WEBVTT - 👼 🛑  Pls With The Baby On Board Stickers 🛑  👼

0:00:01.280 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>On flex and Firms Flex and Fromes. This is the

0:00:04.160 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Flex and Frooms catch Up podcast. I was on Reddit

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the other day and I came across a thread. I

0:00:09.360 --> 0:00:12.280
<v Speaker 1>just can spend hours on that site, and I really

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>am making leaps and bounds and strides with my own

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>personal understanding of the world. I also go there when

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I need help, so you know it's a place fraught

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>with emotions. I came across this thread called ah slash

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>change my View. So it's a Reddit thread called change

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>my View. And what it is is people come with

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>an opinion and they ask people to change their view.

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>It's not a debate. This person isn't coming to say

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going to like rebut you as to why.

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 1>It's more like, Okay, I have this idea of how

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the world works. Can you try and change my opinion

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 1>the blurb of this thread, So what they've written is

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 1>a place to post an opinion you accept, maybe flawed,

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>in an effort to understand other perspectives on the issue.

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Enter with a mindset for conversation, not debate. And the

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>difference with this threat as opposed to the others that

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>champion debate, is that it is a community system. Using

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>points every time someone successfully changes your view. This is

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:07.320
<v Speaker 1>different to up votes. Have you heard of this thread? FLEXI? Yeah?

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:07.919
<v Speaker 2>Really?

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Is this like a common thing?

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>How did you find it?

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm on Reddit?

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:15.399
<v Speaker 1>Is it a big thing? On readit?

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:15.959
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it had like a million How did you

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 1>find it?

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 2>Probably found it the same way you found it. I

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:21.400
<v Speaker 2>was on Reddit and then I saw a subreddit and

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:22.039
<v Speaker 2>I clicked on it.

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:26.559
<v Speaker 1>True well. I saw a few ones that piqued my interest,

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>including why does everybody think America is so bad? That

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>was from someone who hadn't immigrated to America but wanted to.

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 1>The Other one was weddings are pointless, which obviously piqued

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>my interest because we both have been reading Clement Unford's

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 1>latest book, I Don't And then a final one, which

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>is a man's creepiness directly related to how hot he is?

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 2>What do they want their mind changed about that it

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 2>isn't or it.

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Is that it isn't that because you know how, there's

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>like common rhetoric that what makes the guy's behavior creepy

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>is just proportionate to how good looking.

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 2>They are, well, how attractive you find them?

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, which I don't know how I feel about that.

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I agree or disagree, but this

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>did change my view. Soone said Psycho with Christian Balers,

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and this is an example of a really like conventionally

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>attractive man where it's not working, the challenged mister Ripley

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 1>with heartthrob Leonardo DiCaprio. Hot dudes can be creepy as

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>f because creep has nothing to do with your hotness

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:23.639
<v Speaker 1>and literally everything to do with how you're acting, behaving, moving,

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 1>literally everything that is roughly within your wheelhouse or control. Okay,

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:29.639
<v Speaker 1>so this one has changed my view. Baby on board

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>stickers should be removed when the baby is not on board. Okay,

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:36.959
<v Speaker 1>they say the original use for these were for first

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:38.800
<v Speaker 1>responders to know how to look for a baby. I

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't know that. Do you know that, Micky, I had

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 1>no idea about that. WHOA, But then people never remove

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>them when their baby is not on board or when

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:49.639
<v Speaker 1>their kids grow up. I know EMT and firefighters will

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:51.359
<v Speaker 1>look in the back seat for signs of a child,

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's a waste of their time if there could

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>be no baby, if the adults are unconscious, they could

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 1>spend time looking for an injured child. I don't think

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>people are actually more careful around those cars, and half

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the time they don't even have car seats. I think

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the details that have families or dog or whatever is better.

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>This says, this is my family who might be in

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the car, not these people are on board right now,

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>so cared care for them in an accident. And then

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>they've got answers and the edit is read some great answers.

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:18.399
<v Speaker 1>The origin of the signer was likely just to ask

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:20.960
<v Speaker 1>people to drive carefully, but can have the opposite effect.

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Some people with the stickers to practice unsafe driving themselves,

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and the stickers can help families who have children with

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 1>special needs and or a signal that they're dealing with

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:33.239
<v Speaker 1>an issue. I never knew that it was for emergency services.

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I literally just thought it was someone being like, don't

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>be mean to me because I have a kid on board,

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>which I always thought was not very democratic.

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 2>It's your favorite word today?

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Have I said them on the ones? Yeah, me, having

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>no understanding of what a democceities now and someone did

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>a point which I think is quite interesting, which is

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that encouraged drivers to use caution when approaching cars with

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 1>younger passengers as opposed to what driving without caution when

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>approached by everyone else? Am I to pick and choose

0:03:57.240 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>who gets my caution who doesn't? Am I allowed to

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>use less? And people as opposed to others? Interesting? And

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>then they also brought up I respect the student driver

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>signs by passing quickly or giving an abnormally large following distance,

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>which I get it. You might have a kid in

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the back, like hitting the back of the parents seat,

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:17.719
<v Speaker 1>in which case it's good to know, you know, give

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 1>them a bit of a wide berth. Damn. I think

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:23.599
<v Speaker 1>this is a good Creddit to go on, Like I really,

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I know I've said democratic about five times today. I

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:28.840
<v Speaker 1>don't remember doing it, but you know, we are in

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>a system where opinions are allowed. I feel like this

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>is a good place to witness how discussions can be

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:37.479
<v Speaker 1>had in a way that's respectful.

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, I think it's a good place to see other ideas, right,

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:46.159
<v Speaker 2>But I think in this instance a discussion like there's

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 2>no onus on anyone there to fact check it for

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 2>you or to be like I read on Reddit, like

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 2>this guy told me the reason why you don't have

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:53.720
<v Speaker 2>baby on boards because it's like that's you don't come

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 2>here to discuss. You're just getting ideas and then go

0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 2>and use them elsewhere.

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I understand, like a Gateway did to the Flexing Firm's

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>daily podcast. For more, tune Indicator on D A B

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:07.840
<v Speaker 1>or stream it on iHeartRadio.