WEBVTT - Difference Between A Dietitian And A Nutritionist. What Should Really Be Considered A Treat. How Much Salt Should You Be Eating.

0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Where do you get your nutrition information from? From your doctor,

0:00:03.760 --> 0:00:06.520
<v Speaker 1>from a dietitian, maybe it's from the Nutrition Couch, or

0:00:06.519 --> 0:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's from a nutritionist or a health coach online.

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:12.320
<v Speaker 1>The thing with nutrition is there's a wide range and

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>varying degrees and lots and lots of experts out there.

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>So today on the Nutrition Couch, where can I share

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>with you who you should really be listening to and

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>what the differences are between the different types of qualifications. Hi,

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm Leanne.

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Ward and I'm Suzyburrow, And.

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Every week we bring you The Nutrition Couch, the bi

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:32.200
<v Speaker 1>weekly podcast that keeps you up to date on everything

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that you need to know in the world of nutrition,

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>so as well as nutrition and health qualifications. Today we're

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>going to take a closer look at what really is

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>a treat and our listener question today is all about

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 1>salt and how much should we really be having. But

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>to kick us off today, Susie, we have a very

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:52.519
<v Speaker 1>ilways say, somewhat controversial topic to talk about the difference

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>between a nutritionist and a dietitian and I guess. Our

0:00:56.080 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 1>concern is that the nutrition I guess word or qualification

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>is largely unregulated in Australia and in many parts of

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the world. So the term dietitian is highly regulated. If

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 1>somebody is calling themselfs a dietitian, they've gone through a

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>minimum of four years of a science based degree, They've

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>done multiple practical placements under a supervision in hospital. They

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>have the science and the clinical practice behind them. That's

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a dietitian. The qualification itself is very tightly regulated and

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:26.319
<v Speaker 1>they are the only people that can work within a

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>hospital setting in Australia as well. Now, when it comes

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 1>to nutrition, anybody can call themselves of a nutritionists. My

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>neighbor could literally start an Instagram page and be like,

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm a health nutritionist, come and follow me, pay me

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>for my plans. It's appalling, it's scary. Anybody can call

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>themselves a health coach. Anybody can call themselves a health blogger.

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Anybody that can call themselves a weight loss expert. There

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>is zero regulation within the field within Australia, but in

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>many parts of the world as well, So that's the

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>scariest part, Susie. But then we've also got some perfectly

0:01:56.680 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>wonderful professionals that are registered nutritists that do have university

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and science degrees within nutrition. So it's very, very difficult

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>to pull these two terms apart. But I thought that

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I would first start off with I guess the main

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>difference between most nutritionists and most dietitians. And when I

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 1>say nutritionists, I'm really talking about the properly qualified ones,

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>not the one that I've just done a four week

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:21.799
<v Speaker 1>course online or that's done absolutely nothing in them they're

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:24.799
<v Speaker 1>calling themselves a health blogger or nutritionnis online. So I

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>think whenever you go and you see someone, you need

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to ask to see their degree. You need to say,

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>what if you studied? Can I see your degree? Can

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I see your insurance policy? Because unless they have a

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>proper degree, unless they have proper insurance, should you really

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>be seeing them? Should you be trusting their advice? Should

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>you be dming your favorite instagrammer online because they're a

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:45.519
<v Speaker 1>health blogger and they lost twenty killers themselves and asking

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>them for advice. No, the answer is no, because they're

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>not probably qualified. So I wanted to start off with

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>today by going through the definition of a dietitian. So,

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a dietitian is a professional that applies the science of

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>food and nutrition to promote health and to prevent and

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 1>treat diseases, including clinical diseases, to then optimize the health

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>of that individual or group or community or population. So

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the biggest difference between a dietitian and nutritionist comes really

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>down to the clinical aspects of the condition of an individually.

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Largely nutritionists work with healthy populations. They can give advice

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>around health, around weight loss, and generally with population groups

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>or sometimes with individuals as well. But the biggest difference

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>between dietitians is as a clinical aspect to a lot

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 1>of the conditions. And then there's a whole lot of

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>murky area in between. Is there suz between unregistered nutritionists

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>or health bloggers and then actual qualified nutritionists. Then there's

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>a new term coming out called a clinical nutritionists, and

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>then there's dietitians as well. It's very confusing. It's a

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>bit of a mindfield. I'm not even sure if dietitians

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>understand all the different types of nutritionness and health bloggers

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>on the market at the moment.

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 3>So I wanted to discuss this because I had an

0:03:57.000 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 3>email come through and it said, I really need to help.

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 3>I've been seeing a nutritionist and she described the diet

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 3>that she'd been doing and it was quite extreme. It

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 3>was quite damaging metabolically, and I knew exactly where she'd

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 3>followed that diet, and I also knew the person who

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 3>had written it was not qualified, and so I see

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 3>that come through, and it does huge amounts of damage

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 3>metabolically to people because of course extreme diets that are

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:28.719
<v Speaker 3>restrictive and extremely low carbohydrate, and if you've got medical

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 3>conditions like polycystic oovies Inshaw resistance. It just reminded me

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 3>of the fact that there are a number of people

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 3>giving applied nutrition advice in mainstream media who were not qualified.

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 2>So I wanted to discuss it. So I think the blurry.

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 3>Area for me is, yes, dietitians are an accredited profession

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 3>similar to an accountant. You can be a bookkeeper and

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 3>very good at money, but you're not a registered accountant.

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:54.600
<v Speaker 3>So for me, the dietitians the registered professional. We've had

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:57.159
<v Speaker 3>the medical training, we've got a degree, we've got an association,

0:04:57.240 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 3>we're answerable to. We have to do peer reviewed work,

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:03.720
<v Speaker 3>have to do continuing education, and follow a scientific model

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:07.119
<v Speaker 3>of inquiry. We can be audited, we're controlled, very similar

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 3>to medical profession. The issue, nutritionally is that there are

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 3>a lot of what I would describe as qualified nutritionists

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 3>who have a science degree.

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, I know.

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 3>Several very respected nutritionists who have been to university and

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 3>studied for three four years in an area of nutrition,

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 3>and certainly compared to a health coach or someone who

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 3>doesn't have a science degree.

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 2>They're pretty qualified. No, they're not a dietitian.

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 3>And if they were writing prescriptive meal plans for someone

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 3>with a medical condition, I would have concern. But if

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 3>they're giving general advice, cooking healthy recipes, you know, encouraging

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 3>people to eat better, you know, they have a science degree.

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:47.919
<v Speaker 3>The issue I have is that there's a growing number

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 3>of clinical nutritionists doing the round and in mainstream media

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 3>who don't have a science degree. And I'm calling that

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:57.599
<v Speaker 3>shouldn't be allowed, and I'm appalled in some instances that

0:05:57.640 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 3>it has been allowed in television.

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 2>It has been allowed in.

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:03.279
<v Speaker 3>Media because journalists who would claim to be the ones

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 3>who do the research and make sure that all the

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 3>data is correct, don't check the qualifications of the content

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:11.720
<v Speaker 3>that they are actively promoting to the mass population.

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 2>They're basically not qualified.

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:15.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, you don't have someone who has an interest

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 3>in medicine on the morning show talking about medicine, they're

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:22.679
<v Speaker 3>a doctor, and as should be the case, it should

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:25.720
<v Speaker 3>be a dietitian or at least a nutritionist who has

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 3>a science degree. So the message for our listeners is

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 3>we're not here to dish people and their work. But

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 3>what we're saying is that if you're someone who has

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 3>a medical issue, if you've got complicated weight loss, if

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 3>you've got hormone issues, family history to take into account,

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 3>you need to see someone who is qualified. So you

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 3>need to ask do you have a science degree? Are

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 3>you a registered professional? Can I claim you from a

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 3>health fund? Can I claim you from Medicare? And if

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:53.600
<v Speaker 3>the answer is no, I'd be questioning if that's the

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 3>right person for you, because just because a health coach

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 3>looks slim and healthy, does it mean they're qualified in

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 3>the science of nutrition. And when I get emails like

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:05.720
<v Speaker 3>that and I know exactly where those people have been

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:07.600
<v Speaker 3>and what diets have been doing, I just think they

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 3>should shouldn't be allowed to happen. And I think that

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 3>we should be more transparent. And I think if any

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 3>journalists are listening, you need to make sure that if

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 3>you've got nutritionists writing for your publication that they at

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 3>least have a science degree, because you're accountable to the

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 3>population to be giving evidence based advice, and it's a

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 3>question of actual having the qualification to do so.

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 2>So there's a difference.

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 3>Between getting on TV being a chef cooking a chocolate

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 3>cake and calling it healthy because you chuck some avocado

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 3>into it, and then giving advice on who that recipe

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 3>is for, whether it's good for high blood pleasure, cholesterol,

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 3>and giving applied nutritional advice. So you know, journalists need

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 3>to take a look at where they're getting information because

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 3>they don't often do the research, and hence we've got

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 3>situations where there's people in mainstream media who don't have

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 3>a science degree.

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I think my biggest grap is that a lot

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>of quite uncreat nutrition is without the science degrees, like

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, So they've got a certificate in nutrition, but

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>they're not university qualified. They don't have that science background.

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>These type of quote unquote nutritionists are very largely you

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>need to go gluten free, you need to go dairy free,

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>you need to go refine sugar free, and it's the

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>same cookie cutter meal plan time and time again. No calves,

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>no sugar, no dairy, no gluten, And it's like again

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>and again and again, and Susie and I are just

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 1>getting so frustrated seeing all of these clients, and I'm like,

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you can have dairy, you can have gluten, you can

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>eat a little bit of sugar. Let's talk about your goals.

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, just because you have you know, I don't know,

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>an autoimmune condition doesn't mean you can't have dairy. Just

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 1>because you might have PCOS doesn't mean you can't have sugar.

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>So it really nutrition needs to be personalized. And I

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:35.319
<v Speaker 1>think that's the biggest difference between a lot of nutritions

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and dieticians, at least the properly qualified nutritionists are that

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of just cookie cutter programs out there

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 1>floating around without the personalized aspects. So I was just

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>doing a little bit of a hunt to see the

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:47.839
<v Speaker 1>different types of degrees. And I think if I'm being

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>on a Susie, a lot of nutritionists go in thinking

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>they do have the proper qualifications and then being told

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 1>by their certificate or course or wherever they've studied that

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>they are allowed to do what they're doing, and in all,

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:01.079
<v Speaker 1>honestly they probably shouldn't be doing it right. They shouldn't

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:03.679
<v Speaker 1>be giving people advice if you've got you know, inflammatory

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>bout disease. You shouldn't be giving out personalized advice if

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>you've got a condition like PCOS or like insulin resistance,

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 1>because there is that medical and science based background that

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you need to have that knowledge. And if you've just

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>done a tape certificate or a course, you shouldn't really

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:19.200
<v Speaker 1>be giving out this clinical advice. So I found a

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 1>good article on tape courses Australia Suzi about the difference

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:25.960
<v Speaker 1>between nutritions and dietitians, and essentially it breaks it down

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>into this quite easy to understand table where you've got

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a certificate or a course in nutrition versus a properly

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>accredited dietitian, both nutritions and dietitians. As long as you've

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>got that qualification, you're not just calling yourself a nutritionist

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:39.559
<v Speaker 1>for kicks, and you need to be very careful with

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>that to our listeners. You need to actually make sure

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>somebody does have a qualification. Then it's what type of qualification,

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Where did that come from? Have you studied science and

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>anatomy and physiology, and you know, do you understand some

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:54.319
<v Speaker 1>basic BIOCHM practices if we're giving out that personalized advice.

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>So in this little table that they brought up, Suzi,

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>it says here that nutritions and dietitians can both offer

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>basic health and wellness advice. They can both offer some

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>weight loss advice. They can both offer meal planning advice. However,

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>nutritionists cannot offer individualized meal plans for specific health conditions.

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Dietitism can. Dietitians can treat and prevent diseases. Nutritionists can't.

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Nutritionists cannot offer medical nutrition therapy. Dietitians can. Dietitians are

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>properly accredited, They have to do a certain number of

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>PD every single year, and they have to be supervised

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>within their first few years of practice. Nutritionists don't. Dietitians

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 1>will have again that supervision, that practical assessment for many

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>years first, and will always have at the bare minimum

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:39.599
<v Speaker 1>of bachelor's degree from university to be a dietitian. Nutritionist

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 1>stn't so. I think the biggest thing is that that

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>nutritionist term is highly unregulated. But it does say in

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>this little article that generally a nutritionists role is to

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>help their client by providing advice and encouragement around healthy eating.

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>They can provide and encourage healthy eating. Is this with

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>weight management? This was weight loss goals, meal planning, giving

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>out basic advice in life with the strange guides healthy

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 1>eating and promoting general healthy advice and wellness advice. And

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 1>obviously we see a lot of great nutritionalists aligned doing

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of wonderful healthy recipes, and that's wonderful. But

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 1>where the line becomes a little bit blurred, Susie, is

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:16.679
<v Speaker 1>where these guys are giving out general weight loss advice,

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>but the client's also got pcos. They're giving out general

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>weight loss advice, but the client's also pregnant. They're giving

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>out general weight loss advice, but the client also has

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:28.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, quite bad IBS coupled with Crohn's disease. And

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 1>that's where the lines are becoming very blared, and the

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 1>general population don't really understand the difference between the qualifications.

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>And largely media, I guess hasn't really helped us, Susie,

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>because you and me are doing a bit of work

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>this week with a couple of students that we had

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and one of the students said, Leanne and Susie, you know,

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>we read about your a lot online, and why do

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>you sometimes call yourselves nutritionists in the media, And I

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:51.320
<v Speaker 1>basically said to one of them, we don't call ourselves nutritions. Generally,

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 1>we will always call ourselves dietitians. But if a journalist

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>is writing an article about Susie, they might say this

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 1>nutritionist tips, or about me, they might see this nutrition

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 1>recommends these five foods for calcium, And that's a journalist's

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 1>decision to call us nutritionists over dietitians, because all dietitians

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>are also nutritionists, but not all nutritionists are actually dietitians,

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's where it becomes a bit harder. So I

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of times in the media, even if

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 1>we're dietitians, were written about as nutritionists. And so I

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>think the general population thinks that the term nutritionists is

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 1>more highly qualified than dietitians, or they think that that

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>term for some reason is broader than it even is. Like,

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:30.199
<v Speaker 1>what are your thoughts around that? Like I have noticed

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of journals calling dietitians to nutritionists and leaving

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>off the dietitian qualification altogether. And again, it's just more

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:38.079
<v Speaker 1>confusing for the general population.

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's interesting, it's changed I started working in television

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 3>in two thousand and six and then I subsequently was

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 3>on Sunrise.

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:46.559
<v Speaker 2>For twelve years now.

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 3>They always preferred nutritionists in terms that they felt it

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 3>was a more user friendly message, and to be honest,

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 3>I didn't push it.

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 2>Now in my work, I'm much.

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 3>More distinct to say dietitian, and I've noticed with my

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:04.319
<v Speaker 3>headline on nine Honey on Body and Soul, they're seeming

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 3>to prefer dietitian, the Dietitian's top five, the dietitians top five.

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 3>So I feel that educating the media in that space,

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 3>health and lifestyle journalists who you know don't necessarily have

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 3>those nuances themselves. They might not have been to university

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 3>themselves instead of done cadetships and journalism. So I think

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 3>it's really important that they are aware that dietitian is

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:27.559
<v Speaker 3>that the real qualification. If someone's a dietitian, they should

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 3>be referred to them as such and are certainly getting

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:34.559
<v Speaker 3>any kind of information buying diet books, prescriptive weight loss

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 3>books if it's written by a nutritionist, so I would

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 3>be very quickly checking if they've got a science degree,

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 3>and if it's not written there, they probably don't have one,

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 3>So just be taking it with a grain of salt.

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:47.560
<v Speaker 3>Because if you're a dietitian or qualified, or have a degree,

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:50.079
<v Speaker 3>you mention it, you talk about it because it creates

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 3>that credibility. So I think just coming into diet season,

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 3>which is what we call the period through summer, when

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 3>there is a lot of diet books on the market

0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 3>and a lot of information floating around, I would really

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:01.680
<v Speaker 3>be making sure that if if you're taking that information

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 3>and using it, I would be checking that if it

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 3>is a nutritionist, even if they write clinical nutritionists, it

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 3>actually doesn't mean anything you can use that term freely.

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:13.079
<v Speaker 3>You want to make sure there is a science degree there.

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 3>And if they don't mention it, I guarantee lea and

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:16.959
<v Speaker 3>they don't have one. So I'd be really taking the

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 3>information with a grain of salt.

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think the most important thing as well, just

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to double check when you are seeing a professional is

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to us if they're insured. Like that would be the

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>biggest red flag for me. If you're seeing somebody and

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>they're giving you a prescriptive nutrition plan, they're actively cutting

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>out food groups or saying to you can't have dairy,

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>it's inflammatory, it's bad. You can't have this, you can't

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 1>have that. Ask if they have insurance, because if they

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>don't have insurance, that is a scary thing because if

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>anything were to happen to you or you know, your

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>house took a backward step because you're following this advice

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 1>room of a professional or quote unquote professional who isn't

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>actually qualified. The saddest part is that's on you because

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>you didn't do your research. You didn't check. There's nobody,

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 1>there's no governing body to pull these people up. You

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>can't do you register them. They will never register in

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the first place. Then I've had a qualification to take away.

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 3>Or as a real life thing, the client who messaged

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 3>me to say that she's been doing this diet, it's

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 3>played habit with a metabolism. Now she can't get weighed off.

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 3>She's you know, depleted. You have physically damaged your body

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 3>because of doing a diet that was overly restrictive and

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 3>inappropriate for you. You need massive diet rehab. And I

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 3>just went, oh, ok, that is too much for me

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 3>because I know the diet she's been on and I

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 3>know the work that will be required to shift that metabolism.

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 3>After following such a restrictive diet for so long, so

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, beware because it can be actually damaging physiologically,

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 3>particularly if you've got some of those hormonal conditions or

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 3>they haven't been diagnosed, because that non qualified person actually

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 3>hasn't picked up on that, because they're not looking for

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 3>those medical indicators as we would be, all rightly. And

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 3>hopefully that's helpful to our listeners because I know a

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 3>lot of people are, you know, getting advice or following nutrition,

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 3>and I hopefully it encourages you to look up that

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 3>background of people that perhaps you're following. But moving a

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 3>different note, I was listening to a Gabby Bernstein pod.

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 3>Gammy Bernstein is sort of a self help guru. She's

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 3>been around for many, many years. She has a lot

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 3>of stuff around manifesting. She again is not scientifically qualified

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 3>and clearly states so, but she often has experts on

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 3>and she was talking about an expert she interviewed who

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 3>was a medical doctor, and he they were talking about

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 3>reframing the idea of treats because she said, in life

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 3>often we're looking to treat ourselves and whether that's a

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 3>shopping spree or getting a massage, or often, and we

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 3>talk about this tou lean treating yourself with a food,

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, perhaps after you have had a big day

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 3>or once a week, or there's this idea of a treat.

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 3>And the discussion on the podcast was around if it's

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 3>doing damage to your body, it's not a treat. So

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 3>if your idea of a treat is holing into a

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 3>big piece of cake or a process food, or a

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 3>fast food meal or even you know, confectionery ice cream

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 3>at the end of a long day, if it's ultra

0:16:57.120 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 3>process food, we really need to re.

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Examine our idea of a treat.

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 3>And I thought Leanne straight away, this is something and

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 3>this is a good example of why dietitians professional because

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 3>we sort of constantly evaluating our work and considering it scientifically.

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:12.879
<v Speaker 2>And I thought, that is true.

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 3>I need to be much clearer with clients when I'm

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 3>suggesting that they might have a treat, to make sure

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 3>that it doesn't translate into a treat that's crap quality food.

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:25.640
<v Speaker 3>So when I'm thinking crap quality food, I'm thinking blocks

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:28.160
<v Speaker 3>of commercial chocolate that's filled with confectionery.

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm thinking fast food.

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm thinking, you know, process biscuits, I'm thinking process ice

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 3>creams where you look at the ingredient list and it's

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 3>a mile long and it's ultimately lean, an ultra process food.

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 3>And I think I too, and probably both of us,

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 3>we need to be clearer that when we say a

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:47.639
<v Speaker 3>treat or sort of have something that you're soul food,

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 3>that we are talking about ideally good quality soul foods. So,

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 3>for example, you're going to be much better to have

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:58.360
<v Speaker 3>a couple of squares of eighty five percent linch chocolate

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 3>than you are to have a few squares of Marvelous Creations.

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 3>And the difference is that Marvelous Creations is pack full

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 3>of color, flavor, confectionery, chocolate, lollies, many many ingredients, compared

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 3>to say a couple of box of a high quality

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:17.439
<v Speaker 3>dark chocolate that's only got two or three or in

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 3>the case of ice cream. And we're both guilty of this,

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 3>if it's less than one hundred calories, we say it's

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:24.439
<v Speaker 3>all right. Whereas you're much better to have, say a

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 3>twisted frozen yogurt, which is a very clean ingredient list

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:30.439
<v Speaker 3>and far less processed than some of the mainstream kind

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 3>of brands and outlets that have got colors and flavors

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 3>and a really long ingredient list. So I just wanted

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 3>to clarify that and think, you know, I agreed with

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 3>that message. Putting poor quality food into your body is

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 3>not a treat, And I think when we reframe that

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 3>and make sure that the treats we're choosing are the

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:51.679
<v Speaker 3>highest quality possible nutritionally, that's a much better message than

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 3>to say, oh, well, you can have macas once a

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:54.959
<v Speaker 3>week because it's a treat and you deserve it.

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I agree, But also I guess I'm going to

0:18:57.920 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit because.

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:00.639
<v Speaker 3>I think you're thinking of those ice the col's ice

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 3>greeno ones.

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:03.919
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, I'm just trying to say that. What

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I generally say to my clients is if you truly

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 1>love something, I don't care if it's cabarery, marble, whatever.

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't care if it's got a bit of artificial

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>colors or whatnot in I don't care if it's not

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 1>clean food. If you truly truly love something, and I

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>mean love like it would be on your top ten

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:19.159
<v Speaker 1>foods if you were going to die tomorrow, and you

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>could have five to ten foods, and that was the

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:23.160
<v Speaker 1>last five to ten foods you ever eat, those sorts

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of things would be on there right. And I think

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 1>where the lines get blurred are we think that we

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>like treats, and we do like treats. But I'm when

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I say to my clients, are soult food, it's something

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 1>you truly truly love. You don't like because I like

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a chicken salad, but I also like a lot of biscuits.

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:40.160
<v Speaker 1>But I don't eat a lot of biscuits because one

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>is good for me the chicken salad, and one is

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>not so great for me. Majority of biscuits. So if

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to put something into my body, like you said,

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I have to truly truly love it, not just like it.

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 1>And I think where most people go wrong. And this

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>is what I try to teach some of my clients

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Susie around. There's that balance between healing your relationship with

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:01.440
<v Speaker 1>food generally truly enjoying foods that you love, and leaving

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the foods that you like on the table because we're

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:06.680
<v Speaker 1>putting too many things that we just like. The bowl

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 1>of chocolates in the office, the banana bread somebody bake

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that something we had at our mother in law's house,

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>nibbling off the kids plates. We like a lot of

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. So I'm in agree. And Susie, when you

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 1>say that poor quality treats with terrible ingredients, if you

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 1>just like them, leave them alone, because you're just putting

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>crap in your body. You can either put that in

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the bin or you can put it in your body.

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 1>It's crap food. But if you truly truly love it,

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 1>if you truly loved twisties like they were, like, if

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 1>I had one last day on Earth, I would have

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:38.120
<v Speaker 1>a bag of twisties because I absolutely joking. No, I'm

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 1>not joking. I would actually be okay with clients occasionally. No,

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't like twist it's I love twisties. I would

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>be okay with them eating them. It was just a

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>random thing, just twisties. Yeah, I don't love them, but

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>they're not my thing. But for some of my clients

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>they are, and I'm okay. I'm like, okay, cool, we

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>can have them. That's cool. We'll work them into your

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>meal plans. But if they're like, look, I like twisties.

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>My kids have them all the time, they're in the house,

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:04.679
<v Speaker 1>but I don't love them, love them, I'll be like,

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>leave them alone. Put the twisties back in the cupboard.

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 1>We're not working them into the meal plan. They're not

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:09.879
<v Speaker 1>good for you, We're not got to do it. So

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's that blurry line between I like it

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>versus I love it, And you have to truly love

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:17.679
<v Speaker 1>what you're eating if it's not actually good for you.

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 1>And let's be honest, there's that blurred line between healing

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:24.640
<v Speaker 1>our relationship with food, achieving fat loss, and also achieving help.

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>And they're three separate components, but they can kind of

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 1>work together. But you have to be very clear on

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:33.159
<v Speaker 1>the foods that you truly love and the others that

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 1>you just like and leave them alone. Because the majority

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>of the treats that we like that are good for us,

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>like I say, ninety percent of them have crap quality

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:42.400
<v Speaker 1>ingredients in there. So you can do what Zusie suggested

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and choose better quality types, and certainly from a health perspective,

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>that's much better. But in my experience, if you truly

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>love something, cutting it out all together just because it

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>has terrible ingredients can often cause you to then go

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and overeat it later on. But it's a fine balancing

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>app But I think too many of us are just

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>eating too much of the crap tweats that we like

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>because they're available and they're around, versus the fact that

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:05.360
<v Speaker 1>we truly love them.

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And I think though, we do need to be

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 3>very clear that when it's really poor quality processed food,

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:14.200
<v Speaker 3>Like I've just had a look at the ingredient list

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:19.959
<v Speaker 3>of Twisties, it's refined cereal, vegetable oil, cheese powder, MSG. Like,

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 3>we need to be clear though and call out ultra

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 3>process ultimate crap food, like as I said, I've just

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 3>done a review on say, Burger King, KFC Machers, like

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 3>even I was horrified at the what's in these meals?

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 3>So I think, you know, yes, it's a treat, but

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:40.120
<v Speaker 3>let's be also clear that it's not good for the body.

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 3>That I think that's the message that this doctor was saying.

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 3>We're relating it as a treat as in something positive,

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 3>but we've got to be very clear that in the

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 3>case of those ultra process foods. So the ingredient lists

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 3>a mile long with lollies and flavor enhancers and fast food,

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:58.959
<v Speaker 3>is it really a treat when ultimately it's doing damage

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 3>to the body. And I think think that is a

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 3>worth and I will certainly in my own communications be

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 3>clearer with clients to say, look, yes you've got some

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:09.360
<v Speaker 3>extra calories to play with with something you enjoy, but.

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 2>These are the better options.

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 3>So you're one hundred percent better to have the ninety

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 3>percent dark chocolate then the other type of chocolate that's

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:17.959
<v Speaker 3>heavily processed. So I just I thought it was an

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 3>interesting discussion because if you were saying to people that

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:23.720
<v Speaker 3>cakes a treat, but it's actually full of process crap,

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:25.719
<v Speaker 3>it's not good for you, I think it starts to

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:28.880
<v Speaker 3>take the emotion away from a treat to actually saying

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 3>that is just not good for my body.

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:33.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree. I think it's important to recognize. But

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I also think that mindful eating has a huge element

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 1>here because take the Twistis for example, say I had

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:41.679
<v Speaker 1>ten clients that were like, I love Twistis. If I

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>truly got them to sit down and eat it mindfully

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and actually taste it, I would say nine out of

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 1>ten of those people would actually turn away and go,

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 1>you know what, They weren't actually as good as what

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 1>they thought in their head. It feels like such a treat,

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>but when you sit down and you truly savor and

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>enjoy that food and eat it mindfully. What is a

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 1>twisty It's just a dry flavor, cheese tasting thing at

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day.

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Now that's fast food as well. That's fast food. It

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 2>doesn't even taste good exactly.

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:08.679
<v Speaker 1>So I think mindful eating has a huge element to

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>play here, And I think a lot of us aren't

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:13.640
<v Speaker 1>eating treats mindfully. We're not really tasting them. The idea

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of them is far more satisfying than the actual eating

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 1>element of that treat. So even though I'm saying that yes,

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>if that's something that you love, absolutely, I allow my

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>clients to have it. At the end of the day,

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 1>most of them turn around to me after we've gone

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>through what is mindful eating, we've practiced it a few times,

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 1>A lot of them turn around to me, Susie and go,

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't need that sol food on my list anymore.

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 1>Like a lot of clients, the list of self foods

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:37.159
<v Speaker 1>that they send me when they first start working with

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:39.359
<v Speaker 1>me is very different to the list of soult foods

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:41.399
<v Speaker 1>they send me the end, once they've gone through a

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of the practices of mindful eating. So I think

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:46.440
<v Speaker 1>that that mindful eating element has a huge component here,

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>But I hear what you're saying. I agree. I think

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:51.200
<v Speaker 1>that we're putting far more of this ultra process food

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:53.360
<v Speaker 1>into our body than we need to. But I think

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:55.679
<v Speaker 1>we actually need to just start tasting our food and

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>recognizing is that something that I truly love? Is this

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:01.400
<v Speaker 1>actually a treat for me? Or do I think it's

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:03.439
<v Speaker 1>more of a treat that it actually tastes like? Does

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:06.719
<v Speaker 1>it actually taste like something that's incredible, amazing, like a

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>fine cuisine type meal, or is it something I'm just

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>shoveling in because I'm stressed and I'm sad, and I've

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 1>had a bad day and I'm looking to treat myself

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:16.439
<v Speaker 1>in that way. Is it more of a treat in

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:18.879
<v Speaker 1>my head? Or is it actual treat to my palette?

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Because I think so many of these things aren't actually

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>as good at tasting as what we think they are

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 1>on our head.

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Very true, good summary.

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:28.679
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, moving on to our listener question of

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the week, we talk about salt Susie. So, the guidelines

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 1>in Australia, and I imagine they're very similar around the world.

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Ustralian and New Zealand governments actually recommend that healthy adults

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>eat no more than two thousand milligrams of sodium per day.

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:45.119
<v Speaker 1>You think, oh, two thousand milligrams. That sounds like so much,

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:47.640
<v Speaker 1>But oh my goodness, Susie, let's break it down because

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 1>it's really not that much. It's about it's about a

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>teaspoon of salt altogether. Isn't it like, it's not really

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 1>that much at all.

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:55.920
<v Speaker 2>No, it's not much.

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 3>And I think the things that stand out to me

0:25:58.359 --> 0:25:59.919
<v Speaker 3>and why I wanted to discuss it, because this was

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:04.400
<v Speaker 3>question that came through on the podcast Instagram, was there's

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 3>kind of middle ground, you know, in terms of foods

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 3>that say have four six hundred eight hundred if it's

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 3>a process food with a sauce. But then there's a

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 3>whole whack of meals and foods that have got close

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 3>to two thousand milligrams per serves in a single meal,

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 3>So things like presseudo straight away, extremely high bacon sausages,

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 3>and then any kind of cuisine because chefs just throw

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:30.439
<v Speaker 3>so much salt. If you saw how much salt went

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:32.679
<v Speaker 3>into your food at a restaurant, it wouldn't surprise you

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 3>what tastes so good.

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 2>They just have buckets of it.

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:37.159
<v Speaker 3>So any fast food meal Deal's got more than your

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 3>entire daily requirement, as does Mexican Guzman and Gomez, tex

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 3>mex As. Does any Chicken Place KFC, red Rooster, any

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of fast food meal, Burger King macas KFC, They've

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:51.400
<v Speaker 3>got like three up to you know, four thousand milligrams

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 3>of sodium perserve. So it's just good to be aware

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 3>and you have a quick look on the label. I

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:57.680
<v Speaker 3>look for one sort of sort of less than six

0:26:57.760 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 3>hundred milligrams per serve as a rough eye. A low

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 3>sodium food's got less than three hundred milligrams per serve,

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 3>So we do need some, but I think as soon

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:09.360
<v Speaker 3>as you target those old really high foods. Another really

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 3>high one lean is two minute noodles. The sachet has

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 3>got more than almost two thousand milligrams per serve, which

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:16.959
<v Speaker 3>is why it's not a great snack for kids. So

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 3>that's kind of the handful of foods that come up

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:21.440
<v Speaker 3>as being mega high. So just be careful of prosudo

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:24.440
<v Speaker 3>if you selt sensitive going into the holidays. Smoke salmon's

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of middle ground in terms of amounts. It's higher

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 3>than say fresh salmon, of course, but it's yeah, the

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 3>process meets the fast food meals.

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 2>The two minute noodle.

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 3>Sachets are particularly high, coming in at that two thousand

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 3>per serve. And I recently reviewed like a pre made

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 3>meal in a pouch, but I couldn't endorse it because

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 3>it was over one thousand milligrams per serve. So as

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:46.440
<v Speaker 3>soon as any process foods over one thousand, I put

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:46.880
<v Speaker 3>it back down.

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 2>It's way too high.

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 3>So just good to be aware, particularly if you do

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 3>have high blood pressure and you're mindful of sodium, because yeah,

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:55.639
<v Speaker 3>over time, Australians have about two and a half times

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:58.199
<v Speaker 3>the recommended intake per day of sodium, so we have

0:27:58.320 --> 0:28:00.439
<v Speaker 3>huge amounts and there's some food it's just to be

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 3>mindful of.

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:02.359
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, less in the supermarket.

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:05.160
<v Speaker 3>Definitely less than a thousand milligrams per serve and sort

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:07.199
<v Speaker 3>of around six Hundred's a pretty good amount if you're

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 3>having a processed food. Oh, I know, Land soy sauce.

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, any Asian type cuisine.

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 3>HOistin fish sauce, any Asian sauce. That's why when I'm

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 3>cooking Asian cuisine at home, I only ever use one sauce.

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 3>I never combined too, because it just bumps it up

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 3>so much and I get salt reduced soy too can

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 3>help reduce it.

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 1>That's a good one. Yeah, because a typical tablespan of

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>normal soy sauce is about eight hundred milligrams, are low

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:31.399
<v Speaker 1>salt soy sauces around sort of five to six hundred,

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>So it definitely makes it dend. I must say I'm

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>not overly concerned about salt for my healthy adult clients. Obviously,

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:38.959
<v Speaker 1>if they've got issues with blood pressure or heart disease,

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and obviously I'm more concerned. But for my healthy guys

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 1>who just want to kind of optimize god health lose

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a bit of weight, I'm not overly concerned. But like

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 1>you said, there are some heavy hitters out there, Like

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I just googled a typical big mac meal, Like we're

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 1>talking nearly fifteen hundred milligrams of sodium between the burger

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and the fries. Pre made soups on the market, the

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 1>better ones are six hundred milligrams. The higher ones are

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 1>on thy twelve hundred grams a day, and when you

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 1>think the whole amount for the day is only two

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand milligrams. Anything that comes in a packet, whether it's

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a cereal, a bread, a sauce, it's going to have

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:10.479
<v Speaker 1>added sodium in it, even if you can't taste it.

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 1>And there's a reason why I always say to my

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 1>clients if they ever go out for a meal, even

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 1>if it's a healthy type meal, like we might go

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and have some I don't know, like a Vietnamese rice

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 1>chicken salad bowl or something, but because they use the

0:29:21.600 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 1>fish sauce and the soy sauces flavor, always said to

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>my clients, whatever you do, do not jump on the

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>scale the next day after you have a meal out,

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:30.040
<v Speaker 1>because it will be an inflated number on the scale

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 1>because the sodium retains water in your body. And David

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and I just had dumplings last night, Susie, you've got

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 1>us hooked on dumplings. And I added a bit of

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 1>soy in my stir fried greens and I couldn't get

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>my wedding ring on this morning. I was like, oh

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:44.720
<v Speaker 1>my goodness. So whenever you're feeling a little bit puffy,

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 1>or your rings aren't fitting properly, or your face is

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 1>a bit puffy, it's probably due to the excess amount

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 1>of sodium. So there's definitely some heavy hitters. But reading

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:55.959
<v Speaker 1>those labels are really really needed when you're going through

0:29:55.960 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the supermarket products because when you think about two thousand

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:00.719
<v Speaker 1>milligrams a day, even if you don't add salt to

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:02.720
<v Speaker 1>your meals, you know, even if you're not cracking the

0:30:02.800 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 1>salt on top of your here let lunch or dinner,

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 1>you're still getting in a large amount through a lot

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>of the packaged products, and a lot of things people

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>don't really realize. Breads, cereals, sauces, pre made meals, heat

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 1>up meals. I love some of those preheat soup options

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 1>sous you. Particularly just after we had Tilly a couple

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of months ago. It was winter, it was quite cool,

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and we're using a lot of those sort of heat

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 1>up meals soups during winter for our lunches as well,

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 1>just because neither of us had time to cook. So

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 1>you've just got to be a little bit aware of that,

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 1>and particularly if your goal is weight loss, knowing that

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 1>sodium does impact the scale because it kind of acts

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 1>like a sponge. It helps to retain water in your body.

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 1>So if you've had a huge, heavily high salt type

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 1>of meal, you are probably going to weigh a little

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 1>bit heavier on the scale the next day. It does

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 1>tend to influence scale wait quite a bit as well.

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't.

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 3>I just I know for sort of healthy, active people,

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 3>and even I don't pay a huge amount of attention

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 3>to salt. But I certainly with my females in their

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 3>forties and fifties who have any kind of pro inflammatory

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 3>disorder or joint pain, I would really pay attention to

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 3>your sodium because it will have a massive impact on

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 3>reducing inflammation and puffiness in your body and you will

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 3>feel much better. So if you're one of those people

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 3>who have joint pain, you know you're inflamed, certainly you're

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 3>the group who I would be paying a bit more

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 3>attention to it. And another buffer for that is some

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 3>beech stroot juice. It's a very nice buffer for sodium

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 3>in the diet, So a little bit of that in

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 3>the morning. But yes, for that group of people, I'd

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 3>be a bit more salt aware because you'll notice a

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 3>lot less joint pain if you keep the salt in

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 3>the fluid load down in your diet.

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Wonderful. All right, Well, that brings us to the end

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>of the nutrition couch potty for another Sunday, don't forget

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to check out our website. We've got our two webinars

0:31:43.080 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 1>that we recently did, Hack Your Hormones and y Weight,

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 1>which is all about the psychology and wait Less. They're

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 1>available at the nutritioncouch dot com under the shop page.

0:31:51.240 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 1>And we will catch you guys next week for our

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 1>midweek motivational episode.

0:31:55.560 --> 0:32:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Have a great week.