WEBVTT - Sophie Guidolin’s Fourth ‘Husband’, Sarah’s Day’s Confusing Diet Backflip & Ruby Tuesday Matthews’ CCTV Vision

0:00:02.000 --> 0:00:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Coming up on today's show, Sarah's Day ignites debate about

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:09.280
<v Speaker 1>what I eat in a day trend Ruby Tuesday, Matthew's

0:00:09.320 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>house is targeted by a gang of thieves and Saffron

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Barker catches up with her ex. Hello and welcome to Outspoken.

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 1>It's your dose of the hottest influencer and.

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Pop culture news twice a week.

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm Sophie Torba and over the weekend, Sophie Guidland has

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 1>ignited rumors of a secret wedding to fitness coach Nicholas White. Now,

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the couple only hard launched their relationship a few weeks ago,

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and she has hinted in a YouTube video.

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:36.560
<v Speaker 2>That the pair are now married.

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>So in this video, while she was showing off her

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>body building trophies, she casually referred to Nicholas as her husband.

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 2>Let's throw to the clip. Do you mind I can

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 2>put your name on it? You could have Best Husband

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:53.480
<v Speaker 2>of the Year twenty twenty four.

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 3>I could put your name on it and an add

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 3>engrave it like a little bikini girl.

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>The bread crumbing around this apparent marriage is next level

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 1>because it appears like Sophie is wearing a wedding band

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>in this vision and in other vision on an Instagram story,

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:11.959
<v Speaker 1>she is showing off her left hand with what appears

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to be a ring on it as well. She is

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 1>making no secret about this marriage. Nicholas was also wearing

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a matching wedding band in another Instagram story, so it's

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>almost like they are trying to get everyone's attention. It's

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 1>funny how whenever there's an influencer relationship that's in the spotlight,

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:30.400
<v Speaker 1>you actually see the influencer's hand so much. Yes, just

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>thinking about Tammy Henbury in every real and every Instagram story.

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, sometimes she's got the ring on, sometimes she's

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>got the ring off. Do you think they do it

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 1>for engagement? Oh, definitely, because it's their comment section gets

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>filled up with people speculating about their lives, and it's

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 1>a way that they stay relevant. As someone who is married,

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm always taking my rings on and off, like particularly

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>if I'm cooking or doing the dishes. However, you would

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 1>think that if your relationship was in the spotlight, you

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>would make a conceited effort to keep those rings on

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>when you're filming.

0:01:57.880 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 2>I just love how ballsy it is that she's just

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 2>such roped.

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh, husband of the Year Award as well, because surely

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>she knows everyone is going to be talking about this,

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and her followers have gone crazy over this tidbit of

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>information because Sophie and Nicholas have only been together since Descend,

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>but that's the first time we saw them appear publicly

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>on a holiday in New South Wayes. I mean, there

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>are still question marks about what their relationship was actually like.

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Some people said that maybe they're just friends, but it

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>has been kept very low profile. That was until Nicholas

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>actually appeared in Sophie's YouTube video and that was when

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>she spoke about her breast explant surgery. However, he was

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>seen like his hand was seen passing her over flowers.

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:38.799
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't like it was a big hard launch of

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>his face. However, of course all her followers have gone

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and found out who he is on Instagram well, because

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>anytime these influences they try and soft launch with the

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, the boyfriend's hand just appearing in the video.

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 1>They always have these really distinctive tattoos and it's so

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>easy for the followers to go and find out.

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Who the guy is.

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Now, if this is true, it is rather interesting timing

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>because it comes thirteen months after Sophie ended her marriage

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to Gold Coast dentist doctor Andrew Now. The couple separated

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>after just four months of marriage on a very difficult

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and sad term. So this was after their daughter Pixie

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>was sadly delivered stillborn, and Sophie and Andrew had a

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>really well winned relationship, just like Sophie appears to have

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>with Nicholas, because they dated for less than a year

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 1>before getting married in Byron Bay in November twenty twenty two,

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and shortly after they announced they were expecting a baby.

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>The difference is though she was friends with doctor Andrew

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>for over ten years, so we're not sure if it's

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a similar situation where she has known Nicholas for a

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>long time. These relationships have been very different though, although

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>they've both been very quick. Sophie was very public about

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 1>her relationship with Andrew. We saw this epic proposal that

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>was filmed by a videographer. She also monetized the wedding photos,

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>so it was a big controversy at the time because

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>she put them behind a paywall in order to get

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>subscribers on Instagram. But with Nicholas, it seems like she's

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of dancing around the idea of one to be

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>ultra private but then enjoying breadcrumbing everyone in order to

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>get engagement on her YouTube channel. But maybe that's why

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>she has just subtly dropped it because of all the

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>backlash she copped last time for monetizing it. I mean,

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>if you look at them, but if you look at

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>her strategy, it's been to be a bit more real

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and honest on her YouTube channel. She's chosen this real

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 1>doco style way now of presenting some of her But

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it is real and honest amy because

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:28.280
<v Speaker 1>it's more like standing back from it. Like I think

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>it's more so she's probably got married, didn't want to

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 1>share it with anybody, and now she's thought, fuck, I

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of need to mention it to my followers. I'm

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 1>just going to suddenly drop it, and I don't want

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>to make this huge deal. I think she is making

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>a big effort for it to seem different to the

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>other relationship, and I think she has learned a lesson

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 1>about monetizing her relationship and she wants to be open

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>with her audience and share Nicholas in her YouTube videos. However,

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>she's got to do that in a way that it

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look like she's just trying to monetize a new

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>life event. And I think we've seen, as we touched

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 1>on before, women get very heavily judged online if they

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>get into relationships quickly when they get engaged. I mean,

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Tammy Hembro is a complete case study for that. So

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:11.719
<v Speaker 1>I think that she's like, Oh, I'm just gonna casually

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:14.039
<v Speaker 1>drop it and then I can just move on. The

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 1>thing I don't understand is why do you have to

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>rush into getting married though, Like, if there's so much

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>speculation about it, why do you to see how things go?

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, again, it hasn't been confirmed that they are

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>actually married, but the rumor mill really went into overdrive

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>when Amber from Influencer Updates shared on Friday night that

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:35.159
<v Speaker 1>an acquaintance of Nicholas reached out to her saying that

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 1>the couple got married overseas. And if this news is legit,

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>this is Sophie's fourth marriage. So she actually grew up

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>as a Jehovah's witness and she got.

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Married really young.

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:48.599
<v Speaker 1>And she also married Nathan Wallace in twenty fifteen and

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>of course Andrew in twenty twenty two.

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 2>So I just don't understand what the rush is.

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's just at a point where that's just the

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>natural progression feach of her relationships. I mean, maybe once

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>you've been married three or four times, it's kind of like, well,

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>this is just what we do when I feel serious,

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:05.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm in love. I wonder if it has anything to

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>do with the personality type that become influencers, because you

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>look at Tammy Hembro and she's had so many engagements,

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and there's lots of other influencers who've.

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 2>Been married multiple times. Maybe it's something to.

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Do with Wizard of Content arc really, because we have

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 1>spoken a lot about how influencers personal milestones like engagements, weddings,

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>having babies is just a great boost for their engagement.

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 1>So maybe it's just like they look at their lives

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>like with story arcs, and think, Okay, so I've just

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>got out of that marriage thirteen months ago, so if

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I get into this other one, people are going to

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 1>be really excited and want to hear what I've got

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to say and be engaged to what I'm talking about.

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's also because they have a disposable income.

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>To them, it's not a big deal to save up

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>for a wedding. I mean, I don't even this divorce

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>seems to have just gone through. It takes, you know,

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>quite a while for a divorce to come through. I

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>can't even imagine the logistics of planning a divorce and

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>then another wedd I don't think I have to plan

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:03.720
<v Speaker 1>much for a defense, But you've still got the mental

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:06.840
<v Speaker 1>load of having to lodge it and go through all

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of that upset, and then you've already got over that

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>marriage and you're already into another one.

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 2>But even in quotations normal.

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Life, I've never really heard of someone getting married so

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>often and so quickly like it does seem to be

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>either your celebrity like celebrities seem to do this a lot,

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>or influence. People are calling her the Elizabeth Taylor of

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the influencer world. At the moment, I do wonder now

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>there is so much speculation whether Sophie's next YouTube video

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to confirm this marriage. What I don't get

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>is the guys that end up marrying these people that

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>have publicly been engaged or married so many different times,

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Because wouldn't you have alarm bells ringing and think, oh,

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe I shouldn't propose or maybe I shouldn't get into this.

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I think they just get in such a love bubble.

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 3>This concept and this idea again is exciting me.

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Sarah's Day has announced she's going back to her roots

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and will again be sharing what she eats in a day.

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 1>The controversial influencers stopped creating this style of content after

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>receiving backlash, but is one of many influencers jumping back

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 1>on the trend. I literally thought we had left this

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>trend back in twenty ten. So did I, and as

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>you touched on, this trend originated on YouTube more than

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>ten years ago, and if you cast your mind back,

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>influencers would share in great detail exactly what they ate

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 1>during the day. Normally it would be ultra healthy, so

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>it would include a smoothie, a piece of dark chocolate

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, not a lot of snacking,

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I have to say now, the content did form the

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>basis of many OG Australian influencers YouTube channels, including Sarah's Day.

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Now, there was a point where everyone started.

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Waking up to the fact that this was very toxic

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>dieting messaging and it did become taboo to actually share

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>what you ate during the day.

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 2>However, recently it has.

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Been supercharged by TikTok's algorithm and this trend has made

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a massive resurgence on TikTok, clocking up billions of view

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Sarah's Day is one of those people that is back

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>on this trend.

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:05.439
<v Speaker 2>And what really.

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Annoyed me and didn't sit well with me is she

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>started filming this video sharing what she was eating on

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>her Instagram story and she said, I'm actually filming the

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>full video for YouTube, and she showed off this very

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 1>healthy looking salad. However, she then opened up and said

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 1>when she originally filmed this content back in twenty thirteen,

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>that she was in a very bad place with her eating.

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:25.959
<v Speaker 1>Let's row to what she said.

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 3>First off, this concept and this idea again is exciting

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:33.960
<v Speaker 3>me because I'm not like back in the day in

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 3>twenty thirteen when I would film these videos, I was

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 3>so fixated on like looking a certain way and like

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 3>being shredded and being at like low body fat, or

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 3>I was like trying to get my period back or

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 3>healing my acne. There was always a specific goal in

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 3>mind in terms of like what I was putting into

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 3>my body, Whereas now I'm thirty one, I have two children.

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm just a stay at home mom, like trying to

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 3>work at the same time, and I'm like, I just

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 3>want to fill my body with nutrient vicious foods that

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:03.319
<v Speaker 3>are going to give like my skin a glow, give

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 3>me energy, allow me to be regular and poop.

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, I just you know, it really annoys me.

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Because Sarah still has a lot of these toxic videos

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:16.559
<v Speaker 1>still up on her YouTube channel, and if she's reflected

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>back and thought, oh, I wasn't in a good space

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:21.199
<v Speaker 1>when I shared these, why don't you delete them? Yeah,

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>they're still monetized on her channel, and reading between the lines,

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>what she's essentially said is that her YouTube channel was

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 1>based on sharing content that promoted disordered eating. Well, it

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>gets worse because she then went on to say that

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the main reason she stopped filming this type of content

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:39.080
<v Speaker 1>is because of the backlash she received, and also because

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>these videos were having a negative impact on the way

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 1>that she was eating and the way that she was

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>perceiving what she was eating.

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:47.199
<v Speaker 2>Let's throw to what she said.

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 3>I didn't like watching them because I would sit back

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 3>and be like WHOA, like I eat so much? Or like,

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 3>oh my gosh, I'm like consuming double what that person consumes.

0:10:57.480 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Or if there's like a really beautiful model and they

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 3>in a certain way, you subconsciously think.

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:03.559
<v Speaker 2>Like can I be eating like that?

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 3>Like and never want people to watch my videos and

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 3>then feel bad about themselves or like have any kind

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 3>of negative reaction. So I fully pulled back because I

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 3>was like, I just don't want people continuing my content

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 3>and like comparing themselves. Why so yeah, I stopped doing them.

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:24.559
<v Speaker 1>It's quite ironic because in this video she literally points

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:26.439
<v Speaker 1>out all the issues with this style of content, but

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 1>there says, nah, I'm back on it again, like it

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:31.679
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make any sense to me. And she also spoke

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot about how it's not really authentic because she

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>said back in the day, she'd be so focused on

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>what she's actually filming that she wouldn't actually show any

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>of us knacks. So she said, normally as a mum,

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>she would grab a hand, you know, eat some of

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Fox's apple, her son's apple, or you know, finish off

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:48.599
<v Speaker 1>the leftovers.

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 2>But that's obviously not very aesthetically pleasing for TikTok or

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 2>for you think that annoys me.

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Is she clearly has the awareness to know that these

0:11:57.040 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 1>videos can have detrimental impacts for what peopleeople are eating

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and the way that they look at food. I mean

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:04.559
<v Speaker 1>it even had a detrimental impact on the way.

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 2>That she viewed what she was eating. Yet she is.

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Happy to come back and jump back on this trend

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>because it's popular at the moment.

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 2>It's clearly in a bid to stay relevant.

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>We have spoken a lot about how Sarah's Day's YouTube

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 1>views are dropping off, how she is losing followers, She's

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:21.319
<v Speaker 1>no longer actually on that momentum of gaining a lot

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 1>of followers, and maybe she's like, well, I've got to

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>convert back to what I used to do. And particularly

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>TikTok is playing a big role in this, because the

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:32.719
<v Speaker 1>algorithm is favoring this type of content and it has

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 1>been proven to be serving it up directly to vulnerable

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 1>people who will consume it, and those people are people

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that suffer with disordered eating or an eating disorder, and

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>that is so scary. It's important that we don't just

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>single out Sarah's Day because there are so many other

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 1>influencers who are jumping back on this trend. PR Queen

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>roxy Jusenko is one of these high profile Australians who

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:55.239
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mind giving her followers an insight into.

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 2>What she's eating.

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Last week, she put up a Q and A asking

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 1>her followers to send in questions, and the majority of

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>questions were centered around her diet and how she stays

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:07.320
<v Speaker 1>so thin, and she did not hold back. She was

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 1>happy to share specific details about how she curbs her cravings,

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 1>her exercise regimes, her hacks were staying.

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Thin, and also even how much she weighs.

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I have seen her sharing her scales so many times

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 1>on her Instagram. I was really shocked when she actually

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>outlined like this is my height, this is my weight.

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how that's helpful information for anyone. It

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>just makes people compare themselves to her. And when she

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>was asked what she eats during the day, she wrote, okay,

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 1>so this was controversial. I was doing two boiled eggs

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>a day and a Greek salad for dinner and the

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>world lost its minds on my behalf. So I have

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 1>been working with sm Nutrition and she has done a

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:47.959
<v Speaker 1>meal plan specifically for me now.

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 2>She did share a very sad.

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Looking photo of her Greek salad with this information, and

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:56.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not like it was some massive bowl. It was

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 1>like a little plastic container. I'm glad to hear that

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 1>she's no longer eating this, but she's literally just.

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Spelt out how.

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>You can look like her if you want to. I mean,

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 1>how many people have probably now started replication. Is looking

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 1>very fit and thin at the moment, and someone who

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I assume people would find aspirational. And it is quite

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 1>disturbing because last year she opened up about how she

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 1>illegally obtained a zenpic and that is because her doctor

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>would not prescribe it to her, so she actually got

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 1>someone to go and get it from another state. She

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>paid them to drive and get it, and she ended

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>up overdosing on a zen pick and almost died in hospital.

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>So she wanted to speak out about how dangerous it is.

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 1>But it's crazy about of people who are actually on ozempick,

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>like people you would never actually think would be on

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the drug. Well, it is really concerning because there's been

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 1>this huge cultural shift away from the slim, thick era

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>that we knew in the twenty tens to this ultra

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>slim cut ashy an esque era where they're getting the

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 1>implants removed. Everyone appears to be on ozenpick, but some

0:14:57.800 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of these what eight in a day? I have seen

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>diet teaations or even health gurus doing them, and some

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>of the meals actually look very nutritious. Is there some

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>aspect of it that is positive or are all of

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>these videos just negative? Look? I actually wrote an article

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>on this topic for Mum and Mia this week, and

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I did speak to a dietitian and nutritionist called Tanya Ferreto,

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and she said, it's this whole comparison thing that is

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>just not helpful. So it's fine for nutritionists to share recipes,

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 1>but when you put it down into this is what

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I eat in a day, people take that on board

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>as verbatim that they should be following it. And thanks

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>to TikTok, this trend is even more dangerous. I did

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>touch on because of the algorithm, and Tanya actually cited

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>this groundbreaking research from the University of Melbourne Scott Griffiths,

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and she said that TikTok has been proven to actually

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>target users with eating disorders and the study actually found

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that participants with an eating disorder were disproportionately served appearance

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>orientated content, with the delivery intensifying over time. And she

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>said that this can be extremely triggering for those people

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 1>that have had a history of disordered eating and eating disorders.

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's very scary because this app is literally targeting

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable people, and then there are influencers jumping on this

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>trend in a bid to stay relevant. Now, I did

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 1>have a look and TikTok they haven't banned the content. However,

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>they do have a disclaimer when you search the hashtag. However,

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>that's only on TikTok's desktop version, so it does say

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you're more than your weight. If you or someone you

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>know has questions about body image, food or exercise, it

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>is important to know that help is out there and

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>you are not alone. If you feel uncomfortable, you can

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>confide in someone you trust or check out the resources below.

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Please remember to take care of yourselves and each other. Now,

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>this is a trend that we're seeing for Tanning as well.

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Like their solution is, oh, rather than banning this content,

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>we're just gonna put a bit of exclaim it.

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 2>But everyone takes.

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Cover ourselves legally. Have you guys seen the videos where

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>it's people who eat a large amount of unhealthy food

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and they love them. I do have a guilty pleasure

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>of watching them. There is one UK creator who does this,

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and she lives off takeaway and she will probably have

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 1>four or five takeaway meals a day, and a lot

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of people are asking, how can you afford this in

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>this economic crisis. There's a girl who just eats butter.

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 1>She eats like tubs of butter, and I do think

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>that is probably just as unhealthy these influencers who are

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:25.400
<v Speaker 1>promoting it. But the only thing is it isn't packaged

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:27.160
<v Speaker 1>up to be aspiration, although.

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 2>That's where it's actually dangerous.

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:30.120
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of more of a free people and people

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:32.440
<v Speaker 1>aren't following it to replicate it. That they're following more

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>as Wow, it's shot of value and it makes them

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:37.160
<v Speaker 1>feel better about what they're eating. But I don't necessarily

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 1>think it's that helpful. They're on a positive front. Influencer

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Jade two and she actually shared about this trend and

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>it popped up on my feet and I was like,

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:46.679
<v Speaker 1>oh god, as she jumped on the bandwagon. But this

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:49.639
<v Speaker 1>is actually what she said, what I eat in a

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 1>day as a pregnant person in week thirty two, whatever

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel like eating that day. The same goes for

0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>when I'm not pregnant, whatever I eat it doesn't determine

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>what you should or shouldn't eat, and is not a

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 1>benchmark for your body and the way that it functions.

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>This was so refreshing because originally when I saw it,

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh, God, like, how bad is this

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that it's a pregnant video diary of what you're eating?

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Because God, if I was tracking what I'm eating, no

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 1>one would want to be following it at the moment. Yeah,

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that is really good of jar Day because some people

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>do just sit back and watch the trend and don't

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 1>actually call it out, and that can sometimes be worth worse.

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:27.719
<v Speaker 1>At least she's using her platform to actually say this

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>is a bit fucked.

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 2>They were just so guns ablazing did not care.

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Ruby Tuesday, Matthews is becoming the queen of Neighborhood Watch.

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 1>This week, she shared CCTV vision of a gang of

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 1>youths targeting her street.

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 2>That's important to note not.

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>The band, but an actual legitimate group of young people. Yeah. Now,

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>in the vision it does show mass teenagers breaking into

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 1>her garage where her Mercedes was parked, and she wrote

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 1>in the Instagram STORYYI at Bangalore four thirty am this morning,

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>while sleeping our house and cars were broken into. Group

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>of teens are targeting Bangalore as most of our street

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and surrounding streets were affected. Any information, please DM me.

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:12.679
<v Speaker 1>She then later revealed on Instagram that every house on

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the street had experienced break ins, whether it was their

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>car or house being broken into, so.

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 2>Pretty terrifying stuff.

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 1>This is taking me back to a couple of months

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>ago when Ruby shared CCTV vision from her mum's house

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:28.159
<v Speaker 1>and it was thieves stealing this big pot and she

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:31.880
<v Speaker 1>nicknamed it Popgate and she was calling herself constable Oystergate.

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I absolutely love this side of Ruby, and I love

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 1>that she's utilizing her CCTV vision to help the neighborhood out.

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I think a sponsor needs to get on board, some

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:43.919
<v Speaker 1>sort of security company you need to partner with Ruby,

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:47.119
<v Speaker 1>because this is absolutely gold content. It's pretty scary because

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Ruby and her family were asleep when this robbery took

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 1>place and the thieves got into her garage. But she

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>actually didn't realize until a neighbor told her.

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Let's throw to what Ruby said about the thieves. They

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 2>took like random medications, all the scripts in my car

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 2>that I had and I just don't get filled because

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 2>I'll just give you scripts into call the scripts just

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 2>the most weird am I firing my other workfone, which

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 2>am like an idiot?

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, they just took the most random random stuff, like.

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:18.879
<v Speaker 2>Left the handbag, left the wallets.

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:19.920
<v Speaker 1>It just took.

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 3>Random cash, medicines and a few other things, but left

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:32.400
<v Speaker 3>a lot of work computers.

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm so shocked that they didn't steal the car and

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that they were just after medication. Well, Ruby thinks it's

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:41.160
<v Speaker 1>because she has a tracking system on her car, so

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:43.479
<v Speaker 1>maybe they realized it was on there and they wouldn't

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>be able to get away with it. Something similar happened

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to some friends of mine recently. They had some teenagers

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>break into their house and they actually took their mobile phones,

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:54.120
<v Speaker 1>their purse, and also their car, their.

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 2>Purse, sorry, how old are you fifty years old? Their wallet,

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 2>their wallet, then purse whatever, pay and.

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, my friend was thinking, oh, how foolish of me

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to leave my keys to the car on the whole stand,

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 1>And the police actually said sometimes it's better that way

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 1>because you don't want the robbers to go.

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Trying to find in the house.

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 1>That's when they start disrupting people to start, So it

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>just in case I've got to leave all my valuables

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>in an easy to grab spot. Personally, wouldn't be that

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 1>upset if someone took my car. I feel like it

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:23.360
<v Speaker 1>is on its last legs at the moment. There has

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 1>been a huge spike in these sorts of crimes, particularly

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:29.159
<v Speaker 1>in Byron, with these crimes centering around car theft and

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>also break in, and interestingly, there has been an increase

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>in what they're calling post and boast, so that's when

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:39.439
<v Speaker 1>robbers are actually filming and photographing their crime spreeze, so

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>they're uploading all of this to Instagram and TikTok.

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Is this like the Bling Ring?

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think it's more that teenagers know that they

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 1>probably just get a slap on the wrists for doing Yeah,

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:50.479
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing. There's nothing really that the police can

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>do because they're too young to throw them in prison

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and they know that they know they're going to get away.

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 1>But also half the time, I mean I had my

0:21:57.080 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>car broken into last year, even when at l Steward

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 1>as well, I think that it's really difficult to actually

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>catch people in the act.

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 2>They don't have a lot of police time to look

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:06.919
<v Speaker 2>into all of this.

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>But you also need to literally have the person on

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>camera taking the car. That's what yeah, Ruby's provided. And

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the interesting thing is that Byne Bay is a celebrity

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 1>hot spot, so people are obviously thinking, hmm, there's a

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of wealthy people around here that I can steal from. However,

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 1>those wealthy people actually have CCTV footage.

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 4>I mean I hear rumors about myself every single day,

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 4>like genuinely, I open TikTok. There's a new rumor.

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 2>UK influencers.

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Saffron Barker has stunned her followers by revealing she caught

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>up with her ex Tyler Dixon whilst holidaying in the US. Now,

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:43.679
<v Speaker 1>so if this isn't the ex we're expecting her to

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:44.920
<v Speaker 1>be seeing, No, this is.

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:46.159
<v Speaker 2>Very left of field.

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 1>So Saffron has just gone through a very public breakup

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:53.160
<v Speaker 1>with new Cheese recruit Lewis Reesezamt. We have spoken about

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:56.199
<v Speaker 1>this in detail on this podcast and when Lewis and

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Saffron were together, as listeners will know, he did jet

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 1>off on an tense ten week training camp to the

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 1>US in the hopes of getting signed by an NFL team,

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and Saffron was supposed to be meeting up with Lewis

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>in the US to celebrate, but when she found out

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:14.400
<v Speaker 1>that he allegedly cheated on her, of course she had

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:17.199
<v Speaker 1>to change up her trip. So she still went to

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the US, but instead she visited la and Coachella with

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>some friends. And followers were convinced that Saffron was going

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to try and catch up with Lewis while she was

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>over there, either to rekindle the relationship or get some closure.

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 1>But she has surprised all of us by catching up

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:38.479
<v Speaker 1>with her previous ex, Tyler Dixon. Yeah, this was not

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 1>on my bingo card for twenty twenty four, but it

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 1>is a bit of a power move for her, particularly

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:46.159
<v Speaker 1>because she has been so public about it. She's spoken

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 1>about it on her podcast, she spoke about it on

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>her YouTube channel. It's not like she's trying to keep

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 1>this a secret. They actually met during Lockdown and were

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 1>together for about a year, and he was a permanent

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>fixture on her YouTube channel and followers, we were very

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 1>surprised when out of the blue they seemed to call

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 1>it quits.

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 2>But following the.

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Split, there were all these persistent rumors that Saffron cheated

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>on Tyler during a girl's trip to Dubai with none

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 1>other than Love Island's Luca Bish, and it's all very

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:18.679
<v Speaker 1>convoluted and ancestral because Luca Bish ended up dating fellow

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Love Islander Gemma Olwen, who was also rumored to have

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 1>dated Saffron's most recent ex, Lewis recent Zama, that is

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:28.680
<v Speaker 1>such a mouthful, but it's all very weird. Yeah, And

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people started talking about Tyler because it

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:34.919
<v Speaker 1>was in Dubai that Saffron found out that Lewis was

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 1>allegedly cheating on her, and people were like, oh, well,

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:41.120
<v Speaker 1>suck shit, because you cheated on Tyler in Dubai, which

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:43.199
<v Speaker 1>she has come out and said that is not the

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>case at all. It was obvious to me that Saffron

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>had just dropped her catching up with Tyler as a

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 1>bit of a fuck you to everyone, being like, see,

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 1>we are on good terms and I think.

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 2>And I didn't shet. Yeah.

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 1>And because she has obviously been the topic of conversation

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:00.879
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok recently because of her split from Lewis, Riesi's

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>emmet and a lot of people have been saying, well,

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:05.159
<v Speaker 1>Sefron did the same thing to her ex, so I

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>don't feel sorry for her. Here. It's clear that she

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 1>wants to put these rumors to bed, because she dropped

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:12.920
<v Speaker 1>it not only on her YouTube channel, but also on

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:16.439
<v Speaker 1>her dating podcast. Let's throw it to Safron addressing the

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>rumor's head on.

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 4>He just happened to be in La at the same

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 4>time that I was in La, so he messaged me, like,

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm literally around the corner, and we went to the

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 4>grocery store and got erawan together. Anyways, everyone suddenly thinks

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 4>I'm secretly on this trip Tyler the entire time and

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 4>we're back together, So I just like to confirm not true.

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 4>But like, I literally love him. He is one of

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 4>the nicest people I've ever ever met, like genuinely has

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 4>the biggest heart. Like every single person that's met him

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:48.439
<v Speaker 4>says how amazing he is. For some reason, there was

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 4>always this rumor that I had cheated on Tyler, which

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 4>I don't know where it's come from because I've never

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:55.719
<v Speaker 4>cheated on anyone in my life, nor would I Like,

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:59.919
<v Speaker 4>that's just not part of my morals at all. Basic

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 4>you're on social it's I never fell out with him,

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 4>Like nothing bad happened at all, Like literally we just

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:10.679
<v Speaker 4>split for like no really reason. Like there was just

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, Like I just felt like I was

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 4>at a different stage in my life and so did he,

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 4>and like that was genuinely the reason as to why

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 4>we split. There was nothing deeper than that.

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Before Saffron had even revealed that she caught up with Tyler,

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 1>super Sluss had already connected the dots because Saffron and

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Tyler shared nearly identical photos of their luck. But that's

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:34.719
<v Speaker 1>not incidental either. Like the thing is that people might

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 1>be like, oh, well, maybe she had to come out

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and say it, but when you're on YouTube and social

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:42.400
<v Speaker 1>media for years like Saffron is, you know that people

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>are going to.

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Connect those ties.

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:46.159
<v Speaker 1>But she claimed that she wasn't following him, so she

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't know that he'd shared it. But then it's like,

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're not following him, then how are you on

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:53.359
<v Speaker 1>such good We're not out to lunch with someone, even

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 1>if they're trying to do it sneakily, you know that

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>they're taking a photo of their food. And they were

0:26:57.320 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>at Saffron's favorite place, air One, which is that real

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:03.440
<v Speaker 1>expensive soup marko. Can you imagine going there? Literally every

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:06.440
<v Speaker 1>YouTuber is there filming, Oh what I got from Air one.

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:08.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but do you know what that stands for?

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 1>No? So backwards, it's nowhere. I just know they charge

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:14.919
<v Speaker 1>like wounded balls for smoothies named after Haley, but it's

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 1>like forty five US dollars for fucking smoothie.

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:17.879
<v Speaker 2>Do you know what?

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I am loving though? The fact that she is dropping

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 1>these subtle fuck you's, like I am here for it.

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>And on her podcast she even said that Tyler is

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the nicest boyfriend she's ever had, and she gushed it

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that he's doing so well in life and that everyone

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 1>stand their relationship and wants them back together, which I

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>wonder if they potentially could get back together. Nah, she's

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 1>just using him. I think that she's played it very well.

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 1>She has put to bed rumors that she cheated. She

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:47.439
<v Speaker 1>now looks like the good person. Lewis looks like the

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:48.200
<v Speaker 1>bad person.

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Like that.

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 1>She is touching on all of the TikTok rumors on

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:54.680
<v Speaker 1>her podcast, because that's something that I think more influencers

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:56.399
<v Speaker 1>need to do on their podcast because these are the

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 1>things that we want to hear about. So just pretend

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 1>rather than pretending happening, particularly because she's she's got a

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 1>dating podcast, so we actually want.

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 2>To hear about your data.

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:06.679
<v Speaker 1>But you think that's because Spotify are involved, so they're like,

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you have to talk about this. It's kind of like

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:11.399
<v Speaker 1>the Kick Pod when they've got producers involved and like,

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 1>hang on, people just want to hear about your linse.

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean that being said, I do want to find

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 1>out more about what actually happened, because she's trying to

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 1>be the bigger person and not go into all of

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the mercury, but we want to keep some clues, like

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 1>it's quite clear that he cheated on her allegedly. I

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:25.880
<v Speaker 1>did a little stalk into Tyler because I haven't even

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>looked at his Instagram since he and Saffron broke up.

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 2>I refollowed him as soon as I heard they caught up. Well,

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:31.440
<v Speaker 2>he's got one.

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Hundred and seventeen thousand followers, so and it says on

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 1>his Instagram that he lives half in London and then

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 1>in Dubai. And he also looks like I'm not trying

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 1>to be superficial, but he's beefed up a bit. He

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 1>looks a lot better because he kind of looked a

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 1>bit little boy when they.

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Were going out.

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Really came from a very wealthy family to begin with.

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think that the reason that they broke up

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 1>is because he didn't want to just be Saffron's handbag

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and sit around her house with her family.

0:28:57.480 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 2>He wanted to go and do something with this. I

0:28:59.520 --> 0:28:59.959
<v Speaker 2>got the vie.

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 1>The Saffron's mum, Wendy wasn't a fan of his. There

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 1>seems to be some boyfriend that she didn't like.

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 2>No, it was an implication that he was too short

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 2>for her. Yeah, she always.

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Kept referencing how she wanted some real six foot four

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 1>guy because they met through Instagram, and I think he

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 1>claimed he was a lot taller than he actually is.

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 2>I reckon Wendy.

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Her mum is a big fan of him because they

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>reiterated that he's the nicest boyfriend she's ever had. I

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>think her terrible relationship with Lewis has confirmed to her

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 1>that he was actually a nice guy. It's funny in

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 1>hindsight when a dickhead seems like less of a dickhead. Anyway,

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 1>that is where we're going to leave things today. If

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 1>you do want to hear more content from us, though,

0:29:36.480 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 1>we do drop a subs episode every Thursday that is

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 1>exclusive to subscribers. If you aren't an Outspoken Plus subscriber.

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>All the details to sign up are in our show notes.

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 1>This podcast was recorded on the traditional land of the

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Ghana people of the Adelaide Planes. We pay respect to

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 1>elders past and present.