WEBVTT - Kopi Time E063: Ilan Goldfajn on global outlook, inflation, EM risks

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Hi you're listening to copy time, a podcast series on

0:00:08.920 --> 0:00:11.899
<v Speaker 1>markets and economies from DBS group research and 10 Rubik.

0:00:11.900 --> 0:00:15.060
<v Speaker 1>Chief economist. Welcome to our 63rd episode.

0:00:15.540 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>This is a very special episode for me see I

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:20.970
<v Speaker 1>was a graduate student in the late 1990s and in

0:00:20.970 --> 0:00:23.550
<v Speaker 1>1998 I happened to get a summer internship

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:26.860
<v Speaker 1>at the Washington D. C. Headquarters of the International monetary fund.

0:00:27.340 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I was highly interested in the drivers and implications of

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.510
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis and as luck would have it, I was

0:00:33.510 --> 0:00:36.700
<v Speaker 1>pleased under the supervision of a young Brazilian economist with

0:00:36.700 --> 0:00:39.809
<v Speaker 1>whom I would develop such good chemistry that we went

0:00:39.810 --> 0:00:42.550
<v Speaker 1>on to co author three publications over the next few years,

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:46.690
<v Speaker 1>which no doubt contributed immensely to my PhD completion and

0:00:46.690 --> 0:00:48.550
<v Speaker 1>subsequent employment at the I. M. F.

0:00:49.140 --> 0:00:53.740
<v Speaker 1>That resilient economist, Ellen Goldfein soon thereafter left Washington D. C.

0:00:53.740 --> 0:00:56.500
<v Speaker 1>To go back to his country where over the last

0:00:56.500 --> 0:00:59.390
<v Speaker 1>two decades he has done just about everything across the

0:00:59.390 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>public and private sector.

0:01:01.340 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Ellen Goldfein is presently chairman of the Board Credit Suisse

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>brazil but it was recently announced that at the beginning

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:10.819
<v Speaker 1>of next year he would join the I. M. F.

0:01:10.830 --> 0:01:12.649
<v Speaker 1>Western hemisphere department as the head

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:15.650
<v Speaker 1>Ellen was governor of the Central Bank of Brazil from

0:01:15.650 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>2016 to March 2019 and Deputy Governor from 2000 to

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:20.950
<v Speaker 1>2003

0:01:21.340 --> 0:01:23.850
<v Speaker 1>In 2018, he was named Central Banker of the Year

0:01:23.850 --> 0:01:24.960
<v Speaker 1>by the Banker Magazine.

0:01:25.340 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Previously in his career, Ellen was partnered Chief economist and

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:30.950
<v Speaker 1>advisor to the board of Itau Unibanco

0:01:31.340 --> 0:01:35.220
<v Speaker 1>Also he was founding partner of Quiano Investimentos and partner

0:01:35.230 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>of Gavea Investimentos. Ellen go find a very warm welcome

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>to Kobe time.

0:01:41.140 --> 0:01:43.450
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, thank your time or it's um,

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:47.260
<v Speaker 2>he's walking into a memory lane remembering

0:01:47.740 --> 0:01:49.660
<v Speaker 2>Especially on the 90s. Uh,

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:53.460
<v Speaker 2>well he wrote all these papers, you know, until today

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:55.059
<v Speaker 2>they are quite cited

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 2>and the reward

0:01:57.140 --> 0:02:02.500
<v Speaker 2>still I got all these uh, citation indexes and our

0:02:02.500 --> 0:02:03.559
<v Speaker 2>paper is one of the

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:07.250
<v Speaker 2>the most cited because it's about contagion

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:08.860
<v Speaker 2>and then it's about

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:13.460
<v Speaker 2>Uh, you you mentioned 98 and it was just after

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:16.350
<v Speaker 2>the asian crisis and it's a,

0:02:16.740 --> 0:02:19.090
<v Speaker 2>it was it was the moment where I was sitting

0:02:19.090 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 2>in the asian department

0:02:20.740 --> 0:02:23.460
<v Speaker 2>writing papers and it was very nice that you,

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:25.059
<v Speaker 2>you arrived and

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:27.060
<v Speaker 2>then the rest is history

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:29.859
<v Speaker 2>for both of us. I'm very happy to be here.

0:02:30.340 --> 0:02:32.950
<v Speaker 2>Actually. I'm basically recording

0:02:33.340 --> 0:02:34.859
<v Speaker 2>this. I'm not giving

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:39.050
<v Speaker 2>any interview any podcast but I'm doing this because just

0:02:39.050 --> 0:02:40.260
<v Speaker 2>because of this,

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:43.750
<v Speaker 2>our relationship from there from the past,

0:02:44.340 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm very grateful for that and I really appreciate it.

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:50.070
<v Speaker 1>And as you were recalling, I'm also recalling that another

0:02:50.070 --> 0:02:52.790
<v Speaker 1>paper that we worked on where we looked at the

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:56.940
<v Speaker 1>impact of one country's contagion and reaction in another and

0:02:56.940 --> 0:03:00.340
<v Speaker 1>you had that innovative approach of looking at data from

0:03:00.340 --> 0:03:02.660
<v Speaker 1>resident flu and non resident flows to sort of, you know,

0:03:02.740 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>parts, you know, which part of the

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>investor reacts first and what sort of inside information they

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>have over the economy. I thought that was very innovative

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:12.260
<v Speaker 1>and I'm glad that you know, I got to work

0:03:12.260 --> 0:03:14.710
<v Speaker 1>with you on that. I've seen many, many papers subsequently

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>approaching that 20 years ago it was you know, very

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:18.260
<v Speaker 1>cutting edge

0:03:18.740 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Iran again, real pleasure. And I'm very grateful that you're

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>with us. I want to start with talking about of course,

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>what else? The global pandemic,

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 1>What's your view on the fourth quarter and beyond for

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the global economy as vaccination admittedly spreading unevenly but spreading nonetheless.

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 1>And we're even seeing some news about antiviral pills getting introduced.

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, hopefully we are

0:03:42.540 --> 0:03:44.060
<v Speaker 2>at the beginning of the end

0:03:44.740 --> 0:03:49.300
<v Speaker 2>uh of discovered it will not end immediately. I think

0:03:49.300 --> 0:03:50.650
<v Speaker 2>it will take some time

0:03:51.140 --> 0:03:52.850
<v Speaker 2>vaccinations are there

0:03:53.340 --> 0:03:56.850
<v Speaker 2>booster shots are coming some countries,

0:03:57.340 --> 0:03:59.950
<v Speaker 2>the symmetry on vaccination is still there

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:03.460
<v Speaker 2>but slowly and steadily. We are getting into

0:04:03.940 --> 0:04:11.050
<v Speaker 2>developing economies more and more percentage of people vaccinated fully vaccinated.

0:04:11.540 --> 0:04:14.860
<v Speaker 2>Uh my country brazil started in

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:17.460
<v Speaker 2>in the left foot. But now you have

0:04:18.140 --> 0:04:26.239
<v Speaker 2>Uh 50% fully vaccinated and more and almost fooled. Almost 90%.

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:27.650
<v Speaker 2>More than 90%.

0:04:28.140 --> 0:04:29.359
<v Speaker 2>We have the first shot

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 2>uh on on

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:36.369
<v Speaker 2>because there is a difference with nationalism. Nika they're giving

0:04:36.370 --> 0:04:37.250
<v Speaker 2>three months. So

0:04:37.740 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 2>between the first and the second, you have

0:04:39.940 --> 0:04:41.349
<v Speaker 2>periods of time. But

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 2>at the end of the day, I'm I'm starting to

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:46.550
<v Speaker 2>believe that we are at the beginning

0:04:47.140 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 2>of the end of this covered

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 2>markets of course are already ahead of the curve have

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 2>boomed

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 2>and economies advanced economies have recovered.

0:04:59.140 --> 0:05:05.280
<v Speaker 2>So the U. S. Recovered from the fall of last year, europe,

0:05:05.290 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 2>even even emerging markets are just basically

0:05:08.740 --> 0:05:11.130
<v Speaker 2>Uh you may not want to call it a bishop

0:05:11.130 --> 0:05:15.739
<v Speaker 2>recovery but everybody just fell a lot in 2020 and

0:05:15.740 --> 0:05:20.330
<v Speaker 2>recovering 2021. So you question, the fourth part is basically

0:05:20.339 --> 0:05:22.860
<v Speaker 2>what's going to happen after the Bishop Recovery?

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:25.850
<v Speaker 2>Uh We're gonna put video to recover.

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:28.160
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna hit some

0:05:28.540 --> 0:05:30.550
<v Speaker 2>some wall and on,

0:05:30.940 --> 0:05:35.950
<v Speaker 2>oh immediately I think most of the countries will hit

0:05:36.339 --> 0:05:41.260
<v Speaker 2>the potential which won't mean either higher inflation and

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:45.919
<v Speaker 2>and will mean that you will have to aboard strong recovery,

0:05:45.930 --> 0:05:47.460
<v Speaker 2>others have space.

0:05:47.940 --> 0:05:49.050
<v Speaker 2>We are seeing

0:05:49.540 --> 0:05:53.290
<v Speaker 2>quite a bit of monetary and fiscal stimulus. So whoever

0:05:53.290 --> 0:05:56.159
<v Speaker 2>has space will just use the space.

0:05:56.540 --> 0:05:58.969
<v Speaker 2>The rest that do not have space in terms of

0:05:58.970 --> 0:06:02.150
<v Speaker 2>potential will just hit some limits.

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:07.289
<v Speaker 2>Uh and that's basically what I expect from 2020. We

0:06:07.290 --> 0:06:10.730
<v Speaker 2>can talk about the limits on advanced economies which will

0:06:10.730 --> 0:06:12.150
<v Speaker 2>basically give the

0:06:12.740 --> 0:06:16.250
<v Speaker 2>the overall global scenario is shaped.

0:06:17.940 --> 0:06:21.270
<v Speaker 1>Um You began by talking about brazil so maybe we

0:06:21.270 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>just talk a little bit about latin America. I'm sitting

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:25.890
<v Speaker 1>here in Asia. You know, we don't follow latin America

0:06:25.890 --> 0:06:28.310
<v Speaker 1>very closely but we do know that there are latin

0:06:28.310 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>american economies which are very long the commodity cycle and

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:34.239
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing some strength and commodity prices and you mentioned

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the progress with vaccinations. So

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 1>What's your overall sense of Latin as we head into 2022?

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, a tom was hardly hit by the covid.

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 2>It it affected

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 2>uh quite a bit of the population, the mood,

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:57.460
<v Speaker 2>even the political institutional arrangements were

0:06:57.839 --> 0:06:58.349
<v Speaker 2>she cooks?

0:06:58.940 --> 0:07:00.859
<v Speaker 2>I can give you several examples

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 2>uh social unrest in chile before the covid.

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:08.750
<v Speaker 2>But now we have a constitution amendment that will be

0:07:09.339 --> 0:07:10.660
<v Speaker 2>will be voting there

0:07:11.140 --> 0:07:14.860
<v Speaker 2>uh next year, which changed

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the important rules

0:07:17.940 --> 0:07:21.660
<v Speaker 2>and uh in chile. You have with sarah

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:23.660
<v Speaker 2>unrest in Colombia,

0:07:24.340 --> 0:07:27.660
<v Speaker 2>A more difficult time in Colombia. You also have

0:07:28.340 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 2>peru we had a terrorist election,

0:07:32.140 --> 0:07:33.660
<v Speaker 2>a more

0:07:34.340 --> 0:07:35.140
<v Speaker 2>uh huh

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:37.660
<v Speaker 2>candidate that was

0:07:38.140 --> 0:07:42.660
<v Speaker 2>elected with now challenges to deliver what I promised.

0:07:43.340 --> 0:07:46.250
<v Speaker 2>Uh So I will say that

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 2>latin America has emerged from the covid

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 2>With a lot of challenges, social challenges. one

0:07:54.140 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 2>political challenges, but also economic challenge for example, that

0:07:59.540 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 2>that has increased.

0:08:01.540 --> 0:08:04.060
<v Speaker 2>So there are some smaller economies,

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:06.050
<v Speaker 2>we? Ve realized that

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 2>I had to use

0:08:08.540 --> 0:08:10.060
<v Speaker 2>whatever they call to

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:13.450
<v Speaker 2>uh maintain their economies functioning

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:15.950
<v Speaker 2>and now they have to deal with their lives. That's

0:08:15.950 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 2>what what are you gonna do?

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 2>Uh So

0:08:20.140 --> 0:08:23.050
<v Speaker 2>yeah, that's economies are basically

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 2>still stimulating their economies.

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:27.660
<v Speaker 2>But some of the

0:08:28.140 --> 0:08:32.829
<v Speaker 2>emerging market economy, developing economies, especially in latin America do

0:08:32.830 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 2>not have space

0:08:34.740 --> 0:08:35.660
<v Speaker 2>to stimulate

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:37.660
<v Speaker 2>the space, Physical space. I mean,

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:42.060
<v Speaker 2>stimulus before I mentioned space in terms of potential output,

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 2>but I don't think this is the limit

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 2>in latin America is still a lot of unemployment.

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:51.660
<v Speaker 2>We still capacity

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:53.150
<v Speaker 2>to absorb.

0:08:53.540 --> 0:08:55.550
<v Speaker 2>But the limit here is fiscal minutes.

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:57.660
<v Speaker 2>And this is where I believe

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:01.660
<v Speaker 2>the challenge will be economically.

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 2>So political challenges is to do some challenges. Social challenges

0:09:07.540 --> 0:09:10.750
<v Speaker 2>and they come from some economic difficulties where there are faced.

0:09:11.340 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 2>I had

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:16.230
<v Speaker 1>uh indeed Ilan. I mean as you absolutely, you know,

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:18.890
<v Speaker 1>correctly point out that we not only have the issue

0:09:18.890 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>whether the health crisis morphs into a financial crisis and

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:24.620
<v Speaker 1>economic crisis as the cost of dealing with the health

0:09:24.620 --> 0:09:27.349
<v Speaker 1>crisis comes to you in the coming years. But also

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:29.949
<v Speaker 1>it seems like you know, social and political fabric have

0:09:29.950 --> 0:09:30.650
<v Speaker 1>also been

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:34.050
<v Speaker 1>stretch substantially by the stress of the pandemic obviously

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and and many countries are you know sort of convulsing

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:40.470
<v Speaker 1>from that. So yeah, I think that you know, your

0:09:40.470 --> 0:09:44.580
<v Speaker 1>your future institution a multilateral one and your former institution,

0:09:44.590 --> 0:09:48.010
<v Speaker 1>bilateral government wants all will have their work cut out

0:09:48.010 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 1>in the coming years.

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:53.090
<v Speaker 1>Uh Now of course one thing that can trip up

0:09:53.100 --> 0:09:56.430
<v Speaker 1>latin America asia E. M. In general as we have

0:09:56.429 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 1>seen in the past repeatedly is a rise in the U. S.

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:02.550
<v Speaker 1>Treasury yield from 94 onward. We have seen this game

0:10:02.550 --> 0:10:04.059
<v Speaker 1>play out a number of times.

0:10:04.540 --> 0:10:09.010
<v Speaker 1>Um So if we see you know, slight increase in U. S.

0:10:09.010 --> 0:10:12.150
<v Speaker 1>10 year yield and as to the course of next year,

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:14.900
<v Speaker 1>the U. S. Federal reserve carries out paper market starts

0:10:14.900 --> 0:10:16.059
<v Speaker 1>pricing an interest rate hike

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:18.559
<v Speaker 1>late next year, early night in the following year.

0:10:18.940 --> 0:10:21.890
<v Speaker 1>Um So you've already said about the debt but beyond that,

0:10:21.890 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, what is your sense of the shock absorption

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 1>capacity of the global markets?

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:29.860
<v Speaker 2>I think I think the situation is

0:10:30.540 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 2>a bit vulnerable in the sense that

0:10:35.340 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 2>if you have that if you have

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 2>prices markets are

0:10:41.340 --> 0:10:43.050
<v Speaker 2>I have

0:10:43.740 --> 0:10:48.059
<v Speaker 2>uh increase quite a bit prices are

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 2>I? Evaluation and not

0:10:52.140 --> 0:10:53.060
<v Speaker 2>I'm not cheap.

0:10:53.540 --> 0:10:55.459
<v Speaker 2>Uh So

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 2>if you have a period of

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 2>more contraction is monetary policy coming from

0:11:02.740 --> 0:11:03.850
<v Speaker 2>global markets?

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:06.660
<v Speaker 2>You all you tend to have a correction

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:10.449
<v Speaker 2>in prices, stock markets in general

0:11:11.140 --> 0:11:14.140
<v Speaker 2>in the bond markets because to absolve the higher industry,

0:11:14.140 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 2>the market interest that's going up.

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:17.459
<v Speaker 2>Mhm.

0:11:18.140 --> 0:11:19.250
<v Speaker 2>But also

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 2>the council markets,

0:11:21.740 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 2>strong dollar means deposition

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:26.059
<v Speaker 2>across the border.

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:30.350
<v Speaker 2>So if you're in a world with higher inflation

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:32.559
<v Speaker 2>and you get the position

0:11:33.140 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 2>of the currencies against the dollar,

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:38.459
<v Speaker 2>you tend to have more pressure inflation

0:11:38.940 --> 0:11:41.460
<v Speaker 2>and that means more pressure on interest rates.

0:11:42.140 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 2>And that that means that the challenge to a continuous recovery,

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:47.260
<v Speaker 2>which was your question

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:49.650
<v Speaker 2>and the beginning will be more difficult.

0:11:50.340 --> 0:11:52.260
<v Speaker 2>So a beach

0:11:52.940 --> 0:11:55.550
<v Speaker 2>definition of the scenario for next year

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:58.559
<v Speaker 2>will be whether we have higher interest rates

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:00.050
<v Speaker 2>globally.

0:12:00.540 --> 0:12:02.550
<v Speaker 2>And as I will say, defined

0:12:02.940 --> 0:12:04.860
<v Speaker 2>90% of what we're gonna see

0:12:05.340 --> 0:12:06.150
<v Speaker 2>next year,

0:12:06.540 --> 0:12:08.660
<v Speaker 2>The other 10% Arabia's Democratic

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:12.250
<v Speaker 2>each country, how much vulnerable they are.

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:14.980
<v Speaker 2>What can they do? What is the policies and the

0:12:14.980 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 2>rest

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 2>But the the immediate impact

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 2>is

0:12:20.140 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 2>uh huh

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:24.210
<v Speaker 2>US Treasury yields

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:26.950
<v Speaker 2>other global interest rates.

0:12:28.340 --> 0:12:30.950
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm again thinking back, I think 20 years

0:12:30.950 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>ago you had a paper on the pass through from

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:35.910
<v Speaker 1>depreciation to inflation. And as you were saying that I

0:12:35.910 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>was thinking of that paper

0:12:37.540 --> 0:12:40.460
<v Speaker 1>um so let's talk a little bit more about inflation

0:12:40.460 --> 0:12:43.140
<v Speaker 1>because there is such a heated debate in the West

0:12:43.140 --> 0:12:46.929
<v Speaker 1>in particular about the temporary and permanent nature of the

0:12:46.929 --> 0:12:50.260
<v Speaker 1>ongoing rise in global inflation and even within temporary, you

0:12:50.260 --> 0:12:52.970
<v Speaker 1>know how temporary the chip shortages will the last 3

0:12:52.970 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to 6 months if they last for nine months? Would

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>producers start passing on those prices or will there

0:12:59.140 --> 0:13:01.939
<v Speaker 1>margins come under pressure. So all those discussion is also

0:13:01.940 --> 0:13:04.210
<v Speaker 1>going on. So I'm going to hear a little bit

0:13:04.210 --> 0:13:06.850
<v Speaker 1>about what you're thinking is on this record in this regard.

0:13:08.540 --> 0:13:10.660
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think global inflation has

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:15.550
<v Speaker 2>uh has several, several factors,

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:17.559
<v Speaker 2>several causes.

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:21.750
<v Speaker 2>Some of them you could see temporary, others not So

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:25.559
<v Speaker 2>the recovery from Covid was not planned.

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:28.620
<v Speaker 2>As the covid was not planned. You have all this

0:13:28.620 --> 0:13:29.060
<v Speaker 2>there

0:13:29.540 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 2>lockdowns and social distancing

0:13:33.340 --> 0:13:34.860
<v Speaker 2>all of this affecting

0:13:35.340 --> 0:13:41.660
<v Speaker 2>the supply chains. Somehow some sectors recovered immediately.

0:13:42.340 --> 0:13:43.860
<v Speaker 2>They actually some actually boom

0:13:44.540 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 2>in the coffee because they were

0:13:46.740 --> 0:13:47.850
<v Speaker 2>more demanded,

0:13:48.540 --> 0:13:51.610
<v Speaker 2>others have not recovered. Yes. And part of the services,

0:13:51.650 --> 0:13:52.650
<v Speaker 2>tourism

0:13:53.340 --> 0:13:57.150
<v Speaker 2>airlines feel like that is still to still

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:01.260
<v Speaker 2>way to go in the recovery. But

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:04.250
<v Speaker 2>when you look at the same

0:14:05.140 --> 0:14:05.650
<v Speaker 2>product

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:09.150
<v Speaker 2>when you have different changes and you know that

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:13.309
<v Speaker 2>in order to produce today globally you have fix produce

0:14:13.309 --> 0:14:15.550
<v Speaker 2>all over all over the world

0:14:16.340 --> 0:14:19.530
<v Speaker 2>and sometimes you have interruption in a part of the

0:14:19.530 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 2>chain

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:23.030
<v Speaker 2>and for some reason the worker were not able to

0:14:23.030 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 2>produce

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 2>at the same level that other parts of the chill

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:30.260
<v Speaker 2>produced and that generated some scarcity

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:33.060
<v Speaker 2>and has you know scarcity in splashed

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:35.150
<v Speaker 2>shortages mean

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:36.750
<v Speaker 2>high inflation.

0:14:37.340 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 2>So that is part of what I call the temporary

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 2>part

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:43.450
<v Speaker 2>which is

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:47.450
<v Speaker 2>uh covid relating at semantic recovery

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:50.100
<v Speaker 2>tend to have this

0:14:50.940 --> 0:14:53.460
<v Speaker 2>temporary supply disruptions

0:14:53.940 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 2>and that was saying all over

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:58.650
<v Speaker 2>all of the global economy.

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:00.150
<v Speaker 2>Uh huh.

0:15:00.540 --> 0:15:03.060
<v Speaker 2>But there is part of what we're seeing

0:15:03.540 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 2>that is uh

0:15:05.340 --> 0:15:06.710
<v Speaker 2>not only this

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:10.850
<v Speaker 2>supply effects Emperor supply effect.

0:15:11.740 --> 0:15:13.860
<v Speaker 2>Arab it is basically

0:15:14.740 --> 0:15:16.660
<v Speaker 2>roof recovery and

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:19.060
<v Speaker 2>when we see in the U. S.

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:21.850
<v Speaker 2>Very

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:24.650
<v Speaker 2>you see a lot of

0:15:25.140 --> 0:15:27.450
<v Speaker 2>vargas is but not enough

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 2>job

0:15:29.340 --> 0:15:32.060
<v Speaker 2>jobs to fill designs is

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:34.460
<v Speaker 2>I need to generalize phenomenon

0:15:35.140 --> 0:15:37.150
<v Speaker 2>that is leading to higher wages.

0:15:37.940 --> 0:15:41.450
<v Speaker 2>one cannot ignore that that's the basic mechanism

0:15:42.140 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 2>where demand driven inflation

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:45.860
<v Speaker 2>generates,

0:15:46.540 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 2>it's inflation,

0:15:48.340 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 2>more demand. The supply,

0:15:50.540 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 2>labour market is tied

0:15:53.340 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 2>wages go up

0:15:55.140 --> 0:15:57.260
<v Speaker 2>at the beginning the mark up

0:15:58.140 --> 0:16:00.260
<v Speaker 2>goes down but at some point

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:02.260
<v Speaker 2>this implies hard inflation.

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 2>Another sign that there is some

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:07.660
<v Speaker 2>hit it

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:11.359
<v Speaker 2>global economy is that commodities boomed

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:12.850
<v Speaker 2>as you mentioned.

0:16:13.340 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean you see all the it's back and forth

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:16.850
<v Speaker 2>every time you have a

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:19.850
<v Speaker 2>crisis or problem in china.

0:16:20.340 --> 0:16:25.530
<v Speaker 2>Oh there is a flight to quality and commodities go down.

0:16:25.530 --> 0:16:25.860
<v Speaker 2>But

0:16:26.340 --> 0:16:27.150
<v Speaker 2>trends

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:31.060
<v Speaker 2>when you look at oil and you look at

0:16:31.540 --> 0:16:32.860
<v Speaker 2>metallics and

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 2>those

0:16:34.340 --> 0:16:36.860
<v Speaker 2>common is over the last

0:16:37.540 --> 0:16:40.860
<v Speaker 2>two years after the comedy you started recovering comedy is

0:16:40.860 --> 0:16:41.350
<v Speaker 2>going up.

0:16:41.940 --> 0:16:43.650
<v Speaker 2>So that gives me a sign

0:16:44.340 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 2>that

0:16:45.940 --> 0:16:49.060
<v Speaker 2>this part of the inflation may not be so

0:16:49.740 --> 0:16:53.359
<v Speaker 2>so temporary. So if you combine

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:57.350
<v Speaker 2>temporary effects

0:16:57.740 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 2>plus the more permanent effect you get high inflation.

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:03.770
<v Speaker 2>And I believe that's the reason we are having

0:17:04.340 --> 0:17:06.170
<v Speaker 2>inflation everywhere.

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:07.770
<v Speaker 2>On top of that

0:17:08.340 --> 0:17:10.670
<v Speaker 2>as you mentioned there is exchange rates

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:12.950
<v Speaker 2>and exchange. It sometimes reflect

0:17:13.740 --> 0:17:16.260
<v Speaker 2>just democratic issues. So

0:17:16.940 --> 0:17:20.060
<v Speaker 2>if you have a country that has political problems or

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:22.770
<v Speaker 2>economic debt issues or

0:17:23.340 --> 0:17:27.170
<v Speaker 2>you guys capital outflows and that means the deposition.

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:29.770
<v Speaker 2>Once you have the deposition there is

0:17:30.540 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 2>past for effect.

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 2>So and if you're in a recovery and that's part

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:37.389
<v Speaker 2>of the paper you mentioned. Thank you if you're in

0:17:37.390 --> 0:17:39.270
<v Speaker 2>a recovery the past was higher

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:41.169
<v Speaker 2>and when you're not in the republic

0:17:41.740 --> 0:17:43.770
<v Speaker 2>given the procession depends

0:17:44.140 --> 0:17:47.420
<v Speaker 2>to have a higher or lower passport, the fate of

0:17:47.420 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 2>some factors, one of them is going to recover or not.

0:17:51.050 --> 0:17:53.490
<v Speaker 2>The second is if you do if your parents is

0:17:53.490 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 2>already undervalued

0:17:55.540 --> 0:17:57.629
<v Speaker 2>and sometimes these are on the planet and if you

0:17:57.630 --> 0:17:58.660
<v Speaker 2>get an additional

0:17:59.140 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 2>the procession coming from

0:18:01.340 --> 0:18:03.950
<v Speaker 2>whatever reason that means higher pressure. So

0:18:04.340 --> 0:18:06.350
<v Speaker 2>global in pleasure. Plus

0:18:06.740 --> 0:18:08.959
<v Speaker 2>it is symptomatic inflation which is sovereign

0:18:09.340 --> 0:18:11.050
<v Speaker 2>inflation. They're all giving

0:18:11.540 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 2>more or less inflation

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:20.260
<v Speaker 2>uh in our major markets developing in that part

0:18:21.940 --> 0:18:27.609
<v Speaker 1>from the perspective of central bank should supply side inflation

0:18:27.619 --> 0:18:28.359
<v Speaker 1>be ignored.

0:18:30.340 --> 0:18:32.670
<v Speaker 2>No I don't think they usually ignored

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 2>but it should be treated differently

0:18:35.340 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 2>from demand

0:18:37.340 --> 0:18:38.860
<v Speaker 2>side inflation.

0:18:39.340 --> 0:18:41.859
<v Speaker 2>one of the months that inflation things are much easier

0:18:42.540 --> 0:18:44.460
<v Speaker 2>because the demand side inflation means that

0:18:45.140 --> 0:18:47.500
<v Speaker 2>you have an inflation and you have to go back

0:18:47.500 --> 0:18:48.770
<v Speaker 2>to your target.

0:18:49.140 --> 0:18:52.419
<v Speaker 2>Well you have to uh you don't have a inflation

0:18:52.420 --> 0:18:54.950
<v Speaker 2>target but you have just the target or you just

0:18:54.950 --> 0:18:56.850
<v Speaker 2>care about inflation. You have to react

0:18:57.540 --> 0:18:58.670
<v Speaker 2>because inflation is up.

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:01.270
<v Speaker 2>If you have a demand side inflation

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:03.170
<v Speaker 2>you're reacting when

0:19:03.540 --> 0:19:04.350
<v Speaker 2>you are

0:19:05.740 --> 0:19:06.270
<v Speaker 2>yeah

0:19:07.540 --> 0:19:10.449
<v Speaker 2>above full full employment you are

0:19:10.940 --> 0:19:12.350
<v Speaker 2>or overheating.

0:19:12.740 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 2>You are below the national rate of unemployment. Whatever

0:19:17.140 --> 0:19:20.510
<v Speaker 2>is your definition of that you are hitting. So demand

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:24.920
<v Speaker 2>side inflation. You get high inflation when the economy is

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 2>strong

0:19:26.540 --> 0:19:28.550
<v Speaker 2>so you react and you

0:19:28.940 --> 0:19:30.670
<v Speaker 2>to celebrate the economy

0:19:31.140 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 2>and you and you and you rain on inflation at

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:34.050
<v Speaker 2>the same time

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:36.350
<v Speaker 2>and you don't get a recession you just get a

0:19:36.350 --> 0:19:40.260
<v Speaker 2>deceleration with low inflation. That's easier to deal.

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:44.870
<v Speaker 2>Probably the supply is that the correlation is there is

0:19:44.869 --> 0:19:45.550
<v Speaker 2>the opposite.

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:49.649
<v Speaker 2>Whenever you have high inflation can the supply shock. It's

0:19:49.650 --> 0:19:51.670
<v Speaker 2>also the case where you're not in full employment,

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:54.050
<v Speaker 2>you tend to have either

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:56.450
<v Speaker 2>it's a supply shock that generates

0:19:57.140 --> 0:20:02.110
<v Speaker 2>typically a nine struck generates a recession or it's just

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:03.050
<v Speaker 2>uh

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:06.060
<v Speaker 2>temporary supply ship that could not allow you to

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:11.350
<v Speaker 2>to produce or you are shortage shortage of production. So

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:13.460
<v Speaker 2>whenever the central bank reacts

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:19.429
<v Speaker 2>to avoid inflation, it makes recession worse or makes the

0:20:19.430 --> 0:20:20.770
<v Speaker 2>deceleration worse

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 2>and that's not

0:20:23.540 --> 0:20:26.270
<v Speaker 2>not ideal moment to do it. However,

0:20:26.940 --> 0:20:28.950
<v Speaker 2>central banks still have to react. So

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:31.170
<v Speaker 2>they I will say that the

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:32.459
<v Speaker 2>yeah,

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:38.060
<v Speaker 2>accepted protocol. If you can say that

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:41.140
<v Speaker 2>is that you react to the secondary effect of

0:20:41.140 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 1>inflation,

0:20:42.340 --> 0:20:42.770
<v Speaker 1>you

0:20:42.770 --> 0:20:44.770
<v Speaker 2>allow prices to go up

0:20:45.540 --> 0:20:48.540
<v Speaker 2>price levels. So you don't you don't want the oil

0:20:48.540 --> 0:20:50.460
<v Speaker 2>shock to go down. You don't want the

0:20:51.140 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 2>the relative prices too

0:20:54.140 --> 0:20:56.659
<v Speaker 2>move back. You don't want a recession,

0:20:57.040 --> 0:21:00.550
<v Speaker 2>You don't want this one time impulse

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:03.770
<v Speaker 2>to just feed into inflation.

0:21:04.340 --> 0:21:08.940
<v Speaker 2>So if you allow wages to get it to absorb

0:21:08.940 --> 0:21:12.410
<v Speaker 2>the past inflation and put them to the future to

0:21:12.410 --> 0:21:16.230
<v Speaker 2>prices and then you get service ISMs had nothing to do.

0:21:16.230 --> 0:21:18.770
<v Speaker 2>For example, in the initial start to start

0:21:19.140 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 2>having increases. So you react to the secondary effect

0:21:24.140 --> 0:21:25.270
<v Speaker 2>of these sharks. So

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:27.350
<v Speaker 2>the man inflation you just react

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 2>normally supply, you react to the secondary effect that you

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:32.949
<v Speaker 2>absorb

0:21:33.340 --> 0:21:34.450
<v Speaker 2>first round effect.

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:40.350
<v Speaker 1>Well, putting on that makes sense. Um So

0:21:40.940 --> 0:21:45.859
<v Speaker 1>temporary, permanent demand supply side, whatever the causes

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve is of course looking at this with

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:51.370
<v Speaker 1>an innovation a couple of years ago it came up

0:21:51.369 --> 0:21:53.770
<v Speaker 1>with this average inflation targeting framework.

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:57.670
<v Speaker 1>And there is this view that it could be by

0:21:57.670 --> 0:22:00.360
<v Speaker 1>design increasing the risk of policy error because it's more

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:00.860
<v Speaker 1>of a

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:04.820
<v Speaker 1>rear view mirror policy. It's not as preemptive as the

0:22:04.830 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 1>earlier reaction function was. And it could then start getting

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:10.830
<v Speaker 1>into policy credibility. Of course, you know, we don't see

0:22:10.830 --> 0:22:13.330
<v Speaker 1>evidence of that in the market based indicators but that

0:22:13.330 --> 0:22:16.929
<v Speaker 1>seems to be one fear around average inflation targeting framework.

0:22:16.940 --> 0:22:18.270
<v Speaker 1>What's your view on that?

0:22:18.940 --> 0:22:19.170
<v Speaker 2>Yeah,

0:22:19.540 --> 0:22:21.550
<v Speaker 2>well my view is that

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:24.850
<v Speaker 2>for quite some time even the heads

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 2>advanced economies and I will say global inflation has been

0:22:30.850 --> 0:22:31.669
<v Speaker 2>subdued

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:35.460
<v Speaker 2>but it has been below target for

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:37.659
<v Speaker 2>some of those economies

0:22:38.140 --> 0:22:40.450
<v Speaker 2>and that means that they had to react some way

0:22:40.450 --> 0:22:41.770
<v Speaker 2>to get back to target

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:44.060
<v Speaker 2>and one of the devices

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:45.770
<v Speaker 2>was to

0:22:46.340 --> 0:22:47.770
<v Speaker 2>affect expectations

0:22:48.540 --> 0:22:51.060
<v Speaker 2>and to say that even infiltration goes up,

0:22:51.940 --> 0:22:53.350
<v Speaker 2>they will not react immediately.

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:56.450
<v Speaker 2>And a way to commit for that was the average

0:22:56.450 --> 0:22:58.050
<v Speaker 2>inflation tarik who say well

0:22:58.540 --> 0:23:00.160
<v Speaker 2>even if inflation goes up

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:03.660
<v Speaker 2>it will take that, I will look at the average,

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:05.450
<v Speaker 2>I will not look at the

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:09.270
<v Speaker 2>the the the the margin

0:23:09.940 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 2>So that is somehow a way to commit yourself

0:23:14.540 --> 0:23:15.170
<v Speaker 2>two

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:16.450
<v Speaker 2>having

0:23:16.940 --> 0:23:18.770
<v Speaker 2>low nominal rates which

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 2>if inflation goes up

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:23.460
<v Speaker 2>means lower real rates

0:23:24.140 --> 0:23:26.670
<v Speaker 2>and that's the way to stimulate the economy when you

0:23:26.670 --> 0:23:27.050
<v Speaker 2>are

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:30.670
<v Speaker 2>a very low inflation below your target.

0:23:31.540 --> 0:23:32.860
<v Speaker 2>So by design

0:23:33.540 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 2>you say you're not going to react to the margin.

0:23:37.540 --> 0:23:39.670
<v Speaker 2>The problem is when you get to the marching

0:23:40.340 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 2>and inflation is up

0:23:42.140 --> 0:23:44.270
<v Speaker 2>and you have already committed to not react

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:45.859
<v Speaker 2>to stimulate the economy.

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 2>So what we see today is basically

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:49.770
<v Speaker 2>the commitment

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:51.260
<v Speaker 2>that you

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:53.949
<v Speaker 2>promise you have to deliver

0:23:54.340 --> 0:23:55.660
<v Speaker 2>because you don't deliver,

0:23:56.340 --> 0:23:58.350
<v Speaker 2>you won't be able next time too

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:00.770
<v Speaker 2>promise and people believe

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:03.270
<v Speaker 2>so now you're getting the inflation,

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:08.190
<v Speaker 2>you are committed to lower interest real interface and you're

0:24:08.190 --> 0:24:09.060
<v Speaker 2>delivering that.

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:11.170
<v Speaker 2>Of course

0:24:11.540 --> 0:24:13.060
<v Speaker 2>that's good in the way up

0:24:13.540 --> 0:24:15.270
<v Speaker 2>because you allow the economy to

0:24:15.740 --> 0:24:17.360
<v Speaker 2>some more degrees of freedom.

0:24:17.940 --> 0:24:19.050
<v Speaker 2>As you mentioned

0:24:19.740 --> 0:24:21.169
<v Speaker 2>once you guys inflation and

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:23.860
<v Speaker 2>want inflation to go down,

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:26.660
<v Speaker 2>then you're in the opposite side,

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:29.670
<v Speaker 2>which means that you will accept

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:32.950
<v Speaker 2>higher inflation

0:24:33.340 --> 0:24:34.270
<v Speaker 2>even though

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:38.160
<v Speaker 2>you need to be preemptive and you need to somehow

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:42.530
<v Speaker 2>produce inflation. So you're basically in the way down. You

0:24:42.530 --> 0:24:43.060
<v Speaker 2>are

0:24:44.140 --> 0:24:47.330
<v Speaker 2>with every inflation you're using part of you, what you

0:24:47.330 --> 0:24:47.859
<v Speaker 2>mentioned

0:24:48.540 --> 0:24:50.670
<v Speaker 2>the real mirror, you were looking at

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 2>passive relations and

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:54.460
<v Speaker 2>you'll have to

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:56.550
<v Speaker 2>see what happens. So

0:24:57.040 --> 0:24:58.660
<v Speaker 2>it is it isn't

0:24:59.340 --> 0:25:01.350
<v Speaker 2>traditional classic

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 2>trade off

0:25:03.540 --> 0:25:04.670
<v Speaker 2>the commitment

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:06.170
<v Speaker 2>and flexibility

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:07.859
<v Speaker 2>and we are now

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:09.460
<v Speaker 2>basically pain

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:12.670
<v Speaker 2>the prices of commitment of past commitments.

0:25:13.340 --> 0:25:15.460
<v Speaker 2>And we could build

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:18.859
<v Speaker 2>how we could have a scenario was going to be lucky.

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 2>I'll take the lack out of it. But you could

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:22.859
<v Speaker 2>have a scenario

0:25:23.340 --> 0:25:25.770
<v Speaker 2>where inflation is temporary

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:28.670
<v Speaker 2>and the costs are very small

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:31.060
<v Speaker 2>following an average and

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:34.160
<v Speaker 2>you've done well and no, we're not overreacting

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:35.670
<v Speaker 2>or

0:25:36.340 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 2>you will have a more permanent inflation

0:25:39.140 --> 0:25:41.450
<v Speaker 2>were the consciousness this will be

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:44.170
<v Speaker 2>much dear because

0:25:44.540 --> 0:25:47.170
<v Speaker 2>you will be seen husband behind the curve

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:52.350
<v Speaker 2>and trying to raise interest of inflation is already embedded

0:25:52.350 --> 0:25:53.460
<v Speaker 2>in prices. So

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:55.850
<v Speaker 2>I will say next year

0:25:56.240 --> 0:25:57.350
<v Speaker 2>will be crucial

0:25:58.340 --> 0:26:00.050
<v Speaker 2>to start to define whether

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:02.950
<v Speaker 2>we have we are having a temporary inflation

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:05.270
<v Speaker 2>and being more

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:06.750
<v Speaker 2>uh huh.

0:26:07.340 --> 0:26:09.260
<v Speaker 2>I will say slow

0:26:09.740 --> 0:26:11.270
<v Speaker 2>and moving out which is good

0:26:12.340 --> 0:26:14.460
<v Speaker 2>or permanent inflation were

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:15.860
<v Speaker 2>you'll have to run

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 2>behind

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 2>what you lost.

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:20.169
<v Speaker 1>All right.

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:22.450
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think that you know I mean if

0:26:22.450 --> 0:26:23.770
<v Speaker 1>one is going to go

0:26:24.140 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>formerly toward average inefficient targeting one should probably actually say

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:29.490
<v Speaker 1>very clearly you know over which period which is still

0:26:29.490 --> 0:26:31.850
<v Speaker 1>sort of ambiguous as far as the Fed is concerned.

0:26:31.859 --> 0:26:33.540
<v Speaker 1>They might as well say it's a price level target

0:26:33.540 --> 0:26:34.270
<v Speaker 1>in my view.

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:38.730
<v Speaker 1>Um So Ellen related to this is staying with the

0:26:38.730 --> 0:26:40.619
<v Speaker 1>Fed but this is also applicable to the Bank of

0:26:40.619 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Japan and the C. V. And to some extent some

0:26:43.090 --> 0:26:45.300
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets as well that you know a lot of

0:26:45.300 --> 0:26:48.490
<v Speaker 1>money printing since the GFC. And until very recently you

0:26:48.490 --> 0:26:51.350
<v Speaker 1>know there was no you know manifestation of major inflation.

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:53.460
<v Speaker 1>And we also now have

0:26:53.940 --> 0:26:56.570
<v Speaker 1>parallel to this this new line of thinking that if

0:26:56.570 --> 0:26:57.770
<v Speaker 1>the government wants to

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:03.160
<v Speaker 1>spend into productive areas they should just issue that

0:27:03.940 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 1>central banks should help them in terms of the financing

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:08.260
<v Speaker 1>if it needs even monetization so be it

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 1>but but it's okay because it will raise long term

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:15.940
<v Speaker 1>growth rate, it will address social inequities and therefore we

0:27:15.940 --> 0:27:18.369
<v Speaker 1>should not spend too much time worrying about debt levels

0:27:18.369 --> 0:27:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and so on.

0:27:19.340 --> 0:27:22.030
<v Speaker 1>Um It seems like a bit of a call for

0:27:22.030 --> 0:27:24.179
<v Speaker 1>a paradigm shift from what you and I studied in

0:27:24.180 --> 0:27:27.740
<v Speaker 1>school or practice in our professional careers. What's your view

0:27:27.740 --> 0:27:28.270
<v Speaker 1>on this?

0:27:29.740 --> 0:27:32.260
<v Speaker 2>My view is that we are still,

0:27:32.740 --> 0:27:35.459
<v Speaker 2>we have not still abolished the limit.

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:39.649
<v Speaker 2>It could be that the limits in the last few

0:27:39.650 --> 0:27:40.350
<v Speaker 2>decades

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:41.669
<v Speaker 2>where

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:44.060
<v Speaker 2>far away from what we

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:46.450
<v Speaker 2>expected because of the

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:49.460
<v Speaker 2>global nature of what we have seen

0:27:50.140 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 2>and incorporation of large chunks of operation

0:27:53.940 --> 0:27:55.050
<v Speaker 2>into the global

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:56.270
<v Speaker 2>economy

0:27:56.740 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 2>let me have pushed

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:00.350
<v Speaker 2>prices to go down

0:28:00.940 --> 0:28:03.550
<v Speaker 2>not to go down, but inflation to go down.

0:28:04.340 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 2>Uh and it may have given impression

0:28:08.140 --> 0:28:10.060
<v Speaker 2>that the inflation will never come,

0:28:10.940 --> 0:28:12.260
<v Speaker 2>but it will never happen.

0:28:12.740 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 2>So then you started with

0:28:15.340 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 2>theories

0:28:16.940 --> 0:28:18.860
<v Speaker 2>that will tell you that it's forever

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 2>uh that whatever you bring

0:28:23.540 --> 0:28:25.850
<v Speaker 2>well the world whatever you that limit

0:28:26.340 --> 0:28:28.510
<v Speaker 2>and or limit, you can continue doing it. And it's

0:28:28.510 --> 0:28:29.160
<v Speaker 2>always

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:31.060
<v Speaker 2>a very,

0:28:31.940 --> 0:28:36.119
<v Speaker 2>I will say a very enticing proposition because if you

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:37.270
<v Speaker 2>don't have that limits,

0:28:37.940 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 2>you can just spend whatever you want because

0:28:40.540 --> 0:28:41.460
<v Speaker 2>just you should get

0:28:42.140 --> 0:28:45.130
<v Speaker 2>and if you don't have limits to spending, it's wonderful

0:28:45.130 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 2>for

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:47.860
<v Speaker 2>politicians because they don't want to,

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:50.810
<v Speaker 2>they don't need to care about budget constraint they just

0:28:50.810 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 2>spent

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 2>and

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:56.770
<v Speaker 2>what is the problem with another bridge?

0:28:57.240 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 2>What is the problem for another support?

0:28:59.740 --> 0:29:01.450
<v Speaker 2>What is the problem for another

0:29:02.140 --> 0:29:03.270
<v Speaker 2>um

0:29:03.740 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 2>another program? Either infrastructure or not

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 2>or just writing checks

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:13.060
<v Speaker 2>there's no limit. So why do you care?

0:29:13.940 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 2>And if there is a limit for that,

0:29:15.940 --> 0:29:18.270
<v Speaker 2>you just print it and he was printing is free.

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:19.860
<v Speaker 2>Just do it.

0:29:20.540 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 2>And of course there's enough people like me

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 2>have their very suspicions

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:29.260
<v Speaker 2>of this non limited theories.

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:32.570
<v Speaker 2>We just say, look, it's just does it, it's not

0:29:32.570 --> 0:29:33.770
<v Speaker 2>gonna work forever.

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:36.550
<v Speaker 2>It's good that we don't try to breach this limit.

0:29:37.340 --> 0:29:40.850
<v Speaker 2>Uh maybe we already reached the limits because

0:29:41.340 --> 0:29:43.980
<v Speaker 2>inflation seems to be back and we're discussing whether it's

0:29:43.980 --> 0:29:44.550
<v Speaker 2>permanent

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:46.060
<v Speaker 2>or temporary,

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:50.459
<v Speaker 2>maybe it's permanent and they understand then the party's over,

0:29:51.540 --> 0:29:53.670
<v Speaker 2>maybe it's temporary and we still have

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 2>more to go on this

0:29:56.740 --> 0:29:58.450
<v Speaker 2>trying to with the limits. But

0:29:58.940 --> 0:30:01.550
<v Speaker 2>what I would say is that what if you look

0:30:01.550 --> 0:30:02.270
<v Speaker 2>at history,

0:30:02.740 --> 0:30:05.459
<v Speaker 2>it tells us that it takes long

0:30:06.140 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 2>but eventually

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:08.770
<v Speaker 2>you reach the limits

0:30:09.340 --> 0:30:11.860
<v Speaker 2>and then you say why why why we

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 2>why we didn't stop the excesses,

0:30:14.940 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Why we have not stopped before. Let's regulate better. Let's

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:21.770
<v Speaker 2>do a different thing.

0:30:22.140 --> 0:30:25.950
<v Speaker 2>Ask for more capital. As for more regulation,

0:30:26.340 --> 0:30:27.860
<v Speaker 2>let's pray we do stuff.

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:29.350
<v Speaker 2>But in the way up

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:31.060
<v Speaker 2>we just keep

0:30:31.540 --> 0:30:35.050
<v Speaker 2>entertaining theories that basically say

0:30:35.740 --> 0:30:38.770
<v Speaker 2>no excessive, they don't exist. Just go free

0:30:39.540 --> 0:30:42.450
<v Speaker 2>and then we face the crisis and then we blame everybody.

0:30:43.140 --> 0:30:44.850
<v Speaker 2>But at the end of the day we should blame

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:48.460
<v Speaker 2>the non limit theories have been quite difficult

0:30:49.340 --> 0:30:51.670
<v Speaker 2>because of the coffee that the citizens

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:53.060
<v Speaker 2>of the crisis

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:54.770
<v Speaker 2>to still argue

0:30:55.540 --> 0:30:59.210
<v Speaker 2>that's what that whatever you do to support your economy,

0:30:59.210 --> 0:31:00.460
<v Speaker 2>you support the poor,

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:04.959
<v Speaker 2>you have consciousness of the need to governments to act.

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:07.060
<v Speaker 2>But at the same time, no,

0:31:07.740 --> 0:31:09.770
<v Speaker 2>there are limits of what you can do

0:31:10.340 --> 0:31:12.770
<v Speaker 2>in terms of budgets and monetary policy store.

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Final question, Ilan, I mean, half or two more questions.

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 1>One question first, is that have economists as professionals, has

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:24.200
<v Speaker 1>done a poor job of sort of figuring out what

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:26.469
<v Speaker 1>the limit is. Because I remember a decade ago, there

0:31:26.470 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 1>was a whole Reinhart Rogoff paper and they looked at,

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, hundreds of years of, you know, debt crisis

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:34.270
<v Speaker 1>and they had certain thresholds

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 1>um which many developed countries have pushed through in in

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:40.530
<v Speaker 1>recent years, and and therefore, you know, you have the

0:31:40.540 --> 0:31:43.540
<v Speaker 1>proponents of free lunch, you will say, look, they went

0:31:43.540 --> 0:31:46.250
<v Speaker 1>past the Reinhart Rogoff threshold and nothing has happened. So

0:31:46.250 --> 0:31:51.209
<v Speaker 1>why should developing countries uh do anything differently? So, firstly,

0:31:51.220 --> 0:31:53.420
<v Speaker 1>I mean, do you think that, you know, there are

0:31:53.420 --> 0:31:55.340
<v Speaker 1>ways to sort of establish

0:31:55.540 --> 0:31:57.550
<v Speaker 1>such limits? Or is it really,

0:31:58.340 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 1>you know,

0:31:59.140 --> 0:32:00.960
<v Speaker 1>country by country idiosyncratic?

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:05.530
<v Speaker 2>No, I think that just that it could be the

0:32:05.530 --> 0:32:06.670
<v Speaker 2>case that for

0:32:07.140 --> 0:32:09.060
<v Speaker 2>some specific reason

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 2>we we just faced

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 2>and there's inflationary decades,

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:18.270
<v Speaker 2>let's assume

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:20.170
<v Speaker 2>just for reasoning

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:24.670
<v Speaker 2>That you have 2,000 2010, 2020,

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 2>20 years of abnormal low inflation,

0:32:29.540 --> 0:32:31.670
<v Speaker 2>I just give you one reason for that was

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:34.270
<v Speaker 2>logical operation of

0:32:35.940 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 2>of

0:32:37.340 --> 0:32:40.060
<v Speaker 2>big chance of the population to the global market.

0:32:40.740 --> 0:32:44.450
<v Speaker 2>That for me is a very reasonable explanation for low

0:32:44.450 --> 0:32:45.270
<v Speaker 2>inflation

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:49.110
<v Speaker 2>for two or three decades. Let's assume that that's happening

0:32:49.110 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 2>to two decades.

0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 2>We as an economist we don't have the data

0:32:55.340 --> 0:32:58.850
<v Speaker 2>to say that this is just one larger cycle

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:01.670
<v Speaker 2>and not just a permanent change.

0:33:02.540 --> 0:33:05.560
<v Speaker 2>So you're we're here we look at the past dana.

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:07.770
<v Speaker 2>It gives us an information.

0:33:08.140 --> 0:33:09.850
<v Speaker 2>If it doesn't come in one year

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:12.660
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't come in five years it doesn't have in

0:33:12.660 --> 0:33:15.960
<v Speaker 2>10 years and then we are conclude that will never come.

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:20.670
<v Speaker 2>But maybe I was fun of time

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:23.960
<v Speaker 2>generation

0:33:24.740 --> 0:33:25.550
<v Speaker 2>is

0:33:26.340 --> 0:33:28.260
<v Speaker 2>2030 years. Looking like eternity

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 2>move for the economy.

0:33:30.740 --> 0:33:33.050
<v Speaker 2>It's not an intelligent just 20 years

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:37.660
<v Speaker 2>but we have a generation economist memories papers

0:33:38.040 --> 0:33:40.459
<v Speaker 2>it just takes its for happen because it's

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:42.670
<v Speaker 2>so life those part of life.

0:33:44.040 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 2>But when people were looking at it from the past

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 2>will say well there was these 2 20 years of

0:33:49.890 --> 0:33:53.260
<v Speaker 2>low inflation. The guys believe that these 20 years is

0:33:53.260 --> 0:33:54.060
<v Speaker 2>forever

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:55.550
<v Speaker 2>and then they screwed up.

0:33:55.940 --> 0:33:56.450
<v Speaker 2>Okay

0:33:57.040 --> 0:33:58.060
<v Speaker 2>then they had to

0:33:58.740 --> 0:34:02.440
<v Speaker 2>inflation went up actually just have to go up. You

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:03.170
<v Speaker 2>had some

0:34:03.640 --> 0:34:07.290
<v Speaker 2>crisis and then they again learned the least. Lessen the

0:34:07.290 --> 0:34:08.050
<v Speaker 2>disagreements

0:34:10.340 --> 0:34:12.650
<v Speaker 1>very well. Put it on. I I love the way

0:34:12.650 --> 0:34:15.930
<v Speaker 1>you sort of you know frame that gives me some

0:34:15.940 --> 0:34:17.170
<v Speaker 1>food for thought as well.

0:34:17.540 --> 0:34:18.670
<v Speaker 1>All right. Finally

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 1>it's been almost a little more than 2 20 years

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 1>since you left Washington D. C. And went back to brazil.

0:34:24.489 --> 0:34:26.870
<v Speaker 1>You've done all sorts of things in this last 20

0:34:26.870 --> 0:34:30.209
<v Speaker 1>years and now starting in january 2022 you'll be heading

0:34:30.210 --> 0:34:32.969
<v Speaker 1>the western hemisphere department. The I. M. F. What's your

0:34:32.980 --> 0:34:34.360
<v Speaker 1>personal reflection on that?

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:38.540
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's so nice to be able to have a

0:34:38.550 --> 0:34:39.470
<v Speaker 2>full cycle.

0:34:40.140 --> 0:34:41.759
<v Speaker 2>We started like

0:34:42.140 --> 0:34:43.669
<v Speaker 2>young economies

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:45.260
<v Speaker 2>trying to figure out

0:34:45.940 --> 0:34:49.860
<v Speaker 2>how the world behaves how american markets behave.

0:34:50.340 --> 0:34:51.860
<v Speaker 2>We wrote those papers

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:54.770
<v Speaker 2>but we also wanted to know what will happen with

0:34:54.770 --> 0:34:55.670
<v Speaker 2>our careers.

0:34:56.140 --> 0:34:57.549
<v Speaker 2>We was just at the beginning

0:34:58.239 --> 0:35:00.850
<v Speaker 2>Now we have spent 20 years later.

0:35:01.540 --> 0:35:05.469
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah 2025 years later. Actually

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:07.660
<v Speaker 2>we are we are back.

0:35:08.340 --> 0:35:10.260
<v Speaker 2>I am back to

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 2>try to go back to public policy.

0:35:14.140 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 2>I always liked the fact that

0:35:17.140 --> 0:35:21.360
<v Speaker 2>and we can have experiencing in the private sector, learn

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:22.660
<v Speaker 2>how markets work,

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:26.460
<v Speaker 2>learn how, how people react to different

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:28.550
<v Speaker 2>incentive policies,

0:35:28.940 --> 0:35:30.050
<v Speaker 2>how people read

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:32.660
<v Speaker 2>public policy policymakers

0:35:33.140 --> 0:35:34.760
<v Speaker 2>way of communicating

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:37.250
<v Speaker 2>and then be able to go back to

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:40.060
<v Speaker 2>public sector

0:35:40.540 --> 0:35:42.360
<v Speaker 2>and continue to try to help.

0:35:43.140 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 2>But we studied, we evolved phds,

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:47.250
<v Speaker 2>we learn

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:48.970
<v Speaker 2>um

0:35:49.340 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 2>I always thought that there was

0:35:51.640 --> 0:35:54.360
<v Speaker 2>part of us that give us back society

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:57.170
<v Speaker 2>are that they invested in us.

0:35:57.840 --> 0:35:59.160
<v Speaker 2>In addition that

0:35:59.739 --> 0:36:01.540
<v Speaker 2>I think public policy is fun.

0:36:02.130 --> 0:36:03.350
<v Speaker 2>It's fun to see,

0:36:03.830 --> 0:36:04.850
<v Speaker 2>try to

0:36:05.230 --> 0:36:06.340
<v Speaker 2>figure out how to

0:36:07.130 --> 0:36:09.049
<v Speaker 2>how to help the economies.

0:36:10.730 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Well I don I wish you the very best of luck.

0:36:13.210 --> 0:36:14.810
<v Speaker 1>I know that you have a few months between your

0:36:14.810 --> 0:36:17.850
<v Speaker 1>current job and the next job. So rest well enjoy

0:36:17.850 --> 0:36:20.220
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year. And I look forward to

0:36:20.219 --> 0:36:21.850
<v Speaker 1>seeing you in Washington one of these days.

0:36:22.830 --> 0:36:27.230
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I unfortunately will not rest because I still have

0:36:27.230 --> 0:36:30.540
<v Speaker 2>to do the transition here. My current job.

0:36:31.030 --> 0:36:31.960
<v Speaker 2>I have

0:36:32.330 --> 0:36:36.460
<v Speaker 2>do all the changes position, hiring everything.

0:36:36.930 --> 0:36:39.240
<v Speaker 2>But I hope to get today and that we've

0:36:39.730 --> 0:36:41.460
<v Speaker 2>full energy

0:36:42.130 --> 0:36:43.350
<v Speaker 2>to work and

0:36:43.830 --> 0:36:44.850
<v Speaker 2>company will

0:36:45.330 --> 0:36:46.850
<v Speaker 2>keep in touch. Let's do that.

0:36:47.230 --> 0:36:49.840
<v Speaker 2>And if you're in Washington please come by

0:36:50.630 --> 0:36:53.220
<v Speaker 1>uh you can count on that island. Uh thank you

0:36:53.219 --> 0:36:55.960
<v Speaker 1>again very very much And thanks to our listeners as well,

0:36:56.330 --> 0:36:59.810
<v Speaker 1>Copay time was produced by Martin Tuckey Daisy Sharma and

0:36:59.810 --> 0:37:03.330
<v Speaker 1>violently provided additional assistance. It is for information only and

0:37:03.330 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 1>does not represent any trade recommendations. All 63 episodes of

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:10.130
<v Speaker 1>copay time are available on YouTube and on all major

0:37:10.130 --> 0:37:11.239
<v Speaker 1>podcast platforms

0:37:11.630 --> 0:37:15.629
<v Speaker 1>including apple, google and Spotify. As for our research publications,

0:37:15.630 --> 0:37:18.700
<v Speaker 1>webinars and live stream. You can find them all like

0:37:18.700 --> 0:37:22.750
<v Speaker 1>googling dBS research that great. Have a great day