WEBVTT - 18: Unlawful Killing

0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>This podcast contains information and details relating to suicide. We

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:11.760
<v Speaker 1>urge anyone struggling with their emotions to contact Lifeline on

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 1>thirteen eleven fourteen thirteen eleven fourteen or visit them at

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:29.319
<v Speaker 1>lifeline dot org dot au. A twenty four year old

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>devoted mother of two fleeing a violent relationship as a

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:45.200
<v Speaker 1>mom bags pack car running her daughters strapped into the backseat.

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Mom told me that she needed to go back inside

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>to grab something. Panic.

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:53.199
<v Speaker 2>Amy is dead, sir By Amy's Dead?

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Eight Confusion World.

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 3>About five minutes they said, N's a suicide.

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>One hundred percent.

0:00:58.200 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 4>This is immersing.

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:05.319
<v Speaker 1>What do you think is really the honest truth about Amy?

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:11.040
<v Speaker 3>The Truth About Amy?

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 1>Episode eighteen. Hi, I'm Liam Bartlett and.

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:22.319
<v Speaker 5>I'm Alison Sandy.

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 2>Hillo.

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 5>Nancy, Oh, you're looking so beautiful. I'm filming already. I'm sorry,

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:32.479
<v Speaker 5>but you know it's a hungry beast. Nancy, it's all

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 5>It's so good to see you looking so well. On

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 5>my recent visit to Perth, I had the pleasure of

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 5>catching up with Amy's mum and best friend Nancy Kirk

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 5>and Aaron Gower.

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 6>How are you guys feeling after everything in this whole

0:01:53.920 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 6>like avalanche of publicity, and you know that's light, I suppose,

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 6>and the podcast and everything on top of it.

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, I had a lady come up to me the

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:10.679
<v Speaker 2>other week at work. I was helping her and then

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 2>she's gone to the counter bought her stuff and the

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 2>woman I was working with said my name, like olled out, Nancy.

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Can you just have a look at the price for this?

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:24.679
<v Speaker 2>I said, you was, And as she was walking out,

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 2>she said, oh, you're related to Amy Wensley. I said, now,

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm her mother, And I don't know what it was.

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 2>It was just I must have been happened one of

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 2>them days, and I couldn't help. I'd just started tearing up.

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 2>And she said, yeah, one hundred behind hers. You know,

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Amy didn't die, and it was nice, it was it

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 2>was nice, but I sort of yeah, and I just

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 2>teared up, and I was like, oh my god.

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:01.519
<v Speaker 5>What's a lot I mean? And I don't want to

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:04.239
<v Speaker 5>dwell on that because I know how it makes you feel.

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 5>But yeah, I completely understand. There is nothing worse than

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 5>what you've been through, like for me, for you know,

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 5>like a week as mums. We're all mums, right, Nothing

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 5>worse than losing the child so and then having to

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 5>fight for justice.

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 2>I think that's the hardest. Like I was talking today

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 2>yesterday and I told her I was coming to meet

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 2>you when you're going to be here, and she goes, oh,

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 2>I said, why did you want to come? She got

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 2>no thanks, So okay, she goes, Oh, I wish you

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 2>will just hurry up and finish. Yeah, Johanna, she goes,

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 2>I said, I just need to hurry up. She goes,

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 2>I hate saying you like this every time something comes

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 2>up because it messes with your head. Then she goes,

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't like it. So I just felt so nice.

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's I think the sad thing. And they talk

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 5>about it being dredged up again as though like we

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 5>can help that, you know, like if it was dealt

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 5>with properly in the first place.

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 2>That's right, we wouldn't be doing all this and we're

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 2>reliving every single time.

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 5>One of the things that came up lim is how

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 5>victims and their families are treated after the investigation of

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 5>a loved one has been botched compared to that of

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 5>witnesses and persons of interest.

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:34.359
<v Speaker 2>I don't understand how Aaron Tash, myself, what we've seen

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 2>what we've heard out of AIM's mouth. Then this look

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 2>at David, Gareth and what's the other one, Josh them

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 2>through their stories aren't consistent at all. I can't remember

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:56.840
<v Speaker 2>and I can't remember. I forgot where we can tell

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 2>you exactly what we've said at the Coroner's Court twenty

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:07.479
<v Speaker 2>twenty one. I can remember that phone call. I can't

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 2>get that out of my head, her voice. I'm not

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:16.599
<v Speaker 2>going to forget that. I yes, I can't remember bits

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:19.840
<v Speaker 2>and paces.

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:19.799
<v Speaker 5>The shock when you're in shock.

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Right when I got to the house after David said

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 2>that to me, I remember bits and paces. I don't

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 2>remember bits and paces when I got home, but that

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 2>phone call, what she said to me, I'll never forget.

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:41.919
<v Speaker 4>The other week, I was thinking that that's one of

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 4>the frustrating things about it is that we're constantly thinking

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 4>about what information can we get out there about people,

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 4>like where's David at now in his life, or what's

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 4>he doing? When does he have caught and all these things,

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 4>and we don't really get to just focus on just

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:58.359
<v Speaker 4>thinking about Amen, just because how she was as a

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 4>person and who she was and all that sort of stuff,

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 4>and just enjoying or remembering her life.

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 3>We're just focusing on this bad no part of it.

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 2>It's like I can't even enjoying a grandmother and that's

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 2>what I missed. I miss those faint cads on with

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Iman soon, right, I haven't the girls? Yeah tonight, I

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 2>can't do and I miss that. I like it. I

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:28.039
<v Speaker 2>don't feel like Ann a grandmother to them girls. Yeah,

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 2>and just shouldn't have to.

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 5>And how the system isn't just geared against them, but

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 5>also the people who try to help them. I then

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 5>tell Nancy and Aaron about former detective Anne Lahane, who

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 5>we discussed in episode sixteen, and how she was reprimanded

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 5>for not falling in behind the decision from Major Crime

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:51.840
<v Speaker 5>that Amy suicided.

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 2>God, but why is she getting reprimanded when the two

0:06:57.640 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 2>detectives still had their freaking jobs.

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 4>How do they have the authority to tell her to

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:02.479
<v Speaker 4>do that?

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:07.280
<v Speaker 5>Well, they don't, but she got reprimanded and then she

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:08.040
<v Speaker 5>was seen as.

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 6>Not being a team player.

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god. But aren't the uniformed police officers their

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 2>colleagues as well.

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 3>They're not detectives.

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 2>And they do freaking better job.

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 4>Why has there not been that pressure to get more answers.

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 2>It's costing the government more now looking into Amy's case

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 2>now from what it would have if they've done their

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 2>job properly that night. I just hope this new cold

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 2>case term are a lot sorr and a lot better

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 2>than the last one. God, I hope they do the

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 2>right thing this time, by Amy, by Amy's daughters.

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 4>Well, they say it themselves now advertised as a homicide.

0:07:56.000 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 5>Think, yeah, so homicide investigations. Yeah, that's why she needs

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 5>now where they say they've got enough information for enough

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 5>evidence to prosecute.

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 6>I mean, what do you think of it?

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 4>It's a no brainer they definitely do, wasn't it.

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Just like he grabbed Amy Boger's throat, he threw her

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 2>on the ground. That came out of Amy's mouth to me.

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 2>That's when I told Amy pack, yes, stuff, you and

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 2>the girls get down here now. And then that happens.

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 2>She was hysterical. She couldn't hardly talk properly, she was

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 2>that hysterical. But I got her to calm down and yes, mom,

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 2>I'll be there soon, put her girls in the car.

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:51.079
<v Speaker 4>And all the evidence shows that she was an attentive mum.

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 4>She wasn't just like a young mom that just doesn't

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 4>really worry about their kids and just lets them go.

0:08:55.760 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 2>She would follow schools to the school. When they first

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 2>started catching a bus to school, she would follow the

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 2>bus to school to make sure they got off the

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 2>bus and walking to the school, and she would follow

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 2>the bus after school. She've done that for about a

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 2>week to make sure her girls were safe on the bus.

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 5>I don't know about you, Lamb, but what bothers me

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 5>the most is how little power victims and their families

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 5>have in the event authorities decide.

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 3>It's all just too hard.

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 5>As mentioned by the New South Wales Crime Commissioner Michael

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:45.479
<v Speaker 5>Barnes last season, if the DPP doesn't decide to prosecute,

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 5>there's no review process.

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 1>It's an all or nothing situation, isn't it. Al It's

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>very final, and the families of victims must really feel that.

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.199
<v Speaker 1>I think you'd have to do the old walk a

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 1>mile in my shoe routine to fully understand how they

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>must feel. But it's almost how can I put it,

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>It's almost a godlike sort of system, isn't it in

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that respect? Because that's it. The final word is the

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>final word. But the final word comes very early. I

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>think in the process. There's no checks and balances. You

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>just have to rely on the system, like you're in

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the hands of the system full stop, and you just

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>have to trust that everyone along the line, and it's

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a very short line, has done their job properly, due

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>diligence and with enough verve and vigor to come to

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the right decision. And I say that because you know,

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>everyone's under pressure. There's budget tree pressures, there's resource pressures.

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Everyone in those offices is under a lot of pressure

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>because they do do a lot of very good work.

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>And we're the first to acknowledge that. But that's it.

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 1>That's the sort of the Office of the High and Mighty. Now,

0:10:56.480 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just to provide our listeners with context, I've

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>gone back and had a look at the WA Director

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of Public Prosecutions Act nineteen ninety one and his role.

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>The DPP's role is very expansive, includes commencing or conducting, quote,

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the prosecution of any offense, whether indictable or not. Now,

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I won't go into all these functions bore you to death,

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>but I thought i'd mentioned a few key ones that's

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 1>relevant to the case of Amy Wensley. For example, under

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the Coroner's Act of nineteen ninety six. They are required

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>to participate in inquests and with concurrence of the coroner,

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 1>assist them in the proceedings. Talk more about that in

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>a minute, because that'll become a very important point when

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>we go to the previous coroner who had carriage of

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Amy's case originally. But the DPP's office also have the

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 1>ability to quote, make a request in writing to an official,

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>including the Commissioner of Police. Now that's a direct quote

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>from the Act. I haven't added the last part. The

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>last part reads and a member of the police force

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>whose functions include prosecuting for or investigating offenses. Now you'll

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>remember the statement from the office of the DPP said

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 1>they had but a mere ability to advise an investigative agency,

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>implying WA Police, and it was their decision. WA Police's

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>decision whether to lay charges or not. However, I think

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>they're being a bit humble here for want of a

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>better description, because clearly the director's power from the Act,

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>from that quote that I've just given you, extends to

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>requesting from the Police Commissioner with the obvious expectation that

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>he would comply for any specified information or documentation or

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>material that the DPP thinks may be relevant if considered

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to bring or take over a prosecution in relation to

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>an offense or suspected offense. Now he can also request

0:12:56.920 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>investigation or further investigation reried out into any matter in

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>relation to that offense or suspected offense. Again, the police

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>commissioner must comply unless there is any other law preventing

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>that compliance, which I would suggest to you again would

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 1>be very unusual. So Robbo and sc who is the

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Director of Public Prosecutions in Wa, really can make the difference.

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he has complete power to make the difference

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>as to whether Amy's case is brought to justice.

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's interesting again going back to that whole thing

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 5>of them not having any review process for his decisions.

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 5>Not even a judge gets that. It's the power that

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:43.200
<v Speaker 5>that role has the DPP has is just I just

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 5>I can't quite fathom why they're allowed that level of power,

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 5>given that people who you would say were more experienced,

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 5>had better credentials in those top areas in Supreme Court

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:00.839
<v Speaker 5>and High Court aren't given that. I mean, well the

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 5>High Court is, but that's certainly not Supreme Court. And yeah,

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 5>I just it's quite surprising.

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Are you're right? I mean, Supreme Court judges are questioned

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 1>all the time, aren't they. That's why they go to

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>an appeals court. And then, as you say, ultimately there's

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:16.679
<v Speaker 1>the High Court. So the appeal court judges on sitting

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>on that bench, you know, they also get scrutinized. The

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>other interesting part about that is al is that you've

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>got to remember that in the DPP's office, the DPP

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>is not looking just at things that are obvious to

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>you or me, or investigating officers information that we don't

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>even know about. There's other variables as well. There's political

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>variables involved in deciding whether or not a brief meets

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>those criteria to you know, send it through to charges.

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>There are and we've had this from a number of

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 1>DPPs across the country over the years. You know, we've

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>had comments that very truthful comments about the nature of

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the budget for example, and the fact that you know

0:14:56.560 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that particular case hasn't got a great chance of a

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>prosecution being successful. Therefore they must spend their money where

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>justice is also seen to be done. So there are

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>nefarious variables involved that we may not necessarily know about

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>or understand or have explained to us. So there's lots

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of things in the shadows. So it makes that lack

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>of appeals process, I think, even even more acute.

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 5>I know that Michael Barnes would really like a national

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 5>campaign on this because obviously it affects all states, not

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 5>just w WA. Certainly, it's interesting that part about the

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 5>DPP's role in inquests as well Liam that came up

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 5>in a recent interview.

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we managed to track down the very first coroner

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 1>who handled Amy's case, and I must say her views

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 1>were very enlightening and she was very forthcoming. I thought

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I let our listeners be the judge. Pardon the pun,

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>but even though she's now retired, evel and Vicker was

0:15:54.400 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 1>a very experienced, accomplished, extremely knowledgeable coroner who likes Sarah Linton,

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>who was the coroner presiding over the eventual in quest,

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>held the same title Deputy state Coroner. And what I

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>found most interesting is that Evelyn had a specific background

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>in forensics, which I think provided her with a bit

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 1>more understanding of their importance, especially in relation to this case. Anyway,

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 1>let's not get ahead of ourselves here. We are getting acquainted,

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>all right. Evel and thank you very much for as

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>I said, for your time. It's really kind of you

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to have a chat to us. So let's go back

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 1>in time a little bit. How long were you a

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>deputy state.

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 3>Coroner from about July two thousand through to June twenty nineteen.

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>That's a fair old stint. And what sort of cases

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>were you exposed to during all that time?

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, there was only the state coroner, which then was

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 3>Alista Hope and myself for a period of that time

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 3>up until twenty thirteen, I think, so, I mean between

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 3>us we were exposed to all the coronial cases because

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 3>between the two of us we had to cover everything.

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:09.160
<v Speaker 3>Every sudden and unexpected death had to have an investigation

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:11.959
<v Speaker 3>as opposed to an inquest, So there would be an

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:14.439
<v Speaker 3>investigation and one or other us would sign off on it.

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 3>So we saw accidents, homicide, well not usually homicides was

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:23.439
<v Speaker 3>after a trial, so we would get it afterwards just

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 3>to do the finding, because of course we're only responsible

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 3>for manner and cause of death, nothing more. So accidents, suicide,

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 3>medical negligence, workplace incidents, anything where there was a death

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 3>that was sudden and unexpected, even natural causes if the

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 3>person was not expected to die. Therefore a doctor wasn't

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:50.160
<v Speaker 3>prepared to do a death certificate, then that would become

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 3>a coronial case.

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>So essentially, your brief was always trying to find the

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:57.400
<v Speaker 1>manner and cause of death.

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:00.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, cause of death was up to the pathologists, if

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:03.639
<v Speaker 3>you like, But then we would put the cause of

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 3>death together with the surrounding evidence to give a manner

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 3>of death i e. Suicide, accident, unlawful killing, those sorts

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:13.359
<v Speaker 3>of things.

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Yes, whatever was relatable to.

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 3>The evidence about the circumstances the.

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Person end up being deceased one way or the other.

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes, was your background as a prosecutor helpful in doing

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:26.360
<v Speaker 1>that sort of coronial.

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 3>Work, Yes, it was, But don't forget prosecutors beyond a

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 3>reasonable doubt. Coronial is only on the balance of probabilities

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:39.400
<v Speaker 3>because prosecuting your fault finding, coronal your only fact finding. Okay,

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 3>so there's kind of a difference there, But honestly, my

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:48.400
<v Speaker 3>background as a biologist was much more pertinent and helpful

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 3>to me as a prosecutor and as a coroner. Having

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 3>that biology physiology understanding made it a lot easier for

0:18:56.920 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 3>me to understand expert evidence around whatever it was, biological

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:07.159
<v Speaker 3>or whatever it was. I really think my background as

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 3>a biologist was the most useful to me both in

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 3>criminal law, which I was doing and as a coroner.

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:17.439
<v Speaker 1>So that part of it is science, part of it

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:18.640
<v Speaker 1>helped enormously.

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 3>Yep, hugely, absolutely hugely.

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>But also I would imagine as a prosecutor you learned

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 1>along the way how to talk to people and more importantly,

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:33.400
<v Speaker 1>how to decipher their responses in such a way where

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:38.640
<v Speaker 1>you suspected or or perhaps concluded that they were either

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:40.880
<v Speaker 1>telling the truth or leading you down another garden path.

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 3>That's the forensic part, as in somebody may say something

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 3>and taking it from a prosecution point of view, someone

0:19:57.280 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 3>can be mistaken, but because they totally believed what they're saying,

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:04.400
<v Speaker 3>they're very credible. So they're totally credible, so they are

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 3>telling the truth, okay, But they may not be reliable,

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:10.199
<v Speaker 3>and it's other evidence that will point to that. So

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 3>it's not that they're intentionally misleading you, but they may

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 3>have a particular memory that serves them one way. So

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 3>being able to tell with someone saying the truth or

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 3>not isn't actually what you're after. It's actually whether or

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:30.439
<v Speaker 3>not what they believe are the facts. Do you understand

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:31.159
<v Speaker 3>what I mean by.

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>That, yes, But I guess that's my point. Really. Maybe

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I've phrased that the wrong way, being able to read

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the people scenario in situation.

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:40.160
<v Speaker 3>But you have to have other evidence to be able

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:44.160
<v Speaker 3>to do that. So yeah, I mean, but someone who

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 3>believes they're telling the truth, even if they're mistaken, is

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 3>so credible because they are telling the truth as they

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:53.119
<v Speaker 3>know it. So this thing about truth or not truth, no,

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 3>not really, it's just you just know a person passionately

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:59.640
<v Speaker 3>believes what they're saying, but it may not be quite right.

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 5>So again, this is a really good point ms Vicker

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:05.919
<v Speaker 5>is making. Just because someone is saying something in a

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 5>way that they seem like they're telling the truth doesn't

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 5>mean they actually telling the truth. It just means it's

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 5>what they believe. I mean, as you know, Liam, we've

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:17.399
<v Speaker 5>both spoken to Gareth Price, and he genuinely seems to

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 5>believe what he's saying. But when you point something out

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 5>which is completely irrational, he just says something which is

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:24.479
<v Speaker 5>even more irrational to justify it.

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:28.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I think too, Allison. That's the old story,

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:30.679
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. The longer you say something, no matter what

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:34.200
<v Speaker 1>it is the more you believe it, inherently it becomes

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 1>your truth, as they are fond of saying these days,

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>which is complete lunacy because there is only one truth.

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, truth is non binary, however you carve it up.

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 1>But you're right. And again this is justification of why

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a trial would be so critical in a case like Amy's,

0:21:54.280 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>because it's different pressures, different rules of evidence, different rules

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>of legal counsel being able to cross examined, et cetera,

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:17.199
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. Yeah, given Evelyn's background, she is perfectly placed

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to to provide reasonable opinion, as I point out here,

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and clearly you look at the world forensically anyway.

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I mean I think you have to. I mean

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 3>I think that's what science probably teaches you. But kind

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 3>of so does the law, I guess. In the criminal

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 3>law area.

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:38.199
<v Speaker 1>It's long been argued, especially in Western Australia, that the

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Coroner's office has been understaffed, under resourced. I mean, did

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you find that the backlog of cases was a constant challenge.

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it was in a sort of way. But it's

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:59.479
<v Speaker 3>very difficult for families to understand everything that goes into

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 3>making determination. You know, sometimes we wouldn't get the pathologists

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 3>report for eighteen months or so, which would delay the

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 3>police report. And it's not that anyone wasn't working hard.

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 3>They were working very hard. It's just that some of

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 3>those things take an awfully long time to clarify, like

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:24.400
<v Speaker 3>especially neuropathology. Neuropathology about if you're looking at medical issues,

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 3>sometimes we just don't have the information in Australia and

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 3>our pathologists would be looking to other countries to Great

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 3>Britain to put information in. And then when DNA became

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 3>so important, originally we weren't as expert in that as

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 3>we may be now. And also the other thing that

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 3>people really have to understand, and it's difficult for me

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:48.879
<v Speaker 3>because I'm not a technical person. That's kind of different

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 3>from the biology side. Things have come such a long

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 3>way with communication. It's very easy these days to ask

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:58.959
<v Speaker 3>someone's opinion in the States or someone's opinion in Britain

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 3>if you can provide them with all the information. But

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:04.120
<v Speaker 3>it wasn't always that easy. It used to be you'd

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 3>have to send them stuff and get it back and

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:08.399
<v Speaker 3>then they'd have another query, whereas now that can be

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 3>done quite quickly. But there goes your backlog if you like,

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 3>we're waiting for information a lot of the time.

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Very frustrating for the families, doesn't it.

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:21.399
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, absolutely, I totally accept that. And that's the

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 3>other thing. If you want it done properly, then yeah,

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 3>I guess it's just very hard to explain to people.

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 1>You obviously relish the challenge though, as part of.

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 3>That word I loved what I was doing.

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so why did you finish up?

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:38.720
<v Speaker 3>Now, that's part of the whole coronial thing. At the

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 3>time I was made a coroner, I had to be

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:46.119
<v Speaker 3>a magistrate, okay, a magistrate as a statutory appointment. And

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 3>at the time I was made a magistrate, the statutory

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 3>retirement age was sixty five. That was it.

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, okay.

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 3>Shortly after I hit sixty five, it was extended to seventy,

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 3>but I'd already had to officially retire by that stage,

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 3>so it was possible to get extensions, but you had

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 3>to apply for every year to the governor, and that

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 3>actually is quite tiresome, it's quite hindering. So I actually

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 3>hit sixty five, so I then applied for an extension

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 3>and it was just becoming difficult because of the statutory

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:22.400
<v Speaker 3>retirement age, as I say, it then changed, but that

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:25.399
<v Speaker 3>didn't save me. And also is the coronial system. You

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:27.919
<v Speaker 3>got a coronial warrant for either three years or for

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:33.159
<v Speaker 3>five years. Generally it was just renewed. Now, unfortunately, and

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:37.119
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think it's a very bad move, coroners

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 3>don't have to be magistrates, which means they're very vulnerable

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 3>that if they do something that is not appreciated, they

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 3>may not get their warrant renewed. That sort of applied before,

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:50.679
<v Speaker 3>but because you were a magistrate, you still always had

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 3>a job to go to. You could go to being

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 3>an ordinary magistrate. Now if a coroner blots their copybook

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:00.159
<v Speaker 3>in some way, then they're out on the street, if

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 3>you like, which makes them vulnerable politically, is all I

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:04.920
<v Speaker 3>can really say to that.

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:09.120
<v Speaker 5>That is really interesting because what evil and Vicker appears

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 5>to be saying here is there's a lot of political

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 5>pressure put on coroners and if they step out of

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 5>line in whatever capacity that's measured, they may lose their jobs.

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 5>Makes it hard to be independent.

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that's the whole point, isn't it. Of the

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>coronial office of any sort of you know, quasi judicial

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:30.880
<v Speaker 1>office in that sense, it's supposed to be fully independent

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 1>of the political process. I mean, that's what everyone thinks.

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I thought that. Well, yeah, that is the working assumption

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:41.679
<v Speaker 1>every day of the week. But a very interesting insight

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 1>from Evelin on that subject, and back to her.

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 3>Now out the state coroner is a statutory appointment. They

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 3>can do that until they hit now the retirement age

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:56.680
<v Speaker 3>of seventy. But because the newer coroners are not magistrates,

0:26:56.760 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 3>they're quite vulnerable to their tenure.

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:01.399
<v Speaker 1>So you got caught up by the red tape of

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the day.

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I think you can say that it's.

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Great shame because good coroners don't come along very often.

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, I can't answer that I did what I did

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 3>to the best of my ability. Some people wouldn't approve

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 3>of that, and others would. I don't know. I certainly

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 3>strived to always be true to what I believed to

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 3>be right, and I did that as a prosecutor too.

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:27.160
<v Speaker 5>Here Liam asked Evelin if she remembers what she thought

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 5>when she first saw the file of Amy Wensley.

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Can you recall with any sort of clarity your first impressions.

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh, yeah, very clearly. I can't remember why, I asked

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 3>to see the file, because that was after twenty thirteen,

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:43.880
<v Speaker 3>when we'd expanded as an office and there were then

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:46.919
<v Speaker 3>four of us. There was a new state coroner, and

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't know why that file was brought to my attention,

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 3>but I did read it and my whole forensic background.

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:59.199
<v Speaker 3>To me, it was a homicide. But no, that's not

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:01.199
<v Speaker 3>even fair. It was an unlawful killing. It was an

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 3>unlawful killing. All I'm saying is manner of death. To me,

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 3>it was an unlawful killing. I couldn't see it as

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 3>a suicide. I couldn't see it as an.

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Accident straight away.

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely. I mean, I think forensically the photograph speaks for itself.

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 3>But the difficulty we had was that the photograph was

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 3>only macro blood splatter. It's not micro, which is what

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 3>you need for a true determination. But even with what

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 3>we had to me, it was inexplicable any other way.

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:36.960
<v Speaker 3>That is not the situation for some of the other coroners.

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:39.160
<v Speaker 3>As you know, two coroners had conduct of it after me,

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 3>and they didn't see it the same way, And particularly

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 3>Coroneer Linton. She heard the evidence, she sat through the court.

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 3>You make a determination, you said, on where you thinks

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 3>are you're the trier of fact. You know, it was

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 3>just different. But to me, I looked at the photograph

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 3>and I wanted more information.

0:28:57.120 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 1>The red flag went up straight away. Yes, So is

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that why you then referred the case in order to

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>get a report from Professor Tim Ackland? Is that why

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 1>you sought him out?

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, it didn't happen quite like that. I asked the

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 3>police for more information, and I can't remember how that went,

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:19.479
<v Speaker 3>And at some stage I understood that Professor Ackland had

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 3>been asked to look at it, and so I got

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 3>counsel assisting because by eventually I decided if we won't

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 3>get it get any more information, I'd have to inquest it.

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 3>So before we did the inquest, I asked the person

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 3>who was counsel assisting to contact Professor Ackland to ask

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 3>him exactly what he had had. And he hadn't had

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 3>very much, so I asked if he thought he would

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 3>be able to do more with more information. So I

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 3>gave him more information that was on the brief, and

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 3>just before the inquest was due to go, we got

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 3>his report. And as a result of his report, I

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 3>thought it was highly lightly that she hadn't pulled the

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 3>trigger herself, and as a result, I pulled the inquest

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 3>because as a provision in the Coroners that says that

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 3>if criminal proceedings are in the offing, then you can't proceed.

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 3>And on what we had, I knew you couldn't charge anybody.

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 3>We didn't have any information that would indicate who it

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 3>might be. It was just the fact that she didn't

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 3>pull the trigger herself. So I pulled it sent it

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 3>to the DPP because that's what the Act required me

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 3>to do, hoping that if it was from the DPP,

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:37.000
<v Speaker 3>the police may have different investigative pathways for them that

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 3>were not part of what I needed to be doing.

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 1>So let me ask you about that when you were

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 1>looking at it. Firstly, at that time, the police had

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 1>already formally investigated it at least twice on two separate occasions,

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 1>arguably three, but i'm giving one of the operation.

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 3>It was only twice by the time I sent it

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 3>to the DPP, the original and then when I sent

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 3>it back to them the cold case before we got

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 3>the no no. The cold cave case came.

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Up, came after I went to think about operations gen D.

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 3>I left being a coroner or deput state coroner. In

0:31:14.720 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 3>June twenty nineteen. The inquest had been set for August

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 3>twenty eighteen. I think, so I then lost conduct of

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 3>the file.

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:27.240
<v Speaker 1>What I'm trying to get at is, so the police

0:31:27.240 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 1>first turned up to Waitmie's house, and we have the

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 1>whole charade of the detectives turning up and ruling a

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>suicide straight away.

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 3>I didn't use that term, but I did, okay.

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 1>And then they write it off essentially as a suicide.

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 1>But then before twenty eighteen, then it goes then it

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 1>goes back to homos over the next few days to

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 1>a week.

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 3>Oh, yes, that's ripe. Yes, yes, so that's what I'm

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:51.840
<v Speaker 3>when you go back to homicide. We went to homicide

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 3>detectives of local detectives.

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Direct and they that's what I'm saying.

0:31:55.720 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:31:56.120 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 3>So at the time the detective saw it, all they

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 3>saw was the evidence that I had, which was one

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 3>of the constables had taken photographs on his mobile. They

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 3>actually saw the body, but they only had macro, no micro,

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 3>and they decided on that that it was a suicide.

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 1>On that basis. Yes, that was the same photos that

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 1>you saw, yea, and you had the red flags go up, yep.

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 3>But I understood forensic evidence. Don't forget. I mean when

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 3>I first started prosecutor. Detectives, well, they are maybe, But

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 3>when I first started prosecuting, you'd be amazed at the

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 3>number of times the investigating officer would come in and

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 3>I would say about a case, and it wasn't necessarily

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 3>a murder, it could be even burglaries. I'd say, what

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 3>does the forensic evidence tell you? And they looked at

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 3>me as And I was one of the first prosecutors

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 3>at that time for minor cases to call the forensic

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 3>people in and talk to them about their evidence. Back

0:32:56.080 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 3>when I started, a lot of the detectives didn't understand

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:04.400
<v Speaker 3>the value of forensic evidence, especially if it's negative. They

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 3>couldn't see that negative forensic evidence was still evidence. I

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 3>understood that because of my background.

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 6>Now.

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:14.560
<v Speaker 5>Liam Evelan also mentioned doing a search of the National

0:33:14.640 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 5>Coronial Investigation System now as it indicates this is for

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 5>the whole nation, not just WA and in twenty fourteen

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 5>she couldn't find any death by suicide like this. By this,

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:30.480
<v Speaker 5>I mean with the car running, kids strapped in the

0:33:30.520 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 5>back seat, bags packed, then go back inside to get

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 5>something and decide no, instead of dropping her kids off

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 5>to a month's first, she is going to go ahead

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 5>and shoot herself in the head from a really awkward

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 5>angle that requires her to contort her body painfully with

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 5>her arms outstretched to the side and the gun positioned

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 5>slightly downward at her temple. She clarifies it though, by

0:33:53.200 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 5>noting that the database is only as good as the

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 5>information put into it, and different states territories put in

0:33:59.240 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 5>different amounts of data depending on their confidentiality policies and

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 5>the type of data they collect in the first place.

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:09.239
<v Speaker 5>That said, I bet nothing's changed there. It's why it

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:13.440
<v Speaker 5>would be an oversight if WA police haven't consulted a

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:16.239
<v Speaker 5>suicideologist as part of the new investigation.

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, isn't that the point that Michael Barnes made last

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:24.520
<v Speaker 1>season when he said a suicideologist should be consulted. I mean,

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I've got to be honest, I have never heard of

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a suicideologist before. I didn't realize that was a specialty.

0:34:32.760 --> 0:34:34.400
<v Speaker 1>But when he said that, it did make a lot

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:38.280
<v Speaker 1>of sense, didn't it. And the data they collect, obviously

0:34:38.480 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 1>is all encompassing all of us would have only sort

0:34:43.000 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 1>of so much exposure. I think fair to say Allison too. Yeah,

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 1>suicides and the manner in which they occur. Even working

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:56.239
<v Speaker 1>in the media, the exposure is narrow, I have to say,

0:34:56.480 --> 0:34:59.320
<v Speaker 1>given the scope and if we look at the national numbers,

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the complete toll, which is just terribly, terribly sad. But

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:08.759
<v Speaker 1>a suicide ologist specializes in that area, so surely their

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:12.880
<v Speaker 1>expertise would be heavily weighted in any evidence included in

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the police brief of evidence that they provide to the DPP.

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:20.880
<v Speaker 1>And here I seek further clarification on this point. So

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the police are saying, no, we think it's a suicide.

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 1>So you look at the file with that, I take it.

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:29.879
<v Speaker 1>You correct me if I'm wrong with that notation sort

0:35:29.920 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of attached to it. But I didn't agree, and you

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't agree, no, so you pulled it from inquest.

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:37.560
<v Speaker 3>Now that was a bit later on. I asked them

0:35:37.600 --> 0:35:40.560
<v Speaker 3>to look at other things before the inquest thing. I

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 3>put it down for inquest because I wasn't going to

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:45.720
<v Speaker 3>get any further on the evidence we had. And again

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:49.960
<v Speaker 3>the difficulty we had is that there was no micro

0:35:50.280 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 3>there was no micro blood spatter in analysis.

0:35:54.560 --> 0:35:58.120
<v Speaker 1>So you look for more information. Ye, Hence enter Professor Tim.

0:35:57.920 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 3>Acklin yes, because we weren't going to get micro because

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 3>it had been destroyed because the scene was forensically cleaned.

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:09.239
<v Speaker 3>If some of the blood spatter experts had seen it

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:13.880
<v Speaker 3>had been able to do micro forensics on the blood spatter,

0:36:14.280 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 3>which tells you a lot more about direction and those

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 3>sorts of things. Now, to compensate for the fact we

0:36:20.200 --> 0:36:22.319
<v Speaker 3>didn't have that, I had to go to someone like

0:36:22.360 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 3>Professor Ackland.

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:26.439
<v Speaker 1>And when Professor Ackland comes back with his conclusion, which

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:32.320
<v Speaker 1>was very strong, that Amy did not shoot herself, that somehow,

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 1>somewhere there must have been a third party involved. Is

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that when you sent the case to the DPP.

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:40.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, first of all, I pulled the inquest and alerted

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:41.880
<v Speaker 3>the police to fact I was going to do that

0:36:42.760 --> 0:36:45.680
<v Speaker 3>because they'd been organizing witnesses and things like. So I

0:36:45.719 --> 0:36:50.000
<v Speaker 3>pulled the inquest and then I sent it to the

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 3>DPP because on Professor Ackland's report, I was probably looking

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:59.359
<v Speaker 3>at an indictable offense. Whether or not we had a

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:02.600
<v Speaker 3>suspect was irrelevant. It was if she didn't pull the

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:05.920
<v Speaker 3>trigger herself, it may be an indoubtable offense. If it

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:08.640
<v Speaker 3>wasn't an accident, then that meant it was up to

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:10.000
<v Speaker 3>the DPP to look at it.

0:37:10.440 --> 0:37:12.239
<v Speaker 1>And when you sent it to the DPP and then

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:15.359
<v Speaker 1>told the police that you'd pulled the inquest, was there

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:16.680
<v Speaker 1>any reaction from the police.

0:37:17.040 --> 0:37:19.799
<v Speaker 3>No, because I had to explain to the commander why

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:22.440
<v Speaker 3>i'd done it. He came in and spoke to me,

0:37:22.480 --> 0:37:26.440
<v Speaker 3>and I honestly can't remember who it was. And before

0:37:26.520 --> 0:37:29.880
<v Speaker 3>I did it officially, I showed him the report and

0:37:29.920 --> 0:37:32.400
<v Speaker 3>he was very good. He understood straight away what was

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:35.400
<v Speaker 3>going on. But before that I'd had discussions with various

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:38.319
<v Speaker 3>police officers as to why I didn't believe it was

0:37:38.320 --> 0:37:40.920
<v Speaker 3>a suicide. I mean, I can remember at one stage

0:37:40.920 --> 0:37:44.840
<v Speaker 3>getting down behind the door of my office and saying,

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:49.120
<v Speaker 3>it's just not in my view physically possible. I've got asked,

0:37:49.560 --> 0:37:51.799
<v Speaker 3>have you ever handled a shotgun? Well, it just so happened. Yes,

0:37:51.880 --> 0:37:54.359
<v Speaker 3>I had handled a side by side shotgun, and I

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:58.080
<v Speaker 3>was even more determined. But you know, Professor Ackland wasn't

0:37:58.120 --> 0:38:03.080
<v Speaker 3>one hundred percent. But expert witnesses never are, well, most

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:05.680
<v Speaker 3>of them never are. I know we have some people

0:38:05.680 --> 0:38:07.960
<v Speaker 3>who are prepared to go one hundred percent, but real

0:38:08.120 --> 0:38:13.000
<v Speaker 3>experts in a criminal trial will never one hundred percent,

0:38:13.080 --> 0:38:16.080
<v Speaker 3>say one thing. Professor Ackland may be prepared to you now,

0:38:16.080 --> 0:38:18.760
<v Speaker 3>but that's what his report said. You're just a highly

0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:21.160
<v Speaker 3>consistent You're right. Yeah.

0:38:21.440 --> 0:38:24.880
<v Speaker 1>So just to clarify here, I'd interviewed Professor Ackland the

0:38:24.960 --> 0:38:28.400
<v Speaker 1>day before I interviewed Evil and Vicker, so I was

0:38:28.440 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 1>able to tell Evelin the exact percentage that Professor Ackland

0:38:32.640 --> 0:38:34.600
<v Speaker 1>attributed to that ninety five percent.

0:38:34.680 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because I mean, that's that's the whole basis of

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:40.720
<v Speaker 3>scientific theory, is the fact that a theory is proven

0:38:41.120 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 3>until another theory proves it wrong.

0:38:43.760 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you'd be happy to back any theory at

0:38:45.560 --> 0:38:46.280
<v Speaker 1>ninety five percent?

0:38:46.280 --> 0:38:49.240
<v Speaker 3>Would I personally would. But to a person who hasn't

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:52.839
<v Speaker 3>got that sort of background, maybe not. Maybe they expect

0:38:53.280 --> 0:38:57.840
<v Speaker 3>the all expensive expert to say one hundred percent. And

0:38:58.000 --> 0:38:59.160
<v Speaker 3>you have someone who said that.

0:38:59.239 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I think if we went to the races well and

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:03.320
<v Speaker 1>people told us every horse we'd back it was a

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:07.040
<v Speaker 1>ninety five percent chance when it But Evelyn remained there

0:39:07.120 --> 0:39:07.879
<v Speaker 1>is circumspect.

0:39:08.000 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't go to the racist limb.

0:39:09.280 --> 0:39:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Although who she recognized the weight of Professor Eckland's evidence.

0:39:13.680 --> 0:39:15.920
<v Speaker 3>When I sent it to the DPP. I knew as

0:39:15.960 --> 0:39:19.120
<v Speaker 3>a prosecutor on what we had at that stage, you

0:39:19.160 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 3>didn't have enough evidence to charge a particular person.

0:39:22.200 --> 0:39:24.040
<v Speaker 1>In which case you weren't surprised with the way I

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 1>was treated at the DPP's office.

0:39:25.680 --> 0:39:27.520
<v Speaker 3>But I did hope, and that was one of the

0:39:27.560 --> 0:39:30.719
<v Speaker 3>reasons I got the commander in first before I officially

0:39:30.760 --> 0:39:34.960
<v Speaker 3>pulled it. I did hope that, having pulled it so

0:39:35.120 --> 0:39:38.760
<v Speaker 3>close to the inquest, that there may be other investigations

0:39:38.800 --> 0:39:41.359
<v Speaker 3>the police would undertake. And I don't know whether they

0:39:41.360 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 3>did or not. I will never know that, and I

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:46.000
<v Speaker 3>don't want to know that. But I thought that because

0:39:46.040 --> 0:39:48.560
<v Speaker 3>it was now with the DPP, they might look at

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:49.320
<v Speaker 3>other avenues.

0:39:49.960 --> 0:39:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Did it ever strike you as strange or surprising that

0:39:54.920 --> 0:39:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the police generally held that view and didn't budge from

0:39:59.200 --> 0:40:01.360
<v Speaker 1>it suicide scenario?

0:40:02.480 --> 0:40:11.439
<v Speaker 3>Uh? I guess so yes. But hey, two coroners after

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:16.920
<v Speaker 3>me were also skeptical about what had happened. So I mean,

0:40:16.960 --> 0:40:20.320
<v Speaker 3>I can't comment on that other than to say.

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, the final coroner, yeah, just to put the lid

0:40:23.200 --> 0:40:27.560
<v Speaker 1>on that was skeptical but also suspicious because she delivered

0:40:27.600 --> 0:40:28.320
<v Speaker 1>an open finding.

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:30.960
<v Speaker 3>Did deliver an open finding, but she didn't refer it

0:40:31.000 --> 0:40:31.640
<v Speaker 3>to the DPP.

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:36.440
<v Speaker 5>Stopping here, LIAMB. Evelan makes a good point. Why didn't

0:40:36.520 --> 0:40:39.720
<v Speaker 5>Sarah Linton refer it to the DPP. Well, I decided

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:42.399
<v Speaker 5>to follow up this with her and she pointed out

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:45.239
<v Speaker 5>there is a section in the WA Coroner's Act which

0:40:45.280 --> 0:40:49.560
<v Speaker 5>stipulates that where a coroner believes an indictable offense which

0:40:49.640 --> 0:40:53.320
<v Speaker 5>would be an unmawful killing, has been committed, it should

0:40:53.320 --> 0:40:56.359
<v Speaker 5>be referred to the DPP, which is what she did.

0:40:56.920 --> 0:40:59.560
<v Speaker 5>Coroner Linton was unsure as to what it occurred, so

0:40:59.600 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 5>there was no requirement for her to refer to the DPP.

0:41:03.480 --> 0:41:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Sort of swings and roundabouts, there isn't it.

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:05.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:41:05.960 --> 0:41:08.399
<v Speaker 1>You'll also recall, though, in the last episode, seen as

0:41:08.400 --> 0:41:13.319
<v Speaker 1>Sergeant McDonald defending their decision not to implement phone intercepts

0:41:13.880 --> 0:41:17.160
<v Speaker 1>in this case because he didn't consider it to be

0:41:17.719 --> 0:41:21.720
<v Speaker 1>a homicide. Yes, so again it's sort of tail wagging

0:41:21.760 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the dog, if I can put it that way. But

0:41:23.640 --> 0:41:25.600
<v Speaker 1>surely on that basis alone, it should have been brought

0:41:25.680 --> 0:41:29.359
<v Speaker 1>to the attention of the Director of Public Prosecutions at

0:41:29.440 --> 0:41:31.840
<v Speaker 1>least raise the issue as a headline with the DPP

0:41:32.160 --> 0:41:36.680
<v Speaker 1>to let them use their expertise in magnifying that particular

0:41:36.719 --> 0:41:38.680
<v Speaker 1>part of it. So in this case, I still think

0:41:38.960 --> 0:41:42.440
<v Speaker 1>very much, I firmly believe it was integral to refer

0:41:42.480 --> 0:41:55.360
<v Speaker 1>it back to them just looking for additional information. Doesn't

0:41:55.360 --> 0:41:59.839
<v Speaker 1>that only come about by further investigation? And isn't that

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:02.719
<v Speaker 1>largely driven by the police component of all this in

0:42:02.719 --> 0:42:06.120
<v Speaker 1>this case or direction from the DPP's office, which which

0:42:06.239 --> 0:42:08.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, according to one of the sections, is possible. Yep,

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 1>so is it about?

0:42:10.040 --> 0:42:13.080
<v Speaker 3>It was nothing I could do though, No as a coroner.

0:42:12.800 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 1>That's right, you were one out in one back. But

0:42:15.560 --> 0:42:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the intent, I guess, is what I'm asking you about,

0:42:18.280 --> 0:42:20.400
<v Speaker 1>in terms of your opinion professional opinion.

0:42:20.560 --> 0:42:21.960
<v Speaker 3>Yes, the intent of what it.

0:42:22.080 --> 0:42:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Was there a lack of intent to make those things happen,

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to do that extra investigation, to go that extra yard.

0:42:28.640 --> 0:42:34.120
<v Speaker 3>Certainly every time I asked them to do something, they

0:42:34.160 --> 0:42:36.239
<v Speaker 3>did it. Originally, when I got the file, I was

0:42:36.239 --> 0:42:40.000
<v Speaker 3>told there was no gunpowder residue. Okay, well I didn't

0:42:40.000 --> 0:42:43.360
<v Speaker 3>believe that, so I rang up the pathologists and I

0:42:43.400 --> 0:42:45.759
<v Speaker 3>didn't don't think I did. I think probably counsel assisting did.

0:42:46.040 --> 0:42:49.400
<v Speaker 3>And you know, when there's a firearm involved, there's always

0:42:50.200 --> 0:42:52.239
<v Speaker 3>that testing. And then I found out that it had

0:42:52.280 --> 0:42:55.160
<v Speaker 3>been done, so when I asked for the results of that,

0:42:55.840 --> 0:42:57.960
<v Speaker 3>it came back to me. But it also came back

0:42:57.960 --> 0:43:01.400
<v Speaker 3>with an article about how unreliable gunpowder residue can be

0:43:02.120 --> 0:43:06.640
<v Speaker 3>in an environment where it's been used. But once we'd

0:43:06.719 --> 0:43:10.360
<v Speaker 3>done that, then I can remember a police officer saying

0:43:10.400 --> 0:43:14.320
<v Speaker 3>to me, well, how do you account for the burns

0:43:14.400 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 3>on her left hand? And I said, that's just as

0:43:18.600 --> 0:43:22.080
<v Speaker 3>consistent with her trying to push the barrel away from

0:43:22.120 --> 0:43:25.840
<v Speaker 3>herself as it is with her holding the barrel in place.

0:43:26.360 --> 0:43:30.560
<v Speaker 3>So there's different interpretations of everything, but I don't have

0:43:30.640 --> 0:43:35.239
<v Speaker 3>to follow that. Neither did I. And sending me the

0:43:35.360 --> 0:43:41.920
<v Speaker 3>article about how unreliable gunshot residue can be was certainly

0:43:42.000 --> 0:43:44.759
<v Speaker 3>information I needed to know about. And I didn't know

0:43:44.800 --> 0:43:48.440
<v Speaker 3>about that before because back in the day, gunpowder residue

0:43:48.640 --> 0:43:52.759
<v Speaker 3>was anything and everything, and now that's been not it's

0:43:52.800 --> 0:43:55.359
<v Speaker 3>been qualified, is the best way to put it. And yeah,

0:43:55.360 --> 0:43:57.560
<v Speaker 3>I certainly needed to know that as an option.

0:43:58.040 --> 0:43:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:43:58.760 --> 0:44:02.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm not saying they were trying to dissuade me, but

0:44:02.080 --> 0:44:05.640
<v Speaker 3>they were making me aware of everything that they had

0:44:05.680 --> 0:44:08.040
<v Speaker 3>to work with. Look, I do know that there were

0:44:08.080 --> 0:44:11.800
<v Speaker 3>differences of opinion within the police. I would be dumb

0:44:12.160 --> 0:44:14.960
<v Speaker 3>if I didn't think, well, it was apparent on the

0:44:14.960 --> 0:44:17.719
<v Speaker 3>brief from the attending police officers to the detectives that

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:21.640
<v Speaker 3>there was a disagreement about what the evidence said, and

0:44:22.160 --> 0:44:26.480
<v Speaker 3>the situation at that time was that detectives had the

0:44:26.600 --> 0:44:29.240
<v Speaker 3>lead on it. So yeah, there were differences of opinion.

0:44:29.800 --> 0:44:34.640
<v Speaker 1>So the open finding, yes, that was my in quest.

0:44:35.360 --> 0:44:38.759
<v Speaker 1>What sort of impact does that finding have on potential

0:44:39.000 --> 0:44:40.080
<v Speaker 1>criminal proceedings?

0:44:40.320 --> 0:44:42.759
<v Speaker 3>It leaves it open for there to be criminal proceedings,

0:44:42.760 --> 0:44:45.239
<v Speaker 3>which I would have thought is what people wanted. It

0:44:45.360 --> 0:44:48.879
<v Speaker 3>was better than saying it was suicide. But even then

0:44:48.960 --> 0:44:51.759
<v Speaker 3>with additional information that may I don't think that a

0:44:51.840 --> 0:44:56.920
<v Speaker 3>coroner's finding has because a coroner's finding can't be used

0:44:56.960 --> 0:45:01.479
<v Speaker 3>as evidence in a trial. So the coroner's finding may

0:45:01.920 --> 0:45:04.799
<v Speaker 3>leave it open for cold cases, which this one has,

0:45:04.800 --> 0:45:06.520
<v Speaker 3>and I think it's now being treasured as a cold

0:45:06.560 --> 0:45:10.040
<v Speaker 3>case because there's always the potential that new evidence may

0:45:10.040 --> 0:45:13.280
<v Speaker 3>become available, and we're seeing all the time technology changing.

0:45:13.400 --> 0:45:16.160
<v Speaker 3>They used to do it through just pure DNA, Now

0:45:16.160 --> 0:45:20.839
<v Speaker 3>they're using DNA with genealogy to pick people. So who

0:45:20.880 --> 0:45:24.480
<v Speaker 3>knows what could happen in the future, but any coronial

0:45:25.000 --> 0:45:29.919
<v Speaker 3>finding can be For instance, I've done missing persons where

0:45:29.960 --> 0:45:33.200
<v Speaker 3>we had no information at all that the person was dead,

0:45:33.360 --> 0:45:37.680
<v Speaker 3>and the coroner's making a finding that the person is deceased.

0:45:38.000 --> 0:45:41.520
<v Speaker 3>Then sometimes after we've done that, a number of years afterwards,

0:45:41.560 --> 0:45:43.680
<v Speaker 3>a bone may wash up on the shore and through

0:45:43.800 --> 0:45:47.000
<v Speaker 3>DNA we find out that it belongs to that person. So, yes,

0:45:47.239 --> 0:45:49.720
<v Speaker 3>that we've now got proof that the person is dead

0:45:49.960 --> 0:45:53.000
<v Speaker 3>and it's probably no longer a missing person because we've

0:45:53.040 --> 0:45:56.760
<v Speaker 3>got bits of a body, so that can be added

0:45:56.800 --> 0:46:00.759
<v Speaker 3>to It's not a final determination. It's a fine determination

0:46:01.000 --> 0:46:05.400
<v Speaker 3>for people to work with, but if more information becomes available,

0:46:05.440 --> 0:46:06.640
<v Speaker 3>it's not the end of the story.

0:46:07.080 --> 0:46:10.840
<v Speaker 1>So in order for the story to progress, it's really

0:46:10.840 --> 0:46:12.640
<v Speaker 1>in the lap of the police, isn't it, in terms

0:46:12.680 --> 0:46:15.920
<v Speaker 1>of the work that they do or that they're doing

0:46:15.960 --> 0:46:19.080
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes. Yes, in order to strengthen that brief

0:46:19.239 --> 0:46:22.319
<v Speaker 1>before it goes back to the DPP. Yes, we've now

0:46:22.360 --> 0:46:29.799
<v Speaker 1>got three independent expert witnesses, including Professor Eckland, who all

0:46:29.880 --> 0:46:33.600
<v Speaker 1>say adamantly that Amy did not shoot herself.

0:46:33.880 --> 0:46:36.279
<v Speaker 3>Yep, I'd agree with that. I've always believed that that's

0:46:36.280 --> 0:46:36.840
<v Speaker 3>my belief.

0:46:36.960 --> 0:46:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering how many more expert witnesses they need.

0:46:39.320 --> 0:46:41.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't think they need any more. I was surprised

0:46:41.520 --> 0:46:45.120
<v Speaker 3>we had any more after Professor Eckland. However, other people

0:46:45.160 --> 0:46:48.839
<v Speaker 3>didn't agree with me, so they got another expert who

0:46:48.920 --> 0:46:51.200
<v Speaker 3>backed up Professor Eckland, and then I think you guys

0:46:51.239 --> 0:46:55.440
<v Speaker 3>got another expert who was prepared to go even further. So, yeah, fine,

0:46:55.880 --> 0:47:01.080
<v Speaker 3>but there's a huge difference between and unlawful killing or

0:47:01.120 --> 0:47:05.600
<v Speaker 3>a murder and someone who pulled the trigger. What we've

0:47:05.600 --> 0:47:09.279
<v Speaker 3>got is evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. I believe that

0:47:09.440 --> 0:47:12.000
<v Speaker 3>other people don't agree with that, but to me, we've

0:47:12.000 --> 0:47:14.520
<v Speaker 3>got evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. She didn't pull the

0:47:14.520 --> 0:47:17.520
<v Speaker 3>trigger herself. Some people don't agree with that, but that

0:47:17.680 --> 0:47:20.640
<v Speaker 3>was probably enough for me. But that doesn't tell me

0:47:20.680 --> 0:47:23.120
<v Speaker 3>who did pull the trigger, which is what you need

0:47:23.160 --> 0:47:24.280
<v Speaker 3>for a criminal trial.

0:47:24.920 --> 0:47:28.000
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting how personalities can change the course of justice, though,

0:47:28.040 --> 0:47:28.319
<v Speaker 1>isn't it.

0:47:28.440 --> 0:47:29.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I guess so.

0:47:29.320 --> 0:47:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Imagine if you hadn't retired and I had stayed with you,

0:47:32.600 --> 0:47:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and you'd taken it through that coronial process, we might

0:47:34.960 --> 0:47:36.040
<v Speaker 1>have a different result today.

0:47:36.600 --> 0:47:38.279
<v Speaker 3>You may do, but I don't think it would have

0:47:38.360 --> 0:47:43.040
<v Speaker 3>served you any better. What you got was an open finding. Okay,

0:47:44.080 --> 0:47:48.560
<v Speaker 3>I possibly, on the information I had at that stage,

0:47:49.239 --> 0:47:53.480
<v Speaker 3>may have said an unlawful killing by personal persons undetermined.

0:47:54.760 --> 0:47:57.799
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. I don't know that's a and I

0:47:57.880 --> 0:48:01.040
<v Speaker 3>don't know after i'd heard the witnesses. Don't forget I

0:48:01.040 --> 0:48:03.960
<v Speaker 3>haven't heard the witnesses. Conral Linton heard all the witnesses.

0:48:04.040 --> 0:48:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Yes, look, I'm being hypothetical, yeah, but based on evidence,

0:48:07.680 --> 0:48:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and you're being professionally very courteous, which is admirable.

0:48:12.200 --> 0:48:15.719
<v Speaker 3>Well, one thing I learned as a coroner, and I mean,

0:48:15.760 --> 0:48:18.600
<v Speaker 3>don't forget we did lots of mandatory inquest deaths and

0:48:18.640 --> 0:48:22.600
<v Speaker 3>custody and things like that. No one who is in

0:48:22.640 --> 0:48:26.840
<v Speaker 3>the profession of a doctor, a nurse, a prison officer

0:48:27.080 --> 0:48:31.160
<v Speaker 3>or a police officer actually wants someone to die. They're

0:48:31.200 --> 0:48:35.760
<v Speaker 3>actually devastated if people in their care make a mistake.

0:48:36.239 --> 0:48:39.400
<v Speaker 3>But everybody's human and people make mistakes, which is why

0:48:39.680 --> 0:48:43.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm into fact finding and not fault finding. I'm happy

0:48:43.160 --> 0:48:47.320
<v Speaker 3>to say the fact is this, but I played the ball,

0:48:47.440 --> 0:48:47.759
<v Speaker 3>not the.

0:48:47.719 --> 0:48:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Person even And one last thing, if I can just

0:48:50.880 --> 0:48:52.560
<v Speaker 1>get you to cast your mind back as much as

0:48:52.560 --> 0:48:56.760
<v Speaker 1>you can, your memory of seeing that case file talking

0:48:56.760 --> 0:48:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to people dealing with people like Professor Aglin. Is there

0:49:00.160 --> 0:49:04.360
<v Speaker 1>particular part of Amy's case that troubled you more than others?

0:49:04.920 --> 0:49:08.800
<v Speaker 3>Look, because I'm a people person to some extent, and

0:49:08.920 --> 0:49:10.799
<v Speaker 3>people will tell you this doesn't matter. First of all,

0:49:10.840 --> 0:49:13.600
<v Speaker 3>I should tell you as a prosecutor, I would only

0:49:13.640 --> 0:49:15.919
<v Speaker 3>say I had Of all the people I prosecuted where

0:49:15.960 --> 0:49:20.120
<v Speaker 3>we got convictions, I only once or twice ever thought

0:49:20.120 --> 0:49:23.480
<v Speaker 3>someone was evil. People get to a particular point in

0:49:23.520 --> 0:49:26.200
<v Speaker 3>time where they do very bad things, but that doesn't

0:49:26.239 --> 0:49:30.160
<v Speaker 3>necessarily make them evil. So I suppose it made me

0:49:30.200 --> 0:49:32.480
<v Speaker 3>a very good cross examiner though, because I could always

0:49:32.480 --> 0:49:35.440
<v Speaker 3>see things from two points of view, which meant I

0:49:35.560 --> 0:49:39.040
<v Speaker 3>possibly got nearer the mark when I was cross examining,

0:49:39.239 --> 0:49:46.439
<v Speaker 3>which was useful both psychologically and forensically to me. Amy

0:49:46.480 --> 0:49:49.200
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't have committed suicide at that point in time. Why

0:49:49.200 --> 0:49:52.839
<v Speaker 3>do you say that because of the whole psychologically I'm

0:49:52.840 --> 0:49:55.480
<v Speaker 3>not supposed to take into account. But the children in

0:49:55.520 --> 0:49:58.960
<v Speaker 3>the car talking to her mother, I now know, though

0:49:59.000 --> 0:50:01.880
<v Speaker 3>I didn't know at the time, but I know. But again,

0:50:02.000 --> 0:50:05.720
<v Speaker 3>I've not examined this forensically, the passport in the bag,

0:50:05.960 --> 0:50:10.959
<v Speaker 3>all of those things to me say, psychologically, this mum

0:50:11.200 --> 0:50:13.600
<v Speaker 3>was not looking to leave her children. Okay, so that's

0:50:13.600 --> 0:50:17.040
<v Speaker 3>a psychological part which probably doesn't apply in a prosecution,

0:50:17.800 --> 0:50:20.560
<v Speaker 3>but as a coroner, it makes some impression on me. Okay.

0:50:21.080 --> 0:50:24.560
<v Speaker 3>The other thing is forensically, to me, it didn't make sense.

0:50:24.760 --> 0:50:27.719
<v Speaker 3>I and all the alternatives that are put to me

0:50:28.120 --> 0:50:31.640
<v Speaker 3>having hand, and I'm a lot stockier than Amy was.

0:50:31.760 --> 0:50:35.200
<v Speaker 3>Amy's probably a lot lighter than I am. But and

0:50:35.239 --> 0:50:37.480
<v Speaker 3>she worked out, and she was used to guns. That's

0:50:37.520 --> 0:50:40.040
<v Speaker 3>the other thing. You know, people tend to use a

0:50:40.120 --> 0:50:43.759
<v Speaker 3>method for suicide that they're familiar with, which is why

0:50:43.960 --> 0:50:48.720
<v Speaker 3>a lot of women don't use guns in suicide. I've

0:50:48.800 --> 0:50:53.520
<v Speaker 3>never heard of anyone committing suicide by physically holding a

0:50:53.560 --> 0:50:57.320
<v Speaker 3>shotgun parallel to their temple. I'm not saying it's not done,

0:50:57.440 --> 0:50:59.400
<v Speaker 3>but I haven't heard of that. But Amy was used

0:50:59.440 --> 0:51:02.160
<v Speaker 3>to guns. Use of a gun isn't that peculiar, But

0:51:02.480 --> 0:51:05.839
<v Speaker 3>just the way she was behind the door with her

0:51:05.840 --> 0:51:09.200
<v Speaker 3>hand underneath her bottom, and different things happen as people

0:51:09.280 --> 0:51:13.040
<v Speaker 3>relax after they die. So you've got all that forensic

0:51:13.200 --> 0:51:18.200
<v Speaker 3>input as well, But to me, it was just I

0:51:18.239 --> 0:51:20.400
<v Speaker 3>couldn't see how she could pull the trigger herself.

0:51:20.640 --> 0:51:22.960
<v Speaker 1>So it was the totality of the scene and all

0:51:22.960 --> 0:51:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the events surrounding it. Yep, it just made you think

0:51:25.719 --> 0:51:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that this is just not how it happened.

0:51:28.680 --> 0:51:34.520
<v Speaker 5>Yes, So what did you think of what Evil and

0:51:34.600 --> 0:51:35.600
<v Speaker 5>Vicker had to say? LIAMB.

0:51:35.920 --> 0:51:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I thought she was very candid. I thought she was

0:51:39.719 --> 0:51:43.680
<v Speaker 1>professionally very respectful too, wasn't she even though she's retired.

0:51:43.719 --> 0:51:45.440
<v Speaker 1>She's now retired. As we said at the start of that,

0:51:46.760 --> 0:51:49.680
<v Speaker 1>she's a bit of a brain box, sharp, sharp as

0:51:49.920 --> 0:51:53.879
<v Speaker 1>a packet of raisers, and she she still didn't hold back,

0:51:54.760 --> 0:51:58.319
<v Speaker 1>but she was gracious to some of the people still

0:51:58.360 --> 0:52:02.239
<v Speaker 1>involved in proceedings. And that's fair enough. That's fair enough.

0:52:02.280 --> 0:52:04.040
<v Speaker 1>But I think she said what she had to say,

0:52:04.600 --> 0:52:06.320
<v Speaker 1>and she got a couple of things off her chest.

0:52:06.680 --> 0:52:08.600
<v Speaker 1>But they all point back to exactly what we've been

0:52:08.600 --> 0:52:11.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about on this podcast, every single thing that's been

0:52:11.480 --> 0:52:14.160
<v Speaker 1>said from the start by people who've got a few

0:52:14.200 --> 0:52:17.560
<v Speaker 1>brains and a few clues, all the professional independent experts,

0:52:17.920 --> 0:52:21.680
<v Speaker 1>all the people we've spoken to who've got credibility in

0:52:21.760 --> 0:52:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the game, whether it's the legal game or you know,

0:52:24.200 --> 0:52:27.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, every single person. I mean her and she

0:52:27.440 --> 0:52:30.440
<v Speaker 1>was the first one on the scene from the coronial aspect,

0:52:30.680 --> 0:52:34.480
<v Speaker 1>right yeah, and she knew, you know, she is completely

0:52:34.480 --> 0:52:39.560
<v Speaker 1>confident Amy Wensley did not kill herself. And I thought

0:52:39.600 --> 0:52:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the comments that she made not just about the forensics,

0:52:42.400 --> 0:52:44.640
<v Speaker 1>although she had plenty to say about that and all

0:52:44.680 --> 0:52:46.719
<v Speaker 1>the sort of scientific aspect of it, but from the

0:52:46.760 --> 0:52:51.840
<v Speaker 1>attitudinal part of it, from a young mum's perspective, and

0:52:51.920 --> 0:52:54.000
<v Speaker 1>also the if I can put it this way, the

0:52:54.080 --> 0:52:59.720
<v Speaker 1>feminine aspect of suicide, in that you know, highly highly

0:53:00.040 --> 0:53:03.600
<v Speaker 1>highly unusual, not to say it never happens, but highly

0:53:03.680 --> 0:53:08.040
<v Speaker 1>unusual for anyone to kill themselves in that manner, especially

0:53:08.239 --> 0:53:10.640
<v Speaker 1>with the way her life was planned, with the kids

0:53:10.680 --> 0:53:15.680
<v Speaker 1>in the car, the immediate planning, the medium term planning,

0:53:16.000 --> 0:53:19.600
<v Speaker 1>everything about it, everything about it. For a woman of

0:53:19.640 --> 0:53:23.840
<v Speaker 1>that experience in a courtroom to say that, didn't you

0:53:23.880 --> 0:53:25.360
<v Speaker 1>think that had big impact?

0:53:25.800 --> 0:53:28.840
<v Speaker 5>I did. And I think the other thing is the lens.

0:53:29.040 --> 0:53:32.520
<v Speaker 5>It's so the importance of the lens that people view

0:53:32.560 --> 0:53:35.839
<v Speaker 5>these cases through. Right now, that was ten years ago,

0:53:36.000 --> 0:53:37.719
<v Speaker 5>and the world has changed a lot, as you know,

0:53:37.800 --> 0:53:40.360
<v Speaker 5>in ten years, you know, with the Me Too movement

0:53:40.520 --> 0:53:44.880
<v Speaker 5>and also in relation to domestic violence people, you know,

0:53:45.160 --> 0:53:48.719
<v Speaker 5>gas lighting, wasn't even a thing back then. But she

0:53:49.400 --> 0:53:51.399
<v Speaker 5>wasn't looking at it from any of those I guess

0:53:51.440 --> 0:53:53.840
<v Speaker 5>what you'd call emotional perspectives. She was just looking at

0:53:53.880 --> 0:53:56.480
<v Speaker 5>it from a factual perspective, as was tim Ackland, Right,

0:53:56.880 --> 0:54:00.000
<v Speaker 5>there was nothing else involved. The same with Larry Blamfort.

0:54:00.120 --> 0:54:01.799
<v Speaker 5>You'd say the same thing, right, he was just like

0:54:01.960 --> 0:54:03.920
<v Speaker 5>you just couldn't actually physically.

0:54:03.440 --> 0:54:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Do that, Oh no, in fact, loud and clear, just

0:54:06.680 --> 0:54:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to reinforce your opinion there. I think that's spot on,

0:54:09.640 --> 0:54:12.040
<v Speaker 1>if anything evil, and it comes across a little bit

0:54:12.160 --> 0:54:15.480
<v Speaker 1>cold and calculating that, that's how much she leaves out

0:54:15.520 --> 0:54:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the emotional component. She only wants to deal with the facts.

0:54:19.360 --> 0:54:22.239
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, right, And so I think that's the part of

0:54:22.280 --> 0:54:24.480
<v Speaker 5>it as well, that you know, even if you did

0:54:24.560 --> 0:54:28.360
<v Speaker 5>take into account all those you know, domestic violence, the

0:54:28.520 --> 0:54:31.480
<v Speaker 5>issues that were overlooked at the time, just from that

0:54:31.520 --> 0:54:35.839
<v Speaker 5>factual perspective, which is what I always thought was the

0:54:36.360 --> 0:54:40.200
<v Speaker 5>I guess the biggest factor, that was the most weighty factor,

0:54:40.280 --> 0:54:42.680
<v Speaker 5>which is again what tim Acklin said too, right. You know,

0:54:42.719 --> 0:54:46.200
<v Speaker 5>he made it very clear that he had never had

0:54:46.200 --> 0:54:49.080
<v Speaker 5>a case like this one which hadn't proceeded to a trial.

0:54:49.640 --> 0:54:54.480
<v Speaker 5>Based on his evidence, his strong evidence of what he

0:54:54.880 --> 0:54:57.759
<v Speaker 5>believed to be the case. As it just kind of thought, well,

0:54:57.760 --> 0:55:02.160
<v Speaker 5>why did you bother getting him everyone else thereafter if

0:55:02.480 --> 0:55:04.319
<v Speaker 5>you weren't going, or you'd wait for it.

0:55:04.440 --> 0:55:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So nobody's ever questioned tim Acklin's integrity, right, nor

0:55:08.719 --> 0:55:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Evil and Vicar for that matter. So that's pause to

0:55:11.160 --> 0:55:14.640
<v Speaker 1>think about that. So if tim Ackland is turning around saying,

0:55:14.640 --> 0:55:17.040
<v Speaker 1>this is the only case with this sort of weight

0:55:17.080 --> 0:55:21.000
<v Speaker 1>of evidence that's never gone to trial, why is that

0:55:21.080 --> 0:55:26.239
<v Speaker 1>what's extraordinary about this case compared to all the other

0:55:26.280 --> 0:55:28.920
<v Speaker 1>cases that tim Acklin's worked on. I mean, give me

0:55:28.960 --> 0:55:30.960
<v Speaker 1>an answer for that, because I haven't got one. There's

0:55:31.000 --> 0:55:34.560
<v Speaker 1>nothing in any ingredient in this case that sticks out

0:55:35.400 --> 0:55:40.279
<v Speaker 1>as extraordinary. This is the interesting thing about it. So

0:55:40.920 --> 0:55:44.239
<v Speaker 1>comes back to the police pushback against Evil and Vicker

0:55:44.320 --> 0:55:47.680
<v Speaker 1>for example. So there you've got an incredibly experienced deputy

0:55:47.680 --> 0:55:52.320
<v Speaker 1>state coroner looking at this case, going, guys, this doesn't

0:55:52.320 --> 0:55:55.279
<v Speaker 1>add up. This is all wrong. The look on this

0:55:55.360 --> 0:55:57.600
<v Speaker 1>is wrong, the feel on this is wrong. You know,

0:55:57.640 --> 0:56:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you it's wrong. And yet she is still

0:56:01.640 --> 0:56:05.160
<v Speaker 1>at that stage coming up against senior police who are

0:56:05.440 --> 0:56:08.480
<v Speaker 1>insisting as far as we're concerned it to suicide.

0:56:08.800 --> 0:56:11.200
<v Speaker 5>The other interesting thing, and I know evel And didn't

0:56:11.239 --> 0:56:14.560
<v Speaker 5>make anything of this, but I thought it was interesting

0:56:14.640 --> 0:56:17.440
<v Speaker 5>when she said that she asked about the gun residue, right,

0:56:17.640 --> 0:56:20.279
<v Speaker 5>why there wasn't any gun residue on the hand that

0:56:20.320 --> 0:56:22.359
<v Speaker 5>she would have had to have held the gun, and

0:56:22.600 --> 0:56:26.919
<v Speaker 5>the police came back with a report saying how unreliable

0:56:27.040 --> 0:56:29.560
<v Speaker 5>gun residue is. And you know, she sort of just said, oh, well,

0:56:29.560 --> 0:56:31.120
<v Speaker 5>that they have to let me know and things like that.

0:56:31.239 --> 0:56:34.319
<v Speaker 5>But I did think it's interesting that they would have

0:56:34.480 --> 0:56:37.000
<v Speaker 5>come back with an excuse I suppose for that as

0:56:37.000 --> 0:56:40.400
<v Speaker 5>to why, you know, they could just explain that away,

0:56:41.160 --> 0:56:44.800
<v Speaker 5>but they couldn't explain this away, right, They couldn't explain

0:56:44.880 --> 0:56:47.040
<v Speaker 5>the whole tim Acklin. It was always a case, which

0:56:47.080 --> 0:56:51.480
<v Speaker 5>of course was supported by a detective constable and Lahane

0:56:51.800 --> 0:56:55.560
<v Speaker 5>that they wanted it to be treated as non suspicious

0:56:55.600 --> 0:56:57.399
<v Speaker 5>and would only look at it like.

0:56:57.400 --> 0:57:01.400
<v Speaker 1>That now on that out, even Vicker was initially told

0:57:01.760 --> 0:57:06.440
<v Speaker 1>there was no gun residue, remember, zero gun residue, but

0:57:06.560 --> 0:57:10.120
<v Speaker 1>she didn't believe them. Also worth mentioning, I did some

0:57:10.160 --> 0:57:12.880
<v Speaker 1>research and there are many more articles saying that the

0:57:13.080 --> 0:57:18.280
<v Speaker 1>GSR tests are reliable and should be admitted as evidence

0:57:18.880 --> 0:57:23.080
<v Speaker 1>can be admitted. However, it was clarified that the absence

0:57:23.240 --> 0:57:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of gun residue doesn't mean someone didn't fire a gun,

0:57:27.520 --> 0:57:32.560
<v Speaker 1>because it can easily be removed, say by washing your hands,

0:57:32.880 --> 0:57:36.000
<v Speaker 1>as simple as that. But in this case, in Amy's case,

0:57:36.320 --> 0:57:38.680
<v Speaker 1>she certainly didn't wash her hands.

0:57:39.120 --> 0:57:42.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. I found that whole thing of providing Evil and

0:57:42.120 --> 0:57:45.720
<v Speaker 5>Vicker with an article about how unreliable gun residue is

0:57:45.760 --> 0:57:49.320
<v Speaker 5>concerning Liam. Firstly, if they were being fair, they should

0:57:49.320 --> 0:57:53.840
<v Speaker 5>have also included articles arguing the positives of gun residue testing, right,

0:57:54.520 --> 0:57:57.800
<v Speaker 5>I mean, there's plenty which provide a more balanced analysis.

0:57:57.920 --> 0:58:02.440
<v Speaker 5>Like any testing, it's a component of the evidence requiring consideration.

0:58:02.960 --> 0:58:06.040
<v Speaker 5>It's just a matter of taking that into consideration, not

0:58:06.200 --> 0:58:07.520
<v Speaker 5>ruling it out entirely.

0:58:07.800 --> 0:58:09.720
<v Speaker 1>No, I thought it was a bit immature, actually, to

0:58:09.720 --> 0:58:12.120
<v Speaker 1>tell you the truth. In fact, I'd go so far

0:58:12.120 --> 0:58:13.920
<v Speaker 1>as to say I thought it was a bit insulting

0:58:14.280 --> 0:58:17.439
<v Speaker 1>to Evel and Vicker, not that she said that. I'm

0:58:17.480 --> 0:58:19.920
<v Speaker 1>saying that. Yeah, I thought it was insulting to her

0:58:20.040 --> 0:58:23.200
<v Speaker 1>level of expertise. I mean it was like some kid

0:58:23.440 --> 0:58:26.680
<v Speaker 1>waking up in the morning, coming into the kitchen and saying, hey, Mum,

0:58:26.800 --> 0:58:28.400
<v Speaker 1>you know I had a dream last night about an

0:58:28.400 --> 0:58:30.920
<v Speaker 1>alien and then you provide them that afternoon with a

0:58:30.960 --> 0:58:35.240
<v Speaker 1>book about how aliens don't exist. You know what I mean?

0:58:35.360 --> 0:58:38.800
<v Speaker 1>It was that simple as that basic. Yeah, Anyway, I digress. So,

0:58:38.880 --> 0:58:42.440
<v Speaker 1>even though way Pole says it's now investigating Amy Wensley's

0:58:42.440 --> 0:58:45.760
<v Speaker 1>death as a homicide, I agree with Amy's family that

0:58:45.800 --> 0:58:49.120
<v Speaker 1>there should be some oversight from the Triple C just

0:58:49.160 --> 0:58:52.880
<v Speaker 1>to make sure this is absolutely rock solid. Now remember

0:58:52.920 --> 0:58:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the FOI the freedom of information that we got back

0:58:55.800 --> 0:58:59.400
<v Speaker 1>where a senior detective claimed it's a suicide.

0:58:59.480 --> 0:59:04.120
<v Speaker 5>I do because that was after they announced the reward,

0:59:04.640 --> 0:59:06.920
<v Speaker 5>And this is why I sent Waypole a few more

0:59:07.000 --> 0:59:09.680
<v Speaker 5>questions Liam, you know how much they love those, and

0:59:09.760 --> 0:59:13.320
<v Speaker 5>asked them if they had consulted with a suicideologist. After

0:59:13.320 --> 0:59:17.880
<v Speaker 5>speaking with Michael Barnes, I emailed Kyrie and I apologize

0:59:17.920 --> 0:59:22.960
<v Speaker 5>if I have got the pronunciation wrong. Kri Colvez, a

0:59:23.000 --> 0:59:26.840
<v Speaker 5>professor at the Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention.

0:59:27.440 --> 0:59:30.160
<v Speaker 5>When I gave her a summary of Amy's case, she

0:59:30.280 --> 0:59:34.920
<v Speaker 5>replied that she quote very much agreed that a suicidologist

0:59:34.960 --> 0:59:38.440
<v Speaker 5>should be involved in the investigation, but to do it properly,

0:59:38.920 --> 0:59:41.720
<v Speaker 5>she would need access to all the police reports and evidence.

0:59:42.400 --> 0:59:45.560
<v Speaker 5>She's a professional. Now, I was sure that this new

0:59:45.600 --> 0:59:48.920
<v Speaker 5>Waypole Investigation would canvass this because hasn't it been the

0:59:48.960 --> 0:59:52.000
<v Speaker 5>main sticking point throughout I mean, we're still talking about it.

0:59:52.720 --> 0:59:56.000
<v Speaker 5>So I forwarded them doctor Colvez's email and asked them

0:59:56.080 --> 0:59:59.800
<v Speaker 5>if they'd consulted her, or indeed any suicidologist. I also

0:59:59.800 --> 1:00:03.120
<v Speaker 5>made point that given they sought a second opinion following

1:00:03.160 --> 1:00:06.880
<v Speaker 5>doctor Ackland's report ruling out suicide, surely they do the

1:00:06.920 --> 1:00:10.600
<v Speaker 5>same with the police psychologists report. Right, good point, particularly

1:00:10.680 --> 1:00:15.040
<v Speaker 5>given the criticism the police psychologists got from internationally renowned

1:00:15.080 --> 1:00:20.720
<v Speaker 5>criminal behavioral analyst Laura Richards. And you know what, they said, nothing.

1:00:20.800 --> 1:00:23.400
<v Speaker 5>They didn't get back to me, but they indicated they would,

1:00:23.480 --> 1:00:26.440
<v Speaker 5>So hopefully I'll have an update for you next week.

1:00:26.880 --> 1:00:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Good good. I mean again, it's the yin and the yang,

1:00:30.360 --> 1:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. You know, if you take one thing into account,

1:00:32.560 --> 1:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>you've got to take the other thing into account. But

1:00:34.960 --> 1:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>if you go back to basics, as the good Detective

1:00:38.400 --> 1:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Ron Needles said to us many many episodes, ago, start

1:00:41.640 --> 1:00:44.439
<v Speaker 1>with the worst case scenario and you can rarely go wrong.

1:00:44.760 --> 1:00:44.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:00:45.200 --> 1:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Classic statement from Ron and one that has given him

1:00:48.440 --> 1:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>an unbelievable record in solving crime. Allison, So you can't

1:00:52.360 --> 1:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>exactly say that he's got it wrong, can you.

1:00:54.520 --> 1:00:54.600
<v Speaker 5>No.

1:00:59.120 --> 1:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Next week we're going to explore the prevalence of other

1:01:04.600 --> 1:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Australian hidden homicides.

1:01:06.800 --> 1:01:09.000
<v Speaker 5>I think the toller is significantly higher, and I think

1:01:09.000 --> 1:01:11.760
<v Speaker 5>it's because we just have so many deaths across Australia

1:01:11.760 --> 1:01:15.760
<v Speaker 5>that are not being investigated, especially the so called suicide.

1:01:15.280 --> 1:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Deaths, and how another family is grappling with the reluctance

1:01:18.440 --> 1:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>by authorities to make it right.

1:01:21.320 --> 1:01:26.600
<v Speaker 7>He said that Courtney most likely had undiagnosed mental health issues,

1:01:26.680 --> 1:01:30.960
<v Speaker 7>which was something that her partner had said that scene.

1:01:31.120 --> 1:01:35.960
<v Speaker 7>Oh she's crazy, she's suicidal. She wasn't suicidal. She had

1:01:36.280 --> 1:01:39.480
<v Speaker 7>rip one her life.

1:01:41.480 --> 1:01:42.400
<v Speaker 1>See you next week.

1:01:42.200 --> 1:02:05.600
<v Speaker 8>Out the nows you me.

1:02:16.320 --> 1:02:20.800
<v Speaker 1>If you knew Amy and have information, any information about

1:02:20.800 --> 1:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>her death, we'd love to hear from you. Just email

1:02:25.680 --> 1:02:31.080
<v Speaker 1>us at the Truth about Amy at seven dot com

1:02:31.160 --> 1:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>dot au. That's s e v E N The Truth

1:02:35.440 --> 1:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>about Amy at seven dot com dot Au, or visit

1:02:42.120 --> 1:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>our website sevenews dot com dot AU forward slash the

1:02:46.680 --> 1:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Truth about Amy. You can also send us an anonymous

1:02:50.480 --> 1:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>tip at www dot the Truth about Amy dot com.

1:02:58.080 --> 1:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>If you're on Facebook or Instagram, you can follow us

1:03:01.280 --> 1:03:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to see photos and updates relevant to the case, but

1:03:05.360 --> 1:03:08.439
<v Speaker 1>for legal reasons, unfortunately, you won't be able to make

1:03:08.520 --> 1:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>any comments. And remember, if you like what you're hearing,

1:03:15.240 --> 1:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>don't forget to subscribe. Please rate and review our series

1:03:19.800 --> 1:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>because it really helps new listeners to find us. Presenter

1:03:27.240 --> 1:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>and executive producer Alison Sandy, Presenter and investigative journalist Liam Bartlett,

1:03:36.320 --> 1:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Sound design Mark Wright, Assistant producer Cassie Woodward, Graphics Jason Blandford,

1:03:45.440 --> 1:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and special thanks to Brian Seymour and Jessica Evanson. This

1:04:01.600 --> 1:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>is a seven News production.