0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.040 okay off the top of my head, but again, a 0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:43.880 team that's pretty well put together for the for the 0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:47.040 Big Bash in terms of that Hobart squad, So to 0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:50.080 keep that team together to play one day cricket, which 0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:52.360 isn't the same, but it can correlate pretty well to 0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:55.880 fifty overs. So they're going to put a really strong 0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:58.280 team on the on the on the park and going 0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:00.120 to be hard to beat, especially in their conditions. So 0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:03.360 I will claim that if they win that it was 0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.560 my thought process back in September, but I definitely thought 0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:08.600 that they would be around the mark for the Shield. 0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:11.080 So if they can win a One Day Cup, I'm 0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:13.880 sure they'll put the season together as a positive and 0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:17.160 move along for the last Shield game for the year. 0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:20.320 Definitely. Silki also suggested to you that we might see 0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:23.160 Mitchell and opening this Shepherd. We didn't quite see that 0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:25.680 this year, did we didn't. He's been doing it in 0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:26.360 the One Day came. 0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:28.440 Well, there's one game to go, and we just joked that, 0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:30.240 you know, it's like the end of term when you 0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:32.560 get to March, and you know, if there's one game 0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:35.160 to go and there's nothing to lose, or that's a 0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:37.640 gain or there could be something to gain, let's put 0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:40.880 unleash in. Yeah, you put it out there, You told 0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:42.439 me to put it on the podcast. He made me 0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:45.720 look silly, so back it up. He's got one chance, 0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:49.079 one chance. See what happens New South Wales. 0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:51.360 They won't have Steve Smith, and they won't have Mitch 0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:55.600 Stark or Josh Hazel would of course, but they do 0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:58.480 have obviously plenty of players who have been in and 0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.440 around a strange selection of recent years. Sewn Abbott, Ben 0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:05.240 Dorsies are going to be available, and Adam Zampa, unfortunately, 0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:07.600 well maybe fortunately for TANV is saying up. I think 0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:11.760 Sampa has put his hand up to play, but given 0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:14.280 that tam V has been in and around, he's sort 0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:16.360 of said, well, he's the leading we could taker in 0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:18.280 the competition. I'm going to let you play. It's unlikely 0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:20.160 to play two spinners down at Hobart, isn't it. 0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:22.719 Yeah, it's probably the last place you would pick two 0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:26.240 legies for a fifty over game. So yeah, again from 0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:28.120 Adam's point of view, I'm sure he'd love to play, 0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:30.120 but also very what's. 0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:32.520 The word very selfish? 0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:35.240 Yeah, it's probably the word that you know, TAMV has 0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:38.079 been there the whole year, so give him his opportunity. 0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:40.719 And he's obviously a player coming through that has been 0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:44.240 identified as possibly having a really long career in White 0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:46.920 Book cricket, especially for Australia, so to get a final 0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:50.960 under his belt, his age is beneficial and probably the 0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:52.960 opposite of how Tazzi you're doing it. They're loading up, 0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:55.319 aren't They're getting a forty year old back from Australian 0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:58.200 coaching duty to that in the middle order. But I 0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:01.040 mean he's obviously a an amazing player as well, so 0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:03.200 why wouldn't you do that? But you can't fit all 0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:06.240 leg spinners into the eleven. So yeah, very noble of 0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:08.640 zants and I'm sure TMB is very happy that he 0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:09.479 gets the opportunity. 0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:11.840 Yeah, as much as we'd love to have six legs 0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:13.600 spinners in the team, which just doesn't happen, does it. 0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:17.600 Curtis Patterson, he has hit five hundred and thirteen runs 0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:20.560 in this competitions, the most out of anybody, and I 0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:23.439 just wanted to flag that if he passes six hundred 0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:25.440 runs this season, so if he gets eighty seven or more, 0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:28.360 which you wouldn't put it past him, he will join 0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:30.760 only two players to hit six hundred runs in a 0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:35.040 One Day Cup season Brad Hodge in twenty nine ten 0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:38.560 and Phil Jakes in two thousand and five six And 0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:41.040 those were the days they were playing ten or eleven 0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:43.760 games a season. We only play six or seven now, 0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:48.000 so incredible stuff from Curtis. Of course, Manus lavish and 0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:50.400 is hit four centuries, but Curtis still has more runs 0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:52.679 than him, and it's just been one of those all 0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:53.640 time seasons it has. 0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:55.520 Yeah, and like you said, they played a hell of 0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:58.240 a lot more so it's pretty steen company just off 0:10:58.280 --> 0:10:59.680 the back of that. But then to do it in 0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:02.320 half the half the games or a bit over half 0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:06.200 the games is such an amazing achievement. So hopefully he does. 0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:07.440 That's been good. 0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:10.160 Yeah, I mean it's a history love we love recent 0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:13.559 recent history being included with the you know, the greats 0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:16.319 of the competition. So have they named the one Day 0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:18.360 Player of the year. Did Manus get that or have 0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:19.040 they not named that? 0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:21.079 Yeahs Manus is pretty. 0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:24.440 Unlucky to miss out Curtis when you rattle off those numbers, 0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:26.880 but insane. I mean, Malnus has obviously had a great 0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:29.480 season as well, but Curtis's team are in the final 0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:32.880 where it matters, so Coinsland are chasing the Shield final. 0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:35.360 But at least again there's only two trophies up for 0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:38.440 grabs for state teams. As such, So to be in 0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:40.200 the running for one is what you want. 0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:44.320 And Curtis he was the driving force in the most 0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:47.080 recent victory over Tasmania. Just a week or so ago, 0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:49.480 new had the Bells chase down Tasmaniu's two hundred and 0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:52.840 seventy four in only thirty one overs. Patterson hit one 0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:55.320 hundred and twenty five not out from eighty nine balls, 0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:58.960 and Greg ship had said after the game, this performance 0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:02.400 deserves a bit more attention because to chase down mat 0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:05.520 at what nine and over? Yeah, I mean, yes, it's 0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:08.200 at Bell Reeve where scoring can be pretty good, but 0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:10.400 even so nine over is incredible. 0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:12.720 It's tough to do so and that that would have 0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:16.640 been that would have got him into the finals, and 0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:19.040 they got there with nine. They almost got a triple 0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:22.080 bonus point, didn't they. So yeah, to do that to 0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:25.120 get to make a final is yeah. I mean Greg 0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:27.560 Schippard's talking there. This is his kind of last cracket 0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:29.960 with him moving aside at the end of the year 0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:32.360 and then being out of the Shield running. So I mean, 0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:34.760 for him, he must feel so proud of that that 0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:38.160 team for turning it around and being in with an 0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:40.600 opportunity to win a to win a final. And we've 0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:43.000 talked about New South Wales cricket. They've been a little 0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:45.520 bit down the last few years, so for them to 0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:49.280 turn it around since the Big Bushes has finished, yeah, 0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:51.600 it must make him really proud that he's leaving that 0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:53.920 stayed in. Well, what you would say is a better 0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:56.719 they're in better shape than when he took over and 0:12:57.320 --> 0:12:59.160 in a few years ago, and he's he's had a 0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:02.920 great track record wherever he's been bringing success. So yeah, 0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:05.280 hopefully I mean hopefully for him he wants to win, 0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:07.160 but also Tazzy do as well, So there's some good 0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:10.400 storylines approaching this One Day Cup final. 0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:12.680 Now that you're a new South Wales resident, have you 0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:15.120 been approached about the vacant gig at all? 0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:16.680 I haven't. 0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:19.960 I've just been compiling my coaching experience, which is minimal 0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:22.920 at this stage. So maybe in about fifteen to forty 0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:25.680 five years I'll look at that. When I say forty 0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:29.040 five years, it's probably how old ship he is and 0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:33.319 he's put together forty five years of it. Yeah, so yeah, no, 0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:34.520 I haven't thought about that one. 0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:36.280 And of course, if we go right back to the 0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:39.400 start of the season, Tazzy defeated New South Wales by 0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:41.719 two wickets. It was that match where Brad Hope and 0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.320 Matt Cooneman put one hundred RUMs for the ninth wicket. 0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:48.080 So they've already played twice this season when yeah, you 0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:52.840 only play every team once and then yeah there's one team, 0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:56.200 so it'll be their third matchup for the year and 0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:57.520 it's one to one at the minute. 0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:01.320 And with Koneman back in the team that well, bowlers meeting, 0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:03.360 their bowler's meeting is probably going to go over time. 0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:04.520 Now how do we get him out? 0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:08.679 So vital inclusion for Tassy maybe maybe just as much 0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:10.440 for his batting as his bowling. 0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:13.400 Yeah, in terms of the bowling for Tasmania, their leading 0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:15.679 wicket taker this year was a bit of a surprise 0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:19.440 to me. Nikil Chowdury eight wickets. He's got the most 0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:22.200 for them, just ahead of Billy stan Lake and Mitchel 0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:25.920 and on seven apiece. But Chowdery we see him bowl maybe 0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:28.040 over here and then over there in the Big Bash, 0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:30.240 but he's turned out to be an effective we could 0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:32.080 taker for them in this for. 0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:32.560 The Big Bash. 0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:33.440 Yeah, maybe a bit. 0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:35.880 More, well obviously a bit more and fifty over cricket, 0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:37.600 but definitely a bit more. I'm sure if he played 0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:40.240 for a team that didn't have the bowling depth that 0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:43.280 Hobart has, he'd probably I'm not saying he's bowl for 0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:45.800 every game, but he definitely bowl more than what he does, 0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:49.120 so very handy, very handy option. I mean as a 0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:51.320 cricketer in general, I think he's improved out of side 0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:53.560 in the last couple of years. But yeah, to be 0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:55.600 leading the wicket takers in a one day comp just 0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:58.040 shows his growth. So again there'll be more on the 0:14:58.080 --> 0:14:58.960 horizon for him. 0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:01.360 Yeah, And of course ten Vier saying as we touched on, 0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:04.000 he's got eighteen wickets. It's the most in the competition, 0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:07.400 just ahead of Mitch Swebson who's got fifteen. Took that 0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:09.800 incredible seven for twenty eight a couple of weeks ago, 0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:12.560 which is the third or fourth best figures in the 0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:14.640 competition's history. So leg spin is doing well. 0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:17.840 So he's got eighteen wickets for the year in six games, 0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:21.560 pretty good going. And for ten Va he had a 0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:24.120 pretty tough Big Bash in terms of wickets for a 0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:26.960 leg spinner spent some time out of the Thunder team 0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:29.920 and for a young guy that would bat your confidence 0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:31.880 around a little bit, so for him to then come 0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:34.240 back out of that and pre big Bash in a 0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:37.880 different form, to just be taking wickets like that and 0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:40.400 leading his team along with Curtis Patterson to a final. 0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:43.000 As I said, he's got a big career in his future. 0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:46.280 Once Adam hangs up his boots, if he ever does, 0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:48.720 from the One Day and T twenty teams ten V 0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:51.000 will be ready to go. So it's great for him 0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:55.240 to be yes showing so much form through a fifty overseason. 0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:57.000 There have been a couple of other guys who have 0:15:57.120 --> 0:15:59.600 made cricket dot com dot Who's unofficial Team of the 0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:02.280 Tournament who it's worth shouting out as well. I reckon 0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:06.920 Joel Curtis from Wa four hundred and thirty one runs. 0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:09.760 He's been opening over there in the West. He's made 0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:11.600 his maiden one hundred and a couple of other fifties 0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:15.080 as well, and he's a keeper, so he brings a 0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:16.840 lot to the table, doesn't he. Joel Curtis just sort 0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:18.920 of arrived on a domestic scene last season, but this 0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:21.880 year is really Cashtume made it. That's what his own. 0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:23.520 When Josh Englis has been out of the team. 0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:25.520 Well that's a key point, isn't it. So that's kind 0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:27.680 of that role that Josh Philip he filled for a 0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.080 long time and decided that he wanted to be somewhere 0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:31.520 where he can play every game, and then all of 0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:34.080 a sudden wa as they have done for the last 0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:37.240 ten years, just found another guy that can obviously play 0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:40.040 to the level. So it's amazing when you get an opportunity, 0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:44.640 consistent opportunity. Josh Englis is always away, so yeah, embarrassment 0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:45.640 of riches really. 0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:49.240 And speaking of embarrassment of riches, the West always produced 0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:51.920 fast bowlers. Seems like they got another one in Bryce 0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:55.160 Jackson with fifteen wickets as well to his name this season. 0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:58.280 Tall bowler obviously, he runs and looks like he hits 0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:02.680 the bath hard, yes, every ball. But have you seen 0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:04.240 much of Bryce and what have you made of him 0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:04.560 so far? 0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:07.359 Action Jackson? Yeah, I like he's set up great one 0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:09.680 day numbers to start. I was actually disappointed he didn't 0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:11.200 get a game in the Big Bash because I thought 0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:13.040 there would be at some point a role to play. 0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:15.480 But again, when you talk about the depth of fast 0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:19.320 bowling and what led to another BBL title, it probably 0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:21.959 shows that he might have to look for opportunities elsewhere 0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:25.680 to get an opportunity in the Big Bash. But as 0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:28.080 we said, it can correlate One day form to T twenty. 0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:31.199 There's similarities in terms of bowling at the death and 0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:32.879 power play and that kind of stuff. So to be 0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:35.480 taking wickets like he has done in fifty other cricket 0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:37.480 shows that he's got a future in T twenty. 0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:38.840 But yeah, like I like him. 0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:41.000 It's just got you look at him and you go 0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:43.000 that you know when you see team warming up, if 0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:44.399 you didn't know who that. 0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:46.240