WEBVTT - MINI: Unpacking The Baldwins + Their VERY Odd Relationship

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.880
<v Speaker 1>On the weekend. I was scrolling TikTok and I came

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>across an interview between a reporter and Ilaria Baldwin and

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Alec Baldwin. Now, I'm sure so many of you are

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:13.039
<v Speaker 1>familiar Hilaria. She's the one who originally kind of came

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:16.119
<v Speaker 1>into the spotlight and was quite controversial because she was

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:18.160
<v Speaker 1>saying that she didn't know the name for the word

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>cucumber because she was Spanish and she couldn't remember the word.

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:24.919
<v Speaker 1>And then she was called out very publicly because actually

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>she's born in Boston and isn't Spanish at all. Anyway,

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>her and Alec have seven children together, and they have

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>brought out this documentary following their life surrounding the court

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>case where he was embroiled in the What was it.

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:42.520
<v Speaker 2>That he was embroiled? He shot someone on set accidentally, Yeah,

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 2>but he killed them.

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>It was because the prop gun had actual bullets in it.

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:49.959
<v Speaker 1>Like it's a crazy story. It's crazy. So this reality

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:53.200
<v Speaker 1>TV that's based around their lives. They're being interviewed about

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>it on the Red Carpet and the way Ilaria speaks

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to Alec, I was left with my mouth on floor.

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Have listened to this do you want more of this

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>season two.

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 3>Show?

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 2>Now?

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Now, I think we're gonna.

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 3>See you know, it's we're going to see how it

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 3>feels to have it'd be out there.

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 2>You're a winner.

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 3>Oh my god, when I'm talking, you're not talking. No,

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:15.839
<v Speaker 3>when I'm talking, you're not talking.

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 1>This is why.

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Yes, we'll have to like just pat him out of

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 3>the shop.

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 2>It makes me I want to throw a chop stick

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 2>at her.

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Although every time I do listen to it, I'm like,

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:27.480
<v Speaker 1>he did interrupt her twice.

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:29.959
<v Speaker 2>Yes, but he was interrupting her like trying to be

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:31.759
<v Speaker 2>a positive. But he's like, you're the best, honey, Yeah

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:33.680
<v Speaker 2>you've got this, Yeah you can do season two. He's

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:38.039
<v Speaker 2>been like a really like supportive husband. Yes, he interrupted her,

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 2>but it's his show too, it's not just her show.

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:41.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I saw it, and you should see his face afterwards,

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Like he looks absolutely downtrodden. I hate the narrative that

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>like at the moment that's going around that she's kind of,

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, like the evil wife that's contrived this whole situation.

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>There is like a real hate campaign around it, but

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>she is not doing herself any favors. With this type

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>of just like the way that she speaks to him. Now,

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>they came out and they did what was like an

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 1>explanation video around why it happened, and Alec in the

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>original video. We'll put it on Instagram so you guys

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 1>can see it's the pickup. But Alec has also joined

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 1>her in this explanation video. I have listened to this

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>piece of audeo.

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 3>And that is called what's the word of the day, interrupting? Interrupting,

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 3>which could be.

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 2>Correct our dysfunction.

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that's.

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 3>One of our children. Time to get into the room.

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 3>The whole point is that we interrupt each other all

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:32.639
<v Speaker 3>the time.

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Man interrupting and correctile dysfunction.

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 2>I actually love the term correct ale dysfunction. I think

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 2>that's very funny. I'll give her a point for that.

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if she came up with that'ur trademark.

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Correct our dysfunction. B. When a man is correcting a

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>woman and it's not their place to or the doing,

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:52.080
<v Speaker 1>they shouldn't be doing it because it's not the correct

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>thing to do anyway.

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:55.079
<v Speaker 2>Like, yes, I think the video was supposed to be

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a parody. I think it was supposed

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 2>to be like a let's laugh this situation off, let's

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:01.359
<v Speaker 2>have a united front they kids at the end. It's

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 2>all very awkward and uncomfortable to watch, But it didn't.

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it lands. I think it makes a

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 2>situation even worse for both of them. But I think

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 2>that the reason you said there's a lot of hate

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:12.359
<v Speaker 2>surrounding it at the moment, Laura, and we've spoken about

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 2>it before with Megan Markle. I think it comes down

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 2>to this confirmation bias, where we've already decided we don't

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 2>like something or someone from something they've done in the past,

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:23.359
<v Speaker 2>and then we look for any reason to be able

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 2>to double down on that hate.

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's why it goes viral, right, like

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>a pace of content like that probably could have gone under,

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 1>could have gone without people really paying any attention to it.

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>But because people already want to dislike her, that reinforces

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the reasons why we don't. But I do have to

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>say I feel like they are not doing themselves any favors.

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I understand that, like this must be a really heightened

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>emotional time going through this court case and everything, but

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand why they need to make a reality

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>TV show out of it, Like surely they just puts

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>more pressure on them as a family, But it.

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Just makes me think, like where are we are in

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 2>society and a generation if you have taken a life.

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Obviously this wasn't intentional, but then your response to that

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 2>as you go to trial is like, hey, what are

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 2>we going to do with this? How are we going

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 2>to combat this? I know, let's make a reality TV show,

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 2>Like coming up with a reality TV show off the

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 2>back of that whole situation. To me, I mean, it's

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 2>another conversation.

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I just think that I think it's fascinating.

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:18.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's fascinating. I think they're idiots. I do,

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:20.280
<v Speaker 2>I do, I do.