WEBVTT - Kopi Time E088 - Dr. Lynn Loo on Decarbonising International Shipping

0:00:06.410 --> 0:00:09.950
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Coffee Time, a podcast series on markets and

0:00:09.950 --> 0:00:13.299
<v Speaker 1>economies from dBS group Research. I'm Tamar Beck, chief economist

0:00:13.300 --> 0:00:18.050
<v Speaker 1>welcoming to our 88th episode. Pretty Auspicious number. Uh today's

0:00:18.050 --> 0:00:21.340
<v Speaker 1>guest is dr lin liu, who will talk about efforts

0:00:21.340 --> 0:00:23.650
<v Speaker 1>to bring a critical part of the global economy, which

0:00:23.650 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>is international shipping.

0:00:25.340 --> 0:00:29.170
<v Speaker 1>Uh an academic by training Dr Lewis presently on leave

0:00:29.170 --> 0:00:33.140
<v Speaker 1>from Princeton University where she is Theodora D and William H. Walton,

0:00:33.150 --> 0:00:37.460
<v Speaker 1>third professor in engineering in 2017, she co founded and

0:00:37.460 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Luca Technologies, a startup, developing wireless smart window solutions to

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>increasing energy efficiency of buildings and improve occupant comfort.

0:00:46.450 --> 0:00:50.019
<v Speaker 1>Since 2021. She has been here in Singapore shaping and

0:00:50.020 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>leading the Global Center for Maritime decarbonization or GCM D.

0:00:54.930 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>You will hear that acronym several times in this podcast.

0:00:58.130 --> 0:01:00.370
<v Speaker 1>T C M D is a nonprofit set up to

0:01:00.370 --> 0:01:04.460
<v Speaker 1>help accelerate international shipping transition to a low and zero

0:01:04.459 --> 0:01:08.190
<v Speaker 1>carbon future. We've done quite a few podcasts on climate change,

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:10.830
<v Speaker 1>but this one is very sectoral, very specific and I'm

0:01:10.830 --> 0:01:14.050
<v Speaker 1>really excited about it. Dr lin liu. Welcome to Covid Time.

0:01:14.530 --> 0:01:16.830
<v Speaker 2>Hi, thanks for having me.

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:20.229
<v Speaker 1>It's a pleasure to have you tell us about GCM D.

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:24.429
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I prefer to go with the acronym G cmd

0:01:24.430 --> 0:01:28.140
<v Speaker 2>because the full name is indeed a mouthful. Um so

0:01:28.140 --> 0:01:30.950
<v Speaker 2>as you said, G cmd is a nonprofit, we're about

0:01:30.950 --> 0:01:35.540
<v Speaker 2>14 months old. We were set up at the recommendation

0:01:35.540 --> 0:01:40.330
<v Speaker 2>of this international advisory panel for maritime decarbonization that was

0:01:40.330 --> 0:01:41.670
<v Speaker 2>convened here in Singapore.

0:01:41.860 --> 0:01:48.050
<v Speaker 2>Um that that had basically chief executives of shipping companies,

0:01:48.060 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 2>battery companies, etcetera. To think about what we can do

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:56.910
<v Speaker 2>here to really um move the sector forward. And so

0:01:56.920 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 2>the I. P. Met over covid and recommended the setting

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:03.790
<v Speaker 2>up of um a coordinating body uh to look at

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:08.389
<v Speaker 2>action oriented things that we can do to accelerate decarbonization

0:02:08.389 --> 0:02:10.270
<v Speaker 2>for international shipping.

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:14.940
<v Speaker 2>Um This recommendation was put forward um in april last

0:02:14.940 --> 0:02:18.350
<v Speaker 2>year and that was accepted. Uh Six industry partners came

0:02:18.350 --> 0:02:21.780
<v Speaker 2>forward and said they would start, so they are our

0:02:21.780 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 2>founding partners essentially and they provided $10 million apiece. And

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:30.070
<v Speaker 2>then Singapore's Maritime and Port Authority came in and match

0:02:30.070 --> 0:02:33.650
<v Speaker 2>that with $60 million and that formed the first tranche

0:02:33.660 --> 0:02:34.270
<v Speaker 2>of our fund

0:02:34.287 --> 0:02:37.567
<v Speaker 2>for G C M G. So G CMd sits right

0:02:37.567 --> 0:02:42.167
<v Speaker 2>at the private and public interface. Um and really our

0:02:42.167 --> 0:02:46.427
<v Speaker 2>mission is to help the international shipping sector eliminate g

0:02:46.427 --> 0:02:50.776
<v Speaker 2>emissions and we do this by doing three following things.

0:02:50.776 --> 0:02:55.017
<v Speaker 2>One is to shape standards for future fuels, uh the

0:02:55.017 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 2>other is to finance first of a kind

0:02:57.894 --> 0:03:01.113
<v Speaker 2>projects and then the third would be to pilot low

0:03:01.114 --> 0:03:06.434
<v Speaker 2>carbon solutions uh in real world operating conditions. And the

0:03:06.434 --> 0:03:09.304
<v Speaker 2>reason we can do this is because um you know,

0:03:09.304 --> 0:03:11.714
<v Speaker 2>we are a group of engineers and scientists, we have

0:03:11.714 --> 0:03:16.044
<v Speaker 2>domain and technical expertise, we can scope projects, we have

0:03:16.044 --> 0:03:19.104
<v Speaker 2>the flexible funding that our founders have provided us with

0:03:19.114 --> 0:03:21.490
<v Speaker 2>and subsequent partners have provided us with.

0:03:21.501 --> 0:03:24.001
<v Speaker 2>We are an N. G. O. So we're neutral convener

0:03:24.001 --> 0:03:27.061
<v Speaker 2>so we can bring the stakeholders across the supply chain.

0:03:27.071 --> 0:03:30.951
<v Speaker 2>Um and even beyond the ecosystem together to work on

0:03:30.951 --> 0:03:34.430
<v Speaker 2>these pilots and then finally with mph as our partner

0:03:34.431 --> 0:03:36.891
<v Speaker 2>we have access to regulators and so we can begin

0:03:36.891 --> 0:03:40.251
<v Speaker 2>to think about putting sandboxes together so that we can

0:03:40.251 --> 0:03:43.311
<v Speaker 2>actually do these meaningful pilots. So that's in a nutshell.

0:03:43.321 --> 0:03:45.110
<v Speaker 2>Woogie cmd is

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:45.740
<v Speaker 2>oh

0:03:45.740 --> 0:03:49.530
<v Speaker 1>this is so exciting. Um the ability to have that

0:03:49.530 --> 0:03:53.450
<v Speaker 1>kind of flexibility and be in a coordinating role. Um

0:03:53.460 --> 0:03:55.410
<v Speaker 1>and that sounds like a role of a lifetime Lynn.

0:03:55.420 --> 0:03:58.380
<v Speaker 1>Um but let me step back for a second and

0:03:58.380 --> 0:04:00.470
<v Speaker 1>ask the most obvious question, which is why do we

0:04:00.470 --> 0:04:03.630
<v Speaker 1>need to solve for maritime decarbonization and how large are

0:04:03.630 --> 0:04:04.460
<v Speaker 1>the States?

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Ah that's a really good question. I mean um so

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:11.839
<v Speaker 2>14 months ago I knew nothing about shipping, right? And

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:15.780
<v Speaker 2>so to me shipping was um sort of you know

0:04:15.790 --> 0:04:18.430
<v Speaker 2>out of out of sight out of mind and I'm

0:04:18.430 --> 0:04:21.190
<v Speaker 2>sure that's the case for lots of people. We think

0:04:21.190 --> 0:04:23.089
<v Speaker 2>about shipping when we think about O. R.

0:04:23.105 --> 0:04:25.375
<v Speaker 2>Perhaps we think about shipping when we think about our

0:04:25.375 --> 0:04:30.425
<v Speaker 2>Amazon boxes coming outdoors. Um but shipping is really integral

0:04:30.425 --> 0:04:33.455
<v Speaker 2>to the global supply chain. So tomorrow do you know

0:04:33.464 --> 0:04:37.825
<v Speaker 2>that shipping is responsible for 90% of the global trade?

0:04:37.835 --> 0:04:40.805
<v Speaker 2>So it touches 90% of the global trade, right?

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 2>Um and it's responsible for 3% of global carbon emissions.

0:04:45.450 --> 0:04:48.810
<v Speaker 2>Um and just to put things in perspective, 3% may

0:04:48.810 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 2>not sound like a lot, but 3% makes it um

0:04:52.130 --> 0:04:55.430
<v Speaker 2>a the sixth largest emitter, if you will from a

0:04:55.430 --> 0:04:59.550
<v Speaker 2>country perspective, um shipping is regulated by a single entity

0:04:59.550 --> 0:05:03.220
<v Speaker 2>called the International Maritime Organization or the IMF.

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:08.620
<v Speaker 2>Um and so shipping submissions is actually counted um separate

0:05:08.620 --> 0:05:13.050
<v Speaker 2>from individual countries carbon inventory. Right? So it has its

0:05:13.060 --> 0:05:15.969
<v Speaker 2>own carbon emissions. That's why I can tell you it's 3%

0:05:15.980 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 2>and that 3% is comparable to that of aviation. So

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:22.990
<v Speaker 2>why is this such big stakes? Well, because it's such

0:05:22.990 --> 0:05:25.190
<v Speaker 2>an integral part of the global supply chain,

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:28.799
<v Speaker 2>essentially our scope one emissions is always gonna be somebody

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:33.020
<v Speaker 2>else's scope three emissions. So the cargo owners, the consumers,

0:05:33.029 --> 0:05:36.430
<v Speaker 2>they can't dick carbonized if we don't dick carbonized. So

0:05:36.430 --> 0:05:39.180
<v Speaker 2>that's how linked we are in in in terms of

0:05:39.180 --> 0:05:41.950
<v Speaker 2>the global supply chain. Right? So it's really important for

0:05:41.950 --> 0:05:45.580
<v Speaker 2>us to think about decarbonization shipping so that the whole

0:05:45.580 --> 0:05:46.950
<v Speaker 2>world can be carbon eyes.

0:05:47.810 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So speaking of International Maritime Organization, so I understand,

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:54.420
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are these certain targets that they have said.

0:05:54.430 --> 0:05:58.380
<v Speaker 1>So tell us a bit about those targets and your

0:05:58.390 --> 0:06:01.020
<v Speaker 1>overall thoughts, we're gonna go into specific label your broad

0:06:01.020 --> 0:06:04.339
<v Speaker 1>based thoughts on how do we go about addressing these targets.

0:06:05.180 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So, um so I M. O. Has set targets

0:06:08.930 --> 0:06:13.180
<v Speaker 2>for decarbonization. International shipping and the target is to reduce

0:06:13.180 --> 0:06:19.219
<v Speaker 2>carbon intensity by 40% by 2030 relative to 2008 levels,

0:06:19.220 --> 0:06:24.740
<v Speaker 2>and then to reduce total g emissions by 50% by 2050. Now,

0:06:24.740 --> 0:06:28.460
<v Speaker 2>you'll notice that these targets aren't exactly pairs aligned because

0:06:28.460 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 2>power

0:06:28.915 --> 0:06:32.895
<v Speaker 2>um targets call for net zero by 2015. Nonetheless, these

0:06:32.895 --> 0:06:37.235
<v Speaker 2>are very ambitious target for shipping because in order for

0:06:37.235 --> 0:06:40.495
<v Speaker 2>us to get to these kinds of targets, um basically

0:06:40.495 --> 0:06:43.945
<v Speaker 2>we're looking at low carbon and zero carbon fuels that

0:06:43.955 --> 0:06:47.705
<v Speaker 2>are currently not available today. Okay. Um so that's that's

0:06:47.705 --> 0:06:49.685
<v Speaker 2>just the target side of things. So how how am

0:06:49.685 --> 0:06:52.115
<v Speaker 2>I looking at this? Well, I think um

0:06:52.380 --> 0:06:57.460
<v Speaker 2>you know, um shipping went from using wind as propulsion

0:06:57.470 --> 0:07:00.650
<v Speaker 2>to coal to generate steam to oil. And now we're

0:07:00.650 --> 0:07:03.450
<v Speaker 2>looking at sort of the fourth incarnation of what we

0:07:03.450 --> 0:07:05.060
<v Speaker 2>should be using as fuels, right?

0:07:05.190 --> 0:07:08.750
<v Speaker 2>Um just the industrial revolution alone, if you look at

0:07:08.750 --> 0:07:15.100
<v Speaker 2>sort of um what um really helped um economies develop,

0:07:15.110 --> 0:07:19.140
<v Speaker 2>that uh industrial revolution took place, and that energy system

0:07:19.140 --> 0:07:22.370
<v Speaker 2>that was built took more than a century. Um and

0:07:22.370 --> 0:07:26.740
<v Speaker 2>now we're talking about a completely different energy infrastructure and

0:07:26.740 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 2>we'd like to build this in 30 years.

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Um That's a really, really tall task. It's a challenging task.

0:07:32.890 --> 0:07:37.100
<v Speaker 2>Um It's saying this is not meant to cripple one,

0:07:37.110 --> 0:07:40.310
<v Speaker 2>but it's just to put things into perspective, right, in

0:07:40.310 --> 0:07:43.230
<v Speaker 2>terms of how long it took for us to kind

0:07:43.230 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 2>of embrace oil and gas, and now we're saying, okay,

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:48.690
<v Speaker 2>forget about oil and gas. Let's think about renewables. And

0:07:48.690 --> 0:07:51.170
<v Speaker 2>by the way, let's do this in 30 years. Um

0:07:51.180 --> 0:07:54.150
<v Speaker 2>so in order to think about this energy transition, I

0:07:54.150 --> 0:07:57.250
<v Speaker 2>think we need to chunk it up into pieces.

0:07:57.265 --> 0:07:59.865
<v Speaker 2>We need to think about near term solutions. We need

0:07:59.865 --> 0:08:02.185
<v Speaker 2>to think about medium term solutions and then we need

0:08:02.185 --> 0:08:05.115
<v Speaker 2>to think about long term solutions. It's easy to just

0:08:05.115 --> 0:08:07.285
<v Speaker 2>kind of look at the long term solutions because there's

0:08:07.285 --> 0:08:09.935
<v Speaker 2>no question where we'd like to end up, but it's

0:08:09.935 --> 0:08:12.235
<v Speaker 2>not obvious how to get there right. Like I said

0:08:12.245 --> 0:08:15.425
<v Speaker 2>for shipping, the long term solution is really the zero

0:08:15.425 --> 0:08:20.115
<v Speaker 2>carbon fuels, the green pneumonias, green methanol, etcetera that's needed

0:08:20.125 --> 0:08:23.445
<v Speaker 2>um for us to to to be able to sail

0:08:23.445 --> 0:08:26.455
<v Speaker 2>without admitting G. Um

0:08:26.660 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 2>so, so I think what we need to do is

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:30.660
<v Speaker 2>to keep an eye on the ball on the long

0:08:30.660 --> 0:08:33.770
<v Speaker 2>term solution and work hard on that. But in the meantime,

0:08:33.770 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 2>do what we can with what we have now to

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:38.650
<v Speaker 2>start bending the curve. And so what it means is

0:08:38.650 --> 0:08:42.060
<v Speaker 2>we need to simultaneously work on near term solutions. So

0:08:42.059 --> 0:08:43.309
<v Speaker 2>that include a

0:08:43.330 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 2>but it includes technologies that can reduce fuel consumption, like,

0:08:47.730 --> 0:08:52.090
<v Speaker 2>you know, wind sails, like whole cleaning robots, like air lubrication,

0:08:52.100 --> 0:08:55.309
<v Speaker 2>but also look at um low carbon fuels that are

0:08:55.309 --> 0:09:00.740
<v Speaker 2>available today. So biofuels perhaps even liquefied natural gas now

0:09:00.740 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 2>they aren't without their set of issues, but I think

0:09:04.170 --> 0:09:07.930
<v Speaker 2>done right and used properly, they can reduce our carbon

0:09:07.929 --> 0:09:09.300
<v Speaker 2>footprint in the meantime

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:11.780
<v Speaker 2>and then the in the medium term, I think we

0:09:11.780 --> 0:09:15.790
<v Speaker 2>need to think about things like shipboard carbon capture um

0:09:15.790 --> 0:09:20.140
<v Speaker 2>carbon capture provides the runway for green fuels to scale

0:09:20.140 --> 0:09:22.660
<v Speaker 2>for green fuel costs to come down. And so we

0:09:22.660 --> 0:09:25.209
<v Speaker 2>need to think about mid term solutions as well. So

0:09:25.210 --> 0:09:28.170
<v Speaker 2>basically to chunk up the energy transition and think about

0:09:28.170 --> 0:09:33.190
<v Speaker 2>solution in three buckets um most importantly, I think um

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:37.110
<v Speaker 2>you know, we can't do this alone, right? Um um

0:09:37.309 --> 0:09:39.790
<v Speaker 2>just talking about fuels, right? I think if you think

0:09:39.790 --> 0:09:42.830
<v Speaker 2>about shipping fuels is really outside the sector, so we

0:09:42.830 --> 0:09:47.699
<v Speaker 2>need to think about um sectorial collaboration and partnership, but

0:09:47.700 --> 0:09:51.010
<v Speaker 2>we also more importantly need to think about cross sector

0:09:51.010 --> 0:09:55.340
<v Speaker 2>collaboration and partnerships as well in order to really uh

0:09:55.350 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 2>get moving and move the needle and

0:09:58.065 --> 0:10:00.745
<v Speaker 2>and I think finally we need the carrot and the stick.

0:10:00.745 --> 0:10:04.715
<v Speaker 2>So having a price on carbon certainly will help. Um

0:10:04.715 --> 0:10:08.434
<v Speaker 2>and and also having regulations and having these targets so

0:10:08.434 --> 0:10:11.564
<v Speaker 2>that we know where we're headed and that you know,

0:10:11.565 --> 0:10:14.605
<v Speaker 2>these policies are enforced. So all those things need to

0:10:14.605 --> 0:10:16.575
<v Speaker 2>come into play if we're going to get to those

0:10:16.575 --> 0:10:18.819
<v Speaker 2>targets that we just talked about.

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Right, okay, we are gonna unpack some of these because

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>some of the stuff you said, we can't just, you know,

0:10:23.610 --> 0:10:25.679
<v Speaker 1>just use the word you have to explain to us

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:30.079
<v Speaker 1>in greater detail. So um first technologies than solutions and

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:31.860
<v Speaker 1>then I want to talk about carbon capture. Alright, so

0:10:31.860 --> 0:10:35.770
<v Speaker 1>starting with current and frontier technologies, you sort of touched

0:10:35.770 --> 0:10:38.740
<v Speaker 1>upon them and I'm really tantalized by them. So what

0:10:38.740 --> 0:10:41.390
<v Speaker 1>is a little greater detail about some of the technologies

0:10:41.390 --> 0:10:43.949
<v Speaker 1>that you think are promising now and then the frontier

0:10:43.950 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff that you know

0:10:45.017 --> 0:10:47.797
<v Speaker 1>almost sounds like science fiction, but we'd like it to happen.

0:10:47.807 --> 0:10:49.766
<v Speaker 2>Well let's not call it science

0:10:49.767 --> 0:10:50.747
<v Speaker 1>fiction, It

0:10:50.756 --> 0:10:54.016
<v Speaker 2>happen, it's a matter of time, it will happen. So

0:10:54.017 --> 0:10:56.636
<v Speaker 2>we don't want to call that science fiction. Right? So

0:10:56.636 --> 0:10:58.627
<v Speaker 2>we can talk about the near term solutions first. I

0:10:58.627 --> 0:11:01.597
<v Speaker 2>mean near term solutions are things that are currently available

0:11:01.597 --> 0:11:06.686
<v Speaker 2>today that when install you can shave emissions by, I

0:11:06.687 --> 0:11:09.817
<v Speaker 2>don't know anywhere from 1 to 10%. Okay, it doesn't

0:11:09.817 --> 0:11:11.020
<v Speaker 2>get you all the way there, but

0:11:11.034 --> 0:11:13.824
<v Speaker 2>you can start shaving emissions. So those are things like

0:11:13.833 --> 0:11:16.574
<v Speaker 2>wind sales that you can put on board. Um in

0:11:16.574 --> 0:11:19.894
<v Speaker 2>fact just a couple days ago I saw, so my

0:11:19.894 --> 0:11:23.024
<v Speaker 2>office is at, so I look I I overlooked the

0:11:23.294 --> 0:11:27.453
<v Speaker 2>Panjang terminal ports. Um and I saw one of our partnership,

0:11:27.453 --> 0:11:31.383
<v Speaker 2>so this is an ocean network express container ship that

0:11:31.384 --> 0:11:33.864
<v Speaker 2>had this white thing at its bow, so at the

0:11:33.874 --> 0:11:36.034
<v Speaker 2>front of the ship and I couldn't quite figure out

0:11:36.034 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 2>what it was. So I

0:11:37.051 --> 0:11:39.801
<v Speaker 2>Ask your friends at, oh any and they basically said

0:11:39.811 --> 0:11:42.331
<v Speaker 2>Oh it's a wind deflector and so I looked it

0:11:42.331 --> 0:11:44.211
<v Speaker 2>up and it turns out that this wind deflector is

0:11:44.211 --> 0:11:48.310
<v Speaker 2>essentially like a visor on trucks or even on motorcycles.

0:11:48.321 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 2>And it basically reduces drag and by reducing drag as

0:11:51.801 --> 0:11:55.751
<v Speaker 2>it sails, you can reduce fuel consumption and it reduces

0:11:55.751 --> 0:11:58.641
<v Speaker 2>fuel consumption by about 2%. Right? So these are the

0:11:58.641 --> 0:12:00.561
<v Speaker 2>kinds of things one can do in the interim.

0:12:00.811 --> 0:12:03.061
<v Speaker 1>This was a large container ship.

0:12:05.179 --> 0:12:06.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah,

0:12:06.330 --> 0:12:08.680
<v Speaker 2>yeah, yeah, yeah. So, so these are the kinds of

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:12.439
<v Speaker 2>things one can do right? Um there are operational measures

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:15.050
<v Speaker 2>one can also do. So for example, this idea of

0:12:15.050 --> 0:12:19.980
<v Speaker 2>just in time. So basically you can sail more slowly

0:12:19.980 --> 0:12:22.700
<v Speaker 2>and when you sail more slowly, you use less fuel

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:25.210
<v Speaker 2>so that you get to the ports just in time

0:12:25.220 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 2>as opposed to going fast and then getting to the

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:30.500
<v Speaker 2>ports and then having to wait at the court for

0:12:30.510 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 2>a berth space or whatnot. Right? So these are the

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:35.979
<v Speaker 2>kinds of things one can do again. It shapes um

0:12:35.990 --> 0:12:39.429
<v Speaker 2>fuel consumption and so it nets out carbon emissions by

0:12:39.429 --> 0:12:42.179
<v Speaker 2>between 1 to 10% depending on what we're talking about

0:12:42.550 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 2>in terms of fuel. Uh current fuels, low carbon fuels

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:50.949
<v Speaker 2>are available are things like biofuels. Now, biofuels are not

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:53.780
<v Speaker 2>at scale. So we understand that, but you know, if

0:12:53.780 --> 0:12:56.179
<v Speaker 2>you can deploy some of it, you can reduce your

0:12:56.179 --> 0:13:01.020
<v Speaker 2>carbon footprint. So the concept of drop in um is important.

0:13:01.020 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 2>So that's the idea of taking some

0:13:03.615 --> 0:13:06.735
<v Speaker 2>biofuels and dropping it into marine fuel so that you

0:13:06.735 --> 0:13:09.475
<v Speaker 2>can reduce your carbon footprint some now of course it's

0:13:09.475 --> 0:13:12.735
<v Speaker 2>important to know where your biofuel comes from because its

0:13:12.735 --> 0:13:18.575
<v Speaker 2>origination um would affect its carbon footprint reduction. Right? And

0:13:18.575 --> 0:13:20.795
<v Speaker 2>then it's important to know how much you have in

0:13:20.795 --> 0:13:24.675
<v Speaker 2>there so that you can properly calculate your g emissions abatement.

0:13:24.890 --> 0:13:29.559
<v Speaker 2>Um you can use liquefied natural gas um provided that

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:34.470
<v Speaker 2>there's no methane slip upstream, provided you're not leaking methane

0:13:34.470 --> 0:13:38.650
<v Speaker 2>because methane is an even more potent greenhouse gas um

0:13:38.660 --> 0:13:41.990
<v Speaker 2>you can reduce carbon emissions by about 20%. So these

0:13:41.990 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 2>are things that we need to think about. I don't

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 2>think we should a priority cross anything out at this

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:51.060
<v Speaker 2>moment because we need to do whatever we can with

0:13:51.070 --> 0:13:52.349
<v Speaker 2>whatever we have now

0:13:52.367 --> 0:13:55.547
<v Speaker 2>to really bend the curve on carbon emissions. So these

0:13:55.547 --> 0:13:58.117
<v Speaker 2>are the kinds of things we can do sort of now,

0:13:58.267 --> 0:14:01.567
<v Speaker 1>just a second on the biofuel one, is that concept

0:14:01.567 --> 0:14:03.187
<v Speaker 1>or is it actually happening in the world?

0:14:03.587 --> 0:14:06.747
<v Speaker 2>It's actually happening. So I mean there are there have

0:14:06.747 --> 0:14:09.667
<v Speaker 2>been lots of trials that have been done and you

0:14:09.667 --> 0:14:15.136
<v Speaker 2>can commercially purchase biofuels, there's a green fuel premium associated

0:14:15.136 --> 0:14:19.017
<v Speaker 2>with using biofuels and so then you need to justify

0:14:19.017 --> 0:14:19.747
<v Speaker 2>this green fuel

0:14:19.844 --> 0:14:21.984
<v Speaker 2>premium or you need your customers to be able to

0:14:21.984 --> 0:14:24.674
<v Speaker 2>pay for the green fuel premium. So in fact what

0:14:24.674 --> 0:14:28.314
<v Speaker 2>we've done um earlier in the years, we've spoken to

0:14:28.314 --> 0:14:31.664
<v Speaker 2>our stakeholders, this is typical of how we scope our pilots.

0:14:31.674 --> 0:14:34.734
<v Speaker 2>So we spoke to about 200 stakeholders across the supply

0:14:34.734 --> 0:14:37.804
<v Speaker 2>chain and we asked them, why aren't you using biofuels?

0:14:37.804 --> 0:14:41.194
<v Speaker 2>Biofuels are available today? Why aren't you using more biofuels?

0:14:41.204 --> 0:14:45.894
<v Speaker 2>And repeatedly, the pain point that has come up is, well,

0:14:45.894 --> 0:14:47.310
<v Speaker 2>the supply chain is actually quite

0:14:47.321 --> 0:14:50.471
<v Speaker 2>opaque. So we don't quite know what we're getting, we

0:14:50.471 --> 0:14:53.171
<v Speaker 2>don't know what we're paying for. So what we've done

0:14:53.171 --> 0:14:58.441
<v Speaker 2>is we've basically scoped a pilot with 13 vessels bunkering,

0:14:58.451 --> 0:15:02.111
<v Speaker 2>meaning refueling at three different ports on three different continents.

0:15:02.111 --> 0:15:06.591
<v Speaker 2>So Singapore Rotterdam and Houston with different kinds of biofuels

0:15:06.601 --> 0:15:10.781
<v Speaker 2>with the goal of bolstering the supply chain integrity. So

0:15:10.781 --> 0:15:13.661
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna use a tracer technology, we're gonna go all

0:15:13.661 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 2>the way up stream

0:15:15.010 --> 0:15:18.070
<v Speaker 2>to the biofuel producer and we're gonna put that into

0:15:18.070 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 2>the biofuel, it's a tag and flag so you know

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:24.890
<v Speaker 2>where it originates from. So you know, its carbon footprint

0:15:24.900 --> 0:15:27.700
<v Speaker 2>at the beginning and then you follow it down the

0:15:27.700 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 2>supply chain. And so then you can have assurance on

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 2>the quality on the quantity on the abatement potential and

0:15:35.730 --> 0:15:40.670
<v Speaker 2>that should give confidence to the purchaser um to justice

0:15:40.686 --> 0:15:43.816
<v Speaker 2>by the green fuel premium that 11 is purchasing, Right? So,

0:15:43.816 --> 0:15:47.036
<v Speaker 2>so that's sort of the idea to bolster the integrity

0:15:47.036 --> 0:15:49.806
<v Speaker 2>of the supply chain and we're doing this for biofuels

0:15:49.806 --> 0:15:53.556
<v Speaker 2>for now because biofuels are, is available today, but looking

0:15:53.556 --> 0:15:56.696
<v Speaker 2>forward when green fuels become available, they're not going to

0:15:56.696 --> 0:15:59.916
<v Speaker 2>be available at scale immediately. So again, this drop in

0:15:59.916 --> 0:16:03.186
<v Speaker 2>concept of mixing green with gray is going to be important.

0:16:03.196 --> 0:16:05.676
<v Speaker 2>And again, there you want to know how much of

0:16:05.676 --> 0:16:06.350
<v Speaker 2>the green is.

0:16:06.362 --> 0:16:09.132
<v Speaker 2>They're the quality of the green, the carbon footprint of

0:16:09.132 --> 0:16:12.022
<v Speaker 2>the green fuel um so that you can justify the

0:16:12.022 --> 0:16:14.102
<v Speaker 2>green fuel premium. So we think this framework is going

0:16:14.102 --> 0:16:17.852
<v Speaker 2>to be extensible to future green fuels as well.

0:16:17.942 --> 0:16:20.862
<v Speaker 1>That's really interesting. So now on the lng part you

0:16:20.862 --> 0:16:24.282
<v Speaker 1>talked about the risk of methane leakage and so on.

0:16:24.292 --> 0:16:27.272
<v Speaker 1>So walk us through a little bit about the potential

0:16:27.272 --> 0:16:30.052
<v Speaker 1>actual practice and what kind of solutions do you have

0:16:30.052 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 1>in mind to deal with the leakage issue?

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:36.410
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, I think um so the leakage, of

0:16:36.410 --> 0:16:39.620
<v Speaker 2>course the engine um leakages something within the sector and

0:16:39.620 --> 0:16:43.090
<v Speaker 2>that's something that engine manufacturers are working hard to address.

0:16:43.090 --> 0:16:46.510
<v Speaker 2>And in fact I think um done right. Um um

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:50.220
<v Speaker 2>the engines actually have very very little slip or leaks

0:16:50.230 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 2>and so the the large portion of the leeks actually

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:57.970
<v Speaker 2>happened upstream right at the wellhead etcetera etcetera. Um

0:16:57.970 --> 0:17:02.270
<v Speaker 2>so there, I think you need constant monitoring technologies to

0:17:02.270 --> 0:17:05.790
<v Speaker 2>know that you're not leaking methane um and and I

0:17:05.790 --> 0:17:10.389
<v Speaker 2>know there are satellite companies etcetera that are looking at this. Again,

0:17:10.390 --> 0:17:13.859
<v Speaker 2>this is out of this is out of our sectorial scope.

0:17:13.859 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 2>So um we haven't kept track too much except to

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:20.470
<v Speaker 2>say that it's important um for upstream to manage the

0:17:20.470 --> 0:17:22.869
<v Speaker 2>leak and manage the slip along the way.

0:17:24.810 --> 0:17:27.719
<v Speaker 1>Very interesting. Okay, so I'm not going to use the

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:31.050
<v Speaker 1>word science fiction anymore. Frontier technology. So these are the

0:17:31.050 --> 0:17:35.369
<v Speaker 1>intermediate solutions. Where do you see the most exciting? The

0:17:35.369 --> 0:17:37.770
<v Speaker 1>biggest potential on the frontier side is

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:40.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So, I mean, so these would be the zero

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:43.740
<v Speaker 2>carbon fuels. Right. And and so these would be um,

0:17:43.750 --> 0:17:47.770
<v Speaker 2>they're also called E fuels because E stands for, you know,

0:17:47.780 --> 0:17:51.030
<v Speaker 2>from electrons. And so the the implications, you have enough

0:17:51.030 --> 0:17:55.820
<v Speaker 2>renewable electrons to generate green hydrogen and use that green

0:17:55.820 --> 0:18:00.030
<v Speaker 2>hydrogen as a feedstock to produce either ammonia. So that's

0:18:00.030 --> 0:18:01.410
<v Speaker 2>called the green pneumonia

0:18:01.420 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 2>or e methanol, ethanol has one added step of complexity

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:10.149
<v Speaker 2>in its production in that methanol still has a carbon.

0:18:10.150 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 2>So in order for the methanol to be zero carbon,

0:18:13.090 --> 0:18:18.050
<v Speaker 2>you need either a biogenic source of captured carbon or

0:18:18.050 --> 0:18:21.740
<v Speaker 2>you need direct air captured carbon to make that methanol

0:18:21.740 --> 0:18:24.669
<v Speaker 2>in order for the methanol to be zero carbon. Okay,

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:27.640
<v Speaker 2>um or it could be any kind of synthetic fuel,

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:31.620
<v Speaker 2>like a synthetic diesel etcetera, etcetera. So the idea is

0:18:31.630 --> 0:18:35.869
<v Speaker 2>it originates from renewable electrons. So those are the fuels

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:39.450
<v Speaker 2>of the future. And those are the fuels that would um,

0:18:39.460 --> 0:18:43.220
<v Speaker 2>in the long run allow shipping to completely de carbonized.

0:18:43.230 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 2>But these fuels aren't available, like, I mean take ammonia

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:48.530
<v Speaker 2>for for for a second.

0:18:48.710 --> 0:18:51.959
<v Speaker 2>Um, there's very little green ammonia to be to be

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:56.100
<v Speaker 2>spoken off today. Right. Um and so so we need

0:18:56.100 --> 0:18:59.190
<v Speaker 2>time for the infrastructure to scale. We need time to

0:18:59.190 --> 0:19:01.590
<v Speaker 2>build up that supply chain. We need time for the

0:19:01.590 --> 0:19:05.580
<v Speaker 2>production to scale up so that these fuels are available

0:19:05.590 --> 0:19:08.540
<v Speaker 2>um to the shipping community. But I mean,

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:11.220
<v Speaker 2>there are lots of end uses for ammonia. I mean

0:19:11.220 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 2>like fertilizer to Right? And so um yeah, so, so

0:19:15.770 --> 0:19:19.300
<v Speaker 2>so I think um time we need time. And so

0:19:19.300 --> 0:19:21.619
<v Speaker 2>that's why in the interim one needs to think about

0:19:21.619 --> 0:19:24.350
<v Speaker 2>the near term solution as well as the mid term solution,

0:19:24.350 --> 0:19:27.090
<v Speaker 2>which is carbon capture, which I understand will come back

0:19:27.090 --> 0:19:28.389
<v Speaker 2>and talk about in a little bit.

0:19:28.750 --> 0:19:32.670
<v Speaker 1>You wanted to go right there? Yes, I wanna I've

0:19:32.670 --> 0:19:36.050
<v Speaker 1>heard you in other forum talk about carbon capture and

0:19:36.050 --> 0:19:39.550
<v Speaker 1>I've heard some challenges to the notion of carbon capture

0:19:39.550 --> 0:19:41.290
<v Speaker 1>as well. So I went up and read a little bit.

0:19:41.300 --> 0:19:44.030
<v Speaker 1>So there are certain climate activists who argue that, you know,

0:19:44.030 --> 0:19:47.980
<v Speaker 1>carbon capture is expensive. It's energy intensive. It's risky to

0:19:47.980 --> 0:19:52.690
<v Speaker 1>store and risky to dispose um walk us through the

0:19:52.700 --> 0:19:55.590
<v Speaker 1>potential as well as the risks around carbon capture.

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:57.180
<v Speaker 2>I mean,

0:19:58.420 --> 0:20:01.310
<v Speaker 2>the short answer is what you said is all true.

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 2>But then again,

0:20:03.140 --> 0:20:06.070
<v Speaker 2>what technology doesn't have a drawback, right? I mean, even

0:20:06.070 --> 0:20:09.830
<v Speaker 2>the fossil fuel that we use today has a major drawback.

0:20:09.830 --> 0:20:13.860
<v Speaker 2>And that's uh that's that's it's used basically has caused

0:20:13.869 --> 0:20:16.900
<v Speaker 2>irreparable damage to our environment and yet we use it. Right.

0:20:16.900 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, so I think we need to go in

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:19.630
<v Speaker 2>with

0:20:19.690 --> 0:20:23.010
<v Speaker 2>eyes wide open, understand the pros and cons and then

0:20:23.020 --> 0:20:27.570
<v Speaker 2>try to accentuate the pros and then eliminate or mitigate

0:20:27.570 --> 0:20:30.340
<v Speaker 2>the cons. Right? And so so I think that's how

0:20:30.340 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 2>I think about all technologies and carbon capture and sequestration

0:20:34.850 --> 0:20:36.169
<v Speaker 2>in particular.

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:40.350
<v Speaker 2>So the idea of carbon capture is um you're going

0:20:40.350 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 2>to take um C. 02 emissions out. Um And so

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:48.619
<v Speaker 2>there's point source carbon capture and that's basically carbon capture

0:20:48.630 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 2>of flue gasses. Um um and so they're the sio

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:57.090
<v Speaker 2>two is is more concentrated because it comes from flue gas,

0:20:57.090 --> 0:21:00.389
<v Speaker 2>whether it's, you know, a power plant or you know,

0:21:00.390 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 2>a cement

0:21:00.850 --> 0:21:02.950
<v Speaker 2>plan or a steel plant. So this is on land,

0:21:02.950 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 2>let's talk about on land first. Um and um while

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:09.740
<v Speaker 2>the technology um overall is still sort of in the

0:21:09.740 --> 0:21:14.129
<v Speaker 2>demonstration stage, these point source carbon capture technologies would be

0:21:14.130 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 2>the most mature amongst them. And I think, you know,

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:19.970
<v Speaker 2>I mean depending on which report you need, it's about

0:21:20.050 --> 0:21:23.150
<v Speaker 2>$100 a ton for you to break even okay for

0:21:23.150 --> 0:21:25.300
<v Speaker 2>such technology. So yes, it's expensive.

0:21:25.580 --> 0:21:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Um the other technology that's sort of not as far

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 2>along is something called direct air capture and that's you'd

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:36.210
<v Speaker 2>have to capture carbon and and basically separate carbon dioxide

0:21:36.220 --> 0:21:40.300
<v Speaker 2>out from atmosphere. And because it's less concentrated, it's just

0:21:40.300 --> 0:21:42.810
<v Speaker 2>gonna be more energy intensive and it's just gonna cost

0:21:42.810 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 2>more And they're, the cost is between I mean I've

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:51.350
<v Speaker 2>heard numbers between $250 a ton to upward $1000 a ton. Okay.

0:21:51.580 --> 0:21:55.889
<v Speaker 2>Um um For shipping we're thinking about carbon capture on

0:21:55.890 --> 0:22:00.790
<v Speaker 2>ships because you know as you burn fuels you're generating

0:22:00.790 --> 0:22:03.400
<v Speaker 2>carbon dioxide and it comes out of the funnel if

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 2>there's an opportunity to capture that carbon dioxide um then

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 2>you're really releasing less into the atmosphere.

0:22:10.690 --> 0:22:14.669
<v Speaker 2>Um We understand that there's no economies of scale. I

0:22:14.670 --> 0:22:17.670
<v Speaker 2>mean essentially we're putting a small chemical factory on individual

0:22:17.670 --> 0:22:22.310
<v Speaker 2>ships right? Nonetheless as long as we're thinking about sectorial

0:22:22.310 --> 0:22:27.350
<v Speaker 2>emissions and we want to reduce sectorial emissions. This is

0:22:27.350 --> 0:22:31.120
<v Speaker 2>something I think shipping needs to think about. Um So

0:22:31.130 --> 0:22:31.710
<v Speaker 2>um

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:35.490
<v Speaker 2>um what are what what is involved in the process?

0:22:35.490 --> 0:22:39.030
<v Speaker 2>Well it involves capturing carbon dioxide first and then once

0:22:39.030 --> 0:22:41.750
<v Speaker 2>you've captured that C. 02 you need to store it

0:22:41.750 --> 0:22:45.030
<v Speaker 2>on board ships. So you need to liquefy it and

0:22:45.030 --> 0:22:47.730
<v Speaker 2>then store it on board shifts and then you need

0:22:47.730 --> 0:22:49.740
<v Speaker 2>to get rid of it. Um And so there is

0:22:49.750 --> 0:22:53.340
<v Speaker 2>a reverse bunkering process or an offloading process that one

0:22:53.340 --> 0:22:55.710
<v Speaker 2>needs to think about and then one needs to think

0:22:55.710 --> 0:22:57.909
<v Speaker 2>about off takers, what do you do with that carbon

0:22:57.910 --> 0:22:58.430
<v Speaker 2>dioxide

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 2>once you've captured and you've offloaded it. The last thing

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:03.700
<v Speaker 2>you want to do is to release it back into

0:23:03.700 --> 0:23:08.830
<v Speaker 2>the atmosphere. And so we think this is sufficiently interesting

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:11.910
<v Speaker 2>and important to the sector that we've actually two weeks

0:23:11.910 --> 0:23:15.950
<v Speaker 2>ago just launched another pilot um looking at ship world

0:23:15.950 --> 0:23:20.120
<v Speaker 2>carbon capture, and here this is going to be the

0:23:20.130 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 2>largest carbon capture a pilot to date. It adds

0:23:24.970 --> 0:23:28.030
<v Speaker 2>Scale because we want to do everything to the extent

0:23:28.030 --> 0:23:33.570
<v Speaker 2>possible um under real world conditions, under commercial and operational conditions.

0:23:33.580 --> 0:23:38.310
<v Speaker 2>Um so we've identified standard bulks um medium range tanker,

0:23:38.310 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 2>and we've identified the medium range tanker because um similar

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:45.850
<v Speaker 2>sized vessels contribute about 17% of shipping emissions. So it's

0:23:45.850 --> 0:23:48.170
<v Speaker 2>a big sector that we can influence if we can

0:23:48.170 --> 0:23:51.490
<v Speaker 2>demonstrate this technology to be done correctly.

0:23:51.690 --> 0:23:55.310
<v Speaker 2>And so the idea is to capture carbon dioxide at

0:23:55.310 --> 0:23:59.420
<v Speaker 2>a 30% capture rate on this medium range tanker um

0:23:59.430 --> 0:24:03.450
<v Speaker 2>over 500 hours of operations. And then to liquefy it

0:24:03.460 --> 0:24:06.820
<v Speaker 2>on board. So there's a lot of energy demand associated

0:24:06.820 --> 0:24:08.390
<v Speaker 2>with liquefying it. And so the

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:11.930
<v Speaker 2>part of the pilot is to address the energy demand

0:24:11.930 --> 0:24:15.710
<v Speaker 2>side of things. Um And so we're looking at waste

0:24:15.710 --> 0:24:19.060
<v Speaker 2>heat um we're looking at d tuning the engine perhaps

0:24:19.060 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 2>to generate a little more waste heat, so that net net,

0:24:22.210 --> 0:24:25.379
<v Speaker 2>you know, while the engine is suboptimal, maybe net net

0:24:25.390 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 2>when you consider the energy system on the vessel itself,

0:24:29.530 --> 0:24:32.650
<v Speaker 2>that it would be more productive use of waste heat

0:24:32.650 --> 0:24:34.949
<v Speaker 2>to use the waste heat to run the scrubber for

0:24:34.950 --> 0:24:36.050
<v Speaker 2>carbon capture

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:39.530
<v Speaker 2>and then um and then we need to demonstrate offloading

0:24:39.530 --> 0:24:41.250
<v Speaker 2>that carbon dioxide. Um

0:24:41.460 --> 0:24:43.910
<v Speaker 2>and then and then we've identified an off taker to

0:24:43.910 --> 0:24:46.379
<v Speaker 2>take that carbon dioxide. So it's an end to end

0:24:46.380 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 2>pilot um from capture to um to in this case

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:53.750
<v Speaker 2>it's a utilization as opposed to storage. Um but I

0:24:53.750 --> 0:24:58.730
<v Speaker 2>don't want to poo poo. The challenges beyond beyond capture

0:24:58.730 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 2>and storage. Um I think the challenges that you had

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:05.780
<v Speaker 2>referred to um when you hear about the activist talk,

0:25:05.780 --> 0:25:09.340
<v Speaker 2>it's about storage and disposal, right? And so sequestration is

0:25:09.340 --> 0:25:10.379
<v Speaker 2>really important

0:25:10.609 --> 0:25:13.770
<v Speaker 2>and um as long as carbon capture is going to

0:25:13.770 --> 0:25:17.719
<v Speaker 2>be part of the portfolio of solutions, one really needs

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:22.290
<v Speaker 2>to think about trans boundary handling of C. 02 because

0:25:22.290 --> 0:25:26.120
<v Speaker 2>where you collect, even on land where you collect is

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:28.950
<v Speaker 2>not necessarily going to be where you store simply because

0:25:28.950 --> 0:25:31.490
<v Speaker 2>the reservoirs aren't there? Um So one needs to think

0:25:31.490 --> 0:25:34.449
<v Speaker 2>about trans boundary issues. And currently trans boundary issues are

0:25:34.450 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 2>very challenging because who wants to take

0:25:37.490 --> 0:25:40.930
<v Speaker 2>your weight, Nobody really wants to take. There are risks

0:25:40.940 --> 0:25:45.179
<v Speaker 2>and liability and loss and damages that are associated with

0:25:45.180 --> 0:25:48.540
<v Speaker 2>um with taking somebody else's C. 02, right? So an

0:25:48.550 --> 0:25:51.360
<v Speaker 2>international framework needs to be in place to be able

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 2>to help move this along. Um But I take I

0:25:55.280 --> 0:26:00.070
<v Speaker 2>take inspiration and I'm encouraged by a couple of commercial

0:26:00.070 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 2>contracts that have been announced. So there is a commercial

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:04.379
<v Speaker 2>contract between

0:26:04.550 --> 0:26:07.930
<v Speaker 2>uh Norway and the Netherlands where it's going to be

0:26:07.930 --> 0:26:11.050
<v Speaker 2>captured in one country and it's sequestered in another country

0:26:11.060 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 2>and this commercial contract is backed by the relevant ministries

0:26:15.090 --> 0:26:19.780
<v Speaker 2>of both countries. There's another commercial contract between Denmark and Belgium.

0:26:19.790 --> 0:26:21.850
<v Speaker 2>So I mean I think we need to look at

0:26:21.850 --> 0:26:24.119
<v Speaker 2>these kinds of examples and learn from these kinds of

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:28.929
<v Speaker 2>examples and see how we can extend this on a

0:26:28.930 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 2>global basis so that you can actually capture in one

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:35.030
<v Speaker 2>region and then store in another region. Right.

0:26:35.300 --> 0:26:38.750
<v Speaker 1>Very interesting. Lynn can you help me sort of visualize

0:26:38.750 --> 0:26:40.890
<v Speaker 1>the process? So there's a tanker like the way you

0:26:40.890 --> 0:26:44.899
<v Speaker 1>made me help me visualize the drag sail in the

0:26:44.910 --> 0:26:48.130
<v Speaker 1>tanker that you saw in. So there are these big

0:26:48.130 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 1>funnels and a big maritime

0:26:50.850 --> 0:26:54.860
<v Speaker 1>vessel and there will be little filters in front of

0:26:54.869 --> 0:26:56.230
<v Speaker 1>the nozzle of the

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:59.730
<v Speaker 2>no no no. So so there will be funnels and

0:26:59.730 --> 0:27:06.390
<v Speaker 2>then basically the the emissions are then channeled into

0:27:06.570 --> 0:27:11.010
<v Speaker 2>another scrubber. And this is essentially a small chemical factory.

0:27:11.020 --> 0:27:14.290
<v Speaker 2>It has a mean solution. So it's a basic solution

0:27:14.300 --> 0:27:17.990
<v Speaker 2>and when the basic solution meets carbon dioxide which is

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:21.950
<v Speaker 2>acidic nature, it's going to absorb the carbon dioxide into

0:27:21.950 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 2>the amine solution. And so then now you have a

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:28.750
<v Speaker 2>solution amine solution that has the carbon dioxide in it,

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 2>it then has to go somewhere else where it gets

0:27:32.090 --> 0:27:32.449
<v Speaker 2>really

0:27:32.590 --> 0:27:35.859
<v Speaker 2>and this separation is very energy intensive. And then once

0:27:35.859 --> 0:27:39.020
<v Speaker 2>it's separated, the amine solution is recycled and it can

0:27:39.020 --> 0:27:43.590
<v Speaker 2>capture more carbon dioxide. The captured carbon dioxide is isolated

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:47.129
<v Speaker 2>and then it can be either liquefied into C. 02

0:27:47.130 --> 0:27:51.860
<v Speaker 2>tanks or there are technologies that are being explored to

0:27:51.869 --> 0:27:56.630
<v Speaker 2>actually um solidify it into calcium carbonate for example, then

0:27:56.630 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 2>it's easier to transport. Um

0:27:58.609 --> 0:28:03.260
<v Speaker 2>So basically it's a recycled loop of solution that absorbs

0:28:03.260 --> 0:28:05.410
<v Speaker 2>on the one end and then D's orbs the C.

0:28:05.410 --> 0:28:07.530
<v Speaker 2>02 on the other side, if you will.

0:28:07.540 --> 0:28:11.790
<v Speaker 1>Sure, and tankers are large. So I'm assuming space is

0:28:11.790 --> 0:28:14.189
<v Speaker 1>not going to be a huge issue, even if we

0:28:14.190 --> 0:28:17.350
<v Speaker 1>were to set up these little chemical factories on top.

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:20.619
<v Speaker 2>Well to the contrary, space is always going to be

0:28:20.619 --> 0:28:23.780
<v Speaker 2>an issue. So in fact, I am. So this tanker

0:28:23.780 --> 0:28:24.619
<v Speaker 2>that we've identified,

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:28.370
<v Speaker 2>it's a standard imperil what happened to be bunkering in

0:28:28.369 --> 0:28:30.869
<v Speaker 2>the waters of Singapore. So we had a chance and

0:28:30.869 --> 0:28:33.390
<v Speaker 2>so we boarded it to look at where we would

0:28:33.390 --> 0:28:36.300
<v Speaker 2>put the C. 02 tank because we um you know,

0:28:36.300 --> 0:28:39.620
<v Speaker 2>we're in the engineering design phase right now. But preliminarily

0:28:39.620 --> 0:28:43.140
<v Speaker 2>I think we've identified that we need to 300 cubic

0:28:43.140 --> 0:28:46.300
<v Speaker 2>meter C. 02 tanks to hold the C. 02 because

0:28:46.300 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 2>for every ton of fuel you burn you generate three

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:50.650
<v Speaker 2>tons of C. 02.

0:28:50.940 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Um So there's a lot of C. 02 that needs

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:54.870
<v Speaker 2>to be stored onboard. And so we were looking for

0:28:54.870 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 2>space to store this and we've identified sort of space

0:28:57.440 --> 0:29:00.420
<v Speaker 2>to be able to store this and and part of

0:29:00.430 --> 0:29:04.170
<v Speaker 2>um I mean, the tanker, so so the different ships

0:29:04.180 --> 0:29:08.010
<v Speaker 2>have different space constraints. Right? I mean, so tankers still

0:29:08.010 --> 0:29:10.780
<v Speaker 2>have deck space where you can put tanks, but a

0:29:10.780 --> 0:29:13.950
<v Speaker 2>container ship, for example, does not have deck space. And

0:29:13.950 --> 0:29:15.510
<v Speaker 2>so one would have to think hard about where you

0:29:15.510 --> 0:29:18.570
<v Speaker 2>would put the tank, right? Um so I think different

0:29:18.570 --> 0:29:19.170
<v Speaker 2>segments

0:29:19.190 --> 0:29:24.140
<v Speaker 2>are going to have different challenges and therefore different solutions.

0:29:24.150 --> 0:29:27.330
<v Speaker 2>So shipping is very interesting in that way, because it's

0:29:27.330 --> 0:29:30.890
<v Speaker 2>very heterogeneous and so the solutions by nature is going

0:29:30.890 --> 0:29:33.130
<v Speaker 2>to be very heterogeneous as well, you

0:29:33.130 --> 0:29:35.890
<v Speaker 1>know, I'm just hoping and praying that among the various

0:29:35.890 --> 0:29:38.670
<v Speaker 1>listeners of this podcast, there are some budding engineers out

0:29:38.670 --> 0:29:41.190
<v Speaker 1>there who will be sort of riveted and inspired by

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:44.630
<v Speaker 1>all the unsolved problems in this industry and we want

0:29:44.630 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to put their minds to it because this is getting

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:48.740
<v Speaker 1>me very excited for. Sure.

0:29:48.890 --> 0:29:49.500
<v Speaker 1>Yeah,

0:29:49.500 --> 0:29:52.700
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm excited to, you know, I mean, maybe

0:29:52.700 --> 0:29:55.140
<v Speaker 2>I shouldn't say this, but I will anyway, I feel

0:29:55.140 --> 0:29:59.770
<v Speaker 2>like I'm I'm I'm using more of what I learned

0:29:59.780 --> 0:30:03.620
<v Speaker 2>as a chemical engineer now than I have when I

0:30:03.630 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 2>when I when I was teaching. Um because when I

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:08.990
<v Speaker 2>was teaching and doing research, I was very focused on.

0:30:09.150 --> 0:30:12.510
<v Speaker 2>Um and and my team is still currently working at Princeton, right?

0:30:12.510 --> 0:30:16.430
<v Speaker 2>We we developed solar cells and so we're very focused

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:21.050
<v Speaker 2>on specific fundamental questions that we're trying to answer. And

0:30:21.050 --> 0:30:26.100
<v Speaker 2>so um um it's it's not these engineering principles per se. Right?

0:30:26.110 --> 0:30:28.780
<v Speaker 2>And so so it's sort of the kinds of things

0:30:28.780 --> 0:30:32.090
<v Speaker 2>I learned as an undergrad that I'm applying um to

0:30:32.100 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 2>to the kinds of problems that I'm seeing today in shipping.

0:30:35.410 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so since you mentioned solar cells and your own research,

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:40.260
<v Speaker 1>I have to go on a tangent and ask you,

0:30:40.260 --> 0:30:43.060
<v Speaker 1>why don't we see solar cells on top of ships?

0:30:43.990 --> 0:30:47.670
<v Speaker 2>Uh Well, I mean, I think you can, and in fact,

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 2>um there was a demonstration ship called The Energy Observer

0:30:52.730 --> 0:30:56.790
<v Speaker 2>um that was here that docked here and it's basically

0:30:56.800 --> 0:30:58.270
<v Speaker 2>a catamaran

0:30:58.500 --> 0:31:01.790
<v Speaker 2>um that is zero carbon. Right? So it's got solar panels,

0:31:01.790 --> 0:31:05.300
<v Speaker 2>it's got wind sails, it's got basically an electrolyzer that

0:31:05.300 --> 0:31:08.420
<v Speaker 2>produces hydrogen for at night when the wind doesn't blow in,

0:31:08.420 --> 0:31:10.380
<v Speaker 2>the solar panel can't generate

0:31:10.380 --> 0:31:11.430
<v Speaker 1>electricity.

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:15.820
<v Speaker 2>Um it's a catamaran, but you know, it's it's for experiments.

0:31:15.830 --> 0:31:19.670
<v Speaker 2>Um and for demonstration that you can actually sail without

0:31:19.680 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 2>without

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:25.030
<v Speaker 2>without without fossil fuels. That said, I mean, that's a

0:31:25.030 --> 0:31:29.470
<v Speaker 2>small catamaran. Right? And so for these deep deep sea

0:31:29.470 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 2>going ships, it's it's just very challenging. You may be

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:37.830
<v Speaker 2>able to put solar panels to provide some auxiliary power.

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:40.510
<v Speaker 2>The question is always going to be the trade off, right,

0:31:40.510 --> 0:31:42.070
<v Speaker 2>what space? And so

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:45.900
<v Speaker 2>surface area are you sacrificing and how much power are

0:31:45.900 --> 0:31:49.380
<v Speaker 2>you generating? And so when you do that equation, I

0:31:49.380 --> 0:31:54.170
<v Speaker 2>think um frequently you'll find that it doesn't quite make

0:31:54.170 --> 0:31:58.330
<v Speaker 2>sense or shipping for these big ships to think about

0:31:58.330 --> 0:32:00.120
<v Speaker 2>solar panels. Um

0:32:00.130 --> 0:32:03.310
<v Speaker 1>I wanna switch the discussion a bit toward

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:07.830
<v Speaker 1>the taxes and levies around carbon. So what are your

0:32:07.830 --> 0:32:10.950
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on carbon taxes? Especially in Singapore is a big issue.

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:14.340
<v Speaker 1>You know, recent budgets have talked about progressively raising carbon

0:32:14.340 --> 0:32:17.560
<v Speaker 1>taxes in this country. We're discussing issues related to border

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:20.750
<v Speaker 1>adjustment tax coming out of european union. Um so in

0:32:20.750 --> 0:32:23.260
<v Speaker 1>the context of maritime and in general, where do you

0:32:23.260 --> 0:32:24.560
<v Speaker 1>stand on carbon taxes?

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:28.250
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So, um at the so I should say at

0:32:28.250 --> 0:32:30.940
<v Speaker 2>the outset that, you know, G Cmd were not a

0:32:30.940 --> 0:32:34.570
<v Speaker 2>policy think tank. Right? And we we try, I mean,

0:32:34.580 --> 0:32:38.030
<v Speaker 2>um so we are technologists, so we we try to

0:32:38.030 --> 0:32:42.510
<v Speaker 2>look at solutions that said, I mean, I think it's really, really,

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:46.820
<v Speaker 2>really and I'll add two more really, really, really important

0:32:46.820 --> 0:32:48.950
<v Speaker 2>to have a price on carbon. Um

0:32:49.140 --> 0:32:52.850
<v Speaker 2>and and and I think the specific market based measures

0:32:52.860 --> 0:32:57.580
<v Speaker 2>with which we apply a price on carbon um were

0:32:57.590 --> 0:33:00.810
<v Speaker 2>um sort of we have less of an opinion about

0:33:00.810 --> 0:33:03.770
<v Speaker 2>if you will, I think what we have an opinion

0:33:03.770 --> 0:33:05.700
<v Speaker 2>about is that it needs to be fair.

0:33:05.860 --> 0:33:10.010
<v Speaker 2>Okay. And I think um shipping has a tremendous opportunity

0:33:10.010 --> 0:33:14.220
<v Speaker 2>in this regard. Um so I join shipping because, you know,

0:33:14.220 --> 0:33:17.530
<v Speaker 2>shipping is a global industry and so it's regulated by

0:33:17.530 --> 0:33:21.550
<v Speaker 2>a single body, which means that if we can agree

0:33:21.550 --> 0:33:24.270
<v Speaker 2>on a single market based measure or if we can

0:33:24.270 --> 0:33:27.650
<v Speaker 2>agree on a set of market based measures, it can

0:33:27.650 --> 0:33:28.660
<v Speaker 2>be applied through

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:34.380
<v Speaker 2>globally. So then this doesn't create any um any distortion

0:33:34.380 --> 0:33:38.230
<v Speaker 2>to the market. It doesn't create any unlevel playing field, right?

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:41.530
<v Speaker 2>As opposed to electrification. And the power sector where I

0:33:41.530 --> 0:33:45.570
<v Speaker 2>came from, when I was looking at energy systems there,

0:33:45.580 --> 0:33:49.870
<v Speaker 2>it's very fragmented. Um forget about talking across state boundaries.

0:33:49.870 --> 0:33:51.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, even regionally, you have

0:33:51.490 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 2>different um different commissioners that are working and different regulators.

0:33:56.250 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 2>And so they're to pass a carbon policy becomes a

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:02.890
<v Speaker 2>little more challenging right here. I think there's a tremendous

0:34:02.890 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 2>opportunity because shipping is a global industry. So we should

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:10.830
<v Speaker 2>definitely think about um um market based measure. And there's

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:13.879
<v Speaker 2>tremendous conversations that are happening at the I. M. O.

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:14.290
<v Speaker 2>Now

0:34:14.310 --> 0:34:17.589
<v Speaker 2>and just yesterday um in one of our trade journals,

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:20.180
<v Speaker 2>uh you wouldn't know this because you probably don't read

0:34:20.180 --> 0:34:24.890
<v Speaker 2>our trade journal. Um The International uh Chamber of Shipping

0:34:24.890 --> 0:34:29.450
<v Speaker 2>had announced that it submitted a proposal to to the I. M. O.

0:34:29.460 --> 0:34:32.790
<v Speaker 2>Um called the Fund and reward scheme. And so the

0:34:32.790 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 2>idea is that, you know, um ship owners are going

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:37.130
<v Speaker 2>to contribute

0:34:37.510 --> 0:34:41.130
<v Speaker 2>um a flat amount based on the carbon emissions, their

0:34:41.130 --> 0:34:45.899
<v Speaker 2>annual carbon emissions. And this amount then gets pulled together.

0:34:45.910 --> 0:34:50.930
<v Speaker 2>And this amount can be used to incentivize first movers

0:34:50.940 --> 0:34:55.569
<v Speaker 2>by paying for the uh paying for the green fuel premium,

0:34:55.580 --> 0:34:59.029
<v Speaker 2>right? And so so I think these kinds of things

0:34:59.040 --> 0:35:02.140
<v Speaker 2>I think can work. Um we just need to make

0:35:02.140 --> 0:35:05.930
<v Speaker 2>sure that it works across the sector, i. E globally

0:35:05.930 --> 0:35:09.710
<v Speaker 2>for shipping as opposed to sort of regionally because I

0:35:09.710 --> 0:35:15.010
<v Speaker 2>think regional patchwork type policy can really hurt the industry

0:35:15.010 --> 0:35:17.460
<v Speaker 2>because it can create unlevel playing field.

0:35:18.030 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. Um, Lynn earlier, several times you mentioned certain pilots

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:29.290
<v Speaker 1>that GCM D is doing, you know, initiatives and partnerships.

0:35:29.300 --> 0:35:32.590
<v Speaker 1>Um so I think we talked a little bit about

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:35.969
<v Speaker 1>the ammonia bunkering study. Um and you also talked about

0:35:35.969 --> 0:35:39.270
<v Speaker 1>the sailor, wind assisted propulsion. Anything else that you know

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that is taking a lot of your time these days

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:43.250
<v Speaker 1>in terms of initiatives and partnerships?

0:35:43.430 --> 0:35:47.450
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so, I mean, so we talked about the biofuels, right?

0:35:47.460 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 2>The framework for, for supply chain integrity. We talked a

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:53.419
<v Speaker 2>little bit about the shipboard carbon capture. Maybe I'll take

0:35:53.420 --> 0:35:56.080
<v Speaker 2>this opportunity to tell you about the ammonia bunkering study

0:35:56.090 --> 0:35:59.160
<v Speaker 2>that was done. Um I'll start by, I mean that

0:35:59.160 --> 0:35:59.310
<v Speaker 2>was

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:02.600
<v Speaker 2>our first that was our first study. And so we

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:06.450
<v Speaker 2>actually commissioned that study two months into our founding, that

0:36:06.450 --> 0:36:08.960
<v Speaker 2>was how important the study was. And we knew we

0:36:08.960 --> 0:36:11.540
<v Speaker 2>needed to do this. And again, I mean, this is

0:36:11.540 --> 0:36:14.280
<v Speaker 2>with an eye on future fuel. Right? So ammonia is

0:36:14.280 --> 0:36:20.229
<v Speaker 2>a future fuel. Um, ammonia is super toxic, right? It kills.

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:23.250
<v Speaker 2>Um and so if we were gonna use it as

0:36:23.250 --> 0:36:25.989
<v Speaker 2>a marine fuel, we need to have a good handle

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:30.310
<v Speaker 2>On how to manage and handle it safely. Um so

0:36:30.310 --> 0:36:34.110
<v Speaker 2>if you look across the value chain for ammonia, certainly

0:36:34.110 --> 0:36:37.069
<v Speaker 2>there are people who are trying to produce ammonia at

0:36:37.070 --> 0:36:40.770
<v Speaker 2>scale and that cause um and within the sector, you know,

0:36:40.770 --> 0:36:44.120
<v Speaker 2>the first engine will be built 2020 for 20, time

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:46.930
<v Speaker 2>frame and then the first ship will be available. And

0:36:46.930 --> 0:36:49.380
<v Speaker 2>so we asked ourselves, well, where's the gap? How can

0:36:49.380 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 2>we

0:36:49.450 --> 0:36:51.730
<v Speaker 2>plugging the gap and what can we do to kind

0:36:51.730 --> 0:36:55.470
<v Speaker 2>of accelerate the eventual adoption of ammonia? And we identified

0:36:55.469 --> 0:36:58.850
<v Speaker 2>safety as being one of them. How do you safely bunker,

0:36:58.860 --> 0:37:02.680
<v Speaker 2>ammonia bunkers and refueling ammonia. So the idea of moving

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 2>molecules around safely um and so we said, we said

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 2>we were going to do an ammonia bunkering pilot um

0:37:10.050 --> 0:37:13.010
<v Speaker 2>and then we quickly realized, oh we can't actually do

0:37:13.010 --> 0:37:16.200
<v Speaker 2>an ammonia bunkering pilot because there are no safety guidelines.

0:37:16.200 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 2>And if there are no safety guidelines we can't

0:37:18.560 --> 0:37:22.450
<v Speaker 2>generate a regulatory sandbox to do the ammonia bunkering pilot.

0:37:22.450 --> 0:37:24.710
<v Speaker 2>So we took a step back and we said, okay,

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:27.560
<v Speaker 2>we'll do what commission a safety study and so that's

0:37:27.560 --> 0:37:31.310
<v Speaker 2>what the safety studies about its to identify the, you know,

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:35.060
<v Speaker 2>um and define the envelopes, the safety envelope, the operational

0:37:35.070 --> 0:37:39.370
<v Speaker 2>envelopes um so that we can do a bunkering pilot

0:37:39.380 --> 0:37:43.780
<v Speaker 2>um buried in there is also a competency framework development

0:37:43.790 --> 0:37:45.129
<v Speaker 2>because um

0:37:45.330 --> 0:37:48.170
<v Speaker 2>it's not enough to just come up with the safety guidelines.

0:37:48.180 --> 0:37:51.150
<v Speaker 2>Um you need to train the seafarers so that they

0:37:51.150 --> 0:37:55.560
<v Speaker 2>can handle ammonia safely. And so the competency framework is

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:58.920
<v Speaker 2>buried in there as well. Um so I'm happy to

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:02.150
<v Speaker 2>report the study is on track, so it will be

0:38:02.150 --> 0:38:04.390
<v Speaker 2>done by the end of the year and then we

0:38:04.390 --> 0:38:05.730
<v Speaker 2>would be ready to share

0:38:05.750 --> 0:38:08.470
<v Speaker 2>beginning of next year and so we're in the process

0:38:08.469 --> 0:38:11.870
<v Speaker 2>of scoping what that pilot would look like and how

0:38:11.870 --> 0:38:15.410
<v Speaker 2>we can use these guidelines um with the help of

0:38:15.420 --> 0:38:18.450
<v Speaker 2>the regulatory authorities of course and they would have to

0:38:18.460 --> 0:38:23.670
<v Speaker 2>eventually approve and ultimately approve uh the guidelines and then

0:38:23.680 --> 0:38:26.170
<v Speaker 2>approve a sandbox for us to do this pilot.

0:38:26.330 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 2>Um so so again, it's it's it's demonstrating how we

0:38:29.960 --> 0:38:34.430
<v Speaker 2>can safely move the molecules around because um it's with that,

0:38:34.440 --> 0:38:38.330
<v Speaker 2>that I think bunkering can happen. Right. Um so

0:38:38.340 --> 0:38:41.440
<v Speaker 1>great stuff. Well, good luck with that. Well, we'll look

0:38:41.440 --> 0:38:43.790
<v Speaker 1>forward to the announcement toward the end of this year,

0:38:43.790 --> 0:38:49.629
<v Speaker 1>early next year. Yeah, absolutely. Um you mentioned earlier about

0:38:49.630 --> 0:38:53.359
<v Speaker 1>Scandinavian countries being fairly progressive in some of the frontier

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:55.420
<v Speaker 1>issues really to carbon capture and

0:38:55.620 --> 0:39:01.530
<v Speaker 1>sequestration beyond that. I mean, which countries are the leading

0:39:01.530 --> 0:39:04.230
<v Speaker 1>beacons right now in maritime de conversation?

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:07.260
<v Speaker 2>Um Well, I mean, I think I'd be remiss if

0:39:07.260 --> 0:39:10.180
<v Speaker 2>I didn't mention Singapore. Right? I think, look, I mean

0:39:10.180 --> 0:39:13.620
<v Speaker 2>we were set up in record time from the time

0:39:13.620 --> 0:39:17.029
<v Speaker 2>that we were, you know that the recommendation was put

0:39:17.030 --> 0:39:19.020
<v Speaker 2>forth to the Singapore government to the time we were

0:39:19.020 --> 0:39:21.390
<v Speaker 2>set up was a matter of four months, right? I

0:39:21.390 --> 0:39:22.940
<v Speaker 2>mean it's incredible how so

0:39:22.950 --> 0:39:29.250
<v Speaker 2>supportive the ecosystem here is and how um how focused

0:39:29.250 --> 0:39:32.980
<v Speaker 2>we are on the decarbonization agenda and and I mean

0:39:32.980 --> 0:39:37.170
<v Speaker 2>I think um this is to be expected because Singapore

0:39:37.170 --> 0:39:41.219
<v Speaker 2>is such an important maritime hub, so um

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:43.600
<v Speaker 2>I'll give you a couple of stats, I bet you

0:39:43.600 --> 0:39:47.210
<v Speaker 2>didn't know this. So Singapore is a bunkering hub, bunkered

0:39:47.219 --> 0:39:51.180
<v Speaker 2>more than 50 million tons of fuel last year and

0:39:51.180 --> 0:39:57.140
<v Speaker 2>global bunkering is about 250 million tons. Yeah, it's bunkering

0:39:57.140 --> 0:40:01.190
<v Speaker 2>volume in. Singapore is greater than the bunkering volumes of

0:40:01.190 --> 0:40:04.290
<v Speaker 2>the next nine largest bunkering hubs combined,

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:09.330
<v Speaker 2>That's how much Singapore bunkers and um ships today, um

0:40:09.340 --> 0:40:13.920
<v Speaker 2>irrespective of where they go, they generally bunker at more

0:40:13.920 --> 0:40:17.300
<v Speaker 2>than 50% of the ship's bunker only at one port.

0:40:17.310 --> 0:40:20.890
<v Speaker 2>So Singapore sees lots of ships, meaning that if Singapore

0:40:20.890 --> 0:40:25.090
<v Speaker 2>can figure out how to decarbonization shipping here, it's gonna

0:40:25.090 --> 0:40:26.790
<v Speaker 2>have a huge impact

0:40:26.930 --> 0:40:30.780
<v Speaker 2>on the maritime sector. Right? And that's why Singapore is

0:40:30.780 --> 0:40:35.580
<v Speaker 2>looking at a multi fuel future, it needs to be

0:40:35.580 --> 0:40:39.669
<v Speaker 2>ready with different kinds of fuels because we've just said that,

0:40:39.680 --> 0:40:41.660
<v Speaker 2>you know with different ships and different segments of ship,

0:40:41.660 --> 0:40:44.120
<v Speaker 2>different size of ships, they're gonna need different kinds of fuels,

0:40:44.120 --> 0:40:47.620
<v Speaker 2>they have different solutions. So, so, so I think it's

0:40:47.620 --> 0:40:50.880
<v Speaker 2>important um to to sort of look ahead that way. So,

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:53.439
<v Speaker 2>so I think, I mean Singapore is very, very progressive

0:40:53.440 --> 0:40:54.440
<v Speaker 2>in that sense. And of course

0:40:54.450 --> 0:40:58.150
<v Speaker 2>the M. P. A. Had just launched the maritime blueprint.

0:40:58.160 --> 0:41:01.420
<v Speaker 2>Um and so it talks about different measures of how

0:41:01.430 --> 0:41:04.410
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna dick carbonized both on the portside on the

0:41:04.420 --> 0:41:06.920
<v Speaker 2>infrastructure side and and then of course on the ship's

0:41:06.920 --> 0:41:10.840
<v Speaker 2>side of things. Um so we mentioned Norway, um you know,

0:41:10.840 --> 0:41:13.719
<v Speaker 2>it's got green coastal shipping programs, it's got lots of

0:41:13.719 --> 0:41:17.390
<v Speaker 2>pilots going. Um they are a very good partner of

0:41:17.390 --> 0:41:21.960
<v Speaker 2>ours in terms of, you know, looking at shipping and decarbonization, shipping.

0:41:22.180 --> 0:41:25.930
<v Speaker 2>Um uh the M. P. A. Here had just signed

0:41:25.930 --> 0:41:29.590
<v Speaker 2>a green corridor agreement with the port of Rotterdam. So

0:41:29.590 --> 0:41:32.810
<v Speaker 2>Netherlands is another place to look to a port of

0:41:32.810 --> 0:41:35.660
<v Speaker 2>Rotterdam is another big and important ports. And so this

0:41:35.660 --> 0:41:40.080
<v Speaker 2>green corridors idea is again to to harmonize standards at

0:41:40.080 --> 0:41:44.670
<v Speaker 2>both ports to be able to incentivize and and kind

0:41:44.670 --> 0:41:44.850
<v Speaker 2>of

0:41:44.860 --> 0:41:50.270
<v Speaker 2>accelerate decarbonization between for for ships that sail between these

0:41:50.270 --> 0:41:53.210
<v Speaker 2>two ports. Right? And then finally I would say Japan,

0:41:53.210 --> 0:41:55.250
<v Speaker 2>I think Japan, you know, has done a lot of

0:41:55.250 --> 0:41:59.250
<v Speaker 2>trials to look at different bringing in different hydrogen carriers,

0:41:59.260 --> 0:42:02.169
<v Speaker 2>both for their power sector and for the shipping sector.

0:42:02.180 --> 0:42:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Um and so they are very progressive in that sense

0:42:05.280 --> 0:42:07.430
<v Speaker 2>as well. And um there are

0:42:07.540 --> 0:42:09.419
<v Speaker 2>my opinion, there are lots of learnings to be had

0:42:09.430 --> 0:42:12.620
<v Speaker 2>um and sharing to be had with Singapore because like

0:42:12.630 --> 0:42:16.840
<v Speaker 2>with Japan, sorry, because like Singapore, Japan has very little

0:42:16.840 --> 0:42:20.750
<v Speaker 2>natural resources. Right. Um so if we, as we move

0:42:20.750 --> 0:42:25.170
<v Speaker 2>to a renewable energy economy, like we need to import

0:42:25.180 --> 0:42:27.359
<v Speaker 2>our energy. And so how do we think about this?

0:42:27.360 --> 0:42:29.430
<v Speaker 2>So there are lots of, I think exchanges that can

0:42:29.430 --> 0:42:31.270
<v Speaker 2>be had, you

0:42:31.280 --> 0:42:34.030
<v Speaker 1>did not mention the U. S. Or china?

0:42:34.760 --> 0:42:38.920
<v Speaker 2>Um Well, I mean um the U. S. Is not

0:42:38.920 --> 0:42:41.730
<v Speaker 2>a big player in shipping. Um um and so I

0:42:41.730 --> 0:42:44.910
<v Speaker 2>think from a from a sectorial perspective, I didn't mention

0:42:44.910 --> 0:42:47.000
<v Speaker 2>us because it's not a friend shipping.

0:42:47.290 --> 0:42:52.790
<v Speaker 2>Um and and um china certainly has uh is building

0:42:52.790 --> 0:42:55.420
<v Speaker 2>its fair share of ships. And so I think in

0:42:55.420 --> 0:42:59.480
<v Speaker 2>that sense, I think um working with the shipyards is

0:42:59.480 --> 0:43:01.580
<v Speaker 2>very important because they are the ones that are gonna

0:43:01.580 --> 0:43:07.950
<v Speaker 2>be responsible for putting on retrofit, uh technologies hardware on

0:43:07.960 --> 0:43:10.160
<v Speaker 2>on the ships, they're gonna be the ones that are

0:43:10.160 --> 0:43:12.629
<v Speaker 2>going to install new engines on the ships. Right? And

0:43:12.630 --> 0:43:15.160
<v Speaker 2>so I think in that sense they're important too

0:43:16.130 --> 0:43:18.730
<v Speaker 1>Sure because you know, at the very beginning of the podcast,

0:43:18.730 --> 0:43:21.960
<v Speaker 1>you said that, you know, 90% of global trade is

0:43:21.969 --> 0:43:25.779
<v Speaker 1>on on the waters and I think of China, you know,

0:43:25.790 --> 0:43:28.330
<v Speaker 1>the largest exporter in the world, but I suppose it

0:43:28.330 --> 0:43:30.860
<v Speaker 1>also depends on, you know, who actually owns that shipping

0:43:30.860 --> 0:43:33.860
<v Speaker 1>line and where the sort of the responsibility of the

0:43:33.860 --> 0:43:37.540
<v Speaker 1>regulatory uh sort of the window goes in.

0:43:37.739 --> 0:43:41.370
<v Speaker 1>Um so, so yeah, I suppose, you know, countries like Singapore,

0:43:41.370 --> 0:43:42.980
<v Speaker 1>you know, which are big entre ports, you know, it

0:43:42.980 --> 0:43:45.570
<v Speaker 1>makes sense for them to take the lead into, so

0:43:45.570 --> 0:43:49.860
<v Speaker 1>to speak. Um Lynn in a recent interview, you were

0:43:49.860 --> 0:43:52.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about the CMD and you said something to the

0:43:52.320 --> 0:43:54.260
<v Speaker 1>extent that you know, you've got a role to play

0:43:54.260 --> 0:43:56.420
<v Speaker 1>but not just in providing funds but also in providing

0:43:56.420 --> 0:44:00.589
<v Speaker 1>value adds. So curious about this this role of G. C. M. D.

0:44:00.590 --> 0:44:03.100
<v Speaker 1>As a neutral convener of sorts.

0:44:03.110 --> 0:44:06.810
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean um

0:44:07.440 --> 0:44:13.420
<v Speaker 2>yes. So I'll come back to the ammonia bunkering study

0:44:13.430 --> 0:44:17.960
<v Speaker 2>um to illustrate this. So with the ammonia bunkering study

0:44:17.969 --> 0:44:20.509
<v Speaker 2>um Typically when one does a study like this, it

0:44:20.510 --> 0:44:23.160
<v Speaker 2>takes a couple of years to get a safety study done.

0:44:23.530 --> 0:44:28.299
<v Speaker 2>Um because one typically does it serially meaning that one

0:44:28.300 --> 0:44:32.890
<v Speaker 2>does the study then consults with industry to kind of

0:44:32.900 --> 0:44:35.980
<v Speaker 2>refine the study. When the study is done, you submitted

0:44:35.980 --> 0:44:38.989
<v Speaker 2>to the regulatory authorities who then kind of say, well

0:44:38.989 --> 0:44:41.890
<v Speaker 2>you're deficient in this, this this and this go back

0:44:41.900 --> 0:44:43.259
<v Speaker 2>and do more

0:44:43.450 --> 0:44:47.279
<v Speaker 2>And that iterated process takes a couple of years. We

0:44:47.280 --> 0:44:49.080
<v Speaker 2>didn't want to wait a couple of years because we

0:44:49.080 --> 0:44:52.219
<v Speaker 2>don't have time to wait. And frankly, I'm impatient. Um

0:44:52.230 --> 0:44:55.310
<v Speaker 2>so what we did was we were pretty heavy handed

0:44:55.310 --> 0:45:00.370
<v Speaker 2>about this study, we assembled at the get go 22

0:45:00.370 --> 0:45:02.920
<v Speaker 2>industry partners across the supply chain.

0:45:03.130 --> 0:45:09.350
<v Speaker 2>And we when we um selected after technical evaluation D.

0:45:09.350 --> 0:45:13.050
<v Speaker 2>N VSERv wrong and Singapore Maritime Academy to do the study,

0:45:13.060 --> 0:45:17.089
<v Speaker 2>we told the trio that they needed to work with

0:45:17.090 --> 0:45:20.850
<v Speaker 2>these 22 partners that these 22 partners have experience dealing

0:45:20.850 --> 0:45:24.069
<v Speaker 2>with ammonia, They have knowledge they need to work with them.

0:45:24.080 --> 0:45:27.549
<v Speaker 2>And then alongside, we worked with M. P. A. And

0:45:27.550 --> 0:45:31.600
<v Speaker 2>had mph help us set up a regulatory working group.

0:45:32.110 --> 0:45:35.750
<v Speaker 2>Um and so these discussions are happening in parallel and

0:45:35.750 --> 0:45:39.030
<v Speaker 2>the consultations are happening in parallel so everybody has kept

0:45:39.030 --> 0:45:42.940
<v Speaker 2>abreast of the progress. Okay? So that if there's anything

0:45:42.940 --> 0:45:45.670
<v Speaker 2>deficient that we need to address or there's any concerns

0:45:45.670 --> 0:45:49.080
<v Speaker 2>from a regulatory standpoint, we address it at the get go.

0:45:49.090 --> 0:45:51.540
<v Speaker 2>And so by doing so we've been able to kind

0:45:51.540 --> 0:45:54.920
<v Speaker 2>of shorten the study down to about eight months. Um

0:45:54.930 --> 0:45:57.230
<v Speaker 2>and we're hopeful, I mean at the end of the

0:45:57.230 --> 0:45:59.380
<v Speaker 2>day it still needs to be approved but we're hopeful

0:45:59.380 --> 0:46:01.540
<v Speaker 2>that it would be approved relatively quickly

0:46:01.820 --> 0:46:04.509
<v Speaker 2>um for that reason. Right. And so this is sort

0:46:04.510 --> 0:46:07.270
<v Speaker 2>of how we can value add as a neutral convener,

0:46:07.280 --> 0:46:11.260
<v Speaker 2>we can bring people um both from the private sector

0:46:11.260 --> 0:46:14.890
<v Speaker 2>and then the public sector together um we can convene

0:46:14.900 --> 0:46:18.490
<v Speaker 2>um we can bring nominally competitors together to work together

0:46:18.500 --> 0:46:22.560
<v Speaker 2>um in another example. So um so in in in

0:46:22.560 --> 0:46:24.590
<v Speaker 2>the biofuels trial, I mean we brought

0:46:24.820 --> 0:46:28.600
<v Speaker 2>13 vessel owners and charters together to work together on

0:46:28.600 --> 0:46:32.480
<v Speaker 2>this pilot. Right? Um so so again, I think where

0:46:32.480 --> 0:46:37.310
<v Speaker 2>we value add is where there's tremendous complexity when it's

0:46:37.310 --> 0:46:41.840
<v Speaker 2>simply to pilot a single solution by putting it on

0:46:41.840 --> 0:46:45.610
<v Speaker 2>board ship and it's sort of a one player, one solution,

0:46:45.610 --> 0:46:48.820
<v Speaker 2>one solution provider, one player type thing. I think

0:46:49.640 --> 0:46:52.150
<v Speaker 2>there are lots of other players that can add value

0:46:52.150 --> 0:46:55.359
<v Speaker 2>that way, but we can add value where there's tremendous

0:46:55.360 --> 0:46:59.910
<v Speaker 2>complexity and where there's a lot of stakeholders because we

0:46:59.910 --> 0:47:03.719
<v Speaker 2>can bring people together and we can provide the transparency

0:47:03.719 --> 0:47:06.770
<v Speaker 2>where the transparency is needed uh to move,

0:47:07.400 --> 0:47:08.430
<v Speaker 2>does that make sense?

0:47:08.440 --> 0:47:11.330
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. I think this is an important role for you

0:47:11.330 --> 0:47:14.360
<v Speaker 1>to play in addition to just, you know, funding pilots,

0:47:14.380 --> 0:47:18.240
<v Speaker 1>but it helps, you know, results on these complexities and

0:47:18.239 --> 0:47:22.810
<v Speaker 1>knotty issues around that. But Lynne the other big constraint

0:47:22.820 --> 0:47:23.930
<v Speaker 1>is funding

0:47:24.260 --> 0:47:27.430
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, green financing. So as you know, we

0:47:27.430 --> 0:47:30.399
<v Speaker 1>have dbs are, you know, very big champions of green

0:47:30.400 --> 0:47:34.089
<v Speaker 1>financing and green loans um but I don't think, you know,

0:47:34.090 --> 0:47:37.460
<v Speaker 1>the financial system has solved this issue yet. So tell

0:47:37.460 --> 0:47:39.850
<v Speaker 1>me a little bit about your experience and sourcing green

0:47:39.850 --> 0:47:42.580
<v Speaker 1>financing from both the bank and non bank sectors.

0:47:42.910 --> 0:47:46.710
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay, well just to put things in perspective to

0:47:46.710 --> 0:47:49.790
<v Speaker 2>Dick carbonized shipping, the number that's been thrown around is

0:47:49.790 --> 0:47:53.670
<v Speaker 2>you need $3 trillion.80 percent of the $3 trillion is

0:47:53.670 --> 0:47:56.250
<v Speaker 2>going to be spent on land infrastructure. Right. So, so

0:47:56.250 --> 0:47:59.319
<v Speaker 2>think about it to Dick carbonized shipping, you need to

0:47:59.320 --> 0:48:03.240
<v Speaker 2>spend money on land infrastructure right there in itself is

0:48:03.239 --> 0:48:06.730
<v Speaker 2>already a hard problem because the money actually flows out

0:48:06.730 --> 0:48:07.480
<v Speaker 2>of the sector.

0:48:07.630 --> 0:48:10.919
<v Speaker 2>Um, and then of course this land infrastructure, well, what

0:48:10.930 --> 0:48:14.080
<v Speaker 2>are they, they would be storage terminals for new fuels,

0:48:14.080 --> 0:48:18.390
<v Speaker 2>they would be, you know, bunker facilities for new fuel, etcetera, etcetera. Um,

0:48:18.600 --> 0:48:21.620
<v Speaker 2>and so these are first of a kind projects and

0:48:21.620 --> 0:48:25.609
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure you've heard plenty because I've certainly heard plenty.

0:48:25.620 --> 0:48:28.920
<v Speaker 2>These are not bankable. These are not bankable. So there's

0:48:28.920 --> 0:48:32.089
<v Speaker 2>plenty of climate action money out there, but they're really

0:48:32.090 --> 0:48:36.219
<v Speaker 2>for things like solar projects, wind projects. But these first

0:48:36.219 --> 0:48:39.540
<v Speaker 2>of a kind projects, it's really hard because they are

0:48:39.540 --> 0:48:45.290
<v Speaker 2>not bankable. So, um, we're thinking hard about how, you know, um,

0:48:45.300 --> 0:48:46.620
<v Speaker 2>we can distribute risk

0:48:46.640 --> 0:48:50.830
<v Speaker 2>with organizations that can best tolerate these different kinds of risks. Right?

0:48:50.830 --> 0:48:52.870
<v Speaker 2>And I think, you know, GCM B has a special

0:48:52.870 --> 0:48:57.400
<v Speaker 2>role to play here because we can help the risk technology,

0:48:57.400 --> 0:49:00.170
<v Speaker 2>we can help lower the risk on the operations side

0:49:00.170 --> 0:49:02.969
<v Speaker 2>of things. We can even open dialogue with regulators. So

0:49:02.969 --> 0:49:07.270
<v Speaker 2>to lower regulatory or policy risk to, um, and then

0:49:07.280 --> 0:49:10.690
<v Speaker 2>is there an opportunity to crowd in monies from different

0:49:10.690 --> 0:49:14.660
<v Speaker 2>sources with different tolerance of risk to,

0:49:14.670 --> 0:49:17.739
<v Speaker 2>to be able to start moving on these kinds of projects. Right.

0:49:17.739 --> 0:49:19.800
<v Speaker 2>And G CMd is fortunate in that we have a

0:49:19.800 --> 0:49:22.880
<v Speaker 2>small war chest that we can also put money in,

0:49:22.890 --> 0:49:26.190
<v Speaker 2>but let's face it compared to these numbers that we're

0:49:26.190 --> 0:49:29.390
<v Speaker 2>talking about GCM these money is chump change, Right? And

0:49:29.390 --> 0:49:32.009
<v Speaker 2>so we need to see how we can crowd in

0:49:32.010 --> 0:49:34.770
<v Speaker 2>this money and and what it means again to do

0:49:34.770 --> 0:49:37.340
<v Speaker 2>things in the 30 years that we want to do

0:49:37.340 --> 0:49:41.170
<v Speaker 2>things in. It's really, we can't afford to wait to

0:49:41.170 --> 0:49:42.689
<v Speaker 2>do things sequentially. We need,

0:49:42.710 --> 0:49:46.589
<v Speaker 2>we need to be able to invest in fuel production

0:49:46.590 --> 0:49:50.339
<v Speaker 2>facility before they're off takers. We need to invest in

0:49:50.340 --> 0:49:54.109
<v Speaker 2>zero carbon emission ship before fuel production is at scale.

0:49:54.120 --> 0:49:56.529
<v Speaker 2>I mean, these things just need to happen in parallel.

0:49:56.530 --> 0:49:59.770
<v Speaker 2>And so um folks like you need to help us

0:49:59.770 --> 0:50:01.959
<v Speaker 2>think about how to do this. I mean, I know

0:50:01.960 --> 0:50:04.279
<v Speaker 2>nothing about finance. I just know that we need to

0:50:04.280 --> 0:50:08.090
<v Speaker 2>kind of mobilize these so that we can crowd in

0:50:08.090 --> 0:50:10.750
<v Speaker 2>the resources to be able to get going quickly.

0:50:11.719 --> 0:50:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like I said, I don't think finance has solved

0:50:15.000 --> 0:50:17.990
<v Speaker 1>this yet. It's another of those, you know, big issues

0:50:18.000 --> 0:50:22.029
<v Speaker 1>and in terms of risk underwriting or public private partnership,

0:50:22.250 --> 0:50:25.380
<v Speaker 1>uh and the cost of capital associated with these things

0:50:25.380 --> 0:50:27.880
<v Speaker 1>as well as the risk mitigation, it's, it's a big area,

0:50:27.890 --> 0:50:30.500
<v Speaker 1>we will have to revisit this in a couple of

0:50:30.500 --> 0:50:32.989
<v Speaker 1>years timeline to see, you know, whether my part of

0:50:32.989 --> 0:50:35.780
<v Speaker 1>the industry is being a good partner to your part

0:50:35.780 --> 0:50:39.450
<v Speaker 1>of the industry in pushing this forward um lin you

0:50:39.450 --> 0:50:43.400
<v Speaker 1>used the phrase multi fuel future earlier.

0:50:43.540 --> 0:50:46.250
<v Speaker 1>Um I think having talked about a bunch of, you know,

0:50:46.250 --> 0:50:50.469
<v Speaker 1>sort of narrowly defined points earlier, maybe as a final

0:50:50.469 --> 0:50:52.960
<v Speaker 1>question for this podcast you just lay out for me,

0:50:52.960 --> 0:50:55.700
<v Speaker 1>let's say the 2030 vision that you have for a

0:50:55.700 --> 0:50:56.890
<v Speaker 1>multi-fuel future.

0:50:59.000 --> 0:51:04.120
<v Speaker 2>2030 is hard man because I think a lot of

0:51:04.120 --> 0:51:06.989
<v Speaker 2>these um I think a lot of these green fuels

0:51:06.989 --> 0:51:10.740
<v Speaker 2>aren't going to be available at scale to us until

0:51:10.739 --> 0:51:15.000
<v Speaker 2>about mid 20 thirties. So I suspect um there's still

0:51:15.000 --> 0:51:17.520
<v Speaker 2>gonna be a lot of um a lot of ships

0:51:17.520 --> 0:51:21.460
<v Speaker 2>running on fossil. Um And I think to the extent

0:51:21.460 --> 0:51:23.419
<v Speaker 2>possible we should look at um

0:51:23.590 --> 0:51:27.690
<v Speaker 2>you know um where we can do biofuels um where

0:51:27.690 --> 0:51:31.460
<v Speaker 2>we can again do L. N. G. Responsibly. One of

0:51:31.460 --> 0:51:34.629
<v Speaker 2>the things we're looking at is L. P. G. Um

0:51:34.640 --> 0:51:38.469
<v Speaker 2>um and that lowers carbon emissions too and doesn't deal

0:51:38.469 --> 0:51:41.830
<v Speaker 2>with methane slip. So could that be an opportunity? So

0:51:41.830 --> 0:51:44.239
<v Speaker 2>that's something that we're still kind of trying to understand

0:51:44.239 --> 0:51:45.540
<v Speaker 2>and wrap our heads around.

0:51:45.810 --> 0:51:49.830
<v Speaker 2>Um and then um to the extent that green fuels

0:51:49.830 --> 0:51:52.040
<v Speaker 2>are available, I mean if you look at these reports

0:51:52.040 --> 0:51:55.360
<v Speaker 2>they basically say in order for us to hit Paris targets.

0:51:55.370 --> 0:51:59.070
<v Speaker 2>So net zero by 2050 you need to have 5%

0:51:59.080 --> 0:52:02.750
<v Speaker 2>of the fuels being green fuels by 2030. And so

0:52:02.750 --> 0:52:06.070
<v Speaker 2>we need to crowd in that 5% green fuels uh

0:52:06.080 --> 0:52:10.859
<v Speaker 2>to get going on this. So um yeah um it's challenging.

0:52:11.440 --> 0:52:14.350
<v Speaker 1>I'm really glad that you are sort of you know

0:52:14.350 --> 0:52:17.880
<v Speaker 1>waited in reality that you see that, you know, just

0:52:17.880 --> 0:52:20.350
<v Speaker 1>because I gave you this eight year, you know, window

0:52:20.350 --> 0:52:23.230
<v Speaker 1>to sort of expand the vision that everything's gonna work out,

0:52:23.230 --> 0:52:25.219
<v Speaker 1>but you're being very, very realistic and I appreciate that

0:52:25.219 --> 0:52:29.670
<v Speaker 1>very much these are, you know, generational existential issues, but

0:52:29.680 --> 0:52:32.859
<v Speaker 1>we have so much work to do in in cracking

0:52:32.860 --> 0:52:35.660
<v Speaker 1>the code. Um, lin liu thank you so much for

0:52:35.660 --> 0:52:36.779
<v Speaker 1>your time and insights,

0:52:38.710 --> 0:52:41.169
<v Speaker 2>thank you for having me again. I mean I think I'll,

0:52:41.170 --> 0:52:43.759
<v Speaker 2>and by saying that you know, it's, it's really important

0:52:43.760 --> 0:52:47.920
<v Speaker 2>to be grounded and understand what what is happening on

0:52:47.920 --> 0:52:49.940
<v Speaker 2>the ground and how fast we can move. But that's

0:52:49.940 --> 0:52:52.060
<v Speaker 2>not to be despondent. Right? I think we need to

0:52:52.060 --> 0:52:54.730
<v Speaker 2>roll up our sleeves and get going and we need

0:52:54.730 --> 0:52:56.739
<v Speaker 2>to double down is what it comes down to.

0:52:56.989 --> 0:52:59.020
<v Speaker 2>Thanks again, absolutely

0:52:59.020 --> 0:53:02.219
<v Speaker 1>appreciate your call to action. I also thank our listeners

0:53:02.219 --> 0:53:04.819
<v Speaker 1>for listening to this very interesting episode of copy time

0:53:04.830 --> 0:53:08.399
<v Speaker 1>podcast was produced by Kendall bridge from Spice studios, Jz

0:53:08.400 --> 0:53:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Sharma and violently provided additional production assistance, copay time is

0:53:12.600 --> 0:53:14.330
<v Speaker 1>for information only and does not rip

0:53:14.350 --> 0:53:18.330
<v Speaker 1>present any trade recommendations. All 88 episodes of the podcast

0:53:18.330 --> 0:53:21.440
<v Speaker 1>are available on Youtube and on all major podcast platforms

0:53:21.440 --> 0:53:25.670
<v Speaker 1>including apple google and Spotify as for our research publications,

0:53:25.670 --> 0:53:27.790
<v Speaker 1>webinars and live streams, you can find them all by

0:53:27.790 --> 0:53:31.720
<v Speaker 1>googling DBS research library, have a great day