WEBVTT - Conversations 4: The Good Cop

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:06.480
<v Speaker 1>This podcast contains information and details relating to suicide. We

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:12.000
<v Speaker 1>urge anyone struggling with their emotions to contact Lifeline I'm

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:19.079
<v Speaker 1>thirteen eleven fourteen thirteen eleven fourteen or visit them at

0:00:19.440 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>lifeline dot org dot au.

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:32.159
<v Speaker 2>Hello, welcome to Conversations four and we have a very

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 2>special guest today. Ron Idle's the good Cop Victoria Police

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 2>forty two years thirty six as a detective twenty five

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:44.239
<v Speaker 2>at the Homicide Squad, famous for the quote, well at

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:47.200
<v Speaker 2>least I've quoted him a number of times. The answer

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 2>is always in the file.

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 3>Welcome Ron, thank you, thank you for having me.

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 2>And we have Liam Bartlett here of course, and Tim

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 2>is away this week.

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, good Ael and Ron. Just to reiterate what Ellison

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>says there, Thanks very much for coming on board. Your

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>experience is absolutely second to none, mate, so we're very

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>pleased to have you here. And also obviously we're reminder

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>our listeners ol that Ron has been very much a

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>part of this case. His report was included in the

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>coronial inquest.

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:19.680
<v Speaker 2>That is correct, so you would have heard about We

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 2>heard a lot about Ron, particularly in episode ten. So

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 2>if you need to have a listen before you listen

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 2>to this conversations, check it out because it's a very

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 2>important aspect of this case. File Ron first question, how

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 2>did you get involved?

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 3>I think it's as a result of the show that

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 3>I did with Good Cop. Amy's family contacted me asked

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 3>would I look at the inquest brief. They felt that

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 3>the investigation was poor, and eventually I agreed to do it,

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 3>and then their legal team had to get permission for

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 3>me to access some material from the current of course.

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 2>What were your thoughts ro when you looked at the file?

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:10.920
<v Speaker 2>And I guess caught up with everything that had happened.

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:16.079
<v Speaker 3>So I was sent the part of the Inquestbury and

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 3>some of the reviews that had taken place. So I

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 3>read all the file and then I could see that

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 3>there was a massive mistake made right from the start.

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 3>When you go to an incident where there's a shotgun involved,

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 3>you should treat it as a homicide in other words,

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 3>a murder or a manslaughter, and work back from that

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 3>premise to prove anything else. You don't deem it a

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:40.799
<v Speaker 3>suicide from day one.

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Yes, so the default position on the bottom line, that

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>default position should have been something sinister, not something that

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>was innocent.

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 3>That's correct, and then it might prove to be wrong.

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:56.359
<v Speaker 3>But what you should do is you should call all

0:02:56.360 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 3>the services out, which would include your crime scene. You

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 3>call the pathologist out, you call a blood splatter expert out,

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 3>you call a ballistics person out, and you do all

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 3>the necessary measurement and that to determine whether the person

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 3>could have shot themselves or whether it's actually a homicide.

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 3>This case was determined in forty two minutes by the

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 3>detectives just saying, well, she's taken her own life.

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes, when you put it like that forty two minutes,

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>that really brings it home, doesn't it. Ron. I've got

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>to say, you know, one of the things I think

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>you're and I'm not blowing smoke here, but the Good

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Cop show that you've been involved with and hosted one

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>of the best true crime shows on TV because you

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>make it simple, even for mugs like me. You know,

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>you break it down, break it down, break it down

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>all the way through an investigation. And I guess that's

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>what good detectives do, right. You know, it's not a

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>question of being the smartest person in the room. It's

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>a question of being thorough and absolutely looking at stuff.

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Where the common sense alternative doesn't stack up. You know,

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and when I look at this case and I read

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>your report to the coroner again, by breaking it down

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 1>like that, none of this makes sense. Would you agree

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:25.039
<v Speaker 1>with that?

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 3>None of it made sense? And it's a bit like

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 3>ABC Assume nothing, believe nothing, and check everything. Now, before

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:37.799
<v Speaker 3>the two people that were at the house at the time,

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 3>that's David and Gareth, they had statements, taken him down

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 3>at the front gate, sitting in the back of a

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:50.599
<v Speaker 3>police car. Now, before those statements were finished, the detective

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 3>that had already said it was a suicide. Now that's

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 3>impossible because you haven't even got a full detailed statement

0:04:57.800 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 3>from the two people who are present.

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 2>It's disgraceful, really, I mean when you look at it,

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 2>I think though, when they obviously had the major crime

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 2>investigation and then the cold case review, what were your

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:16.479
<v Speaker 2>thoughts as that transpired? Do you think that that was

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 2>enough or you know, where were you thinking the investigation

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 2>was going from there?

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 3>I think the Major Crime did a half reasonable job,

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:30.160
<v Speaker 3>But the problem was you're already three or four days

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 3>behind because at that stage David and Gareth have been out. Joshua,

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 3>who was there earlier on it has been about you

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 3>don't know what they're doing in those three days leading

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:45.239
<v Speaker 3>up to it. And the sad part is the crime

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 3>says planed up and no matter what you do, you

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 3>can never recreate that exactly.

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 2>That's true, but that seems to be something that that

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 2>resolved themselves too. Sorry it was watched at the beginning.

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 2>There's nothing we can do. We just have to leave

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 2>it as an open finding. Is that good enough or

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 2>is there still a way to redeem the situation? Do

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:08.720
<v Speaker 2>you think?

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:13.359
<v Speaker 3>I think with further investigation, further publicity, it can still

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 3>be redeemed. There are people out there who know exactly

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 3>what happened, and it's a matter of locating those people.

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't think I've ever been involved in a homicide

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 3>investigation where the person responsible has not told someone, So

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:36.720
<v Speaker 3>it's about finding that person. Carl Williams, who was an

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 3>underworld figure in Melbourne who elderly died and was involved

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 3>in four or five murders, had this thing and he

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 3>said those who know don't talk, and those who talk

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 3>don't know. But in the end that was all proved wrong.

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Those who knew always told someone.

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, human nature isn't it.

0:06:57.320 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a rufic thing to cover up, and they

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 3>all always go ahead and tell someone.

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 1>But Ron, let's put aside people's sense of loyalty, misguided loyalty.

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's put that aside for a second. Just coming back

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to that point about what evidence is available now, and

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>we know we've been through a whole stake of episodes

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>in this podcast trying to find the truth about Amy.

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>There is a lot of and not just circumstantial evidence.

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>To me as a layperson, there is a lot of

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>evidence in that room and around that room at the time,

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>regardless of the fact that it wasn't forensically protected, that

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>could still make a strong brief. Do you agree with

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>that point? Because I'm asking you because because you must

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>have had cases over the years where you've assembled what

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>you thought was a very strong brief and yet still

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the DPP or the equivalent has knocked it back.

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 3>I've only lost three murder trials out of three hundred.

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 3>I've had a couple of briefs that have gone to

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 3>the Director of probably Prosecutions and it's come back in

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 3>sufficient evidence. In this case, I think the bio mechanic engineer,

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 3>and more so the reconstruction that you have done with

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 3>the expert from America is pretty telling stuff. I'm a

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 3>detective and I looked at the photos, and the right

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 3>hand is under the right leg, So the only way

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:37.440
<v Speaker 3>that she could have pulled the trigger was with her

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 3>left hand. And if you try to hold a fourteen

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 3>shotgun in the position that she was and get a

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:49.319
<v Speaker 3>ninety degree horizontal entry and exit, it's impossible.

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:54.199
<v Speaker 2>Yes, exactly, Well, that's the thing, right. They decided she'd

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 2>used that to shield the barrel, so then they pretty

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 2>much dispensed with that theory and then went to the

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 2>right hand being used, and then they were trying to

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 2>find a way that the gun could have fallen in

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 2>that position and her hand could have gone under a buttock,

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 2>But of course in the end they couldn't prove that either.

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:16.439
<v Speaker 2>So then it was the whole idea of the body

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:20.839
<v Speaker 2>being moved. But there's still that attachment to the suicide

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 2>theory as opposed to just looking forward and saying, look,

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 2>what are the balance of probabilities. This is the brief.

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Let's just put it to the DPP and let them decide.

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 3>Look, I think that I don't know what they've done

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 3>since the inquest. But what I'd be doing is who

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 3>is David's assay siate who are his friends who he's

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.319
<v Speaker 3>been in contact with over the last three or four years.

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:47.319
<v Speaker 3>You would go and speak to all Gareth's friends again,

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 3>because sometimes with the passage of time, people's relationship change,

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:55.199
<v Speaker 3>and I think if you did that, you might actually

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 3>find someone who says, this is what he told me,

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 3>which is incant distant to what the account that he

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:06.079
<v Speaker 3>gave back in June two thousand and fourteen. And then

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 3>you couple that with all your evidence that you've found

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 3>and you put it to the Officer Public Prosecutions.

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Ron here is there anything from a police level that

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>allows or doesn't allow the police to go to back

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to David Simmons, back to the Gareth Price Joshua Brydon

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:31.079
<v Speaker 1>and pull them in again for a formal interview separately.

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:35.559
<v Speaker 3>At this stage you would have to have new evidence.

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 3>You can't just go and arrest a person that you've

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 3>already interviewed for the sake of another interview unless you've

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 3>got new material to put to them.

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Can you ask them to do that voluntarily?

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 3>Yes, you could go to any one of those three

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 3>who were there on the day with David especially, you

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:57.559
<v Speaker 3>could go back and put the matters that you're uncovered

0:10:57.600 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 3>as a result of your expert from America.

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Listen, this is where I still go back again and again,

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, to that terrible evening. I still can't get

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 1>my head around there. I mean, two detectives turn up

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:14.839
<v Speaker 1>with three uniforms already there, and between the two experienced

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 1>detectives senior police, they create notes between the two of

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>them that don't even fill a page, a single page

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 1>of a four paper. I'm just I just it does

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 1>my head in that statistic ron. How do you feel

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>about that as a senior police officer.

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, I've got to sadly agree with you. If I

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 3>was at that scene, I think you would find that

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 3>I would probably have twenty a four pages of notes.

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to talk to the first uniform police there.

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to take notes to that, You're going to

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 3>do a diagram of the scene. Then I'm going to

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:55.080
<v Speaker 3>make phone calls because I know I want other services there.

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 3>I just think those two detectives just didn't want to

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 3>be there that night. They might add something else to

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 3>go to. It's as if well, let's just tick this

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 3>box and walk away and sadly, I think they got

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 3>it wrong.

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 2>The Brotherhood of the Police. And you were in the

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 2>police force for half a century, so you know about this.

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:30.680
<v Speaker 2>And when mistakes are made, when people do muck up,

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 2>is there an issue sometimes with having them taken into account?

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 2>And I mean there was an internal investigation and you

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 2>saw that. Was it enough? And do you think that

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 2>there should have been a bit more of an open

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 2>mind at the inquest as to what happened to Amy?

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 3>I think there was definitely should have been an open mind.

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 3>After I made my statement for the currents court, they

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 3>then got a superintendent to read report and to produce

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 3>a report. Now I listened to his evidence at the

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 3>Currenter's court and he said everything was done. It was

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 3>all done properly, although he can see the mistakes at

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 3>the crime scene, but he said, I can tell you

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 3>now she took her own life. Well, that is just

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 3>a closed mind. And I've got to tell you, in

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 3>forty two years I've had to go up against the

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 3>Brotherhood and not once has anyone ever apologized to me

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 3>order families that we got it wrong.

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting. You would have seen with Larry Blandford, right,

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 2>he's created like a bit of a leper now because

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 2>he actually stood up and he's no longer an officer.

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 2>How often does it happen that uniform cops might do

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 2>that and is it seen as a bit of an

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 2>army mentality you don't question your superior when it comes

0:13:57.120 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 2>to the police force as well.

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Look, I think it was difficult for those junior officers

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 3>on the night. They were quite to the point that

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:09.079
<v Speaker 3>it wasn't a suicide, or she hadn't taken her own life,

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 3>or they wanted a lot of other things done and tested,

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 3>and I think they spoke your mind. But it's like

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 3>a hierarchy. So, Okay, you've got these detectives who are

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 3>they're far more experienced than we are. They're saying she

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 3>took her own life, so they have to accept that,

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 3>even though deep down they don't yes.

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>On that level, Ron, If we just get your comments

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>on a couple of these things that relate to the

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 1>police directly from your experience from some of our listeners

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>that have made queries put comments on the Facebook page

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>for the Truth About Amy podcast. If you don't mind out,

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll just go through a couple of these for Ron

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>on that exact subject. Debra is asking why the uniform

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 1>police who turned up couldn't go over the heads of

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the detectives at the time. Can you explain that, ron.

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 3>If they did, then there'd be consequences down the track.

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 3>They would be seen as not being loyal to a

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 3>senior officer.

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it would. It'd be very difficult, woudn't it. I mean,

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's just like trying to go up against

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>your manager if you're in a big organization. It's a

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>difficult thing at that level, isn't it.

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 3>It is? And I was asked in twenty twelve to

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 3>review the murder of two policemen Silken Miller in Melbourne,

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 3>and I came to the conclusion that one of the

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 3>persons responsible wasn't there.

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 3>When I finished my report, I took it directly to

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 3>the Director of Public Prosecutions. Now that's caused me no

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 3>end of grief. I've been ostracized. I'm now the evil one,

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 3>even though later on it was proved I was right,

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 3>and the young person charged, Jason Roberts, did twenty one

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 3>years and has been exonerated. You don't buck the system.

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 3>If you buck the system, you'll be offstra basically left

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 3>to your stone devices.

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, even though, as you say, you've been proved to

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 1>be one hundred percent right in fact, to the point

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 1>where that particular person has now launched a multimillion dollar

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit against the government. So yeah, maybe more people should

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>have listened to you earlier.

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's just one of those things that if you

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 3>go against the hierarchy, you're considered basically as a black shirt.

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's sad, right for doing the right thing. Shouldn't

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 2>that be respected?

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Or it should be it should be respected, But I

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 3>haven't seen it change much over the last twenty twenty

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 3>five years.

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Agreed. Well, here's another one on that level. This is

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>from Judy on the Facebook page. Judy wants to know

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>how the Premier in Wa, Roger Cook, and the state's

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General John Quigley sleep at night and how they

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 1>would feel if it happened to one of their children,

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>And she goes on to say the Police Commissioner Cole

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Blanche needs to step up. That's a fairly straightforward and

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>fair comment, don't you think, Ron It is?

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:08.159
<v Speaker 3>But I think the Premier wouldn't know the exact details.

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 3>The police minister would have an overall briefing. But I

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:15.639
<v Speaker 3>think it's time the Chief Commissioner stood up and said, well, look,

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 3>let's put this to bed once and for all, let's

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 3>get all the available evidence, put it back before the

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:25.120
<v Speaker 3>Director of Public Prosecutions, and let's get a decision made.

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, very good point. I mean, I'd love to

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 1>see some of this stuff, things that we've been shaking

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 1>our head over, ol, I'd love to see. I'd love

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to see a jury hear the same stuff in the

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 1>same order. But here's another one from Facebook. Ron Trisha

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 1>wants to know more about the missing door handle. Now

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm intrigued by that as well. What did you think

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of that? Ron?

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 3>I can't explain that, Like, the door handle's missing, was

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 3>it missing prior to that day? And then I've got

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 3>a vague recollection that could have been on the dressing table.

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Yes, well it was replaced. That's the funny thing, right,

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 2>the door handled turned back up afterwards, but at the

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 2>time it was missing on the inside. And that's just

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 2>so strange. I've always thought that was strange because if

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Amy had taken it, she would have taken it from

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 2>the outside, because she wouldn't have wanted her daughters to

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 2>walk in on her if she had killed herself.

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:20.120
<v Speaker 3>Oh, that's right. But where she's located behind the door,

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 3>to me, it's like she's gone down there and she's

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:28.359
<v Speaker 3>cowering like gotta rum up, as if something's going to

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 3>take place.

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I agree, there was another guy. Actually, I don't know.

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:36.679
<v Speaker 2>And Liam's going through this too, and it's great. I

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:38.919
<v Speaker 2>love that we've had so many people get back to

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:42.360
<v Speaker 2>us on this. This is Paul. We kind of addressed

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:43.719
<v Speaker 2>this a little bit, but it'd be good to get

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:45.879
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more detail. And he's basically said he's

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 2>enjoying the listening to the podcast since the terrible injustice

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 2>has occurred, but he can't help but wonder about one

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 2>piece of evidence that doesn't make sense to him. If

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:56.159
<v Speaker 2>Amy was right handed and someone was holding a shotgun

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 2>on or near her right temple, why was she not

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 2>trying to push the hourl away with her dominant hand.

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Surely she uses her strongest arm in trying to save herself. Now,

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:08.879
<v Speaker 2>my understanding, as I remember seeing in the room, and

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 2>you saw the pictures right that the door is on

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:18.160
<v Speaker 2>her left, so it's coming in from there and her

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 2>left hand is closest. But yeah, it's just another thing

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:23.400
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't make sense.

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't think any of that stuff makes sense.

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't make sense after the fact either, with the

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>way the gun was handled by at least three people,

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the way the ammunition was handled in it, taken out

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:37.919
<v Speaker 1>of it all before police arrived. I mean, it just

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:40.159
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff just doesn't make sense at all to me.

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 3>No, and then when they were told to clean up,

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 3>I think I think there's been shells were thrown out.

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well they weren't found again.

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 1>No, that's yeah. Look, here's another one on that subject. Guys.

0:19:55.119 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>There's an email here from Mirian. Mirian says this probably

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:04.719
<v Speaker 1>has been covered. But if Amy was going to use

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:06.919
<v Speaker 1>a gun to kill herself, as she would use the

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>pink one she bought, as it was hers and she

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 1>knew how to use it. But apparently it was over

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:15.440
<v Speaker 1>in the wardrobe or against another wall. That's correct, that's right,

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:17.919
<v Speaker 1>she said. Marian said, I heard on the podcast she

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>was slumped against the wall by the door with another

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:23.680
<v Speaker 1>gun with her right hand underneath her bum, which absolutely

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't add up, correct, Marion, Yep, we just discussed that.

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Being a woman myself and a mum, i'd never leave

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 1>my children in a running car and go inside to

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 1>kill myself. Great point. You would hate to think your

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:37.440
<v Speaker 1>child may find you if they got out of the

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>still running car and she had presents in the car

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 1>ready to leave, So it does not stack up seeing

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:47.159
<v Speaker 1>how slight she was. Marian also suggests she wouldn't smash

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the tank in the shed. She may have run past

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:51.640
<v Speaker 1>angry and brushed against it, which made it tip and smash,

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>depending on what kind of stand it was. Look another

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:58.199
<v Speaker 1>good set of comments from some of our listeners, and

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>they do pick up for obvious reusons. They pick up

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>on the important points. And again, surely a jury of

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:06.880
<v Speaker 1>peers would also have many many questions wrong.

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:11.440
<v Speaker 3>Oh absolutely, But I think the thing that the DPP

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 3>if they get, if they get the brief, is that

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 3>the new reconstruction and even the previous biomechanic, it's impossible

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 3>to shot herself. And to a lay person in the

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:29.199
<v Speaker 3>jury twelve good people drawn from the community, trying to

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 3>picture themselves holding a four ten shotgun with one hand

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:38.880
<v Speaker 3>and pulling the trigger doesn't make sense. Well, there's three

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 3>three classic things that you always look for, motive, opportunity,

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 3>and capability.

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, Here's an email from Mandy. She says, I can't

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>stop thinking about the motive I heard in a few

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>episodes ago, the comment that the coroner said there was

0:21:56.760 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>a lack of motive for murder. Unfortunately, he says, Mandy,

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:03.439
<v Speaker 1>this was glossed over. I feel you could have focused

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>on this statement more. Amy had applied for compensation for

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>her neck injury following the accident, when Simmons was driving

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the vehicle. How was that going to directly impact Simmons? Then,

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Mandy points to the clear evidence Amy was clearly in

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the process of leaving with the car engine running. Or

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>domestic abuse victims, This is the most dangerous time to leave.

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Mandy goes on, but she makes some great points there.

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, again, Ron, you know, if you want to

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 1>find the evidence disregarding the fact that, as we've been

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 1>saying time and time again, the detectives made a terrible,

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 1>terrible mistake and the place was cleaned up, but there

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:46.880
<v Speaker 1>is all this suggestion of associated evidence around the actual

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 1>scene that could be well and truly explored.

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, is there.

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Many homicides that you've had to deal with, Ron that

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 2>involved or had a background of domestic violence?

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 3>Oh? Absolutely, I think if you went back to the

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 3>nineteen eighties, the homicide squad was called the heavy Domestics.

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:07.400
<v Speaker 3>In other words, the majority of murders that we went

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:12.199
<v Speaker 3>to were domestic related. The truth is always in an

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 3>an investigation, you've actually got to go out and find it.

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 3>And at the moment, I don't think that's being done.

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.959
<v Speaker 2>There's another one from Leslie who says keep at it,

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:26.679
<v Speaker 2>justice will come. Has anyone investigated other cases around the

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 2>time the two detectives attended. I mean, one of the

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:32.200
<v Speaker 2>detectives is no longer in the police force and we're

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:37.439
<v Speaker 2>not there to necessarily bring them down. But it is

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 2>one of those things, right that some people in the

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:45.640
<v Speaker 2>police force don't have the motivation. Do you find that

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:47.639
<v Speaker 2>with people that you've worked with that there would be

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 2>ones that you you know, there's good and bad in

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 2>every profession, right.

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I think there's more good in the police force

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 3>than I won't say they're bad. I think they're lazy.

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, sort of morale and the driver for motivation that

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>comes from the top, doesn't it wrong? I mean, this

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:11.360
<v Speaker 1>is not you know, this is not a witch hunt

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>to pile in on those particular police officers who did

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:18.639
<v Speaker 1>the wrong thing. We know, it's very clear cut. They

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 1>did the wrong thing. They were terrible. But let's move on,

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 1>you know's let's get justice for amy, for a family.

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, let's just do the police work. Now. Let's

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 1>have somebody at the top say, look that that was wrong,

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>but this is now. Let's plant the flag and say

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 1>from today, from here, we're going to do some excellent

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>police work and we're going to right a few wrongs

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to score a blow literally for justice.

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 1>As much as that sounds like a cliche, but that

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 1>has to come right from the top so that we

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:53.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, we just we set the agenda that way.

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:54.640
<v Speaker 1>That's leadership, isn't it wrong?

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 3>Oh? Absolutely? Or it comes from the head of the

0:24:57.520 --> 0:25:01.400
<v Speaker 3>colcase innit that says, okay, Swan's a priority. It's been

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:05.680
<v Speaker 3>raised in parliament. It's been going on now since twenty fourteen.

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:08.399
<v Speaker 3>The only reason they got an in quest is they

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:13.440
<v Speaker 3>went to the equivalent to iback, such time, we did

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 3>the right thing. Yes, we've made mistakes. Let's finish it

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:20.919
<v Speaker 3>off completely, do as much as we can and if

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 3>we get there, we get there, and if we don't,

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 3>we don't. But we've done the best we can for

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 3>the family.

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Exactly. I know some fantastic police officers over the years

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:40.199
<v Speaker 1>who've done some brilliant work and they're motivated by all

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the right things, yourself included, Ron, And I mean that's

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:44.920
<v Speaker 1>what you know, that's what the public should be supporting

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:48.640
<v Speaker 1>because we really need those people in the service generally.

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, but you know, we can take any industry.

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, I know some shocking journalists. Fortunately none of

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>them are on this podcast. But that's just life, isn't it.

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>But but you just need some strong leadership to say, okay,

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>let's make this work. Let's get some.

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 3>Action, and you get everyone involved and each detective have

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 3>some ownership, and where you go it can't happen. I've

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:19.880
<v Speaker 3>sold the case that was thirty two years old by

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 3>going back over so the answer is always there. You

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:25.400
<v Speaker 3>just got to go and get the evidence.

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:28.199
<v Speaker 2>Tell us about that one, Ryan, that was a great one.

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 3>So that was a young sixteen year old girl in

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 3>Shepperton who went missing. She was found in a table

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 3>drain stabbed sixteen to eighteen times in nineteen eighty two.

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 3>Now again investigated in that made a mistake earlier on

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:48.160
<v Speaker 3>and they believed it was a person, Paul Greg Bledhill.

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 3>They even actually charged him with the murder, and back

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 3>then it went to an inquest, which was the same

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 3>as a committal. The coroner found that there was insufficient

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:03.359
<v Speaker 3>evidence and he was released. Now, young Johnas wanted to

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 3>do a story about it, and she wrote a story,

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 3>and I actually went to Shepherd and after I read

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 3>the file and publicly I said Greg Gladill could not

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:17.639
<v Speaker 3>have done this. So there were mistakes earlier on, but

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 3>as a result of that being honest upfront, the information

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:25.160
<v Speaker 3>came in and eventually I charged Stephen Bradley, who's now

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:26.359
<v Speaker 3>doing thirty six years.

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Did you get any flack for that, ron No.

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 3>One of the things with that case is that the

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 3>original exhibits for some reason, had been destroyed, so I

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:41.399
<v Speaker 3>didn't have exhibits. So whilst there were mistakes made, whilst

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 3>there had been someone that was already charged and released

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 3>and the exhibits were missing, we were still able to

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:50.920
<v Speaker 3>build a case and get sufficient evidence for him to

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 3>stand his trial.

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 2>That's a benefit of being treated like a homicide in

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:58.440
<v Speaker 2>the first instance. I'm so glad though, that you are

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 2>willing to stand up and you are willing to do

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:05.400
<v Speaker 2>what's right, no matter the repercussions. I think that's so important.

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:07.679
<v Speaker 2>I think it should be applauded. I mean people like

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:12.200
<v Speaker 2>you who stand up to the brotherhood. I mean you

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't listen to the episode where we went through the

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 2>internal fois from senior police. Were you surprised by that?

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 3>I was especially the comments of the ballistics man using

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:27.360
<v Speaker 3>for our language. Now he in this matter. It had

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:31.199
<v Speaker 3>completed his report before all the testing was done, and

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:35.119
<v Speaker 3>he says there's no criminality because there's no fingerprints on

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:37.960
<v Speaker 3>the gun. Well, that doesn't mean there's no criminality. So

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 3>it's sad with that attitude because you are getting senior

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 3>members of the police force basically saying we're going to

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 3>do nothing.

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that was in twenty twenty three as well, it's

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 2>only a year ago. So just for listeners, they were

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 2>arguing about getting that one million dollar reward and being

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 2>treated as a homicide and having you go with the

0:28:56.840 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 2>West saying that are they taking poetic license by calling

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 2>it a homicide and saying it was a botched investigation.

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:05.959
<v Speaker 2>So there are still people in the police force they

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 2>don't even accept it was a botched investigation.

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 2>And seen people.

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to be very smart to figure out

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 1>it was a botched investigation, notwithstanding the fact that that's

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>already been decided at a higher level than our Yeah,

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:22.719
<v Speaker 1>the inquest. But again it shows you the mentality, doesn't it.

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's like the old adage about you know,

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 1>whether you win or lose, isn't it ron? You know,

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>it's like a grandmother's homily. You know, if you lose,

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>that's fine, but it's the way you lose. And again,

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 1>we're supposed to all be in this to have a win,

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 1>So let's forget about the losses and just make sure

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 1>we try and have the victory in other people's interests.

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, an investigation is a search for the truth

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 3>in accordance with the specifications of the law. So get

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 3>out there, try and find out what the truth is

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 3>and presented.

0:29:56.120 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, And on that level, the correspond we've had

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 1>with the police, the recent correspondence, how back me up

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>on this because my interpretation, I think yours is the same,

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 1>is that this is certainly the way the WA police

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>have put it out there. This is the sort of

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 1>public perception that they want to create. So I'm hoping

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 1>this is the honest reaction, and this is true, but

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 1>it seems like there is a new team. In other words,

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>there is a new investigation into Amy's death. Is that

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>your interpretation as well?

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 3>My understanding is that the cold case will relook at

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 3>it again and start from more basically scratched, but go

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 3>over it all and bring it to a conclusion.

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I hope.

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 2>So, I hope that's what it is, because this is

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 2>what we ask the police when they got back to it.

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Once investigated, will the brief of evidence be updated and

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 2>passed on to the Office of the Director of Public

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Prosecutions to consider. If not, why not? The answer is,

0:30:57.640 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 2>if new evidence relating to the death of Amy Wentz

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 2>is obtained during this investigation, it will be assessed by

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 2>the investigation team under the direction of the senior investigating officer.

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 2>If any new evidence indicates criminality or involvement by another

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 2>personal persons, it will be provided to the Officer of

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 2>the Director of Public Prosecutions for their review. So it's

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 2>very noncommittal to.

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Me, that's a motherhood statement without saying what you're going

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 3>to do, but it's something and hopefully they can be

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 3>asked continually well where you're at, and they should be

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 3>in regular contact with the family.

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's the thing, right, that's not happening. I mean Nancy,

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know when Nancy was last contacted. It's just

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 2>kind of crazy. And Anna has a family liaison officer

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 2>who sometimes gets back or does answer her questions, but

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 2>it just seems I don't know, it just doesn't seem

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 2>like enough, because I mean, it's obvious from our podcast

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 2>and the information that has been uncoveted to any line Freddie,

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 2>that there is information that should be considered by the ODPP,

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 2>particularly since as I know it, they haven't seen the

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 2>file since twenty eighteen.

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 3>So the information and the reconstruction that you people have

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 3>done has that been passed on to the police.

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 2>The name of Scott Rohada has been passed on to

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 2>the police, so hopefully they've made contact with him and

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 2>would consider him as part of that. Also, every single

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:29.479
<v Speaker 2>person we've spoken to, a lot of people haven't appeared

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 2>on the podcast. All that information, all those people their

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 2>details have been invited to police with their permission, and

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of information there that would help the case.

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's put that on the record again. In the case

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 1>of Scott Rhoda because obviously we went to a lot

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of trouble to get him to be able to set

0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 1>that up as a sendime to perfect scene Ron. So

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 1>it was a scale model of everything so he could

0:32:56.360 --> 0:33:00.719
<v Speaker 1>do an absolutely accurate analysis. I've said it before, but

0:33:00.880 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll say it again. The police can have all our

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 1>camera tapes of all Scott's work. We filmed a whole lot.

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 1>They can study it back and forth to their heart's content.

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're more than happy to muck in whatever

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 1>it takes. They can ring Scott personally, can have a

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 1>chat to him about it. But you know there's the trifecta.

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 1>You've now got not one independent expert, You've got three

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 1>separate independent biomechanical experts all saying not only does the

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 1>evidence not point to Amy Wensley shooting herself, but actually

0:33:38.000 --> 0:33:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the evidence points to someone else shooting her. How many

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 1>more people ron do you need? How many more independent

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:46.600
<v Speaker 1>experts do you know?

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 3>You can produce those three experts, and the defense are

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 3>then entitled to rebut it and call their own experts.

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 2>When you went through the process of getting a referral

0:33:57.520 --> 0:34:00.720
<v Speaker 2>to the ODPP or providing a case, did you decide

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 2>that or did you have to send it up the

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 2>line ron to get permission. No.

0:34:05.080 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 3>So when I the Michelle Buckingham case, I believed I

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:13.719
<v Speaker 3>had sufficient evidence based on my experience, and I charged him.

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:15.799
<v Speaker 3>I didn't have to send it to the Director of

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 3>Public Prosecutions. So you could get to the point in

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:23.359
<v Speaker 3>this case. If the cold case believe that they had

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:25.920
<v Speaker 3>a primer facy case, in other words, that all the

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 3>points for a homicide or a murder were covered, they

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 3>could make the decision themselves to charge and present.

0:34:34.800 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Here's the problem, though, we saw that FOI and senior

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 2>people who weren't supportive of there being any other resolution

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:49.279
<v Speaker 2>other than suicide. What happens if they don't do it?

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, is it like we just reliant on them

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 2>and their subjective opinion.

0:34:55.360 --> 0:34:59.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, you reliant solely on the police either to charge

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 3>or put the brief together and send it to the

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:03.680
<v Speaker 3>Director of Public Prosecutions.

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 2>Does the Director ever ask for briefs to be sent

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 2>to them.

0:35:07.080 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 3>Not that I'm aware of now, which.

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Is why we went back to the whole thing with

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 2>the Attorney General. I mean the Attorney General We've asked

0:35:13.680 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 2>obviously in a petitioner and is asked on behalf of

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 2>the family in a petition to have it referred because

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 2>of this, I guess opposition from the police in the

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 2>past and currently according to the fied emails that we have,

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 2>and there is this whole idea that he wouldn't be

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:36.280
<v Speaker 2>able to do that now. This is actually his comment

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:38.600
<v Speaker 2>that brings me back to the correspondence that we got

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:42.719
<v Speaker 2>from his office again who outlined to me it is

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:45.680
<v Speaker 2>a matter of a subject of a police investigation and

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:47.760
<v Speaker 2>it would not be appropriate for the attorney to comment.

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:52.480
<v Speaker 2>The attorney extends his condolences to Miss Wensley's family. Police

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:54.920
<v Speaker 2>can refer a brief of evidence for the Office of

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:58.719
<v Speaker 2>the ODPP to assess whether the available evidence establishes a

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:01.759
<v Speaker 2>prima facing case with reasonable prospects, but the attorney has

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:04.160
<v Speaker 2>no role in that process. There is nothing in the

0:36:04.200 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Director of Public Prosecutions Act which provides for the attorney

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:10.239
<v Speaker 2>to refer matters the ODBP. Of course, this is just

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:13.080
<v Speaker 2>me saying this. There's nothing that that also which prevents

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 2>them from doing it. And then she goes under say

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:18.960
<v Speaker 2>and it specifically prohibits the attorney from issuing directions to

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:22.360
<v Speaker 2>the DPP in respect of that of a particular case.

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:27.240
<v Speaker 1>But issuing directions is completely separate to referring matters.

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:30.799
<v Speaker 2>I know, I know, but they're clinging to that, as

0:36:30.880 --> 0:36:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Ron put it beautifully, a motherhood statement.

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's just basically telling us and all our listeners

0:36:36.920 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 1>how to suck eggs in a very very bureaucratic way

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and tying it up with a bow. Are you serious

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that they don't have meetings at that level and discuss

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:45.640
<v Speaker 1>various things.

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:47.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know, I understand there has to be

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:53.000
<v Speaker 3>a separation of powers. But the Attorney General in Victoria

0:36:53.160 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 3>at the time of the Jason Robertson incident became involved.

0:36:57.120 --> 0:37:00.439
<v Speaker 3>The Victoria police put a submission in. The defense put

0:37:00.440 --> 0:37:04.080
<v Speaker 3>a submission in on behalf of Jason roberts and initially

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:08.600
<v Speaker 3>Martin Biller. The Attorney General made a decision that there

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 3>should be a retrial.

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:14.799
<v Speaker 3>Then he backed away from that and change the legislation

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:17.480
<v Speaker 3>which meant that you had to have new and compelling evidence,

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 3>and eventually that was done. So they do have official meetings,

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 3>but most of the time there's that separation.

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Well that's the point, Ron. The attorney general sets the

0:37:26.920 --> 0:37:31.040
<v Speaker 1>legislation right, So, for instance, go back a few months

0:37:31.080 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to where John Quigley was rapping on about domestic violence

0:37:34.960 --> 0:37:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and this is sweet irony and they're helping victims of

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 1>domestic violence. Allison, guess what. He sets up the legislation

0:37:44.800 --> 0:37:47.200
<v Speaker 1>for his government to then put to Parliament. Well, where

0:37:47.200 --> 0:37:49.359
<v Speaker 1>do you reckon? You get some of those ideas on

0:37:49.440 --> 0:37:52.120
<v Speaker 1>what can work and what can't. There's a news flash.

0:37:52.120 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 1>He talks to his police commissioner. That's correct.

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:57.280
<v Speaker 3>They would have a meeting at the Department of Justice exactly.

0:37:57.480 --> 0:37:59.279
<v Speaker 3>But I've got to go because I've got to go

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:00.640
<v Speaker 3>and volunteer and was close.

0:38:01.360 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 2>I know. Well, Ron, we want to thank you so

0:38:04.800 --> 0:38:07.840
<v Speaker 2>much for being part of this. This is invaluable and

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 2>I do believe that we keep pushing it and with

0:38:11.840 --> 0:38:15.560
<v Speaker 2>people like you on our side that I guess justice

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:18.200
<v Speaker 2>will prevail hopefully or at least common sense.

0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Ron, thanks, thanks very much for being part of

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:25.719
<v Speaker 1>the podcast and and and look the case overall. Really

0:38:25.800 --> 0:38:30.240
<v Speaker 1>appreciate your input. It's very valuable, as Allison says, thanks mate.

0:38:30.160 --> 0:38:33.840
<v Speaker 2>No, thank you. All our listeners are also just a

0:38:33.880 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 2>reminder please sign our petition. It's in the show notes

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:41.879
<v Speaker 2>or Google Amy Wensley and petition or change dot org

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:44.000
<v Speaker 2>and you will find it. Thank you so much,