WEBVTT - Roxy Jacenko's Bootcamp Back Flip, The Baby Reindeer Interview & Shower Snacks

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to Outspoken. It's your dose of the

0:00:05.519 --> 0:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>hottest influencer and pop culture news twice a week. Coming

0:00:09.480 --> 0:00:12.760
<v Speaker 1>up on today's show, Roxy Jusenko steps down from her

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>ten million dollar house giveaway. Here's Morgan is under fire

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>for interviewing Baby Reindeer's real life Martha, and journalist Antoinette

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Latoufe breaks her silence over the inspired Unemployed break. But first,

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>what do you guys think about eating in the shower,

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>because jar Dae Tunci has sparked debate after she uploaded

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a video of her chowing down on a burger in

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the shower. Well, I have been known to eat in

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 1>the shower quite a bit, but I've never gone as

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 1>far as having a burger. I've only had snacks. Yeah,

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I have been known to also eat in the shower,

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 1>which probably won't surprise OG listeners because we have been

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>slammed for using our phone in the shower. That's gross.

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I've ever really eaten a meal, let

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>alone a chocolate in the shower. Oh, you've got to

0:00:57.120 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>try it. It's the best when you have a little

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>snack and you take it in there and you're just

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>so comfortable and warm. I do want to point out

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>that Jade Twincy also is eight months pregnant, so I

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>respect it even more as a fellow pregnant woman. I'm

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>actually thankful that she reminded me of this because I

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>haven't done it for so long. I can see how

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:14.760
<v Speaker 1>it would be nice in winter. And maybe this is

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:16.960
<v Speaker 1>something that a lot of mums do because it's probably

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the only time they get on their own. The worst

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>thing is when you get caught out and you've left

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>a wrapper in the shower and you just look like

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>it absolutely pig to your part. I think I like

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 1>when I have a shower at night time. Usually it's

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>an everything shower where I'm scrubbing off tan or I'm

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>shaving my legs so and I'm usually on my phone

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 1>as well, so I don't have an extra hand to

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 1>hold food. I can't let this get too out of hand.

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I feel like your partner, Amy is someone who could

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>progress to eating in the shower because I don't mean

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 1>to call you out. Often when I go in your

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>bathroom there are empty soda water bottles and also beer bottles.

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I think Dale does love a shower beer now and

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>then it is getting a little bit embarrassing, especially when

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I've left my chocolate wrapper and there's also beer cans

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>in there.

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 2>I had CAFC for dinner last night, and I feel good.

0:01:58.680 --> 0:01:59.639
<v Speaker 1>I feel good that I've.

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Held my head.

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I was backed into a corner. My name is

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>all over.

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 2>This money can be made again by me.

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Roxy Jasenko has announced she's stepping away from the controversial

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>ten million dollar house giveaway she was the face of.

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:14.919
<v Speaker 1>Now before we get into the recent drama, Kay, can

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>you tell us more about this competition? Well, Roxy launched

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the promotion called Roxy's boot Camps, in a wave of

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>publicity on March eighth. She was absolutely everywhere promoting this competition,

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>which I'm sure she heavily regrets. Now so, she appeared

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>on the Kyle and Jackie Oh Show and told the

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>host that she was giving away a ten million dollar home.

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:38.080
<v Speaker 1>She also did an interview with Sunrise where she said,

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you need to incentivize people to study, and what better

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>way than a ten million dollar house, a rolex or

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 1>a burken bag. Now amongst the media attention, Domain ran

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>with the headline Roxy Jasenko is giving away a ten

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>million dollar Mediterranean style waterfront pad. This competition was much

0:02:56.760 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>more complicated than your average home lottery, so to you

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>had to sign up to the course. Prices ranged from

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:06.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine dollars for one month's access to the course

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and one entry into the competition to a four hundred

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and ninety nine dollar subscription which provided you then with

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:16.399
<v Speaker 1>five hundred entries. The main prize promoted was a ten

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>million dollar home located in Cronulla, and the other prizes

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>included a Rolex watch and a Burken bag, both valued

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>at twenty thousand dollars. This is such a huge incentive

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to enter. It's not every day you see a ten

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 1>million dollar house up for grabs, and that is why

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>over seven thousand people signed up for Roxy's course. A

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>big part of the issue is, though, that media reports

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't clearly state entrance only had a chance of winning

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the major prize. So the first red flag appeared during

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>a Sunrise interview when Roxy deflected from answering the exact

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>chances of winning the ten million dollar house. So this

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>led publication Criche to dig into the terms and conditions,

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and it turned out the winning prize wasn't actually the house,

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>but instead entry into another game of chance for the home.

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>So In the secondary competition, in order to win the home,

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the entrant had to select two winning envelopes out of

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and fifty available to win the house. So

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the odds of going on to pick the right envelope

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>alone was one in sixty two thousand, two hundred and fifty. Now,

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Kraiki ended up contacting Roxy about the low odds, and

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:25.719
<v Speaker 1>she responded saying, there is a chance, and that is

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:28.159
<v Speaker 1>how we are communicating the offer and always have been.

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 1>We are offering someone the chance to play to win

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the property and guaranteed consolation prizes if it is not

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>one via the method. Now, the prizes that Roxy is

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 1>referring to is the two hundred and fifty thousand dollars

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>cash and also the Rolex and Burken Bag. So essentially

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>this competition was committed to giving away those three prizes,

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and then it seems like it was very unlikely to

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 1>actually go on to win the ten million dollar house.

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>And as for this ten million dollar home, it has

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 1>been revealed that it didn't even belong to Roxy, but

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>instead it belonged to her business partner Yo of Tills

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>and his associate Kasman Aloui. And according to the Sunday Telegraph.

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>It was actually purchased in twenty twenty for three point

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>four million dollars after it failed to sell at auction,

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 1>but it was enlisted again late last year for ten million,

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:17.360
<v Speaker 1>but also didn't sell. Now The Daily Telegraph is also

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>reporting that local Cronulla real estate agents have expressed doubts

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that the house would even reach the ten million dollar

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>asking price. Now. On Friday night, Roxy did share an

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:30.280
<v Speaker 1>eight minute video announcing she was stepping down as director

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>from Roxy's boot camps. The backstory is very interesting because

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:36.919
<v Speaker 1>she revealed that she had agreed to run the competition

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 1>after being approached by a stranger who direct messaged her

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:43.360
<v Speaker 1>with the idea. She said, she went on to form

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a partnership with two people she said she didn't know.

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:51.039
<v Speaker 1>Did this shock anyone else? Well, particularly because Roxy does

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 1>position herself as being a very savvy business woman and

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 1>well connected. Yeah, Well, it didn't take long for her

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to regret her decision, because she claims three days after

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the emotion commenced that she felt really uncomfortable and she

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 1>actually suggested to her new business partners that they refund

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>all of the purchases. And she alleged that her request

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>was rejected and that the promotion continued.

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:16.479
<v Speaker 1>The pr message was very clear in this video. I

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>actually laughed watching it because she said the same thing

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:22.479
<v Speaker 1>over and over again. So she wanted her audience to

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:25.359
<v Speaker 1>know that she has done everything within her power to

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:29.039
<v Speaker 1>ensure that the three prizes are given to the winners. Now,

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:32.160
<v Speaker 1>she claims, after discovering the company bank accounts didn't have

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>funds to cover the two hundred and fifty thousand dollar prize,

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>that she tried to chip in the remaining twenty k

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:41.359
<v Speaker 1>that was missing. Now. She said she would do so

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:45.279
<v Speaker 1>if the money was put into a trust to protect it. Now,

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>she said that that request was rejected and then she

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>was told that she had to stand down as a

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>director and she is now just a shareholder in the company.

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 1>She also confirmed that she no longer has access to

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that bank account, so she can't guarantee that the two

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty thousand dollar parries will be paid. She did, however,

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>say that she is holding the burken bag and the

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:07.719
<v Speaker 1>role AT's hostage. She also claimed that she's out of

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>pocket three hundred and fifty thousand dollars now. On Saturday,

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Roxy did a follow up video confirming that she would

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>be personally refunding all seven thousand plus customers who purchased

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a package from Roxy's boot camp. She said the course

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>would also remain available to everyone who received a refund. Again,

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>in this video, it was so clear that she was

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>really sticking to the PR messaging. So she said so

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>many times that she will be personally fitting the bill

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that the money is coming from her. I mean, obviously,

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:39.559
<v Speaker 1>if you are going to be paying that amount of money,

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>your people to know that's from you. Well, there is

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a rule when you are communicating with people that you

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>actually do have to reiterate those points over and over

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>again for people to actually buy in and understand it.

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>But it's not surprising that she has because how dirty

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>would you bet your name is attached to this? This

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 1>isn't a good look for her, oh, and a terrible look,

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that, I mean she has come out

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and said, look, this doesn't look good for me. My

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:05.679
<v Speaker 1>face is all over it. I did find her PR

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>strategy around it very interesting because she is known as

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>being a very glamorous PR queen, but she chose to

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>film the video with no makeup on, in her pajamas,

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>with her hair slipped back. That was a very intentional move.

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:23.119
<v Speaker 1>She was clearly trying to create sympathy for herself. She said,

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>my hands are tired, I am exhausted, I feel bullied,

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I feel distressed, and I'm embarrassed. It is a clever

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 1>move because it is in stark contrast to how she

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>was portrayed in the advertisements for this ten million dollar giveaway.

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>She was obviously very glamed up. It really humanized her

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>as well. I fell and if I'm someone who has

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>purchased one of these tickets and I'm sort of sitting

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 1>at home thinking what the fuck is going on? I

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:48.079
<v Speaker 1>think one, Okay, she's clearly jumped on her social media

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 1>as soon as she could to let me know the messaging.

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 1>And also if she's sitting on there with a hair

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>all done, in glamorous clothes, expensive jewelry, I'm thinking, oh,

0:08:57.440 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you've clearly run away with the peat. And it also

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 1>looks like it's been pre planned, whereas this looks like

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 1>she's just jumped on and she's been very emotive and

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>wanting to just as you said, instantly get on there

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to update people. Yeah, there was definitely a sense of

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:11.839
<v Speaker 1>urgency to this. I also found it interesting that a

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>month's providing the business details, she repeatedly spoke about her

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>weight and how it had been impacted by the stress

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>of the promotion. Let's writ to some of what she

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 1>said regarding this.

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 2>The course of the last two months, which to be

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 2>really honest with you, feels like two and a half

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:34.239
<v Speaker 2>years for me, Um, it's been nothing short of distressing, stressful.

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:41.199
<v Speaker 2>I am forty nine kilos today alone. I have fainted twice,

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 2>things that have never happened to me. And I have

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 2>had many businesses. I've had many ups and downs, and

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 2>I've powered through each and every one of them.

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>In the second video, she followed up by telling her

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 1>audience not to worry because she had eaten KFC tonight.

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Before I get what she was trying to do, she

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:00.559
<v Speaker 1>was trying to show that obviously, this competition is taken

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>an emotional toll on her and it's causing her a

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of stress. But I just feel so uncomfortable with

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>her constantly putting out there how much she weighs. I

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:10.079
<v Speaker 1>think it's quite irrelevant. You can just say I'm very

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>stressed and I've lost weight. You don't have to say

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>how much weight, but also using it as a method

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>to gunner sympathy. When she has explicitly spoken on an

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Instagram story about how she works out five times a week,

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>she was caught up in controversy because she said she

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>only ate two boiled eggs and a Greek salad for dinner.

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 1>She's spoken a lot about how she exercises five times

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>a week. Her weight loss seems quite intentional, particularly because

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>she also spoke about how she nearly died from taking

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 1>a zepic, So it was strange to me that she

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:42.440
<v Speaker 1>was then blaming this weight loss on the stress of

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:45.680
<v Speaker 1>this competition. I wonder how many people they actually expected

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to sign up for this course, because it's come out

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 1>that they've had seven thousand entries. If they all of

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>those seven thousand people actually signed up to the four

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred ninety nine dollars subscription, that adds up to around

0:10:56.880 --> 0:11:00.200
<v Speaker 1>three point four million dollars, it's obviously not an enough

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to even pay for the house. Yeah, and it's very

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 1>unlikely that everyone is going to sign up to the

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>top package.

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:05.839
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Roxy's former business partner, Joseph Tills, spoke to The Sunday

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Telegraph and he confirmed that the competition will still go

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 1>ahead without Roxy, so Yosef refuted Roxy's claims and said

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>that the two hundred and fifty thousand dollars were safely

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:23.319
<v Speaker 1>sitting in the company's bank account, and he said that

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:26.559
<v Speaker 1>he only removed Roxy from the account after she shared

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the Instagram video on Friday night. Joseph claims that Roxy

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:32.839
<v Speaker 1>was also set to take fifty percent of the shareholding,

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>while he and his other business partner would take twenty

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 1>five percent each. He then went on to claim that

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Roxy resigned from the company in mid April, which resulted

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>in him being locked out of the company accounts and

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the bank account being frozen. He also said he explored

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>legal proceedings, but they were averted when he was granted

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>access to the accounts on condition that Roxy was permitted

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to exit the business. Now it just seems like an

0:11:57.240 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 1>absolute shit show. So there were attempts made to repair

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:03.559
<v Speaker 1>this relationship, and Joseph said that it became irreparable on

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>May first. I think the most interesting part of his

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:09.199
<v Speaker 1>claim is that he said he and his business partner

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 1>were actually the ones that wanted to originally resign from

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:15.319
<v Speaker 1>this business, and he claims that Roxy got wind of

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:17.959
<v Speaker 1>vis so that is why she then pulled the plug

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and announced publicly that she was stepping down as director.

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 1>So it sounds like they're all trying to jump from

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:26.960
<v Speaker 1>this sinking ship. If I had purchased one of these tickets,

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that would not fill me with much confidence that I'm

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>getting money. I question what these guys are saying because

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 1>they have come to Roxy with this concept they are

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the brains behind this competition and she is merely the

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:42.680
<v Speaker 1>face of it. Well, I wouldn't say merely the face,

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>because she also agreed to go ahead with it. These

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>guys actually claim that they approached Roxy and said that

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>they wanted a celebrity from the Ministry of Talent, which

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>is a talent agency. She managed the position, and she said, no,

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I've actually got the reach, that is what they allege.

0:12:57.000 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I am so interested to see what happens when this

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>competition is actually drawn, because Roxy said that she's refunding everyone.

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:06.559
<v Speaker 1>So doesn't that defunct the whole competition? Like, how can

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>it still go ahead?

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:10.199
<v Speaker 3>I've got a photographic memory. I was top of the

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 3>skill apart from the science. What grade did you get

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 3>all right? Grads? I mean, not top of the or anything.

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 3>When you do a degree, you get it. You're asking

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 3>me what mace I got for thirteen subjects.

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:27.439
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember. Controversial UK broadcaster Piers Morgan is under

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>fire for his face to face interview with the so

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:34.079
<v Speaker 1>called real life Marfa, who allegedly inspired the hit Netflix

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:35.439
<v Speaker 1>show Baby Reindeer.

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Critics are questioning the ethics of paying and interviewing an

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>alleged stalker, who the show's creator, Richard Gadd, claims is

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 1>mentally ill. Sophie, You, like the rest of the world,

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>has been captivated by this show. Yeah, this show has

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>gripped me in a way that other shows haven't for

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>quite some time. And I think it's down to the

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 1>fact that it has been promoted as a true story.

0:13:56.720 --> 0:13:59.680
<v Speaker 1>This isn't just based off a true story or inspired

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 1>by real life events. Netflix has boldly said that this

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>is a true story and the show is absolutely fascinating.

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>It is written by Richard Gadd, who also plays himself

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 1>on the show. See when I was watching her, I

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't realize and that adds a whole extra dimension to

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>it because the show is just so confronting and raw. Yeah,

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 1>it does explore how he became the point of obsession

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 1>for a serial stalker called Martha whilst he was trying

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to make it as a comedian, and I think the

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>fact that he plays himself in the show makes it

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>even more powerful. What is pretty remarkable about this show

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>is that it has turned its audience into armchair detectives.

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>So after watching this show, fans have been trying to

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>hunt down the real life Martha and it was actually

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>relatively easy for them to find her because on the

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>show they used real messages and emails that Richard says

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>that the stalker sent him. And the interesting thing about

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the messages is they were written in such a specific

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>way there were a lot of consistent ramatical and spelling errors. Yeah,

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and fans were able to cross reference the messages on

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 1>social media to the ones on the show, and it

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>wasn't long before TikTok users revealed who Martha was and

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>they created all of these videos online which generated a

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of engagement and a lot of attention. Now, the

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>real life Martha was revealed to be a fifty eight

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>year old Scottish woman called Fiona Harvey, and not long

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 1>after her identity was revealed, online journalist Piers Morgan was

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 1>promoting that he had a world exclusive TV interview with her,

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 1>so he wrote on ex world exclusive, the real life

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Martha from Baby Reindeer breaks cover and gives me the

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 1>first TV interview about the smash hit Netflix show Fiona

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Harvey wants to have her say and set the record straight.

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Is she a psychostalker? I love that he finished with

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>that line, because clearly the interview was already in the can.

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>They would have had to do so much persuading to

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>get her on the show. It's pretty incredible when you

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 1>think a YouTube show actually beat out these huge networks

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to get this interview. Well, I think that that speaks

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 1>more broadly about the entertainment industry though, because TV is dead.

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean Piers Morgan, he has two million followers or

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>two million subscribers on his YouTube channel. In the space

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 1>of three days, this YouTube has had nine million views. Now,

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 1>this interview was very lengthy. It went for fifty four minutes,

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and I was glued to every single second of it,

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>even though at times I felt uncomfortable that I was

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>watching it. I think that's how a lot of people

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>felt online. You almost felt guilty for watching it and

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>buying into the sensationalism of it. All. It was like

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>watching a car crash. You just could not look away.

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 1>And it is clear that Peers used this lengthy interview

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>style as a way to trip her up. I could

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>just sense how much the producers had tried to say

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to Fiona how she and Peers were the same, because

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>when he asked her, oh, so, what made you choose

0:16:56.920 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>my show to appear on, she said that she knew

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 1>he had all been persecuted like her. There was this

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>connection there. However, I think once the interview went on,

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 1>it became quite apparent what side Peers was on. Yeah,

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the amount of smoke they would have blown up her

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>ass to actually get her to agree to do the interview,

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:17.439
<v Speaker 1>and then the tables would turned sue quickly. Now, during

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:20.920
<v Speaker 1>this interview, Fiona did claim to have only met Richard

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 1>a few times, and she did deny sending him forty

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:28.159
<v Speaker 1>one thousand emails and one hundred letters. Instead, she claimed

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:31.439
<v Speaker 1>that she sent him only a handful of emails and

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>that he must have made up the rest himself. It's

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 1>funny because rather than denying the fact that she contacted

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>him via email, she just kept saying, oh, how would

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>someone possibly send forty one thousand emails in the space.

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Of a year.

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>It's like, yeah, I don't know if that's a good

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.679
<v Speaker 1>enough defense, And then she also said, oh, I don't

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:48.639
<v Speaker 1>think I did, and he's like, well, how do you

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 1>not know if you've sent that many emails. She also

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>denied that she's been convicted of stalking Richard or being

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>sent to prison, and also claimed to be a lawyer,

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and she revealed her plans to sue both Richard and

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:04.719
<v Speaker 1>Netflix for defamation. She did reiterate that she personally wouldn't

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 1>be suing them. She also said that her boyfriend was

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a lawyer and he wouldn't be suing that she would

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>get a other lawyer to do so. Apparently she has

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 1>been dating this lawyer for five years now. While she

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:18.199
<v Speaker 1>said the show was defamatory, she also claimed to have

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>never watched any scene of the show, and in one

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 1>notable moment during this interview, she also boasted about having

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a photographic memory, but was then unable to tell peers

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:33.160
<v Speaker 1>her law school grades. So there were just so many

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>moments where peers managed to trip her up and make

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>her look silly. This interview did her no favors whatsoever.

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>There were so many inconsistencies, and at some points I

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>felt like Peers was actually trying to help her out,

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:48.119
<v Speaker 1>but she just didn't take the bait at all, and

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 1>some of her remarks about Richard have quickly become viral

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>memes on TikTok. Let's throw to one of them.

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 3>Leave me alone, please get a life, get a proper job.

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 3>I am horrified what you've done.

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>When I first saw these memes circulating, my first reaction

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 1>was to send them on and have a bit of

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 1>a laugh. But when you think about it, it's actually

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 1>really sad that this mentally ill woman is being taken

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:16.679
<v Speaker 1>advantage of by a huge broadcaster and being mocked for

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 1>all of our entertainment. This is also not going to

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:21.199
<v Speaker 1>be good for her legal case, because this will be

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>used as evidence against her. What I found most surprising

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:28.239
<v Speaker 1>was following this interview, Fiona came out and admitted that

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 1>she was paid only two hundred and fifty pounds for

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:34.960
<v Speaker 1>this exclusive, and it turned out that she had turned

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:37.919
<v Speaker 1>down a number of other morning shows. She said that

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:40.680
<v Speaker 1>she felt used by Peers and that the questions were

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>rapid fire to try and trip her up. She also

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 1>said it was fast paced to catch me off. God,

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:49.479
<v Speaker 1>has she not seen any other interviews by Piers Morgan

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:53.400
<v Speaker 1>because that is just his interview style. I do wonder

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:56.479
<v Speaker 1>if these morning shows didn't offer her any money, because

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:59.919
<v Speaker 1>ethically it looks really wrong to pay an accuse stalk

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>her to get their side of events. Like I mean,

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 1>if this was a male stalker, a male older stalker,

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that we would give them any airtime

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 1>at all, let alone pay them for their time and

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 1>their side of the story. The UK aren't really known

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 1>for their media ethics and Piers has faced a lot

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of backlash from mental health campaigners and survivors of stalking

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 1>over his decision to interview Fiona. Many people have called

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:27.880
<v Speaker 1>it irresponsible and bizarre, and I would agree with them. Yeah,

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>because after Baby Reindeer, Ed Richard did tell the media

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:35.640
<v Speaker 1>that the real person who inspired Martha was very mentally unwell,

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:38.479
<v Speaker 1>and he also did urge fans not to try and

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:41.719
<v Speaker 1>find her. So it was an interesting decision for a

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>broadcaster to then go and spotlight this woman.

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:44.239
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:46.400
<v Speaker 1>While he did give her a platform to share her

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:49.919
<v Speaker 1>side of the story, Piers Morgan was always going to

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 1>interrogate her. He fired questions at her and he did

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 1>pull apart her story. Yeah, I think plenty of journalism

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>students could learn a lot from watching Peters's interview techniques.

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 1>While many people people are questioning the ethics over this interview,

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>it is clear that he pulled this interview off pretty flawlessly.

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 1>He demonstrated that he definitely has talent in interviewing people.

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:12.199
<v Speaker 1>He gave her enough room at the start of the

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>interview so that she felt comfortable to share her side

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:17.679
<v Speaker 1>of things, but then he was very clever on jumping

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:20.920
<v Speaker 1>on all of her inconsistencies in an attempt to trip

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>her up and to get her to admit what she

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 1>had been accused of. While this may have been a

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>masterclass in interviewing, it was not in ethics, because while

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Fiona may have agreed to do the interview, it's quite

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 1>clear that she probably wasn't mentally fit to actually make

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 1>that decision or fully understood the repercussions of that decision.

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 1>If the show is anything to go by, she was

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>portrayed as a very lonely person who didn't have a

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>big support group around her, and if that is the

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>case in real life, it means that she wouldn't have

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 1>had the support of friends of family to actually step

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 1>in and say this is a bad idea. I mean,

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:58.639
<v Speaker 1>she did mention that she hadn't told her mum about

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the interview. It's clear watching this interview that there's two

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>possibilities at play. The first possibility is that Fiona is

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 1>telling the truth and that Richard and Netflix have overly

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 1>exaggerated this story and her character and passed it off

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>as a true story. If this is the case, a

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.880
<v Speaker 1>woman has been defamed and both parties have left themselves

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>open to legal action. I don't think that that is

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the case, but that is one scenario. The other scenario

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>that is more feasible, in my opinion, is that Fiona

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:28.639
<v Speaker 1>did do all of these things that she's been accused of,

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and the media are parading around a mentally ill woman

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>for clicks and entertainment. And the worst thing is that

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>we're all lapping it up. Like I personally, as soon

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:40.880
<v Speaker 1>as this interview dropped, I couldn't get enough of it.

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I just could not stop watching it. It was such

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>compelling viewing. So I think we do have to have

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:48.199
<v Speaker 1>a look at ourselves as well. I couldn't help but

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:51.879
<v Speaker 1>also think that Piers Morgan has opened her up for

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:56.119
<v Speaker 1>a counter defamation case because she kept making comments about

0:22:56.119 --> 0:23:00.359
<v Speaker 1>how Richard gadd is psychotic and mentally ill himself, and

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:03.640
<v Speaker 1>also making derogatory comments about Netflix. Yeah, and I think

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:06.879
<v Speaker 1>even just mental health. Aside from this, the ethics of

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 1>giving an alleged stalker the opportunity to give their side

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 1>of the story and rebut a victim's claims, I think

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:18.119
<v Speaker 1>is just very unjustifiable. I think that gender, as I

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 1>touched on, has really come into play with this decision.

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>If this was a fifty eight year old man who

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 1>stalked a much younger woman, we wouldn't have opened up

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 1>the possibility to hear his side of events, and I

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think that he would have been spotlighted in this

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:35.639
<v Speaker 1>way in this show. Richard also made the point the

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 1>police didn't take his matter seriously due to it being

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:41.439
<v Speaker 1>a woman who stalks him. And this is despite the

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:46.360
<v Speaker 1>fact that in Baby Reindeer, Martha actually sexually assaulted Richard's

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:50.119
<v Speaker 1>character on the show, So if any of that is true,

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and then also an alleged sexual predator has also been platformed,

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:57.439
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing is just uncomfortable. I don't understand how

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 1>it's even gotten to this point, and I think Netflix

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:03.639
<v Speaker 1>are really to blame for it because they didn't have

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to come out and promote this as a true story.

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 1>They could have easily said based on a true story.

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>They clearly have all of the receipts. I think that

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 1>it's quite clear that there's a lot of evidence to

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:17.879
<v Speaker 1>prove that this did happen to Richard. And I just

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>feel so bad for Richard. You know, he's put it

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 1>very bravely, put all of his darkest moments into this

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 1>show out for the world to see it. But ethically, Sophie,

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:28.919
<v Speaker 1>if they had said based on a true story and

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 1>people found this real Martha, then it wouldn't have such

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 1>massive repercussions for this person. I just have found this

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:39.640
<v Speaker 1>interview to be so disrespectful to Richard, and I think

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 1>what is so scary about this is this is far

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:44.959
<v Speaker 1>from the end of the story. People are saying that

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing Baby Reindeer two play out in real life,

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and through taking part of this interview, Fiona has become

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:55.399
<v Speaker 1>somewhat of a celebrity. In the interview, she even spoke

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 1>about getting a potential book deal where she was going

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:01.159
<v Speaker 1>to expose her side of the story and as we speak,

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:03.679
<v Speaker 1>she probably has a ton of reality show producers or

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:06.880
<v Speaker 1>documentary makers who were knocking on her door offering her

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>money to be involved, and I don't think that she

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 1>should be able to profit on allegedly any of this

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 1>behavior that has taken place. In saying that, though, do

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you think Richard could have avoided this by changing a

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>few things up, particularly sharing the exact messages that she

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>shared that were available on Twitter. I think it's a

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>tough one because when the show exploded in popularity, he

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>made a point of saying, I have tried to conceal

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the real people's identities by making the character slightly different. However,

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>when we did meet the real life Martha, she looked

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>bang on to her the actor on the shows absolutely uncanny. Yeah, resemblance.

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 1>It was spot on. And also I've seen a lot

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>of memes floating around saying that all of the other

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 1>characters look very much like the actors as well. It's

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 1>not just in appearance though, it's the fact that they

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>would easily know that those tweets were available and could

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:00.119
<v Speaker 1>be searched. But I also think why does he he

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>necessarily have to protect someone who made his life a

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:06.879
<v Speaker 1>living misery and how it protects him from a defamation case.

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 1>But it's not defamat truf. It's true. There's the truth

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:11.720
<v Speaker 1>defense there as well. Yes, I know, but he probably

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want his show overshadowed by having to now go

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:18.919
<v Speaker 1>to court and relive all of overshadowed. This is probably

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the best thing for him if he's going to want

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:23.199
<v Speaker 1>to bring out a second series, while mentally it might

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 1>be bad for him. I mean, the thing that is

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a bit awkward is in the show. In one of

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the last episodes, he admitted that he sort of became

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 1>obsessed with her and he couldn't let her go. So

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people are saying, is this a way

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>for her to still be in his life. Journalist Antoinette

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Latoufe has broken her silence, saying she was mortified by

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 1>the response to her involvement in the inspired unemployeds prank

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:56.160
<v Speaker 1>last month.

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:56.680
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:26:56.720 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Alongside Antoinette, high profile feminist you Miss Steins and Clementine

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Ford featured at the Love Unboxed event in Sydney last month,

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:08.920
<v Speaker 1>which was marketed as a thought provoking discussion on love

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:12.159
<v Speaker 1>and marriage. Now, the crowd at the time didn't know

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 1>that the free Q and a style panel was part

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:18.959
<v Speaker 1>of The Inspired Unemployed's prank show called Impractical Jokers. So

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Jack Steele, who is one half of The Inspired Unemployed,

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:24.639
<v Speaker 1>appeared on the panel to give the perspective of a

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 1>young male and some of his contributions to the panel

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>were that he thinks chicks did consent and he really

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:34.640
<v Speaker 1>likes girl writers. Now, he was being fed these lines

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:36.639
<v Speaker 1>because the show was a prank show, so this was

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>part of a punishment. The backlash was swift, and it

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:42.879
<v Speaker 1>seemed like people were more pissed off at the feminists

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:46.440
<v Speaker 1>that were on the panel rather than at the Inspired Unemployed. Yeah,

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 1>they definitely copped it a lot. Now, Antoinette has opened

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 1>up on her podcast, explaining that she previously had been

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:56.399
<v Speaker 1>unable to comment about the incident as she and the

0:27:56.480 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 1>other women had signed a non disclosure agreement. That's what

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:02.119
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people did guess at the time. She

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:05.680
<v Speaker 1>admitted that she and the other panelists had completely misread

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:09.679
<v Speaker 1>the situation and was mortified that the audience felt jeeps.

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>So she explained that producers approached her to host the event,

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 1>and she and the other hosts said that they answered

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the questions posted them on the panel very seriously, so

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 1>they felt as though their audience was still getting something

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:26.439
<v Speaker 1>from the experiment. She said that they really thought that

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the joke would be on Jack and that the audience

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 1>would enjoy being annoyed at him. However, when the joke

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 1>was revealed, the producers were supposed to come up on

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:38.719
<v Speaker 1>stage and back the women and explain what happened, but

0:28:38.800 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 1>they didn't come up on stage, and they were then

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>left to deal with the upset and the situation as

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 1>it unfolded. Well, Antoinette said, the great irony of it

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>was the three women mopping up. We apologized profusely, and

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>apologized repeatedly, and we listened and we heard. Then we realized, damn.

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>We all thought this would land differently. We honestly did

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 1>think it would land differently. It's clear they misread the

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>situation completely. There is a lot of backtracking going on.

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it's fair to blame the producers because

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I personally don't think it would have made a difference

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>if they came out and back them up. I think

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 1>it was a bit naive to assume that Jack was

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 1>simply going to be the butt of the joke, and

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that there wouldn't be men having a laugh about feminism,

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 1>because even the fact that this was Jack's punishment to

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:26.239
<v Speaker 1>be put on a stage with feminists who were going

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>to pick him to pieces, it's clear that the feminists

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>were the butt of the jokes, not Jack. Maybe it

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 1>was this allure of working with the inspired unemployed because

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>they are extremely popular. Everything they touch seems to turn

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 1>to gold, and while they do put out edgy jokes,

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 1>people don't normally get too offended by them. They vereem lovable,

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 1>they seem untouchable. The inspired unemployed are like teflon. They

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:50.800
<v Speaker 1>have slipped themselves out of this situation and left the

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 1>women to explain themselves, which seems to be a reflection

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 1>of what happens a lot of the time in society.

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking forward to hearing when Clementine Ford comes out

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and what she has to say about Well, if the

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 1>NDA has already passed, surely she would have said something

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 1>by now. I'm surprised that the NDA finishes before the

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 1>episode is aired. That's what's confused me. I'm really interested

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to see this episode I think it air or yeah, well,

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:14.360
<v Speaker 1>if it does air, we'll get more of an idea

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 1>of what's gone down. I think that is all we

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 1>have time for today. Thank you so much for joining

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 1>us for this episode. If you have enjoyed it, could

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 1>you please make sure you are subscribed on Apple Podcasts

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and also Spotify. And if you are a longtime listener

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 1>of the show and really enjoy what we put out,

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:31.239
<v Speaker 1>we would really appreciate it if you could leave us

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a five start review. If you do want to hear

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>more content from us, we release a subscriber episode every

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Thursday with bonus content. If you're not already an Outspoken

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Plus subscriber. All the details to sign up are in

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 1>our show notes. This podcast was recorded on the traditional

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 1>land of the Ghana people of the Adelaid Planes. We

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 1>pay respect to elders past and present.