WEBVTT - Why thousands are protesting in New Zealand

0:00:00.520 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Already and this is the Daily This is the Daily OS.

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh, now it makes sense. Good morning and welcome to

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 2>the Daily OS. It's Wednesday, the twentieth of November.

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:19.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm Lucy, I'm Zara.

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 2>You probably saw this video last week of a young

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 2>woman leading a harker in New Zealand's Parliament. Yesterday, thousands

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 2>of people gathered outside New Zealand's Parliament to protest the

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:40.480
<v Speaker 2>same thing as that young woman who's actually an MP.

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 2>Her name's Hannah Raffitimip Clark.

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>That's a bill that would change the legal interpretation of

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:51.640
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand's founding treaty. It's not just unpopular with thousands

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>of people, minor parties and the opposition, it also doesn't

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>have the support of Prime Minister Christopher Luxen.

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:06.559
<v Speaker 4>This is such a complex story and as you said,

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, I think it really gained international attention, especially

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 4>here in Australia when we saw that hakka in New

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 4>Zealand's Parliament. But it's a really important story and it's

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:20.400
<v Speaker 4>one with a lot of layers. So I guess, Lucy,

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:23.639
<v Speaker 4>where do we begin with it? How do we start

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 4>to tell this story?

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:27.480
<v Speaker 2>We have to start in the year eighteen forty.

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:29.199
<v Speaker 3>Okay, going way back then.

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Going way back before we can kind of explain what

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:36.040
<v Speaker 2>the bill is trying to change, we have to explain

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 2>what the status quo is. So going back to eighteen forty,

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:44.960
<v Speaker 2>English officials and over five hundred Mari leaders signed Tatti

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 2>or Waitangi or the Treaty of Waitangi. Mari leaders signed

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 2>a Mari version of the treaty and English representatives signed

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 2>the English version. It was the English officials belief that

0:01:57.160 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 2>the treaty meant that the Marii had agreed to seed

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 2>sovereignty complete control over New Zealand to the British crown.

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 2>Marti leaders were not told that this was what the

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 2>English version of the treaty said. They were led to

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:16.679
<v Speaker 2>believe they had given the English the right to make laws,

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 2>not to take over. This obviously led to decades of

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 2>conflict as the two conflicting interpretations, or rather the two

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 2>conflicting kind of versions of the treaty were carried out

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 2>in day to day life. Also important to note that

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 2>not every Marti leader in New Zealand signed the treaty

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 2>at the time, but the English decided it still applied

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:41.079
<v Speaker 2>to them.

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So we're talking about a treaty that was signed

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 4>in eighteen forty, and one central issue that emerged with

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 4>it was interpretation, or as you said, perhaps even just

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:57.639
<v Speaker 4>understanding of what that treaty meant around certainly whether there

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 4>was full sovereignty seated or whether it was about making laws.

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 3>What else was in this treaty that now.

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 4>Gets to the heart of why there are so many

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 4>protests across New Zealand.

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:09.079
<v Speaker 2>I'll go off the English language version of the treaty

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 2>because that is really, you know, what was used by

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 2>the settler government. It has three agreements. The first agreement

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 2>I've covered, and that's that in the English version, MARII

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 2>ceded sovereignty of New Zealand to the British Crown. The second,

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 2>and this one is really really important, is that if

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:31.519
<v Speaker 2>Mary wanted to sell any of their land, they only

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 2>sold it to the English and in exchange they were

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 2>meant to have quote the full, exclusive and undisturbed possession

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 2>of their lands, forests and fisheries. So imagine that part

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 2>is bolded and underlined so that it's very very important.

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 2>And the third agreement was that Mary were to have

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 2>quote all the rights and privileges of British subjects. All

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 2>of these agreements have had really far reaching consequences.

0:03:56.360 --> 0:04:00.080
<v Speaker 4>So the first agreement was around sovereignty, the second it

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 4>was around the selling of land.

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 2>And then the kind of exclusive and undisturbed possession of.

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 4>That land, okay. And then the third was around the

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 4>rights of the Maori people.

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 3>Is that correct?

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 3>Okay?

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 4>And so we've said that this was signed, you know,

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 4>decades and decades and decades ago. How is the treaty

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:21.480
<v Speaker 4>affecting modern day New Zealand life? Just bringing it now

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:22.719
<v Speaker 4>back into the present.

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Following decades of both violent and peaceful conflicts between Marii

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 2>ewi that's the word that means communities and the British Crown.

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 2>In nineteen seventy five, the New Zealand government set up

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 2>the White Tangi Tribunal to investigate allegations that the Treaty

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 2>wasn't being upheld. The tribunal has considered allegations about the

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 2>government's actions going all the way back to when the

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 2>treaty itself was signed in eighteen forty to the present,

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 2>including allegations of stealing land and polluting waterways. In a

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 2>landmark decision in twenty fourteen, the Tribunal found that one

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 2>EWI did not seed sovereignty when they signed the treaty.

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 2>The most important thing about the Tribunal to think about

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 2>today is that one of its responsibilities was to interpret

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 2>what the treaty agreements actually meant. This is something called

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 2>the principles of the Treaty. These principles have been established

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 2>over years of tribunal cases and expert opinion, and they

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 2>are now referred to, but not necessarily defined, in New

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:28.799
<v Speaker 2>Zealand laws. I think a good way to think about

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 2>this for an Australian listening to this is that so

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:35.280
<v Speaker 2>Australians don't have a legal right to freedom of speech

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:41.279
<v Speaker 2>in our constitution, but across multiple High Court cases, judges

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:45.600
<v Speaker 2>have found that the Constitution implies a right to political

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 2>expression because we live in a democracy. This basically means

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 2>you can't be stopped from saying something if a politician

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 2>doesn't want you to say it, and this has governed

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 2>a lot of legal cases. But it's not an official

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 2>law or in our constitution that we have a quote

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 2>freedom of speech like they do in the US. Now

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:09.039
<v Speaker 2>back to why we're talking about this story today. One

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand party wants to put a version of these

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 2>principles that have been established over decades into law.

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 4>Okay, And why does someone want to do or why

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:21.359
<v Speaker 4>does a party want to be doing that, what's the

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 4>justification for doing that?

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 2>So the party in question is called Act, led by

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 2>David Seymour, and it says the Treaty principles have been

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 2>quote gradually built up over time, which they say means

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 2>the New Zealand public has never been democratically consulted on them.

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 2>They say, quote the Treaty principles are often mentioned in legislation,

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:46.720
<v Speaker 2>but they have never actually been defined in law. And

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 2>for something that can govern land decisions and decisions made

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 2>about a group of people in New Zealand, they're saying,

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 2>this is something that needs to be legally defined, okay.

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 2>A bill introduced by Act would legally define what the

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:07.279
<v Speaker 2>Treaty principles are and what the treaty means. This includes

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 2>establishing a new legal definition of that thing that I

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:14.559
<v Speaker 2>mentioned that was important earlier, the quote Undisturbed Possession Land

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 2>and Property Agreement. Act's proposal is that this agreement should

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 2>apply to every New Zealand citizen, not just Mardy people,

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 2>unless there has been a legal agreement otherwise, such as

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 2>a White Tangy tribunal decision protecting a piece of land.

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 2>And they say that doing this would ensure quote, all

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 2>New Zealanders are equal under the law, with the same

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 2>rights and duties. If it passes, the bill would ultimately

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 2>lead to a referendum on what act has proposed. New

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Zealanders would be asked if they accept the bill's interpretation

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 2>of these principles to enshrine them into law, but that's

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 2>very unlikely to happen.

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 4>We'll be back in a moment, but first a quick

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 4>word from our sponsor. Okay, so let me just get

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 4>my head around this quickly. So this treaty was signed,

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, over one hundred years ago, and over time

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 4>and throughout New Zealand's history, these principles have emerged. And

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 4>now today in twenty twenty four, there is a party

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 4>in Parliament and who is part of the government who's saying,

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 4>we actually never got the chance to vote on those

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 4>things that are these principles, and we believe that needs

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:32.559
<v Speaker 4>to happen. And you're saying this legislation has been introduced

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 4>and that if it passes, it would lead to a

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:37.199
<v Speaker 4>referendum but where you just left off, is it that's

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 4>unlikely to happen right?

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:39.559
<v Speaker 3>Why is that?

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 2>That is because of the current makeup of New Zealand's parliament.

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 2>So like Australia, New Zealand's parliament made up of a

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:51.439
<v Speaker 2>lot of different parties. Unlike Australia, no one party has

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 2>formed a government by itself since early nineteen ninety six,

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 2>so within my lifetime, you know, as a comparison, the

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:02.559
<v Speaker 2>Labor Party has formed government in the House of Representatives

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:06.959
<v Speaker 2>just by itself. Another difference is that Australia's government flips

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 2>back and forth between the very established coalition of the

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:14.439
<v Speaker 2>Liberal and National Parties and the Labor Party governing alone.

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:20.079
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand's coalitions can be a variation of different combinations.

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Different parties work together at different elections. Right now, the

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 2>government is a coalition of three broadly right wing parties,

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 2>National which Prime Minister Christopher Luxen belongs to the aforementioned

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Act and New zealand First. Previous PM Jacinda A Dern,

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 2>formed government in twenty twenty with a coalition of Labor,

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 2>the Green Party and New Zealand First also a few

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 2>days ago. But back to today's coalition, At the last

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 2>election in October twenty twenty three, National, led by Christopher Luxen,

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.440
<v Speaker 2>won the most seats, didn't win enough to form government

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 2>by itself, had to negotiate with smaller parties Act and

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 2>New First through a long process of negotiation that led

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 2>to coalition agreements.

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 4>So, I mean the idea of forming government through a

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 4>coalition isn't foreign to us, but certainly we don't have

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 4>it to the same degree here. But one of the

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 4>things that happens when you have multiple parties become the

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 4>government is that there have to be concessions, right, Everyone

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 4>wants different things. So what sorts of agreements did National,

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 4>who said is the Prime Minister's party, what sort of

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 4>agreements did they make during these negotiations to get those

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:33.319
<v Speaker 4>other two parties on board.

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 2>Part of Acts agreement with National was to allow them

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 2>to put forward the Treaty Principle's Bill.

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Which is okay, the bill we're talking about today.

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And part of that meant that National would support

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 2>the bill's first phase, but no further than that, just

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 2>the first phase.

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 4>Okay, And so when does that support technically stop? Because

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 4>you said at the very beginning of this podcast that

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 4>Christopher Luxen, the Prime doesn't support this bill.

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it basically has meant that they have supported the

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:10.199
<v Speaker 2>first vote in Parliament. They've allowed the bill to pass

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 2>the first round of voting, which in New Zealand means

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 2>it goes to a committee discussion. It has not meant

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 2>public support for the bill, which is why Christopher Luxon

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 2>has spoken out about it publicly. But in actual Parliament

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 2>they voted for it one time and not again now

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 2>that it's been sent to a committee, national support has ended. Okay,

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 2>here's what Christopher Luxon said earlier this month.

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 5>My view a very simplistic interpretation of the Treaty of

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 5>WHITEITANGI that has served us, I think incredibly well. And

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 5>to simplify it down in the way through a piece

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.079
<v Speaker 5>of legislation like this, I think is a disservice to

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 5>the treaty. We do not like this bill. We will

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 5>not be supporting it. We see no need for it

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 5>because we think it is divisive.

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 4>So even though it doesn't have the support of the

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 4>sitting Prime Minister, this bill has made quite a splash.

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 4>There has been quite a strong reaction to it, not

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 4>just inside Parliament but also outside of Parliament. Can you

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 4>talk me through what some of the reactions to the

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 4>bill have been.

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 2>So a minor party to party Maori has been the

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 2>most outspoken against the bill. One of their arguments is

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 2>that legally reinterpreting the treaty to mean everyone is equal

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 2>is not in its spirit. The spirit of the treaties

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 2>that it grants Marii particular rights, and that changing it

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 2>is not a way of achieving equality because Marii Ewe

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 2>face greater and more entrenched disadvantage, according to Tapati Mari

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:46.679
<v Speaker 2>than other New Zealand communities, and that this disadvantage needs

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 2>to be addressed by government action, including law making everyone

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 2>equal under the law. Their argument is that this would

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:58.199
<v Speaker 2>undo progress towards erasing this disadvantage. Another one of their

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 2>arguments is probably best ex prest by party co leader

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 2>Rowi riwait Titi in the parliamentary debate.

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 6>To Tito, white tangy is superior to any person in

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 6>any law if it created in this house this parliament,

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 6>means nothing in all Tardo without the tz or white Tangi.

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 6>The only people who can make changes in an agreement

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 6>are the parties who signed it. The King of England,

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 6>Man ayoahapu all tello. Now tell me David Simour, what's

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 6>one of those? Are you?

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 2>And here's the stance from the Labor opposition from MP

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Willie Jackson.

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 7>David Seymour wants to turn over fifty years of our

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 7>understanding of treaty principles and partnership. The principles are clear,

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 7>mister speaker.

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 6>They're clear.

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:53.080
<v Speaker 7>They're about partnership, they're about equity, they're about active protection

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 7>and they're about redrease. Simple Why is this offendous minister

0:13:58.440 --> 0:13:58.959
<v Speaker 7>so much?

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 4>And so I think the first time, as I said

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 4>a bit earlier, that a lot of people internationally would

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 4>have seen this story was when the hukka was performed

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 4>in Parliament as part of a form of protest against

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 4>this bill. What has the reaction been from kiwis across

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 4>the country?

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 2>Ahead of the bill's introduction to Parliament, thousands of people

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 2>participated in a hikoy or a march from the far

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 2>northern tip of the North Island of New Zealand to

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 2>the capital, Wellington, which is in the south of the

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 2>North Island. Two hundred and thirty thousand people have signed

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 2>a petition calling for the bill to be thrown out

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 2>because it quote represents a direct assault on Marti Wright's

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 2>culture and identity.

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so there is some pretty firm opposition there to

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 4>this bill, but you did mention that it won't progress

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 4>or it would be very unlikely for it to progress

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 4>given the composition of the Parliament and who's said therefore

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 4>and who's said they're agains.

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 3>So what happens now? What do we expect to see happen?

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 2>The bill is going through through a committee. Submissions are

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 2>now open to the public. I'm sure it will receive

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 2>lots of submissions. After that, it's back for another vote

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 2>where we know it doesn't have the support of the

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 2>majority and it will likely fail. That's not due to

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 2>happen for another six months or so, so we'll have

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 2>to loop you back in then.

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 3>Brilliant.

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, thank you, Lucy for explaining quite a complex topic

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 4>and indeed making me understand and hopefully making our audience understand.

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 4>Thank you for joining us for another episode of the

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 4>Daily Ods. We'll back later today with some headlines, but

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 4>until then, have a great day.

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 2>My name is Lily Madden and I'm a proud Dunda

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 2>bungelung calcottin woman from Gadigol country.

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 7>The Daily os acknowledges that this podcast is recorded on

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 7>the lands of the Gadighl people and pays respect to

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 7>all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island and nations.

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 2>We pay our respects to the first peoples of these countries,

0:15:57.440 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 2>both past and present.