WEBVTT - Your Cholesterol Numbers Explained: What's Normal, What's Not & When to Act

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you know what your cholesterol is? Or when was

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the last time that you had a blood test? On

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>today's episode of The Nutrition Couch, we chat all things cholesterol,

0:00:13.400 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 1>What the numbers mean, when you need to pay attention

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to your actual cholesterol and when is it time to

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.040
<v Speaker 1>take some action. I'm Leanne Wars and I'm Susy Burrow,

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and together we bring you The Nutrition Couch, your weekly

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>podcast that keeps you up to date with everything that

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you need to know in the world of nutrition as

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>well as all things cholesterol. We tackle the issues circulating

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 1>on social media of protein powder versus skim milk powder.

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>We've also found a beautiful new dip we think our

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 1>listeners will love. And our list of question today is

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 1>all about kids' diets and how strict is too strict

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to our kids nutrition. Like to kick

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>us up today, Susie, we are chatting all things cholesterol.

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>What if you got for us today? You get a

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>nice case study it just kick us off with.

0:00:57.120 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 2>So I think you know, going back land twenty years

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 2>that was sort of the number one test that everyone

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 2>got done, wasn't it to check or infer heart related health?

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 2>And we would monitor our cholesterol levels, and we were

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 2>told we shouldn't have too many eggs because they contain

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:15.959
<v Speaker 2>cholesterol levels and all of the aboves. So I think

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 2>cholesterol is certainly relevant. It's a predictor, a positive predictor

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 2>of heart disease risk. I think the issue, particularly for women,

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 2>is that going back again ten twenty years, what would

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 2>happen is with the rise of statin drugs, which are

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 2>cholesterol lowering medication, and heart disease was for a long time,

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 2>if not still a stayor's greatest predictor of death. You know,

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 2>it's a risk of death, whether it's heart disease, stroke,

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:42.679
<v Speaker 2>up disease related illness. So doctors would look if you've

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 2>had high cholesterol levels and in many cases suggest that

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 2>you take a statin drug which would significantly reduce the

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 2>cholesterol being taken in by the blood and reduce heart

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 2>disease risk. Whereas now, like all areas of medicine, we're

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 2>learning a lot more and we know that it's not

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 2>just about cholesterol levels. It's about what we call the

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 2>ratios of good to bad cholesterol in the blood stream,

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 2>and also things like classification score, which is how hard

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 2>or sort of rigid arteries are as well as family

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 2>risk factors, because it's quite possible for people to have

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 2>high circulating cholesterol levels, no damage to the arteries, no

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 2>positive family history, and that may not warrant medications. So

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:22.639
<v Speaker 2>it's not a case of it's high, get it down.

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 2>It's really looking at the overall risk. But the numbers

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 2>that we tend to look at are a total cholesterol level,

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 2>and that ranges between about three point nine and five

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 2>point two, So a lot of women will sit sort

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 2>of five point two five point six lesson six, and

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 2>that may not be a concern, particularly if your LDL

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 2>cholesterol levels, which are the sort of enflame bad cholesterol,

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 2>is relatively low. So it's recommended that LDL cholesterol be

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:51.640
<v Speaker 2>below say two million miles per later and not heading

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 2>above three. So you might have a total high cholesterol level,

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 2>but your LDLs are relatively low, and as such it

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 2>may be deemed that that's not a signay at risk.

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 2>And that can be the case for people who have

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 2>got high levels of what we call HDL, which is

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 2>the high density of proteins, which is what we know

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 2>is the good cholesterol, and that basically helps to rid

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 2>the artery of the sticky damaging LDL cholesterol and predictors

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 2>of high HDL cholesterol or high levels of physical activity.

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 2>So people who are athletes or doing a lot of

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 2>training can have high HDL levels over too, which is

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 2>basically a very protective measure of cholesterol in the blood.

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 2>And then you have triglycerides, which can be an independent

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 2>risk factor, and certainly there are some people genetically who

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 2>can have incredibly high triglyceride levels in the hospital. If

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 2>you've ever worked at a lipid clinic that might be

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 2>managing someone who's got those very high triglyceride levels. It's

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 2>generally recommended that triglycerides would be less than one. Now

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 2>it's about the overall risk, But I think the message

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 2>for our listeners today, yes, you should be getting a

0:03:56.240 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 2>blood cholesterol level done annually, absolutely, and what we're tracking,

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 2>similar to blood glucose levels, increases over time. So if

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 2>your cholesterol has always sat at six, it doesn't change.

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 2>Your LDLs aren't overly high, your hathgls are hopefully close

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 2>to two, you wouldn't do much. But what we want

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 2>to pay attention to, particularly through your forties and beyond,

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 2>is when your LDLs start to increase, because that is

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 2>an early warning or early sign that perimenopause is kicking in.

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Your estrogen levels are lowering over time, and as that's

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 2>your insulin, glucose and cholesterol are creeping up, and that's

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:35.919
<v Speaker 2>certainly a time to act because if you can prevent

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 2>that and reduce the information in your body by doing

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 2>things like including ten serves of leafy veggies and fruit

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 2>each day, consuming the positive ratio of good fats to

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 2>bad fats, minimizing your intake of fatty meat process meat,

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 2>increasing your intake of amega three fats from oily fish,

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 2>perhaps utilizing a product like a plant steril milk or

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 2>even a plant sterol supplement that you can get in

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 2>in health food stores and in pharmacies, which is a

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:07.599
<v Speaker 2>plant sterol in a capsule form. You may successfully be

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 2>able to reduce your own cholesterol by as much as

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:12.480
<v Speaker 2>ten to twenty percent, which is what the data shows,

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 2>and for you, that may be enough to keep that

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 2>LDL level under control. And then following on from that,

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 2>if you do start to see cholesterol levels increasing, you

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 2>would get a calcium score done and a referral for

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 2>that to see if there is any damage happening to

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 2>the arteries. And on top of that, you would discuss

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 2>with your GP where the medication was necessary. Now, if

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 2>there's a positive family history, for example, it may be

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 2>pertinent prudent to use a satin drug. If a cholesterol

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:42.919
<v Speaker 2>is significantly raised around the sevens to eight, even with

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 2>no calcification, it may be deemed prudent to try statin medication.

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 2>So these are all the things to consider now. In

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 2>my clinical experience, it's rare that you can get someone

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 2>who's got a cholesterol of seven or eight down to

0:05:56.560 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 2>a normal level. Usually that's familiar hypercholesterol that's going to

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 2>require often medication. It may be deemed you don't need

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 2>it if there's no positive family risk, but that's certainly

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 2>a discussion for a doctoral cardiologist. For me, in my

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 2>clinical experience, if cholesterol is six or lower, that is

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 2>when diet can help to get it into normal range.

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:22.160
<v Speaker 2>And all for the perimenopausal women whose LDLs are creeping up,

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 2>it is possible to reduce them. But what I would

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:27.039
<v Speaker 2>want to be clear about is if your cholesterol is

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 2>significantly higher, diet alone is unlikely to bring a cholesterol

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:34.600
<v Speaker 2>seven or eight down. It's more likely your livers churning

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:37.599
<v Speaker 2>out cholesterol genetically, and that's when you need to talk

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 2>to the medical doctor to see what is the best

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 2>management strategy. I think sometimes we're led to believe lean

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:46.840
<v Speaker 2>that we have full control over all these variables and

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 2>eating a healthy diet will bring cholesterol, and I want

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 2>to be very clear on the podcast that is not

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 2>the case. Diet can get one or two points out,

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 2>it can't get three or.

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Four or five.

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 2>It just doesn't work like that. So I think being

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 2>aware of that in general, also, particularly for our listeners,

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:05.159
<v Speaker 2>acting early and grabbing it when it's creeping up is

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 2>the best thing to do. Yeah.

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, And it's really important that you know people particular

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>our listeners don't feel any shame for having high cholesterol

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>levels either, because, as you said, sometimes it is it

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>is very genetic, you know, li linked and even if

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you have the best art in the world, you exercise

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>like crazy, you eat so well, you can still have

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>really high cholesterol. So just having high cholesterol in itself

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>also isn't inherently a risk. But this is absolutely a

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>discussion for your doctor because there are other tests that

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>they can do, and I've certainly had many clients who

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>have had genetically high cholesterol. My husband does as well.

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>You know that their mums and dads have both had

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>high cholesterol. It runs through the family, you know, And

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>it's actually about looking at your risk factors. So David

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>does have that genetic high cholesterol as well. No matter

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>how well he eats, he's very fit, he's got a

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 1>dietisin wife. His cholesterol has always been high. No matter

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>what we've done. You know, We've tried adding in a

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>ton of fiber, We've tried adding in a bit of

0:07:57.640 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>klucan from the oats, We've tried all the different strategies

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and nothing really works, and it does continue to trend

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 1>up over time. So the genetic risk is a huge thing.

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>But when I said to him, to go back to

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>your doctor and ask for the risk profile. So there's

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a couple of different tests that your doctor can run

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that essentially looks at despite you having high cholesterol, it

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>looks at your overall risk of having what they call

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>like an adverse you know, cardiac situation, basically a heart attack.

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>And he did all of those tests and it basically

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 1>came back that he had a less than one percent

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>chance of you know, having something really bad happen from

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 1>like a cardiac perspective. So the doctor was like, look,

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>you're doing all the right things, keep going with them,

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>but we will at some point need to look at

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 1>getting you onto a stat and to start reducing your

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:43.680
<v Speaker 1>overall cholesterol. So I just think that that is really

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 1>really important to keep in mind. And if you are

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 1>someone that has done all the right things from a

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 1>diet and a lifestyle and an exercise perspective, yet it

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 1>hasn't really made a difference to your cholesterol, it is

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>certainly a good time to go and have a chat

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to either your standard doctor or a cardiologist and actually

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:01.839
<v Speaker 1>come up with a really great game plan. And if

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that includes medication, then there's absolutely no shame in that.

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>It's like any other type of medical disease as well,

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>that some things are best managed with medication, but also

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>diet and lifestyle can play, you know, a role alongside

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 1>that as well. So I do think it's worth knowing

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>that there are different tests that assess your risk based

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>on different types of cholesterol markers, your age, your waste measurement,

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 1>all these sorts of things as well. So if you

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>haven't had that discussion with your doctor, it's probably a

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>good time to go and get your risk assessed because

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:33.839
<v Speaker 1>it might, you know, just give you a bit of

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 1>clarity and acceptance around potentially your high cholesterol level despite

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>doing all the right things.

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:41.559
<v Speaker 2>And I think when it comes to food solutions, particularly

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 2>if you've just got a slight elevation so you're sitting

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 2>just in the fives or those sixes, I absolutely think

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 2>it is worth trialing a plant sterol. A plant sterol

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:54.319
<v Speaker 2>is added to different foods, including some of the milk cereals,

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 2>and consuming that every day has been clinically shown to

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 2>help redges cholesterol by I think it's ten percent. But

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 2>you've got to have the two to three grams of

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 2>plant sterols daily. It's not enough just to do it occasionally. Now.

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't like the margarines. I don't think it's a

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 2>positive health message adding in process that to get plant sterols.

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 2>I think there are better options. And there are two

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 2>milks I utilize frequently with clients. There is the Dairy

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Farmer's Heart Active milk, which is found in audi and

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 2>both supermarkets, and then there's the Long Life Australia's own

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 2>version which has also got the plant sterrels added and

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 2>there's also a wheat Bix. So I think if you're

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 2>a cereal eater and have milk regularly in coffees or

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:36.679
<v Speaker 2>smoothies or a cereal each day, or add a cholesterol

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:40.079
<v Speaker 2>owned wheatbis to your smoothie with some cholesterol lowering milk,

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 2>that can be a very effective option. And if you

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 2>don't consume those products, the next best is the plant

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 2>sterol supplement that you can get. Black Mores have one

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 2>which is called I've got it in front of me

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 2>because I do tend to have a bit of high

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Cholesterolia Cholesterol Health is the Blackmore supplement that you must

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:58.239
<v Speaker 2>take it regularly. It's not enough to do it sporadically.

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 2>So I think that is certainly worth a try for

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 2>the individuals who find it is creeping out because it

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:06.319
<v Speaker 2>is clinically proven to reduce cholesterol. Buy as much as

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 2>ten percent. Yeah.

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, And I'll just make one final point on the

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 1>margarine because it makes me laugh that mum my dad

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:15.319
<v Speaker 1>has like slightly high cholesterol and mom buys him the margarine.

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 1>What is it logical or floor or proactive one of them?

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>But he takes like just the tiniest little scrap on

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the tip of his knife and puts it on, you know,

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>with his vegimin. I've said to him, Dad, it's not

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>going to do a thing unless you use the proper amount.

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:28.679
<v Speaker 1>And I said to him, don't buy it, get him

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:30.839
<v Speaker 1>something else because he's not using it, so he's not

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>going to get the clinical dose. So it's something like

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a massive heat tablespoon of that every single day, which

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>is not something as dieticians we want you to actively

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>add into your diet, like more margarine. It's not a

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>great thing. So if you are someone who does use

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:46.559
<v Speaker 1>that type of margarine at home, you're effectively just wasting

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>your money because it's not cheap like it's goes to

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>ten dollars or something at tub, isn't it. And unless

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>you are using the clinical dose, which I believe is

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a good tablespoon or so a day, you're actually not

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>going to get any benefits at all. You have to

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>use enough of the clinical dose, is what we always

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:03.599
<v Speaker 1>say is dietitians when you're looking at different types of supplements,

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:05.959
<v Speaker 1>if it doesn't have the effective clinical dose in there,

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 1>you're basically just wasting your money if you're not taking enough.

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>So sometimes like Susie said, I recommend for my clients

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to have a range of the products, so they might

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:15.840
<v Speaker 1>have the week bigs one day, the hearts might milk

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>another day. And then there's also a great fiber blend

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:20.560
<v Speaker 1>on the market that has the cholesterol lowering stuff in

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>it as well. So there's a range of different products,

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>but you do need to ensure that you are having

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>them regularly, or as Susie said, there is a supplement

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>version of it as well if that is your preference

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:33.319
<v Speaker 1>or you find that easier to take. But consistency, like creatine,

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 1>it has to be daily or you're not going to

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:38.439
<v Speaker 1>get the full benefits from these cholesterol lowering options.

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 2>True, true, true, true, All right, Leanne, there was a

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 2>scandal online recently and we had a few questions from

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:49.560
<v Speaker 2>some of our clients when they had heard that protein powder,

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 2>which we make under our design by Dietitians brand, had

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 2>been compared to skim milk powder, suggesting that it was

0:12:57.120 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 2>much more cost effective to swap out protein powdery your

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 2>diet for skim milk powder, and straight away our tails

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:07.680
<v Speaker 2>started wagging because we instantly said, it's not the same thing.

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 2>So we thought it's actually a topic that we haven't

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 2>covered before on the Nutrition Couch, and I think that

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 2>a lot of our listeners are interested because if you

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 2>aren't familiar and have not used protein powder before, it

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 2>can be a little bit confronting. So by way of background,

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 2>I in my past life was a sports dietian and

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 2>as a sports ditician, we would routinely use good quality protein.

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 2>And when we talk about good quality protein, we're often

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 2>referring to what Leanne and I use in our design

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 2>by dietitians range, which is way protein isolate. And the

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 2>reason that I always used it is that basically you

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 2>can get twenty to thirty grams of the highest purest

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:47.559
<v Speaker 2>form of protein in a very small amount of food

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 2>because when you're working with athletes, they don't necessarily have

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 2>time or capacity to sit down to bucket and buckets

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 2>of steak and chicken breast, particularly through the day. So

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 2>that is what it is. Protein powder is nothing to

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 2>be scared of. It is a pure form of concentrated

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 2>form of protein in a very small amount of food.

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 2>But leand it is not the same as skim milk powder,

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 2>is it? Tell us why? Yeah?

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 1>So we saw some comments online saying that skim milk

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:15.319
<v Speaker 1>powder is the same nutritionally as protein powder. And now

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>all these comments saying, oh my gosh, this is amazing,

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>what a great hauck. You know, I spend so much

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>money on protein powder wise is so expensive, and so

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>we think we just want to be very clear that

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 1>skim milk powder can be a great option. Is it

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>budget friendly? Absolutely? Are you going to get a small

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>boost of protein from mixing in a bit of skim

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>milk powder into your smoothie or something, Probably, But will

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 1>you get the same amount of protein, same amount of calorie,

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 1>same amount of carbohydrate from a good quality WPI. Absolutely not.

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>And we need to be very very clear that they

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>are fundamentally different things from a nutrition perspective because way

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>protein isolate or what we call WPI as disese, that

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>is a very concentrated form and as such, the carbohydrate,

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the sugar and the lactose content is sign magnificantly lower

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>in a WPI than in a skim milk powder, and

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the protein is significantly higher. So a serve of skim

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>milk powder and it is a budget from the option.

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, you can get a kill all of it

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>for around I think eleven bucks or something at the shops, right,

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>So a serve of that, which they're saying is forty

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>grams on the packet is about one hundred calories, about

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>just shy of nine grams of protein, so eight point

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>seven grams of protein with thirteen and a half grams

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>of carb and thirteen and a half grams of sure.

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 1>So the sugars are naturally occurring. There's only one ingredient

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>in skim milk powder, and that is skim milk, and

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>so the sugars are naturally recurring. We're not concerned about that.

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>But it does have overall thirteen grams of carbohydrate in there,

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and when you compare that to a good quality WPI,

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>so I'm going to use our digestive pre and probodic

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>protein from designed by dieticians. The serving size on the

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>pack we say is thirty grams, and in that it's

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>one hundred calories, so similar amount of calories, but twenty

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>four grams of protein compared to the skim milk powder,

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>which has just shy of nine grams of protein. So

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 1>you simply cannot say subbing skim milk powder for a

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>good quality WPI is the same amount of protein, because

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 1>nine grams is not twenty four grams of protein. Does

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>skim milk powder have protein in there, Yes, but it

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have obviously the same amount that a good quality

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>WPI does have. Now, carbohydrate wise, is skim milk had

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>thirteen point three grams of serve, whereas a good quality

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>WPI has less than one gram of carbohydrate and less

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>than one gram of sugar. And the other thing to

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>really be aware of as well, is because WPI is

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>very concentrated and a lot of that lactose is sort

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of strained off the case is taken off. It is

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>very very low in lactose. I've had so many clients

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>have said, you know, I can't tolerate dairy based protein.

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Yet they've tried out pre in probotic blend, which we've

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, especially formulated for digestive concerns with the added

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>pre and proboiotics in it. It is also certified gluten free.

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>We have external testing, so it's safe the celiacs. And

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>of course it's very very low in lactose, not technically

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:06.879
<v Speaker 1>lactose free, but sitting just above that threshold of what

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 1>is considered lactose free, so zero point three grams of

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:12.920
<v Speaker 1>lactose in there. So the majority of people who do

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 1>struggle with theiry I am going to assume, would be

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>absolutely fine with a good quality WPI. So that's the

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>main difference is where it's significantly lower in lactose, significantly

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>higher in protein, and also I would say significantly higher

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 1>thirteen and a half grams of card versus one gram

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 1>of carb. So if you're looking for something to really

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>boost the protein up in your diet, but keep the

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>carbs and the sugars a lot lower. Which lets be honest,

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>most women in perry or trying to lose weight are

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 1>or in menopause. They are looking for these things on

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:45.400
<v Speaker 1>an nuitution panel. This is the difference between a WPI

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and a skim milk powder. And do you pay more

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:51.439
<v Speaker 1>for it? Of course you do, because it's about what

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:53.440
<v Speaker 1>is it three or fours to one? Do you know

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 1>what I mean? Like you're getting you would have to

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 1>use about four times that skim milk powder to get

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:01.120
<v Speaker 1>close to the amount of protein that you get from

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a good quality WPI. And having said that, you would

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>also get four times the carbohydrate. So Susie mass isn't

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>my strong point, but four times thirteen is you know

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:11.479
<v Speaker 1>what I mean? You're getting upwards of forty to fifty

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>gram of carb in that skim milk powder, and then

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 1>you're having about four servings of it to get to

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that twenty plus grams of protein. So we're not banging

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:21.919
<v Speaker 1>on skim milk powder. It's a great product, it is

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>very budget friendly, but it is fundamentally a very different

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>thing to WPI, so you cannot use it in the

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 1>same realm of comparison. It's sort of like saying, you know,

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 1>this is an orange and this is apple juice, Like

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>they're different products, but they're also they have very different applications.

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I would say, as well.

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 2>It will it be like orange juice compared to beetroot juice,

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 2>Like they're kind of similar, but they're not, you know,

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 2>they wears orange and apple juices quite do what you please,

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 2>do what you please with it. But we just wanted

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:52.919
<v Speaker 2>to really be aware that this is the reason that

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:55.919
<v Speaker 2>a good quality WPI obviously costs a lot more. And

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 2>if your goals are.

0:18:57.040 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>To really get in a good hit of protein into

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:02.440
<v Speaker 1>your breakfast routine or you know, have that good twenty

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:05.199
<v Speaker 1>thirty grams that we normally talk about through the afternoons,

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 1>you really help control blood sugars and hormones and cravings.

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 1>This can be a really really smart option, but there

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:14.880
<v Speaker 1>are certainly other options available as well. You know, three eggs,

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 1>some chicken breads, a tin of tuna, some cottage cheese

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 1>on crackers, there are many other ways that you can

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 1>get protein powder in as well. But I personally find

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and you do as well as Susie, that as practicing dieticians,

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 1>women are busy, so this is a very convenient option.

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 1>A WPI is a convenient option to get a high

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>quality protein amount for very low calories and very low

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 1>carbohydrate and very low lactose as well. So if you

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 1>struggle with yogurts and cottage cheese, perhaps this is a

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:43.120
<v Speaker 1>better option for you because it's just better tolerated from

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 1>a digestive health perspective. So do what you want with that.

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>But we just wanted to cover it on a segment

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 1>because we haven't talked about it before, and I think

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:53.159
<v Speaker 1>it is really good to sort of dispel some of

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>these miss circulating online. So I think it's a great option.

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 1>It's a booster for proteinskim milk if you will, you

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 1>know it can boost you diet, but you know eight

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 1>nine grams of protein. But we do know that the

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>research is really supporting that women from a weight loss

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:10.640
<v Speaker 1>perspective or a hormonal perspective going through perimenopause really need

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>upwards of thirty grams of protein per meal. So if

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you have other types of protein that meal and you

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>want to add an extra nine or ten grams or

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the skim milk powder, that's a great option. But if

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>you didn't have much protein in your meal to start with,

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:26.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, nine grams isn't going to get you up

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 1>over that kind of thirty grams that ideally we look

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 1>for for a lot of women when it comes to

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 1>a breakfast, lunch, or a dinner meal. So do you

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>want anything to say to round out that segment, SEUs.

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 2>Or I just think it's a functional ingredient, Like I think,

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 2>we want to be clear that whilst we do make

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 2>protein powder, we're not making everyone use it. It's an

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 2>ingredient that complements the diet. It's not a necessity. But

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:51.399
<v Speaker 2>what I find with busy women is that it just

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 2>means that when they're making a smoothie, they've got a base.

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:56.400
<v Speaker 2>If I've got vegetarians, it might be that they can

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 2>have a protein coffee in the afternoon. So it's just

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 2>an alternity to eggs to meet all the time to

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:04.879
<v Speaker 2>get the highest quality protein. Now, of course there are

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 2>plant based options available. Eventually we will make a plant

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 2>based protein, but the reason that at the moment we

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 2>have the WPI is it's the gold standard. It's the

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:16.199
<v Speaker 2>best quality, which is what it's expensive. So yeah, I

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:18.400
<v Speaker 2>don't think it's an all or nothing. You don't have

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:21.400
<v Speaker 2>to use it do. I use it probably twice a week.

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't use it all time, But it's just an

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:26.119
<v Speaker 2>ingredient that you can add to bump it off and

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 2>in the case of our protein, tastes really good. So yeah,

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:31.400
<v Speaker 2>I think it's just getting some context around it, because

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:33.159
<v Speaker 2>if you haven't used protein before, it can be a

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 2>bit confronting, but there's nothing to be scared about it.

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 2>It's just basically concentrated milk protein and it is an

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 2>option for people to bump up the protein content in

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 2>their diet. So and I'll also just say quickly that

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 2>we do have two blends available at design by dieticians

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 2>as well. We have our Digestive Protein blend, which is

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 2>safe for healthy, pregnant and breastfeeding women as well, so

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:54.640
<v Speaker 2>it's our sort of our family friendly blend word Hubby

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 2>wants to take it like my husband takes it, David

0:21:56.880 --> 0:21:59.479
<v Speaker 2>takes it, Chris uses it. It's a great all rounder

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 2>from it protein perspective, it's got added pre and probotics

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 2>for digestive help as well, and then we have our women,

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:09.120
<v Speaker 2>which is our protein for hormone support, so in that

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 2>is obviously a high quality WPR, we actually also add

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 2>methylated follow to help support thyroid health and function. We

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 2>also add a serve of enoceotol and chromium which helps

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 2>to support blood sugar regulation, and there is a three

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:24.880
<v Speaker 2>hundred milligram serving of calcium in there as well, which

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 2>we know busy women often struggle to get in their

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 2>diet through whole foods as well, So that is also

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 2>why we do add some expension functional ingredients to our

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:37.199
<v Speaker 2>protein blends as well, so they are more expensive than

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 2>what you would call a commercially available or a supermarket

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 2>option of protein powder as well, and a lot of

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 2>the supermarket blends will blend WPR with milk powder and WPC,

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:50.400
<v Speaker 2>so they're creating a blend whereas ours is all WPI.

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 2>So it is the highest quality protein, which does mean

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 2>that it is lower in lactose and a lot lower

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 2>in carbohydrate in sugar as well then a lot of

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 2>what the supermarket blends turn out. It's true. All right,

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:04.439
<v Speaker 2>onto other things in and it's time to talk dips.

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Because we are cheeky dip lovers, chiky cheese platter lovers,

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 2>don't we.

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>We love a good platter.

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god. And I can sit down with a

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 2>girlfriend and have a champagne and a platter. Oh that

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 2>is just what I'm happiest, isn't that. Oh? Anyway, we

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 2>found a new dip. This is actually a listener request

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:22.239
<v Speaker 2>and I haven't actually seen it in audi, but I

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 2>think similar to a number of dips, they're also the

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 2>same as sink holes colds.

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so it's the goals.

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:32.199
<v Speaker 2>It's the Black Swan seasonal addition, Green Goddess dip, and

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Green Goddess got a lot of attention several years ago

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 2>with a beautiful salad and you can still get that

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 2>salad mix thing. It's got cranberries and some flaked almonds

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 2>and things in it. And this is a dip that's

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 2>been based on that. And like all things nutritional, if

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 2>it looks green, it's surely.

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 1>It's healthy for us.

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Lead So it's like a closer look at retails for

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 2>four dollors fifty probably cheap Renaldi and the ingredient it's

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 2>the first ingredient, yoget sixty five percent with milk, milk solids,

0:23:57.240 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 2>multiplier culture, nine percent, avocado, pure water, vegetable oil, feta, mayonnaise,

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:08.120
<v Speaker 2>spring onion, lemon, juice, garlic, puree, salt, herbs, thickness, sugar, spice, preservatives,

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 2>but in very small amounts, which is a very nice

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 2>nutritional profile for a dip. I have to say. It

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 2>comes in pretty low coal and a ten gram serve,

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 2>which is very small to tea spoons. It's under one

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 2>hundred kilogeels, which is just thirty calories. It is not

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:26.120
<v Speaker 2>low in fat overall, but pretty low for a dip.

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 2>So it's fourteen percent fat, and that's compared to say

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:31.919
<v Speaker 2>thirty forty percent for cream cheese type dips. And the

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:34.680
<v Speaker 2>saturated fat again not low but pretty good for a dip,

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 2>so four percent per serve. Very low in carbohydrate and sugars,

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 2>coming in eight percent carbohydrate overall and pretty low in

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:45.880
<v Speaker 2>sodium two at four ninety five milligrams per hundred, which

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 2>comes in at less than one hundred milligrams per serve.

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 2>So I would give this dip a ten out of ten.

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 2>It's one of the healthiest sticks out there, with the

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:56.920
<v Speaker 2>exception of something that's you know, really high percentage avocado.

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 2>It's actually pretty low calorie. I haven't tried it, but

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 2>I look at it and think it probably tastes pretty

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:05.639
<v Speaker 2>good and it would be up there with my top

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 2>dips if you can find it and enjoy it. So

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 2>whilst you can look at the ingredient list and see

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 2>a few additives, overall, give it a sixty five percent

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:17.400
<v Speaker 2>yoga at nine percent avocado, so over seventy percent sort

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 2>of whole food ingredient. It's one of the best dips

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 2>you can find, so big fan of it. I like

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:24.239
<v Speaker 2>it a lot land if you tried it.

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:25.879
<v Speaker 1>No, I haven't tried it, but I like it a

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:28.239
<v Speaker 1>lot too. I'd give it nine out of ten, which is,

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:30.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, very strong still just because you know, there

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 1>are a couple of emulsifiers and you know, thicknose colors

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:35.920
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing added. But overall, like you said,

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the ingredient Liss is very very strong. I do love

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that it's dray made. I also do love that it's

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 1>gluten free, so for our CILIAC listeners, that's a massive positive.

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:47.199
<v Speaker 1>The allergens in the dip of milk and egg, so

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:49.879
<v Speaker 1>just be worried of that if you have different types

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:52.879
<v Speaker 1>of aligen needs. But otherwise I would think it tastes

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>really good, Like on a base of sixty five percent yogat,

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be creamy, right. But my only hesitation

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:00.200
<v Speaker 1>would be the serving size of ten grand. It's like,

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 1>who's eating two teaspoons of dip? Like we're eating a

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 1>few tablespoons? Come on like, particularly if it tastes good, right,

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:09.680
<v Speaker 1>So don't be fooled by the nutritional information panel like

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 1>the preserving Let's be honest, isn't that accurate In a

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>real world situation, I would happily eat probably at least

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>a third of that container. But I think that as

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 1>far as dip goes, this is certainly one of the

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:21.639
<v Speaker 1>better options. And look, I hope it sticks around. We

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 1>see this all the time where really wonderful products come in,

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:26.680
<v Speaker 1>nobody buys them, and they're gone off the shelf two

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>three months later. So Nutrition Couch community get behind it.

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the good ones. I think Blackswan have

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>done a bit of an update in terms of their

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 1>dip range because I'm just looking at coals and there's

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:38.359
<v Speaker 1>a buffalo ranch, which I'm going to assume is probably

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:40.919
<v Speaker 1>not the healthiest one, same with the creamy ranch. But

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 1>there's also a beech root, a bubbaga, nush, a hummus,

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 1>a ziki, a roasted garlic, a spring onion, and a

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:50.640
<v Speaker 1>spicy capsicum and a lower fat spicy capsicum. So they've

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>done a bit of a dip refresh I think lately,

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and they've got some good options in there. But I

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:57.640
<v Speaker 1>certainly will be buying this to try. It does look

0:26:57.720 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>very tasty, and I do like that it has a

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:01.760
<v Speaker 1>basive yoga to add that cream inniscin, because a lot

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:04.679
<v Speaker 1>of dips out there do have a base of basically

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:07.119
<v Speaker 1>like cream or it's spoiled, don't they. That's sort of

0:27:07.119 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the top ingredient and a lot of dips out there,

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 1>So the fact that it's a whole food ingredient as

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the first ingredient is something that we'd love to see

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:14.119
<v Speaker 1>as dieticians.

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 2>All Right, Anne, to finish us off today, we have

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 2>a listener question which is all about am I being

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:22.399
<v Speaker 2>too strict with my kid's food? So our listener is

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:24.120
<v Speaker 2>written in to say that she was at a party

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:28.159
<v Speaker 2>and she was actively limiting the number of lollies that

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 2>her kids were eating, and her in laws had a

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:32.400
<v Speaker 2>goal at her that she was being way too strict

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 2>and going to give her children an eating disorder. Are

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 2>we fairly strict with our children the ann or on

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:40.160
<v Speaker 2>the laissez fair side of parenting?

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>You do tell? I think we're sort of somewhere in

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the middle. We're in the nice middle. I like to think, well,

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a hard one, right, because I mean,

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:52.400
<v Speaker 1>children are going to develop eating disorders. It's everywhere. It's online,

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 1>it's on social media. They're learning about dieting from their peers.

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe that limiting lollies at a party is

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 1>going to actively give you your child in eating disorder.

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:03.639
<v Speaker 1>I also don't think a lot of the grandparents they

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:06.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of forget, you know, they're not there doing the

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>witching hour at nighttime. They're not there when you're trying

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>to get a screaming toddler into bed, you know, for

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the next two hours. Because they're high on sugar after

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a party. So I personally do I don't limit my kids,

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:19.160
<v Speaker 1>but I say to my kids say, Okay, that's probably enough. Guys,

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 1>why don't you go choose a sandwich or a piece

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of fruit or something. I'll say, there's some beautiful grapes

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 1>over there, why don't we go try that. I think

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that it's fine. I think I would have more of

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a problem if they were saying they can't have any

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>like it's off limits. And I'll give you a little

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:35.159
<v Speaker 1>not a case study, but a little example where a

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:36.919
<v Speaker 1>friend of a friend of mine came to me for

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 1>some advice because she said, my friend, who's a mum,

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 1>is too strict. What can I say to her? And

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 1>she was saying at the party, you know, she doesn't

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 1>ever allow the kids to have cakes. She brings her

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 1>own homemade like low sugar gummies. And when the cake

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>gets cut up and served, she says to the kids

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and not allowed to have any cake. These are your gummies.

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>She doesn't let them touch anything. Then I'll add the

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 1>fairy bread. They can't have the tiny dirties, the cookies,

0:28:57.160 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'll add anything. So she brings them a box

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:02.959
<v Speaker 1>of veggies, sticks, some berries, and basically some homemade gummies.

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 1>So I would think, in my personal opinion that that

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 1>probably is a little bit too strict, because then she

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 1>went on to say, and then she saw that little

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 1>boy hiding under the table, scoffing. Dorito's trying to hide

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>from his mum. So I think that those kind of

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:18.560
<v Speaker 1>when it is a bit too strict, it can backfire.

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think that there's any problem personally. It's

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 1>putting boundaries on your kids, and it's not sort of

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>saying that you're ripping it out of their hands, but

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of redirecting them in the moment because kids

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 1>don't do well with too much sugar. It's not good

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 1>for their teeth, it's not good you know, it's not

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:34.719
<v Speaker 1>good for the hyperactivity you're going to get at bedtime

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a few hours later. Like I certainly will encourage my

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 1>children to go more for the whole food options. But

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 1>when the cake gets cut, of course I'll let them

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 1>have some of the cake. But if they're going to

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>churn through packets of tiny teddies and lollies and biscuits,

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and then you know, I know that they want the

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:51.600
<v Speaker 1>cake later, I'll just remind them, hey, guys, don't forget

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 1>we've got the cake coming. Do we want to have

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 1>a bit of frusis there and something to fill our

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>tummy up a little bit more. So we have a

0:29:57.040 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of discussions in our household around my kids are

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 1>still a little right two, and they'refore around what foods

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>fill us up more and what foods are more of

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 1>our treat kind of foods. And they have that understanding

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that they know that if they have a packet of

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 1>crackers or tiny teddies doesn't fill.

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Them up very much.

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 1>But if they have a sandwich, a meatball, you know,

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 1>a bit of chicken or something with some spinach, that

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 1>fills them up a lot more and gives them that

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 1>longer lasting energy. So I think we can do it

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:22.959
<v Speaker 1>in the right way, but I don't personally believe. I mean,

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>we don't have a whole lot of context of this

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 1>that the listener was being too strict, And I think

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>it is difficult sometimes with you know, grandparents' family friends.

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, they're not there. They don't

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 1>know how your kids respond to sugar. They don't know

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>what the bedtime routines like, they don't know how much

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 1>other sugar the kids had in the day. They could

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 1>have started off the day with the stewberry milkshake and

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 1>already got a ton of sugar in, so they don't

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 1>know the context of the whole situation. So I think

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 1>it is important to hold your boundary and be firm

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 1>with that if you know that that is something that

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 1>your children and your family will do better with longer terms.

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 1>So if you ask me black or White, were they

0:30:57.400 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 1>being too strict? My answer would be no. I kind

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of feel that to me, that sounds like good, you know,

0:31:02.320 --> 0:31:05.480
<v Speaker 1>gentle parenting. They haven't restricted completely, but they've also put

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:07.239
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a boundary or a limit on

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 1>their children, and I personally do the same as well.

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:10.240
<v Speaker 1>What do you think.

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 2>I think ultimately how you run your family is completely

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 2>up to you. You know, there'll be some people who

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 2>have treats regularly, there'll be some who limit it. That

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:20.959
<v Speaker 2>comes back to our early programming. So the first thing

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 2>I'd say is that it's completely up to you. I

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 2>think if I was judging it on it and eating

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:29.120
<v Speaker 2>disorder spectrum, first of all, we want to be clear,

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 2>you can't give your kids an eating disorder. It doesn't

0:31:31.360 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 2>quite work like that as a complicated mix of biology, genetics, environment.

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 2>It's not as simple as that. But what I would

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 2>say is that generally speaking, when we're talking about disordered eating,

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 2>if you can't fit into activities of daily living, that's

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 2>when it's an issue. So in this context, I would say,

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 2>you basically want your kids to be to go to

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:54.720
<v Speaker 2>a party and be normal kids. Now you may have

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 2>a child who needs more monitoring. So I've got one

0:31:57.120 --> 0:32:00.080
<v Speaker 2>child who could give or take the sweet style, and

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 2>I've got one who will sit and guzzle if I

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 2>let them. So if I'm just mindful at that event,

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 2>that I might say to my child who's more likely

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 2>to indulge enough, you've had enough. I don't say you

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 2>can't have it, but I say you've had enough. I

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 2>personally have quite strict girls on soft drink, and I

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 2>will actively say no soft drink, and I'll say that

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 2>to a pot a party, but in general other then

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:23.440
<v Speaker 2>let them have lollies or cake or whatever. So I

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 2>think that you want your kids to be able to

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 2>be normal children. What is normal. Normal is going to

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 2>a party, Normal is having you know, a cake on

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 2>your birthday. But then when it gets down to the

0:32:34.480 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 2>more nitty gritty of more regular treats. Yeah, I think

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 2>it's okay if that assuits you to be stricter for

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 2>a range of reasons. So I would be thinking, what

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 2>do normal children do. Normal children do go to a

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 2>party and indulge a bit, But because as you've described,

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 2>you don't want to have the kid who's stuffing their

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:52.800
<v Speaker 2>face full of lollies and sweets and hoarding. And I

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 2>see all the time here at a birthday party recently,

0:32:56.080 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 2>my boys turned ten and I went to Costco and

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 2>I got like a big box of those sort of

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 2>multi pit chocolates because it was a lot more cost effective,

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 2>and I just put them around the house. And there

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 2>were a couple of kids who shoved chocolates in the

0:33:09.320 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 2>whole night, whereas the bulk of them had a few

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 2>and then got sick of it. And some didn't have

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 2>money at all. And that's the normal bell cot of

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 2>eating behavior. That's what I would expect, but I would

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 2>be putting money on it. The kids who are stuffing

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 2>their face the whole time probably didn't have a lot

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:25.960
<v Speaker 2>of access to chocolates, whereas I actually have chocolates around

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 2>my house all time because I grew up at a house

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 2>we didn't, and I think it does make you more

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 2>obsessive with food. And I want it to be neutral

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 2>that my kids are not just eating it because it's there.

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 2>They're eating it at a time and they actually want it,

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 2>and they're just as likely to grab a carrot. So

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:41.720
<v Speaker 2>I think that works for me and each to their own.

0:33:41.760 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 2>Some people might find you don't want to have it

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 2>and you bring it in once a week. It's your

0:33:45.080 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 2>personal rules. But I think that is sort of a

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 2>reference point. What do normal children do and how can

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 2>we emulate that to not create the heightened obsession with

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 2>food that fuels when people feel overly restricted.

0:33:57.480 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, absolutely, some great points. So hopefully that gives

0:33:59.840 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 1>that listener a few things to think about. But as

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 1>you said, it is very individualized. It is you are

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the parent. You get to decide what your children and

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 1>what the family does, and what the rules are and

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the boundaries are. But don't feel guilty for setting you know,

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:14.840
<v Speaker 1>boundaries or family rules that are going to work for

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:17.279
<v Speaker 1>your family. That's probably the bottom message, where only you

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 1>know the correct thing in terms of your children and

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 1>what they need in the time. All right, So that

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>brings us to the end of the nutrition catch for

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:27.239
<v Speaker 1>another week. Thank you for listening, and if you are

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:30.839
<v Speaker 1>interested in some of our scientifically formulated supplement options, we've

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 1>got a range of creating collagen magnesium with what, our

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 1>brand new hydrate range, and of course our digestive and

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 1>women's hormone protein blend. Find the map designed by dietitians

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:42.759
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Thank you for listening and we'll catch you

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:43.200
<v Speaker 1>next week.

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Have a great week.