WEBVTT - How did we get the right to a weekend?

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Already and this is this is the daily This is

0:00:03.760 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the daily.

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:16.079
<v Speaker 2>Ohs oh, now it makes sense. Good morning and welcome

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 2>to the Daily OS. It's Tuesday, the tenth of September.

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 2>I'm Harry, I'm Zara. Weekends are sacred in Australia. Whether

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 2>it's kicking back to have a few beers with mates,

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 2>exploring the great outdoors, or putting your feet up. It's

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 2>a rite that work has fought for and was granted

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 2>by the courts seventy seven years on. We're starting to

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 2>look at four day work weeks. In today's rewind and

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:42.200
<v Speaker 2>deep Dive. We'll look at how the Ausie weekend came

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:45.279
<v Speaker 2>to life and how the nature of work is changing.

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 2>But first, Sarah, what's making headlines?

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 3>The Royal Commission into Defense and Veteran Suicide has handed

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 3>down its final report, recommending a major overhaul of recruitment

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 3>processes and better regulation of veterans and defense departments. The

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 3>Royal Commission lasted three years, heard from hundreds of witnesses

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 3>and received more than five and a half thousand submissions

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 3>on the prevalence of poor mental health in Australia's military.

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 3>It found one thousand, six hundred and seventy seven serving

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 3>and ex Defense Force personnel had died by suicide in

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:23.120
<v Speaker 3>the years nineteen ninety seven to twenty twenty one. That's

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 3>more than twenty times those killed on active duty. The

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 3>Royal Commission made one hundred and twenty two recommendations, including

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 3>reforming the culture of the military and strengthening accountability for

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 3>the health and well being of eighty f members. The

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 3>Government will now consider whether it will adopt any of

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:42.960
<v Speaker 3>these recommendations. If this story has raised any concerns for you,

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 3>you can reach out to Lifeline any time on thirteen

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 3>eleven fourteen or open arms on one eight hundred zero

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 3>one one zero four six.

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 2>A group of Western Australian farmers are set to protest

0:01:56.920 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 2>outside Parliament House in Cambridge today against the government's ban

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 2>on live sheep exports. In July, legislation passed the Federal

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Parliament to introduce a live sheep export ban by May eight.

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 2>Western Australia is the only state still conducting live sheep exports,

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 2>which have been criticized by animal welfare groups. Now advocacy

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:22.239
<v Speaker 2>group Keep the Sheep is protesting the ban, which they

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 2>say will quote damage regional communities and impacted multiple industries.

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Today's protest in Canberra follows rallies in Perth and Regional wa.

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 3>Multiple polls released this week show Kamala Harris and Donald

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 3>Trump neck and neck in the US presidential race just

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 3>two months out from the November election. A national poll

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 3>from The New York Times in Siena College showed Trump

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 3>ahead of Harris by just one percent, while CBS News

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 3>and Yugov polling in Key States showed Harris ahead of Trump,

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 3>also just by one percent. The candidates will officially face

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:00.920
<v Speaker 3>off for the first time on live televis tomorrow morning

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 3>Australian time. That'll be the first debate since late June,

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 3>when Trump debated current President Joe Biden.

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 2>And Today's good news. It turns out galaxies are a

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 2>lot bigger than scientists initially estimated, according to new research

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 2>from Durham University. An image taken by the researchers showed

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 2>the gas around galaxies reaches much further into space than

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 2>previously thought. According to the research, the discovery could help

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 2>us to understand how galaxies build mass over time, and

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 2>could impact how different galaxies interact.

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 3>Harry, I saw your piece on this over the weekend

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 3>and thought that it was an excellent piece of trivia

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 3>that people could go and take to their Tuesday trivia

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 3>nights to say, hey, do you know how long the

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 3>weekend's been around formally in Australia.

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Would you have gotten it right before?

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 3>Certainly not, would have theyiled that one. But I think

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 3>that this is so interesting because you know, us here

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty four believe that the weekend is this kind

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 3>of enshrined right that we have to turn off, and

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, especially with right to disconnect laws, especially to

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 3>turn off. But it hasn't always been that way.

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 2>When I first thought about the weekend coming into existence

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 2>for the first time seventy seven years ago, I sort

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 2>of thought, Okay, that's a long time ago. It's been,

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, seventy seven years. But then you look back

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 2>and think, nineteen forty seven wasn't actually that long ago.

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:32.599
<v Speaker 2>I mean, my grandparents, I was going to say, any

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:36.840
<v Speaker 2>about older listeners will take great offense to us. So

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:41.280
<v Speaker 2>long ago exactly, and the whole concept of a work

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 2>is right to some knockoff time just didn't really exist

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 2>and there wasn't even really a word for it until

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 2>maybe the nineteen thirties nineteen forties when this idea of

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 2>a weekend actually started to spread and pick up around

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 2>the world.

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 3>And what was the typical day for an Australian worker

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 3>prior to to this weekend actually becoming a thing.

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:05.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure a lot of people who are listening are

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 2>visual learners like me. So I wanted to put myself

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:13.720
<v Speaker 2>into the boots of a steel factory worker. He and

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 2>I can say he, because it was a largely masculine

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 2>industry at the time, would get up at the crack

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 2>of dawn maybe year around five am and head out

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 2>to the factory floor slog away burning iron ore to

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 2>make steel and would clock off sometime in the evening.

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 2>Some factories days were even longer and squeezed even more

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 2>out of their workers, and people would normally work six

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 2>days a week and the only sanctified day off was

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 2>a Sunday because in Australia at the time we had

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 2>a predominantly Anglo Christian population who was running the show

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 2>and Sunday is the sacred day of rest.

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:55.280
<v Speaker 3>And so then, how did this idea of the weekend

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 3>come to be?

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 2>It was many, many years in the making, and looking

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 2>back on it, Australia was actually comparatively late compared to

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 2>some other Western countries, so in the US, UK, New Zealand,

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:10.039
<v Speaker 2>they had all developed the idea of the forty hour

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 2>work week before they entered the Second World War. Once

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 2>the war ended in nineteen forty five, Australian workers decided

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 2>to barrack for this right to reduce their hours. But

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 2>this had been a fight that had been going on

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 2>for decades, and many union groups and organizers brought legal

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 2>action against some industries, including car manufacturers, metal workers, tailors, stonemasons,

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 2>boiler makers. That's not a word I've heard in the

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 2>recent past, but at the time was a very big industry.

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:45.039
<v Speaker 2>The unions had pushed for a reduction in working hours,

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 2>and on the eighth of September in nineteen forty seven,

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 2>the Commonwealth Court of Arbitration made a pretty important ruling

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 2>that gave life to the idea of the forty hour

0:06:56.520 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 2>working week, and in handing down its unanim decision, the

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 2>court actually said, and I quote, the future will be

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 2>watched with concern and interest. So I can't go back

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 2>and ask the judges what they were thinking when they

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 2>made this decision, But that kind of language just gives

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 2>you a sense of how they knew. There was a

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 2>lot writing on this.

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 3>Decision, and I mean that, as you said, betrays a

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 3>lot of the thinking at the time, which was that

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 3>it was this really novel concept and it was new

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 3>and untested, at least in the Australian market, whether people

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 3>who are posed it or groups that are posed it

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 3>at the time, i'd presume.

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 2>So, yeah, definitely. And in fact, some employer groups had

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 2>made pretty detailed arguments against introducing a forty hour work week.

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 2>So they said that it would devastate some businesses, It

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 2>would lead to lower productivity, there would be good shortages,

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 2>price increases, and they leaned on this idea that some

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 2>overseas trading partners were more competitive than Australia and so

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 2>reducing working hours would just see their overseas competitors dominate

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 2>an increasingly globalized trade in a post World War two era.

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 2>So while that might have been somewhat accurate when you

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 2>look at some parts of the world, as I mentioned earlier,

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 2>some big economies like the US and the UK had

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 2>already given work as a weekend, so it doesn't really

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 2>hold water entirely. The unions have pointed out that some

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 2>conservative politicians at the time were keen to avoid the

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 2>forty hour workweek. But I got to say the tune

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 2>has definitely changed over time. I was reminded of the

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 2>time when Prime Minister Scott Morrison in twenty nineteen, who

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 2>is from the more conservative side of politics the Liberal Party,

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 2>went against his more progressive opponent Bill Shortened for proposing

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 2>a way to get more electric vehicles sold and used

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 2>in Australia with this line.

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Bill Shorten wants to end the weekend when it comes

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to his policy on electric vehicles.

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 2>And Scott Morrison went on to beat Bill Shorten at

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 2>the election. Was it a line like this that helped him?

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 2>Very possibly, I would say, because the weekend is sacred

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 2>in Australia. And I spoke with Sally McManus, who is

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 2>the Secretary of the Australian Council of Trade Unions, and

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 2>she quite succinctly said, quote, you wouldn't want to get

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 2>in between an ordinary person and their right to a weekend.

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 2>You'd be hard pressed to find anyone fighting against the

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 2>right to a weekend in this day and age.

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 3>No, I would agree with that, But when you are

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:27.319
<v Speaker 3>listing the reasons why people at the time or business

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 3>groups at the time were rallying against this notion of

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 3>a weekend. It did sound eerily familiar and like the

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:35.959
<v Speaker 3>same tune that people who are against the four day

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 3>work week. Now you know all of these ideas of

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 3>a loss of productivity, and you know what will happen.

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 3>It will devastate businesses those sorts of things. So, I mean,

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 3>it's been seventy seven years since the six day work

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 3>week turned into five, and now we are, as I

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 3>said before, kind of hurdling towards this idea of a

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 3>four day work week. Where are we at with that now?

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, I was hoping you'd bring that out, Sarah. When

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 2>I first looked at this idea of a weekend first

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 2>coming into existence, some people said to me, the court

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:09.199
<v Speaker 2>should have barracked for a three day weekend instead of

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 2>a turns weekend. But that's where we're out now. So

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 2>the weekend was hard fought for, and the conversation is

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:19.719
<v Speaker 2>really increasingly focused on a four day work week and

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 2>whether it could improve productivity and work them morale because

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 2>we know, especially post COVID, that burnout rates are pretty

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 2>high in most industries. In fact, Australia has one of

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:35.840
<v Speaker 2>the highest rates of burnout in the world, with Microsoft's

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 2>work Index trend showing around sixty two percent of workers

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 2>feel burnt out, compared to a global average of forty

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 2>eight percent. So a few workplaces have now trialed a

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 2>four day work week, like Manibank, the private health insurer,

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 2>and in twenty twenty two there were about two dozen

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:58.199
<v Speaker 2>companies that trialed the four day work week and recorded

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 2>a sixty four percent in burnout among staff, and more

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 2>than a third of workers also said they felt less

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 2>stressed at work. And it's trickled into politics too. The

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 2>act government is considering a four day workweek trial for

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 2>the public sector employees, and that was after a parliamentary

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 2>committee had recommended it.

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm curious because in the forties the push was really

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 3>led by the unions. Are we seeing the unions behind

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 3>this current push for a four day working week in

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 3>the way that they were behind you establishing the weekend

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 3>back then.

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 2>They definitely are considering it. In fact, when I spoke

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 2>to Sally McManus, she said that they've been looking through

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 2>some ideas of reducing the work week from thirty eight hours,

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 2>which is what it's at now to thirty five, So

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 2>that would take the number of hours worked down three

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:54.239
<v Speaker 2>hours spread across four days, but incomes wouldn't be affected.

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Salaries wouldn't be impacted by that kind of work week.

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:00.080
<v Speaker 2>So the unions are definitely looking at.

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 3>And I mean they did have quite a bit to

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 3>do with the right to disconnect legislation as well, So

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 3>I guess there are just different ways that this is

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 3>now being woven into the public conversation.

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:12.680
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, but you also mentioned a really important point that

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 2>I think is worth touching on, which is there was

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:19.439
<v Speaker 2>some resistance to the weekend initially from some of those

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 2>employee groups, and there continues to be a little bit

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 2>of pushback when it comes to looking at the four

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 2>day workweek. There are some very genuine questions about how

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 2>that would actually play out, what that would look like,

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 2>and there are definitely some issues that some business groups

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 2>are concerned about. So you and I have also spoken

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 2>at length about the nature of the workplace as boss

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 2>to employee, and I think it's just important to note

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 2>that we as journalists also work in one of those

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 2>industries where it could be really tricky to bring in

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 2>a four day work week, just by the sheer nature

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:00.040
<v Speaker 2>of the news cycle. It's a twenty fourth to seven grow.

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 3>If we could just switch it off one day of

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 3>the week, no news today, bragging news.

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 2>No, no one do anything interesting. But that would also

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 2>require people to just not die on Sat Days because

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 2>that's newsworthy. Significant events can occur at any time of

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:19.719
<v Speaker 2>the day. We just would never be able to predict it.

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:23.319
<v Speaker 2>So the four day work week's just definitely something we're

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 2>going to keep hearing about. And in the meantime, Zara,

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Happy weekend anniversary to.

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 3>Happy weekend Anniversary, and thanks for jumping on the plot

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 3>again today, Harry. Thank you for joining us for another

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:37.199
<v Speaker 3>episode of The Daily OS. If you learn something and

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 3>want to take it to trivia on Tuesday, let us know.

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 3>We love hearing about all the fun facts that you

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:45.319
<v Speaker 3>pick up through the week. If you're listening on Spotify,

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 3>you can leave a comment there. Otherwise, if you are

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 3>watching on YouTube, can leave a comment on there. We

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 3>will be back again tomorrow, but until then, have a

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 3>great day.

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:58.079
<v Speaker 1>My name is Lily Madden and I'm a proud Runda

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Bungelung Cargoton woman, Gadigol Country. The Daily Oz acknowledges that

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 1>this podcast is recorded on the lands of the Gadighl

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 1>people and pays respect to all Aboriginal and torrest Rate

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>island and nations. We pay our respects to the first

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>peoples of these countries, both past and present.