WEBVTT - Kopi Time E135 - Techno-nationalism with Alexander Capri

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:08.819
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Kobe Time, a podcast series on Markets and

0:00:08.829 --> 0:00:11.939
<v Speaker 1>Economies from D BS Group Research. I'm Tam Rbe, chief economist.

0:00:11.949 --> 0:00:16.940
<v Speaker 1>Welcoming you to our 135th episode today. We will welcome

0:00:16.950 --> 0:00:20.540
<v Speaker 1>back Alexander Capri to the podcast. Alex is a writer,

0:00:20.549 --> 0:00:24.399
<v Speaker 1>academic and former partner in the Asia Pacific Practice of KPMG.

0:00:24.829 --> 0:00:27.750
<v Speaker 1>He has done a lot of work on global value chains,

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:31.940
<v Speaker 1>trade and geopolitics, Global tech, the digital economy and the

0:00:31.950 --> 0:00:33.340
<v Speaker 1>industries of the future.

0:00:33.590 --> 0:00:37.330
<v Speaker 1>Alex has recently published a book Techno Nationalism, how it's

0:00:37.340 --> 0:00:41.729
<v Speaker 1>reshaping trade, geopolitics and society. Alexander Capri, a warm welcome

0:00:41.740 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>back to Copy time. Thank you. It's great to have you, Alex.

0:00:45.790 --> 0:00:49.529
<v Speaker 1>We did this once before back in April 2020 just

0:00:49.540 --> 0:00:52.200
<v Speaker 1>as we were being engulfed by the global pandemic. Alex.

0:00:52.209 --> 0:00:54.569
<v Speaker 1>When I look at the transcript of that conversation, I

0:00:54.580 --> 0:00:57.090
<v Speaker 1>think we kind of had it right. We talked over

0:00:57.099 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the push and pull factors driving the realignment of the

0:00:59.209 --> 0:01:00.270
<v Speaker 1>global supply chain.

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:03.020
<v Speaker 1>Uh We asserted barely a couple of months into the

0:01:03.029 --> 0:01:07.540
<v Speaker 1>pandemic that the crisis would provide additional motivation to lean

0:01:07.550 --> 0:01:13.150
<v Speaker 1>toward resiliency over efficiency. Well, those issues remain alive today, Alex,

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:15.339
<v Speaker 1>and you've written a lot rather large book on it.

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:18.940
<v Speaker 1>So let's start, how do you define techno nationalism?

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:20.540
<v Speaker 2>Good question.

0:01:21.069 --> 0:01:23.839
<v Speaker 2>Uh II, I would say that we would throw in

0:01:23.849 --> 0:01:26.690
<v Speaker 2>a few other words. Uh So let, let's start with

0:01:26.699 --> 0:01:30.988
<v Speaker 2>geo economics, right? If we're thinking about supply chains, let's

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:34.809
<v Speaker 2>replace uh just in time with, just in case. Uh

0:01:34.949 --> 0:01:38.379
<v Speaker 2>you know, if, if we're thinking about a purely cost

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:44.569
<v Speaker 2>driven model that seeks efficiencies and hyper rationalized supply chains, now,

0:01:44.910 --> 0:01:49.870
<v Speaker 2>geo poli geopolitics and other issues stemming from great power

0:01:49.879 --> 0:01:50.730
<v Speaker 2>competition

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 2>are now factoring into how a supply chain is structured.

0:01:55.470 --> 0:01:58.750
<v Speaker 2>Um You know, where a manufacturing process is going to

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:03.059
<v Speaker 2>take place, how a strategic partner is chosen. Um So,

0:02:03.069 --> 0:02:07.500
<v Speaker 2>so I I would break down techno nationalism into six

0:02:07.550 --> 0:02:09.258
<v Speaker 2>very distinct elements.

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:15.119
<v Speaker 2>Um The first is uh supply chains. So supply chain weaponization,

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:20.699
<v Speaker 2>governments looking to control or stem the flow of technology

0:02:20.839 --> 0:02:26.149
<v Speaker 2>to perceived adversaries and that happens through things like export controls,

0:02:26.410 --> 0:02:30.070
<v Speaker 2>ah the imposition of sanctions. Um Then I would, I

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 2>would break it down into uh decoupling and Deris. And

0:02:34.449 --> 0:02:36.850
<v Speaker 2>if decoupling and deris is happening, then we're looking at

0:02:36.860 --> 0:02:39.809
<v Speaker 2>reshoring near shoring friend, shoring

0:02:40.288 --> 0:02:44.029
<v Speaker 2>uh from, from a sort of a G to G basis.

0:02:44.038 --> 0:02:47.460
<v Speaker 2>Um And even a G to B basis. We're looking

0:02:47.470 --> 0:02:52.429
<v Speaker 2>at government driven innovation, industrial policy if you will. Uh

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:58.649
<v Speaker 2>we're also looking at um an increase in basically, frankly,

0:02:58.779 --> 0:03:02.288
<v Speaker 2>you know, hybrid warfare, right? We're looking at espionage. We're

0:03:02.300 --> 0:03:07.109
<v Speaker 2>looking at uh elevation of cyber intrusions, that sort of thing.

0:03:07.410 --> 0:03:10.410
<v Speaker 2>And then the final element would be uh basically what

0:03:10.419 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 2>we call tech uh diplomacy, right? So governments working with

0:03:14.610 --> 0:03:17.779
<v Speaker 2>other governments and working with businesses to forge these new

0:03:17.788 --> 0:03:21.829
<v Speaker 2>strategic alliances around strategic technologies.

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Why is it just not nationalism? Why is it techno nationalism?

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:31.130
<v Speaker 2>Because uh technology is a power multiplier. And so if

0:03:31.139 --> 0:03:34.199
<v Speaker 2>we put this in the context of a a nation,

0:03:34.210 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 2>a nation state uh technology, I, if we're putting this

0:03:38.610 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 2>in the terms of techno nationalism ah is about the

0:03:42.529 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 2>linkage between the technological prowess of a particular country or

0:03:48.009 --> 0:03:49.979
<v Speaker 2>organizations within that country

0:03:50.470 --> 0:03:55.110
<v Speaker 2>and their ability to project national security and, and, and

0:03:55.119 --> 0:04:02.130
<v Speaker 2>defense related uh power, uh the linkage to economic strength, prosperity.

0:04:02.330 --> 0:04:04.649
<v Speaker 2>And then finally, really, there's a third element which is

0:04:04.660 --> 0:04:08.979
<v Speaker 2>societal and that is uh you know, as technology becomes

0:04:09.289 --> 0:04:16.170
<v Speaker 2>uh essential to controlling narratives, to releasing information or disinformation

0:04:16.528 --> 0:04:21.688
<v Speaker 2>uh towards uh in, in uh authoritarian regimes, towards uh

0:04:21.699 --> 0:04:26.269
<v Speaker 2>suppression of populations, censorship that, that sort of thing. Technology

0:04:26.278 --> 0:04:28.519
<v Speaker 2>is central to all of that. And so all of

0:04:28.528 --> 0:04:30.919
<v Speaker 2>these would be power multipliers.

0:04:31.269 --> 0:04:34.587
<v Speaker 1>Is this a brand new thing that basically goes back

0:04:34.598 --> 0:04:37.229
<v Speaker 1>to Donald Trump, becoming the president of the United States

0:04:37.238 --> 0:04:39.397
<v Speaker 1>or it's been going on for long before that,

0:04:39.479 --> 0:04:41.959
<v Speaker 2>as long as there as there have been nation states,

0:04:41.968 --> 0:04:43.949
<v Speaker 2>there has been techno nationalism.

0:04:44.420 --> 0:04:46.700
<v Speaker 2>Ah So, for example, in the book I talk about

0:04:46.709 --> 0:04:50.119
<v Speaker 2>the founding of the United States. Uh Alexander Hamilton, first

0:04:50.130 --> 0:04:52.738
<v Speaker 2>Secretary of the Treasury, really one of his top priorities,

0:04:52.750 --> 0:04:56.329
<v Speaker 2>if not, the top priority was to get access to

0:04:56.339 --> 0:04:58.969
<v Speaker 2>British technology when it, when it came to the, you know,

0:04:58.980 --> 0:05:02.469
<v Speaker 2>textile milling machines and, and, and so on. So, um

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:04.618
<v Speaker 1>and there were adversaries at that time, so you basically

0:05:04.630 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 1>had to steal it

0:05:06.738 --> 0:05:09.229
<v Speaker 2>and that's precisely what happened. I mean, that was really

0:05:09.238 --> 0:05:13.558
<v Speaker 2>item number one on the agenda was, you know, steal, acquire,

0:05:13.570 --> 0:05:17.549
<v Speaker 2>figure out how to get access to technology. So, um

0:05:17.589 --> 0:05:20.160
<v Speaker 2>that sort of if you want to, let's just stick

0:05:20.170 --> 0:05:23.868
<v Speaker 2>with the term techno nationalist uh approach to, to real

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:28.299
<v Speaker 2>politik and, and, and international relations, ah has been around

0:05:28.309 --> 0:05:29.239
<v Speaker 2>for a very long time.

0:05:30.170 --> 0:05:32.808
<v Speaker 1>It's fascinating and I think going back to the Cold

0:05:32.820 --> 0:05:36.589
<v Speaker 1>War era, some would argue that some of the decoupling

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:39.660
<v Speaker 1>that happened between the US and Russia put Russia under

0:05:39.670 --> 0:05:41.339
<v Speaker 1>a lot of economic strike because they had to sort

0:05:41.350 --> 0:05:44.230
<v Speaker 1>of create homegrown tech stack, which was never really good.

0:05:44.238 --> 0:05:47.519
<v Speaker 1>Enough incentives were not aligned. And that was one of

0:05:47.529 --> 0:05:50.570
<v Speaker 1>the key elements that drove the victory if you will,

0:05:50.579 --> 0:05:52.630
<v Speaker 1>the Cold War in favor of the West over the

0:05:53.470 --> 0:05:54.410
<v Speaker 1>Soviet bloc.

0:05:54.420 --> 0:05:56.678
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, that's a, that's a widely held view.

0:05:56.690 --> 0:06:00.130
<v Speaker 2>Um I, I certainly, I, I certainly would, would say

0:06:00.140 --> 0:06:04.869
<v Speaker 2>that um the amount of, of resources that, that, that

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:08.349
<v Speaker 2>needs to go into uh you know, pushing the, the

0:06:08.359 --> 0:06:12.250
<v Speaker 2>envelope if you will from a technological standpoint and the,

0:06:12.260 --> 0:06:16.510
<v Speaker 2>the idea that um the, for example, the, the Star

0:06:16.519 --> 0:06:20.570
<v Speaker 2>Wars system that the Reagan administration uh was pushing whether

0:06:20.579 --> 0:06:22.470
<v Speaker 2>or not it was e even feasible.

0:06:22.709 --> 0:06:25.469
<v Speaker 2>Uh you know, the, the theory is, is, is that

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 2>it bankrupted the, the Soviets because they thought it was,

0:06:28.290 --> 0:06:29.940
<v Speaker 2>and they were putting a lot of, you know, time

0:06:29.950 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 2>and effort and money into it. And, and of course,

0:06:32.299 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, they, they it, it helped in the collapse. So,

0:06:35.570 --> 0:06:36.159
<v Speaker 2>um

0:06:37.140 --> 0:06:40.399
<v Speaker 2>but from a techno nationalist standpoint, uh if you look

0:06:40.410 --> 0:06:43.690
<v Speaker 2>at really, if you go back 100 years, uh and

0:06:43.700 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 2>let's go back to the first World War, right? I mean,

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:49.369
<v Speaker 2>there were chemistry wars, right? To figure out how to,

0:06:49.380 --> 0:06:54.059
<v Speaker 2>how to produce nitrates, to produce uh explosives, for example, right?

0:06:54.070 --> 0:06:56.260
<v Speaker 2>And that, that was really the war of the scientists,

0:06:56.269 --> 0:06:58.579
<v Speaker 2>right to come up with those innovations. And if you

0:06:58.589 --> 0:07:01.799
<v Speaker 2>trace this theme of techno nationalism really back the last

0:07:01.809 --> 0:07:03.970
<v Speaker 2>100 years plus, um

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:07.339
<v Speaker 2>there really is this very important correlation between the industrial

0:07:07.350 --> 0:07:08.140
<v Speaker 2>revolutions

0:07:08.869 --> 0:07:12.609
<v Speaker 2>and uh and what what I call the technology feedback loop,

0:07:12.619 --> 0:07:18.809
<v Speaker 2>which is essentially this virtuous cycle that exists between um

0:07:18.820 --> 0:07:23.649
<v Speaker 2>you know, governments, national governments, the defense establishment, academia,

0:07:24.390 --> 0:07:28.290
<v Speaker 2>private business and or markets. Uh and as they all

0:07:28.299 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 2>work together, uh you have this phenomenon where you have

0:07:31.989 --> 0:07:37.809
<v Speaker 2>innovation taking place, uh it's, it's generating profit, it's generating

0:07:37.820 --> 0:07:41.450
<v Speaker 2>more innovation, which it becomes a network effect sort of thing.

0:07:41.459 --> 0:07:43.769
<v Speaker 2>So if you, if, if you look at this, this

0:07:43.779 --> 0:07:46.809
<v Speaker 2>view of the world that some have described as, um

0:07:47.149 --> 0:07:48.768
<v Speaker 2>the west versus the rest,

0:07:49.140 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 2>uh you know, going back really 3, 400 years. Uh

0:07:53.010 --> 0:07:54.929
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we could trace this all the way back

0:07:55.070 --> 0:07:59.239
<v Speaker 2>to the Dutch East India company, right. And that, that

0:07:59.250 --> 0:08:02.850
<v Speaker 2>sort of symbiotic relationship that emerged between the state and

0:08:02.859 --> 0:08:05.589
<v Speaker 2>a for profit organization and all those elements in the

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 2>feedback loop, right? But if you, if you project forward

0:08:08.570 --> 0:08:09.119
<v Speaker 2>um

0:08:09.730 --> 0:08:13.649
<v Speaker 2>that has combined with the, now we're in the fourth

0:08:13.660 --> 0:08:15.899
<v Speaker 2>industrial revolution. But when you, when you, when you look

0:08:15.910 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 2>at the fortuitous results of the industrial revolutions, the technology

0:08:21.609 --> 0:08:22.540
<v Speaker 2>feedback loop

0:08:22.829 --> 0:08:27.929
<v Speaker 2>uh on a nation state level that has essentially laid the,

0:08:27.940 --> 0:08:31.230
<v Speaker 2>laid the groundwork for the international system as we see

0:08:31.239 --> 0:08:31.769
<v Speaker 2>it today,

0:08:31.779 --> 0:08:35.179
<v Speaker 1>right? Uh Alex, I want to get one thing clear,

0:08:35.190 --> 0:08:38.049
<v Speaker 1>which is when you are referring to techno nationalism and

0:08:38.059 --> 0:08:41.020
<v Speaker 1>especially when I think about the totality of the measures

0:08:41.299 --> 0:08:43.789
<v Speaker 1>that particularly the US has taken against China in the

0:08:43.799 --> 0:08:46.030
<v Speaker 1>last decade or so. A lot of it is

0:08:46.630 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 1>rationalize under the guise of national security. We don't want

0:08:49.849 --> 0:08:52.210
<v Speaker 1>our data to fall into the wrong hands. We don't

0:08:52.219 --> 0:08:55.488
<v Speaker 1>want our technology to be weaponized in an armed conflict

0:08:55.500 --> 0:08:57.849
<v Speaker 1>or something like that by our adversaries. But it seems

0:08:57.859 --> 0:09:01.609
<v Speaker 1>to me that you, when you take this big historical sweep,

0:09:01.900 --> 0:09:05.049
<v Speaker 1>you're also putting it in the context of economic security.

0:09:05.059 --> 0:09:07.559
<v Speaker 1>I don't want you to rise to my level of

0:09:07.570 --> 0:09:10.369
<v Speaker 1>economic prosperity and I would sort of prevent you from

0:09:10.380 --> 0:09:11.780
<v Speaker 1>rising to some extent. Yeah,

0:09:11.789 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 2>I, I

0:09:11.890 --> 0:09:16.239
<v Speaker 2>think that's, that's somewhat of a zero sum view. Right? And,

0:09:16.250 --> 0:09:19.579
<v Speaker 2>and I actually don't think that, that techno nationalism puts

0:09:19.590 --> 0:09:21.979
<v Speaker 2>us in a world of zero sum. Right? I think

0:09:21.989 --> 0:09:24.359
<v Speaker 2>the world has become way too complex right now, too

0:09:24.369 --> 0:09:28.359
<v Speaker 2>many overlapping interests. And, and we're actually in a paradox.

0:09:28.849 --> 0:09:30.359
<v Speaker 2>So the paradox is this,

0:09:30.989 --> 0:09:32.729
<v Speaker 2>if you look at the, if you look at the

0:09:32.739 --> 0:09:36.968
<v Speaker 2>grand sort of the mega trends that are defining the

0:09:36.979 --> 0:09:40.978
<v Speaker 2>international system today, right? Um you know, you look at

0:09:41.590 --> 0:09:46.229
<v Speaker 2>uh the fragmentation of a global supply chains because of

0:09:46.239 --> 0:09:53.750
<v Speaker 2>geopolitical pressures, right? This move towards regionalization, even localization. Um

0:09:53.900 --> 0:09:58.609
<v Speaker 2>the the the the idea that uh the world is bifurcating,

0:09:58.619 --> 0:10:02.429
<v Speaker 2>right um around these, these two nodes, right? That basically

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:07.329
<v Speaker 2>the GSG G7 US plus plus China, I mean, if

0:10:07.340 --> 0:10:09.608
<v Speaker 2>if you look at that, um

0:10:10.349 --> 0:10:15.340
<v Speaker 2>we're not de globalizing, this is not a de globalization process,

0:10:15.349 --> 0:10:19.718
<v Speaker 2>this is a reorganization process. So the global economy is,

0:10:19.729 --> 0:10:24.039
<v Speaker 2>is reorganizing itself and it's, it's, it's a correction if

0:10:24.049 --> 0:10:28.409
<v Speaker 2>you will. Um III I actually refer to it um

0:10:28.419 --> 0:10:33.848
<v Speaker 2>as a geopolitical version of creative destruction. All right. So

0:10:34.179 --> 0:10:37.380
<v Speaker 2>there, there is a, there there are many new economic

0:10:37.390 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 2>opportunities that are rising as, you know, as a banker.

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:43.380
<v Speaker 2>Uh and the work that, that the bank is doing,

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:46.109
<v Speaker 2>you know, that, that, that when you have these shifts

0:10:46.119 --> 0:10:49.309
<v Speaker 2>in supply chains in, in global value chains, um

0:10:50.020 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 2>there's rebuilding, there's restructuring, there's, there's the services industry, you know, there, there's, it's,

0:10:55.330 --> 0:10:57.439
<v Speaker 2>it's a real knock on effect. And I should point

0:10:57.450 --> 0:11:00.900
<v Speaker 2>out the paradox that I that I refer to is

0:11:01.349 --> 0:11:04.950
<v Speaker 2>that on one hand, we have all of these things

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:08.830
<v Speaker 2>that I've just described happening with strategic technologies. So, so

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:13.479
<v Speaker 2>the value chains around there's really 12 core technologies and

0:11:13.489 --> 0:11:14.919
<v Speaker 2>we can get back into that in a little bit

0:11:14.929 --> 0:11:18.840
<v Speaker 2>of course, semiconductors, quantum biotech, you know that sort of thing.

0:11:19.159 --> 0:11:19.559
<v Speaker 2>Um

0:11:19.849 --> 0:11:22.728
<v Speaker 2>But even as that's happening, even even as we're seeing

0:11:22.739 --> 0:11:28.010
<v Speaker 2>this bifurcation, we're seeing increases in trade volumes including between

0:11:28.020 --> 0:11:31.390
<v Speaker 2>the US and China, right? So um

0:11:32.119 --> 0:11:34.189
<v Speaker 2>the way I look at that, the way I dissect

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:36.719
<v Speaker 2>that is I look at global value chains as a,

0:11:36.729 --> 0:11:39.809
<v Speaker 2>as a sort of a striation like three levels. OK.

0:11:40.260 --> 0:11:43.569
<v Speaker 2>So on the top level, we have all the strategic goods, right?

0:11:43.849 --> 0:11:47.309
<v Speaker 2>And that's where that's where the decoupling and the deris

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:50.900
<v Speaker 2>is happening, the restructuring and so forth in the middle,

0:11:51.270 --> 0:11:55.479
<v Speaker 2>the second, the second layer down, we have this nebulous

0:11:55.489 --> 0:11:56.739
<v Speaker 2>gray area.

0:11:57.299 --> 0:12:00.510
<v Speaker 2>And uh within that gray area, we have uh dual

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 2>use goods. So these are commercial goods that are used

0:12:05.090 --> 0:12:10.228
<v Speaker 2>for a wide array of industries and sectors, you know,

0:12:10.239 --> 0:12:13.119
<v Speaker 2>everything from a SIM card in your phone, literally to

0:12:13.130 --> 0:12:15.890
<v Speaker 2>the brake pads in the car you're driving. But they

0:12:15.900 --> 0:12:20.299
<v Speaker 2>could be considered dual use, meaning they're commercial, but they

0:12:20.309 --> 0:12:22.909
<v Speaker 2>could be used for military purposes. And therefore, if they're

0:12:22.919 --> 0:12:23.679
<v Speaker 2>being sent

0:12:23.919 --> 0:12:29.190
<v Speaker 2>to um you know, an identified entity, a blacklisted entity somewhere,

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:31.169
<v Speaker 2>it's going to require an export license or it's just

0:12:31.179 --> 0:12:34.770
<v Speaker 2>gonna be blocked throughout, that's the real gray area. And

0:12:34.780 --> 0:12:38.209
<v Speaker 2>that's really where the scenario mapping and the the the

0:12:38.219 --> 0:12:41.650
<v Speaker 2>really serious analysis has to take place if you're a

0:12:41.659 --> 0:12:42.179
<v Speaker 2>company

0:12:42.650 --> 0:12:44.489
<v Speaker 2>and then the and then the third level is just

0:12:44.500 --> 0:12:48.368
<v Speaker 2>the the rest of the stuff. Uh that is essentially innocuous, right?

0:12:48.380 --> 0:12:51.689
<v Speaker 2>I mean, do we care where your shoes come from?

0:12:51.700 --> 0:12:53.890
<v Speaker 2>You know, your bottle of shampoo, you know, that type

0:12:53.900 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 2>of thing.

0:12:54.590 --> 0:12:57.989
<v Speaker 1>But even that evolves Alex, I'll give you an example

0:12:58.419 --> 0:13:02.579
<v Speaker 1>five years ago. If you bought an Osim massage chair,

0:13:02.890 --> 0:13:06.439
<v Speaker 1>it'd give you a massage. Today's Osim chairs have Bluetooth

0:13:06.450 --> 0:13:09.429
<v Speaker 1>capability and you can connect to your phone and you

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:11.169
<v Speaker 1>can run the chair through your phone. So all of

0:13:11.179 --> 0:13:12.340
<v Speaker 1>a sudden now it has

0:13:13.309 --> 0:13:19.039
<v Speaker 1>mini Bluetooth application and data transmission capabilities. So then it

0:13:19.049 --> 0:13:22.239
<v Speaker 1>starts going on from the third, completely innocuous. A chair

0:13:22.250 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that does no harm. That's right to somewhere in the middle.

0:13:25.539 --> 0:13:29.130
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's where lawyers and regulators and consultants. Everybody

0:13:29.140 --> 0:13:32.150
<v Speaker 1>come in and they fight it out to the company

0:13:32.159 --> 0:13:33.500
<v Speaker 1>gets a buy or not.

0:13:33.590 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:13:34.369 --> 0:13:36.569
<v Speaker 2>And so if you take, uh if you take a

0:13:36.580 --> 0:13:41.140
<v Speaker 2>dual use technology that's in a, a fairly ubiquitous kind

0:13:41.150 --> 0:13:44.450
<v Speaker 2>of product that everybody buys. And then there's this uh

0:13:44.460 --> 0:13:48.500
<v Speaker 2>a sudden geopolitical event, uh an accidental flare up in

0:13:48.510 --> 0:13:50.950
<v Speaker 2>the South China Sea or some kind of an event.

0:13:51.489 --> 0:13:54.150
<v Speaker 2>It's quite possible that literally overnight,

0:13:54.789 --> 0:13:57.549
<v Speaker 2>ah what was a commercial, what was considered purely a

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:01.229
<v Speaker 2>commercial good going to a particular importer or buyer in

0:14:01.239 --> 0:14:04.809
<v Speaker 2>say China um is now off limits,

0:14:05.609 --> 0:14:07.179
<v Speaker 2>right? And so, I mean, these are the types of

0:14:07.190 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 2>things that companies need to be uh mapping out, right?

0:14:09.969 --> 0:14:11.679
<v Speaker 2>They need to be looking at what parts of their

0:14:11.690 --> 0:14:15.210
<v Speaker 2>supply chain are in this gray dual use area and

0:14:15.219 --> 0:14:18.479
<v Speaker 2>given different scenarios in the world, what would happen if

0:14:18.489 --> 0:14:23.119
<v Speaker 2>you know, scenario one, scenario two, perfect example of that

0:14:23.270 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 2>is um electric vehicles

0:14:25.729 --> 0:14:28.109
<v Speaker 2>and all of the, you know, w what is an

0:14:28.119 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 2>electric vehicle, right? It's, it's, it's a computer on wheels, right?

0:14:31.770 --> 0:14:35.299
<v Speaker 2>And it's, it's, it's sending and receiving information not only

0:14:35.309 --> 0:14:38.969
<v Speaker 2>about where you're going but everything that's around you. Uh

0:14:38.979 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 2>what's coming in on communication networks and other smart devices.

0:14:44.169 --> 0:14:46.530
<v Speaker 2>And as you saw, I think it was just yesterday

0:14:46.909 --> 0:14:50.299
<v Speaker 2>that Washington has announced that both the software and the

0:14:50.309 --> 0:14:54.070
<v Speaker 2>hardware that goes into electric vehicles in the states cannot

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:55.270
<v Speaker 2>be of Chinese origin,

0:14:55.619 --> 0:14:58.969
<v Speaker 1>right? So no export and no import around those things.

0:14:59.090 --> 0:14:59.609
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so

0:14:59.619 --> 0:15:03.159
<v Speaker 2>that's an example of how in anything that's considered strategic,

0:15:03.330 --> 0:15:05.750
<v Speaker 2>we're going, we're going to continue to see a very

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:09.989
<v Speaker 2>clear bifurcation of supply chains, value chains.

0:15:11.309 --> 0:15:14.690
<v Speaker 1>Uh Maybe this question is too early to ask. But

0:15:14.700 --> 0:15:16.869
<v Speaker 1>since you were talking about it, it sort of follows

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:20.809
<v Speaker 1>to me almost naturally do these restrictions work.

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:25.140
<v Speaker 1>You know, a semiconductor is super tiny, a lot of

0:15:25.150 --> 0:15:28.770
<v Speaker 1>stuff just are uploaded and transmitted through the cloud over

0:15:28.780 --> 0:15:31.539
<v Speaker 1>the air. It's not a question of a Department of

0:15:31.549 --> 0:15:34.719
<v Speaker 1>Commerce inspectors sitting in Vietnam or somewhere else and making

0:15:34.729 --> 0:15:36.940
<v Speaker 1>sure that everything is up and up.

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:40.349
<v Speaker 1>Um What has, what is the report card so far?

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:45.349
<v Speaker 2>Well, look export controls, le le let's start historically, I'll, I'll,

0:15:45.359 --> 0:15:47.270
<v Speaker 2>I'll give you the answer historically and then, and then

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:50.030
<v Speaker 2>maybe we can apply it to say semiconductor today, right?

0:15:50.179 --> 0:15:52.070
<v Speaker 2>What's what's going on? So historically,

0:15:52.859 --> 0:15:56.940
<v Speaker 2>the record shows that um an export control will slow

0:15:56.950 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 2>down the transmission or the, you know, the, the the

0:16:00.409 --> 0:16:03.479
<v Speaker 2>dissemination of a certain kind of technology, but it's not

0:16:03.489 --> 0:16:06.650
<v Speaker 2>going to stop it eventually. Um You know, it's, it's

0:16:06.659 --> 0:16:09.010
<v Speaker 2>going to make its way into sort of the, the,

0:16:09.020 --> 0:16:11.159
<v Speaker 2>the broader environment. Now,

0:16:11.950 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 2>we also have to be careful about what kinds of

0:16:14.289 --> 0:16:17.469
<v Speaker 2>technology we're talking about. So if we're talking about satellite technology,

0:16:17.479 --> 0:16:19.859
<v Speaker 2>which in the, in the eighties, you know, the eighties

0:16:19.869 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 2>and nineties there were controls, but eventually everybody figured out

0:16:22.210 --> 0:16:26.150
<v Speaker 2>how to make satellites. Um That's one thing. But if

0:16:26.159 --> 0:16:29.770
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about making a two nanometer chip

0:16:30.159 --> 0:16:33.109
<v Speaker 2>where the barriers to entry are so incredibly

0:16:33.119 --> 0:16:33.380
<v Speaker 2>high,

0:16:33.390 --> 0:16:35.210
<v Speaker 1>basically one company makes it or

0:16:35.219 --> 0:16:37.510
<v Speaker 2>or you know, it's it's right. So in the case

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:39.900
<v Speaker 2>of one company, you're probably talking about a SML which

0:16:39.909 --> 0:16:44.919
<v Speaker 2>which makes the lithography lithography equipment.

0:16:45.820 --> 0:16:50.179
<v Speaker 2>But even beyond that, within that, within that value chain,

0:16:50.190 --> 0:16:54.119
<v Speaker 2>within that fabrication process, the the hyper specialization and the

0:16:54.130 --> 0:16:58.599
<v Speaker 2>companies that specialize in that. So it's it's essentially with,

0:16:58.609 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 2>in that case, we're we're looking at the emergence of

0:17:01.090 --> 0:17:02.979
<v Speaker 2>a cartel, right. We're looking at the emergence of a

0:17:02.989 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 2>chip cartel along geopolitical lines, right? So to answer the question,

0:17:08.010 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 2>do do export controls work.

0:17:10.859 --> 0:17:14.699
<v Speaker 2>Uh it's two fold, it depends how sophisticated the technology

0:17:14.709 --> 0:17:17.569
<v Speaker 2>is and, and how, how high the barriers to entry are.

0:17:18.010 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 2>But it also um it it also comes down to

0:17:22.540 --> 0:17:26.969
<v Speaker 2>um how can these export controls be circumvented? What are

0:17:26.979 --> 0:17:31.079
<v Speaker 2>the workarounds? What are the back doors and to that effect,

0:17:31.089 --> 0:17:33.079
<v Speaker 2>there are quite a few, right? So let's let's talk

0:17:33.089 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 2>about NVIDIA, nvidia's A I chips, right?

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:39.339
<v Speaker 2>So ex you know, export controls on them. Are they

0:17:39.349 --> 0:17:42.530
<v Speaker 2>continuing to make their way into China, for example? And

0:17:42.540 --> 0:17:46.459
<v Speaker 2>the answer is yes um uh you know, are ex

0:17:46.469 --> 0:17:49.050
<v Speaker 2>and how, how is that happening? There's there's a few

0:17:49.060 --> 0:17:52.140
<v Speaker 2>ways that's happening. The first is the export control process

0:17:52.150 --> 0:17:53.050
<v Speaker 2>itself

0:17:53.369 --> 0:17:56.339
<v Speaker 2>and the way it works is before an export control

0:17:56.349 --> 0:17:59.849
<v Speaker 2>is actually enforced and it becomes mandatory to get a license.

0:18:00.099 --> 0:18:02.920
<v Speaker 2>There's this long period where they make an announcement where

0:18:02.930 --> 0:18:05.109
<v Speaker 2>they say yes, we're uh you know, it's a public,

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:08.219
<v Speaker 2>it's a public announcement process. We're, we're going to uh

0:18:08.229 --> 0:18:11.389
<v Speaker 2>be implementing export controls and it's going to take effect

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:13.979
<v Speaker 2>in such and such time. So what does that do?

0:18:14.329 --> 0:18:18.750
<v Speaker 2>Uh that incites a AAA binge buying sessions, right. So

0:18:19.010 --> 0:18:20.910
<v Speaker 2>to load all the purchases as much as possible, I mean,

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:23.939
<v Speaker 2>just soak up everything that's out on the market, stockpile

0:18:23.949 --> 0:18:25.849
<v Speaker 2>it and you've got chips for the next two years.

0:18:25.859 --> 0:18:28.209
<v Speaker 2>That's what Huawei did when they were placed on the

0:18:28.219 --> 0:18:33.099
<v Speaker 2>entity list, the the the Chinese telecommunications equipment manufacturing company.

0:18:33.439 --> 0:18:34.030
<v Speaker 2>Um

0:18:35.260 --> 0:18:37.790
<v Speaker 2>So there's, there's that, so there's the, the issue that

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:40.479
<v Speaker 2>everybody goes out in stockpiles. And we're seeing that now

0:18:40.699 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 2>with uh DUV uh deep ultraviolet lithography machines uh being stockpiled.

0:18:47.300 --> 0:18:51.079
<v Speaker 2>Uh you know, in China, right? The huge, huge, you know,

0:18:51.089 --> 0:18:54.109
<v Speaker 2>spikes in, in, in the numbers going up because

0:18:54.270 --> 0:18:56.319
<v Speaker 1>the EU vs are not available at all. The

0:18:56.329 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 2>EU vs which is the extreme ultraviolet. Uh But the

0:18:59.530 --> 0:19:04.319
<v Speaker 2>Duvs um um are are being basically purchased because

0:19:04.750 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 2>um you know, just to divert a little bit. Um So,

0:19:07.410 --> 0:19:11.169
<v Speaker 2>so Huawei worked with SMIC uh and they came up

0:19:11.180 --> 0:19:15.619
<v Speaker 2>with a seven nanometer chip using uh imported DUV equipment. Basically,

0:19:15.630 --> 0:19:18.060
<v Speaker 2>they used that for the, the, the mate 60 phone

0:19:18.380 --> 0:19:18.680
<v Speaker 2>which was

0:19:18.689 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 1>not considered likely, but they pull it off,

0:19:20.650 --> 0:19:22.448
<v Speaker 2>they, they pulled it off. But again, if you look,

0:19:22.459 --> 0:19:25.369
<v Speaker 2>I mean, uh I'm kind of detracting but

0:19:25.589 --> 0:19:27.369
<v Speaker 2>uh I'll come back to the, you know, do the,

0:19:27.380 --> 0:19:29.719
<v Speaker 2>do export controls work. Um But yeah, so in the

0:19:29.729 --> 0:19:32.079
<v Speaker 2>case of Huawei, what they did with the, with, with that,

0:19:32.089 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 2>with that process is it's a, it's a, it's a

0:19:33.890 --> 0:19:37.399
<v Speaker 2>much more labor intensive process. You know, when you're in

0:19:37.410 --> 0:19:40.739
<v Speaker 2>the lithography process, you have to pass over again and

0:19:40.750 --> 0:19:41.439
<v Speaker 2>again and again,

0:19:42.030 --> 0:19:43.150
<v Speaker 1>yield, you get a lot of commercial,

0:19:43.849 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 2>it costs a lot more money. So unless somebody's basically,

0:19:46.979 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 2>you know, reimbursing you for all that, that leakage, that

0:19:50.130 --> 0:19:53.880
<v Speaker 2>cost leakage, it's not competitive, basically. OK. So, so coming back,

0:19:53.890 --> 0:19:54.930
<v Speaker 2>so we got binge buying

0:19:55.550 --> 0:19:58.599
<v Speaker 2>uh which is happening. Um the other is, of course,

0:19:58.609 --> 0:20:01.119
<v Speaker 2>is just black market and gray market, you know, achieving

0:20:01.130 --> 0:20:02.849
<v Speaker 2>chips uh you know, on the black market and the

0:20:02.859 --> 0:20:05.069
<v Speaker 2>other uh and this is why this is a game

0:20:05.079 --> 0:20:07.640
<v Speaker 2>of whack a mole, right? When we talk about um

0:20:07.689 --> 0:20:11.890
<v Speaker 2>the US administration trying to, trying to enforce um

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:14.439
<v Speaker 2>uh but you know, the the other is when, when

0:20:14.449 --> 0:20:17.219
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about uh cloud computing, for example, and and

0:20:17.229 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 2>accessing the power of those chips to to do whatever

0:20:21.369 --> 0:20:24.780
<v Speaker 2>computer processing you want, you can access that in the

0:20:24.790 --> 0:20:26.530
<v Speaker 2>cloud from a third

0:20:26.540 --> 0:20:26.938
<v Speaker 2>party.

0:20:26.949 --> 0:20:28.739
<v Speaker 1>So the data center can be in the Middle East,

0:20:29.060 --> 0:20:32.129
<v Speaker 1>the company could be in China, right? I mean, right,

0:20:32.140 --> 0:20:35.139
<v Speaker 1>they're accessing all the cutting edge chips being used over there.

0:20:35.430 --> 0:20:39.139
<v Speaker 2>So, so this is, this is a a game that's

0:20:39.150 --> 0:20:40.900
<v Speaker 2>in progress.

0:20:41.339 --> 0:20:43.739
<v Speaker 2>And uh you know, we're going to continue to see,

0:20:43.750 --> 0:20:46.599
<v Speaker 2>you know, efforts to sort of uh clamp down on

0:20:46.609 --> 0:20:50.030
<v Speaker 2>these types of, of things. And I think maybe maybe

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:51.819
<v Speaker 2>another time we can come back and talk about what

0:20:51.829 --> 0:20:55.198
<v Speaker 2>I call the surveillance supply chain. Basically, the the way

0:20:55.209 --> 0:21:00.880
<v Speaker 2>new technologies are going to be used to essentially achieve much,

0:21:00.890 --> 0:21:05.839
<v Speaker 2>much greater transparency and traceability in supply chains, right, to

0:21:05.849 --> 0:21:07.599
<v Speaker 2>trace the actual movement.

0:21:07.810 --> 0:21:09.510
<v Speaker 2>Uh And a lot of this is gonna be focused

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:12.510
<v Speaker 2>on A I right on, on A I chips and

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:16.180
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna be focused on cloud infrastructure. You mentioned uh

0:21:16.189 --> 0:21:18.609
<v Speaker 2>data centers. This is where all this is going to

0:21:18.619 --> 0:21:19.790
<v Speaker 2>be playing out. So it's

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:22.099
<v Speaker 1>not just a question of I buy something from you

0:21:22.109 --> 0:21:23.609
<v Speaker 1>and then I do whatever I want with it.

0:21:24.020 --> 0:21:26.149
<v Speaker 1>In fact, even after buying it from you, I remain

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:27.969
<v Speaker 1>liable to how I use it

0:21:27.979 --> 0:21:31.010
<v Speaker 2>or, or even the the original seller will be able

0:21:31.020 --> 0:21:35.020
<v Speaker 2>to trace where it actually is including embedded in a

0:21:35.030 --> 0:21:38.510
<v Speaker 2>finished product basically. So I think we'll see more of

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:40.510
<v Speaker 2>that and that is that's going to be a growth industry,

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:42.489
<v Speaker 2>think about the amount of money that's gonna be made

0:21:42.790 --> 0:21:46.239
<v Speaker 2>just around the compliance like the reg tech that's gonna

0:21:46.250 --> 0:21:47.969
<v Speaker 2>go into that and that's gonna be big

0:21:47.979 --> 0:21:52.149
<v Speaker 1>rec tech huh so many different techs out there. Um

0:21:53.050 --> 0:21:57.479
<v Speaker 1>You know, we began this discussion in a very general term.

0:21:57.489 --> 0:21:59.929
<v Speaker 1>We said techno nationalism define it. I don't think you

0:21:59.939 --> 0:22:02.790
<v Speaker 1>even mentioned the US initially. When you responded to my question,

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:05.199
<v Speaker 1>you definitely did not touch on China, but we have

0:22:05.209 --> 0:22:08.579
<v Speaker 1>naturally veered toward the US China dynamic because let's be

0:22:08.589 --> 0:22:13.170
<v Speaker 1>clear that is the big story behind techno nationalism. Um

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:15.948
<v Speaker 1>I want you to talk to me about something that

0:22:15.959 --> 0:22:17.550
<v Speaker 1>you devote quite a bit of space in your book,

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:20.550
<v Speaker 1>which is the Digital Belt and Road by China.

0:22:21.979 --> 0:22:26.030
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so, so you know, yes, absolutely. This is all

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:29.869
<v Speaker 2>about great power competition us China. Um you know, the

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:32.489
<v Speaker 2>Belt in the Road, the original Belt and Road, of course,

0:22:32.500 --> 0:22:35.819
<v Speaker 2>is a, you know, it's a ma major Chinese initiative

0:22:35.829 --> 0:22:38.859
<v Speaker 2>to essentially connect China to the rest of the world

0:22:39.020 --> 0:22:45.020
<v Speaker 2>through massive infrastructure projects, ports, rail, et cetera, roads, roads

0:22:45.030 --> 0:22:45.839
<v Speaker 2>and and so on.

0:22:46.209 --> 0:22:49.530
<v Speaker 2>Uh And that of course, is beneficial because a it

0:22:49.540 --> 0:22:51.989
<v Speaker 2>connects the Chinese economy to the rest of the world.

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:55.859
<v Speaker 2>It allows for frankly a lot of excess capacity from

0:22:55.869 --> 0:22:58.310
<v Speaker 2>steel companies and all kinds of other things in China

0:22:58.319 --> 0:23:00.688
<v Speaker 2>to actually go out and build these big projects and

0:23:00.699 --> 0:23:04.310
<v Speaker 2>so forth. But those who have gotten very expensive and,

0:23:04.319 --> 0:23:07.069
<v Speaker 2>and as you know, uh as a banker and you're

0:23:07.079 --> 0:23:10.400
<v Speaker 2>following these things, there are a lot of um countries

0:23:10.410 --> 0:23:12.189
<v Speaker 2>that are on the verge of defaulting,

0:23:12.530 --> 0:23:14.630
<v Speaker 2>uh they can't pay back the money that the Chinese

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 2>lent them and so forth. And then we've had this, this, this, this,

0:23:17.369 --> 0:23:20.228
<v Speaker 2>this notion of, you know, debt diplomacy and that sort

0:23:20.239 --> 0:23:25.609
<v Speaker 2>of thing. So in a geopolitical and techno nationalist context,

0:23:25.619 --> 0:23:29.750
<v Speaker 2>um so China has, has uh really turned its focus

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:33.089
<v Speaker 2>along the Belt and Road to building digital infrastructure. It's

0:23:33.099 --> 0:23:36.109
<v Speaker 2>not as expensive, but at the same time, you, you

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:40.109
<v Speaker 2>get more bang for your Renminbi, right? And, and, and

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:41.949
<v Speaker 2>that is because if you have

0:23:42.619 --> 0:23:46.839
<v Speaker 2>uh Chinese companies like Huawei and, and you have, you know,

0:23:46.849 --> 0:23:50.300
<v Speaker 2>Alibaba cloud and, and, and you know, Tencent and all

0:23:50.310 --> 0:23:55.030
<v Speaker 2>these other companies building the digital infrastructure, you have sense time,

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:58.699
<v Speaker 2>the the big A I uh software makers hike vision,

0:23:58.709 --> 0:24:02.839
<v Speaker 2>the the uh the the uh the camera surveillance technology,

0:24:02.849 --> 0:24:07.739
<v Speaker 2>facial recognition, you have um Baidu, the the the Chinese

0:24:07.750 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 2>uh satellite network. So you have this ecosystem of Chinese

0:24:11.290 --> 0:24:11.909
<v Speaker 2>companies

0:24:12.270 --> 0:24:16.270
<v Speaker 2>that are building this digital infrastructure and then you overlay

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:20.750
<v Speaker 2>on top of that uh Beijing's um you know, Beijing's

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 2>efforts to, to roll out its digital currency for and,

0:24:24.930 --> 0:24:26.380
<v Speaker 2>and of course, this is all part of the de

0:24:26.390 --> 0:24:30.250
<v Speaker 2>dollarization efforts. Uh you know that they've been involved with,

0:24:30.260 --> 0:24:32.349
<v Speaker 2>with other BRICS countries and also with, you know, their

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:35.390
<v Speaker 2>client states along the Belt and the Road, this becomes a,

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:36.670
<v Speaker 2>a very, very

0:24:37.030 --> 0:24:41.569
<v Speaker 2>um compelling and very attractive uh formula if you will

0:24:41.579 --> 0:24:47.010
<v Speaker 2>for extending influence economic influence and, and you know, ee

0:24:47.020 --> 0:24:51.089
<v Speaker 2>extending as, as sort of the duality of that is it,

0:24:51.099 --> 0:24:52.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, it doubles as a, as a, as a

0:24:52.650 --> 0:24:54.369
<v Speaker 2>force multiplier and projector.

0:24:54.780 --> 0:24:55.050
<v Speaker 1>I just

0:24:55.060 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>want to ss before I want to talk about the

0:24:56.569 --> 0:24:58.169
<v Speaker 1>digital currency part in a moment, but I just want

0:24:58.180 --> 0:25:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to stay with the digital infrastructure part a little longer.

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:02.290
<v Speaker 1>Um When we talk about this

0:25:02.989 --> 0:25:06.909
<v Speaker 1>digital stack, if you will coming from the various Chinese

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:13.629
<v Speaker 1>ah providers of technology, is it ubiquitous? Is it interoperable? So,

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:17.030
<v Speaker 1>could I have Cisco routers in my country? And routers

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:19.889
<v Speaker 1>made by I don't know Huawei or something and they

0:25:19.900 --> 0:25:22.589
<v Speaker 1>can all talk to each other or Cisco routers will

0:25:22.599 --> 0:25:23.889
<v Speaker 1>have a problem dealing with

0:25:24.390 --> 0:25:26.530
<v Speaker 1>interoperability with Chinese technology.

0:25:26.540 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's a, that's a great question. So, so the

0:25:30.010 --> 0:25:33.140
<v Speaker 2>currently the way things stand, you know, you have very

0:25:33.150 --> 0:25:37.199
<v Speaker 2>few players building this kind of technology. Um There, there

0:25:37.209 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 2>have been many efforts through the, the O A uh

0:25:39.290 --> 0:25:44.599
<v Speaker 2>network which is essentially efforts to basically open source. A

0:25:44.660 --> 0:25:47.430
<v Speaker 2>lot of the technologies that go into the whole value

0:25:47.439 --> 0:25:49.959
<v Speaker 2>chain around five G wireless. And the the rationale behind

0:25:49.969 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 2>that is

0:25:50.839 --> 0:25:55.050
<v Speaker 2>you don't just have Ericsson and Nokia and Qualcomm and, and, and,

0:25:55.060 --> 0:25:58.020
<v Speaker 2>and Huawei basically, uh so

0:25:58.729 --> 0:26:01.750
<v Speaker 2>as it stands now, if you have one big provider,

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:05.189
<v Speaker 2>it's a lot more complicated, right? It's, and, and it's

0:26:05.199 --> 0:26:08.589
<v Speaker 2>very difficult to get these companies to work together. Basically,

0:26:08.599 --> 0:26:13.510
<v Speaker 2>it's almost impossible, basically. Right? Um So um

0:26:14.260 --> 0:26:17.659
<v Speaker 2>the i the answer is it works better. And certainly

0:26:17.670 --> 0:26:19.458
<v Speaker 2>if we're talking about the Digital Belt and Road, and

0:26:19.469 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about, you know, um China's China's view and

0:26:23.650 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 2>China's strategy, it's, it's about having a, a fully Chinese ecosystem.

0:26:28.319 --> 0:26:32.609
<v Speaker 1>I heard this uh onion analogy from an executive recently

0:26:32.619 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 1>where they said that if you have core infrastructure that

0:26:36.810 --> 0:26:40.619
<v Speaker 1>is very security sensitive of an organization, you tend to

0:26:40.630 --> 0:26:43.920
<v Speaker 1>still stay very Western with respect to buying those technologies

0:26:43.930 --> 0:26:48.900
<v Speaker 1>and capabilities. But if there are outer layers of that

0:26:49.739 --> 0:26:54.629
<v Speaker 1>company's infrastructure, you're OK, buying something rather ubiquitous, which doesn't

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:56.819
<v Speaker 1>have that much of a tech related sensitivity.

0:26:57.050 --> 0:26:59.349
<v Speaker 1>But it does come with very large scale from the

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:01.969
<v Speaker 1>Chinese and it's very reasonably priced and it does make

0:27:01.979 --> 0:27:04.829
<v Speaker 1>commercial sense to have the outer layers, having some degree

0:27:04.839 --> 0:27:06.839
<v Speaker 1>of Chinese layering, but not the inner

0:27:06.849 --> 0:27:07.270
<v Speaker 1>layers.

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:09.500
<v Speaker 2>And, and that's an ongoing debate and it's a very

0:27:09.510 --> 0:27:13.949
<v Speaker 2>contentious debate that is taking place in European countries in particular, right?

0:27:13.959 --> 0:27:19.189
<v Speaker 2>Where um you know, the the consensus is moving though

0:27:19.209 --> 0:27:23.750
<v Speaker 2>uh to the point to where nobody wants potentially adversarial

0:27:24.050 --> 0:27:29.670
<v Speaker 2>uh technology in the core of their networks anywhere uh to,

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:31.890
<v Speaker 2>you know, uh on if you peel, you know, if

0:27:31.900 --> 0:27:33.688
<v Speaker 2>you have, if you leave the outer layers of the

0:27:33.699 --> 0:27:37.209
<v Speaker 2>onion out there, um there's there's now increasing debate as

0:27:37.219 --> 0:27:39.250
<v Speaker 2>to who should be, who should be providing that kind

0:27:39.260 --> 0:27:40.619
<v Speaker 2>of technology. So

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:41.689
<v Speaker 2>um that

0:27:42.089 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 1>is out

0:27:43.900 --> 0:27:46.349
<v Speaker 2>and, and, but that's where the tech diplomacy takes place, right?

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:50.109
<v Speaker 2>That's where governments, you know, they have, they, they deal

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:53.130
<v Speaker 2>with pressure from in Washington, in particular, if we're talking

0:27:53.140 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 2>about Huawei.

0:27:54.530 --> 0:27:57.270
<v Speaker 1>Ok. So now let's come to the digital currency aspect.

0:27:57.479 --> 0:28:01.349
<v Speaker 1>So you see there being two sides of the same coin,

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:06.530
<v Speaker 1>the digital infrastructure diplomacy and then using the digital currency

0:28:06.540 --> 0:28:07.020
<v Speaker 1>as

0:28:07.430 --> 0:28:10.969
<v Speaker 1>a compliment uh additional offering if you will from the Chinese.

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:15.829
<v Speaker 2>Well, the the the the issue with, with digital money

0:28:15.839 --> 0:28:20.750
<v Speaker 2>uh or in particularly uh central bank backed digital currencies, right? As, as,

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:25.030
<v Speaker 2>as they become, as they sort of are rolled out

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:29.179
<v Speaker 2>if you will. Um is you're, you're dealing with um

0:28:29.290 --> 0:28:32.660
<v Speaker 2>a central bank of a of a sovereign state, basically

0:28:32.670 --> 0:28:36.569
<v Speaker 2>that is overseeing uh this particular currency. So

0:28:37.079 --> 0:28:41.780
<v Speaker 2>uh the question then becomes, is this a democratic state

0:28:42.319 --> 0:28:47.989
<v Speaker 2>that uh adheres to specific kinds of values, privacy values?

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:50.060
<v Speaker 2>How do you know how to use, how you know what,

0:28:50.069 --> 0:28:53.030
<v Speaker 2>what can be done once somebody's data is harvested to

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:55.780
<v Speaker 2>what may it be linked and applied? Can it be

0:28:55.790 --> 0:28:59.979
<v Speaker 2>applied to some kind of a social credit system essentially? Right?

0:28:59.989 --> 0:29:03.250
<v Speaker 2>Because our our commercial daily activities

0:29:03.689 --> 0:29:06.250
<v Speaker 2>uh that's our lifeblood, right? And if, if, if you

0:29:06.260 --> 0:29:08.239
<v Speaker 2>know if, if we can't buy a cup of coffee

0:29:08.250 --> 0:29:11.790
<v Speaker 2>or if we can't buy a train ticket because we've

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:15.949
<v Speaker 2>got a low social credit score, right? You know, that

0:29:15.959 --> 0:29:19.479
<v Speaker 2>is that's, that, that's a problem. Right. And certainly from a,

0:29:19.489 --> 0:29:23.260
<v Speaker 2>from a liberal democratic value standpoint, that's a problem. Right. So,

0:29:23.930 --> 0:29:26.770
<v Speaker 2>so I think we're, when, when we look at different

0:29:26.780 --> 0:29:29.670
<v Speaker 2>systems where we have a potential um

0:29:30.660 --> 0:29:35.170
<v Speaker 2>Chinese hegemony, uh digital money hegemony, particularly around uh around

0:29:35.180 --> 0:29:36.589
<v Speaker 2>the Belt and Road, some of the countries in the

0:29:36.599 --> 0:29:40.670
<v Speaker 2>Belt and Road. Um that's a, that's a, that's a train,

0:29:40.869 --> 0:29:44.290
<v Speaker 2>that's a head, head on train crash, right? Uh With, with,

0:29:44.300 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 2>with Western values when it comes to what kind of

0:29:46.410 --> 0:29:48.209
<v Speaker 2>money is used and how it's used and how that

0:29:48.219 --> 0:29:49.530
<v Speaker 2>data is used, right?

0:29:49.780 --> 0:29:52.750
<v Speaker 1>But there's so many countries in the world which run

0:29:52.760 --> 0:29:54.530
<v Speaker 1>large trade deficits vis A vis China

0:29:55.630 --> 0:29:56.250
<v Speaker 1>and

0:29:56.959 --> 0:29:59.969
<v Speaker 1>add to that the dynamic of weaponization of the US

0:29:59.979 --> 0:30:04.390
<v Speaker 1>dollar seizing the central bank assets of Afghanistan of Russia.

0:30:05.310 --> 0:30:07.729
<v Speaker 1>I would think that there would be actually increased motivation

0:30:07.739 --> 0:30:10.699
<v Speaker 1>for countries that have pretty deep trade relationship with China

0:30:10.709 --> 0:30:12.430
<v Speaker 1>and are a bit spooked by what the US has

0:30:12.439 --> 0:30:14.949
<v Speaker 1>done in recent years to reduce their reliance on the

0:30:14.959 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>US

0:30:15.170 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 1>dollar.

0:30:15.650 --> 0:30:17.829
<v Speaker 2>I totally agree. I, I think we're going to see,

0:30:17.839 --> 0:30:20.380
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we're seeing efforts and we're seeing a lot

0:30:20.390 --> 0:30:24.130
<v Speaker 2>of enthusiasm around de dollarization, right? And uh so I,

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:26.719
<v Speaker 2>I think I, I, well, the green back is going

0:30:26.729 --> 0:30:27.239
<v Speaker 2>to be,

0:30:27.650 --> 0:30:32.209
<v Speaker 2>ah, a very powerful reserve currency for decades to come,

0:30:32.319 --> 0:30:34.670
<v Speaker 2>but there clearly is an impetus right? There clearly is,

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:39.030
<v Speaker 2>is a very conscious effort to move away. And in

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 2>the process of doing that,

0:30:41.140 --> 0:30:44.709
<v Speaker 2>uh the rise of digital currencies bring, you know, bring

0:30:44.719 --> 0:30:47.180
<v Speaker 2>with them all kinds of issues,

0:30:47.189 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 1>right?

0:30:47.890 --> 0:30:48.079
<v Speaker 2>So

0:30:48.089 --> 0:30:48.150
<v Speaker 1>the

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:50.530
<v Speaker 1>funny thing, Alex is that while we're discussing this in

0:30:50.540 --> 0:30:52.599
<v Speaker 1>the context of frontier technology,

0:30:52.989 --> 0:30:56.300
<v Speaker 1>the biggest beneficiary of this motivation to de dollarization is

0:30:56.310 --> 0:30:59.310
<v Speaker 1>actually an old asset, which is gold. That's the thing

0:30:59.319 --> 0:31:01.619
<v Speaker 1>that has rallied in the last couple of years, unlike

0:31:01.630 --> 0:31:04.869
<v Speaker 1>any other things. Whereas you know, cryptos they go up

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:07.469
<v Speaker 1>and down CBD CS, the things that we you and

0:31:07.479 --> 0:31:09.329
<v Speaker 1>I are talking about is still a work in progress.

0:31:09.339 --> 0:31:11.510
<v Speaker 1>We're not sure whether the Chinese or any other country

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:17.050
<v Speaker 1>would really be enthusiastically replacing their paper currency with digital currency,

0:31:17.060 --> 0:31:18.890
<v Speaker 1>but the potential is certainly there.

0:31:19.300 --> 0:31:25.530
<v Speaker 1>Um OK, so that takes me to the transatlantic alliance,

0:31:25.540 --> 0:31:29.119
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned earlier that Europe and both at the government

0:31:29.130 --> 0:31:31.500
<v Speaker 1>and corporate level, there is some degree of, you know,

0:31:31.510 --> 0:31:35.060
<v Speaker 1>rethinking about how to engage with China on the US.

0:31:35.069 --> 0:31:37.239
<v Speaker 1>We've seen it already pretty clear there is no daylight

0:31:37.250 --> 0:31:41.530
<v Speaker 1>between the Democrats and Republicans. Everybody is becoming pretty antagonistic

0:31:41.540 --> 0:31:45.150
<v Speaker 1>to Chinese technology. So how are the Europeans thinking? How

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:47.689
<v Speaker 1>are the Americans thinking in terms of their collaboration?

0:31:48.260 --> 0:31:51.310
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so there there are different views on this, right?

0:31:51.319 --> 0:31:54.569
<v Speaker 2>So the the the diehard neo li uh you know,

0:31:54.579 --> 0:31:57.719
<v Speaker 2>basically look at all of these, these big initiatives like

0:31:57.729 --> 0:32:00.050
<v Speaker 2>the Chips and Science Act, you know, the chips for

0:32:00.060 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 2>America Act, which are big subsidies for um the semiconductor

0:32:04.290 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 2>sector to reso or bring back fabrication to the United

0:32:07.650 --> 0:32:11.219
<v Speaker 2>States government subsidized. Uh They look at things like that,

0:32:11.229 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 2>they look at things like the um

0:32:13.650 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 2>the uh the Ira Act, right? Which is, which is the,

0:32:17.989 --> 0:32:20.010
<v Speaker 2>the Inflation Reduction Act, which has a lot of buyer

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 2>and it has a lot of subsidies and sweeteners for

0:32:23.410 --> 0:32:26.989
<v Speaker 2>companies to, to, to move things home and, and, and, and, and, and,

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:31.359
<v Speaker 2>and do production that otherwise they may have offshored somewhere else.

0:32:31.829 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 2>So the neo, the, the neo liberal argument says, look,

0:32:34.650 --> 0:32:36.569
<v Speaker 2>this is a race to the bottom, right? Because it's

0:32:36.579 --> 0:32:40.270
<v Speaker 2>not just the US that is offering these kinds of subsidies.

0:32:40.430 --> 0:32:42.790
<v Speaker 2>But now, of course, then the Europeans have to respond

0:32:42.800 --> 0:32:44.579
<v Speaker 2>and like, and the South Koreans have to do the

0:32:44.589 --> 0:32:46.530
<v Speaker 2>same thing. And all of the, you know, all of

0:32:46.540 --> 0:32:49.609
<v Speaker 2>these regions are in fact putting up big, big amounts

0:32:49.619 --> 0:32:53.790
<v Speaker 2>of money, particularly for semiconductors. But I would say that

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:55.849
<v Speaker 2>that it's not a race to the bottom and that,

0:32:55.859 --> 0:32:57.719
<v Speaker 2>and we have not seen that. Yes, there have been

0:32:57.729 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 2>European companies that have gone to the US,

0:33:00.410 --> 0:33:02.750
<v Speaker 2>but there are us companies that are still looking to

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:06.489
<v Speaker 2>invest in Europe, right? We look at Intel, for example,

0:33:06.650 --> 0:33:08.579
<v Speaker 2>you know, Intel is a little bit stalled in some

0:33:08.589 --> 0:33:12.869
<v Speaker 2>of their efforts, but nonetheless, uh they'll get on track, right. They,

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:14.579
<v Speaker 2>you know, to do a lot of a lot more

0:33:14.589 --> 0:33:18.989
<v Speaker 2>research and development and actually fabrication in in Europe. And they,

0:33:19.000 --> 0:33:23.609
<v Speaker 2>and they will avail themselves of European money basically. So,

0:33:23.729 --> 0:33:24.469
<v Speaker 2>so I think

0:33:25.349 --> 0:33:28.359
<v Speaker 2>that will happen. Um now

0:33:29.630 --> 0:33:33.140
<v Speaker 2>there, there, there's no doubt that that as we see

0:33:33.150 --> 0:33:39.599
<v Speaker 2>this reconfiguration, this restructuring around strategic supply chains, that more

0:33:39.609 --> 0:33:43.569
<v Speaker 2>and more innovation and more and more investment is concentrating

0:33:43.689 --> 0:33:46.410
<v Speaker 2>in these different nodes that otherwise may have been spread

0:33:46.420 --> 0:33:48.449
<v Speaker 2>out a little bit more, you know, in a much

0:33:48.459 --> 0:33:52.290
<v Speaker 2>more open trading, less geo economic paradigm.

0:33:52.969 --> 0:33:54.770
<v Speaker 2>Um So in that respect,

0:33:55.359 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 2>um certainly developing countries that may have had, you know,

0:34:00.290 --> 0:34:03.319
<v Speaker 2>may have been playing a bigger role in global value chains,

0:34:03.329 --> 0:34:07.109
<v Speaker 2>they're losing out that, that, that clearly is happening. Um

0:34:07.119 --> 0:34:11.100
<v Speaker 2>So the, so the renaissance, if you will uh the

0:34:11.110 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 2>the technology and the innovation renaissance, which is happening because

0:34:14.530 --> 0:34:17.449
<v Speaker 2>of the public, private partnerships that are being so well

0:34:17.459 --> 0:34:21.699
<v Speaker 2>funded in these nodes, right? That's happening.

0:34:22.290 --> 0:34:24.229
<v Speaker 2>And yes, there is going to be there is going

0:34:24.239 --> 0:34:26.870
<v Speaker 2>to be economic opportunity in those places, but it's going

0:34:26.879 --> 0:34:28.189
<v Speaker 2>to be a lot more uneven,

0:34:29.260 --> 0:34:32.319
<v Speaker 1>right? But is there alignment full alignment between the Americans

0:34:32.330 --> 0:34:34.419
<v Speaker 1>and the Europeans on how to deal with China? No,

0:34:34.459 --> 0:34:34.729
<v Speaker 2>no.

0:34:34.739 --> 0:34:38.629
<v Speaker 1>Has the alignment improved in the last 3.5 years under Biden?

0:34:38.649 --> 0:34:39.219
<v Speaker 1>I I

0:34:39.229 --> 0:34:42.020
<v Speaker 2>think uh I think you have to go country by

0:34:42.030 --> 0:34:45.549
<v Speaker 2>country in Europe, right? The Germans are really struggling, right?

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:49.009
<v Speaker 2>They're really divided because they've had just a core, small

0:34:49.020 --> 0:34:53.949
<v Speaker 2>group of companies that have invested very, very heavily right in, in,

0:34:53.959 --> 0:34:57.919
<v Speaker 2>in China. Right. Siemens and the auto, the big automotive companies,

0:34:58.280 --> 0:35:00.610
<v Speaker 1>their, their global sales come from China. Yeah, that's right.

0:35:00.620 --> 0:35:01.239
<v Speaker 1>BMW s of

0:35:01.250 --> 0:35:05.639
<v Speaker 2>the world. Exactly. Exactly. They bet big right. Under Chancellor Merkel. Um,

0:35:05.649 --> 0:35:08.580
<v Speaker 2>they really bet big on China and, and, but then

0:35:08.590 --> 0:35:12.408
<v Speaker 2>if you look at sort of the middle tier companies

0:35:12.419 --> 0:35:16.330
<v Speaker 2>in Germany and you look at, you know, uh the labor,

0:35:16.340 --> 0:35:19.819
<v Speaker 2>you know, the the labor pool there, um they want,

0:35:20.149 --> 0:35:22.359
<v Speaker 2>they want jobs to come back to Germany, they want

0:35:22.370 --> 0:35:25.299
<v Speaker 2>more investment to, you know, to, to sort of gravitate

0:35:25.310 --> 0:35:28.330
<v Speaker 2>in the tech sector uh to, to Germany. So that

0:35:28.340 --> 0:35:32.629
<v Speaker 2>Germany is one example. Um So again, I think I

0:35:32.639 --> 0:35:35.399
<v Speaker 2>mentioned early on there is no way to analyze this

0:35:35.409 --> 0:35:39.790
<v Speaker 2>whole situation through a zero sum uh you know, kind

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:42.370
<v Speaker 2>of lens, right? It's, there's just, there's so many different

0:35:42.379 --> 0:35:46.330
<v Speaker 2>overlapping interests, some peop some lose some win.

0:35:46.800 --> 0:35:49.070
<v Speaker 2>Uh There's a great deal of, of uncertainty, but I

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:55.219
<v Speaker 2>think in general, I think in general the transatlantic um relationship,

0:35:55.389 --> 0:35:57.759
<v Speaker 2>of course, we have some elections coming up here, right?

0:35:58.659 --> 0:36:01.260
<v Speaker 2>Just a few. Just yes. So we have a big

0:36:01.270 --> 0:36:04.669
<v Speaker 2>presidential election coming up. Uh You know, III I would

0:36:04.679 --> 0:36:08.159
<v Speaker 2>say this uh I think uh uh a Trump two

0:36:08.169 --> 0:36:10.899
<v Speaker 2>term I think would, would put much more strain on

0:36:10.909 --> 0:36:14.979
<v Speaker 2>the transatlantic relationship. Of course, because of his tariff plans

0:36:14.989 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 2>and so forth

0:36:15.919 --> 0:36:21.010
<v Speaker 2>than a Harris uh administration. But having said that there

0:36:21.020 --> 0:36:26.639
<v Speaker 2>still are too many uh uh mutual interests across the Atlantic.

0:36:27.070 --> 0:36:32.260
<v Speaker 2>Uh you know, uh interests around A I standards, basically

0:36:32.270 --> 0:36:37.899
<v Speaker 2>rule frameworks around tech interests to, to cooper on supply

0:36:37.909 --> 0:36:43.260
<v Speaker 2>chain resilience around critical minerals, rare earths uh

0:36:43.639 --> 0:36:48.580
<v Speaker 2>uh incentives. I think uh I mentioned this a around semiconductors.

0:36:48.969 --> 0:36:52.620
<v Speaker 2>Uh I think there are incentives uh around, you know,

0:36:52.629 --> 0:36:56.540
<v Speaker 2>things like lithium batteries and, and electric vehicles and so forth.

0:36:56.550 --> 0:36:58.179
<v Speaker 2>So I think there are, there still are quite a

0:36:58.189 --> 0:37:01.580
<v Speaker 2>few incentives and then of course, there's the NATO angle

0:37:01.590 --> 0:37:03.779
<v Speaker 2>and the security angle when it comes to Ukraine.

0:37:04.389 --> 0:37:08.279
<v Speaker 2>Um So II, I think, I think the transatlantic relationship will,

0:37:08.290 --> 0:37:09.319
<v Speaker 2>will be just fine.

0:37:09.610 --> 0:37:11.469
<v Speaker 1>I want to stay on that for a second because

0:37:11.479 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 1>you made a, you know, great premise, which is that

0:37:14.570 --> 0:37:16.888
<v Speaker 1>we should look at country by country. The European Union

0:37:16.899 --> 0:37:19.879
<v Speaker 1>is not a single entity. There are countries, especially on

0:37:19.889 --> 0:37:21.820
<v Speaker 1>the eastern side of the European Union, which are very

0:37:21.830 --> 0:37:24.030
<v Speaker 1>friendly to China and then there are others who are not.

0:37:24.449 --> 0:37:27.770
<v Speaker 1>Um So is there a risk that eu itself could

0:37:27.780 --> 0:37:30.919
<v Speaker 1>fracture as a result of the US China conflict?

0:37:31.820 --> 0:37:35.860
<v Speaker 2>Um There's always a risk that, you know, when you

0:37:35.870 --> 0:37:38.969
<v Speaker 2>have a uh a union or certainly a customs union

0:37:38.979 --> 0:37:42.080
<v Speaker 2>that big uh when, when you have a block of

0:37:42.090 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 2>countries that big. Yes. Uh There's always a risk of that. And,

0:37:46.090 --> 0:37:47.939
<v Speaker 2>and I totally agree. I mean, I think, you know,

0:37:47.949 --> 0:37:51.479
<v Speaker 2>if you look at the eastern eastern European countries, they're

0:37:51.489 --> 0:37:55.389
<v Speaker 2>very eager to absorb investments, you know, from China, they're

0:37:55.399 --> 0:38:00.199
<v Speaker 2>very eager for infrastructure. Um uh But at the end

0:38:00.209 --> 0:38:00.840
<v Speaker 2>of the day,

0:38:02.310 --> 0:38:06.449
<v Speaker 2>I think there is a tipping point uh even in

0:38:06.459 --> 0:38:10.770
<v Speaker 2>eastern Europe, when uh the view becomes that, that any

0:38:10.780 --> 0:38:13.370
<v Speaker 2>outside power, China or anybody else, in this case, of course,

0:38:13.379 --> 0:38:17.199
<v Speaker 2>it's China is overstepping its bounds when it comes to

0:38:17.209 --> 0:38:20.399
<v Speaker 2>trying to exert influence. And we've seen that we've seen

0:38:20.409 --> 0:38:23.889
<v Speaker 2>that over the last decade, particularly during the COVID crisis, right.

0:38:24.399 --> 0:38:28.570
<v Speaker 2>So uh even that uh I think we, you know,

0:38:28.580 --> 0:38:31.129
<v Speaker 2>we will, we will, we will continue to see,

0:38:31.860 --> 0:38:33.540
<v Speaker 2>you know, if I had to make a prediction of,

0:38:33.550 --> 0:38:35.569
<v Speaker 2>you know, what the global economy is going to look

0:38:35.580 --> 0:38:38.399
<v Speaker 2>like from a supply chain standpoint over the next decade,

0:38:38.909 --> 0:38:39.959
<v Speaker 2>I would say that

0:38:40.830 --> 0:38:47.100
<v Speaker 2>what is deemed desking today uh with from strategic Chinese

0:38:47.110 --> 0:38:50.770
<v Speaker 2>or single source kind of Chinese supply chains that DERIS

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:54.500
<v Speaker 2>is going to slowly evolve into decoupling

0:38:55.199 --> 0:38:59.580
<v Speaker 2>essentially. And we'll just see those supply chains basically coalesce,

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:02.629
<v Speaker 2>you know, under different in different regions.

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:05.899
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious to see what happens to the EV supply chain.

0:39:05.939 --> 0:39:11.839
<v Speaker 1>If Chinese companies invest in Hungary and Poland and Turkey

0:39:12.020 --> 0:39:15.790
<v Speaker 1>and starts making B DS and other cars, they should

0:39:15.800 --> 0:39:19.469
<v Speaker 1>be credible within Europe under eu rules of origin

0:39:19.770 --> 0:39:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and they should be classified as made in Europe cars.

0:39:22.770 --> 0:39:26.919
<v Speaker 1>But clearly in the context of U MC, the Americans

0:39:26.929 --> 0:39:28.129
<v Speaker 1>have said they are not going to accept that, that

0:39:28.139 --> 0:39:30.360
<v Speaker 1>even if we already make something in Mexico, it will

0:39:30.370 --> 0:39:34.000
<v Speaker 1>be considered a made in China car. So I can

0:39:34.010 --> 0:39:36.340
<v Speaker 1>sort of think about this alignment that if you are

0:39:36.350 --> 0:39:39.479
<v Speaker 1>more open to investment in the EU than the US

0:39:39.489 --> 0:39:40.790
<v Speaker 1>is within the U MC A.

0:39:41.159 --> 0:39:42.969
<v Speaker 1>Uh how do these things?

0:39:43.260 --> 0:39:46.810
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, look there uh this is just playing out. Now, now,

0:39:46.820 --> 0:39:50.779
<v Speaker 2>one thing I would say about um sort of the, the,

0:39:50.790 --> 0:39:54.600
<v Speaker 2>the the the movement of, of, in this case, Chinese

0:39:54.610 --> 0:39:59.419
<v Speaker 2>electric vehicle assembly, uh manufacturing, you know, out of China into,

0:39:59.429 --> 0:40:00.739
<v Speaker 2>into the European Union.

0:40:01.510 --> 0:40:04.639
<v Speaker 2>Um what is still going to be a very contentious issue,

0:40:04.649 --> 0:40:07.709
<v Speaker 2>there is going to be the fact that they may

0:40:07.719 --> 0:40:10.649
<v Speaker 2>be assembling the cars there. But if all the parts

0:40:10.659 --> 0:40:15.189
<v Speaker 2>and components are also still coming from China, then I

0:40:15.199 --> 0:40:17.770
<v Speaker 2>think we're going to run into issues around local content

0:40:17.780 --> 0:40:21.830
<v Speaker 2>requirements and we're already hearing about that, right? So, you know,

0:40:21.840 --> 0:40:23.639
<v Speaker 2>if you look at uh if you look at a

0:40:23.649 --> 0:40:28.370
<v Speaker 2>typical uh free trade agreement that in that involves automotive,

0:40:28.379 --> 0:40:30.290
<v Speaker 2>um they're usually pretty high

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:34.699
<v Speaker 2>local content requirements or even local labor, uh you know,

0:40:34.709 --> 0:40:37.639
<v Speaker 2>the US MC A which is the, you know, us,

0:40:37.649 --> 0:40:42.850
<v Speaker 2>Canada Mexico replacement of what was used with NAFTA. Um

0:40:43.179 --> 0:40:46.529
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they've, they've, they've got in very, very high,

0:40:46.540 --> 0:40:52.229
<v Speaker 2>um you know, local origin content, uh requirements that even include,

0:40:52.479 --> 0:40:55.959
<v Speaker 2>you know, you know, proving that uh that, that labor

0:40:55.969 --> 0:40:59.260
<v Speaker 2>was paid a certain wage. Right. So I, I think

0:40:59.590 --> 0:41:01.610
<v Speaker 2>you, you might call it a non tariff barrier if

0:41:01.620 --> 0:41:04.729
<v Speaker 2>you want. You know, technically, but II, I think

0:41:05.590 --> 0:41:07.750
<v Speaker 2>no matter what happens in eastern Europe, as long as

0:41:07.760 --> 0:41:10.669
<v Speaker 2>it's part of the, the union, um there's going to

0:41:10.679 --> 0:41:16.010
<v Speaker 2>be pretty strong push back uh about about moving uh

0:41:16.030 --> 0:41:17.429
<v Speaker 2>you know Chinese uh

0:41:17.929 --> 0:41:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Chinese cars into that into that

0:41:20.770 --> 0:41:21.100
<v Speaker 2>region,

0:41:21.110 --> 0:41:24.399
<v Speaker 1>right? So there is like general assembly, there is full

0:41:24.409 --> 0:41:27.070
<v Speaker 1>kit assembly and there is manufacturing. I'm learning about this

0:41:27.080 --> 0:41:30.549
<v Speaker 1>because I'm thinking about phone Apple phones being made in

0:41:30.560 --> 0:41:33.590
<v Speaker 1>India or assembled in India debate. Uh And and I'm

0:41:33.600 --> 0:41:36.639
<v Speaker 1>sure for the EV same thing comes up. Uh Alex,

0:41:36.649 --> 0:41:39.060
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about substation in India momentarily, but

0:41:39.070 --> 0:41:42.669
<v Speaker 1>just a couple of words on this race for innovation.

0:41:43.620 --> 0:41:47.609
<v Speaker 1>So chips, for example, the US remains the undisputed leader

0:41:47.620 --> 0:41:50.909
<v Speaker 1>in the world in chip design, East Asia is the

0:41:50.919 --> 0:41:53.679
<v Speaker 1>undisputed leader in the world in chip manufacturing. But the

0:41:53.689 --> 0:41:56.399
<v Speaker 1>design which is the highest value added comes from the US.

0:41:56.409 --> 0:41:58.459
<v Speaker 1>The best innovation on the chip side come from the

0:41:58.469 --> 0:41:58.929
<v Speaker 1>US

0:41:59.689 --> 0:42:02.830
<v Speaker 1>Europe has pockets of excellence. You talked about a SML earlier.

0:42:02.840 --> 0:42:04.560
<v Speaker 1>A SML itself is a function of a bunch of

0:42:04.570 --> 0:42:08.580
<v Speaker 1>other excellent companies, you know, Carl Zeiss Lens and Siemens Laser.

0:42:08.590 --> 0:42:13.229
<v Speaker 1>All going into the capabilities that A SML develops. Um

0:42:13.239 --> 0:42:16.989
<v Speaker 1>We don't hear as much about cutting edge innovation coming

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:21.350
<v Speaker 1>out of China in green transition. Some uh and to

0:42:21.360 --> 0:42:22.709
<v Speaker 1>your point earlier that

0:42:23.179 --> 0:42:28.100
<v Speaker 1>buying up lots of dvs and then making up to

0:42:28.110 --> 0:42:30.780
<v Speaker 1>seven nanometers perhaps in five can be done by the

0:42:30.790 --> 0:42:34.439
<v Speaker 1>Chinese at a low year nonetheless. But has this, this

0:42:34.449 --> 0:42:38.370
<v Speaker 1>entire trade tech war led to widening of the tech

0:42:38.379 --> 0:42:40.800
<v Speaker 1>gap between the US and Chinese already?

0:42:41.879 --> 0:42:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Uh Well, let's let's stick with the semiconductor uh discussion, right?

0:42:45.530 --> 0:42:47.040
<v Speaker 2>I think it's good. So I, I think when you

0:42:47.050 --> 0:42:50.799
<v Speaker 2>talk about semiconductors, you really have to be careful to

0:42:50.810 --> 0:42:55.129
<v Speaker 2>make that distinction between advanced semiconductors and sort of

0:42:56.169 --> 0:42:58.239
<v Speaker 2>for lack of a better term, we'll call it legacy.

0:42:58.300 --> 0:42:59.820
<v Speaker 1>So leading versus lagging

0:43:00.060 --> 0:43:02.299
<v Speaker 2>edge versus lagging edge and some people don't like the

0:43:02.310 --> 0:43:05.110
<v Speaker 2>term lagging edge, especially, you know, big, even big Western

0:43:05.120 --> 0:43:08.129
<v Speaker 2>companies that are making so called lagging edge. So, but

0:43:08.370 --> 0:43:12.239
<v Speaker 2>um so I think that's a really important distinction. Um

0:43:12.250 --> 0:43:16.879
<v Speaker 2>So if, if we're talking about um China or anyone

0:43:16.889 --> 0:43:19.580
<v Speaker 2>else being anywhere near what a SML can do when

0:43:19.590 --> 0:43:21.459
<v Speaker 2>it comes to extreme ultraviolet,

0:43:22.969 --> 0:43:27.879
<v Speaker 2>a decade, two decades, maybe never, right? Because you know,

0:43:27.889 --> 0:43:30.159
<v Speaker 2>this is not a, this is not a stationary target,

0:43:30.479 --> 0:43:33.219
<v Speaker 2>this is, you know, Moore's law is still alive, right?

0:43:33.610 --> 0:43:37.169
<v Speaker 2>Uh uh And, and so it's just so incredibly complex

0:43:37.179 --> 0:43:39.060
<v Speaker 2>and hard and you need to have the right partners.

0:43:39.409 --> 0:43:41.810
<v Speaker 2>It's that ecosystem, right? And if you can't get that

0:43:41.820 --> 0:43:42.899
<v Speaker 2>full ecosystem,

0:43:43.320 --> 0:43:47.879
<v Speaker 2>it's almost an impossibility. But if we're talking about trailing edge,

0:43:48.189 --> 0:43:52.540
<v Speaker 2>um then, then I think China uh is uh uh

0:43:52.550 --> 0:43:55.340
<v Speaker 2>already a player and is going to be a much,

0:43:55.350 --> 0:43:58.610
<v Speaker 2>much bigger player in terms of global supply. Uh And

0:43:58.620 --> 0:43:59.520
<v Speaker 2>if you think about it,

0:44:00.110 --> 0:44:02.439
<v Speaker 2>um the innovation that you talked about, there is a

0:44:02.449 --> 0:44:04.770
<v Speaker 2>lot of innovation taking place in China. There's no question

0:44:04.780 --> 0:44:05.489
<v Speaker 2>about it. So

0:44:05.500 --> 0:44:06.199
<v Speaker 1>you don't have

0:44:06.209 --> 0:44:09.830
<v Speaker 1>to have leading edge processors to do innovation.

0:44:09.840 --> 0:44:10.179
<v Speaker 2>Not

0:44:10.189 --> 0:44:12.139
<v Speaker 2>at all, not at all. I mean, you need it

0:44:12.149 --> 0:44:14.379
<v Speaker 2>for leading edge A I, right? So if you want

0:44:14.389 --> 0:44:17.040
<v Speaker 2>to do machine learning and like large language models and

0:44:17.050 --> 0:44:19.699
<v Speaker 2>that sort of thing, you need to have cutting edge

0:44:19.709 --> 0:44:22.090
<v Speaker 2>A I, right? And you need cutting edge A I but,

0:44:22.300 --> 0:44:26.649
<v Speaker 2>but for even relatively sophisticated weapons systems,

0:44:26.929 --> 0:44:32.009
<v Speaker 2>uh for almost all consumer electronics, you don't need leading edge, right?

0:44:32.020 --> 0:44:34.899
<v Speaker 2>I mean, and so Apple, you know, the, the, you know,

0:44:34.909 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 2>a as it pushes the, the, the, the the boundaries

0:44:37.570 --> 0:44:41.850
<v Speaker 2>with its iphone, uh a Tesla, for example, you know, you,

0:44:41.860 --> 0:44:44.149
<v Speaker 2>I guess you can put in more and more advanced

0:44:44.159 --> 0:44:46.580
<v Speaker 2>technology because it's a computer on wheels, right? Depending on

0:44:46.590 --> 0:44:48.510
<v Speaker 2>what you want it to do other than just drive around.

0:44:48.949 --> 0:44:51.840
<v Speaker 2>But um but, but you know, if you look at,

0:44:52.439 --> 0:44:54.799
<v Speaker 2>if you look at medicine, uh you know, he medicine

0:44:54.810 --> 0:44:57.719
<v Speaker 2>and health care, if you look at basic communications. If

0:44:57.729 --> 0:45:00.669
<v Speaker 2>you look at most consumer electronics, most of that, there's

0:45:00.679 --> 0:45:04.138
<v Speaker 2>a huge market for lagging edge tips.

0:45:05.510 --> 0:45:08.199
<v Speaker 1>And I think the lighting it chips are also a

0:45:08.209 --> 0:45:11.179
<v Speaker 1>pretty important component of the entire green transition wave that

0:45:11.189 --> 0:45:16.350
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing. So building smart wind turbines, building new age

0:45:16.360 --> 0:45:19.120
<v Speaker 1>solar cells. Again, you don't need three nanometer chips for them,

0:45:19.300 --> 0:45:22.909
<v Speaker 1>but you can have tremendous value addition and sources of

0:45:22.979 --> 0:45:27.889
<v Speaker 1>jobs and profitability and market share just through pushing that

0:45:28.280 --> 0:45:31.179
<v Speaker 1>that line of technology. Um

0:45:32.620 --> 0:45:35.729
<v Speaker 1>in terms of Southeast Asia, you know, that our mutual

0:45:35.739 --> 0:45:37.939
<v Speaker 1>friend Charlie Ormiston and I, we worked on a project

0:45:37.949 --> 0:45:40.070
<v Speaker 1>together with a bunch of analysts from D BS and

0:45:40.080 --> 0:45:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Bain and company. Uh and we wrote a report on

0:45:43.050 --> 0:45:44.179
<v Speaker 1>Southeast Asia's outlook.

0:45:44.840 --> 0:45:47.580
<v Speaker 1>So I want to hear your view on subs Asia

0:45:47.590 --> 0:45:51.408
<v Speaker 1>as you know, we feel that the techno nationalism will

0:45:51.419 --> 0:45:54.149
<v Speaker 1>have some winners and losers to your point earlier. And

0:45:54.159 --> 0:45:57.529
<v Speaker 1>we can we see this region being a winner? Do

0:45:57.540 --> 0:46:00.189
<v Speaker 1>you see that as an unqualified argument or do you

0:46:00.199 --> 0:46:01.669
<v Speaker 1>think that there are some ifs and buts around

0:46:01.679 --> 0:46:02.030
<v Speaker 1>that?

0:46:02.189 --> 0:46:03.979
<v Speaker 2>II, I would agree and I thought it was a

0:46:03.989 --> 0:46:06.529
<v Speaker 2>good report, of course. And I went to the presentation,

0:46:06.540 --> 0:46:08.510
<v Speaker 2>I did listen to your presentation.

0:46:09.520 --> 0:46:12.169
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I, I would absolutely agree with it because of course,

0:46:12.179 --> 0:46:16.219
<v Speaker 2>Southeast Asia is a very uneven economic landscape right there.

0:46:16.229 --> 0:46:19.830
<v Speaker 2>You know, you've got the, the original four right countries, Singapore,

0:46:19.840 --> 0:46:22.859
<v Speaker 2>of course, you know, being right at the top. Um

0:46:23.149 --> 0:46:24.909
<v Speaker 2>so it will be uneven. So if you look at

0:46:24.919 --> 0:46:27.840
<v Speaker 2>uh in the electronic sector, for example, um you know,

0:46:27.850 --> 0:46:33.810
<v Speaker 2>where they're uh interestingly enough as these uh these as

0:46:33.820 --> 0:46:35.969
<v Speaker 2>supply chains um

0:46:36.520 --> 0:46:39.399
<v Speaker 2>move or, you know, derisk or decouple out of China,

0:46:39.409 --> 0:46:41.649
<v Speaker 2>you know, they're going to, of course, Vietnam, right, they're

0:46:41.659 --> 0:46:45.139
<v Speaker 2>going to Malaysia, some of it's coming to Singapore uh

0:46:45.149 --> 0:46:45.560
<v Speaker 2>and so

0:46:45.570 --> 0:46:45.739
<v Speaker 2>on,

0:46:45.750 --> 0:46:48.429
<v Speaker 1>surprising amount coming to Singapore. So

0:46:48.709 --> 0:46:52.649
<v Speaker 2>not so surprising. Uh, you know, III I think Singapore certainly,

0:46:53.040 --> 0:46:53.739
<v Speaker 2>um

0:46:54.709 --> 0:46:57.770
<v Speaker 2>you know, provides a good environment uh for some of

0:46:57.780 --> 0:47:00.469
<v Speaker 2>the high end, you know, certainly memory chips and sort

0:47:00.479 --> 0:47:03.429
<v Speaker 2>of expanding the, the, the chip, the chip sector. Although

0:47:03.439 --> 0:47:06.770
<v Speaker 2>that's a very, uh that's a, that's a very discreet

0:47:06.780 --> 0:47:10.010
<v Speaker 2>topic here, right? Uh Nobody wants to really admit that that,

0:47:10.020 --> 0:47:11.989
<v Speaker 2>you know, a lot of that is coming to Singapore

0:47:12.000 --> 0:47:13.609
<v Speaker 2>because nobody wants to really offend

0:47:14.169 --> 0:47:16.110
<v Speaker 2>the Chinese in particular, but the

0:47:16.120 --> 0:47:18.750
<v Speaker 1>country remains one of the major players in lagging edge,

0:47:18.760 --> 0:47:19.909
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing and exports.

0:47:19.919 --> 0:47:20.069
<v Speaker 2>That's,

0:47:20.080 --> 0:47:21.989
<v Speaker 2>that's exactly right. So I think there's gonna be more

0:47:22.000 --> 0:47:24.810
<v Speaker 2>activity there, certainly around A I, that's a big part

0:47:24.820 --> 0:47:29.469
<v Speaker 2>of Singapore's uh future, right? They're, they're, they're, they're hedging

0:47:29.699 --> 0:47:32.340
<v Speaker 2>or they're, they're betting I should say big on, on

0:47:32.350 --> 0:47:35.350
<v Speaker 2>being a player in that regard. Um Yeah, so I,

0:47:35.360 --> 0:47:36.790
<v Speaker 2>I think I, I think

0:47:37.469 --> 0:47:44.009
<v Speaker 2>the necessity to, um to derisk Taiwan from a chip

0:47:44.020 --> 0:47:47.770
<v Speaker 2>perspective where you have literally one company, one company making 90%

0:47:47.780 --> 0:47:51.529
<v Speaker 2>of the world's most advanced chips as a subcontractor and 60%

0:47:51.659 --> 0:47:54.229
<v Speaker 2>of all of the world's chips. I mean, that's just not,

0:47:54.280 --> 0:47:57.610
<v Speaker 2>that's just simply not sustainable, right? That just can't be.

0:47:57.820 --> 0:47:59.729
<v Speaker 1>So we can talk about Apple, we can talk about.

0:48:00.159 --> 0:48:03.819
<v Speaker 1>But Maiden Taiwan made by TS MC, made by

0:48:03.830 --> 0:48:06.270
<v Speaker 2>TS MC, I mean, that's, you know, so, so the

0:48:06.280 --> 0:48:10.020
<v Speaker 2>tech diplomacy that I mentioned earlier is about, you know,

0:48:10.030 --> 0:48:13.290
<v Speaker 2>getting them to build plants, not just in Arizona, but

0:48:13.300 --> 0:48:15.719
<v Speaker 2>in Germany and other parts of the world. And I

0:48:15.729 --> 0:48:16.178
<v Speaker 2>think

0:48:16.800 --> 0:48:20.929
<v Speaker 2>um the uh from the the lagging edge side, uh

0:48:20.939 --> 0:48:24.500
<v Speaker 2>we'll see more and more of that again, being restored

0:48:24.790 --> 0:48:29.000
<v Speaker 2>uh again within II I hate this term friend shoring, right?

0:48:29.310 --> 0:48:31.979
<v Speaker 2>But e essentially what it means is a much more

0:48:31.989 --> 0:48:37.110
<v Speaker 2>reliable uh partnership, right? Um So, uh but so, so

0:48:37.120 --> 0:48:39.979
<v Speaker 2>Southeast Asia, I think it's, it's gonna be very uneven

0:48:40.409 --> 0:48:43.520
<v Speaker 2>from a, from a, from a tech standpoint. Um And

0:48:43.530 --> 0:48:43.860
<v Speaker 2>then

0:48:44.250 --> 0:48:46.590
<v Speaker 2>I know you want to talk about this. Um You know,

0:48:46.600 --> 0:48:50.638
<v Speaker 2>is there a linkage to India? Right? Is there, is

0:48:50.649 --> 0:48:54.739
<v Speaker 2>there a corridor that links Southeast Asia more to India, right?

0:48:54.750 --> 0:48:57.929
<v Speaker 2>When it comes to again, trailing edge chips and there,

0:48:57.939 --> 0:49:01.089
<v Speaker 2>I think uh Malaysia is a very interesting country and

0:49:01.100 --> 0:49:03.669
<v Speaker 2>I think if there is um if, if India is

0:49:03.679 --> 0:49:08.250
<v Speaker 2>gonna have competition, if India is able to pursue its

0:49:08.260 --> 0:49:12.030
<v Speaker 2>hopes and dreams of establishing a, a trailing edge,

0:49:12.379 --> 0:49:16.179
<v Speaker 2>uh sort of manufacturing base and they, there's activity going

0:49:16.189 --> 0:49:18.479
<v Speaker 2>on in that area. I think Malaysia is going to

0:49:18.489 --> 0:49:20.459
<v Speaker 2>give them a run for their money. Alex.

0:49:20.469 --> 0:49:23.889
<v Speaker 1>I'm really surprised by the developments out of Malaysia. I

0:49:23.899 --> 0:49:26.409
<v Speaker 1>think when we started writing our Southeast Asia report at

0:49:26.419 --> 0:49:27.399
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of this year,

0:49:28.100 --> 0:49:31.439
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't that seriously taking Malaysia's prospects. I have changed

0:49:31.449 --> 0:49:35.399
<v Speaker 1>my mind dramatically over the last 89 months. And in

0:49:35.409 --> 0:49:38.340
<v Speaker 1>my recent trip to Kuala Lumpur also reinforced that view

0:49:38.350 --> 0:49:43.270
<v Speaker 1>that you actually have now interregional competition within Malaysia from

0:49:43.280 --> 0:49:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Penang to Cyberjaya to Johor. They are all

0:49:45.675 --> 0:49:50.274
<v Speaker 1>competing for the tech dollars and you have now the

0:49:50.284 --> 0:49:54.175
<v Speaker 1>Western companies, the Chinese companies and the Indians, everybody is

0:49:54.185 --> 0:49:57.274
<v Speaker 1>sort of flocking to Malaysia for the know how for

0:49:57.284 --> 0:50:00.475
<v Speaker 1>their abandoned land and water and electricity. It seemed like

0:50:00.485 --> 0:50:05.895
<v Speaker 1>a very fertile ground for data centers and fabs. And

0:50:05.905 --> 0:50:08.294
<v Speaker 1>I thought that this was going to be for the

0:50:08.304 --> 0:50:11.405
<v Speaker 1>Vietnam and Indonesia to pick. But I think Malaysia is

0:50:11.415 --> 0:50:13.465
<v Speaker 1>going to be a very formidable player in this area.

0:50:13.475 --> 0:50:14.495
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely.

0:50:14.800 --> 0:50:19.429
<v Speaker 2>Now, we do have another development uh happening across Southeast Asia,

0:50:19.439 --> 0:50:22.939
<v Speaker 2>which is, which is a sort of a, an extension

0:50:22.949 --> 0:50:28.270
<v Speaker 2>of the original uh you know, export control uh environment.

0:50:28.560 --> 0:50:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Uh and that is that as many Chinese companies pick

0:50:33.090 --> 0:50:37.939
<v Speaker 2>up and move right to, to circumvent export controls, et

0:50:37.949 --> 0:50:40.679
<v Speaker 2>cetera or to, you know, to, to, to get out

0:50:40.689 --> 0:50:43.399
<v Speaker 2>from under that, that that umbrella if you will

0:50:43.689 --> 0:50:47.330
<v Speaker 2>um you know that that's been placed over them by

0:50:47.340 --> 0:50:49.780
<v Speaker 2>uh by the Department of Commerce and the US Bureau

0:50:49.790 --> 0:50:53.350
<v Speaker 2>of Industry and Security which enforces export controls.

0:50:54.010 --> 0:50:56.500
<v Speaker 2>A lot of the, a lot of that um supply

0:50:56.510 --> 0:50:59.529
<v Speaker 2>chain activity that was in China is just picking up

0:50:59.540 --> 0:51:00.229
<v Speaker 2>and moving

0:51:01.149 --> 0:51:05.820
<v Speaker 2>to Southeast Asia. So the question then becomes um do

0:51:05.830 --> 0:51:09.959
<v Speaker 2>the export controls and the licensing requirements simply follow them, right? Does,

0:51:09.969 --> 0:51:13.000
<v Speaker 2>does Washington turn around and say, oh, ok. So you've relocated,

0:51:13.229 --> 0:51:17.330
<v Speaker 2>you know, uh a factory from, from China to Vietnam.

0:51:17.739 --> 0:51:21.850
<v Speaker 2>Uh It's, it's basically a transshipment exercise, right? Or it's, it's,

0:51:21.860 --> 0:51:25.290
<v Speaker 2>it's like we were discussing with Eastern Europe. Um Now

0:51:25.300 --> 0:51:28.370
<v Speaker 2>we're going to start, you know, imposing once again,

0:51:30.100 --> 0:51:33.709
<v Speaker 2>you know, security requirements coming out of Vietnam or coming

0:51:33.719 --> 0:51:35.409
<v Speaker 2>out of Malaysia or even Singapore.

0:51:35.860 --> 0:51:38.909
<v Speaker 1>I understand this is already happening. It's already happening even

0:51:38.919 --> 0:51:41.229
<v Speaker 1>during the Trump years. And certainly during the Biden years,

0:51:41.239 --> 0:51:44.469
<v Speaker 1>we've had Department of Commerce officials go repeatedly to Vietnam

0:51:44.479 --> 0:51:46.560
<v Speaker 1>precisely to investigate issues like that.

0:51:47.120 --> 0:51:50.649
<v Speaker 1>But you know, it's challenging. Um I don't think anybody

0:51:50.659 --> 0:51:54.409
<v Speaker 1>moves one for one, a company from country to Country B.

0:51:54.870 --> 0:51:57.110
<v Speaker 1>There is always some implement creation, some value creation in

0:51:57.120 --> 0:51:59.669
<v Speaker 1>country B. So then it becomes a question of gradation,

0:51:59.679 --> 0:52:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the gray area that you are talking about, right? What

0:52:02.129 --> 0:52:05.429
<v Speaker 1>percent of value added from China is acceptable? Is it zero?

0:52:05.439 --> 0:52:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Is it 10? Is it 20? And then how much,

0:52:08.530 --> 0:52:10.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, forensic investigation do you have to do with

0:52:10.409 --> 0:52:14.850
<v Speaker 1>the paperwork and the actual hardware to ascertain those claims?

0:52:14.860 --> 0:52:15.489
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely.

0:52:15.959 --> 0:52:20.020
<v Speaker 2>So, the, so, you know, this is an absolute bonanza, right?

0:52:20.030 --> 0:52:22.610
<v Speaker 2>For the consulting firms, lawyers. Uh, you know,

0:52:23.250 --> 0:52:23.699
<v Speaker 1>as you said,

0:52:24.389 --> 0:52:26.649
<v Speaker 2>tech, I mean, this is a great time to be, uh,

0:52:26.659 --> 0:52:29.879
<v Speaker 2>you know, a big four or mckenzie or, you know, um,

0:52:29.909 --> 0:52:31.620
<v Speaker 1>stuff that you did in your previous life,

0:52:31.629 --> 0:52:32.020
<v Speaker 2>stuff

0:52:32.030 --> 0:52:33.459
<v Speaker 2>that I did in my previous, I'm wondering if I

0:52:33.469 --> 0:52:36.279
<v Speaker 2>should go back. Uh But yeah, definitely.

0:52:36.290 --> 0:52:39.489
<v Speaker 1>Um finally, uh we just touched on India, let's talk

0:52:39.500 --> 0:52:42.489
<v Speaker 1>a little more about India because India has also been

0:52:42.500 --> 0:52:44.419
<v Speaker 1>pursuing what is known as making in India

0:52:45.020 --> 0:52:48.320
<v Speaker 1>for the last decade or so. And India has ruled

0:52:48.330 --> 0:52:50.030
<v Speaker 1>out what is known as production link and send a

0:52:50.040 --> 0:52:52.649
<v Speaker 1>PL scheme and not small a chain. I mean, we're

0:52:52.659 --> 0:52:55.620
<v Speaker 1>talking about 20 something odd billion dollars worth of pl

0:52:55.739 --> 0:52:59.469
<v Speaker 1>have been offered. It hasn't been taken up 100% but some,

0:52:59.479 --> 0:53:02.699
<v Speaker 1>some has been and there are large Indian conglomerates who

0:53:02.709 --> 0:53:05.780
<v Speaker 1>are now joining the fray in raising capital to build

0:53:05.790 --> 0:53:06.739
<v Speaker 1>fabs in India.

0:53:07.489 --> 0:53:11.569
<v Speaker 1>Is it a worthy goal to create a big manufacturing

0:53:11.580 --> 0:53:15.330
<v Speaker 1>footprint when you have a hyper competitor like China, when

0:53:15.340 --> 0:53:18.689
<v Speaker 1>you have Southeast Asia, just around the corner, should all

0:53:18.699 --> 0:53:20.939
<v Speaker 1>countries that are large enough, try to build their own

0:53:20.949 --> 0:53:23.429
<v Speaker 1>supply chain for certain levels of technology?

0:53:23.560 --> 0:53:26.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I think so, India is such a unique case.

0:53:26.489 --> 0:53:30.129
<v Speaker 2>I mean, India has not had great success with industrial

0:53:30.139 --> 0:53:31.310
<v Speaker 2>policy in the past.

0:53:32.250 --> 0:53:36.199
<v Speaker 2>It's always the same, same reasons. Right. It's, it's, it's, it's, uh,

0:53:36.560 --> 0:53:41.790
<v Speaker 2>you know, too many taxes, it's over regulation, it's bad infrastructure,

0:53:41.800 --> 0:53:44.540
<v Speaker 2>it's corruption, it's, you know, a lot of things that

0:53:44.550 --> 0:53:47.350
<v Speaker 2>are big, you know, that are big challenges. So the

0:53:47.360 --> 0:53:53.699
<v Speaker 2>question is now, you know, can India move from what

0:53:53.709 --> 0:53:57.050
<v Speaker 2>it's doing now? Well, which is basically R and D

0:53:57.060 --> 0:54:00.909
<v Speaker 2>and engineering centers that, you know, you know, companies have

0:54:00.919 --> 0:54:01.580
<v Speaker 2>set up,

0:54:01.889 --> 0:54:04.888
<v Speaker 2>uh it does software very well. It's got a lot

0:54:04.899 --> 0:54:06.388
<v Speaker 2>of engineers, that sort of thing.

0:54:06.939 --> 0:54:09.090
<v Speaker 2>Can they move it to a man? Can they move

0:54:09.100 --> 0:54:13.169
<v Speaker 2>that to more of a manufacturing focused endeavor? Right. And

0:54:13.179 --> 0:54:15.899
<v Speaker 2>that's hard, that's, that's, that's been very, very hard

0:54:15.909 --> 0:54:18.350
<v Speaker 1>for that also somewhat unique because you go from agriculture,

0:54:18.360 --> 0:54:20.709
<v Speaker 1>you leapfrog into services and now you're gonna go back

0:54:20.719 --> 0:54:21.949
<v Speaker 1>to the mid point to the mid

0:54:22.060 --> 0:54:22.299
<v Speaker 1>point.

0:54:22.310 --> 0:54:24.459
<v Speaker 2>And, and I mean, you know, if, if you look

0:54:24.469 --> 0:54:26.949
<v Speaker 2>at the numbers, some numbers show that actually manufacturing is

0:54:26.959 --> 0:54:31.030
<v Speaker 2>actually shrunk in India, uh you know, even during this

0:54:31.040 --> 0:54:33.259
<v Speaker 2>period where it's been emphasized, right? So

0:54:34.000 --> 0:54:38.790
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's gonna happen unless you have, you know, a,

0:54:38.800 --> 0:54:42.888
<v Speaker 2>a situation like Apple and Foxconn basically moving and just

0:54:42.899 --> 0:54:46.570
<v Speaker 2>putting billions of dollars into an ecosystem and bringing 2nd

0:54:46.580 --> 0:54:50.229
<v Speaker 2>and 3rd tier suppliers. And even then you have, you

0:54:50.239 --> 0:54:55.830
<v Speaker 2>have these um these isolated hubs across India. You know,

0:54:56.139 --> 0:54:59.250
<v Speaker 2>you know, that, that, that are potentially these hotbeds.

0:54:59.840 --> 0:55:02.310
<v Speaker 2>The other thing is, and, and I write about this in,

0:55:02.320 --> 0:55:05.419
<v Speaker 2>in my book is, you know, what India really wants

0:55:05.429 --> 0:55:07.629
<v Speaker 2>to do is it wants to, it wants to grow

0:55:07.639 --> 0:55:11.669
<v Speaker 2>an indigenous um sort of cell phone, uh you know,

0:55:11.679 --> 0:55:15.620
<v Speaker 2>mobile phone, uh sort of kind of ecosystem that then

0:55:15.919 --> 0:55:20.250
<v Speaker 2>uh grows out into uh infrastructure for wireless and that

0:55:20.260 --> 0:55:21.779
<v Speaker 2>type of thing. Um

0:55:22.290 --> 0:55:25.189
<v Speaker 2>And that to do that you need you, you, you

0:55:25.199 --> 0:55:28.870
<v Speaker 2>need uh certain kinds of technology, right? So, you know,

0:55:28.879 --> 0:55:31.109
<v Speaker 2>obviously you need chips, right? So if you can, if

0:55:31.120 --> 0:55:34.550
<v Speaker 2>you can bring foreign investment in and you can get

0:55:34.949 --> 0:55:37.770
<v Speaker 2>the right companies to come in and, and build those

0:55:37.780 --> 0:55:42.279
<v Speaker 2>lagging edge chips and, and, and so on. Um Then

0:55:42.290 --> 0:55:44.300
<v Speaker 2>that I, I think that's, that's gonna be critical and

0:55:44.310 --> 0:55:45.979
<v Speaker 2>I think it's gonna be a big challenge. And as

0:55:45.989 --> 0:55:50.060
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned, I think Malaysia will probably uh probably do that.

0:55:50.629 --> 0:55:53.330
<v Speaker 2>They are doing that and they will do that pretty well.

0:55:53.729 --> 0:55:56.379
<v Speaker 2>Um And so, II, I really, I think this is

0:55:56.389 --> 0:55:58.689
<v Speaker 2>a wait and see. And as one of my, and

0:55:59.139 --> 0:56:01.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying that I believe this is going to happen. I, I,

0:56:01.850 --> 0:56:06.609
<v Speaker 2>you know, uh but you know, not to say this glibly, but,

0:56:06.620 --> 0:56:09.500
<v Speaker 2>you know, India has missed a lot of opportunities, right?

0:56:10.250 --> 0:56:12.729
<v Speaker 2>Uh And the question is, are we going to see

0:56:12.739 --> 0:56:15.590
<v Speaker 2>a repeat of that, or is this,

0:56:16.510 --> 0:56:19.388
<v Speaker 2>is this period in history right now where we have

0:56:19.399 --> 0:56:21.699
<v Speaker 2>this massive paradigm shift in the West and we have

0:56:21.709 --> 0:56:24.069
<v Speaker 2>all these things that we've been talking about the reorganization,

0:56:24.080 --> 0:56:25.370
<v Speaker 2>the bifurcation, all of that

0:56:26.000 --> 0:56:28.810
<v Speaker 2>is, is this going to put them over the hump? Right?

0:56:28.820 --> 0:56:30.379
<v Speaker 2>Is this, and

0:56:31.350 --> 0:56:33.449
<v Speaker 2>you know, if I'm, if I'm putting money on it,

0:56:33.679 --> 0:56:35.600
<v Speaker 2>it's not good money at this point. Right. I mean,

0:56:35.610 --> 0:56:36.830
<v Speaker 2>it is still a wait and see.

0:56:37.350 --> 0:56:38.649
<v Speaker 1>Well, at least the window is there,

0:56:39.370 --> 0:56:40.159
<v Speaker 2>is there no doubt.

0:56:40.270 --> 0:56:43.500
<v Speaker 1>And now it's really up to the policymakers to come

0:56:43.510 --> 0:56:46.649
<v Speaker 1>up with the right policy environment and a stable regulatory

0:56:46.659 --> 0:56:48.370
<v Speaker 1>environment to to make it happen.

0:56:49.090 --> 0:56:51.959
<v Speaker 1>Alexander Caffrey. This has been fantastic. Thank you very much

0:56:51.969 --> 0:56:53.049
<v Speaker 1>for your time and insights.

0:56:53.419 --> 0:56:54.779
<v Speaker 2>Pleasure. Enjoyed it.

0:56:55.020 --> 0:56:59.229
<v Speaker 1>Great as always. Thanks to our listeners as well. Copy

0:56:59.239 --> 0:57:02.659
<v Speaker 1>Time was produced by Ken Delbridge Violet, Lee and Daisy

0:57:02.669 --> 0:57:07.510
<v Speaker 1>Sherma provided additional assistance. All 135 episodes of copy time

0:57:07.520 --> 0:57:11.780
<v Speaker 1>are available on youtube and on major podcast platforms like

0:57:11.790 --> 0:57:15.580
<v Speaker 1>Apple and Spotify. It is for information only and does

0:57:15.590 --> 0:57:17.659
<v Speaker 1>not constitute any investment advice

0:57:18.030 --> 0:57:21.219
<v Speaker 1>for our research publications and webinars. You can find them

0:57:21.229 --> 0:57:24.449
<v Speaker 1>all by Googling D BS Research Library. Have a great day.