WEBVTT - Skye Wheatley's Controversial Baby Name, Twins Who Share a Boyfriend & Cracking the Code On Celeb Spellcheck

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.160
<v Speaker 1>This is Outspoken. The podcast is not afraid to say

0:00:03.360 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>exactly what you're thinking. Our names are Amy Kate and

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Sophie Torba. We're identical triplets, but we often don't have

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>identical opinions, so sometimes things can get heated. Outspoken covers

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:20.640
<v Speaker 1>all things reality TV, influencers, entertainment, and issues facing women.

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>That is so fatch. Thank you, Happy Friday, everyone, Welcome

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>back to another episode of Outspoken. We wanted to start

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>today's episode with a really funny story about our dat Well.

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>It all started when one of our og listeners shared

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>an instant story of himself reciting our intro. Well, mime

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>into the intro. Really, A few people have been doing

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:43.159
<v Speaker 1>that now and I really like it. Maybe it's going

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>to be like a new TikTok joint. Anyway, I digress anyway,

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>And so we re shared it and someone wrote in saying,

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:53.200
<v Speaker 1>oh my gosh, that's so lovely. Is that your dad?

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>It's so nice that he's supporting you in that way.

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>This particularly cracked me up because last family dinner, we

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>had a bit of a quiz with our dad because

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>we always have this joke that he doesn't really know

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>anything that's going on. In our lives, and we asked

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 1>him what the name of our podcast was, and he

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>actually couldn't answer it. So we decided this family dinner

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to hit record and see if he had done some

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>research during the week and had found out what his

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>daughter's podcast was called. So this is what he had

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>to say, Dad, So what's the name of our podcast?

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't know? It starts with an oh, both. I

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:32.479
<v Speaker 1>think Dad's just one father of the year. They're being

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:34.679
<v Speaker 1>able to remember the name. Do you think Mum was

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:37.039
<v Speaker 1>like trying to mouth it to him and we weren't watching.

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that it's kind of good that mum and

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>dad balance each other out because Mum is like our

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>biggest supporter with stuff like this, and then you know,

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Dad keeps us grounded by not even knowing the name

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of it. Yeah, it's pretty funny. We're talking about our dad.

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>He has sent in a social dilemma. Actually, I'm just joking.

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't even know that we do this, but we

0:01:56.760 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>have based a social dilemma on his behavior. So currently

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>he is having a few disputes in his street and

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>it seems like a very Today Tonight story. But fortunately

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>that show's not around anymore. It has all started because

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the neighbors has decided to park their car

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>out the front of our dad's house. And as a

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>retired gentleman, this is his biggest concern in life at

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the moment. And can we just set the scene if

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>anyone's in Adelaide and they follow shit Adelaide they recently

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>put up this picture of a mister men book and

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>they made it mister Mitcham, which is quite a nice

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:33.799
<v Speaker 1>suburb in Adelaide, and Dad is the spitting image of

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>mister Mitchell. We'll have to put it up on the

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>instera story. Yes, so mister Mitcham has a mustache, he

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>also complains to the council a lot, and he is retired,

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:43.839
<v Speaker 1>so it literally ticks all the boxes for our dad.

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>The only issue is he's holding prune juice where I

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>think he should be holding cigarettes. If you done a coffee,

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel like a lot of people listening this could

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>also be their father. Yeah, so let's get into the

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>crux of what happened. As I said, his neighbor across

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the road has been parking his car in front of

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>our father's house. So now it's quite funny because Dad

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>literally has a garage to park in and SODA's mum,

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>so it doesn't really affect him, but it does affect

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>him on a Wednesday night when we come over for death,

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>so it affects him one day out of the week.

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>So this all culminated in a rather explosive exchange the

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>other night when Dad was out the front having a

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>cigarette and his neighbor got out of the car out

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the front of Dad's house and Dad politely, apparently politely

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>said excuse me, could you please stop parking in front

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>of my house. Now, this isn't the first time Dad

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:31.919
<v Speaker 1>has asked the neighbor not to park in front of

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>his house, apparently, so that the guy in question is

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>a twenty year old guy and his girlfriend also parks

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>in front of the house, so Dad has actually asked

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>both if they can stop doing it. So it seems

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>like they're kind of purposely doing and how to piss

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>him off. So this neighbor apparently got in Dad's face

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and told him to get a life and that he

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>will continue parking in front of his yard if he

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>wishes to in front of his house. Well, no, he said,

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>he's going to park there all the time now. But

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>our Dad now purposely gets up very early in the

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>morning and parks his car in that spot, and he

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>said he's going to chalk out the spot so it's

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>reserved for him. I actually thought there was going to

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>be a punch up because Dad said this guy got

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>well in his face. I think the F word was

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>thrown back by our father. Just on Kate's point. Do

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:17.919
<v Speaker 1>you know what the funniest thing is It's obvious that

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:22.480
<v Speaker 1>it's Dad's car because his number plates are h fifty four. Well,

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the best part is Dad was telling everyone at family

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 1>dinner last night, and all our boyfriends come to family

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>dinner and he's like, boys, I let him know that

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you guys were coming around and we're gonna go knock

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>on his door. Now, he was only joking because Dad

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>actually told us that this guy's like six foot five.

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think Dad needs to back down. So really,

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>this brings up the point. Do you think our dad

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 1>is right in thinking that the neighbor shouldn't be parking

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>consistently in front of his house? Should that spot be

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>reserved for him and his visitors? See, I told Dad

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:52.359
<v Speaker 1>this last night. I think that park is free for

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>anybody to park in of course, it's really annoying if

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:57.679
<v Speaker 1>someone continually parks in your spot if you don't actually

0:04:57.720 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>have a car park in your house. Can I just

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>say I think what dad was actually concerned about is

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:05.279
<v Speaker 1>the fact that someone parking at the front of the

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 1>house could create a bottleneck situation, and apparently that's his issue. No,

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>he said that it's hard for mum to back out

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>of the driveway. So we're going to put it out

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to the community. Should your neighbor consistently park in front

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of your house? And also, has your dad ever done

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 1>anything embarrassing like this? So I want to hear what

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>other people's dads have done. Is Kayle here today not it?

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Klee's at home with the opal. I think Venus gave

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>him the flu. Sky Whitley has sparked debate ever since

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>giving birth to her second child last Friday. The former

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Big Brother contestant has taken her followers along every step

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of the way, culminating in a thirty seven minute birth

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>log and name reveal on Thursday. So, if it's been

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 1>such a wild ride for her followers, how did it

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>all start? Well? Sky has just been so open with

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>her followers from the get go. She went live on

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>her Instagram story as soon as she went into labor,

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and she's also vlogged the whole experience, and it was

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>really awkward to watch because at eleven PM she went

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>into labor, and we quickly find out on the vlog

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and also through the life that Lockie will not be

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>coming to the hospital with Sky. The tension was palpable

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 1>in these vlogs. You could tell that she was just

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>so over and I was kind of annoyed at him.

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, get off your ass and help your girlfriend.

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>But what we quickly find out is it's not actually

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Lockie who's made the decision to stay. Sky doesn't want

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:27.039
<v Speaker 1>him to come, and that is because Sky reveals that

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:29.279
<v Speaker 1>Lockie is making her feel as though she is being

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>extra dramatic about her reaction, and this made me feel

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>quite sorry for Sky. I mean, yes, maybe on Lockey,

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:38.599
<v Speaker 1>in Locke's defense, he's thinking, oh, well, you're well enough

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to film this, or maybe you're putting it on a

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.039
<v Speaker 1>little bit, but this woman is in labor or I

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>could see where Locke was coming from, because it did

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:48.719
<v Speaker 1>seem a bit performative to begin with, especially if you

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>are choosing to vlog your birth but I could tell

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 1>from someone who watches her vlogs a lot that she

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>really was in a lot of pain. I do love

0:06:57.240 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that she started packing her bag when she was going

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>in to labor, and the top of the priority list

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 1>was bringing one of those fake Polaroid cameras along with it. Oh,

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>what I don't get is haven't they been preparing for

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 1>this arrival of their new baby for a while, Like,

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't get it. You would, wouldn't you have a

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>backup plan because she's obviously gone into labor late at

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>night and they were kind of fussing about who was

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>going to look after Forest. I feel like your second child,

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>it's always a bit not as planned, you know what

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean. It's like, oh, whatever, we'll grab the bag. Well,

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>you're busy with the first child. So one thing that

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>really stood out to me on this flog was the moaning.

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>And it's quite funny because I was just watching it

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>earlier and I felt a bit uncomfortable because I had

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>it in fast forward and it sounded quite pornograb. Oh

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>my gosh. I remember watching Sarah's Day's birth log when

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I was over in Bali and Brandon was literally like,

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>what the hell, are you watching as a pawn? You know? Well,

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Fortunately for Sky, Lockie actually did end up coming to

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the hospital, so he acted as the cameraman of this vlog.

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>He really did capture everything, and it was really interesting

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>because as soon as we all at the hospital with them,

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Sky reveals that after speaking to the midwife, she has

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>actually been in labor all day. So the midwife said, no,

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>wonder you're in so much pain. You've actually had half

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>of the labor already done at home. So she was

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>well within a right to be act during dramatic wouldn't

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you feel like such a dick if you were Locky? Yeah?

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I love how real and raw Skuy is in this vlog,

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Like she spoke about how she felt like she was

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna pooh her pants and piss herself. You also see

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>her basically touching her for JJ trying to see how

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>dilated she is. There's not a lot you don't see.

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:34.319
<v Speaker 1>I did say to you guys, I felt like a

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:37.199
<v Speaker 1>family video that kind of needed to be edited a

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit more. I mean, particularly, I don't think we

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>need to see the nurse cutting the umbilica before. That

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>just grossed me out. I think it was actually Locky

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:48.080
<v Speaker 1>cutting it. But yeah, that was really revolting. I'd have

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 1>to look away. I have no stomach for that sort

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. I think that thing that's really stood out

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>to me about this pregnancy is as an influencer, she

0:08:56.559 --> 0:09:00.320
<v Speaker 1>is really trying to capitalize on this milestone. But I

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>also think she wants to keep have these moments captured

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 1>to keep us memories too. I do think she's been

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>really strategic with this whole pregnancy and birth. I mean,

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 1>asking people to turn on their notifications to be alerted

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>when she goes into labor. She's dragged the whole labor

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 1>blog out for a week. She is a new mum though. Yeah,

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>but with the carrot at the end that she's going

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>to release the name, well, it hasn't been a week.

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>It's actually only been four days. So she has taken

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>four days to reveal his name. And as we all

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>now know, his name is Bear west War So this

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:34.679
<v Speaker 1>was revealed at the end of the YouTube video. And

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>it's safe to say that followers were quite divided on

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>this name. Look, I wasn't surprised. I knew it was

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be something unusual. I did think it would

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>be on theme and let's be honest, bear on forest

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty big theme. I had to laugh. In

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 1>our community group someone said does a bear shit in

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the forest? Like that was the call of the day. Well,

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I actually really liked when someone said when people trying

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:01.079
<v Speaker 1>to guess the name and someone said Gump Horris Scump. Well.

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>In the YouTube video, she explained the reasoning behind the name.

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 1>She said she really wanted to set the records drait

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>on the fact that she was not inspired by the

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Kardashians and Kanye West. She said it was actually her

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 1>first boyfriend in high school that had the last name Wes,

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and I find it weirder. Yeah, that's perfectly. That makes

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>so much more sense. I prefer people thinking I'd copy

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the Kardashians and naming it after my ex. What do

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you guys think about that? It's particularly considering it was

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the ex's last name. It's kind of, you know, like

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Chloe Kardashian when she married Lamar Odin was Chloe Kardashian Odem.

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of like adding your ex's last name to

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>your child. I don't like it at all. I'd be

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>really pissed off if my partner was like, oh, actually, yeah,

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 1>after my ex I want to call my baby this.

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 1>What I find even worse is if you break his

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>name down, it sounds like a direction. Yeah, Bear West,

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Bear West. Yeah, it's terrible. He should they should have

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 1>gone for Wild. But at least there was no connection

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 1>with the exper Northwest now sounds normal. That's of course

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Kim Kardashian and Kanye West daughter. That sounds normal. Now,

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe Bear West will. But don't you think baar wild

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:06.959
<v Speaker 1>would also sound weird? Oh? They are all terrible names. Well,

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>what did you guys think about Sky's decision to put

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>it out to her followers to choose between the two names,

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>because for me, it really seemed like, again a strategic

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>social media decision because she didn't actually put a poll

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 1>up on an Instagram story. Instead, she posted a photo

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and got people to comment, and on that photo she

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>got the most comments she's really ever gotten. So to

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>put it into context, the photo where she announced the

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 1>arrival of Bear, which was that beautiful photo of her,

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>only had around two thousand comments. However, they post about

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the middle name had over six thousand comments, so that

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>would be really driving a lot of traffic and engagement

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:46.959
<v Speaker 1>to her. PA. Well, she's obviously incredibly clever. She's obviously

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 1>thought about this for a while and thought, what's a

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>great strategy to get greater engagement to my page, get

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>more brand deals. Maybe she's thinking she's got two kids

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 1>now to support. Maybe, or maybe she and Lockie are

0:11:57.520 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>just having a legitimate fight and they've gone, let's put

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:02.719
<v Speaker 1>it on Instagram, because isn't that the worst thing when

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:05.680
<v Speaker 1>you are so set on a name and your partner's like, nah, well,

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 1>just back to the name Bear. It's actually really interesting

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 1>because it appears to be now a trend of people

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>normalizing really aggressive animals, if that makes sense, because we're

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 1>having cute animal though no, but we're having the rise

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 1>of wolf and fox and now Bear, and it's really

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>it's quite fascinating because Bear is actually quite a popular

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>celebrity name. So Jamie Oliver was the first one. He

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 1>used Bear as the middle name for his son Buddy.

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:34.560
<v Speaker 1>We have then had Alicia Silverstone call her son Bear Blue.

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Kate Winslet's son is also called Bear Blaze, and Liam

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:41.199
<v Speaker 1>Payne from One Direction, who I did forget a couple

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago, his son is also called Bear, and

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 1>we have Bear from X on the beach. You've forgot Ale, Yeah,

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.959
<v Speaker 1>you've forgot Oh fuck, I've forgotten ile again. Oh well,

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>it's funny you say that about these aggressive animals because

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Reese's NaN's middle name is actually Swan and you don't

0:12:57.480 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 1>hear a lot of swans around it. Him. No. I

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 1>do feel for Bear though, because I feel like it's

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a really cute baby name. But like Reese's Nan, she

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't like being called like Swan anymore, Like she gets

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>called Swanny as a joke. Do you know what, I

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>could see it being quite like a hot young guy's

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 1>names like Bear from That's what I just said, Stephen Bear. Yeah,

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>what do you guys think? Like, why do you think

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:24.559
<v Speaker 1>that the topic of baby names prompts so much unsolicited opinions? Well,

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 1>for me, I feel like this is a bit of

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:29.679
<v Speaker 1>a branding exercise. I feel like these days with influencers,

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>if you name them something exotic, you can really like

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:36.959
<v Speaker 1>look at Sarah's day calling her son Fox. She then

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:39.439
<v Speaker 1>launched a range of pajamas with foxes on it. It's

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>very marketable. I mean, if if Sky had just called

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>her son John, I don't think people would be talking

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>about it. But again, it drives a lot of engagement.

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I've read this really interesting article about baby names and

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>they interviewed professor Diane Ree from the University of Cambridge,

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and she said that names influence other people's impressions of

0:13:56.960 --> 0:14:00.440
<v Speaker 1>us and can convey implicit messages that on the one

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 1>hand we are clever, cultured, worthy of recognition and respect,

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and on the other hand that we are ignorant, uncultured

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and undeserving of recognition and respect. So I feel like

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these unusual baby names somewhat fall into

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 1>that category. That's why I think a lot of older

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:18.359
<v Speaker 1>people have issues with these names because they can't imagine

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>a bear wear standing up in Parliament and being taken seriously.

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 1>But they can probably imagine a bear west in like

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>a low paying job or well, you could be right,

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>But I think these days on the internet, everybody has

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>an opinion. No one's going to agree on a child's

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>name at all. Yeah, and a lot of people have

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of opinions about Sky this week, and

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>as I spoke about I do think she has been

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>very strategic and clever around creating engagement on her social

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>media accounts. However, some of it has created backlash. Hey,

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>but you make it sound so sinister, isn't it good?

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Because she is? That is her job. Her social media

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>is a job. I'm not being sinister at all, but

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying, with all these extra eyeballs on, because she

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>has created so much attention for herself this week around

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the birth of Bear, she has been copying a lot

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 1>of criticism and I feel like she has been quite

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>controversial with a few posts that she's made. So on

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Saturday morning, very early, she posted that her and Bear

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 1>were struggling to get to sleep, so she posted a

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 1>photo of herself rolling her eyes, and she spoke about

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>in the caption, saying how there was another mother that

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>she was sharing a room with keeping her awake, and

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>her baby was crying and screaming and it was really,

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, not great for her. And so Sky actually

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>copped a lot of criticism for this post, which ended

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>up being deleted. Is it because she was mummy shaming?

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Is that what that was? This? Yeah, so people thought

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>that it was sort of very mean to kind of

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>call this woman out on a public platform who was

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 1>quite vulnerable in this situation. But did she take a

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>photo of the woman? How would anyone know it was her. Well,

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean the woman could be like, oh my gosh,

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm next to Sky with lead and she could go

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>look at it. I mean, Sky has got like six

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred and seventy eight thousand followers. I do think it

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>wasn't right to be commenting on another mum who's just

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>given birth. I'm in two minds about it because at

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the same time, Sky has also just given birth, She's

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>had zero sleep. I could see myself getting very irritated. Well, yeah,

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you, Sophie. I am really in two

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>minds about it because it does seem quite an ironic

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>situation where we're criticizing one new mum for criticizing another

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 1>new mum, And it is really important to consider the

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 1>fact that Sky was recovering from birth and is experiencing

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of hormonal changes, not to mention sleep deprivation.

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>But it really did make me reflect back to when

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>she had Forrest, her first child, and how much she

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>was struggling, and I was surprised she wasn't more empathetic

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to this new mum. Well, what something else she copped

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>a bit of heat for was her photo announcing the

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>arrival of her son. So she shared a beautiful photo

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>of herself with bear, but people seem to think that

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the photo promoted quite an unrealistic standard for an after

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>birth shot because she was glam to the match. She's

0:16:57.960 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 1>such amazing. I have to say, I hope I look

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>like that after I give birth. Well, I think that's

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the issue that people think that that's how you should

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:06.239
<v Speaker 1>look after birth. I mean, her hair looked like it

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 1>was beautifully done. I think she had a bit of

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:11.360
<v Speaker 1>makeup on. It looked like the photo had been touched up.

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, my first reaction was, Wow, she looks good.

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 1>But I really did feel for other mums who don't

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:19.440
<v Speaker 1>get that amazing photo of themselves. I mean, I feel

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 1>like there is a lot of pressure to get a

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>great photo of yourself and your baby, like it's the

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 1>first photo you're ever having together. Should we be putting

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:29.440
<v Speaker 1>pressure on mums to do I can tell you already

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna look like absolute shit when I've just given

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>birth to my future child. There will be no photos

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of me being taken whatsoever. That social media photo, maybe

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:40.439
<v Speaker 1>don't share it on social media. It did make me

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:43.440
<v Speaker 1>think back to when Courtney Kardashian, when all those years ago,

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 1>she gave birth to Mason, and she allowed keeping up

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>with the Kardashians to film it, and she was like

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>putting on fake ten and giving herself a shave beforehand.

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I think we've also got to remember with Sky, she

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:56.919
<v Speaker 1>is a very extra and glamorous person, so the photo

0:17:57.040 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't surprise me. That being said, it would be really

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>great to see some influences being a little bit more

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 1>real with the imagery they share, because I think we're

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>also sick of this perfect mum impression that people get

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 1>out well. Another controversy that has surrounded Sky this week

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 1>is also her decision to promote a weight loss program.

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 1>So on Wednesday, Sky shared a photo of herself in

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>leggings and a crop top with the caption, my tummy

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:23.880
<v Speaker 1>has gone down so fast just from healthy eating. If

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:26.119
<v Speaker 1>you're interested in checking it out, I'll leave a swipe

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 1>up link. What did you guys think about this? God,

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it's so dangerous to be promoting weight loss

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:34.439
<v Speaker 1>right after you've given birth. I mean, I'm sorry your

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>stomach is going down because your baby is no longer

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>in your stomach. I'm just so sick of this message

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 1>of how quickly women have to bounce back after pregnancy,

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:45.879
<v Speaker 1>just enjoy spending time with your child. I know that

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a mum, so I don't understand it completely,

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 1>But to me, I just think there's so much pressure

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:53.880
<v Speaker 1>on women these days. Yeah, and I'm all forgiving Sky

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the benefit of the doubt with the stories she shared

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>on the night of giving birth. However, I feel very

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:02.119
<v Speaker 1>differently about this because to me, it's quite clear that

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>she made a decision before she actually gave birth to

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>be a part of promoting these weight loss guys, because

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>she actually spoke about them in a couple of weeks

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>before the birth. So for me, this just seemed very

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 1>immoral to be promoting to vulnerable mums that you need

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:19.640
<v Speaker 1>to bounce back like she is. And I did find

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:22.400
<v Speaker 1>it disturbing because I feel like Sky was very sick

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 1>fixated on her pre baby body during her pregnancy. Yeah,

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>she did a lot of throwback photos. This post was

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 1>actually very reminiscent of Emily Radakowski when she was showing

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 1>her followers how flat her stomach was a couple of

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>days after giving birth. And I just can't even begin

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to imagine how you would feel as a mum who

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:44.400
<v Speaker 1>has just given birth seeing this type of imagery because

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:46.680
<v Speaker 1>it's yet again telling you, oh, you're not good enough.

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I feel like weight loss should be the last thing

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>new mums are thinking about. My friend say that I'd

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 1>like mister Barton in that photo. Ida. On Tuesday, celeb

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 1>Spelchek created a frenzy when she shared a post of

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Mary kay Olson flanked police. The post had no caption

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and the comments were turned off, but it's still garnered

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>over ten thousand likes. What does this mean? What did

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you guys think? Well? I believe it may be a

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>clue that she is going to be focusing on old

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:18.160
<v Speaker 1>pop culture moments, because if you take a look, there

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 1>is also a highlight up on her page which is

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 1>called the os pop Culture Highlights, and they are, of course,

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 1>when she went back through about ten years of nostalgic

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:30.880
<v Speaker 1>memories about all these pop culture moments. Some people are

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 1>actually saying that this is in response to Shameless's Scandal

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:37.199
<v Speaker 1>podcast where they're going back and looking at pop culture moments,

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and that she might be a bit pissed off that

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>they've taken her idea. Really, I don't think that's the case. Oh,

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>she always uses shots of celebrities from twenty ten, that

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of era, and it's obviously a picture of Mary

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Kate being flanked by police. I think she's saying she's

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>just out of trouble, like she's coming back, like this

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>is her big comeback. She also shared a photo on

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:00.199
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday of M and M again with no caption. The

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>comments turned off, and it's got some people in our

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>community hypothesizing, and I kind of liked some of their ideas.

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 1>So someone wrote that potentially she shared a picture of

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 1>the Olsen Twins because it could be in reference to

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>that amazing movie New York Minute, saying that you know, celeb'

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:18.160
<v Speaker 1>spellcheck is going to be back in a brief span

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:20.639
<v Speaker 1>of times in a New York Minute. And then someone

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>else pointed out that Eminem took a hiatus, and also

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:28.880
<v Speaker 1>there's that amazing song guess Who's back? Now? That's I mean.

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I posted that on our Instagram story when I saw

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:33.399
<v Speaker 1>her initial post, because that's all I could think about.

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 1>So I think she's back. She's a bloody genius drip

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>feeding us all these clues. I'm living for it. I

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:41.880
<v Speaker 1>suppose we just need to think about what capacity she's

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 1>actually back in and I think her turning off the

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:48.439
<v Speaker 1>comments points to potentially maybe watering the page down in

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:51.159
<v Speaker 1>terms of, you know, just pointing out spelling errors or

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about nostalgia. I think she's trying to cover her

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>ass by turning the comments off. Yeah, moving on, and

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 1>baby Watch continues for Steph Claire Smith, who at the

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:02.920
<v Speaker 1>time of recording is forty weeks and three days pregnant.

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:05.199
<v Speaker 1>So Steph has taken a bit of a hiatus from

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>social media for the past couple of days, but was

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 1>back on Thursday to promote Kick's new program. Kate, what

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:13.679
<v Speaker 1>is this new program about? Well, Steph and Kick were

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 1>teasing it a little bit because this was on the

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:18.199
<v Speaker 1>weekend where everyone was sort of watching to see if

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>she was going to give birth, and they were saying

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that something exciting is coming, and a lot of people

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:26.679
<v Speaker 1>are like, oh my gosh, is Laura Henshaw also pregnant? However,

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 1>that is not the case. They are releasing a new

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:32.160
<v Speaker 1>program called Kick Bump. So the program has been created

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 1>for pregnant women as well as new mums, and it

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>is backed by Steph's personal physio Ash from Women's Life Physio,

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 1>And there were a lot of mums out there that

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:43.439
<v Speaker 1>were really excited by the program, and I thought this

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>was a perfect marketing opportunity, particularly to release it in

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the week that everyone is watching Steph to find out

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>if she has given birth. I love it, Kate, because

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>you're always sold on everything that Steph Claire Smith does,

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>but just playing devil's advocate. What makes this different to

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Sky Wheatley promoting Await? Well, personally for someone who has

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 1>used the program before, it really is backed by professionals,

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:08.919
<v Speaker 1>and I feel the fact that STEP's personal physio is

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 1>involved in the program and ensuring that it is safe

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:15.159
<v Speaker 1>for pregnant women. Well, I'm sorry, but it is a

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>safe program for women to use. It's not focused on

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>weight loss. It's focused on moving your body in a

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>safe way. Well, they do say that this program is

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>meant to empower women and meant to get them back

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>moving their bodies. It doesn't seem to focus on extreme

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>weight losses. And it's definitely not about oh look this

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>is my postpart and body. It's very much, as you said,

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 1>moving your body feeling good again. Well, I suppose also

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 1>it's marketed at doing something for yourself. It's not all

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>based on looks. It will be really interesting to see

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 1>how Steph does handle showing off her body after the

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 1>baby arrives. I don't know. I think you think I

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 1>may can really be mistave, don't you? Yeah? I do.

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's get into the reality wrap and the trailer for

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:58.879
<v Speaker 1>the new series of The Hills, New Beginnings has dropped

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and it looks sense I am so excited about this.

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I saw it shared on Facebook that it was out

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:07.200
<v Speaker 1>in May, and I had to text Reese's mum because

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:09.639
<v Speaker 1>she is addicted to this show. Do you know what

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:11.159
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be on? Like, do we get at

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the same time as the US? Well, it's May twelfth

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that it comes out, and so season two we'll see

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the cast reunite following the easing of COVID restrictions in California,

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and all the favorites are back from the first series,

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:24.919
<v Speaker 1>minus Mischa Barton. Let's be honest, she wasn't really bringing

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that much. I'm glad we saw a little bit of her,

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>but I'm really keen for the fact that Kristin Cavalier

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 1>is back. Well. She definitely is the huge draw card

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>for this series. We saw her return a couple of

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>years ago when she replaced Lauren when, of course Lauren

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 1>moved on and got married and everything else and was

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 1>too big for the show to be honest though I

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>hated that. I feel like the hills went downhill when

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 1>no pun intended when Kristen returned, because Lauren was so

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 1>much better. Yeah, but it was very fake by the

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>time Kristen returned. But Kristen's returning after she's just split

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:57.399
<v Speaker 1>from her husband, Jay Cutler, so it's going to be

0:24:57.440 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>really interesting to see. Is Kristin going to be dating

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:02.160
<v Speaker 1>new Do you think she'll hook up with Brody? Because

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:05.199
<v Speaker 1>Brodie's also split from his wife who was also on

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:08.439
<v Speaker 1>the show, Caitlyn Carter, So she's actually famous for hooking

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 1>up with Miley Cyrus after she announced her split from

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Liam Hemsworth. I don't know if you guys remember this,

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>but Brody took a swipe at Caitlyn online. So Brandon Lee,

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 1>who is the son of Pamela Anderson and another cast

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>mate on The Heels, he shared the photo of Miley

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:26.119
<v Speaker 1>and Caitlyn kissing, and Brody wrote under the post, watch

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:28.480
<v Speaker 1>out picks of Liam and I holding hands on the

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>beach coming soon, and Miley responded, go take a nap

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:34.640
<v Speaker 1>in your truck and cool off hashtag hot girl Summer. Look,

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I actually like that exchange. I don't think it's so

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 1>much him taking a swipe. I think they're all taking

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the piece out of it. Yeah. I do love that

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Miley tags at the hashtag hot girl Summer. That's just

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:50.160
<v Speaker 1>bloody hilarious. Well, what's really interesting is Spencer Pratt's sister, Stephanie,

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 1>has hit out at Caitlyn, implying she was only using

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:56.199
<v Speaker 1>Brody for his fame. She told Cosmopolitan, I'm not going

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to say she's a clout chaser, but she had ninety

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 1>five followers before she started dating Brody then became an influencer.

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 1>That's a bit rich coming from Stephanie Pratt, who's only

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>on the show because her brother is Spencer and then

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 1>went on Made in Chelsea. She's been chasing a lot

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 1>of claim so the whole cast is chasing clown on

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>that show. Well, I do actually love the inclusion of

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Stephanie and Spencer because they always bring so much drama

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 1>to the Hills. Spencer also told Cosmo that Caitlyn and

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 1>Brody are pathological liars, and he claimed that both had

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 1>pretended to be married for twelve episodes of The Hills

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 1>when they were merely boyfriend and girlfriend who slept with

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:31.440
<v Speaker 1>other people. I love that he is still shopping these

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 1>stories around to the media because we will, of course

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:37.199
<v Speaker 1>remember on the second series of The Hills when he

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:42.400
<v Speaker 1>shopped around Lauren and Jason's supposed sex, like he stirred

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:45.160
<v Speaker 1>that whole thing. What love. I love that you actually

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 1>think that Spencer's acting independently. Don't you think the MTV

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>are like pushing his interviews and creating a bit I'm thinking,

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:56.960
<v Speaker 1>to be fair, the whole open relationship that Brody and

0:26:57.040 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Caitlyn has was a storyline in the first series very manufactured.

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I actually do think Spencer and Heidi were

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:06.399
<v Speaker 1>causing shit with the sex tape, But I think this

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:10.479
<v Speaker 1>is all very manufactured, particularly because they're not even friends anymore.

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 1>They literally like bring them together and be like, oh, hey,

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you guys haven't seen each other for ten years. Yeah.

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know if it is actually fake what

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Spencer is saying, because it's come out that Brody and

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Caitlin were never actually legally married. But I'm not saying

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>it's fake, but I'm saying they're spinning the drama in

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the media to create hype over The Hills, and I'm

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:30.440
<v Speaker 1>living for it. I'm just saying. Well. Another interesting point

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:33.199
<v Speaker 1>of the trailer was it showed Audrina saying that she

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and Brody had shared a kiss. What do you guys

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 1>think about that? Do you think they'd be a good couple.

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Look For someone who has watched all of the series

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>of The Hills recently, there was obviously a lot of

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 1>sexual tension between Brody and Audrina. I do feel like

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:49.200
<v Speaker 1>they're just trying to rehash these relationships over and over again,

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:52.399
<v Speaker 1>particularly because they brought Justin Bobby back in series one.

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:55.920
<v Speaker 1>If he's coming back again for serious tar, oh my god,

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>he's clearly going to rekindle some bullshit with Christie. It's

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 1>just so manufied. Actually, do you guys know how old

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Justin Bobby is. I'm guessing thirty five? Thirty five? He's

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:07.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine? Real? Well? Yeah, And in the trailer he's

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 1>like to his dad, Oh, I'm finally ready to start

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:13.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about settling down with a wife and a child,

0:28:13.240 --> 0:28:15.639
<v Speaker 1>like you're thirty nine. I actually love the fact that

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 1>we are following people in their thirties lives because I

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 1>am so over this whole discussion, this whole narrative that

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:24.719
<v Speaker 1>your life ends at thirty. I'm sorry, it begins at

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty every one, very much so. Now moving on, a

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:30.119
<v Speaker 1>thirty five year old Perth twins Anna and Lucy d

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Chenk are set to start in a US reality show

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:36.400
<v Speaker 1>called Extreme Sisters. Now, for those who haven't heard about

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Anna and Lucy, they're the sisters who are well known

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 1>for sharing a really close bond, so much so that

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>they've each spent two hundred and fifty thousand dollars on

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 1>matching plastic surgery. They also share a boyfriend. Just disgusting.

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh sorry, So they've been in this joint relationship for

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the last ten years and they so wrong, I know.

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 1>And they said if it was legal, they would both

0:28:57.600 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 1>marry him. So I know this sounds weird, But how

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 1>do you I think we'd go sharing a boyfriend. Well,

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that would go very well at all.

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I think we have shared on this podcast before that

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>we did have a crush on the same guy back

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 1>when we were twenty and that was a really big

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 1>learning curve for us, and I think that we would

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 1>never make that mistake again. Like, the whole thing is weird.

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Can I just put it out we never like nothing

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 1>ever happened though. No, no, this was an unrequired crush.

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I just want to put it out there because there's

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of weird twin documentaries out there that paint

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 1>all twins to be you know, talk in the same

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, the same sentences, all do the same jobs.

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I can't I can't be away from me. He was

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>saying this while we're all talking on a podcast and

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 1>interrupting each other. Journalist. No, but I'm just saying, like this,

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 1>this narrative about them being twins being the same person

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>is so wrong, and it makes me feel sick to

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:46.480
<v Speaker 1>my stomach seeing these documentaries, you know what, It makes

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:50.160
<v Speaker 1>me feel really uncomfortable. Because Reesa's family had watched Australian

0:29:50.200 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Story and there were these twins on there that all

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>work at a bird place and they called themselves the twinies,

0:29:57.120 --> 0:30:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and they talked in unison and they shared like bunk beds. Yeah,

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>and it really show with that. Well, these sisters, the persisters,

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:09.239
<v Speaker 1>they said that they actually suffer from separation anxiety if

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 1>they're apart, and so they actually they measure out the

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:15.520
<v Speaker 1>same amount of food to ensure they're eating the exact

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 1>same calories. And they also said that they go to

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the toilet with each other and they shower together. Can

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I just say, who is this sick individual that is

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 1>going out with both of them? Because there is something

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 1>so he's going to be in the show, so they

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>actually this show is going to be sensation. It's going

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to detail how this relationship works. Do you know what,

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I more actually judge the twins in this situation, because

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 1>I think there are a lot of guys out there

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that may be into this scenario. But the girls about

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:47.239
<v Speaker 1>me sharing a boyfriend with you and God knows what

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 1>goes on behind closed doors in this situation actually makes

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 1>me feel physically ill. There's another set of twins in

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 1>this Extreme Sisters show and their names are Brittany and Brianna,

0:30:56.640 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and they're from the US and they've married twin brothers,

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Jeremy and Josh. Was quite cute. So the sisters now

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 1>have the same married name and they live in the

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 1>same house. But they're quick to tell people that they

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 1>don't share a bed like all four of them, and

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 1>they don't swap partners. Do you know what, I love

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 1>some of these questions that you get when you are

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a multiple birthday. Oh does your partner ever get you

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 1>mixed up? Well? I bloody hope not. Can I just say,

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 1>where was our invite to be on this show? I

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know, like a bit hurt. I'm not hurt. They

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 1>only choosing people that are extremely weird. I don't think

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 1>these last two are extremely weird though. I think that

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 1>they've just happened to meet twin brothers. It's married twin

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 1>brothers and live in the same house. Oh, I thought

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 1>they live next door. Like I thought there was a

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 1>cute situation of like matching house and they had it

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and they got married on the same day in a

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 1>joint wedding. Oh that happened on Maths once. I think

0:31:41.640 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that's quite cute. Save on the bill. Yeah, actually Dad

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 1>would love that they did. They wear identical dresses. I'm guessing.

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure. I think you have to watch the show.

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Why are we just saying that the twin women are weird?

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 1>The twin boys are obviously weird as well. Well. It's

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 1>called extreme sisters, So we're focusing on the women in

0:31:56.880 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the story. Yea, If anyone's got any twin or trip

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:01.520
<v Speaker 1>LOOKQ Maye we've got to start a thread. Maybe we've

0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 1>going to debunk some of this weird shit that's being

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 1>thrown out at the moment of this show. I'll put

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 1>it out there. We do not feel each other's pain.

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 1>That's a common one that we we do not share

0:32:11.400 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a boyfriend. I think that would be one of the

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 1>fun which I spoke at the same time say that

0:32:15.160 --> 0:32:18.560
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. It's such a weird, freaky trip moment.

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 1>So I need to go to the toilet, soill you

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 1>guys come to toilet with me? No, well, I think on

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that note, that's all we've got time for today. Thank

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. We hope you have

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 1>an amazing weekend. We also just want to say a

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 1>big thank you to all of those lovely people who

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:33.960
<v Speaker 1>have left us wonderful reviews over the past couple of weeks.

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 1>You've really really appreciated it, and if you haven't, we'd

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 1>love if you could go and leave us a five

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 1>star review because it truly does help out our podcast

0:32:41.280 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 1>so much. And if you want to join in the conversation,

0:32:43.600 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 1>please join our Facebook community, which is Outspoken the podcast community. Yeah,

0:32:48.720 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and every week it's right outspoken the podcast community. I

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 1>think Sovie needs to always be the one, but I'm

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 1>going to throw off to that anyway, and also follow

0:32:57.520 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 1>us on Instagram. But Outspoken Underscore The Underscore a podcast