1 00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:02,280 Speaker 1: We are now going to head across and catch up 2 00:00:02,320 --> 00:00:05,960 Speaker 1: with the Police Association President Paul mchughue. Good morning to you. 3 00:00:05,960 --> 00:00:08,320 Speaker 2: Paul, Morning Katie here. Are you going? 4 00:00:08,440 --> 00:00:11,040 Speaker 1: Not too bad now? Paul? Obviously are we organized to 5 00:00:11,080 --> 00:00:12,920 Speaker 1: have you on the show this morning to talk about 6 00:00:13,240 --> 00:00:17,160 Speaker 1: the legislation that the COLP is proposing on mandatory sentencing. 7 00:00:17,840 --> 00:00:20,159 Speaker 1: Before we get there, though, as I'm sure you have 8 00:00:20,280 --> 00:00:23,880 Speaker 1: just heard Matt Cunningham from Sky News, he and another 9 00:00:23,960 --> 00:00:26,680 Speaker 1: journalist have written the story which is on the front 10 00:00:26,720 --> 00:00:30,200 Speaker 1: page of The Australian Today, where it's been reported that 11 00:00:30,240 --> 00:00:33,360 Speaker 1: the police notes obtained by The Australian show that senior 12 00:00:33,400 --> 00:00:37,520 Speaker 1: police executives, including mister Chalker, met in Deputy Commissioner Michael 13 00:00:37,520 --> 00:00:40,440 Speaker 1: White's office at three point thirty four on November thirteen, 14 00:00:41,080 --> 00:00:43,800 Speaker 1: the afternoon that Constable Rolf was charged with the murder 15 00:00:43,840 --> 00:00:47,040 Speaker 1: of Indigenous man cooman Ji Walker. I'm sure you've heard 16 00:00:47,080 --> 00:00:51,280 Speaker 1: the other detail that we have discussed, Paul. Does this 17 00:00:51,680 --> 00:00:56,400 Speaker 1: strengthen those calls for an independent inquiry to take place? 18 00:00:58,000 --> 00:01:00,480 Speaker 2: You know, obviously the meeting that took place that's been 19 00:01:00,520 --> 00:01:03,520 Speaker 2: referred to in that article is obviously out of notes 20 00:01:03,520 --> 00:01:06,000 Speaker 2: produced through the trial and look, no doubt, only those 21 00:01:06,040 --> 00:01:09,080 Speaker 2: that were involved in that meeting can really advise anyone 22 00:01:09,120 --> 00:01:11,000 Speaker 2: what took place in that meeting and what was said 23 00:01:11,480 --> 00:01:14,640 Speaker 2: and what decisions came out of that. So I guess 24 00:01:14,720 --> 00:01:17,240 Speaker 2: until we really know that, it's really speculation about what 25 00:01:17,319 --> 00:01:20,520 Speaker 2: may have taken place in those meetings. But obviously many 26 00:01:20,560 --> 00:01:24,480 Speaker 2: of the detectives involved have taken notes and about some 27 00:01:24,600 --> 00:01:28,039 Speaker 2: of the processes in there. But obviously it continues that 28 00:01:28,080 --> 00:01:32,200 Speaker 2: perception out there in the public public domain and to 29 00:01:32,240 --> 00:01:34,880 Speaker 2: a certain extent through some of the membership, that the 30 00:01:34,920 --> 00:01:37,600 Speaker 2: correct process may not have been followed. But you know, 31 00:01:37,680 --> 00:01:40,440 Speaker 2: until and that really is why we on the fourteenth 32 00:01:40,480 --> 00:01:42,280 Speaker 2: of March came out and made a statement around the 33 00:01:42,280 --> 00:01:45,360 Speaker 2: fact that that process needs to be interrogated because obviously 34 00:01:45,440 --> 00:01:47,400 Speaker 2: those questions currently exist today. 35 00:01:47,480 --> 00:01:50,600 Speaker 1: Still, Paul, from your perspective, where to from here? 36 00:01:52,280 --> 00:01:55,120 Speaker 2: Yeah, well, obviously, you know we've got to wait and see. Look, 37 00:01:55,160 --> 00:01:57,360 Speaker 2: there's no doubt the OKAK commissions come out and said 38 00:01:57,680 --> 00:02:00,440 Speaker 2: he's potentially going to look into it. Obviously, were're still 39 00:02:00,440 --> 00:02:02,559 Speaker 2: getting around to our membership to find out how they're 40 00:02:02,560 --> 00:02:05,840 Speaker 2: feeling and the many questions they have. And of course, 41 00:02:06,160 --> 00:02:09,080 Speaker 2: until we really can delve into those meetings and delve 42 00:02:09,080 --> 00:02:12,160 Speaker 2: into the reasons behind those decisions that were made in 43 00:02:12,200 --> 00:02:15,480 Speaker 2: that critical forty eight hours seventy two hours after the 44 00:02:15,480 --> 00:02:20,760 Speaker 2: shooting took place. To really find out what occurred and 45 00:02:20,800 --> 00:02:24,920 Speaker 2: how that occurred. It's really speculation, and I mean, you know, 46 00:02:25,040 --> 00:02:28,840 Speaker 2: certainly continues our call and obviously the tech detectives notes 47 00:02:28,880 --> 00:02:32,240 Speaker 2: that have been put out there and those detectives that 48 00:02:32,240 --> 00:02:35,360 Speaker 2: were concerned about the speed this all took place really 49 00:02:35,400 --> 00:02:39,959 Speaker 2: strengthens the need and certainly our commentary around the interrogation 50 00:02:40,880 --> 00:02:43,720 Speaker 2: of that decision making process and an explanation for it. 51 00:02:43,800 --> 00:02:46,160 Speaker 2: So you know, from here we need to find out 52 00:02:46,160 --> 00:02:48,280 Speaker 2: if the KACS are guess going to proceed with that, 53 00:02:48,639 --> 00:02:51,160 Speaker 2: but some form certainly of an open inquirer in terms 54 00:02:51,240 --> 00:02:54,000 Speaker 2: of making sure the public app confidence in our police 55 00:02:54,280 --> 00:02:55,760 Speaker 2: then that decision making process. 56 00:02:56,400 --> 00:02:59,160 Speaker 1: Paul, let's move along because we know that the Northern 57 00:02:59,280 --> 00:03:03,000 Speaker 1: Territory Police Association has welcomed the announcement from the CLP 58 00:03:03,160 --> 00:03:06,720 Speaker 1: on proposed Mandatory Sentencing Law Reform Bill which is going 59 00:03:06,760 --> 00:03:09,840 Speaker 1: to be introduced in Parliament this week, which if passed, 60 00:03:09,840 --> 00:03:13,720 Speaker 1: it would strengthen penalties for assaults on Northern territory police officers. 61 00:03:14,040 --> 00:03:17,000 Speaker 1: Why do you reckon this is needed? Yeah. 62 00:03:17,040 --> 00:03:19,600 Speaker 2: Look, each year, Katie, we stand up at annual conference 63 00:03:19,639 --> 00:03:22,760 Speaker 2: and we address our delegates and every year when we 64 00:03:22,760 --> 00:03:26,400 Speaker 2: speak to them, this is a very significant concern for 65 00:03:26,520 --> 00:03:28,440 Speaker 2: police out there on the front line. And obviously it 66 00:03:28,440 --> 00:03:31,760 Speaker 2: relates to frontline work is generally as well. But you know, 67 00:03:31,840 --> 00:03:34,440 Speaker 2: for years we've been saying that the laws aren't strong 68 00:03:34,560 --> 00:03:39,520 Speaker 2: enough around sentencing to protect our frontline police officers. And 69 00:03:39,600 --> 00:03:43,080 Speaker 2: you know, really a survey from last year really highlights 70 00:03:43,080 --> 00:03:46,200 Speaker 2: and some really concerning figures, Katie, in terms of the 71 00:03:46,240 --> 00:03:48,360 Speaker 2: amount of police that are getting a sould at each day, 72 00:03:48,720 --> 00:03:52,720 Speaker 2: the amount of injuries they're copying, including hospitalization, and you know, 73 00:03:52,800 --> 00:03:55,400 Speaker 2: strengthening these laws is certainly a positive step in the 74 00:03:55,480 --> 00:03:57,160 Speaker 2: right direction from our perspective. 75 00:03:57,280 --> 00:03:59,680 Speaker 1: Well, Paul, even last week, you know, we heard about 76 00:04:00,200 --> 00:04:02,200 Speaker 1: officer who was kicked in the head while attending a 77 00:04:02,240 --> 00:04:06,600 Speaker 1: domestic violence incident. At what rate are incidents like this 78 00:04:06,760 --> 00:04:08,560 Speaker 1: happening two police officers? 79 00:04:09,200 --> 00:04:11,640 Speaker 2: Yeah, Look, we know year on year an average around 80 00:04:11,640 --> 00:04:14,640 Speaker 2: two hundred and forty five assaults on police are taking place. 81 00:04:14,720 --> 00:04:19,680 Speaker 2: Many of those, as we've discovered through our research, you know, 82 00:04:19,800 --> 00:04:21,920 Speaker 2: show that people are being Our members are being as 83 00:04:21,920 --> 00:04:26,080 Speaker 2: solded up to three times a year, and fifty percent 84 00:04:26,120 --> 00:04:29,320 Speaker 2: of those are suffering some form of harm or violence, 85 00:04:29,800 --> 00:04:31,800 Speaker 2: and many of those are being spat on or bitten. 86 00:04:32,680 --> 00:04:35,760 Speaker 2: I mean, it is really increasing the severity of these attacks. 87 00:04:35,800 --> 00:04:38,880 Speaker 2: And sadly, more often than not, many of these people 88 00:04:38,920 --> 00:04:41,120 Speaker 2: go to court get a slap on the wrists and 89 00:04:41,160 --> 00:04:43,440 Speaker 2: off they gave because you know, they were drunk at 90 00:04:43,440 --> 00:04:45,720 Speaker 2: the time, or they you know, there's other factors that 91 00:04:46,120 --> 00:04:48,880 Speaker 2: the court take into account. Well, I'm sorry. It is 92 00:04:48,960 --> 00:04:51,599 Speaker 2: time to put the protection of our police front and center. 93 00:04:52,120 --> 00:04:54,520 Speaker 2: Frontline workers are out there keeping us safe, and this 94 00:04:54,560 --> 00:04:57,400 Speaker 2: has to be above politics. This is very much about 95 00:04:57,440 --> 00:04:59,800 Speaker 2: protecting our people and our police officers that are looking 96 00:04:59,839 --> 00:05:02,280 Speaker 2: up to us, and it's about time we made some 97 00:05:02,279 --> 00:05:03,200 Speaker 2: strong laws around this. 98 00:05:03,440 --> 00:05:06,160 Speaker 1: What are some of the typical consequences which are handed 99 00:05:06,200 --> 00:05:09,279 Speaker 1: down to offenders from your perspective, from some of those 100 00:05:09,320 --> 00:05:12,920 Speaker 1: cases that you've seen go through the courts, and you know, 101 00:05:13,080 --> 00:05:15,919 Speaker 1: and is it very different to what we would see 102 00:05:16,560 --> 00:05:20,240 Speaker 1: in a case of I guess a regular person being assaulted. 103 00:05:21,160 --> 00:05:23,159 Speaker 2: Yeah, well, at the moment as it stands under the 104 00:05:23,240 --> 00:05:26,800 Speaker 2: Sentencing Act, it really takes quite a severe assault on 105 00:05:26,800 --> 00:05:30,200 Speaker 2: one of our police officers for somebody to have any 106 00:05:30,240 --> 00:05:36,200 Speaker 2: form of detentional or incarceration as a consequence. And yet, 107 00:05:37,080 --> 00:05:39,719 Speaker 2: you know, there's actually stronger laws for the general public. 108 00:05:39,720 --> 00:05:42,240 Speaker 2: And I'm not saying that the general public is any 109 00:05:42,520 --> 00:05:46,480 Speaker 2: less important, but police and frontline workers are putting themselves 110 00:05:46,520 --> 00:05:49,640 Speaker 2: in harms way every day, and yet how on earth 111 00:05:49,680 --> 00:05:52,039 Speaker 2: can we have laws that are as strong as the 112 00:05:52,080 --> 00:05:57,279 Speaker 2: general public incarceration laws. So it's really about looking after 113 00:05:57,320 --> 00:05:59,400 Speaker 2: our people that are out there looking after us, and 114 00:05:59,480 --> 00:06:01,359 Speaker 2: if we're not prepared to do that, what are we 115 00:06:01,400 --> 00:06:03,600 Speaker 2: here for. This is community expectation in my view. 116 00:06:03,839 --> 00:06:07,520 Speaker 1: Well, what is the impact on police officers when someone 117 00:06:07,680 --> 00:06:09,919 Speaker 1: has given a suspended sentence or they put on a 118 00:06:09,960 --> 00:06:13,960 Speaker 1: good behavior bond after they've been subjected to quite a 119 00:06:14,000 --> 00:06:15,000 Speaker 1: bad assault. 120 00:06:16,520 --> 00:06:19,560 Speaker 2: Well, quite often we follow many of these cases through 121 00:06:19,600 --> 00:06:22,359 Speaker 2: the court process, and you know, some of our members 122 00:06:22,560 --> 00:06:26,719 Speaker 2: are just extremely dejected that it affects their longevity in 123 00:06:26,760 --> 00:06:29,479 Speaker 2: the job, that a vets their mental health. Their family 124 00:06:29,680 --> 00:06:32,240 Speaker 2: are concerned obviously when they come home with severe injuries, 125 00:06:32,600 --> 00:06:34,479 Speaker 2: and then they sit there and see somebody go through 126 00:06:34,480 --> 00:06:36,839 Speaker 2: the court process and get a slap on the rest 127 00:06:36,880 --> 00:06:39,080 Speaker 2: and walk out the door. Now, those officers may have 128 00:06:39,120 --> 00:06:41,479 Speaker 2: been bitten, may have been spat at, and they don't 129 00:06:41,480 --> 00:06:46,560 Speaker 2: know if they've contracted a communicable disease or anything of 130 00:06:46,600 --> 00:06:48,600 Speaker 2: that nature. And yet they sit there and see these 131 00:06:48,640 --> 00:06:53,200 Speaker 2: people walk away almost scott free, and it really affects 132 00:06:53,279 --> 00:06:55,640 Speaker 2: them around and affects the ability to make sure we're 133 00:06:55,720 --> 00:06:57,800 Speaker 2: keeping out people safe on the front line. 134 00:06:58,120 --> 00:07:00,560 Speaker 1: Paul, just before I let you go, have you heard 135 00:07:00,600 --> 00:07:02,640 Speaker 1: anything from the Labor government at this point in time 136 00:07:02,680 --> 00:07:04,560 Speaker 1: as to whether they are going to support this bill. 137 00:07:04,600 --> 00:07:06,320 Speaker 1: I know that the Health Minister had said to us 138 00:07:06,360 --> 00:07:08,680 Speaker 1: earlier on the show that they will look at the 139 00:07:08,760 --> 00:07:11,920 Speaker 1: legislation that is put forward. Yesterday afternoon, i'd seen on 140 00:07:12,040 --> 00:07:14,720 Speaker 1: nine News she was much stronger in saying that they 141 00:07:15,400 --> 00:07:18,120 Speaker 1: that you know, it was a complex issue. Today she'd 142 00:07:18,160 --> 00:07:20,280 Speaker 1: certainly tempered those comments. 143 00:07:20,320 --> 00:07:24,040 Speaker 2: I think, yeah, look, certainly, I mean, obviously this is 144 00:07:24,600 --> 00:07:27,800 Speaker 2: it'll be disappointing if this isn't supported. I know when 145 00:07:27,880 --> 00:07:31,400 Speaker 2: people talk about mandatory sentencing laws, it does frighten people. 146 00:07:31,440 --> 00:07:34,560 Speaker 2: But you know, let's have a serious conversation about this. 147 00:07:34,600 --> 00:07:37,120 Speaker 2: Because we know the government have been working on a 148 00:07:37,120 --> 00:07:40,520 Speaker 2: assaults working group for frontline workers, but it has stalled. 149 00:07:41,160 --> 00:07:44,120 Speaker 2: This is an opportunity for politics to be set aside 150 00:07:44,360 --> 00:07:46,800 Speaker 2: and support our police and our frontline workers, and that's 151 00:07:47,040 --> 00:07:49,120 Speaker 2: a huge improvement from our perspective. 152 00:07:49,560 --> 00:07:53,200 Speaker 1: Well Police Association President Paul Mchew, we always appreciate your time. 153 00:07:53,240 --> 00:07:55,000 Speaker 1: Thank you very much and we'll chat to you soon. 154 00:07:55,920 --> 00:07:57,480 Speaker 2: Thanks Katie, Chief, thank you.