WEBVTT - Kopi Time E066: Danny Quah’s trampoline metaphor

0:00:07.440 --> 0:00:07.650
<v Speaker 1>Mhm.

0:00:09.539 --> 0:00:12.690
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Kobe time, a podcast series on markets

0:00:12.690 --> 0:00:16.390
<v Speaker 1>and economies from DBS group research. I'm tomorrow. Big chief economist,

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:18.659
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to our 66th episode.

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:22.900
<v Speaker 1>I first saw Danny Quah in action as a sharp

0:00:22.910 --> 0:00:25.610
<v Speaker 1>and rigorous professor at the London School of Economics Way

0:00:25.610 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Back in 1993.

0:00:27.740 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Well through various career advancement since then, Professor Quan now

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:35.620
<v Speaker 1>is the leak gushing professor in economics and dean at

0:00:35.620 --> 0:00:38.500
<v Speaker 1>the lee Kwan Yew School of Public Policy, which resides

0:00:38.510 --> 0:00:40.550
<v Speaker 1>in the National University of Singapore

0:00:40.940 --> 0:00:46.059
<v Speaker 1>these days. His research focuses on inequality, income mobility, international

0:00:46.060 --> 0:00:50.130
<v Speaker 1>systems of Trade and Finance and war order among superpowers.

0:00:50.140 --> 0:00:53.540
<v Speaker 1>Professor who is also a commissioner on the Spence Stiglitz

0:00:53.540 --> 0:00:57.210
<v Speaker 1>Commission on Global Economic transformation and serves on the executive

0:00:57.210 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>committee of the International Economic Association or I. E. A.

0:01:00.340 --> 0:01:03.330
<v Speaker 1>He is also at the advisory board of LSE ideas

0:01:03.340 --> 0:01:07.290
<v Speaker 1>is an in the imminent advisory council of the UNDP

0:01:07.290 --> 0:01:10.949
<v Speaker 1>Bureau of Asia for Asia pacific and the World Economic

0:01:10.950 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Forum's Global Future Council for Geopolitics. Professor Danica, Welcome to

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:16.260
<v Speaker 1>Kobe time.

0:01:17.340 --> 0:01:18.260
<v Speaker 2>Hello, how are you

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:21.539
<v Speaker 1>Create? It's been a long time coming. I'm so pleased

0:01:21.540 --> 0:01:24.570
<v Speaker 1>that we have you on Kofi time today uh squad

0:01:24.580 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>if I may, let's begin with the immediate juncture the

0:01:28.250 --> 0:01:32.170
<v Speaker 1>global economy and the pandemic. A few of your thoughts

0:01:32.170 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>please on how 2022 is shaping up.

0:01:35.540 --> 0:01:37.819
<v Speaker 2>Okay first it's a great honor to be part of

0:01:37.819 --> 0:01:40.100
<v Speaker 2>your code. But yeah, you know, I followed the series

0:01:40.100 --> 0:01:42.459
<v Speaker 2>and I'm glad that I managed to start in and

0:01:42.459 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 2>number 66. Actually, it's great fun. Um

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:52.660
<v Speaker 2>Thinking about the global economy or the regional economy for 2022,

0:01:53.340 --> 0:01:56.060
<v Speaker 2>I think that we are still at a point where

0:01:56.640 --> 0:02:00.750
<v Speaker 2>we might be described as a situation of tentative

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:02.850
<v Speaker 2>contingency.

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 2>There's lots of uncertainties, the stages that we've got to

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 2>look like there might be bright ways ahead, but there's

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:13.450
<v Speaker 2>still a long way to go before we're out of

0:02:13.450 --> 0:02:14.460
<v Speaker 2>the woods.

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:17.260
<v Speaker 2>I think if I had to put my finger on

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:21.059
<v Speaker 2>three on a number of things or any number of things,

0:02:21.540 --> 0:02:24.300
<v Speaker 2>I would say three things that are gonna matter that

0:02:24.300 --> 0:02:25.459
<v Speaker 2>we need to watch.

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 2>The first of these

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:30.060
<v Speaker 2>is great power rivalry

0:02:30.940 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 2>china and the United States

0:02:33.139 --> 0:02:36.050
<v Speaker 2>Russia entering the free in europe,

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:41.709
<v Speaker 2>the european union continuing to settle in as a global

0:02:41.710 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 2>force to be reckoned with. Great power rivalry

0:02:45.139 --> 0:02:49.329
<v Speaker 2>hugely impactful for our part of the world, where so

0:02:49.330 --> 0:02:51.980
<v Speaker 2>much of our livelihood, so much of our well being

0:02:51.990 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 2>hinges

0:02:53.740 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 2>on a stable international system, on international system with rules

0:02:58.210 --> 0:03:03.220
<v Speaker 2>that benefit our economy. So first thing great power rivalry

0:03:03.220 --> 0:03:04.750
<v Speaker 2>for us to look at and that

0:03:05.139 --> 0:03:08.060
<v Speaker 2>as you and I and all, all your listeners know

0:03:08.070 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 2>is in a state of turmoil. Every now and then

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:15.220
<v Speaker 2>we see a bright spot but still lots of things unsettled.

0:03:15.230 --> 0:03:16.860
<v Speaker 2>So that's the first part

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:20.460
<v Speaker 2>of the tentative contingency.

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 2>The second I might say is the pandemic

0:03:25.340 --> 0:03:27.650
<v Speaker 2>after vaccines came online.

0:03:28.139 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 2>The world looked like it was also in a good place.

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:32.660
<v Speaker 2>There was a clear trajectory forwards.

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:35.900
<v Speaker 2>We were hit then by delta and now the only

0:03:35.900 --> 0:03:37.660
<v Speaker 2>grown white variants.

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 2>It's not at all clear

0:03:40.740 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 2>where we're gonna go with this because the evidence is

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:48.750
<v Speaker 2>not in yet on how the vaccines will manage relative

0:03:48.750 --> 0:03:53.140
<v Speaker 2>to the omicron variant. And the only crown variant itself,

0:03:53.150 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 2>it's not clear yet

0:03:55.540 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 2>its impact on the things that matter serious illness, mortality.

0:04:01.930 --> 0:04:05.260
<v Speaker 2>I see you take uptick

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 2>hospital bed

0:04:07.340 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 2>usage. None of these things is yet clear. But we

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:14.740
<v Speaker 2>do know it is a highly infectious variant and it's

0:04:14.740 --> 0:04:17.260
<v Speaker 2>already in many, many parts of the world.

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:20.290
<v Speaker 2>And I suppose the last of the three legs that

0:04:20.290 --> 0:04:22.909
<v Speaker 2>I am keeping an eye on as we look ahead

0:04:22.910 --> 0:04:24.150
<v Speaker 2>to 2022

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:29.150
<v Speaker 2>is what's happening to trade. The globalization system.

0:04:29.540 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 2>No,

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:34.539
<v Speaker 2>The 1990s that you were just harking back to a

0:04:34.540 --> 0:04:38.349
<v Speaker 2>and I think myself to with great nostalgia and fondness

0:04:38.740 --> 0:04:41.950
<v Speaker 2>Running into the 2000s was a period of

0:04:42.339 --> 0:04:46.450
<v Speaker 2>rising hyper globalization.

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:51.059
<v Speaker 2>The ideal there was that very soon we could see

0:04:51.070 --> 0:04:52.360
<v Speaker 2>for all of us

0:04:52.940 --> 0:04:54.050
<v Speaker 2>that anything

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:55.849
<v Speaker 2>me anywhere

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:57.250
<v Speaker 2>on the planet

0:04:58.140 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 2>would be available to everyone everywhere else on earth.

0:05:03.540 --> 0:05:06.740
<v Speaker 2>There was an exciting time to be alive to think

0:05:06.740 --> 0:05:11.050
<v Speaker 2>about how ideas, goods and services would disseminate across the world,

0:05:11.050 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 2>bringing prosperity to everyone on the planet.

0:05:15.140 --> 0:05:17.450
<v Speaker 2>We're not in that situation. Now,

0:05:17.940 --> 0:05:22.339
<v Speaker 2>Trade might be described as an attenuated trade Yes. Access

0:05:22.339 --> 0:05:23.460
<v Speaker 2>abated by

0:05:23.940 --> 0:05:29.630
<v Speaker 2>great power rivalry shaken by pandemic, but long before this,

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 2>there were forces in play that would profoundly change the

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:36.750
<v Speaker 2>way we view trade among others.

0:05:37.339 --> 0:05:41.180
<v Speaker 2>The impact of trade on the distribution of well being

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:43.250
<v Speaker 2>within all of our societies.

0:05:44.339 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 2>The impact of train as it continued to change in

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:51.150
<v Speaker 2>character from a situation where,

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:53.860
<v Speaker 2>you know, pretty much everything

0:05:55.140 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 2>that you wanted to buy, you could see your new

0:05:58.440 --> 0:05:59.550
<v Speaker 2>way it was made

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:02.390
<v Speaker 2>in one place on earth and from there it was

0:06:02.390 --> 0:06:07.310
<v Speaker 2>then consumed everywhere else. Now there's practically nothing that's made

0:06:07.310 --> 0:06:13.330
<v Speaker 2>in one single place. International trade is mostly about minimizing

0:06:13.339 --> 0:06:18.310
<v Speaker 2>inventory holdings and maximizing the flow of value in intermediate

0:06:18.310 --> 0:06:19.060
<v Speaker 2>inputs

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:21.060
<v Speaker 2>across our planet. The great

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:25.350
<v Speaker 2>evolution of the global supply chain and pandemic

0:06:26.540 --> 0:06:30.820
<v Speaker 2>fears of populism and nationalism and great power rivalry of

0:06:30.820 --> 0:06:32.060
<v Speaker 2>all conspiring

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:36.300
<v Speaker 2>to make us worry about whether this system of globalized

0:06:36.310 --> 0:06:39.250
<v Speaker 2>production and exchange can be sustained

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:42.660
<v Speaker 2>and where we go from here with that system we

0:06:42.660 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 2>don't really know yet. So I come back to these

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 2>three great forces, great power rivalry,

0:06:49.339 --> 0:06:50.150
<v Speaker 2>pandemic

0:06:50.540 --> 0:06:53.050
<v Speaker 2>and the new nature of a can you waited trade

0:06:53.050 --> 0:06:55.460
<v Speaker 2>that we don't have a really good handle on.

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:59.310
<v Speaker 2>So that's where I see 2022 and and the years

0:06:59.310 --> 0:06:59.750
<v Speaker 2>to come.

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>So it seems like you see a convergence between the

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:05.359
<v Speaker 1>long term structural changes and the very near term. There

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:07.180
<v Speaker 1>isn't that much of a difference between these two now

0:07:07.180 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and more.

0:07:07.940 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. I think that is now, you know, the art

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 2>going forward is a seamless narrative. One thing is going

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:16.550
<v Speaker 2>to lead to another and the things that are very

0:07:16.550 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 2>far out

0:07:17.940 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Where, you know, our leaders, where our governments where international

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:25.750
<v Speaker 2>system sees as a convergence point way out in the future.

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 2>They will have impacted in for 2022.

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:32.690
<v Speaker 1>Right uh protocol. I was traveling last week and was

0:07:32.700 --> 0:07:35.850
<v Speaker 1>in the in a discussion and a large companies boardroom

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:40.020
<v Speaker 1>and they were outside advisers were speaking and some of

0:07:40.020 --> 0:07:43.540
<v Speaker 1>their view, I mean, mostly Western observers. However, the view

0:07:43.540 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>is that if things progress the way they are, the

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:49.870
<v Speaker 1>way the dominant are falling, it will inevitably lead to war.

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:54.100
<v Speaker 1>And therefore we need course corrections because we can let

0:07:54.100 --> 0:07:55.460
<v Speaker 1>the status quo, sort of, you know,

0:07:55.740 --> 0:07:58.950
<v Speaker 1>take us to that unfortunate or you know, very, very

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:03.510
<v Speaker 1>undesirable situation. I want to talk to you about some

0:08:03.510 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of your recent writings uh and I know that you

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>are very concerned about

0:08:08.740 --> 0:08:13.270
<v Speaker 1>worker welfare inequality among the haves and between the haves

0:08:13.270 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and the have nots and so on. Um and so

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:17.750
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with the one narrow area which

0:08:17.750 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>is sort of

0:08:18.940 --> 0:08:19.750
<v Speaker 1>the

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:23.990
<v Speaker 1>The the rights and the privileges enjoyed or not by

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>workers in the gig economy. So this trend began well

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 1>before the pandemic, but of course has accelerated substantially since

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 1>then in the us we keep hearing about the great resignation,

0:08:34.010 --> 0:08:35.780
<v Speaker 1>but I think what we don't appreciate is that some

0:08:35.780 --> 0:08:39.340
<v Speaker 1>of the great resignation is manifesting into people leaving formal

0:08:39.340 --> 0:08:41.260
<v Speaker 1>9-5 jobs into becoming

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:44.580
<v Speaker 1>a contractor for amazon or just doing things out of

0:08:44.580 --> 0:08:49.410
<v Speaker 1>home operating in the economy. So you are the vice

0:08:49.410 --> 0:08:52.310
<v Speaker 1>chair of a committee in Singapore, tasked to look into

0:08:52.309 --> 0:08:55.490
<v Speaker 1>the protections for Cape workers here. So, your thoughts on

0:08:55.490 --> 0:08:56.050
<v Speaker 1>this place.

0:08:56.740 --> 0:09:00.460
<v Speaker 2>Okay. Um, thank you. Let's dive into that. But if

0:09:00.460 --> 0:09:02.900
<v Speaker 2>I may, can I just take take a minute to

0:09:02.900 --> 0:09:06.100
<v Speaker 2>reflect on on what you described as the views of

0:09:06.100 --> 0:09:07.559
<v Speaker 2>many Western observers.

0:09:07.940 --> 0:09:12.130
<v Speaker 2>The war is inevitable. There's there's been this this hypothesis

0:09:12.140 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 2>that the world is in the so called facilities trap,

0:09:16.540 --> 0:09:19.710
<v Speaker 2>that the international system that we've had for seven decades,

0:09:19.710 --> 0:09:24.699
<v Speaker 2>if not longer is not capable of managing with the

0:09:24.700 --> 0:09:26.950
<v Speaker 2>rise of a new superpower

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:27.860
<v Speaker 2>china.

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:32.050
<v Speaker 2>And that the incumbent hegemony of the United States for

0:09:32.050 --> 0:09:35.580
<v Speaker 2>whatever reason, structural reasons or reasons of bragging rights or

0:09:35.580 --> 0:09:39.950
<v Speaker 2>reasons of actual inability to just to deal with the

0:09:39.950 --> 0:09:43.929
<v Speaker 2>competition or really out of the feeling of benevolence towards

0:09:43.929 --> 0:09:45.849
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the world, keep the world safe as

0:09:45.850 --> 0:09:46.350
<v Speaker 2>it were,

0:09:46.540 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 2>needs to take on this rising challenges the

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:52.330
<v Speaker 2>whole slew of narratives on this. I think that is

0:09:52.330 --> 0:09:55.740
<v Speaker 2>quite important that, you know, even as the West worries

0:09:55.740 --> 0:09:58.460
<v Speaker 2>about this inevitable drive towards war,

0:09:58.940 --> 0:10:01.630
<v Speaker 2>we have to you and I and and all of

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:04.189
<v Speaker 2>all of the listeners to your program and everyone around us.

0:10:04.190 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 2>We need to realize that

0:10:05.940 --> 0:10:06.860
<v Speaker 2>actually

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 2>80% of the world

0:10:10.340 --> 0:10:13.060
<v Speaker 2>lives in neither the United States nor china,

0:10:13.540 --> 0:10:18.660
<v Speaker 2>the overwhelming majority of the world stands outside

0:10:19.340 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 2>the competition between number one and number two. If indeed,

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:25.140
<v Speaker 2>that's all it is a great power rivalries between number

0:10:25.140 --> 0:10:26.059
<v Speaker 2>one and number two.

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:29.270
<v Speaker 2>And somehow this 80% of the world, which is the

0:10:29.270 --> 0:10:32.790
<v Speaker 2>democratic majority, we are the ones who need to have

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:36.250
<v Speaker 2>the legitimate say on how the international system evolves.

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:40.660
<v Speaker 2>We need to convince the great powers

0:10:41.140 --> 0:10:46.910
<v Speaker 2>That heading into heading into a one on one competition

0:10:46.910 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 2>that will lead to violent conflagration is not good for

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:53.250
<v Speaker 2>them and it's terrible for the world. It has no

0:10:53.250 --> 0:10:56.439
<v Speaker 2>legitimacy for the rest of us who are just watching

0:10:56.440 --> 0:11:00.010
<v Speaker 2>the 80% of us who are the great democratic majority

0:11:00.020 --> 0:11:01.150
<v Speaker 2>and how that

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:04.820
<v Speaker 2>needs to unpack is something that I'm sure will occupy

0:11:04.820 --> 0:11:07.059
<v Speaker 2>our conversation for a long time. So I could probably

0:11:07.059 --> 0:11:10.270
<v Speaker 2>take a whole other topic, Let's correct you the word

0:11:10.270 --> 0:11:12.219
<v Speaker 2>you wanted to to ask me about which is the

0:11:12.220 --> 0:11:13.260
<v Speaker 2>gig workers,

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:16.570
<v Speaker 2>the gig economy on the platform workers. And like you said,

0:11:16.580 --> 0:11:21.060
<v Speaker 2>I'm lucky enough to to serve the nation on this committee.

0:11:21.059 --> 0:11:24.140
<v Speaker 2>To look at the well being of the platform workers,

0:11:24.140 --> 0:11:26.059
<v Speaker 2>the platform workers advisory committee

0:11:26.540 --> 0:11:29.150
<v Speaker 2>constituted under the Ministry of manpower.

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:31.060
<v Speaker 2>And it seems like

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:35.210
<v Speaker 2>is it very special isn't very complicated. I'd like to

0:11:35.210 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 2>remember the following.

0:11:37.540 --> 0:11:40.150
<v Speaker 2>We the will has always had

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:44.990
<v Speaker 2>in different parts, a gig economy side to it. Well

0:11:44.990 --> 0:11:49.069
<v Speaker 2>as therefore always had platform workers who work in the

0:11:49.070 --> 0:11:50.050
<v Speaker 2>gig economy.

0:11:50.740 --> 0:11:53.949
<v Speaker 2>Uh And it's simply the case that today

0:11:54.540 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 2>technology, information technology, data networks algorithms have all brought us

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:05.780
<v Speaker 2>to a point where there will be more and more

0:12:05.790 --> 0:12:09.300
<v Speaker 2>of us involved in the gig economy, involved in in

0:12:09.309 --> 0:12:12.590
<v Speaker 2>platform working. So the issues that we're trying to deal

0:12:12.590 --> 0:12:14.250
<v Speaker 2>with in this committee,

0:12:14.740 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 2>although for now they reflect on a relatively small part

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 2>of the Singapore workforce, they reflect on a much larger

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:27.650
<v Speaker 2>portion of the global economy's labor force and I suspect

0:12:27.650 --> 0:12:30.550
<v Speaker 2>will become more and more important for all of us.

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:32.650
<v Speaker 2>You know, there's actually

0:12:33.140 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 2>In the early 20th century

0:12:35.940 --> 0:12:37.650
<v Speaker 2>paul, Erdos sh

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Is one of was one of the world's greatest mathematicians

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:44.069
<v Speaker 2>worked in the 20th century. And and I don't know

0:12:44.070 --> 0:12:47.260
<v Speaker 2>if you remember this from your days at LSE he

0:12:47.740 --> 0:12:51.370
<v Speaker 2>had no permanent home, he had no permanent contract with

0:12:51.380 --> 0:12:55.079
<v Speaker 2>any university. He would travel around the world living out

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:59.979
<v Speaker 2>of a suitcase working to solve mathematical problems with collaborators everywhere.

0:12:59.980 --> 0:13:01.859
<v Speaker 2>He went around the planet.

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:08.059
<v Speaker 2>He wrote over 1500 mathematical papers. Still a record.

0:13:08.540 --> 0:13:09.950
<v Speaker 2>He was a gig worker.

0:13:10.740 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 2>He was using a gig economy that worked around the

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:17.189
<v Speaker 2>production of mathematics that could be chopped up into chunks

0:13:17.220 --> 0:13:22.050
<v Speaker 2>solving mathematical theorems, proving mathematical theorems everywhere he went.

0:13:22.540 --> 0:13:27.380
<v Speaker 2>And what we see today is that information technology, data

0:13:27.380 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 2>networks

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:33.059
<v Speaker 2>algorithms have made that kind of work

0:13:33.540 --> 0:13:35.250
<v Speaker 2>both available

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:39.260
<v Speaker 2>and indeed necessary for many of us around the world.

0:13:39.740 --> 0:13:43.630
<v Speaker 2>So where is shown up now? Uh, the platform workers

0:13:43.630 --> 0:13:47.260
<v Speaker 2>that this this committee is looking at, which are

0:13:48.140 --> 0:13:49.660
<v Speaker 2>right hailing drivers,

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:52.859
<v Speaker 2>taxi drivers, delivery workers,

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:58.390
<v Speaker 2>but included in platform workers in the gig economy. Also,

0:13:58.390 --> 0:14:01.790
<v Speaker 2>software engineers and designers who seek not a permanent contract

0:14:01.790 --> 0:14:04.170
<v Speaker 2>with google, but who want to be like Paula dash

0:14:04.179 --> 0:14:07.010
<v Speaker 2>traveled the world, lived out of a suitcase, pop up

0:14:07.010 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 2>their notebook, solve a problem. They to our platform workers,

0:14:11.940 --> 0:14:13.650
<v Speaker 2>music teachers in Singapore,

0:14:13.740 --> 0:14:18.370
<v Speaker 2>we're taking on gigs in different places for temporary for

0:14:18.370 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 2>for short, for short time periods are also

0:14:21.940 --> 0:14:25.100
<v Speaker 2>platform workers in the gig economy. The reason that this

0:14:25.100 --> 0:14:28.450
<v Speaker 2>committee and the Ministry of Manpower is concerned about,

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 2>about this

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:31.050
<v Speaker 2>is that

0:14:32.140 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 2>the workers that were looking at

0:14:34.140 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 2>uh, on the lower wage end of the income spectrum,

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:43.180
<v Speaker 2>software designers, engineers make a lot of money, many of

0:14:43.180 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 2>them doesn't bother the rest of society that they're traveling

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:49.490
<v Speaker 2>or living out of a suitcase for the platform workers

0:14:49.490 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 2>that we're looking at again, delivery writers, write hailing taxi drivers,

0:14:55.970 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 2>delivery writers,

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:00.260
<v Speaker 2>these workers

0:15:00.740 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 2>loki

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:07.260
<v Speaker 2>They're below the 20th percentile of the Singapore workforce and

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:10.490
<v Speaker 2>we need to think about their long term well being by,

0:15:10.490 --> 0:15:11.750
<v Speaker 2>we I mean, they

0:15:13.140 --> 0:15:18.130
<v Speaker 2>uh, you know, concerned social observers and the platforms themselves,

0:15:18.130 --> 0:15:19.950
<v Speaker 2>the companies themselves because

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:22.250
<v Speaker 2>that these workers

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 2>do okay in the long run

0:15:25.140 --> 0:15:27.660
<v Speaker 2>is important for the sustainability

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:32.220
<v Speaker 2>of the platforms and ultimately for the well being of

0:15:32.220 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 2>the Singapore consumer for everybody involved in this, this new

0:15:36.690 --> 0:15:41.870
<v Speaker 2>ever expanding gig economy. So, to come around to how

0:15:41.870 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 2>we began,

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:45.690
<v Speaker 2>I said that, you know, although it seems like this

0:15:45.690 --> 0:15:49.130
<v Speaker 2>is something terribly new and exciting, it is terribly new

0:15:49.130 --> 0:15:49.950
<v Speaker 2>and exciting

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 2>its roots, the fundamentals were thinking about it our longstanding,

0:15:54.650 --> 0:15:57.900
<v Speaker 2>they go all the way back to when academics travel

0:15:57.900 --> 0:16:00.950
<v Speaker 2>the world solving problems we can think about is like,

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 2>it's like a Marie condo decluttering

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:07.990
<v Speaker 2>of our production process. Instead of having like you and

0:16:07.990 --> 0:16:10.850
<v Speaker 2>me books on our shelves, sitting in one place, working

0:16:10.850 --> 0:16:14.380
<v Speaker 2>on problems, we declutter, we get rid of all of this,

0:16:14.380 --> 0:16:17.890
<v Speaker 2>we focus on essentials and we become platform workers in

0:16:17.890 --> 0:16:22.150
<v Speaker 2>the gig economy, you in a very lucrative financial service industry,

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:25.060
<v Speaker 2>being the much lesser paid epidemics

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:29.250
<v Speaker 2>and then all the way through to delivery writers, uh

0:16:29.250 --> 0:16:32.550
<v Speaker 2>and and taxi drivers. So that's the, that's the set

0:16:32.550 --> 0:16:35.290
<v Speaker 2>of issues. You're looking at the well being of all

0:16:35.290 --> 0:16:38.030
<v Speaker 2>of us who are involved in this decluttering of the

0:16:38.030 --> 0:16:40.770
<v Speaker 2>production process and the well being includes

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:45.140
<v Speaker 2>retirement. Now, what happens now with platform workers, once you

0:16:45.150 --> 0:16:47.770
<v Speaker 2>if you and I decided to leave our workplace

0:16:48.340 --> 0:16:51.570
<v Speaker 2>and worked in a platform working kind of way,

0:16:51.940 --> 0:16:55.470
<v Speaker 2>you and I will no longer be considered employees,

0:16:56.540 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 2>we would be workers, but we don't employees now for economists,

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:02.660
<v Speaker 2>that distinction doesn't make any sense in our models, we

0:17:02.660 --> 0:17:06.190
<v Speaker 2>use these terms interchangeably, but in the law in and

0:17:06.190 --> 0:17:10.460
<v Speaker 2>in reality workers are one category and employees

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:12.170
<v Speaker 2>attract

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:15.670
<v Speaker 2>coverage and protection under the Employment Act

0:17:16.140 --> 0:17:19.220
<v Speaker 2>variants of that in Singapore and elsewhere in the world.

0:17:19.220 --> 0:17:20.360
<v Speaker 2>And the Employment Act

0:17:20.740 --> 0:17:21.670
<v Speaker 2>looked at

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:27.149
<v Speaker 2>retirement benefits, health care, housing, the protection bargaining power, the

0:17:27.150 --> 0:17:28.959
<v Speaker 2>stress and fragility of work.

0:17:29.540 --> 0:17:32.350
<v Speaker 2>The things that, as economists, we would say the long

0:17:32.350 --> 0:17:32.959
<v Speaker 2>term

0:17:33.340 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 2>president value considerations that everyone should be mindful of

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 2>and the worry is that in the gig economy platform

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:45.580
<v Speaker 2>workers were daily on the run from, you know, from

0:17:45.580 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 2>on on food delivery or goods delivery or going from

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:53.340
<v Speaker 2>one taxi right to another. Haven't had the space to

0:17:53.340 --> 0:17:56.360
<v Speaker 2>think about their long term, longer run welfare

0:17:56.540 --> 0:17:57.859
<v Speaker 2>considerations.

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:02.580
<v Speaker 2>And so this committee attempts to solve that problem of

0:18:02.580 --> 0:18:05.510
<v Speaker 2>externality of where people haven't had time to think about

0:18:05.510 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 2>these issues will have long run implications for the well

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:09.350
<v Speaker 2>being

0:18:09.740 --> 0:18:11.170
<v Speaker 2>of themselves,

0:18:11.740 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 2>but also the platforms they work for and for the

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 2>customers that all the rest of society is

0:18:17.740 --> 0:18:21.060
<v Speaker 1>indeed. Uh, the fiscal nerd in me wants to ask

0:18:21.060 --> 0:18:24.660
<v Speaker 1>some follow up questions to that Professor Quad. So we

0:18:24.660 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>are used to paying income taxes in the area we

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:29.850
<v Speaker 1>reside because the activity we do there seems to be

0:18:29.850 --> 0:18:31.959
<v Speaker 1>economically linked to that geography,

0:18:32.340 --> 0:18:35.060
<v Speaker 1>but my son who is eight years old and takes

0:18:35.060 --> 0:18:38.359
<v Speaker 1>quoting lessons from a service provider in India.

0:18:38.740 --> 0:18:41.340
<v Speaker 1>Uh, this gentleman, we don't know where in India he lives,

0:18:41.340 --> 0:18:43.500
<v Speaker 1>but he's a friend of my son. Now they meet

0:18:43.510 --> 0:18:46.510
<v Speaker 1>each other on zoom twice a week. They share a

0:18:46.510 --> 0:18:51.740
<v Speaker 1>screen and he learned scratch uh uh, through the scratch platform.

0:18:51.740 --> 0:18:52.770
<v Speaker 1>He learns quoting from him.

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:56.020
<v Speaker 1>The gentleman is providing a service for Singapore. We pay

0:18:56.020 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>him but his earning is in India.

0:18:58.940 --> 0:19:01.190
<v Speaker 1>So is it the responsibility of the government of India

0:19:01.190 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to charge income tax or as a service provider to

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:07.179
<v Speaker 1>activity in Singapore. Should there be a way of Singapore

0:19:07.180 --> 0:19:09.900
<v Speaker 1>and government to take a pie? A piece of that pie,

0:19:09.900 --> 0:19:12.260
<v Speaker 1>which is I think impossible in today's day and age.

0:19:12.270 --> 0:19:14.860
<v Speaker 1>But that's sort of challenges we have coming

0:19:15.740 --> 0:19:17.270
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. You know,

0:19:18.340 --> 0:19:22.690
<v Speaker 2>when we were learning economics, we thought it was complicated

0:19:22.690 --> 0:19:23.260
<v Speaker 2>enough

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:28.470
<v Speaker 2>to remember the difference between gross national product and gross

0:19:28.470 --> 0:19:32.290
<v Speaker 2>domestic product because you know, was it, was it earnings

0:19:32.290 --> 0:19:35.350
<v Speaker 2>owned by citizens or was it learning by earnings and

0:19:35.350 --> 0:19:39.770
<v Speaker 2>by residents? Where exactly does that transaction occur? That

0:19:40.540 --> 0:19:43.140
<v Speaker 2>Help know that stood us in good stead for decades.

0:19:43.140 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 2>This distinction between GNP or GDP within the last 10 years,

0:19:46.770 --> 0:19:52.659
<v Speaker 2>the movement of transactions and services into cyberspace

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:55.970
<v Speaker 2>where there is no physical location to speak of has

0:19:55.970 --> 0:19:58.850
<v Speaker 2>compounded these complications many times over.

0:19:59.540 --> 0:20:02.220
<v Speaker 2>And I think, you know, we, we all need to

0:20:02.220 --> 0:20:04.850
<v Speaker 2>be fiscal nerds. We all need to think about where

0:20:04.859 --> 0:20:09.170
<v Speaker 2>these tax considerations go because ultimately they are what drive

0:20:09.170 --> 0:20:12.530
<v Speaker 2>the way in which our, our policy makers and our

0:20:12.530 --> 0:20:15.419
<v Speaker 2>leaders look after our well being to take care of

0:20:15.420 --> 0:20:17.270
<v Speaker 2>the externalities and the

0:20:17.340 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 2>the public goods that all our societies will still need.

0:20:21.140 --> 0:20:24.619
<v Speaker 2>It's going to be hugely important. And I hope that,

0:20:24.619 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, the work on platform workers, uh it's small,

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:31.390
<v Speaker 2>is focused on just a small part of labels for now,

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:34.590
<v Speaker 2>but we'll give us insights into these larger, more, more,

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:39.649
<v Speaker 2>more consequential considerations as the global economy continues to evolve. Absolutely,

0:20:39.650 --> 0:20:41.060
<v Speaker 2>I am talking with you

0:20:41.340 --> 0:20:44.490
<v Speaker 1>and earlier this year, we saw after a very long time,

0:20:44.490 --> 0:20:47.479
<v Speaker 1>one tangible progress in global taxation in the form of

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:48.060
<v Speaker 1>the minimum

0:20:48.340 --> 0:20:51.230
<v Speaker 1>corporate income tax and lots of countries which frankly, I

0:20:51.230 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>thought it was unthinkable that would sign up did sign

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:55.740
<v Speaker 1>up on this initiative. Does it give you a glimmer

0:20:55.740 --> 0:20:58.740
<v Speaker 1>of hope that we could have more progress at the

0:20:58.740 --> 0:21:02.170
<v Speaker 1>multilateral level of taxation of gig workers?

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:07.780
<v Speaker 2>It is a glimmer of hope, because on many other

0:21:07.780 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 2>multilateral considerations, we have been abysmal getting any kind of

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:19.109
<v Speaker 2>cooperation collaboration, the global pandemic, global climate crisis, international terrorism,

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:20.460
<v Speaker 2>uh you know,

0:21:20.940 --> 0:21:21.260
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:23.959
<v Speaker 2>The way in which

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:29.270
<v Speaker 2>very well off people are able to manipulate the international

0:21:29.270 --> 0:21:32.490
<v Speaker 2>financial system in a way, so that many of them

0:21:32.490 --> 0:21:37.750
<v Speaker 2>end up paying less tax than the poorer uh fellows

0:21:37.750 --> 0:21:40.660
<v Speaker 2>in whichever society they live in all of these are

0:21:40.670 --> 0:21:45.670
<v Speaker 2>hugely important. The corporation part of it is one

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:49.990
<v Speaker 2>relatively easy win. But I hope we're gonna we're gonna

0:21:49.990 --> 0:21:52.300
<v Speaker 2>need to do a lot more in terms of keeping

0:21:52.300 --> 0:21:53.770
<v Speaker 2>the global economy together.

0:21:55.340 --> 0:21:59.690
<v Speaker 1>I want to switch gear to really, you know, excellent

0:21:59.690 --> 0:22:03.740
<v Speaker 1>piece of opinion editorial piece you wrote for a Singaporean

0:22:03.740 --> 0:22:08.300
<v Speaker 1>newspaper recently. It was entitled Building Back Better with trampolines.

0:22:08.310 --> 0:22:11.590
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about the trampoline metaphor later. Um

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:15.130
<v Speaker 1>but in the very beginning you portray a post pandemic

0:22:15.140 --> 0:22:16.460
<v Speaker 1>world that is a need

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:19.660
<v Speaker 1>for resilience and social cohesion.

0:22:20.140 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Words that you know economists didn't talk a lot about

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:24.390
<v Speaker 1>in the past but you know now you're bringing them

0:22:24.390 --> 0:22:28.129
<v Speaker 1>into the core of discussions and thoughts that economists must have.

0:22:28.140 --> 0:22:31.450
<v Speaker 1>So let's unpack those two words start with resilience.

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:35.190
<v Speaker 1>Um Is it the same as a robust society that

0:22:35.190 --> 0:22:38.290
<v Speaker 1>has internal financial buffer support for the poor? Or do

0:22:38.290 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you have something bigger than that in mind?

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:44.410
<v Speaker 2>Okay. I think financial buffers, support systems for the poor

0:22:44.420 --> 0:22:46.860
<v Speaker 2>all those are steps in the right direction.

0:22:47.540 --> 0:22:52.290
<v Speaker 2>Um and Brazilians could be viewed as one natural end

0:22:52.290 --> 0:22:54.050
<v Speaker 2>point as we continue this.

0:22:55.340 --> 0:22:58.370
<v Speaker 2>But the important distinction to be made here is that

0:22:58.369 --> 0:23:04.270
<v Speaker 2>sometimes when they are conventionally or historically implemented

0:23:04.740 --> 0:23:08.170
<v Speaker 2>financial buffers, support systems for the poor are viewed as

0:23:08.170 --> 0:23:11.359
<v Speaker 2>ways to to simply strengthen society.

0:23:12.140 --> 0:23:15.389
<v Speaker 2>And there's an interesting difference conceptually and I think for

0:23:15.390 --> 0:23:19.700
<v Speaker 2>formulating policy in terms of strengthening society and making society

0:23:19.700 --> 0:23:21.340
<v Speaker 2>more resilient now in english

0:23:21.740 --> 0:23:24.649
<v Speaker 2>uh in most sort of natural language and verbal language.

0:23:24.650 --> 0:23:27.770
<v Speaker 2>He's not clear clear what that means what the distinction is.

0:23:28.140 --> 0:23:32.780
<v Speaker 2>But the visual metaphor might help we strengthen social systems

0:23:32.790 --> 0:23:34.169
<v Speaker 2>when we make them

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:36.270
<v Speaker 2>like an oak tree

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:38.360
<v Speaker 2>we make them like a redwood

0:23:38.740 --> 0:23:40.660
<v Speaker 2>tree that is strong

0:23:41.340 --> 0:23:43.170
<v Speaker 2>and is able to

0:23:43.540 --> 0:23:47.460
<v Speaker 2>do keep upright even against strong winds.

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:49.460
<v Speaker 2>An oak tree

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 2>that is a strong system.

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:54.659
<v Speaker 2>If we're building financial performance and support systems for the

0:23:54.660 --> 0:23:56.780
<v Speaker 2>poor because we want to try and mix this again,

0:23:56.790 --> 0:24:00.060
<v Speaker 2>oak tree then what we're doing is strengthening

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:01.270
<v Speaker 2>the system,

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:04.950
<v Speaker 2>resilience is not about an oak tree,

0:24:05.980 --> 0:24:07.270
<v Speaker 2>it's about bamboo

0:24:07.940 --> 0:24:10.060
<v Speaker 2>or is about willow trees,

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:13.060
<v Speaker 2>structures that are soft

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:16.260
<v Speaker 2>and pliable and bend with the wind.

0:24:16.940 --> 0:24:19.070
<v Speaker 2>Why is it important to have this well? And oak

0:24:19.070 --> 0:24:24.030
<v Speaker 2>tree does well against the kinds of forces that historically

0:24:24.030 --> 0:24:24.949
<v Speaker 2>we have seen.

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:27.850
<v Speaker 2>Yeah the known knowns

0:24:28.540 --> 0:24:31.130
<v Speaker 2>they are the things that we can imagine happening. We

0:24:31.130 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 2>can build a crease sufficiently strong against them. If we

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:35.860
<v Speaker 2>build financial buffers,

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:39.169
<v Speaker 2>support systems for the poor against the kinds of risks

0:24:39.170 --> 0:24:43.300
<v Speaker 2>that we can imagine. Even even black swan kind of

0:24:43.300 --> 0:24:45.949
<v Speaker 2>risk if you can imagine and describe it then we're

0:24:45.950 --> 0:24:47.460
<v Speaker 2>making system stronger.

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:50.060
<v Speaker 2>The idea of resilience is too

0:24:50.740 --> 0:24:53.730
<v Speaker 2>say yes let's make some strong when we can but

0:24:53.730 --> 0:24:57.550
<v Speaker 2>we should pay attention to unknown unknowns, things that we

0:24:57.550 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 2>can't even imagine things that could be potentially overwhelming

0:25:02.740 --> 0:25:06.140
<v Speaker 2>called the covid pandemic set on the boundary between unknown

0:25:06.140 --> 0:25:10.379
<v Speaker 2>unknowns and unknown unknown because we we've had pandemics in

0:25:10.380 --> 0:25:13.250
<v Speaker 2>the past. We didn't know how devastating would be, Who

0:25:13.250 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 2>knew that for over two years we will be sitting

0:25:16.609 --> 0:25:20.300
<v Speaker 2>speaking like this on to having our entire world transform.

0:25:20.310 --> 0:25:22.659
<v Speaker 2>I think that would have been very difficult for people

0:25:22.660 --> 0:25:23.670
<v Speaker 2>to imagine this.

0:25:23.940 --> 0:25:26.250
<v Speaker 2>We can put on the boundary of an unknown unknown.

0:25:26.250 --> 0:25:30.030
<v Speaker 2>So we build a system that was resilient against this

0:25:30.030 --> 0:25:31.169
<v Speaker 2>like a willow

0:25:31.940 --> 0:25:33.050
<v Speaker 2>or bamboo

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:37.380
<v Speaker 2>shoot that can bend with this force and then in

0:25:37.380 --> 0:25:40.270
<v Speaker 2>a resilient way bounce back.

0:25:40.740 --> 0:25:44.419
<v Speaker 2>Is this bouncing back? That is the critical difference between

0:25:44.420 --> 0:25:46.859
<v Speaker 2>simply building strong robust systems

0:25:47.340 --> 0:25:49.859
<v Speaker 2>and building systems of resilience.

0:25:50.340 --> 0:25:54.340
<v Speaker 2>So you had referred to trampoline as a valuable metaphor

0:25:54.340 --> 0:25:59.060
<v Speaker 2>for this. Indeed contrast strong table made of hardwood

0:25:59.740 --> 0:26:03.570
<v Speaker 2>versus a trampoline, the hardwood will stand up against most

0:26:03.570 --> 0:26:05.630
<v Speaker 2>things we want to put on it. But at some

0:26:05.630 --> 0:26:08.170
<v Speaker 2>point you could see that the force will hit it

0:26:08.170 --> 0:26:11.459
<v Speaker 2>and it would creak and crumble. Trampoline

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:15.170
<v Speaker 2>absorbs the force and bounces back.

0:26:15.740 --> 0:26:18.209
<v Speaker 2>The more the systems that we can build that are

0:26:18.210 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 2>like trampolines, the more resilient with our society's b

0:26:22.340 --> 0:26:24.580
<v Speaker 2>in a nutshell. That's that's kind of how I would

0:26:24.580 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 2>think about how

0:26:26.140 --> 0:26:29.469
<v Speaker 2>uh it is different from the systems that we have

0:26:29.470 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 2>traditionally built

0:26:31.140 --> 0:26:33.810
<v Speaker 2>and and to give credit where credit is due. Many

0:26:33.810 --> 0:26:37.710
<v Speaker 2>people have talked about resilience and in a way as

0:26:37.710 --> 0:26:43.830
<v Speaker 2>you saw the commentary that I wrote was a riff

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:44.850
<v Speaker 2>and take off

0:26:44.940 --> 0:26:48.500
<v Speaker 2>on something that a brilliant economists at Princeton Marcus Bruno

0:26:48.500 --> 0:26:50.620
<v Speaker 2>meier had written, He's written a whole book on the

0:26:50.619 --> 0:26:51.770
<v Speaker 2>resilient society.

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:55.060
<v Speaker 2>I took parts of what he had written and expanded

0:26:55.060 --> 0:26:58.449
<v Speaker 2>on them. Um he mentions trampoline, a lot of ideas

0:26:58.450 --> 0:27:03.470
<v Speaker 2>about resilience, his, but he doesn't develop more the trampoline metaphor.

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 2>And I've tried I've tried to do that.

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:09.260
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, sorry, go ahead.

0:27:09.740 --> 0:27:12.290
<v Speaker 2>Well, I was going to turn to social cohesion because

0:27:12.290 --> 0:27:14.780
<v Speaker 2>you had mentioned that I'm happy to wait if you

0:27:14.780 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 2>want to come back to it. After we we talked

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:19.070
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more about resilience. Well,

0:27:19.070 --> 0:27:22.650
<v Speaker 1>I was just struck by your redwood versus bamboo tree metaphor.

0:27:22.660 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>A few weeks ago, I was traveling at a different

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 1>part of the world. I was in California and the

0:27:27.770 --> 0:27:28.270
<v Speaker 1>great

0:27:28.340 --> 0:27:32.170
<v Speaker 1>Mirror woods in northern California, which has these great redwood trees.

0:27:32.740 --> 0:27:33.660
<v Speaker 2>And and to your

0:27:33.660 --> 0:27:40.169
<v Speaker 1>point that very strong institutions or structures of nature uh

0:27:40.180 --> 0:27:41.090
<v Speaker 2>over time

0:27:41.100 --> 0:27:45.390
<v Speaker 1>have a track record of dealing with past shocks by

0:27:45.390 --> 0:27:47.629
<v Speaker 1>survival bias. They are the ones that are standing, but

0:27:47.630 --> 0:27:50.989
<v Speaker 1>that does not guarantee that the next bout of climate

0:27:50.990 --> 0:27:53.859
<v Speaker 1>change that is affecting northern California substantially

0:27:54.140 --> 0:27:57.570
<v Speaker 1>is going to keep these 1000 year old trees intact

0:27:57.580 --> 0:28:00.300
<v Speaker 1>because the soil erosion that you're seeing in that area

0:28:00.300 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 1>of northern California and the plethora of forest fires now

0:28:04.290 --> 0:28:08.160
<v Speaker 1>are making the nature specialist over there very worried that

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:10.980
<v Speaker 1>these trees which have survived through basically the entire history

0:28:10.980 --> 0:28:12.170
<v Speaker 1>of the United States and more

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:14.679
<v Speaker 1>may not survive the next 100 years or 200 years.

0:28:14.690 --> 0:28:17.950
<v Speaker 1>So to your point that you can't just say that

0:28:18.340 --> 0:28:20.710
<v Speaker 1>Something has worked for the last 23, 400 years means

0:28:20.710 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 1>that it's going to last forever. That's just a survival bias.

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:24.659
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't mean that it's going to be lasting in

0:28:24.660 --> 0:28:25.170
<v Speaker 1>the future.

0:28:26.140 --> 0:28:30.750
<v Speaker 2>That's an excellent, excellent metaphor. Uh dinosaurs would be another

0:28:30.750 --> 0:28:31.270
<v Speaker 2>example

0:28:31.740 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 2>650 million years ago. There was one group, one species

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:38.620
<v Speaker 2>that that rule the earth. They had done so for

0:28:38.620 --> 0:28:42.350
<v Speaker 2>millions of years. They were the most powerful beings, the dinosaurs.

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:45.500
<v Speaker 2>And there were little rats that scurried around beneath their

0:28:45.500 --> 0:28:47.660
<v Speaker 2>field who didn't, that didn't amount to very much in

0:28:47.660 --> 0:28:48.860
<v Speaker 2>the order of things,

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:54.030
<v Speaker 2>But 650 million years ago and unknown unknown did hit

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:57.489
<v Speaker 2>our planet. And it's the little mice animals, they have

0:28:57.490 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 2>survived and became you and me. The theory of evolution

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:02.729
<v Speaker 2>is one that says that, you know, it is this,

0:29:02.740 --> 0:29:04.950
<v Speaker 2>it's not necessarily the strongest

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:09.550
<v Speaker 2>they have emerged. Whether through design or through survival bias,

0:29:10.140 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 2>it is those that have the resilience to continue to

0:29:13.330 --> 0:29:17.550
<v Speaker 2>hold together against the shocks that are historically unprecedented.

0:29:18.140 --> 0:29:21.190
<v Speaker 1>So would you say when the government of Singapore sets

0:29:21.190 --> 0:29:23.500
<v Speaker 1>out a plan for the rest of the century in

0:29:23.500 --> 0:29:27.209
<v Speaker 1>terms of dealing with rising sea levels and and creating

0:29:27.210 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 1>seawalls and that's not going to be something that

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:31.450
<v Speaker 1>you and I will be around to see it. It

0:29:31.450 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 1>is for our grandchildren, their grandchildren. So on, that is

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 1>one of those resilience building exercises.

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. I mean the government, you know, just as you know,

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:45.020
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of looking back and looking forward uh

0:29:45.030 --> 0:29:49.170
<v Speaker 2>scans horizons and it constructs scenarios and

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:52.380
<v Speaker 2>so the best that anyone can imagine any human mind

0:29:52.380 --> 0:29:54.930
<v Speaker 2>can imagine it does try to to do exactly as

0:29:54.930 --> 0:29:58.990
<v Speaker 2>you say, look forward to the circumstances that are emerging.

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:02.270
<v Speaker 2>But we will always need to be constantly on the

0:30:02.270 --> 0:30:02.950
<v Speaker 2>watch

0:30:03.540 --> 0:30:06.450
<v Speaker 2>for new things that we will need to adapt to.

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 2>Having a plan means that we will sometimes need to

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:11.670
<v Speaker 2>deviate from that plan

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:15.420
<v Speaker 2>when you are No, no, no. It's actually uh changes

0:30:15.430 --> 0:30:18.170
<v Speaker 1>right. I want to talk about social question a second,

0:30:18.170 --> 0:30:20.860
<v Speaker 1>but maybe this question will bridge us in that direction.

0:30:21.540 --> 0:30:24.890
<v Speaker 1>It is one thing to talk about the importance of

0:30:24.900 --> 0:30:28.930
<v Speaker 1>preparing for these unknown unknowns and and having systems of

0:30:28.930 --> 0:30:31.670
<v Speaker 1>buffer in place that are not just about dealing with

0:30:31.670 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 1>shocks of the past but trucks that may come.

0:30:34.340 --> 0:30:35.270
<v Speaker 1>Um, but

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:39.719
<v Speaker 1>you need a really forward thinking society, not a society

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:40.260
<v Speaker 1>where

0:30:40.740 --> 0:30:44.270
<v Speaker 1>every four or five years you have rather contentious elections,

0:30:44.640 --> 0:30:47.660
<v Speaker 1>lot of society where there is a lot of strife

0:30:47.670 --> 0:30:52.260
<v Speaker 1>over race and ethnicity and left of center

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>political beliefs and the right of center political beliefs. So,

0:30:56.010 --> 0:30:59.930
<v Speaker 1>so how do societies that are of democratic by nature

0:30:59.930 --> 0:31:03.490
<v Speaker 1>but are not necessarily capable of forming very long term

0:31:03.490 --> 0:31:04.460
<v Speaker 1>planning horizons

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:07.170
<v Speaker 1>survives the test of resilience.

0:31:07.940 --> 0:31:12.170
<v Speaker 2>Well, one thing that I remember from my time

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:14.260
<v Speaker 2>in the United Kingdom

0:31:14.940 --> 0:31:18.270
<v Speaker 2>was how in government or in parliament,

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:21.650
<v Speaker 2>that would be a debate between whoever the government was

0:31:21.660 --> 0:31:22.660
<v Speaker 2>and the opposition

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:24.860
<v Speaker 2>by the opposition.

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:27.770
<v Speaker 2>When it did things right,

0:31:28.340 --> 0:31:30.459
<v Speaker 2>always referred to itself

0:31:31.140 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 2>as her majesty's loyal opposition

0:31:35.340 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 2>was an opposition, not against the nation, not against society

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:42.060
<v Speaker 2>was for the nation and society,

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:44.630
<v Speaker 2>but I was trying to make sure the best ideas

0:31:44.630 --> 0:31:49.410
<v Speaker 2>emerged from debate with whichever party was in government at

0:31:49.410 --> 0:31:49.959
<v Speaker 2>that time.

0:31:50.340 --> 0:31:53.330
<v Speaker 2>Now, that's that's the, you know, that that for me

0:31:53.330 --> 0:31:54.770
<v Speaker 2>is uh

0:31:55.940 --> 0:31:59.270
<v Speaker 2>uh it's a singular moment of when

0:31:59.940 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 2>all different people come together realized that although they're arguing

0:32:04.610 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 2>quite heatedly, there's a greater goal that they're trying to

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:09.170
<v Speaker 2>move towards.

0:32:09.940 --> 0:32:11.050
<v Speaker 2>Unfortunately,

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:16.850
<v Speaker 2>in many democratic societies, and in many non democratic societies,

0:32:16.860 --> 0:32:21.270
<v Speaker 2>that vision is not always helped. It's not always clearly communicate.

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:26.090
<v Speaker 2>We're lucky that in Singapore we do have a consistent

0:32:26.090 --> 0:32:29.460
<v Speaker 2>narrative of where the nation is going and then people

0:32:29.460 --> 0:32:30.850
<v Speaker 2>can rally around that

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 2>in Britain the story that I just told,

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:38.140
<v Speaker 2>although royalty is is, you know, it's a figurehead, royalty

0:32:38.140 --> 0:32:41.110
<v Speaker 2>has no powers to speak of. But it does provide

0:32:41.110 --> 0:32:45.050
<v Speaker 2>that kind of rallying point around which people feel the

0:32:45.050 --> 0:32:47.860
<v Speaker 2>nation needs to organize itself

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:52.220
<v Speaker 2>and I think all human societies need that human nature

0:32:52.220 --> 0:32:53.270
<v Speaker 2>is such that

0:32:54.940 --> 0:32:59.709
<v Speaker 2>how many economists, young economists, we we we we subscribe

0:32:59.710 --> 0:33:02.300
<v Speaker 2>to the idea that human nature is at the end

0:33:02.300 --> 0:33:05.660
<v Speaker 2>of it all, ultimately self seeking. It is purposeful, but

0:33:05.660 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 2>it's self seeking

0:33:07.240 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 2>and the job of government. The job of political leadership

0:33:11.850 --> 0:33:15.860
<v Speaker 2>is to see how to align that self seeking nature

0:33:15.870 --> 0:33:17.260
<v Speaker 2>with the greater good.

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:21.660
<v Speaker 2>Some societies do it successfully and well, other societies don't,

0:33:21.660 --> 0:33:25.500
<v Speaker 2>and it's not always the most obvious societies that that

0:33:25.500 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 2>do it well,

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:29.900
<v Speaker 2>uh you know, if I may, you know, I I

0:33:29.900 --> 0:33:32.330
<v Speaker 2>can turn this maybe to a little bit of discussion

0:33:32.330 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 2>about social cohesion, because social cohesion is a natural freezing.

0:33:37.490 --> 0:33:39.860
<v Speaker 2>That comes into the conversation here.

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:42.270
<v Speaker 2>There are many observers to say, I've only read a

0:33:42.270 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 2>socially cohesive society, then of course, individual incentives would be

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:49.950
<v Speaker 2>aligned with the greater good. I don't think it's as transparent,

0:33:49.950 --> 0:33:52.450
<v Speaker 2>I think social cohesion is building something deeper,

0:33:52.940 --> 0:33:56.910
<v Speaker 2>that just the obvious manifestation that everybody uh seems to

0:33:56.910 --> 0:33:58.460
<v Speaker 2>be aligned in the right way.

0:33:58.940 --> 0:33:59.770
<v Speaker 2>Casino,

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:04.180
<v Speaker 2>about 100 years ago, when social scientists started talking about

0:34:04.180 --> 0:34:07.430
<v Speaker 2>social cohesion, and like you say, it was an economist

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:11.700
<v Speaker 2>with sociologists and others, and one of their key hypothesis

0:34:11.700 --> 0:34:14.379
<v Speaker 2>was that the way he had social cohesion, which is,

0:34:14.390 --> 0:34:17.550
<v Speaker 2>you know, really about the good things from groups in

0:34:17.550 --> 0:34:19.350
<v Speaker 2>society coming together,

0:34:19.739 --> 0:34:22.160
<v Speaker 2>there being a sense of community and belonging people helping

0:34:22.160 --> 0:34:25.270
<v Speaker 2>one another. Well, the early viewings of sociology was that, well,

0:34:25.270 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 2>you got that

0:34:26.540 --> 0:34:28.970
<v Speaker 2>by making sure society

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:31.060
<v Speaker 2>was all alike,

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:33.859
<v Speaker 2>society was homogeneous. Everybody

0:34:34.739 --> 0:34:36.560
<v Speaker 2>looked the same.

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:38.359
<v Speaker 2>And that's how,

0:34:38.739 --> 0:34:41.470
<v Speaker 2>in the early sociological perspective,

0:34:41.940 --> 0:34:46.050
<v Speaker 2>That's how you got societies to be cohesive by making

0:34:46.060 --> 0:34:49.960
<v Speaker 2>all members of society as much like each other as

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:52.060
<v Speaker 2>you could and you and I know that in the

0:34:52.060 --> 0:34:55.860
<v Speaker 2>modern world of the 21st century, that's a disaster.

0:34:56.739 --> 0:34:59.050
<v Speaker 2>Societies are now cohesive

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:00.670
<v Speaker 2>when instead

0:35:01.140 --> 0:35:04.760
<v Speaker 2>we respect diversity and difference,

0:35:05.340 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 2>that people are different with different skills, they look different,

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:12.400
<v Speaker 2>they speak different is by bringing all of this together

0:35:12.410 --> 0:35:13.350
<v Speaker 2>than we get

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:18.310
<v Speaker 2>the bamboo shoe. The strong resilient societies that can adapt

0:35:18.310 --> 0:35:19.860
<v Speaker 2>to unknown unknowns

0:35:20.340 --> 0:35:24.830
<v Speaker 2>and social cohesion as a phrasing as an idea itself

0:35:24.830 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 2>continues to evolve.

0:35:27.340 --> 0:35:30.130
<v Speaker 2>But what you and I might say is it's clear

0:35:30.130 --> 0:35:33.450
<v Speaker 2>what we need is to go back to the fundamentals

0:35:33.450 --> 0:35:33.969
<v Speaker 2>where

0:35:34.340 --> 0:35:37.180
<v Speaker 2>people feel that they belong. People feel that they can

0:35:37.180 --> 0:35:38.260
<v Speaker 2>help one another

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:41.530
<v Speaker 2>and the way to do that is by building an

0:35:41.530 --> 0:35:44.850
<v Speaker 2>environment building institutions where

0:35:46.640 --> 0:35:48.049
<v Speaker 2>We Trust one Another.

0:35:49.640 --> 0:35:53.260
<v Speaker 2>But there's a there's a difficulty here as well because

0:35:53.940 --> 0:35:56.670
<v Speaker 2>trust is an important part of social cohesion.

0:35:57.540 --> 0:36:00.240
<v Speaker 2>But trust is not stable

0:36:01.130 --> 0:36:04.910
<v Speaker 2>in economics language, trust is not a stable equilibrium. It's

0:36:04.910 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 2>not incentive compatible. If we try to build a situation

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:12.350
<v Speaker 2>of trust and we found ourselves in like a

0:36:12.930 --> 0:36:15.910
<v Speaker 2>the prisoner's dilemma type situation or a situation that allow

0:36:15.910 --> 0:36:18.570
<v Speaker 2>me to free. Right then that you trust me to

0:36:18.570 --> 0:36:21.450
<v Speaker 2>do the right thing makes you do the right thing

0:36:21.830 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 2>and that's wonderful.

0:36:23.830 --> 0:36:26.049
<v Speaker 2>But when we are all doing the right thing,

0:36:26.430 --> 0:36:29.460
<v Speaker 2>I will still see i as a member of this group,

0:36:29.830 --> 0:36:32.950
<v Speaker 2>we'll still see gain by deviating from it.

0:36:33.330 --> 0:36:35.780
<v Speaker 2>I will try and do something different. I will free

0:36:35.780 --> 0:36:38.750
<v Speaker 2>ride on all the good things that the rest of

0:36:38.750 --> 0:36:42.630
<v Speaker 2>society is doing. If society rely only on trust to

0:36:42.630 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 2>build social cohesion,

0:36:44.530 --> 0:36:46.750
<v Speaker 2>it is not a stable outcome

0:36:47.830 --> 0:36:51.060
<v Speaker 2>instead. What we have to do is to build institutions

0:36:51.060 --> 0:36:51.549
<v Speaker 2>so that

0:36:52.030 --> 0:36:55.540
<v Speaker 2>everybody continues to see again to themselves

0:36:56.230 --> 0:37:01.300
<v Speaker 2>from playing the game, that is the society's game. So

0:37:01.300 --> 0:37:03.340
<v Speaker 2>what we need to do is we need to

0:37:03.930 --> 0:37:06.900
<v Speaker 2>make sure that the poor, the weak and vulnerable, the

0:37:06.900 --> 0:37:09.660
<v Speaker 2>deprived continue to gain,

0:37:10.430 --> 0:37:12.850
<v Speaker 2>why they're sticking with the rest of society

0:37:13.230 --> 0:37:14.250
<v Speaker 2>and they will not

0:37:14.630 --> 0:37:19.940
<v Speaker 2>if they think the corporations businesses, the rich element, society

0:37:19.950 --> 0:37:21.550
<v Speaker 2>permanently exclude them,

0:37:22.230 --> 0:37:24.350
<v Speaker 2>no matter how much the poor trust the rich.

0:37:24.730 --> 0:37:28.359
<v Speaker 2>If the rich permanently exclude the poor from ever being

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:31.040
<v Speaker 2>able to become rich to be able to do the

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:34.000
<v Speaker 2>same kinds of things that the rich do, that, society

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:37.540
<v Speaker 2>is not going to be stable in social cohesion.

0:37:37.930 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, what we need to do is that we need

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:41.950
<v Speaker 2>to build systems

0:37:42.430 --> 0:37:45.160
<v Speaker 2>so that the lower strata of the income distribution

0:37:45.530 --> 0:37:49.040
<v Speaker 2>can continue to receive continuing improvement in their well being.

0:37:49.730 --> 0:37:53.540
<v Speaker 2>They must feel that society continues to have space for them.

0:37:54.130 --> 0:37:56.850
<v Speaker 2>They must feel the society continues to be inclusive

0:37:57.330 --> 0:37:59.160
<v Speaker 2>and that will align.

0:37:59.930 --> 0:38:04.040
<v Speaker 2>I was thinking no matter how racially ethnically physically diverse,

0:38:04.040 --> 0:38:05.750
<v Speaker 2>we are none of that matters

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:11.020
<v Speaker 2>because individual self gain will align with the social good

0:38:11.020 --> 0:38:13.250
<v Speaker 2>provided that we can build these systems

0:38:13.620 --> 0:38:18.540
<v Speaker 2>probably we can build systems with great social mobility, Social mobility.

0:38:18.920 --> 0:38:20.239
<v Speaker 2>I feel it's the key

0:38:20.820 --> 0:38:22.339
<v Speaker 2>to having social cohesion.

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:27.540
<v Speaker 2>It's not not just mouthing words like trust, cooperation.

0:38:28.320 --> 0:38:31.070
<v Speaker 2>What we want is that people actually see the game

0:38:31.070 --> 0:38:35.509
<v Speaker 2>to themselves of being in the society of helping one another.

0:38:35.680 --> 0:38:38.859
<v Speaker 2>That they see that by lifting those around them, they

0:38:38.870 --> 0:38:40.250
<v Speaker 2>raised themselves.

0:38:40.719 --> 0:38:43.239
<v Speaker 2>That is the critical thing for social cohesion.

0:38:43.620 --> 0:38:48.290
<v Speaker 1>So you would rather look at a database that looks

0:38:48.290 --> 0:38:50.840
<v Speaker 1>at absolute gains as opposed to relative gains.

0:38:52.420 --> 0:38:57.270
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. I fear that when we fall into a language

0:38:57.270 --> 0:39:00.640
<v Speaker 2>of relative gains, that is simply

0:39:01.320 --> 0:39:02.640
<v Speaker 2>the word we use

0:39:03.020 --> 0:39:06.830
<v Speaker 2>to be the word we use in polite society

0:39:07.520 --> 0:39:12.299
<v Speaker 2>for forcing society to a zero sum game. See if

0:39:12.300 --> 0:39:14.700
<v Speaker 2>you and I are in a situation where I am

0:39:14.700 --> 0:39:18.339
<v Speaker 2>constantly concerned about whether I've gained relative to you.

0:39:19.120 --> 0:39:21.360
<v Speaker 2>The only way I can gain relative to you is

0:39:21.360 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 2>if you lose relative to me, even if both of

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:26.440
<v Speaker 2>us are becoming richer,

0:39:26.820 --> 0:39:29.149
<v Speaker 2>it is a zero sum game. And once we get

0:39:29.150 --> 0:39:30.840
<v Speaker 2>locked into a zero sum game,

0:39:31.520 --> 0:39:33.530
<v Speaker 2>you know, there is no compromise,

0:39:33.920 --> 0:39:37.360
<v Speaker 2>There's no alignment of incentives. Everything that each of us

0:39:37.370 --> 0:39:38.330
<v Speaker 2>does

0:39:38.719 --> 0:39:41.540
<v Speaker 2>is a slight against the other.

0:39:42.020 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Everything that we do, no matter how helpful

0:39:45.820 --> 0:39:49.510
<v Speaker 2>to you yourself, to your neighbors, to everybody around you.

0:39:49.520 --> 0:39:50.950
<v Speaker 2>Anything that helps you

0:39:51.320 --> 0:39:54.279
<v Speaker 2>becomes a damage to me. That's the nature of the

0:39:54.290 --> 0:39:57.490
<v Speaker 2>zero sum game that I feel we construct when we

0:39:57.489 --> 0:40:01.380
<v Speaker 2>say relative gains. And so while it sounds nice to

0:40:01.380 --> 0:40:05.180
<v Speaker 2>some policymakers to say, oh, we can't let, even if

0:40:05.180 --> 0:40:08.240
<v Speaker 2>the poor become richer, we can't let, can't let the

0:40:08.239 --> 0:40:10.820
<v Speaker 2>rich become relatively too much richer.

0:40:11.110 --> 0:40:14.750
<v Speaker 2>They are binding themselves. They're closing themselves into a zero

0:40:14.750 --> 0:40:16.529
<v Speaker 2>sum game from which no good

0:40:17.210 --> 0:40:21.839
<v Speaker 2>can emerge. My worry also is at the very largest level.

0:40:21.850 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 2>The game of geopolitical rivalry has been shoehorned into a

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:31.020
<v Speaker 2>zero sum game. Nothing that china does that benefits its

0:40:31.020 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 2>people or its neighbors can be viewed as beneficial now

0:40:35.310 --> 0:40:38.880
<v Speaker 2>By the # one incumbent Hegeman who've used any such

0:40:38.880 --> 0:40:41.730
<v Speaker 2>game as being a relative loss to itself.

0:40:42.110 --> 0:40:44.850
<v Speaker 2>It's a zero sum game. And it's a very dangerous

0:40:44.850 --> 0:40:50.450
<v Speaker 2>position that for some reason humanity finds itself wanting to

0:40:50.450 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 2>construct more and more of

0:40:53.010 --> 0:40:55.390
<v Speaker 2>their natural situations where the world is not a zero

0:40:55.390 --> 0:40:59.260
<v Speaker 2>sum game. But we talk ourselves into it. We talk

0:40:59.260 --> 0:41:02.260
<v Speaker 2>ourselves into worrying that, you know, we are not as

0:41:02.260 --> 0:41:04.360
<v Speaker 2>well off because there are people who are richer than

0:41:04.360 --> 0:41:07.960
<v Speaker 2>us who are becoming richer, becoming even richer and therefore

0:41:07.960 --> 0:41:11.450
<v Speaker 2>that's a relative loss to us, even though we ourselves

0:41:11.450 --> 0:41:12.530
<v Speaker 2>10 years ago,

0:41:12.610 --> 0:41:13.630
<v Speaker 2>could not afford

0:41:14.610 --> 0:41:20.390
<v Speaker 2>the smart phones, the Internet, the enjoyment of netflix of

0:41:20.390 --> 0:41:24.440
<v Speaker 2>so many things that we previously could not even imagine.

0:41:24.910 --> 0:41:27.650
<v Speaker 2>But we tell ourselves this is not as good because

0:41:27.650 --> 0:41:30.840
<v Speaker 2>somebody else has something even better and that's a very

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:31.740
<v Speaker 2>dangerous

0:41:32.110 --> 0:41:35.940
<v Speaker 2>game. We play with ourselves, ultimately is not good for humanity.

0:41:37.610 --> 0:41:41.790
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. Um Professor Cole you've been very generous with your time.

0:41:41.790 --> 0:41:45.020
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you one final question. Before you know,

0:41:45.020 --> 0:41:48.609
<v Speaker 1>we we conclude this podcast. So you you talked about

0:41:48.620 --> 0:41:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Byrne Meyer's book, Brazilian society lessons from the pandemic

0:41:52.080 --> 0:41:55.819
<v Speaker 1>and you talked about the sort of ways to build

0:41:55.910 --> 0:41:59.239
<v Speaker 1>societies that are resilient and socially cohesive at the same time.

0:41:59.610 --> 0:42:00.930
<v Speaker 1>Um China

0:42:01.600 --> 0:42:04.400
<v Speaker 1>in addition to being pushed around by the whole great

0:42:04.400 --> 0:42:06.730
<v Speaker 1>for rivalry is also basically the

0:42:07.200 --> 0:42:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the the, you know, the team of Asia for the

0:42:10.080 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 1>next century or beyond. I mean, there it is, you

0:42:12.520 --> 0:42:15.630
<v Speaker 1>loom on top of us for better for good for

0:42:15.630 --> 0:42:17.310
<v Speaker 1>the rest of our lives and our Children's lives.

0:42:17.700 --> 0:42:22.070
<v Speaker 1>So what is your sense of china in its sort

0:42:22.070 --> 0:42:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of quest for resilience and social conditions?

0:42:24.800 --> 0:42:28.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we'll see. Okay. First thought on china, is that

0:42:28.770 --> 0:42:32.610
<v Speaker 2>unlike all the rest of the world, it has chosen

0:42:32.620 --> 0:42:35.509
<v Speaker 2>to pursue a zero covid strategy,

0:42:36.800 --> 0:42:40.569
<v Speaker 2>right? It is it is intent on stepping out any

0:42:40.580 --> 0:42:44.230
<v Speaker 2>sign of the of the pandemic re emerging

0:42:44.600 --> 0:42:47.630
<v Speaker 2>in China is going through great pains, great cost to

0:42:47.630 --> 0:42:50.230
<v Speaker 2>its economy and its people to do that.

0:42:51.100 --> 0:42:54.200
<v Speaker 2>If I were to point to one thing among some

0:42:54.200 --> 0:42:55.620
<v Speaker 2>others that we can talk about.

0:42:56.000 --> 0:42:59.319
<v Speaker 2>It's not clear that that's going to be a resilient strategy.

0:43:00.400 --> 0:43:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Living with covid is something that seems to be much

0:43:03.480 --> 0:43:05.930
<v Speaker 2>more in the nature of the okay, we'll let the

0:43:05.930 --> 0:43:09.230
<v Speaker 2>shock hit and we will bounce back from them. So

0:43:09.230 --> 0:43:12.189
<v Speaker 2>among all the other things that china does this Covid thing,

0:43:12.190 --> 0:43:14.820
<v Speaker 2>it seems to be going in a completely different direction,

0:43:15.400 --> 0:43:20.100
<v Speaker 2>putting that to one side, it has internal challenges to

0:43:20.100 --> 0:43:20.819
<v Speaker 2>deal with

0:43:21.500 --> 0:43:22.010
<v Speaker 2>are

0:43:22.400 --> 0:43:25.380
<v Speaker 2>like all the rest of the world. It needs to

0:43:25.390 --> 0:43:28.010
<v Speaker 2>be mindful of its carbon footprint

0:43:28.500 --> 0:43:32.310
<v Speaker 2>in terms of annual emissions. It is now the world's largest,

0:43:32.700 --> 0:43:36.330
<v Speaker 2>uh, simply by sheer size, even though in total emissions,

0:43:36.330 --> 0:43:38.009
<v Speaker 2>the United States is still well ahead.

0:43:38.500 --> 0:43:42.029
<v Speaker 2>But internally is facing this challenge between part of the

0:43:42.030 --> 0:43:44.620
<v Speaker 2>country wanting to continue development

0:43:45.000 --> 0:43:48.859
<v Speaker 2>in a carbon intensive way and part of the country

0:43:48.860 --> 0:43:52.660
<v Speaker 2>which is already rich seeing the benefits of blue skies,

0:43:52.660 --> 0:43:56.920
<v Speaker 2>clean environment and pushing for zero carbon strategy. So China

0:43:56.920 --> 0:43:59.120
<v Speaker 2>is having to deal with an internal

0:43:59.500 --> 0:44:03.420
<v Speaker 2>Conflict over the, over the global climate crisis that many

0:44:03.420 --> 0:44:06.240
<v Speaker 2>of us don't fully get into. Because many of us

0:44:06.239 --> 0:44:09.060
<v Speaker 2>feel that, you know, a nation sets down his line

0:44:09.060 --> 0:44:10.660
<v Speaker 2>in the sand. This is what it's gonna do on

0:44:10.660 --> 0:44:12.610
<v Speaker 2>the 1.5°C

0:44:12.989 --> 0:44:15.720
<v Speaker 2>achievement. And then it's either yes or no. But China

0:44:15.719 --> 0:44:17.830
<v Speaker 2>is so large that society is having to face all

0:44:17.830 --> 0:44:21.800
<v Speaker 2>these internal dissension is having to deal with corruption, something

0:44:21.800 --> 0:44:23.420
<v Speaker 2>that's profoundly

0:44:23.890 --> 0:44:27.969
<v Speaker 2>a fundamental to its history and the history of many

0:44:27.969 --> 0:44:32.130
<v Speaker 2>of our asian uh, nations is having to deal with

0:44:32.130 --> 0:44:35.669
<v Speaker 2>this in a very in a very consequential way is

0:44:35.670 --> 0:44:37.300
<v Speaker 2>having to deal with uh

0:44:37.890 --> 0:44:41.210
<v Speaker 2>challenges internally that it feels the rest of the world

0:44:41.210 --> 0:44:44.510
<v Speaker 2>and pounces on as human rights violations.

0:44:44.890 --> 0:44:49.009
<v Speaker 2>And it doesn't completely understand why at this critical time

0:44:49.010 --> 0:44:50.920
<v Speaker 2>in human history,

0:44:51.290 --> 0:44:55.710
<v Speaker 2>global climate crisis pandemic, uh you know, so many challenges

0:44:55.710 --> 0:44:58.080
<v Speaker 2>that we're having to deal with on the environment or

0:44:58.080 --> 0:44:59.420
<v Speaker 2>natural resources,

0:44:59.989 --> 0:45:02.779
<v Speaker 2>while all the rest of the world in Western society

0:45:02.780 --> 0:45:06.050
<v Speaker 2>is jumping on it for its human rights violation, which

0:45:06.060 --> 0:45:09.940
<v Speaker 2>it says, it says come and see what's actually going

0:45:09.940 --> 0:45:12.680
<v Speaker 2>on here is completely different from what you think. So.

0:45:12.690 --> 0:45:15.070
<v Speaker 2>So there's a lot of uh there's a lot of

0:45:15.070 --> 0:45:18.220
<v Speaker 2>texture and color in this conversation

0:45:18.290 --> 0:45:20.510
<v Speaker 2>in Asia, we have a

0:45:20.890 --> 0:45:23.220
<v Speaker 2>we have long held the view that

0:45:23.590 --> 0:45:28.109
<v Speaker 2>for our economic progress dealing with china trading with it,

0:45:28.489 --> 0:45:33.690
<v Speaker 2>hooking our wagon as it were onto the spectacular growth

0:45:33.690 --> 0:45:36.360
<v Speaker 2>that the chinese economy continues to see is a good

0:45:36.360 --> 0:45:40.040
<v Speaker 2>way forwards for us. In Asean alone, we've still got

0:45:40.040 --> 0:45:42.770
<v Speaker 2>scores of millions of people living in extreme poverty, for

0:45:42.770 --> 0:45:46.530
<v Speaker 2>whom trade is a very reliable way to be lifted

0:45:46.540 --> 0:45:48.500
<v Speaker 2>out of the state of deprivation.

0:45:48.890 --> 0:45:52.760
<v Speaker 2>And and in ASia and china trade needs to continue

0:45:52.760 --> 0:45:54.310
<v Speaker 2>to be a large part of our

0:45:54.690 --> 0:45:56.509
<v Speaker 2>of our growth story.

0:45:57.489 --> 0:46:00.709
<v Speaker 2>The west has gone mad on this is concerned about

0:46:00.710 --> 0:46:02.100
<v Speaker 2>all the kinds of issues.

0:46:02.580 --> 0:46:05.440
<v Speaker 2>So in terms of resilience that we're going to build

0:46:05.440 --> 0:46:07.780
<v Speaker 2>in Asia, the choices that we're going to have to

0:46:07.780 --> 0:46:11.000
<v Speaker 2>make will come down to our own thinking about

0:46:11.980 --> 0:46:14.410
<v Speaker 2>uh our economic future,

0:46:15.480 --> 0:46:20.130
<v Speaker 2>our understanding, our own understanding of what our set of

0:46:20.130 --> 0:46:23.440
<v Speaker 2>value systems is not subscribing to either America or the

0:46:23.440 --> 0:46:28.130
<v Speaker 2>West or china's but developing our own narrative or values

0:46:28.140 --> 0:46:31.410
<v Speaker 2>and then seeing a way forward that navigates between

0:46:32.380 --> 0:46:37.090
<v Speaker 2>a security that the West sometimes offers. Not always

0:46:37.480 --> 0:46:41.370
<v Speaker 2>economic prosperity that trade will continue to deliver. And a

0:46:41.370 --> 0:46:44.890
<v Speaker 2>narrative for ourselves that says, you know, this is our

0:46:44.890 --> 0:46:46.980
<v Speaker 2>set of values. This is the way that we work

0:46:46.980 --> 0:46:50.339
<v Speaker 2>towards and this is not Western values. It's not values

0:46:50.340 --> 0:46:53.200
<v Speaker 2>with chinese characteristic. It's our own set of values. And

0:46:53.200 --> 0:46:55.500
<v Speaker 2>this is the way we're going to navigate the world. Now,

0:46:55.880 --> 0:46:57.800
<v Speaker 2>If we're allowed to do that, it's not clear that

0:46:57.800 --> 0:47:00.819
<v Speaker 2>we will because if the world becomes zero sum between

0:47:00.820 --> 0:47:03.840
<v Speaker 2>the two great powers, there's very little room for navigation here.

0:47:03.850 --> 0:47:05.660
<v Speaker 2>But if we're allowed to do that, it seems to

0:47:05.660 --> 0:47:08.299
<v Speaker 2>me that that is the sensible way ahead for all

0:47:08.300 --> 0:47:10.879
<v Speaker 2>the 80% of us not living in the US or China.

0:47:10.880 --> 0:47:13.000
<v Speaker 2>In fact, even for the United States and China.

0:47:13.380 --> 0:47:15.259
<v Speaker 2>So I hope that this would be an alignment of

0:47:15.260 --> 0:47:18.760
<v Speaker 2>individual incentives and the greater good. But my worry is

0:47:18.770 --> 0:47:22.850
<v Speaker 2>that the world too easily wants to build zero sum

0:47:22.850 --> 0:47:26.700
<v Speaker 2>games around practically every issue it narrates

0:47:27.380 --> 0:47:32.800
<v Speaker 2>so in a very tricky state of tentative contingency going ahead.

0:47:33.380 --> 0:47:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I like that phrase very much protocol when I leave

0:47:37.000 --> 0:47:39.230
<v Speaker 1>the U. S. Borders and cross over into Mexico. I

0:47:39.230 --> 0:47:42.810
<v Speaker 1>immediately sensed a major decline in per capita income. Then

0:47:42.810 --> 0:47:45.630
<v Speaker 1>once you pass Mexico and started exploring the other countries

0:47:45.630 --> 0:47:49.010
<v Speaker 1>in Central Asia, you can't even believe that you're just

0:47:49.010 --> 0:47:51.580
<v Speaker 1>you know, 500 miles away from the United States. So

0:47:51.580 --> 0:47:54.509
<v Speaker 1>despite the incredible prosperity and gains in the U. S.

0:47:54.510 --> 0:47:55.300
<v Speaker 1>Over the last

0:47:55.480 --> 0:47:59.620
<v Speaker 1>75 years or so, the positive spillover for its neighboring

0:47:59.620 --> 0:48:02.469
<v Speaker 1>nations has been extremely limited. Whereas you know, you go

0:48:02.469 --> 0:48:05.470
<v Speaker 1>to Vietnam today, you already see the positive spillover of

0:48:05.469 --> 0:48:08.330
<v Speaker 1>being proximate to China through a mix of good governance

0:48:08.330 --> 0:48:11.589
<v Speaker 1>but also taking advantage of the Chinese tailwind and and

0:48:11.590 --> 0:48:13.879
<v Speaker 1>hopefully we will see more in the Asian region as

0:48:13.880 --> 0:48:15.910
<v Speaker 1>opposed to the contrast that we see in Central Asia.

0:48:16.780 --> 0:48:17.500
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely,

0:48:17.880 --> 0:48:18.800
<v Speaker 2>absolutely.

0:48:19.880 --> 0:48:23.920
<v Speaker 1>It's been fantastic having you on the podcast. Kwaje thank

0:48:23.920 --> 0:48:25.210
<v Speaker 1>you so much for your insights.

0:48:26.480 --> 0:48:28.469
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much and look forward to seeing you

0:48:28.469 --> 0:48:28.910
<v Speaker 2>again

0:48:29.380 --> 0:48:31.350
<v Speaker 1>by all means. I would also like to thank our

0:48:31.350 --> 0:48:35.590
<v Speaker 1>listeners Kobe time was produced by martin Tuckey daisy Sharma

0:48:35.590 --> 0:48:39.430
<v Speaker 1>and violently provided additional assistance. It is for information only

0:48:39.440 --> 0:48:43.419
<v Speaker 1>and does not represent any trade recommendations. All 66 episodes

0:48:43.420 --> 0:48:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of Kobe time are available on Youtube

0:48:45.480 --> 0:48:49.130
<v Speaker 1>and on all major podcast platforms including apple google and

0:48:49.130 --> 0:48:49.910
<v Speaker 1>Spotify

0:48:49.980 --> 0:48:53.090
<v Speaker 1>as for our research publications, webinars and live streams. You

0:48:53.090 --> 0:48:56.210
<v Speaker 1>can find them all by googling. Devious Research Library. Have

0:48:56.210 --> 0:48:57.210
<v Speaker 1>a great Day.