WEBVTT - Changes for Mackay! 

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>This is Pat Cummins. This is Australia.

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 2>One of the worst things I have ever seen done

0:00:06.280 --> 0:00:07.400
<v Speaker 2>on a cricket field.

0:00:10.320 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 3>Hello everyone, welcome to the Unflavorable Podcast, Coming to your

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 3>wife from Grey Barry Reef Arena. Here and Mackay, head

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:19.239
<v Speaker 3>of a second Test match between Australia and Bangladesh, play

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:20.759
<v Speaker 3>on the line. My name is Josh on a Finger.

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 3>Luie Camerontre. How are you going?

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm good, Josh, how are you very well? Thank you?

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to just start by thanking our listener.

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 2>You want to start with a scripted intro and you

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 2>told me to be ready for that, so I just

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:35.520
<v Speaker 2>wanted to throw you off. Well, I know that sounded weird.

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:37.880
<v Speaker 3>You've got to get your obligations out, and just wanted

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 3>to thank you. Know, we asked for some Apple reviews

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 3>in the first Test match and we've had some great

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 3>ones coming in from and you want to.

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:46.239
<v Speaker 1>Keep me interested before you launched into the view.

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 3>Exactly okay, exactly cool cool.

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 2>I'm interested. Now I'm invested in this podcast. I hope

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 2>people who are listening are also still invested.

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 3>I hope, but yes, I just wanted to give a

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:59.279
<v Speaker 3>shout out to NK one seven seven and jelly Boy

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 3>twelve for them wonderful reviews on Apple podcasts, So if

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 3>you want to get in touch with the show, you

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 3>can also do that by getting onto Apple podcasts and

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 3>checking it out.

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 2>Definitely my favorite of the NKS number the first one

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 2>hundred and seventy six, though a bit overrated. What did

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 2>he say or she.

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 3>Just that's some very positive feedback. I don't want to

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 3>get too self aggrandizing here, but yeah, we.

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Got around you well and you yeah yeah, oh nice.

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so you're going to check out those podcasts and

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 2>jelly Beans sixty seven?

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 1>What did they say?

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Jelly Boy wanted some tips on how a both fast bowling.

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:32.839
<v Speaker 2>You don't. We've already covered that, Yeah, I mean, he's

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 2>just I mean, you're listening to the wrong, wrong podcast

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:37.040
<v Speaker 2>if you if you want to get better at cricket,

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 2>we are here to critique those who are.

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Already good at cricket.

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:41.919
<v Speaker 3>Yeah that's right, people who were.

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Already better than you, and that you'll never people would

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 2>just never be as good at cricket as I suppose.

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, unless that's one of the members of the

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Australian cricket team well, could bee, Yeah, could bee?

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 3>We better get to this traint cricket team because they

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 3>have made a big change this week after they're lost

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:00.040
<v Speaker 3>by name, it's to bangaledeshin dah when they have so

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 3>I did to drop Jake Weatherold. He's out of the

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 3>thirteen player squad and in comes Matthew Renshaw. Fourteen tests

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 3>he's played. He hasn't played since twenty twenty three, but

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 3>some strong form for Queensland last season brings him right

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 3>back up to the top. And unfortunately, after a loss

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 3>like that, it feels like the change that Australia had

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:17.799
<v Speaker 3>to have.

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 2>It felt like they needed to make a change for sure.

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 2>Whether it was the right one, people are going to

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 2>ask some questions. I was really surprised, but really surprised.

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:30.920
<v Speaker 2>I thought that given the scope of the technique changes

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 2>he kind of made that he'd been encouraged to make

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 2>by this Aussie team, or at least endorsed by you

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 2>know this, he wouldn't have been changing these things without

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 2>their endorsement. I thought they'd give him another test. You know,

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 2>you can argue both sides of it, like six tests

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 2>into a career is longer than I believe Sam Constant Scott.

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 2>He played the two he might have got about the same,

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 2>might have played five those two at the back end

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 2>of the Yash of.

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Summer and then three in the Caribbean.

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 2>He was left out for Schlanker in between them exactly right,

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 2>and the World Test Championship final as well, and then

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 2>came in when Marnus the opening thing didn't didn't work,

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:07.959
<v Speaker 2>so he got about as long as Sam, give you

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 2>one one more test than him, he got less than Sorry,

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 2>he got more than Nathan McSweeney, so double the amount

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 2>of games and performed better than those two. Like I think,

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, Constas had three poor tests in the West Indies.

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 2>McSweeney didn't really ever get going in an unfamiliar position,

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:29.639
<v Speaker 2>so there was enough there to be encouraged, and then

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 2>they pulled the trigger on him early, like you know, people,

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 2>I think, if anything, it actually heightens the pressure on

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 2>a few other guys who have either been underperforming for

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 2>some time or had a poor test an outlying test

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 2>in the in Darwin and and and are older just

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 2>in that bracket where we're waiting, not waiting, but were

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 2>We just know that athletes around that age slow down,

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, there's there was a lot you know, it

0:03:57.720 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 2>was it was a small change, but it also was

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 2>a was a really big one.

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I guess a lot of listeners will be wondering

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 3>is it as simple as a straight swap Matthew Renshaw

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 3>coming into the eleven for jaqueas always saw him doing

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 3>some practice at first slip today pushing bow webs through

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 3>out of that position which you just got off with mcquajen.

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 3>Now he's into third slip. So does that mean we're

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 3>going to see Renshaw straight to the top or is

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 3>it going to be some extra batting eleven shenanigans at

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 3>play from the Aussies.

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean that was my first instinct when I

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 2>saw the squad change. I'm like, like, this is this

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:32.799
<v Speaker 2>would be very on brand for them to do something funny.

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 2>You know, Travis Head went up to open. No one

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 2>saw that coming last summer. That was kind of a

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:40.600
<v Speaker 2>bit of a force change, But you would think it's

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 2>a straight So, I mean, Alex Carey, speaking to the

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:44.799
<v Speaker 2>media yesterday, said that he was looking forward to renta

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 2>opening the batting with Travis Head. So that's probably a

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:50.159
<v Speaker 2>pretty good sign that's what's going to happen. Marnas is

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:53.039
<v Speaker 2>you know the one when I was saying, you know,

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 2>in terms of underperformance over a longer period of time,

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about Marnas, right. He has been preparing as

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 2>if he's I'd be surprised if they made a move

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 2>there like a training today. English. English would be the

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 2>only other one who could come in for him. He

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 2>battered kind of at the end of the session. You know, Look,

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 2>they have done things like that before, where you know,

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 2>we read too much into training and then they pull

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 2>the trigger.

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>It would surprise me. Like Martinus had a.

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 2>Really really long hit today and stayed back longer than

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 2>any of the others. You would think his mood would

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 2>have changed if he'd been told that he was out.

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 2>So unless he hasn't been told that he's that he's out,

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 2>so maybe they're still waiting to have a look at

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:34.280
<v Speaker 2>the pitch. I know that they do rate Josh Inglis's versatility,

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 2>but asking him are expecting him to come straight into

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:39.720
<v Speaker 2>number three in the Test team would be a big goal,

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't it. Yeah, that would feel like a like a

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 2>big change. Then if you've changed two of your top

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 2>three after one defeat, it's on Australia really to prove

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 2>it's this isn't this this is an outlier because as

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:55.720
<v Speaker 2>the stands, you go, eleven of thirteen tests beforehand they

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 2>won and then they've lost to the ninth ranked bangladeshis

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:02.159
<v Speaker 2>who had the best of the conditions in Darwin. So

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 2>you might be able to kind of say that, but

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, a loss here and Makai that would you know,

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 2>there'd be no excuses there. So one test defeat to

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 2>Bangladeshi acceptable, you know, not acceptable, but you know, in

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:16.040
<v Speaker 2>the realm of like you know, people can hack it.

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 2>A second one would be you know, disastrous, it would

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:22.600
<v Speaker 2>be okay, that's a great little set up there. Loo

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Matthew Renchel, let's just touch on him. Fourteen tests so

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 2>far in his career, an average of twenty nine point three.

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:31.919
<v Speaker 2>It just turned thirty as well. As I said, he

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 2>came back in in twenty twenty three, but that was

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:36.719
<v Speaker 2>in a middle order role. Wasn't ahead of that India series.

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 2>I feel like that time didn't really feel like that

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 2>spot was his. This time, it feels like to me

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 2>the selectors are saying, okay, now it's yours take with

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:45.360
<v Speaker 2>both hands and see what you can do.

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Is that a really strange career.

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:49.919
<v Speaker 2>Kind Of writing a piece on him yesterday, it was

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 2>instructive to kind of remember what that was like. Yes

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 2>the kind of twenty year old who burst onto the

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:57.559
<v Speaker 2>scene way back in twenty sixteen. It was this fresh, frace,

0:06:57.680 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 2>young opener. You know, he was going to be the future.

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Came in with the team with rend Nick Madison and

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Peter Hanscombe and by the end of that year they

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 2>were all out of the team. Maybe Hanscom lasted a

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 2>bit into that seventeen to eighteen ashes, but renshawd lost

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 2>his spot twelve months after or maybe even nine months

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 2>after that one hundred of the SCG and then he

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 2>went into the middle order. He lost his Queensland spot.

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 2>He kind of came back in for one test after

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 2>the Cape Town debark all the middle order thing in India.

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 2>As you mentioned, he's since come into the wap ball frame.

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 2>He's dominated the One Day Cup and then had some

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 2>really encouraging and then also maybe some discouraging the ODI performances.

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 2>I think people have kind of put the narrative of

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 2>the ode I thing and you know, being this upward

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 2>trajectory of the last little bit well. He made in

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 2>Bangladesh earlier this year he made and Pakistan I think

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 2>was four to zero zero in four consecutive innings.

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 3>It's a tough run.

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a tough run and so it hasn't been linear.

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 2>But then at the end of that tour he made

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 2>eighty nine not out and I think he finished as

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 2>one of their leading we could takers over the course

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 2>of the games, as one of their best bowlers. So

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 2>a really strange tour that kind of encapsulates a really

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 2>up and down kind of career. Let's see if this

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 2>is the kind of second or third or fourth coming

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 2>of him that that can really deliver something for Australia.

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 2>He's had a bat in the nets last couple of

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 2>days here, always an energetic trainer. You'd say he's got

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 2>that bright green lid on and then I think he's

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 2>just it's extra shiny. Is that a different brand of

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:34.079
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it's the DSc because he's recently changed bat sponsors,

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 2>I believe, so maybe that's how they make their homelets.

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, it's extra shiny. I'm sure the viewers will

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 3>notice that when they see him walk out there in

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 3>the Test match. Let's have a look at what else

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 3>happened in the nets today. Bow Webster and Manus Labish

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 3>and had a long battle both with bad and ball.

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 3>I guess they both do a little bit of both.

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 3>Now if you say that Manus is you know it's

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:58.679
<v Speaker 3>condod it. But on the final ball of bo Webster's session,

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 3>Labashane actually knocked over his off stump and there were

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:06.439
<v Speaker 3>a few giggles and laughs all around from his teammates.

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 3>Cameron Green just gave him a shake of the head

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 3>to say sorry mate. No one should have to go

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 3>through that sort of thing. So that was interesting. All

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 3>the bowlers were there, they had a quick bowl, not

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:18.079
<v Speaker 3>all of them bold to batters. They were only Bowland

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 3>and Lion batted to or bold to batters, and lyone

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 3>actually had a long chat to Kumar Damasina, who is

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:28.199
<v Speaker 3>going to be umpiring in this Test match. Of course,

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:30.959
<v Speaker 3>he was an off spinner himself, took over two hundred

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 3>wickets for Sri Lanka and so perhaps they were just

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 3>comparing a few notes on the craft of off spin Bolin.

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, potentially, maybe Nathan Lion was giving him some tips

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 2>for his Instagram page. And the dumb scene has really exploded.

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's been prolific in that area, hasn't it.

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Yeah, Sorry, I don't know where I'm going with

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 2>that other than I just wanted that to be noted.

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:53.719
<v Speaker 2>I know more about Nathan lyon the last couple of

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 2>days in the nets, and I do Kuma Damascena's Instagram.

0:09:57.160 --> 0:09:58.679
<v Speaker 2>I've been watching him closely.

0:09:58.800 --> 0:09:59.079
<v Speaker 1>Line.

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 2>There's some suggestion that maybe the you know, the effectiveness

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 2>that we saw in that Adelaide test last summer wasn't

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 2>quite there in Bangladesh. So in Darwin against Bangladesh coming

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 2>off a big injury layoff, the reports internally was that

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 2>the fizz and the dip and everything was there. Well,

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 2>so windy here, we've just lost our camera.

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 1>The reports were that post injury, the fizz.

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 2>And the dip and everything were already there. All back

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 2>there for Lion, which is a good sign. He's been

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 2>working quite closely with James Franklin's kind of a bit

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 2>of a new addition to this coaching stuff. He's done

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 2>a few tours, but I believe he's kind of going

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 2>to be here more frequently now that Dan Vattori is

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 2>going to do more franchise stuff over the next little

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 2>bit and it's watching line bolted Cary just off a

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 2>step in the nets today you could carry was explaining

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 2>to Franklin what glove Nathan Lyon watches of his when

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 2>he to right handers. And it was interesting just seeing

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Franklin like kind of picked that up. So there's all

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 2>these little because he's ostensibly the kind of bowling us.

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 2>So I think Kerry was saying that he line watches

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 2>his right glove religiously when he's bowling to right handers,

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 2>and that's his.

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:17.439
<v Speaker 1>Kind of like aim point.

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 3>Interesting.

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so that was this morning.

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 2>The morning before that, he kind of laid out a

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 2>little box with his yellow bits of tape on the

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 2>pitch and again was just bowling off step or two,

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 2>just going through the basics. It was remarkable how often

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 2>so this box would have been maybe thirty.

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 3>Meters thirty centimeters.

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Thirty thirty meters, that'd be a big box even even

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 2>you could a thirty yeah, thirty centimeters give or take

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 2>each side of it. And yeah, so they must have

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 2>run out of handkerchiefs for him to bowl that bigger.

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 2>But he like, he landed so many balls in that

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:53.319
<v Speaker 2>little thing and it was just like a little thing

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 2>that if Old mats listening and wants advice on how

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 2>to become a better cricketer. If you can hit the

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:02.839
<v Speaker 2>thirty cinemeter as much as Nathan Lyon, you know you're

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 2>gonna be pretty good. So it was interesting that he's

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 2>just working on these basic things.

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's funny you say that because I mentioned today

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 3>that Stark, Hazewlod and Cummins only bowled on empty nets,

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 3>but they had cones placed on a good length and

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 3>again taking it right back to basics. I was impressed

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 3>because I know that they're professional cricketers and all that,

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 3>but you would expect Cummins and Hazeward to be the

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 3>most accurate. It was actually Starker hit the cones the

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 3>most out of the three.

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>And were they bowling off a full run?

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 3>They were, yeah, off their full run. So interesting stuff.

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:34.680
<v Speaker 1>It's often like the really little things that you look back.

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 2>I remember one of the one of our colleagues around

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:41.719
<v Speaker 2>like the player Content Capture day, was stunned at how

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 2>good these guys were. Like a chipping challenge, and you

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 2>just kind of forget that you're working with the athletes

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 2>who have the best hand eye coordination in the country,

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 2>so like, it's not that surprising they pick up another

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 2>ball stick sport and they're really good at it. It's

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 2>often the littler things rather than the big things to

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 2>kind of illustrate that. So yeah, with line, you know,

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 2>some really basic technical kind of stuff going on. Manas

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 2>similar long hits. You know, you can tell it's a

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 2>team that kind of have been a bit rattled on

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 2>happened in Darwin and they're desperately you know, looking to

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 2>looking for ademption.

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I suppose.

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.079
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I mean when you look back at that border

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 3>Gavasca Trophy that was down under a couple of years ago.

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 3>They lost that first test in Perth comprehensively and you know,

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 3>the outside noise was, oh, there needs to be changing

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 3>all these sorts of things. But they came back and

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, responded really well in that series, isn't there.

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 3>So I think they feel like one loss is not

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 3>a time to panic and they'll back their processes to

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 3>get them back on the winning list.

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:37.200
<v Speaker 2>It's an interesting one to bring up, and it's been

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:38.959
<v Speaker 2>talked about a little bit in the last week, right

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 2>like the teams, this team's performance after long breaks, I mean,

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 2>you're nitpicking or up, but like there was the Ashes

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 2>game against England last year that you know, England could

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 2>have easily won it had they played some smart in Perth. Yeah,

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 2>some smarter cricket and then Travis Head has single handedly

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 2>won that game for Australia, the Perth game the previous

0:13:58.040 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 2>year against.

0:13:58.520 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>India with our outplay.

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 2>And then I've heard others even bring up the World

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Test Championship Final in twenty last year twenty twenty five,

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 2>the lost to South Africa. Lost to South Africa, had

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a lay off their guys coming off

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:15.839
<v Speaker 2>ipl and then they hit played really good cricket in

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 2>the Caribbean on the back of that. Yeah, yeah, I

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 2>mean it is nitpicking. The thing with those is they

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 2>are all the start of longer test campaigns in Australia.

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 2>There was five test campaigns against India in England, you know,

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 2>a four test campaign if you want to call it.

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 2>That WTC final plus Caribbean. Here they've got two tests

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 2>and I know they've got South Africa on the back

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 2>of that, but there's that a six week break between

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 2>the second Test here in Mackay and the first Test

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 2>in Durban, so there's no time like you know, if

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 2>we get a wash out here, there's I don't think

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 2>there's a chance of some small chance of rain, or

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 2>if it's a really fat flat wicket here and there's

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 2>a draw, Bangalsh wins series like you can't. You know,

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 2>it's a luxury that Australia have had. They play these

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 2>longest series, even three Test series is long now, right

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 2>that they get to warm into it, so they don't

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 2>have that luxury and they've been rightly pulled up for it. Yeah, okay, Bangladesh,

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Well they pulled off perhaps the greatest Test victory in

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 2>their history and they come hear the mackay, We've just

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 2>seen them run around in the field, very energetic and

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 2>full of competitive spirit as well. There were quite a

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 2>few games that they had where they were throwing at

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 2>the stumps and every time the ball hit the stumps

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 2>one team cheered and the other hands on head sorts

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 2>of things. They get their left arm quick shore for

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Islam back. He is available after dealing with a side

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 2>straight and I believe whether or not he gets picked

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 2>there's another question here because it's very hard to change

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 2>that team that comprehensively beat Australia over eleven sessions in Darwin.

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Just watching him in the nets. He's literally bowling as

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 1>we speak. You can see him.

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 2>Over your left shoulder. Josh, I watched him bowl a

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 2>couple of balls to Mominal Huck. I think it was

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 2>on picking him, really him, like on the on the

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 2>evidence of two balls, I'm like, oh right, this this

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 2>bloke's a proper bowler. I might argue he's better than

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 2>the all three of the bowlers they picked in that

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 2>first test. So if he's fit for me, he's in.

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 2>He is a he's a proper one thirty plus, you know,

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 2>one thirty five plus left arm tall for you know,

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 2>for these Bangal a really short Bangladesh team. He's a

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 2>tall bowler. He's one hundred percent in. Yeah, you can

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 2>actually he's literally bowling as we speak and bolwing some

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 2>good gas. So I mean, Eberdot would probably be the one.

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 2>He was a little bit way with that second innings

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 2>and didn't get much of the ball when the game

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 2>was on the line. That's often a bit of a teller.

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 2>Who's who do you turn to when the game's you know,

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 2>really in the in the nutcrunch time, and and I

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:49.240
<v Speaker 2>think Shanto kind of didn't didn't really trust him in

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 2>that moment. The other option would be to go four quicks.

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 2>Keep everto Sato bomb quite well on that first tick,

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 2>got a couple of wickets and maybe get rid of

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Title Islam and go four quick and Mahedi, who was

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 2>the more effective spinner in Darwin definitely. You know, I

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 2>think Titles are really experienced operator. I'd be inclined, especially

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:13.119
<v Speaker 2>here Mackay that the ball does, the pitch does take

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 2>a bit of spin towards the end of the game.

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 2>The caveat there is a there hasn't been a whole

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 2>lot of first class cricket, and be the first class

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 2>cricket we have had here has normally been in that

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 2>November October November kind of period. I think the weather's

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:27.360
<v Speaker 2>a lot cooler here. I think that kind of caught

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 2>us a little bit by surprise. So whether it would

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 2>break up quite as much as it does, then that's

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 2>all for Bangladesh to decide.

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I suppose.

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I've seen the suggestion that they might leave Tigle out,

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 3>but and he wasn't super effective in there, and you

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 3>have to say, I think just the one we could

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 3>have Labushane in that second innings. But yeah, as you say,

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:45.919
<v Speaker 3>he's got so much experience and they like going to

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:49.680
<v Speaker 3>him to potentially hold up an end. Although Mehetia Sogn

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:52.120
<v Speaker 3>was much more successful at that in the first Test,

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 3>wasn't he. But it's again it's title's first test here

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 3>in Australia as well, so like all of them, even

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 3>though he's got nearly three hundred Test wickets under his belt,

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:00.639
<v Speaker 3>he's still probably adjusting to conditions.

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:04.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, the fear into that first Test, unfounded

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 2>as it was, was that you know, the small spinners

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 2>in Australia get eaten up by this country and the

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 2>extra bounce is the kind of thing that you need.

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, they didn't get eaten up by any measure.

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 2>And Mahdi on the contrary, like you know, boldest team

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 2>to victory. So I fear that Mackay being a more

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 2>normal creer ground inverted commas on normal natural pitch, you

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 2>probably get a bit more of that carrying bounce that

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 2>should play into Australia's favor. That should be conditions that

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 2>Australia know and have been dominant in over the last

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:40.440
<v Speaker 2>little bit to the point where you know, if if

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 2>it is a you know a mid August pitch as

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 2>opposed to a November pitch that might crack up. Maybe

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 2>it's a bit more seam movement. Do you need Nathan Lyon?

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 2>I mean that that will be I think a question

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 2>that they will be asking. They've they've shown that they're

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:57.400
<v Speaker 2>willing to drop him. It has always been pinkball games,

0:18:57.440 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 2>has always been a little last tix when they've done it.

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Does Scott Bowland give you more than Nathan Lyon?

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:06.639
<v Speaker 2>You know, when you've got Webster and Green in the team.

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm not one hundred percent sure that they do it,

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 2>but it will definitely be a talking point. And ran

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 2>short of alsome OFFI is as well potentially, so not

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 2>saying that they're of Nathan Lyon's quality, but they are

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:18.920
<v Speaker 2>rough and they have got.

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 3>Anic they are off spin.

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:24.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Bo Webster as well. I guess you blag you

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:27.160
<v Speaker 2>a through it. I mean I think I think you've

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 2>got enough scene bowling coverage personally.

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 2>And if they do think it's going to nip around

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more, then I think probably Webster comes

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:36.680
<v Speaker 2>into the game a little bit more. You know, Bangledesh

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 2>went after him. Min Darwin on a lower wicket. I

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 2>think that's easier to do. And I still have high

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 2>hopes for Green his improvement as a bowler. I thought

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 2>he was poor and down with the ball. He's got

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 2>so much potential with the ball on It's a hill

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:51.920
<v Speaker 2>that I would not die on that Cameron Green can

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 2>be an extremely effective Test bowler.

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:56.439
<v Speaker 3>Okay, there you go. Now the last Chiffield should match here,

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 3>which was two seasons ago, mitchwebson five for in the

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 3>final innings. So yep, it has taken spin, but we

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:04.679
<v Speaker 3>were also expecting it to take a little bit of

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:07.199
<v Speaker 3>pace as well. This has been the unplayable podcast Here

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 3>Mackay join us for the Day one recap after Saturday's play.

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 3>We'll be right here wherever you like to get your podcasts.