1 00:00:01,400 --> 00:00:03,720 Speaker 1: My name is Lily Maddon and I'm a proud Arunda 2 00:00:03,960 --> 00:00:08,720 Speaker 1: Bunjelung Calcottin woman from Gadighal Country. The Daily oz acknowledges 3 00:00:08,800 --> 00:00:11,000 Speaker 1: that this podcast is recorded on the lands of the 4 00:00:11,000 --> 00:00:14,560 Speaker 1: Gadighl people and pays respect to all Aboriginal and Torres 5 00:00:14,560 --> 00:00:17,479 Speaker 1: Strait Island and nations. We pay our respects to the 6 00:00:17,520 --> 00:00:20,280 Speaker 1: first peoples of these countries, both past and present. 7 00:00:25,880 --> 00:00:28,560 Speaker 2: Good morning and welcome to the Daily os. It's Tuesday, 8 00:00:28,600 --> 00:00:29,760 Speaker 2: the eighteenth of April. 9 00:00:29,880 --> 00:00:31,480 Speaker 3: I'm Zara, I'm Sam. 10 00:00:31,640 --> 00:00:34,640 Speaker 2: Discrimination in schools is back in the news after the 11 00:00:34,680 --> 00:00:38,040 Speaker 2: Presbyterian Church of Australia called for the right to ban 12 00:00:38,320 --> 00:00:43,720 Speaker 2: LGBTQI plus and sexually active students from leadership positions, saying 13 00:00:43,760 --> 00:00:46,880 Speaker 2: that students who are actively gay or having unmarried straight 14 00:00:46,960 --> 00:00:49,920 Speaker 2: sex should not be school captains. This was part of 15 00:00:49,960 --> 00:00:53,479 Speaker 2: the Church's submission to a review of anti discrimination laws. 16 00:00:54,320 --> 00:00:58,440 Speaker 2: So what's being proposed and what's likely to happen moving forward, Well, 17 00:00:58,440 --> 00:01:00,400 Speaker 2: we're going to let you know in the deep But 18 00:01:00,560 --> 00:01:03,720 Speaker 2: first Sam the headlines. 19 00:01:06,240 --> 00:01:09,080 Speaker 3: A leading group campaigning for a no vote at this 20 00:01:09,200 --> 00:01:12,319 Speaker 3: year's referendum on the Indigenous Voice to Parliament launched new 21 00:01:12,360 --> 00:01:17,160 Speaker 3: advertising material yesterday. The Recognize a Better Way campaign, which 22 00:01:17,240 --> 00:01:20,520 Speaker 3: is led by former politician Warren Mundine, has published new 23 00:01:20,520 --> 00:01:24,560 Speaker 3: commercials featuring what they describe as everyday First Nation's people 24 00:01:24,640 --> 00:01:27,760 Speaker 3: who disagree with the voice model proposed by the federal government. 25 00:01:28,200 --> 00:01:30,360 Speaker 3: The referendum will be staged later this year. 26 00:01:32,319 --> 00:01:35,880 Speaker 2: Scammers stole a record three point one billion dollars from 27 00:01:35,920 --> 00:01:38,840 Speaker 2: Ozzie's in twenty twenty two. That's according to a new 28 00:01:38,880 --> 00:01:43,000 Speaker 2: report from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. The highest 29 00:01:43,000 --> 00:01:46,920 Speaker 2: reported losses came through investment scams, remote access scams and 30 00:01:47,040 --> 00:01:51,680 Speaker 2: payment redirection schemes, while sms's text messages were the most 31 00:01:51,680 --> 00:01:55,840 Speaker 2: popular contact method for scammers. Australian's age sixty five and 32 00:01:55,880 --> 00:01:58,680 Speaker 2: over reported being scammed more than any other age group. 33 00:02:00,800 --> 00:02:03,600 Speaker 3: Long COVID symptoms have been found to be less prevalent 34 00:02:03,720 --> 00:02:06,360 Speaker 3: than long term symptoms of the flu. That's according to 35 00:02:06,400 --> 00:02:09,520 Speaker 3: a new study by the Queensland Government. It found twenty 36 00:02:09,520 --> 00:02:12,040 Speaker 3: one percent of people with the omicron strain of COVID 37 00:02:12,120 --> 00:02:16,080 Speaker 3: nineteen reported ongoing symptoms twelve weeks after their diagnosis, and 38 00:02:16,120 --> 00:02:18,680 Speaker 3: that's compared to twenty three percent of adults who have 39 00:02:18,800 --> 00:02:21,680 Speaker 3: the flu The study was conducted with about two thy 40 00:02:21,800 --> 00:02:24,960 Speaker 3: two hundred adults with COVID and almost one thousand with 41 00:02:25,040 --> 00:02:27,760 Speaker 3: the flu. At the time of the survey, ninety percent 42 00:02:27,800 --> 00:02:30,840 Speaker 3: of Queenslanders were vaccinated against COVID nineteen. 43 00:02:32,840 --> 00:02:34,799 Speaker 2: And the good news. I suspect we're going to be 44 00:02:34,840 --> 00:02:38,000 Speaker 2: hearing a lot about her this year. But Australian soccer 45 00:02:38,040 --> 00:02:40,720 Speaker 2: player Sam Kerr scored the winning goal for her English 46 00:02:40,760 --> 00:02:43,519 Speaker 2: team Chelsea in the semi final of the English FA 47 00:02:43,639 --> 00:02:47,600 Speaker 2: Football Association Cup against Aston Villa. Kerr was called the 48 00:02:47,639 --> 00:02:50,400 Speaker 2: best in the world by the opposing team's coach after 49 00:02:50,440 --> 00:02:53,880 Speaker 2: the game. Chelsea will now face Manchester United in the final, 50 00:02:53,919 --> 00:02:56,680 Speaker 2: which will be held at London's Wembley Stadium next month, 51 00:02:56,720 --> 00:02:59,280 Speaker 2: and then she'll be heading over to Australia soon after. 52 00:03:02,560 --> 00:03:06,639 Speaker 2: There's renewed controversy over a proposal to restrict religious schools 53 00:03:06,680 --> 00:03:12,200 Speaker 2: from discriminating against LGBTQI plus staff and students. The proposal 54 00:03:12,240 --> 00:03:15,160 Speaker 2: was prepared by the Australian Law Reform Commission, which we'll 55 00:03:15,160 --> 00:03:18,640 Speaker 2: call the ALRC during this pod at the request of 56 00:03:18,680 --> 00:03:23,360 Speaker 2: the federal government. Now several religious groups have expressed concern 57 00:03:23,400 --> 00:03:28,440 Speaker 2: about the proposal, while LGBTQI plus advocacy organizations have broadly 58 00:03:28,520 --> 00:03:29,440 Speaker 2: been in support of it. 59 00:03:30,000 --> 00:03:33,519 Speaker 3: Okay, and give me a sense of the broader context here. 60 00:03:34,080 --> 00:03:36,760 Speaker 3: Why is this a proposal that the government has asked for? 61 00:03:37,120 --> 00:03:39,480 Speaker 2: Okay? So to answer that, I feel like we need 62 00:03:39,520 --> 00:03:41,800 Speaker 2: to take a step back because we've been hearing about 63 00:03:41,800 --> 00:03:43,840 Speaker 2: this for a very long time in the news and 64 00:03:43,880 --> 00:03:46,360 Speaker 2: it can all get a bit confusing. So the first 65 00:03:46,360 --> 00:03:50,200 Speaker 2: thing to say is that Australia doesn't have a comprehensive 66 00:03:50,320 --> 00:03:54,040 Speaker 2: national human rights law. We're party to global human rights 67 00:03:54,040 --> 00:03:57,760 Speaker 2: treaties which protect a range of freedoms things like sexuality, 68 00:03:57,880 --> 00:04:02,120 Speaker 2: gender identity, and religion, but they're not always explicitly reflected 69 00:04:02,200 --> 00:04:06,480 Speaker 2: in Australian law. Now. Scott Morrison, when he was Prime Minister, 70 00:04:06,840 --> 00:04:10,160 Speaker 2: tried to introduce some new legal protections for people with 71 00:04:10,360 --> 00:04:13,839 Speaker 2: religious beliefs and that was called the Religious Discrimination Bill, 72 00:04:13,880 --> 00:04:16,159 Speaker 2: and we spoke about it a bunch of times also 73 00:04:16,200 --> 00:04:19,640 Speaker 2: on this pod. Morrison's bill proposed, among a host of 74 00:04:19,680 --> 00:04:24,520 Speaker 2: other things, allowing religious hospitals, aged care facilities and retirement 75 00:04:24,600 --> 00:04:28,479 Speaker 2: homes to preference members of the same religion. It also 76 00:04:28,520 --> 00:04:33,040 Speaker 2: proposed extending the ability of religious organizations to preference staff 77 00:04:33,080 --> 00:04:36,120 Speaker 2: of a specific religion. So if we take the example 78 00:04:36,160 --> 00:04:39,919 Speaker 2: of a Catholic religious school wanting to preference hiring Catholic teachers, 79 00:04:40,520 --> 00:04:43,200 Speaker 2: it's fair to say this proposed bill was fairly contentious, 80 00:04:43,480 --> 00:04:47,159 Speaker 2: especially for advocates from LGBTQI plus communities. 81 00:04:47,440 --> 00:04:51,440 Speaker 4: Scott Morrison promised us a bill that would prevent discrimination 82 00:04:51,600 --> 00:04:55,200 Speaker 4: against people because of their faith, and instead what we 83 00:04:55,279 --> 00:04:58,640 Speaker 4: have is a bill that allows discrimination in the name 84 00:04:58,680 --> 00:04:59,080 Speaker 4: of faith. 85 00:04:59,240 --> 00:05:02,159 Speaker 2: In response to the criticism that was leveled against him, 86 00:05:02,320 --> 00:05:06,039 Speaker 2: Scott Morrison did try to introduce further laws with protections 87 00:05:06,040 --> 00:05:09,640 Speaker 2: for some staff and students in the LGBTQI plus community, 88 00:05:10,160 --> 00:05:13,960 Speaker 2: but he didn't initially include trans children in his proposal. 89 00:05:14,320 --> 00:05:17,240 Speaker 2: This was Liberal and p Bridget Archer speaking in Parliament 90 00:05:17,279 --> 00:05:19,560 Speaker 2: at the time, well, some very pleased to say that 91 00:05:19,560 --> 00:05:22,000 Speaker 2: there would be an amendment to protect gay students. 92 00:05:22,080 --> 00:05:24,320 Speaker 3: I'm horrified to see that it doesn't extend to children 93 00:05:24,360 --> 00:05:25,960 Speaker 3: who identify as transgender. 94 00:05:26,360 --> 00:05:28,800 Speaker 2: In the end, that legislation that we've been speaking about 95 00:05:28,800 --> 00:05:32,240 Speaker 2: by Scott Morrison was shelved before the election last year, 96 00:05:32,320 --> 00:05:34,240 Speaker 2: which the Coalition then went on to. 97 00:05:34,240 --> 00:05:38,000 Speaker 3: Lose Okay, and today we have a labor government. So 98 00:05:38,040 --> 00:05:41,360 Speaker 3: when they came into power, how did they tackle this issue? 99 00:05:41,560 --> 00:05:44,799 Speaker 2: Well, Labor at the time had I guess a similar 100 00:05:44,839 --> 00:05:49,320 Speaker 2: position to Brigid Archer and those other liberals, supportive broadly 101 00:05:49,400 --> 00:05:53,200 Speaker 2: of the idea, but wanting to ensure protection for trans kids, 102 00:05:53,320 --> 00:05:56,159 Speaker 2: among other things. So they promised to pick up the 103 00:05:56,160 --> 00:05:59,800 Speaker 2: issue of religious freedoms when they won government, and they've 104 00:05:59,800 --> 00:06:02,720 Speaker 2: been decided to do that in two parts. They're going 105 00:06:02,760 --> 00:06:06,960 Speaker 2: to work on the religious protection parts separately. But in November, 106 00:06:07,080 --> 00:06:10,400 Speaker 2: Attorney General Mark Drefers asked the ALARC to develop a 107 00:06:10,440 --> 00:06:14,039 Speaker 2: proposal for a law to protect LGBTIQ plus staff and 108 00:06:14,080 --> 00:06:18,120 Speaker 2: students from discrimination by religious schools. So you can see 109 00:06:18,120 --> 00:06:20,559 Speaker 2: there that they saw two issues and are now working 110 00:06:20,600 --> 00:06:24,760 Speaker 2: on that latter one. First, the ALARC published its proposal 111 00:06:24,800 --> 00:06:28,960 Speaker 2: in January and sought public submissions from individuals and organizations. 112 00:06:29,600 --> 00:06:32,560 Speaker 2: Those were published last week, which is why we're speaking 113 00:06:32,600 --> 00:06:33,239 Speaker 2: about it today. 114 00:06:33,600 --> 00:06:35,960 Speaker 3: And before we dive into those submissions, because I'm keen 115 00:06:36,000 --> 00:06:39,160 Speaker 3: to understand the content in them, give me a sense 116 00:06:39,160 --> 00:06:41,440 Speaker 3: of what the ALARC proposed overall. 117 00:06:42,040 --> 00:06:46,000 Speaker 2: For students, the ALARC proposed religious schools should not be 118 00:06:46,080 --> 00:06:50,040 Speaker 2: able to expel or deny enrollment to LGBTQI plus students 119 00:06:50,200 --> 00:06:54,600 Speaker 2: or children of LGBTQI parents. Schools would also need to 120 00:06:54,640 --> 00:06:59,039 Speaker 2: accommodate uniform adjustments and couldn't stop a student from privileges 121 00:06:59,080 --> 00:07:02,280 Speaker 2: like being the school captain. And keep that one in mind, 122 00:07:02,320 --> 00:07:04,200 Speaker 2: because we're going to get back to that a bit later. 123 00:07:04,839 --> 00:07:08,160 Speaker 2: So that's what it proposed for students. For staff, the 124 00:07:08,160 --> 00:07:12,080 Speaker 2: alarc's proposed law would mean that religious students couldn't refuse 125 00:07:12,120 --> 00:07:15,240 Speaker 2: to hire a staff member because of things like their sexuality, 126 00:07:15,360 --> 00:07:20,080 Speaker 2: gender identity, or marital status. Schools could still preference, though, 127 00:07:20,200 --> 00:07:23,360 Speaker 2: hiring staff who share the religious beliefs of the school, 128 00:07:23,640 --> 00:07:26,840 Speaker 2: but only if their role genuinely required those beliefs. So, 129 00:07:26,880 --> 00:07:30,960 Speaker 2: for example, somebody that is teaching religion. Schools could require 130 00:07:31,000 --> 00:07:34,720 Speaker 2: any staff members to teach the school's view on sexual morality, 131 00:07:34,840 --> 00:07:38,600 Speaker 2: but must also allow them to provide objective information about 132 00:07:38,800 --> 00:07:40,720 Speaker 2: alternative viewpoints if they wish. 133 00:07:41,440 --> 00:07:44,560 Speaker 3: Okay, So now let's talk through the submissions that were 134 00:07:44,600 --> 00:07:48,320 Speaker 3: delivered in response to that proposal. Was there any support overall? 135 00:07:48,400 --> 00:07:54,000 Speaker 2: There was definitely support, especially from LGBTQI plus activist organizations 136 00:07:54,080 --> 00:07:57,720 Speaker 2: like Equality Australia and Wear at Purple. There were also 137 00:07:57,760 --> 00:08:01,560 Speaker 2: calls for stronger restrictions on religious teas teachings discriminating against 138 00:08:01,560 --> 00:08:05,000 Speaker 2: the LGBTQI plus communities. So people thought that this proposal 139 00:08:05,040 --> 00:08:08,560 Speaker 2: didn't actually go far enough. In that case, the Australian 140 00:08:08,680 --> 00:08:12,760 Speaker 2: Education Union the AU submitted that they believed that there 141 00:08:12,760 --> 00:08:15,920 Speaker 2: shouldn't be any exemptions like the one I spoke before 142 00:08:15,960 --> 00:08:18,480 Speaker 2: about being able to hire someone from a certain religion. 143 00:08:19,000 --> 00:08:22,800 Speaker 2: They said that those practices quote codify bigotry and they've 144 00:08:22,840 --> 00:08:26,360 Speaker 2: called for urgent and total removal of any of those exceptions. 145 00:08:26,440 --> 00:08:28,840 Speaker 3: And how have the religious schools responded to the. 146 00:08:28,840 --> 00:08:33,560 Speaker 2: Proposal well, Several religious schools suggested that the ALARC had 147 00:08:33,679 --> 00:08:38,800 Speaker 2: fundamentally misunderstood the purpose of religious schools. This sentiment was 148 00:08:38,840 --> 00:08:42,600 Speaker 2: reflected in submissions from some Catholic, Anglican, and other Christian, 149 00:08:42,920 --> 00:08:47,280 Speaker 2: Jewish and Islamic peak bodies. Several submissions noted many religious 150 00:08:47,280 --> 00:08:50,920 Speaker 2: schools except students and staff of all or no religion, 151 00:08:51,160 --> 00:08:54,800 Speaker 2: and recognize a duty of care for lgbtqi plus students. 152 00:08:55,480 --> 00:08:58,040 Speaker 2: They maintained, though, that schools should be able to preference 153 00:08:58,080 --> 00:09:01,000 Speaker 2: religious staff and be free to teach and enact their 154 00:09:01,040 --> 00:09:04,880 Speaker 2: religious values. And of course, there was this one submission 155 00:09:04,920 --> 00:09:08,040 Speaker 2: from the Presbyterian Church of Australia and that's been making 156 00:09:08,080 --> 00:09:11,559 Speaker 2: some headlines recently that schools should be able to deny 157 00:09:11,640 --> 00:09:16,640 Speaker 2: school captaincy to LGBTQI plus students or students in sexually active, 158 00:09:16,800 --> 00:09:19,680 Speaker 2: unmarried heterosexual relationships. 159 00:09:19,360 --> 00:09:22,240 Speaker 3: A very complicated topic. What happens now. 160 00:09:22,160 --> 00:09:24,679 Speaker 2: Well, I think it's important to know that these are 161 00:09:24,720 --> 00:09:28,320 Speaker 2: just submissions. The ALARC is by no means required to 162 00:09:28,559 --> 00:09:32,520 Speaker 2: incorporate them in the proposal, and you know, on the 163 00:09:32,559 --> 00:09:35,000 Speaker 2: other side of that, the government doesn't actually have to 164 00:09:35,080 --> 00:09:39,200 Speaker 2: take on everything the ALARC says either. So the ALARC 165 00:09:39,400 --> 00:09:42,880 Speaker 2: will consider these submissions that we've spoken about and they 166 00:09:42,920 --> 00:09:46,440 Speaker 2: will then finalize their proposal to the government. It will 167 00:09:46,440 --> 00:09:49,120 Speaker 2: then be up to the government to interpret whatever final 168 00:09:49,160 --> 00:09:52,079 Speaker 2: proposal they make and decide what to do moving forward. 169 00:09:53,240 --> 00:09:55,640 Speaker 3: We'll definitely keep you posted on this topic. Thanks for 170 00:09:55,679 --> 00:09:58,319 Speaker 3: listening to this episode of the zale Os and Zara. 171 00:09:58,559 --> 00:10:01,160 Speaker 3: This is actually goodbye for a little while. 172 00:10:01,720 --> 00:10:04,880 Speaker 2: It is. It's good bye for just less than a 173 00:10:04,920 --> 00:10:07,960 Speaker 2: week going to Mexico to see my brother get married. 174 00:10:08,080 --> 00:10:15,360 Speaker 2: So we'll see you on the flip side.