WEBVTT - New Evidence Support's Reed's Innocence

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Good. Just before nine o'clock last night, the jury returned

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:09.280
<v Speaker 1>guilty verdicts against all three defendants.

0:00:09.320 --> 0:00:12.840
<v Speaker 2>It was absolute shambles, to tell you the truth, just absolutely.

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Really pallous blood on his clothing the day after the

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 1>alleged at top.

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 3>A shallow mud bank, and it fits Roy River. Basically.

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:20.040
<v Speaker 3>I think most of the people are used to me

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 3>are good people. I think a really important question we

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 3>need to ask is how many Indigenous prisoners in Australia

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 3>are innocent.

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>This is Curtain, a podcast where we pulled back the

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:33.239
<v Speaker 1>blinds to shine a light on the darkest parts of

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>our justice system and ask who are the victims. I'm

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Amy Maguire and.

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm Martin Hodgson, a senior advocate for the Foreign Prisoner

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 3>Support Service. And a warning, this series contains the names

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:51.640
<v Speaker 3>of deceased peoples and has distressing content that might upset

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:52.520
<v Speaker 3>some listeners.

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Curtain the podcast. Now today we're going

0:00:57.160 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>to take you again overseas to a case that's close

0:00:59.880 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>to both of our hearts. The reason it's so important

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:05.840
<v Speaker 1>for me is because, as we've said previously on this show,

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>it's the case that led me to asking Martin Hodgson

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>to investigate Kevin Henry's case. It's the case of Rodney Reid,

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 1>who is an African American man who was on death

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 1>row for the murder of a white woman in Belstrop, Texas,

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>back in the nineties, and when we first spoke about it,

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of troubling similarities with Kevin Henry's case,

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>but also a lot of key differences. And one of

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the key differences currently is that Rodney Reid is still

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>on death row. Granted he's been given a stay of

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>execution and in definite stay of execution, but his family

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and his legal team are still fighting for him to

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>be free. We know that Kevin Henry is currently out

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>on parole and we're still fighting that exoneration, but that

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to me stands as one of the key differences is

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>that you know Rodney Reed. There is still this ongoing

0:01:57.480 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>fight for Rodney Reed to be free, to be out

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>in his community with his family. But there has been

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>some updates in the case now. Martin has been working

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>on Rodney's case for over a decade and he's been

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>following these proceedings very closely. In fact, he's still involved

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>with the legal team Martin, can I first ask you

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>about the context behind the recent hearing, what led to

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:24.919
<v Speaker 1>this hearing and what does the hearing mean for Rodney

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Reid and his family in the case.

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:30.079
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So, over the last two weeks there's been an

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 2>evidentiary hearing in Texas and basically after his execution was stayed,

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 2>this new evidentiary hearing was required to assess the new

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 2>evidence and to get new evidence from forensic experts that

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 2>can shine a light on new forensic methods and things

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 2>like that. There's also new witnesses have come forward and

0:02:55.600 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 2>basically the judge, once this proceedings are finished, will then

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:04.079
<v Speaker 2>have some time to think about it and he can

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 2>come back and either say Rodney's guilty and to continue

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 2>with the execution. He can order a retrial, or he

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:17.679
<v Speaker 2>could exonerate Rodney and set him free. So the stakes

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 2>really couldn't be any higher.

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 1>What has actually brought us to this point? Briefly, Martin,

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how long has this taken to get a

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>new hearing for Rodney.

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's probably over a decade to get to this

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 2>point of being able to present this new evidence to

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 2>a court. So as people are probably aware, Stacey Stitz

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 2>was found murdered on the side of the road in Texas.

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 2>She was nineteen at the time. Her fiance was the

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 2>primary suspect, A police officer named Jimmy Fanell and his

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 2>neighbor and friends in law enforcement investigated the case and

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 2>never got anywhere really with it, and then after about

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 2>six months they turned their attention to Rodney. Now, we've

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 2>always said that there was no evidence linking Rodney to

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:16.599
<v Speaker 2>the crime. In fact, that there was considerable evidence pointing

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 2>to Jimmy Fanel, the police officer fiance, and we've always

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 2>just wanted to get this evidence into court and also

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 2>to show that the prosecution withheld information at the initial trial,

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 2>that the forensic evidence presented was wrong at the initial trial,

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 2>and that there was witnesses who were scared or didn't

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 2>come forward at the time because the prosecution either didn't

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 2>let the defense know they even existed or those people

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 2>were threatened. So that's how it's taken over a decade

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 2>to get to this point. And now we feel like

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 2>over the last two weeks we've given it a really

0:04:57.760 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 2>good crack at presenting that new evidence.

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:03.920
<v Speaker 1>And so what was that new evidence? Can you take

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>us through some of the details of what was hurt

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>in court.

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:10.119
<v Speaker 2>So one of the key points is at what time

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:16.040
<v Speaker 2>Stacy died. We've always argued that she was murdered at

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 2>home sometime after dinner by her fiance, Jimmy Fanel, and

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 2>the state has always said that she was killed the

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 2>following morning. If she was killed the following morning, they say,

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 2>then Rodney could have done it when she was on

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 2>her way to work. We say, Jimmy did it, as

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 2>I say, just after dinner. So to the first witnesses

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 2>at this new evidentiary hearing were doctor Andrew Baker, who

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 2>is the Minnesota's chief forensic pathologist, and he testified in

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 2>the successful prosecution of the police officer who killed George Floyd,

0:05:55.360 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 2>and basically he found endless errors in the original forensic

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 2>evidence and basically disputed all of that evidence. He also

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 2>pointed out to the fact that Stacey had clearly been

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 2>murdered earlier on in the night, which is what we've

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 2>always said. And one important factor too, was that the

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 2>prosecution has always claimed that Rodney had raped Stacy, and

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:29.160
<v Speaker 2>what doctor Baker found was that there was no evidence

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 2>whatsoever of a sexual assault. And that's really important because

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 2>without that there's again there's nothing linking Rodney. But this

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 2>was something that, as we've spoken about on this podcast,

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 2>when they can't get a black man guilty, it's really

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 2>easy to throw this accusation of rape up, as happened

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:56.040
<v Speaker 2>to Kevin Henry, and now, as in Kevin's case, same

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 2>with Rodney. The new forensic evidence is that there never

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 2>was a rape. And I think it's a horrific thing

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 2>the police do to the family of the victim, telling

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 2>them that something shocking like that occurred when they know

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 2>they didn't know it didn't. The second witness was the

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Kentucky medical examiner and forensic pathologist, doctor Gregory Davis. He

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 2>not only agreed with doctor Baker, but brought a letter

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 2>with him to court of fourteen other of the nation's

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 2>leading medical examiners. They the head examiners from different states,

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 2>who all agreed that literally the forensic evidence at the

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 2>first trial made no sense. It was basically deliberately botched

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 2>to point to Rodney when there was no evidence. And

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 2>so he went through a litany of forensic evidence about

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 2>dating the bruises on Stacy's body, looking at issues of

0:07:54.040 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 2>lividity and rigormortis discoloration of the body, and also the

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 2>way that Stacy might have been murdered. Now we say

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 2>it's never been proven conclusively. The state says she may

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 2>have been that she was strangled by Rodney Reid. We

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 2>say that's not correct. And what doctor Davis said was

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 2>that there is also a possibility that she was drowned

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 2>and that that could have taken place in the bathtub

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 2>inside her home with Jimmy Fanell. And as everyone knows

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 2>who's listened to the podcast, their house was never searched

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 2>or examined. And what he showed was that one point

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 2>two liters of fluid was in Stacy's left lung. Now

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 2>how that got there is anyone's guess, but again it

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 2>points to Jimmy and away from from Rodney.

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting you brought up Jimmy Fanella, which who was

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Stacey Stite's fiance at the time, and he was a

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>lot older than her as well, and she was only

0:08:56.559 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>nineteen and she tragically lost her life. He actually, for

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the first time was brought to the stand, wasn't he

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>How was it when he gave evidence or what what

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 1>was his testimony like?

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was quite unusual because generally when someone who

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:19.199
<v Speaker 2>is being pointed at as a new suspect as far

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 2>as the state might be concerned, and the person we've

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 2>always believed and known committed the murder, generally they will

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:32.439
<v Speaker 2>plead the Fifth Amendment and they won't answer questions. And

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 2>we were under the assumption and had been told that's

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 2>what would happen. But in fact, Jimmy answered all the

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:44.319
<v Speaker 2>questions that Rodney's legal team put to him. And there

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 2>was nothing interesting about Jimmy's statements to the court other

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 2>than that every other witness who had given evidence at

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 2>the hearing was lying. And whenever he was questioned about

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 2>this new forensic evidence, he said that the forensic pathologists

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 2>were lying. Questioned about eyewitnesses, he said they were lying.

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Other police officers who gave evidence against him at this

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 2>new forensic hearing, he said, were lying. Former cellmates of his. Because,

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:23.439
<v Speaker 2>as people will be aware, Jimmy Fanell, ten years after

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Stacy died, was still a serving police officer when he

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 2>kidnapped a woman who he'd pulled over and raped her,

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 2>and he was sentenced to ten years in prison, and

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 2>he's only just been released now. One of the witnesses

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 2>was one of his former inmates. And what's quite interesting

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 2>about this witness is that he was a member of

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 2>the Aryan Brotherhood, the most well known white supremacist prison gang,

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 2>and Jimmy had sought their protection while he was in prison.

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 2>And this witness, Arthur Snow Junior, said was that Jimmy

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 2>confessed to him while he was inside and that he

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 2>said that that basically he said that Jimmy had told

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 2>him that and I quote, you wouldn't believe how easily

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:22.959
<v Speaker 2>a belt would break strangling an N word loving whore.

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 2>That's what Jimmy said to mister Snow Now. The important

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 2>thing about that is that Jimmy had been overheard to

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 2>say this about using the N word and using those

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 2>sort of names to describe Stacy. But the belt did

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 2>break when he strangled Stacy, and that was something that's

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 2>not really that well known unless you've really studied the evidence.

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 2>And this witness, Arthur Snow, was in prison when the

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:55.199
<v Speaker 2>murder happened, so he had no way of knowing it.

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 2>There was also another former inmate who was friends with

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Jimmy inside who said basically the same thing, that not

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 2>only had he killed his fiance, but that Jimmy had

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 2>got away with it, and that there was a man

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 2>on death row, and he'd said to Michael Bordellen that

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:19.839
<v Speaker 2>I took care of her and that damn n word

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 2>is doing the time for it. And Bordellan even says

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 2>that when he Jimmy told him that he simulated strangulation.

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 2>And one thing that's really important to note, as I say,

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 2>the belt that was used to strangle Stacey did in

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 2>fact break and the other half of that belt was

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:48.959
<v Speaker 2>found next to Jimmy Fanell's car, and that vehicle was

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 2>also where Stacy's body was believed to have been in

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 2>just before her body was dumped, and only Jimmy's, Jimmy

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Fanell's DNA and Stacy's d was in that vehicle. So

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 2>you have the murder weapon, Jimmy Fanell's DNA, Stacy's DNA,

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:14.839
<v Speaker 2>and these confessions inside that Jimmy had killed her in

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 2>this way. And then we had a litany of witnesses

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:22.559
<v Speaker 2>who were at Stacy's funeral who were friends of hers,

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 2>co workers, friends of the family, one being a Lee

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 2>County Deputy, Lee Clampet. And so this is a former

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 2>police officer with no reason to lie, and he says

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 2>at the funeral, Jimmy told him that Stacy and I quote,

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 2>she got what she deserved. And this was backed up

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 2>by a large number of witnesses, including Richard Scoggins who

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 2>worked with Stacy, and Faranell had said to him that

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.559
<v Speaker 2>and again, this is a horrible thing that he said,

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 2>but again this was at the fun funeral, that she

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 2>deserved it, and that she was a lying, fucking bitch.

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 2>And this is a guy supposedly at the funeral of

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 2>his fiance who's died just before they are supposed to

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 2>get married, and this is what he's saying to everyone,

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 2>from his own friends, fellow police officers, her friends, and

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 2>co workers. Yeah, there was just a litany of those witnesses, and.

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Martin, I think you haven't mentioned it on this podcast.

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>We do. I know you've mentioned it before. But there

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>was a reason he was saying those things about Stacy,

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's a reason that some people have said is

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the reason Rodney is guilty. Is that Rodney was having

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 1>an affair with stacy'starts, which is something he's always said.

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>And I know that there were other witnesses, weren't They

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>have friends who had confirmed that who previously hadn't been

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>listened to.

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's right, and they were some of the key

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 2>new witnesses that we say the prosecution withheld from the

0:14:56.960 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 2>defense at the original trial, which is that Rodney admits

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 2>that he and Stacy were having an affair, and a

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 2>number of her good friends and co workers confirmed that

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 2>and took the stand to confirm that, and that they,

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, they'd seen them together, that Rodney had been

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 2>to her work, that they'd seen her with Rodney at

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 2>an ice cream store, and things like that. So there

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 2>was all this evidence really that not only was Jimmy

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 2>prior to Rodney ever having the affair with Stacy, he

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 2>was already a very jealous, abusive guy, but then once

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 2>and look, you know, there's no doubt he joined the

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Aryan brotherhood in prison, so he's clearly a racist that

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, the fact that his fiance was having an

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 2>affair with a black man sent him off the edge.

0:15:56.760 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 2>And in this case, one of the most startling new

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 2>witnesses was a man named William Sappington, and he his

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 2>son and wife attend church with one of the highest

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 2>law officers in the area, are Ted Williams. And what

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 2>makes William very interesting is that he was one of

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Jimmy Fanell and Stacy Stitz's neighbors, and he approached his

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 2>friend at church, Ted Williams, and told him that he,

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 2>his son and his wife had heard loud arguing between

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Jimmy and Stacy, that they'd heard screaming, that they'd heard

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 2>things like her being thrown to the ground having their

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 2>hair pulled. They said that they'd always observed him to

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 2>be very jealous, very controlling, and threatening. Stacy had even

0:16:56.080 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 2>mentioned to them that she didn't think that the wedding

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 2>would go ahead. They'd observed what would amount to considerable

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 2>domestic violence by Jimmy Fanell. And these are the next

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 2>door neighbors. And they, as I say, they went to

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 2>church with this wems who was one of the highest

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:23.200
<v Speaker 2>law officers in the area. They taught his children at

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Sunday School. They described themselves as very God fearing people.

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 2>And we have no reason to believe they would possibly

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:36.160
<v Speaker 2>make this up or why. And all three of them

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 2>not only testified that they witnessed and overheard this domestic violence,

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 2>that they witnessed and overheard threats towards Stacy from Jimmy Fanel,

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:52.439
<v Speaker 2>but they approached this wems outside of their church and

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 2>were told and I quote, to hush your mouth. So

0:17:56.400 --> 0:18:00.119
<v Speaker 2>they were warned off by the police, and so they

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:05.200
<v Speaker 2>never came forward and when asked, when Miss Sappington was

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:08.880
<v Speaker 2>asked why she didn't even though she knew Jimmy had

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 2>probably done it, and it seemed clear to her that

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Rodney never had. This is a white woman from Texas,

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 2>a church going woman from a good family, said simply

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 2>that she was scared of the police and that it

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:26.919
<v Speaker 2>simply wasn't worth the risk to her family, but that

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:33.199
<v Speaker 2>they simply couldn't stay quiet any longer. And you know,

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 2>her son then took to the stand and mentioned that

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 2>during the day when Stacy and Jimmy were home on

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:43.919
<v Speaker 2>one particular occasion, he'd gone to their back door to

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 2>inquire because he'd heard tables and chairs being thrown and

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 2>screaming and shouting, and that he'd said to his father

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 2>when he came on came home what he'd heard, and

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 2>his father had basically said on the stand that that's

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Jimmy up there yelling at Stacy. It goes on all

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 2>the time. So there was this clear evidence of ongoing

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 2>domestic violence by Jimmy Fanel being committed against Stacy.

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 1>It makes me just wonder, Martin, you know what you

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>said about, you know, this white church going lady being

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 1>scared of the police. Did it come up in the

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:27.119
<v Speaker 1>trial at all about why the case wasn't probably investigated

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and why Jimmy Fanell wasn't actually charged over this overseas's murder, Because,

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:35.479
<v Speaker 1>as you've said many times, like the first suspect is

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:38.679
<v Speaker 1>the husband, the partner, or the fiance. Did it come

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 1>up in the hearing about why or why the police

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:46.399
<v Speaker 1>investigation actually zeroed in on Rodney and why not Jimmy Fanel.

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, there's a few reasons, I mean, one being that

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Jimmy was a local police officer and it was his

0:19:54.320 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 2>partner and good friend who were investigating this murder. Now,

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 2>for those who have been listening, they may know what

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:09.360
<v Speaker 2>happened to those officers. For those who haven't, I'll explain.

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 2>So one of those officers' names was Ed Celmeller, and

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:20.360
<v Speaker 2>six months after Stacey died, before Rodney had ever been charged,

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Ed committed suicide. Except there was a problem, and this

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 2>was evidence that we presented in the past few weeks.

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:35.199
<v Speaker 2>Ed was right handed. Naturally had always been right handed.

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 2>All his police documentation showed that that he wrote right handed,

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:44.719
<v Speaker 2>used his firearm right handed. The forensic evidence clearly shows

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:48.439
<v Speaker 2>he killed himself with his left hand. Now, one of

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 2>the problems with that is Ed cel Meller couldn't hit

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 2>the side of a barn with his left hand because

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 2>he'd sustained an injury while serving as a police officer

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 2>to his left hand. And so his brother has continued

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 2>to give evidence that not only was his brother not suicidal,

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 2>that his brother suspected Jimmy Fanel, his colleague, and that

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 2>he did not believe his brother could possibly have killed himself.

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:22.399
<v Speaker 2>Now this wasn't new. This was something we've made available

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 2>to the public. Something that wasn't known is that one

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:30.719
<v Speaker 2>of the other officers, Gary joe' bryant, was investigating Stacy's

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:35.160
<v Speaker 2>death for the neighboring police department, that was the Giddings

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:39.919
<v Speaker 2>Police Department. Now, what we've always known is that just

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 2>like Ed Celmeller, Gary jo'bryant died too before Rodney was

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 2>ever arrested, and he'd told his wife, and his wife

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 2>testified that Gary jo'bryant, the Giddings police officer, believed it

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 2>was Jimmy who'd killed Stacy, and he was investigating that. Now,

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 2>up until the last few weeks, we'd been told that

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Gary joe' bryant had been murdered by a Mexican immigrant

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:15.879
<v Speaker 2>who was in Texas without papers. And for Australians, where

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:18.480
<v Speaker 2>this murder in Texas took place is very close to

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:22.399
<v Speaker 2>the Texas border. We're also led to believe that it

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:26.639
<v Speaker 2>was an automatic weapon that was used to kill Gary joe' bryant.

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 2>This is a police officer investigating Jimmy Fanel who believed

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Jimmy was the real killer. Well, what we learned this

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 2>week is there probably never was a Mexican because when

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 2>we've demanded to have that person, this Mexican citizen, brought

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 2>before the court, that's been denied. Now, finally, the state

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 2>of Texas has claimed that that Mexican man was deported

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 2>back to Mexico and never charged with the police officer's murder. Now,

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:02.199
<v Speaker 2>this is ridiculous. No one can possibly believe that what

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 2>they and I quote an illegal immigrant could kill a

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:09.879
<v Speaker 2>serving police officer and never be charged with murder, that

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 2>they would simply just deport them back, get away with it,

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 2>away you go. So that's ridiculous, So we don't believe

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 2>that person ever existed. What else we learned this week

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 2>was something really shocking that, just like ed Selmeller, Gary

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:31.119
<v Speaker 2>Jo Bryant was killed with his own gun, a forty

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 2>five pistol that was his police service weapon. Now this

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 2>had never been disclosed before. So here we have two

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:44.119
<v Speaker 2>police officers investigating Jimmy Fanel. One has told his brother

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:46.679
<v Speaker 2>he believes Jimmy did it. The others told his wife

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 2>that they believe he did it. And within about a

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 2>week they're both dead, murdered with their own guns, but

0:23:55.800 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 2>not killed. They didn't kill themselves quite clearly. Is shocking,

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 2>and their families deserve answers too.

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 1>And we've talked a lot about this case, and you've

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:09.639
<v Speaker 1>outlined a lot of the evidence before and just knowing

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that evidence, but also knowing just hearing what you're saying today,

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 1>all the new witnesses, all the evidence that hadn't previously

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:19.919
<v Speaker 1>come before court, the fact these two police officers who

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 1>are investigating Jimmy Finill were found dead, it makes you know,

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:29.920
<v Speaker 1>it's almost unbelievable to think that Rodney Read isn't free.

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 1>What were the prosecution's case or what did they bring

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 1>to the hearing.

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes, so they brought to the hearing a number of

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:44.119
<v Speaker 2>witnesses who were largely police officers and largely friends and

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 2>family of Stacy. One of those police officers is a

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 2>former detective who was involved in the initial investigation, and

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 2>he was the first person to the scene, and he

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 2>made quite a few slip so, I mean, initially he

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 2>claimed that they thoroughly investigated Jimmy and he was first

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 2>to the scene and he was able to rule Jimmy

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 2>out for a variety of reasons. The problem with his evidence,

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 2>and his name is retired police detective David Board, was

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:22.159
<v Speaker 2>that he claims when he found Jimmy's truck in a

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 2>school parking lot the following day, he clearly noticed there'd

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 2>been a struggle inside the truck, that one of Stacy's

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 2>tennis shoes was still in in the truck, and that

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:36.360
<v Speaker 2>there was broken glass in there. And this was before

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 2>he knew that only Jimmy and Stacy's DNA was in there.

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:43.679
<v Speaker 2>So he was trying to and still claiming that it

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:48.919
<v Speaker 2>was someone else involved in this struggle with Stacy. But

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 2>where he really made an error was that he claims

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 2>he called Jimmy, and Jimmy was at home and hadn't

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 2>been woken during the night. How he knows that is

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 2>anyone's guess. That he'd found and Stacy's truck that looked

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 2>like there'd been a struggle. They'd found Stacy's body, and

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 2>could Jimmy come to the truck and the truck was

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 2>about thirty miles from Jimmy's house and Jimmy turned up.

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 2>How the hell did Jimmy know where the truck was parked?

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 2>So here was a police prosecutor, prosecution witness who made

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 2>a huge error. He'd never told Jimmy where the truck was.

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 2>His note shows that he never did. And this was

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 2>something that ed Selmeller, who had arrived at the scene too,

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 2>thought was very suspicious, and he'd wrote that in his book,

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 2>in his little police book. But of course he'd be

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:49.679
<v Speaker 2>found dead. Now. When he was really questioned this David

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:54.639
<v Speaker 2>Board about his evidence, he was asked was he a

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 2>member of a Facebook group of witnesses for the prosecution

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:01.880
<v Speaker 2>who were sharing him information together to make sure their

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:06.679
<v Speaker 2>stories were the same, And he said no, Well, we

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 2>have accessed that Facebook group and there was a number

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 2>of comments that he'd made he was a member of

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 2>the group. In fact, he'd made comments that day in

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:22.400
<v Speaker 2>terms of the day he was called to give evidence

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 2>in that Facebook group. So this is a clear violation

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:33.639
<v Speaker 2>of the court's rulings for witnesses not to have discussed

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 2>the case. So what makes David Board very interesting is

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 2>that he'd had it in for Rodney long before Rodney

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 2>had ever even met Stacy. In fact, we know that

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 2>David Board had tried to frame Rodney in the past.

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:56.159
<v Speaker 2>He'd done a photo ID of a lineup basically, so

0:27:56.359 --> 0:28:00.159
<v Speaker 2>six photos on a piece of paper to show to

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:05.479
<v Speaker 2>a witness. One of those people was Rodney. Rodney couldn't

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 2>have committed that crime. He was one hundred and fifty

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 2>miles away. But David Board printed two copies, circled one

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:15.919
<v Speaker 2>to show the witness first, and then used the second

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:19.439
<v Speaker 2>one to have the witness ID Rodney. So this was

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 2>a police officer who's been gunning for Rodney for the

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:25.679
<v Speaker 2>past thirty years, and here we had him lying on

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 2>the stand that he wasn't part of a Facebook group.

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 2>And there was also a number of the other prosecution

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 2>witnesses who were part of this Facebook group who basically

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 2>we allowed to give some evidence for a while and

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 2>then confronted them with that another one, another person's name

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 2>was Dianthea. Lee denied it on the stand again that

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 2>she was a member, and then we produced print outs

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 2>showing that she had in fact posted in that group

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:00.680
<v Speaker 2>and was a member. So a lot of the prosecution

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 2>witnesses were tainted before they ever got on the stand.

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 2>None of them had any new information of any kind.

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 2>And again, you know, the fact they are colluding in

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 2>a Facebook group doesn't say a lot about their evidence.

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 4>So the other thing I was wondering, Martin, is how

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 4>have Rodney's family been holding up, particularly his mother and

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 4>his brother, but his whole family as they go through

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 4>this process. I mean, there must be a lot of

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 4>hope there, but also you know, they've been fighting for

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 4>so long. How have they been coping through this whole hearing?

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 2>It's been really difficult. I think one of the positives

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 2>is that for the hearing, Rodney's been present every day,

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:45.840
<v Speaker 2>so they've been able to be in the same room

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 2>as Rodney. Rodney was moved to the local prison so

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 2>that he could be brought to the court each day.

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 2>It's not possible when someone's on death row for them

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 2>to be brought every day to the So it's been

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 2>a good break in that sense for Rodney, and it's

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 2>allowed his family to visit him more frequently, something they

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 2>haven't had for the past twenty five years. But for

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 2>his brother, Rodrick, who travels all over the country the

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 2>United States, supporting others whose loved ones are wrongly convicted

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 2>and who are on death row. I think when these

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 2>prosecution witnesses were on the stand and it was clear

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:34.240
<v Speaker 2>that they'd all been colluding violating the court's rulings, he

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 2>basically said to the prosecutors, I don't know how you

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 2>sleep at night. And unfortunately for that, the judge banned

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 2>Rodrick from the court for the rest of the hearing.

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 2>But you can clearly understand Rodrick's frustration. You know, his

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 2>brother's been wrongly on death row for twenty five years.

0:30:56.640 --> 0:31:00.479
<v Speaker 2>Four times he's come within moments of being execs cuted.

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 2>We finally had the chance to present all of this new, compelling,

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 2>fresh evidence that we say shows Jimmy committed the crime,

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 2>but at the very least casts enormous reasonable doubt as

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 2>to the initial trial. And here he has to watch

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 2>the prosecutors lie all over again, and their witnesses life.

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 2>So I think in that moment it got the better

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 2>of him. But look, they're amazing people, an amazing family.

0:31:31.360 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 2>His mother remains really upbeat and really positive. And they've

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 2>always said, just present the evidence, and this has been

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Rodney's thing. He's always said too, He's got nothing to hide,

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 2>show everything that there is, and that the truth set

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 2>him free. And two things that I think really lifted

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 2>their spirits was that finally it was put to a

0:31:55.400 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 2>court that in the months following Stacy's death, investigators asked

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 2>Jimmy Farnell to take a polygraph test. They wanted to

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 2>rule him out. I think they were looking to help

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:14.000
<v Speaker 2>their friend. He took one and he failed. He took

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 2>a second one and he failed. So of course they

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 2>never presented that to court, so this is now finally

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:25.480
<v Speaker 2>on the record. The other evidence is that I think

0:32:25.560 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 2>is really was really a boost to the family with

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 2>these beer cans that were found that we've spoken about

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 2>that were found near Stacy's body, three beer cans, none

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:41.960
<v Speaker 2>of which had Rodney's DNA on them. So again, Rodney's

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 2>DNA hasn't been found within coo EE of this crime scene.

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 2>But the DNA from those beer cans were from ed Celmeller,

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 2>one of those officers who was found dead, Stacy herself,

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 2>and Jimmy's best friend David Hall, a police officer, and

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 2>there is also some DNA evidence suggesting and that it

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:13.360
<v Speaker 2>can't rule out Jimmy fanew. So here we have Stacy's

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 2>body in a ditch by the side of the road

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:21.480
<v Speaker 2>and three beer cans with three police officers DNA evidence

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 2>on it, and that was confirmed finally by the Texas

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Department of Public Safeties head of the crime lab, doctor

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:35.480
<v Speaker 2>Allison Heard. So there's been this evidence that we've said

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 2>shows Rodney's innocence, but it hadn't got to court before,

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 2>and here for the first time it did. So the

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 2>two polygraphs of Jimmy lying and the DNA on the

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 2>beer cans, and again I think that was a great

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 2>boost to Rodney and his family that this was just

0:33:53.240 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 2>more modern forensic evidence showing that he had nothing to

0:33:57.760 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 2>do with it and this was all Jimmy.

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 1>So when is the judge to hand down his decision?

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Mardin the hearing went a little bit over time. We

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:10.760
<v Speaker 2>wanted to make sure that the forensic witnesses were able

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:14.080
<v Speaker 2>to give all of their evidence. It's quite complex, but

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:17.319
<v Speaker 2>because it all points to Jimmy Finel, it was really

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:19.960
<v Speaker 2>important to get it on the record. So we were

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 2>hoping for a decision on the seventeenth of August. That's

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:27.120
<v Speaker 2>been pushed back. Now the final arguments will be heard

0:34:27.160 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 2>before the seventeenth. Then the judge has until the thirty

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 2>first to basically wrap up this evidentiary hearing should there

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 2>be any new witnesses or any new evidence that needs

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 2>to be presented. And then sometime after the thirty first

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:47.360
<v Speaker 2>of August, the judge, Judge Judge J. D. Langley, will

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:52.600
<v Speaker 2>hand down his decision again. That'll either be to exonerate Rodney,

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 2>to set a new trial for Rodney where all this

0:34:56.160 --> 0:34:59.440
<v Speaker 2>evidence can be heard, or for Rodney to still face

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:02.759
<v Speaker 2>the death pen and be executed. And as soon as

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:05.520
<v Speaker 2>we hear the results of that, we'll do a show

0:35:05.680 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 2>and let all our listeners know, but it'll be some

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:12.760
<v Speaker 2>time after the thirty first of August. That was curtin

0:35:13.080 --> 0:35:13.879
<v Speaker 2>the podcast.