WEBVTT - Why Everyone's Middle Name Is Louise, Anne & Rose 🤪

0:00:01.560 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Flex and Frooms Flex and Frooms. This is the Flex

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and Frooms catch up podcast. Happy Friday guys. Today we're

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about crop tops and Love is Blind.

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Crop Tops number one because why won't they leave? But

0:00:15.360 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 2>Love is Blind because of the weak cups they have.

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:20.279
<v Speaker 2>And it's interesting because you know, when you look at

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:23.119
<v Speaker 2>TV and media, you're like, not everything has to mean something.

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Everything means something. Everything is so meticulously placed there and

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 2>put there for a reason, subliminal or otherwise. And we

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:34.639
<v Speaker 2>are revealing all have a lovely weekend. Here is the podcast.

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to, Flex and Frooms on Kita Mikiyani Mickyani

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>out beautiful loving producer has brought a story to my attention,

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>and that is the fact that every girl has the

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:51.599
<v Speaker 1>middle name Louise. If you're listening to this and your

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>middle name is Louise, please dam us at Flex and

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Frims on Instagram. I can't at present off your prize,

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>but I can if you come tell us and provide

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 1>some government identification, we might be able to pull some strings,

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe send you a lanyard or some such Anyway, Mickey

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>found this article from Amber Mia, which is looking at

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:15.479
<v Speaker 1>why so many women's middle name is Louise. If you're

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>a gen Z you might not relate to this. But

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>carry on, do we.

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 2>Have a headcount? Like how many? How many do you know? Personally?

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 2>What's going on?

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Louise? I reckon? I know one? Which is big?

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 2>How do we go from? Why every girl has the

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:31.959
<v Speaker 2>middle name Louise and you're gonna say you know one each?

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:35.399
<v Speaker 1>No, there's a list.

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:37.680
<v Speaker 3>There's a list of a few names that are around.

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh lot, Okay, let's go, let's go.

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 3>You know I can, but any child born in twenty

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 3>twenty three isn't going to have Louise. I could have

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 3>the list.

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 1>The list was like.

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 3>Carper an Ava, you know, all those sorts of vibes.

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Remember there was a real Cooper phase in like two

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand and seven. Ooh Cooper. Maybe that's all nine. So

0:01:57.160 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>this article says everyone from the nineteen nineties has the

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>same middle name. Back in the nineteen eighties, Louise was

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the third most popular middle name for girls born in Australia,

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>behind Anne and Jane. That's a good one.

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, classic.

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>My mum's her name is Gene. I feel like that.

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>So is that a classic middle name? Gene By the

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:16.919
<v Speaker 1>nineteen nineties it had crept up to second spot. It's

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>not like Luise was ever really a popular first name

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>in Australia, So what's going on, Well, it's all about

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the rhythm. Most popular eighties and nineties girls names had

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>two to three syllables with the accent on the first

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>syllable Jessica, Sarah, Amy, Emma, Catherine, Rachel, Hannah, Georgia, Caitlin

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:38.359
<v Speaker 1>to make a pretty sound. In combination, most parents would

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>subconsciously choose a middle name with one syllable and Jane

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Lee Kate or two syllables with the accent in the

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>second syllable Louise, Marie renee Nicole. That makes total sense.

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 2>But the fact that it was intrinsic it's very interesting.

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I feel like naming a baby might be a little

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:58.639
<v Speaker 1>bit like a wedding in that you think yours will

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>be different, but then you ends up being part of

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the trend. Wow, similar thing. Yeah, where does it come

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>from to have your mum's last name is your middle name,

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:10.799
<v Speaker 1>which is what I have? Is it like a Celtic thing?

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Celtic other people I meet people who have the same thing.

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, who started this trend? Because it's kind of random.

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's kind of like the hyphenated name, but

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 1>like they haven't gone the full hog.

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 3>That's what I always assumed.

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>That's what you think.

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:24.919
<v Speaker 3>That's what I assumed.

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Double barrel name.

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I was like, instead of we get double barrel,

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 3>we want on a legacy, so we'll check it in

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 3>the middle.

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 1>We'll just give them a little pass.

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 2>I think we might have come across our longest standing

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 2>fashion trend. The people might be confused into thinking that

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 2>it's a classic item and it is not. The item

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 2>in question is a crop top. I don't get it,

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 2>and I'm not anti croptop. I got a stomach tattoo,

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 2>so when I showed my mid ri, if it had

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:55.119
<v Speaker 2>a bit more flavor and accessory, babe, I'm more pro

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 2>crop top. But I don't understand. I would say most

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 2>demographics in the women's clothing section don't want a croup

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 2>tom and I could understand. For a couple of seasons

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 2>there it was like popstar Q, your favorite pop stars

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 2>wearing a cruptop. You'll want a croptop. L la la

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 2>la la la. But it became so saturated that to

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 2>find a full length top was so considered matronly or

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:22.039
<v Speaker 2>corporate esthetic or quite luxury or whatever it was, you

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:25.480
<v Speaker 2>couldn't just find a full length top that was also trendy.

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 2>And I'm getting confused because when we look at essays

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 2>now or opinion pieces, they always say the same thing,

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 2>that trend cycles are moving so quickly that it's hard

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 2>to keep up, and that it's resulting in overconsumption, or

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 2>it's resulting in excess waste because we are not buying intentionally,

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:47.039
<v Speaker 2>and then we're getting rid of things even less intentionally beforehand.

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 1>So why do.

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Crrup tops make the cuts every single trend cycle if

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:56.720
<v Speaker 2>it's so supposedly racing and moving so quickly. I don't

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 2>get it. I thought about it a lot too. I

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 2>don't see why there would be a need to have

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:03.479
<v Speaker 2>just a crop top. It would make sense have full

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 2>length tops for everything. Tuck it in, get it it in.

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Was a real thing. For a while. I used to

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.840
<v Speaker 1>cut my tops crop tops. Mmm, that was a thing.

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that the reason why bodysuits had become

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 2>a thing is because of crop tops? The idea that okay,

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 2>let's say we like a crop top, huh, we like

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 2>that it sticks to the body, it's felt, it's whatever.

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:28.679
<v Speaker 2>Oh don't want to tuck a shirt in that doesn't

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:31.839
<v Speaker 2>feel right, So let's get a bodysuit. We created a

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:35.919
<v Speaker 2>whole different category of items that connected a top with

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 2>the undies. You still wear undies underneath.

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I've such just like it for a bodysuit.

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Your bodysuit.

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Girl, Bodysuits really started to popping off. I reckon twenty ten,

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>like the one Teaspoon bodysuit situation. They were hot, they

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 1>were hot property. Some glad skins is really popping. I

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>was wearing one today.

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 2>You were, and you took it off because it did

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 2>what to you redacted? Yeah, it made her Tommy funny.

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Made my toe every time. We're that bloody skims bodysuit

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>so sick in bed that night.

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:04.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they're so tight and I got I got one

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that was big for my size and still it's too tight.

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>It's flex and froomes on catera. But it is just

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>me and Mickey Arnie because it is that time of

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 1>day again, all that time of year. We are here

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 1>thanks to mcafe. We're having a little catch up and

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to spell a little bit of coffee.

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, iced coffee, because catching up is always done well,

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.719
<v Speaker 3>I would say over a coffee. Most cash ups involve

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 3>coffees in my life.

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Babes, and don't make me tell everyone twice macus has

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.119
<v Speaker 1>McCafe rather has almond milk from Milk Club.

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. And as a soy drinker, I do enjoy the

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 3>soy options.

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 1>True. What I wanted to talk about today is talk

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 1>about what we wanted to be when we were kids,

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 1>because I think this has a lot about someone. They

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:58.279
<v Speaker 1>say that your personality was built by the time you

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:01.039
<v Speaker 1>were seven. I cannot confirm nor deny this, as I

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:02.919
<v Speaker 1>have not researched it. I just like the way that

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>it sounds. Micky, you want me to tell you what

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I was, Yeah, I want to know drop it. I'll

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>tell you mine first because I don't think it will

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>surprise you. Yeah. So when I was a kid, I

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>initially wanted to be a waitress. I remember being at

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a Chinese restaurant in Barnsdale with my cousins. They lived

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>in the country and we go there like once every

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>two months and hang out. It was the best sum

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>of my life. That was the time when the merciless

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>cow animal the cow like chase me through a paddic

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and I thought I was going to die. And then

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I run all the way home through Boundsdale down the

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>dirt track and lose yourself by Eminem. My cousin had

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>just like bought the CD, so that was playing in

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>my head, and that was when I knew life was

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>never the same again anyway. So I wanted to be

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>a waitress. And then I shifted priorities and I decided

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to be a red carpet reporter, and so

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I have this. We had this assignment in school where

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you had to get a picture of a magazine and

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>draw the other side, like cut it in half and

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>draw the other side, and I obviously did one of

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>a woman on the red carpet. I also wanted a

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>radio show, and wow, I also had a newsletter, so

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>you could say that dreams have been kicked off. That's crazy.

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>What did you want to be, doll?

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, obviously, like the early days, want to be a

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 3>trible threat dance, I singer, actors like you know. But

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 3>then I think I started to realize I was better

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 3>at dancing than I was acting, and I was better

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 3>at dancing than I was singing, and then I just

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 3>realized people were better at dancing than I was. And

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 3>then I think in year six and look, I think

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 3>this is like a theme for the my life as

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 3>an adult. I don't like committing things or putting things

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 3>out there in fear of not getting them. So in

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 3>year six we had to write a business card and

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 3>with what we wanted to be on it, and I'm

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. I think the old person in me

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:44.559
<v Speaker 3>just said, I just want.

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>To be happy.

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 3>My teacher got so mad at me. He was like,

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 3>you have to pick a career. Oh, And I was like, no,

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 3>I just want to be happy, sir, Like that's all

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 3>I want, Like whatever I choose to do, I just

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:57.839
<v Speaker 3>want to be happy. And he was not happy with that.

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Thinking you need he needs to read some philosophy me

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>as a ten year old reading soccer team Blue Turn. Anyways,

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:12.560
<v Speaker 1>thank youm cafe, expertly crafted Bruce Maid, your choice of

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 1>cool ice coffee just the way you like it. However

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you take yours to drive through for your favorite at McCafe.

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>You know you're listening to Flex and Rooms on Kita.

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 2>We have to discuss the cups on Love is Blind,

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:27.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't really watch a lot of reality TV. I

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 2>only make exceptions for Love Island. I think it's the

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 2>most interesting one, only because it closely reflects real dating.

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 2>The other terms and conditions around I don't know, maths,

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 2>The Bachelor, whatever, just seems so contrived that I don't

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 2>know how love is meant to blossom when you're one

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 2>girl dating twenty four guys, or one guy dating twenty

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 2>four girls or whatever it might be, or like in

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:49.679
<v Speaker 2>a pod and you can't see the other person. As

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:51.559
<v Speaker 2>soon as you exit, you have to marry them. Is

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 2>it necessary? I don't know, But if you watch Love

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 2>is Blind, then you're definitely aware of the drinking vessels

0:09:56.800 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 2>that they use. They drink out of these gold, opaque chalices.

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 2>It's strange. It's not even aesthetically aligned with the show

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 2>in any capacity. I understand, you know, using opaque cups

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:11.439
<v Speaker 2>for a bit of color, a bit of flavor, like

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 2>a branding moment. Maybe you don't want to show that

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 2>you're drinking champagne or beer because there are miners watching

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 2>the show. I don't know.

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>But turns out as.

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:21.199
<v Speaker 2>Soon as you google something, the FBI agent in your

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 2>phone will make sure that a TikTok pops up and

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 2>explains to you exactly why it's happening. So it's not

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 2>about whether or not the contestants are drinking alcohol. It's

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 2>not about making sure that it's not about making sure

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 2>that there are no logos on the drinking vessels. It's

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 2>not even about aesthetics. It's so when editors are splicing

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 2>up a bunch of content from the same occasion, you

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 2>can't tell whether it's two drinks in, ten drinks in,

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 2>when someone who's really drunk, or if they're sober, if

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 2>the interaction happened at one pm or six pm at

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:59.200
<v Speaker 2>the same event. Truly is so the editors can frankenstein

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 2>us a great show that maybe might not be entirely true,

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 2>and I stand by it. Reality TV show editing is

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 2>an art form and they should be validated as such.

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 1>It's my favorite time of the week. It's Mickey's Music Quiz,

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>where Mickey brings a selection of songs for Flexing Night

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to battle out until the death. One day, I'm sure

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>that we will be tipped over there je at each

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>other to try and guess what the song is. What's

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the price this week? Mickey?

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 3>No price, but the topic is two thousand club songs. Yeah,

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 3>so I'm thinking the quiz was getting like a bit easy.

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 3>So I've pitch shifted all the songs to chipmunks and

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm playing it for longer hour.

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 1>So this is why you didn't want to for overtime.

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:45.319
<v Speaker 1>Damn overtime.

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 3>I was like, they're getting too good at this. Like

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 3>I was like, let's let's trip them up.

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 3>Number one.

0:11:54.960 --> 0:12:05.560
<v Speaker 4>Me me Rihanna, No really, Rowland Glen Love takes over.

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:08.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, point to Flex. That's way.

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 2>That's my favorite songs.

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Rihanna, Miss Serious, miss Girl. Okay. Number two maybe sexy

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Back justin Timber like play the rest of the song,

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>please look you Okay?

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:30.439
<v Speaker 3>Number three me.

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Lady Gaga, justin.

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:35.839
<v Speaker 2>Lady Gaga, poker face?

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Am I getting like points redacted by?

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 3>We can start that if you want.

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Number four, Kylie Minogue, can't get you out of my head. Oh,

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 2>at least think a little bit.

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 3>What do you think Flex has beaten you for the

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 3>third week in a row.

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Hey, there's still more to go.

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 3>Okay, well it's out of five.

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>She's only got three, so well, she obviously has an advantage.

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>She's a DJ. I'm just your typical Spotify ninety nine twelve.

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:19.439
<v Speaker 3>Week you Not Not You with your playlist with thousands

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:20.079
<v Speaker 3>of likes.

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay, the last song man, gentlemen, Missy Elliott past the Dutch.

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 3>Noyeah on a man and what's the name of the song? Nic?

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 2>No, it does matter. I've already won.

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:48.560
<v Speaker 1>One two step Okay, thank you for thank you. I

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 1>swear it sounds like it sounded like a Missy Elliott

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 1>song She's Oh Okay.

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:57.599
<v Speaker 3>You've been listening to The Flex and Froom's daily podcast.

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 3>For more, tune Inticater on DAB or stream it on iHeartRadio.