WEBVTT - Kopi Time E147 - Kishore Mahbubani on a Fragmenting World

0:00:06.090 --> 0:00:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Cookie Time, a podcast series on markets and

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:12.449
<v Speaker 1>economies from DBS Group Research. I'm Tebei, chief economist. Welcome

0:00:12.449 --> 0:00:16.930
<v Speaker 1>you to our 147th episode. Today, we are delighted to

0:00:16.930 --> 0:00:20.128
<v Speaker 1>have Kishore Mahbani back on the show. He's a distinguished

0:00:20.129 --> 0:00:23.649
<v Speaker 1>fellow at the Asia Research Institute, National University of Singapore. Mr.

0:00:23.690 --> 0:00:26.409
<v Speaker 1>Mahobani has been privileged to have two distinct and very

0:00:26.409 --> 0:00:30.049
<v Speaker 1>distinguished careers. First, as a diplomat from the 70s all

0:00:30.049 --> 0:00:32.769
<v Speaker 1>the way to the early 2000s, and then in academia.

0:00:33.180 --> 0:00:35.950
<v Speaker 1>He is a prolific writer who has spoken in many

0:00:35.950 --> 0:00:38.540
<v Speaker 1>corners of the world, and his latest book is Living

0:00:38.540 --> 0:00:44.229
<v Speaker 1>the Asian Century An Undiplomatic Memoir. Highly recommended. Kiswani, welcome

0:00:44.229 --> 0:00:46.470
<v Speaker 1>back to Coff Time. Thank you, Timur. It's great to

0:00:46.470 --> 0:00:48.779
<v Speaker 1>have you, and we are recording this in Mumbai, India.

0:00:49.029 --> 0:00:51.500
<v Speaker 1>So I would like to begin our conversation with India.

0:00:51.709 --> 0:00:55.270
<v Speaker 1>Where do you see India sitting here in late January

0:00:55.270 --> 0:00:57.950
<v Speaker 1>2025 in the geopolitical landscape?

0:00:58.630 --> 0:01:00.639
<v Speaker 2>Uh, first of all, thank you very much for having

0:01:00.639 --> 0:01:04.319
<v Speaker 2>me on again. Uh, I know that our first recording

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:05.599
<v Speaker 2>had quite a few

0:01:05.599 --> 0:01:06.199
<v Speaker 1>so

0:01:06.199 --> 0:01:06.629
<v Speaker 2>far

0:01:06.629 --> 0:01:07.639
<v Speaker 1>the history of COVID time,

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:14.399
<v Speaker 2>yes. Um, you know, to understand, uh, India's place in

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:16.190
<v Speaker 2>this geopolitical moment.

0:01:17.489 --> 0:01:20.690
<v Speaker 2>We have to understand first the geopolitical movement.

0:01:21.889 --> 0:01:26.209
<v Speaker 2>And here it's important to emphasize, we are a very

0:01:26.209 --> 0:01:28.500
<v Speaker 2>unique crossroads.

0:01:29.300 --> 0:01:30.930
<v Speaker 2>In the field of geopolitics.

0:01:31.629 --> 0:01:36.830
<v Speaker 2>So there are fundamental structural take uh structural changes.

0:01:37.620 --> 0:01:42.059
<v Speaker 2>Taking place in the geopolitical order. That's the moment. And

0:01:42.059 --> 0:01:47.690
<v Speaker 2>the question, therefore, is which countries are adapting well to this,

0:01:47.940 --> 0:01:52.300
<v Speaker 2>to these structural changes and which countries are adapting badly?

0:01:53.050 --> 0:01:55.730
<v Speaker 2>To these structural changes. I can give examples of both.

0:01:56.260 --> 0:01:58.739
<v Speaker 2>So clearly, one of the changes that is happening, and

0:01:58.739 --> 0:02:01.779
<v Speaker 2>I've said this over and over and over again, is

0:02:01.779 --> 0:02:04.739
<v Speaker 2>that we're reaching the end of 200 years of Western

0:02:04.739 --> 0:02:10.579
<v Speaker 2>domination of world history, you know. So, clearly the 88%

0:02:10.580 --> 0:02:14.300
<v Speaker 2>of the world's population who live outside the West are

0:02:14.300 --> 0:02:17.580
<v Speaker 2>waking up significantly and people ask me to give one

0:02:17.580 --> 0:02:18.949
<v Speaker 2>simple example of this.

0:02:19.350 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 2>I just say, look at the uh Ukraine war, even

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:26.758
<v Speaker 2>though the Russian invasion of Ukraine was clearly illegal, no

0:02:26.758 --> 0:02:33.389
<v Speaker 2>question about that. When the West imposed sanctions on Russia, 85%

0:02:33.389 --> 0:02:37.119
<v Speaker 2>of the world's population didn't join the West in imposing

0:02:37.119 --> 0:02:41.479
<v Speaker 2>sanctions on Russia. So you can see, therefore this bifurcation.

0:02:42.410 --> 0:02:47.539
<v Speaker 2>And uh at the same time also, within the West, uh,

0:02:47.619 --> 0:02:51.940
<v Speaker 2>you have to make a huge distinction between United States

0:02:51.940 --> 0:02:54.779
<v Speaker 2>and Europe. You know, at the beginning of the 21st century,

0:02:54.860 --> 0:02:56.300
<v Speaker 2>they were more or less on par.

0:02:57.250 --> 0:03:00.519
<v Speaker 2>Now, look at the United States is so much bigger, right?

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.330
<v Speaker 2>The EU has shrunk to 2/3 the size of the

0:03:03.330 --> 0:03:07.529
<v Speaker 2>United States and the European Union clearly has also lost

0:03:07.529 --> 0:03:12.210
<v Speaker 2>its way and is floundering in terms of adjusting to

0:03:12.210 --> 0:03:16.190
<v Speaker 2>this new world order, both in the arena of geopolitics

0:03:16.190 --> 0:03:20.449
<v Speaker 2>and their mismanagement of the Ukraine issue and also uh

0:03:20.449 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 2>in economics and not being able to grow their economies

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:25.649
<v Speaker 2>and adapt and just to a new world.

0:03:26.100 --> 0:03:28.570
<v Speaker 2>By contrast, by the way, the United States looks very

0:03:28.570 --> 0:03:34.850
<v Speaker 2>robust and strong and and dynamic. So in this setting, uh,

0:03:34.860 --> 0:03:38.759
<v Speaker 2>there will be winners and losers with these structural changes,

0:03:38.770 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 2>and I predict that India will be a big winner

0:03:42.089 --> 0:03:46.089
<v Speaker 2>because this, this, this, these kinds of structural changes open

0:03:46.089 --> 0:03:50.050
<v Speaker 2>windows of opportunity and clearly India is going to have

0:03:50.050 --> 0:03:53.559
<v Speaker 2>a major window of opportunity because as things change.

0:03:54.039 --> 0:03:57.839
<v Speaker 2>As people try to cultivate the rising powers, India clearly

0:03:57.839 --> 0:04:00.279
<v Speaker 2>is one of the rising powers. The beginning of the

0:04:00.279 --> 0:04:04.940
<v Speaker 2>20th century wasn't in the top 10 list of world economies. Uh,

0:04:05.039 --> 0:04:07.210
<v Speaker 2>today it is already number 5. By 2030, it will

0:04:07.210 --> 0:04:10.039
<v Speaker 2>be number 3. So India has arrived in that sense.

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 2>So as we move towards a multipolar world order, India

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:17.600
<v Speaker 2>will be one of the significant poles, and India, therefore,

0:04:17.678 --> 0:04:21.359
<v Speaker 2>can become a huge beneficiary if it plays this game well.

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:24.679
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about the playing the game well in

0:04:24.678 --> 0:04:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the context of India-US relationship. We have Donald Trump back

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:33.350
<v Speaker 1>in the White House. Um, India runs a large trade deficit. Uh,

0:04:33.589 --> 0:04:36.529
<v Speaker 1>the US has a big trade deficit vis a vis India. Uh,

0:04:36.809 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Trump's key API or key performance indicator seems to be

0:04:40.559 --> 0:04:43.599
<v Speaker 1>narrowing deficit vis a vis nations. Would he impose tariffs

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:45.558
<v Speaker 1>on India? How will India play that? What's your

0:04:45.559 --> 0:04:46.190
<v Speaker 1>sense?

0:04:46.519 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think in the case of Donald Trump.

0:04:51.890 --> 0:04:55.469
<v Speaker 2>Uh, you have to do, uh, you have to switch

0:04:55.470 --> 0:04:59.269
<v Speaker 2>your means of calculating. Uh, you know, in the past,

0:04:59.369 --> 0:05:05.790
<v Speaker 2>you know, things like goodwill, relationships, uh, um, how do

0:05:05.790 --> 0:05:09.589
<v Speaker 2>you say, established history would make a difference. In the

0:05:09.589 --> 0:05:14.219
<v Speaker 2>case of Donald Trump, nothing matters except very simple question,

0:05:14.670 --> 0:05:17.549
<v Speaker 2>what have you done for me lately? That's all he asks.

0:05:18.390 --> 0:05:22.480
<v Speaker 2>And this is where on the one hand, uh, I

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:27.359
<v Speaker 2>have no doubt that the close personal relationship between Donald

0:05:27.359 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Trump and the Prime Minister Narendra Modi is a genuine,

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:34.238
<v Speaker 2>they both get along with each other, will make some

0:05:34.238 --> 0:05:39.279
<v Speaker 2>kind of a difference. But you know, frankly, if you

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:43.359
<v Speaker 2>look at countries in the world, no country has been

0:05:43.359 --> 0:05:46.928
<v Speaker 2>as loyal to the United States as Canada has been.

0:05:47.420 --> 0:05:49.160
<v Speaker 2>And if you look at the way that Canada has

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:53.510
<v Speaker 2>been kicked around by Donald Trump, you realize that relationships

0:05:53.809 --> 0:05:54.559
<v Speaker 2>don't matter.

0:05:55.399 --> 0:05:58.170
<v Speaker 2>At the end of the day, what matters is pure

0:05:58.519 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 2>uh transactional interests, and he will want to see uh

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 2>balanced trade between US and India.

0:06:07.869 --> 0:06:11.070
<v Speaker 2>Uh, he may insist on India opening up, uh, some

0:06:11.070 --> 0:06:15.230
<v Speaker 2>of its markets, uh, to American products. He's going to

0:06:15.230 --> 0:06:19.670
<v Speaker 2>deport illegal Indian immigrants, which is, you know, going to

0:06:19.670 --> 0:06:21.989
<v Speaker 2>be a problem for India because if you look at

0:06:21.988 --> 0:06:24.829
<v Speaker 2>the countries with the number of illegal immigrants in the US,

0:06:24.869 --> 0:06:28.339
<v Speaker 2>number one is Mexico, number 2 is El Salvador, number

0:06:28.339 --> 0:06:29.589
<v Speaker 2>3 is India.

0:06:30.238 --> 0:06:32.220
<v Speaker 2>So there'll be some friction, you know, in the way

0:06:32.220 --> 0:06:33.959
<v Speaker 2>it's done and so on and so forth. You saw

0:06:33.959 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 2>it with Colombia and all that, that's right. So there

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 2>are potential issues uh that could complicate uh relations uh

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:47.269
<v Speaker 2>with the Donald Trump administration, but the biggest complication arises

0:06:47.269 --> 0:06:52.230
<v Speaker 2>from the fact that, you know, in the Biden administration

0:06:52.230 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 2>which courted India ferociously except except the last year, something

0:06:57.440 --> 0:06:58.959
<v Speaker 2>went wrong in the last year, clearly.

0:06:59.829 --> 0:07:04.679
<v Speaker 2>Uh, saw India as a natural ally against China.

0:07:05.540 --> 0:07:09.959
<v Speaker 2>Uh, Trump doesn't see allies as assets.

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:13.989
<v Speaker 2>Trump sees allies as liabilities.

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:18.809
<v Speaker 2>Seriously, so all he's asking you is, how much are

0:07:18.809 --> 0:07:21.519
<v Speaker 2>you paying me and what have you done for me lately?

0:07:22.190 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 2>And so even uh he's not going to see India

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 2>necessarily as an important ally, uh counterbalancing uh China, for example.

0:07:31.250 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 2>In fact, one of the problems that India may have

0:07:35.890 --> 0:07:39.649
<v Speaker 2>is that since Donald Trump is a big deal maker,

0:07:40.290 --> 0:07:43.170
<v Speaker 2>he may come to some kind of deal with China.

0:07:43.940 --> 0:07:48.679
<v Speaker 2>And if relations between US and China settle down, then

0:07:48.679 --> 0:07:53.239
<v Speaker 2>the value of India as a geopolitical card goes down.

0:07:54.220 --> 0:07:58.559
<v Speaker 2>And so India, therefore has got to adjust and therefore

0:07:58.559 --> 0:08:01.078
<v Speaker 2>try to see how we can take advantage of these

0:08:01.079 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 2>changes to ensure that its interests are protected.

0:08:05.179 --> 0:08:08.130
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about India-China relationship momentarily, but just

0:08:08.130 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>want to stick with in the US, uh, briefly before

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 1>we do that. The US is, or rather Donald Trump's

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 1>team is keen on getting a deal done between Ukraine

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>and Russia, but the first step in that direction seems

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:23.959
<v Speaker 1>to be tightening the screw on Russia and easing the screw, including.

0:08:24.369 --> 0:08:27.489
<v Speaker 1>Access to Russian oil, you know, heavy discount that both

0:08:27.489 --> 0:08:30.609
<v Speaker 1>India and China have been benefiting. So how does India

0:08:30.609 --> 0:08:35.049
<v Speaker 1>calibrate its still fairly deep relationship with Russia while dealing

0:08:35.049 --> 0:08:36.619
<v Speaker 1>with the US with this transactional?

0:08:37.979 --> 0:08:41.478
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think for India it's a matter of vital

0:08:41.770 --> 0:08:47.250
<v Speaker 2>national security interests to preserve its relationship with Russia.

0:08:48.099 --> 0:08:50.859
<v Speaker 2>Because at the end of the day, you know, when

0:08:50.859 --> 0:08:54.488
<v Speaker 2>you go through a crisis, we all go through crisis.

0:08:55.250 --> 0:08:58.409
<v Speaker 2>You have to ask yourself, who can you rely upon

0:08:58.409 --> 0:09:02.109
<v Speaker 2>in a crisis. So for example, that if India has

0:09:02.109 --> 0:09:07.750
<v Speaker 2>a problem that appears in the UN Security Council of

0:09:07.750 --> 0:09:12.339
<v Speaker 2>the five permanent members, United States, UK, France, China, Russia,

0:09:12.669 --> 0:09:18.229
<v Speaker 2>the only dependable ally or friend that India has is Russia.

0:09:18.900 --> 0:09:22.140
<v Speaker 2>If you, if India asked Russia to veto something on

0:09:22.140 --> 0:09:25.580
<v Speaker 2>India's behalf, Russia is likely to do so. So you

0:09:25.580 --> 0:09:30.488
<v Speaker 2>watch even the body language and the meetings between uh

0:09:30.489 --> 0:09:34.819
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Putin, President Putin within Prime

0:09:34.820 --> 0:09:37.780
<v Speaker 2>Minister Narendra Modi and Sergey Lavrov, you can see there's

0:09:37.780 --> 0:09:40.770
<v Speaker 2>a lot of trust that's been built up over there.

0:09:41.380 --> 0:09:44.609
<v Speaker 2>So India is not going to give up its relationship

0:09:44.609 --> 0:09:45.419
<v Speaker 2>with Russia.

0:09:45.909 --> 0:09:50.419
<v Speaker 2>And for India as a net importing oil country, to

0:09:50.419 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 2>give up access to cheap Russian oil will be a

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:57.059
<v Speaker 2>huge economic price to pay, and I don't see how

0:09:57.059 --> 0:10:01.218
<v Speaker 2>why Indian should pay that economic price. So I think

0:10:01.219 --> 0:10:08.710
<v Speaker 2>they will definitely resist any moves to um ah have

0:10:09.179 --> 0:10:10.978
<v Speaker 2>get by the US to try and get them to

0:10:10.979 --> 0:10:13.049
<v Speaker 2>cut off their ties with Russia.

0:10:13.659 --> 0:10:15.689
<v Speaker 2>And you know, going, you since you want to discuss

0:10:15.690 --> 0:10:21.789
<v Speaker 2>the USIndia relationship. I think it's also important to emphasize

0:10:21.789 --> 0:10:26.510
<v Speaker 2>why why did things go some a bit rough in

0:10:26.510 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 2>the last year, the Biden administration. Things seem to be,

0:10:30.190 --> 0:10:31.669
<v Speaker 2>you know, going so well.

0:10:32.349 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 2>And then you had at least 3 points of friction

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:40.049
<v Speaker 2>that emerged. First was, of course, the, uh, I think

0:10:40.049 --> 0:10:44.090
<v Speaker 2>India was surprised how Canada went full blast on going

0:10:44.090 --> 0:10:45.010
<v Speaker 2>after India.

0:10:46.070 --> 0:10:49.579
<v Speaker 2>About the purported assassination of a Canadian citizen.

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:54.489
<v Speaker 2>And you know, traditionally, Canada would listen to hints from

0:10:54.489 --> 0:10:55.409
<v Speaker 2>Washington DC.

0:10:56.710 --> 0:10:59.849
<v Speaker 2>Didn't the Biden administration tell Canada, go easy, you know,

0:10:59.909 --> 0:11:03.329
<v Speaker 2>India is an important friend. That question must be on

0:11:03.330 --> 0:11:07.270
<v Speaker 2>Indian minds. And then, of course, the sudden removal of

0:11:07.270 --> 0:11:11.150
<v Speaker 2>Sheikh Hasina from Bangladesh was also a bit of a

0:11:11.150 --> 0:11:15.179
<v Speaker 2>shock for India, because Sheikh Hasina was a reliable friend

0:11:15.179 --> 0:11:17.989
<v Speaker 2>of India and right now, as you know, she's in India.

0:11:18.849 --> 0:11:23.429
<v Speaker 2>Uh, and that also, frankly, was encouraged uh by the

0:11:23.429 --> 0:11:25.598
<v Speaker 2>United States that we know it's a matter of fact.

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:30.799
<v Speaker 2>And then thirdly, the other thing that surprised me was

0:11:30.799 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 2>the decision of the Justice Department of uh the Biden

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:37.799
<v Speaker 2>administration to go after Adani.

0:11:38.859 --> 0:11:42.859
<v Speaker 2>I mean, surely enough people in Washington DC knew that,

0:11:43.270 --> 0:11:46.849
<v Speaker 2>you know, Mr. Adani is very close to Prime Minister Modi.

0:11:46.869 --> 0:11:50.789
<v Speaker 2>So suddenly you find a relationship that you thought was

0:11:50.789 --> 0:11:51.590
<v Speaker 2>a good one.

0:11:52.369 --> 0:11:57.809
<v Speaker 2>Uh, got a lot of sand was thrown into the gearbox.

0:11:58.330 --> 0:12:01.150
<v Speaker 2>And so that's why I think India has got to

0:12:01.150 --> 0:12:06.848
<v Speaker 2>really decide, uh, how it balances, it's still, it's still

0:12:06.849 --> 0:12:08.489
<v Speaker 2>going to have good relations with the US, by the way,

0:12:08.580 --> 0:12:12.770
<v Speaker 2>there's no question whatsoever, but how you balance the, how

0:12:12.770 --> 0:12:15.728
<v Speaker 2>you play the balance within US and China. You got

0:12:15.729 --> 0:12:17.650
<v Speaker 2>to recalibrate now.

0:12:18.049 --> 0:12:18.289
<v Speaker 1>Speaking

0:12:18.289 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 1>of recalibration, let's talk about India and China relationship.

0:12:22.450 --> 0:12:26.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, I think in the case of the India-China relationship,

0:12:26.919 --> 0:12:31.189
<v Speaker 2>clearly some degree of rethinking is going on. I mean, I,

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:33.359
<v Speaker 2>I was surprised to learn from you this morning.

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:37.710
<v Speaker 2>That India has allowed the resumption of direct flights between

0:12:37.710 --> 0:12:40.750
<v Speaker 2>India and China. That was a major anomaly. I mean,

0:12:40.789 --> 0:12:43.819
<v Speaker 2>a major anomaly. I mean, the two biggest.

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Uh, uh, I mean, apart from Japan, the two biggest

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 2>economies in Asia have no direct flights to each other.

0:12:50.609 --> 0:12:53.369
<v Speaker 2>That doesn't make sense, you know. So clearly there was

0:12:53.369 --> 0:12:57.429
<v Speaker 2>a big move and it's part of a gradual recalibration

0:12:57.919 --> 0:13:01.968
<v Speaker 2>driven partly by the fact you by realization you can't

0:13:01.969 --> 0:13:04.209
<v Speaker 2>put all your eggs in the American basket. You can't

0:13:04.210 --> 0:13:05.319
<v Speaker 2>just rely on the

0:13:06.109 --> 0:13:11.789
<v Speaker 2>Uh, United States and at the same time, uh, if

0:13:11.789 --> 0:13:17.659
<v Speaker 2>India's goal is to become a manufacturing economy, no country

0:13:17.659 --> 0:13:22.619
<v Speaker 2>in the world, anywhere, by the way, including United States, Germany, uh,

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:28.189
<v Speaker 2>UK can advance their manufacturing agenda without in one way

0:13:28.190 --> 0:13:32.020
<v Speaker 2>or another getting inputs from China. I mean, the most

0:13:32.020 --> 0:13:34.570
<v Speaker 2>stunning statistic of the 21st century.

0:13:35.270 --> 0:13:39.190
<v Speaker 2>Is that when the 21st century opened in the year 2000.

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:43.349
<v Speaker 2>Uh, China's share of global manufacturing was 5%.

0:13:44.549 --> 0:13:49.830
<v Speaker 2>Uh, by 2030, it will be 45%. Now that's stunning. Now,

0:13:49.950 --> 0:13:53.939
<v Speaker 2>virtually every product in the world that is manufactured, I think,

0:13:54.469 --> 0:13:57.789
<v Speaker 2>in one way or another contains some kind of Chinese

0:13:57.789 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 2>uh component because that's how indispensable the Chinese manufacturing economy

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:08.659
<v Speaker 2>has begun. And if you, if you closed your eyes, OK, you, you,

0:14:08.710 --> 0:14:11.919
<v Speaker 2>you scrub out the word India, put economy X.

0:14:12.340 --> 0:14:16.020
<v Speaker 2>And you scrub out the word China, you put economy Y.

0:14:16.739 --> 0:14:22.630
<v Speaker 2>And you did a simple cost-benefit calculation. Would economy X

0:14:23.239 --> 0:14:27.599
<v Speaker 2>benefit from closer cooperation in manufacturing economy Y or would

0:14:27.599 --> 0:14:30.039
<v Speaker 2>it be would it be better off doing less with

0:14:30.039 --> 0:14:35.479
<v Speaker 2>economy Y? And any kind of basic cost-benefit calculation will

0:14:35.479 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 2>show you that India will benefit a lot more by

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:41.349
<v Speaker 2>not necessarily cooperating.

0:14:41.710 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 2>But taking advantage of China's manufacturing capabilities to enhance its

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 2>own manufacturing uh in India. And so to give a

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:54.479
<v Speaker 2>simple and obvious example, India wants to become a big

0:14:54.479 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 2>manufacturer of iPhones. There is no way you can manufacture

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:05.789
<v Speaker 2>an iPhone without Chinese components. No way, absolutely no way.

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 2>And I can tell you that Apple's reliance.

0:15:10.059 --> 0:15:14.030
<v Speaker 2>Everybody thinks that because of the US China friction.

0:15:14.900 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Apple has reduced its reliance on Chinese components. If you

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:21.409
<v Speaker 2>studied carefully, it has actually increased.

0:15:22.210 --> 0:15:25.929
<v Speaker 2>Because the, the products in China have become cheaper and

0:15:25.929 --> 0:15:31.609
<v Speaker 2>more competitive, and Apple is all about profits. So clearly, you, you,

0:15:31.650 --> 0:15:36.010
<v Speaker 2>if you really want to enhance your manufacturing capability, and

0:15:36.010 --> 0:15:39.409
<v Speaker 2>I think as you know, some people within the Prime

0:15:39.409 --> 0:15:42.210
<v Speaker 2>Minister Modi's government are coming to realize that they have

0:15:42.210 --> 0:15:44.929
<v Speaker 2>to in one way or another collaborate with China too.

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:49.690
<v Speaker 1>It is encouraging, uh, absolutely. Uh, you mentioned Apple. My

0:15:49.690 --> 0:15:52.919
<v Speaker 1>understanding is that when Foxconn was initially nudged into assembling

0:15:52.919 --> 0:15:56.890
<v Speaker 1>iPhones in India, the fear, even among Indians was that,

0:15:56.969 --> 0:15:59.090
<v Speaker 1>you know, it may not match the efficiency of Chinese

0:15:59.090 --> 0:16:01.450
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing plants. But now we can see that there's a

0:16:01.450 --> 0:16:04.130
<v Speaker 1>win-win there. You be part of the Chinese supply chain,

0:16:04.210 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>bring in the inputs, bring in Indian labor, train them,

0:16:07.210 --> 0:16:09.419
<v Speaker 1>and now my understanding is that the Apple's yield in

0:16:09.419 --> 0:16:13.140
<v Speaker 1>India is almost as good as it is in China. Uh, so.

0:16:13.530 --> 0:16:16.979
<v Speaker 1>There is a mutually beneficial dynamic there in place. Foxconn

0:16:16.979 --> 0:16:20.179
<v Speaker 1>is happy, India is happy, Chinese components remain in place, uh,

0:16:20.289 --> 0:16:20.409
<v Speaker 1>but

0:16:20.409 --> 0:16:22.919
<v Speaker 2>it has increased India's trade deficit with China.

0:16:23.330 --> 0:16:25.650
<v Speaker 1>It will probably do the same, yes, indeed. Um, so

0:16:25.650 --> 0:16:29.409
<v Speaker 1>that's the irony that India's fear about Chinese trade deficit

0:16:29.409 --> 0:16:31.539
<v Speaker 1>probably got in the way of India joining regional companies

0:16:31.539 --> 0:16:32.809
<v Speaker 1>of economic partnership with.

0:16:33.359 --> 0:16:36.270
<v Speaker 1>Uh, now, again, there's some rethink that maybe that was

0:16:36.270 --> 0:16:40.590
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity lost. You can't just fixate on a bilateral deficit.

0:16:40.630 --> 0:16:42.309
<v Speaker 1>You have to sort of think about your own export

0:16:42.309 --> 0:16:46.309
<v Speaker 1>prowess and how you build it with cooperation, joint ventures,

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:48.260
<v Speaker 1>if you will, with others. Like you sure I see,

0:16:48.309 --> 0:16:52.020
<v Speaker 1>for example, uh, MG cars on the roads of India.

0:16:52.309 --> 0:16:55.630
<v Speaker 1>It's a joint venture between an Indian company and Chinese SAIC.

0:16:56.140 --> 0:16:58.090
<v Speaker 1>So that's the Chinese model in the past worked very

0:16:58.090 --> 0:17:00.900
<v Speaker 1>well for China, and I think India with this recalibration

0:17:01.130 --> 0:17:02.729
<v Speaker 1>is beginning to head in that direction. I think that's

0:17:02.729 --> 0:17:04.089
<v Speaker 1>a welcome development. Yeah,

0:17:04.209 --> 0:17:09.930
<v Speaker 2>but I'm glad you mentioned RCEP because I think all the, again,

0:17:10.290 --> 0:17:16.300
<v Speaker 2>objective econometric studies show that if India joins the RCEP,

0:17:16.410 --> 0:17:18.319
<v Speaker 2>you'll be a net beneficiary.

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:22.899
<v Speaker 2>And India's GNP will gain a boost. I mean, there

0:17:22.900 --> 0:17:27.979
<v Speaker 2>was already a very powerful geopolitical argument uh for India

0:17:27.979 --> 0:17:32.180
<v Speaker 2>to join the RCEP because, you know, if India stays

0:17:32.180 --> 0:17:37.180
<v Speaker 2>out of RCEP, it will lose its ability to integrate

0:17:37.180 --> 0:17:43.089
<v Speaker 2>better with the ASEAN region. And you know, Southeast Asia, uh,

0:17:43.099 --> 0:17:45.369
<v Speaker 2>for only for 2000 years.

0:17:46.439 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 2>Has been trying to balance China and India, right? And overall,

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:55.030
<v Speaker 2>Indian influence in Southeast Asia has always been very strong

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:58.319
<v Speaker 2>because out of the 10 countries in Southeast Asia, 9

0:17:58.319 --> 0:18:02.270
<v Speaker 2>have an indic base. Only 1 Vietnam has a scenic base.

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:08.310
<v Speaker 2>So there's a natural affinity, natural, how do you say,

0:18:08.319 --> 0:18:11.229
<v Speaker 2>complementarity between Southeast Asia and India.

0:18:11.709 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 2>But what RCEP does is in with India not joining

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 2>is that India cuts itself off from Southeast Asia. There's

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 2>a manufacturing ecosystem there, very powerful one. And in Southeast Asia,

0:18:23.599 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 2>of course, by then, uh, by default gets closer uh

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:30.239
<v Speaker 2>to China. So there's real political argument for India to

0:18:30.239 --> 0:18:36.429
<v Speaker 2>join RCP, but more importantly, you know, in the long run, uh,

0:18:36.599 --> 0:18:40.550
<v Speaker 2>India is going to make a vital strategic decision.

0:18:41.219 --> 0:18:43.989
<v Speaker 2>And this is a big strategic decision that only someone

0:18:43.989 --> 0:18:48.708
<v Speaker 2>as strong as Prime Minister Narendra Modi can make that

0:18:48.709 --> 0:18:52.419
<v Speaker 2>do you, in the long run, will the Indian economy

0:18:52.420 --> 0:18:58.589
<v Speaker 2>succeed by being more protectionist or being by being more open?

0:18:58.949 --> 0:19:03.270
<v Speaker 2>And frankly, the main reason why China has succeeded as

0:19:03.270 --> 0:19:06.790
<v Speaker 2>an economy so well is that the Chinese made a

0:19:06.790 --> 0:19:10.979
<v Speaker 2>big strategic decision that the only reason why they suffered.

0:19:11.189 --> 0:19:15.929
<v Speaker 2>The century of humiliation from 1842 to 1949, and the

0:19:15.930 --> 0:19:18.329
<v Speaker 2>reason why they became so weak is because they closed

0:19:18.329 --> 0:19:21.400
<v Speaker 2>their economy and not integrated with the rest of the world.

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 2>And as you know, the Chinese have decided, OK, now

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:28.329
<v Speaker 2>we'll do the opposite. As Xi Jinping said in Davos

0:19:28.329 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 2>in 2017, we'll be plunge into the ocean of globalization,

0:19:32.650 --> 0:19:36.209
<v Speaker 2>we struggle to swim, we drank water, but we became

0:19:36.209 --> 0:19:37.169
<v Speaker 2>stronger as a result.

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:41.829
<v Speaker 2>And so now Chinese economy by integrating it with the

0:19:41.829 --> 0:19:45.669
<v Speaker 2>rest of the world, has become a remarkably robust and

0:19:45.670 --> 0:19:46.989
<v Speaker 2>strong economy, you know.

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:50.659
<v Speaker 2>And I think India can do the same because India,

0:19:50.819 --> 0:19:55.859
<v Speaker 2>Indians are naturally competitive. I mean, you look at every

0:19:55.859 --> 0:20:00.260
<v Speaker 2>country in the world, the Indians have migrated to, and

0:20:00.260 --> 0:20:03.699
<v Speaker 2>I can say this with some confidence as aindi. I

0:20:03.699 --> 0:20:06.780
<v Speaker 2>have first cousins, you know, children of my mother's and

0:20:06.780 --> 0:20:14.869
<v Speaker 2>father's siblings all over the world living in Guyana, uh, Suriname, Texas, London, Florida.

0:20:15.609 --> 0:20:23.310
<v Speaker 2>Uh, Nigeria, Ghana, Mumbai, Kolkata, Singapore, Hong Kong, Japan, every

0:20:23.310 --> 0:20:27.819
<v Speaker 2>corner of the world. I have first cousins and Kyoto, yeah,

0:20:27.910 --> 0:20:31.140
<v Speaker 2>and you know what, they, they're all doing very well.

0:20:32.239 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 2>They they compete very well, uh, in, in, in, in

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 2>a competitive uh economic uh environment. You can see in

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:43.438
<v Speaker 2>the United States, which is the most competitive human laboratory

0:20:43.439 --> 0:20:46.020
<v Speaker 2>in the world, uh, the ethnic community with the highest

0:20:46.020 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 2>per capita income are the Indians.

0:20:48.319 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 2>So, you know, India, therefore needs to make a very

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 2>powerful strategic decision that India can and will compete. Now,

0:20:58.010 --> 0:21:00.599
<v Speaker 2>of course, when you open up the economy, there will

0:21:00.599 --> 0:21:05.189
<v Speaker 2>be disruptions, there will be difficulties, you know, it's it's,

0:21:05.199 --> 0:21:09.660
<v Speaker 2>it's the same thing that happens when a woman gives birth, right? You,

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 2>you go through labor pains. After the labor pains, you

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:15.709
<v Speaker 2>end up with a beautiful uh baby.

0:21:16.489 --> 0:21:19.699
<v Speaker 2>So and and that beautiful baby could be a much

0:21:19.699 --> 0:21:22.099
<v Speaker 2>more dynamic competitive Indian economy.

0:21:23.939 --> 0:21:27.250
<v Speaker 1>Sure, uh, we are two Singaporeans sitting here in India.

0:21:27.459 --> 0:21:30.290
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk a little bit about Singapore-India relationship.

0:21:31.770 --> 0:21:35.390
<v Speaker 2>Sure. Well, I think we are, we are very blessed.

0:21:36.329 --> 0:21:41.139
<v Speaker 2>Uh, that early on, uh, all the leaders of, uh,

0:21:41.150 --> 0:21:47.500
<v Speaker 2>Singapore decided that they had to make long-term investments in India. And,

0:21:47.510 --> 0:21:50.750
<v Speaker 2>you know, it, it happened under Mr. Lee Kuan Yew.

0:21:50.829 --> 0:21:54.750
<v Speaker 2>I actually personally accompanied Mr. Lee Kuan Yew, uh, when

0:21:54.750 --> 0:21:57.430
<v Speaker 2>he visited India, and I, all I remember is that

0:21:57.430 --> 0:22:01.150
<v Speaker 2>at that time, I think the Prime Minister was Murai Jayai.

0:22:01.930 --> 0:22:05.419
<v Speaker 2>And, uh, Indira Gandhi was in opposition, so you can

0:22:05.420 --> 0:22:08.290
<v Speaker 2>more or less figure out what year it was. So

0:22:08.290 --> 0:22:11.619
<v Speaker 2>it regularly, Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yeww used to come here,

0:22:11.900 --> 0:22:14.500
<v Speaker 2>come here, but the man who triggered what you call

0:22:14.500 --> 0:22:18.699
<v Speaker 2>the India fever, uh, in Singapore was Prime Minister Goh

0:22:18.699 --> 0:22:23.180
<v Speaker 2>Chok Tong. And you, you mentioned my, uh, memoirs, Living

0:22:23.180 --> 0:22:26.619
<v Speaker 2>the Asian Century. I think I also talk about how

0:22:26.619 --> 0:22:28.260
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong.

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:32.910
<v Speaker 2>Uh, you know, worked hard to get India admitted into

0:22:32.910 --> 0:22:37.750
<v Speaker 2>the ASEAN Regional Forum, you know. So over the years,

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot of trust has been built up between the

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:45.989
<v Speaker 2>Indian leaders and, and Singapore. So I think that, uh,

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:51.069
<v Speaker 2>that long term trust means that we have a very stable, uh,

0:22:51.079 --> 0:22:52.479
<v Speaker 2>long term relationship.

0:22:53.140 --> 0:22:56.979
<v Speaker 2>Uh, between India and Singapore. But at the same time,

0:22:57.060 --> 0:23:00.410
<v Speaker 2>I think it's important for Singapore to realize.

0:23:01.420 --> 0:23:06.650
<v Speaker 2>That the competition for attention of India is growing more

0:23:06.650 --> 0:23:09.930
<v Speaker 2>intense because all you have to do is do a

0:23:09.930 --> 0:23:13.729
<v Speaker 2>count of all the leaders coming to Delhi now to

0:23:13.729 --> 0:23:17.339
<v Speaker 2>court India. It's, it's gone up like this, right? Clearly,

0:23:17.530 --> 0:23:20.880
<v Speaker 2>India's influence is grown. So you cannot take for granted

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:24.448
<v Speaker 2>that just because we were close relation, have close relations

0:23:24.449 --> 0:23:27.660
<v Speaker 2>in the past, we have close relations in the future,

0:23:27.930 --> 0:23:29.979
<v Speaker 2>we have to reinvent ourselves.

0:23:31.060 --> 0:23:33.719
<v Speaker 2>And continue to work hard to get closer because you

0:23:33.719 --> 0:23:39.199
<v Speaker 2>can see already in the past, uh, relations between Indonesia

0:23:39.199 --> 0:23:43.670
<v Speaker 2>and India were not close, but just a few days ago, uh,

0:23:43.719 --> 0:23:47.478
<v Speaker 2>President Prabowo was invited as the chief guest, uh, of

0:23:47.479 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 2>the Indian government. So that, that's an example of how

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:54.530
<v Speaker 2>the competition for India's attention.

0:23:54.979 --> 0:23:56.609
<v Speaker 2>Will grow in the coming years.

0:23:57.140 --> 0:24:00.149
<v Speaker 1>this is a very critical point. Uh, last year, uh,

0:24:00.260 --> 0:24:04.199
<v Speaker 1>several members of Indian Chamber of Commerce were in Singapore,

0:24:04.619 --> 0:24:06.869
<v Speaker 1>and they seem to suggest, I mean, there was a

0:24:06.869 --> 0:24:08.579
<v Speaker 1>push back to what they said, but they seem to

0:24:08.579 --> 0:24:13.239
<v Speaker 1>think that Singapore lacks a credible, coherent strategy, vis a

0:24:13.239 --> 0:24:16.939
<v Speaker 1>vis India, especially with all these um competition for attention,

0:24:16.979 --> 0:24:20.609
<v Speaker 1>if you will. Um, so what should be Singapore's strategy

0:24:20.609 --> 0:24:23.060
<v Speaker 1>in this time when India is being quartered by the

0:24:23.060 --> 0:24:23.609
<v Speaker 1>whole world?

0:24:24.170 --> 0:24:27.619
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think the important thing is to continue working

0:24:27.619 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 2>in the relationship, and I'm very glad that uh President

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:39.329
<v Speaker 2>Thaman Shamugratnam came on a state visit to India. I think, uh, probably, uh,

0:24:39.339 --> 0:24:43.959
<v Speaker 2>apart from the two former prime ministers, uh, Mr. Goh

0:24:43.959 --> 0:24:47.420
<v Speaker 2>Chok Tong and Mr. Lee Hsien Loong, uh, I think

0:24:47.420 --> 0:24:52.339
<v Speaker 2>the the third most respected Singaporean figure in, uh, India

0:24:52.339 --> 0:24:53.739
<v Speaker 2>is Thaman Chamratnam.

0:24:54.380 --> 0:24:57.938
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of uh reverence for him and trust

0:24:57.939 --> 0:25:01.619
<v Speaker 2>in him. So it's good that he came and re-established.

0:25:02.390 --> 0:25:05.589
<v Speaker 2>The close relations, but we also have to keep on

0:25:05.589 --> 0:25:11.589
<v Speaker 2>sending uh visitors and also working hard to find concrete

0:25:11.589 --> 0:25:17.349
<v Speaker 2>areas of uh cooperation and collaboration between India and Singapore.

0:25:17.670 --> 0:25:20.869
<v Speaker 2>And I hope that we can at least work with

0:25:20.869 --> 0:25:25.030
<v Speaker 2>India slowly to try and persuade India to reconsider your

0:25:25.030 --> 0:25:27.750
<v Speaker 2>decision not to join the RCEP.

0:25:28.189 --> 0:25:31.550
<v Speaker 2>Because I think once India joins the RCP and benefits

0:25:31.550 --> 0:25:36.790
<v Speaker 2>from joining RCEP, uh, then the ties, uh, not just

0:25:36.790 --> 0:25:40.030
<v Speaker 2>within India and Singapore, but India and Southeast Asia will

0:25:40.030 --> 0:25:40.900
<v Speaker 2>become much stronger.

0:25:41.060 --> 0:25:45.660
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I fully concur. Um, let's, uh, put India aside

0:25:45.660 --> 0:25:48.149
<v Speaker 1>for the time being and talk about what you and

0:25:48.150 --> 0:25:51.379
<v Speaker 1>I discussed at length in the previous podcast, the China-US relationship.

0:25:52.349 --> 0:25:56.229
<v Speaker 1>How do things look from Beijing's perspective, including the last

0:25:56.229 --> 0:25:58.780
<v Speaker 1>4 years of Biden administration and the coming 4 years

0:25:58.780 --> 0:25:59.959
<v Speaker 1>of Trump administration here again,

0:26:03.109 --> 0:26:08.550
<v Speaker 2>it's very important to make a distinction between the structural

0:26:08.550 --> 0:26:11.540
<v Speaker 2>changes and the short term developments.

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:13.339
<v Speaker 2>Excuse me.

0:26:18.719 --> 0:26:18.729
<v Speaker 2>Um,

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:24.959
<v Speaker 2>Structurally, the relationship between US and China.

0:26:26.380 --> 0:26:27.020
<v Speaker 2>is shifting

0:26:28.060 --> 0:26:29.689
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the.

0:26:30.959 --> 0:26:33.660
<v Speaker 2>Americans are obviously trying to stop China's development.

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 2>They think to some extent they have done so.

0:26:38.439 --> 0:26:42.430
<v Speaker 2>But if you take a 10 year time horizon, no way,

0:26:42.770 --> 0:26:43.770
<v Speaker 2>they're going to stop China.

0:26:44.510 --> 0:26:47.239
<v Speaker 2>So the Chinese still feel confident.

0:26:49.050 --> 0:26:52.089
<v Speaker 2>That the long run, the long run, they are, they'll

0:26:52.089 --> 0:26:55.130
<v Speaker 2>be better off. The Chinese economy, as you know, is

0:26:55.130 --> 0:26:58.069
<v Speaker 2>having some real short term challenges. The next 2 to

0:26:58.069 --> 0:27:02.729
<v Speaker 2>3 years will be difficult. The real estate market is

0:27:02.729 --> 0:27:03.770
<v Speaker 2>still in the dumps.

0:27:04.449 --> 0:27:06.718
<v Speaker 2>Uh, consumer sentiment is down.

0:27:07.780 --> 0:27:12.688
<v Speaker 2>Business sentiment is down, so they're struggling to get their 5%

0:27:12.689 --> 0:27:15.079
<v Speaker 2>growth rate. So over the next 2 to 3 years,

0:27:15.410 --> 0:27:18.209
<v Speaker 2>Chinese economy is going to be struggling. But if you

0:27:18.209 --> 0:27:20.719
<v Speaker 2>look at China decade by decade.

0:27:21.670 --> 0:27:24.310
<v Speaker 2>At the end of each decade, they look so much

0:27:24.310 --> 0:27:27.099
<v Speaker 2>stronger and I, and I, I gave the statistic how

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:30.589
<v Speaker 2>their share of global manufacturing has gone from 5% in

0:27:30.589 --> 0:27:34.869
<v Speaker 2>2000 and will reach 45% in 2030. That's an example

0:27:34.869 --> 0:27:38.229
<v Speaker 2>of how this look decade by decade and and certainly

0:27:38.229 --> 0:27:41.959
<v Speaker 2>if you look at, you ask yourself a very simple question.

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:46.479
<v Speaker 2>Which leading economy in the world?

0:27:47.349 --> 0:27:51.500
<v Speaker 2>Has invested the most in the industries of the future.

0:27:52.930 --> 0:28:00.170
<v Speaker 2>I mean, no question is China, EVs, solar panels, wind turbines,

0:28:00.550 --> 0:28:03.750
<v Speaker 2>battery technology, robots, you go on, right?

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:09.170
<v Speaker 2>And uh if there's one economy that's really prepared for

0:28:09.170 --> 0:28:12.410
<v Speaker 2>the future, preparing itself for the future, is China, and

0:28:12.410 --> 0:28:15.170
<v Speaker 2>it's causing structural changes around the world. I mean, if

0:28:15.170 --> 0:28:19.079
<v Speaker 2>you and I had had this interview 10 years ago,

0:28:19.410 --> 0:28:19.849
<v Speaker 2>and I told you.

0:28:21.910 --> 0:28:23.659
<v Speaker 2>10 years ago, I told in 2015.

0:28:24.449 --> 0:28:32.449
<v Speaker 2>10 years from now, Mercedes Benz, BMW, Audi, uh, Toyota, Nissan, oh,

0:28:33.329 --> 0:28:36.739
<v Speaker 2>we so scared of Chinese automobiles. You would have laughed

0:28:36.739 --> 0:28:39.609
<v Speaker 2>at me. Everybody would have laughed. You must be joking.

0:28:39.699 --> 0:28:44.489
<v Speaker 2>I remember as recently as 34 years ago, Elon Musk said,

0:28:44.849 --> 0:28:47.369
<v Speaker 2>who the hell is going to buy a Chinese automobile?

0:28:48.469 --> 0:28:52.459
<v Speaker 2>Look where we are today. All the companies I mentioned

0:28:53.060 --> 0:28:54.270
<v Speaker 2>are shit scared.

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:59.238
<v Speaker 2>Of Chinese automobiles. So, you know, this is and, and

0:28:59.239 --> 0:29:02.709
<v Speaker 2>just to mention an event that happened last few days.

0:29:03.660 --> 0:29:06.969
<v Speaker 2>Look at how much value Nasdaq has lost.

0:29:07.780 --> 0:29:10.910
<v Speaker 2>Because of a company I never heard of called Deep.

0:29:12.459 --> 0:29:14.410
<v Speaker 2>Where did this Chinese company come from?

0:29:15.270 --> 0:29:19.050
<v Speaker 2>And how does a hedge fund manager create a world

0:29:19.050 --> 0:29:23.839
<v Speaker 2>beating AI company? It doesn't make sense. So, you know, therefore,

0:29:24.790 --> 0:29:27.390
<v Speaker 2>What, what we have, the biggest lesson, and this is

0:29:27.390 --> 0:29:29.270
<v Speaker 2>what I, you know, I, I'm a friend of the

0:29:29.270 --> 0:29:32.979
<v Speaker 2>United States. My goal is to help the United States

0:29:32.979 --> 0:29:37.890
<v Speaker 2>adapt intelligently to the rise of the Chinese. And I

0:29:37.890 --> 0:29:42.609
<v Speaker 2>always keep telling my American friends, it's, it's very dangerous

0:29:42.609 --> 0:29:46.670
<v Speaker 2>for you to underestimate China. It's safer for you to

0:29:46.670 --> 0:29:49.270
<v Speaker 2>overestimate China and to be fair to me, I've been

0:29:49.270 --> 0:29:52.390
<v Speaker 2>saying this for 2030 years, consistently.

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:58.890
<v Speaker 2>And so if the structural changes happening, the rebalancing between

0:29:58.890 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 2>US and China will continue. Now over the short term, uh,

0:30:03.810 --> 0:30:06.050
<v Speaker 2>I think China is probably going to have a rough

0:30:06.050 --> 0:30:10.410
<v Speaker 2>time initially, uh, with Donald Trump because Donald Trump is,

0:30:10.489 --> 0:30:14.099
<v Speaker 2>you know, only believes in working through threats and uh

0:30:14.099 --> 0:30:16.130
<v Speaker 2>tariffs and so on and so forth. So there'll be

0:30:16.130 --> 0:30:21.089
<v Speaker 2>some rockiness in the US China relationship, but at the

0:30:21.089 --> 0:30:21.969
<v Speaker 2>same time,

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:26.959
<v Speaker 2>If there's one man who can make a deal with China,

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 2>comprehensive deal with China, it is certainly Donald Trump. You know,

0:30:32.199 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, Joe Biden and his administration were so frightened

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:39.310
<v Speaker 2>of being seen to be soft on China, they didn't

0:30:39.310 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 2>dare to do even the obvious things they could have

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:44.479
<v Speaker 2>done to improve ties with China. Donald

0:30:44.594 --> 0:30:46.994
<v Speaker 2>Trump has got the advantage. They say only, you know,

0:30:47.074 --> 0:30:50.314
<v Speaker 2>they say only Richard Nixon could go to China, only

0:30:50.314 --> 0:30:53.354
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump can make a deal with China. And at

0:30:53.354 --> 0:30:56.114
<v Speaker 2>some point in time, if they reach a deal of

0:30:56.114 --> 0:31:00.714
<v Speaker 2>some kind and stabilize the US-China relationship, that wouldn't be

0:31:00.714 --> 0:31:04.435
<v Speaker 2>surprised either. So, and this means that all the other

0:31:04.435 --> 0:31:07.435
<v Speaker 2>people around the world, like the Europeans.

0:31:08.229 --> 0:31:13.270
<v Speaker 2>Who are counting on an adversarial US China relationship will

0:31:13.270 --> 0:31:15.819
<v Speaker 2>suddenly find themselves marginalized.

0:31:16.859 --> 0:31:18.500
<v Speaker 2>So this is the sort of thing that you got

0:31:18.500 --> 0:31:21.869
<v Speaker 2>to be very geopolitics is a very cruel business. You

0:31:21.869 --> 0:31:24.900
<v Speaker 2>got to think very hard about how you could, on

0:31:24.900 --> 0:31:27.738
<v Speaker 2>the one hand, enhance your position, and on the other hand,

0:31:27.859 --> 0:31:32.020
<v Speaker 2>how your position could be seriously suffer if other changes happen.

0:31:32.530 --> 0:31:36.619
<v Speaker 1>Like sure, the mercurial nature of Trump is really something else.

0:31:37.109 --> 0:31:40.469
<v Speaker 1>To your point of the Biden administration being petrified of

0:31:40.469 --> 0:31:43.790
<v Speaker 1>being seen soft on China, they basically co-opted all the

0:31:43.790 --> 0:31:47.540
<v Speaker 1>measures that Trump had put in place, and they intensified them,

0:31:48.069 --> 0:31:51.099
<v Speaker 1>including the ban on TikTok, and then Trump comes back

0:31:51.270 --> 0:31:54.010
<v Speaker 1>and he says, yeah, maybe we shouldn't ban it. Um,

0:31:54.189 --> 0:31:56.349
<v Speaker 1>so what was the point of trying to look even

0:31:56.349 --> 0:31:58.949
<v Speaker 1>holier than thou for the Biden administration, it didn't really

0:31:58.949 --> 0:31:59.709
<v Speaker 1>amount to anything.

0:32:00.199 --> 0:32:01.939
<v Speaker 1>Um, but just saying it,

0:32:02.199 --> 0:32:05.630
<v Speaker 2>just a quick point, the bigger problem with the Biden administration.

0:32:06.550 --> 0:32:10.270
<v Speaker 2>Is that they didn't have long term strategic thinkers in

0:32:10.270 --> 0:32:14.699
<v Speaker 2>the administration. I can tell you that in my last, uh,

0:32:14.829 --> 0:32:20.939
<v Speaker 2>one on one conversation, uh, with Henry Kissinger in October 2022,

0:32:21.380 --> 0:32:25.180
<v Speaker 2>about a year before he died, he more or less, uh,

0:32:25.229 --> 0:32:27.630
<v Speaker 2>suggested that, you know, they're not thinking long term and

0:32:27.630 --> 0:32:30.988
<v Speaker 2>competing with China, you got to ask yourself where you

0:32:30.989 --> 0:32:33.069
<v Speaker 2>want to be 10 years, 20 years from now, forget

0:32:33.069 --> 0:32:33.989
<v Speaker 2>the next quarter.

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:37.189
<v Speaker 2>Forget the tariffs and all that. Where, what is your

0:32:37.189 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 2>end goal? And the Biden administration never specified what his

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:43.719
<v Speaker 2>end goal is going to be 10 years, 20 years

0:32:43.719 --> 0:32:47.119
<v Speaker 2>down the road. And, and, and what it shocked me

0:32:47.119 --> 0:32:50.209
<v Speaker 2>even more is that not a single member of the

0:32:50.209 --> 0:32:51.988
<v Speaker 2>Biden administration.

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:55.339
<v Speaker 2>Consulted Henry Kissinger.

0:32:56.270 --> 0:32:58.959
<v Speaker 2>And the least they could have done, at least I

0:32:58.959 --> 0:33:00.339
<v Speaker 2>mean to show some courage.

0:33:01.089 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 2>It allowed Henry Kissinger to go back to China in

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:08.479
<v Speaker 2>2021 to mark the 50th anniversary of the opening up

0:33:08.479 --> 0:33:12.119
<v Speaker 2>with China, but they were so scared, they didn't even

0:33:12.119 --> 0:33:15.329
<v Speaker 2>allow Kissinger to go to China. So that's an example

0:33:15.329 --> 0:33:20.109
<v Speaker 2>of cowardice that unfortunately plagued the Biden administration.

0:33:20.479 --> 0:33:23.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I've I've looked at various speeches that Jake Sullivan

0:33:23.359 --> 0:33:25.510
<v Speaker 1>and Anthony Blinken gave over the last 4 years.

0:33:25.819 --> 0:33:28.420
<v Speaker 1>And I felt that it was a continuation of whatever

0:33:28.420 --> 0:33:30.869
<v Speaker 1>they thought the Trump administration had done that we're going

0:33:30.869 --> 0:33:32.900
<v Speaker 1>to be even tougher than that of wide yard and

0:33:32.900 --> 0:33:35.099
<v Speaker 1>high fence and those sort of analogy. It was all

0:33:35.099 --> 0:33:38.569
<v Speaker 1>about looking at China as an existential adversary, as opposed

0:33:38.569 --> 0:33:42.089
<v Speaker 1>to looking at the gains from a win-win relationship of openness.

0:33:42.380 --> 0:33:44.979
<v Speaker 2>And and the Biden administration especially.

0:33:46.180 --> 0:33:49.819
<v Speaker 2>Because it genuinely, the biggest compliment I can pay the

0:33:49.819 --> 0:33:53.859
<v Speaker 2>Biden administration is that they understood that climate change was

0:33:53.859 --> 0:33:56.689
<v Speaker 2>a real threat and it is a real threat, come on.

0:33:57.579 --> 0:34:00.459
<v Speaker 2>Like climate change is a real threat and you really

0:34:00.459 --> 0:34:02.900
<v Speaker 2>want to focus on saving planet Earth.

0:34:03.869 --> 0:34:06.390
<v Speaker 2>Then you've got to press the pause button on the

0:34:06.390 --> 0:34:10.110
<v Speaker 2>geopolitical contest with China and tell China, hey, they are

0:34:10.110 --> 0:34:13.090
<v Speaker 2>both two cabins on one boat, the boat is sinking,

0:34:13.469 --> 0:34:17.549
<v Speaker 2>let's work together. But the Biden administration, even though it

0:34:17.870 --> 0:34:21.800
<v Speaker 2>realized that climate change is real, didn't have the courage

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:25.159
<v Speaker 2>to tell the American people, hey, we really got to

0:34:25.159 --> 0:34:26.909
<v Speaker 2>save the planet, and the only way we can save

0:34:26.909 --> 0:34:28.870
<v Speaker 2>the planet if all of us come together, and we

0:34:28.870 --> 0:34:30.178
<v Speaker 2>must bring China on board.

0:34:30.610 --> 0:34:33.969
<v Speaker 2>That's a very simple, obvious thing the Biden administration could

0:34:33.969 --> 0:34:36.770
<v Speaker 2>have said, but all they wanted to show is that

0:34:36.770 --> 0:34:40.090
<v Speaker 2>they were tougher on China than the Trump administration, and

0:34:40.090 --> 0:34:41.408
<v Speaker 2>it was a losing game, I

0:34:41.409 --> 0:34:45.049
<v Speaker 1>agree. Um, let's go back to the point you made

0:34:45.050 --> 0:34:49.229
<v Speaker 1>about Xi Jinping's speech about China, you know, jumping into

0:34:49.229 --> 0:34:52.479
<v Speaker 1>the rough waters of globalization and coming out stronger.

0:34:53.289 --> 0:34:57.128
<v Speaker 1>If we assume that the narrative of fragmentation continues in

0:34:57.128 --> 0:35:00.248
<v Speaker 1>the US and Europe, they see China as an adversary

0:35:00.248 --> 0:35:04.038
<v Speaker 1>and they restrict market access, technology access, and so on.

0:35:04.368 --> 0:35:07.448
<v Speaker 1>What is China's strategy vis a vis the other 85%

0:35:07.448 --> 0:35:08.138
<v Speaker 1>of the world?

0:35:08.849 --> 0:35:11.688
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think that China's strategy vis a vis the

0:35:11.688 --> 0:35:16.248
<v Speaker 2>other 85% of the world started more than 10 years ago.

0:35:17.219 --> 0:35:21.250
<v Speaker 2>I mean, with things like the Belt and Road Initiative,

0:35:21.739 --> 0:35:27.729
<v Speaker 2>the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, the New Development Bank, you know,

0:35:28.100 --> 0:35:32.739
<v Speaker 2>and you know, uh, a Brazilian diplomat told me that

0:35:32.899 --> 0:35:36.739
<v Speaker 2>in the year 2000, it took Brazil one year.

0:35:37.449 --> 0:35:39.879
<v Speaker 2>To export $1 billion to China.

0:35:40.929 --> 0:35:45.810
<v Speaker 2>Today it take Brazil 60 to 70 hours to export

0:35:45.810 --> 0:35:49.739
<v Speaker 2>$1 billion to China. So, you know, remember, Brazil is

0:35:49.739 --> 0:35:53.820
<v Speaker 2>in theory in the American sphere of influence, and Brazil

0:35:53.820 --> 0:35:56.399
<v Speaker 2>is covered by the Monroe Doctrine and so on and

0:35:56.399 --> 0:36:00.100
<v Speaker 2>so forth. So here is a country that has developed

0:36:00.100 --> 0:36:03.770
<v Speaker 2>extensive ties with China. It's not going to sacrifice, uh,

0:36:03.780 --> 0:36:07.330
<v Speaker 2>it ties with China just because of uh the United States.

0:36:07.830 --> 0:36:11.229
<v Speaker 2>So, what what the Chinese have done, therefore vis a

0:36:11.229 --> 0:36:16.360
<v Speaker 2>vis the 85%, is to enhance their substantive ties with

0:36:16.360 --> 0:36:21.270
<v Speaker 2>these countries. And another give you another example, Indonesia, you know,

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:23.750
<v Speaker 2>when after Indonesia made a decision.

0:36:24.530 --> 0:36:28.609
<v Speaker 2>To, uh, build a fast train with China between Jakarta

0:36:28.610 --> 0:36:32.469
<v Speaker 2>and Bandung, the Biden administration sent a team and said,

0:36:32.590 --> 0:36:36.509
<v Speaker 2>you know, be careful, be careful. And the Indonesian response was, OK,

0:36:36.750 --> 0:36:38.709
<v Speaker 2>why don't you, America, come and build a fast train

0:36:38.709 --> 0:36:41.989
<v Speaker 2>in Indonesia. You'll be happy if you did so. But

0:36:41.989 --> 0:36:46.100
<v Speaker 2>you know, again, the US couldn't compete with China on that. So, I,

0:36:46.229 --> 0:36:50.270
<v Speaker 2>I think therefore, the Chinese have, in the Chinese have

0:36:50.270 --> 0:36:50.610
<v Speaker 2>had

0:36:51.429 --> 0:36:53.790
<v Speaker 2>As I, as I explained in my book as China One,

0:36:54.310 --> 0:37:00.360
<v Speaker 2>a consistent long term strategy on how to manage pressures

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:04.149
<v Speaker 2>from China, from United States and China, and the best

0:37:04.149 --> 0:37:06.750
<v Speaker 2>way to do so is to ensure that the rest

0:37:06.750 --> 0:37:11.389
<v Speaker 2>of the world uh has a vested interest in not

0:37:11.389 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 2>cutting off China. That's a strategic decision they made ages ago,

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:16.909
<v Speaker 2>when you see this in ASEAN.

0:37:17.550 --> 0:37:20.870
<v Speaker 2>Uh, for example, in the year 2000, China ASEAN trade

0:37:20.870 --> 0:37:25.229
<v Speaker 2>was only $40 billion US dollars. In 2022, it hit

0:37:25.229 --> 0:37:29.949
<v Speaker 2>$975 billion you know, almost $1 trillion. So all this

0:37:29.949 --> 0:37:33.750
<v Speaker 2>interdependency between China and the rest of the world means

0:37:33.750 --> 0:37:38.830
<v Speaker 2>that they have preemptively, China has preemptively killed any containment strategy.

0:37:39.540 --> 0:37:43.179
<v Speaker 2>Uh, by the United States and see, by contrast, the

0:37:43.179 --> 0:37:50.100
<v Speaker 2>United States doesn't have a long term policy that can counterbalance, uh, uh, China,

0:37:50.540 --> 0:37:52.939
<v Speaker 2>and actually what the United States has now with the

0:37:52.939 --> 0:37:55.340
<v Speaker 2>Trump administration is the exact opposite.

0:37:56.189 --> 0:38:00.929
<v Speaker 2>Because Trump is actually in one way or another, going

0:38:00.929 --> 0:38:03.649
<v Speaker 2>to alienate a lot of countries in the world. I'm

0:38:03.649 --> 0:38:07.049
<v Speaker 2>sure Canada is mad as hell. I'm sure Mexico is

0:38:07.050 --> 0:38:10.360
<v Speaker 2>mad as hell. Colombia, I'm sure is not mad as hell,

0:38:10.689 --> 0:38:11.209
<v Speaker 2>even though it.

0:38:11.735 --> 0:38:13.764
<v Speaker 2>In the end, you know, when people have to cut out,

0:38:13.804 --> 0:38:19.235
<v Speaker 2>they get mad, of course. Uh, so, uh, you ironically,

0:38:19.685 --> 0:38:24.685
<v Speaker 2>if Trump goes systematically threatening country by country systematically, including

0:38:24.685 --> 0:38:30.245
<v Speaker 2>friends like Japan and South Korea, then frankly, the Trump

0:38:30.245 --> 0:38:33.844
<v Speaker 2>could be a real gift to China that keeps on giving.

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:39.330
<v Speaker 1>But in terms of China, so nobody contest the fact that,

0:38:39.340 --> 0:38:43.178
<v Speaker 1>you know, China has deepened economic symbalances with vast parts

0:38:43.179 --> 0:38:47.840
<v Speaker 1>of the global South, but is it doing the prudent

0:38:47.840 --> 0:38:50.659
<v Speaker 1>thing in South China Sea, for example, we see Philippines,

0:38:50.820 --> 0:38:54.260
<v Speaker 1>China friction, sometimes Vietnam, China friction, and of course we

0:38:54.260 --> 0:38:57.620
<v Speaker 1>have the Taiwan, Korea, Japan uh situation uh vis a

0:38:57.620 --> 0:38:58.489
<v Speaker 1>vis China as well.

0:38:58.840 --> 0:39:01.979
<v Speaker 1>So what's your assessment of China's sort of the wool

0:39:01.979 --> 0:39:04.959
<v Speaker 1>for your past or is it sort of being a

0:39:04.959 --> 0:39:07.639
<v Speaker 1>little more pragmatic and dealing with his immediate neighbors?

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:11.479
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, uh, the key point I always emphasize

0:39:11.479 --> 0:39:15.209
<v Speaker 2>about when you deal with great power, great powers, always

0:39:15.209 --> 0:39:19.399
<v Speaker 2>remember that the phrase benevolent great power is an oxymoron.

0:39:20.419 --> 0:39:24.580
<v Speaker 2>No great power is is is benevolent. I mean, the

0:39:24.580 --> 0:39:27.569
<v Speaker 2>United States was in some ways benevolent after World War

0:39:27.570 --> 0:39:30.060
<v Speaker 2>2 and so on and so forth with the Marshall

0:39:30.060 --> 0:39:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Plan and all that. But as you can see, in

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:35.419
<v Speaker 2>the long run, every great power will put its interests

0:39:35.419 --> 0:39:39.340
<v Speaker 2>first and sacrifice others. As you know, the Europeans are terrified.

0:39:39.989 --> 0:39:44.159
<v Speaker 2>Uh, are being abandoned in Ukraine now. Uh, so in

0:39:44.159 --> 0:39:47.020
<v Speaker 2>the same way, China is also not a benevolent great power.

0:39:47.100 --> 0:39:51.500
<v Speaker 2>It has to put its own, uh, interests first. And

0:39:51.500 --> 0:39:57.219
<v Speaker 2>there's no question that as China becomes more and more powerful, uh,

0:39:57.340 --> 0:40:00.020
<v Speaker 2>it is going to become more and more assertive. I mean,

0:40:00.179 --> 0:40:03.779
<v Speaker 2>you know, if I give a simple analogy, if you

0:40:03.780 --> 0:40:06.500
<v Speaker 2>and I having this conversation for an hour, we started

0:40:06.500 --> 0:40:08.219
<v Speaker 2>off by having a cat in the room, sitting in

0:40:08.219 --> 0:40:08.780
<v Speaker 2>the corner.

0:40:09.090 --> 0:40:12.179
<v Speaker 2>You and I will be talking very comfortably. What a

0:40:12.179 --> 0:40:15.020
<v Speaker 2>lovely cat, you know, you can look at it. But

0:40:15.020 --> 0:40:18.340
<v Speaker 2>after an hour, suddenly the cat becomes a tiger. I

0:40:18.340 --> 0:40:20.780
<v Speaker 2>think you and I would sit here very uncomfortably looking

0:40:20.780 --> 0:40:24.820
<v Speaker 2>at the tiger, you know. So China, to put it simply,

0:40:25.060 --> 0:40:28.340
<v Speaker 2>I mean, mathematically, this is true, has gone from being

0:40:28.340 --> 0:40:32.260
<v Speaker 2>a cat to becoming a tiger, right? Look at how

0:40:32.260 --> 0:40:35.770
<v Speaker 2>much the economy has exploded. And so you can no

0:40:35.770 --> 0:40:37.260
<v Speaker 2>longer assume.

0:40:38.070 --> 0:40:40.459
<v Speaker 2>That the china that behave like a cat.

0:40:41.370 --> 0:40:44.370
<v Speaker 2>It's going to continue behaving like a cat when it

0:40:44.370 --> 0:40:47.569
<v Speaker 2>becomes a tiger. That's so unrealistic. It's going to become

0:40:47.570 --> 0:40:51.250
<v Speaker 2>more assertive. But at the same time, there's a huge

0:40:51.250 --> 0:40:54.889
<v Speaker 2>difference between two English words. One is assertive and the

0:40:54.889 --> 0:40:59.080
<v Speaker 2>other is aggressive. So China can become more assertive without

0:40:59.080 --> 0:41:03.850
<v Speaker 2>necessarily becoming aggressive. Now, you mentioned the South China Sea.

0:41:04.489 --> 0:41:08.408
<v Speaker 2>Just go and read uh Graham Allison's book Destined for

0:41:08.409 --> 0:41:13.439
<v Speaker 2>War on US-China relations, where he says Americans keep wishing,

0:41:13.610 --> 0:41:17.770
<v Speaker 2>why can't China be like us? He said Americans should

0:41:17.770 --> 0:41:21.239
<v Speaker 2>stop wishing that China be like us because China today.

0:41:22.000 --> 0:41:25.219
<v Speaker 2>In the 2020s is where the United States was in

0:41:25.219 --> 0:41:29.550
<v Speaker 2>the 1890s and the president then, by the way, was McKinley,

0:41:29.979 --> 0:41:34.100
<v Speaker 2>whom Trump reveres. What did he do? Once you got

0:41:34.100 --> 0:41:35.100
<v Speaker 2>the muscles.

0:41:35.780 --> 0:41:40.060
<v Speaker 2>You declare war in Spain. You seize Philippines, you seize

0:41:40.810 --> 0:41:45.639
<v Speaker 2>uh Puerto Rico, you, you seize Guam, you, you, you, you,

0:41:45.689 --> 0:41:48.850
<v Speaker 2>you seize Cuba and so on and so forth. I mean,

0:41:48.929 --> 0:41:53.280
<v Speaker 2>that's what great powers do. Now, I can tell you this,

0:41:53.689 --> 0:41:56.090
<v Speaker 2>there are lots of features in the South China Sea.

0:41:57.050 --> 0:42:01.189
<v Speaker 2>If tomorrow China decided that it should occupy all of them,

0:42:01.270 --> 0:42:04.350
<v Speaker 2>it could do so in 24 hours. Everyone knows that,

0:42:04.629 --> 0:42:05.870
<v Speaker 2>no question whatsoever.

0:42:06.620 --> 0:42:10.949
<v Speaker 2>And the question therefore is why hasn't China done that

0:42:10.949 --> 0:42:12.189
<v Speaker 2>on the South China Sea?

0:42:13.010 --> 0:42:15.280
<v Speaker 2>And the here.

0:42:16.149 --> 0:42:18.589
<v Speaker 2>When you look, look at all the discussions on the

0:42:18.590 --> 0:42:22.459
<v Speaker 2>South China Sea, in theory, the problems are within China

0:42:22.459 --> 0:42:28.989
<v Speaker 2>and the four ASEAN countries, Philippines, Malaysia, Vietnam, and Brunei.

0:42:29.830 --> 0:42:32.698
<v Speaker 2>All the discussion of South China Sea in the Anglo-Saxon media.

0:42:33.520 --> 0:42:36.448
<v Speaker 2>The South China Sea, the ASEAN countries are keeping very

0:42:36.449 --> 0:42:39.060
<v Speaker 2>quiet because they know they have to in some ways

0:42:39.060 --> 0:42:41.540
<v Speaker 2>or another get along and work with China and find

0:42:41.780 --> 0:42:44.698
<v Speaker 2>adjustments with them. And it doesn't mean that they kowtow

0:42:44.699 --> 0:42:47.179
<v Speaker 2>to China, but they also know that you got to

0:42:47.179 --> 0:42:50.100
<v Speaker 2>stand up with China, which Vietnam is doing all the time,

0:42:50.169 --> 0:42:53.020
<v Speaker 2>but you don't have to do so publicly, right? And

0:42:53.020 --> 0:42:57.620
<v Speaker 2>the problem with the Philippines is that you notice that

0:42:57.899 --> 0:43:01.379
<v Speaker 2>when you deal with the rising power as a neighbor.

0:43:02.090 --> 0:43:05.479
<v Speaker 2>The most important thing every country in Southeast Asia should

0:43:05.479 --> 0:43:09.540
<v Speaker 2>have is a consistent long term policy in managing your

0:43:09.540 --> 0:43:13.199
<v Speaker 2>big neighbor. When you vaccinate, you create confusion and, and,

0:43:13.209 --> 0:43:19.580
<v Speaker 2>and uncertainty, and the Philippines has gone from uh Maloria

0:43:19.580 --> 0:43:26.219
<v Speaker 2>Macapagal Arrayo pro-China to Akino pro US to Duterte, pro-China,

0:43:26.300 --> 0:43:30.600
<v Speaker 2>to now Marcos, pro-S. Now that inconsistency.

0:43:31.250 --> 0:43:35.739
<v Speaker 2>Uh, becomes a challenge in, in geopolitics. You know, you're creating,

0:43:35.810 --> 0:43:39.928
<v Speaker 2>you're creating unnecessary problems. So my, I, I've told my

0:43:39.929 --> 0:43:41.689
<v Speaker 2>Filipino friends, sit down.

0:43:42.350 --> 0:43:45.860
<v Speaker 2>And work out a consistent long-term policy on China where

0:43:45.860 --> 0:43:50.178
<v Speaker 2>you defend your interest, but make it bipartisan and stick

0:43:50.179 --> 0:43:53.060
<v Speaker 2>to it over the long term. And don't flip and

0:43:53.060 --> 0:43:57.310
<v Speaker 2>switch every 4 to 5 years because it's not healthy.

0:43:57.580 --> 0:44:00.540
<v Speaker 2>At the end of the day, Philippines has got to

0:44:00.540 --> 0:44:04.100
<v Speaker 2>find a way of living with your big neighbor. and

0:44:04.560 --> 0:44:07.300
<v Speaker 2>and and the rule of history is that if you

0:44:07.300 --> 0:44:11.179
<v Speaker 2>have a big neighbor, uh, you adjust to the big neighbor.

0:44:11.780 --> 0:44:14.000
<v Speaker 2>And the big neighbor doesn't adjust to you. By the way, in,

0:44:14.080 --> 0:44:17.149
<v Speaker 2>in just to, just for, just to confirm this, a

0:44:17.149 --> 0:44:20.479
<v Speaker 2>good friend of mine was a champion sailor.

0:44:21.540 --> 0:44:25.179
<v Speaker 2>And she says when you're, when you're on a sailboat.

0:44:26.020 --> 0:44:28.020
<v Speaker 2>And you see a big boat, right?

0:44:28.870 --> 0:44:31.750
<v Speaker 2>Even if in theory you have the right of way

0:44:32.320 --> 0:44:35.159
<v Speaker 2>and the big boat has to give way, there's something

0:44:35.159 --> 0:44:39.060
<v Speaker 2>called the big boat rules. The big boat rules, you,

0:44:39.199 --> 0:44:42.310
<v Speaker 2>you move aside, because if you ram into the big boat,

0:44:42.840 --> 0:44:46.629
<v Speaker 2>the big boat carries on and your yacht is sunk. Yes, so,

0:44:46.669 --> 0:44:50.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, so it's a reality of life and, and,

0:44:50.159 --> 0:44:54.439
<v Speaker 2>and to pretend that you, you can deal with the

0:44:54.439 --> 0:44:56.590
<v Speaker 2>power that is so much more powerful.

0:44:57.189 --> 0:45:01.899
<v Speaker 2>Uh, as an equal, it's a very dangerous geopolitical illusion.

0:45:02.159 --> 0:45:03.908
<v Speaker 2>But it doesn't mean, I want to emphasize, it doesn't

0:45:03.909 --> 0:45:05.989
<v Speaker 2>mean you cut out, give way, and so on and

0:45:05.989 --> 0:45:09.549
<v Speaker 2>so forth, but you manage the great power in such

0:45:09.550 --> 0:45:13.330
<v Speaker 2>an intelligent way. You persuade them that it's in their

0:45:13.330 --> 0:45:16.138
<v Speaker 2>interest to work with you and you're not hostile to them,

0:45:16.429 --> 0:45:18.709
<v Speaker 2>and yet at the same time you tell them very clearly,

0:45:18.790 --> 0:45:21.709
<v Speaker 2>these are my core interests and please don't touch them.

0:45:22.550 --> 0:45:26.139
<v Speaker 1>I experienced the rule of big boats recently I was

0:45:26.139 --> 0:45:28.820
<v Speaker 1>canoeing from Palau went back to Singapore. When the big

0:45:28.820 --> 0:45:30.939
<v Speaker 1>tugboats come, it doesn't matter whether you have the right

0:45:30.939 --> 0:45:32.659
<v Speaker 1>of way, you get out of their way because they

0:45:32.659 --> 0:45:34.899
<v Speaker 1>cannot stop for you. But sure, I want to stay

0:45:34.899 --> 0:45:37.469
<v Speaker 1>with the tiger analogy for a second. US has been

0:45:37.469 --> 0:45:40.379
<v Speaker 1>a big tiger in the global neighborhood for a century

0:45:40.379 --> 0:45:44.209
<v Speaker 1>or so, um, and the US soft power has been

0:45:44.209 --> 0:45:46.780
<v Speaker 1>so powerful in keeping the rest of the world at

0:45:46.780 --> 0:45:50.810
<v Speaker 1>ease with the US. The recent experience notwithstanding Hollywood.

0:45:51.350 --> 0:45:55.589
<v Speaker 1>Books, US companies and their brands. So isn't it in

0:45:55.590 --> 0:45:59.989
<v Speaker 1>China's interest to project soft power in a more benign way,

0:46:00.070 --> 0:46:04.020
<v Speaker 1>so that even if the benevolent superpower oxymoron is true,

0:46:04.310 --> 0:46:07.739
<v Speaker 1>there's a little more adaptability and a little more uh

0:46:07.739 --> 0:46:10.229
<v Speaker 1>positivity associated with dealing with China.

0:46:11.060 --> 0:46:14.299
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think uh there's no question that the US

0:46:14.300 --> 0:46:15.889
<v Speaker 2>has a lot of soft power.

0:46:16.560 --> 0:46:20.570
<v Speaker 2>I mean, uh, if you ask the brightest young people

0:46:20.570 --> 0:46:22.529
<v Speaker 2>in any corner of the world.

0:46:23.129 --> 0:46:28.350
<v Speaker 2>In Latin America, in Africa, in South Asia, in Southeast Asia.

0:46:29.080 --> 0:46:33.270
<v Speaker 2>Uh, even in East Asia, you know, if you're bright, young, ambitious,

0:46:33.760 --> 0:46:36.199
<v Speaker 2>which country do you want to go to and where

0:46:36.199 --> 0:46:39.290
<v Speaker 2>can you make this become enormously successful?

0:46:39.969 --> 0:46:45.179
<v Speaker 2>You can't do that in China. I mean, Brazilian, Nigerian, Indonesian,

0:46:45.790 --> 0:46:49.350
<v Speaker 2>very rarely can succeed in in China, but you can

0:46:49.350 --> 0:46:54.350
<v Speaker 2>succeed in uh United States and exhibit A, people like

0:46:54.350 --> 0:46:57.709
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk, Satya Nadella, Sundar Pichai, and so on and

0:46:57.709 --> 0:47:00.709
<v Speaker 2>so forth. So in that sense, the United States has

0:47:00.709 --> 0:47:04.469
<v Speaker 2>real soft power in terms of attracting the brightest and

0:47:04.469 --> 0:47:07.179
<v Speaker 2>the best to come to the United States.

0:47:07.679 --> 0:47:10.260
<v Speaker 2>But you got to make soft power is going to

0:47:10.260 --> 0:47:11.659
<v Speaker 2>be dissected, OK?

0:47:12.280 --> 0:47:14.489
<v Speaker 2>In the past, the United States had a lot of

0:47:14.489 --> 0:47:19.370
<v Speaker 2>soft power with the mass populations and also with the

0:47:19.370 --> 0:47:22.919
<v Speaker 2>governments of the world. Most governments of the world in

0:47:22.919 --> 0:47:25.489
<v Speaker 2>one way, especially during the Cold War, and I can

0:47:25.489 --> 0:47:28.969
<v Speaker 2>say this because I worked very, very closely with American diplomats,

0:47:29.739 --> 0:47:32.889
<v Speaker 2>with American diplomats in the Cold War. Government to government

0:47:32.889 --> 0:47:36.290
<v Speaker 2>relations were also very close. You could trust the United States.

0:47:36.750 --> 0:47:39.649
<v Speaker 2>And the United States will always try to listen to

0:47:39.649 --> 0:47:42.209
<v Speaker 2>you and deal with you and understand your concerns and

0:47:42.209 --> 0:47:46.729
<v Speaker 2>all that. Uh, and you know, the height of that

0:47:46.729 --> 0:47:49.250
<v Speaker 2>I saw when Mr. Lee Kuan Yew went to United

0:47:49.250 --> 0:47:53.100
<v Speaker 2>States in 1985 and gave a speech at the joint

0:47:53.100 --> 0:47:56.169
<v Speaker 2>session of the US Congress saying thank you, United States

0:47:56.169 --> 0:48:01.820
<v Speaker 2>for creating a rules-based order whereby you guarantee us that

0:48:01.820 --> 0:48:04.290
<v Speaker 2>small states can grow and thrive and do well, right?

0:48:05.100 --> 0:48:08.779
<v Speaker 2>So you, they have soft powered individuals and soft power

0:48:08.780 --> 0:48:11.739
<v Speaker 2>with governments. Now I would say the soft power with

0:48:11.739 --> 0:48:16.419
<v Speaker 2>individuals still remains. Uh, people still believe, still dream of

0:48:16.419 --> 0:48:18.770
<v Speaker 2>going to the United States to live and work in.

0:48:19.340 --> 0:48:21.689
<v Speaker 2>But I would say the soft power with governments is

0:48:21.689 --> 0:48:23.339
<v Speaker 2>at an all-time low.

0:48:24.260 --> 0:48:27.020
<v Speaker 2>Because especially, and this is where Donald Trump is going

0:48:27.020 --> 0:48:30.899
<v Speaker 2>to do the biggest amount of damage, because Donald Trump's

0:48:30.899 --> 0:48:34.500
<v Speaker 2>message to every country is, I don't care what you've

0:48:34.500 --> 0:48:38.330
<v Speaker 2>done for me in the past. That's irrelevant to me.

0:48:38.699 --> 0:48:40.739
<v Speaker 2>What have you done for me lately?

0:48:41.409 --> 0:48:47.159
<v Speaker 2>And also in a more fundamental way, the rules that Mr.

0:48:47.169 --> 0:48:51.010
<v Speaker 2>Lee Kuan Yeww praised the United States for creating, one

0:48:51.010 --> 0:48:54.209
<v Speaker 2>of the rules is you respect the territorial integrity of

0:48:54.209 --> 0:48:59.939
<v Speaker 2>sovereign states. Trump is overthrowing. He's telling Panama, your canal

0:48:59.939 --> 0:49:03.919
<v Speaker 2>belongs to me. He's telling Denmark, Greenland belongs to me.

0:49:05.340 --> 0:49:08.669
<v Speaker 2>Now, I can tell you that every government around the

0:49:08.669 --> 0:49:09.620
<v Speaker 2>world is asking.

0:49:10.800 --> 0:49:13.600
<v Speaker 2>What happens if Trump comes and says, I want a

0:49:13.600 --> 0:49:14.729
<v Speaker 2>slice of this from you?

0:49:17.830 --> 0:49:18.919
<v Speaker 2>How are you going to

0:49:19.909 --> 0:49:21.649
<v Speaker 2>Uh, tell him no, right?

0:49:22.419 --> 0:49:26.419
<v Speaker 2>And, and, you know, he's doing this to, not to

0:49:26.419 --> 0:49:28.489
<v Speaker 2>erstwhile adversaries.

0:49:29.320 --> 0:49:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Uh, of the United States. I mean, if he was

0:49:32.000 --> 0:49:36.639
<v Speaker 2>doing this to North Korea or Iran, uh, you can

0:49:36.639 --> 0:49:39.239
<v Speaker 2>understand this. He's doing, I mean, I can't think of

0:49:39.239 --> 0:49:40.109
<v Speaker 2>two countries.

0:49:40.760 --> 0:49:46.709
<v Speaker 2>That reveal the United States as much as the Canadian

0:49:46.709 --> 0:49:49.609
<v Speaker 2>and Danish governments that would have been the two governments

0:49:49.949 --> 0:49:54.719
<v Speaker 2>that would have revealed the United States. Now, United States.

0:49:55.780 --> 0:49:58.860
<v Speaker 2>Basically he's saying, excuse me.

0:49:59.560 --> 0:50:04.020
<v Speaker 2>You've been to my will, right? And just imagine if

0:50:04.020 --> 0:50:07.379
<v Speaker 2>China did the same thing with the Philippines, there will

0:50:07.379 --> 0:50:10.290
<v Speaker 2>be this huge uproar in the Anglo-Saxon media.

0:50:11.179 --> 0:50:12.989
<v Speaker 2>But the US is doing it.

0:50:16.639 --> 0:50:21.389
<v Speaker 1>So, finally, Yushu, um maybe we move away from China

0:50:21.389 --> 0:50:25.280
<v Speaker 1>um and come back to our little island of Singapore. Um,

0:50:26.040 --> 0:50:31.639
<v Speaker 1>Singapore's role in this world where China US relationships sometimes evolve,

0:50:31.919 --> 0:50:35.520
<v Speaker 1>sometimes deal making, but it is a challenging one. Singapore

0:50:35.520 --> 0:50:39.520
<v Speaker 1>wants to be open to everyone and uh it is conceivable,

0:50:39.639 --> 0:50:41.879
<v Speaker 1>not guaranteed, but conceivable that at some point Donald Trump

0:50:41.879 --> 0:50:44.840
<v Speaker 1>makes it difficult for Singapore to keep its open relationship

0:50:44.840 --> 0:50:45.919
<v Speaker 1>with China and others.

0:50:46.360 --> 0:50:50.029
<v Speaker 1>Um, what is Singapore's strategy in situations like this?

0:50:50.439 --> 0:50:55.799
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think the Singapore's strength, uh, is that is

0:50:55.800 --> 0:51:00.540
<v Speaker 2>the exact opposite of the Philippines. It's very consistent over

0:51:00.540 --> 0:51:01.158
<v Speaker 2>the long term.

0:51:02.360 --> 0:51:06.379
<v Speaker 2>Doesn't switch. So Prime Minister after Prime Minister after prime

0:51:06.379 --> 0:51:09.049
<v Speaker 2>minister has said, we want to be good friends with

0:51:09.050 --> 0:51:11.649
<v Speaker 2>the United States and we want to be good friends

0:51:11.649 --> 0:51:14.259
<v Speaker 2>with China. But it wasn't a problem when the United

0:51:14.260 --> 0:51:17.820
<v Speaker 2>States and China were getting along, but the first leader

0:51:17.820 --> 0:51:21.699
<v Speaker 2>in the world to come out openly to say that

0:51:21.699 --> 0:51:22.979
<v Speaker 2>we will not take sides.

0:51:23.919 --> 0:51:27.379
<v Speaker 2>In the in between United States and China was the

0:51:27.379 --> 0:51:31.219
<v Speaker 2>then Prime Minister, uh, Mr. Lee Hsien Loong, who said

0:51:31.219 --> 0:51:33.379
<v Speaker 2>at the Shangri-La Dialogue and who followed up with an

0:51:33.379 --> 0:51:36.779
<v Speaker 2>article in the magazine Foreign Affairs saying Singapore will be

0:51:36.780 --> 0:51:39.509
<v Speaker 2>friends with the US and Singapore be friends with China.

0:51:39.899 --> 0:51:43.459
<v Speaker 2>But at the same time, you see, Singaporeans are realistic

0:51:43.459 --> 0:51:48.139
<v Speaker 2>enough to know that it will not be easy, that

0:51:48.139 --> 0:51:50.299
<v Speaker 2>things will get more difficult.

0:51:50.870 --> 0:51:55.209
<v Speaker 2>Uh, especially with, uh, you know, a leader like Donald

0:51:55.209 --> 0:51:58.729
<v Speaker 2>Trump who doesn't care what you, what you did for

0:51:58.729 --> 0:52:03.049
<v Speaker 2>him many years ago. So I would say, therefore, that

0:52:03.050 --> 0:52:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Singapore has to be very, very careful.

0:52:07.540 --> 0:52:12.949
<v Speaker 2>Uh, and make sure that no event happens that triggers,

0:52:13.139 --> 0:52:17.399
<v Speaker 2>you know, uh, uh, a situation where you're, uh, forced

0:52:17.399 --> 0:52:19.509
<v Speaker 2>to take sides. So you got to be very, very

0:52:19.919 --> 0:52:26.120
<v Speaker 2>vigilant and make sure that nothing comes close to your shores,

0:52:26.520 --> 0:52:31.280
<v Speaker 2>which affects you having to make a choice between uh

0:52:31.280 --> 0:52:33.469
<v Speaker 2>US and China. But of course, at the same time,

0:52:33.800 --> 0:52:37.029
<v Speaker 2>you got to step up your substantive ties with both countries.

0:52:37.570 --> 0:52:40.340
<v Speaker 2>And, and here I must say that the good news

0:52:40.340 --> 0:52:43.689
<v Speaker 2>is that the United States doesn't have a trade deficit

0:52:43.689 --> 0:52:46.300
<v Speaker 2>with Singapore. See that being flagged in the media, it

0:52:46.300 --> 0:52:50.580
<v Speaker 2>has a trade surplus with Singapore. And fortunately for us,

0:52:50.800 --> 0:52:54.149
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump knows a little bit about Singapore and admire

0:52:54.149 --> 0:52:57.658
<v Speaker 2>Singapore because when somebody asked him, why did you bring

0:52:57.659 --> 0:53:00.620
<v Speaker 2>Kim Jong-un to Singapore to meet him.

0:53:01.750 --> 0:53:03.339
<v Speaker 2>And he's uh.

0:53:04.219 --> 0:53:06.580
<v Speaker 2>His answer was that I wanted Kim Jong-un to see

0:53:06.580 --> 0:53:10.020
<v Speaker 2>a successful country like Singapore so that he could model

0:53:10.020 --> 0:53:14.779
<v Speaker 2>North Korea and Singapore. And, and that frankly, uh, is

0:53:14.780 --> 0:53:18.820
<v Speaker 2>worth something, the fact that Donald Trump respects uh and

0:53:18.820 --> 0:53:25.270
<v Speaker 2>admire Singapore, but in the event of uh something coming up,

0:53:25.699 --> 0:53:30.340
<v Speaker 2>don't count on uh loyalty from Donald Trump. Uh, he

0:53:30.340 --> 0:53:32.620
<v Speaker 2>doesn't know what the word loyalty means at all.

0:53:33.250 --> 0:53:38.320
<v Speaker 1>So, on that very realistic sober note, Kiswa Mahawai, thank

0:53:38.320 --> 0:53:40.530
<v Speaker 1>you so much for your time and insights. My pleasure.

0:53:40.719 --> 0:53:43.199
<v Speaker 1>It's great to have you and thanks to our listeners

0:53:43.199 --> 0:53:46.159
<v Speaker 1>as well. Copy Time was produced by Martin Delrich.

0:53:46.709 --> 0:53:50.030
<v Speaker 1>Uh, ballad Lee and Daisy Sherma provided additional assistance. All

0:53:50.030 --> 0:53:54.020
<v Speaker 1>147 episodes of the podcast are available on YouTube, also

0:53:54.020 --> 0:53:58.500
<v Speaker 1>on Apple, Google, and Spotify. As for our research publications, webinars,

0:53:58.750 --> 0:54:01.389
<v Speaker 1>and live streams, you can find them all by Googling

0:54:01.389 --> 0:54:03.629
<v Speaker 1>Devious Research Library. Have a great day.