WEBVTT - The Story So Far

0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Just before nine o'clock last night, the jury returned guilty

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:08.480
<v Speaker 1>verdicts against all three defendants.

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 2>It was absolute shambles, to tell you the truth, just

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:12.560
<v Speaker 2>absolutely really conant.

0:00:12.280 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 3>Blood on his clothing the day after the alleged.

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 4>Attapshell a mud bank and it fits Roy River. Basically,

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:19.239
<v Speaker 4>I think most of the people are used to me.

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:20.600
<v Speaker 5>Where are good people?

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:23.280
<v Speaker 4>I think a really important question we need to ask

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 4>is how many Indigenous prisoners in Australia are innocent.

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 3>This is Curtain, a podcast where we pull back the

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 3>blinds to shine a light on the darkest parts of

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:36.240
<v Speaker 3>our justice system and ask who are the victims. I'm

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:38.879
<v Speaker 3>Amy Maguire and I'm.

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 4>Martin Hodgson, a senior advocate for the Foreign Prisoner Support Service.

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:47.160
<v Speaker 4>And a warning, this series contains the names of deceased

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 4>peoples and has distressing content that might upset some listeners.

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 6>Welcome to Curtain the podcast.

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Today, we've had major developments in the media's coverage of

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Kevin Henry's case. We'll discuss this later in the program,

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 3>but first we're up to episode eighteen in this podcast series.

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 3>And if you've just caught up with us, but you

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 3>don't want to go back and listen to all of

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 3>the episodes. This episode is going to be a handy recap,

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 3>but if you're a regular listener, it's always good to

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 3>go back and rehash the case. There might be something

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 3>you've forgotten or something that slipped past you. We'll also

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 3>discussed a few major developments following our brief recap. Min

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 3>We've talked a lot about this case, but a big

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 3>part of understanding it means going back in time to

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 3>around nineteen ninety one. What was life like for Aboriginal

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 3>people back in nine ninety one, particularly in Queensland.

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, it was a very rough time. One of the

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>things that had recently wrapped up in nineteen eighty nine

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>was the Fitzgerald Inquiry, which examined corruption right across Queensland,

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>both in the sphere of politics and in particular policing.

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Now so bad was the police service that the Police

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Commissioner at the time was charged with corruption and ended

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>up in prison himself. And there was also major issues

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>to do with policing right around Queensland, and the police

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 1>culture of the state was heavily criticized. It was alleged

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and also found that police officers largely had loyalty to

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>each other and no one else, that they weren't enforcing

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the law against other police officers, that there was a

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:45.920
<v Speaker 1>great deal of misconduct, inefficiency, and contempt for the justice system.

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>So it was this background of police corruption, shocking treatment

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>of Aboriginal people right across the state, of crackdowns on

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 1>any dissent and protest, and that a lot of people

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>who didn't have access to really good legal assistance were

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>slipping through the cracks on a weekly basis. And I

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>think it's very important that people understand that as it

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>relates to Kevin Henry, because it's fair to say these

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>recommendations were nowhere near in place those that would see

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:28.639
<v Speaker 1>a change to corrupt police culture in Rockhampton in nineteen

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>ninety one when the tragic events took place.

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 3>And Linda, when we talk about her as a victim,

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 3>she actually had a family history involving another really important

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 3>event around that time, and that was the Royal Commission

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 3>into Aboriginal Deaths and Custody, which would have just concluded.

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 6>In the year of her death.

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 3>Does that come into play when we talk about Kevin

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 3>Henry's case.

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think it's particularly important and doubly tragic for

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Linda's family. This was a brilliant Aboriginal woman and mother

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>who'd lost one of their own family members in custody

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>at the hands of police and correctional services. And this

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>was such an issue the way people were treated by

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>police and corrective services in custody, that it prompted this

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:22.840
<v Speaker 1>nationwide royal commission that's had wide reaching findings that sadly

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>is still not implemented to this day. And many of

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the issues raised in that Royal commission relate to the

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 1>way people were treated by the police upon their arrest,

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and sadly, Kevin would fall victim to exactly the issues

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 1>that were raised at that Royal commission.

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 5>So in recapping what was the crime, well, basically what

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 5>was established at the time was that Linda had been

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 5>in Rockhampton for a short period of time.

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>She'd gone missing for a period around eight days and

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>was last seen wearing black pants, a black top, a

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 1>red coat, and a white and black scarf. And on Saturday,

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:17.159
<v Speaker 1>the thirty first of August nineteen ninety one, Linda was

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 1>brutally assaulted by three women. And what we believe is

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:25.720
<v Speaker 1>that that assault took place in two locations, but the

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>primary one established by the court at the time, and

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:33.720
<v Speaker 1>all the evidence is that that assault took place at

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a place called Tanuba House on the banks of the

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 1>Fitzroy River, and that it left Linda with life threatening

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>injuries enough to have the women charged and convicted with

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>grievous bodily harm. In addition, Kevin Henry was charged with

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:57.719
<v Speaker 1>the rape and murder of Linda, and he was accused

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>of placing Linda's body in the river the following day,

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>on the Sunday, Linda's body was found by a fisherman

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>early in the morning, and that's the basics of the

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:15.920
<v Speaker 1>crime and what took place. Who were the witnesses, So,

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>as we've explained throughout the podcast, there were a large

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>number of people who used to attend t n Uber House,

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 1>who would sleep there, who would gather there. It was

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>essentially their second home. For some it was their home

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:36.600
<v Speaker 1>on the river bank, and so we had many Aboriginal

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>people who were witnesses to the assault. We don't have

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:47.919
<v Speaker 1>any witnesses to Kevin Henry ever placing Linda's body in

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the river, but there was a large number of witnesses

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>who saw what went on during that day and It's

0:06:54.960 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>important to remember that they were all watching a football game,

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and there had been heavy alcohol consumption on that day,

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>and so basically all our witnesses to the event itself

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>were heavily intoxicated.

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 6>Was Kevin Henry a witness to the assault.

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Henry did witness the beginning of the assault. But

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>there's two issues that are supported by the evidence and

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>by statements of both Kevin and witnesses, which are that

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Kevin was heavily intoxicated, and he actually went to sleep.

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 1>And it appears he went to sleep either during the

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>assault or very shortly after. It was quite prolonged and

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>as we said, took place in a number of locations,

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>so he saw a little bit, but he really didn't

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>see a lot. And because he was heavily intoxicated, he

0:07:57.200 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>did spend most of the day and certainly most of

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>that night asleep.

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 3>So who were the women who committed the assault and

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 3>why do we think they might have had motive to

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 3>commit that assault?

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>So the three women were convicted of grievous bodily harm

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>against Linda. Their names are Susan Aubrey, Margaret Bob and

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Amy Saunders. Now it's believed these women took issue with

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:34.439
<v Speaker 1>Linda and they accused her of stealing their men. They

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>used language that is highly inappropriate, highly sexualized, that I

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>won't repeat. And there was an event that day that

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 1>if you want to know more about, you can listen

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>to the podcast that led to these women beginning to

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>verbally abuse Linda and then violently attacking her. Now, it's

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>important to remember these women were feared by many people.

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>They were known to commit many assaults. Many of the

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>witnesses who gave statement spoke of their fear of these women.

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 1>The assault these women committed was horrific. It left Linda

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 1>with life threatening injuries. It left Linda bleeding profusely. And

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 1>there's the very real possibility that the forensic expert at

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the initial trial couldn't rule in or out, which is

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>that Linda died of the injuries suffered at the hands

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>of these women. And still to this day, there are

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:44.559
<v Speaker 1>people who speak of their fear of the women who

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>committed this violent assault.

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 3>So what where does Kevin Henry come into it? What

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 3>do police allege he did after the assault?

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:59.439
<v Speaker 1>So what the police would allege is that when everybody

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>left to nuber House where this assault took place and

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>went to a place nearby called the Crown Hotel. Is

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>that Kevin dragged Linda's body away, had sex with Linda,

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and then placed her body in the water. Now it's

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 1>important to point out that nobody witnessed this, Kevin Henry's

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>denied this for twenty five years, and that there was

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 1>no physical or forensic evidence that linked Kevin Henry to

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 1>those alleged events. But for now in the podcast, this

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 1>is what the police would allege when they charged Kevin

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Henry with murder.

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 3>So when did the police investigation begin? And I guess

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 3>how did the police again in conducting that investigation.

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:55.680
<v Speaker 1>So the following day, when Linda's body was found early

0:10:55.760 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>on the Sunday morning, the police slowly, and it needs

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to be emphasized very slowly, made their way to Tanuba House.

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 1>There was a long delay in roping off the area

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and securing the crime scene. There was a long delay

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>in arresting people, or at least questioning those around and

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>those who saw or may have seen what went on.

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>In fact, despite Kevin Henry having been there that night,

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:32.200
<v Speaker 1>he was not spoken to that day. It wasn't until

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the Monday when Kevin Henry was walking in Rockhampton that

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>he was picked up. And so we have over a

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>period of a number of days, most of the people

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 1>who were there but certainly not all spoken to by police,

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and the police going about collecting the forensic evidence, although

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>this was problematic to given that the crime scene had

0:11:57.280 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>not been properly secured.

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 3>When were the women charged?

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:07.559
<v Speaker 1>So the women were charged on the fifth of September,

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>that was the Thursday after the crime, and they were

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>charged around about twelve pm. Now it's important to understand

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the women at that time were charged with the murder

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>of Linda. It wasn't until later in the day that

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Henry was interrogated for a second time and he

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 1>was charged with murder later in the afternoon. Now what's

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:37.559
<v Speaker 1>concerning about this is that he was charged with murdering

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Linda in a completely separate fashion to the women who'd

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:46.440
<v Speaker 1>been charged with Linda's murder. And so at this point

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you can understand it's quite confusing and very difficult to

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 1>understand how this is good police practice to charge two

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>separate lots of people with the murder of the same person,

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>but that that murder somehow took place in two different

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:06.559
<v Speaker 1>sets of circumstances, and in two different ways.

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 3>Imagine that Kevin was picked up by police. What happened

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 3>when he was picked up.

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>We won't ever know exactly what happened, because the judge

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 1>at the trial was very critical of what happened when

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Kevin was picked up, the way he was interrogated and

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>spoken to, and the way the police conducted themselves. But

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the very bare bones, and again people can go back

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:41.679
<v Speaker 1>to hear more, is that the police interrogated Kevin Henry,

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 1>he asked for a lawyer. The tape recording which was

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>taping his interview was turned off. A few minutes later,

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>it came back on and suddenly it seems as if,

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:59.239
<v Speaker 1>but it's not clear that he's agreed to proceed without

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a lawyer. The interview goes on for a little while longer,

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>about twenty minutes to half an hour, and then Kevin

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Henry advises the police he has nothing more to say,

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and at no point in what was recorded up until then,

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>had Kevin Henry ever admitted to rape or ever admitted

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 1>to murder. And it's at this point that the rest

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of the interrogation of Kevin Henry was ruled unlawful by

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the judge. So all we do know is that the

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>police continued to speak to Kevin for the rest of

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>that day. They put him in the car and they

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>drove him around. We know they drove him to the

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>crime scene, but they may have also driven him elsewhere.

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>But the point remains that the judge ruled this was

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>inadmissible because all of this was done unlawfully. Kevin had

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>asked for a lawyer and had said he had nothing

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 1>more to add and nothing more to say, but that

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't stop the police from trying to continue for hours.

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 4>More.

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 3>Was this why they charged Kevin with rape and murder?

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 6>Was it based on this confession?

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:20.239
<v Speaker 1>Yes, so it is believed that based on this confession,

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>because they discovered no other evidence linking Kevin to the crime,

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>that this is why the police charged Kevin with murder.

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 1>But again, Kevin was charged on the same day as

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the women with the murder of Linda, but said to

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>have done so in a completely different way to the women.

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 3>So when did the women's charges get downgraded to grow

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 3>this bowly harm?

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>So from that September, just a few days after Linda

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>had been killed, all the way until February the next year,

0:15:57.200 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety two. It wasn't till the day that the

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 1>three women turned up at court to face charges of murder.

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>And it wasn't until all their lawyers were in place,

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the judge and prosecutor were in place, that the charge

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>of murder was dropped against the women and those charges

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>were downgraded to grievous bodily harm. So for five months,

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Henry and the three women were all charged with murder,

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and yet the police were somehow alleging this had taken

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 1>place in two separate ways.

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 6>So how did the trial begin?

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>So there was two starts to the trial. Kevin Henry

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and two of the women would go on trial in

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the April, two months after the charges of murder against

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the women had been dropped. The third woman pleaded guilty

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to grieve us bodily harm and was sentenced. Then the

0:16:56.280 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>trial opened officially and immediately the confession, and I do

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>say that in inverted commas, a confession was immediately contested

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>by Kevin's lawyer, and this was when the judge chose

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 1>to rule such a huge amount of the confession out.

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>And this was a vital piece of evidence against Kevin

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:23.639
<v Speaker 1>Henry because there was no other evidence, And so the

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 1>trial begins with the judge ruling the vast bulk of

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:32.919
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Henry's statement inadmissible because he'd been denied a lawyer,

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 1>he'd been denied his right to end the interview, and

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:41.719
<v Speaker 1>the police had conducted the interview in an unlawful manner.

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 6>So what were the main points that came out of

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 6>the trial.

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>So largely we had a number of forensic experts that

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>were called, the two arresting police officers, and the witnesses

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>who either saw the crime att tenuber House or a

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:07.359
<v Speaker 1>number of people who had seen goings on earlier that day,

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and the fishermen who'd found the body. Now the basics

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of the crime are this that in terms of the witnesses,

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:21.679
<v Speaker 1>they'd all given multiple statements and none of those statements

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>were consistent with their other statements. This is for a

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>number of reasons. The three women who had been previously

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>charged with murder changed their statements once they'd been charged

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:39.679
<v Speaker 1>with murder, and one of whom had tried to implicate

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Henry, but her statement was inconsistent. A number of

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:49.119
<v Speaker 1>the other witnesses simply didn't see anything that would link

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:52.879
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Henry to the crime in any way, and so

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the police, by their own admission, had tried to interview

0:18:56.440 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 1>these witnesses on multiple occasions, had one witness who said

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the police followed him for months, and some of the

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>witnesses didn't give their final version of events, their final

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:14.439
<v Speaker 1>statement until just days before the trial commenced. And again,

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>all these statements contradicted each other. And the last thing

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that's important to know about the witnesses is virtually all

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:27.119
<v Speaker 1>of them were heavily intoxicated, both when the crime was

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>committed and when they were interrogated by police, and all

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the witnesses basically admit to this. Some of them are

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 1>very open about that, and others it takes a little

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>bit of questioning. But again, the police should not have

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 1>interviewed these people when they were intoxicated, and yet they did.

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 1>The forensic evidence that was presented at trial was basically

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to do with Linda's injuries, the forensic material that was

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>collected that matched Linda and matched some of the women,

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and whether any of that forensic material connected Kevin Henry.

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>And none of that forensic material connected Kevin Henry in

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>any way. So not the blood, not the clothes, not hair, nothing,

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 1>of a forensic nature linked Kevin. And finally we had

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the testimony of the two police officers who had investigated

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the crime, and, by one of them's own admission, from

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the moment they charged Kevin Henry, they stopped investigating the crime.

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>They did not look at who else could be involved,

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>they didn't look for any further evidence. They simply believed

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 1>they had their man. And so other names and other

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:56.919
<v Speaker 1>possibilities of what happened that night were raised, But the

0:20:56.960 --> 0:21:00.880
<v Speaker 1>police couldn't answer any of this because they'd simply stopped

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:07.920
<v Speaker 1>investigating the very day they charged Kevin Henry. Now, as

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:10.880
<v Speaker 1>much as it might sound like, it's difficult to believe

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that was the totality. In summary of the evidence presented

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:21.159
<v Speaker 1>against Kevin Henry, there was not a single witness called

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 1>who saw Kevin Henry with Linda's body, either when Linda

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:31.639
<v Speaker 1>was alive or dead, neither having sex with Linda or

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:37.120
<v Speaker 1>placing her in the river. When the jury retired, they

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 1>came back and returned guilty verdicts against the women, where

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 1>there were many many witnesses to what they'd done, and

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a great deal of forensic evidence linking them to what

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 1>they'd done, and also finding Kevin Henry guilty of the

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 1>rape and murder of Linda, despite there being no witnesses

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>that saw him involved in the crime in any way,

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 1>no forensic evidence of Kevin ever having sex with Linda,

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 1>let alone committing rape, and no evidence of murder. And

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 1>so for twenty five years Kevin Henry has been in

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>prison in Queensland based on the verdict of that jury

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and based on the sentence handed down by the judge

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 1>on that day.

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 6>In that time, did he ever appeal his sentence.

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Kevin did have a very brief appeal. It was done

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:41.680
<v Speaker 1>in a way that only challenged the Privacy Act which

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:45.439
<v Speaker 1>sought to it sought to throw out the entirety of

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the statement given by Kevin to police. But what it

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't do. It never challenged the fact that no forensic

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>evidence was ever presented that implicated Kevin, and it didn't

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 1>challenge the fact that no witnesses ever saw Kevin Henry

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 1>involved in the crime itself. And so for twenty five years,

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:11.920
<v Speaker 1>and this is important to stress, Kevin Henry has always

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:16.919
<v Speaker 1>maintained his innocence. He pleaded not guilty at the trial.

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>He denied anything that he was accused of. He pleaded

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>not guilty at trial. He maintained that innocence leading up

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to the trial, all the way up to his appeals,

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and for twenty five years, Kevin Henry has told everyone

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>who will listen, he did not commit that crime.

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 3>So what is the investigations uncovered today?

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>So, after all this has taken place twenty five years later,

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:51.199
<v Speaker 1>those who are following the podcast will know that a

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:55.920
<v Speaker 1>year ago Amy and I launched our own investigation and

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I didn't need more than five minutes looking at this

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>case to know that something was wrong. The first issue

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>we looked at was whether it was possible Linda's body

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>had been placed in a different location to where police

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>would claim, and a location that was simply impossible for

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Henry to access. And all our investigation, including consulting

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>with forensic experts, has led us to believe that Linda's

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 1>body was placed on the racecourse side of the Fitzroy

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 1>River that is on the opposite side of the river

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to Tenuba House, the crime scene, and would have required

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a car to drive the body around to that spot.

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>The way we were able to work that out is

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:48.199
<v Speaker 1>to do with where Linda's body was found when it

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>was found and the movement of the tides, a parallel

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 1>line that her body had left in the mud, and

0:24:57.080 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>also the variations in the two river banks, one being

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>accessible by foot without getting wet or muddy, and the

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Tanuba house side where it was alleged Kevin placed Linda

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 1>in the river, requiring at the time someone waded out

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:16.119
<v Speaker 1>into the mud and water to place a body in

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 1>the river. And Kevin Henry's clothing, his shoes, and his

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:27.679
<v Speaker 1>body was entirely clean of any river water, any mud,

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 1>any salt, any trace of having ever gone near the river.

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 1>So that was the first issue. We've also been able

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to clarify the forensic evidence. Now, at the initial trial,

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>no evidence was ever tendered that would link Kevin Henry

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:51.639
<v Speaker 1>to the crime itself, but we were able to go further.

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 1>We were able to show that had Kevin Henry been involved,

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>there would have been forensic evidence, and so it's not

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a matter of evidence simply being lost at the time

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>or things like that. The forensic conclusion of the new

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 1>report we commissioned is that so there was no forensic

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:19.639
<v Speaker 1>evidence linking Kevin to Linda's body or the crime scene

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 1>post the assault committed by the women that is the

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:27.919
<v Speaker 1>forensic report found had Kevin been involved, he would have

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:31.919
<v Speaker 1>had Linda's blood on his clothes, There wasn't any he

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>would have had Linda's blood on his skin and hands,

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:39.959
<v Speaker 1>There wasn't any that he would have had mud and

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 1>remnants of the river water on his body, and there

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:48.119
<v Speaker 1>wasn't any. So not only did we show that the

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:54.440
<v Speaker 1>initial forensics while failing to implicate Kevin Henry in the crime,

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:58.959
<v Speaker 1>the new forensics show he couldn't have been involved in

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the crime. And this was very important.

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:04.639
<v Speaker 3>So if Kevin Henry didn't do it, who are the

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 3>other suspects?

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>So, as listeners to our podcast will remember, in the

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:16.359
<v Speaker 1>last few episodes, we finally received a statement by someone

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>we call Witness X. They were an eye witness to

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:25.120
<v Speaker 1>basically everything that went on that day and that night.

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Witness X is very clear in what they saw. Witness

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 1>x's statement matches the forensics, it matches the other witnesses

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 1>statements that are believed and thought to be consistent, and

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 1>it matches with our thorough investigation. And that is firstly,

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that Kevin Henry was asleep under a gum tree and

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:52.639
<v Speaker 1>that he did not have anything to do with the crime,

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 1>and secondly that those involved in the crime did have

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 1>a car, did drive Linda's body to the other side

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of the river, and did place Linda's body on the

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:10.440
<v Speaker 1>racecourse side of the river into the water, as we'd

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 1>initially predicted with our own forensic examination, and we'd never

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>seen this witness statement until just a few weeks ago,

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:23.639
<v Speaker 1>So that Willy West was the primary person in the

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 1>transportation and dumping of Linda's body along with another man,

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and Witness X was also in the car with another

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 1>individual in the back seat. And this is how they

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>were able to establish who they saw and believed committed

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the crime. And again they ruled out Kevin Henry completely

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 1>and they placed another individual, Willie West, and another unnamed

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 1>individual at the crime scene and in possession of Linda's body.

0:28:56.600 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 7>And that brings us to today where after twenty five years,

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 7>rock Hamden's local paper, the Morning bullet And finally covered

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 7>Kevin Henry's case, and they covered it on its front page,

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 7>and not only did they cover it, but it led to.

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 6>Other stories in the ABC.

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 3>Finally, after a quarter of a century, Kevin Henry's name

0:29:16.720 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 3>is back in the press. Martin, what did the one

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 3>billion story say today.

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 1>The very first sentence of the article on Kevin Henry

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 1>says this, The rumor mill has churned the same message

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 1>in Rockhampton for twenty five years. Kevin Henry didn't do it,

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 1>So immediately, that backs up what we've always said in

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>our investigation, really what I think you could take from

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the initial trial and what witness X said. So for

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty five years, Kevin Henry has been waiting for the

0:29:55.560 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>world to acknowledge what he always knew and maintained in

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 1>this crime. He simply didn't do it and had no involvement.

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 1>So Amy, perhaps you can explain to our listeners as

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 1>a rock Hampton local yourself, what happened in the media

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 1>in Rockampton today.

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 3>So, after a quarter of a century, it was really

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 3>amazing to see Kevin Henry's case back in the newspaper.

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 3>It hasn't been back in the press since he was

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 3>originally convicted back.

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 6>In nineteen ninety two.

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 3>And we know from looking back into the archives that

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 3>it was reported really badly in it. It really made

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 3>kenn Henry look guilty because of them miss the inaccuracies

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 3>in the trial reporting. So Rockhampton is a single paper

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 3>town and the fact that they've put this story on

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 3>the front page and given it the prominence that it

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 3>deserves means quite a lot. It also means that a

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 3>lot of the other media in the town, like the

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 3>ABC and WIN News, have actually finally followed up the story.

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 3>And not only that, the AC the ran Kevin Henro's

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 3>story at the top of their local bulletin, there were

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 3>stories in the statewide bulletins and Kevin Henro's story also

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:13.360
<v Speaker 3>made ABC online. So following on from this front page

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:15.959
<v Speaker 3>in the morning bulletin, the story has actually gone further

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 3>and further, and I'm sure that a lot more people

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 3>are going to pay attention to this enduring injustice.

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 1>One thing I think that's important to add is that

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the reason the media picked up on this, the reason

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 1>it made the paper, the reason it made the radio,

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and the reason it made the TV news was because

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 1>of this podcast curtain and because of people supporting and

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 1>sharing this podcast, both in Australia and around the world.

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:47.000
<v Speaker 1>What we've been able to uncover and show to those

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 1>of you who have listened and shared this podcast with

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 1>your friend's family and those who are interested in justice,

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 1>is that Kevin Henry is quite clearly an innocent man,

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and no longer could the media remained silent on that issue.

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 3>And one of the advantages of finally having Kevin Henry's

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 3>case on the front page of the local paper is

0:32:08.840 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 3>the potential for other witnesses to come forward, and by

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 3>the end of the day a new witness did come

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:20.720
<v Speaker 3>forward with crucial information. So Martin, who was this key witness.

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 1>This witness wants to remain anonymous at this stage. But

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the witness is a taxi driver from Rockhampton who says

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>that he dropped Linda at Tanuba that day and it

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly seems as if he knew who Linda was. And

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 1>this is what he describes about when Linda walked from

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 1>his cab down to Tanuba House where immediately the women

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 1>assaulted her, as was detailed twenty five years ago. He says,

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I could hear yelling and screaming and here they are

0:32:57.600 --> 0:33:02.520
<v Speaker 1>getting stuck right into her. Event Actually I drove away,

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>he went on. They were the rulers of the river bank.

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Them women used to shiver when and he says, Margaret

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Bob came up. She was rarely on her own and

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 1>when she got in the cab, you thought oh Jesus, No,

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Kevin would never mix with them. The only time he

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 1>ever mixed with them was when he had no money.

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 1>He also made other comments about Kevin Henry. He said

0:33:30.520 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 1>he was tall and so frail looking. I'd say to

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 1>my wife, my grandmother would have been able to give

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Henry a touch up. It brought back a few

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 1>memories when I read it in the paper and what

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I should have done.

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 6>So why didn't this taxi driver come forward?

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:50.840
<v Speaker 1>At the time, He says he was fearful of Bob

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and Aubrey, there're two of the women convicted of the

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 1>grievous bodily harm against Linda. But he had trouble believing

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Henry was still behind bars all these years later,

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:08.719
<v Speaker 1>some twenty five years later, he said Henry was unbelievably harmless,

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and was also hopeful that any information he could provide

0:34:13.440 --> 0:34:17.400
<v Speaker 1>might in the end lead to Henry's release. This is

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:20.160
<v Speaker 1>what he said. He is as innocent as the day

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 1>is long, poor old Kevin. He was just so docile

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:26.799
<v Speaker 1>and innocent. There wouldn't even be a grain of aggression

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:30.840
<v Speaker 1>in him. But they threw it all at him. You

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 1>know why, because he'd be down there and that drunk,

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 1>he wouldn't know what had happened. I'm very sorry that

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:42.319
<v Speaker 1>I've never come forward. So what this witness has just

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:46.920
<v Speaker 1>told us is that he believes that the assault was

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 1>committed against Linda by the women because that's what he

0:34:51.120 --> 0:34:54.760
<v Speaker 1>heard and what he believes he saw. That he never

0:34:54.840 --> 0:34:59.359
<v Speaker 1>believed Kevin Henry was guilty, and primarily for the same

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:03.720
<v Speaker 1>reasons pointed out because on that day Kevin was heavily

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:08.520
<v Speaker 1>intoxicated and asleep under the gum tree. And this is

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:12.279
<v Speaker 1>coming from someone who has quite clearly worked as a

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>taxi driver in Rockhampton, and it's important to remember that

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:20.399
<v Speaker 1>the Aboriginal people, particularly those who spend a good deal

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 1>of time down at the River, would use the taxis

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 1>very regularly. In fact, part of Kevin Henry's alibi for

0:35:28.200 --> 0:35:31.319
<v Speaker 1>those who have listened to all the podcast, is that

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 1>he was in a taxi cab at around the time

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the murder would have taken place. So it's very believable

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that a taxi driver would be someone who would have

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:47.720
<v Speaker 1>known and seen about what had happened. This individual clearly

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:54.920
<v Speaker 1>remembers Linda, remembers Kevin, and very clearly remembers the women

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:58.960
<v Speaker 1>involved in the vicious assault against Linda and says the

0:35:59.000 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 1>reason he'd never forward was his fear of those women.

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:06.480
<v Speaker 1>But it's quite clear this is a new witness who

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:10.960
<v Speaker 1>has been prompted by today's media attention, who has not

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:14.759
<v Speaker 1>heard the podcast, who's not heard it on the radio,

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:17.799
<v Speaker 1>because he was under the impression Kevin Henry was no

0:36:17.880 --> 0:36:21.880
<v Speaker 1>longer in jail, but is quite sorry that he hadn't

0:36:21.880 --> 0:36:25.760
<v Speaker 1>come forward earlier, and he's quite sorry that Kevin Henry

0:36:25.840 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 1>is in prison twenty five years later.

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:31.479
<v Speaker 6>So mart In, the media today also mentioned that you're

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:32.560
<v Speaker 6>working on something.

0:36:32.680 --> 0:36:36.760
<v Speaker 1>What is it so right at the present, I'm working

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 1>with a lawyer in Brisbane to push forward for Kevin

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Henry to have a new parole date where much of

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 1>this may at least be considered. But while we're not

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:53.000
<v Speaker 1>sure if they will consider new information because that can

0:36:53.040 --> 0:36:57.359
<v Speaker 1>be deemed outside their charter of operation, we certainly want

0:36:57.360 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to put to the parole board once again, and this

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:05.719
<v Speaker 1>has been done many times, that Kevin Henry maintains his innocence,

0:37:06.400 --> 0:37:09.759
<v Speaker 1>that he's served his sentence, and that his behavior is

0:37:09.800 --> 0:37:13.800
<v Speaker 1>certainly that of an innocent man desperate to return back

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:17.319
<v Speaker 1>to a community that has shown huge support in him

0:37:17.480 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 1>by signing a petition by the elders of his community

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:26.400
<v Speaker 1>in Warabinda calling on the Parole Board to release Kevin

0:37:26.520 --> 0:37:30.879
<v Speaker 1>back to them, and by many of the Indigenous services

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:36.439
<v Speaker 1>in Rockhampton and Warabinda offering their services and accommodations from

0:37:36.440 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 1>his family to welcome Kevin back to the community. Now,

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:45.880
<v Speaker 1>given that we believe Kevin Henry is innocent, given that

0:37:46.800 --> 0:37:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I believe I have the evidence to prove Kevin Henry

0:37:50.320 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 1>is innocent, we can tell our listeners I'm in the

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:57.319
<v Speaker 1>process of filing a petition to the Governor of Queensland

0:37:57.680 --> 0:38:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to grant a pardon to Kevin Henry for a crime

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:04.440
<v Speaker 1>he did not commit. And you'll hear more about that

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:06.600
<v Speaker 1>next week on Curtin.

0:38:07.320 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 2>That was episode eighteen of Curtain the Podcast. Like us

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:14.719
<v Speaker 2>on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, or go to our

0:38:14.719 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 2>website www. Dot Curtin Thepodcast dot com. Just a reminder

0:38:20.080 --> 0:38:21.960
<v Speaker 2>that Kevin Henry needs.

0:38:21.760 --> 0:38:25.120
<v Speaker 3>All the support he can get, so please share the

0:38:25.160 --> 0:38:28.880
<v Speaker 3>information with your friends and do your little bit to

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 3>help Kevin Henry and help reverse this endearing injustice.