1 00:00:00,240 --> 00:00:02,720 Speaker 1: Well, as you've heard us discussing throughout the morning, we 2 00:00:02,759 --> 00:00:06,440 Speaker 1: know changes to the Northern Territory Residential Tendancies Act from 3 00:00:06,519 --> 00:00:09,280 Speaker 1: nineteen ninety nine are going to commence on the first 4 00:00:09,320 --> 00:00:12,719 Speaker 1: of January next year, after being passed by the Parliament 5 00:00:12,760 --> 00:00:16,319 Speaker 1: earlier this year. We know that they were deferred to 6 00:00:16,400 --> 00:00:20,119 Speaker 1: allow for some further legislative changes required in response to 7 00:00:20,160 --> 00:00:24,000 Speaker 1: COVID nineteen, but it is looking as though this controversial 8 00:00:24,079 --> 00:00:28,160 Speaker 1: change enabling pets at a resident well at these rental 9 00:00:28,200 --> 00:00:31,520 Speaker 1: properties is set to forge ahead. Now joining us on 10 00:00:31,600 --> 00:00:35,040 Speaker 1: the line from the Real Estate Institute of the Northern Territory, 11 00:00:35,120 --> 00:00:35,960 Speaker 1: Quentin Killian. 12 00:00:36,080 --> 00:00:39,440 Speaker 2: Good morning, Quentin, Morning Katie. Quentin. 13 00:00:40,080 --> 00:00:44,400 Speaker 1: I know that you've stood very firm on your beliefs 14 00:00:44,400 --> 00:00:46,279 Speaker 1: with this. It's not the right move. 15 00:00:47,360 --> 00:00:49,879 Speaker 3: No far from it. Like this is a bit like 16 00:00:49,920 --> 00:00:53,600 Speaker 3: groundhog Day. It's just coming around again. Legislation that should 17 00:00:53,600 --> 00:00:56,200 Speaker 3: have been thrown out. In fact, it was the government's 18 00:00:56,240 --> 00:01:00,640 Speaker 3: own Scrutiny Committee, led by four of its own members, 19 00:01:00,680 --> 00:01:04,120 Speaker 3: that stood up and said this is nonsensical legislation. It 20 00:01:04,160 --> 00:01:09,560 Speaker 3: should never be passed, to which the Attorney General at 21 00:01:09,560 --> 00:01:13,080 Speaker 3: the time was Natasha Files stood up five minutes later 22 00:01:13,120 --> 00:01:15,120 Speaker 3: in the same parliament and said we're ignoring our own 23 00:01:15,160 --> 00:01:20,720 Speaker 3: committee and passing the legislation. It is nonsensical. It flies 24 00:01:20,800 --> 00:01:26,080 Speaker 3: in the face of attracting investors of growing the market, 25 00:01:26,120 --> 00:01:28,240 Speaker 3: which is what the mantra of the government is at 26 00:01:28,240 --> 00:01:30,839 Speaker 3: the moment. The mantra is let's get rid of red tape, 27 00:01:31,080 --> 00:01:35,039 Speaker 3: let's regrow the government, rego the economy, let's bounce back. 28 00:01:35,800 --> 00:01:38,800 Speaker 3: And they're introducing legislation which is going to scare away 29 00:01:39,920 --> 00:01:42,000 Speaker 3: a huge block of our investor market. 30 00:01:42,760 --> 00:01:46,840 Speaker 1: Quentin, look for me, I can't understand why they've introduced this, 31 00:01:47,000 --> 00:01:49,320 Speaker 1: so I sort of think it didn't seem broken to 32 00:01:49,360 --> 00:01:50,240 Speaker 1: me previously. 33 00:01:50,360 --> 00:01:52,040 Speaker 2: So what are they trying to fix? 34 00:01:52,880 --> 00:01:56,400 Speaker 3: Why is the committee, said Katie. Their own committee said 35 00:01:56,440 --> 00:02:01,200 Speaker 3: there is nothing broken. The current system works. Current legislation 36 00:02:01,280 --> 00:02:05,520 Speaker 3: that is contained in the Residential Tenancies Act of nineteen 37 00:02:05,600 --> 00:02:09,960 Speaker 3: ninety nine works. It simply means that you have to 38 00:02:10,040 --> 00:02:13,919 Speaker 3: ask your landlord permission to have a PET. All you're 39 00:02:13,960 --> 00:02:16,960 Speaker 3: doing at the moment now is you're forcing the landlord 40 00:02:17,000 --> 00:02:20,240 Speaker 3: to accept a PET or at the landlord's cost, to 41 00:02:20,280 --> 00:02:22,920 Speaker 3: go to nt CAT, which then starts to clog up 42 00:02:22,919 --> 00:02:27,000 Speaker 3: the tribunal with claims against lamas in living rooms and 43 00:02:27,040 --> 00:02:30,200 Speaker 3: turtles in the backyard, and god knows what else. So 44 00:02:30,200 --> 00:02:35,040 Speaker 3: I mean, there's an example in Victoria of the in fact, 45 00:02:35,080 --> 00:02:38,079 Speaker 3: I got you just yesterday of a group of people 46 00:02:38,280 --> 00:02:41,200 Speaker 3: in a very small apartment that decided they wanted to 47 00:02:41,200 --> 00:02:43,680 Speaker 3: have a dog, and so they told their landlord, we're 48 00:02:43,680 --> 00:02:48,040 Speaker 3: getting one. The landlord objected, and the case ended up 49 00:02:48,080 --> 00:02:52,120 Speaker 3: in the VCAT. Turns out, in an eighty square apartment, 50 00:02:52,200 --> 00:02:56,359 Speaker 3: these guys wanted a very large husky and they got 51 00:02:56,400 --> 00:02:58,880 Speaker 3: it because the VCT said no, no, you're going to 52 00:02:58,919 --> 00:03:03,160 Speaker 3: have the dog. Now, in an eighty square meter apartment, 53 00:03:03,639 --> 00:03:06,680 Speaker 3: they have a huge husky living in there, and cost 54 00:03:06,720 --> 00:03:07,480 Speaker 3: knows what it's doing. 55 00:03:07,520 --> 00:03:10,960 Speaker 1: You know, Quentin, I know that those who own investment 56 00:03:10,960 --> 00:03:13,799 Speaker 1: properties around the territory who are listening this morning will 57 00:03:13,800 --> 00:03:16,280 Speaker 1: be thinking to themselves, shit, have I got a leg 58 00:03:16,320 --> 00:03:17,160 Speaker 1: to stand on here? 59 00:03:18,520 --> 00:03:22,639 Speaker 3: Well, essentially, no. The way that the legislation works is 60 00:03:22,720 --> 00:03:26,240 Speaker 3: that under this legislation that the government is bringing in, 61 00:03:26,320 --> 00:03:29,440 Speaker 3: sneaking in our might add during the Christmas break, they've 62 00:03:29,440 --> 00:03:31,200 Speaker 3: had all year to do something with it, and they've 63 00:03:31,240 --> 00:03:33,480 Speaker 3: sat on it, hidden it in a drawer, and now 64 00:03:33,680 --> 00:03:38,880 Speaker 3: over Christmas break, they're sneaking it in. Under this legislation, 65 00:03:39,920 --> 00:03:42,520 Speaker 3: the tenant can decide that they're going to have a 66 00:03:42,600 --> 00:03:46,640 Speaker 3: lama in their living room. They then tell the landlord 67 00:03:46,720 --> 00:03:50,200 Speaker 3: I'm doing this. The landlord has fourteen days to object 68 00:03:50,200 --> 00:03:54,000 Speaker 3: in writing to the tenant and then must go under 69 00:03:54,040 --> 00:03:58,200 Speaker 3: their own steam and their own cost, to the tribunal 70 00:03:58,240 --> 00:04:02,440 Speaker 3: to the nt CAT and lodge a claim to stop 71 00:04:02,520 --> 00:04:07,560 Speaker 3: this occurring. And then it goes to a hearing in 72 00:04:07,560 --> 00:04:11,000 Speaker 3: front of a delegate. And the delegate not the landlord 73 00:04:11,040 --> 00:04:14,520 Speaker 3: who owns the property, who invested millions of dollars into 74 00:04:14,560 --> 00:04:18,640 Speaker 3: these properties, not that person, but a third person who 75 00:04:18,760 --> 00:04:21,719 Speaker 3: sits in a tribunal position, gets to decide whether or 76 00:04:21,720 --> 00:04:23,680 Speaker 3: not the tenant is allowed to have that pet in 77 00:04:23,720 --> 00:04:24,200 Speaker 3: the property. 78 00:04:25,160 --> 00:04:28,600 Speaker 1: Quentin, are we property owners maybe just being a bit 79 00:04:28,920 --> 00:04:31,640 Speaker 1: you know, a bit mean here? I mean, is it 80 00:04:31,680 --> 00:04:34,400 Speaker 1: actually appropriate that people are allowed to have a pet? 81 00:04:34,560 --> 00:04:36,360 Speaker 2: To play Devil's advocacy. 82 00:04:36,680 --> 00:04:39,920 Speaker 3: Katie, They're allowed to have a pet now, there's nothing 83 00:04:40,000 --> 00:04:42,320 Speaker 3: stopping them having a pet if they ask their landlord, 84 00:04:42,800 --> 00:04:46,160 Speaker 3: if they speak to their landlord. There's many the multitude 85 00:04:46,160 --> 00:04:49,520 Speaker 3: of landlords out there already who allowed pets in properties. 86 00:04:50,200 --> 00:04:52,640 Speaker 3: I was a landlord for a while, and I happily 87 00:04:52,680 --> 00:04:54,960 Speaker 3: allowed the family that was living in our property to 88 00:04:55,040 --> 00:04:58,039 Speaker 3: have a dog because they asked, and it was the 89 00:04:58,120 --> 00:05:00,920 Speaker 3: right sort of animal, and it was for that property. 90 00:05:01,960 --> 00:05:05,840 Speaker 3: It's appropriate for that tenant to ask the landlord for permission, 91 00:05:05,880 --> 00:05:08,480 Speaker 3: and if it's appropriate for that animal to be there, 92 00:05:08,839 --> 00:05:11,640 Speaker 3: and things like body corporate rules allow it and so forth, 93 00:05:12,080 --> 00:05:16,560 Speaker 3: then why not. But it's inappropriate to say, here's a 94 00:05:16,600 --> 00:05:21,280 Speaker 3: person who's invested their hard earned cash into a property 95 00:05:21,400 --> 00:05:24,800 Speaker 3: which is their future, and you're telling them that they 96 00:05:24,839 --> 00:05:27,320 Speaker 3: have no control over what happens in that property. 97 00:05:27,760 --> 00:05:29,920 Speaker 1: Yeah, that's the thing I'm really grappling with. You know, 98 00:05:29,960 --> 00:05:31,800 Speaker 1: I'm trying my best to see this from the other 99 00:05:31,839 --> 00:05:34,159 Speaker 1: side of the fence. And you know, I've been a 100 00:05:34,200 --> 00:05:37,320 Speaker 1: renter who had a pet in my younger days. I've 101 00:05:37,320 --> 00:05:40,200 Speaker 1: had dogs most of my adult life, and I never 102 00:05:40,360 --> 00:05:43,760 Speaker 1: rented a place where I didn't have approval to have 103 00:05:43,880 --> 00:05:46,840 Speaker 1: a pet. So for me, I'm just really struggling with 104 00:05:46,960 --> 00:05:48,880 Speaker 1: why they've made this change. 105 00:05:49,440 --> 00:05:52,800 Speaker 3: Well, the argument that they're putting forward in their lame 106 00:05:54,000 --> 00:05:57,880 Speaker 3: attempt to justify this is that there's a balance between 107 00:05:57,920 --> 00:06:01,039 Speaker 3: the tenant and the landlord. Well, it's not. You're actually 108 00:06:01,080 --> 00:06:04,640 Speaker 3: taking away landlord's rights. So forget, forget the fact for 109 00:06:04,680 --> 00:06:07,400 Speaker 3: a moment that this is about Pitts right. Put that 110 00:06:07,520 --> 00:06:10,839 Speaker 3: to one side. This is about landlord's rights, and it's 111 00:06:10,880 --> 00:06:13,200 Speaker 3: the thin edge of the wedge. Because there's a whole 112 00:06:13,240 --> 00:06:18,200 Speaker 3: lot more to come that we've already seen previewed in 113 00:06:17,360 --> 00:06:22,960 Speaker 3: the last round of negotiations on the Residential Tenancies Act. 114 00:06:23,240 --> 00:06:26,680 Speaker 3: This is the thin edge of the wedge about landlord's rights, 115 00:06:26,839 --> 00:06:29,640 Speaker 3: and that's what it comes down to. You're the person 116 00:06:29,640 --> 00:06:32,800 Speaker 3: who owns the property. You've invested in it. Quite frankly, 117 00:06:32,920 --> 00:06:35,400 Speaker 3: if a tenant wants to have the same rights as 118 00:06:35,440 --> 00:06:38,960 Speaker 3: a landlord, then purchase a property, then that property is yours. 119 00:06:39,000 --> 00:06:40,719 Speaker 3: You can do what you want with it. Well, for 120 00:06:40,760 --> 00:06:43,560 Speaker 3: the time being, you're a guest in somebody else's house 121 00:06:44,080 --> 00:06:47,640 Speaker 3: that you're renting from them. You don't have the right 122 00:06:48,240 --> 00:06:51,600 Speaker 3: to just do what you want because it's not your property. 123 00:06:51,760 --> 00:06:54,159 Speaker 1: Well, you're not taking that same level of risk that 124 00:06:54,279 --> 00:06:56,520 Speaker 1: the person who's purchased the home and is carrying that 125 00:06:56,600 --> 00:07:01,039 Speaker 1: level of debt is actually taking. Quentin, can I just 126 00:07:01,200 --> 00:07:04,320 Speaker 1: ask I know that that prior to these changes going 127 00:07:04,360 --> 00:07:08,480 Speaker 1: through Parliament, you had actually started a petition, you know, 128 00:07:09,120 --> 00:07:12,120 Speaker 1: I guess now that's been that was presented to parliament, 129 00:07:12,200 --> 00:07:13,560 Speaker 1: wasn't it and the still went ahead? 130 00:07:13,680 --> 00:07:16,760 Speaker 3: So no, no, no, it wasn't. That was the problem 131 00:07:17,080 --> 00:07:20,600 Speaker 3: is that the opposition leader attempted to present it to 132 00:07:20,680 --> 00:07:24,880 Speaker 3: Parliament and the government blocked it. They would not accept 133 00:07:24,880 --> 00:07:29,840 Speaker 3: it in parliament. They refused to accept the petition in parliament. 134 00:07:30,960 --> 00:07:34,760 Speaker 3: Why because they were too busy. They were too busy 135 00:07:34,800 --> 00:07:39,080 Speaker 3: introducing COVID legislation to In fact, it was about a 136 00:07:39,080 --> 00:07:41,640 Speaker 3: twenty minute ramp as to why they wouldn't accept the 137 00:07:41,640 --> 00:07:45,440 Speaker 3: petition for what would have taken one minute to pass through. 138 00:07:45,720 --> 00:07:49,240 Speaker 3: So the petition was never accepted by parliament or by 139 00:07:49,280 --> 00:07:51,680 Speaker 3: the government in parliament. How many people signed it to 140 00:07:51,720 --> 00:07:52,280 Speaker 3: be presented. 141 00:07:52,360 --> 00:07:53,920 Speaker 2: How many people signed that petition? 142 00:07:54,640 --> 00:07:57,040 Speaker 3: Around eighty three hundred people. 143 00:07:57,600 --> 00:08:00,280 Speaker 1: So they've not listened to those eight thousand people. Were 144 00:08:00,280 --> 00:08:02,240 Speaker 1: they all from the Northern Territory or were some of 145 00:08:02,280 --> 00:08:03,360 Speaker 1: them from interstates? 146 00:08:03,560 --> 00:08:07,760 Speaker 3: From it? There were some there were interstatus, there was internationals, 147 00:08:08,800 --> 00:08:10,920 Speaker 3: so there was that there was a wide church of 148 00:08:11,320 --> 00:08:14,680 Speaker 3: people who were saying we are property investors or potential 149 00:08:14,720 --> 00:08:18,280 Speaker 3: property investors, and we think this is nonsensical ruling. 150 00:08:19,920 --> 00:08:23,520 Speaker 2: Goodness, may Quentin. I know that. 151 00:08:23,720 --> 00:08:26,280 Speaker 1: Look, I know that people, some people listening this morning 152 00:08:26,280 --> 00:08:28,320 Speaker 1: who own an investment property are going to feel be 153 00:08:28,360 --> 00:08:33,120 Speaker 1: feeling quite demoralized by these changes. You know, if they 154 00:08:33,280 --> 00:08:36,160 Speaker 1: if they are really concerned, is there somewhere there they 155 00:08:36,160 --> 00:08:39,439 Speaker 1: can that they can go for more information or or 156 00:08:39,840 --> 00:08:42,440 Speaker 1: to seek some some you know, some support. 157 00:08:42,520 --> 00:08:43,640 Speaker 2: I guess you might say. 158 00:08:43,559 --> 00:08:46,680 Speaker 3: Well, I assume because the government is rushing this through, 159 00:08:47,000 --> 00:08:49,120 Speaker 3: that they're going to put out some sort of fact sheet. 160 00:08:49,160 --> 00:08:52,120 Speaker 3: Perhaps they can talk to Consumer Affairs. I'm sure that 161 00:08:52,200 --> 00:08:55,160 Speaker 3: Consumer Affairs will have some information on it. But you 162 00:08:55,200 --> 00:08:58,160 Speaker 3: know what I would have been encouraging all investors to do, 163 00:08:58,240 --> 00:09:02,040 Speaker 3: and all concern people, those people with concerns is contact 164 00:09:02,080 --> 00:09:05,199 Speaker 3: your local member, right to your local member, Ring your 165 00:09:05,200 --> 00:09:09,360 Speaker 3: local member and let them know en mass how concerned 166 00:09:09,400 --> 00:09:13,080 Speaker 3: you are. Ring the Attorney General herself, ring her office 167 00:09:13,160 --> 00:09:16,199 Speaker 3: right to her office emailer, right to the Chief Minister, 168 00:09:16,559 --> 00:09:20,320 Speaker 3: and tell them this is not on You're making a 169 00:09:20,400 --> 00:09:23,760 Speaker 3: huge mistake here. We told you this last year when 170 00:09:23,800 --> 00:09:25,880 Speaker 3: this was all starting, that this was a big mistake. 171 00:09:25,920 --> 00:09:28,959 Speaker 3: Your own committee told you that this was a big mistake. 172 00:09:28,800 --> 00:09:30,280 Speaker 2: And you've done it anyway you. 173 00:09:30,280 --> 00:09:33,719 Speaker 3: Continue to do this groundhole day activity and push through 174 00:09:33,840 --> 00:09:37,080 Speaker 3: more red tape that completely disrupts a market that is 175 00:09:37,120 --> 00:09:38,920 Speaker 3: only just starting to rebound. 176 00:09:39,480 --> 00:09:41,559 Speaker 2: Well, Quentin Killian, we are going to have to leave 177 00:09:41,600 --> 00:09:41,920 Speaker 2: it there. 178 00:09:42,200 --> 00:09:45,559 Speaker 1: SEEO of the Real Estate Institute of the Northern Territory. 179 00:09:45,640 --> 00:09:48,600 Speaker 1: I really appreciate your time this morning. Thanks so much 180 00:09:48,640 --> 00:09:49,320 Speaker 1: for coming with. 181 00:09:49,200 --> 00:09:51,920 Speaker 3: You time, Katie. People ring your ring your local member 182 00:09:51,920 --> 00:09:53,560 Speaker 3: and let them know how upset you are. 183 00:09:53,800 --> 00:09:57,199 Speaker 1: Thank you, Quintin and well for the sake of transparency, 184 00:09:57,280 --> 00:10:00,319 Speaker 1: we did definitely put in a request. I've put in 185 00:10:00,400 --> 00:10:03,520 Speaker 1: a request into the Attorney General's office for the last 186 00:10:03,559 --> 00:10:07,079 Speaker 1: couple of days, actually not just on this topic. In fact, 187 00:10:07,200 --> 00:10:08,959 Speaker 1: we didn't know that this announcement was going to be 188 00:10:09,000 --> 00:10:12,199 Speaker 1: made until late yesterday or yesterday, But we had also 189 00:10:12,280 --> 00:10:16,560 Speaker 1: put in a request to speak to Selena Rubau earlier 190 00:10:16,559 --> 00:10:19,880 Speaker 1: in the week about those proposed cuts to some of 191 00:10:19,880 --> 00:10:24,520 Speaker 1: those rehab programs for corrections and for those that have 192 00:10:25,000 --> 00:10:26,880 Speaker 1: done time in correctional facilities. 193 00:10:27,320 --> 00:10:29,240 Speaker 2: We weren't able to get her on about that. 194 00:10:29,480 --> 00:10:32,080 Speaker 1: I am of the understanding that they have now extended 195 00:10:33,000 --> 00:10:35,439 Speaker 1: some of that money when it comes to the correction's 196 00:10:35,800 --> 00:10:39,000 Speaker 1: rehab programs. But look, I'd be very keen to have 197 00:10:39,040 --> 00:10:42,760 Speaker 1: the Minister on to find out exactly why the government 198 00:10:42,920 --> 00:10:47,640 Speaker 1: has forged ahead with these changes despite the fact that 199 00:10:47,679 --> 00:10:49,960 Speaker 1: there was a petition, and there is a petition that 200 00:10:50,000 --> 00:10:52,640 Speaker 1: more than eight thousand people have signed. I know that 201 00:10:52,679 --> 00:10:54,679 Speaker 1: some of those from what Quentin killy And has said, 202 00:10:54,720 --> 00:10:58,319 Speaker 1: they're very upfront. Some of those are obviously into state. 203 00:10:58,400 --> 00:11:01,679 Speaker 1: Some of those people who've also signed are overseas investors. 204 00:11:02,320 --> 00:11:05,520 Speaker 1: But that petition, from what Quentin has said to us, 205 00:11:05,800 --> 00:11:10,240 Speaker 1: wasn't able to be presented to parliament earlier this year. 206 00:11:10,559 --> 00:11:13,800 Speaker 1: The opposition leader Leofanocchiaro wasn't able to present it to 207 00:11:13,840 --> 00:11:17,559 Speaker 1: parliament because the Government of the day had said that 208 00:11:17,600 --> 00:11:20,200 Speaker 1: there was other legislation that needed to be introduced and 209 00:11:20,280 --> 00:11:24,200 Speaker 1: changed on urgency due to COVID. Now, to me, this 210 00:11:24,400 --> 00:11:27,760 Speaker 1: is a real example of changing something for the sake 211 00:11:27,800 --> 00:11:31,240 Speaker 1: of changing it. You know, if their own committee, for 212 00:11:31,520 --> 00:11:34,920 Speaker 1: members of that committee had said it's not broken, so 213 00:11:34,960 --> 00:11:36,680 Speaker 1: we don't need to fix it, we don't need to 214 00:11:36,720 --> 00:11:39,360 Speaker 1: implement these changes, why on earth. 215 00:11:39,480 --> 00:11:40,520 Speaker 2: Have they gone through? 216 00:11:41,120 --> 00:11:43,280 Speaker 1: Now there are a lot of you getting in contact 217 00:11:43,280 --> 00:11:45,880 Speaker 1: with us this morning, and do you know what if 218 00:11:45,920 --> 00:11:47,960 Speaker 1: you want to call through, if you want us to 219 00:11:48,000 --> 00:11:50,120 Speaker 1: talk about this on air, If you want to call through, 220 00:11:50,440 --> 00:11:52,640 Speaker 1: if you if you own a property and do you 221 00:11:52,679 --> 00:11:55,240 Speaker 1: want to make your voice heard, give us a ring. 222 00:11:55,400 --> 00:11:58,360 Speaker 1: Eight nine one four nine is the number. We've got 223 00:11:58,400 --> 00:12:00,520 Speaker 1: quite a bit of time after ten o'clock. If you 224 00:12:00,559 --> 00:12:02,520 Speaker 1: want to make sure that your voice is heard on 225 00:12:02,559 --> 00:12:06,160 Speaker 1: this issue, call through. I've got a message here, Katie. 226 00:12:06,240 --> 00:12:08,559 Speaker 1: I can only rent as I don't have money, but 227 00:12:08,600 --> 00:12:11,640 Speaker 1: my daughter is highly allergic to cat here and some dogs. 228 00:12:11,640 --> 00:12:14,280 Speaker 1: This is going to make things harder to find a properties. 229 00:12:14,600 --> 00:12:17,080 Speaker 1: That message I read out a little earlier as well. 230 00:12:17,400 --> 00:12:19,440 Speaker 1: I've got one here. This pet law is something the 231 00:12:19,520 --> 00:12:24,079 Speaker 1: Victorian government did. This mob just follows them. Another one, hi, Katie, 232 00:12:24,200 --> 00:12:27,520 Speaker 1: was the community provided opportunity to input. I did not 233 00:12:27,559 --> 00:12:30,480 Speaker 1: get anything to indicate it was about to change. What 234 00:12:30,559 --> 00:12:35,120 Speaker 1: about constant barking dogs, arrogant and high handed behavior? 235 00:12:35,240 --> 00:12:38,400 Speaker 2: Says that Texter. Another one here, Katie. 236 00:12:38,000 --> 00:12:40,080 Speaker 1: The cynic in me says the government want to push 237 00:12:40,080 --> 00:12:42,280 Speaker 1: through the ability for people to be allowed to have 238 00:12:42,360 --> 00:12:46,120 Speaker 1: dogs in particular to maybe influence the break and entry numbers, 239 00:12:48,000 --> 00:12:51,080 Speaker 1: maybe reduces the crime stats as well. I think that 240 00:12:51,120 --> 00:12:54,120 Speaker 1: one's matting driver. There's another one high Katie and co. 241 00:12:54,360 --> 00:12:57,679 Speaker 1: Regards to the Tenants Act to allow dogs. This is 242 00:12:57,720 --> 00:13:02,000 Speaker 1: a way for the government and their mates to in 243 00:13:02,080 --> 00:13:05,520 Speaker 1: litigation to make more money. Government thinks landlords are all rich, 244 00:13:05,800 --> 00:13:09,160 Speaker 1: so tax, tax, tax in any way to rip people off, 245 00:13:10,160 --> 00:13:15,120 Speaker 1: silly people running the looney farm. And yeah, look there 246 00:13:15,240 --> 00:13:19,520 Speaker 1: is a lot more. There's a lot coming through. One 247 00:13:19,559 --> 00:13:21,960 Speaker 1: here says my property, my rules. If you choose to 248 00:13:22,000 --> 00:13:24,880 Speaker 1: rent from me, you choose to follow my rules. Don't 249 00:13:24,960 --> 00:13:27,280 Speaker 1: like my rules, don't rent from me, says that texter. 250 00:13:27,640 --> 00:13:29,880 Speaker 1: Another one here. The last time you had this pet 251 00:13:29,960 --> 00:13:33,000 Speaker 1: story on, I told you about my tenant who kept 252 00:13:33,040 --> 00:13:38,560 Speaker 1: pigeons in the internal cupboards. Oh my goodness, they had 253 00:13:38,600 --> 00:13:41,400 Speaker 1: permission to have a dog. I shudder when I think 254 00:13:41,480 --> 00:13:45,439 Speaker 1: of my public housing neighbor who had seven dogs and 255 00:13:45,480 --> 00:13:51,160 Speaker 1: then went to prison. Goodness, gracious, that is crazy stuff. 256 00:13:51,280 --> 00:13:53,160 Speaker 1: And look, if you do want to send us a message, 257 00:13:53,240 --> 00:13:56,200 Speaker 1: feel free to do so. Zero four one eight nine 258 00:13:56,280 --> 00:13:59,000 Speaker 1: five seven three six nine. I do want to point 259 00:13:59,040 --> 00:14:01,520 Speaker 1: out I know that there are a lot of wonderful 260 00:14:01,559 --> 00:14:04,760 Speaker 1: renters who have dogs and other animals who actually look 261 00:14:04,800 --> 00:14:08,000 Speaker 1: after homes beautifully. And I've been one of those people 262 00:14:08,080 --> 00:14:11,000 Speaker 1: who has had a small dog while renting my property 263 00:14:11,120 --> 00:14:14,600 Speaker 1: and done everything I could to keep that property immaculate. 264 00:14:15,040 --> 00:14:17,560 Speaker 1: So I do definitely want to point out that there's 265 00:14:17,600 --> 00:14:19,920 Speaker 1: lots of people who do the right thing. But the 266 00:14:20,000 --> 00:14:23,360 Speaker 1: concern here, of course, is that you know that people 267 00:14:23,360 --> 00:14:25,840 Speaker 1: who own these properties sort of are feeling like they 268 00:14:25,880 --> 00:14:27,040 Speaker 1: don't have a leg to stand on.