WEBVTT - Not The Clown Emoji  🤡

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Flex and Frooms, Flex and Frooms. This is the Flex

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and Frooms catch up podcast. Happy Wednesday, guys. I have

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the strangest like my arse muscles and fires really hurt.

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:16.239
<v Speaker 2>You're breaking down. You got the ulcer?

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I got an ulcer, But like, what was I

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:20.119
<v Speaker 1>doing in order to have Like were you sitting on

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the chair?

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Funny? No, No, this is like.

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>A strain injury. Like what the hell was I doing

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>this weekend?

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 2>You want to get into it? I want.

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>That feels like a gateway, I know, like a hubole brag. No,

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>like my like, I'm trying to think, talk us through. Okay,

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 1>so my let me just sit off of a second.

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Might see what I was doing for this hurt?

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 3>So she's kind of on all fours and she and

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 3>Fumi is like taking her knee from a twelve o'clock

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 3>position to a three o'clock position and back to twelve.

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 3>So now Freumi is back in a squat position. No,

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 3>it's more like a wrap squat, so one knee to

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:59.279
<v Speaker 3>the ground and one knee to the sky. And now

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 3>she's kind of arch her back outwards. She seems to

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 3>be in pain, but she's not. But also she's giggling

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 3>with it.

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>No idea what I was doing?

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Why were you in those positions?

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's go guys. This is flex and Firms on Kaita.

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:19.759
<v Speaker 3>I think that this might be the juiciest pr nightmare

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 3>that I have shared.

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:22.960
<v Speaker 2>With the show in two years.

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 3>It's bad and bad in a sense that it's completely avoidable,

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 3>but with real life consequences. So we all know what's

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:33.279
<v Speaker 3>happening with Travis Kelcey and Taylor Swift. If we pretend

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 3>nothing in studious is happening and it's above board. They're

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:37.680
<v Speaker 3>in a new relationship. They're both at the top of

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 3>their game, so when they come together, it's just it's

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 3>a beautiful affair. Now, if we go one degree deeper,

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 3>people start to question the legitimacy of this relationship because

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 3>of their superstar status and that usually people with this

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 3>much prestige would keep things under wraps a little bit.

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, they wouldn't be publicizing every second thing. I mean,

0:01:57.640 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 3>you're someone like Taylor Swift and you need to get

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 3>security clearance to go anywhere. It's odd that you'd be

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 3>publicizing yourself with a new person so often.

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 2>If it wasn't for some kind of like material game.

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 2>So here's the thing.

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:16.640
<v Speaker 3>People are claiming that Travis Kelcey is the one for

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 3>miss Swift because he's shown in so many ways that

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 3>he's fiercely protective. I don't know about all this, maybe

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 3>not following closely enough, so much so that apparently he's

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 3>fired his publicist because of what she did to Taylor Swift.

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 3>So this publicist, her name is Piare, and she was

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 3>doing a bit of an ig story birthday run down.

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 3>She was reposting pictures that people have posted of her

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 3>onto her profile because it was her birthday. It happens,

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 3>We've seen it plenty of times, No big deal. However,

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 3>she reposts a photo of her in a group photo

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:51.800
<v Speaker 3>with Taylor Swift a couple other people, and she puts

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 3>a clown emoji on Taylor Swift's face, a clown emoji

0:02:57.880 --> 0:02:59.959
<v Speaker 3>of all the emojis to pick you put a clown emo?

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:04.119
<v Speaker 3>Are you not the publicist? Is it not your job

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 3>to ensure that the messaging around this relationship is not

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 3>just overwhelmingly positive, but not unnecessarily tainted by parties who

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 3>should not be considered. We shouldn't even know about the publicist.

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:17.639
<v Speaker 3>To be honest, it should be a secret kind of

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:21.079
<v Speaker 3>role for real, but so much so that this publicist

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 3>with not very many followers, who should be quite incognito,

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 3>has gone as far as the post.

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 2>And like, the thing about.

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 3>Being a publicist is you are ten steps ahead of

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 3>everybody else for a reason. You recognize that every decision

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 3>you make is for a very particular outcome, which means

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 3>there is no falling through the cracks, especially not for

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 3>a sports publicist. Okay, a sports publicist. I can't imagine

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 3>the person you hire to ensure that your image is

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 3>squeaky clean bring you into disrepute. It's messy, it's nonsense.

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 3>And think about if you're a celebrity on this scale,

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 3>of all the things you have to deal with, all

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 3>the fires you gotta put out, it's from your own backyard,

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 3>your frontline soldier, ruining a reputation.

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Anyway.

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 3>I still have doubts about this relationship, only because it's

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 3>fun to speculate. But if they're in love, I love

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 3>it for them.

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I realized the other day when I was preparing for

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a show, that it's been a while since we've shared

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>some knowledge with the class. I don't know how I

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>got here. I think I was on Reddit somehow, and

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I came across the idea that there's more than like

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 1>one type of animal in terms of I thought that

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 1>every animal sleeps at night. Yeah, just off the top

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>of my dormas. And I've always wonder like, where do

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>sharks go to sleep?

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 2>What about bats? Bo?

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, they do sleep during the day. But it turns

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>out there are all different types of animals, and I

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>want to share with the class. So humans sleep at

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:47.720
<v Speaker 1>night and are awake during the day. That means they

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 1>are diurinal. So they reckon most animals first of all

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to be di urinal, especially even the nocturnal ones. Advanced

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 1>color and vivid vision isn't an adaptation of diural animals,

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 1>So that's why like animals that sleep and I can

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 1>only see kind of black and white vibes. Allegedly, animals

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that mainly rely on vision to hunt for food are

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>usually diurinal. Oh, and they include humans, emuse, reptiles, pollinator

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>insects like bees, and primates. Then we've got nocturnal animals.

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>We've all seen what those are, bats, bandicoots, bilbies, cane, toads, crocodile, dingo, fly, fox, kangaroo, koala, platypus, possum,

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>quocker and quoal. We're talking old.

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Tasmani volas are nocturnal allegedly.

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's why at the zoo they're so sleepy.

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because I just went to a koala sanctuary and

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 2>they're away. It was in the morning and they were.

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh okay, they said, koala mostly in brackets. Okay, they

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>sleep eighteen to twenty hours a day. Mikayla said, so.

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 2>We caught them at a good time.

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah. Australian snakes, for example, though, are both nocturnal.

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Under diurinal, then we've got crepuscular. Crepuscular animals are those

0:05:57.040 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>that are active primarily during twilight, and they're different from

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:04.039
<v Speaker 1>the daylight and the darkness are animals. The term is

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>not precise, however, as some crepuscular animals may also be

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:10.840
<v Speaker 1>active in moonlight or on an overcast day. So they're

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:16.919
<v Speaker 1>giving vampire that don't want to be in the sun, bats, hamsters, cats, dogs, rabbits,

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>ferrets and rats. So I'm seeing some overlap here, But

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 1>essentially they're animals that like that's when their prey is out,

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's when they're most likely not to be preyed upon.

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 1>That's where we're getting. We've got two more types skies.

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 1>There's actually three different types. Three more verse for time

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>that indicates something of or related to or occurring in

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:42.719
<v Speaker 1>the evening. They include moths and beetles. They are creatures

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 1>that become active at dusks, like bats and owls. Then

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>we've got two more matutinal in ecology. Mattutinal crepascular animals

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:53.479
<v Speaker 1>are those that significy active during pre dawn and early hours,

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 1>so it's giving rotating shift, it's giving shift work. The

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 1>final one is cathermal ca. Thermal animals have sporadic and

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:05.840
<v Speaker 1>irregular active spurts during both day and night. Lions and

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>some species of lima are known for being carmrphical. Damn,

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to flex and Rooms on Kaita. I've been

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>getting real big into my book bag recently. I haven't

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>watched something in ages on TV. I did watch The

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Invention of Lying last night, the Ricky Jervass movie, and

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>side note, I realized that his show Afterlife, which is

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 1>on Netflix, is so heavily inspired by that movie. Like

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>there's so many motifs, like he's always like sitting with

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>someone on a bench, like there's like mother's dying and

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>father's dying and stuff. I think it's good to see,

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>especially in the creative industry, like someone's trajectory from like

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>creating one movie that's really brilliant into a show.

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 2>And I didn't even know Ricky Javas did movies, but

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 2>it was a comedian.

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>He is comedian actor.

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 2>He was in the office, so he's acting in movie.

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 2>They're not his movies, he's just acting in them.

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>With Afterlife, it was his show, like he made it

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>an acted in it. He's definitely that kind of guy. Yeah.

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>He also like was real big on Twitter back in

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the day. He might still be anyway. Sustainable books, I'm

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>always looking ways to cut corners and save money. And

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>my recent hack is a website called World of Books.

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>If you listen to this and you love books and

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't mind something that's like a little bit dirty

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>or not even dirty, just something that's like not fresh

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>off the shelves, not got that fresh book smell, go

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>to World of Books. It's an Australian website. We can

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>buy secondhand books for way less than the recommended retail

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>price and I really like it. Not only because it's cheap.

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>That's obviously the number one thing, but it's really it's

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:37.439
<v Speaker 1>like a sustainable way to get knowledge. And I also

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:40.559
<v Speaker 1>like that it has free shipping.

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh amazing.

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is totally not sponsored. It's just something that like,

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I literally buy books all the time, and I never

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>thought to find a site like this.

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 2>He basally good with new releases or not particularly.

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I haven't checked. But that's the other thing is I'd say,

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 1>if there is a new release by an author that

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>you want to support, it's better to buy a new

0:08:57.920 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 1>because then.

0:08:58.679 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 2>We'll just buy an e book.

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 1>But I do like look a books on my shelf.

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 3>The topic of making friends breaking up with friends does

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 3>not clog up the internet enough. I think if we

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 3>did a little bit of a one to eighty switch

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:13.559
<v Speaker 3>and for every person who talks about dating, talk about friendships,

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 3>and I think that we'll see a few development in

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:18.559
<v Speaker 3>that area. For one, I think that we don't have

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 3>enough terminology around friendships. People find it really offensive to

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 3>be called an acquaintance. I think that's just a beautiful

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:28.199
<v Speaker 3>way to describe someone who you have a pleasant relationship with,

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 3>who you don't feel responsible for. But alas in due time.

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 3>I think a lot of phrases will be made, like

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 3>what's the ghosting bread crummy equivalents for friendships?

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 2>They're different.

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 3>It's a different kind of ghostings, different kind of bread crumbing.

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 3>Nobody cares enough to create terms, so maybe I will.

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 3>On my TikTok feed, there was a creator called mum

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 3>a taz is Alive and they were talking about making

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 3>friends with women in particular, and how they found that

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 3>the blanket advice wasn't.

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Really helpful because people.

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:01.359
<v Speaker 3>Often talk aspirationally about what they would do in certain situations,

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 3>but don't really think about what the reality is like.

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 3>So she created a list of tips making friends with women.

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 3>The first tip is to not complain about your old

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 3>friends or your other friends, which I think is something

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 3>that people would struggle with. A big part of making

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 3>new friends is commiserating. Is to talk about things in

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 3>your life that aren't really going so well, or areas

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:25.839
<v Speaker 3>in which you make comparisons to validate somebody else, like oh,

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 3>my goodness, it's a lovely to hear from you, like

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:28.959
<v Speaker 3>I never hear from my friends this much.

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 2>It's so nice.

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 3>Little digs or things like that that might give you

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 3>the impression that you're making this person feel like you're close,

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 3>but realistically your position yourself is not really that great

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 3>of a friend. The other one, she said, is to

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 3>recognize it slow and stead he wins the race. And

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm reading Yankovic's book right now called Just Friends. It

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 3>comes out in February. She talks a lot about this

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 3>idea that people don't really make time for the early

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:56.319
<v Speaker 3>stages of friendships. And similar to the early stages of dating,

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 3>you don't know how it's going to go, but for

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 3>fear that it's you start to love bombs, so you

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 3>spend more time with them. It's haying after hanging after haying,

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:08.680
<v Speaker 3>text after texts after text. And the issue is it

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 3>doesn't set a good precedent for a friendship you can maintain,

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 3>and then what happens is that this unmet expectation festers.

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 3>Last week we spoke about what we learned in friendships

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 3>as opposed to relationships, and having big conversations is a

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:27.319
<v Speaker 3>new thing. I've had friends I've had for ten years

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 3>that I couldn't dare have a big conversation with because

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm just like, oh, they're not good with confrontation. They're

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 3>too sensitive, la la la la. But a new friend

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 3>goes through such a vigorous training program. But I'm like,

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 3>if I get a whiff that you are not someone

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:43.079
<v Speaker 3>I can have a proper conversation with, it's not gonna happen.

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Like, I'm not gonna waste my time. Max. The other thing,

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 2>I think the biggest tip.

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 3>For making friends with women now is that you have

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 3>to bring in new framework. You can't use the same

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:55.439
<v Speaker 3>tactics you are using to make your high school friends

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 3>make friends with adults, especially adult women.

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:02.319
<v Speaker 1>Is there a reason why way differentiating women to everyone.

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:04.679
<v Speaker 3>I think the point of her specifying women is that

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 3>so men didn't come in and say, well, this doesn't

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 3>relate to me, because she's speaking to people who want

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 3>to make friends with women.

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, thank you to her for bringing us to our attention.

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 2>You've been listening to The Flex and Froom's daily podcast.

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 1>For more, Tune Indicator on DAB or stream it on iHeartRadio.