WEBVTT - The Billboard, The 'Idiots' & The Big Apology 

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to Outspoken. It's your dose of the

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>hottest influencer and pop culture news twice a week. I'm

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Sophie Torba and coming up on today's show, The Real

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Reason behind Molly May and Tommy Fury Split, the Queensland

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:21.280
<v Speaker 1>influencer charged with torturing her baby to boost her social

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:25.479
<v Speaker 1>media following, and finance podcast a Victoria Devine is in

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 1>hot water for her comments over that controversial billboard. But first,

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>it's been a turbulent time for TikTok users in the US.

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>On Sunday, one hundred and seventy million Americans were shut

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>out from the app as a nationwide band took effect.

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:42.239
<v Speaker 2>To the US government.

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm never forgiving you for this.

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 3>I was so dumb coming on the internet and crying

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 3>about an app.

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 4>But the fact is that this has been a sense

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 4>of community for me.

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>But the band was short lived because within fourteen hours

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>TikTok was back. I feel like there would have been

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>a few red faces because I saw so many creators

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>in hysterical tears. I also saw many TikTok creators exposing

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>secrets before the app went down.

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there'd be a.

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Lot of regret over that I was pretty shocked by

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the message that TikTok users receive, so they've got to

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>pop up message saying sorry, TikTok isn't available right now.

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>A law banning TikTok has been enacted in the US. Unfortunately,

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:23.840
<v Speaker 1>that means you can't use TikTok for now. We are

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:26.759
<v Speaker 1>fortunate that President Trump has indicated that he will work

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:29.399
<v Speaker 1>with US on a solution to reinstate TikTok once he

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>takes office. Please stay tuned. And it didn't take Donald

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump too long to take credit for TikTok's return. So

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>he was speaking at an inauguration event and he told crowds,

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 1>as of today, TikTok is back. We have no choice.

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>We have to save it. He then went on to

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>suggest that the US was set to own fifty percent

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>of the company, telling the media it would make a

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:56.639
<v Speaker 1>lot of money. So if TikTok is worth nothing zero

0:01:57.600 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>without an approval, you know, if you don't.

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 5>Approve of business, there worth nothing.

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>If you do approve, there worth like a trillion dollars.

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 5>There worth some crazy number.

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>So I said, I'll approve, but.

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 3>Let the United States of America own fifty percent of TikTok.

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm approving on behalf of the ivinal self.

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to cut through the crap here because he

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>is acting like a hero when he is the one

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>who initiated talks back in twenty twenty to ban the

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>app over fears that it was a national security risk.

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>This just seems to be some big public that he's

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>stunt for Donald Trump. I think he's in cahoots with TikTok.

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>The fact that they even named him in that initial

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:38.239
<v Speaker 1>pop up message, and also the fact that TikTok did

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>have that big blackout in the US. No one was

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>expecting it to actually go down. Well, it was early

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:45.919
<v Speaker 1>as well, and there were a lot of rumors saying, well, no,

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to cancel out if you have the

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>TikTok app, It's just going to stop people from downloading TikTok. Yeah,

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:53.079
<v Speaker 1>people thought it was going to be a slow transition

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>away from TikTok. It wasn't going to be something that

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 1>suddenly just got blacked out. It's scary to see what

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>is unfolding on our social media apps. Last week, Mark

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Zuckerberg got rid of fact checking on Facebook and Instagram.

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>We can see that he is kissing the ring as

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 1>people are saying of Donald Trump, he is sucking up

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to Donald Trump at the moment. Donald Trump also has

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk in his camp, and now we're seeing that

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:17.959
<v Speaker 1>he's in cahoots with TikTok, the app that he originally

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>wanted to get rid of. Now I want to get

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to the fun stuff. Let's talk about this TikTok confession trend.

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 1>So before the app shut down, a lot of creators

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>jumped on this audio clip from Family Guy where Peter

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Griffin made a confession to his family. So a lot

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of people lip synced to this grab and then they

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>made their own confession.

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 6>Since we're all going to die, there's one more secret

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 6>I feel I have to share with you now.

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>One of the TikTokers that ruffled feathers was Lexi Hidlergo,

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and she's really well known for her coffee chats and

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>also for her workout videos, and she revealed to her

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>two point seven million followers that she never once drank

0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>coffee in her coffee chats and that she only did

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>half the workouts. She posted this confession, as you can imagine,

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:06.119
<v Speaker 1>went down like a lead balloon. Everyone was like, why

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the fuck would you admit this, especially if you're trying

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to get followers to follow you over to Instagram. It

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>just makes it looks so inauthentic. Well, the one that

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>upset me the most was beauty influencer Meredith Duxby, and

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>she has gained a lot of attention on TikTok for

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>using an outrageous amount of foundations. So she will put

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>about twelve pumps onto her face and it's all about

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>trusting the process because she always looks incredible after. Well,

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 1>she has admitted that she wiped a hell of a

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of that makeup off before the final results. She

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>said it was just for rage baiting, which is obviously worse.

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>The worst one was some of the creators who admitted

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:43.839
<v Speaker 1>that they never used the products that they promoted on

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:46.559
<v Speaker 1>their TikTok shop. There must be so many people kicking

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>themselves so jumping on this trend, And as you said earlier,

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand it because it's not like these people

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 1>were going to lose their following. People were going to

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>go across to Instagram or red No or Snapchat and

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>still follow these people. Yeah, I'm how stupid can you be?

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 1>It's literally just ruined any credibility they might have had. Also,

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I would be really pissed off as one of the

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:10.160
<v Speaker 1>brands that's done sponsored work with them, because you'd be questioning, Oh, okay, cool.

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:12.280
<v Speaker 1>So you've pretty much told everyone you hated the products

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>we provided you with.

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 6>Oh no, don't worry, I'm not calling you idiots. All

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:19.280
<v Speaker 6>the girls that bought my book, listened to my podcast,

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 6>took financial advice for me. You're not idiots. You made

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 6>me millions, all right.

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>A national real estate agency has caused a stir online

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>after bragging on a billboard that they've been making homes

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:35.359
<v Speaker 1>more expensive since twenty seventeen. The backlash was swift, with

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the agency labeled out of touch in the current housing

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>affordability crisis. Amidst the drama, finance podcaster Victoria Devine went

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>into bat for the agency, calling people who don't get

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:50.239
<v Speaker 1>the billboard idiots. Now, So, when this story first broke,

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of confusion because the real estate

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 1>agency in question shares the same name as one of

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Australia's most popular online clothing stores. Yeah, that's right, if

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>you believe it. This agency is called White Fox real Estate.

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>And what makes things even more confusing is that it's

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 1>branding is nearly identical to the clothing retailer. Well, we

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>actually spoke about White Fox real Estate probably a month

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>ago now, when Steph kless Smith revealed that she was

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>selling her home.

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, the name of the agency is derived from the

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>founder's name, Marty Fox, and he's recently found fame as

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a judge on the Block and he is your stereotypical

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>real estate agent. He's very good looking, he dresses well,

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 1>he's got flashy white teeth, and he's very confident. And

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 1>because of his appearance on the Block, he has around

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty four thousand followers online. His agency specializes in luxury

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>real estate and as you touched on Kate, he has

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>a number of celebrity clients like Steph Klesmith and Josh Miller.

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>He currently has Sam Wood and Snees's home on his

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>listings at the moment, so you can tell the type

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of clientele he works with. Now. The drama kicked off

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>when a passer by snapped a photo of the controversial

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:58.039
<v Speaker 1>billboard in Perth and shared their thoughts on TikTok so.

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>The TikTok's user's name is m Redman, and she's got

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:04.280
<v Speaker 1>around three thousand followers. So she shared vision of the

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>billboard with the slogan making homes more expensive since twenty seventeen,

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and she wrote, maybe not the message to be gloating

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>about in the middle of a housing crisis.

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 7>Now.

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>This video quickly garnered three hundred thousand views and people

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>started making reaction videos. And again there was a lot

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 1>of confusion in M's comment section because her audience assumed

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>that the billboard was from the clothing brand. So one

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>user wrote, I thought this was about White Fox, the

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:32.239
<v Speaker 1>clothing label and was so lost, and that comment received

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>four thousand likes. Another user said I'm so confused. Do

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>you mean you're spending more money on their clothes when

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you could be saving for a house? And another time

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>beIN saying that advertising must be terrible because I drive

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>past one of their offices every day, and up until

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>now I thought they were White Fox, the clothing brand.

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm very curious from this if this lack of branding

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>distinction is one of the reasons why the agency was

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>so desperate to create a stir. Maybe they thought a

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>stun like this was going to help them build some

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>much needed brand awareness and cement their spot in the

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>real estate market. Surely Marty being on the block is

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 1>enough advertisement though like good advertisement for well, clearly not,

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of people have not heard of them.

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I had to look on Google and they appear straight

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>after White Fox Boutique, So this stunt hasn't been able

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to get them top spot just yet. That's not how

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:23.119
<v Speaker 1>SEO works over. I used to work at an SEO firm,

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and you don't generally type in the name of the

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>real estate company to find them because you know what already,

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>so you're going to search their u URL. If you're

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 1>looking for a real estate agent, you were type in

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:35.719
<v Speaker 1>real estate agent Adelaide's Those are the terms that real

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>estate companies would be going and it sounds like they

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 1>only want the rich and famous anyway, So as long

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>as the lights of Steph Claire Smith knows the difference

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>between White Fox Boutique and White Fox real Estate. When

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 1>this story blew up, it was picked up by the

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Today Show and even Karl Stefanovic was confused. Here's what

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 1>he said, and it's just stating the facts that at

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>White Fox, that's what we do. We try and get

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:56.559
<v Speaker 1>you as much money as possible.

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 2>I thought you made women's lingerie white Fox.

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:01.559
<v Speaker 1>Has that a different White Fox, That's a different one.

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I love that you still didn't quite get it right

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that it's apparel clothing brand, not just lingerie. He's like

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>offended both of the marketing teams of White Fox Boutique.

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 1>In White Fox real Estate Now, the comments section on

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:17.599
<v Speaker 1>M's TikTok post was relatively mixed. So many people acknowledge

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that it's a real estate agent's job to make as

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>much money for their client as possible and that the

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>housing crisis was not their fault, whilst others were outraged

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and thought the billboard added unnecessary salt to the wound

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>for those who've been priced out of the market. So

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 1>one user wrote, read the room, White Fox, whilst another said,

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 1>imagine driving passes ad in your car you were forced

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to live in because of the current Perth housing market.

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I really think that your reaction to this campaign mostly

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>depends on what financial position you're in, because if you

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>own a home and you're looking at selling, you want

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>to know that your real estate agent is working for

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>you and they're going to get the best price for you.

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 2>But if you are.

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Currently a buyer, and you're having a tough time financially.

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 1>This is going to make you feel so resentful and hopeless.

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:04.439
<v Speaker 1>You feel like you're never going to get a house.

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>You're going to feel ripped off whatever house you do get. Yeah, Well,

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>for White Fox, I think it's clever marketing because the

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 1>people that are offended are not the target market they're

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:17.199
<v Speaker 1>going for. This is for these high earners who want

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to make as much money as possible. I mean, yes,

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:21.839
<v Speaker 1>questioning why they chose a billboard for that then, because

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>that type of advertising you can't measure the return on

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>investment of it. It's literally for everyone to see. It's

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that say and spray method. It's douchey though, whereas if

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>they had actually used targeted marketing towards people in that

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 1>top echelon, it probably would have done a lot better. Kate,

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>they knew exactly what they were doing by putting this

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>billboard up. This is a classic case of rage baiting.

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:48.959
<v Speaker 1>They were banking on someone passing by being completely outraged

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:52.199
<v Speaker 1>and posting this on social media and it going viral.

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:56.599
<v Speaker 1>It's very clever and I think that this achieved exactly

0:10:56.640 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 1>what they wanted it to achieve. Well, so many people

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:00.840
<v Speaker 1>now know that they're really state firm and not a

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 1>clothing boutique. They knew that this bragging about making homes

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>more expensive was going to elicit a huge response, particularly

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>when we are in the midst of such a huge

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>housing affordability crist I don't think that type of publicity

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 1>is particularly good for this real estate company because now

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>people are like, ah, they're a bit douchey, Yeah, rubbing

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 1>it into the common man. But the people who think

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>that are people who aren't their customer base. Because not

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 1>only did they attract free commercial attention from this, he

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 1>appeared on the Today Show. There was a ton of

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 1>mainstream media publications, but it was also a very powerful

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:39.199
<v Speaker 1>value proposition because the slogan, directly spelled out to prospective customers,

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:41.839
<v Speaker 1>will get you the most money for your home, which

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>ultimately is what every seller wants to hear. And White

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Fox knew they weren't going to offend their target demographic,

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>which is the insanely wealthy people who own multiple properties.

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Their target demo would have looked at this slogan and

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 1>had a chuckle and thought, Gee, these guys are super confident.

0:11:57.600 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>They're good at what they do. I want them to

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 1>get the best for me. They weren't going to have

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>an emotional reaction to this slogan. Yea, even most everyday people.

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I get what you're saying, Sophie, because when I was

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>in the market to buy a house with my husband,

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>there were real estate agents that popped up and you'd

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>go along to the inspection and you go, oh fuck,

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to deal with them. This house is

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be so expensive. However, if I was looking

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to sell, I would totally engage them to sell my

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>house because my mindset is they're going to get me

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the most money. There's been a lot of questions over

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 1>whether this has damaged Marty Fox's personal brand because he

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>was very popular on The Block, and the majority of

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 1>people who watch that show they're everyday Ozzy, So I

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:38.559
<v Speaker 1>wonder if this has left a bad taste in their matt.

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's going to affect Marty's brand at all.

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>But someone whose brand has been affected is finance podcaster

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Victoria Divine. For those who aren't familiar with Victoria, she

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 1>is a retired financial advisor who is the host of

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 1>hugely successful podcasts She's on the Money Now, She's on

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the Money is marketed as a finance podcast that shares honest,

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>relatable and non judgment financial advice to women. Victoria has

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>also written three best selling books which provide financial literacy

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to women. She is also hugely successful in the business wll.

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.599
<v Speaker 1>She is a founder of Zella, a finance broking practice

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>which supports people through the process of buying a home,

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>investment or dream asset. Now, how Victoria fits in this

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>story is that she's friends with Marty Fox and she

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 1>saw the backlash he was receiving, and in response to

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>one of his Instagram stories about the Billboard, she sent

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>him a DM saying, the people talking shit aren't your

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 1>target demographic.

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:34.559
<v Speaker 2>They're idiots.

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I got it immediately, brilliant. Now, Marty replied saying, can

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I post and say that Even one of the smartest

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 1>business minds in Australia even gets it? And a woman

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:46.559
<v Speaker 1>who empowers others to get ahead to is not confused

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>by this message. There's a lot of ego stroking involved

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>in that to get what he wanted, So Victoria replied,

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>of course, so she gave him permission to post her

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 1>opinion on the billboard. Marty went ahead and shared the

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>screenshot of the post, writing Victoria Divine, Ossie financial advisor,

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>author and podcast host known for empowering millennials to take

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>control of their finance, even gets it now. This didn't

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:12.840
<v Speaker 1>get quite the reaction that Victoria was expecting. TikToker m Redman,

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 1>who initially posted about the Billboard, shared this screenshot to

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>TikTok and wrote, when the real estate ceo posts your

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>comment making fun of like ninety percent of your podcast audience,

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 1>We're not idiots. We get the Billboard. It just makes

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>us angry because it's a symbol of the crisis we're

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>trapped in now. The video quickly attracted over one hundred

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and sixty seven thousand views. The comment section was absolutely scathing.

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>One TikToker wrote, oh my god, what the fuck Marty

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Fox and Victoria Divine? Her response is so disgusting. Is

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>this real chucking out her book now? Another said oh gross,

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>immediately unfollowed She's on the money, whilst another said Oopsie's

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>not a nice way to speak about your own target demographic. Now,

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Victoria was on the front foot, so she released an

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>apology video that afternoon. What I initially liked about this

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>apology video was that Victoria spoke directly on camera to

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>her audience, so she didn't put up a black tile

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of other influencers do with text over it.

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>She put up quite a long video where she actually

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 1>acknowledged a lot of the points. Let's have a listen

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to what she said.

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 3>Hey, guys, I just wanted to jump on here and

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 3>address a couple of comments that I have seen online

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 3>today about me being tone deaf and completely.

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Out of touch.

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 3>And I can't disagree with you. At the end of

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 3>the day, the comments I made were tone deaf and

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 3>completely out of touch, and for that I apologize. I

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 3>am genuinely really sorry. I can promise you that I

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 3>never made comments like this with the hope to make

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 3>anybody feel less than or make any fewone feel stupid

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 3>or dumb, because at the end of the day, my

0:15:54.080 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 3>entire purpose is to financially empower women in particular, and

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 3>there's no world in which I would want anyone to

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 3>feel stupid. And I want to be really clear, I

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 3>was not saying that people who can't buy property are idiots.

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 3>I was saying that people who didn't understand the billboard

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 3>were idiots, and that is very rude. Still, that is

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 3>very unacceptable and for that I do apologize.

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Now, Victoria provided context for those who might not have

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>been across the whole story and confirm the screenshot was

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>from a conversation between her and Marty and that the

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>intention of her comment was to support a friend. She

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>also confirmed she gave Marty permission to post a screenshot,

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>as at the time she didn't see it as an issue.

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>It is interesting to note, though, when describing the billboard

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>in this apology video, Victoria misquoted the slogan. So this

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>was pointed out by another TikToker called Rachel McQueen. So

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Victoria misquoted the billboard and said making property more expensive

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>since twenty seventeen, when it actually said making homes more expensive. Now,

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to me, the word home was strategically used on this

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 1>billboard to evoke more anger and outrage from the everyday

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>ossie because the word home is a motive. It's the

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>place where you feel a sense of stability and security.

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I feel like Victoria may have been trying to lessen

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the blow by pretending that the campaign said properties and

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:24.399
<v Speaker 1>not homes, because the word property is far less of motive.

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 1>It speaks to a possession. It doesn't speak to a

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 1>place where everyday Australians live. And when you hear the

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>word property, it makes you think of rich and elite

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>people who own a number of properties that they rent out.

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I disagree, Sophie. I just think it was a slip

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 1>of the tongue. The video went for about six minutes.

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>She was very off the cuff in the video. In

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>this apology, she referenced that she'd done wrong. She owned

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>up to saying I shouldn't have called my audience idiots.

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a slip of the time.

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:51.919
<v Speaker 7>Oh.

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I definitely think that this was a good apology.

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's interesting to analyze the misuse of

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 1>words there. Now. She did apologize several times, as you said, Amy,

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and she apologized for hurting people by her comments and

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:08.400
<v Speaker 1>making people feel less than She completely owned up to it.

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I found this next admission really interesting because Victoria admitted

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 1>in the apology that she'd read all the comments about

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 1>her and she found them confronting because she agrees that

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>she has become out of touch and unrelatable. Here's what

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 1>she said.

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 3>They're really upsetting, but they are also very confronting because

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 3>some of them, You're not wrong. I am a little

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:37.199
<v Speaker 3>bit out of touch nowadays. I am, you know, a

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:41.239
<v Speaker 3>little bit unrelatable. But what I want you to know

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 3>is that I know you because I was you. I

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 3>have been in a position where I have been in

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 3>mountains of debt, not knowing how I was going to

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:53.880
<v Speaker 3>pay it off. I have been in a position where

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 3>I just didn't think that property was ever going to

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:59.679
<v Speaker 3>be for me. And now I am in the very

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:03.640
<v Speaker 3>foot position where I do own property, and I am

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 3>very grateful for that. But I just want to make

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 3>sure that the people that are in my community know

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:14.679
<v Speaker 3>that I would never think of you were stupid or

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:17.679
<v Speaker 3>less than or not worthy of these things.

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you guys think that the money expert has to

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:25.160
<v Speaker 1>be relatable or can they simply be aspirational. I think

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 1>it's difficult for Victoria Divine because you can see she's

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 1>wrestling with trying to be relatable but then also showcasing

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:36.919
<v Speaker 1>that she is a successful businesswoman. And unfortunately, especially women

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>in the media and women who are influencers, they do

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 1>struggle with showing off their wealth because a lot of

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>people tear them down over it. I think if Victoria

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:49.399
<v Speaker 1>was struggling to get by, and it was clear that

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:53.160
<v Speaker 1>her tips for financial freedom weren't working or advancing her

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>in any way. We would not be willing to take

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 1>her advice on board. I see her as a very

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 1>aspirational business woman and someone that a lot of women,

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 1>particularly in her community, look up to. So for the

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>average person, maybe her lifestyle doesn't seem achievable, but maybe

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 1>they think if I implement some of these tips, I

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>might get a bit further ahead like her. Yeah, but

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I think what a lot of listeners are grappling with

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 1>is Victoria will share money hacks to save I don't know,

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 1>like the tram fare, But then people see her in

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>designer clothing and at her beach house and they're like, well,

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:30.119
<v Speaker 1>that seems a little bit disingenuous. So it's this the

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>lifestyle and her influencing career is not really matching up

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:36.640
<v Speaker 1>with what she shares on her money podcast, and that's

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>where the clash is wrong or right. I mean, as

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you said, Sophie, I think she's a very successful business

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 1>woman and she should be well within her riots to

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 1>promote the successes that she's had. But I can see

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>why there is a clash. I agree, because, as you said,

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:53.880
<v Speaker 1>she hands out money advice to her community, but then

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 1>her community when they jump on her Instagram, they see

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that she doesn't apply that to the way that she lives.

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's been because she doesn't have to, because she

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:04.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have the same financial pressures as her audience. I mean,

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>she said herself that she's out of touch at the moment,

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and I do wonder if that's impacting on her podcast success.

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's always in the charts, but I have

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:16.199
<v Speaker 1>seen a lot of negative commentary in her reviews and

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>also online more recently, because she has been very vocal

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and jumping on board different topics of discussion. So, for instance,

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>she has been really vocal about all of the Kate

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Forster stuff, and she is on a bit of a

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 1>crusade about MLMs, and whilst a lot of people have

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>agreed with her stance on them, I think people have

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 1>found maybe the approach to be a bit aggressive, and

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that is backed up by her recent discussions

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 1>around Kate Forster. The apology did receive a mixed reception,

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of people found it to be very genuine.

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:53.159
<v Speaker 1>You could hear the raw emotion in Victoria's voice, and

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>you felt like she was genuinely sorry for affecting her community,

0:21:57.040 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>whilst others said it's interesting to hear the opinion that

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:02.679
<v Speaker 1>she's behind closed doors and thought that the emission of

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>her being out of touch made her look worse. What

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I found quite surprising about the whole thing is that

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>she agreed for the screenshot of her message to be

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 1>shared and then suddenly realized how bad it sounded, not

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:21.919
<v Speaker 1>because of hindsight, but because she obviously absolutely copped it.

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's throw to a reaction video that's currently going

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 1>viral to paint a picture of how some people are feeling.

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:30.720
<v Speaker 6>Oh no, don't worry, I'm not calling you idiots. All

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 6>the girls that bought my book, listened to my podcast,

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 6>took financial advice for me. You're not idiots. You made

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:39.120
<v Speaker 6>me millions, all right, I'm talking about all the other

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:41.199
<v Speaker 6>girls that can't buy their first home because you know

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 6>it's your fault.

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 3>You're idiots.

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:46.399
<v Speaker 6>You're not my target demographic, because really, the housing market,

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 6>what's that got to do with me? Nothing.

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Someone else who wasn't pleased and buying into the apology

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 1>was TikTok of Rachel McQueen, who has over eighty four

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>thousand followers now, she created a ten minute video sharing

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:02.919
<v Speaker 1>her thoughts on Victoria's apology. She said she thought the

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 1>apology seemed disingenuous.

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 4>In my opinion, the reason that Victoria apologized is because,

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 4>unlike Marty, she did upset and alienate her target demographic,

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 4>the people that she makes money from, the people who

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 4>look to her for honest, relatable and non judgmental financial advice.

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Of course she's going to.

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 4>Apologize when her whole brand is being relatable and non judgmental,

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 4>and it's just been discovered and a lot of people

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 4>are upset by the fact that she's not those things.

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 4>That is why she apologized and Marty didn't. That is

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 4>why she apologized and Marty didn't because it was her

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 4>target demographic that were upset, not Marty's. Marty's target demographic

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 4>are people trying to profit from the housing crisis. Her

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:55.879
<v Speaker 4>target demographic, especially through her new business ventures Zella Money,

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 4>is people who are struggling because of the housing crisis.

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:03.120
<v Speaker 4>Victoria is in a dichotomy. She lives in a completely

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 4>different world to the people she's marketing to. It may

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 4>not have been that way in the beginning, but it

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 4>certainly is that way. Now. Did she admit in her

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:13.159
<v Speaker 4>apology that she is now out of touch with the

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 4>people that she's marketing to and that support her, Yes,

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 4>she did, But I am still not convinced that that

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 4>apology comes from a place of being empathetic toward those people.

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 4>I still believe, until it's proven otherwise, that the apology

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 4>came from a place of desperately trying to repair the

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:34.440
<v Speaker 4>relationship with the majority of her audience, because, as em

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 4>put beautifully in this video and directly to Victoria, Victoria's

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 4>audience are struggling and cannot outsave and out hustle a

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 4>housing crisis.

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 1>It is interesting to note that Victoria has since deleted

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>her apology. What do you think about that move? I

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 1>think it came down to a few factors. She was

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>probably absolutely copying it in the comment section, which isn't

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>pleasant and sometimes you just don't want.

0:24:57.359 --> 0:24:57.879
<v Speaker 2>To deal with.

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I also think maybe it came down to sponsorship opportunities.

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not a good look to have a video up

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 1>where you're saying you're out of touch and you aren't

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 1>relatable to your core demographic when you are trying to

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 1>get people on board. That isn't not worse to delete it,

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>because the way social media works is people will have

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>saved it and they'll stitch it up on TikTok or

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 1>on Instagram. And now you go over to her page

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and it looks like she's even guiltier because she's removed it. Well,

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>she also recently deleted a video where she called out

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Kate Forster, So it's difficult because you want to look

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 1>like you believe in what you say and the content

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:34.159
<v Speaker 1>that you put out there. I was really interested to

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:36.360
<v Speaker 1>see if she's on the money, had lost any followers

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 1>since this drama. What surprised me is they've actually gained followers,

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:43.120
<v Speaker 1>So they gained four thy two hundred this week, which

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>can sometimes happen when scandals break out. Over the four

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 1>days when the controversy broke, Victoria did lose one hundred

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and twenty two followers, but over the weekend she picked

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 1>up another five hundred and eighty four, so it doesn't

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:59.119
<v Speaker 1>seem to be affecting her brand too much. But maybe

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 1>she got some advice to take it down because it

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't look great to sponsors.

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:03.400
<v Speaker 2>See.

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of the followers that she picked up.

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Aren't genuine followers. They're probably just following her for the

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 1>controversy and maybe a bit of hate following. I hate

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 1>to say it.

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, hey guys, hello, Oh so nice to.

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:19.400
<v Speaker 3>Come.

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>It's been a big week for Molly May Hague and

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Tommy Fury. Just two days before Molly's tell all documentary

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:29.920
<v Speaker 1>aired on Prime, Tommy piped her at the Post, revealing

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the real reason behind their shock breakup. In an interview

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>with Men's Health, the boxer revealed it was his addiction

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 1>to alcohol that caused the split. Kate, there is a

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:41.440
<v Speaker 1>lot to unpack here. I am dying to talk about

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the Molly May doco, but let's start chronologically with what

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Tommy had to say on Wednesday. It is the first

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>time Tommy has acknowledged he's had a problem with alcohol. Yeah,

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 1>it is, and it did come as quite a surprise

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to some of his fans. So during the emotional interview,

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Tommy revealed his dependence on alcohol actually started early last

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:01.679
<v Speaker 1>year after he had react instructive surgery on his hand.

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 1>So the surgery was to repair a boxing injury from

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen when he snapped all the ligaments in the

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 1>back of his hand. I actually remember Molly vlogging Tommy

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 1>post surgery and he was really frustrated. We now know

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>that that recovery had a very detrimental impact on Tommy's

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 1>mental health, and in the interview he said his mental

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:21.440
<v Speaker 1>health was in the pan, and he started to spend

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>nights drinking with the goal to get blackout drunk.

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:27.639
<v Speaker 7>The reason why me and Molly broke up because I

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:30.959
<v Speaker 7>got addicted to alcohol and I couldn't be the partner

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 7>that I wanted to be anymore. And it kills me

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 7>to say it's true, you know, I couldn't be. I

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 7>was loved to pint of beer, love to drink, you know.

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 7>And it is what it is. People go through different

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 7>things in life, and I have, you know, we all

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 7>have our crosses to bear.

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Tommy isn't the only member of his family to grapple

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>with addiction. His brother, Tyson Fury, who was the heavyweight

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 1>champion of the world, he has also struggled with alcohol

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:59.360
<v Speaker 1>addiction and cocaine abuse. Yeah, and we saw that play

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 1>out a little bit in real time on Tyson's doco

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 1>last year. Now, as expected, Tommy continued to deny cheating

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 1>was involved in this relationship breakdown. So initially, when the

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:11.919
<v Speaker 1>couple broke up back in August, the internet was rife

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 1>with rumors that Tommy had cheated on Molly, and one

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 1>persistent rumor was that Molly called off their relationship after

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 1>being sent a video of Tommy up to no good

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:22.440
<v Speaker 1>on a boy's trip to Macedonia, and it even led

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to a woman coming out to the media and claiming

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 1>that they kissed but she didn't know who he was.

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>There was also that rumor at the beginning of the

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 1>breakup that Tommy had got another woman pregnant who was

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 1>actually the daughter of a boxing coach. Well, that one

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 1>got shut down really quickly because the woman had to

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 1>come out and say no, this is my partner and

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the father of my child. And at the time, Tommy

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>did vehemently deny these rumors, and a spokesperson for the

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:49.960
<v Speaker 1>boxer said that his legal team were investigating them. Now,

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 1>his stance on the cheating allegation was no different in

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 1>this men's health interview.

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Here's what he said.

0:28:56.480 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 7>There's been so much shit, so much crap in the

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 7>every single day for the past six months. I've done

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 7>this and I've done that, and it's like people don't

0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 7>know the half of it. If it's not come from

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 7>my mouth or Molly's mouth, it's complete a not of bullshit.

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 7>It's like all I've been seen for the past six

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 7>months is cheeta, cheeta, cheeta, cheeta. Oh, he cheated, he

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 7>slept with me, slept with this girl, slept with that girl.

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 7>Complete a lot of bollocks, and you can ask Molly yourself.

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I cannot get over the timing of this interview. Firstly,

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 1>it dropped two days before Molly's documentary Behind it All

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>aired on Prime. The producers would have been absolutely spewing.

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 1>This would have all been pre planned, particularly between Molly,

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Tommy and their management. They wouldn't want Molly to be

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 1>revealing Tommy's secret because it looks like she would be

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 1>exposing something that he's perhaps not ready to talk about

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 1>when it is something as serious as alcohol addiction. I

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>think you're right, Sophie, but I think this strategy has

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 1>only been enacted since the New Year's Kiss because a

0:29:56.840 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of people now think that Tommy and Molly are

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 1>back together. Yeah, the New Year's Kiss definitely has a

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 1>lot to do with the timing of this doco, particularly

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:07.239
<v Speaker 1>because originally I think that all six episodes were going

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to be aired at the same time, but it's now

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 1>been broken up to have three air now and then

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 1>three air in autumn. The date hasn't even been set.

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 1>It's clear that they're still filming because so much has

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 1>gone on behind the scenes, and it's hard for this

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 1>doco to keep up with the immediacy of TikTok and

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 1>everything that is happening. I don't think the producers, though,

0:30:24.760 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>would have been in on Molly allowing Tommy to go

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 1>to another rival media company in Men's Health and break

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 1>that news first. Because this doco it's called Behind All,

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's been touted as the real story behind the breakup.

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I think Molly's gone behind the back of the producers

0:30:39.000 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and agreed on this with Tommy because in an interview

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 1>she did recently, she did say, well, Tommy's going to

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 1>come out and explain his side of things.

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think it's Tommy's story to tell first.

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it would have looked completely inappropriate if Molly

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 1>was to break that news.

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 2>I also noticed that.

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 1>The two messages weren't the same throughout, so Tommy said

0:30:56.120 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>he has an alcohol problem, but in the documentary Molly's

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 1>said Tommy doesn't have an alcohol problem.

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 2>Drinking leads to problems.

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:08.040
<v Speaker 1>And that to me reading between the lines, either meant

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that he cheated or it made me think, has things

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 1>escalated behind the scenes, has something happened that again they're

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 1>not going to tell us about how I watched this

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>documentary with Dale and he said, do you know what,

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe he's just a complete dickhead when he's been drinking. Well,

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that's that vibe that everyone seemed to get. Yeah, and

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 1>it was really interesting to be a fly on the

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 1>wall in that conversation between Molly and her mum, Debbie,

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and I felt for Debbie because Molly revealed that when

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 1>her parents broke up, her mum had issues with alcohol

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and it was part of the reason why Molly didn't

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 1>want to be with someone who drank. And during the

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>docco they showed Molly rewatching the scene on Love Island

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:48.239
<v Speaker 1>when she first met Tommy, and they kept in the

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 1>grab where Molly said, oh, do you drink and Tommy

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 1>said not really, and then she confirmed that she actually

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't drink either. That's a big part of her brand,

0:31:55.800 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 1>her being sober. I mean, she's even spoke recently on

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a YouTube how she doesn't really like out and letting

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:02.280
<v Speaker 1>herself go and having a drink.

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Isn't it interesting? Though?

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Because this New Year's Eve kiss seemed to all come

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 1>about because Molly was drinking and out there partying with Tommy.

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's actually dive a little bit deeper into this doco.

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 1>So it was meant to document the leader to Molly

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and Tommy's wedding, but when they broke up, it was

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 1>repurposed into a documentary about Molly navigating life as a

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:24.120
<v Speaker 1>single mum as she launched her brand Maybe. Did anyone

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 1>else feel like some sections of the episodes were just

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:29.600
<v Speaker 1>blatant ads though for Maybe. I don't actually think it

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 1>was a great ad for Maybe though, because they mentioned

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of criticism that the brand has got, especially

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 1>over the balling of one of its blazers. I mean,

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it was more an ad for Molly May

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 1>at her personal brand, which I suppose then cascades down

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 1>into Maybe because people are only really buying the clothes

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>because of Molly May. But the documentary really showed from

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 1>her perspective that she was the one who was passionate

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 1>about rectifying this issue and giving back to her consumer

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and making sure her audience weren't angry. Sophie really bought

0:32:57.920 --> 0:33:00.160
<v Speaker 1>into the good prs, so I was laughing with Dale's say,

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I can imagine Sophi're working for her PR team.

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:03.239
<v Speaker 2>Well I did.

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 1>What I did disagree with, though, is that they put

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:08.720
<v Speaker 1>out a statement saying anyone who's had issues with this

0:33:08.840 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 1>jacket please contact us, But they didn't actually outline whether

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>they would get a refund.

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 2>There was no resolution.

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 1>They were acting like, oh, we just don't know what

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 1>to do. I said to Dale, just give everyone a

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 1>refund financially, though I don't think that the brand could

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 1>handle it. So you need to come down because we

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>are recording a subscriber only episode really getting to the

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 1>nitty gritty of the doco. But for now, I really

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:34.280
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about what most people are interested in,

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and that is the breakup. So the number one reason

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 1>people tuned in was to find out what actually happened.

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I know Tommy did pip Molly at the post, as

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:43.680
<v Speaker 1>you said earlier, but it was interesting to see that

0:33:43.680 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 1>their stories did match up because again she did reveal

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 1>that drinking was a problem in terms of talking about

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the cheating, though she really glazed over that, so she

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't actually back Tommy up and say there was definitely

0:33:56.320 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 1>no cheating. She did say this.

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:02.480
<v Speaker 5>Though, on Somebody Pregnant, I'm really sorry to hear that

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 5>he's been with this person, And I was just like,

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:07.719
<v Speaker 5>where is this coming from? It was a build up,

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 5>and there was It was a lot of times of

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:15.919
<v Speaker 5>sort of okay, like last chance type situation. Last chance,

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 5>last chance, last chance, There's only so.

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:18.719
<v Speaker 2>Much that.

0:34:21.480 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 5>You can take. You kind of don't really have another choice.

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:29.840
<v Speaker 5>You just have to You just have to do what

0:34:29.840 --> 0:34:30.359
<v Speaker 5>you have to do.

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that comment was trying to shoot down

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:36.919
<v Speaker 1>the validity of some of those cheating claims. But then

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:40.360
<v Speaker 1>when we saw the scene of Molly rewatching her proposal

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to Tommy, she reiterated that they actually had a huge

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:47.359
<v Speaker 1>argument on the way there because she thought he had

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:50.320
<v Speaker 1>photos of another girl on his phone because he wouldn't

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:52.400
<v Speaker 1>let her look at the phone. Yeah, he was being shady,

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and she asked, oh, can I check out the photos

0:34:54.360 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 1>you took of me? And he was being funny about it,

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously because he had all of the engagement plans on

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 1>his phone. I saw a lot of people creating TikTok

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 1>saying that it was interesting that they left that section

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of the interview in because it was sort of eluding

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that there was cheating going on, but nothing confirming it. Oh,

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 1>there was so much eluding going on, and I think

0:35:12.040 --> 0:35:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Tommy's alcohol problem is a lot easier to blame, especially

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 1>if they do end up getting back together. I mean,

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:20.960
<v Speaker 1>all of the conversations between Molly and her sister Zoe

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:23.680
<v Speaker 1>in the car alluded to cheating being involved. Yeah, you

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:26.360
<v Speaker 1>could tell that Zoe absolutely hates Tommy Fury's guts. I

0:35:26.360 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 1>thought it was really interesting when Zoe said that she

0:35:28.840 --> 0:35:31.080
<v Speaker 1>had clashed with Tommy as well, because often it is

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the sisters who have to get involved. Well, she said

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that she kept seeing Tommy cheating Molly so badly. Yeah,

0:35:36.000 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I suppose she felt she had to stand up to her.

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:40.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's because Zoe has a really lovely husband.

0:35:40.800 --> 0:35:43.719
<v Speaker 1>His name's Danny. He's in the Army. He seems to

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:46.719
<v Speaker 1>be the opposite of Tommy and what he stands for,

0:35:46.800 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 1>So for her, she's like, why are you putting up

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:51.080
<v Speaker 1>with this shit? Side note, My favorite scene of the

0:35:51.120 --> 0:35:54.759
<v Speaker 1>whole documentary so far was Molly and Zoe singing along

0:35:54.800 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to the Saddle Club. Oh yea, I know that that

0:35:57.160 --> 0:35:59.160
<v Speaker 1>was aired in the U game. I love it because

0:35:59.200 --> 0:36:01.799
<v Speaker 1>it was so related, even though they're driving around in

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:03.960
<v Speaker 1>this fuck off g wag and it was just like

0:36:04.080 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 1>every girl does that with their sister, have a little

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:10.240
<v Speaker 1>sing alongs in the car. Back to Zoe hating Tommy's guts.

0:36:10.480 --> 0:36:13.799
<v Speaker 1>It's also probably because she's the only family member who

0:36:13.880 --> 0:36:16.360
<v Speaker 1>knows the ins and outs of the relationship with Tommy.

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Because Molly said this.

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:22.719
<v Speaker 5>I think Zoe ready struggles with Tommy and I the

0:36:22.760 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 5>most have anyone in my family because she has heard

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:31.440
<v Speaker 5>it all now and I have really shared it all

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:31.879
<v Speaker 5>with her.

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because Molly was like, oh, yeah, just go through

0:36:35.040 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 1>my messages, my WhatsApp with Tommy. Yeah, she's read too much.

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Clearly interesting that they are conversing through WhatsApp because it's

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:44.400
<v Speaker 1>a platform that's encrypted, so it's more difficult for the

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:46.840
<v Speaker 1>press to break into her phone and get her messages.

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:49.800
<v Speaker 1>And what we're so fascinating was on their YouTube channels,

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 1>on both Zoe and Molly's, they're always putting out such

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:56.640
<v Speaker 1>positive content about their like, you know, going and doing

0:36:56.680 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 1>couple things. It was odd to actually hear Zoe negatively

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:02.279
<v Speaker 1>talk about Tommy because it's always seems to be so

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:03.920
<v Speaker 1>positive everything they say, but.

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:04.960
<v Speaker 2>That's just social media.

0:37:05.000 --> 0:37:07.040
<v Speaker 1>At the end of the day, did anyone else think

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:10.520
<v Speaker 1>that maybe Tommy ruined Zoe's wedding, because it does seem

0:37:10.600 --> 0:37:12.480
<v Speaker 1>like the wedding was a bit of a breaking point

0:37:12.480 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 1>for Molly May. She didn't go into details about what happened,

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 1>but she said this.

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 5>He's never had an alcohol problem. It's just that alcohol

0:37:21.960 --> 0:37:26.320
<v Speaker 5>caused problems for us. It got to a point where

0:37:26.840 --> 0:37:32.440
<v Speaker 5>I wasn't really looking forward to anything because alcohol affected

0:37:32.480 --> 0:37:36.360
<v Speaker 5>it so much. I could only cite a couple of

0:37:36.400 --> 0:37:39.919
<v Speaker 5>examples where he had some alcohol and it's not led

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:42.799
<v Speaker 5>to anything disastrous. I mean, I actually don't know any

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 5>I really don't my sister's wedding, Like I literally pleaded

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:51.440
<v Speaker 5>with Tommy, like I begged him to not drink, and.

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:53.439
<v Speaker 1>It's just.

0:37:56.840 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:37:57.239 --> 0:37:59.719
<v Speaker 5>It's it's just really sad because I don't know, I'm

0:37:59.719 --> 0:38:00.439
<v Speaker 5>crying enough.

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, the breakup came shortly after Zoe's wedding, so.

0:38:04.840 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 1>They were on their honeymoon it came out, so this must.

0:38:07.040 --> 0:38:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Have been a tipping point for her.

0:38:08.840 --> 0:38:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Was anyone else surprised at how vocal Molly was about

0:38:11.920 --> 0:38:14.240
<v Speaker 1>her desire to get back with Tommy during this doco,

0:38:14.280 --> 0:38:16.919
<v Speaker 1>because I would love to know the timeline of when

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:19.279
<v Speaker 1>those bits were filmed. Well, it was clear that she

0:38:19.400 --> 0:38:22.920
<v Speaker 1>blindsided Tommy when she released that statement saying they'd broken up,

0:38:22.960 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and it felt like a really desperate move of Molly

0:38:26.160 --> 0:38:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to actually get Tommy's attention and to wake him up

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and be like, look, I'm actually serious, because it sounded

0:38:30.840 --> 0:38:32.960
<v Speaker 1>like she had been threatening for a long time to

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:35.520
<v Speaker 1>break up. Yeah, because she spoke through the process, so

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:39.440
<v Speaker 1>this wasn't some joint decision to put out a statement.

0:38:39.520 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 1>She said she was sick of lying in her bed

0:38:42.000 --> 0:38:44.640
<v Speaker 1>wirying all night, so she thought this is the final straw.

0:38:44.719 --> 0:38:47.040
<v Speaker 1>This is going to show him that he needs to change,

0:38:47.040 --> 0:38:49.640
<v Speaker 1>but also make herself accountable because she said that she

0:38:49.719 --> 0:38:52.640
<v Speaker 1>probably wouldn't go through with the breakup if it wasn't public. Yeah,

0:38:52.640 --> 0:38:54.840
<v Speaker 1>And in the third episode of the doco, she revealed

0:38:54.840 --> 0:38:56.879
<v Speaker 1>to Zoe it was never meant to be a permanent thing.

0:38:58.040 --> 0:39:02.279
<v Speaker 5>I know it's exhausting, but if you didn't draw a

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:04.040
<v Speaker 5>line in the sand, it will carry on being exhausting

0:39:04.080 --> 0:39:05.759
<v Speaker 5>for the next time. But I don't want you because

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:08.080
<v Speaker 5>I don't want to end. I knew we were going

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:08.840
<v Speaker 5>to get back together.

0:39:09.880 --> 0:39:10.720
<v Speaker 7>Surely you didn't.

0:39:10.920 --> 0:39:13.560
<v Speaker 5>No, I did know that. No, because you're waiting for

0:39:13.680 --> 0:39:14.120
<v Speaker 5>why do you think?

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:15.080
<v Speaker 2>How m not cried?

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:18.279
<v Speaker 5>All I want in this life is to be with

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:20.360
<v Speaker 5>him and to have another baby with him, and to

0:39:20.400 --> 0:39:22.400
<v Speaker 5>grow old as a family, and to live in a

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:24.359
<v Speaker 5>nice house together and to have a nice life together.

0:39:24.560 --> 0:39:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Fortunately, that's all I want. To be perfectly honest with you.

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:30.480
<v Speaker 5>I think what's getting me through is the hope and

0:39:30.680 --> 0:39:34.160
<v Speaker 5>the idea that Tommy and I, well, we will end

0:39:34.239 --> 0:39:34.880
<v Speaker 5>up back together.

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 1>You could tell Zoe was just like, oh for Fox, Yeah, yes,

0:39:39.880 --> 0:39:42.839
<v Speaker 1>what's going on? You do forget that they're only twenty five.

0:39:43.160 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 1>And when Molly was talking about the fact that Tommy

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:47.640
<v Speaker 1>wants to be a regular twenty five year old and

0:39:47.640 --> 0:39:50.000
<v Speaker 1>got drinking with his friends and partying, but he also

0:39:50.040 --> 0:39:53.640
<v Speaker 1>wants to be have this stable relationship in this family life,

0:39:53.760 --> 0:39:55.600
<v Speaker 1>you can see that he's at a crossroad and he

0:39:55.640 --> 0:39:57.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't know what to do. He almost doesn't want to

0:39:57.360 --> 0:39:59.879
<v Speaker 1>grow up. How sad was watching the vision of Molly

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:02.200
<v Speaker 1>their phone out having to FaceTime Tommy to say good

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:04.320
<v Speaker 1>night to Bamby. That made me feel really upset. I

0:40:04.360 --> 0:40:07.400
<v Speaker 1>think bye bye, that's all she ended the conversation. Every

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:10.319
<v Speaker 1>con was bye bye. Notice her saying bye bye all

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the time, and I was wondering if it was just

0:40:11.760 --> 0:40:14.239
<v Speaker 1>a Tommy because she felt awkward, but then she said

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 1>it to her manager and everyone in the colledep or.

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:18.920
<v Speaker 1>One viral clip from this doc that's doing the rounds

0:40:18.920 --> 0:40:21.680
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok is a scene where Molly is trying to

0:40:21.719 --> 0:40:25.040
<v Speaker 1>feed her daughter Bamby, and there's a moment where Bambi

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:29.160
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely losing it, and then Molly realizes the Bambi

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:32.359
<v Speaker 1>is trying to say dadda because she misses Tommy. And

0:40:32.880 --> 0:40:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I've seen so many people saying that they were in

0:40:35.200 --> 0:40:38.080
<v Speaker 1>tears over this moment. It doesn't help that Bambi looks

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 1>exactly like Tommy Fury either, like it would be hard

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to get over him when your daughter is his clone.

0:40:43.760 --> 0:40:43.920
<v Speaker 6>Now.

0:40:43.920 --> 0:40:46.000
<v Speaker 1>The producers, of course, left all of us on the

0:40:46.080 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 1>edge of our seats in the last episode when Molly

0:40:49.280 --> 0:40:51.640
<v Speaker 1>revealed that she was so adamant that they were going

0:40:51.640 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to get back together, but now she was worried that

0:40:54.040 --> 0:40:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the problems weren't going to go away, and then I

0:40:57.160 --> 0:41:00.480
<v Speaker 1>flashed to the teaser showing Molly's reaction to the headlines

0:41:00.480 --> 0:41:02.680
<v Speaker 1>that came out about their New Year's Eve kiss, and

0:41:02.719 --> 0:41:05.920
<v Speaker 1>she said, oh my god, what Molly May and Tommy

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Fury kiss on New Year's Eve? That is so bad.

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:10.799
<v Speaker 1>It's clear that this doco is having to play catch

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:13.400
<v Speaker 1>up big time, and that is why they haven't actually

0:41:13.440 --> 0:41:16.319
<v Speaker 1>set an exact date for the second installment. It says

0:41:16.600 --> 0:41:20.399
<v Speaker 1>coming spring, as in the spring UK time, sometime around there.

0:41:20.560 --> 0:41:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it was always planned that it was

0:41:22.239 --> 0:41:24.200
<v Speaker 1>going to have this big break in between it, or

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:26.600
<v Speaker 1>you're just going with the floor, because I think they

0:41:26.600 --> 0:41:29.200
<v Speaker 1>were almost scraping the barrel a bit to fill out

0:41:29.239 --> 0:41:32.400
<v Speaker 1>three episodes of content. A lot of it was on

0:41:32.440 --> 0:41:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the maybe controversy with the jacket we spoke about earlier,

0:41:35.200 --> 0:41:37.239
<v Speaker 1>so I think they've gone fuck well. A lot of

0:41:37.280 --> 0:41:39.759
<v Speaker 1>this stuff that's happening in current time is far more

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:41.839
<v Speaker 1>interesting than what we've already recorded. I saw a lot

0:41:41.840 --> 0:41:45.279
<v Speaker 1>of people saying it was boring, but I absolutely loved it.

0:41:45.360 --> 0:41:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I thought the producers did an incredible job. It was

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:50.799
<v Speaker 1>shot so beautifully. It was But if you weren't a fan,

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:52.520
<v Speaker 1>of Molly May. I can say why some people might

0:41:52.719 --> 0:41:54.719
<v Speaker 1>think got she was a bit boring. She's got eight

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:57.080
<v Speaker 1>million followers, so there are a lot of people invested

0:41:57.120 --> 0:41:59.279
<v Speaker 1>in her life and it's like, oh, well, we didn't

0:41:59.320 --> 0:42:02.359
<v Speaker 1>hear all the details. I thought what we did get

0:42:02.400 --> 0:42:06.719
<v Speaker 1>to hear was incredible. A thirty four year old Queensland

0:42:06.760 --> 0:42:11.000
<v Speaker 1>influencer has been arrested and charged after allegedly torturing and

0:42:11.080 --> 0:42:14.920
<v Speaker 1>poisoning her baby daughter to boost her social media following.

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:17.680
<v Speaker 1>It's important to note that the reason why we and

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 1>other media outlets aren't naming the woman is to protect

0:42:21.040 --> 0:42:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the identity of the child. Now, kay, can you tell

0:42:23.560 --> 0:42:26.680
<v Speaker 1>us more? Yeah? So, on Thursday, the influencer was charged

0:42:26.719 --> 0:42:31.160
<v Speaker 1>with a multitude of offenses, including torture, making child exploitation,

0:42:31.280 --> 0:42:35.320
<v Speaker 1>material fraud, and multiple counts of administering poison. Now, vision

0:42:35.400 --> 0:42:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of the woman being arrested in her pajamas at her

0:42:38.520 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 1>home and then escorted into a police cart was circulated

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:45.160
<v Speaker 1>to the media. The woman's face was blurred, but you

0:42:45.200 --> 0:42:47.320
<v Speaker 1>could tell who it was if you know who the

0:42:47.400 --> 0:42:50.720
<v Speaker 1>influencer is. What we can say is this influencer gained

0:42:50.719 --> 0:42:53.759
<v Speaker 1>a following by documenting her child's apparent battle with the

0:42:53.840 --> 0:42:57.000
<v Speaker 1>terminal illness on social media. Now it's alleged that the

0:42:57.040 --> 0:43:00.120
<v Speaker 1>poisoning took place between August and October, when and the

0:43:00.160 --> 0:43:03.640
<v Speaker 1>woman gave the baby, who had a medical condition, medications

0:43:03.640 --> 0:43:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that were not prescribed or medically approved. The charges follow

0:43:08.040 --> 0:43:11.800
<v Speaker 1>an extensive police investigation that took place after medical staff

0:43:11.840 --> 0:43:14.759
<v Speaker 1>from a Brisbane South hospital raised their concern. Now the

0:43:14.800 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 1>baby was already sick in hospital with a genuine illness

0:43:17.680 --> 0:43:20.800
<v Speaker 1>when staff suspected something was not right now. In a

0:43:20.880 --> 0:43:24.720
<v Speaker 1>press conference, Detective Inspector Paul Dalton labeled the alleged offenses

0:43:24.760 --> 0:43:27.520
<v Speaker 1>as abhorrent. He said, there are no words to describe

0:43:27.800 --> 0:43:31.200
<v Speaker 1>just how repulsive offenses of this nature are. There is

0:43:31.280 --> 0:43:34.239
<v Speaker 1>no excuse for hurting a child, especially not a one

0:43:34.280 --> 0:43:36.959
<v Speaker 1>year old infant who was reliable on others for care

0:43:37.040 --> 0:43:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and survival. Dalton confirmed the little girl is going well

0:43:40.680 --> 0:43:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and she and her siblings are safe, but he did

0:43:43.120 --> 0:43:46.080
<v Speaker 1>not say who was caring for them. When asked about

0:43:46.080 --> 0:43:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the woman's sentence, Dalton said, if convicted, she would be

0:43:49.200 --> 0:43:51.200
<v Speaker 1>facing substantial prison time.

0:43:51.400 --> 0:43:51.560
<v Speaker 7>Now.

0:43:51.600 --> 0:43:55.680
<v Speaker 1>The influencer has been also accused of defrauding donors of

0:43:55.719 --> 0:43:59.560
<v Speaker 1>sixty thousand dollars via a GoFundMe page that she allegedly

0:43:59.600 --> 0:44:02.640
<v Speaker 1>set up. Now, GoFundMe has announced they will refund the

0:44:02.719 --> 0:44:06.160
<v Speaker 1>money to people who donated, and I've already seen screenshots

0:44:06.160 --> 0:44:09.759
<v Speaker 1>of people sharing that that donation has been refunded to them. Now,

0:44:09.760 --> 0:44:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the thirty four year old woman appeared in a prison

0:44:12.080 --> 0:44:15.640
<v Speaker 1>magistrate's court on Friday, and her lawyer requested that she

0:44:15.840 --> 0:44:19.480
<v Speaker 1>beheld in protective custody because of concerns for her safety

0:44:19.680 --> 0:44:23.680
<v Speaker 1>following the publicity around her arrest. Now, she does plan

0:44:23.800 --> 0:44:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to apply for bail later this month, and the influencer

0:44:27.160 --> 0:44:29.600
<v Speaker 1>was remanded in custody and will face court again in

0:44:29.719 --> 0:44:32.960
<v Speaker 1>late January. Well, that is all we've got time for today.

0:44:33.000 --> 0:44:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for listening to another episode of Outspoken. If

0:44:35.560 --> 0:44:38.240
<v Speaker 1>you do like this show, please leave us a review.

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:40.880
<v Speaker 1>This podcast was recorded on the traditional land of the

0:44:40.880 --> 0:44:43.239
<v Speaker 1>Ghana people of the Adelaide Planes. We pay respect to

0:44:43.280 --> 0:44:44.520
<v Speaker 1>elders past and present.