WEBVTT -  Sydney D4: Why Bethell’s ton was 'always coming'

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:03.239
<v Speaker 1>The Unplayable Podcast is proudly presented by quantas the official

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:06.399
<v Speaker 1>podcast partner and the official airline partner of Cricket Australia.

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:08.799
<v Speaker 1>Once again this season, Quantus is proud to be flying

0:00:08.800 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Australia's cricketers as they take on the world. Hello everybody,

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:19.479
<v Speaker 1>this is The Unplayable Podcast, Day four of the Fifth

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Test here at the SCG and Australia. Oh, they now

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>trail England by one hundred and nineteen runs. We've seen

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>an amazing century to Jacob Bethel here, one hundred and

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:31.159
<v Speaker 1>forty two not out as it stands, and overall a

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:34.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty great day of Test cricket. Eleven wickets, three hundred

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and fifty one runs and we've got a game, folks.

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think we do.

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:43.559
<v Speaker 3>Tentatively, it felt like the way England had some kind

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 3>of mind explosions, like in the piece there, it felt

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 3>like what Jacob Bethel had done a ton for the

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 3>ages was going to be completely undone in.

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 2>A bit of a flash.

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 3>But there are one hundred and ten, one hundred and

0:00:57.400 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 3>nineteen runs ahead now. Jacob Bethay sat up here in

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 3>the press conference a second ago and said, if we

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 3>can get it up to one eighty one ninety who knows.

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 3>I tend to agree with him. But England, as I

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 3>think you've pointed out, England agan need to bowlop it

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:13.680
<v Speaker 3>than they have in this game so far.

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:17.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's been the story of the series. England

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>have got themselves into strongish positions and then have relinquished that.

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>We saw a couple more today, which we will get to.

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>A brook Wick at Jack's Wicker of Stokes, sorry, a

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Smith run out, So we'll get to all those, but

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 1>let's stay with Jacob Bethel because what an innings that

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>was austraight in lasts too long today, and then Bethel's

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>in in the first over of England's innings after Stark

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:44.679
<v Speaker 1>struck again one hundred and two hundred and thirty two balls,

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>sixteen fourth, A lot of those high class boundaries as well,

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>you could make a claim for many of those being

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the shot of the day.

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 2>And he, I don't know, did he give a chance.

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>He was pretty much chanceless, and even when he had

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>to spend seven balls on ninety nine, he never looked

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>like he was going to panic.

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 2>He just looked.

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Composed, calm, and he got there with not much doubt

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>in the.

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:10.639
<v Speaker 3>End, which is a great starting point, and I think

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 3>it was four or five overs one shot away from

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 3>one hundred.

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:17.639
<v Speaker 2>He got to ninety six really quickly.

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 3>He got to into the nineties off some overthrows, kind

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 3>of exactly what we're talking about the other to day

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 3>around throwing at the stumps and the potential of creating

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 3>some overthrows. But that was probably my biggest takeaway of

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 3>today was this is a man who has two centuries

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 3>before today against grown men.

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 2>So I'm going off Cricket Archive, which is a pretty

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 2>reliable source for me most of the time.

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>So not juniors, That's right, that's what you're saying.

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So there's the list I'm kind of going off.

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 3>Has a bunch, you know, Barbados under fifteens versus Jamaica

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 3>under fifteens, English Schools, Cricket Association, Midlands under fifteens versus

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 3>North under fifteens, Warwickshire under seventeens Young Lions stuff. When

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 3>he's actually played against men, there's been one hundred against

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 3>the Warwickshire Fort Warwickshire second eleven against Clusters year second eleven.

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:06.919
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so not even county stuff.

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 2>Well not in below county.

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, second eleven stuff, and then there was another under

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:15.679
<v Speaker 3>nineteenth century following that, and then he made one in

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 3>a bilateral ODI against South Africa. Yet when he got

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 3>to within one shot away from a century, he just

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 3>kind of calmly nudged around. He got a single, he

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 3>got to ninety seven, he got to ninety eight, he

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 3>got to ninety nine. Stark bolt too ripping bounces at him,

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, one hundred and forty five k an hour.

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Yep, he got in the line of it.

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 3>And then when he finally saw bow webster flight wine up,

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 3>he said, I'm having a piece of that and bunted

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 3>him over long on that. Just the composure he showed

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 3>in that moment was extraordinary for a guy who, as

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 3>we said, just hasn't got much experience in like he

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 3>hasn't even done that at county level, Like he hasn't

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 3>been he hasn't been dominating ODII cricket T twenty cricket. Yes,

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 3>we can all see the talent, but when it got

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 3>to that moment, I was watching him really cihause, I'm likeual,

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 3>he's never been in this pitchure before. I guess you

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 3>can you can see why the basball regimes have have

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 3>fast tracked him.

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah they love him, don't they, and heading into today

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>averaging only twenty seven in first class cricket from twenty

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 1>seven matches, So it doesn't really strike you as a

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>player of the future. But when we saw him a

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:21.599
<v Speaker 1>bat today, it was without doubt that's six. That was

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a great shot. It came down the track. And then

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 1>the celebration was not over the top either. It was

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>if he was saying, like the job's not done. It

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>was a little fist pump and a little salute to

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>his family, and the family was shown a lot on TV.

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>There weren't many words being spoken as he got through

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the nineties. And then I reckon a few tears down

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:42.919
<v Speaker 1>his father's face when he did get there. Great to see,

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, that's one of the things that makes test

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>cricket special.

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 2>It does.

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:50.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and dad is an absolute spitting image. Apple doesn't

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 3>fall far from the tree. And but yeah, he was

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 3>he was really struggling. Bethel himself said I found his

0:04:57.160 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 3>press conference just before really interesting. He said that he

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 3>could nervous when he sees other people in the nineties,

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 3>but you know, I guess like he does it in himself.

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:06.919
<v Speaker 3>He wouldn't really know because he just hasn't been in

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 3>that position too much. You know. It's interesting as well,

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:12.479
<v Speaker 3>like he came out and played a season a great

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 3>cricket out here, didn't get to one hundred in that either.

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 3>He played, he got to the ninety nine in under

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 3>twenty one game, but he never passed fifty playing in

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 3>first grade in Sydney. So it's interesting. And even we

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 3>asked him about him before and about Great Cricket, he said,

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 3>I didn't really learn much, Like it's very different conditions

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 3>to you know, what you're going to play at the

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 3>next level, and it's like, well, you're an eighteen year

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 3>old kid, Like what do you mean the next level?

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 3>Like there was no next level at that point. But

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 3>this is a it's not to be confused with arrogance,

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 3>because he seems like a very humble, down to worth,

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 3>modest kid. But he has clearly just been pre ordained

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 3>for greater things the whole time, and it's like he's

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:57.599
<v Speaker 3>known it. It's a remarkable, remarkable story, remarkable character.

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 1>He was asked as well if he had can sit

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>it about or thought forward ahead to what he would

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:04.479
<v Speaker 1>do when he would get this one hundred, his first

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred in first class cricket, and he said it was

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:10.479
<v Speaker 1>always coming, wasn't it? So that was maybe that could

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>be a mistaken as arrogance, but that is just a

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.920
<v Speaker 1>young kid with a full belief in his own ability.

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 3>That was a remarkable line. That really was a remarkable line.

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 3>It was like out no, it was always coming. Yeah,

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 3>hang on, what do you mean who knew? Who knew?

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Was?

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean we all thought it was, you know, the media, everyone,

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:27.720
<v Speaker 3>Baz McCullum, everyone has watched him.

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 2>They thought it was coming.

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:32.279
<v Speaker 3>But for him to also kind of know that it's

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 3>that's yeah.

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>It's rare now to score your first Test century, sorry,

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>to score your first first class entry in a Test match.

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>There are some good numbers and players that you dug up,

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 1>including some of the English guys. Gus Atkinson did it,

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Stuart Broad did it, Jack Russell or Keeper did it.

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I've also found some others Lou from other countries. Jason Holder,

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 1>he did it from the West Indies of course, Jason

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Gillespie he did it as night watching and then this

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>is a surprise. Kumar Sangakara yeah as well from Shrinker.

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>So if you can have half a career that Kuma

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 1>he'll be doing pretty well.

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 3>So a bit of a theme with those ones. Yeah,

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Atkinson suit Broad is one of them. Jack Russell, there

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 3>was a guy from pre nineteen hundred's weally bin cricket

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:15.680
<v Speaker 3>doesn't count.

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 2>In Healy did it as well. So the theme.

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 3>There is wicket keepers and handy lower roared to batters

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 3>who are primarily bowlers. They are the ones doing it

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 3>not And then you know there's a couple from I

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 3>guess countries or regions in Holder's case, where the first

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 3>class system maybe isn't you know, as robust as Australia

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 3>in England and maybe India. But and then I guess

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 3>you get the prodigies. I guess that's the other category

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 3>is and Sanga Kara was probably one of those. Holders

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 3>was probably one of those as well as one of

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 3>the most talented cricketers coming through it at one hundred

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 3>nineteen's level, certainly in the last last couple of decades.

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 3>So there are some guys who can just be fast

0:07:58.920 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 3>tracked to.

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Greatness, definitely, and Bethel might be one of those. Only

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty two years of age the start of the day

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Australia scored three for forty nine to get their total

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>up to five hundred and sixty seven. It was Bo

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Webster who was not out seventy one, not out stranded,

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>perhaps short of his made in Test century, but had

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>fantastically well. It didn't look like getting out really And

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 1>then it was Mitch Stark who struck for the twenty

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>seventh time in the first over of a Test innings

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and he got Crawley out for the third time in

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 1>that fashion in this series.

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it was an interesting start from Mitchell Stark because

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 3>it looked like that was a pretty wild and wooly

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 3>first over. Like that ball that came back to Crawley

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 3>was an absolute beauty. But the rest of them were

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 3>nowhere near the stump, so were sure they were wide.

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, Duckett kind of got off the mark with

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:47.079
<v Speaker 3>some of them, but yeah, he just speared one back

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 3>into his pads. And that's kind of bowler he is.

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 3>He struggled all game. In fact, I reckon with the footholes,

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 3>even in the first sinnings when they hadn't been anywhere

0:08:56.720 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 3>and down on the wicket. He was really battling. And

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:02.200
<v Speaker 3>that seems to be a theme. It doesn't seem to

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 3>just he just doesn't love bowling at this ground. They

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 3>even had to kind of swing him around from the

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 3>other end to bowl from there. But you know the

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:13.439
<v Speaker 3>way Michael Nisa and Scott Bowland in particular in this

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 3>innings have just kind of picked it up off the

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 3>back of him, you know, maybe not being quite at

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 3>his best the last two tests of this series, which

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 3>is forgivable. Bowland I thought was just immense two thirty

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 3>four up nineteen overs I think he had. You know,

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:30.719
<v Speaker 3>he'd considered thirteen runs from his first ten overs of

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 3>the day, so he was just relentless and that created

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 3>a lot of pressure. You know, Nissa gets Ben Duckett

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 3>up to he kind of gets away to his high

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 3>score of the series. It only gets his series average

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 3>up to about twenty, but he looked like finally a

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 3>big score was in the offing. But yeah, Nissa gets

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 3>duck it. Boland then gets Joe Root on the back

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:54.680
<v Speaker 3>of some really excellent bowling, and it kind of brings

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 3>Brooke and Bethel together and for a moment there it

0:09:57.800 --> 0:09:59.439
<v Speaker 3>looked like things were going pretty well for England.

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so Ducket's a serious total two hundred and two

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>runs I've also dug out the stats how many times

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 1>you reckon?

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:07.839
<v Speaker 2>He left the ball?

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 3>This seriously, probably probably quite a few more times I

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 3>reckon than what he had done in previous series. That

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:18.679
<v Speaker 3>might I haven't looked up the previous series, but his

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 3>total leaves for the series with ten, so probably more

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:26.440
<v Speaker 3>than you'd think actually considering that reputation he has. But

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 3>I went back and had a look at a few

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 3>of them. Some are, you know, swaying out of a

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 3>lay of bouncers. So we're counting those as leaves because

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 3>he's not trying to cook or pull.

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 2>But you could you could probably discount them, really.

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>You could in a sense, Yeah, it's those ones outside

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>off that we're looking for, aren't we And there was

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>only a handful.

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 3>Of those so well, And I mean he would have

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:46.439
<v Speaker 3>been warned, but you know, the kind of pitches they've

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 3>been playing on, you don't really need to leave the

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 3>ball because you can always trust the bounce. And he

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 3>would have been worn that. It wouldn't work in Australia

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 3>and it hasn't worked in Australia.

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 2>You know, absolute absolute shock.

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 3>So you have to change your game when you when

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 3>you go to different conditions the best players do. No

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 3>one bats the same way in every single conditions. Bethel

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 3>was up here just now saying that he opened up

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:09.959
<v Speaker 3>his stance from his first test at the MCG of

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 3>the series compared.

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 2>To test too. The best players are always.

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Tinkering with their game, adjusting and making changes on the move.

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 1>You touched on the Boland to Root thing there. Boland

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>was just at his accurate best, wasn't he? And in

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>fact that little passage of player that he had two

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Joe roots. He bowled twenty four balls at the former

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 1>England captain Rude didn't score off any of them before

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>he was trapped LBW and it looked like Rut didn't

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>want to review that, or at least that he took

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 1>some convincing from Bethel his partner. But then when the

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>ball tracker showed that it was just clipping the top

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of the baiales, he looked furious that he had been

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 1>given out in that fashion, or maybe it was just disbelief.

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>He sort of threw his head back and then dropped

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>his bat, although I don't think that was a deliberate act.

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he just fumbled it as he was turning around

0:11:57.440 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>to head to the sheds. But that was a big

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>moment in this game because Rute batted so well on

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that first innings and then he's out for six off

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven. Here.

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:06.560
<v Speaker 3>He looked furious, didn't he. And I think the dropping

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 3>of the bat was almost a metaphorical kind of addition

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 3>to it, just added to the theater and the drama

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 3>of it. He was a guy who's maybe played his

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 3>last ashes Test innings in Australia. I have to say

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 3>ashes before Test innings because there is the one hundred

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:22.319
<v Speaker 3>and fiftieth Test he next year. I think people forget that.

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 3>You'd be surprised if route he isn't playing for England,

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, within the next fourteen months, so he might

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 3>get another another go out here. But yeah, his last

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 3>last knock in Sydney certainly, And yeah, he shaped as

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 3>a danger man after his first inning century. And yeah,

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:41.439
<v Speaker 3>I mean the fact that the fact that Brook and

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:44.439
<v Speaker 3>Bethel got going despite him, despite him, you know, not

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 3>making too many runs. You know, budded really well for England,

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:51.959
<v Speaker 3>and then there was some even more infuriating kind of

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 3>stuff to follow, wasn't it.

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:56.239
<v Speaker 1>There was so Brooke and Bethel put one hundred partnership,

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:59.959
<v Speaker 1>they've restored parody, they're building a lead now for England.

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>And then yeah, bo Webster is throwing the ball of

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Bosom off spin, which he's done most of his careers.

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>The medium pace is just a recent sort of edition,

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>so he says he doesn't practice it a lot. It's well,

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>here's the words he's got off he's on tap, just

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 1>in case they're ever called it.

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 3>A pint, and that him and Travis had agree that

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 3>the less you practice them, the better they are.

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if the coaches would agree with that,

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>but that's certainly their philosophy. And then in his second

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 1>over he gets one to turn sharply into Brook that

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Webster didn't even think was going to hit the stumps.

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Alex Carey did and thankfully, frustrating Kerry was able to

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>convince Smith to take The review was only one second

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 1>on the clock and three reds.

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 3>I think the whole thing probably proves that both teams

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 3>were wrong in not picking a specialist spinner. It's a

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 3>hard one because Todd Murphy probably would have played in

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 3>the bow Webs spot. Yeah that's right, but yeah, like

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean, and you know, bow Webbs has been one

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 3>of their best players, and it's maybe their best player

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 3>and in the match, maybe the most impactful with seventy

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 3>one not out and three really crucial wickets. So I

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 3>don't know how you kind of shake that all out.

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 3>You probably would have him instead of Green really, if

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:08.839
<v Speaker 3>you know, if they wanted to get Websit into the team,

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 3>I think they would have looked.

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 2>At that way.

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, it was great bowling to get Brook and

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 3>then geez Will Jacks like what a test that he's having,

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 3>like to come down second, second ball and try to

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 3>mow him over. I guess he was trying to get

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 3>him over midwicket mid on. He's just got to you know,

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 3>too little of it and squirt it out to Cameron Green,

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 3>ironically the exact same bound he'd put down Travis Head

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 3>the previous day. I think there were about twenty people

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 3>ready to make that point in the press box as

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 3>soon as it happened, but it just felt like a

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 3>mindless wicket at that point.

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Ricky Punting said, you know, what do you say to

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you teammates and you walk back into the sheds and

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you've played a shot like that. I'm sure he was

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>promoted ahead of the injured Stokes and ahead of wicket

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>keeper Jamie Smith because of his ability to bat for

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 1>long periods of time, which he's shown in Brisbane and

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 1>in Adelaide. Here he comes out and does that.

0:14:57.720 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 2>It was baffling.

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, I don't know what he supposed to be as

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 3>a Test cricketer. He hasn't had a bad series like

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 3>I think there's been. He's bold as well as he

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 3>could have. Like I don't think, you know, he's done

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 3>what he would have said on the sorry with the ball,

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 3>he's done what he said on the tin. With the bat,

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 3>he's done the opposite. I mean he's supposed to be

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 3>this t twenty ye blaster, come in number eight, counterattacking.

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Whatever it is.

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 3>His strike rate for the series, his twenty runs lower

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 3>per hundred balls. And it was mcguaja, who's, you know,

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 3>probably the most watchful of the Australian batters. I think

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 3>it stood at forty coming into this inning. So a

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 3>really puzzling move from him, and caps are you know

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 3>he's placed in the line on the line going into

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 3>this Test. So that was a frustrating one. And then,

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean even more frustrating was Jamie Smith saidsit because Yep,

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 3>he's scoring quite quickly, as as he always does. Again

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 3>it's at the hands of Barnas Lavisha.

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Marnus was bowling, came on to bowl the short

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff to him and then a bit of a mix up.

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm interested to get your take on this. It was

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>nice work, must be said from Jake Weatherold. Yeah, square

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>leg or just in front of square had to come

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 1>around to his left hand side, so non preferred got

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>onto his right and was able to pinpoint the throw

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to Laboshine, who, as he always does, gets right over

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the top of the stumps. It looked like Smith had

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>gone beyond halfway of the pitch before turning around. Bethel

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>was sort of ball watching. Whose fault does that go

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>down to? Yeah?

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 3>I think some responsibility has to go to Bethel, but

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't think all of it. Look, maybe it's sixty forty.

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 3>Bethel's way would have been a good one to ask

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 3>him a second go whether he felt some responsibility, because yeah,

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 3>you're right, he's kind of ball watching. He's unsure. It's

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 3>one of those ones just out of reach of the field.

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 3>If they had taken the run, I think he would

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 3>have been scrambling. But he so I guess you know

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 3>your junior cricket coaches would say, anything in front of

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 3>the wicked is the striker's call, Anything behind the wicked

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 3>is the non strikers call. I think that's not always

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 3>the case when you've got a good line of sight

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 3>on the ball. So he would have known, Okay, that's

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 3>gone to weather, it's left. How far to his left?

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 3>I suppose it's a question, and it is going to

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 3>his non preferred side. So you know, Smith was probably

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:11.439
<v Speaker 3>doing the right thing by trying to get down the

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 3>other end, but he's just overcommitted a bit.

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, certainly, certainly Bethel could have called more clearly, I think.

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 3>But in the same boat, I don't think Smith really

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 3>should have been that far down the wicket, but excellent

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 3>fielding and it would just something if you're an England fan.

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:29.879
<v Speaker 2>It would just frustrate, you know.

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:32.479
<v Speaker 1>End. Yeah, And if you look at that replay, Bethel

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 1>as sort of he's got his hands on his knees.

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>He looks as devastated as Smith that he played a

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>part in that runout, but it didn't face him. He

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>kept going, didn't he even when he's injured. Captain Ben

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Stokes came out and lasted five balls, couldn't really run

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>too well between the wickets. He's obviously hobbled by that adductor.

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 3>We're saying, a doctor, a double duc which is why doctor,

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 3>that's the inside of the groin. I believe the abductor

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 3>is on the outside, kind of more your hip flexa area.

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, have I passed that test?

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Job?

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:04.360
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm not. I'm asking.

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:06.640
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so yeah, really concerning for him, and he's bowled

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 3>a lot of overs in this series. I think Brighton

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:15.639
<v Speaker 3>Cass is the only one to bowled more. You know,

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.439
<v Speaker 3>he's bowled himself into the ground. And I think there

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:20.479
<v Speaker 3>were some question marks as to why he didn't come

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:22.199
<v Speaker 3>out at six. Well, you know it was clear. I

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 3>mean even at eight that might have been a spot

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 3>too high. You saw the first ball that Bethel faced

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 3>after Smith got out. He tucked one around the corner

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 3>and he started running and then Stokes just was walking

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 3>down the other end and Bethel was like, oh, hang on,

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 3>what's going on? Like it seems crazy that there wasn't

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:43.160
<v Speaker 3>more of a conversation had, like you know, Stokes making

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:45.879
<v Speaker 3>he probably needs to make it clear to Bethel like okay,

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:48.360
<v Speaker 3>like I'm out here, but we're not running any quick singles.

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:53.159
<v Speaker 3>So who knows what exactly that conversation looked like. But yeah, Bethel,

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 3>it was good that he was paying so much attention

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:57.680
<v Speaker 3>to his teammate because it could have been a little

0:18:57.720 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 3>bit hairy. But yeah, you could just tell Stokes wasn't

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:02.200
<v Speaker 3>quite right. It did feel like the stage was set

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:06.679
<v Speaker 3>for a Stokes like just dig in to show you guys. Well,

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't think he could. Physically, he just can't tee

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 3>off right, like he saw the first couple of balls

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 3>he faced from Marnas trying to get under those coupers,

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:15.400
<v Speaker 3>which you know, you do have a lot more time

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 3>getting under those bumpers compared to compared to Mitchell Stark,

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:21.400
<v Speaker 3>Like he was in a lot of pain ducking under them.

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:24.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, I imagine if Stark had been let loose

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 3>on him. And then yeah, going back to that bow

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 3>Webster ball that was that was just not a shot

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:32.439
<v Speaker 3>that Ben Stokes wouldn't ordinarily play off a bowler of

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 3>Webster's caliber.

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 1>Let's say it was Webster's third wicket. He finished the

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 1>day with three for fifty one. Now, I don't love

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:41.160
<v Speaker 1>to name drop Lou, but I do have a little

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 1>bow Webster's story for you.

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 3>Here.

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>On the way down to the press conference room at

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the SCG, you have to get into some lifts that

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>are shared with some corporate suites. I was lucky enough

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to be in with a Crash Credit of fame. And

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 1>then in comes John Howard and his wife. So as

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 1>we're waiting Jeannethe Jane Howard. Hello to as we're coming

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:06.160
<v Speaker 1>down the lift, I said to John, you know Bow Webster.

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 1>He's surprised a bit, didn't he got three for John Goes.

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't think you bold that well. Someone to s

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 1>feedback from the former PM not a big fan of

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 1>big Bow.

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 3>Calling it like he says, I reckon, that's probably a

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 3>fair I mean bo Webster certainly didn't send to Raid

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:25.400
<v Speaker 3>his own spin that much. That's a remarkable sledge from

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 3>Prime Minister. I wouldn't be surprised to see that in

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 3>Crashes copies.

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Now. Because of Bethel's performance in this match and tongues

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>in the last, it does make you wonder hold the

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 1>series have played out if those two were selected in

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Perth and the proceed and the subsequent matches, Lou, I mean,

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 1>have England got their selection wrong or were they just

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>not ready at that time of the series.

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I can see why they went in with the

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 3>team they did going into Perth. It worked really well

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 3>for one innings, it didn't for the next. That probably

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 3>sucked them in a little bit to thinking this very

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 3>untested combination of Archer, would and Atkinson and Stokes and

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 3>there's one more Cars. Of course, yeah, he's probably the

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 3>one I should because I've watched.

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Him bold more than anyone.

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:14.199
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, Wood went down with injury after one of

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 3>that first test, Archer then after three Atkinson midway.

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Through the fourth.

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:22.919
<v Speaker 3>It just it felt like they they obviously had a

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:25.120
<v Speaker 3>clear plan on how they want to go about it,

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 3>but that I don't think that a contingency for if

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 3>things went wrong, and you know, and a contingency for like, Okay,

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 3>Josh Tungue actually looks like he might be bowling better

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:37.879
<v Speaker 3>than than Cars and maybe your rest cast for a test,

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 3>or maybe your rest Josh for Archer for for a test.

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 3>It's a really difficult one as well, in the sense

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 3>that like, oh, we kind of hinted it early in

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 3>the series. We're like, well, why are they playing someone

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:49.639
<v Speaker 3>who can kind of nip it around like a Matthew

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 3>Potts might be helpful. Well, it turns out Matthew Potts

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 3>isn't that good. You know, maybe that's a little bit

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 3>harsher and maybe earlier in this series he might have

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 3>been able to play more of apart, but yeah, certainly.

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:03.439
<v Speaker 3>I mean the other thing about Bethel, this is the

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 3>whole thing with how England have gone about their selection

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 3>in this series. Like their only specialist battle was a

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:13.119
<v Speaker 3>guy who'd never made a first class hundred. So you know,

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 3>it does feel like they kind of had made a

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 3>few missteps along the way. The fact that, you know,

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 3>if they really did rate Bethel so much, like they

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:22.399
<v Speaker 3>should have had him at three earlier, you know, all

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 3>through that India series to really see what he was

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 3>made of and make sure he's he's ready to go

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:29.120
<v Speaker 3>for this for this next series, and then you could

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 3>always go back to Olipope because you know he had

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 3>that test experience, you know, going back quite a long way,

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 3>I think they could have pulled the trigger on that

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 3>probably before this series. I can understand why they're then

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:42.120
<v Speaker 3>stuck with it was a bit of ride or die

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 3>wasn't it with Pope and some of those other guys

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 3>through them through the first three Tests. So yeah, certainly

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 3>Tongue should should have played earlier because he's been their

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 3>best bowler.

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:53.040
<v Speaker 2>I think since he's come in, the.

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Seg has been the final destination for many England cricketers

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>over the past few years. By that, I mean that

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 1>they've played their final Test match at the end of

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 1>an ASHES series and Louis you wrote a piece about

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 1>that yesterday. You can find it on cricket dot com

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:09.919
<v Speaker 1>dot It's called Sydney enshrined as England Cricket's final destination?

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Will we see a few more in this Test match?

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 1>Let's find out tomorrow. On Day five, Australia need two

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:17.439
<v Speaker 1>wickets to knock over England. The Pomps say late by

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and nineteen