WEBVTT - What To Never Say To A Real Estate Agent 🏘️ 💼

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Flex and Ferens i'n cater the flexen Frooms Big Icon

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:08.559
<v Speaker 1>Energy podcast recorded live It's Studios three oh one in Sydney.

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>At this rate, we have beef with every community. But

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:12.799
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that is the spice of life. A

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit of conflicte keeps the blood flow up, cortisol

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>levels slightly above average. But I think that works best

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>for both of us real estate agents. Look, I don't

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>want to be on your back, right, don't kick the

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>little one when he's down, but unfortunately disappointed. Huh no,

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>ignore me? Are you the little one?

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 3>Nah, someone else.

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Don't do that to your jobs. Sabe you're a big dog.

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, for me has been houseless, which I don't

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:41.200
<v Speaker 1>want to say we saw coming. But when you plan

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:45.200
<v Speaker 1>a euro trip and know that your lease is up

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>before you get back, I feel like that was bound

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>to happen.

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:51.239
<v Speaker 2>Hidrata and a high drama experience. I don't know, but

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 2>it was worth it. Yeah, paid no rent in Europe,

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 2>came back to a rental crisis. Wasn't saying that coming,

0:00:57.080 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 2>but eventually becoming a better person one hundred percent.

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>So here is the thing. I feel like we should

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>all mass migrate to Hobart. I've started for us. There's

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:11.120
<v Speaker 1>something about going to live in a city where you

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 1>haven't missed the boat on every opportunity ever, you know,

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 1>like something about Sydney. I remember when I was in

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>high school, my mom was like, oh my goodness, like,

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>it's so hard to live, so hard to do this,

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>hard to do this. You can't even buy things inexpensive anymore.

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to get a sausage roll the other day.

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even like sausage rolls. My earliest memory with

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:30.479
<v Speaker 1>one was when I had a sausage roll and pineapple

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>chunks in primary school, came home vomited it up. Anyway,

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:40.759
<v Speaker 1>So I'm trying to like, I'm trying to eat more foods,

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>like different types of food. Do I want to get

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a sausage roll as at the airport? Why is it

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>eleven dollars?

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, an airport sausage roll is never going.

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>To really hit anyway. So that's neither here nor there,

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>but it is plaguing my mind. What hasn't been, though,

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>is your living situation, which unfortunately for me is not

0:01:59.240 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>great but.

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Fortunately for you, is getting better. Anyway, let's speed it up,

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 2>spice it up up. Next is a voice note from

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 2>a friend explaining what another friend did potentially the worst

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:13.639
<v Speaker 2>pocket dial adjacent experience that I've heard of in recent times.

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 2>But that's coming up next on the podcast Let's Go.

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 2>I am currently in the process of looking for a house.

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 2>As we know, here in Sydney there's a rental crisis.

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 2>There's also a rental crisis all around Australia, but in

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 2>the Sydney's Eastern Subway, where I have chosen.

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 3>To live, it's particularly bad.

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 2>You gotta pay a premium, and that premium happens to

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 2>have gone up by twenty percent, and I'm a tired ass.

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to be spending my money on rent.

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 3>I spend money on a mortgage. SIS is not there yet.

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 2>However, I'm looking for a three bedroom house, which is

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:49.399
<v Speaker 2>particularly difficult.

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>You don't really come across three bedroom houses. It's not

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>in two bedrooms, one study type of thing. Yeah, totally.

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 2>So a friend of mine went to that. I've got

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:00.240
<v Speaker 2>moving with two friends. A friend of mine went and

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:02.519
<v Speaker 2>looked at a house for us. But this other friend's

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 2>going to tell the story.

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, cool with me.

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 4>So we've recently been looking for houses across the eastern

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 4>suburbs of Sydney, and as you know, it's extremely competitive.

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 4>So our game plan was to really butter up the

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 4>real estate agents, like really schmooz them, be their best friend, like,

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 4>be really friendly inspections because financially we aren't able to

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 4>give them like two hundred dollars above the offer. So

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 4>our friend she went to one of the inspections, first

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 4>met the real estate agent like, had a really good

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 4>like chat to him, and then was messaging him and

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 4>send him a message saying looking forward to hearing back

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 4>from you today. Had such a great time, loved the apartment,

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 4>and then she went to message me, but messaged him

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 4>again and said residential real estate agents are just the

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 4>worst people.

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>And then he.

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 4>Replied, I suppose that Texas not meant for me?

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Or was it?

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 4>Cheers.

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 1>It's been a long time since I've been embarrassed, and

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>that is so embarrassing.

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:21.719
<v Speaker 2>Residential real estate agents not the worst, the worst people.

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 2>That is the craziest thing about I can't believe this

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 2>actually happened. And in the time since, I have stopped

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 2>looking with these two women only because the appearance of

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 2>a three bedroom house in the eastern suburbs who are

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 2>looking very grim.

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 1>But I think they're in a bit.

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Of a pickle because now their names are on file

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 2>for this very prestigious, very well known real estate. Like,

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 2>if you were the guy and you've got a message

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 2>like that, surely you put him on a blacklist?

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Is the blacklist real?

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, Like, anyone here a real estate agent?

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 1>Are you honest? Be honest? Has anyone been blacklisted or

0:04:56.600 --> 0:05:01.039
<v Speaker 1>has experience with someone who's been blacklisted? Oh? You have fives?

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, but you're not a real estate babe. I

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 1>don't believe black Wow. Do you think it's like a

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:18.359
<v Speaker 1>really sophisticated scare tactic? If we're all assuming there's this

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>like blacklist that we're all trying not to be on,

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and so we are on the side of caution, We're

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:26.279
<v Speaker 1>trying not to be like prickly or do anything so

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>we don't get blacklisted. But there's this many people in

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a room, and we know how many people and nobody

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>knows of anyone who's been blacklisted. Maybe it's fake.

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I think blacklisting exists, I just mean more in

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 2>a real estate capacity, or.

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Like, what is a blacklist? Is it a physical list.

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Is there like a network of people putting them into

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:44.160
<v Speaker 2>a document.

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is assuming that to the real estate agent,

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 1>your friend's names were that memorable.

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's pretty it's pretty funny, Like if you

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 2>were him, you'd be screen showing it sending around you know,

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 2>bella property or.

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:02.679
<v Speaker 1>You're the Rubenstein group.

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 3>We should you Gavin on this segment.

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>See what how you respond? I mean, I reckon, you'll

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:09.719
<v Speaker 1>be fine. To be honest, you might not be fine.

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I was. I saw a video that Domain posted a

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:17.720
<v Speaker 1>little like Tiki talking whatever, of seventy people lining up

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>for seven hundred a week two bedroom. Generally that's not unusual, yep.

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I would never line like, if that's why people are going,

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 1>it's done. You're not getting the apartment, just tap out.

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I know, but someone's gonna win it. I don't know

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:36.480
<v Speaker 1>about all that. To be fair, I feel like that

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>story was worthwhile just to say it's been done before. Personally,

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I want all my interactions with my real estate. If

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have any kind of commotion, I want to

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>be postly signing total I'm going ham I don't even

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>care anymore. I feel like I've been like seamonged into

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>being like, don't do this, don't say this. It's not

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:57.479
<v Speaker 1>charity work, especially renting in Sydney. You're gonna hear from

0:06:57.480 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>me King.

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm very excited hopefully I've heard that there might be

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 2>a tenant. You know how we have to give like

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:09.039
<v Speaker 2>good referra. We have to get referrals to be given

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 2>a house. I think now there's talk about being getting

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 2>well who are the people that win them.

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 3>Or landlord landlord references?

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Wouldn't that TikTok mean?

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>But no, it's a thing.

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 3>And there it was that comedian that started at what's

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 3>his name?

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Tom?

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Do you dny when I'll see that TikTok or that

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 2>comedian and be like, yeah, we need to get landlords

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 2>giving references. I literally read an article that's like this

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 2>actually might happen.

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>But not to be devil's I'd recur. But even if

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>there are landlord references, rent is still on in the

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>position where even having that reference is going to make

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 1>easier for them to find a place to live. Like

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the point remains that like it is like a systemic

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>issue where houses are a commodity. Therefore people will never

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>be able to fairly get you know what I'm saying. Yeah,

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I do. So put the pressure on your real estate agent.

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Why you're in a mutual agreement anyway? Were he If

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>we're going to suffer, let's both suffer.

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, I'm calling up for the mold.

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm calling up for any little things, little ship on

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 2>the wall, I'm calling.

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Then I'm like, the TAP's leaking, and they're like, did

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>you check? No, you fix it?

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, that's on that well rapitch that guy.

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I honestly thought it's going to be a voice member

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>from the real estate agent. You geat it up? Oh

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>imagine that.

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, was it worth a payoff for your paddler, Yeah,

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 2>sympathy paddles.

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>They would never do that, would never do that. If

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>you are someone who is spending a lot of time

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 1>on the Internet, you've definitely heard people speak about how

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>social media is rotting our brains and our attention span

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:43.839
<v Speaker 1>is terrible, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. And as

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>someone who is trying to not shame myself about enjoying

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the fruits of the Internet's labor, I've been thinking about, like,

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>what is the big deal? Like, yes, let's say TikTok

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>is rotting our brains? What will be saving them for?

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you know what I'm saying, Like, if that's not

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 1>going to rute our brains, what do we need the

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 1>full brain capacity to do? Yeah? Yeah, do you see

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying? This is my thing. I just don't

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 1>like that somehow we can take a bunch of like

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:18.079
<v Speaker 1>joyous things and then just like change them for a

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>counter conversation devil's advocate narrative. And I'm a devil's advocate,

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 1>so I get it. It's fun to idate about, like, well,

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>like what's this different side of the story, But then

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>we get to the point where we like shame and

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>demonize fun things. I know there are heaps of people

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 1>who are like, oh no, Like I definitely have a

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>terrible relationship with my body because of social media, and

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I definitely have like you know, indoctrinated myself or internalized

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of bad ideas. But for the vast majority,

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 1>every day it brings you joy, access to your friends,

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 1>access to broader ideas, lifestyles you would never have experienced before.

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 1>And every day you come home talking about spraiunning my

0:09:57.200 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>brain new slash. We weren't using it. Well, anyway, I

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know anyone before social media who was really challenging.

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean aside from the philosophers. And even then, like

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you really look at what philosophers were riding and it

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>was just like thoughts, okay, what I was like, if

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>a tree falls in the forest and nobody hears that

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't make a sound? Yeah, genius, be real, be for real?

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:24.959
<v Speaker 1>Do you know what I'm saying. So even before then,

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:27.679
<v Speaker 1>we weren't even doing much. And have you seen Limitless?

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Paddles up? Who's seen Limitless with Bradley Cooper? You got

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 1>you know what? You know what action movies? Wow, tough crap. Anyway,

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Limitless is this movie, this action movie with Bradley Cooper,

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and he takes his pill that is meant to give

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>him access to his full brain capacity. He takes this

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>pill that takes him from about eight percent brain capacity,

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>which is like average is what we all have, to

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:52.719
<v Speaker 1>the full one hundred and he's like, whoa, Like I'm

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>seeing four dy five D, I smell, taste, I taste

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>sense or whatever. And then so I was thinking about

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>that and it's like by the end of the movie

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>it was too much for him. He was like I

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 1>don't need all of this, Like I'm a prisoner in

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 1>my own simple man, literally, And so I'm thinking even

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>with us, like we are so sure that without this

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>thing that is rotting our brains that we weren't already

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna be rotted anyway, now we get pleasure out of

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it totally.

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Who feels I'm gotta be diplomatic about this, don't do that.

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 2>Who feels that TikTok positively impects their life in a

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 2>sense that even if it wasn't addictive, you would still

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 2>love it?

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Wow? Okay.

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Who feels as if they've seen something really awful that

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 2>they wish they didn't see on TikTok?

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Can you say what you saw? Just any ideas? Not traumaduant,

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:50.559
<v Speaker 1>But I'm curious, let's rephrase that for the real world. Yeah,

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>who thinks that they have experienced joy from life paddles up?

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:11:57.720 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Who was experienced and they wouldn't want to experience in life?

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Up?

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? It was always going to happen, true, true, And

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's such a cop out to attribute it

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>all to an app that didn't come with a ruled book,

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't come with a guide book. Removing all of your

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:15.840
<v Speaker 1>agency to be like this app is the reason why

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>or why not lazy.

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:21.320
<v Speaker 2>However, I will say TikTok is very interesting in showing

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 2>you what your mind is doing at one point. Like

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 2>let's say you feel really sad, but you haven't put

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 2>your finger on it. The shit that TikTok is giving

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 2>you is showing you what's actually wrong.

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 3>Like I'll be like, do I feel bad? Do I

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 3>not feel bad? And then I'll start getting all these

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 3>like depression tiktoks.

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:37.559
<v Speaker 1>So that's a placebo.

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 2>No I swear, I swear, and it comes to other instances.

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 2>I want to talk about this more in depth in

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 2>a different scenario, but if you've ever experienced disordered eating,

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 2>sorry to go there.

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Trigger warning.

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:50.959
<v Speaker 2>There was a period in my life where it was bad,

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 2>like a year ago. I would get so many eating

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 2>disordered tiktoks, like people going through it, people talking about

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:00.199
<v Speaker 2>what they ate in a day, like it, to the

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 2>point where I'm sure that the algorithm is doing it,

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Like there's absolutely no ifs and butts, because now I

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 2>don't get any of that.

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't get any ed tiktoks.

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>But how do you think an algorithm works?

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's still It's what I'm trying to say is

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 2>like I didn't ask to see that content. I didn't

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 2>actually actively seek it out. I would scroll past them,

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 2>but they would still come up because it's looking at

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 2>my face.

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 3>Because Tiktoks sees your face.

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>It definitely does track your eye movements though, so it

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>can see when you're enjoying stuff. I still love it.

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm still on the top twisted, but just saying, can

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 2>you see what it does in ten years?

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm a fearmonger. I'll say nothing more. Big icon energy.

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 2>So something that I've noticed with FLEXI lately is her

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 2>lexicon changing and shifting.

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Flex and I spend.

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 2>Quite a lot of time together just talking pretty much

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 2>just in a radio based capacity, Like we don't really

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.959
<v Speaker 2>share that many thoughts outside of the studio. We keep

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:54.719
<v Speaker 2>them to ourselves and then we dump them in the

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 2>studio and we go on and live our lives. Let's

0:13:56.760 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 2>tell creative integrity, work life balance. But someone that I've

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:03.559
<v Speaker 2>noticed flex do lately, it started last week.

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 1>She's coming into the.

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Office three weeks, but we'll take and she comes in

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 2>using a very particular vernacular that I've only ever heard

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 2>in high school, with a certain demographic footy lads. Flex

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 2>has started speaking like a footy lad.

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 3>It started out with.

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 2>A phrase that I think we started using a few

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 2>months ago.

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 3>But you've just picked it up with steam.

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that is getting near it? Correct? You put

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>your paddle up?

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 3>If you know what that means?

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Getting near it? Anyone? Yeah? Can I ask you what

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>you think it means?

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 2>Is it?

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>There close? Anyone else? Come on? Someone screaming out?

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 3>What's getting near it?

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes? My god?

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 2>The man in sitting in the back of the room

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 2>with glasses on in a tracksuit.

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Who is that? I would also say, but I would

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>all say to be fair, it has a broad range

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>of meetings. Like if I'm saying something's cooked, what do

0:14:59.280 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>you think cooked means?

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 3>Uh?

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Cool? Exactly? Is it cool? Is it crazy? Is it uncomfortable?

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Is it weird? It's all of it. Getting near it

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 1>is specifically sexy. No, I don't think so.

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 3>Getting near it? Well, what did I say this sort

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 3>of say?

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 2>There is a very particular vernacular that he's been created

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 2>in charge rooms, in footy boys, old boys, footy boys,

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 2>in school AFL rooms. You see it when they do

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 2>the live telecasts.

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Getting near it?

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 2>What are some others salad you know what that means.

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't tossing salad the hair in your head like

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 2>you've got a rough salad, or you got a rough lid.

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>That means you're ugly.

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 3>Oh what else have I got here? Day for it?

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh? Yeah, day for it?

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Clack class, fun, punching, cutting grass, and a bit of alright,

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 2>what I've noticed a lot of these are very sex oriented.

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, for you, I just think, Okay, so here's

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>my thing, Like I'm area's thinking about language. And I

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>spoke before about how, like my greatest thing, like my life, ick,

0:15:57.320 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the thing that really like frustrates me, is misunderstood, And

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about how much time I spent trying

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to find the perfect words and the perfect verbiage to

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>perfectly communicate whatever. It's all just a leaders and boring.

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I just want to use all the words. And I

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>often find that, like you've said, you've attributed this type

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of language to the type of person. It's so exclusionary,

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like that's the issue with how people

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 1>approach language generally, is like, if you speak a certain way,

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 1>then you must be this person, and therefore we only

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>allow you to like see the world through that particular lens,

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>and I just don't like it because I feel like

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>it's doing the opposite of what language should do, which

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>is unite and connect and bridge the gap in understanding.

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 1>And so now when I see language, I just like

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>incorporate it in hopes that it gives me the kind

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 1>of understanding to talk to more people or to make

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>people more comfortable with speaking to me.

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 3>Interesting, so we're appealing to a new audience.

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Are you regrets it's generally in life. I just I

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 1>would hate the idea of someone being like, oh, I

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>can't speak to her or speak with her because I can.

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>She's like she's giving me a vibe that says that

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 1>she wouldn't understand me, or like she wouldn't allow for

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>this type of conversation. But you can all stay. I'll

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>determine it after you've spoken, not Throst and Block, but

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you know what it is, Footy Boy.

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 2>Inclusion is very, very important at the Flex and Froom show.

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 1>But there's also something about we were speaking about it earlier.

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, like when you're in high school, you learn

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 1>how to use a billion words to say nothing like

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>essay approach, like in order to unpack the thing of

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the word it's okay too much, and then you might

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 1>overcorrect and not know how to articulate yourself because you

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>want to oversimplify everything. Everything's a vibe, you know. Yeah,

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>everything's vibe. It's vibes, you know, and it's like, okay, so,

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:46.439
<v Speaker 1>but what does that mean. I'm trying to find the

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 1>way to like do all of it, you know, use

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:51.919
<v Speaker 1>as many words or as little words and still have

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>as like validating the connection with people and it's fun.

0:17:57.200 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 2>And just before we head onto the next break, I

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 2>was having a comes with someone the other day. What

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 2>did we used to say before he said sleigh? Yeah,

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 2>people just say, oh, slay, slay, slay to anything. Does

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 2>anyone remember I swear there was a word before Literally

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 2>it's the slay sligh.

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't say sleigh that much.

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Put your paddle up sleigh swag Yeah maybe No, who

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 2>said swag swaggy swaggy? I would have said that's hot,

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 2>but I just didn't graduate from Paris Hilton. Anyway, if

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 2>you come up with what we said before slay, please

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 2>see me.

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>It's plaguing my brother. Nah vie stay sick. Vibe is

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>less new than slay right.

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 3>Oh, love it, love it.

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 6>And then before Vibe there was mint No yes, yes, yes, yes,

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:52.400
<v Speaker 6>thank you, but that was.

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:53.120
<v Speaker 1>So long ago.

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but that's what I mean. That was yes, Vibe slay.

0:18:56.960 --> 0:18:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's there's a few things in between

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>anything else. Period. It was period on fleek. It was

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 1>on fleek.

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna rile these down the break. Yeah, this is

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 3>why I love a period. That's why I love a

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 3>last shooting audience FLEXI.

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, literally, because you couldn't google that knowledge in the brain.

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>This is community. My dms were a scary place a

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago. Do you remember that when people

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 1>thought I was living in a dungeon?

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, that hit different.

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:28.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to be good about my privacy, and now

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 1>everyone thinks I'm a gremlin troll. But every now and then,

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 1>when I go through my dms, I like to do

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 1>some screenshots, mine some data, see what the vibes are,

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 1>but also see what conversations are happening outside of what

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 1>we do, because as someone who's been chatting publicly for

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 1>ten years, I feel like I've talked about everything so

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 1>much so that the conversations I want to have are

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 1>not coherent. The conversation I want to have is if

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden this room started flooding and all

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the doors were locked, what would we do? But you

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 1>know where am I placing that?

0:19:58.800 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 3>Sure?

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Where does it start? Exactly? I digress. It's all about blocking.

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Apparently that's what people want to know if we should

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:07.159
<v Speaker 1>do anyway. This person says, hey, flex, I need to

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 1>know if you're a blocker.

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 3>Wait is she in the audience?

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:11.679
<v Speaker 1>Now he's not here. This person needs to know if

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:14.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm a blocker? Off top, hands up? If blocking is

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the acceptable way to respond to communication, paddles up. Please,

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>this is not enough. You guys need to protect your energy.

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 1>This person wants to know what they should do. And

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm very intrigued because I often find whenever we're answering

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>any kind of listener dilemma, my approach is always feral

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and direct, and your approach is considered and it's giving

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 1>cute indirect Yeah, like consideredly indirect. But listen to this.

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:43.360
<v Speaker 1>This guy used to see very casually over four years ago.

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Likes to message me every now and then. They always

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>come back, don't they. He was way more into me

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:51.920
<v Speaker 1>than I was into him. Naturally, and he was pretty

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>devo when we broke it off, despite having only been

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>on two dates.

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:55.479
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't go as far as to say he's a pest,

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:01.159
<v Speaker 1>but he messages me every couple of months or so,

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>which is annoying. The messages are also weird, like I

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 1>saw you walking the other day and you're looking good lately.

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>To stop that king? That one's quite nice, is it not?

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 2>No, I would be calling the police, calling the police station, police.

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 1>She's gonna talk to the police.

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:23.639
<v Speaker 3>I'm walking into the screenshot. I need witness protection.

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>This person says I'm a boyfriend now and he knows

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:28.719
<v Speaker 1>about the situation, but has never requested a block or anything,

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:33.200
<v Speaker 1>most likely due to complete just complete disinterest. I feel

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of weirded out by the fact that he can

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:38.880
<v Speaker 1>see my picks, comments, likes, hence my contemplation of a block. However,

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>he is the type of guy that would message me

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:44.199
<v Speaker 1>on another platform to ask why I blocked him. On

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 1>top of that, there is the potential that I would

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:48.119
<v Speaker 1>run into him somewhere he would confront me about it.

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I also don't want to give him the satisfaction of

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the block, like I care enough to block him, Oh,

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent chance. I'm overthinking this, but interested to

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 1>know what you would do, because I value your opinions

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>quite highly through me. This is why I just block,

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Like I just don't feel like it's that deep. And

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:06.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's because I'm interacting with people that I don't

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:08.919
<v Speaker 1>know quite well. So it's like, this is my family

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>friend from three years ago. I'm going to block them.

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>But I often feel like it's very odd to me

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:17.640
<v Speaker 1>how much room we make for people who are encroaching

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>on our personal safety and comfort, you know what I'm saying,

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 1>like or that we have over enthused how difficult it

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 1>would be to just make the decision and see what

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:32.160
<v Speaker 1>happens after, Like this person is paralyzed by the fear

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:34.880
<v Speaker 1>that if I do block this person that maybe I'll

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:36.959
<v Speaker 1>run into them, or maybe they'll contact me on another platform,

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>or maybe I'll do this or that, And it's like,

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 1>what's happening now is that they're annoying on this platform,

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>So how do we fix that.

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:44.919
<v Speaker 2>I'm of the opinion that the only reason why you

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 2>don't block old flames if they're annoying you is if

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 2>you want to stroke your own ego.

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Paddles up if you agree.

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, come on, put your laters, put your.

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Paws up, put your browser because you're okay, so okay, okay,

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I believe like it's always nice having the

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 2>one person that you know they'm we're gonna get over you,

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 2>and you.

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Know, I just kind of you see my new hair

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 1>or on you see my new job? Yep, look at me.

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm on a post.

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Now, are you wondering could have been? I could have

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 2>been your ride and die that you let me go.

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:20.479
<v Speaker 2>So to clarify you, I don't think he listens to this.

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 1>You're saying that one of the few reasons why you

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't block someone who is acting this way is because

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you want the validation of them seeing you. If you

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 1>don't agree with that, please yell. What are the other

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 1>reasons why you wouldn't block someone? Seriously, you can.

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 3>Just mute them?

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, yep, yep, I like that. Anything else? Why else? Something?

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Just blocking? I need to understand in case they get

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:49.639
<v Speaker 1>hotter because I'm looking back. I'm not not interacting, but

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm watching.

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I like to be able to go back and

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:52.160
<v Speaker 3>look at them.

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very simple. I think everyone sho just

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:57.719
<v Speaker 1>start blocking. It's truly so fun. But also there's something

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:00.360
<v Speaker 1>about and what we don't consider enough is like emotional

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>energy very finite. You know, the amount of emotional energy

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 1>you can give to something before you're depleted. For yourself

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and the things you want, you got like six bad

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>conversations a week before you're knocked out. Now he's taking

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 1>up two three four shame.

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 3>I reckon.

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 1>She secretly loves it. That's just me. Today we're talking

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 1>about icons, which like I'm very fascinated by because I

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>feel like people aren't seeing it the way we're seeing it.

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Like I wonder if people can really truly conceptualize, like

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 1>we have created icons out of mere mortals, regular people

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 1>who do regular things, and we're like, no, they're special.

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:44.199
<v Speaker 3>I'm here for it.

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I get it.

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 3>Newflix disrecording the Ring right now.

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:49.159
<v Speaker 2>Just to paint your picture. We're on like a slightly

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 2>elevated stage. There's studio lighting occurring, got cameras on either side.

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:55.919
<v Speaker 2>We even got cameras on the audience. You're looking slay today,

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:59.199
<v Speaker 2>so that's the best thing. And the people in the

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 2>audience you were invited, I'm quite sure, and I think

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:03.199
<v Speaker 2>we've got some influencers in the audience.

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Don't worry.

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 2>I won't dox anyone, though I do say season familiar faces.

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about whether.

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 3>Or not influencers are icons.

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Just that simple sentence, our influences icons paddles up, It happens,

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 2>it's creeps up slowly. May I ask you, why do

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:21.919
<v Speaker 2>you think influencers are icons?

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 5>I was just thinking about, like all the TikTok is

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 5>that I watch and I just like love them, and

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:29.880
<v Speaker 5>I think that they've actually influenced my daily life.

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I say, Gorgina, and that's because of a TikTok Regina.

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 5>It is like so ingrained in my daily life now,

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 5>So that's psychoonic.

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Would it help if I read out the definition? I

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>do love a definition, okay, shout out to Oxford Webster's

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:48.640
<v Speaker 1>as well. A person or thing regarded as a representative

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>symbol or a person or thing that is worthy of veneration.

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Veneration is like praise, adoration with you. So, by that definition,

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 1>are influences icons, yes or no? Paddles up or down?

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:07.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, does it change anything with that definition?

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:09.439
<v Speaker 1>Well, it depends. I feel like sometimes people don't know

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>words mean things. You know, we just say some stuff

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and then we get confused in the mix or whatever.

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:13.119
<v Speaker 1>What do you reckon?

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 2>I think the earliest influencers are icons because they were

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 2>influencers when the term influencing was a dirty word.

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it's not a dirty word now? Nah?

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that.

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 3>Do you think influencer is a dirty word?

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Now?

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Put your paddle up? Yeah.

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 3>Look, sometimes the paddles go.

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:31.640
<v Speaker 2>Other times they're like whoa, that was like it whoo,

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 2>which is interesting given the location we're with the people with.

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>If you compare it, I think if you compare it

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to like, is artist a dirty word? You're like, no,

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, is musician a dirty word? Is like lawyer

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 1>a dirty word? Lawyer's pushing the boundaries? Yeah, but but

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 1>like in a neutral sense. If someone's like I'm a

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 1>lawyer and like oh, you're like, oh, okay, I'm an influencer,

0:26:57.680 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 1>people are like oh noah, no, no, no, no no.

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:03.119
<v Speaker 1>The narrative starts getting painted and it's like Olive Green

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and rancid.

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Does anyone have an idea for why they think influencer

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 2>is a dirty word?

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Anyone want to incriminate themselves?

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:15.719
<v Speaker 7>I just think sometimes when you say influencer, especially like

0:27:15.760 --> 0:27:18.360
<v Speaker 7>what you said about being a dirty word in the past.

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:21.400
<v Speaker 7>It's also environmental, like where you grow up, so you

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:23.239
<v Speaker 7>grow up. Lucky for me, I'm surrounded by a lot

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 7>of content, creative friends or influence friends. But if you

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 7>go to a certain demographic and you're like, oh, I'm

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 7>an influencer, they're just like, you're all about yourself and

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:33.119
<v Speaker 7>that's not a real job kind of thing. And I

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 7>think that people kind of it's got a bit of

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 7>a stigma to it. And I think that's why, you know, totally, so.

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 2>You think it's like imposed on the influencer that it's

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 2>a dirty word, but they themselves shouldn't feel like it's

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 2>a dirty word.

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I don't know, Like, wait, what was the question?

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 3>Honestly, I don't know.

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I this point, all I say is I.

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Probably used to think influencers was a dirty word. Personally,

0:27:56.600 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't anymore. Seriously, I'm starting to think, well, well, okay,

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:02.640
<v Speaker 2>do you consider flex an influencer.

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna put the paddles up, come on out, you

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 1>did you? Look, I don't want to offend her, so

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you see you did it. It's true.

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:15.639
<v Speaker 2>We didn't print him out for no reason. This was funny,

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:18.920
<v Speaker 2>this was eating into the budget. Do I think influencers

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 2>are icons?

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 3>I can name a few.

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Kirk Coleman, put you put your paws up for Kirk Colemin. Guys,

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 2>regardless of what I asked, just put him up. I

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:31.919
<v Speaker 2>think that Kirk Coleman is the absolute pinnacle of iconic

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:34.880
<v Speaker 2>because he was an influencer before it was a thing,

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:36.880
<v Speaker 2>Like he was an influencer on Facebook.

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 3>So many people made fun of him.

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 2>He was the butt of so many jokes, and yet

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 2>he always had his slogan of like purf like Kurt,

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 2>that's hot, I'm hot. And it's not until today's day

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 2>and age where like taking potos of yourself and being

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 2>in love with yourself even if it's facetious is celebrated,

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Whereas back then when he did it, we weren't in

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 2>that culture.

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Yet we're in the culture of like playing.

0:28:57.120 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 2>Down your hotness or like like I don't know that

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm hot, whereas now I think we we're all being

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Kirk commons, and so I think he's an icon.

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 1>But maybe that's the point, if we're all icons. I

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>thought part of I mean that definition didn't go into

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of depth. But I always assume part of

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:15.960
<v Speaker 1>icon status is to be revered way past your time,

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 1>do you know what I mean? And I think that

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 1>like back when I don't know, Liberaci was doing his thing,

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and like Napoleon or whatever, I don't think at the

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>time they were revered as icons. They weren't. They were

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>social pariahs and lepers and people that were Seraci was

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 1>in a way, but not in the way now. And

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 1>everyone looks back and it's like, oh my god, icon Nick,

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 1>because we can see the way that you impacted time

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 1>is like so far greater than what you were able

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to realize at the time. Our influence as icons? You think, Well,

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think influencers are icons. Like that's not the question,

0:29:50.560 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 1>do you know what I mean? Like, broadly speaking, do

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 1>influencers have the capacity to be iconic? Probably, But like

0:29:57.480 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I feel like some of the greatest, like most influence

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 1>people in the whole wide world still aren't regarded as icons.

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>So why would we divvy it out to someone who,

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 1>on a small scale probably isn't changing the face of

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the world as we know it.

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 3>They quick, wow, big icon energy.

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 2>You've been listening to the flex and frooms, Big icon

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:20.479
<v Speaker 2>Energy Podcast. For more, tune in the KDO and DAB

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 2>or stream it on iHeartRadio radio