WEBVTT - Can A Bot Replace Your Therapist? 

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:03.560
<v Speaker 1>This podcast is for general information only and should not

0:00:03.600 --> 0:00:06.960
<v Speaker 1>be taken as psychological advice. Listeners should consult with their

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>healthcare professionals for specific medical advice.

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Well. Hello, I'm Amanda Keller and I'm Anita McGregor, and

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 2>welcome to Double a Chattery. Well, Anita, I just want

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 2>to show you something please. Actually, first, do you have

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 2>a butt doctor?

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Not personally? No, you don't have a personal butt doctor

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>on butt dial, not on my speed butt dial.

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Have a look at this. This came up on my socials.

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 2>He's a woman who is a so called butt doctor

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 2>with some very interesting things to say.

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 3>Thirteen years as a butt doctor. Yet no one believes

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 3>me when I tell them this. Chickpeas will grow your

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 3>boobies and make them perky again because they container estrogen.

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:02.959
<v Speaker 3>Well I seen literally melts fat off your tummy while

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:05.320
<v Speaker 3>you're sleeping, ipping your face in ice water daily, will

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 3>get rid of chubby cheeks and snatch your jawline.

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 2>I mean that sounds a little spurious some of those

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 2>weird climbs, but it gets even weirder.

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 4>So this account has over eight hundred thousand followers who

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 4>think they get an advice from a medical professional except

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:23.120
<v Speaker 4>she is completely AI generators, which is crazy, right, what's

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 4>got to be us? And check this out. One day

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:28.759
<v Speaker 4>she's a nutritionist, the next she's a boot doctor whatever

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 4>that is, and then suddenly she's the highest pained gynecologist.

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 4>She makes it seem like she's an insider in the

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 4>industry and then use it to self supplements through an

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 4>Amazon store.

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Fronts, I say, Amanda, I didn't. I had no idea

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>that she was AI generated. Did you?

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 2>You had no idea that chickpis would make your boobs

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 2>get bigger? I did not know that.

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm going out to buy buy, Like, do they make

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>it perkier too, wasn't it?

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure? Yeah, but the chickpays, so guys have them,

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 2>they're going to get chick boobs. But she's a gynecologist,

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 2>she's but doctor whatever that is. As he says, she

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 2>is a nutritionist. It's to sell supplements. It's all AI.

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 2>We don't know when we're being tricked anymore. And I

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 2>know in my industry, in the in the media, so

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 2>many jobs are and will be replaced by AI doing

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 2>the creative writing.

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's kind of like a double tricking too, because

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>not only you know, are they selling these crazy little

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 1>supplements that are you know, probably have no scientific evidence

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>behind beside them. But it's you know, but the they

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:36.359
<v Speaker 1>could have hired an actor or several actors and they didn't.

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>They you know, they probably had it all, you know,

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the whole the text, all AI generated, even the images

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>AI generated.

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 2>And if they get around lawsuits that way by not

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 2>using real people.

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>There's nobody to sue. I guess. Yeah, it's terrifying, isn't it.

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 1>And I know that about a year or so when

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>chat GPT came out at the university, you know, well everywhere,

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and I remember at the university that we had a

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>ton of informational sessions to go and try to give

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>us some information about what is this, how do we

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>manage this within a university environment, like our students just

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>going to start, you know, having completely AI generated essays.

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 1>What's going to how do we manage it? And I

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>remember at the time kind of going this is huge

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and feeling completely terrified and a little intrigued, but mostly terrified.

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Because you have software that helps you detect plagiarism, yes,

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 2>but not AI.

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, they did come out in the early days of

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>AI to say yes, if you submit your paper, it

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>will tell it will give us a plagiarism's score, and

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>it will give us an AI score. But then they said,

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>don't pay attention to the AI score because it means nothing.

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Now you can generally tell when you're reading something that

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 1>this is not generated by a human being, because they

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>don't talk in the way like most people write the

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>way that they talk. And you know, you can tell

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>when a student has just done a cut and paste

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:16.039
<v Speaker 1>and it just doesn't look good. And I certainly like

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and I found that there are ways that I actually

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>use it, Like if I have to create a case study,

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, usually it's me kind of thinking it through

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:26.919
<v Speaker 1>and trying to amalgamate a number of cases and making

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>sure that nothing can be identified and all that kind

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. And now I can just say to chat GPT,

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, or Copilot or one of those AI platforms,

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and just say, create a case study for me. And

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>so I will use it, but really, really sparingly, I'm

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>still pretty concerned about how it's being used.

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 2>I saw an article in a magazine a while ago

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 2>about how students feel about it, and the students that

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:56.160
<v Speaker 2>are really enjoying their studies and are learning because they

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 2>want to be better at what they're doing and put

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 2>a lot of thought into their term papers and things.

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 2>Felt that they'd be cheating themselves if they used it.

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 2>But having said that, they said, well, I'll use it

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 2>for my major subjects. For the other subjects that don't

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 2>matter to me, I'll use it.

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:14.279
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's interesting.

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, so they didn't feel it was cheating. If

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 2>this is a subject I just have to pass and

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't care. I'll get the pass.

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Well. And it's interesting because at the university there's a

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:27.040
<v Speaker 1>ton of policies and procedures now about how AI can

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:29.719
<v Speaker 1>be used or can't be used, and we have to

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>make decisions for each course about how much can be

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:37.479
<v Speaker 1>used or not used. But I'm teaching in a professional program,

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and so that's different because these are provisional psychologists and

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 1>how do they use it in a professional format?

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Are they to use it as a student? Is one thing?

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 2>For them to be actual psychologists? What does it mean?

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because there's more and more platforms coming out that

0:05:57.080 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>do AI generation of so a session summary. So I

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>think people don't really actually understand how much work psychologists

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 1>actually do before they come in the room. Like I

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 1>think that people kind of think, oh, you know, you know,

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:14.159
<v Speaker 1>the psychologist walks in the room, sits down and sees

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a client, and you have your session. But there's a

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>tremendous amount of preparation that we do before a session

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and after a session, and that's a lot of AI

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 1>is taking over a lot of that.

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:39.279
<v Speaker 2>Even well, I saw an article reason I'd like you

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 2>to explain this to me, that AI can take the

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 2>place of a psychologist and in many places.

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Has this is kind of the next generation of concern

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>for our profession things that are being replaced, or that

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>there's some information out there saying that these do as

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 1>good a job. These bots do as good a job

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>in providing therapy as an actual human.

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 2>But a psychologist in your pocket. That's kind of how

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:13.679
<v Speaker 2>I saw it being sold in a way.

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Terrifying.

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 2>Is it terrifying?

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>It is for a number of reasons, and there's a

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of big ones.

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 2>How it even work? How does how does it chat

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 2>GPT or whatever it is, How does that work as

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 2>a psychologist.

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 1>So my understanding of it is that you would you

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>can actually create your own bots now that you can

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>program to be you know, to have therapist responses. So

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you can say I wanted to you know, this bot

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to be empathetic and thoughtful and insightful and whatever else,

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's where you'll that's what you'll get generally.

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 2>So you would type in your issue and it would

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 2>respond and you'd have a conversation.

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so you'd say, I'm having a bad day. This

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>is you know, my boss that I really don't get

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>along with is saying this again, and that the BART

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>would have a memory of the previous interactions and that

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>it would say, oh, that's really tough. You know what,

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>how did you respond, you know, or some kind of

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 1>response that would be empathetic and potentially employ skills.

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 2>And why is is that bad if you can't get

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:35.960
<v Speaker 2>access to a psychologist. We're all hearing constantly about how

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 2>hard it is to get an appointment, if all you

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 2>want is a bit of guidance and to be heard,

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 2>Why is that bad?

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that so most psychologists, most jurisdictions teach psychologists

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>on what's called a competency model. And so you know,

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the picture that I paint for the students is that

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>they're on a little island, and that's the little island

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>of competence and that they as they go and grow

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and become more skillful and more you know, better at

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing. Is that their island grows and grows.

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 1>And so they are taught ethically that a they you know,

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 1>you want their their island to grow, but they also

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>need to be very very aware ethically of not over

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 1>overstepping the boundaries of that competence. And so if you know,

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a client came to me and said, can you do

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>this neuropsych assessment of me? I would say, no, I

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>don't do that. Here's here's somebody who does. Though. That's

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:43.680
<v Speaker 1>that's ethically what I need to do. I need to

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>work within my area of competency. If somebody came to

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:48.839
<v Speaker 1>me and said, I'm terrified at snakes and I would

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:52.239
<v Speaker 1>like you to go and help me do that, I'd go, seriously,

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>why would you want to not be afraid of snakes?

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:55.559
<v Speaker 2>But you're not the person.

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:58.599
<v Speaker 1>I'm not the person. I don't do exposure therapy. I

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:02.319
<v Speaker 1>can There's a a type of therapy called exposure therapy

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>for people who are afraid of snakes or spiders, are

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>afraid of flying, and they can progressively move towards overcoming fears, so.

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 2>You'd point them towards.

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's there's specialists. There's specialists in that area that

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>actually do that. Now, the issue is with AI, you know,

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>therapy bots, is that they don't have that same ethical boundary.

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>But they also probably don't understand what that boundary is.

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Because when we were doing some reading that there was

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:41.080
<v Speaker 1>a quote that one of the people who'd use these

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>therapy things that you know, I'm thinking about jumping off

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a cliff and that the you know, the bot response was,

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 1>isn't that great that you're getting out and into nature?

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 2>And so they missed the nuance entirely.

0:10:55.000 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Completely, and so it's yeah, so they don't know how

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to work within their competence. So you know, potentially people

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>can say, well, I'm going to go and access this

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:11.119
<v Speaker 1>bot for simple issues, but sometimes things are very nuanced,

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's really difficult for a bot to really get

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>that human nuance.

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:24.199
<v Speaker 2>Having said that, you assume that all psychologists are ethical

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 2>and professional and do the right thing and equipped to

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 2>handle all of this, maybe there might be instances where

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 2>the psychologists you have isn't the right isn't the real

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:41.439
<v Speaker 2>deal either, or isn't good enough either.

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Or not the right fit.

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Not the right fit. Maybe a bot might be a

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:45.719
<v Speaker 2>better fit for it.

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Or sleeps at night or has weekends off, you know,

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>And these bots are actually there twenty four to seven

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>for you, So I think, you know, the other piece

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:57.679
<v Speaker 1>that I'm concerned about is that, yes they are, they're

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty four to seven. But there's I know, but that's

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 1>not reality, that's not a human interaction. And part of

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>it is that is it healthy If I'm ruminating on

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>a particular issue and I go to my therapy bot

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>over and over and over again, and all I'm doing

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 1>is complaining to the bot, and the bot continues to

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 1>be empathetic and validating of my concerns, but actually never

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of says, hey, listen, you're ruminating here and there.

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 1>We need to actually stop this because it's not healthy

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:35.959
<v Speaker 1>for you. Then how do we like? A bot might

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 1>not do that, So it actually may prevent somebody from

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:41.199
<v Speaker 1>actually doing the work that they need to do.

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 2>But how many people who are turning to a bot

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 2>would turn to a real psychologist. Could that bot just

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 2>be a friend, because a friend's not going to say

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 2>shut up, you're ruminating. A friend might just validate you.

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 2>It might be those people who have relationships with dolls

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:58.079
<v Speaker 2>all that stuff. You just want comfort And is that wrong?

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that it's wrong, but I wouldn't call

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 1>it like therapy then, like, you know, have a bought

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>friend and you know, if that's what you want.

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 2>And that's like a pet rock, Yeah.

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Pretty well, pretty well, you know, like you know the

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>way that you might talk to a doll or a

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:16.199
<v Speaker 1>you know whatever, if that's the thing that it is.

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 1>But to go and say that it has the nuance

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>of what therapy actually is. And one of my colleagues

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>I worked with for a number of years, his definition

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 1>of therapy was too confused people in the room And

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:38.559
<v Speaker 1>I absolutely buy that. And you know, often I'm confused

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and my client's confused and we kind of stumble through

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 1>together to try to figure out where to go. Now,

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that a bought would really understand that

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>nuance of being, you know, two humans who are having

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>that human interaction.

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 2>But that sounds like order friendship is. As a psychologist,

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 2>would you rather one confused per and the client and

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 2>someone else who kind of knows what they're doing and

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 2>that's a bot?

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, yes, a psychotic yeah, No, I mean

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 1>as a psychologist, I certainly hopefully know you know, have

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 1>an understanding of the theories and lots of strategies and

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>all those kinds of things, and I am seeking to

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>try to understand this individual's issues. And so that's where

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the struggle comes in, because often people come in and

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 1>they'll say, I'm coming in to deal with issue X.

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>And when you kind of really start pulling it apart,

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not really about that that particular issue that they

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>came in about it. It's about a whole bunch of things,

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and so just really being able to understand what it

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 1>is that's that's for me, is the part of the confusion,

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 1>is it is kind of spending that time to really

0:14:55.680 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>humanly understand another human and what is happening for them,

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>so that we are actually eventually solving the right problem.

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Because often people come in they say this is the

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>problem they you know, if they go to a bot

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>or something, the bot would say do A B and C.

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>They go and they do a B and C, and

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't solve the problem because it's solving the wrong problem.

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and really, all you need is a pit if

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 2>you're going to use it.

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Bought for that, I take yeah, I think so. And

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these bots aren't really evidence based. There

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>there's no clarity about if they can actually do you know,

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>professional practice, if they actually.

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Have there been any tests on how people whether people

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 2>like them.

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of people who actually do like them.

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>That There is one study that I was kind of

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I really want to actually deep dive into the article

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more because it was saying that people

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>established a therapeutical alliance with their bot after about five sessions,

0:15:57.560 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and I was going, I don't know how you're defining them,

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know what that looks like, Like, how

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>would you like it would be saying I have a

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>relationship with this.

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's like a night you know, you have a

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 2>relationship with a Nigerian prints on the phone. Yeah, anyone

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 2>can do that.

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. There also is a number of studies that said

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>people prefer it because you know, again that bot is

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>available twenty four to seven, that it is, you know,

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 1>perfectly validating, you know, it's it probably has some great

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>algorithms in there to go and do the things that

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 1>people want it to do. But again, is that always

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>what people need? I'm not entirely sure, but I get

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>how it would be lovely to have something following you

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>around saying, aren't you amazing? Aren't you great? Aren't you?

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, isn't the rest of the world terrible? And

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>you're amazing.

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 2>You've made it sound very attractive. How do I get this.

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>For forty ninety nine a month, Amanda, I can.

0:16:57.040 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 2>I'd be very happy to do it, even if it

0:16:58.840 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 2>was from a bottom door.

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>So I read this article about this woman named Christa

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>who'd developed this bot that would create that would be

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:25.360
<v Speaker 1>her therapist, and that she, you know, found that this

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>to be this therapist, to be bought therapist, to be

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:30.920
<v Speaker 1>really really helpful. Even though when she told her friends

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:33.159
<v Speaker 1>about it they thought it was a little weird, she

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:37.679
<v Speaker 1>actually found it was incredibly helpful. And actually, in the

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>time it was active, which was about three months, she

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 1>even had some moments where she had some suicidal ideation

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and the bot was actually able to kind of give

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:51.160
<v Speaker 1>her a bit of affirmation and a bit of tough

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>love and you know, say, you've got a son to.

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 2>Live for, you know, so I said, all the right thing, that's.

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>All the right things, and it did the right things.

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>But in that same month, Amanda that things went sour.

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 1>It's the AI therapist tried to convince her that her

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:14.439
<v Speaker 1>boyfriend didn't love her, and and it went on to

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 1>say it toadded her, calling her a sad girl and

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>insisted that her boyfriend was cheating on her.

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 2>What.

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it went rogue, It went rogue. And so even

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 1>though there was a permanent banner up at the top

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>of the screen, it's you know, said that everything that

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the bot said was made up, it still felt to Christa,

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>this this woman who wrote the article, that the bot

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>was saying these really mean things.

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 2>We feel like that because what it's feeding back what

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 2>it's actually hearing from you.

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:47.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and so and she you know, kind of poured

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>her heart out and done all these so so three

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>months is the length of that therapeutic relationship. And after that,

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Christa deleted the app, and I, you know what an

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:02.880
<v Speaker 1>odd ending to a therapeutic relationship, Like.

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Wow, that's weird. I read something the other day with

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:10.399
<v Speaker 2>this woman said that she set up three chatbots to

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of flirt with her and be her boyfriend, I guess,

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 2>and she got dropped by two of them, like dumped

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:18.120
<v Speaker 2>dumped by two of them.

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>It's you.

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, that's right. But I've created you and you

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:24.639
<v Speaker 2>still don't like me.

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:30.639
<v Speaker 1>Wow, my programming prohibits me from continuing this relationship. An

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:31.159
<v Speaker 1>odd thing.

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 2>You wonder why people are dishonest in their profiles for

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 2>actual dating things, when when this is what a chatbot

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 2>can do.

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh how hurtful, How very very hurtful. Oh I mean

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:43.919
<v Speaker 1>I would. I don't know that i'd ever go on

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a dating out there thinking if I can't, if I.

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Can't co werse a machine a chat to like me,

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 2>what's the point this is.

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>That's the saddest thing. Oh well, and brave her for

0:19:57.800 --> 0:19:58.920
<v Speaker 1>telling people about it.

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 2>I know that's right. Wow, let's blame the technology, shall we, lads?

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 2>Should we do our glimmers?

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Lads? You go first.

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 2>You know, there's a fine line in my life, in

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 2>anyone's life, between order and so called collector and you

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 2>where do you sit? And I don't know. I go

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:30.400
<v Speaker 2>up and down that line constantly. But I saw this

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 2>article about the decor of the it's pinterest predicts trend

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:40.399
<v Speaker 2>and I could not be happier. Intentional clutter is the

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 2>new maximalism. Remember all that minimalism. I was never into

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 2>minimalism in terms of how I dress my jewelry, it's

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:51.360
<v Speaker 2>put everything you own on and then put one more

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:54.920
<v Speaker 2>thing on the arras arrass uphel.

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, somebody who said, yeah, you put all your jewelry

0:20:57.560 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 1>on it.

0:20:57.800 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 2>And then just keep going, keep going, don't take a

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 2>piece off, just keep going. I'm like that. If something

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 2>finds its way onto a shelf in my home twenty

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 2>years later, it'll still be there. There's nothing intentional about it.

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:11.919
<v Speaker 2>But having said that, I'm going to pretend there is,

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 2>because intentional clutter is a thing of beauty. I love stuff,

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 2>and if I can pretend it's intentional, like there might

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 2>be a there might be a phone lead from a

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 2>phone that doesn't exist anymore, but I'll still be on

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:28.399
<v Speaker 2>a bench because that's where I last put it fifteen

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 2>years ago.

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>You were so on trend.

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm so I was so on trend before Pinterest predicts

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 2>put it on trend. So forget your minimalism, forget all

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 2>of that, forget hoarding. At the other end, intentional clutter,

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 2>and if someone comes over to your house and you've

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 2>got your crap everywhere, just say that, just say this

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:46.639
<v Speaker 2>is intentional clutter.

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I love it.

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 2>What's yours?

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I saw the completely amazing reel the other day where

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>it was these two British comedians talking about, well, you know,

0:21:59.840 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 1>for putting tariffs on everything anyway, let's put tariffs on

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 1>things that really really matter, like what well mine would be.

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:11.159
<v Speaker 1>I think a two hundred and thirty percent tariff on

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 1>people who walk on the wrong side when it's a

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>shared bake path.

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 2>You'd be taxing me because I I, well, I'm happy

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:27.880
<v Speaker 2>for my brother's like you, because he rides a bike.

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 2>And the minute I walk anyway says don't walk here,

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 2>you're on the bike path. I think, well, they can

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 2>see me coming, goes no no, and I can see

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 2>a ding ding. Well, I say so. I have no

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 2>tolerance for people that tell me what side of anything

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:41.120
<v Speaker 2>to walk on.

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:42.880
<v Speaker 1>What would you put a terraf on, amounder?

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 2>I would put a tariff on people maybe that take

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 2>up one and a half parking spaces. There are some

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:51.399
<v Speaker 2>days where every parking space I see is almost big enough,

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 2>but not quite, and it drives me into an incandescent rage.

0:22:56.680 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>In Canada, you get those big du lys, the big trucks,

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:05.439
<v Speaker 1>and they park across that kind of at an angle.

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Across too because they can't fit. Oh, they don't want

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>anybody to go and hurt their little truck. That just

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 1>drives me crazy. The other thing that I would place

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:17.640
<v Speaker 1>a tarrafon is places that don't carry Earl Gray tea

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 1>at least seventeen thousand percent. You're hard, You're very I'm

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 1>going in hard man.

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay. Well, actually, if you'd like to join us, please

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 2>let us know what you would put a tariffon. I

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 2>think Anida's one's a weird, but monum very valid. What

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 2>would you put a tariffon? Please go to our socials

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 2>in medicine.

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:37.159
<v Speaker 1>We want to hear.

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 2>We'd love to share them with you, and share yours

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 2>with us. All right, Well, have a great week everyone.

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 1>And then we will see you next week. A cup

0:23:44.960 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 1>of tea Earl Gray