WEBVTT - How to Eat at the Pub Without Derailing Your Diet, Plus the Truth About Subway's High-Protein Range

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>What do you eat when you go to the pub?

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:08.880
<v Speaker 2>A steak, maybe you opt for a snitty, or maybe

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:11.120
<v Speaker 2>you try and be healthy and order the salad whether

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 2>you feel like it or not. On today's episode of

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 2>The Nutrition Couch, we deep dive pub meals and share

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:20.759
<v Speaker 2>how to manage it as a weekly indulgence for many Hi,

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 2>I'm Susie Burrow and I'm Leon Wood, and together we

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 2>bring you The Nutrition Couch, the weekly podcast that gets

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 2>you up to date with everything you need to know

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 2>in the world of nutrition, as well as all things

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:32.639
<v Speaker 2>eating at the pub. We take a closer look at

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 2>the new high protein range at Subway, We deep dive

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 2>a healthy chocolate treat that we've got some thoughts about,

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 2>and our listener questions is all about a cheeky, sugary

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 2>weekly indulgence, so leanne. I know that with the cost

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:51.520
<v Speaker 2>of food at an all time high, if we're thinking

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 2>about going out for dinner, whether it's with friends or

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 2>with the family, I certainly have been steering towards pubs.

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Not because I a pub.

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, I love going to a gorgeous restaurant, and

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 2>certainly when you come to visit or vice versa, we

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.040
<v Speaker 2>like to indulge ourselves and go to some restaurants that

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:09.399
<v Speaker 2>are high on our list. A shout out to Blackwood

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 2>at Bondy for brunch if anyone's in the area. Outstanding.

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:15.320
<v Speaker 2>But of course you're going to dump probably well over

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 2>one hundred dollars for two if not closer to two hundreds,

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:20.400
<v Speaker 2>So it's certainly and that is leanne Let's be honest,

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:22.960
<v Speaker 2>what we can spend to feed several meals for the family,

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 2>So it's a reasonable thing to be considering. So I

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 2>know my mum and dad, for example, were very keen

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 2>to go to a local pub because they had eighteen

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:32.959
<v Speaker 2>dollars specials on the other night, and that included a

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:36.679
<v Speaker 2>burger schnitzel and also a steak, which everyone ordered because

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 2>as retirees they find that much more cost effective. You know,

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 2>if I buy steak for the family, it's thirty forty

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 2>dollars minimum, and my boys are getting older they eat

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 2>a lot more, so you can see how perhaps it

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 2>can be a very smart choice. But of course, traditionally

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 2>pub meals are not overly healthy in the sense they

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 2>generally are very large portions. Many of the options are

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 2>deep fried, and you get the typical chips every time

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:05.559
<v Speaker 2>with everything that you order, so I thought it was time.

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 2>My husband actually suggested we do this given it was

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 2>coming into Sunday roast season as well, because over a

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 2>long weekend when we're recording this, a lot of people

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 2>will head to the pub for Sunday roasts. So I thought, yeah,

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 2>it was a good time to have a little chat

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 2>about it, because the last thing we want to do

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 2>is make people feel guilty if they're trying to be

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 2>budget conscious going to the pub. But I also don't

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 2>want my clients in particular to feel like they need

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 2>to always eat a salad, because I find salads at

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:31.919
<v Speaker 2>the pub can be just as expensive as a main meal.

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, you're paying eighteen twenty twenty five dollars by

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 2>the time you add the prawns or chicken or meat to.

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>A salad and ultimately land.

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:41.239
<v Speaker 2>They sometimes aren't that healthy because their chicken caes are

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 2>or their rice noodle based, or they're vegetarian but really

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 2>heavy and things like sweet potato chickpeas for laffl So

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 2>they end up being a cub super high load anyway,

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 2>and if you don't actually feel like eating a salad,

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:56.080
<v Speaker 2>in my experience, you keep eating the fries anyway, Sometimes

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 2>you are better to order what you feel like and

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 2>do it that way. So I'll kick off with a

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 2>few strategies because I really feel it's important if you're

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 2>treating yourself to a meal out you do kind of

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:08.079
<v Speaker 2>order what you feel like. One thing I've been doing

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 2>a lot more with my girlfriends is because the meals

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:15.119
<v Speaker 2>are so large, I often will split slit something because

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 2>if it's a burger or if it's a snitsel, it

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 2>easily feeds to small women. And even if you don't think,

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 2>if you think you're really hungry, even if you still

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 2>order the half, you'll find you quite satisfied after it.

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:28.119
<v Speaker 2>So I think that can be a very effective strategy.

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 2>So you still get a taste of the schnitzel or

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 2>the burger, and then I try and always take the

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 2>fries off the plate. I'll try and order extra salad

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 2>if I can, but I find that a very good strategy.

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 2>I think red meat, if you eat red meat, is

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 2>a great choice of the pub because often we're not

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 2>cooking ourselves a steak at home. So if you do

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 2>again order the steak and can say vegetables, and I

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 2>always check the vegetables, because sometimes they'll just be potatoes

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 2>and carrot or something quite plain. If it's greens, I'll

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 2>invest in it. So if it's the broccoli, beans, carrots,

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 2>that kind of mix, I'm more likely to order it,

0:03:57.880 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 2>but I'll ask for the salad and veggies if I

0:03:59.880 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 2>can can avoid the potato on the plate, because I

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 2>will definitely eat it and probably don't need to if

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm already having a Schitzel or big burger or steak.

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 2>But if you do order that meal, if you are

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 2>aiming for protein, whether it's the steak or the schitzel, again,

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 2>if it's just for you, I'd find if you cut

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 2>half way off, you can often get two meals out

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 2>of it and take it home and use it for

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:18.600
<v Speaker 2>wraps or salad the next day.

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>So it just splits it.

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:21.840
<v Speaker 2>So instead of having an eight hundred calorie meal, you're

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 2>only having a four or five hundred calorie one, but

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 2>you're getting your money's worth out of it and still

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 2>getting some decent nutrition. If you're choosing to pay, I'd

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 2>rather someone pay for fish or steak or chicken than

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:35.280
<v Speaker 2>eating a salad that's not overly satisfying. So They're my

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:37.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of defaults, or I would say to clients if

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 2>this is a once a week or once a month

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 2>eat as such. I've got a lot of rural people

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 2>who might only go to the pub occasionally, you know,

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 2>and you want to have the prom pasta, go for it,

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 2>you know. Just keep in mind it is quite a

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:51.359
<v Speaker 2>big meal and you probably can take some home and

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 2>get two serves. I will always order a veggie side

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 2>and cut that through any pasta to get the veggie

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 2>bulk of the meal. But yeah, they're probably some of

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 2>the strategies I use myself. I don't necessarily recommend the salad,

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 2>which I think some people would say.

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>And if it's a.

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Remote pub not close to the water, I generally wouldn't

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 2>order seafood either. So if you're in table like in

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 2>the middle of nowhere, there's no water, I'm not ordering

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:15.799
<v Speaker 2>barramundi or salmon. I'd wait to year on coastal regions

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:18.720
<v Speaker 2>for that, and probably stick more to the red meat

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 2>and stick to a leaner steak if you can.

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:23.280
<v Speaker 3>And port can be a really nice lean option as

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 3>well if you're not into sort of more of that

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 3>red red meat. But the RSLs are also talking about

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 3>budget friendly meals. My parents love a good RSL that's

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 3>also really nice and friendly. Yeah, yeah, they often do

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 3>like a lunch Honestly, sometimes my parents will go down

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:38.359
<v Speaker 3>for like a week day lunch and it's like I

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 3>think Mum said, it's like fifteen sixteen dollars or something,

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 3>and often, you know, they might do a twenty dollars

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 3>with a coffee. And so my parents are big fans

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 3>of of an RSL as well.

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:47.719
<v Speaker 1>So both of those options are really good.

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 3>I like them because I've got small children and I

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 3>find it there's less pressure. David and I rarely, if ever,

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 3>maybe once a year, got to a nice restaurant by ourselves,

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:57.720
<v Speaker 3>and we definitely don't take the kids because it's just

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 3>it's so embarrassing. They're so small, they run around everywhere.

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 3>So I like that there's less pressure and you can

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 3>take the kids and if they're you know, a little

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 3>bit feral, it's not too bad. But in terms of

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 3>what I get my clients to focus on, like you said,

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:12.160
<v Speaker 3>sometimes those heavier dishes, like a really nice pasta, if

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:14.039
<v Speaker 3>I'm getting a client to only have half of that

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 3>and top it up with the side of save broccolini

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 3>or something. What I will do in terms of really

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 3>trying to prioritize that protein is get them to eat

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:22.720
<v Speaker 3>half but all of the protein. So say it's a

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 3>beautiful prawn pasta or a chicken pasta, so eat all

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 3>of the protein, but only half the sauce and the

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 3>carp and then buffer that with extra green veggies, and

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:32.280
<v Speaker 3>then if you want to take it home, you can

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:33.920
<v Speaker 3>just simply add a tiner tuna or a bit of

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 3>extra shredded chicken breast to it the next day, and

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 3>a bit of extra veggies at home, and you've got

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 3>a really nice base and you can get two meals

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 3>out of it, not one. So that can be a

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:44.479
<v Speaker 3>really chiky hack, but don't forget. When you are halving meals,

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 3>you're often harving the protein size as well. So if

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:50.559
<v Speaker 3>you are actively in a calorie deficit, you're training hard.

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:53.280
<v Speaker 3>Your goal is to gain some muscle mass, and obviously

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 3>if you eat out regularly when you have a meal,

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:58.160
<v Speaker 3>you're also harving the protein size, so just be wary

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:00.360
<v Speaker 3>of that. If you rarely ever eat out, it's not

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 3>really a big deal. I'd say eat until you're satisfied

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 3>and not stuffed. Is generally my golden rule, but I

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 3>do like my clients to prioritize seafood at a pub

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 3>because it is very, very lean. But like Susie said,

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, potentially the area that you're eating at may matter,

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 3>because obviously you're going to get better, fresher seafood if

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 3>you are somewhere near the water, one would hope. And

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 3>then a salad and veggie one is really really tricky

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 3>because often at a pub, if you are getting say

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 3>the rest of the day, often you'll get potato soup, potato, pumpkin,

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 3>and corn and they are all quite you know, starchy

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 3>focused vegetables. So, as Susie said, if you want to

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 3>pay the extra sometimes ten fifteen, eighteen dollars for a

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 3>side of veggie, you want it to be good quality.

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:39.679
<v Speaker 3>You don't just want to get a mix of peas

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 3>and corn and carrot and pay all of that money.

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 3>So it is well worth asking what type of extra

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 3>veggies they're serving, or if it says seasonal veggie on

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 3>the menu, what type is that? And then often sometimes

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 3>you'll get a side of vegetables, but it'll be drowned

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 3>in ricotta, or I got a rocket a side of

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 3>rocket at an Italian place the other day, and it

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 3>was absolutely drenched in olive oil, and then it was

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 3>drowned in parmesan ch Like, there was more oliveil and

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 3>parmesan than there were greens in that eighteen dollar side

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 3>of green. So that was my bad. I forgot to ask.

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 3>But often I'll say, you know what other greens?

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Is it?

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 3>Not?

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>With cheese? Can I remove that?

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 3>If I am having it with something like a pizza,

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 3>because honestly, you just don't need that extra calorie bulk

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 3>if you are using that to sort of buffer or

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 3>lighten up a higher calorie meal.

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 2>True, And I think if we're talking about portion sizes,

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 2>so I would say on average, the steaks tend to

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 2>be at least two hundred and fifty grams, if not

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 2>closer to three three fifty. The same with the shnitty

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 2>like you're not getting one hundred gram schnitz l, you're

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:39.199
<v Speaker 2>getting two hundred and two fifty three hundred. So just

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 2>keep that in mind and agree, you know, eat to

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 2>you're satisfied. But if you are, if you love a Schitzel,

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 2>for example, you're getting the car from that. As I said,

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 2>try and ditch the chips because you're getting that more

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 2>indulgence there already, and have it with the salad. But

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 2>if it's more of that special occasion where it's a

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 2>very occasional and you feel like the heavier option, I

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 2>think when you go to the wood fire pizza, it

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 2>can be tricky, and I think again, try and order

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 2>the sides of veggies or salad to complement the meal

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 2>if you can. And probably the other thing if you

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 2>can avoid it, the stuff that doesn't have a huge

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 2>amount of nutritive value, and stuff I would argue is

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 2>filler food, but I know we love it, but things

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 2>like the Aarantina balls, the spring rolls, the deep fried

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 2>salt and pepper squid like it really does have huge

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:23.080
<v Speaker 2>amounts of fat and unfortunately in restaurants and pubs that

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:25.679
<v Speaker 2>don't use the best quality oil simply because it's expensive.

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:28.839
<v Speaker 2>So that is adding a lot of extra fat and

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:31.320
<v Speaker 2>calories and can be more calories than a whole meal

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 2>you've had with starters and picking before you've even had

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 2>the meal. So if you can minimize that or you

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 2>know have it, you know, one entree of that kind

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 2>of food between four or six people have a small

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 2>amount of it. That's always going to be better, whereas

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 2>things like I love a muscle pot. If there's muscles,

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 2>I will always order that. The tomato salad can be

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 2>a really good option, the rocket salad lately and said,

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 2>if it's not too drizzled in concentrated extras. The grilled

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 2>type calamari can be a good option, the rice paper

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 2>rolls if they have then what are some other healthy

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 2>antipasto things like scollops, prons, any sort of raw fish

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 2>like sashimi can always be a really good option, like

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 2>a kingfish crudo. Anything I think is like that lighter

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:13.559
<v Speaker 2>and it's flavored with a lot of those beautiful flavors

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:16.079
<v Speaker 2>that you often get with something like a sashimi or

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 2>a kingfish crudo. You get it with a bit of

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 2>citrus or a tiredy bit of mis The flavoring is

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 2>a lot lighter than, say, if you did get a

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 2>deep rid calamari, which would come with a side of

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 2>say aoli or something. So I love a seafood focus

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 2>as like an entree or like you said, zuzi. Often

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 2>depending on the place that you go, you know you

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:34.679
<v Speaker 2>might be able to get some grilled prawns and avocado

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:37.680
<v Speaker 2>you might be able to get a prescido and I

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 2>don't know, rocket or a rock melon sort of entree

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 2>as well. Anything with a bit of extra fresh food

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 2>in it from an entre perspective, i e. Not the

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 2>garlic bread, not the aaranginie bulls is often your best

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 2>bet if you are trying to lighten the load, if

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 2>it's a special occasion, if you're very healthy with your weight.

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 2>These obviously these strategies don't matter as much. We're really

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:59.679
<v Speaker 2>actively targeting women who are trying to drop some body

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 2>fat and really try to bring down the overall calorie

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 2>load because often, you know, at a pub, we do

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 2>like to have a couple of cheeky drinks as well,

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 2>we do like to sometimes share a dessert, We do

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 2>like to have the entrees, and all of those things

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 2>sadly do add up. If you are eating out, you know,

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 2>more than probably once a week or so, and if

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 2>it is more of an occasional or sorry, I should say,

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:21.559
<v Speaker 2>if you're actually going out a lot, you are better

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 2>than to have the barrel mundy and the green veggies absolutely,

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:26.319
<v Speaker 2>you know, and steer clear of the fried food options.

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:28.680
<v Speaker 2>If it's more of a regular weeknight of occurrence for

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 2>you because you go to trivia every week as opposed

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 2>to a special occasion meal with friends and family. All right, Lenne,

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 2>you've sent me something in the week that my tail

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 2>started wagging because I do love subway.

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 3>Me too.

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Now, we love subway, and the reason I love subway

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 2>is that it's cost effective. It is easily accessible, Like

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 2>we stopped on the way home from Rugby the other

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 2>day and got one instead of the bacon and egg

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.680
<v Speaker 2>roll at sports or the macas. I like a few

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 2>things there, but I've also got some criticisms. So the

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 2>first thing I'll launch out with is that I love

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 2>their seven dollars six inch subway range, but it's actually

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 2>incredibly difficult to navigate the subway website. So they have

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:10.559
<v Speaker 2>a lot of claims about high protein foods, which Land's

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 2>going to cover in a minute, and budget friendly options,

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 2>but you can literally not find the nutritional information unless

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 2>you've got a nutrition degree and can scroll, and certainly

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:23.559
<v Speaker 2>almost impossible on your phone. So the seven dollar range,

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 2>they have six or seven subways for seven dollars, but

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 2>it's not all of them, so it's like Chuna Mao

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 2>veggie Delight turkey on rye, some weird seafood thing, and

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 2>then barbecue Southern style chicken. So they're not all healthy

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 2>because the one from that I would say is probably

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 2>the best is the turkey on rye. So the seven

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 2>dollar one is sort of specific in terms of nutritionals

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 2>I myself like the plain chicken and chicken teriarchy is

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 2>pretty light on for a six inch of course, but

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 2>that's about ten dollars, so that's not in the seven

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 2>dollar range. But what we actually want to talk about

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 2>today was I've noticed this too. There are some massive

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 2>slogans Subway are advertising called the packed with Protein range,

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 2>and if you've got el Janna near your house as well,

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:10.679
<v Speaker 2>you'll notice they're doing it as well. And the el

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Janna PR team sent me a media release with a

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 2>forty six grams of protein rap and when I wrote

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 2>back and said, but how many calories is that? And

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:21.679
<v Speaker 2>it came back at eight hundred, I pointed out to

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 2>her it wasn't healthy. It was double the lunch size

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 2>most women should be having. So we wanted to talk

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 2>about it today because I think Subway are really being

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:33.079
<v Speaker 2>a little bit naughty, almost deeply misleading with their claims

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 2>of their packed with protein range. Because then when you

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:40.199
<v Speaker 2>deep dived that nutritional information sheet, what did we find

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 2>the reality is about the subway high protein range.

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, it wasn't.

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 3>Pretty, and as dietitians, we intuitively knew this. And I

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 3>got my tail wagging like you, and I sent you

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 3>this and I said, this is so misleading, and you

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 3>were like, absolutely, we have to discuss this, because both

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 3>you and I love a good subway. If I could

0:13:56.679 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 3>afford it, I would buy shares in a subway, like

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:00.719
<v Speaker 3>I spent that much time there. I recommend it to

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 3>that many clients. I feel like I should be getting

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 3>a kickback at this stage.

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>You should be definitely getting a kick I agree.

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 3>You and I often will eat a good chicky subway

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 3>together occasionally if we're traveling. Certainly we've been late for

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 3>our own retreat because we stopped at subway for lunch one.

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Time we had to get where we started.

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 3>But the one that I sent you was the chicken

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 3>protein subway foot long. So it came up as an

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 3>ad while I was just casually scrolling news dot com

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 3>one day. Then I saw it again on Facebook there,

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 3>but they're retargeting working very well. From a metads perspective,

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 3>and it had a big label across it saying fifty

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 3>four grams of protein and it was a foot long, granted,

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 3>and I was like, hmm, that's a lot of food

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 3>and that's a lot of protein.

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Well my first two thoughts.

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 3>But I think that we live in this world where

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 3>protein is like a health halo. Is it important? Absolutely?

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 3>Can you eat too much protein? Absolutely? And with more

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 3>protein comes more calories. We need to be aware of that.

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 3>So when I deep dive the nutritionals on this chicken

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 3>protein foot long, it was also dripping with some sort

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 3>of creamy I think it was like an a only dressing.

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>It had cheese on it.

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 3>And then it had the chicken and everything as well,

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 3>so it was coming in it three thousand, eight hundred

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 3>and forty Kilogele SUSI all for those ones who like calories,

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 3>like myself, over nine hundred calories for that lunch with

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 3>the fifty four grams of protein. But both Susan and

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 3>I would argue that women, irrespective of whether they're trying

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 3>to lose weight or not, do not need fifty four

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 3>grams of protein and a meal. You could split that

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 3>across two meals and still be very happy. So higher

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 3>protein is important, but for a lot of women, you know,

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 3>per meal, twenty five thirty grams is more than enough.

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 3>So when you if you and a lot of people

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 3>would say, well, I don't need a foot long, I agree,

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 3>like six inch for most women is probably more than enough.

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 3>If you're super active, maybe the foot long, but I

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 3>think for the average woman who works a desk job

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 3>or doesn't do a whole lot of exercise, six inch

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 3>is probably enough. And even that clock's in at four

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 3>sixty calories and twenty seven grams of protein, So I

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 3>would say that that is a much better nutrition option

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 3>than the whole foot long and even twenty seven grams

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 3>of protein for a quick, fairly budget, friendly, on the

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 3>go option that you can access, you know through airports

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 3>that like this is subway in my local Maruka where

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 3>I live in Queensland, Like they're just everywhere, right, so

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 3>they're really really accessible. So about four hundred and fifty

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 3>calories twenty seven grams of protein, and that's pretty tasty.

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 3>That's an awesome option. Whereas when I looked at the

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 3>protein option in the wrap, and I have so many

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 3>clients or say I listened to you on Suzi on

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 3>the podcast. I know subways are good options, so where

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 3>go when I get the wrap?

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, oh no, no, no, no no.

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 3>I'd actually rather you have the bread because I think

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 3>there's this perception that wraps are healthier because they're somewhat lighter.

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 3>But the subway uses these massive white wraps. So the

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 3>wrap in the chicken protein option SUSI is basically three

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 3>thousand kilodueles or seven hundred calories, So you are far

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 3>better off having the six inch bread option than the rap.

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 3>And I think a lot of people just have this

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 3>perception that the wrap is healthier, but in the case

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 3>of subway, the wraps are often not healthier than the

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 3>six inch raine. And then if you wanted to look

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 3>at the salad option, that clocks in at about four

0:16:57.120 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 3>hundred and seventy calories with a similar amount of protein.

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 3>So if I was saying to my client, you've got

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 3>very similar calories and protein between the six inch protein

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:07.919
<v Speaker 3>chicken one or the salad, what do you prefer, not

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:09.679
<v Speaker 3>out of ten of my clients would say, oh, well,

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 3>I want the bread with that, and I would agree

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 3>because I actually want my clients like you do. Susie

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:17.119
<v Speaker 3>eating some carbohydrate but in a controlled portion, and a

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 3>six inch sub for most people is a good amount

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:22.199
<v Speaker 3>of carbohydrate, whereas the salads don't really have much in

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 3>there at all, but they do have often more facts,

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 3>more dressing, a bit of cheese, that kind of thing

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:28.639
<v Speaker 3>to bulk out the bowl. So yes, you might get

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 3>a bit more volume with a bit more salad, but

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 3>we actually want people to eat some carbohydrate as well.

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 3>We just for most women trying to lose weight, they

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 3>don't need as much carbohydrate that a foot long contains.

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:41.680
<v Speaker 3>So it's very interesting. It's also very difficult to find

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 3>the nutrition. I had to go and I actually had

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 3>to download the pdf, get out my microscope, scroll through,

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 3>and this new protein range, of course, isn't on the

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 3>nutrition Kandel whatsoever. So I had to go into subway website,

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 3>put in my area code, actually look to buy it,

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 3>add it to my cart at all the separate ingredients

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 3>before it actually spat out the nutritional So I was like,

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 3>I hope our nutrition couch audience appreciates this, but it's

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 3>very difficult to find, and I do feel like companies

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 3>they don't hide it, but they make it difficult to find.

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 3>So they'll happily put fifty four grams of protein on

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 3>the advertisement that I'm seeing online. But they're not going

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 3>to write nine hundred and fifteen calories, are they. No,

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 3>they keep that one to themselves.

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Arms enraged as you are. Land.

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:22.359
<v Speaker 2>The only one I can find that actually comes in

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:25.680
<v Speaker 2>at fifty is the chicken and bacon ranch rap. Now,

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't like the raps at Subway because I think

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 2>that the bread, if you get the whole weed or

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 2>the rise better nutritionally, it's more filling, it's less process

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 2>than a rap, and I think it's a better option.

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 2>So and certainly we wouldn't be recommending you eat the

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 2>bacon ranch option for over three thousand calories just to

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 2>get the protein. So that is another reason it's deeply misleading.

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 2>The other thing I noticed is their salad range, and

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 2>they're plugging that quite heavily as well. Now they've got

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:54.360
<v Speaker 2>some quite plain salads, like just sort of the greens

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 2>in quite a small container, and some of those come

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 2>in at about twenty grams of protein and certainly less

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:02.919
<v Speaker 2>than three hundred, so very light. But again, I wouldn't

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:04.639
<v Speaker 2>actually want my clients to be having that because I

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:07.160
<v Speaker 2>don't think they're full. If you had a two three

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:09.400
<v Speaker 2>hundred calorie salad for lunch, you're going to be eating

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:12.160
<v Speaker 2>a chocolate bar an hour later. So sometimes you better

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.679
<v Speaker 2>to actually eat the proper food, like the Subway, in

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 2>a leaner variety. The turkey, I think the tune is

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 2>not too bad the hams process meat, but I think

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:24.439
<v Speaker 2>the chicken tariarchy is particularly lean as well, and have

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 2>that and enjoy it with the bread rather than having

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 2>a wrap or the salad and then being hungry an

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:32.239
<v Speaker 2>hour or two later. But I agree with you. I

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 2>think they need a lot of work on that website.

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 2>You can't track the nutritionals easily. You can't be claiming

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 2>fifty grams of protein for two meals because really a

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 2>foot long sub for women is two meals. So that's

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 2>misleading and I'm not happy at all with it. I

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 2>think that they're trying to write off a protein tag

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 2>as Eljada are and it's irresponsible.

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>So Subway, you've got good products.

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 2>You can do better with it Land and I'm very

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:56.239
<v Speaker 2>happy to help you if you want to take us

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 2>on as consultants with a discount card for our subway.

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 2>And now you know there's one thing that annoys me

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:13.399
<v Speaker 2>more than misleading food. It is the healthy.

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Masquerade annoys us.

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:16.640
<v Speaker 2>And you're going to take us through one of these products,

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 2>because again, if you go to the musleibar section at supermarkets,

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:23.679
<v Speaker 2>there are seven hundred different high protein bars. Some are

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 2>healthier than others. Some have got a deep chalk coating

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 2>and some have got a choc dizsel. Some marketed as

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:35.439
<v Speaker 2>low carb, others are marketed as high protein, and so

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 2>then some sleep in under an indulgence tag. And when

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:42.439
<v Speaker 2>you take a look at the nutritionals, I have major

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:46.160
<v Speaker 2>issues because I find them deeply misleading. And I want

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 2>you to take us through one of the products, but

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 2>we could take any number. This is one brand, but

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 2>definitely any bar you pick up that has a chocolate coating,

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:57.679
<v Speaker 2>if you read the first ingredient this chocolate, it is

0:20:57.760 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 2>more like a chocolate bar than a health bar. That's

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 2>my first point. And what I want us to start

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:04.400
<v Speaker 2>looking at is how much saturated fat you're getting from

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:07.119
<v Speaker 2>these bars. So Land will talk as student nutritionals, and

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 2>then I'll pipe in when I can't control myself any longer.

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 3>And I will say that Susie and I have just

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:15.199
<v Speaker 3>been trying a few bars out of curiosity because there

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:17.200
<v Speaker 3>are so many on the market these days it's hard

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 3>to know which ones are good or bad. And between

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:20.919
<v Speaker 3>both of our client loads and our clinics, you know,

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 3>clients are eating probably upwards of fifty to one hundred

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:26.679
<v Speaker 3>different types. So we've been looking at bars a lot lately.

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 3>And one of the ones you and I tried was

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 3>a brand that heavily markets at pregnant and breastfeeding women.

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:33.399
<v Speaker 3>And the first thing when we both said when we

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 3>tried it, We're like, oh, that's delicious, and we were like,

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 3>cheez that chocolate. It was coated in chocolate. We're like, jeez,

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 3>that's thick. And you were like, this is a treat,

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 3>Like this is this is a chocolate bar. It is

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 3>certainly healthier than a chocolate bar. But this is absolutely

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:46.879
<v Speaker 3>a treat, not an every day or multiple times a

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 3>day occurrence, which I think a lot of women are

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:51.399
<v Speaker 3>eating it at. So this is someone you set me.

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 3>So it is that coals. It's the idi bronounced is it?

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:55.440
<v Speaker 1>No shoe?

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 3>Low carb choc mint indulgence bars. They come in a

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:02.719
<v Speaker 3>pack of five, they're eight ninety and at the moment

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:05.440
<v Speaker 3>at the time of recording their own sale for six nineties,

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 3>so there's still you know, a dollar something a bar.

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:10.640
<v Speaker 3>And on the front of packet marketing it, there's only

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 3>two grams of sugar naturally sweetened in four grams of

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 3>carb perserve. So they're definitely obviously marketed at that low

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:20.879
<v Speaker 3>carb crowd. And when you look at the ingredient list,

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:23.199
<v Speaker 3>I mean it's quite long. I mean most bars have

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 3>a longer ingredient list because there's multiple ingredients that make

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:29.440
<v Speaker 3>that up. However, you know, you've actually got to read

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 3>the ingredient. You can't just be looking at the nutrition

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 3>information panel and say, hey, it's low calories like sugar,

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 3>this must be a good type of bar, because you

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 3>certainly can't have one without the other. You have to

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 3>look at the nutrition information panel and you cannot bypass

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:46.159
<v Speaker 3>the ingredient list. So the first ingredient is dark chocolate. Basically,

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 3>there's a dark chocolate coating. So as Susie said, that's

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 3>the first ingredient. This is acting more like a chocolate

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 3>bar than it is a health bar. So the first

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:57.160
<v Speaker 3>ingredient is dark chocolate coating, and within that dark chocolate,

0:22:57.160 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 3>the ingredients are vegetable fat, arethra told, cocoa solids, inulin,

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:07.120
<v Speaker 3>milk solids, maltodextion, polydextros, corn fiber, soi lethercen, and natural flavors.

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 3>If you're someone with IBS or a sensitive tummy, you're

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 3>gonna have issues with this bar. I could not eat

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 3>something like that just due to the fact that it's

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:16.160
<v Speaker 3>got the inulin and all of the other different types

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 3>of fibers in there already. Now, the next ingredient is polydextrose,

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:22.959
<v Speaker 3>followed by a vegetable fat, followed by biscuit pieces at

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 3>nine percent. You've got in the biscuit pieces wheat flour,

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 3>cornola oil, s gross malt extract, glucose raising agent, xylotols, subatol,

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:37.200
<v Speaker 3>milk solids, pea protein isolate, vegetable glycerine, coca powder, modified starch,

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 3>and an emulsifier. We've also got soy lethace and another emulsifier,

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 3>non dairy cream and natural flavors, salt, monk, fruit extract,

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:50.120
<v Speaker 3>steavier and mint extract being our last ingredient. There are

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:53.639
<v Speaker 3>not many ingredients susy on that ingredient list that I

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 3>would have at home in my kitchen. And what I

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 3>classify what I tell my clients a whole food product

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 3>or what we can you know, basically class as a

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 3>better option in the supermarket. Are lots of ingredients that

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 3>we naturally recognize and have in our own pantry or

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 3>cupboards or fridge at home. There are so many ingredients

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 3>in there that this company is using to make up

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 3>a bar to make the nutritionals match what the public

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 3>I guess want and what we have been taught is healthy.

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 3>But we're doing it in a way where to me,

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 3>there's nothing really natural about this bar despite having this

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 3>health talo effect that is, at a natural I guess,

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 3>lower carb indulgence bar, there aren't many things in there

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 3>that I would technically classify as natural. So I'll go

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 3>through the nutrition information panel. So this five bars in

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 3>the box.

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Each bar is.

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 3>Thirty grams so per serving nearly five hundred kilodules, which

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:47.120
<v Speaker 3>is about one hundred and sixteen calories, so quite low

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:50.360
<v Speaker 3>calorie for you know, a kind of chocolate indulgent bar.

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 3>Three point seven grams of protein, six point six grams

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:56.479
<v Speaker 3>of fat total, with five point nine grams of that

0:24:56.560 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 3>being saturated fat. That is basically twenty percent saturated fat

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:02.640
<v Speaker 3>in the bars. I'll let your pipe in a minute,

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 3>but I'll just round off the carb is four point

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 3>four grams, sugar two point two, dietary fiber is six

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 3>point three grams. But a lot of that dietary fiber

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 3>isn't coming from the whole food sources that we want,

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:16.919
<v Speaker 3>like you know, the whole grains, oats, nuts and seeds, legumes.

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 3>It's coming from what I call kind of modified fiber sources.

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 3>And forty five milligrams of sodium, which is very very low,

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:27.119
<v Speaker 3>not a concern so to me. It's the ingredient list,

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 3>and it's the saturated fat in total, which I'm sure

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:32.920
<v Speaker 3>that you have many thoughts about, because if there's one

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:35.959
<v Speaker 3>of many things that irritate you, it's saturated fat, isn't it, Susie.

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's saturated fat in a bar that is being

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:43.400
<v Speaker 2>marketed as somewhat healthy because it's lowering car Because whilst

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 2>some of the claims around saturated fat and heart disease

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:49.120
<v Speaker 2>have been somewhat refuted, with people saying, oh, a small

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 2>amount of saturated fat doesn't increase the risk of heart disease,

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:55.639
<v Speaker 2>I tend to disagree when it's in processed food and

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 2>I think this is the problem with the bars because

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:00.440
<v Speaker 2>generally speaking, a strands get more than enough saturated fat

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 2>from foods like their dairy, they're lean meat, their chicken, cheese,

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:06.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, the foods that do have a lot of

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:10.119
<v Speaker 2>nutritional value. So then when we're getting multiple grams are

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 2>saturated fat. I think that one we looked at together

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 2>was eight or nine grams are saturated fat in the time,

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 2>and it was tiny bar. It was forty grams or

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:19.440
<v Speaker 2>twenty actually maybe twenty or thirty grams.

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>It was twenty five. Yeah, you could eat in two bites.

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 2>As an amount. If you're looking, we wouldn't want more

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:27.120
<v Speaker 2>than thirty percent of total intake to be coming from

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:30.640
<v Speaker 2>saturated fat. So if you're working on a female, say

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 2>having sixty grams of fat a day, which is a

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:36.400
<v Speaker 2>pretty low fat diet, that in terms of thirty thirty

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 2>thirty fat ratios for cell assimilation, that would translate into

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 2>no more than about twenty grams are saturated fat per day,

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 2>which you will easily get from your regular foods, like

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:48.639
<v Speaker 2>you get a little bit from olive oil if you're

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 2>having some red meat, if you're having a serve of cheese.

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:53.360
<v Speaker 2>So When I see a bar that's offering six eight

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 2>ten grams in a small bar mask that's claiming to

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:59.199
<v Speaker 2>be healthy, I'm like, that is deeply misleading. So I

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:01.439
<v Speaker 2>think the first take co message for our listeners is

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 2>if you see on a snack by the first ingredients chocolate,

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 2>put it back.

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>It's not healthy for you.

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 2>You need to be looking for a whole food bar

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 2>that's got a nutbase that's going to be much better

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:14.399
<v Speaker 2>nutritionally than a bar with chocolate, because, for example, this

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 2>is per hundred grams almost twenty percent saturated fat, almost

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 2>twenty grams per hundred and per bar, it's almost six

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:24.119
<v Speaker 2>So that's a third of your entire daily recommended upper

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:27.960
<v Speaker 2>intake of saturated fat coming from a relatively small thirty gram,

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 2>one hundred calorie snack that's basically covered in chocolate. And

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:33.880
<v Speaker 2>there's one in the range that's worse. That's cherry that's

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 2>even higher because coconut, of course offer saturated fat. Now

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 2>I have noticed that some of the brands, So for example,

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:41.879
<v Speaker 2>I looked at the Maver's range because Mavers are doing

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 2>more chokcoating, there's a bit much lower. They're not low

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 2>in saturated fat. But I thought they were about five percent.

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:50.679
<v Speaker 2>And the bars come in at less than three grams

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:54.399
<v Speaker 2>of saturated pat per bar, so they're doing it in

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 2>a slightly better way. So that's another reference. If you

0:27:57.080 --> 0:28:01.200
<v Speaker 2>can get per serve less than three of saturated fat,

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 2>that's not too bad. But I would still generally prefer

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 2>a bar that didn't come coated in chocolate at all.

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:09.359
<v Speaker 2>So I think a little drizzle you can get away

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 2>with as soon as it's choclated. It's a chocolate bar,

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 2>and don't kid yourself that it's not.

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and if you want chocolate, just go eat some chocolate,

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 3>like get the real dealing to me, I'd be much

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:20.919
<v Speaker 3>more satisfied from having a link ball or two and

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:24.199
<v Speaker 3>actually feel genuinely satisfied and just be able to move

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:25.879
<v Speaker 3>on with my day and not think about it. Whereas

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:27.679
<v Speaker 3>the reality is that a lot of our clients, Susie,

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 3>are having these type of I don't know, indulgent health

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 3>halo type bars and eating one or two a day

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 3>and then still bringing on the block of chocolate at

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:37.359
<v Speaker 3>night after dinner anyway, because they're actually not satisfied. So

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 3>I've always had that big belief that if you want something,

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 3>have the thing you actually want in a small portion,

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 3>be mindful, measure it out, sit down and thoroughly enjoy it,

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 3>and then.

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Just move on.

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 3>Like call it a soul food like this is to me,

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 3>I guess like they are calling it an indulgence bar,

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 3>so they're not trying to say it's healthy healthy, But

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 3>I think again, like do you prefer that or do

0:28:56.960 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 3>you prefer some actual chocolate or some actual ice cream?

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 3>Because the real is that if you stick to a

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 3>good quality portion size, the nutritionals are pretty similar, and

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 3>if you have a couple of extra grams of carb

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 3>in something, it's not the end of the world.

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Like women actually need carbohydrate.

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 3>We don't need every single food that we eat being

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 3>low carb because we're going to have a lot more

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 3>problems than if we were eating carbohydrate anyway. So we

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 3>want carb, but it's just more of that controlled amount

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 3>throughout the day. That is probably an area for a

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 3>bigger discussion another day.

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Too true, And I just had to look at a

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 2>limp ball has five grams saturated fat per ball, so

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 2>that's actually less than this chocolate treat. So just be aware.

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 2>You know it seems like chocolate, it probably is. And

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 2>that's the case with a lot of protein bars. We

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 2>were looking at another very well known brand and it

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 2>had like in the Actually, I looked at a protein

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 2>cookie a client had the other day and it had

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 2>fifteen It was being marketed as fifteen grams of protein

0:29:48.400 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 2>per cookie, but it was three hundred and fifty calories.

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 1>It was a real you know. So I think you know,

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 1>in particularly in that health.

0:29:56.480 --> 0:30:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Food section where there's the higher protein chocolate flavored stuff

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 2>that our cookie flavored chocolate chip cookie coated in chocolate,

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 2>they're probably more like chocolate bars than natural protein bars,

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 2>because the truth is land protein bars don't usually taste

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 2>that great if they're nutritionally sound, because they're pretty processed

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:17.320
<v Speaker 2>in protein on its own and taste so good. So yep,

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 2>if it looks like a chocolate bar, it probably is

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 2>all right. Moving on from one level of indulgence to another.

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 2>A listener question from a client of mind who said

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:30.720
<v Speaker 2>to me in passing, as clients often do when they're

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 2>throwing in something just to keep it interesting, said so,

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 2>and I just am checking it's okay that I have

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 2>my mini coke a few times a week as a treat.

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 2>And she said it's the minis. It's the real minis.

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 2>And I said, oh, okay, I love it. She said,

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't have it very often. I said, well you

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 2>can't have the zero. No, she doesn't want to have

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 2>the zero?

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Is it okay?

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 2>And I said, well, you know, we would our line

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 2>as dieticians. Is there anything's kind of okay occasionally? But

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't say a cheeky soft drink, even a mini

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 2>can three weeks occasionally. And so as a reference point,

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 2>a Buddy bottle of coke has got about thirteen teaspoons

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 2>of sugar, A can has about nine, and a mini

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:13.720
<v Speaker 2>can then would have about four to five about two

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 2>hundred mile. So I would say to my client listening,

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 2>I want you to get five teaspoons of sugar and

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 2>put it in a glass and see if you drink that,

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 2>because that's ultimately what you're drinking. Because everything is a

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 2>choice in life. You know, a good girlfriend of mine

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 2>was drinking a Buddy bottle of coke yesterday at a

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 2>kid's performance, and it took every amount of my control

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 2>to not say something, but you know, it's to their own.

0:31:36.880 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Would I drink a glass of five teaspoons of sugar?

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't do. I be quite strict with my kids

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 2>doing it. Yes, I am, I really. If they're having it,

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 2>I'll try and get them to do the zero and

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 2>if they're even getting a slushy, I'll try and find

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 2>the one when they've got a zero one. Do they

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 2>have it occasionally, yes, they do, so I think the

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 2>issue with sugary drinks and lollies is there's nothing positive

0:31:58.320 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 2>nutritionally in them.

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 1>It's just pure. It's not good for us. It's a

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 1>complete overload.

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 2>If you're a teenage basketball player or you know, been

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 2>out doing a massive hike and had it occasionally, sure,

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:10.719
<v Speaker 2>but two or three times a week is not occasionally.

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 2>That's a habit. So I think basically my stance is

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 2>the less sugary drink you have ever, the better. And

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 2>if you are happy with your weight and not wright

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:22.600
<v Speaker 2>about your dental health and love it that much, sure,

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 2>but I wouldn't be recommending it nutritionally, even particularly if

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 2>it's more than once a week. I think once a

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 2>week for that kind of thing, it'd be what I'd say, sure,

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 2>But once it's more than that, it's easy because the

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 2>more you have of that sweet food, the more you

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 2>want and it's just five tea spoons of sugar and

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 2>a glass, So that's basically what you're drinking, and you've

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:41.960
<v Speaker 2>got to decide if that's the right choice for you.

0:32:42.680 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I definitely agree with everything you've said, But

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 3>I also I would say to someone saying that to me,

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 3>does it align with your goals and does it fit

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 3>in with the rest of your diet, because if it does,

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't have a problem with a client doing that.

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 3>But I think for most people, they're not just having

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 3>one or two treats a week, right. They're having they

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:02.320
<v Speaker 3>want the wines Friday and Saturday night. They want to

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 3>go out once or twice a week. They want to have,

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:06.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, take the kids out for ice cream every weekend.

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 3>They want to have a little bit of the work

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 3>morning tea every Tuesday or Wednesday. Like, these treats slip

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 3>in far more than what we realize. But if it

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 3>was someone who you know, does a lot of exercise,

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 3>their diet's really good. They don't They're not really a

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 3>chocolate person. They rarely ever eat out, they don't drink alcohol,

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 3>and they want to have a mini little can of

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 3>coke a couple of times a week. I personally wouldn't

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 3>have a problem with that, but I do think it

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 3>comes back to what is your baseline diet, and every

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:33.720
<v Speaker 3>single one of us is going to be highly variable

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 3>in terms of that response. So I think it's a

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 3>better question for what else are you having that are

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 3>considered treats in your.

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Diet, and what are your goals?

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 3>And if it aligns with your goals and you know

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 3>the bulk of obviously it's the amount of sugar that

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:48.040
<v Speaker 3>we're having every single day or every single week that's

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 3>going to make the real impact here. And if the

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 3>rest of your diet is incredibly low, to me, I

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't really have, you know, a problem with it. I

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 3>would sort of classify that as your soul food a

0:33:57.440 --> 0:33:58.960
<v Speaker 3>couple of times a week, which I wouldn't have a

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 3>problem with. But I do think it comes down to

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 3>what else is creeping into the diet, which we know

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:05.400
<v Speaker 3>for a lot of people it's never just one or

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 3>two things. It's often quite a lot of things. When

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 3>we really take a step back, and I'm totally honest

0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 3>with ourselves, So I think it's just a good one

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:14.400
<v Speaker 3>to sort of inwardly reflect on or even keep a

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 3>food diary for a couple of weeks, and an accurate

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:19.320
<v Speaker 3>food diary, I'll say, and you will be actually surprised

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:21.400
<v Speaker 3>at the little things that creep in, because even Susie

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:22.759
<v Speaker 3>and I, you know, it's hard to say no when

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:25.840
<v Speaker 3>things are about we're socializing, we're off at a kid's party,

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:28.240
<v Speaker 3>we're caught out and you know, someone does a social

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 3>thing and we weren't really prepared for it. It is

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:31.879
<v Speaker 3>really hard to keep on track, and all of these

0:34:31.880 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 3>little things do slip in. So I don't think it's

0:34:34.160 --> 0:34:37.080
<v Speaker 3>a simple black or white answer from my perspective, just

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of something more to think on.

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 4>I would say, true, true, true, true. So I've coaxed

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 4>you think go for it occasionally, all right. An that

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 4>brings us to the end of the initiation caps for

0:34:46.040 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 4>another week. Please keep telling your friends about us so

0:34:48.239 --> 0:34:50.400
<v Speaker 4>we can continue to grow, and if you need some

0:34:50.440 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 4>evidence based supplementation in your life, check out our website

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:56.400
<v Speaker 4>designed by Dietitians dot com and we will see you

0:34:56.400 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 4>next Wednesday for our weekly episode drop.

0:34:58.760 --> 0:34:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening.

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:03.839
<v Speaker 3>The stamps Some Man Steps