WEBVTT - Your brain is unique... here's how to maximise it's potential 🧠

0:00:04.000 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Get everyone Sam here.

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Today is a really interesting episode because it's one of

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 2>those things where we're talking with one of the world's

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 2>best neuroscientists, and sometimes I feel like understanding the brain

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 2>is just too complicated for a simpleton like myself that

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't delve into it because I don't think i'll

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 2>understand it. And the refreshing thing about today's episode is

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 2>it was exactly the opposite. It was explained by someone

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 2>who's highly, highly intelligent but speaks in a way that

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:47.199
<v Speaker 2>hopefully you'll understand, and I understood, so I think you're

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 2>really going to enjoy it. And then I'm going to

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 2>answer some of your fitness questions to help kick off

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty three in the best way possible. So we'll

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 2>get to those questions later on. But now our incredible

0:00:56.920 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 2>neuroscientist Chantell Pratt. I am joined from the West Coast

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 2>of America up in Seattle by the incredible Chantell Pratt,

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 2>who is a neuroscientist and author of her new book

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:34.040
<v Speaker 2>which is called The Neuroscience of You. Chantell, Welcome to

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 2>the WOODLFE.

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much for having me so.

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:40.759
<v Speaker 2>Chanteau, You've done a lot of work studying the individuality

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 2>of our brains and how they are all unique and differ,

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 2>which I have to admit is very different to what

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 2>most of us will definitely what I have been taught

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to the brain. I kind of thought,

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 2>we're all in the same boat a little bit. So

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 2>what led you down this path of finding I guess,

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 2>the passion for the brain and challenging what has been

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 2>so widely except for decades.

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 3>I started out wanting to be a medical doctor, a

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 3>physician anyway. I was deep into this accelerated pre med

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 3>program and I needed to take one social science class.

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 3>Took a class purely because it fit into my schedule.

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 3>Is a night class introduction to psychology, and the first

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 3>day of this class, our instructor started to outline the

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:32.080
<v Speaker 3>fact that the psychological principles were also biological by telling

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:35.959
<v Speaker 3>the story of Phineas Gauge. Phineas Gauge was a railway

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 3>worker who suffered an accident that resulted in a railway

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 3>spike being blown out through the top of his head,

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 3>right through his frontal lobe, and the fact that he

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 3>walked away from this would be phenomenal even today, But

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 3>he walked away being fundamentally changed his personality changed, just

0:02:57.560 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 3>the idea that you change this organ and you change

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 3>the person and it was just game over for me.

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, how is that possible? There's a physical entity

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 3>between your ears that makes you you? So when I

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 3>went to study neuroscience, the fact that the normal that

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 3>the typical paradigm for studying how the brain gives rise

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 3>to the mind or how the brain gives rise to

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 3>feelings completely ignores individual variation and averages across to people.

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 3>Takes a mean or a sort of characterization or a

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 3>sketch of a group of people to describe how the

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 3>brain gives rights to the mind and the feelings and

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 3>the mental life. I found this like utterly not only surprising,

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 3>but unsatisfying, Like, Yeah, why do we care how groups

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 3>of people's brains look in different contexts? And why do

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 3>we form theories on how the group average changes when

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 3>you have a group of people do different things and

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 3>the theories can't account for why two people doing the

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 3>same task are using dramatically different parts of their brain

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 3>to accomplish it.

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 2>I love how it sort of lit that spark in

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 2>you and you've just you know, followed it intently.

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>And so passionately for so long.

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Why still, then, do we have these sort of very

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 2>not archaic, but very basic sort of stereotypes of I'm

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 2>a left brain person or brain person. I'm either this

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 2>sort of analytical think or this creative think. Here, it's

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 2>are we just simplifying it down, way, way, way too much.

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I love to ride, you know, right off into

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 3>the sunset on my individual differences matter, shy horse. Yeah,

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 3>but the brain is really freaking complicated. Sure, on the

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 3>one hand, we have to pick some dimensions to simplify

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:56.040
<v Speaker 3>to understand anything. Sure, and starting with a characterization of

0:04:56.080 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 3>how most people work or you know, how the average

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:04.480
<v Speaker 3>brain works, is a good place to start. What I

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 3>like about the right brain left brain thing, there are

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 3>two things I like about it. One is it is

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 3>people use it, and I think it's one of the

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:17.039
<v Speaker 3>only kinds of labels we have to understand or to

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:19.359
<v Speaker 3>describe what we all know intuitively, And that's that we

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 3>don't all work the same, right Like the one size

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 3>fits all approach to neuroscience doesn't fit anyone very well. Right,

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 3>just like one size fits all T shirts don't fit

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 3>anybody very well. So we have this intuition that not

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 3>everyone works the same and the right brain the left

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 3>brain analytical versus right brain creative thinker is something that

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:43.719
<v Speaker 3>we can grab onto as a way of describing sort

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:47.599
<v Speaker 3>of characteristic differences between people. What's cool about that story

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 3>is the science that it's actually based on, So it's

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:55.839
<v Speaker 3>not garbage, it's not myth, it's based on an actual

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 3>scientific fact about how the two hemispheres of the brain work,

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:05.159
<v Speaker 3>and these differences between people. One of the fundamental differences

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:08.280
<v Speaker 3>between people in terms of how our brains work is

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 3>actually a difference within us, and that is that everybody

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 3>has two hemispheres. Well not everybody, but most typically developing

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 3>people have two cerebral hemispheres in their brain, and these

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 3>two hemispheres are halfs of your brain process the world

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 3>largely independently. They get input and they create computations or

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 3>understandings of the world. They vote about how you can

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:40.280
<v Speaker 3>behave and then they share information with one another. And

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:45.279
<v Speaker 3>this kind of symbiosis or collaboration between brains is what

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:49.799
<v Speaker 3>drives most of our behavior. And because of that sharing,

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 3>we don't necessarily feel divided. But there are two perspectives

0:06:55.720 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 3>happening within our own minds, and one of the most

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:06.840
<v Speaker 3>interesting differences is how distinct those two perspectives are. So

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 3>in a typical strongly right handed individual, the left hemisphere

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 3>is processing the world by dividing it into very skilled

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 3>small problem sets, like processing the trees in a forest.

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 3>It is larger in some areas, faster to do a

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 3>lot of computations, and this kind of lopsidednes This larger

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 3>left hemisphere allows us to become specialized for things like

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 3>language calculations, et cetera, newer kinds of human thinking tasks.

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 3>But what's interesting about this, and one of the main

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 3>points of my book, is how different doesn't necessarily mean

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 3>better or worse. It's just a continuum of trade offs.

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting about this is that the way the brain

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 3>becomes lopsided, which allows this left hemisphere specialization, is actually

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 3>by shrinking parts of the rate hemisphere, so it actually

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 3>sort of handicaps the area of the brain that does

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 3>spatial navigation and three dimensional processing of the world. I

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 3>just read a book called The Dyslexic Advantage that talks

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 3>about how people with dyslexia tend to be better at

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 3>like mechanistic or world building things that require this three

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 3>dimensional view that takes place in the rate hemisphere.

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 2>So my wife and my seventeen year old daughter are

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 2>both dyslexic and have ADHD, and at first in our

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 2>relationship I used to get frustrated because I'm quite the opposite.

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, I can sort of see words and numbers

0:08:55.920 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 2>really really easily. But if we were together, I would

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 2>be the one that gets lost. Or if a pram

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 2>arrives to put together for our kids, all stare at

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 2>the instructions for about three days and still not to

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 2>be able to do it. In my seventeen year old

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:12.559
<v Speaker 2>to be able to put it together in about eight

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 2>seconds without the instructions. It's like, it's fascinating. How do

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 2>we identify what type we are? Or at least you know,

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 2>as you know, narrow it down as much as possible.

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 3>Well without being able to come into a lab and

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 3>get a picture of your brain, which I assume the

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 3>people who read my book won't do. Yes, the most

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:38.119
<v Speaker 3>straightforward instinct or insight you can get about how lopsided

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 3>your brain is is by thinking about the relative skill

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:42.679
<v Speaker 3>of your two hands.

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Right, So hold on really quick, you got dogs playing

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:49.439
<v Speaker 2>here that this.

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Is about the left hemisphere's ability to stay goal oriented

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 3>and focused versus the right hemispheres noticing ability to be

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 3>reflexively wondering wh the dogs is summery.

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>We cave it real in the chel dog's backing. It's oh,

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>part of the shot. I love it.

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, Okay, So number one, Handedness is a continuum. You know,

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 3>most of us identify as right or left handed, but

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 3>in fact the degree of handed the sort of degree

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 3>of skill between your hands, varies on a continuum. And

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 3>what's interesting is that it's actually the we can, the

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:33.320
<v Speaker 3>strength of the we can that determines how balanced you

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 3>will be. So so one way to do this if

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 3>you go to my website, which is Chantelpratt dot com.

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 3>There's a research tab and I've linked to other people's research.

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 3>So one thing you can do is check the boxes

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:47.559
<v Speaker 3>exercise where you actually take a mouse with your right

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 3>hand and left hand and see how many bubbles you

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 3>can check in sixty seconds, and just compare the relative

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 3>strength of your two hands. Most people cannot, like not

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:59.680
<v Speaker 3>do anything with their non dominant hand, but some people can,

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, would never open a doorknob with their non

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 3>dominant hand, where others can do it. No problem. And

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 3>there are other things you can do too, like if

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 3>you're strongly you know, right hand dominant, and also like

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 3>always go up the stairs with your right foot, or

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:17.079
<v Speaker 3>would sit like would also like look into a microscope

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 3>with your right eye. These are all hints that you're

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 3>strongly right side dominant, which means that you have this

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 3>left lop sided brain because control of the body and

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 3>the brain are switched to the left side of the

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 3>brain controls the right side of the body.

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 2>This is so powerful because you need to understand what

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:37.080
<v Speaker 2>you are naturally and then you need to embrace that

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 2>to reach your potential by working out this is who

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 2>I am, and this is if I do something from

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 2>a career perspective that utilizes my natural kind of way

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 2>of thinking and skill set, then I'm just going to

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 2>be more successful because I'm working. I'm working in the

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 2>space that I'm stronger. But you're saying if you take

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 2>that too far and you neglect to the other side completely,

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:08.199
<v Speaker 2>that actually causes a lop sidedness, and you better off

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 2>having a balanced approach where you sure utilize your strengths

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 2>but don't neglect your weaknesses.

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Is that sort of what you're saying.

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:19.199
<v Speaker 3>That's a very interesting take. I think there are advantages

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 3>to being everywhere on the spectrum, right, Like, just like

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 3>you said, like you know, verbal instructions come quite easily

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:27.960
<v Speaker 3>to you, but you would like get lost in a

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 3>new building or whatever. You know, there's a cost to

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 3>this linguistic advantage that's pretty new in our brain's evolution.

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:40.439
<v Speaker 3>And right now we live in a society that highly

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 3>prizes being able to read. Right, So all of education

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 3>for better or for worse, and I think it's for

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:53.959
<v Speaker 3>worse because language is really new in terms of skills

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 3>that our human brain is able to do. And I

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 3>think what has happened is that we take for grited

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 3>some really computationally hard but older things that our brain does,

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 3>like navigation or just basic like memory organization or spatial

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:17.680
<v Speaker 3>rotation or motor function. So like, think about the fact

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 3>that we have all these computer algorithms that can beat

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 3>the world's expert in chess, and we think, oh, that's

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 3>like chess or go or whatever is you know, really

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 3>that's a smart quote unquote way of behaving. But a

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 3>computer these ais can beat us. But yet we don't

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 3>have a robot that can move a chess piece. With

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 3>the acuity of a five year old. So we have

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 3>an idea of the way, the optimal way of being

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 3>that's defined based on a cultural norm of right now,

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:58.439
<v Speaker 3>but really doesn't appreciate the sophistication and the importance of

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 3>all the computetions of our brain, be they motor, be

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 3>they navigation. You know, we have this like idea of

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 3>how to focus, how to communicate that really involves like

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 3>Western educational systems and working in an office nine to five,

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 3>and really largely ignore what our brains evolve for the

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 3>broader range of things that are defined us success in

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 3>the human brain. And so what I you know, sort

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 3>of went into this thinking is like why do I

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 3>have eighty six billion neurons and I can't do two

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 3>things well at the same time? Like what is the

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 3>point of this brain design? Why are we so bad

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 3>at multitasking? Are like changing our behavior in goal oriented ways?

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 3>And what I've come to realize is that a lot

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 3>of things that feel frustrating or feel like sticking points

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 3>for us are precisely the thing that allows us to

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 3>do something else phenomenal. Right, And so like, for instance,

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 3>I think that attention and the fact that we are

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 3>actually not. I think I know that the reason we

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 3>can't focus on multiple things at once, or we can't

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 3>operate based on multiple goals at one time, is because

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 3>this remarkable flexibility of human behavior. Humans can like I

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 3>could say something to you right now. I could say, please,

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 3>every time my dogs bark, stand up and do a

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 3>jumping jack. You know, I could tell your listeners that,

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 3>and they could do it immediately instantly, despite the fact

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 3>that there was no reward system in your life. I

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 3>think I would be willing to bet that there's no

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 3>situation in your life in which doing a jumping jack

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 3>when you hear a dog bark was rewarding or important

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 3>where you ever practice that. But I can use language

0:15:56.880 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 3>to reprogram your brain instantly, or reconfigure the networks of

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 3>your brain to have them do something that they've never

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 3>done before. But that takes up about a third of

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 3>the neurons in your frontal lobe. And we could play,

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, for two hours. I could say, well, okay,

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 3>jumping jacks for dogs or this or that, and there

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 3>are almost infinite number of things that you can do.

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 3>The flexibility of this system requires a whole lot of

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 3>brain power, and because it's taking up about a third

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 3>of the frontal lobe. These networks in the brain that

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 3>don't have specialized jobs, they're flexible. They can be recombined

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 3>in different ways to do different things. I can't do

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 3>more than one effortful thing at a time. If I

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 3>maybe if I get really lucky and find two things

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 3>that don't overlap and need the same neurons, maybe I

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 3>can kind of juggle between those two things. But most

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 3>animals don't do that. Most animals move through the world

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 3>in stimulus response ways and sort of practiced behaviors. It's

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 3>precisely the human flexibility, the nature of our flexible information

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:08.439
<v Speaker 3>processing that creates this information bottleneck. So that you know,

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:10.959
<v Speaker 3>I guess what I would say to your listeners is

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:15.160
<v Speaker 3>be careful what you wish for a lot of things,

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 3>like forgetting is really important to generalizing and learning categories

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:22.879
<v Speaker 3>of things. You know, people who can't forget have a

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:26.679
<v Speaker 3>real hard time learning any kind of abstract principle. So

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the things that we want to be

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 3>better or different about our brands are actually really optimally

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 3>working for us.

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 2>The education thing I find fascinating because I was only

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 2>talking with my teenage daughter because she's just she's doing

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 2>her year eleven exams, she's just finished them. Who's not

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:49.639
<v Speaker 2>wonderfully academically. You know, she's dyslexic, so she struggles to

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 2>finish her exams in the allocated time and all this

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of stuff. She gets very distracted when she's trying

0:17:55.880 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 2>to study in focus. But she's creatively brilliant, and she

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 2>knows that she wants to study fashion. She wants to

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 2>go to New York and study fashion.

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 1>And part of.

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Me is like responsible dad saying it's really important you

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 2>finish your schooling and you take it seriously, and the

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 2>other parties, I'm not worried about you at all because

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 2>I actually think you what you want to do is

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 2>what you should do, and you're just going to flourish.

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 2>What would your advice be to parents who are looking

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 2>to help their kids through schooling, and not not necessarily

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 2>my age children, but as they get older and they're

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 2>kind of understanding how their brain works and embracing that individuality.

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, I study predictors of learning success. So we've

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:44.919
<v Speaker 3>shown that if you close your eyes and do nothing

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 3>for five minutes, you can tell by the patterns of

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 3>connectivity in the brain how easily someone will learn a

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:55.879
<v Speaker 3>natural language like French or even a programming language like

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 3>our Python or Java. So there's something in the way

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:03.360
<v Speaker 3>your brain is connected that can determine how successful you'll

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.399
<v Speaker 3>be in a particular environment. Does this mean that if

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 3>your brain isn't working like that, like give it up,

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:11.959
<v Speaker 3>don't even try and learn a language. No, Because the

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:16.160
<v Speaker 3>number one predictor of success of most of the hard

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 3>things in life. I think as soon as I say this,

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 3>you're going to say, duh, like this is obvious is motivation, right,

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:28.920
<v Speaker 3>And so what I think happens in schools is that

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 3>you learn that you're not good at something, yeah, and

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 3>you have to work harder to do that thing. And

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 3>that can be very non motivating. If you're not inherently

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 3>driven to learn algebra and you don't know why you're

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 3>going to need algebra in your life and you struggle,

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 3>it can be this sort of self fulfilling prophecy, right,

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 3>because you have to be more motivated, you have to

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:02.120
<v Speaker 3>work harder to learn this thing for whatever reason, and

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 3>you don't think you're going to be good at it.

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 3>There are a couple hidden layers here. One is it

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 3>doesn't mean you're not good at algebra, or it doesn't

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 3>mean you're not good at a foreign language. It means

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 3>that in the way that that is being taught to

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 3>you right now is not the natural way that your

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 3>brain thrives. So I think, like the messaging you send

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 3>your kids is not you're bad at this. Yeah, but

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 3>how is the best way to expose you to this information?

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 3>This is hard for everybody, and it's you know, easier

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:36.479
<v Speaker 3>when it's matched to the way that your brain learns,

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:39.119
<v Speaker 3>because I can give you you know, for every person

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 3>I've ever talked to about learning, there's a story about

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 3>someone telling them they were no good at something. You're

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 3>not bad at math. You're having a hard time learning

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:51.399
<v Speaker 3>the way this is being taught to you.

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean just just reframing it like that. I

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 1>mean that that.

0:20:57.240 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 2>Simple sentence that you just said is every child needs

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 2>to hear.

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 3>I think that's right. And how crappy would the world

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 3>be if everybody was smart in the same way. There's

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 3>a reason that our brains work differently because in a team,

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, you were talking about like ADHD also right,

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 3>like imagine that there are our ancestors were like hunting

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 3>and gathering and you've got a team of people. You

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 3>need somebody to keep you on track. You need somebody

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 3>to tell you, hey, we've already been in this neighborhood.

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 3>But you also need somebody to notice the thing that

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:30.400
<v Speaker 3>nobody's expected.

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, save everybody's life.

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 2>I knew today would be we scratch the surface our listeners.

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 2>That which there will be a lot of them that

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 2>are really interested in this and would like to buy

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 2>your book. It is called The Neuroscience of You. And

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 2>then if people wanted to find out a little bit

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 2>more and do some of your tests that that mouse test,

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 2>the right side, left side one, I'm going to absolutely

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:59.440
<v Speaker 2>go away and do that. They go to Chantelpratt dot com.

0:21:59.480 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Is that correct?

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:02.679
<v Speaker 3>That's correct, that's correct, And there are a bunch of

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:05.239
<v Speaker 3>other games you can play there. You get it for

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:07.400
<v Speaker 3>each one. You can click. If you want to actually

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:10.200
<v Speaker 3>do research, do a little bit longer, maybe fifteen minute

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 3>tests and okay, that will then contribute to the research.

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:15.920
<v Speaker 3>If you don't feel like you want your brain being researched,

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 3>you can just click just for me and they'll get

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 3>a short and sweet version that also gives you feedback

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:23.439
<v Speaker 3>on how you did and what it means, and I

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 3>think that's a great way to get started.

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 1>Beautiful. I love it.

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for joining us here on the

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:28.440
<v Speaker 2>wood Life.

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Have a great day.

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much.

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 2>So I definitely think that chat would have got our

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 2>brain's ticking.

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Excuse the pattern.

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:44.880
<v Speaker 2>There's a link in the show notes to Chantel's website

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:46.719
<v Speaker 2>where you can do one of her little brain tests.

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 2>I say it little, maybe it's not little, but I'm

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 2>going to go and do it. I think it's really

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 2>interesting to find the uniqueness of our brains. Now we'll

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 2>move away from brains to bodies as it is time

0:22:56.440 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 2>for me to answer some of your exercise questions. All right,

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 2>our first exercise questions for twenty twenty three, Which is

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:16.879
<v Speaker 2>good because I if nothing else comes of listening to

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:19.639
<v Speaker 2>the Woodlife this year, but it gets you moving more.

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 1>That puts a huge smile on my face and is

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:22.360
<v Speaker 1>a massive win.

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 2>So let's get into some of these questions that perhaps

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:27.880
<v Speaker 2>are holding you back, or you feel like when you're

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:30.680
<v Speaker 2>training you're not getting the most out of your training.

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 1>You're still a little bit confused.

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm a big fan in training smarter, not harder, So

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 2>if I can help you in any way that you

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:41.400
<v Speaker 2>modify your training and you get better results because of it,

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 2>then that that's what I'm all about. So our first

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 2>question has come through from an.

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Sam. I often hear about resistance training and how

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 4>important it is to include two to three times per

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 4>week as well as our cardio type of training, whether

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 4>that's walking, running, swimming, But in terms of the resistance training,

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 4>you very seldom hear people give detail of what that

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 4>should include. How long should each session be, what should

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 4>we be doing, should we be doing half upper body,

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 4>half lower body or concentrate on full body for every session, etc.

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Thank you bye, And that is I mean this sincerely.

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:31.399
<v Speaker 2>That's going to be a question that's going to be

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:33.639
<v Speaker 2>hard to beat this year because I think you spot on.

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 2>I think so many people are starting to get the message,

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 2>which is a good message. I need to be doing

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 2>some form of resistance training. Remember when we talk about

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 2>resistance training doesn't have to be heavy weight training.

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:48.119
<v Speaker 1>It can be anything against a resistance.

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:50.639
<v Speaker 2>Two to three times a week to really get the

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 2>best results both from a fat burning and a sort

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 2>of tone and strength perspective.

0:24:56.920 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 1>And it's correct. I one hundred percent agree with that.

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 2>So if you're doing these two to three sessions or

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:05.119
<v Speaker 2>anywhere from two to five. Really, I don't think you

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 2>need to be doing resistance training seven times a week,

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 2>and then how you do it needs to depend on

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:13.200
<v Speaker 2>how many sessions you're doing. So if you're doing five

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:18.119
<v Speaker 2>resistance training workouts a week, I probably wouldn't do full

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:22.679
<v Speaker 2>body every time. If you're doing two or three a week,

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:25.920
<v Speaker 2>I think doing full body is a good thing because

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 2>you're probably going to have a day of full forty

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 2>eight hours in between your sessions.

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's say you're doing resistance.

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Training every day Monday to Friday, you're not likely to

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 2>be able to train at the volume or the intensity

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:43.880
<v Speaker 2>that's going to give you the best results if you're

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 2>doing full body every day, because you're going to be

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 2>effectively training sore, fatigued muscles again.

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>The next day, I like different splits.

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 2>I like push pull legs, So that's one day I

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 2>do push exercises, so I do all of my pushing

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 2>movements my chest, my shoulders, my triceps. The next day

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 2>I do all my pulling movements where I work my

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 2>back and my biceps, and the third day I do

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:11.439
<v Speaker 2>my lower body. So I do three workouts a week.

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 2>Two of them are focusing on my upper body strength

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 2>but with very different muscles targeted, and then one of

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 2>them is lower body. And I think if you can

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 2>do let's say three to five strength training sessions a week,

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 2>and if it's closer to five, you're doing more of

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 2>a split, and if it's closer to two or three

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:35.120
<v Speaker 2>you're doing full body, then you're.

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Going to be holding yourself in really good stead. Our

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 1>next question is from Allison.

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Sam, I just wanted to know what your thoughts

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:46.120
<v Speaker 3>were on swimming and running for cardio and which one

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 3>is better and why.

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 2>They're both great. Allison, I think it really depends on

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:54.160
<v Speaker 2>what you're training for. Are you training for general fitness.

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 2>If you're training for general fitness, I would have both

0:26:56.640 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 2>of them if you can, in your weekly routine because

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:03.120
<v Speaker 2>they're so different. One of them's wonderful cardio of vascally

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 2>but no impact, and one of them's wonderful cardio vascually

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:09.479
<v Speaker 2>bit high impact because our feet are banging against the ground.

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:13.879
<v Speaker 2>But if you're training for a marathon, I'd probably be

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:16.400
<v Speaker 2>doing more running and maybe the swimmings once a week

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:18.120
<v Speaker 2>or once a fortnight as a bit of a cross

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 2>training recovery session, but if you're not training for a

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 2>specific event, I'd include both in my weekly routine.

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Our last question is from Jodie.

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 5>Hey Sam, just wanting a bit of advice of what

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 5>sort of exercise I can do that won't put extra

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 5>pressure on my lower back. I do have a sway

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:38.439
<v Speaker 5>back and I get a bit of pain in my

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 5>lower back with a lot of exercises. So it's usually

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:44.920
<v Speaker 5>when I'm doing something horizontal like a plank or in

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:49.360
<v Speaker 5>pilates with leglowers, but I also feel pain or some

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:53.920
<v Speaker 5>pain with some standing exercises, like if I'm doing bicep curls,

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 5>my back starts to ache. So any suggestions would be great.

0:27:58.240 --> 0:27:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Thanks.

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 2>That's a great question, Jody. I'm a bit of a swaybacker,

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 2>so welcome. Welcome to the club. I don't know if

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:06.639
<v Speaker 2>it's a great club to be a part of, but

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 2>your glutes are your best friend. And what do I

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:13.200
<v Speaker 2>mean by that. The reason you get a saw back

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 2>is your pelvic tilt is out of whack, which means

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:18.439
<v Speaker 2>you've got a big curve in your lower back, a

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:23.199
<v Speaker 2>big sea curve because your pelvis is tilting backwards. So

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:26.679
<v Speaker 2>you need to get good at tucking your pelvis or

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 2>your hips under and then holding that position with your

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 2>glutes squeezed. And to be honest, whether you're in a

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 2>plank position horizontal, whether you're standing up in front of

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 2>the mirror doing bicep curls in a vertical position, it

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 2>doesn't matter. And I guess the thing here is we

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 2>think about it really consciously when we're doing a plank

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 2>because it's a static exercise where we're not doing anything else,

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 2>So working on that pelvic tilt, squeezing those glutes becomes

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 2>a really simple thing to focus on. Then, when we're

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 2>doing shoulder press or bicep curls or something else with

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 2>our arms, even with our legs, we tend to forget

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 2>our better perfect till because we're focusing on our biceps

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 2>or our triceps or whatever.

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 1>It might be.

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 2>You need to do your bicep curls side onto the mirror,

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 2>and you need to tuck your pelvis first, squeeze your glutes,

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 2>and you need to continually remind yourself are my glutes

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 2>on them? By that, I mean are you clenching a

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 2>walln up between your butt cheeks? And if you've relaxed

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 2>your butt cheeks, stop doing your bicep curls, reclench, and

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 2>then go back to your arms. And if you do that,

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 2>whether you're horizontal or vertical, first of all, you'll get

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 2>a better bum. Second of all, you'll get us less

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 2>sore back, and third of all, your posture improved dramatically

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 2>across your whole body. I promise you, over time you'll

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 2>correct it.

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 1>And you'll be very thankful that you did.

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 2>There we go.

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Three brilliant questions.

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 2>You've obviously been waiting for me to get back from holidays,

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 2>and away we go.

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Just make sure if you've.

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Got any questions fitness, food, whatever they are, there's a

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 2>link in the show notes. I'd love to hear from you,

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 2>and I'll see you next week.

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 3>M m m m m m hmmmmmm mmmmmmmm mm hmmmmmm