WEBVTT - The Fall Out From Megxit, Steph Claire Smith Targeted Again & The Most Cringeworthy Insta Fail

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Hi, and welcome to Outspoken. You're joined by journalists Sophie

0:00:06.640 --> 0:00:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Kate and Amy Torber. Coming up on the episode, we

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>dissect mexit and the backlash that's followed. Steph clare Smith

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>targeted again by thieves. Is social media to blame and

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the biggest Instagram fail of the week. But first, K,

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>you had a pretty funny incident happened at work this week? Yeah,

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:26.079
<v Speaker 1>I did. It was quite embarrassing. I'm a bit of

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>a shitsterir at work and I look after the influencers.

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:32.559
<v Speaker 1>So there's one influencer a sports style that I've been

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>wanting to come along to the thirty sixers game for

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 1>probably like three seasons. Now, let's just name him because

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I feel like people want to know it's Travis Boke.

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:43.199
<v Speaker 1>So go everyone, go Instagram Travis Bok. That doesn't leave him.

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:45.559
<v Speaker 1>Feel like everyone from Adelaide will know Travis Boke. He

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>has the most, he shares the most epic insta stories.

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>He's got this absolute palace of a house where he's

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>got about i'd say three different fireplaces and just his

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>epic pool. It's big, walking drobe cute dog. Anyway, Kay,

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 1>what happened with him? Disclosure. I hate Port Power, but

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I love Travis Boche anyway, So he said that finally

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:05.960
<v Speaker 1>he was coming along to a game, which I was

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 1>excited about, and so did you try and set this up? Kay?

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, yeah, well I have. I basically invited all

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 1>of the Crows and port players that have lots of followers. Anyway,

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 1>So my boyfriend also works at the thirty six's and

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I absolutely owned him when Ali Odigin from The Bachelor

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:26.199
<v Speaker 1>was coming along. This was why we weren't actually dating,

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>but he'd been going on in the office about how

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>he was excited and drooling over her Instagram photos. So

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:34.759
<v Speaker 1>when she was actually there at the game last year,

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>she came up to me and I was like, oh, Ali,

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:38.960
<v Speaker 1>you see that guy over there and pointed out Race.

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>He's so excited he hasn't stopped talking about the fact

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:43.960
<v Speaker 1>that you're coming to the game. So I was so wild.

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty embarrassing. Yeah, So I was so worried leading

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>into the game because my friend Kyle and Reese are

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>also going on that they were going to embarrass me.

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>So fortunately I didn't get embarrassed, but I did go

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>up and shake his hand and gave him his pass

0:01:57.560 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and then I just literally like chucked the other tickets

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>at the other people that I didn't give a shit

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>about that I was. I was sitting in the crowd

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>with my mum and we were just watching it all

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>unfold because Mom's like, oh, okay, it's got the tickets

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and it was like watching this sick game. And I

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>finally got glasses so I could actually watch. Thought I

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 1>knew you'd lose your bottle to say anything, but that

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>was the worst bit because Mum told me that she

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>would watch, and I was like, I don't want you

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>to watch, Like, stop making a big deal. It's not

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>a big deal. But anyway, it was quite funny. So

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>soph I know, at the basketball you love watching mister

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:27.639
<v Speaker 1>fruit Chuck and Murray, But what else have you been

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>doing this weekend? It's so random. If anyone follows Sophie

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>on Instagram and they'll see that every time she goes

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to the thirty sixers game, that's all she uploads. Yeah,

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm a bit fond of mister fruit Chuck. He's very cute.

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 1>But well, you see the person in there, but people don't.

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.639
<v Speaker 1>People might not know who were not in Adelaide, where

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 1>a fruit chock is what may they sell fruit chocks

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>in Adelaide? Well? Are you serious? Yeah? That's an absolute travesty. Sorry,

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>excuse our cat crying in the background, and he's been

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>introduced to going outside and now he won't stop. I

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>cannot believe they don't sell fruit chucks everywhere. You're serious?

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:02.239
<v Speaker 1>Oh god, this is going to be added to Sophie's

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>stupid comment. Oh send it to shit Adelaide again. Well,

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:07.080
<v Speaker 1>if anyone would like any fruit chocks, she should get

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>him bloody sent there. Incredible. Anyway, this week, Brandon and

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:12.239
<v Speaker 1>I have decided that we're going to go to Bali.

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 1>It's only like first week of the year and we

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:16.800
<v Speaker 1>already need a break from it, so we're gonna We

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:18.920
<v Speaker 1>noticed there were really really cheap flights. But now my

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>job has been trying to track down every YouTuber's barley

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>vlogs to work out where I want to stay. Is

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>it wrong that I trust them more than like the

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>places on Trip Adviser. It amazes me how many crap

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 1>vlogs you'll make brand and sit through. So I actually

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>feel kind of a bit sorry for him. What he's

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>going to have to look at now he likes the

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>travel ones. Yeah, he's secretly he wouldn't watch knowing Brandon,

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>he wouldn't stick through them if you didn't like them.

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>You put yourself out your comfort zone this week as well,

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>haven't you. Yeah. I actually I learned how to ride

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a motorbike on the weekend, to mom's absolute disgust. So

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>if anyone knows our mother, there's nothing more. I'm not

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>sure what she hates more tattoos or motorbikes and people

0:03:57.040 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>are not brushing their teeth. Yeah, it's a hard one.

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:03.839
<v Speaker 1>But so my boyfriend Dale, he's been riding motorbikes since

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>he was twelve, and he was that like a humble brag.

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>My boyfriend's been riding motorbikes since he was twelve. I

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Well anyway, I'm just giving the facts here.

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:16.280
<v Speaker 1>And he was really wanting to teach me how to ride.

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>And I didn't say anything to mom because I didn't

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:21.359
<v Speaker 1>want her to worry anyway. Wow, it's body complicated, but

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:24.039
<v Speaker 1>I managed to ride the motorbike by myself, and I

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>was so proud and can I just interrupted here in

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the car. Amy gave me this full run through of

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>how to ride the motorbike and I was actually like,

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to be rude, but I was kind

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:36.480
<v Speaker 1>of shocked at the level of detail. I don't want so.

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to explain how difficult it actually is,

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 1>how I had a new fun respect for people who

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>ride motorbikes, but it was it was funny. I told

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Dale to film me riding the motorbike to send it

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to you guys, because I thought you wouldn't believe me,

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>And then I watched it back. I couldn't believe how

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>small the motorbike looked, at how slow I was going,

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and how shit you looked. I feel like this whole

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 1>segment's been a big plug to follow our Instagram accounts

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>because me uploaded this. I had a bit of a chuckle.

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>You uploaded someone going really really fast. Yeah, well, I'll

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 1>put it on our Insta story. You guys can see

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>how stupid I looked ahead of every sort of neck brace,

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 1>arm pads, everything on. Just in case I felt, did

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you have a mouthguard? No, I did it, but yeah,

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I nearly shot myself when I got in the back

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>of Dale's motorbike. I don't think I've ever like it.

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Seems like he was writing like two hundred k's but

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>apparently it was quite slow and I just didn't shit yourself.

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>We can't put that mouthguard coming into context. When we

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 1>were growing up. Our mum's a dental therapist and she

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>made us wear mouthguards whilst playing netball, a non contact sport.

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Haven't lived that one down, WHI should probably move on

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>to the first topic. This week, Meghan Mikel and Prince

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Harry have rewritten the fairy tale turning their backs on

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the monarchy. Megs. It has dominated our feeds after Prince

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Harry and Meghan Markel announced on Instagram they'll be stepping

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 1>back from their jobs as senior royals and splitting their

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 1>time between the UK and North America. The news has

0:05:57.480 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 1>not only shocked the public, but the royal family will

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Peter to have been blindsided by the announcement, Amy, can

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>you tell us about how it to all unfolded? Well,

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the bit I love most I think about this story

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 1>is the fact that they made the announcement on Instagram,

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:12.719
<v Speaker 1>as you said, and I think it shows just exactly

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>what progressive royals are. They knew that that's where the

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>eyeballs were, and the Instagram post was also used to

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>promote their new Royal Sussex website and that's where they're

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:24.039
<v Speaker 1>going to be posting all their news. And they did

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:26.719
<v Speaker 1>have a pretty interesting media policy, which Kate knows a

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit more about. Are you able to fill us

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>in a bit more, Kate, Well, I suppose that's where

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the Instagram post has holds its most relevance because basically

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>a part of the Royal media policy is they have

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>to adhere to this Royal Rota which was established forty

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>years ago and basically there's seven chosen media publications that

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:49.480
<v Speaker 1>are allowed exclusive access to their engagements and special events.

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>So you'd be pretty shocked to find out that out

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>of these seven publications, the Sun and the Daily Mail

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>are included. Well, the Daily Mail is such a fine

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:01.719
<v Speaker 1>media outlet, is a lot of people will also know

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that the Royals are currently suing the Sun for and

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>when you say Royal, was Harry and Meghan suing the Sun,

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>which I suppose, it makes what they had to say

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>in their statement a bit more interesting in terms of

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>their new look at the media. So what are they

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>actually doing now? Well, so, as you said, Harry is

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>suing the Sun for phone hacking, His voicemails, and Meghan

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>is also suing the male for the publication of private

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>letters to her father. So basically, what I found interesting

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 1>about this media policy is instead of going through this

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Royal Rota, they are now opening it up to fresh new,

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>non established journalists that have you know, have a diverse speech.

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm just putting it out there now. If they'd like

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>to appear on Outspoken, well yeah, that we definitely take her.

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>So basically, anyway, what was interesting about this Royal Rota

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>is that the Royals actually can't upload anything to social

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>media normally. So I mean I always thought, oh, where's

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Kate Middleton's Instagram? Where's Williams? But it's not because they

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>don't want to have it. It's actually because in order

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>to upload any fresh photo of themselves it's never been

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>seen before, the royal family have to pass it through

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>this Royal Rota, who then have access to publish it

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>wherever they want. Well, we're living in a time when

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 1>obviously Meghan Markel as a thirty six year old and

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>eight well when she met Harry she was thirty six.

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 1>As a thirty six year old, she was coming into

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the royal family. Obviously with her acting background, but also

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>one point four million followers on Instagram, and even though

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 1>she deactivated that account, it gave media time to get

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 1>a hold of those pictures. So for Megan, it would

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>be very strange going into this world where suddenly you

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>can't even be sharing about your personal life. So taking

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>back that control must feel quite good for her. Well.

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's why it was so powerful that they

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:45.439
<v Speaker 1>made the announcement on Instagram, the place that they're actually

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>not allowed to post. Do you guys think that now

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 1>this is all happened, her Instagram might come back? Definitely

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>for sure. They actually have said that now, you know,

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>turning against the royal rota, that we are expected to

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>see a lot more photos about their lives and they're

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be sharing directly with us, which I think

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing, Like what a cool thing that now we

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.559
<v Speaker 1>can actually see firsthand from the royals rather than going

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 1>through the fucking sun to see a picture of Archie.

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's safe to say that Buckingham Palace, we're not

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>really aware that this Instagram post was going to go out,

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 1>or so they would lead us to believe. Can you

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>imagine the Queen's face seeing that? I mean one. I

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know if she actually has Instagram, so someone probably

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>had to tell her. But can you do you think

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 1>they have fake profiles? Well, Harry and Megan, not the Queen,

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>but like other royals, I was sure they'd be private,

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and they have like five follows. Why why is Beatrice

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 1>lad half one? She's She's one of the only royals

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 1>with her own instrucause I think it's only the senior

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:40.960
<v Speaker 1>royals that have to adhere. Maybe. Yeah, So the Buckingham

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Palace put out this pretty controversial statement. It was one line.

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 1>It said, we understand their desire to take a different approach,

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>but these are complicated issues that will take time to

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 1>work through. So basically the rest of the royals are

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 1>pissed off about From what I heard, Prince William was

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>enraged because he can't. I mean, he could do what

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Prince Harry has done, but there'd be so much more

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 1>backlash where it kind of seemed like Harry, which is

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I think why everyone loves him, kind of sets his

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 1>own tone. And we've got to remember Harry is sixth

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 1>in line to the throne. I mean, and we've also remember,

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>as you said, Prince William could do this, but as

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:21.839
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in the past. Does everyone remember what happened

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>with King Edward and Wallace Simpson. This is history repeating itself.

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:29.199
<v Speaker 1>That was pretty embarrassing. There was a Sunrise Live cross

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to some sort of royal expert in Australia and she

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>was like, this is the first time we're ever seeing

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>anything like this happen. Yeah, I saw that Sunrise cross.

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't believe it. I was like, oh my gosh.

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I went to look at the comments to see if

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>anybody else had noticed. So, for those who don't know,

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 1>years ago, Prince Edward ended up falling in love with

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>an American actress who was also a divorce a like

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Megan Mircale, and he ended up having to abdicate the

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>throne in order to marry her. So that's when Queen

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth's dad actually became the king. So if he'd never

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>abdicated and fell in love with this American actress, we

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:03.839
<v Speaker 1>would never have the queen is there we have now?

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>We never have Prince Harry. We never had this issue

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that we're having. How ironic is it, though, that it's

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:12.679
<v Speaker 1>another American actress divorce as it's very scandious. She never

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:15.959
<v Speaker 1>heard the word diverse divorce are used so often. We

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 1>should probably talk about what motivated their decision because it

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:22.319
<v Speaker 1>does run parallel to their media policy on their website.

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>So it appears they were motivated because of the disgusting

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:27.679
<v Speaker 1>treatment that they received from the UK press. You might

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>remember a couple of months ago we did a podcast

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>where we dissected Harry's statement regarding his wife's treatment from

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the British media. In the letter, Harry drew parallel to

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the press's treatment of Meghan, Michael and his mother, Princess Diana, who,

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>of course everyone will know, tragically died in a car

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>accident when she was trying to escape from the paparazzi.

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>So he claimed that Meghan was being targeted by the

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 1>British press. He said he would be taking legal action

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>against the publication for running a smear campaign against his wife.

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Now I find this found this quite interesting. I didn't

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 1>realize all of the ridiculous claims the British press have

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>made about Meghan, So were you guys aware of this?

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>So during a charity book tour for the victims of

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Grenfell Tower, the Telegraph somehow linked the Duchess to supporting terrorism.

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Later The Daily Mail reported that Meghan's consumption of avocado

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>was fueling human rights abuse, draup and murder, and then

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:19.200
<v Speaker 1>The Express published an article with the headline claiming that

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Harry was miserable because she was such a difficult person

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to deal with. That's so disgusting. I also have been

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>seeing a few screenshots of different articles pop up, and

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the different media coverage surrounding Kate Middleton and Meghan Markel

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>has been astounding. Kate has been painted in an angelic way.

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 1>For instance, there was an article which showed how the

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 1>press was saying how gorgeous it was that Kate Middleton

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 1>was holding a baby bump, and then the next article

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>by the same publication was slamming Meghan Markle as being,

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:53.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, so needy and attention seeking by holding her

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 1>baby bump. It's quite concerning the difference, and it makes

0:12:57.360 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you think, what is the reason. Why Is it because

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you need to have Kate Middleton be this angelic figure

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>because she will one day been you know? Is it

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 1>because Meghan Markle is wack? Do you not think that

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>it might be encouraged by the fact that the Royal

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:13.679
<v Speaker 1>Rot which is publishing a lot of these things that

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 1>it's been pushed by the Royal family. There was a

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>really interesting opinion piece on news dot com and it

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>was talking about why Kate Middleton is really the biggest

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>loser out of the royal split, and people may not

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>know that the announcement actually came on her thirty eighth birthday,

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 1>which was very much overshadowed by this announcement, and on

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>her birthday she was photographed driving into Kensington Palace wearing

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>a very unregal puffer jacket and she just looked really

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>upset and pissed off in the photo. Many people are

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>reflecting on the fact that it might mean a lot

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of extra work for Kate Middleton. But what this opinion

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>piece was saying that the most the worst that's to

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>come from it is the women are already being pitted

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:53.079
<v Speaker 1>against each other, you know, but until now they were

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 1>very much on equal footing. Both are in their thirties,

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 1>both of moms, both are obviously gorgeous looking. Now the

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>fact that Megan has stepped out on her it's going

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 1>to make things even more difficult because she you think

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 1>about it, Meghan has now has the freedoms to be

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>able to speak at any sort of international conference that

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>she wants to. She can actually talk about politics, she

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 1>can wear whatever she likes without being I don't know

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 1>if that's a bad thing for Kate Middleton on equal

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>footings And if anything, I feel like Kate Middleton, as

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 1>we said, is going to be the golden child now

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and every negative article is going to be about Meghan.

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>But if you think about it, Meghan Michael is going

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>to be able to speak at World Economic forums at

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the un She's going to actually have put her mark

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 1>on the world while also being but everyone's going to

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>be tearing her down. Plus, I don't think they were

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>on equal footings. Meghani Mirkal was thirty six when she

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>joined the royal family. She had a full life, she

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>was a you know, an actress, she had it, lived

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a completely different background. I mean Kate Middleton was put

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>into the same university as William Just to me, well,

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>they say they're on equal footings, is in because at

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that point in time they both were living very similar

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:00.080
<v Speaker 1>lives once they got into the royal family. Kate and

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I were actually having quite an interesting conversation today when

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>we were preparing for this podcast, and we were discussing

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it seems like Kate Middleton has had

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot more time to get I suppose this royal

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 1>thing right, and the fact that she's married Prince William,

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I suppose expectations have been completely different on her because

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>she is in line to be the queen, her kids

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>are going to be the You know, does she become

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the queen or a princess? Because I'm not sure actually

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 1>will I believe she does become the queen? In going

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 1>back back? Can't just finished my point. The thing is,

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>as you said, Meghan Markle has lived thirty six years

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 1>as what he described as a commoner. She's been famous,

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>she's had Instagram accounts, She's done everything. So it seems

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>like her life so far hasn't been building up to

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>be a royal. What I find particularly interesting about this

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 1>whole thing, which I we've touched on before, is the

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>fact that they went through Instagram and didn't tell the Queen.

0:15:57.360 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>So I think a lot of people, a lot of

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the opinion piece out there saying that they're pissed off

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>that they think that they disrespected the Queen and Prince

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>William and Prince Charles for not telling them first. But

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I actually don't think that they had the opportunity to

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>do that. I think that these news organizations are part

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>of this royal rota, are so in with some of

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the family that they dictate what is going to be said. So,

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've had the Prince Andrew scandal, and a

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of the time there's been a lot of conversations

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>around the fact that Meghan mark was being used as distraction.

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, there was rumors around Prince William and cheating

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>on Kate. Obviously, this Prince Andrew thing again. And it

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>seems like the common thing coming out of all the

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>publications to do with this royal rota is the fact

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>that Meghan's a bitch? Is anyone else just sick of

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the way this narrative always plays out. I mean, people

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 1>are comparing Meghan Markel to Yoko Ono except even worse.

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>And what I find perplexing is the fact why is

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>it always the woman? Why is that Meghan market? Obviously

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Prince Harry has had some say in this. He's always

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 1>been the royal that's been a bit rogue. He always

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>does his own thing. Why does everybody care so much?

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Why can't they go and live their lives? I honestly

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:08.120
<v Speaker 1>think it's because the British people think that they own

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the Royals. There's all this backlash, Oh we paink for

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the renovation near Kernage's shut up, you don't fucking own them.

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Why do we not think that Harry wants to leave

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 1>on his own accord. He has gone through a dreadful

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>childhood of having his mother hounded by the press and

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 1>then practically killed because of their constant harassment. But the

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 1>thing is they're not saying they they're not going to

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>be a part of anything to do with the Royal Family.

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Their statement, I thought was quite respectful. They're just saying

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to be paid anymore by the Royal Family.

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>And obviously if you're getting a wage or whatever it

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:43.400
<v Speaker 1>is from the Royal family, they own you and they

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>tell you what you need to do. They're saying, we

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 1>want to stand at our own feet, we want to

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:48.959
<v Speaker 1>do our own thing, we want to talk to whatever

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>media we want to talk to and push our own agendas.

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>And it's quite interesting because it seems like there's a

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>lot that they know about the Royal Family that they

0:17:57.240 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 1>may potentially or be rumored to be threatening if they

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>if the Royal found they're going to make this exit messy.

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:05.200
<v Speaker 1>What seems to be at the brunt of this backclash

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:06.919
<v Speaker 1>is the fact that people think Harry and Meghan are

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 1>having their cake and eating it too. People are pissed

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:11.719
<v Speaker 1>off that they think their money is going towards the

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 1>funding of their extravagant lifestyle, but in actual fact, it's

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>only five percent of the Sovereign grant, which is the

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>taxpayers money that goes towards the Royal family that is

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>actually funding them. So to dumb this down, they're only

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>getting five percent of taxpayers money. But what is quite interesting,

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 1>which you were telling me about before, is that the

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>rest of their ninety five percent paycheck is made up

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>by money from Prince Charles, which is also causing a

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>bit of controversy. Yeah, so ninety five percent of the

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:41.200
<v Speaker 1>income is coming from Prince Charles who owns the Duchy

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:46.440
<v Speaker 1>of Cornwell, which is a portfolio of agricultural investments, and

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that is where the money for Prince Harry and then

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:51.719
<v Speaker 1>also Prince William comes from. But I'm guessing a lot

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of people are saying, well, that's bullshit, because he's making

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:56.360
<v Speaker 1>all of this money off being a Royal family member. Anyway.

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:59.919
<v Speaker 1>But isn't that just irrelevant because there's so many people

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 1>out there that get money from their parents. It's not

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>irrelevant because at the end of the day, people want

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to have access to the royal family and they feel

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:11.439
<v Speaker 1>that they are paying for the Royal family to have

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:14.679
<v Speaker 1>this lifestyle. So the whole argument is, well, what, they

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:18.719
<v Speaker 1>can't be fucked to go and open these shelters and

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>dood the boring parts of it, but they'll take the

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 1>good parts with it. I don't know if that's at

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>all true. I think the reason that they're leaving is

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>because of the disgusting press coverage. I think they're also

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>leaving because Meghan grew up. I'm not saying that's the

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:34.199
<v Speaker 1>reason they're leaving. I'm saying that's the reason people are

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 1>pissed off. What has been feeling at my feet at

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the moment is the amount of money people are speculating

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 1>Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are set to make when

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:43.719
<v Speaker 1>they do venture to North America. It's already been announced

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:45.959
<v Speaker 1>that Meghan Markle is going to be voicing a character

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 1>for a Disney movie, and apparently this was actually organized

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 1>while she was still part a senior member of the

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>royal family. It will be very interesting to see how

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:58.360
<v Speaker 1>much money they do make off talks. There have been

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:01.679
<v Speaker 1>mentions that they're going to make six seven, eight figure

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>amount of these talks. You know what. I feel like

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 1>everyone's getting so obsessed with the money side of things.

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:09.639
<v Speaker 1>I do not think they're doing this for the money.

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I feel like if they just wanted to sit on

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>their asses and have a cozy and have an easy lifestyle,

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:17.360
<v Speaker 1>they would continue to be a part of the rule.

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I suppose the whole money thing comes because the fact

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:22.119
<v Speaker 1>that they said that they want to be financially independent.

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I think they were saying that they wanted to be

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 1>financially independent, so people would actually like that, because they're saying,

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:32.959
<v Speaker 1>we don't want the money. We just want to go

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and do our own thing. I don't want that speculation,

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 1>we don't want to have to abide by all this

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:39.640
<v Speaker 1>bullshit rules. We don't want to talk to this bullshit

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 1>media who were hacking our phones allegedly and doing all

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 1>this bullshit. Now that I think people are just focusing

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:47.360
<v Speaker 1>on the money to be negative and to tell can

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I ask you, do you think that taxpayer money should

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:53.919
<v Speaker 1>pay for their security? Then I don't see an issue

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>with it because Harry has been born into this situation.

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>He didn't ask to be Prince Harry. The argument could

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:03.679
<v Speaker 1>be should they protect Meghan because she knew what she

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 1>was getting into, But at the end of the day,

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:07.719
<v Speaker 1>Prince Harry didn't ask for this. He can't help who

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:10.119
<v Speaker 1>he falls in love with. He is sixth in line,

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>so yes, for all the bullshit he's had to put

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>up with, I don't understand why they can't pay for

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 1>his security. Now, moving away from the money, the thing

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that has captivated me the most with this announcement is

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Megan Michael has shown girls and women

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 1>all around the world that there is so much more

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 1>than just dreaming about becoming a princess. Elle magazine wrote

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:33.879
<v Speaker 1>this amazing piece and they spoke about how, you know,

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Meghan grew up in a time when being a princess

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>was everything, and she basically had what every girl wanted

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>to be part of the British royal family, and that

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:45.160
<v Speaker 1>she achieved this dream in front of so many people,

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Yet she decided last week for her that that wasn't

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>enough for her. There was so much more to life

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:56.640
<v Speaker 1>than just living this lifestyle. I think Princess Diana showed

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>being a role isn't all it's cracked up to be.

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I do like the whole and allergy that she's rewriting

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the fairy tale because I think I don't know it. Actually,

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:07.919
<v Speaker 1>even though I said I was shocked initially, it doesn't

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>really surprise me thinking about it now, because if you

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>look into the you know, if you look into Meghan

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Markle's life, she's always been a pioneer. She's always sort

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:20.159
<v Speaker 1>of fought for women's rights and being a princess that

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:23.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really fit in with me. It's basically what Princess

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Diana did. Obviously she got divorced from Prince Charles, but

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:28.919
<v Speaker 1>she didn't have to divorce him. She could have stayed

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:32.119
<v Speaker 1>unhappily married for many years. So I think Harry really

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:34.919
<v Speaker 1>is following in Diana's footsteps. So I think that's why everyone,

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:39.400
<v Speaker 1>most people, most sane people, young people think it's fantastic.

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I think when Meghan Markle was first introduced to us

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 1>as Harry's new partner, there was this strong hope that

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>she would become the next people's princess because, similarly to Diana,

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 1>she's obviously very intelligent. She has feminist principles, but I

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>feel like she's done so much more by making this move,

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 1>because she showed us that you don't have to be

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>this perfect princess and that maybe our princess dreams of

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:03.400
<v Speaker 1>being mispoortous. She is the modern day princess because these

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 1>days women want to say what they want and do

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>what they want. So she's exactly doing well. She's showing

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that you don't have to speak, you don't have to

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>compromise yourself because there's a stronger there's stronger forces that

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 1>are trying to bring you down. Do you know what though,

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:17.679
<v Speaker 1>if you look at Princess Diana, she only became the

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:22.199
<v Speaker 1>people's princess when she separated from Charles. That's when she

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:24.360
<v Speaker 1>started dropping all the bombs. That's when she did that

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:28.680
<v Speaker 1>explosive interview where she revealed all of the dirty secrets

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>that were going on about Charles's affair, that she threw

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:33.640
<v Speaker 1>herself down the stairs, that she had on Erexit. Also,

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 1>her charity endeavors too, which is what Harry and Meghan

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a big part of why they want to break away.

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:42.119
<v Speaker 1>They want to do that, they want to back the

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>charity that they chew. Well, that's what I was going

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.359
<v Speaker 1>to say. I mean, when she was separated from the

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:49.159
<v Speaker 1>royal family, that's when she could start doing all of

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 1>those amazing charitable things. So perhaps we are going to

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 1>see Megan Mirkl become the people's princess when she's away

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>from the royal family and she's able to do what

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>she wants to do. It is quite interesting to consider

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 1>why people are so against them doing things a little differently.

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, exactly what is going to be gained by

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:09.360
<v Speaker 1>forcing a young couple to remain entrenched in a situation

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 1>that isn't working for them anymore. Yeah, well, we will

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 1>finally find out what the go actually is with this

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 1>because today in Britain the Sandringham Summit is being held,

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 1>so basically it's the big crisis meeting between the family.

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>The Queen has called in Prince Harry, Prince William and

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Prince Charles, and Meghan is actually going to be on

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the phone, which would be interesting because she's back in

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Canada with Master Archie. I heard she caught a budget fly.

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>She sneaked back back to Canada, So no Royal jets

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:40.400
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that, but that was pretty cool. Yeah, well,

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>so can you imagine the shade on the flone. Yeah,

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I would joined us on the phone. I'd love to

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>be a fly on the wall. What seems like the

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Queen is pretty content on making the fallout as minimal

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:54.360
<v Speaker 1>as possible, even though I don't think that's possible. I'd

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>be really interested from a pr perspective to see them

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>what the hours that they're clocking up trying to solve

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 1>this so it comes out in the best interests of

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the royal family. What is going to be really interesting

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 1>to see is the resolution of this conversation, because a

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 1>journalist of the name Tom Bradbury has actually come out.

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>He's close to the family and he's warned that things

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 1>might not be that great for the royal family if

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:19.439
<v Speaker 1>it isn't resolved with Harry and Meghan basically set to

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.360
<v Speaker 1>dish the dirt. Yeah, from what they're reporting, there may

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>be a new royal scandal if things don't go their way,

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:29.440
<v Speaker 1>because they're threatening to dish dirt on stuff that's gone

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 1>on in the royal family, including racial slurs, sexist comments,

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. So I don't think they're threatening

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to dish the dirt, but they're basically going to dish

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the dirt if it's out their bargaining tool. Perhaps, Yes,

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:43.679
<v Speaker 1>I think it is because in the popularity polls at

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the moment, all of those the Queen and Prince Harry

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and Prince Charles are pretty high up there, just like them.

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:51.640
<v Speaker 1>But I think that their popularity may plummet down once

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 1>this dirt is dished. Yeah, so I can't wait for

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the outcome of this crisis. Talk moving on to our

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>new segment, and it is the Pit and Peak of

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:04.199
<v Speaker 1>social Media. This week we will be looking at what

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>are some of our favorite moments that have happened this

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>week and what are some of the most controversial. Now

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 1>kicking us off cake, can you tell us about the

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>peak of the week that involved a friend of the podcast,

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Sam Magnan. I loved this post. It was an Instagram

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 1>story of the legend Sam Magnan, who is a pr

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:22.119
<v Speaker 1>god put up. He has his own podcasting. He's pretty

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>loud and proud about the fact that he doesn't give

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>in to uber driver's demands to meet them on the street. Instead,

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>he actually makes the meet at the front door. So

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 1>he had a screenshot from a conversation he'd had with

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 1>an uber Eats delivery person. The person said I'm out

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:37.159
<v Speaker 1>the front, and he said, I'm at my door. I

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>just found that so funny. I have great respect for

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that because they do try to pressure you into kind

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of meeting them halfway, and it's like, I'm paying for

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>this delivery, So could you actually do your job? I

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:49.640
<v Speaker 1>always crumble and go outside to meet them. And Amy,

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>would you like to tell us about the pit of

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:53.879
<v Speaker 1>the week, Well, the most embarrassing, Well, the pit of

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the week is a US Bachelor contestant who actually feel

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>a bit sorry for her because it's so embarrassed. So

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>she's on the latest series and she's got her Instagram

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:07.399
<v Speaker 1>account set up and basically she went to write a

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 1>comment under her post in a fake name, but was

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:13.160
<v Speaker 1>logged into her own accounts. So it seems that she's

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 1>been commenting how great she is under pictures of herself. Yeah,

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it was a comment about how real she was, Yeah,

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 1>You're so real, except it was her own official account

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:24.640
<v Speaker 1>commenting how real she was on her own photo. She's

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:26.920
<v Speaker 1>copped a lot of shit online, but her friend who

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 1>runs her was apparently running her account while she was

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 1>in lockdown, has said that she actually went to write

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the comment in a fan page or something, and that's

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>how it's happened. Have you guys ever done that before,

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:40.440
<v Speaker 1>as in, maybe not to the extent of having fake

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Instagram accounts, but where you've text message, you've sent a

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:46.159
<v Speaker 1>text to somebody that you didn't mean to or all

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:48.359
<v Speaker 1>the time. That's a worse feeling. Oh I did it.

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 1>At school. There was this girl who were kind of

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 1>friends with and she would constantly bludge off school and

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 1>it was probably the fifth day she'd bludge because she

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 1>had a sore arm has a bit over it by then.

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's just say I remember her saw it was sore

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>because she walked and it brushed against the site of

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:08.120
<v Speaker 1>a wall. That's goool, And then she'd have to wrestling anyway, hypochondria.

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 1>And I text her being like I thought. I was

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 1>texting mom, like can you believe this girl has been

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:15.719
<v Speaker 1>away again? I can't believe it. And then I had

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to play it off like I was like, oh, I'm

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 1>saying I just can't believe you're on well again. She

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't know we weren't friends. Shortly after that, Now, moving

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:28.200
<v Speaker 1>on to our next topic. On Friday, model and fitness

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 1>influencer Steph Claire Smith stepped out to celebrate her twenty

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 1>sixth birthday with a romantic dinner with husband Josh. The

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>newlyweds shared the evening with their combined one point six

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 1>million followers on Instagram. Later that night, thieves stole Josh's

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Blackoudi straight out of their garage. Just five months earlier,

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the influences were victims of a smash and grab when

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 1>their passports were stolen while dining with friends. Now there

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 1>has been a lot of taught that social media could

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 1>potentially have played a big part in this, So if

0:28:56.880 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 1>what's your thoughts on all of it? It was really

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 1>interesting to watch this whole incident unfold on social media.

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Social media was used in several ways. Firstly, it was

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 1>really interesting to note that before this robbery happened, they

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 1>were very much posting about their whereabouts and actions that

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 1>night because, as you mentioned previously, it was Steph Klea

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Smith's birthday, so they were out at a very fancy restaurant.

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 1>The robbery actually happened at two thirty in the morning.

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>So my initial gut feeling, and I'm obviously not a

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 1>police officer here, but because these robbers would have known

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 1>that Steph and Josh were out, they had time to

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 1>scope out the building, They had time to work out

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 1>where they could enter the garage to steal the car.

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 1>It was. Is that what you guys gauged from the

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 1>incident online? Well, I think it's a warning to influences

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 1>all around the world. They just have to be so careful.

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, remember when Kim Kardashian was held at gunpoint.

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I know that incident changed her social media behavior. She

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>no longer posts her Insta stories when they're happening, so

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>she'll save them and then upload them later. Did anyone

0:29:57.560 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 1>notice that the fact that Josh's car had his registration

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 1>it was Jane Miller as well. It's a pretty identifiable AUDI.

0:30:04.120 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 1>You don't see too many of them. Well, you do

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of beautiful cars in Melbourne. But the

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 1>faight that had those normal plates, Well, Steph was saying

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>online that the robbers may have obviously removed the plates

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to get away with this. What is quite startling though,

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>is in August last year, Steph made headlines with mainstream

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 1>media because she put an emotional plea on Instagram when

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 1>she had her passport stolen. So they were also out

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 1>at dinner in August with some friends and Josh's backpack

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>was in one of the friends cars and there was

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 1>a smash and grab incident where robbers took this bag out.

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it's Do you think it's something that

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 1>they're wanting to get from Stephan Josh because in Josh's

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>message on Instagram, he did say that there were items

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 1>in the car that were very important. He didn't really

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:50.200
<v Speaker 1>go into it, but it seems very targeted. Yeah, I

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>definitely think it's targeted, and I think social media was

0:30:53.080 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 1>used at it as a tool to know their whereabouts

0:30:56.200 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and how to sneak into their house. It's actually quite

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 1>timely because people who listen to this podcast will know.

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm a huge fan of Facebook Marketplace and ive just

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:07.040
<v Speaker 1>been selling my absolute shit online and I was thinking

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the other day about Facebook Marketplace and could that potentially

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 1>be a tool to rob people? Because no one was

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 1>anything good on there though, No, but to know when

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:16.960
<v Speaker 1>people are going to be home, because I had some

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 1>person say they were going to go, oh, can I

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 1>come over now? And I'm like, yeah, yeah, you can

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 1>come over. They never came. I asked them so many times,

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 1>are you coming over? Blah blah and never responded and

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>then messaged me, Willy Nelly, are you home? And I

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 1>actually wasn't home, and I thought, did you give them

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 1>your address? Yeah, and they'd already had my address. I

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 1>was like, I don't want to say I'm not at

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 1>home because they might come and rob me. So when

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I heard this news about Steph and Josh, I was like, Ooh,

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the weird thing is that they chose to rob them

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>when they were at home. I felt so sorry for Steph.

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:50.720
<v Speaker 1>She was putting up some emotional Instagram stories about how

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 1>upset she was, and this was all while she was

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to celebrate her twenty sixth birthday. I was actually

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 1>fearful though, that she might get some backlash because she was,

0:31:57.840 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, being pretty honest about how upset she was.

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I was like, God, I hope with all the bushfires

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 1>going on and people have been dickheads, that no one

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 1>was gonna tell her off for being upset because this

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 1>is a legitimate reason to be upset. Well, let's let's

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 1>be honest. Regardless of whether she's right or wrong, there's

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 1>always going to be someone on social media who has

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a problem with it. No one's ever happy on social media.

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:21.480
<v Speaker 1>It is becoming quite a problem. Obviously, social media is

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 1>becoming more prominent and people are using it in the

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 1>everyday lives, and police said that over the past two years,

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 1>there's been two dozen celebrity burglaries across Los Angeles. So

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 1>people like Kelly Clark's and Hillary Duff, Scott Disick, even

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Kendall Jenner are just some of the celebrities that have

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 1>experienced break ins. And what is most disturbing is that

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the majority of these celebrities houses were broken into after

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 1>they've made posts online about their whereabouts. It's all the

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 1>instera stories, isn't it. Because a Whitney post a picture,

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 1>it could have been anytime. But it's the fact that

0:32:51.200 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 1>insta stories keep you up to date with what people

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:55.960
<v Speaker 1>are doing. You know exactly where they are. The instant

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 1>nature is what's putting them at risk. Well it's even

0:32:58.160 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Twitter because Rhianna she put up on Twitter that she

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 1>was at an event in Dubai and that evening her

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 1>house was burgled. So it is quite scary. All the

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 1>different platforms they've got. Shul think they've got security though

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 1>when they're away, well that's the scary thing. I think

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:14.560
<v Speaker 1>with like Steph Claire Smith, who you wouldn't say is

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 1>on the level of Rhianna or the Kardashians. It's kind

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 1>of scary for her because she doesn't have personal security

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 1>following her around. She's a big star in her own

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 1>right due to social media, and you know, all these

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 1>influences have a lot of expensive things don't seem to

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 1>have the security to actually protect them. But it's even

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 1>for non celebrities. If you're posting a lot on social

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 1>media about being out and or you're on holiday and

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 1>people know where you live, that your house then becomes

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 1>a target. So it's kind of a bit concerning because

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 1>it makes you think, well, how do I use social media?

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Do I not post in the stories when I'm out?

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Do I not give my address to people on Facebook, Marketplace?

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Or you know what I mean. I think this incident

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 1>does show that we should all be a little bit

0:33:56.400 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 1>more careful and put a bit more thought into when

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 1>we are sharing. As you say, and now we're moving

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 1>on to our new segment, which is called Who's on

0:34:05.360 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Our Feed? And this is where we're going to detail

0:34:07.200 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 1>some of our favorite influences of the week. Sophie, I

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 1>was kind of surprised to hear your new favorite, but

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:16.839
<v Speaker 1>then after watching her content, I'm also sold. Tell us

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 1>about your YouTuber of the week. We might be surprising

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 1>to some, but her name is Anastasia kings North and

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 1>she is a nineteen year old British girl who I

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:29.319
<v Speaker 1>have literally become obsessed with watching her YouTube. So if

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:32.720
<v Speaker 1>just likes her because she says taco likes how taco

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to taco? Yeah, there's been an on running debate of

0:34:36.080 --> 0:34:40.359
<v Speaker 1>the pronunciation of some of the Mexican foods. Anyway, she

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:43.879
<v Speaker 1>has some incredible content and what I'm liking about her

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:49.239
<v Speaker 1>is she is incredibly consistent, incredible. She's incredible, incredibly consistent.

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:52.359
<v Speaker 1>She's also not afraid to share, which I think what

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot about Australian influencers are lacking at the moment.

0:34:55.760 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 1>She shares everything. I think they share until they get

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:00.480
<v Speaker 1>too big and then they don't want to share anymore.

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:03.800
<v Speaker 1>But she does cool videos like I've only eaten pink

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 1>food for today, Here's my mac Donald's mukbun Like Taco

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Bell and Bunk, She's just constantly pumping out content, whereas

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's not just vlogs. They actually all have

0:35:11.200 --> 0:35:12.960
<v Speaker 1>a theme. Well, what is interesting is she has her

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 1>black her back vlog channel, so that's where she will

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:17.920
<v Speaker 1>share her vlogs that people like to keep up with her.

0:35:17.960 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 1>But then she will have her main channel where it's

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:23.120
<v Speaker 1>actually curated content. And the one that caught my attention

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 1>this week was her say it or Shot It challenge

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:28.759
<v Speaker 1>with her mother. Now, her poor mother has copped a

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of backlash from some of her followers. She's been

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 1>criticized for having weird eyebrows. Go check it out, make

0:35:34.280 --> 0:35:36.399
<v Speaker 1>kept your own mind. Whether you like the idea weird,

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 1>they're a bit weird. I love the mom. It's funny. Well,

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's first best to preface it with the

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:43.759
<v Speaker 1>say it or Shot it. They have to ask each

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 1>other really awkward questions and if they don't want to

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 1>answer the question, they have to take a shot. And

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:51.160
<v Speaker 1>some of the questions that Anna Stage asked her mom

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 1>were hilarious and she answered them. They were pretty brave

0:35:54.680 --> 0:35:57.279
<v Speaker 1>to share it with one another and also online. The

0:35:57.320 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 1>funniest was the mother sharing her Tinder experience. It was

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:04.759
<v Speaker 1>so cringe. Now. These messages consisted of her sharing the

0:36:04.800 --> 0:36:07.440
<v Speaker 1>fact that she hasn't had sex in six years. It

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 1>was her cringe comments back and forth to the guy.

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Everyone has to go and check it out. It was hilarious.

0:36:13.760 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 1>The conversation just went on and on like they just

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:18.440
<v Speaker 1>continue to read it out and it just got juicier

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:21.399
<v Speaker 1>and juicier. And these were messages on Christmas Day as well,

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:24.160
<v Speaker 1>even though the mum denied messaging this guy from Tinder

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 1>on Christmas Day. Now, I have seen this say it

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:29.360
<v Speaker 1>or Shot It challenge around YouTube a lot, and the

0:36:29.440 --> 0:36:31.840
<v Speaker 1>thing that has frustrated me with a number of the

0:36:31.880 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 1>influencers is the fact that they have all been asked

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the question, tell us your highest pain campaign on social

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:41.360
<v Speaker 1>media or shot it? And I'm appalled that none of

0:36:41.400 --> 0:36:43.680
<v Speaker 1>them have answered because one, it pisses me off more

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 1>because it makes it seem like they must earn a

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:48.720
<v Speaker 1>disgusting amount of money. Yeah, it was just the arrogance,

0:36:52.080 --> 0:36:55.400
<v Speaker 1>no way, And these are like load level influencers that

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:59.120
<v Speaker 1>are promoting like men shavers who are females. Just as

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a clue, we have decided ourselves though, we've been so

0:37:02.719 --> 0:37:05.239
<v Speaker 1>inspired by this say it or Shot It challenge that

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 1>we want to do it ourselves. So if anyone has

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:10.400
<v Speaker 1>any juicy questions, I don't even think. I mean, people

0:37:10.440 --> 0:37:12.799
<v Speaker 1>can send some in, but I think that we just

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:14.319
<v Speaker 1>have to come up with them for each other. Because

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I've got a few juicy ones I can already think

0:37:16.960 --> 0:37:18.920
<v Speaker 1>of throwing in. We'll do a bit of both. If

0:37:18.920 --> 0:37:20.959
<v Speaker 1>someone does have a question they think would be quite

0:37:21.000 --> 0:37:25.120
<v Speaker 1>embarrassing or controversial, please send it in. And I think

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:27.239
<v Speaker 1>that's all we've got time for today. Thank you so

0:37:27.360 --> 0:37:29.440
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. If you would like to join

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:33.160
<v Speaker 1>in the conversation or see me riding a motorbike very slowly,

0:37:33.320 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 1>you need to follow us on Instagram and Facebook where

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:40.839
<v Speaker 1>at Outspoken Underscore the Underscore Podcast. And if you did

0:37:40.920 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 1>enjoy the podcast, we'd love if you could share it

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:46.319
<v Speaker 1>on your Instagram story and tag us so we can

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 1>also share it. And if you'd like to leave us

0:37:48.239 --> 0:37:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a review, we'd love to hear it. Thank you so

0:37:50.760 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 1>much