WEBVTT - TNC Review: Soy Mylks

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Our last few plant milk reviews have had such fantastic

0:00:03.720 --> 0:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>reviews that today we thought it was time to take

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:08.440
<v Speaker 1>a closer look at one of ours. And when I

0:00:08.480 --> 0:00:11.800
<v Speaker 1>say ours, Leanne the favorite plant milks which is soy.

0:00:12.280 --> 0:00:15.320
<v Speaker 1>And we've taken a close look at three very popular

0:00:15.360 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>different kinds of soy milk that you can find in

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the Ossi supermarkets. Hi I'm Cuzyburrow and Li lean Wood.

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:24.080
<v Speaker 1>And as two of us Jays leading dieticians, we bring

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you the Nutrition Couch Product Review, a weekly chat on

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>new products and old favorites that you can find in supermarkets. Now, Leanne,

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>we thought it was time to do a whole milk section,

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and of course you have put your hands up to

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>not only do the plant milk write ups, but particularly

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 1>soy because I know that that is your choice of

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 1>when we go for coffee, that's your order, and you've

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:45.880
<v Speaker 1>chosen some good ones. And on an episode, normally we

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>would take turns at running through it, but I'm up

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>in Brisbane actually visiting Leanne, and I don't have my

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>normal tech with me and I literally cannot see these

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>labels they're so small. So Leanne is going to take

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>over and take us through and I will just chirp

0:00:58.080 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>in with very valuable comments as we go.

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 2>All Right, Well, the first one I think I'll say

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:04.959
<v Speaker 2>is probably the most popular, or the one that I

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 2>always see clients gravitate towards. So the one that I

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:09.479
<v Speaker 2>would say is in the media a lot, and it's

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 2>the Bonsoy Long Life soy Milk. So this one is

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:15.679
<v Speaker 2>in a one lead UHT pack and it's four dollars

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 2>eighty so it's very pricey, like nearly five dollars, and

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 2>it very rarely comes and sale from what I've seen,

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:24.839
<v Speaker 2>So I wouldn't exactly say that it was very affordable

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:26.320
<v Speaker 2>for a lot of people, but I do know it's

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 2>very popular. So I thought we'd start with this one today, Susie.

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 2>And when we go through the ingredient list, it starts

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 2>with filtered water, followed by organic whole soy beans minimum

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 2>of fourteen percent, followed by tapioca syrup, sea salt, jobs tea,

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 2>and calcium carbonate. Now there's two interesting ingredients in there,

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 2>one being tapiocis syrup, But I think people gravitate towards

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 2>slim because there's no easily visible sugar on the label.

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 2>But what a lot of people don't realize is that

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 2>the tapioca syrup is actually sugar and the job's tier.

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 2>I must be completely honest. I had to google. I

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 2>was like, what is jobs tear and water is it

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 2>doing in soy milk? So apparently it's a grain and

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 2>it's a cereal plant that's native to Southeast Asia. And

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 2>the grain is like a soft hold grain. It's dried

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:11.520
<v Speaker 2>out and then it's sold, and so they use it

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 2>in things like jeury and some food products as well.

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 2>So I'm guessing it contributes to a little bit of

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:18.799
<v Speaker 2>maybe the texture of the soy milk. Maybe it makes

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 2>it blend easier. I'm not entirely sure what it's doing

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 2>in there, but I imagine it's probably only a very

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 2>small amount, and there is a little bit of calcium

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 2>fortification happening, but it's not a huge amount when we

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 2>go through the nutrition panel. So this is quite weird

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 2>because I've never really seen a plant based milk that

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 2>does any sort of milk milk or plant based milk

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't have a serving size of two fifty meals

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 2>like this one's two hundred mils, which I find very unusual.

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:42.080
<v Speaker 2>Have you ever seen that before.

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>No, but I do wonder because I think bon sooy

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:45.640
<v Speaker 1>comes from overseas, doesn't it?

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Does so.

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's got to do with a little bit

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>of the change in values. And I guess we should

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>say that soy milk is probably closest nutritionally to cow's milk.

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>It's just a plant based sauce. So when we look

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>at the nutritional profile, it's quite different from the previous

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>two that we've looked at when we looked at oat

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and almond milk. Certainly, when we're trying to replicate the

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>nutritional profile of cow's milk and dairy, soy is a

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>lot closer nutritionally. But it is a bit out of

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>fashion at the moment, isn't it.

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Soy?

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I haven't had clients say they're using soyfa agent. Well,

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm bringing it back, susy, bringing it back, baby. So

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>should I convert it to two fifteen meals?

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't really want to compare it via a hundred

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 2>mills because no offense, no one really has one hundred

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 2>meals of milk. Most people would have a standard cup

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 2>of milk if they're making a coffee. Okay, yeah, convert

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 2>it okay, So basically what we're going to do is

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to try my best to convert it with

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 2>my calculator in hand, because I must admit mass is

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 2>not my strong point. So we've got roughly six hundred

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 2>kilo jewels per serving, so per two fifty meals, which

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 2>is on average about just about one hundred and forty

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 2>five calories. Protein Wise, we have about ten grams of

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 2>protein per serve, which we would expect in a soy

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 2>milk because so is naturally higher. And then fat wise,

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 2>we've got about five and a half grams of fat,

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 2>with very low saturated fat under a gram of saturated fat.

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Now carbohydrate, we have nearly fourteen grams of carbohydrate per cup,

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 2>with about five and a half grams of sugar per

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 2>cup as well, so that is some of that is

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 2>added sugar from the Tabiogi syrup as well. Now they

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 2>have actually listed dietary fiber in here as well, which

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:20.280
<v Speaker 2>you're getting from the soybeans that are added in here,

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:23.160
<v Speaker 2>and dietary fiber is three and a half grams per cup,

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 2>so that's actually quite a lot in something like a

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 2>plant based milk. They've actually also listed potassium as well,

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:31.840
<v Speaker 2>which I find interesting. And potassium per cup is three

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 2>hundred and fifty milligrams, and calcium I'm not loving Susie

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 2>because it's quite low. It's only sixty three milligrams per cup,

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:41.039
<v Speaker 2>which I just think, I don't know my mind of

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 2>like why bother well.

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:44.839
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's interesting because when we look at

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:48.799
<v Speaker 1>the Australian plant based milks, if they do contain calcium,

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 1>they do tend to have that massive two hundred three

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred milligrams, you know, a really decent serve. And I

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>do wonder because this product I'm going to look u

0:04:57.080 --> 0:05:00.719
<v Speaker 1>where it comes from, is not a low cool product

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:03.719
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps oversees the demand for that fortification is not

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>so high because bon Sooi has had that level of

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>calcium as long as I've been a dietitian. It's always

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>had a little bit, but just not so much celcinc carbonate.

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>So that's probably not our ideal preferred type of calcium.

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:19.280
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to absorption factors. It's sort of relatively insignificant,

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean, Like you're getting a little bit,

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>as you would from a serve of leg humes, but

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:26.119
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly not replicating a dairy by any way, shape

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>or form. You know this so being quantity is similar

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 1>across the board in terms of amounts. But I think

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>my understanding of Bon Soi fans is it's a flavor thing.

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>They love the taste. There's something that tastes amazing. Do

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you think it has that distinct taste and flavor because

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:44.359
<v Speaker 1>of the like the sweetness that's added.

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think so. I think it's one of the

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 2>highest sugar varieties on the on the market, not by

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 2>anything extravagant, but it's definitely got a couple of extragrams

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:53.559
<v Speaker 2>in some of the other brands. So I will admit

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 2>like it tastes good. I definitely frequent cafes that use

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:58.840
<v Speaker 2>Bonsoi as their preferred soy milk of choice, and I

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 2>must admit it does make a really nice coffee. But

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 2>when I'm someone that uses soy milk on a regular basis,

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 2>like I would some days have one to two cups

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 2>of milk avls having a bit of cereal having it

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 2>in my poroadge making it smoothie, than having it in

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 2>my coffee as well at home. So I definitely preference

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 2>another brand which is a lot more affordable and b

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 2>actually has a required calcium in there for me, particularly

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 2>when I was pregnant and breastfeeding as well, because it's

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 2>something a nutrient that we really want to watch out

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:24.719
<v Speaker 2>for as calcium. So this isn't my topic. I definitely.

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't think I've ever recommended this for clients, Susie,

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 2>but I must say it does taste nice and I

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 2>don't mind it occasionally in you know, in my local

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:31.840
<v Speaker 2>coffee shop.

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Bond Soy was the first modern Japanese soy milk to

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>arrive in Australia.

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:38.719
<v Speaker 2>Well, there you go. So it's Japanese.

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it is Australia, but they're modeling it

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>on a Japanese profile.

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. The factory is in Victoria. Well, there you go.

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:48.359
<v Speaker 1>It's local, so it's basically seems to be replicating a

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:50.039
<v Speaker 1>Japanese recipe.

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:52.359
<v Speaker 2>Or they source the organic soybeans from the US and

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 2>from Canada. That's why it's got the claims about GMO

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 2>on there, because I think that, you know, Americans are

0:06:57.160 --> 0:06:58.159
<v Speaker 2>very concerned about GMO.

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I think this product get exported. I think

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you can buy just once around the world. Yeah, very interesting,

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>But I've always wondered if it was that was why

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the calcium levels would remain low. But obviously they're following

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a very distinct formula and if it's not broken, you

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>don't have to fix it. And it's such a popular

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>type of milk, but nutritionally, I wouldn't probably recommend it

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>one because it's way too expensive, like four dollars eighty

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>for a liter for families. That's that's up there. And

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I like any kind of soy to have some decent calcium.

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>But you know, if you love it and occasionally have

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>a you know, cafe coffee, but it wouldn't be on

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>my list of ones that I would recommend people buy

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>just based on the calcium alone, agreed. And we don't

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>love added sugar to milk, you know what I mean,

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>It's not ideal.

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 2>And then the second one I've gone for is the

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 2>pure harvest organic soy unsweetened. So I must say that

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 2>the majority of soy milk's on the market or found

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 2>in super markets are sweet. It's actually very rare to

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 2>find an unsweetened one. I had to really go hunting today, Susie,

0:07:57.400 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 2>So I hope our listeners appreciate this one, especially very

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 2>if aoudable will wors At the moment, it's retailing for

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 2>two dollars for the UHD for the one liter and

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 2>is it Australia made in owned company as well. So

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 2>I was quite impressed with this one, and looking at

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 2>the ingredient list, it's pretty good. It's filtered water, it's

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 2>organic whole soy beans, minimum of fifteen percent organic sunflour, oil,

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 2>plant calcium, and sea salt. And you know, it's got

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 2>a pretty clean ingredient list per serving, which is two

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 2>fifty mils so a standard cup size, unlike the bon

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Soi is five hundred kilodules per serving, seven point five

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 2>grams of protein, eight point five grams of fat. So

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 2>this is a higher fat soy milk compared to some

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 2>of the others of the market because of the addition

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 2>of the oil. And I'll talk about that in a second.

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 2>So eight point five grams of total fat, one gram

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 2>of saturated, three point eight grams of carbohydrate, two grams

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 2>of sugar that's naturally occurring sugars and less than a

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:52.439
<v Speaker 2>gram of dietary fiber, and thirty eight milligrams of sodium

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:55.080
<v Speaker 2>and three hundred milligrams of calcium. So that's exactly what

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 2>we want to see. And I just realized, Suzie, I

0:08:56.920 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 2>think the dietary fiber. I thought that was all coming

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 2>from the soybeans. Actually think that's that Job's tier. They've

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 2>added that, perhaps for the taste, but also that's got

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:07.679
<v Speaker 2>to contribute to the fiber profile because it has a

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:09.959
<v Speaker 2>very similar amount of soybeans per cup, So this is

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:12.679
<v Speaker 2>less than a gram and the other ones close to

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 2>three grams. They must be getting some sort of fiber

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:18.359
<v Speaker 2>out of that Job's tier because it is a grain.

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 1>And I guess it would also give the consistency. Yeah,

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think one of the things about soy

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>milk is that it's thicker and it sort of has

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that mouth feel, you know what I mean. So I'm

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 1>wondering if that's where that comes into it as well.

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:33.439
<v Speaker 1>It's a bit unique in that sense, whereas some of

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the others will be very similar formulation. So perhaps that's

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the sort of secret ingredient.

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 2>People love it.

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 1>But I don't remember seeing that ingredient long term, so

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>whether they didn't declare it or whether it's a new

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>because I don't remember ever seeing that before on a label, I.

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Don't either, And I looked it up today and I thought,

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:49.559
<v Speaker 2>what is that?

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>So, you know, it would be strange they suddenly started

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>to declare it, and it would also be strange that

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>they'd started to add it and change the formulation. So

0:09:57.640 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>these are whole questions. We're not quite sure. So if

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>anyone knows, how do share it? But I have never

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, you've seen that, And I think if I

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>had seen it on the label before, I would have

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:07.199
<v Speaker 1>sort of thought, what is that?

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 2>So? Yeah?

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Interesting? Maybe it's like their secret ingredient. It's like the

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 1>KFC herbs and spice.

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so this is the pure harvest one. I like

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:18.960
<v Speaker 2>it because it's got a nice clean ingredient list. It

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 2>is a higher fat one versus a higher sugar one,

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 2>so I guess, you know, pick your poison. But I

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 2>love the addition of the three hundred milligrams of calcium

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 2>per serving, and I love the price point, like two

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 2>dollars for a plant based milk that's high calcium. I

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:32.680
<v Speaker 2>think that's really affordable for a lot of families. It is.

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 1>But the question I have for you, what does it

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 1>taste like?

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:35.840
<v Speaker 2>I haven't.

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I must admit I haven't had this one. I must admit,

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>because that's the other thing. We don't like to sort

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of suggest products that don't taste amazing. And I guess

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 1>my thoughts would be, well, it might be cleaner, but

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>if it doesn't taste great, but certainly nutritionally it comes

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>up trumps. Like I think it's great, great amount of calcium,

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>it's clean, nutritionally, very very strong. So my only hesitation

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>would be if it's not tasting so amazing, but certainly

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 1>it would be a product that I would absolutely recommend

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 1>based on the nutritionals and the very clean ingredient list

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and that great amount of calcium. The only way I

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>would see it being a better product is if they

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:10.679
<v Speaker 1>added some vitamin D. But apart from that, I think

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 1>it's nine out of ten for a soy milk.

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 2>It's great, and it's Aussie made and owned as well,

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 2>which we love. Of course we're always going to support local.

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:19.199
<v Speaker 2>And the last one SUSI am. I say I'm a

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 2>little bit biased. This is the one I personally choose

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 2>to drink. It's the Vita soy milky, so it's a

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 2>light one, so it's a lower sugar one, the lower

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:28.679
<v Speaker 2>sugar and sort of the lower fat one as well,

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 2>so there's a Vita soy soy milky. The normal range

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 2>is like a dark blue color than the light version,

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 2>which is a light blue color. So this one's two

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 2>dollars forty five at retails four at wool West for

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 2>the LITA and ingredient wise, we've got filtered water followed

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 2>by whole soy beans minimum fourteen percent raw sugar. So shock, horror,

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:50.439
<v Speaker 2>the finessed artician is drinking a soy milk woods amounted sugar.

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 2>It's got minerals being calcium phosphate, natural flavor, and some

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 2>sea salt, so we get a pretty clean ingredient list

0:11:57.440 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 2>with the addition of the raw sugar. So it's actually

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 2>a small amount, I would say per serving. So it's

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 2>actually only four grams of sugar per serving, but two

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 2>of that's natural, two of that's added, so it's not

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 2>like I'm drinking a huge amount. And I think it's

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 2>perfectly acceptable if you've got a generally a well balanced diet.

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 2>And as I said, it is very rare to actually

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 2>find a soy milk on the market that doesn't have

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of added sugar into it. By far,

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 2>this is one of the lower varieties on the market.

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 2>But you can absolutely go for the pure Harvest one,

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 2>which is no added sugar in it, if that is

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 2>your choice. But as I said, the Pure Harvest one

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.599
<v Speaker 2>is higher fat. The Vita Soy Soy Milky Light is

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 2>actually it's lower fat, but it's higher sugar. So I

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 2>guess kind of you know, pick your poison, see what

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 2>you see, what you prefer. I preference the lower calorie

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 2>one with a little bit of added sugar because I

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 2>personally think it tastes nice.

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:44.319
<v Speaker 1>And I think we should also say, you know, talking

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>about sugars in milk, so if you have your dairy milk,

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not added sugar, but you're still getting close to

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>eight grams of sugars from lactose per serve. So we

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 1>do tend to go crazy about added sugars in a

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:58.680
<v Speaker 1>milk or a plant based milk. But it should be

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:01.680
<v Speaker 1>said that these amounts of relative insignificant, given that that's

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>half the amount that you would get in a dairy

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>based milk. So you would be splitting hairs to say, right, well,

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 1>this is giving you four grams of added sugar in

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and fifty mil which is sort of just

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, less than even two percent, it's still less.

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Now is it worse because it's added a little bit,

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>But really it's splitting hairs nutritionally in the big scheme

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>of things, And my only sort of feedback to clients

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>would be if they were having two three serves of

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>this per day, whereas then those sugars are adding up

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>to sort of two three tea spoons. But if you

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 1>were having a single coffee per day, and that's quite

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:42.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of milk in a coffee land, like two

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty mili milk coffee would be quite a

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 1>large latte, like most of the smaller cups are giving

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>you two hundred and if you pickle or even less so.

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:51.839
<v Speaker 1>In the grand scheme of a diet, if you're having

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>a swiw milk coffee once a day that does have

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:56.599
<v Speaker 1>some sugar, I wouldn't be the least bit concerned, particularly

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:59.319
<v Speaker 1>if you prefer that flavor to the unsweetened. Of course,

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:02.079
<v Speaker 1>if you like the unswa and even better. But again,

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 1>you know a great amount of calcium. Interesting they use

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 1>calcium phosphate as opposed to carbonate, And yeah, we'd just

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>love to see a little bit of vitamin D in

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>there so apart from that, like it's the thumbs up,

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>But I think the thing with vitasoi is there's so

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 1>many different ones. I find it a little bit confusing.

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 2>There's the protein one a high, there's a higher calcium one.

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>As well, then there's a fiber one and or prebody.

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>All the different ones, there's a lot in the range,

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 1>so you know, definitely you've got to sort of have

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>your glasses on and be sure what you're getting because

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of different varieties.

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 2>And I will say the reason I didn't pick the

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 2>extra calcium fortified one in which I think someone particularly

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 2>perhaps a metapausal listeners will be asking me for it's

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 2>only one hundred milligrams and more. Actually had a client

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 2>who was using it, and she was having two cups

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 2>of milk within about two three copies a day, and

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 2>the calorie load is a lot higher, like this per

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 2>cup is ninety eight calories. The higher calcium one is

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and sixty calories per cup, and if you're

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 2>doing two or three cups of that per day, she

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 2>was drinking over five hundred calories in her coffees and

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 2>for an extra hundred logams or calcium it just wasn't

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 2>worth it. Where are the.

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Calories coming from? What are they putting more sugar in there?

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot more calories.

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 2>You have to look that up. Let's look that up. Yeah,

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 2>that's a lot more you look that up, and I'll

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 2>go through the nutrition information panel because I haven't done that.

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 2>We look at it.

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot more calories. But the other thing is

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 1>four hundred. This is three hundred. Yet it's not really

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that much more, is it?

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 2>For one hundred milligrams and you know, an extra sixty

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 2>seven calories, we went not worth it. So average nutrition

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 2>information per cup so per two fifty mils. So we've

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 2>got just over four hundred kilo duels, which is about

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 2>ninety eight or one hundred calories per cup. Seven point

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 2>five grams of protein total, four point five grams of

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 2>fat withero point eight grams of that being saturated's so

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 2>very low saturated fat. Six point two grams of carbohydrate

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 2>something we would consider, you know, a low carbohydrate product

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 2>per serving, four grams of sugar, two of that being

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 2>added to of that being natural, two hundred milligrams of sodium.

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 2>So not insignificant, I guess, and three hundred milligrams of calcium,

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 2>which is exactly what we want to see. So for

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 2>most I guess average assurants, it's you know, it's a

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 2>decent serve and it's probably about thirty to forty percent

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 2>of the recommended daily amount of calcium. So if you're

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 2>someone who doesn't really eat dairy, this is a wonderful product.

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Or any plant based milk that's fortified with as at

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 2>least three hundred milligrams of calcium is definitely a good thing.

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 2>So I would definitely recommend the vitisl one, and I

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 2>would also recommend the pure harvest one, pending taste.

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, so I've just had a quick look. It's got

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 1>more fat and so it's like a full fat you know,

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 1>seven eight grams of fat per serve, so almost double

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the fat. I think of this one or three times,

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and a lot more sugar carbohydrate fourteen grams and seven

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>per serve. And the only other benefit is that it's

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>got a vitamin D in it as well. So I

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 1>would use this product with my elderly clients who I

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 1>was worried about their bone health and who needed more calories.

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>So I'm thinking like seventy eighty year old people who

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>are not having a whole lot and need a lot

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>more nutrition because their appetites reduced versus what you're saying,

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 1>which is this lightwire and all the unsweetened and much

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>better nutritionally for a younger audience who don't need as

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>many calories. So yeah, and they've put in this one

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:04.640
<v Speaker 1>barley flower as well. I'm wondering if it's a consistency

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and texture thing to try and get it tasting good.

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>If they're adding so much stuff to.

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 2>It, is there a preiodic mention on the front of

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 2>the level like a gutthal's mentioned or a fiber mension.

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:14.919
<v Speaker 2>Perhaps that's why they've done it. No, don't think so.

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 1>It's more just calcy plasts enriched with calci and vitamin D,

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 1>phosphorus and magnesium. It's really targeting boone hell. But you're right,

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:23.159
<v Speaker 1>it's a high calorie product with a lot more fatten

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and a lot more sugars relative to the other two

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you've compared, so that's where it's coming from. But yeah,

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>not insignificant calories, particularly if you're having a few serves

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 1>a day, So good to know these different So it's

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:35.360
<v Speaker 1>very interesting of vitamin A two actually on this one

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:39.639
<v Speaker 1>so heavy fortification Vitamin B twelve good product for a vegan,

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 1>too wonderful? All right, well, thanks Ianne for that review

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:45.119
<v Speaker 1>on sown mill. It's your personal favorite. That brings us

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to the end of the Nutrition Couch product review for

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>another week. If you haven't done so, don't forget to

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and tell all your friends about us. The podcast

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:55.399
<v Speaker 1>continues to grow. We've recently hit one point five million downloads,

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 1>so we're well on the way to two million, and

0:17:57.160 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>for that we have to say thank you and keep

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:01.239
<v Speaker 1>telling your friends so we can continue to grow and

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>bring more and more great episodes. Don't forget We've got

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 1>our information session available on hormones, gut health and fat

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 1>loss that you can find on our website which is

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the nutritioncouch dot com. And we will see you on

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Sunday morning. A great week.