WEBVTT - 2024: The year that was

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Already and this is the daily This is the daily.

0:00:04.160 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Ohs oh, now it makes sense. Good morning, and welcome

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to the Daily OS. It's Friday, the twentieth of December.

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm Billy, I'm Zara Zara. Today is our last day

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>in the office.

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Cannot believe it. What a year it's been. We do, though,

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 2>I need to say at the top, have a summer

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 2>series coming, So this isn't the last that you will

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:34.199
<v Speaker 2>hear Billy and I in your ears. Sadly, if that's

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 2>what you wanted, we will have those episodes over the

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:39.559
<v Speaker 2>coming weeks. But today we are wrapping up the year

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:42.240
<v Speaker 2>that was. As we look back on twenty twenty four,

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 2>it will.

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Be a very good series. Just quickly. You're saying, cannot

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>believe it. Do you think anyone ever gets to the

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>end of the year and goes I can believe that

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 1>it's been a long year.

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 2>I think well, I think when we're younger, time goes slower.

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 2>We have had this conversation. Time goes slower, and so

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 2>perhaps you reach the end of the year and you're like, oh, okay,

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 2>that was a roundred and sixty five days.

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Great time goes so fast when you're older.

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:06.680
<v Speaker 2>It feels like genuinely yesterday that Sam and I sat

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 2>in this room made our predictions for twenty twenty four

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 2>and here we are.

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>And we'll get into them because I hear you were

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>quite Acuratezara, So I'm glad you've been able to sneak

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that in early on too. Okay, So on today's podcast,

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>we are going to reflect on what a big year

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>it has been in the news. The Daily Os has

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:26.960
<v Speaker 1>been there every step of the way breaking it down

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>for you, and today we just want to look at

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>all of the biggest moments from politics to pop culture.

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the best way to wrap up a full

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and sixty five days. Oh it was a

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>leap year.

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Was it a leapier this year?

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes, every four years it's a leap yere US election

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and Olympics, and that was this year.

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 2>In a year.

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to go in themes. Why don't we

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>start locally first with domestic politics?

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Soar, you're coming off strong and interesting.

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Your favorite topic is Australian politics, is it? Yes, a

0:01:58.560 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>a nerd.

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Kick it off for us, Okay, So I think it's

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 2>fair to say that this year in Australian politics was

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:10.360
<v Speaker 2>quite backloaded, and by that I mean it was like

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 2>a kind of slow start to the year, but then

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:16.119
<v Speaker 2>the back saw quite a lot of progress and quite

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 2>a lot of news events happen in this space. And

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 2>I think that just goes to the fact that we

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 2>are approaching an election and the government and the opposition

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 2>both knew that full well as we got to you know,

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 2>those last sitting weeks of the calendar, and that saw

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 2>a whole lot of massive pieces of legislation passed through.

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 2>So just to run you through them at the top

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 2>of my head, you know, we had a social media

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 2>ban pass parliament in a matter of weeks. We had

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 2>the governments helped Buy and Build to rent legislation that

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 2>was of course their big housing policy that passed in

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 2>the last week. And we saw changes to the way

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:56.080
<v Speaker 2>that He's indexation works also pass through parliament.

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Both of those things, just a social media ban and

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>also Hex's massive things for young people.

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Exactly, and I think again that speaks to the fact

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:07.959
<v Speaker 2>that the government is really looking how to bring young

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 2>people into the folds ahead of that election. In terms

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 2>of where I guess the country sits as a whole,

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:16.800
<v Speaker 2>it's fair to say that cost of living still remains

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 2>top of the agenda, both for voters and for the

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:22.799
<v Speaker 2>government and the opposition. We saw in the US election

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 2>that the economy really stuck out as a defining feature,

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 2>and that is the same all around the world. It's

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 2>especially the same here. It'll be interesting to see whether

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 2>voters are talking about interest rates and things like that

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 2>at the election. We know, of course that that's not

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 2>something the government themselves can be changing, but we have

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 2>seen in other elections that governments are punished for higher

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 2>interest rates, so no doubt that'll be something that Anthony

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 2>Albinezi will be thinking a lot about over the summer holidays.

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 2>I think that if we take a step back, the

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 2>other big defining part of the Australian political landscape this

0:03:59.880 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 2>year were two independents. So Lydia Thorpe and Fatima Payman

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:07.839
<v Speaker 2>were both part of other parties. Lydia Thorpe was part

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 2>of the Greens she left last year and Fatima payment

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 2>was part of the Labor Government and she left this year.

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:16.600
<v Speaker 2>And I think both of them have been part of

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:21.280
<v Speaker 2>the biggest moments in Australian politics. Lydia Thorpes of course,

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 2>and we've spoken about it on this podcast. Came when

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 2>the King was visiting Australia with Queen Camilla and she

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 2>stood up and staged a protest that made headlines all

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 2>around the world, not just here in Australia. And then

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 2>with Fatima Payman, she left the Labor Party due to

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 2>their stance on the war in Gaza as.

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I was of a massive moment when she did that.

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 2>Huge and you know, for a party that doesn't allow

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 2>for people to cross the floor, so when you're in

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 2>the Labor Party you need to vote with the Labor

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Party on all matters. She was standing against them and

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 2>then left the party altogether. And since then she's really

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:58.799
<v Speaker 2>been making waves. And again to the point of young people.

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 2>Fatima payment is one of the youngest people in Parliament

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 2>and so to see her leave one of the major

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.159
<v Speaker 2>parties when we know young people are turning to minor

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 2>parties and independents, that'll be an interesting thing to keep

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 2>in mind. And of course there was another viral moment

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 2>with Fadam A. Payman and Pauline Hanson when there was

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a tussle about Fatima Payman's citizenship, So

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 2>that'll be a story to watch in the new Year.

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to take a breath now. But the other

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 2>big political story I think that it would be remiss

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 2>of us not to mention this year was the return

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 2>of Julian Massange and that has kind of cross party lines.

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 2>That's been something that both the Labor government and the

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Coalition have been talking about for years and years and years,

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 2>and this year was the year that he was released

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 2>from prison and returned to Australia and now walks as

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:47.599
<v Speaker 2>a freeman, which you know, when we went into twenty

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 2>twenty four, I don't know that would have been a

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:50.159
<v Speaker 2>foregone conclusion.

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's absolutely crazy. Juliana Massange feels like something that

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>just went on for years and years and felt like

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the never ending saga. So to see that he finally

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:00.599
<v Speaker 1>did come home, that was just one of the moments

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of the year domestically. And then just quickly you've mentioned

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you're foreshadowed that we do have an election coming up

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>next year. It needs to happen before May. But other

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:12.720
<v Speaker 1>than that, it's in the hands of Anthony Albersi as

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>to when exactly it will be. What are your predictions

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:17.159
<v Speaker 1>as to what will happen there?

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean I think Firstly, in terms of the timing,

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 2>A lot of the chatter seems to be that it

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 2>will be held around March, just based on a whole

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:28.160
<v Speaker 2>bunch of things that need to happen for that election

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 2>to be called. In terms of what will actually happen

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:34.919
<v Speaker 2>come that federal election, I don't think anyone knows really.

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 2>I think based on the polling, it looks like it

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 2>might be difficult for either of the major parties to

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 2>win a majority. Support for both of the major parties

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 2>has continued to slip, especially as I said, among young people.

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 2>And I think that we can take some notes from

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 2>what we've seen globally, because twenty twenty four was the

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 2>year of the election. We saw elections all around the world,

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 2>and what we saw was a fairly uniform shift to

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 2>the right. Billy talked me through this trend that we saw.

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we did see elections all around the world. It

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>was actually the most amount of people that have ever

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>voted in elections around the world than ever before. So

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>it was a record making year four elections. I think

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>it's safe to say that the most high profile election

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>was definitely the US election between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump,

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and it was a very dramatic lead up to the election.

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Obviously we had Joe Biden drop out just months before

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>election day, and then we also had the two assassination

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>attempts on Donald Trump, which just major news moments. And

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>of course Trump did win in a decisive victory, and

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the race was nowhere near as close as what was

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>predicted in the polls, which once again just shows us

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that the polls, I think the public's trust in polls

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>is comminishing, is definitely diminishing. They've really struggled, especially with

0:07:56.240 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the US elections. To get it right, Zara, we have

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>to play I mentioned it at the start of the

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>podcast that last year when you and Sam did the

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>episode on recapping Train Training three, you also predicted what

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>would happen this year, and you did it has to

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>be said, predict that Trump would win. Let's play a

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit of that now.

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 2>I think he'll win the nomination and he'll win the president.

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>So you think he's going to be the president.

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 2>I think this time next year we'll be talking about

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 2>President Trump. Yeah, Okay, well we'll come back in twelve

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 2>months and sea, Yes, So what's going on? Hello future, Zara,

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 2>talk to you? Then, thank you for giving me that credit.

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 2>I will also just add, because the clip was not played,

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 2>that sam My beloved best friend and co founder, did

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 2>say on the same podcast that not only would Donald

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Trump not win the presidency, but he believed he wouldn't

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:48.080
<v Speaker 2>win the nomination and he was wrong on two her house.

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 2>If that's okay. He was right about starting a business,

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 2>so we still love him.

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>If you guys could see Zara's face right now, she's

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>just like glowing knowing that she was right exactly. Zara,

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>what was your biggest takeaway from the US election?

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 2>I think that the biggest takeaway for me was legacy

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 2>media getting it wrong. And by that I mean the tone.

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 2>The way that Donald Trump supporters were spoken about was

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 2>again fairly uniform when it came to legacy media. If

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 2>you flipped through you know, the big newspapers in the US,

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 2>what you saw was this writing that suggested there was

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 2>no way Donald Trump could win the presidency and that

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 2>anyone that voted for him was just wrong. And what

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 2>we saw was that more than half the country disagreed

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 2>with that and ended up voting. And I think that

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 2>this disconnect between the way that the media sees the

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 2>political class and the way that ordinary Americans and it's

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 2>not just an American issue, it's all around the world.

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 2>But I think that disconnect was really really clear at

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 2>the US election, and it.

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Was largely in legacy left wing media that you're talking about. Yeah,

0:09:57.120 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and after the election happened, we sat down as a

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>newsroom and went through a lot of the coverage from

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:04.960
<v Speaker 1>other newsrooms, and the words shocking was used a lot,

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and we kept saying or surprise, yes, and we kept saying,

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>how could it be shocking if more than half of

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:12.439
<v Speaker 1>the people who voted in the election did vote for

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump?

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 2>It was shocking for the other side, and it was

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 2>shocking because seemingly so much of the media sits on

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:21.200
<v Speaker 2>that side. But yeah, taking a step back, that sort

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 2>of language around shock and surprise didn't really land for

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 2>anyone else. What about you, Billy, what was your takeaway?

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to stay in kind of like the media theme.

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I think both campaigns really embraced new media for the

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>first time in the US election. I'm thinking about Joe Rogan,

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking a bat call her daddy. Kamala Harris's team

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 1>really went hard on TikTok, as did Donald Trump's team.

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump also spoke to the Paul Brothers, so there

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of talking to influences to try to

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 1>reach a new audience that way. And I think that

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>was really interesting and really smart on both sides to

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>not just go go to the legacy media that we

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>were just speaking about Sarah, but to think of new

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>innovative ways to reach new audiences, especially young people.

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 2>I'll be really curious to see if that translates here,

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Like we haven't seen the same. I mean, obviously we've

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 2>had a sky minister and the opposition leader on this podcast.

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>But we're included in that we are new media.

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 2>But I don't know that there has been a kind

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 2>of all of government or all of political class embracing

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 2>of new media. I think that we're still a media company,

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:33.559
<v Speaker 2>whereas I haven't necessarily seen influences engaged in the way

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:35.319
<v Speaker 2>they were in the US. I'll be really curious to

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 2>see if that happens.

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I actually just saw Peter Dunnan do an interview with

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Sam Frick I think his name is, who is the

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Olympic diver who's very famous on TikTok. Yeah, so he Yeah,

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>there's an early indication that Christing possibly is going to

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>go down a similar route to what Donald Trump did.

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Wow, I mean, definitely one to watch, and we will

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 2>be absolutely knocking on the doors of both a prime

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 2>minister and that position leader ask them to come on

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 2>this part again ahead of the election. But Billy, not

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 2>just the US election that happened. Tell me about everything

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 2>else in the world.

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Before we get to that. We're going to hear a

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:15.679
<v Speaker 1>quick message from our sponsor. Okay, you mentioned this earlier,

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think I answered your question properly, But

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>we did see across the world, not just in the US,

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a swing to the right. We also saw in Europe

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>across several elections. So there was the European Parliament's election,

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:33.079
<v Speaker 1>which is the world's only democratically elected transnational organization. Was

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:34.959
<v Speaker 1>a mouthful, yes, but so it was a whole lot

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>of countries that were part of this election. They saw

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a historic surge for small far right parties across Europe,

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>and in particular that one election caused a lot of

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>disruption to France, who had to call a snap election

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:54.559
<v Speaker 1>for its own parliament because of the popularity, the unexpected

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:58.079
<v Speaker 1>popularity in the rise in the far right. Like you said,

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and that has now led to months of disarray in

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>French politics, and we've already seen another French PM come

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and go since that, and it's all because of this

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>sudden surge in the right.

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I mean, it's a really interesting thing because so

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 2>much of politics is cyclical in that it goes in cycles.

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, you have a swing to the left, then

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 2>a swing to the right, and a swing to the left.

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 2>But somehow this is still really surprising a lot of analysts.

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and a similar thing also happened in Austria and Portugal,

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and also in Germany on a state level.

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, on a state level, there were grounds made from

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:33.199
<v Speaker 2>far right parties that hadn't happened or hadn't been seen

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 2>since World War Two. So that's definitely one. And we

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 2>saw the German Chancellor Olive Schultz voted down in a

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:43.680
<v Speaker 2>no confidence vote just this week, so definitely one to

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:45.599
<v Speaker 2>keep an eye on in the new year, yeaph.

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 1>And then elsewhere, we had the biggest election that the

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 1>world has ever seen in India, where nearly one billion

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>people voted over a six week period. Can you imagine

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:58.199
<v Speaker 1>that we have twenty six million people who need a

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>vote in Australia, they had one billion people, unbelievable who

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>needed to vote, and that resulted in incumbent Prime Minister

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Naranda Emodi returning to power for a third time. And

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>then also just of note, Mexico elected its first female president.

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and we knew that that was a foregone conclusion

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 2>because both candidates in the end were females. So either

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 2>way it was going to end with a female president there.

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I had forgot that, Okay, and Zara. Whilst we are

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>still talking about overseas, a big focus in the news

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 1>this year has been what has been happening in the

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Middle East. Yeah, the changing geopolitics there. Do you want

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to take us through that?

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean the thing is that there are just so

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 2>many different stories that are kind of interwoven and interlaced

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 2>in this one region, and it has seen the biggest

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 2>shift in decades just in the last couple of months alone.

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 2>So obviously, I think the first thing to be said

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 2>is that the war between Israel and Hummas in Gaza

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 2>remains ongoing. That has not come to an end. It

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 2>started this round of violence rather started on October seven

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 2>of twenty twenty three. But there does seem to be

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 2>a move towards a ceasefire, and perhaps the most meaningful

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 2>steps taken to a ceasefire that we've seen in months.

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 2>So based on reporting, there could be a ceasefire deal

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 2>over the Christmas period, but we'll have to wait and

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 2>see what happens there. Elsewhere. In Lebanon, Hesbela and Israel

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 2>reached a ceasefire earlier this year, and that came after

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 2>Hesbelah was really quite weakened. There had been an ongoing

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 2>war since October eighth of last year between those two

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 2>and Hesbela had this year lost its leadership almost entirely,

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 2>and that ended up with, as I said, that deal

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 2>being reached. Then if we go to another border that

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Israel has with Syria. In Syria, we saw the government

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 2>collapse in recent weeks and there's been that vacuum of

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 2>power that has been filled by the rebels there.

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 1>So I guess kind of what we can take from

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>there is that previously last year, a lot of the

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>war was focused on what was happening in Gaza, and

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>now a lot of it is based on what is

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>happening at the borders of Israel on multiple sides.

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Yes, exactly, so Israel is fighting on multiple fronts, but

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 2>I think the one commonality there is Iran. So the

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Iranian regime backs Hamas, it backs Hezbola, and until recently

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 2>it was backing Syria and Bashar al Asad, and all

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 2>three of those, as I just mentioned, have had quite

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 2>significant changes. In recent months. We have seen Iran and

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Israel for the very first time directly attack each other.

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 2>But that didn't really escalate into a direct war between

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 2>the two, but it certainly symbolizes the biggest shift in

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 2>the region in a very long time.

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>An absolutely massive thing that happened this year and that

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>will continue to keep a very close eye on in

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the new year. Zara, a bit of a change of pace.

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 1>We're going to talk about cultural moments.

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 2>We had a fight about this.

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh my, that sounds like we hate each other. We don't,

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 1>but we just argued about what the biggest cultural moments were,

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think that speaks to how fragmented everyone's algorithms are.

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:08.680
<v Speaker 1>What's very popular on your for you page obviously isn't

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 1>the same as my for you page, which is what

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>is so addictive about TikTok and yeah, algorithms that I

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>think is so tailored to.

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:18.360
<v Speaker 2>You like, how interesting that in a conversation we're having

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 2>about big cultural news moments, TikTok is the thing that

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 2>has somehow shaped that like that is totally That in

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 2>itself is so novel and I can't remember a time

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:31.479
<v Speaker 2>where it can dictate what is important to someone and

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 2>not important to another person. But we'll stop with the

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 2>preamble now, Billy, what was the stand up cultural moment

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 2>for you this year?

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, it's not one that you agreed with, no,

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>but I didn't want to have recency bias, so I

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 1>wanted to pick one that was from earlier in the year,

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and I would say it was Kate Middleton, which it

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>feels so long ago, Yeah, but that was this year.

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:52.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>But it went on for about a month where the

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:58.479
<v Speaker 1>world was wondering what had happened to her, what she was.

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 1>There had been a lot of speculation about it, and

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 1>in March, on Mother's Day, she put up a photo

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 1>of herself with her three children, and it was then

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:08.919
<v Speaker 1>discovered that that photo was photoshopped. And I think what

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 1>stood out to me was the fact that Geddy and

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 1>I think AAP as well, which are both photo agencies

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that we use at the Daily Os. They had put

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>a kind of warning or cautionary message on that photo

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 1>saying that this photo has been photoshopped and that you

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:26.439
<v Speaker 1>should be wary when you use it. And I have

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>never seen anything like that before, And that was a

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>conversation at the time that that was unprecedented for them

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to do that, and it then led to even more

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 1>of a storm of speculation, and it was then revealed

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:42.400
<v Speaker 1>towards the end of March that Kate Middleton had been

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>diagnosed with cancer and had begun chemotherapy, which I think

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 1>was a very sad kind of ending to that speculation.

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it caused a lot of people to reflect

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 1>on how they had reported and how they had commented. Discourse, Yeah,

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>on her kind of disappearance, and they're not disappearance, but

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I would say that was, you know, in the first

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 1>three months of this year, that was one of the

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>biggest stories.

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:06.680
<v Speaker 2>And also I just had to google this to make

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:08.400
<v Speaker 2>sure it was this year. But King Charles was also

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 2>diagnosed with cancer this yes, so Prince William had both

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 2>his wife and his father battling separate cancer diagnoses at

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:19.159
<v Speaker 2>the same time. It's unbelievable to think what can happen

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 2>in just one year. I do think that that recency

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 2>bias is perhaps clouding my judgment, and I do remember

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 2>it was a huge moment at the time, and you're right,

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:31.360
<v Speaker 2>like the implications were fairly far reaching.

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>So I'll give you that, all right, Zarah, What was

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>your biggest moment of the year in culture?

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, for me, when I think back to this year,

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:42.439
<v Speaker 2>the thing that stands out is just this rise and

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 2>rise and rise of female artists, and specifically the idea

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 2>that people think that Charlie XCX, Chapel Ron Sabrina Carpenter,

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:54.679
<v Speaker 2>that these people were overnight successes. And I have just

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 2>loved reading, listening to watching the fact that these super

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 2>stars have been decades in the making but have emerged

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 2>into stardom very very quickly, and just you know, watching

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:11.919
<v Speaker 2>Chapel Roone performing busking on the street to nobody to

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:15.119
<v Speaker 2>then filling out the biggest festival audience that the world's

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 2>ever seen. I just think like it's been the year

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 2>of the female pop star, of the GIRLI Pops, of

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 2>the Gurli Pops, and like, really, you know, I think

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:27.360
<v Speaker 2>last year was probably Harry Styles's year. This year has

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.919
<v Speaker 2>to be the year of the female superstar, led of

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 2>course by Taylor Swift, but she has kind of reigned

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 2>supreme for a very long time. So I think it's

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:39.880
<v Speaker 2>the new entrance who really characterized twenty twenty four.

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:42.479
<v Speaker 1>For me, absolutely love it. Should we get to sport?

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Are you not going to mention Reagun? Billy has ridden

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 2>here Reagun rise and fall, but maybe we can just

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 2>leave that there. I don't know that we need to

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:56.200
<v Speaker 2>elaborate much more that happened.

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know whether to say Reagan's rise or Reagan's

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:03.119
<v Speaker 1>full both of the above, but I think that she

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>was also one of the biggest cultural moments. I mean,

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>literally six months ago we had never heard her.

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 2>I know we did. Actually I will say our sport

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 2>journo George did write a piece about who was ray

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:17.159
<v Speaker 2>Gun ahead of the Olympics, So we were ahead of

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:19.679
<v Speaker 2>the curve there. He always is that one. Yeah, that

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 2>one could be recycled many times after the fact. But anyway,

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:25.640
<v Speaker 2>let's move on now, good segue here to the biggest

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:28.680
<v Speaker 2>sports story of the years. What's it for you? All right?

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 1>I think it is the Olympics. Australia had its best

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>performance at an Olympics. Ever, that's in terms of gold

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:40.200
<v Speaker 1>medals won and it was again year of the girlipops.

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>It was really the Australian women who absolutely dominated our

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 1>gold medal tally. We had Arian Timmis, Jessica Fox, the

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>or the Fox Sisters, really Emma McKeon, just so many

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and then Raygun. Can we include Raygun? She didn't win

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 1>a gold medal, but she was included in the rise

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>of Australian sports women at the Olympics, which was just

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>so exciting to see. One day, I remember we woke

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:07.160
<v Speaker 1>up to there being four gold medals having been won

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 1>by the Australian Olympic team in the space of five

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>hours or something.

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 2>It was unbelievable.

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>It was such a proud moment to be Australian, which

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:17.959
<v Speaker 1>is always such a nice feeling. Touche Zara, what about you?

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:23.439
<v Speaker 2>Mine is a more recent story, but it is just

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 2>the unbelievable rise of Australians. Sprinting star Quaquat who broke

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:32.119
<v Speaker 2>the nation's longest standing record in athletics and the best

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 2>part is that he did it at like a school

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 2>loving festival, at a school carnival school carnival, I mean

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:40.439
<v Speaker 2>where else is a good place to be a you know,

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 2>decades long record.

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>It was like an all schools carnival, Like it wasn't here.

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 2>It was like imagining my local school carnival.

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I was so nervous, but still just so exciting.

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 2>So exciting, and I think that this signals and symbolizes

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:55.880
<v Speaker 2>the next wave of Ossie talent that we're going to see.

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:58.120
<v Speaker 2>And he's just at the beginning. You know, he's got

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 2>his eyes set on twenty thirty two, but we know

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 2>that he ran faster than you say Bolt did at

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 2>the same age, So I think we have high hopes,

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:08.440
<v Speaker 2>but not too high. I think that it's an important

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:10.919
<v Speaker 2>message about not putting too much pressure on up and

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 2>coming talent because he is so young and he has

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:15.920
<v Speaker 2>so much ahead of him. He's just going to take

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 2>his time with it.

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm so excited to see at the twenty thirty two Olympics.

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll be waiting eight years. Is that how long it is?

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 1>But that will be a very exciting moment. But like

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you said, we can't put too much pressure on him, Zarah,

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 1>that's twenty one. That's twenty twenty four. The year that was.

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 2>Wow, what a year Lots has happened, lots more will happen.

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:39.679
<v Speaker 2>TDA will be there every step of the way, as

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 2>you said, can't wait.

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much to every single person who is

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 1>listening to this podcast right now and to everyone who

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:50.240
<v Speaker 1>has been listening to The Daily Ors this entire year.

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Our podcast numbers, I've said this before on the podcast,

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:56.920
<v Speaker 1>but they've never been higher, and we're just so appreciative

0:23:57.040 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of every single person who listens to us appreciates new media,

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 1>like we said, and we'll be back again next year

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 1>to do it all again. Like we said, we've got

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the Australian election, which is just like Christmas. Christmas is

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:10.719
<v Speaker 1>being extended for the Daily Ohs because we have an

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Australian election.

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 2>We'll wrap it up there, but take care of yourself

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:17.199
<v Speaker 2>over this holiday period. We will be back with a

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 2>final good news rap tomorrow, but after that we have

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:23.479
<v Speaker 2>got our summer series, so stay tuned and have a

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:24.439
<v Speaker 2>wonderful summer.

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Bye.

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 3>My name is Lily Maddon and I'm a proud Arunda

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 3>Bungelung Kalkotin woman from Gadighl Country. The Daily oz acknowledges

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 3>that this podcast is recorded on the lands of the

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Gadighl people and pays respect to all Aboriginal and Torres

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 3>Strait Island and nations. We pay our respects to the

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 3>first peoples of these countries, both past and present.

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:00.080
<v Speaker 2>M