WEBVTT - Why The Two Trials?

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Just before nine o'clock last night, the jury returns guilty

0:00:06.080 --> 0:00:10.000
<v Speaker 1>verdicts against all three defendants. It was absolute shambles, to

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:12.000
<v Speaker 1>tell you the truth, just absolutely really.

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Comorant blood on his clothing the day after the alleged

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.440
<v Speaker 2>detemp on a shallow mud bank and the fitz Roy River. Basically,

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 2>I think most of the people are used to me.

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 2>There are good people.

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 3>I think a really important question we need to ask

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:26.279
<v Speaker 3>is how many Indigenous prisoners in Australia are innocent.

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>This is Curtain, a podcast where we pull back the

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>blinds to shine a light on the darkest parts of

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 1>our justice system and ask who are the victims.

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm Amy Maguire.

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:42.160
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Martin Hodgson, a senior advocate for the Foreign

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 3>Prisoner Support Service. Our producer is Paul Watts. Music by

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Clint Curtis and produced in collaboration with the Brisbane Indigenous

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 3>Media Association. And a warning, this series contains the names

0:00:55.960 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 3>of deceased peoples and has distressing content that might sid

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 3>some listeners.

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>We are now up to episode five in this podcast

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>series and by now you might be forming your own

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 1>opinion about the innocence of Kernin which is Kevin Henry's

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>nickname Kevin Henry has been in jail for a quarter

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>of a century over the murder of an Aboriginal woman

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:18.480
<v Speaker 1>named Linda, found on the banks of the Fitzroy River

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>in September nine ninety one. We've told you a little

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>bit about how we came to doubt Kevin's guilt. Those

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>were based on historic title records which showed it was

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>very unlikely that Kevin had placed Linda in the water

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>where police alleged he did, which was on the south

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>side of the river, the Tanuba House side.

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 3>We found she was most likely placed in on the

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 3>opposite side, on the racecourse side. If you've never been

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 3>to rock Hampton in central Queensland, that would require about

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 3>a five to ten minute drive over one of rock

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Hampton's two bridges. We also told you about how the

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 3>police failed in following up other leads despite the need

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 3>to go down every avenue of inquiry. Who told you

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 3>a little bit about Linda's last day of how she

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 3>most likely came into contact with the three women who

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 3>brutally assaulted her that night the night before she was found,

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 3>because she was found having sex with one of the men,

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 3>Duckhart Duckhart.

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Was the man who later found Linda's clothes at Tanuba

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the next morning, before he would have known that she

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>had been found on the banks of the river. For

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the past two weeks, we've also been telling you about

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Kevin's confession, the only thing that really ties him to

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Linda's death. There was never any DNA evidence tying Kevin

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to Linda. The only thing that stuck to him was

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>that confession. And we brought you an expert in forced confessions,

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Pat McGuinness, whose legal work was the subject of the

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Academy Award winning documentary Murder on a Sunday morning.

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 3>We raised a lot of concerns about Kevin's confession and

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:57.239
<v Speaker 3>particularly the police tactics used to extract information. Now we'll

0:02:57.240 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 3>take you back again to the day that Kevin was

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 3>picked up, because this day is important. It was September five,

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 3>four days after Linda's body was found. Now, we told

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 3>you that in the afternoon Kevin was picked up by

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 3>police while walking on the street and taken to Rockhampton

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 3>Police station.

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>But earlier that morning, around six am, in fact, the

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>woman who led the assault on Linda, Susan Aubrey, was

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>also arrested by police. Her arrest was followed by the

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 1>arrest of two other women that day, Margaret Bob and

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Amy Saunders. All three of the women were described in

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>several witness statements and later admitted leading the assault on

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Linda that night. We've also told you that the assault

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>was brutal, sustained and had the potential to be lethal.

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 3>We're going to tell you a little bit more about

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 3>that assault later in the series. But on this day,

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 3>the police picked up Susan, Margaret, and Amy and charged

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 3>them with murder. The man who recommended the three women

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 3>be charged with murder was the highest ranked police officer

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 3>in Rockhampton, Detective Inspector Kel Weeks. Remember that that's important now.

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 3>Even though the police had already charged three women with murder,

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 3>for some reason, the two arresting officers, Senior Constable Leslie

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 3>Girk and Senior Constable Robert Hunt, picked up Kevin.

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:30.239
<v Speaker 1>They took him back to the Rock Campden police station

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that afternoon. So that day, those few hours on September fifth,

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 1>before he was picked up, was the last time Kevin

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Henry was free in a quarter of a century. Because

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>after that confession, he was charged with murder. Now, think

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 1>about that four people charged with murder on the same day,

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 1>two separate sets of circumstances.

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 2>We'll talk about that later.

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 3>Now, for the last two weeks, we've gone through Kevin's

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 3>confession in detail. Remember, so how it ended. Here's Elijah Player,

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 3>a young Aboriginal radio announcer from rock Hampton's radio station

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 3>four US, playing the role of twenty two year old

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Kevin Henry.

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>See that's it, man, I just told you everything.

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 2>That's all the evidence.

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 3>I've got nothing to say. No more. Now you can't

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:21.040
<v Speaker 3>ask me anymore because I've got nothing else to say.

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 3>Kevin ended that interview and was very clear he had

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 3>nothing more to say. Remember, he had no legal representation,

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:34.360
<v Speaker 3>he'd only been to year nine in school, and he

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 3>was likely very confused about what was happening. But that

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 3>interview didn't end there.

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Now, after Kevin refused to say anything else, Senior Constable

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:49.039
<v Speaker 1>Girk and Senior Constable Hunt took Kevin for a ride

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>in the police car. They taped the conversation with him

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>on that short trip. Now, they took Kevin down to

0:05:55.960 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Chanuba House and they videotaped him walking through the scene

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>of the crime. Now, why didn't we include that fact

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 1>in the last two episodes.

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 3>Well because of this, this is the judge at Kevin

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 3>Henry's trial. So after the initial formalities, the judge was

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 3>quick to raise the issue of the confession. Now, let

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 3>me read from the transcript. The judges remarks, this is

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:28.719
<v Speaker 3>what he said, mister Wright. The prosecutor has recognized that

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:32.159
<v Speaker 3>it cannot be said that the interview that continues after

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 3>the accused statement on page nineteen is admissible as a

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 3>voluntary statement. Clearly enough, the accused is exercising his right

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 3>to decline to answer further questions. The exercise of this

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 3>right is ignored by the investigating police, and the accused

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 3>is put in the position where he is effectively told

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:59.359
<v Speaker 3>he has no such rights. He makes some two or

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 3>three further attempts to assert that he wishes to say

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 3>nothing further, and these are ignored. Clearly, the record of

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 3>interview from the middle of page nineteen onward at the

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 3>CI Branch Rockhampton is tainted and cannot be received as

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 3>a voluntary statement. The judge then goes on to say,

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 3>the accused has quite clearly at page nineteen exercised the

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 3>right that is the right of every citizen that right

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 3>must be respected in its entirety, both by the court

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 3>and by the investigating officers. So I rule that the

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 3>subsequent interview of the record at the CI branch subsequent

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 3>to page nineteen is not admissible, as indeed is agreed,

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 3>and that the video and the audio recording of the

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 3>trip down to Tanuba and the return to the CI

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 3>branch is also not receivable because it is not voluntary

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 3>in the sense that the law uses that word.

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>So Martin, in the judge's statement, just then he imagined

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>something about a page nineteen.

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 2>What was in that page nineteen.

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's a part of the interview where Kevin really

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 3>asserts both his rights not to need to speak anymore,

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 3>and he really states what he wants to say, and

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 3>he ends by saying, nobody killed her. See that's it, man,

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 3>I just told you everything. That's all the evidence. I

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 3>got nothing to say. No more. Now you can't ask

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 3>me anymore because I got nothing else to say. And

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 3>that's a clear exercise of his right not to further

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 3>continue with that interview. And yet he was continued to

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:52.680
<v Speaker 3>be pressed and pressed and pressed. And we know now

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 3>that that interview went on for at least an hour further,

0:08:57.160 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 3>and he was taken to Tanuba House, he was put

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 3>in a police car. He was interviewed in the police

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 3>car both during the ride down and back from Towas

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 3>And so the judges ruled that all of that was involuntary.

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 3>And we know Kevin earlier in his interview, had already

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 3>asked for earlier quite forcefully. He also declined to comment

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 3>on multiple times. So when the judge says that Kevin

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 3>proclaimed I got nothing else to say, that was not

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 3>the first time Kevin had exercised his right not to

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 3>continue with the interview. The judge clearly identifies two or

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 3>three other times he feels Kevin tried to end the

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 3>interview and should have been allowed not to speak any further.

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 3>And there's also a great deal of concern about the

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 3>fact that Kevin didn't have legal representation, despite what you've

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 3>already heard him requesting it multiple times.

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 1>So, I mean, the police officers heard him say this

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:07.199
<v Speaker 1>very adamantly. They knew he didn't have legal representation because

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>at the first time he'd asked for it, they still

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 1>took him in a police car and took him down

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 1>to Tanuba. I mean, I know, we can't really establish

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>what their actual motives were. But it just seems like

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>he said it over and over again. Why do they

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>need to take him down to Tanuba.

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, clearly they're trying to get him to say something

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 3>they want to hear. If they were satisfied that he'd said,

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 3>or he knew, or they could get out of him,

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 3>they would have stopped. But that despite knowing the law. Surely,

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 3>as men who'd conducted many of these sort of interviews

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 3>which they say they had on the stand, they continued

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 3>to press on despite everything they're taught. And the judge

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 3>was pretty ruthless in ruling a lot of this confession out.

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 3>He was very clear didn't need to take his time

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 3>on it. It was a very clear matter of law,

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 3>and he was fairly scathing of the police and the

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:08.719
<v Speaker 3>police practice.

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>And then what does it say that he ruled such

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 1>a big chunk of the confession out so that it

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>was involuntary. What does it say about the other parts

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of the confession and the ones we've already read out

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>on air. Doesn't mean that potentially they were made involuntary too,

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:22.079
<v Speaker 1>like what we think.

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:22.679
<v Speaker 2>Might have happened.

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:26.839
<v Speaker 3>Well, the judge does say that even at the part

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 3>he ends the interview where the judge doesn't allow any

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 3>more of that interview to be placed into evidence that

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 3>he was concerned on multiple occasions Kevin had already tried

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 3>to terminate that interview. So even the judge feels the

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 3>sense that Kevin was under duress and that he was

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 3>not voluntarily responding to the questions he was being asked

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 3>and the way he was being probed, And in fact,

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 3>he even says that the police ignored the rights that

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:03.439
<v Speaker 3>Kevin has all citizens have. So I think it definitely

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 3>raises a great deal of concern about the police behavior

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 3>that day. And we've heard last week from Pat McGinnis,

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 3>an expert in this area, and we've heard from other

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 3>experts that false confessions are very common, and now we

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 3>know that Kevin was pushed even when he didn't want

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 3>to say anymore.

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>It's very interesting that this came up right at the

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 1>start of the trial. Isn't it that this confession played

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 1>such a big part at the start of the trial.

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:36.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, definitely, And I think that's for two reasons. One,

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 3>the prosecutor had clearly already accepted that there was a

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 3>great likelihood a huge amount of the confession was going

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 3>to be ruled inadmissible, and he didn't protest that at all.

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:53.719
<v Speaker 3>So even the prosecutor was accepting that the majority of

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 3>Kevin's statement wasn't voluntary. And I think the other reason

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 3>we can assume that this came up so early is

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 3>because there really wasn't any other evidence against Kevin. So

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:11.199
<v Speaker 3>for the bulk of the trial, all that's been relied

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 3>on is this one confession, and if most of that

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 3>is already struck off, well that's how they had to

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 3>start the trial. So they knew what they were working with.

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 2>And they weren't working was a lot.

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 3>Obviously, no, they weren't working with much at all. So

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 3>the judge made it very clear that in removing such

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 3>a large portion of Kevin's statement, that what was going

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 3>to be allowed into evidence was considerably reduced compared to

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 3>what the prosecutor had previously believed. So it certainly changed

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 3>the shape of the trial, and it lets us know

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 3>a lot about what the judge was thinking, and in

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 3>an extent, even what the prosecutor was thinking, because he

0:13:56.960 --> 0:14:00.080
<v Speaker 3>didn't contest. Once that judge is ruling.

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Now there was something else, very very strange about this case.

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 3>We told you that On that same day, September fifth,

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 3>the last day Kevin Henry was a free man. Three women,

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 3>Susan Aubrey, Amy Saunders and Margaret Bob, the women who

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 3>led the brutal assault on Winder, were arrested as well

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 3>in the morning. They were charged with murder.

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 2>But how could that be?

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>How could four people be charged with murder for two

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>separate sets of circumstances. How could Linda have been murdered twice? Mardin,

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 1>We've sort of been operating under the assumption that the

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>women it was Kevin who was charged with murder, the

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>women had gotten the charges for Grover's bodily harm. But

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>we later found out that wasn't the case, did we

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>How did we find that out?

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 3>Well? I received a package in the mail and I

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 3>was assuming that going to be a transcript or further

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 3>pages to the transcript of Kevin's trial, but in fact

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 3>what it was was a transcript of proceedings in the

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 3>magistrates court in Rockhampton where the three women were formally

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 3>presented in front of a judge charged with murder. And

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 3>this was the first time we'd heard about it, and

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 3>so I'm not sure how much that Kevin's later lawyers

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 3>knew about this and how much that had been analyzed

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 3>even during his initial trial.

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting, So how long had all four people been

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>charged with murder over Linda's death?

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 3>So all four were charged on the fifth of September,

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 3>and the murder charges against the three women were not

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 3>dropped until the twenty seventh of February the next year.

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 3>So that's a good five month period where we have

0:15:56.000 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 3>Kevin and then a set of three women charged with

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 3>murdering the same woman, Linda, but in separate circumstances. And

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 3>that's a very odd state of affairs, and it's something

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 3>I've discussed with a number of lawyers, both in Australia

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 3>and overseas, and it just seems a highly unusual fact

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 3>that you could have two groups charged with the murder

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 3>of the same person, but based on totally separate evidence

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 3>and different version of events. One can't be true. In fact,

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 3>maybe both aren't true. But we find out that those

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 3>charges against the three women are subsequently dropped.

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>The thing I find very confusing about it is that

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the three women of charges murder early on in the morning,

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and yet later on Kevin has picked up so deliberately

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>targeted it sounds like because they knew who he was,

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and then he's gone through this big process of almost

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>being like, I think, being her worst to confess that

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:05.360
<v Speaker 1>they'd already had three women charge with murder already, they'd

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>already charged people, so got the people they thought were

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>responsible for this death. Why would they need to go

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:13.639
<v Speaker 1>pick up Kevin and charge someone else's murder.

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 3>That was a question I had as well, But the

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 3>answer became very clear once I received this further information

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:24.920
<v Speaker 3>in the mail. And what that shows is that Susan

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 3>Aubrey was arrested at six point fifty am that morning,

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 3>on the fifth of September. Now, she'd already given a

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 3>statement to police the day after Linda's body had been found,

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 3>and in it she doesn't say anything about Kevin's involvement.

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 3>But once she'd been charged with murder, she started taking

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:49.680
<v Speaker 3>a completely different line to her first statement, and that's

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 3>when Kevin's name was raised. Now people have to remember

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:59.439
<v Speaker 3>that everyone would have been talking about Linda's death, the circumstances,

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 3>and there'd been a lot of witnesses to the vicious

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 3>assault the three women committed against Linda. But somehow in

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 3>that second interview, Susan Aubrey starts pointing the finger at Kevin,

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:15.920
<v Speaker 3>and the police, for whatever reason, start to take that seriously.

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:16.640
<v Speaker 2>So at this.

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:19.919
<v Speaker 1>Point, were there any suspects for the murder of Linda

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>other than these women, Well, we.

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:26.680
<v Speaker 3>Can tell immediately from their statements that there certainly were.

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 3>They were mentioning a lot of names by now. But

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:35.440
<v Speaker 3>we also know something else. A local lawyer approached one

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 3>of the police officers that day and made a statement.

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 3>Now it wasn't officially recorded, but it is acknowledged to

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 3>have taken place, and that is that a client of

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 3>this lawyer had confessed that he'd committed the murder, and

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 3>that client was not Kevin Henry.

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 2>Did the police look into it?

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 1>Was there any suggestion that they had considered this other suspect.

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 3>We don't believe they ever looked at it. In fact,

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 3>we know once Kevin was picked up on the fifth

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 3>of September and the interview conducted with him, most of

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 3>which is later struck out as involuntary, the police didn't

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:19.400
<v Speaker 3>investigate anyone else. They never followed up on this individual

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 3>who had supposedly confessed to a lawyer. They never followed

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 3>up on the other individuals named in the statements of

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 3>the three women who'd committed the violent assault and who

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 3>were then charged with murder. So the police should have

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 3>been looking for their co assailants if they believed, and

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:42.679
<v Speaker 3>clearly they did, that those three women had committed murder.

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 3>But even the fact of a lawyer coming to them

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:50.400
<v Speaker 3>and stating that someone had confessed to them didn't seem

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:54.400
<v Speaker 3>to change the way they conducted their investigation. And once

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 3>they'd taken their statement from Kevin, even though it's clearly

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 3>tainted and the judge ruled that, they just stopped investigating

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 3>point blank.

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 1>So who actually charged the three women? Was it the

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 1>same police officers?

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 3>So the charges laid against the three women that was

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:14.439
<v Speaker 3>handled by the most senior police officer in Rockhampton at

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 3>the time, Detective Inspector Kel Weeks. But we know from

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 3>the trial transcripts that Senior comes to a Wesley Girk

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 3>and Senior comes to a Robert Hunt. Were the ones

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 3>that pressed forward with interviewing Kevin, with taking him to

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 3>Tanuba and then we're charging him with murder? And it

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:39.120
<v Speaker 3>wasn't the detective inspector who would charge Kevin, even though

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 3>the detective inspector was most senior officer and had already

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:47.880
<v Speaker 3>charged three individuals in relation to Linda's death. The two

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:51.959
<v Speaker 3>senior constables took it upon themselves to charge Kevin.

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's very interesting because obviously, at that point,

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:58.639
<v Speaker 1>the highest ranked police officer in Rocky had decided that

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 1>there was enough to charge women, and yet lower ranked

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:04.400
<v Speaker 1>police officers have gone ahead and decided to look into

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>someone else.

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 3>It's quite unusual, especially in a country town. It's not

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 3>as if we're in a large city in the United

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 3>States where multiple murders are happening on one day. This

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:22.159
<v Speaker 3>was clearly the most serious and horrific event that had

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:25.920
<v Speaker 3>happened in Rockhampton for some time. So you would assume

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 3>that the police were trying to get everything done to

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 3>the book accurately and investigate it fully. And we know

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 3>that the most senior officer in the town was watching

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:42.399
<v Speaker 3>over the investigation and he'd decided to charge the three women.

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 3>Now why two lower ranked officers and much lower ranked

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 3>officers would go out of their way on that same

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 3>day to charge Kevin without consulting with their superior officer,

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:03.679
<v Speaker 3>having conduct did an interview with Kevin and seemingly trying

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 3>to get confessions based on just the implication of one

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:12.639
<v Speaker 3>of the accused murderers seems to be very bizarre.

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>So I guess, bringing it back to how we I

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:21.119
<v Speaker 1>guess started. In February, the women and Kevin, their case

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 1>comes up in court the Magistrate's court.

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:26.159
<v Speaker 2>Are all four still charged with murder.

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 3>In the first court hearing, all four are charged with murder,

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:33.919
<v Speaker 3>but it's only the three women who appear. Kevin's not

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 3>scheduled to appear for another couple of months. And it's

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 3>quite unusual what occurs. And I'll read from the court

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 3>transcripts so everyone can understand very clearly what happened. So

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 3>the judge reads the charges and these are against the

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 3>three women, and he states that on the thirty first

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 3>of August nineteen ninety one, at Rockhampton in the state

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 3>of Queensland, you murdered one winder and for cultural reasons,

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 3>we won't say her last name. He goes on to say,

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:13.640
<v Speaker 3>there is a further charge on the same day, each

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:17.640
<v Speaker 3>of you unlawfully did grievous bodily harm to one winder.

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 3>At this point the prosecutor interrupts, and this is where

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 3>things get a little strange. The prosecutor says, there are

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 3>preliminary matters. First, I would seek to substitute charges in

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 3>relation to all three defendants in relation to those murder charges.

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:41.679
<v Speaker 3>Now that's not the strange part. What happens next is

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:46.359
<v Speaker 3>what's unusual. The judge asks one of the lawyers for

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 3>the women, does he agree to these murder charges being dropped?

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:56.439
<v Speaker 3>And he states yes, I was informed of that only

0:23:56.480 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 3>this morning, your worship. So at that point, the judge

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 3>strikes the three murder charges against the women. But what

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 3>we now know is that for five months, the women's

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 3>lawyers had no idea that the charge of murder was

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 3>going to be dropped against them. We don't know when

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 3>that decision was made. We do know that the lawyers

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:25.439
<v Speaker 3>for the women didn't know until that day that it

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 3>was going to take place that those murder charges against

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:32.199
<v Speaker 3>the three women would be dropped. What we don't know

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:36.400
<v Speaker 3>is when the police or the prosecutor made the decision

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 3>themselves to drop that charge. So it appears that for

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:45.640
<v Speaker 3>five months, four people were charged with murder with two

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 3>separate circumstances.

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 2>So then what happened next.

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, then we have quite a lengthy period of argument

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 3>between the prosecutor and the defenders for the three women.

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Once that murder charge had been struck out, the prosecutor

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 3>tried to introduce a new charge of unlawful killing against

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:14.399
<v Speaker 3>the three women and maintains the charge of grievous bodily harm.

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 3>So there's a great deal of debate between the defense

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:23.359
<v Speaker 3>lawyers and the prosecutor about that unlawful killing charge, and

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:25.920
<v Speaker 3>in the end they go back and forward on a

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:29.640
<v Speaker 3>crucial number of matters of law. But in the end

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:33.919
<v Speaker 3>the judge rules, based on the fact that there is

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 3>another person who's been charged with murder and that he

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:41.399
<v Speaker 3>will hear that case in a few months time, that

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 3>he won't accept the unlawful killing charge, and that is removed.

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 3>So the women are no longer charged with either murder

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 3>or unlawful killing. Only the charge of previous bodily harm

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 3>is allowed to stand. And this is important because we

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 3>know at the start of Kevin's trial the judge initially

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 3>raised grave issues about his confession, and we also know

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:12.880
<v Speaker 3>he struck a huge part of that confession from the record.

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 3>Now we find out the judge also had grave concern

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 3>about the way all four were charged. What they were

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 3>charged with, and the fact that the prosecutor seemed to

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 3>be changing his mind on the run and had only

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 3>told the defense lawyers that day what he was doing,

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:39.160
<v Speaker 3>and the judge just doesn't accept that. And I think

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 3>that goes largely to the evidence against Kevin and perhaps

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 3>even the evidence against all three women. And this seems

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 3>to stem from the police really not doing their job

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 3>and not having conducted a thorough investigation, because on that

0:26:56.160 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 3>day in February, the judge does ask about the level

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 3>of evidence against the accused, the.

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Level of evidence against who Kevin or the three women.

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:09.119
<v Speaker 3>Initially he asks about the evidence against the three women,

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:13.479
<v Speaker 3>but given the lack of evidence and information put forward,

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:16.719
<v Speaker 3>he then goes on to ask what the evidence is

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 3>against Kevin. And that's important because for him to be

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:27.879
<v Speaker 3>convinced that he can drop the unlawful killing charge against

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 3>the three women. He states that he needs to be

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:34.879
<v Speaker 3>sure that the murder charge against Kevin Henry is still

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 3>going to go ahead, and so he's probing as to

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:42.919
<v Speaker 3>how much evidence there actually is, and there's not a

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:48.720
<v Speaker 3>great deal presented. There's some forensic evidence, more of which

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:53.920
<v Speaker 3>would be later revealed at Kevin Henry's trial, and one

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:57.360
<v Speaker 3>of the arresting police officers is called to the stand

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:01.439
<v Speaker 3>to explain to the judge what evidence there is, and

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 3>interestingly enough, some of his evidence changes at Kevin Henry's trial.

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 1>So did the defense have much to say about that

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 1>that lack of evidence.

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 3>They did, And what we find out about the transcript

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:18.919
<v Speaker 3>from the February is that they hadn't seen most of

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 3>the evidence, particularly the physical evidence, and they asked that

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 3>the evidence be tended and then ask for an adjournment

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 3>so that they can look through the evidence. So that's

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:34.880
<v Speaker 3>highly unusual that we've got charges being dropped, new charges

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 3>being included. We've got the defense not having seen evidence,

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 3>the defense not being aware that those charges were going

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:46.920
<v Speaker 3>to be dropped. We've got a judge who's not convinced

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 3>of the whole process. We've got a judge who is

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 3>only agreeing to drop charges and only agreeing to introduce

0:28:56.880 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 3>new charges if the prosecution will bring that evidence forward

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 3>so that both he and the defense can see it.

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of mess in this situation, and it

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 3>comes largely from the police and prosecution side.

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 1>But given that we know that there wasn't a lot

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>of evidence to justify what we think anyway in our

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 1>conviction over murtaphor Kevin. I mean, would there have been

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>any enough evidence even brought forward at that time in

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 1>February when they're actually looking.

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 3>At this at that time. No. And one thing we

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 3>do know, however, is that multiple witnesses in the case

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 3>gave up to three different statements. In fact, one witness

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 3>may have given many more. So clearly, once this had

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 3>taken place and the judge had been raising doubts, more

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 3>evidence was sought by the police. And that wasn't physical evidence,

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 3>it wasn't forensic evidence, it wasn't DNA, It was simply

0:29:55.080 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 3>the statements of people who'd already given sworn evidence as statement.

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 1>So what you're saying is after February, when they realized

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 1>they had to gather more evidence, they went back and

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 1>reinterviewed people had given witness statements.

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 2>So other people gave two witness statements.

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so there was two witness statements. Some witnesses gave three,

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 3>some even more. And what's concerning about that is in

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 3>their first statements, given either the day after Linda had

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 3>been found or in the following days, those witnesses largely

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 3>say they can't remember what happened, and they say that

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 3>because they consumed a large amount of alcohol the night

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 3>Winder died. So how could they be expected to recall five, six,

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 3>seven months later what they couldn't recall only days after

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 3>Winder's death. Nevertheless, the police pressed forward with interviewing those people,

0:30:56.880 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 3>and we know they even chased some of them around

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 3>Queen's and to get those interviews. So there was clearly

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:08.959
<v Speaker 3>concern amongst the police and probably from the prosecutor too,

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 3>that the evidence they had was not going to hold

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 3>up in court, and the judge had made that very

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 3>clear in the February.

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 1>And now before that you talked about the women also

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 1>being charged with unlawful killing instead of murder and how

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 1>that was dropped.

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 2>But what is the difference between unlawful killing and murder?

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So in that court case in the February, that's explained,

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 3>and I'll read from the transcript. The definition of killing

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 3>is contained in section two ninety three of the Code.

0:31:42.200 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 3>It simply reads, it is unlawful to kill any person

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 3>unless such a person is authorized or justified or excused

0:31:51.280 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 3>by law. It goes on to state except as here

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 3>and after as said, for any person who causes the

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 3>death of another directly or indirectly by any means whatever

0:32:05.040 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 3>is deemed to have killed that other person. Now, whether

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 3>you understand the definition of unlawful killing, the difference between

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 3>unlawful killing and murder in this case, it really doesn't matter,

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:23.239
<v Speaker 3>because what we know is what happened next, and that

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:27.479
<v Speaker 3>is the judge refused to accept the unlawful killing charge

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 3>against the three women. He ruled but not only was

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 3>there not enough evidence, but that the prosecutor couldn't possibly

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 3>bring a murder charge later on in the year against

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:44.479
<v Speaker 3>another individual having been accused of murdering a woman, Linda,

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 3>in completely separate circumstances if he intended to charge the

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 3>three women that day in separate circumstances. So the unlawful

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:57.800
<v Speaker 3>killing charge as well as the murder charge against the

0:32:57.880 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 3>three women was thrown out.

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Because they wouldn't have been able to go ahead with

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:05.560
<v Speaker 1>a murder charge against Kevin Henry if the women were

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 1>being convicted or being charged and then later convicted over

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 1>unlawful killing. It wouldn't work that way. They'd have to

0:33:11.240 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 1>drop the gu charges against Kevin.

0:33:12.840 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Would you say, well.

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 3>It sounds like that was the ultimatum that was being

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 3>delivered to the prosecution. The judge went on for a

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 3>number of pages. In fact, most of his discussion was

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 3>done with the prosecutor present, but not even speaking to

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 3>the prosecutor. The matters of law were discussed amongst the

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 3>defense lawyer and the lead barrister and the judge. By

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 3>this point it was fairly clear from what's written in

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 3>the statements as what was said in court, that the

0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 3>judge had lost patients with the prosecutor and he was

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 3>going to work out the matter of law for himself,

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 3>and much of the assistance for that came from the

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 3>defense attorney. So we can tell that the judge really

0:34:00.200 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 3>not satisfied with what was going on, and we have

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 3>to assume that that pressure that was applied that day,

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:13.719
<v Speaker 3>the unhappiness on the judge's behalf, was passed on through

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:18.600
<v Speaker 3>the prosecutor to the police who'd made the call that day,

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:22.200
<v Speaker 3>on the fifth of September, to charge Kevin Henry with

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 3>murder without it having ever been recommended by the most

0:34:26.239 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 3>senior police officer at the Rockhampton Police station.

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 1>So the fact that the women were charged originally with

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:36.120
<v Speaker 1>murder makes me think that, you know, the potential for

0:34:36.160 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the assault to be lethal was obviously something that there

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:41.360
<v Speaker 1>was thought by a lot of people at the time.

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:44.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's right, and it was considered part of the

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:49.960
<v Speaker 3>forensic evidence, first in the February and then later on

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:53.280
<v Speaker 3>at the full trial of all four in the April,

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:58.399
<v Speaker 3>and two forensic experts testified and both would have very

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:02.440
<v Speaker 3>interesting things to say about the forensics, the way they

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 3>were gathered and what conclusions could be drawn. Now we've

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 3>done our own examination of that forensic evidence, but don't

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:12.920
<v Speaker 3>just take our word for it. Next week we'll speak

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 3>to an international expert and hear what they have to

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:19.719
<v Speaker 3>say about the way the forensics were handled, testified to

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:21.880
<v Speaker 3>and what they suggest.

0:35:23.520 --> 0:35:27.439
<v Speaker 1>That was episode five of Curtain, a podcast delving into

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen ninety one murder of an Aboriginal woman named

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:32.799
<v Speaker 1>Linda on the banks of Tanuba or the Fitzroy River

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:36.160
<v Speaker 1>in Rockampton, Central Quensland. For now, you can catch up

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes by typing in Curtain the Podcast, or go

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to our website www dot Curtainthepodcast dot com.

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:48.440
<v Speaker 3>Also follow us on Facebook and Twitter at Curtain the Podcast.