WEBVTT - 14: Do You Believe Me Now?

0:00:00.680 --> 0:00:06.440
<v Speaker 1>This podcast contains information and details relating to suicide. We

0:00:06.640 --> 0:00:11.799
<v Speaker 1>urge anyone struggling with their emotions to contact Lifeline on

0:00:12.000 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>thirteen eleven fourteen thirteen eleven fourteen or visit them at

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>lifeline dot org dot AU. A twenty four year old

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>devoted mother of two fleeing a violent relationship as a

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:45.240
<v Speaker 1>bags pack car running her daughters strapped into the backseat.

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 2>Mom told me that she needed to go back inside

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:49.880
<v Speaker 2>to grab something.

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Panic.

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 3>Amy is dead, Sir aim his dead?

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Eight confusion about five minutes they sit not to suicide.

0:00:56.680 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 4>One hundred percent. This is emergency.

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>What do you think is really the honest truth about Amy?

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 5>The Truth about Amy?

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 6>Episode fourteen.

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm Liam Bartlett.

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 6>And I'm Alison Sandy.

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 7>Female fifteen, jud female Bustleton female thirty eight.

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>This is the place, gender, and age of people who

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>have died in Western Australia this year as a result

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>of domestic violence. As their details are called out, loved

0:01:55.320 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>ones place a flour on a cardboard cutout, representing them

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to be precise right where their heart would be.

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 6>Every year in Perth, the Western Australian Center for Women's

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:14.639
<v Speaker 6>Safety and well Being holds a Silent March.

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 4>Stop Them, Silence, Stop.

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:21.920
<v Speaker 6>The violence, not only to honor those whose lives have

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 6>been lost at the hands of abuses, but to raise

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 6>awareness about how prevalent this is silence. So far this year,

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 6>there have been sixteen deaths in Wa alone, including Jennifer

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 6>and Gretel Patelchek Floris.

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 7>Eighteen Florians.

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Fifteen as their details are called. Twenty seven year old

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Ariel Bombara tearfully puts flowers to each of her friend's hearts.

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Jennifer was her mum's best friend, Gretel her daughter. They

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>were shot to death by Ariel's father, Mark Bombara at

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the end of his search for them. Live from Perth

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 1>seven Yews with Rick Garden and Susannika Good Evening.

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 8>For the first time we've heard what life was really

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 8>like under the roof of double murderer Mark Bombara. His

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 8>daughter Today detailed the reign of terror he inflicted on

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:32.239
<v Speaker 8>their family before he tried to hunt down his ex wife.

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Sadly, Ariel can't help but blame herself for what happened, knowing.

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 9>Two lives were taken instead of my own and my

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 9>mom's because I was too good at hiding from him.

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 9>And hating myself for never considering that he would kill

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 9>other people if he couldn't find us.

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 2>In front of a crowd of hundreds, Ariel Bombara describes

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 2>the actions of a monster, a monster that was her father.

0:03:58.480 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 4>My father was a.

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 9>Dictator, and his coercive and controlling behaviors were constant. I

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 9>remember being whipped with belts, tied to my chair until

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 9>I ate every piece of food on my plane. He

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 9>thought women were less than dogshit, and he made it

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 9>clear in front of his daughters.

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Aril knew her father was dangerous, and she and her

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 2>mother told police they feared that he would kill.

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:23.720
<v Speaker 9>After trying unsuccessfully to convince the police to take any

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 9>action to protect.

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 4>Us against him back in March, we had to disappear.

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 9>I knew the only way to make sure he couldn't

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 9>kill us was to make sure he couldn't find us.

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 2>Speaking at Today's March against Domestic and Family Violence, Bombara

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 2>recounted that horrific night in May when her father shot

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 2>dead her mother's best friend, Jennifer Ptelchek, and her eighteen

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 2>year old daughter in their flory at home before turning

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 2>the gun on himself. Police did not intervene sooner because

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 2>the insidious abuse that he inflicted leading up to the incident,

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 2>known as coercive control, is not illegal, and while the

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 2>government now agrees that it should be, it won't commit

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 2>to pushing through legislation.

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 9>Knowing that Jenny and Grettel lost their lives in our

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 9>places filled me with both devastation and an overwhelming sense

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 9>of duty to do everything.

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 4>In my power to prevent this from ever happening again.

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:19.279
<v Speaker 9>Last year, after a state of murders, the government developed

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:22.480
<v Speaker 9>the WA Family and Domestic Violence System Reform.

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 4>Plan, So now I'm asking what is being done to

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 4>implement it.

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 9>I believe in the reform of our systems so long

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 9>as there is a commitment to adequately fund it. I

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 9>believe that we as a collective have the power to

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 9>make a real difference. But to do so, we need

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 9>to believe in victims, survivors and their right.

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 4>To be heard and supported.

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:45.279
<v Speaker 9>We need to believe in the services and systems that

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 9>can help victims, and in the capacity for change in perpetrators.

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 4>I hope you'll join me in this fight, not just

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 4>for me, but for all of us.

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:57.799
<v Speaker 9>Because violence against women and children is everyone's problem.

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 6>Coerce of control. Laws protecting domestic violence victims have been

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 6>introduced in New South Wales and Queensland, but not w

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 6>Way except here. The Seven Years Journalist pushes Prevention of

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 6>Family and Domestic Violence Minister Sabine Winton to commit to

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 6>a date to roll out a similar legislation.

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 10>Coursive control.

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 11>Legislation could have saved these two people that were killed

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:27.160
<v Speaker 11>by this man. And you know that how I don't

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:29.840
<v Speaker 11>know that, but I know that it's a real, tangible,

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 11>actual consequence for people like this man. And why then

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 11>will you not commit to a date when these laws

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 11>will be introduced.

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:40.799
<v Speaker 12>Our government has permitted to criminalizing coersim control.

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:43.719
<v Speaker 13>We will do it in a staged way. We will

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 13>do it in a way where we will.

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 11>Know, we will get results, asking why you commit to

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 11>a date and will also make sure that when we

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 11>introduce it that we don't further put at risk victims survivors.

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 9>The system doesn't protect us and puts the owners on

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 9>women to managements that behavior rather than holding perpetrators accountable.

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 4>Natcy, can I ask your proper question?

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 6>Amy's mom, Nancy and her best friend Aaron Gower, were

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 6>also at this event and understand how frustrating it was

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 6>for arial bombards, and despite a new investigation into Amy's

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 6>death by Wa police, they remain fearful that police will

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 6>continue to ignore key evidence supporting homicide.

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 14>I know there were previous investigations, but more information has

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 14>come out now since the podcast has aired, that you know,

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 14>should have been found out while those other two investigations

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 14>were happening.

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 13>The investigation being mishandled by police.

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 4>How does that evenpact your family?

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 14>It's so hard, you know, we haven't been able to

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 14>grieve properly because we're fighting constantly. So it's just it's exhausting.

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 10>Really, I would love to hear the police commissioner apologize.

0:07:55.360 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 10>I don't want no letter of regret. I want an

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:02.239
<v Speaker 10>apology aim.

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 15>His daughters, apology.

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 10>They disserve an apology for the big mess up then

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:15.239
<v Speaker 10>I happened that night. We wouldn't be standing here if

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 10>it was conducted properly, but it wasn't.

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 16>With respect to coercive control, one single piece of legislation

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 16>will not solve this.

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Police Minister Paul Papalia responds to a scrum of journalists

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 1>asking if enough is being done to address domestic violence.

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:34.679
<v Speaker 11>I know that your officers know that they do all

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 11>this hard work and then it gets handed over to

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 11>the courts and then the magistrates slap these violent very signs. Right,

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:46.839
<v Speaker 11>So we can do a community education campaign, But what.

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 16>Of the magistrates When I've seen the training that's delivered

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 16>to officers in the academy and how significantly that has changed.

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 8>I'm not sure that the courts.

0:08:55.559 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 16>Are aware or have been provided the similar sort of training.

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 16>And I'll be encouraging the Attorney General to speak with

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 16>the heads of the different courts.

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 6>And the Chief Justice wasn't even here today.

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 16>Chief Justice is dedicated to dealing with family and domestic guidance,

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 16>so there's probably a reason for him.

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 3>Not Then we will talk to the town generally have

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 3>about it.

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 16>I have taken before, but I would like to see

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 16>magistrates and judges be forwarded the opportunity to witness what

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 16>I witnessed at the academy, so they understand that police training,

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 16>police capability has moved and has changed, and then the

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 16>courts can reflect that knowledge. At the moment, I'm not

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 16>sure that they are aware of what is provided to

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:37.439
<v Speaker 16>the police and then what is then presented to them

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 16>in the courts.

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>We'll have more on the WA Attorney General later in

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>this episode.

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:46.319
<v Speaker 5>Thank you for welcoming me. Laura Richards, criminal behavioral analysts

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 5>and expert in domestic violence and coercive control and stalking

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 5>and domestic commicide.

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Meanwhile, as promised, we caught up with internationally acclaimed criminal

0:09:56.280 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>behavioral analyst Laura Richards, who had a a lot to

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>say about domestic violence and the way it's being handled

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>by authorities.

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 5>Well, firstly, I just want to mention, having reviewed and

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 5>analyzed thousands of murders committed by men killing women and children,

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 5>it's not a drugs related issue. And I do want

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 5>to make that very clear because I have heard people

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 5>continuously say, oh, it's this, it's alcohol, it's drugs, and

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 5>actually it's not. That plays a role when it aggravates things.

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 5>It's an aggravating factor, but it's not a causal factor.

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 5>The behavior is the causal factor, and it's things around

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 5>power and control, a male entitlement, and the lack of accountability.

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 5>So when they are abusive and violent, there's no accountability

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:47.439
<v Speaker 5>through the criminal justice system.

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 6>And what that.

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 5>Basically says to the perpetrator is carry on, carry on,

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 5>because it's not important enough. And what that says to

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:57.319
<v Speaker 5>the female victim is you're not important enough and you

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 5>don't matter. So you have victims who then don't want

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 5>to report, and you have male perpetrators in the main

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 5>who just feel that they're untouchable and can do what

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 5>they want, set within a culture of misogyny and male entitlement.

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 5>So I do just want to make that clear, because

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 5>it's the same all across the world. There is nothing

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 5>new here other than the lack of accountability which has

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:25.839
<v Speaker 5>been consistent and the misogynistic elements that create male entitlement

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 5>and green light these offenders. So I think it is

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 5>important that you look at the data and the facts

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 5>and the evidence, and that experts talk about domestic violence

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 5>and domestic homicide and femicide and given very clear indication

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 5>of what we see in these cases, rather than people

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 5>just speculating or quontificating because they had one case and

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 5>there was a drug element to it and therefore they

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 5>think it is drug related. It's an aggravating feature, but

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 5>it's not causal.

0:11:55.640 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Laura acknowledgers frontline emergency officers often to make snap decisions,

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 1>which is why their training is so integral.

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:07.319
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's what I used to see when I trained detectives,

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 5>and I'd go up to detective training school and we'd

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 5>have one case, and a detective before me would talk

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 5>to the incoming detectives as if that one case would

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 5>repeat again and again and that was just one case.

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 5>You know, It's like a case of false allegation, where

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 5>you say, false allegations always look like this, and then

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 5>it becomes the norm where that's not the case at all.

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 5>You have to look at lots of cases together, which

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 5>I've spent my career doing looking at thousands of domestic

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 5>violence murders, and that's what I've spent my time at

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:40.559
<v Speaker 5>New Scotland Yard doing of unraveling the psychological autopsy of

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 5>what's gone on so that we can get into intervention

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 5>and prevention, so that we do it through data, not

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 5>just through the prism of murder, but look at other

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 5>cases as well, so that we understand what the patterns

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 5>look like, so that we can get into early identification,

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 5>assessment and management. And I think sometimes people are just

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:02.440
<v Speaker 5>overconfident in airing their one case or there are two

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 5>cases or a handful of cases, and thinks that that

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 5>just replicates and therefore you get these generalizations which really

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 5>aren't good. I've much rather the experts were spoken to

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 5>in this niche, and I think in Australia that's been

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 5>one of the problems of not listening to the experts

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 5>who do this day in day out, and they should

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 5>be advising on domestic homicides and so called suicides. They

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 5>should be the one the fatality reviews. And that was

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 5>a process I started at New Scotland Yard and then

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 5>it became a national process of domestic homicide review where

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 5>we made it very clear within the legislation experts should

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 5>be co opted to sit on those groups to give

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 5>that expertise because a lot of people still don't understand

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 5>co werse of control and stalking and it's really important

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 5>that we do have that expert voice that's victim led,

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 5>because obviously we do have it oftentimes the cases where

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 5>we get too focused on the perpetrators where we must

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 5>talk about the victim. And what I really like about

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 5>what you've been doing for Amy is giving her a

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 5>voice and a voice that she hasn't had, although she's

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:15.080
<v Speaker 5>had relatives trying to bang the drama. Actually it needed

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 5>a much bigger platform to say, we'll hang on a minute,

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 5>are we asking the right questions here? Is there a

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 5>critical thinking process and a critical lens that we need

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 5>to apply, And this is a case which really lends

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 5>itself well to having that critical lens and having experts

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 5>talk about what we see in these types of cases

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 5>and what were the questions that should have been asked

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 5>at the time.

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 6>So I'm glad you've mentioned that because the other issue

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 6>that we have with this case is the feeling from

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 6>the family, and I think they've got a good reason

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 6>to feel this way that WI Police, given what happened

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 6>at the beginning, that they don't feel that they can

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 6>trust them to carry the case further, even to the

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 6>point now they're reinvestigating. I guess is that something that

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 6>you've come across a bit where you know that's distrust

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 6>are suppose of authorities.

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, and from everything I've seen in this case, there's

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 5>good reason to distrust the authorities, and it's one of

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 5>the reasons when I was at New Scotland Yard we

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 5>started independent advisory groups in the wake of Stephen Lawrence

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 5>being killed and the Metropolitan Police was found through a

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 5>public inquiry to be institutionally racist, and so the Racial

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 5>and Violent Crime Task Force was set up, and within

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 5>that the Adeputy Assistant Commissioner John Grieve had the foresight

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 5>to create critical friends, so people who would critically and

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 5>independently evaluate us and our decisions, both at the local

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 5>level and the strategic level. And I think that that's

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 5>really important to ensure that you don't become myopic and

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 5>you haven't got everybody in the room agreeing with you,

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 5>because ultimately, what I've seen in this case, in Amy's

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 5>case in particular, is you had two detectives who were

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 5>experienced attend the scene, and you had two junior officers

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 5>who were detectives who were in training six months in

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 5>and then you have a lead detective, Detective Kirkman, saying

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 5>one thing and then everyone agreeing with him. And that

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 5>happens a lot, and it's in their career future to agree,

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 5>particularly when we go back in the day, rather than

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 5>having a dissenting voice who might say we need to

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 5>question this, we actually do need to speak to other

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 5>members of the family and get a history here. We

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 5>should really do the toxicology, we should do the forensics,

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:40.239
<v Speaker 5>we need to know in her bag, there was the passport.

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 5>We need to think about the fact that she was

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 5>actually exiting the relationship with the children, and the bags

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 5>packed and gifts, and that she had future planned. We

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 5>need to question the crime scene. And actually, we can't

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 5>make this determination in fifteen minutes. Let's take our time.

0:16:56.720 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Laura then refers to the Internal Affairs Unit report relating

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to the conduct of detectives Kirkman and Wiederman in Amy's case.

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>You'll recall that investigation found that they both neglected their

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>duty in their handling of Amy's case and were referred

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>to the Integrity Review Panel for consideration of an Assistant

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 1>Commissioner's warning notes. Doesn't sound like much, does it.

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 5>There was a detective I think it was Detective Pover

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 5>who effectively said when he was interviewed by Internal Affairs

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:36.919
<v Speaker 5>that he didn't remember anything because he didn't take notes

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 5>and he was six months in I probation. He said

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 5>he didn't speak to witnesses, he didn't go into the house,

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 5>he didn't assess the scene, but he did believe that

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 5>David and Gareth were telling the truth. But he can't

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 5>recall the reasons for the determination that it was a

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 5>non suspicious death. But he disagreed it was a premature

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 5>decision to say it was non suspicious and he had

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 5>very little recall, but he seems to remember vividly driving

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 5>away from the scene, happy the correct decision had been made.

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 5>That is confounding to me, because you know, I have

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 5>reviewed many, many cases and for him not to remember

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 5>so many things but remembered that it was the right decision.

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 5>And that's the problem when you've got everyone agreeing, but

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 5>you've got three uniformed officers saying differently and that their

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:32.120
<v Speaker 5>voices weren't heard. So that's also why you have these

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 5>critical friends the advisory groups that New Scotland Yard started,

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 5>but also on the domestic homicide review panels, we have

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 5>independent advisors and family members who are also there to

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 5>give a very clear understanding of what was going on

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 5>because we know that victims were talked to them before

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:53.639
<v Speaker 5>they talked to the police, and so it's really important

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:56.399
<v Speaker 5>if you attend a scene where a young woman, a

0:18:56.480 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 5>mother as well, has suddenly and unexpectedly died in such

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 5>unusual circumstances, and yet further questions weren't asked of the

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:09.640
<v Speaker 5>men who were at the scene at the time, and

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:14.119
<v Speaker 5>a detective who doesn't interview them determines that there witnesses

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:18.879
<v Speaker 5>are not suspects. That is a very confusing thing to me,

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:23.360
<v Speaker 5>because you would want to get as much information as

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 5>possible in order to make an informed decision and write

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 5>up your decision log I mean, we're talking about twenty fourteen,

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 5>We're not talking about the nineteen seventies, the nineteen eighties,

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 5>whereas the uniform officers who were first on the scene

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 5>were very uncomfortable with what they saw, given that the

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 5>engine was running, the children were in the car, everything

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 5>was packed up. There were signs of a violent struggle,

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 5>not necessarily in the bedroom, but there was glass smashed.

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:57.160
<v Speaker 5>One of the men gave an account that Amy tried

0:19:57.200 --> 0:20:01.640
<v Speaker 5>to head butt David Simmons. And you've got a door

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 5>knob missing, and you've got a young mother who, for

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 5>all intense purposes, police are being told, had packed the

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 5>car up but went back into the house and then

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 5>shot herself in the face, which is again highly unusual

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:20.360
<v Speaker 5>for that to happen. That's not something I always look

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 5>for the one percent of cases, and they are out there.

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 5>But for me, this was all the things that I

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:29.119
<v Speaker 5>found out initially, which is what led me to post

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 5>on social media was that she died suddenly and unexpectedly,

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:38.919
<v Speaker 5>and two men's narrative were believed and they were treated

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:39.719
<v Speaker 5>as witnesses.

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:42.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it is a standing. And of course the one

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 6>officer who did stand his ground and keep saying to

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:48.440
<v Speaker 6>this day that he believes that suicide, he's gone. He's

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 6>no longer in the police force. So obviously it's not

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:52.880
<v Speaker 6>good to go against a grain.

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:55.399
<v Speaker 5>It's not It can be very career limiting, and I

0:20:55.480 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 5>know that from having worked in it. The institutionalization is

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:05.880
<v Speaker 5>profound and severe and if you have a dissenting voice,

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 5>you do tend to be shut down. And that's highly

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 5>problematic when you're talking about people's lives, and more in

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:16.399
<v Speaker 5>particular women's lives, because I do think that there is

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 5>a huge issue and a poor trap record of responding

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 5>to women, and WA police have that same trap record,

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 5>And anyone can just do a Google search and find

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:31.439
<v Speaker 5>three cases immediately where Lynn Cannon who was threatened by

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 5>her ex partner threatened by him with a knife, a

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:39.159
<v Speaker 5>call to police was made, they didn't respond, and now

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 5>it's just been announced that an inquest is underway. Could

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 5>WA police have done more then? Another case, the legal

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:48.920
<v Speaker 5>reason she hasn't been named, but a domestic violence call

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 5>out and yet the police didn't respond and she was

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:55.199
<v Speaker 5>killed by Warwick Walker Bear in twenty twenty one, and

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 5>more recently the Ariel Bombara case who alerted police that

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:03.400
<v Speaker 5>her father was a threat and she had called three times,

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 5>was concerned, and he ended up killing a mother and

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:10.640
<v Speaker 5>a daughter, Jenny and Gretel who was eighteen, who were

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 5>trying to protect her mother. And the trap record of

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:20.120
<v Speaker 5>not believing women and not responding everyone sees it. And

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 5>that's the point when people say, well, why didn't she

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 5>call if there was domestic violence, no cause to police?

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 5>Oh okay, no history. So it is complex, but when

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 5>snap decisions are made at a scene within fifteen minutes,

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 5>you're going to catch a cold on that. Ultimately, with

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 5>these cases without a decision log clearly written up, and

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 5>you're missing the very unusual circumstances of a car running

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:49.360
<v Speaker 5>with children in it, with future plans being laid down

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 5>to exit, separation and finality being high risk factors and

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 5>coerci of control to femicide, and women are much more

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 5>likely to be killed. Six percent of murders happen on separation,

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:07.199
<v Speaker 5>and yet they made a very quick judgment that this

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:11.199
<v Speaker 5>was a suicide without knowing any of the history, and

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 5>that is extremely concerning.

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:17.399
<v Speaker 6>Okay, so how can the situation be redeemed? I mean,

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 6>I guess the point I say here is they're reinvestigating.

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 6>There was evidence that was misterior ignored, which is what

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 6>we've highlighted in the podcast, as well as new evidence.

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 6>But there still seems to be this reluctance to debate

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:36.119
<v Speaker 6>from the suicide theory. And in this case, it comes

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:40.160
<v Speaker 6>down to ultimately one man who will determine whether this

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 6>can proceed, and he's the Director of Public Prosecutions. The

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:46.879
<v Speaker 6>police will, as I say, they'll prefer an update, a brief,

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:49.160
<v Speaker 6>he will consider it. They have a little coverletter giving

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 6>their thoughts and then yay or nay, and they generally

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 6>give about two sentences saying I don't think this should

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 6>proceed or there's not enough to proceed. Yeah.

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 5>So that shows the lack of transparent and in the UK,

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 5>what was decided in twenty thirteen was that there would

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 5>be a right to review process built in to prosecutors' decisions,

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 5>where the victim or family members could request a right

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 5>to review within a six I think it's a six

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 5>month period if there is a determination not to prosecute,

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:27.880
<v Speaker 5>and it has to be explained as to why either

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:30.639
<v Speaker 5>a prosecution has stopped or a decision has been made

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 5>not to prosecute. And I think there should be that

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:39.640
<v Speaker 5>transparency now because people deserve to understand with such serious

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 5>decisions in every part of I call it the criminal

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:46.879
<v Speaker 5>legal system rather than the criminal justice system because there

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 5>seems to be an absence of a focus on justice,

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 5>which is why it comes much more down to the

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:58.120
<v Speaker 5>criminal and legal matters relating to cases. But I think

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 5>that that would lend itself well in US. I mean,

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:03.879
<v Speaker 5>normally you do tend to adopt things that are brought

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:06.639
<v Speaker 5>in as good practice, and I think that with a

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:10.120
<v Speaker 5>case like this, there should be transparency in that decision.

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 5>And also I would want to know what exactly the

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 5>brief look like, because you know, is there a thorough

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:20.880
<v Speaker 5>reinvestigation or is it just a cursory review.

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:23.639
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, there's a lot to take in its complex.

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:27.120
<v Speaker 5>It is, but cases have been prosecuted with a lot

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 5>less and therefore, you know, how do you make that decision?

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 5>And I notice within many of the documents that you

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 5>sent me. There was a document written by a clinical

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:45.639
<v Speaker 5>psychologist that I believe went to the coroner's in quest,

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 5>and I have many questions about Chris Geeson's report. It

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 5>states that they're a clinical psychologist, but I believe that

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 5>they're also a detective senior sergeant within the police working

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:03.439
<v Speaker 5>in the Detectives Command. So my initial question, as I

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:07.160
<v Speaker 5>always like to understand, is what exactly is your background?

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 5>Are you a clinical psychologist or a police officer? First

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 5>and foremost are you independent? Because an expert who is

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 5>independent and outside the police would request a very clear

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:21.919
<v Speaker 5>terms of reference that you would like me to do

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 5>AB and C and I have a very clear scope

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 5>of doing this work, and most independent experts would say,

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 5>actually to make this level of determination, I will need

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 5>other documentation. So it was ostensibly a three page report

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:39.680
<v Speaker 5>that was written in March twenty nineteen, with no clear

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 5>terms of reference, that stated that they were a behavioral analyst.

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 5>And I have to say I have never in my

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 5>career seen report like that before, where it starts with

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 5>the conclusion that David Simmons is telling the truth, which

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:59.159
<v Speaker 5>is based on pre prepared testimony with no understanding of

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:03.919
<v Speaker 5>baseline behind. But the determination is there's no inconsistencies in

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:08.160
<v Speaker 5>his account and that his emotional reactions were congruent. Well,

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 5>I could interpret the same thing in a very different fashion.

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:16.679
<v Speaker 5>I Chris Geeson wrote that he showed intense distress and

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 5>disbelief and horror when he came across Amy, and that

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:25.119
<v Speaker 5>he appeared to be in shock. And Simmons said the same,

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:27.119
<v Speaker 5>that he appeared to be in shock, and that he

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:30.640
<v Speaker 5>said fuck, fuck, fuck, and that was indicative of him

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 5>being in shock and telling the truth. Well, I could

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:39.919
<v Speaker 5>also read that same behavior. Whatever happened unraveled in the moment,

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:43.399
<v Speaker 5>you can interpret it in different ways. But the last

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 5>part of the document focuses solely on Amy's mental health.

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:51.360
<v Speaker 5>All the while this report writer is focusing on her

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 5>mental health. The report writer fails to note at any

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 5>point David Simmons' mental health and his problem with alcohol

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 5>and drugs, and that according to other independent witnesses, they

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:08.360
<v Speaker 5>said that when he drinks and when he does drugs,

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 5>he gets very bad tempered and that's when he devalues

0:28:12.320 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 5>and name calls it Amy. But yet there's no mention

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 5>of that at all. So you've got this epistemic imbalance

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:21.640
<v Speaker 5>in this three page document that concludes it's much more

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:25.119
<v Speaker 5>likely she ended her life. To me, that document is

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:28.640
<v Speaker 5>not worth the paper it's written on. There's no behavioral analysis,

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 5>nothing about the crime scene assessment that I would expect

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:34.639
<v Speaker 5>a behavioral analyst to comment on. There's nothing on the

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 5>history of the relationship and what other people said. There's

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 5>nothing about domestic abuse, there's nothing about the high risk factors.

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 5>All of these things are omissions that are problematic in

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 5>my view having written reports to help investigators with their inquiries,

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 5>and I don't know how much weight that document was

0:28:55.920 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 5>given within the coronial inquest. When you see someone, you know,

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 5>a clinical psychologist, putting a report together like this, and

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 5>you know Simmons did tell the police, as did I

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 5>think Gareth also said the same thing, that she wasn't

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 5>in a happy state of mind, and Kirkman commented on that.

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 5>But yet that is negated in that report. And also

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 5>what's negated as a triple zero call where he says,

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 5>David Simmons, I've got two kids and my wife just

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 5>shot herself, my wife without a name, which is distancing.

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 5>That's what we understand that to be. And can you

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 5>please just come and take her away or do something. Well,

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 5>that is a highly in my view, inappropriate reaction to

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 5>ask on a triple zero call to remove her body

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 5>like she's a piece of garbage, just to remove her

0:29:56.960 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 5>with no real emotion. That stands out to me. And

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 5>yet this clinical psychologist is saying that his response was

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 5>consistent with it being a suicide and his in shock.

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 5>So I think for me, there's very serious questions about

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 5>that particular report and what purpose was it really looking

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 5>to serve.

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Deputy Coroner Sarah Linton addresses the report by doctor Geson

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>in her findings.

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 17>Doctor Chris Geson, senior sergeant in the WA Police, who

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 17>is a practicing psychologist with a PhD in clinical psychology

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 17>and behavioral analyst at Major Crime, viewed the electronic recordings

0:30:34.760 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 17>of Simmons and Prices interviews and provided a psychological opinion.

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 17>Doctor Geson did not observe any seminal inconsistencies in simmons account,

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 17>even with the retelling parts, and did not detect any

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 17>obvious behavior that suggested he was censoring his disclosures or

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 17>constructing a story. Reports of his actions and behavior at

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 17>the time of the event were also felt to be

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 17>consistent with the account, and Doctor Geson did not believe

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 17>there was sufficient time lag to allow for any staging

0:31:03.080 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 17>and colluding between David Simmons and Gareth Price. Accordingly, doctor

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 17>Geeson was inclined to believe David Simmons' version of events

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 17>and expressed the opinion that both David and Gareth were

0:31:13.880 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 17>telling the truth in their interviews and statements. The detective's

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 17>reinvestigating also did not find there was any deliberate action

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 17>on the part of either witness to try and deceive them,

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 17>and inconsistencies between their accounts were felt to be explainable.

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 17>Doctor Geeson also reviewed the evidence of Amy's mental state

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:36.479
<v Speaker 17>and the external factors preying upon her mind. Doctor Geeson

0:31:36.560 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 17>found that there were ongoing factors suggesting Amy was depressed

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 17>at the time of her death, with the onset of

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 17>depression appearing to coincide with the birth of her second child,

0:31:46.080 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 17>and then being exacerbated by her years in an unstable,

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 17>controlling and abusive relationship with David Simmons, social isolation, financial stress,

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 17>and health issues. Doctor Geeson noted that depression is known

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 17>to be the strongest predictor of suicide. While Amy did

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 17>not appear suicidal in the week prior to her death,

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 17>and made no such disclosures to friends and family. She

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 17>did show risk factors such as impulsivity, aggression, helplessness, and hopelessness.

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 17>The immediate circumstances prior to her death, involving the violent

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 17>argument with David and the potential breakdown of their relationship,

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 17>made the possibility of a suicide attempt by Amy more likely.

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 17>Doctor Geeson also speculated that Amy's use of the antidepressants

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 17>a tulepram could have been a factor, so.

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Her report does appear to have been given weight at

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the inquest. Now back to our interview with Laura.

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 6>I guess from your perspective, it's the whole picture, isn't it.

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:55.960
<v Speaker 6>It's not just singular elements it is.

0:32:56.040 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 5>It's the totality of the circumstances when you look at everything.

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 5>Also weighed against men being given the benefit of the doubt.

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 5>And that's something that I see consistently in cases, and

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 5>there have been many cases that I could quote where

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 5>he says it's one thing and he's believed, but yet

0:33:19.000 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 5>there's evidence that it's something else, and the female victim

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:24.720
<v Speaker 5>is not believed. And we've seen it with murders like

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 5>Robert Trigg who killed two women, and the first woman

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:30.480
<v Speaker 5>who he killed was Susan Nicholson, and he claimed he

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 5>just rolled over on her in the night and she

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 5>died and Sussex police said okay then, and they believed

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 5>his narrative without any real investigation. Were five years later

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:45.360
<v Speaker 5>he killed another woman, Caroline Devlin. How many passes do

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 5>men get? I have many of these cases where a

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 5>man's narrative is just believed just because he's a man,

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 5>and we have to move away from that. We have

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 5>to start to assess the evidence and analyze in context

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 5>the history of the relationship, because it is highly relevant.

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 5>When you are called to a twenty four year old

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:10.560
<v Speaker 5>woman's death and the car is running and there were

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:12.879
<v Speaker 5>two children in the car, and she's called her mother

0:34:12.960 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 5>to exit, and there's finality that she's going, and then

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:22.840
<v Speaker 5>she's found allegedly having blown her head off, which I

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 5>can't think of one case where that's happened in my

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:28.960
<v Speaker 5>almost thirty year career. There are those one percent of cases,

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 5>as I mentioned, but you should question everything, and the

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:37.320
<v Speaker 5>history of that relationship is incredibly relevant. So if you

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:41.319
<v Speaker 5>have seen a pattern of when he drinks, there is

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 5>abuse and violence. Well you would look at that relationship.

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 5>What's he like when he doesn't drink. Well, there's coercive control.

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:52.440
<v Speaker 5>He's controlling and he devalues her. Still okay, so he's

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 5>still abusive with or without drink. But here we have

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 5>a situation where he is in drink. Why is it

0:34:59.040 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 5>that his narrative is just believed With a friend, two

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 5>of them are treated as witnesses. Often women are just

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 5>devalued and written off as well, they were crazy, Oh,

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 5>they took antidepressants. There's a reason why there are investigative protocols,

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 5>and particularly if for firearms involved, there's a reason why

0:35:18.640 --> 0:35:22.239
<v Speaker 5>those investigative standards are there to ensure that this type

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:23.400
<v Speaker 5>of thing doesn't happen.

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:26.600
<v Speaker 6>How are we doing with this case? Is their progress

0:35:26.640 --> 0:35:27.800
<v Speaker 6>being made that you can see?

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think there have been some in roads, but

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:32.760
<v Speaker 5>it hasn't been quick enough and it hasn't been urgent enough.

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 5>And when we look at the epistemic imbalance of one

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:41.400
<v Speaker 5>of the Australian cities where a man was killed a

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:44.400
<v Speaker 5>one punch kill and the city was shut down and

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:47.920
<v Speaker 5>new laws come in when things like that happen and

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:52.800
<v Speaker 5>yet we don't have urgent change happening. So the short

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 5>answer is, yes, we've made some inroads New South Wales

0:35:57.239 --> 0:36:00.279
<v Speaker 5>criminalizing coercive control and it takes time for that to

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:03.440
<v Speaker 5>take effect. Queensland doing the same. Really, it should be

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 5>a federal law. So it's all across Australia, and I

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:09.759
<v Speaker 5>think the general consensus is that it's just not quick enough.

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:12.960
<v Speaker 5>There's a lot of glossy documents being written. But when

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:15.440
<v Speaker 5>you've still got people saying, oh, this is a drugs problem,

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:18.439
<v Speaker 5>or this is an unemployment problem, rather than actually it's

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:22.880
<v Speaker 5>a male problem, and we need men to solve that problem,

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:26.400
<v Speaker 5>rather than saying it's violence against women. It's a women's

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 5>safety issue and therefore the owner's falls to women. It's

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:33.719
<v Speaker 5>not our burden to create this change. We actually need

0:36:33.800 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 5>male leaders and within the community to create change, to

0:36:38.160 --> 0:36:41.439
<v Speaker 5>help young boys to break those patterns and to break

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 5>the cycle of misogyny and sexism and chauvinism. And that's

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:48.839
<v Speaker 5>where it begins. We've got to start young with young

0:36:48.920 --> 0:36:51.960
<v Speaker 5>boys changing that cycle and doing it at every level.

0:36:52.000 --> 0:36:55.320
<v Speaker 5>And really, Alison, it takes men to do it, not women.

0:36:55.600 --> 0:37:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Laura reiterates the need for independent expert analysis in cold

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:02.840
<v Speaker 1>cases such as Amy's, and.

0:37:02.760 --> 0:37:07.439
<v Speaker 5>If you've been part of making decisions that are under

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 5>review and being criticized, it's hard for the most evolved

0:37:12.239 --> 0:37:16.880
<v Speaker 5>person amongst us to not be conflicted and not be biased.

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:20.320
<v Speaker 5>And that's what it takes. It's not about finger pointing.

0:37:20.360 --> 0:37:22.880
<v Speaker 5>When we brought in the domestic homicide review process, when

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:25.359
<v Speaker 5>I work with Harriet Harmon, the Solicitor General, it wasn't

0:37:25.400 --> 0:37:28.319
<v Speaker 5>about pointing the finger to blame. It was about really

0:37:28.440 --> 0:37:32.880
<v Speaker 5>understanding intervention and prevention and getting upstream of things, and

0:37:32.920 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 5>that's always been the onus. It's not been about litigation.

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:39.840
<v Speaker 5>So it's that changing that culture that we really do

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:41.799
<v Speaker 5>want to get better at what we do. And when

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 5>I ran the homicide prevention unit, you know, some people

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 5>really loved it, but a lot of people didn't because

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:47.759
<v Speaker 5>it meant my team and I were going to be

0:37:47.760 --> 0:37:50.560
<v Speaker 5>reviewing a lot of decisions that were made. So, you know,

0:37:50.640 --> 0:37:53.240
<v Speaker 5>I have the head wounds from banging my head against

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 5>the proverbial brick wall trying to create change. But it

0:37:57.239 --> 0:38:00.719
<v Speaker 5>does take leaders to agree that this is what we

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 5>need to do and have independent experts sat there who

0:38:04.840 --> 0:38:08.320
<v Speaker 5>really understand this area. Far better than other people around

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:11.840
<v Speaker 5>the table and family members. You know, we hear so

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:14.840
<v Speaker 5>much more. We learned so much more about victimology and

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:17.880
<v Speaker 5>what was really going on. Rather than saying, oh, do

0:38:17.920 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 5>we have any history of domestic violence? Callouts to the address.

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:24.040
<v Speaker 5>You know, that does not give a good indication of

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 5>whether there is a domestic violence history between two people.

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 5>You must talk to others to get a real sense

0:38:31.560 --> 0:38:34.880
<v Speaker 5>of what's going on, and you know it's not always easy.

0:38:35.000 --> 0:38:37.359
<v Speaker 5>You have to leave your ego at the door. And

0:38:37.920 --> 0:38:40.239
<v Speaker 5>what I saw in the police when I was in it,

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:44.360
<v Speaker 5>and equally with Amy's case, is bro culture. The detectives arrive,

0:38:44.640 --> 0:38:47.400
<v Speaker 5>they're the bro culture together. One says one thing and

0:38:47.400 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 5>everyone just follows suit. But you've also got the bro

0:38:50.600 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 5>culture of David Simmons and two of his good friends

0:38:53.719 --> 0:38:57.319
<v Speaker 5>who are around at the house at the time where

0:38:57.360 --> 0:39:00.080
<v Speaker 5>all of this unfolded, and yet they're being given the

0:39:00.160 --> 0:39:03.560
<v Speaker 5>benefit of the doubt. Well, where's Amy's benefit of the doubt?

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:08.399
<v Speaker 5>Where's the critical questioning for her? Where's her group saying well,

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:11.960
<v Speaker 5>hang on? And that's been her sister and her mother

0:39:12.440 --> 0:39:15.080
<v Speaker 5>and others, But it's fallen on death is for far

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:18.839
<v Speaker 5>too long, and it really shouldn't be this hard when

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:21.239
<v Speaker 5>you're up against that brick wall. It shouldn't be this

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:24.480
<v Speaker 5>hard in the day of transparency and openness, and people

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:27.200
<v Speaker 5>should be wanting to get better at what they do.

0:39:27.239 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 5>We've got some learning to do here, and we want

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 5>to engage rather than being defensive and circling the wagons.

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 6>One mass thing. They'll argue that you've got to have

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:39.360
<v Speaker 6>a resumption of innocence and that they need a primer

0:39:39.400 --> 0:39:41.480
<v Speaker 6>facy case, which they say, isn't it.

0:39:41.520 --> 0:39:44.680
<v Speaker 5>Well, you never get a primer facy case without investigating it.

0:39:45.520 --> 0:39:48.239
<v Speaker 5>I've never seen one yet. It doesn't land on your

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:51.000
<v Speaker 5>lap with a nice big pink bow on it. You

0:39:51.120 --> 0:39:54.560
<v Speaker 5>have to ask questions irrespective of what case it is.

0:39:55.239 --> 0:39:58.080
<v Speaker 5>That's why you're an investigator, and you have to look

0:39:58.120 --> 0:40:02.920
<v Speaker 5>at everything at that scene the way that people behave

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:08.520
<v Speaker 5>the history. You have to go through the forensic process

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:12.080
<v Speaker 5>because there are certain areas that are not in your wheelhouse.

0:40:12.560 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 5>You have to have the results of the toxicology, the clothing,

0:40:16.520 --> 0:40:20.120
<v Speaker 5>the gunshot residue. You have to do all of these

0:40:20.160 --> 0:40:24.560
<v Speaker 5>things to be sure that your determination is the right one.

0:40:24.600 --> 0:40:29.040
<v Speaker 5>And that's about being having a critical mind and an

0:40:29.040 --> 0:40:33.719
<v Speaker 5>open mind at the outset of investigation, and you have

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:37.360
<v Speaker 5>to look at building the case rather than looking to

0:40:37.600 --> 0:40:41.719
<v Speaker 5>confirm your initial assumption. And I believe it was the

0:40:41.800 --> 0:40:47.560
<v Speaker 5>latter here that there's confirmation bias of just the quick easy, Okay,

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 5>it looks to be this, and I'll read the statements

0:40:51.680 --> 0:40:55.320
<v Speaker 5>just to check it's this, rather than having professional curiosity.

0:40:55.840 --> 0:40:59.960
<v Speaker 5>And you have to have that professional curiosity an inquiring mind.

0:41:00.320 --> 0:41:02.399
<v Speaker 6>But it's a balance of probabilities right as well.

0:41:02.520 --> 0:41:04.560
<v Speaker 5>You have to look at the micro and the macro,

0:41:05.239 --> 0:41:08.520
<v Speaker 5>and timelines are very important and sequence of events. And

0:41:08.880 --> 0:41:10.439
<v Speaker 5>I have to say, I can't think of one case

0:41:10.480 --> 0:41:13.279
<v Speaker 5>that I've advised on where you get the timeline and

0:41:13.320 --> 0:41:16.320
<v Speaker 5>sequence of events within an hour. It just doesn't happen.

0:41:16.360 --> 0:41:19.280
<v Speaker 5>You have a starburst of at least seventy two hours

0:41:20.040 --> 0:41:22.759
<v Speaker 5>where all of that activity takes place. So even if

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:25.640
<v Speaker 5>it's seventy two hours that you give it to, actually

0:41:25.719 --> 0:41:29.839
<v Speaker 5>have lines of investigation to be sure within your decision log.

0:41:30.800 --> 0:41:33.640
<v Speaker 5>You know, these are very serious decisions. A woman's life

0:41:34.080 --> 0:41:39.040
<v Speaker 5>with two young children. She mattered, She mattered enough to

0:41:39.120 --> 0:41:42.759
<v Speaker 5>give it longer than fifteen minutes or an hour.

0:41:43.239 --> 0:41:45.920
<v Speaker 6>Well, we had the emails from place only from as

0:41:45.960 --> 0:41:48.760
<v Speaker 6>late as last year where they say they were foy

0:41:49.360 --> 0:41:51.920
<v Speaker 6>and they say that, you know, when they announced the

0:41:52.360 --> 0:41:55.080
<v Speaker 6>a million dollar reward treating it as a homicide walk

0:41:55.080 --> 0:41:57.560
<v Speaker 6>because also opened finding they said it was a saucer.

0:41:57.760 --> 0:42:00.239
<v Speaker 6>So they have seen your officers still in the so

0:42:00.480 --> 0:42:02.720
<v Speaker 6>Wa Police saying it was a surce.

0:42:03.000 --> 0:42:05.800
<v Speaker 5>I would imagine that that is still very much in

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 5>the crime report, the decision log, that that's still very

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:12.440
<v Speaker 5>much in there, and that's why they're still saying those things.

0:42:12.480 --> 0:42:17.160
<v Speaker 5>But that again fights itself and having someone you know,

0:42:17.280 --> 0:42:20.960
<v Speaker 5>who's small and of a slight build. But even where

0:42:21.000 --> 0:42:24.360
<v Speaker 5>she was found tucked into that area behind the door,

0:42:25.160 --> 0:42:29.000
<v Speaker 5>that's highly unusual for someone to end their life and

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:32.759
<v Speaker 5>be wedged into that tiny area, and the way that

0:42:32.840 --> 0:42:36.000
<v Speaker 5>she did it, I can't think of any case where

0:42:36.040 --> 0:42:38.560
<v Speaker 5>that's happened with the children that are outside, with the

0:42:38.600 --> 0:42:42.520
<v Speaker 5>mother saying the children were her life, and everything that

0:42:42.560 --> 0:42:45.440
<v Speaker 5>she said to friends and everything that her mindset was

0:42:45.480 --> 0:42:48.520
<v Speaker 5>about was resilience. And I can tell you I know

0:42:49.239 --> 0:42:53.880
<v Speaker 5>no one stronger than single mothers. Single mothers who raise

0:42:54.040 --> 0:42:57.719
<v Speaker 5>children are the strongest kind, and certainly when you add

0:42:57.719 --> 0:43:01.200
<v Speaker 5>in domestic violence. They tend to be very resilient, and

0:43:01.200 --> 0:43:06.239
<v Speaker 5>it's their children that keep them resilient. So knowing that,

0:43:06.480 --> 0:43:12.440
<v Speaker 5>it's incredibly bizarre, puzzling, unfathomable of why she would end

0:43:12.440 --> 0:43:14.800
<v Speaker 5>her life. But I wouldn't expect any e mail detective

0:43:14.840 --> 0:43:17.920
<v Speaker 5>to think like that. I wouldn't expect them to go

0:43:17.960 --> 0:43:19.720
<v Speaker 5>to that scene and think, well, hang on a minute,

0:43:20.520 --> 0:43:23.360
<v Speaker 5>let's check the history. Oh, look, she survived a car accident.

0:43:23.600 --> 0:43:26.120
<v Speaker 5>She was resilient. Then hang on. Other people are saying

0:43:26.120 --> 0:43:29.520
<v Speaker 5>about strangulation, life to the throat, all these things that

0:43:29.520 --> 0:43:33.480
<v Speaker 5>have happened. She's been resilient, then being pregnant and being assaulted,

0:43:33.760 --> 0:43:37.799
<v Speaker 5>she's resilient then. So now she's saying, I'm leaving. She's

0:43:37.840 --> 0:43:40.920
<v Speaker 5>going to come into some money. She's finally said I'm going.

0:43:41.320 --> 0:43:43.719
<v Speaker 5>She's got her mother a place to stay, she's got

0:43:43.719 --> 0:43:47.279
<v Speaker 5>her passport, she's packed everything in future planned, even with

0:43:47.360 --> 0:43:51.799
<v Speaker 5>gifts for her daughter, and they're about to go. Why

0:43:51.840 --> 0:43:54.560
<v Speaker 5>would she end her life then? That just makes no

0:43:54.719 --> 0:43:57.239
<v Speaker 5>sense to me. When she had been earlier getting a

0:43:57.280 --> 0:44:01.520
<v Speaker 5>recipe for pe and ham soup, seeing friends, her mindset

0:44:01.680 --> 0:44:07.239
<v Speaker 5>wasn't of suicidal ideation. Her mindset was of leaving him,

0:44:07.480 --> 0:44:10.719
<v Speaker 5>and it was exacerbated in alcohol because she saw the

0:44:10.800 --> 0:44:14.080
<v Speaker 5>same thing from him again of the alcohol and putting

0:44:14.080 --> 0:44:18.759
<v Speaker 5>alcohol before the family. They have another huge argument and

0:44:18.800 --> 0:44:22.000
<v Speaker 5>she's assaulted and she's upset, but she is going to leave.

0:44:22.200 --> 0:44:24.960
<v Speaker 5>She did all of those things to exit that relationship.

0:44:25.000 --> 0:44:27.120
<v Speaker 5>I think you have got the perfect storm here of

0:44:27.160 --> 0:44:30.640
<v Speaker 5>all of these things happening together. I don't believe it

0:44:30.680 --> 0:44:34.240
<v Speaker 5>was any one thing as to why they made these decisions.

0:44:34.320 --> 0:44:37.320
<v Speaker 5>I think it's a culmination of all of those things.

0:44:37.440 --> 0:44:40.240
<v Speaker 5>But not to thoroughly interview the people at the scene

0:44:40.280 --> 0:44:43.920
<v Speaker 5>who were there in twenty fourteen, that's unfathomable.

0:44:44.520 --> 0:44:46.520
<v Speaker 6>Laura, I just want to thank you so much. I

0:44:46.600 --> 0:44:50.520
<v Speaker 6>really really appreciate everything that you do. You're so important

0:44:50.560 --> 0:44:52.120
<v Speaker 6>in the world, So thank you.

0:44:52.600 --> 0:44:55.239
<v Speaker 5>Thank you well. I appreciate you giving Amy and her

0:44:55.280 --> 0:44:58.719
<v Speaker 5>family a voice. And we need more victim advocates who

0:44:58.760 --> 0:45:02.000
<v Speaker 5>come at things for the right reasons of asking questions,

0:45:02.280 --> 0:45:05.560
<v Speaker 5>even though it might rattle cages and upset people, but

0:45:06.680 --> 0:45:09.279
<v Speaker 5>Amy deserves it, and her two children do as well,

0:45:09.400 --> 0:45:14.640
<v Speaker 5>her daughters. They deserve to establish what really went on,

0:45:14.840 --> 0:45:18.440
<v Speaker 5>rather than be met with a wall of silence or

0:45:18.480 --> 0:45:23.640
<v Speaker 5>what's more, a decision that is based on a house

0:45:23.680 --> 0:45:28.120
<v Speaker 5>of cards. Really that it doesn't stand up to scrutiny.

0:45:28.400 --> 0:45:30.840
<v Speaker 5>It's opinion. At the end of the day. Neither do

0:45:30.920 --> 0:45:33.960
<v Speaker 5>they have clear facts that point to suicide, but there

0:45:34.000 --> 0:45:36.560
<v Speaker 5>are many more questions that point to when we put

0:45:36.600 --> 0:45:40.200
<v Speaker 5>it in the wider context of male violence to women,

0:45:41.000 --> 0:45:47.879
<v Speaker 5>that women suddenly dying and unexpectedly dying in circumstances like this,

0:45:48.600 --> 0:45:50.520
<v Speaker 5>we owe it to women to do more, and we

0:45:50.560 --> 0:45:52.319
<v Speaker 5>owe it to them when they call for help that

0:45:52.360 --> 0:45:54.960
<v Speaker 5>we actually take action. So thank you for doing what

0:45:55.000 --> 0:45:57.640
<v Speaker 5>you do, and I really hope that there will be

0:45:58.239 --> 0:46:09.520
<v Speaker 5>justice for Amy and the right decisions are made well.

0:46:09.600 --> 0:46:13.399
<v Speaker 1>We did ask WA Police, among other things, whether their

0:46:13.440 --> 0:46:19.400
<v Speaker 1>focus was still on proving suicide rather than homicide, the

0:46:19.520 --> 0:46:24.000
<v Speaker 1>weight being afforded to doctor Geson's report, and if external

0:46:24.080 --> 0:46:29.880
<v Speaker 1>experts would be consulted about Amy's case. We received this response.

0:46:30.440 --> 0:46:35.719
<v Speaker 18>The investigation into Amy's death remains ongoing. WA Police continue

0:46:35.719 --> 0:46:39.120
<v Speaker 18>to explore a number of investigative leads, some of which

0:46:39.239 --> 0:46:43.239
<v Speaker 18>involve external experts. Upon the completion of the investigation, we

0:46:43.360 --> 0:46:45.840
<v Speaker 18>will present the findings the Office of the Director of

0:46:45.880 --> 0:46:50.600
<v Speaker 18>Public Prosecutions for their consideration and assessment. The death of

0:46:50.640 --> 0:46:53.719
<v Speaker 18>Amy Wensley is considered suspicious and the focus of the

0:46:53.760 --> 0:46:57.360
<v Speaker 18>investigation is to ensure all available evidence is captured and

0:46:57.440 --> 0:47:00.880
<v Speaker 18>presented to the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions

0:47:00.960 --> 0:47:04.800
<v Speaker 18>for his assessment. With regards to whether legal decisions made

0:47:04.840 --> 0:47:07.920
<v Speaker 18>by the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions should

0:47:08.000 --> 0:47:11.080
<v Speaker 18>be reviewable, that is a question for the Attorney General,

0:47:11.400 --> 0:47:14.759
<v Speaker 18>not the Western Australia Police Force. The information in the

0:47:14.840 --> 0:47:19.200
<v Speaker 18>coroner's findings referencing doctor Geeson is not material we presented

0:47:19.280 --> 0:47:20.480
<v Speaker 18>in criminal proceedings.

0:47:24.520 --> 0:47:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Now that's a bit confusing because it's unclear what he's

0:47:29.040 --> 0:47:32.520
<v Speaker 1>referring to. As far as we're aware, there haven't been

0:47:32.719 --> 0:47:38.319
<v Speaker 1>any criminal proceedings in relation to Amy Wensley. We also

0:47:38.440 --> 0:47:42.920
<v Speaker 1>queried Attorney General John Quigley's office about the concerns raised

0:47:42.920 --> 0:47:49.279
<v Speaker 1>by a new South Wales Crime Commissioner, Michael Barnes. Our

0:47:49.360 --> 0:47:54.960
<v Speaker 1>questions included should decisions by Directors of Public Prosecutions in

0:47:55.000 --> 0:48:01.279
<v Speaker 1>relation to suspicious debts be reviewable? Why or why not,

0:48:02.160 --> 0:48:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to which he replied.

0:48:04.040 --> 0:48:05.640
<v Speaker 19>They are by the coroner.

0:48:07.320 --> 0:48:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Now we know that even if the coroner does recommend

0:48:11.480 --> 0:48:16.680
<v Speaker 1>charges be laid, the DPP doesn't have to comply, which

0:48:16.719 --> 0:48:21.200
<v Speaker 1>is what Michael Barnes recalled happening in Queensland following his

0:48:21.320 --> 0:48:24.920
<v Speaker 1>decision on the Vicky Arnold, Julie and Lay capse.

0:48:25.320 --> 0:48:26.799
<v Speaker 17>I did the third in question and said it was

0:48:26.800 --> 0:48:29.960
<v Speaker 17>a homicide and the DPP refused to charge.

0:48:30.640 --> 0:48:35.239
<v Speaker 1>The situation is not different here in WA. We then asked.

0:48:35.160 --> 0:48:38.600
<v Speaker 6>Would your government consider an appeal system being implemented.

0:48:39.000 --> 0:48:42.440
<v Speaker 19>Mister Quigley replied the High Court has ruled there can't

0:48:42.480 --> 0:48:46.239
<v Speaker 19>be a judicial review of a DPP's decision. However, there

0:48:46.320 --> 0:48:49.560
<v Speaker 19>can be a judicial review of a coroner's decision, which

0:48:49.600 --> 0:48:51.240
<v Speaker 19>an aggrieved party can seek.

0:48:52.320 --> 0:48:56.560
<v Speaker 6>Should Directors of Public Prosecutions be made to provide comprehensive

0:48:56.600 --> 0:48:58.560
<v Speaker 6>explanations of their decisions.

0:48:58.880 --> 0:49:02.480
<v Speaker 19>A comprehensive except given by the DPP as to why

0:49:02.560 --> 0:49:05.400
<v Speaker 19>not to commence a prosecution at that point in time

0:49:05.680 --> 0:49:10.000
<v Speaker 19>made prejudice any further prosecution or further police investigation.

0:49:11.760 --> 0:49:14.640
<v Speaker 6>Not satisfied with this response, I wrote back to the

0:49:14.640 --> 0:49:18.880
<v Speaker 6>Attorney General's Chiefest Staff when Dy Pryor, thanking her, but

0:49:19.000 --> 0:49:21.960
<v Speaker 6>pointing out the criticism related to the issues raised by

0:49:22.000 --> 0:49:25.600
<v Speaker 6>mister Barnes following his experience as State Coroner of both

0:49:25.640 --> 0:49:29.840
<v Speaker 6>New South Wales and Queensland, citing cases such as Lynn Simms,

0:49:30.160 --> 0:49:34.240
<v Speaker 6>Julianne Leih and Vicky Arnold and Laney Carwell, and pointing

0:49:34.239 --> 0:49:37.640
<v Speaker 6>out that sometimes directors of public prosecution get it right,

0:49:38.000 --> 0:49:41.960
<v Speaker 6>but other times it's many more years before justice is realized.

0:49:43.520 --> 0:49:45.759
<v Speaker 6>I urged her to take a listen to our podcast,

0:49:45.960 --> 0:49:48.920
<v Speaker 6>and then c c the Premier's Chief of Staff, David Cooper,

0:49:49.200 --> 0:49:52.360
<v Speaker 6>asking if the AG's answer was reflective of the entire

0:49:52.400 --> 0:49:56.279
<v Speaker 6>government or just his office. I didn't hear back from

0:49:56.280 --> 0:49:59.320
<v Speaker 6>mister Cooper, but I did get this response from Miss Pryor.

0:50:00.120 --> 0:50:04.360
<v Speaker 15>Hi Allison. Thanks for educating me. I also appreciate that

0:50:04.400 --> 0:50:07.520
<v Speaker 15>other people in other states may have various views on matters.

0:50:08.040 --> 0:50:11.200
<v Speaker 15>I am reiterating below the information we have provided on

0:50:11.239 --> 0:50:13.920
<v Speaker 15>the Wensley matter. The information was in a letter to

0:50:13.960 --> 0:50:17.080
<v Speaker 15>Miss Davy, which I understand you were provided. I'm not

0:50:17.120 --> 0:50:20.280
<v Speaker 15>sure if you have published all of it. The Attorney

0:50:20.320 --> 0:50:23.080
<v Speaker 15>General will not be making any further comment in relation

0:50:23.160 --> 0:50:26.000
<v Speaker 15>to your request for comment this week. I'm sorry that

0:50:26.040 --> 0:50:29.560
<v Speaker 15>you don't like his response, which explained what review mechanisms

0:50:29.600 --> 0:50:34.480
<v Speaker 15>are already in place. The letter outlined the following one

0:50:34.520 --> 0:50:37.840
<v Speaker 15>a hearing was set down for a discretionary coronial inquest

0:50:37.840 --> 0:50:40.319
<v Speaker 15>to be held in relation to Miss Wensley's death in

0:50:40.400 --> 0:50:44.800
<v Speaker 15>twenty eighteen. Prior to the inquest, the former Deputy State

0:50:44.840 --> 0:50:48.440
<v Speaker 15>Coroner Vicker referred the matter to the DPP. This was

0:50:48.480 --> 0:50:52.359
<v Speaker 15>based on the opinion of an expert biomechanical report, which

0:50:52.440 --> 0:50:56.840
<v Speaker 15>former Deputy State Coroner Vicker considered contained information to suggest

0:50:56.880 --> 0:50:59.719
<v Speaker 15>an indebtable offense had been committed in relation to Miss

0:50:59.760 --> 0:51:04.840
<v Speaker 15>Wensley's death. Two. That referral to the DPP resulted in

0:51:04.840 --> 0:51:08.280
<v Speaker 15>the WA Police Cold Case Homicide Squad conducting a review

0:51:08.440 --> 0:51:13.520
<v Speaker 15>of the earlier police investigations into Miss Wensley's death. Three.

0:51:13.560 --> 0:51:17.360
<v Speaker 15>WA Police conducted further investigations in an attempt to obtain

0:51:17.400 --> 0:51:20.799
<v Speaker 15>evidence which would establish criminality in Miss Wensley's death.

0:51:21.760 --> 0:51:22.080
<v Speaker 6>Four.

0:51:22.640 --> 0:51:26.560
<v Speaker 15>The review concluded that there was insufficient evidence to establish

0:51:26.560 --> 0:51:31.040
<v Speaker 15>the involvement of another person in Miss Wensley's death. Five

0:51:31.600 --> 0:51:35.080
<v Speaker 15>The DPP reviewed the materials and agreed with the determination

0:51:35.239 --> 0:51:38.000
<v Speaker 15>made by the WA Police and referred the matter back

0:51:38.040 --> 0:51:39.080
<v Speaker 15>to the Coroner's court.

0:51:39.920 --> 0:51:40.240
<v Speaker 18>Six.

0:51:40.840 --> 0:51:44.120
<v Speaker 15>An inquest took place in February twenty twenty one, with

0:51:44.239 --> 0:51:47.680
<v Speaker 15>Deputy State Coroner Linton conducting the inquest with a focus

0:51:47.719 --> 0:51:50.279
<v Speaker 15>on whether there was any additional evidence that could be

0:51:50.320 --> 0:51:54.319
<v Speaker 15>obtained that might assist in determining how Miss Wensley came

0:51:54.400 --> 0:51:58.960
<v Speaker 15>to suffer the injury that caused her death. Seven the

0:51:59.080 --> 0:52:02.479
<v Speaker 15>current deputies ste Coroner Linton declined to refer the matter

0:52:02.560 --> 0:52:06.640
<v Speaker 15>to the DPP for further consideration, concluding that there was

0:52:06.719 --> 0:52:10.239
<v Speaker 15>insufficient evidence to be satisfied that an indictable offense had

0:52:10.239 --> 0:52:15.080
<v Speaker 15>been committed in relation to Miss Wensley's death. Kind regards, Wendy.

0:52:16.560 --> 0:52:18.719
<v Speaker 6>We also heard from a listener this week who was

0:52:18.800 --> 0:52:22.440
<v Speaker 6>concerned WA police had not made enough of the thirteen

0:52:22.520 --> 0:52:25.640
<v Speaker 6>second phone call to Robert Simmons by David at the

0:52:25.680 --> 0:52:26.920
<v Speaker 6>Serpentine roadhouse.

0:52:27.560 --> 0:52:30.760
<v Speaker 20>Hi, Alian Liam, I find it strange that the coroner

0:52:30.840 --> 0:52:34.919
<v Speaker 20>ruled an open verdict, which includes the possibility of homicide.

0:52:35.400 --> 0:52:38.400
<v Speaker 20>Under one million dollar reward has been offered for information

0:52:38.719 --> 0:52:43.279
<v Speaker 20>leading to the identification of the perpetrator or perpetrators. There

0:52:43.320 --> 0:52:45.799
<v Speaker 20>were only two or possibly three of us present when

0:52:45.840 --> 0:52:49.520
<v Speaker 20>Amy died. Another point is regarding the phone call David

0:52:49.600 --> 0:52:53.040
<v Speaker 20>mead to Robert from the servo. It doesn't seem much

0:52:53.080 --> 0:52:55.600
<v Speaker 20>attention has been paid to this his word has just

0:52:55.680 --> 0:52:59.279
<v Speaker 20>been accepted. I'm enjoying listening to the podcast and I

0:52:59.360 --> 0:53:02.080
<v Speaker 20>hope Am and her family will finally get the justice

0:53:02.120 --> 0:53:03.720
<v Speaker 20>they deserve. Thanks.

0:53:03.920 --> 0:53:07.200
<v Speaker 6>And we touched on this thirteen second phone call last

0:53:07.200 --> 0:53:11.000
<v Speaker 6>week and in episode seven when Robert Simmons was questioned

0:53:11.040 --> 0:53:13.680
<v Speaker 6>by council assisting the coroner, Sarah Tyler.

0:53:14.280 --> 0:53:17.320
<v Speaker 21>On your mobile phone, there's a record at five twenty

0:53:17.360 --> 0:53:21.040
<v Speaker 21>pm of an incoming phone call from Serpentine Falls Roadhouse

0:53:21.080 --> 0:53:24.840
<v Speaker 21>that lasted for thirteen seconds. We know that David and

0:53:24.840 --> 0:53:27.880
<v Speaker 21>Gareth went to the roadhouse to call the emergency services.

0:53:28.160 --> 0:53:30.239
<v Speaker 13>That was going to my landline, that was to your

0:53:30.280 --> 0:53:31.200
<v Speaker 13>mobile phone.

0:53:31.239 --> 0:53:33.279
<v Speaker 22>I don't think I never answer it.

0:53:33.320 --> 0:53:36.759
<v Speaker 6>Then, here's what Robert Simmons said when questioned at the

0:53:36.760 --> 0:53:40.360
<v Speaker 6>inquest by counsel for Amy Wensley's family, Peter Ward.

0:53:40.680 --> 0:53:43.040
<v Speaker 23>Phone records indicate that there was a call from the

0:53:43.160 --> 0:53:47.080
<v Speaker 23>Serpentine Falls Roadhouse number to your mobile yes, at five

0:53:47.239 --> 0:53:49.680
<v Speaker 23>twenty one, two minutes before you got the call from St.

0:53:49.719 --> 0:53:50.480
<v Speaker 23>John Ambulance.

0:53:50.640 --> 0:53:51.520
<v Speaker 22>I never received it.

0:53:51.600 --> 0:53:53.120
<v Speaker 23>You don't recall receiving that no?

0:53:53.360 --> 0:53:53.760
<v Speaker 5>Okay.

0:53:53.840 --> 0:53:56.719
<v Speaker 23>One of the police officers who attended that night has

0:53:56.800 --> 0:53:58.759
<v Speaker 23>recorded in his nose that when he went up to

0:53:58.800 --> 0:54:00.600
<v Speaker 23>see you at the end of the night and give

0:54:00.640 --> 0:54:03.160
<v Speaker 23>you the receipt for the firearms. That you spoke to

0:54:03.239 --> 0:54:06.080
<v Speaker 23>him then and you said you'd received a phone call

0:54:06.160 --> 0:54:08.759
<v Speaker 23>from the service station. Do you remember telling him that? No,

0:54:08.960 --> 0:54:11.080
<v Speaker 23>And he says that what you told him was that

0:54:11.120 --> 0:54:13.680
<v Speaker 23>you had received a call from Bob Ibbotson, the service

0:54:13.680 --> 0:54:16.320
<v Speaker 23>station owner, to say that he was worried about Garett,

0:54:16.400 --> 0:54:19.880
<v Speaker 23>worried about David. No, not at it was the police

0:54:19.920 --> 0:54:22.320
<v Speaker 23>officer was mistaken when he made that note in his notes.

0:54:22.440 --> 0:54:25.400
<v Speaker 22>My phone had an answering service on it, but I

0:54:25.480 --> 0:54:27.879
<v Speaker 22>never had the message on there or anything like that.

0:54:28.440 --> 0:54:30.520
<v Speaker 22>And the only call I got that day was from

0:54:30.520 --> 0:54:34.239
<v Speaker 22>the Saint the emergency services. They asked me if I

0:54:34.360 --> 0:54:38.040
<v Speaker 22>was David Simmons. Someone from there has called an ambulance

0:54:38.080 --> 0:54:40.480
<v Speaker 22>and that's when I said, I will go and investigate.

0:54:42.280 --> 0:54:45.680
<v Speaker 6>So there's a police record that Robert Simmons said who

0:54:45.760 --> 0:54:51.319
<v Speaker 6>received that call. This is extremely important, particularly as with

0:54:51.640 --> 0:54:55.319
<v Speaker 6>much of this case, there are varying witness accounts which

0:54:55.360 --> 0:55:00.080
<v Speaker 6>will ultimately require investigators to weigh up the balance of probability.

0:55:01.880 --> 0:55:05.120
<v Speaker 6>It's pretty clear where the weight lies here, and when

0:55:05.160 --> 0:55:10.640
<v Speaker 6>looking at the evidence in its entirety back to mister Ward,

0:55:10.640 --> 0:55:14.480
<v Speaker 6>who continues questioning Robert Simmons about his phone conversation with

0:55:14.600 --> 0:55:18.560
<v Speaker 6>the Saint John's ambulance operator and what the transcript of

0:55:18.600 --> 0:55:22.200
<v Speaker 6>the call indicates. He said, upon answering.

0:55:22.480 --> 0:55:24.560
<v Speaker 23>You responded, hang on, Lloyd, I have to go.

0:55:24.840 --> 0:55:25.480
<v Speaker 3>Yes, go on.

0:55:25.760 --> 0:55:26.400
<v Speaker 23>Who's Lloyd?

0:55:26.520 --> 0:55:27.759
<v Speaker 22>There was no one with me at all.

0:55:27.880 --> 0:55:29.080
<v Speaker 3>There was no one with you.

0:55:29.120 --> 0:55:31.080
<v Speaker 22>No, I don't know where they got that from.

0:55:31.200 --> 0:55:33.439
<v Speaker 23>Well, this is your voice recorded on the phone call.

0:55:33.600 --> 0:55:35.839
<v Speaker 23>You say, hang on, Lloyd, I have to go.

0:55:36.160 --> 0:55:40.279
<v Speaker 22>Well was I no? I know I was speaking. I

0:55:40.360 --> 0:55:43.759
<v Speaker 22>was talking to someone on my mobile. That's what it was. Yes,

0:55:43.800 --> 0:55:47.000
<v Speaker 22>I've got to go. I had two I wasn't speaking

0:55:47.040 --> 0:55:47.520
<v Speaker 22>to anyone.

0:55:47.600 --> 0:55:49.760
<v Speaker 23>You were talking to somebody on your mobile.

0:55:49.520 --> 0:55:51.560
<v Speaker 22>Unless it was someone who wrung me about a job

0:55:51.680 --> 0:55:54.640
<v Speaker 22>or something like that. I run a business. Could have

0:55:54.719 --> 0:55:57.719
<v Speaker 22>been someone who said Lloyd and were looking to do

0:55:57.800 --> 0:55:58.720
<v Speaker 22>some clearing work.

0:55:58.920 --> 0:56:01.719
<v Speaker 6>And here's what David Simmons said on the last day

0:56:01.760 --> 0:56:02.520
<v Speaker 6>of the inquest.

0:56:03.000 --> 0:56:05.319
<v Speaker 21>We have it in evidence that you made that call

0:56:05.360 --> 0:56:07.759
<v Speaker 21>to the ambulance services and then you asked if you

0:56:07.760 --> 0:56:09.840
<v Speaker 21>could make his second phone call, and you took the

0:56:09.880 --> 0:56:12.280
<v Speaker 21>phone out the front and dialed another number.

0:56:12.440 --> 0:56:14.319
<v Speaker 13>Do you remember making that second call?

0:56:14.760 --> 0:56:17.080
<v Speaker 3>Maybe? Yeah, Well I can't.

0:56:17.080 --> 0:56:18.960
<v Speaker 13>Who are you calling? What do you remember?

0:56:19.200 --> 0:56:21.440
<v Speaker 3>I think? I don't know?

0:56:21.840 --> 0:56:23.400
<v Speaker 13>You're not sure, nah?

0:56:23.480 --> 0:56:26.400
<v Speaker 21>If I said the second phone call was made to

0:56:26.440 --> 0:56:29.840
<v Speaker 21>your dad from the Serpentine roadhouse around that time with

0:56:30.040 --> 0:56:30.840
<v Speaker 21>that jog your.

0:56:30.719 --> 0:56:37.120
<v Speaker 24>Memory, maybe I can't remember exactly.

0:56:37.239 --> 0:56:37.319
<v Speaker 23>No.

0:56:37.560 --> 0:56:40.200
<v Speaker 13>Do you remember talking to your dad before from the

0:56:40.280 --> 0:56:43.480
<v Speaker 13>roadhouse or talking to your dad about what happened to Amy?

0:56:45.040 --> 0:56:48.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Vaguely maybe I can. Yeah.

0:56:48.560 --> 0:56:49.959
<v Speaker 13>What do you remember about that.

0:56:50.360 --> 0:56:52.319
<v Speaker 3>I was seeing? If he was at home? I think?

0:56:53.120 --> 0:56:54.880
<v Speaker 3>And that what had happened?

0:56:54.960 --> 0:56:55.959
<v Speaker 13>And what did he say?

0:56:56.280 --> 0:56:57.160
<v Speaker 3>I can't remember.

0:56:57.320 --> 0:56:59.760
<v Speaker 13>But you're sure you called him? You've got a memory

0:56:59.760 --> 0:57:00.120
<v Speaker 13>of that?

0:57:00.560 --> 0:57:02.360
<v Speaker 3>I do now, yeah?

0:57:02.920 --> 0:57:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:57:03.360 --> 0:57:06.960
<v Speaker 17>And did you definitely talk to him?

0:57:07.000 --> 0:57:08.400
<v Speaker 13>Sorry, that's the coroner.

0:57:09.000 --> 0:57:11.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm pretty sure I talked to him.

0:57:11.120 --> 0:57:14.000
<v Speaker 21>Yeah, but you don't remember the details other than what

0:57:14.160 --> 0:57:14.800
<v Speaker 21>had happened.

0:57:15.160 --> 0:57:19.360
<v Speaker 24>Nah. To tell you the truth, I've just turned my

0:57:19.440 --> 0:57:21.920
<v Speaker 24>whole memory and everything off for the last so many years,

0:57:21.920 --> 0:57:24.520
<v Speaker 24>you know, and I've just tried to forget things, and

0:57:24.520 --> 0:57:26.600
<v Speaker 24>now I'm still dealing with it and got to go

0:57:26.600 --> 0:57:27.200
<v Speaker 24>through it again.

0:57:27.480 --> 0:57:30.560
<v Speaker 21>So I understand that It's difficult to talk about these things,

0:57:30.560 --> 0:57:32.600
<v Speaker 21>and I know I'm asking you to remember things that

0:57:32.680 --> 0:57:35.360
<v Speaker 21>happened a long time ago, but it's important to tell

0:57:35.400 --> 0:57:38.440
<v Speaker 21>me what you do remember, and if you don't remember,

0:57:38.720 --> 0:57:41.480
<v Speaker 21>just tell me that you don't remember. Is there anything

0:57:41.480 --> 0:57:43.720
<v Speaker 21>else that you remember about the phone call to your

0:57:43.800 --> 0:57:45.160
<v Speaker 21>dad from the roadhouse.

0:57:45.480 --> 0:57:51.120
<v Speaker 1>No, so like the bins, the lack of gun residue

0:57:51.240 --> 0:57:56.439
<v Speaker 1>or blood on David and Gareth's clothing, David going back

0:57:56.440 --> 0:58:00.480
<v Speaker 1>for the pink phone, or entering the room within ten

0:58:00.600 --> 0:58:05.920
<v Speaker 1>minutes before Amy died, the missing door handle, and so

0:58:06.120 --> 0:58:11.160
<v Speaker 1>much more. In this case, no real clarity was provided

0:58:11.720 --> 0:58:17.520
<v Speaker 1>surrounding that thirteen second phone call, and the contradictions appear

0:58:17.640 --> 0:58:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to have just been glossed over, like so much in

0:58:22.360 --> 0:58:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Amy's case. What we do know for certain, though, is

0:58:26.920 --> 0:58:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the call occurred, because the phone records prove it did. Unfortunately,

0:58:33.680 --> 0:58:38.360
<v Speaker 1>David was questioned after his father Robert, so there was

0:58:38.360 --> 0:58:43.120
<v Speaker 1>no opportunity to requestion him, and nothing about it was

0:58:43.240 --> 0:58:48.120
<v Speaker 1>even mentioned in Deputy coroner Sarah Linton's findings. But she

0:58:48.200 --> 0:58:51.280
<v Speaker 1>did have this to say about Robert simmons testimony.

0:58:52.400 --> 0:58:55.480
<v Speaker 17>I considered Robert Simmons to be an honest, forthright witness.

0:58:55.880 --> 0:58:58.400
<v Speaker 17>He certainly had not tried to hide his concerns about

0:58:58.400 --> 0:59:00.320
<v Speaker 17>what David might have done when he sat spoke to

0:59:00.320 --> 0:59:03.280
<v Speaker 17>the emergency services operator after going into the house at

0:59:03.280 --> 0:59:06.760
<v Speaker 17>their request. Mister Simmons also gave evidence that he said

0:59:06.760 --> 0:59:09.200
<v Speaker 17>to David at a later time, I'm going to ask

0:59:09.240 --> 0:59:11.720
<v Speaker 17>you once, and then asked David to talk him through

0:59:11.840 --> 0:59:14.880
<v Speaker 17>exactly what happened when Amy died and to tell him

0:59:15.080 --> 0:59:17.040
<v Speaker 17>if he had any involvement.

0:59:16.600 --> 0:59:17.120
<v Speaker 6>In her death.

0:59:18.320 --> 0:59:20.800
<v Speaker 17>Mister Simmons gave evidence that David has never been the

0:59:20.840 --> 0:59:24.040
<v Speaker 17>same since that day. At the time of the inquest,

0:59:24.120 --> 0:59:27.200
<v Speaker 17>mister Simmons gave evidence that David's drug and alcohol problems

0:59:27.200 --> 0:59:30.320
<v Speaker 17>have spiraled out of control and is now homeless and

0:59:30.360 --> 0:59:34.400
<v Speaker 17>his mental and physical health is compromised. Mister Simmons said

0:59:34.440 --> 0:59:37.440
<v Speaker 17>he had tried to help him at various times, but ultimately,

0:59:37.600 --> 0:59:40.320
<v Speaker 17>for his own health and to protect other family members,

0:59:40.680 --> 0:59:42.600
<v Speaker 17>he has to stay away from David.

0:59:43.600 --> 0:59:47.400
<v Speaker 1>So the coroner acknowledges Robert's comments that he needs to

0:59:48.160 --> 0:59:53.600
<v Speaker 1>protect other family members from David, but she doesn't mention

0:59:53.680 --> 1:00:00.360
<v Speaker 1>his comments about the thirteen second phone calls.

1:00:01.160 --> 1:00:04.240
<v Speaker 12>Hi, Allison, I've been listening to the truth about any

1:00:04.320 --> 1:00:06.880
<v Speaker 12>podcast and have to say that you are all doing

1:00:06.920 --> 1:00:09.920
<v Speaker 12>such a great job. There is one point that keeps

1:00:09.920 --> 1:00:12.120
<v Speaker 12>coming up, and it's a missing door handle.

1:00:12.440 --> 1:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Jane, a DV survivor who, like many other listeners,

1:00:16.680 --> 1:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>wants to share her story.

1:00:18.960 --> 1:00:22.840
<v Speaker 12>I found myself in an abusive relationship twenty years ago.

1:00:23.560 --> 1:00:26.040
<v Speaker 12>I was lucky enough and managed to escape it within

1:00:26.080 --> 1:00:29.480
<v Speaker 12>four years. I was in my mid forties when it happened.

1:00:30.320 --> 1:00:32.919
<v Speaker 12>What I wanted to say is that sometimes he would

1:00:33.000 --> 1:00:37.400
<v Speaker 12>take off the door handle inside the bedroom, leave the room,

1:00:37.600 --> 1:00:41.040
<v Speaker 12>and of course I could not get out. I hope

1:00:41.080 --> 1:00:44.520
<v Speaker 12>this helps keep up the good work guys, Jane.

1:00:45.040 --> 1:00:48.800
<v Speaker 6>Thanks Jane for turning your pain into purpose. We know

1:00:49.000 --> 1:00:52.800
<v Speaker 6>it can't be easy. We're truly grateful to people like

1:00:52.880 --> 1:00:57.800
<v Speaker 6>you and Ann earlier who want to help. It hasn't

1:00:57.840 --> 1:01:00.560
<v Speaker 6>been easy for any of us involved in fighting for

1:01:00.600 --> 1:01:03.920
<v Speaker 6>the truth about Amy, and we honestly couldn't do it

1:01:03.960 --> 1:01:06.040
<v Speaker 6>without the support of our listeners.

1:01:07.360 --> 1:01:12.200
<v Speaker 10>So soon you see, this.

1:01:12.120 --> 1:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Is our final episode for the year, but we will

1:01:15.680 --> 1:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>be back next year with season two. From all of

1:01:19.080 --> 1:01:23.400
<v Speaker 1>us here, thank you all for caring about Amy's story

1:01:23.880 --> 1:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and supporting her family's continuing fight for justice. We wish

1:01:30.600 --> 1:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>you all a very safe festive season. We'll leave you

1:01:34.880 --> 1:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>with more from Ariel Bombara, whose story reminds us not

1:01:40.600 --> 1:01:44.920
<v Speaker 1>to take safety for granted. Also how far as a

1:01:44.960 --> 1:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>society we still need to go to protect domestic violence victims.

1:01:50.480 --> 1:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Please note some listeners might find this distressing.

1:01:58.280 --> 1:02:01.440
<v Speaker 9>Six months ago, I picked up the keys to our

1:02:01.480 --> 1:02:04.800
<v Speaker 9>new rental apartment. It was a breath of fresh air,

1:02:05.320 --> 1:02:08.320
<v Speaker 9>a sigh of intense release. We'd been on the run

1:02:08.400 --> 1:02:10.840
<v Speaker 9>for eight weeks, and during that time we were gas lit,

1:02:11.280 --> 1:02:15.440
<v Speaker 9>told we were overreacting crazy, but my father would never

1:02:15.480 --> 1:02:19.920
<v Speaker 9>physically hurt us. We were stressed, malnourished, and living on

1:02:19.960 --> 1:02:23.840
<v Speaker 9>top of each other and various accommodations, dragging our belongings

1:02:23.880 --> 1:02:27.400
<v Speaker 9>around in suitcases and garbage bags, just trying to make

1:02:27.440 --> 1:02:32.120
<v Speaker 9>it through each day. We often questioned our sanity, but

1:02:32.200 --> 1:02:35.240
<v Speaker 9>I remained adamant that my father was dangerous and I

1:02:35.240 --> 1:02:36.920
<v Speaker 9>would do anything to keep him.

1:02:36.760 --> 1:02:37.440
<v Speaker 4>Away from us.

1:02:39.240 --> 1:02:41.440
<v Speaker 9>So when we stepped into that new rental, it felt

1:02:41.480 --> 1:02:43.440
<v Speaker 9>like the first glimpse of light at the end of

1:02:43.480 --> 1:02:48.200
<v Speaker 9>a very dark tunnel we'd been navigating. We were giddy

1:02:48.240 --> 1:02:51.120
<v Speaker 9>and excited as we unpacked the same clothes we'd been

1:02:51.160 --> 1:02:53.920
<v Speaker 9>wearing for eight weeks, this time with the knowledge that

1:02:53.960 --> 1:02:56.280
<v Speaker 9>we finally had a home again and could start to

1:02:56.320 --> 1:02:57.640
<v Speaker 9>rebuild our lives.

1:02:58.200 --> 1:03:02.280
<v Speaker 4>While unpacking, my received from her best green Jenny. We

1:03:02.320 --> 1:03:04.840
<v Speaker 4>heard Jenny telling her eighteen year old daughter, Gretel to

1:03:04.880 --> 1:03:05.600
<v Speaker 4>go hide.

1:03:06.320 --> 1:03:08.720
<v Speaker 9>My father had turned up looking for Mum and he

1:03:08.760 --> 1:03:11.360
<v Speaker 9>didn't believe her when she said Mum wasn't there, so

1:03:11.440 --> 1:03:15.640
<v Speaker 9>he forced his way into their home. We heard Jenny say,

1:03:15.880 --> 1:03:18.720
<v Speaker 9>Mark put the gun away, and I remember the ice

1:03:18.760 --> 1:03:22.160
<v Speaker 9>cold shot of adrenaline and the sound that escaped my mouth,

1:03:22.160 --> 1:03:24.560
<v Speaker 9>akin to that of someone who's been kicked in the girl.

1:03:26.040 --> 1:03:28.560
<v Speaker 9>It was the knowledge that after eight weeks of meticulous

1:03:28.560 --> 1:03:32.240
<v Speaker 9>safety planning, eight weeks of predicting and staying ahead of

1:03:32.280 --> 1:03:35.480
<v Speaker 9>his behavior in the most terrifying game of cat and mouse,

1:03:36.000 --> 1:03:38.200
<v Speaker 9>he was about to do everything we thought he was

1:03:38.240 --> 1:03:42.760
<v Speaker 9>going to do to us, to somebody else. Those were

1:03:42.800 --> 1:03:45.120
<v Speaker 9>the last words I heard Jenny say as I frantic

1:03:45.160 --> 1:03:48.280
<v Speaker 9>the cul triple zero while Mum continued to listen to

1:03:48.360 --> 1:03:52.080
<v Speaker 9>what was going on in Jenny's house. While speaking to

1:03:52.080 --> 1:03:55.280
<v Speaker 9>the police, I heard Mum scream and then she was wailing.

1:03:56.200 --> 1:03:58.800
<v Speaker 9>The last thing Mum heard was two gunshots before the

1:03:58.840 --> 1:04:03.360
<v Speaker 9>phone went dead. I stood there, powerless, watching her in

1:04:03.440 --> 1:04:06.880
<v Speaker 9>shock as her whales filled our empty apartment, laden with

1:04:06.920 --> 1:04:09.600
<v Speaker 9>the pain of someone who's just heard their abusive husband

1:04:09.880 --> 1:04:14.240
<v Speaker 9>murdered their best friend. My father murdered Jenny and Gretel

1:04:14.680 --> 1:04:17.680
<v Speaker 9>while Jenny's other daughter, Liesl and her boyfriend Blair were

1:04:17.720 --> 1:04:18.960
<v Speaker 9>down the road at the shops.

1:04:19.680 --> 1:04:21.960
<v Speaker 4>They returned after Gretel texted.

1:04:21.600 --> 1:04:24.760
<v Speaker 9>Liesl to call the police and heard my father's final

1:04:24.800 --> 1:04:27.320
<v Speaker 9>gun shot as he ended his life.

1:04:28.320 --> 1:04:31.200
<v Speaker 4>What people don't realize is that the true impact of.

1:04:31.160 --> 1:04:34.720
<v Speaker 9>Domestic violence homicides isn't just the loss of life. It's

1:04:34.800 --> 1:04:38.760
<v Speaker 9>the devastation that ripples through the families, the quiet aftermath,

1:04:39.520 --> 1:04:43.400
<v Speaker 9>the survivors guild. For the rest of my life, I'll

1:04:43.480 --> 1:04:46.480
<v Speaker 9>question every decision I made, from the point of convincing

1:04:46.560 --> 1:04:50.240
<v Speaker 9>Mom to leave because it wasn't safe, wondering what more

1:04:50.360 --> 1:04:53.760
<v Speaker 9>I could have done to stop him, knowing two lives

1:04:53.760 --> 1:04:57.320
<v Speaker 9>were taken instead of my own and my mom's because

1:04:57.360 --> 1:04:59.840
<v Speaker 9>I was too good at hiding from him, and hating

1:04:59.840 --> 1:05:03.320
<v Speaker 9>my for never considering that he would kill other people

1:05:03.400 --> 1:05:03.800
<v Speaker 9>if he.

1:05:03.720 --> 1:05:10.560
<v Speaker 4>Couldn't find us. It's a heavy burden women carry, blaming themselves.

1:05:10.120 --> 1:05:15.120
<v Speaker 9>For men's violence, an utterly unfair, twisted weight we feel

1:05:15.160 --> 1:05:18.800
<v Speaker 9>because the system doesn't protect us and puts the onus

1:05:18.800 --> 1:05:23.040
<v Speaker 9>on women to manage men's behavior, rather than holding perpetrators accountable.

1:05:25.160 --> 1:05:27.720
<v Speaker 9>We weren't the ones to pick up that gun, yet

1:05:27.760 --> 1:05:30.280
<v Speaker 9>we must live the rest of our lives paying.

1:05:29.960 --> 1:05:30.920
<v Speaker 4>For his crimes.

1:05:32.000 --> 1:05:34.920
<v Speaker 9>My father was a dictator and his coercive and controlling

1:05:35.000 --> 1:05:40.120
<v Speaker 9>behaviors were constant. He constantly humiliated Mum in front of us,

1:05:40.480 --> 1:05:43.960
<v Speaker 9>tore her down and made her feel small. He was

1:05:44.000 --> 1:05:47.120
<v Speaker 9>a master manipulator who would twist her words and gaslight

1:05:47.200 --> 1:05:48.040
<v Speaker 9>her until.

1:05:47.760 --> 1:05:51.760
<v Speaker 4>She couldn't trust her own mind. He kept her isolated

1:05:51.760 --> 1:05:54.280
<v Speaker 4>from friends and family. He controlled the money.

1:05:55.160 --> 1:05:58.480
<v Speaker 9>He'd make degrading comments about her appearance, call her names,

1:05:58.640 --> 1:06:02.560
<v Speaker 9>criticize every little pressure her to wear clothes she didn't

1:06:02.560 --> 1:06:06.680
<v Speaker 9>want to wear, constant unwanted sexual advances, and I could

1:06:06.680 --> 1:06:09.880
<v Speaker 9>see the dead look behind her eyes. That new compliance

1:06:10.000 --> 1:06:13.640
<v Speaker 9>wasn't as bad as the alternative, because she knew that

1:06:13.720 --> 1:06:16.400
<v Speaker 9>when she resists, he takes it out on her children.

1:06:17.200 --> 1:06:19.560
<v Speaker 4>He knows this is the most effective way to hurt her.

1:06:21.400 --> 1:06:23.160
<v Speaker 4>It was the persistent.

1:06:22.720 --> 1:06:25.560
<v Speaker 9>Gut wrenching dread, waiting for when and how he was

1:06:25.560 --> 1:06:28.440
<v Speaker 9>going to shame you. That had everyone walking on eggshells,

1:06:28.880 --> 1:06:32.720
<v Speaker 9>constantly on edge and exhausted from playing his mind games.

1:06:33.720 --> 1:06:39.160
<v Speaker 9>Oh but he's not a violent man, people would tell me. Hm,

1:06:39.320 --> 1:06:44.320
<v Speaker 9>So how did this non violent, gun wielding, law abiding

1:06:44.440 --> 1:06:48.560
<v Speaker 9>citizen end up committing murder? Because he believed my mother

1:06:48.840 --> 1:06:52.200
<v Speaker 9>was his property and if he couldn't have her, then

1:06:52.280 --> 1:06:57.080
<v Speaker 9>no one could. After trying unsuccessfully to convince the police

1:06:57.080 --> 1:06:59.080
<v Speaker 9>to take any action to protect.

1:06:58.680 --> 1:07:01.840
<v Speaker 4>Us against him back in March, we had to disappear.

1:07:03.120 --> 1:07:04.800
<v Speaker 9>I knew the only way to make sure he couldn't

1:07:04.880 --> 1:07:06.880
<v Speaker 9>kill us was to make sure he couldn't find us,

1:07:07.440 --> 1:07:11.040
<v Speaker 9>and still managed to inflict maximum damage.

1:07:11.440 --> 1:07:12.400
<v Speaker 4>Utter devastation.

1:07:15.480 --> 1:07:18.400
<v Speaker 9>I thought for eight weeks against every person that tried

1:07:18.400 --> 1:07:22.240
<v Speaker 9>to convince us we were overreacting, the police who dismissed us,

1:07:22.760 --> 1:07:25.600
<v Speaker 9>the people who said, oh, but he doesn't rape.

1:07:25.360 --> 1:07:27.200
<v Speaker 4>You or hit you, so it can't be that bad.

1:07:29.000 --> 1:07:31.880
<v Speaker 4>All I can ask is do you believe me?

1:07:31.960 --> 1:07:32.160
<v Speaker 6>Now?

1:08:02.160 --> 1:08:03.800
<v Speaker 12>Lisser c.

1:08:06.200 --> 1:08:07.440
<v Speaker 23>So deation.

1:08:11.160 --> 1:08:19.640
<v Speaker 9>We both know the now set you mek.

1:08:20.800 --> 1:08:20.840
<v Speaker 4>S.

1:08:27.880 --> 1:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>If you knew Amy and have information, any information about

1:08:32.360 --> 1:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>her death, we'd love to hear from you, just email

1:08:37.240 --> 1:08:42.639
<v Speaker 1>us at The Truth about Amy at seven dot com

1:08:42.680 --> 1:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>dot au. That's s E V E N The Truth

1:08:47.000 --> 1:08:53.559
<v Speaker 1>about Amy at seven dot com dot Au, or visit

1:08:53.640 --> 1:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>our website sevenews dot com dot Au forward slash the

1:08:58.200 --> 1:09:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Truth about Amy. You can also send us an anonymous

1:09:02.040 --> 1:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>tip at www dot the Truth about Amy dot com.

1:09:09.600 --> 1:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>If you're on Facebook or Instagram, you can follow us

1:09:12.840 --> 1:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to see photos and updates relevant to the case, but

1:09:16.880 --> 1:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>for legal reasons, unfortunately, you won't be able to make

1:09:20.080 --> 1:09:26.400
<v Speaker 1>any comments. And remember, if you like what you're hearing,

1:09:26.760 --> 1:09:30.960
<v Speaker 1>don't forget to subscribe. Please rate and review our series

1:09:31.320 --> 1:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>because it really helps new listeners to find us. Presenter

1:09:39.360 --> 1:09:46.720
<v Speaker 1>and executive producer Alison Sandy, Presenter and investigative journalist Liam Bartlett,

1:09:48.439 --> 1:09:55.959
<v Speaker 1>Sound design Mark Wright, Assistant producer Cassie Woodward, Graphics Jason Blandford,

1:09:57.000 --> 1:10:12.559
<v Speaker 1>and special thanks to Tim Clark and Brian's Emo. This

1:10:13.120 --> 1:10:14.759
<v Speaker 1>is a seven News production.