WEBVTT - 17: Body of Evidence

0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>This podcast contains information and details relating to suicide. We

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:11.760
<v Speaker 1>urge anyone struggling with their emotions to contact Lifeline on

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 1>thirteen eleven fourteen thirteen eleven fourteen or visit them at

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:29.319
<v Speaker 1>lifeline dot org dot AU. A twenty four year old

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 1>devoted mother of two fleeing a violent relationships am bags

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:45.200
<v Speaker 1>packed car, running, her daughters strapped into the backseat.

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Mom told me that she needed to go back inside

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:49.839
<v Speaker 2>to grab something.

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 3>Panic. Amy is dead, Sir Amys dead.

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 4>Eight Confusion World.

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 3>About five minutes they said, NA, it's a suicide. One

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 3>hundred percent.

0:00:58.160 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 4>This is emmersing.

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:05.319
<v Speaker 1>What do you think is really the honest truth about Amy?

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 2>The Truth about Amy?

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 5>Episode seventeen.

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 4>Well, welcome back. I'm Liam Bartlay.

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 5>And I'm Alison Sandy. This week we returned to the

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 5>Wild West. Well, Liam, I know you're still there, but

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 5>I'm referring to our most recent shoot. So we've touched

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:47.040
<v Speaker 5>on the places we've gone to before, like Perth and Serpentine.

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 5>But I realize a lot of our listeners may not

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 5>know a terrible lot about Australia's largest at least in

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 5>area state, and I think it's important due to the

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 5>level of detail we're going into for this investigation, particular

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 5>in relation to the police and political culture. So what

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 5>do you say, Liam, do you want to give them

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 5>a bit of background about living in WA and the

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:09.959
<v Speaker 5>climate here?

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? Okay, well where do I start? Now? Wild West

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 4>owl I'll take that as a compliment on behalf of

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:20.519
<v Speaker 4>all the other West Australians.

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's begin with that. But let's just do a

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>broad brush. Okay, start with the geography. As you mentioned,

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Way's Australia's largest state, and we've got something like two

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>point six million square kilometers a little under one hundred

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:36.959
<v Speaker 1>thousand square miles in the old language. So that's about

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>a third of the entire nation of Australia, Larger than

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:43.920
<v Speaker 1>any state in the United States, larger than Texas, can

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>you believe that? Bigger in Texas, but a little bit

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 1>smaller than Argentina or a little Trivia or Factotum. We

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>only have a population though, of around about three million,

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>give or take a couple of dogs. So to give

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you some context, Australia's most populous state, New South Wales,

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>is almost three times that, followed by Victoria that comes

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>in at about seven million and Queensland, you're joint ol

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>five million, five million compared to our three million. Well

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 1>we're a little bit over three now, I think.

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:19.359
<v Speaker 4>But you know, which just.

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Goes to prove you know, quality is not always on

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the Gold Coast, you know what I'm saying, just for

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:29.679
<v Speaker 1>ever of Australian for ACUSM. But despite this, WA is

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the richest state in Australia because we produce almost half

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of Australia's goods in exports and obviously through the resource sector,

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>we generate billions of dollars.

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 4>Now, last year our GDP.

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Per capita per capita was one hundred and fifty five

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>six hundred and forty four dollars.

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 4>It's just to give you.

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Some context, Australia's GDP per capita is sixty eight thousand dollars,

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>so well and truly yeah, well and truly twice that.

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 4>Now, now that's still relatively good.

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean Australia is ranked thirteenth in the world, thirteenth

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>in the world for GDP per capita, so you know,

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty good, yong.

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 5>But I guess what it all boils down to is

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 5>the nation's good standing is largely attributable to Western Australia

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 5>because of its mining industry, specifically minerals and petroleum. So

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 5>it's not surprising, then, Liam, that there's been a few

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:24.679
<v Speaker 5>moves made for Western Australia to become its own country Australia.

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 3>Is that?

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 5>Have you heard of this term? Of course you have.

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 5>Wasn't there a referendum in nineteen thirty three where a

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 5>third of the population voted in favor of this happening?

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:37.039
<v Speaker 5>Do you reckon that would still happen now? You reckon

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 5>a third of the population wants Westralia.

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 4>No, No, I don't. I don't.

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I think after we put the fluoride in the water,

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of us got a little a

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 1>lot smarter. No, because it's a very different It's a

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 1>very different makeup now, isn't it. And that was not

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:56.720
<v Speaker 1>long after federation. Really in historical context, you know, I think, look,

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you know what it's like with remote places, right, Perth's

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 1>the most remote capital city in the world, So it's

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:09.919
<v Speaker 1>sort of that isolation context, the distance to the east coast.

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>It does give people a different sort of mental you know,

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>a mental state, if I can put it that way

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:21.039
<v Speaker 1>in a nice way, in a nice way. So become territorial,

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>is what I'm trying to say.

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 4>And that's good.

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, West Australians are very proud and very you

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>know very you say, people can get house proud, you

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean. That's a good way of putting it,

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I think for most West Australians. But I think the

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:36.599
<v Speaker 1>idea of secession, you know, when people point out you

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>have to have your own armed forces and you have

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to pay for this and that and the other thing,

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and I think that starts to.

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:44.480
<v Speaker 4>Become it's too hard basket. But it's not.

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>And especially in sport, in sporting contests, you know, it's

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:49.720
<v Speaker 1>nice to say, oh we beat the Vicks, so we've

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>beat New South Wales or whatever.

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:53.840
<v Speaker 4>You know, so that's all good, that's all good. But

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 4>apart from that, we're you know, we're all one. We

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:00.839
<v Speaker 4>are one and three.

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 6>It is.

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:03.479
<v Speaker 5>It is different, though, I mean, I don't know. It

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 5>seems like because of the large land mass and the

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 5>smaller population that there is, it's a bit tighter, like

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 5>people know people more and there seems to be.

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 4>True. It can be very clique.

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>You're right, you're right, but that also comes I think

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>from being isolated more, you know, people feel as they

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>have to protect their patch and it becomes a smaller

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a smaller pool.

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:30.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Queensland is a little bit like that.

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 5>It is. But I don't think I would know as

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 5>many people in Brisbane, like you know of you know

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 5>what I mean. Like, I don't think it's I think

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:45.160
<v Speaker 5>it's the population is big enough just in Brisbane that

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 5>you're not you know, it's not a case of everyone

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 5>knows each other's business.

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 4>No, true, you used to be. But I agree with you.

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:53.799
<v Speaker 1>It's that critical mass in the last sort of twenty

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty five years you start to get over that.

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 5>Also, though, doesn't it have a big English and South

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 5>African migrant base expat population?

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it does, it does. Yeah, a lot of a

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of English people early on, sort of more in

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the southern suburbs, southern coastal suburbs, now a little bit

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of some of the northern coastal suburbs. But a

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of a lot of Poms, as we say, quite

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a few South Africans. Yeah, a large, a large South

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>African expat population.

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 4>I know.

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 5>We had to get a South African voice actor over

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 5>here to voice the lawyer in the inquest representing Amy's

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:41.559
<v Speaker 5>family Rain Waite, So yeah we did. But yes, also

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 5>fun fact, it's quicker to fly from Perth to Bali

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 5>than Sydney or Melbourne. So many people do, don't.

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 4>They Well, yeah, because it's cheap.

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I don't know whether i'd invoke Bali

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>as being a great thing for Western Australia. I mean,

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>you've got Fiji over there, that's that's the East Coast barley.

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, but I don't think as many of us

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 5>go to Fiji as per people or Western Australians necessarily

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 5>got a balley.

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, No, that's true.

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Although I did hear an interesting thing yesterday that the

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 1>incidents of Bali belly was up seventy nine percent year

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>on year. So yeah, I'd be going somewhere else.

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 5>But anyway, so you're not one of those people.

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 4>I digress.

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 5>No, Also, I had and again tell me if this

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 5>has any truth in it, but one top businessman from

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 5>here told me recently how success here can really be

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 5>about not upsetting Perth's power brokers, this tight knit as

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 5>you talked about this click and you know, I know

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:41.959
<v Speaker 5>the police have probably seen as an arm of that.

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:46.079
<v Speaker 5>I mean as they are in many capital cities, obviously

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 5>the media and the mining industry. So anyway, I guess

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 5>the only reason I say that is because it makes

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 5>it much more impressive, given how careful people are not

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:00.200
<v Speaker 5>too upset other people, because of the repercussions that we

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 5>have so many people speaking out on Amy's case.

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 4>I think that's right. I think that's right.

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>And also can I just add though, that there has

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 1>been that thing in Perth in the past, especially back

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>in the alum Bond days especially you know you have

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:16.599
<v Speaker 1>because you had a very tight click between businessmen, developers

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and government and people in the mining industry obviously played

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a big part of that. But I think that's largely

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>that's that's very different these days, very different. But I

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 1>think the legal community, not just in Perth, Australia wide

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>every capital city. I think that it's a very tight club.

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's combined with the connections with police

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:42.199
<v Speaker 1>and prosecutors, and I think I think that makes a

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>big difference. Yes I do, Yes, I do. And the

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>legal grape vine is so much smaller in Perth, which

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I think makes a big difference. So that traditional, if

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I can put it this way, boys club, but I

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>don't mean that in a gender way, because I think

0:09:56.600 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 1>there's plenty of women involved these days in those top

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 1>echelons of the legal circle. But I think that very

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>much exists, and I think they a lot of them

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>protect each other. When I say protect each other, a

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of them just won't speak out because they don't

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 1>want to get involved, because they don't want to be

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>seen to be critical of their fellow legal brethren, even

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 1>though they might be on the other side of the bench,

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>if you know what I mean. And I think that

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 1>that very much happens in Perth. It happens in Sydney

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and Melbourne as well, but you notice it more in Perth.

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:24.959
<v Speaker 1>And it comes back to what you're talking about. I

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 1>think sort of that sort of power base. And I

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>think that's why it's so impressive that a lot of

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:33.959
<v Speaker 1>people have been prepared on a legal footing, or people

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>who continue to deal with people high up in the

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>legal circles, have been prepared to speak out on behalf

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>of Amy Wensley. I think that's been terrific.

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it really is. And I think what we're finding

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:49.559
<v Speaker 5>in this season lamb Is and later in this episode

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 5>is the fact that those people who are in the

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 5>know involved, credible people with good reputations may be not

0:10:57.559 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 5>necessarily a member of the cool club. There is always

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 5>a bit of a cool club in every city, but

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 5>they're willing to keep going at it because they believe

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 5>in it too, And I think that's been really heartening.

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely. Yeah, No, I couldn't agree more.

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 5>Also, though I have worked in Adelaide, I don't have

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 5>this issue so much in Brison, but there's probably a

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 5>bit of it. But where if you you know, particularly

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 5>if you're in the part of the local news cycle, right,

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 5>you can get punished for suing a story like this, right, Yeah,

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 5>And I think it's worth telling or letting our listeners

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 5>know that we're both national reporters, and I think that

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 5>gives us a little bit of protection.

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I absolutely get where you're coming from. I mean,

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>it is a lot easier for us because we can

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>move on to other stories at the end of the day.

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>We don't have to be dependent upon any you know,

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 1>one particular area to feed us information or to release

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>information to us. And that's right, all of the circle

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>is Adelaide's a good example. Then the harder it is

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 1>for those reporters to push back and do their job properly,

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>because remember, cases like Amy's are a great example of this.

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>The truism is you're not in journalism to make friends.

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 1>And if you are a journalist who wants to make friends,

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>find something else to do. It's not your job. It's

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>not your job. You're there to find the truth and

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:33.199
<v Speaker 1>you're there to disseminate as much of that truth as

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>you possibly can to your listeners, readers, viewers, whatever that is.

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 1>So in that context, yeah, I take your point, you know,

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 1>because we do a national role call, if I can

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>put it that way, you know, because we don't have

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>to go back to the same old pot on the

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>same old stove, do we.

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 4>So it makes it, it makes it a little bit easier.

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 5>Well, I'm just glad that I don't have to ring

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:01.079
<v Speaker 5>Waypole every day asking what happened last night, you know.

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Or following up on and they're probably glad you don't rememberies.

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:11.559
<v Speaker 5>Don't do it up to the presses anyway. So let's

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 5>discuss it again. The reason we've once again assembled in.

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 4>Perth apart from it being a great city.

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 5>Oh absolutely, and obviously Amy's death being at Serpentine near Perth.

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 5>But now Obviously it's a lot of work involved with

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 5>these trips.

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a lot of planning, isn't there with trips like this,

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and logistics trying to get people to not only talk

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>but be in the right place at the right time,

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and as you say, our both of us to be

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>here and then organize other people to support us.

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 5>Yes, including the brilliant producer Dwayne Heavily. So it was

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:49.320
<v Speaker 5>great to have him along because obviously he's been with

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 5>us on a few projects. Now were you more so

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 5>than me? But I love having Dwayne along, So that's

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 5>been good.

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Dwayne does some great work with Spotlight and as

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>well as the engagement of an experience camera operator of course,

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 1>which makes a big difference, but that can vary depending

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 1>on who's available and again the logistics of it. This

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:11.199
<v Speaker 1>time it was one of WA's best wellow called Simon Heidzik.

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 5>Simon was fantastic, absolutely, and of course the talent the

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 5>actual reason for us coming here, whose insight is integral

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 5>to helping us realize the truth about amy. So those

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 5>of you who've traveled from the East Coast, no, going

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 5>to Perth is treated like an international flight. It takes

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 5>almost six hours. These flights are almost always full, mostly

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 5>of FIFO workers. That's fly in, fly out, which isn't

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 5>surprising giving the mining industry employs hundreds of thousands of people.

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 5>And I don't mind telling you, Liam, I'm always pretty

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 5>disgruntled if I get stuck in a middle seat for

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 5>six hours.

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 7>I do take care, may have moved and could form out.

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 5>But this time, this time I was by the window

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 5>over the wing and it was a smooth landing and

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 5>the peanuts.

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Were all right, yeah, well look and you're laying it

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>on there. I mean, it can be less than that

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>if there's depending on where you're coming from, of course,

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's a tough one. From Brisbane, I must have

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>known it is a tough one. It's a long way.

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a long way, but ol, you did make it.

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>And I'm really excited about this and letting our listeners

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>hear some of these people. The first person we caught

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 1>up with is somebody whose appearance I think was well overdue.

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 5>Well we've certainly heard a lot from him, but yes,

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 5>this is the first time was spoken with him directly.

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 5>But he was worth the weight lamb.

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely, And just by way of background, Professor Tim

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Ackland did his PhD at the University of Western Australia

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>back in the nineteen eighties as a tutor working his

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>way up to professor. Now his career spanned something like

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>forty five years and at the time he was recruited

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to assist with Amy's case. This is important he was

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>being called upon regularly by WA police and other authorities

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>to provide expert advice in the area of biomechanics. So

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I began the interview by asking Tim more about that.

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Can you outline the extent and the depth of your

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>experience in sharing forensic cases details with authorities around Australia.

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 4>Give us an idea of what you've been associated with.

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 3>Yes. So, in addition to my work as a teacher

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 3>and a researcher at University of Western Australia, I also

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 3>undertake consulting work. Most of it's in the sphere of

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 3>people being injured at work and applying the biomechanics knowledge

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 3>that I have to those situations. But on occasions I've

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 3>been asked to undertake consultancies for the police and coroners

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 3>in various jurisdictions around Australia in order to try to

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 3>work out or try to give some indication as to

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 3>whether the scenario that they have seen or come across

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:04.719
<v Speaker 3>could have been caused in one way or another.

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:09.120
<v Speaker 4>So mostly workplace insurance claims, Yes, that's right, working out

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 4>who's in the right and who's in the wrong.

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:13.879
<v Speaker 3>Yes, And could a person have injured themselves in the

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:16.920
<v Speaker 3>manner that they've said and ended up with the injuries

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 3>that they've eventually got.

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 4>But when it comes to the difference between that and

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 4>cold cases, especially involving homicides around Australia, it must be

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 4>pretty confronting.

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 3>It is confronting. I won't deny that. But my background

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 3>in anatomy and applied anatomy has dealing with deceased persons

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 3>has helped me to work through that evidence, that visual

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 3>evidence in particular, and remain scientific as much as I can.

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 4>How many cases do you think you've looked at criminally

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:48.959
<v Speaker 4>professor criminal cases?

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:52.160
<v Speaker 3>Probably about fifteen to twenty criminal cases.

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>So you've had a fair breadth of experience in terms

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>of knowledge and information shared. Yes, And who approached you

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 1>initial to look at Amy Wensley's case.

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:06.919
<v Speaker 3>So I was initially approached by some officers from the

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 3>homicide squad. They asked me some questions and showed me

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:14.159
<v Speaker 3>some photographs and said could I make a determination? And

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 3>I said no, with that information alone, I couldn't do.

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 4>So.

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 3>Then a little bit of time went by, and then

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:23.399
<v Speaker 3>I got a call from the State Coroner's office and

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 3>asked if I would be happy to look at some

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 3>of the evidence that they have available and to give

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:33.360
<v Speaker 3>my preliminary views. They were particularly interested to know if

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:37.199
<v Speaker 3>I could give a determination from my perspective on the

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 3>basis of that information alone.

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 1>So what was the essential brief? What were they asking

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 1>you to try to ascertain?

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 3>They asked me if I could make a determination of

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:52.440
<v Speaker 3>whether Amy had committed suicide in the manner in which

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 3>the detectives who were on the scene had suggested, or

0:18:56.440 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 3>whether this was indeed some other form of homicide.

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 4>So your advice was going direct to the coroner.

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 3>At that point. Yes. At the same time, they asked

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 3>if I would interrogate the various witness statements, the information

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 3>from forensic scientists, and to see if there were any

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 3>inconsistencies in that information, which I was able to write

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:23.679
<v Speaker 3>a report in twenty eighteen, I believe, and sent that

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 3>report to the state coroner.

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:27.120
<v Speaker 1>So just to be clear, you were looking at the

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:31.919
<v Speaker 1>biomechanics of this in Amy's case, yes, whether or not

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:38.160
<v Speaker 1>she could have potentially shot herself if someone else had

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:41.160
<v Speaker 1>done it, et cetera, et cetera. But also surrounding that

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:47.120
<v Speaker 1>crime scene photographs witness statements as rare as they were

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>on the ground from that night. And you also, as

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I understand it, you traveled to the location.

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:57.200
<v Speaker 3>So this occurred later and on the basis of that

0:19:57.400 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 3>report that I wrote, I believe that you State Coroner

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 3>then asked the Cold Case Squad of the West Australian

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:08.159
<v Speaker 3>Police to allow me to go and do a reconstruction

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:12.199
<v Speaker 3>and simulation of the events that supposedly took place on

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:15.199
<v Speaker 3>that particular day, and that was the basis of my

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 3>second report, which was for the WA Police.

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 1>So essentially you had two cracks at it, didn't you.

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 1>First your role was with the Coroner's court and then

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>as you say, with the cold case squad the homicide squad.

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 1>So you really did a deep dive, as it were.

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Yes, as a deeper dive as I could do given

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:35.119
<v Speaker 3>the circumstances.

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:38.119
<v Speaker 1>Yes, But in the whole case, you've probably been privy

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:43.679
<v Speaker 1>to the entire caseload of information as it is available.

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you would be not an orphan, but you

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>would be one of the few.

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:53.400
<v Speaker 3>I guess. So nothing was withheld from me that I

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 3>know of in making my determinations.

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 4>And in terms of determinations, have you ever had a

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 4>case where you've been in error, even in hindsight, in

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 4>terms of your assessment your determination.

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:10.199
<v Speaker 3>I only go on the facts that are presented to

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 3>me and using my science background, what is the likelihood

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 3>of the facts being consistent? True? In many cases, I

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 3>may not be privy to all of the facts, but

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 3>I think in this case, nothing was withheld from me

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 3>that I know about. I guess.

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 4>The point I'm getting to, Professor is your track record

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 4>is pretty.

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 3>Good, if you'd like to put it that way.

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I mean, there has not been a case that

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 4>you've looked at so far, even with a rearview mirror,

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:42.360
<v Speaker 4>where you've been proven to be wrong with your assessment.

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 3>Liam, with respect, I've not been proven wrong. It's sometimes

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 3>the decision maker, be it the jury or the judge,

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:53.360
<v Speaker 3>waits my evidence differently to the way I wait it.

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 3>So let's say decisions can go against my recommendations, but

0:21:58.560 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 3>that doesn't mean that I'm.

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Wrong, understood, But scientifically, your results in your assessment have

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:08.880
<v Speaker 1>not ever been proven to be inaccurate.

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Not in those cases that I've looked at. Known.

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So when you first looked at Amy's case, was

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:27.159
<v Speaker 1>there any particular thing that stood out for you? Was

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>there one thing that looked unusual or extraordinary?

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 3>There are about twenty things that looked unusual and extraordinary.

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 3>There was so much inconsistency in the witness statements and

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 3>in what people had said had occurred, and the evidence

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 3>such as it was that I was presented with. So

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 3>the whole thing from the start did not ring true.

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:55.680
<v Speaker 3>And it's unfortunate that those various witnesses had not been

0:22:55.720 --> 0:23:00.119
<v Speaker 3>interrogated correctly or properly at the time. Not much so

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 3>the witness statements information made sense to me. The only

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 3>thing that made sense was the report of the attending

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 3>uniformed officers who were the first people on the scene,

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:14.639
<v Speaker 3>apart from those witnesses.

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:19.359
<v Speaker 1>The first three constables, that's right, Professor. The witness testimonies,

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 1>particularly from Gareth Price and David Simmons, what did you

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 1>make of those?

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 3>They had plenty of time to get their story straight.

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 3>But when it came to what they witnessed when they

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:39.439
<v Speaker 3>walked into the bedroom, and David Simmons was apparently the

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:44.160
<v Speaker 3>first person to go into the bedroom, followed sometime later

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 3>by Gareth Price. Those stories did not match up, so

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 3>there were still glaring inconsistencies.

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:52.479
<v Speaker 4>Is that fair to say? Or am I overdoing it?

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:56.120
<v Speaker 3>There were inconsistencies. Once they described what they saw when

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 3>they went into the room, they were quite consistent with

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 3>the the story that they were suggesting that they were

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:07.200
<v Speaker 3>both standing out by the car with the children in

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:11.199
<v Speaker 3>the car and they both heard a loud bang. That

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 3>part of it was consistent between the two of them.

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:18.200
<v Speaker 4>Can we drill down a little bit on that room?

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Can we talk about the bedroom, because, as I say,

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 1>you had the benefit of being allowed back into that

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 1>room Amy's bedroom at a later date in order to

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.640
<v Speaker 1>do some of your tests and some of your simulations.

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:36.879
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that particular house was occupied by a third party

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 3>who were very generous in allowing us to go back

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:43.360
<v Speaker 3>and do our recreations and simulations. As you walk through

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 3>the house, you come to the main bedroom. There is

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 3>a door into that bedroom which opens into an alcove.

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:52.359
<v Speaker 3>The bed is on the left, hand side as you're

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 3>facing that, and straight ahead is a wardrobe. So the

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:59.120
<v Speaker 3>little alcove is bordered by the wardrobe on the far

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 3>side of wall, and the door the bed is off

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 3>to the left.

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 1>As I say, can you recall with clarity when you

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 1>went in there to start those tests, what it looked

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>like and how you felt about what had happened.

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 3>Yes, we were very fortunate. Even though the detectives shut

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:25.680
<v Speaker 3>the scene down and declared it a suicide and therefore

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 3>there was no opportunity for proper forensic photographs, etc. We're

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:33.640
<v Speaker 3>very fortunate that one of the attending uniformed officers took

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:37.120
<v Speaker 3>photographs at the time, so we were able to set

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 3>the room up pretty much exactly the way it was

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 3>as seen in those photographs.

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 4>There was Constable Roberts, I think, yes, So from his

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 4>photographs you sort of pieced it together. Yes, And what

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 4>conclusion did you come to?

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:54.639
<v Speaker 3>So my conclusion has always been, from that very first

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 3>report that I did for the coroner, is that Amy

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:02.680
<v Speaker 3>Wensley did not shoot us, did not did not definitively

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 3>as definitively as I can be as a scientist, there's

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 3>always a small percentage of doubt but as definitively as

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 3>I can be, she did not take a gun and

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:18.439
<v Speaker 3>shoot herself in the manner that people have described. Is

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:22.160
<v Speaker 3>there a particular reason which makes you so sure? From

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 3>that bedroom scene? There are probably half a dozen reasons which,

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 3>when taken together, mean that, in my view, it would

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:36.160
<v Speaker 3>be biomechanically impossible, let's say, for her to have shot

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 3>herself and then the scene to have been left the

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 3>way we saw it in those photographs taken by Constable Roberts.

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 4>What are the most compelling for you, professor?

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 3>So the most compelling is the position that Amy was

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 3>found in the blood and other biological material spatter on

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 3>the wall adjacent to her left side of her head

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 3>and shoulder, the upright position of her head, the almost

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 3>horizontal entry and exit points of the wound, the position

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 3>most importantly of her right hand, and her right hand

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:22.640
<v Speaker 3>was in the photograph, tucked under her right thigh, right

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:26.919
<v Speaker 3>up near her buttock and virtually completely covering her right hand.

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:31.400
<v Speaker 3>The other two important bits of information are that, even

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 3>though there was a limited forensics taken after this, Dr

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 3>Pitts was able to show that there was gunpowder resnue

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 3>on Amy's left hand, but not on her right hand,

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 3>which is tucked underneath her thigh. And there was transfer

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 3>blood on both the barrel of the gun and Amy's

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 3>left hand, but nothing on her right hand. So they're

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:58.159
<v Speaker 3>the important bits of information that lead me to my conclusion.

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:01.159
<v Speaker 4>So in terms of a scientific eg saw puzzle, it

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 4>just didn't add up.

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 3>That's correct.

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 4>The pieces are just in the wrong position.

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 3>They are they are for the various scenarios that were

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:15.879
<v Speaker 3>put by the detectives to promulgate their notion of suicide. Indeed,

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:19.160
<v Speaker 3>we had an opportunity go and test other scenarios where

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:23.159
<v Speaker 3>Amy perhaps could have held begun in a different manner,

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 3>and then both of those I can discard for the

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 3>fact that they don't match up with the other parts

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 3>of the evidence.

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Can we put a figure on it? Because when we're

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 1>talking about using science as you do, you're only dealing

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 1>with the facts as they are, the cold heart clinical facts.

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Is there a hard scientific percentage? I mean when you

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 1>say you concluded Amy did not shoot herself.

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 3>So in science we're always dealing with probabilities. You know,

0:28:57.200 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 3>we test hypotheses. There are some limitations to our tests

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 3>and those have to be acknowledged and That's why we

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 3>never say with one hundred percent certainty that a equals

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 3>be if you like, so, if you ask me for

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 3>a percentage, I would say that, you know, the ninety

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 3>five percent confidence that I would have is that my

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 3>suggestion that she did not kill herself is true. Ninety

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 3>five percent sure, ninety five percent.

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 1>See, it's fascinating because your conclusion and the results of

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 1>your simulations are almost identical to that of Scott Rhoder's experiments.

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 1>And as you know, Scott Roder is a similar forensic

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 1>biomechanical expert who we brought to Sydney from Los Angeles,

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 1>has dealt with dozens of American police forces and consulted

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of different homicide units in the States.

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:58.600
<v Speaker 1>He recreated that bedroom to the centimeter in a studio

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 1>in Sydney and did exactly the same barrage of tests

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 1>in his own way and came to exactly the same

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 1>conclusion that you've come to.

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 3>I would hope, so, Lene, if he's worth his salt,

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 3>Science doesn't lie, does it. I guess that's what you're

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 3>pointing to. The Scientific aspects of this don't lie. The

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 3>human aspects can be manipulated let's say.

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:25.160
<v Speaker 4>So, then you went ahead and made your final report. Yes,

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 4>and that went to the police. Yes, and in that

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 4>final report.

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 1>And correct me where I'm wrong here, But you basically said,

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the evidence that you found overwhelmingly suggests that Amy did

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 1>not shoot herself.

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 3>That's correct.

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 4>And what was the police reaction to that?

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 3>I did not get a reaction from the police at

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 3>the time. They simply took that and took it to

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 3>the coroner. And so the next time I encountered the

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 3>police was in the coronial inquest.

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 5>Well, we know what the reaction was from police to

0:30:57.000 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 5>get another opinion. It's funny because they didn't, but going

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 5>for another opinion when they got say the psychologists report

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 5>from the internal police psychologists back to you, Liam, you

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 5>then asked Professor Acklan what he thought of the coroner's finding.

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that was the deputy coroner, I believe, and she

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 3>delivered an open finding. But she did give weight to

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 3>the evidence of the various experts, and she was I

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 3>think the words were convinced that there was some doubt

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 3>about the histories that were purported to have happened by

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 3>the various witnesses. So there was doubt, but for reasons

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 3>of her own. She could not deliver anything other than

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 3>an open finding. Were you surprised?

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 4>I was surprised you were, Yes, because again you have

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 4>had access like no one else to all the information,

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 4>the photographs, the witness statements, and then conducted your own

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 4>experiments in situ at the crime scene.

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. We must remember that simulations and reconstructions come with

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 3>a number of limitations. For example, we used a live

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 3>model similar size, age, weight, etc. As Amy. We used

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 3>a replica gun which was loaded with blank bullets to

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 3>be exactly the same weight. All of those things are limitations.

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 3>They have to be acknowledged as limitations, and it just

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 3>depends on the decision maker as to how much weight

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 3>they put on those limitations compared to the eventual conclusions

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:32.240
<v Speaker 3>that I came to have.

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 1>You worked on any cases, Professor, where you have made

0:32:36.480 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 1>such a definitive conclusion and they haven't gone to trial.

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 3>No.

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 4>Is there anything about Amy's case that troubles you?

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 3>Yes. The longer this goes on, it troubles me more

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 3>and more that I believe an injustice has been done,

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 3>and it's part of the reason why I'm sitting here today.

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 1>You're in a difficult position. I've got to say, because

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 1>police still call upon you as they should for your

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 1>professional opinion in other cases. Yes, and so you walk

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:09.200
<v Speaker 1>a fine line, don't you. You have to deal in

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 1>fact you're a scientist. But there's also the politics of this.

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:17.120
<v Speaker 3>There is a lot of politics around this. But I

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 3>deal with the facts and my job as an expert

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 3>is to provide the best information I can to the

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 3>decision maker, if that's the coroner or a judge or

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 3>a jury. That's my job and I will do that

0:33:31.720 --> 0:33:35.479
<v Speaker 3>honestly to the best of my ability. And that's what

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 3>I do. If the police wish to use me and

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 3>like what I do, then I'm very happy to work

0:33:42.200 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 3>with them. I do a lot of work for the

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 3>WA Police at minimal cost, let's say, because I feel

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 3>it's my duty to help.

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 4>Well, you have a very good reputation. Thank you, well,

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 4>you've earned it.

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's one of the reasons that former Coroner

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Vicar decided upon the receipt of your report to afford

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 1>it to the DPPs because it carries weight. I hope

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 1>something yes, And just a reminder for our listeners here,

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:09.759
<v Speaker 1>Al evel And Vicker was the first coroner who was

0:34:09.800 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 1>assigned Amy's case. Now, she was another key person in

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 1>this whole chain who was privy to the details, all

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the details, and did not agree with the WA police's

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:25.839
<v Speaker 1>conclusion that Amy killed herself. We'll be speaking with her

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:30.239
<v Speaker 1>in the next episode. Now back to Professor Ackland. I'm

0:34:30.239 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 1>asking him about any possible connection that he has with

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Amy's case prior to officially getting involved. Now, this is

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 1>important for people living outside Perth because those of us

0:34:41.719 --> 0:34:44.399
<v Speaker 1>who live there know how tight the community is. As

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 1>we've discussed, even if we don't know somebody directly, we

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 1>often know of them, or we know somebody else who's

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:54.000
<v Speaker 1>had some sort of involvement. Is there any personal connection

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:56.880
<v Speaker 1>for you, Professor, And I don't mean with the particular

0:34:56.880 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 1>players in this case, in Amy's story, but being exposed

0:35:01.680 --> 0:35:05.200
<v Speaker 1>to the sort of information and the pictures and all

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:07.719
<v Speaker 1>the things that go with it in cases like this,

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:09.520
<v Speaker 1>does it have an impact person.

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:12.719
<v Speaker 3>I try to remain dispassionate as much as I can,

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 3>and that serves me very well in most of the

0:35:16.200 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 3>other cases that I'm involved with. But I guess this

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:22.280
<v Speaker 3>one's a little bit different. It's gone on for some time,

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:26.239
<v Speaker 3>and I just get the feeling that you know, the

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 3>evidence hasn't been weighted in the best way possible for

0:35:31.719 --> 0:35:32.920
<v Speaker 3>Amy to get justice.

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 1>What has to happen, though scientifically in this case, because

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 1>we can't go back and change any of that, shall

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I say, nightmarish litany of mistakes at the actual crime

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:48.719
<v Speaker 1>scene on the night So that does leave all that

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:51.720
<v Speaker 1>potential forensic evidence missing forever.

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:52.800
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that's true.

0:35:52.920 --> 0:35:54.279
<v Speaker 4>So how does it progress?

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 3>I think it can progress if those various players who

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:03.320
<v Speaker 3>were witnesses on the scene have an opportunity to present

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:07.520
<v Speaker 3>themselves in a criminal case and be cross examined and

0:36:08.120 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 3>interrogated if you like, to find out the veracity of

0:36:12.600 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 3>their stories and where the holes lie. The holes which

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:19.719
<v Speaker 3>I saw in my report, but others need to see

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 3>that and hear that for themselves.

0:36:21.719 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 1>So what you're suggesting, if I may be so bold,

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 1>is the DPP needs to take a leap of faith,

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 1>based on the available evidence that's already there in the

0:36:30.719 --> 0:36:34.879
<v Speaker 1>bottom drawer, go to trial and litigate the whole thing.

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:37.680
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't like to tell the DPP what to do.

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:40.640
<v Speaker 3>They have their whole series of things that they must

0:36:40.719 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 3>check off. But let me say that I would be

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 3>very pleased to see that happen.

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:48.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to sound morbid about this or gruesome,

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 1>but one thing that's always struck me as highly unusual

0:36:53.440 --> 0:36:56.719
<v Speaker 1>in this case is the position of the wound on

0:36:56.760 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Amy's head, the entry specifically for person so tiny and

0:37:03.239 --> 0:37:07.080
<v Speaker 1>also be just generally and correct me if I'm wrong here.

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:10.279
<v Speaker 1>I might be completely off the beaten track. But if

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:13.719
<v Speaker 1>anyone is going to suicide with a weapon like that,

0:37:14.560 --> 0:37:16.279
<v Speaker 1>I would have thought the last thing you would try

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to do is shoot yourself horizontally. Am I being nice?

0:37:22.320 --> 0:37:23.399
<v Speaker 1>You're right on the mark.

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:27.640
<v Speaker 3>If I could take you back to the scenario that

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 3>was painted by the detectives who were on the scene,

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:34.719
<v Speaker 3>who called it very early in my view, a suicide.

0:37:35.600 --> 0:37:41.440
<v Speaker 3>They suggested that Amy had held this shotgun with her

0:37:41.520 --> 0:37:45.920
<v Speaker 3>left hand only out here on her right hand side,

0:37:46.560 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 3>and shot herself that way. This was because her right

0:37:49.239 --> 0:37:53.440
<v Speaker 3>hand was tucked up underneath her buttocks. There's a whole

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 3>bunch of problems with that. We recreated this scenario with

0:37:57.719 --> 0:38:01.759
<v Speaker 3>the police officer, who, by the way, was naive to

0:38:01.840 --> 0:38:04.560
<v Speaker 3>the story. She had not seen any of the photographs,

0:38:04.920 --> 0:38:09.759
<v Speaker 3>and she acted under my direction. So we supported that

0:38:10.160 --> 0:38:13.920
<v Speaker 3>shotgun with some strings and she was able to reach

0:38:14.040 --> 0:38:16.880
<v Speaker 3>the trigger out here on her right hand side with

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:19.800
<v Speaker 3>her left hand, but she couldn't support the weight and

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:23.760
<v Speaker 3>aim the shotgun. It was very you know, it moved

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:28.520
<v Speaker 3>around a lot. And so the detectives were challenged by

0:38:29.040 --> 0:38:32.719
<v Speaker 3>one of the police officers, Reynolds, I believe, and they said, well,

0:38:32.760 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 3>obviously she's supported the butt onto the beder, onto the

0:38:37.080 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 3>floor and still used this very awkward action with her

0:38:41.040 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 3>left hand and pushed the trigger, not pulled the trigger,

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:48.000
<v Speaker 3>but pushed the trigger away. Now, all of that does

0:38:48.040 --> 0:38:51.359
<v Speaker 3>not make sense because if she had leant over this

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:55.440
<v Speaker 3>way towards her right and pushed the trigger, then the

0:38:55.480 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 3>exit wound would have spattered blood high up on that wall.

0:38:59.560 --> 0:39:03.120
<v Speaker 3>She would probably fallen over as well onto the right side,

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:05.160
<v Speaker 3>and the gun would have been out to the right

0:39:05.200 --> 0:39:08.280
<v Speaker 3>hand side. This is a nonsense, This is a fiction.

0:39:08.920 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 3>It cannot have happened that way. And the reason for

0:39:11.120 --> 0:39:15.120
<v Speaker 3>that is because Amy was found sitting upright in the alcove.

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:18.920
<v Speaker 3>Her head was upright, leaning against the wall. The blood

0:39:18.920 --> 0:39:22.879
<v Speaker 3>spatter and other material was next to her left side

0:39:22.880 --> 0:39:27.480
<v Speaker 3>of her face and down by her shoulder, so almost horizontal. Yes,

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:31.239
<v Speaker 3>the entry and exit wound. We didn't have good forensics,

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:34.880
<v Speaker 3>but you know, the physics don't lie. The entry and

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:39.480
<v Speaker 3>exit wounds were almost horizontal, probably slightly downward, and the

0:39:39.520 --> 0:39:42.880
<v Speaker 3>exit room was near where that blood spatter material was

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:47.920
<v Speaker 3>there on that so the scenario painted by the detectives

0:39:47.920 --> 0:39:51.239
<v Speaker 3>at the time could not have been possible given the

0:39:51.600 --> 0:39:55.480
<v Speaker 3>other evidence. The other evidence also includes the fact that

0:39:55.520 --> 0:39:57.800
<v Speaker 3>if she was pushing the trigger with her right hand,

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:01.840
<v Speaker 3>she couldn't have blood materi there and she couldn't have

0:40:01.920 --> 0:40:07.319
<v Speaker 3>gunpowder residue. So clearly, in my view, if she has

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:09.839
<v Speaker 3>committed suicide, she can't have done it in that way.

0:40:10.520 --> 0:40:12.440
<v Speaker 3>So part of what we tried to do was to

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:16.080
<v Speaker 3>look for other scenarios where she might have committed suicide

0:40:16.200 --> 0:40:20.080
<v Speaker 3>using a different approach, and the most logical approach one

0:40:20.080 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 3>would think about it would be to use the gun

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:26.120
<v Speaker 3>and push the trigger with the right hand and maybe

0:40:26.160 --> 0:40:29.440
<v Speaker 3>hold and support the barrel of the gun with the

0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:32.759
<v Speaker 3>left hand. This means that the gunpowder residue on the

0:40:32.840 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 3>left hand and the transfer blood on that left hand

0:40:36.360 --> 0:40:40.560
<v Speaker 3>would have been there, as was found no blood residue

0:40:40.560 --> 0:40:44.799
<v Speaker 3>on the right hand and no gunpowder residue. It also

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 3>means she could have probably stayed up right. The trouble

0:40:47.600 --> 0:40:52.000
<v Speaker 3>with all of that is when a person is immediately deceased,

0:40:52.200 --> 0:40:56.040
<v Speaker 3>they can't move and move things around. They fall. The

0:40:56.080 --> 0:41:00.440
<v Speaker 3>limbs will fall in that position, and the gun fall

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:03.959
<v Speaker 3>and probably go out to the right given the action

0:41:04.160 --> 0:41:07.960
<v Speaker 3>reaction Newton's third law. When we did this simulation, the

0:41:08.080 --> 0:41:12.319
<v Speaker 3>right hand dropped down by her side, nowhere near where

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:16.200
<v Speaker 3>it was found and photographed underneath her thigh and buttock.

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:18.759
<v Speaker 4>Who had us her arm managed to be tucked under

0:41:18.760 --> 0:41:19.320
<v Speaker 4>her buttock.

0:41:19.520 --> 0:41:23.759
<v Speaker 3>It can't happen, not by her anyway. So these were

0:41:23.800 --> 0:41:28.400
<v Speaker 3>inconsistencies even with that scenario that I painted, made even

0:41:28.440 --> 0:41:33.200
<v Speaker 3>worse by Gareth Price, who entered second into the room

0:41:33.560 --> 0:41:36.399
<v Speaker 3>and said that the gun was lying with the butt

0:41:36.520 --> 0:41:40.440
<v Speaker 3>by her feet and the barrel by her head. Now,

0:41:40.520 --> 0:41:43.279
<v Speaker 3>David Simmons says he walked into the room and he

0:41:43.360 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 3>did not move the body. So we've got a second

0:41:46.719 --> 0:41:49.400
<v Speaker 3>witness who says that the gun was lying this way.

0:41:50.080 --> 0:41:52.879
<v Speaker 3>If she'd shot herself, then the blood spatter would be

0:41:52.880 --> 0:41:55.799
<v Speaker 3>behind and the gun may have ended up there. But

0:41:56.080 --> 0:41:58.400
<v Speaker 3>all of the other information is incorrect.

0:41:58.480 --> 0:41:59.320
<v Speaker 4>It made no sense.

0:41:59.480 --> 0:42:02.560
<v Speaker 3>It made no sense, so on the basis of those things,

0:42:02.640 --> 0:42:06.279
<v Speaker 3>I was able to discount the suggestion that Amy had

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:10.040
<v Speaker 3>killed herself, either in the scenario purported by the detectives

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:12.240
<v Speaker 3>and in the one that sort of made more logical

0:42:12.320 --> 0:42:14.319
<v Speaker 3>sense if you were going to take a gun and

0:42:14.320 --> 0:42:18.040
<v Speaker 3>shoot yourself. Yes, So the only thing that then made sense,

0:42:18.400 --> 0:42:23.400
<v Speaker 3>And partly because this trajectory of the entry and exit

0:42:23.440 --> 0:42:27.279
<v Speaker 3>were in the trajectory of the pellets was horizontal but

0:42:27.360 --> 0:42:30.360
<v Speaker 3>slightly downward. The fact that Price said that the gun

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:35.520
<v Speaker 3>was placed here led me to conclude that Amy was

0:42:35.560 --> 0:42:39.880
<v Speaker 3>shot by a third party and the gun was placed there. Now,

0:42:39.880 --> 0:42:43.200
<v Speaker 3>if we believe what Price says, he took that gun

0:42:43.360 --> 0:42:46.160
<v Speaker 3>from that position and threw it on the floor, she

0:42:46.200 --> 0:42:49.000
<v Speaker 3>couldn't have put that gun there. She couldn't have shot

0:42:49.040 --> 0:42:52.080
<v Speaker 3>herself from that position. The gun would have been out

0:42:52.120 --> 0:42:53.320
<v Speaker 3>to the right hand side.

0:42:53.560 --> 0:42:56.600
<v Speaker 1>So, based on every scenario that you've looked at, there

0:42:56.640 --> 0:42:58.600
<v Speaker 1>has to be a third party involved. The only thing

0:42:58.640 --> 0:43:02.840
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense is a third party shot Amy Wensley.

0:43:03.120 --> 0:43:05.799
<v Speaker 3>It's the only thing that's consistent with all the other

0:43:05.840 --> 0:43:09.440
<v Speaker 3>bits of evidence, Lamb. And the question remains, who is

0:43:09.440 --> 0:43:11.160
<v Speaker 3>that third party? That's the question.

0:43:11.760 --> 0:43:15.160
<v Speaker 1>It beggars belief for me that police detectives who trained

0:43:15.239 --> 0:43:18.680
<v Speaker 1>these sorts of things, or even minus the training, just

0:43:18.680 --> 0:43:22.880
<v Speaker 1>with their common sense, can't come even half way to

0:43:22.920 --> 0:43:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the same conclusion.

0:43:24.080 --> 0:43:27.719
<v Speaker 3>It was a very strange for me to hear that

0:43:27.760 --> 0:43:31.600
<v Speaker 3>they were sticking with their story through that coronial inquest

0:43:31.880 --> 0:43:33.040
<v Speaker 3>and wouldn't budge from that.

0:43:33.239 --> 0:43:35.520
<v Speaker 4>But these are the same police detectives who didn't even

0:43:35.560 --> 0:43:38.480
<v Speaker 4>want to enter the room, who were told by uniform

0:43:38.480 --> 0:43:41.399
<v Speaker 4>officers when they turned up on the scene that there

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 4>was a dead mum in that bedroom, and they didn't

0:43:45.680 --> 0:43:47.480
<v Speaker 4>even want to go in and have a look themselves

0:43:47.520 --> 0:43:48.320
<v Speaker 4>with their own eyes.

0:43:48.680 --> 0:43:51.520
<v Speaker 3>I can't recall that as being the case, But I

0:43:51.520 --> 0:43:52.560
<v Speaker 3>will take your point.

0:44:07.040 --> 0:44:09.680
<v Speaker 5>Now, stopping there for a minute, Liam, and you make

0:44:09.719 --> 0:44:13.280
<v Speaker 5>this point. Of course, this was never about WA police

0:44:13.360 --> 0:44:16.160
<v Speaker 5>as a whole, because there were so many officers there

0:44:16.200 --> 0:44:19.160
<v Speaker 5>wanting to do the right thing. The thing that surprises

0:44:19.200 --> 0:44:23.439
<v Speaker 5>me most though, is how those ones were punished while

0:44:23.480 --> 0:44:26.120
<v Speaker 5>the two detectives got a rap over the knuckles, a

0:44:26.120 --> 0:44:30.680
<v Speaker 5>token gesture. Talk about lack of justice. That's it right there.

0:44:31.160 --> 0:44:34.880
<v Speaker 5>How can an organization whose primary purpose is to instill

0:44:35.040 --> 0:44:38.640
<v Speaker 5>justice have any credibility when they continue to deny it

0:44:38.640 --> 0:44:40.160
<v Speaker 5>for Amy and her family.

0:44:42.800 --> 0:44:44.399
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's a hard one, isn't it.

0:44:44.680 --> 0:44:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I've got to say, though, I don't think we're the

0:44:46.160 --> 0:44:48.239
<v Speaker 1>only ones who see it this way. In fact, I

0:44:48.280 --> 0:44:49.759
<v Speaker 1>know we're not the only ones who see it this

0:44:49.800 --> 0:44:52.719
<v Speaker 1>way because of the enormous feedback that we've had to

0:44:52.760 --> 0:44:56.560
<v Speaker 1>this podcast, although many of the other feedback streams might

0:44:56.600 --> 0:44:58.759
<v Speaker 1>be a bit more diplomatic the way they put things.

0:44:59.000 --> 0:45:01.880
<v Speaker 1>But look towards the end of our interview, I couldn't

0:45:01.920 --> 0:45:06.520
<v Speaker 1>help lamenting the attitude of authorities ongoing treatment of Amy's

0:45:06.520 --> 0:45:12.040
<v Speaker 1>case to Professor Ackland Now, who of course was pretty

0:45:12.040 --> 0:45:15.480
<v Speaker 1>good about that. He completely understood our frustration. Do you

0:45:15.520 --> 0:45:18.960
<v Speaker 1>think that this case is now held up because people

0:45:18.960 --> 0:45:24.920
<v Speaker 1>who made perhaps erroneous decisions in the first instance ten

0:45:25.000 --> 0:45:27.520
<v Speaker 1>years ago don't want to be embarrassed.

0:45:28.200 --> 0:45:32.479
<v Speaker 3>I suspect that that is the case. People will hold

0:45:32.480 --> 0:45:35.880
<v Speaker 3>a position and defend that position. That's the way of

0:45:35.960 --> 0:45:39.239
<v Speaker 3>human nature. I think that there are people who were

0:45:39.480 --> 0:45:43.760
<v Speaker 3>witnessed to the events and they won't be changing their story.

0:45:44.320 --> 0:45:48.360
<v Speaker 3>So it'll be very interesting to see what the DBP does.

0:45:48.600 --> 0:45:52.360
<v Speaker 5>It will, indeed, But before we go on, as WA

0:45:52.440 --> 0:45:56.359
<v Speaker 5>police are no longer answering any more questions from US,

0:45:56.760 --> 0:46:00.520
<v Speaker 5>I decided to put those questions to WA's new Police Minister,

0:46:00.840 --> 0:46:04.080
<v Speaker 5>Rees Whitby, similar to what we put to Police Commissioner

0:46:04.239 --> 0:46:09.400
<v Speaker 5>Cole Blanche. They were directed at WA Police's credibility among

0:46:09.719 --> 0:46:13.640
<v Speaker 5>new evidence of senior officers pushing for a suicide finding.

0:46:13.960 --> 0:46:17.920
<v Speaker 5>No matter what. Here's what his spokesman said in a statement.

0:46:18.560 --> 0:46:21.920
<v Speaker 8>WA Police Special Crime Squad has carriage of the ongoing

0:46:21.960 --> 0:46:25.240
<v Speaker 8>investigation into Amy's death, and there is a million dollar

0:46:25.320 --> 0:46:28.720
<v Speaker 8>reward for information leading to a conviction of the person

0:46:28.880 --> 0:46:33.240
<v Speaker 8>or persons responsible. WA Police have been pursuing a number

0:46:33.239 --> 0:46:37.000
<v Speaker 8>of investigative leads and have committed to presenting any findings

0:46:37.000 --> 0:46:41.080
<v Speaker 8>to the DPP for consideration. I encourage anyone who can

0:46:41.120 --> 0:46:44.080
<v Speaker 8>assist and has information in relation to her death to

0:46:44.160 --> 0:46:48.120
<v Speaker 8>contact crime Stoppers on one eight hundred triple three, triple

0:46:48.200 --> 0:46:53.120
<v Speaker 8>zero or online at www dot crime stoppers, WA dot

0:46:53.120 --> 0:46:54.320
<v Speaker 8>com dot au.

0:46:54.760 --> 0:46:58.560
<v Speaker 5>SI liam I politely replied to his media advisor, first

0:46:58.600 --> 0:47:01.560
<v Speaker 5>by thanking him, but of course also pointing out that

0:47:01.600 --> 0:47:04.800
<v Speaker 5>this didn't answer my questions or even address the issue

0:47:04.800 --> 0:47:06.640
<v Speaker 5>of WA Police's integrity.

0:47:06.880 --> 0:47:10.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, it's clearly it's a popcorn reply designed to

0:47:10.880 --> 0:47:13.080
<v Speaker 4>make you feel better about the fact that they've read

0:47:13.120 --> 0:47:16.799
<v Speaker 4>it and actually sent something back. I just wish politicians

0:47:16.920 --> 0:47:20.399
<v Speaker 4>and the way they run their offices, including media, would

0:47:20.440 --> 0:47:23.120
<v Speaker 4>just be honest. You know. If they don't want to

0:47:23.120 --> 0:47:25.280
<v Speaker 4>buy into it, they don't want to make a public

0:47:25.320 --> 0:47:28.640
<v Speaker 4>comment about it, just say nothing. I mean, that's really

0:47:28.840 --> 0:47:32.920
<v Speaker 4>quite insulting if the police minister doesn't think there's public

0:47:32.960 --> 0:47:38.279
<v Speaker 4>interest in a case that is so heavily tarnished with

0:47:39.000 --> 0:47:43.040
<v Speaker 4>the dv lens and everyone's trying to well, everyone that

0:47:43.120 --> 0:47:45.880
<v Speaker 4>I know who's responsible is trying to do something to

0:47:45.880 --> 0:47:50.520
<v Speaker 4>make an impact against domestic violence and the rising numbers.

0:47:51.600 --> 0:47:54.719
<v Speaker 4>You know, if a police minister can't find the time

0:47:54.760 --> 0:47:57.440
<v Speaker 4>to do that, just say, just send you back a

0:47:57.480 --> 0:48:01.920
<v Speaker 4>proper message in English. Look, we don't want to be

0:48:01.960 --> 0:48:04.600
<v Speaker 4>part of this particular podcast because we don't want the

0:48:04.600 --> 0:48:07.640
<v Speaker 4>public to hear exactly what we've got to say, because

0:48:07.680 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, for some reason it's the minister is embarrassed,

0:48:10.160 --> 0:48:12.920
<v Speaker 4>or the minister can't do anything, or the minister's not interested.

0:48:13.239 --> 0:48:15.279
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, isn't the lad up? I mean one of those

0:48:15.360 --> 0:48:18.640
<v Speaker 5>operational things that they've got to leave in w a

0:48:18.760 --> 0:48:22.280
<v Speaker 5>police's corner. So I understand that, but when it comes

0:48:22.320 --> 0:48:27.560
<v Speaker 5>to the reputation, the integrity, the perception public confidence in

0:48:27.840 --> 0:48:32.560
<v Speaker 5>WA police, which is severely undermined by the information that's

0:48:32.600 --> 0:48:37.160
<v Speaker 5>come out from our investigation recently where you have a

0:48:37.320 --> 0:48:40.600
<v Speaker 5>former police officer another one saying that they were told

0:48:40.640 --> 0:48:43.880
<v Speaker 5>to treat this as non suspicious and when they didn't,

0:48:44.360 --> 0:48:47.480
<v Speaker 5>they were reprimanded verbally. But you know it was a

0:48:47.840 --> 0:48:51.520
<v Speaker 5>yelled at, which would be I would have thought be

0:48:51.600 --> 0:48:53.560
<v Speaker 5>a misconduct issue at the very least.

0:48:54.000 --> 0:48:56.759
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think again. You know, you use the word integrity,

0:48:57.360 --> 0:49:01.600
<v Speaker 4>but it starts at the top. And I've said this before,

0:49:01.680 --> 0:49:05.720
<v Speaker 4>but what we need and WA is not an orphan

0:49:05.840 --> 0:49:09.360
<v Speaker 4>in this case. If there's a new minister on the

0:49:09.360 --> 0:49:13.360
<v Speaker 4>block in which mister Whitby is, it's about time that

0:49:13.400 --> 0:49:15.520
<v Speaker 4>somebody took a stand and became a minister of the

0:49:15.520 --> 0:49:19.319
<v Speaker 4>Crown for the crown, which is the people, and that's

0:49:19.360 --> 0:49:22.480
<v Speaker 4>who's paying his wages. Sometimes they need to be reminded

0:49:22.480 --> 0:49:26.120
<v Speaker 4>of that. So we want a Minister of Police, not

0:49:26.200 --> 0:49:29.919
<v Speaker 4>a minister for police. We want a minister who's going

0:49:29.960 --> 0:49:33.960
<v Speaker 4>to keep the police on the right track and keep

0:49:34.160 --> 0:49:38.640
<v Speaker 4>the integrity implicit in the running of that police service.

0:49:39.080 --> 0:49:41.640
<v Speaker 4>That's what we need. You know, when's the last time

0:49:41.719 --> 0:49:45.320
<v Speaker 4>you heard a minister who had police as their remit

0:49:46.280 --> 0:49:49.840
<v Speaker 4>be critical at all of what police did. I'm telling you,

0:49:49.880 --> 0:49:55.240
<v Speaker 4>it's like a football club. They become the card carrying

0:49:55.360 --> 0:49:58.720
<v Speaker 4>number one member and it's not right. It's the minister

0:49:58.880 --> 0:50:02.280
<v Speaker 4>is there as the old overseer, he is the boss.

0:50:03.000 --> 0:50:05.840
<v Speaker 4>But they become, as I say, they become the biggest,

0:50:06.160 --> 0:50:07.840
<v Speaker 4>most important part of the fan club.

0:50:07.960 --> 0:50:10.000
<v Speaker 5>At the very least, I would have just said, look,

0:50:10.120 --> 0:50:12.719
<v Speaker 5>I'm going to catch up with the police commissioner about this,

0:50:13.320 --> 0:50:15.160
<v Speaker 5>because obviously I want to make sure that but you know,

0:50:15.239 --> 0:50:17.640
<v Speaker 5>it is a matter for investigation. The kind of a

0:50:17.719 --> 0:50:20.120
<v Speaker 5>way of dealing with this in a more frank and

0:50:20.239 --> 0:50:23.279
<v Speaker 5>honest and you know, at least looking like you care,

0:50:23.360 --> 0:50:26.240
<v Speaker 5>because I don't know if the police commissioner cares because

0:50:26.280 --> 0:50:29.239
<v Speaker 5>he hasn't gotten back to us on it, and he's

0:50:29.280 --> 0:50:31.640
<v Speaker 5>not elected, and I guess they kind of just had

0:50:31.680 --> 0:50:33.680
<v Speaker 5>an election, so they probably don't care too much. But

0:50:34.200 --> 0:50:36.840
<v Speaker 5>you know, I mean, this is this is your reputation,

0:50:37.040 --> 0:50:39.880
<v Speaker 5>and I mean I think that's why people just become

0:50:40.680 --> 0:50:43.960
<v Speaker 5>so yeah, cynical, cynical.

0:50:43.480 --> 0:50:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Yes about politics. Yeah, so you know, there's the BS

0:50:46.760 --> 0:50:49.560
<v Speaker 1>for you. But anyway, we'll move on and hopefully we

0:50:49.719 --> 0:50:53.840
<v Speaker 1>will try and keep magnifying issues that force the judicial

0:50:53.880 --> 0:50:57.160
<v Speaker 1>system to do something about Amy Wensley for her family.

0:51:00.719 --> 0:51:03.399
<v Speaker 1>And on top of that, I see also where Amy's aunt,

0:51:03.560 --> 0:51:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Anna Davy, has also written to the Triple C Commissioner.

0:51:08.120 --> 0:51:12.560
<v Speaker 1>That's the Corruption and Crime Commissioner John mckeckney. See seeing

0:51:12.560 --> 0:51:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the Police minister into that letter.

0:51:15.840 --> 0:51:19.319
<v Speaker 2>Dear Commissioner mckeckney, my name is Anna Davy, and I'm

0:51:19.360 --> 0:51:22.879
<v Speaker 2>writing in regard to the Western Australian police handling of

0:51:22.920 --> 0:51:26.280
<v Speaker 2>the investigation into the death of my niece Amy Wensley,

0:51:26.600 --> 0:51:29.840
<v Speaker 2>who died in June twenty fourteen. As a family, we

0:51:29.920 --> 0:51:33.840
<v Speaker 2>still have concerns over the adequacy of the police investigations

0:51:33.880 --> 0:51:37.640
<v Speaker 2>into Amy's death since twenty fourteen. By way of background,

0:51:38.000 --> 0:51:40.920
<v Speaker 2>in November twenty nineteen, I wrote to the Corruption and

0:51:40.960 --> 0:51:45.640
<v Speaker 2>Crime Commission about Western Australia's police mishandling of Amy's death

0:51:45.680 --> 0:51:49.319
<v Speaker 2>on the night she died and the subsequent investigation by

0:51:49.400 --> 0:51:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Major Crime that followed Operation Johnde. At the time, the

0:51:54.200 --> 0:51:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Corruption and Crime Commission concluded there was reasonable suspicion of

0:51:58.760 --> 0:52:03.200
<v Speaker 2>serious misconduct by Detective Kirkman and Detective Weedman and referred

0:52:03.200 --> 0:52:06.719
<v Speaker 2>the matter back to Western Australian Police Internal affairs. It

0:52:06.840 --> 0:52:10.560
<v Speaker 2>was only after a twenty twenty one coronial inquest determined

0:52:10.960 --> 0:52:14.239
<v Speaker 2>there wasn't enough evidence to conclude Amy killed herself that

0:52:14.280 --> 0:52:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Western Australian Police acknowledged the detectives made mistakes, but not

0:52:18.520 --> 0:52:21.839
<v Speaker 2>that they wrongly concluded Amy took her own life. The

0:52:21.840 --> 0:52:25.440
<v Speaker 2>two detectives each received a warning but no further punishment,

0:52:25.600 --> 0:52:29.799
<v Speaker 2>and our family has never received an apology. At the inquest,

0:52:30.239 --> 0:52:33.640
<v Speaker 2>it was revealed that the officer heading the coronial investigation

0:52:34.239 --> 0:52:37.560
<v Speaker 2>was instructed by the homicide squad to treat Amy's death

0:52:37.560 --> 0:52:42.120
<v Speaker 2>as non suspicious and was then severely reprimanded when she didn't.

0:52:43.040 --> 0:52:46.200
<v Speaker 2>This is yet more evidence of the extensive mishandling of

0:52:46.239 --> 0:52:50.359
<v Speaker 2>Amy's case and their bias applied to investigations to try

0:52:50.400 --> 0:52:54.640
<v Speaker 2>to manipulate a suicide finding. A transcript of the inquest

0:52:54.680 --> 0:52:57.239
<v Speaker 2>is not available to our family, and we have tried

0:52:57.280 --> 0:52:59.440
<v Speaker 2>on a number of occasions to obtain a copy, but

0:52:59.520 --> 0:53:02.560
<v Speaker 2>to know of it. However, I urged the Corruption and

0:53:02.560 --> 0:53:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Crime Commission to obtain a copy to read the extraordinary

0:53:06.239 --> 0:53:11.000
<v Speaker 2>bias applied by the police hierarchy for yourselves. It's clear

0:53:11.400 --> 0:53:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Western Australian police attempted to cover up mismanagement of Amy's case,

0:53:15.400 --> 0:53:19.600
<v Speaker 2>which is at best police misconduct. This has never been investigated.

0:53:20.239 --> 0:53:22.920
<v Speaker 2>We're repeatedly being told now that there's a lot more

0:53:22.920 --> 0:53:26.399
<v Speaker 2>awareness in Western Australian police of the sometimes hidden nature

0:53:26.400 --> 0:53:29.479
<v Speaker 2>of domestic violence than at the time of Amy's death.

0:53:29.960 --> 0:53:33.279
<v Speaker 2>Police Commissioner Cole Blanche even stated that a case like

0:53:33.360 --> 0:53:36.799
<v Speaker 2>Amy's was less likely to happen again after the introduction

0:53:36.960 --> 0:53:39.520
<v Speaker 2>of a two day domestic violence course for police to

0:53:39.600 --> 0:53:43.279
<v Speaker 2>attend and a helpline for more junior police officers to

0:53:43.360 --> 0:53:46.200
<v Speaker 2>call if they feel their concerns were not being heard

0:53:46.280 --> 0:53:50.360
<v Speaker 2>by more senior police. However, earlier this year, a police

0:53:50.400 --> 0:53:55.520
<v Speaker 2>internal investigation found eight Western Australian Police officers did not

0:53:55.600 --> 0:53:58.600
<v Speaker 2>perform their duty in their lead up to the Floreate

0:53:58.719 --> 0:54:02.439
<v Speaker 2>murders the Bombard case. It does not seem like much

0:54:02.440 --> 0:54:06.600
<v Speaker 2>has changed since Amy's death. Feeling helpless against an organization

0:54:06.760 --> 0:54:10.480
<v Speaker 2>such as Western Australian Police, I sought help from investigative

0:54:10.560 --> 0:54:14.719
<v Speaker 2>journalists to help uncover all the material required to see

0:54:14.760 --> 0:54:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Amy's case finally be heard in a criminal court. Their

0:54:18.000 --> 0:54:21.360
<v Speaker 2>work has been published on Spotlight and the podcast The

0:54:21.400 --> 0:54:24.880
<v Speaker 2>Truth About Amy Is This what policing has come down to.

0:54:25.760 --> 0:54:29.360
<v Speaker 2>Late last year, the Western Australian Police relented following negative

0:54:29.360 --> 0:54:34.000
<v Speaker 2>publicity about their failure to investigate Amy's case properly and

0:54:34.120 --> 0:54:37.440
<v Speaker 2>formed a task force to review Amy's case and prepare

0:54:37.560 --> 0:54:40.640
<v Speaker 2>a report for the Office of the Director of Public Prosecution.

0:54:41.440 --> 0:54:44.480
<v Speaker 2>We are pleased about this, but given their approach to

0:54:44.480 --> 0:54:48.879
<v Speaker 2>Operation Johnde and what they told the coronial inquest, our

0:54:48.960 --> 0:54:53.440
<v Speaker 2>family is concerned Western Australian Police will continue to perpetuate

0:54:53.600 --> 0:54:57.759
<v Speaker 2>the very inaccurate theory of suicide, which has now been

0:54:57.840 --> 0:55:02.840
<v Speaker 2>debunked by three biomechanical experts, or find excuses not to

0:55:02.880 --> 0:55:06.680
<v Speaker 2>support a prosecution. I note with interest that the Corruption

0:55:06.760 --> 0:55:10.880
<v Speaker 2>and Crime Commission website states that during October twenty twenty

0:55:10.880 --> 0:55:15.800
<v Speaker 2>four to December twenty twenty four you assessed five hundred

0:55:15.880 --> 0:55:21.279
<v Speaker 2>and seventy three allegations of alleged minor and serious misconduct

0:55:21.320 --> 0:55:26.239
<v Speaker 2>by Western Australian Police. That's an average six complaints a day.

0:55:27.000 --> 0:55:31.040
<v Speaker 2>There is clearly a serious issue within Western Australian Police

0:55:31.400 --> 0:55:35.280
<v Speaker 2>and it has been frustrating and negatively impacting my family

0:55:35.360 --> 0:55:38.920
<v Speaker 2>now for more than a decade. I urge you to

0:55:39.040 --> 0:55:43.800
<v Speaker 2>please undertake a new investigation into Western Australian Police's handling

0:55:43.880 --> 0:55:47.440
<v Speaker 2>of the case of Amy Wensley relating to Operation Johndee,

0:55:47.840 --> 0:55:50.720
<v Speaker 2>the Homicide Squad's attempt to have an officer in charge

0:55:50.760 --> 0:55:54.520
<v Speaker 2>of the coronial investigation treat Amy's case as non suspicious,

0:55:54.880 --> 0:55:59.480
<v Speaker 2>and the obvious bias by senior police officers displayed at

0:55:59.480 --> 0:56:04.080
<v Speaker 2>the coronial inquest. I request you also oversee the current

0:56:04.120 --> 0:56:07.760
<v Speaker 2>investigation being undertaken and receive a copy of the brief

0:56:07.800 --> 0:56:10.880
<v Speaker 2>of evidence when it's provided to the Director of Public

0:56:10.920 --> 0:56:16.040
<v Speaker 2>Prosecution at its conclusion, to ensure Amy's case doesn't continue

0:56:16.080 --> 0:56:19.360
<v Speaker 2>to be mishandled. Please don't hesitate to contact me to

0:56:19.440 --> 0:56:23.360
<v Speaker 2>discuss this matter further, kind regards, Anna Davy.

0:56:24.320 --> 0:56:27.040
<v Speaker 1>The Triple C replied that the matter would be assessed

0:56:27.600 --> 0:56:34.920
<v Speaker 1>and they would contact Anna when the process was complete. Meanwhile,

0:56:34.960 --> 0:56:37.040
<v Speaker 1>as I finished up my interview with Professor Ackland, I

0:56:37.040 --> 0:56:39.640
<v Speaker 1>couldn't help but marvel at the expertise of someone of

0:56:39.680 --> 0:56:43.360
<v Speaker 1>his caliber and his credibility had not managed to convince

0:56:43.680 --> 0:56:47.799
<v Speaker 1>WA Police even before the inquest that Amy could not

0:56:47.960 --> 0:56:50.799
<v Speaker 1>possibly have shot herself. He did well though, to try

0:56:50.840 --> 0:56:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to give them the benefit of the doubt. But once again,

0:56:55.200 --> 0:56:58.439
<v Speaker 1>of course, he emphasized his findings were based on a reconstruction,

0:56:58.880 --> 0:57:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and fair enough, that's the margin of erar, isn't it.

0:57:01.160 --> 0:57:02.880
<v Speaker 1>That's what he's saying. Look, you know it can't be

0:57:02.880 --> 0:57:06.399
<v Speaker 1>perfect because it's a reconstruction. But still it obviously does

0:57:06.480 --> 0:57:10.919
<v Speaker 1>bother him that they're not being taken more seriously, particularly

0:57:11.239 --> 0:57:13.880
<v Speaker 1>when taken into consideration with the other evidence.

0:57:14.360 --> 0:57:17.400
<v Speaker 5>Ninety five percent lamb, he said, ninety five percent.

0:57:17.600 --> 0:57:18.120
<v Speaker 6>He was sure.

0:57:18.240 --> 0:57:19.800
<v Speaker 4>Ninety five percent. Yeah, amazing in that.

0:57:20.080 --> 0:57:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean from bloke has been around this stuff his

0:57:22.400 --> 0:57:25.240
<v Speaker 1>whole life, you know, forty five years, all that experience,

0:57:25.240 --> 0:57:27.800
<v Speaker 1>all that expertise. I mean he's seen this guy's seen

0:57:28.000 --> 0:57:30.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff that you know, would keep people awake at night,

0:57:31.160 --> 0:57:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and he says ninety five percent. It's good enough for me.

0:57:35.960 --> 0:57:38.800
<v Speaker 5>Well, that's a maximum because he's always got to account

0:57:38.840 --> 0:57:39.560
<v Speaker 5>for the margin of era.

0:57:39.920 --> 0:57:42.960
<v Speaker 4>You've always got a margin of ra Yeah.

0:57:42.120 --> 0:57:44.720
<v Speaker 5>As you know, I spoke to Professor Ackland about this too,

0:57:44.840 --> 0:57:45.880
<v Speaker 5>and this is what he told me.

0:57:46.680 --> 0:57:51.240
<v Speaker 6>My original thoughts were that there was so much in

0:57:50.080 --> 0:57:55.440
<v Speaker 6>the evidence trail that was inconsistent, even down to the

0:57:55.720 --> 0:57:59.240
<v Speaker 6>witness statements by the people who were there at the time,

0:57:59.440 --> 0:58:04.400
<v Speaker 6>David Simmans, his friend, Gareth Price, David's father, as well

0:58:04.680 --> 0:58:05.520
<v Speaker 6>Robert Simmons.

0:58:06.160 --> 0:58:10.960
<v Speaker 3>There was a veneer of consistency. But when I looked

0:58:11.240 --> 0:58:16.480
<v Speaker 3>with my forensic head hat on, it didn't hang together

0:58:16.640 --> 0:58:21.840
<v Speaker 3>very well. In there were aspects of those witness statements

0:58:21.880 --> 0:58:25.920
<v Speaker 3>which were contradictory that weren't picked up by other parties,

0:58:26.160 --> 0:58:28.600
<v Speaker 3>and that was the basis of my report. It was

0:58:28.600 --> 0:58:32.000
<v Speaker 3>simply to say these things don't hang together from a

0:58:32.040 --> 0:58:33.080
<v Speaker 3>logic perspective.

0:58:33.440 --> 0:58:36.520
<v Speaker 5>I then asked him about the ongoing reluctance of WA

0:58:36.640 --> 0:58:40.200
<v Speaker 5>police to change their mind from suicide. I mean, even

0:58:40.480 --> 0:58:44.680
<v Speaker 5>at the inquest after your evidence, they just didn't seem

0:58:44.720 --> 0:58:47.800
<v Speaker 5>to want to contemplate anything other than suicide.

0:58:48.120 --> 0:58:49.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that astounded me actually.

0:58:50.160 --> 0:58:53.400
<v Speaker 5>So the other thing, of course, is about her hand

0:58:53.440 --> 0:58:56.640
<v Speaker 5>being tucked under. There seemed to be some talk about

0:58:56.680 --> 0:59:00.760
<v Speaker 5>how possibly maybe going in in that the door right,

0:59:01.040 --> 0:59:03.640
<v Speaker 5>pushing her body, that sort of thing, But then there

0:59:03.640 --> 0:59:06.880
<v Speaker 5>seems to be contradicting it evidence saying well, her body

0:59:06.880 --> 0:59:10.560
<v Speaker 5>can't have been moved much because of the blood spatter

0:59:10.600 --> 0:59:14.440
<v Speaker 5>and all the other forensic evidence. So is it feasible

0:59:14.960 --> 0:59:18.080
<v Speaker 5>that somehow her body could have been pushed Do you

0:59:18.120 --> 0:59:22.760
<v Speaker 5>think so that her hand ended up under her thigh

0:59:23.200 --> 0:59:24.240
<v Speaker 5>after the fact.

0:59:24.480 --> 0:59:27.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, This was a question put to me by the

0:59:27.440 --> 0:59:33.160
<v Speaker 3>cold case detectives. So in order to look at that scenario,

0:59:32.560 --> 0:59:36.640
<v Speaker 3>we had our model seated with both feet up against

0:59:36.720 --> 0:59:39.840
<v Speaker 3>the door as you would imagine someone trying to stop

0:59:40.080 --> 0:59:45.760
<v Speaker 3>someone coming in the door. After ten pushes, each time

0:59:46.000 --> 0:59:49.520
<v Speaker 3>the right knee, which was bent at the time because

0:59:49.560 --> 0:59:53.360
<v Speaker 3>her feet were up against the door, it flopped down

0:59:53.400 --> 0:59:56.440
<v Speaker 3>to the right hand side once that occurred. Once you

0:59:56.520 --> 0:59:59.880
<v Speaker 3>tried to open the door, the knee stopped the door

1:00:00.040 --> 1:00:04.560
<v Speaker 3>from opening more than about halfway. So after ten trials

1:00:04.560 --> 1:00:07.120
<v Speaker 3>of that we were fairly convinced. I was fairly convinced

1:00:07.120 --> 1:00:11.480
<v Speaker 3>that the right leg would have gone from a vertical

1:00:11.520 --> 1:00:15.520
<v Speaker 3>position to a horizontal onto the ground still bent, but

1:00:15.560 --> 1:00:18.440
<v Speaker 3>that the door could not be opened more than about halfway.

1:00:18.520 --> 1:00:22.120
<v Speaker 3>So we marked that position on the floor. We then

1:00:22.400 --> 1:00:25.880
<v Speaker 3>position the hand. So again, if we go back to

1:00:25.920 --> 1:00:29.160
<v Speaker 3>the first set of tests, the right hand did not

1:00:29.360 --> 1:00:32.400
<v Speaker 3>fall anywhere near her thigh. It was out to the side,

1:00:32.960 --> 1:00:37.720
<v Speaker 3>but in order to test this hypothesis, we positioned the

1:00:37.800 --> 1:00:41.680
<v Speaker 3>right hand where it was found to have been or

1:00:42.080 --> 1:00:45.600
<v Speaker 3>to finish up in those photographs. So again I need

1:00:45.640 --> 1:00:47.960
<v Speaker 3>to need to say that this is not where the

1:00:48.040 --> 1:00:51.120
<v Speaker 3>right hand would have finished. We put it there, and

1:00:51.160 --> 1:00:54.600
<v Speaker 3>we had one of the detectives open the door with

1:00:54.680 --> 1:00:58.200
<v Speaker 3>a fair amount of force up to that marked position

1:00:58.280 --> 1:01:01.840
<v Speaker 3>that we had on the ground. And indeed, each time

1:01:02.160 --> 1:01:07.120
<v Speaker 3>the door was stopped by the model's knee on the ground,

1:01:07.160 --> 1:01:09.880
<v Speaker 3>so it really would have taken a lot more force

1:01:10.400 --> 1:01:14.320
<v Speaker 3>to push it even further. After ten trials, we could

1:01:14.360 --> 1:01:20.680
<v Speaker 3>not get that thigh to cover the right hand in

1:01:20.760 --> 1:01:24.680
<v Speaker 3>any way, as shown in that photograph taken by the

1:01:24.840 --> 1:01:26.760
<v Speaker 3>uniformed officers who attended site.

1:01:26.880 --> 1:01:31.280
<v Speaker 5>Okay, so it's safe to say then that that positioning

1:01:31.320 --> 1:01:34.760
<v Speaker 5>of the hand was in that position when she died

1:01:35.160 --> 1:01:37.400
<v Speaker 5>like that, that didn't move into that position.

1:01:37.600 --> 1:01:38.680
<v Speaker 3>That was my conclusion.

1:01:38.800 --> 1:01:42.160
<v Speaker 5>Yes, I know that we can't really say where the

1:01:42.200 --> 1:01:46.600
<v Speaker 5>gun fell, particularly because I mean the presumption is potentially

1:01:46.640 --> 1:01:49.200
<v Speaker 5>it was moved, so that doesn't help us. But just

1:01:49.480 --> 1:01:53.120
<v Speaker 5>with that position of her hand under the thigh, you

1:01:53.160 --> 1:01:56.320
<v Speaker 5>would think that that would have been enough. Am I

1:01:56.400 --> 1:01:59.640
<v Speaker 5>just looking to basically at this that would be enough

1:02:00.120 --> 1:02:02.280
<v Speaker 5>to say that there's no way she could have, I mean,

1:02:02.360 --> 1:02:05.240
<v Speaker 5>highly unlikely, as you say, to have been up to

1:02:05.320 --> 1:02:05.600
<v Speaker 5>kill us.

1:02:05.800 --> 1:02:08.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there's a whole bunch of things that go along

1:02:08.240 --> 1:02:11.000
<v Speaker 3>with that, Allison. She kind of moved after her gun

1:02:11.120 --> 1:02:13.320
<v Speaker 3>was discharged, so she kind of put her hand there.

1:02:14.040 --> 1:02:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Our simulations show that the thigh could not have been

1:02:16.880 --> 1:02:21.800
<v Speaker 3>pushed over the hand. The lack of biological material and

1:02:21.960 --> 1:02:25.120
<v Speaker 3>residue on the right hand shows that that was nowhere

1:02:25.160 --> 1:02:28.280
<v Speaker 3>near the barrel at the time. If she had used

1:02:28.320 --> 1:02:31.360
<v Speaker 3>the right hand to push the trigger, then it would

1:02:31.400 --> 1:02:34.560
<v Speaker 3>not have finished up in the position that it ended

1:02:34.600 --> 1:02:38.680
<v Speaker 3>up in. And so all of those things combined tell

1:02:38.760 --> 1:02:43.720
<v Speaker 3>me that I'm fairly convinced that Amy did not discharge

1:02:43.760 --> 1:02:47.400
<v Speaker 3>that weapon by herself using her right hand on the trigger,

1:02:48.280 --> 1:02:51.160
<v Speaker 3>nor could she have done so using her left hand

1:02:51.200 --> 1:02:54.200
<v Speaker 3>on the trigger. The various reasons for that is you've

1:02:54.200 --> 1:02:58.040
<v Speaker 3>got to also take into account the horizontal orientation of

1:02:58.080 --> 1:03:02.680
<v Speaker 3>the gun, which has helped the spatter on the wall,

1:03:03.400 --> 1:03:05.440
<v Speaker 3>the location of that, as well as the entry and

1:03:05.520 --> 1:03:09.240
<v Speaker 3>exit rooumds. So all of those things inspire to say

1:03:09.280 --> 1:03:12.000
<v Speaker 3>that she could not have done it. Herself. I do

1:03:12.120 --> 1:03:15.160
<v Speaker 3>go back to the evidence of the witness statements and

1:03:15.640 --> 1:03:18.800
<v Speaker 3>run my ruler over them to see if there's consistency

1:03:18.920 --> 1:03:21.120
<v Speaker 3>and does it match with the evidence that we see

1:03:21.160 --> 1:03:24.120
<v Speaker 3>after the fact. And a lot of things don't match

1:03:24.200 --> 1:03:27.360
<v Speaker 3>up in this case, and I'd just like to go

1:03:27.440 --> 1:03:32.200
<v Speaker 3>through what those people who entered the room said. So

1:03:32.640 --> 1:03:35.560
<v Speaker 3>David Simmons said that when he entered the room after

1:03:35.600 --> 1:03:39.520
<v Speaker 3>they'd heard this shot apparently outside, he said that Amy

1:03:39.640 --> 1:03:42.480
<v Speaker 3>was lying on the floor and the gun was out

1:03:42.520 --> 1:03:45.439
<v Speaker 3>to her right hand side. He then exited the room

1:03:45.480 --> 1:03:48.919
<v Speaker 3>and his mate Gareth Price, said he came straight into

1:03:48.960 --> 1:03:52.240
<v Speaker 3>the room. It was difficult to open the door. Amy

1:03:52.440 --> 1:03:56.560
<v Speaker 3>was seated in that position, and he said that the

1:03:56.680 --> 1:04:00.640
<v Speaker 3>gun was lying on top of her, with the butt

1:04:00.720 --> 1:04:05.400
<v Speaker 3>down by her feet and the barrel resting on her shoulder,

1:04:06.000 --> 1:04:08.040
<v Speaker 3>so in other words, not out to the right hand side,

1:04:08.080 --> 1:04:13.120
<v Speaker 3>but in fact facing her propped up there. So somebody

1:04:13.480 --> 1:04:17.520
<v Speaker 3>is not telling the truth. Clearly, the gun could not

1:04:17.600 --> 1:04:22.600
<v Speaker 3>have been discharged in that position, and the biological material, etc.

1:04:23.440 --> 1:04:27.640
<v Speaker 3>And the entry and exit worns being in the way

1:04:27.680 --> 1:04:31.520
<v Speaker 3>they were in the photographic evidence, so someone has put

1:04:31.560 --> 1:04:35.320
<v Speaker 3>that gun there. Mister Price says that he then took

1:04:35.360 --> 1:04:38.360
<v Speaker 3>the gun and threw it to his left side, which

1:04:38.440 --> 1:04:42.720
<v Speaker 3>is Amy's right side, and that's where David's father, Robert,

1:04:42.760 --> 1:04:45.920
<v Speaker 3>says he found that gun out to the right hand side.

1:04:46.320 --> 1:04:48.800
<v Speaker 3>So I guess what I'm saying is she could not

1:04:48.880 --> 1:04:51.560
<v Speaker 3>have killed herself holding the gun in front of her

1:04:52.040 --> 1:04:54.640
<v Speaker 3>with all those other pieces of evidence.

1:04:54.880 --> 1:04:57.439
<v Speaker 5>One of their issues that has been raised is that

1:04:57.480 --> 1:05:01.160
<v Speaker 5>because forensics was called off, we can't rely upon this.

1:05:01.400 --> 1:05:05.560
<v Speaker 5>But when I listen to you and doctor Gibson and

1:05:05.720 --> 1:05:07.760
<v Speaker 5>Scott Rohta, I mean, there's no way she could have

1:05:07.800 --> 1:05:09.440
<v Speaker 5>killed herself. Sure, it would have been great to have

1:05:09.480 --> 1:05:11.880
<v Speaker 5>all the other forensics, but it seems like you've got enough. Right,

1:05:12.280 --> 1:05:13.080
<v Speaker 5>Am I wrong in that?

1:05:13.600 --> 1:05:15.400
<v Speaker 3>In my view, we've got enough.

1:05:20.600 --> 1:05:20.840
<v Speaker 4>Well.

1:05:21.000 --> 1:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Next week, Al the first coroner to see Amy's case,

1:05:25.920 --> 1:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>really looking forward to letting our listeners hear what she

1:05:29.200 --> 1:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>has to say.

1:05:30.120 --> 1:05:34.240
<v Speaker 4>What we've got is evidence she didn't pull the trigger herself.

1:05:34.400 --> 1:05:36.680
<v Speaker 4>Some people don't agree with that, but that was probably

1:05:36.800 --> 1:05:37.320
<v Speaker 4>enough for me.

1:05:37.600 --> 1:05:42.040
<v Speaker 5>And how Amy's family is coping As WA Police's latest

1:05:42.080 --> 1:05:44.440
<v Speaker 5>investigation draws to a close.

1:05:44.760 --> 1:06:03.400
<v Speaker 7>We wouldn't be doing not reliving every single time, So de.

1:06:07.440 --> 1:06:08.480
<v Speaker 4>ReBs.

1:06:08.640 --> 1:06:12.240
<v Speaker 6>Now do you.

1:06:24.160 --> 1:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>If you knew Amy and have information, any information about

1:06:28.600 --> 1:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>her death, we'd love to hear from you. Just email

1:06:33.480 --> 1:06:38.600
<v Speaker 1>us at the Truth about Amy at seven dot com

1:06:38.920 --> 1:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>dot au. That's s E V E N The Truth

1:06:43.240 --> 1:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>about Amy at seven dot com dot Au, or visit

1:06:49.920 --> 1:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>our website sevenews dot com dot Au forward slash the

1:06:54.480 --> 1:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Truth about Amy. You can also send us an anonymous

1:06:58.320 --> 1:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>tip at www dot the Truth about Amy dot com.

1:07:05.840 --> 1:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>If you're on Facebook or Instagram, you can follow us

1:07:09.080 --> 1:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to see photos and updates relevant to the case, but

1:07:13.160 --> 1:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>for legal reasons, unfortunately, you won't be able to make

1:07:16.320 --> 1:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>any comments. And remember, if you like what you're hearing,

1:07:23.040 --> 1:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>don't forget to subscribe. Please rate and review our series

1:07:27.600 --> 1:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>because it really helps new listeners to find us. Presenter

1:07:35.600 --> 1:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and executive producer Alison Sandy, Presenter and investigative journalist Liam Bartlett,

1:07:44.680 --> 1:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Sound design Mark Wright, Assistant producer Cassie Woodward, Graphics Jason Blandford,

1:07:54.360 --> 1:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and special thanks to Brian Seymour. This is a seven

1:08:10.320 --> 1:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>News production.