WEBVTT - Patriots Catch-22 12/26: 3 Up/Down vs. Bills, Chargers Preview, NFL Draft Talk

0:00:30.618 --> 0:00:34.657
<v Speaker 1>Patriots Unfiltered the world's original podcast. Patriots Unfiltered brings you

0:00:34.698 --> 0:00:38.818
<v Speaker 1>inside Jillette Stadium for rousing conversations on everything New England, Patriots,

0:00:38.857 --> 0:00:42.658
<v Speaker 1>and NFL. Join host Fred Kersh alongside Patriots dot COM's

0:00:42.658 --> 0:00:46.098
<v Speaker 1>Paul Parillo, Mike Deso, Evan Lazar, Tamara Brown, and Alex

0:00:46.138 --> 0:00:48.898
<v Speaker 1>Francisco as they bring you in depth coverage of the team.

0:00:48.977 --> 0:00:51.098
<v Speaker 2>He's a red shirt rookie at that point, so it's

0:00:51.138 --> 0:00:53.978
<v Speaker 2>really that's his rookie season essentially too, so now we're

0:00:53.978 --> 0:00:56.018
<v Speaker 2>really not talking about them, really knowing.

0:00:56.138 --> 0:01:04.937
<v Speaker 1>Search for Patriots Unfiltered anywhere you get your podcasts. This

0:01:05.057 --> 0:01:08.378
<v Speaker 1>is the Patriots Catch twenty two podcasts with Evan Lazar

0:01:08.497 --> 0:01:09.417
<v Speaker 1>and Alex Barth.

0:01:09.497 --> 0:01:13.418
<v Speaker 2>I'm Lazar b and Lazarre. Hello, everybody nailed it joined

0:01:13.418 --> 0:01:15.697
<v Speaker 2>as always, buy our bark.

0:01:18.858 --> 0:01:21.418
<v Speaker 3>Here is Evan Lazar and Alex bars.

0:01:23.018 --> 0:01:26.137
<v Speaker 2>All right, everybody, what's up? It feels good to be

0:01:26.298 --> 0:01:29.978
<v Speaker 2>here on a holiday Thursday here at Jalette Stadium and

0:01:30.858 --> 0:01:33.498
<v Speaker 2>festive day here today. Got some free sushi that was

0:01:33.618 --> 0:01:37.578
<v Speaker 2>nice Karma Sushi. Shout out to Karma Sushi, and we

0:01:37.618 --> 0:01:41.698
<v Speaker 2>appreciated that here today. So I've definitely got a full stomach,

0:01:41.697 --> 0:01:44.417
<v Speaker 2>and now we're gonna talk some football, which is always

0:01:44.458 --> 0:01:48.418
<v Speaker 2>fun and a pretty basic normal show here today. I

0:01:48.458 --> 0:01:50.818
<v Speaker 2>know there's gonna be a lot of draft questions as always,

0:01:50.858 --> 0:01:53.138
<v Speaker 2>and we're going to get to them in the second hour.

0:01:53.178 --> 0:01:55.858
<v Speaker 2>We're going to talk a little Patriots bills here in

0:01:55.858 --> 0:01:58.858
<v Speaker 2>the first hour as well as we always do. And

0:01:59.418 --> 0:02:02.138
<v Speaker 2>Alex is also here. Hi, I am here, yep. In

0:02:02.218 --> 0:02:05.058
<v Speaker 2>case you didn't know, Alex also here also on ninety

0:02:05.098 --> 0:02:07.218
<v Speaker 2>eight five the Sports Hub quite a bit this week. Yep.

0:02:07.498 --> 0:02:08.258
<v Speaker 4>Holiday season.

0:02:08.377 --> 0:02:11.058
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's it's your time to shine. It's the holiday

0:02:11.138 --> 0:02:14.738
<v Speaker 2>filling schedule, it's this is the Alex Barthes Show. Great.

0:02:14.898 --> 0:02:16.818
<v Speaker 4>I had a great show this morning with with Andrew

0:02:16.858 --> 0:02:17.898
<v Speaker 4>Callahan and Kendrim Middleton.

0:02:17.938 --> 0:02:18.817
<v Speaker 2>Honestly, it was a ton of fun.

0:02:18.858 --> 0:02:21.418
<v Speaker 4>I haven't worked I've worked with Kenda two or three times,

0:02:21.418 --> 0:02:23.898
<v Speaker 4>hadn't obviously no Andrew, but hadn't been on the radio

0:02:23.938 --> 0:02:25.658
<v Speaker 4>with him before today, done podcast, But it was a

0:02:25.658 --> 0:02:26.058
<v Speaker 4>good show.

0:02:26.298 --> 0:02:29.898
<v Speaker 2>You you are the star of ninety eight five. This

0:02:29.938 --> 0:02:32.018
<v Speaker 2>time of year, I won't go you are you are?

0:02:32.257 --> 0:02:34.018
<v Speaker 2>You are on the you are on TV The other

0:02:34.098 --> 0:02:34.657
<v Speaker 2>day too.

0:02:34.618 --> 0:02:37.897
<v Speaker 4>I was You're on TV Film TV tomorrow with Bill

0:02:37.938 --> 0:02:38.898
<v Speaker 4>Perry tend to too.

0:02:38.938 --> 0:02:41.857
<v Speaker 2>Love that, love that. So before we get rolling here

0:02:42.138 --> 0:02:44.298
<v Speaker 2>now and now that I've ribbed Alex enough for for

0:02:44.418 --> 0:02:47.137
<v Speaker 2>being the star of ninety eight five for the next week. Uh, Hey,

0:02:47.138 --> 0:02:49.338
<v Speaker 2>Patriots fans, if you want to see Toyota's best offers,

0:02:49.377 --> 0:02:52.298
<v Speaker 2>including those not seen on TV, go by go to

0:02:52.458 --> 0:02:56.377
<v Speaker 2>buy Atoto. Toyota dot Com is Toyota's official website for

0:02:56.458 --> 0:02:59.538
<v Speaker 2>deals from the official vehicle of the New England Patriots,

0:02:59.578 --> 0:03:02.898
<v Speaker 2>Toyota let's go places and easy to drink, easy to enjoy,

0:03:03.058 --> 0:03:06.218
<v Speaker 2>but like the official beer sponsor of your New England Patriots.

0:03:06.218 --> 0:03:09.938
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's talk a little bit of Bill's Patriots here,

0:03:10.058 --> 0:03:14.738
<v Speaker 2>and uh, my reaction after this game was met with

0:03:14.738 --> 0:03:18.018
<v Speaker 2>with some hostility. I would say some pushback, pushback, some

0:03:18.058 --> 0:03:22.378
<v Speaker 2>better word, some pushback, because I I gave the Patriots

0:03:22.418 --> 0:03:25.898
<v Speaker 2>some flowers in this game for competing against a much

0:03:25.978 --> 0:03:30.538
<v Speaker 2>much better Buffalo Bill's team. And there are certainly nippicks

0:03:30.657 --> 0:03:34.298
<v Speaker 2>of their coaching performance on Sunday, almost as Saturday, I'll

0:03:34.338 --> 0:03:37.858
<v Speaker 2>thrown off. There's certainly nitpicks of their performance on Sunday,

0:03:37.858 --> 0:03:39.578
<v Speaker 2>which I'm sure we will get to. We were actually

0:03:40.298 --> 0:03:43.618
<v Speaker 2>texting about this when I was traveling back and I

0:03:43.658 --> 0:03:45.298
<v Speaker 2>was texting with you and we were kind of in

0:03:45.338 --> 0:03:48.218
<v Speaker 2>disagreement on this then. I don't know if your opinions

0:03:48.258 --> 0:03:51.538
<v Speaker 2>have changed too much, but we'll get to that. My

0:03:51.618 --> 0:03:56.778
<v Speaker 2>biggest takeaway from this game against the Bills is I

0:03:56.898 --> 0:04:01.338
<v Speaker 2>wanted to see proof of concept from Girodmeo and his

0:04:01.458 --> 0:04:09.298
<v Speaker 2>coaching staff that they could go into it and coach

0:04:09.338 --> 0:04:14.378
<v Speaker 2>a game with a concise, clear plan that they could execute.

0:04:14.778 --> 0:04:18.218
<v Speaker 2>It's one thing to have all these grandiose ideas of, oh,

0:04:18.258 --> 0:04:21.658
<v Speaker 2>this is how we're gonna contend or beat Buffalo, but

0:04:21.698 --> 0:04:24.977
<v Speaker 2>the reality is that their team and their personnel cannot

0:04:25.018 --> 0:04:29.498
<v Speaker 2>necessarily execute the most complicated or the most sophisticated of

0:04:29.618 --> 0:04:33.217
<v Speaker 2>game plans. So do you have a game plan that

0:04:33.337 --> 0:04:36.698
<v Speaker 2>not only makes sense for how your strains versus the

0:04:36.738 --> 0:04:39.698
<v Speaker 2>Bills weaknesses and what you could do to beat the Bills,

0:04:40.097 --> 0:04:42.338
<v Speaker 2>that you can also execute? And that's the name of

0:04:42.378 --> 0:04:46.298
<v Speaker 2>the game, right that's coaching and going into this game offensively.

0:04:46.818 --> 0:04:49.498
<v Speaker 2>I think we all were refreshed by the fact that

0:04:49.538 --> 0:04:52.858
<v Speaker 2>they went out there and took Drake may first spin

0:04:52.977 --> 0:04:54.777
<v Speaker 2>a little bit, you know, let him run around a

0:04:54.778 --> 0:04:57.058
<v Speaker 2>little bit let him throw down the field early on

0:04:57.097 --> 0:04:59.178
<v Speaker 2>in this game against man coverage, which I thought was

0:04:59.658 --> 0:05:03.097
<v Speaker 2>crucial to their fast start, was actually taking some shots

0:05:03.457 --> 0:05:06.058
<v Speaker 2>against press man and allowing him to go make plays

0:05:06.097 --> 0:05:08.498
<v Speaker 2>when he sees man to man coverage instead of what

0:05:08.538 --> 0:05:12.298
<v Speaker 2>they did to against Arizona. And the second thing defensively,

0:05:12.337 --> 0:05:14.978
<v Speaker 2>I was even more impressed. And this goes to another

0:05:15.018 --> 0:05:19.058
<v Speaker 2>big picture thing that I wanted to point out. This

0:05:19.217 --> 0:05:24.738
<v Speaker 2>was truly the first time that Gerrodmeo and DeMarcus Covington,

0:05:25.258 --> 0:05:30.017
<v Speaker 2>in their respective roles, currently played Josh Allen. And I

0:05:30.097 --> 0:05:32.017
<v Speaker 2>know that we have a little bit of different opinion

0:05:32.058 --> 0:05:35.017
<v Speaker 2>on Josh Allen, but the point is is that Josh

0:05:35.058 --> 0:05:37.698
<v Speaker 2>Allen is the king of the division right now and

0:05:38.217 --> 0:05:41.938
<v Speaker 2>he's not going anywhere anytime soon. The Bills aren't going anywhere.

0:05:42.217 --> 0:05:45.338
<v Speaker 2>Josh Allen's not going anywhere. So in order for this

0:05:45.418 --> 0:05:48.577
<v Speaker 2>regime to get where they want to go, even if

0:05:48.577 --> 0:05:50.777
<v Speaker 2>it's two to three years from now, they need to

0:05:50.818 --> 0:05:54.138
<v Speaker 2>start laying the foundation of how we are going to

0:05:54.178 --> 0:05:57.217
<v Speaker 2>play defense against Josh Allen and go out there and

0:05:57.258 --> 0:06:00.338
<v Speaker 2>find a way to solve this problem that really goes

0:06:00.378 --> 0:06:03.457
<v Speaker 2>back to twenty twenty, where they've more or less other

0:06:03.538 --> 0:06:06.537
<v Speaker 2>than a win aided twenty twenty one game, have not

0:06:06.658 --> 0:06:09.577
<v Speaker 2>had a lot of answers for Josh Allen. So in

0:06:09.618 --> 0:06:12.138
<v Speaker 2>this game, I felt like defensively, they had two clear

0:06:12.217 --> 0:06:15.177
<v Speaker 2>concise goals. Keep him in the pocket, and we're going

0:06:15.258 --> 0:06:17.898
<v Speaker 2>to play man to man coverage and to your point

0:06:17.977 --> 0:06:20.418
<v Speaker 2>your side of the street a little bit. A big

0:06:20.457 --> 0:06:23.177
<v Speaker 2>part of that man to man coverage to me was

0:06:23.178 --> 0:06:25.738
<v Speaker 2>that they no longer have Stefan Diggs, so there's not

0:06:26.018 --> 0:06:29.138
<v Speaker 2>this trump card that Buffalo can throw at you where

0:06:29.138 --> 0:06:32.498
<v Speaker 2>they have this receiver that is uncoverable in man to

0:06:32.577 --> 0:06:37.297
<v Speaker 2>man one on one. And so the Patriots, I felt like, said, well,

0:06:37.938 --> 0:06:40.778
<v Speaker 2>if we take Allen's skill players out of the game

0:06:40.977 --> 0:06:44.218
<v Speaker 2>by playing type man to man coverage and sort of

0:06:44.258 --> 0:06:47.658
<v Speaker 2>bait him into playing hero ball from the pocket, then

0:06:47.698 --> 0:06:49.818
<v Speaker 2>we have a much better chance than if we back

0:06:49.857 --> 0:06:51.577
<v Speaker 2>off and we play this off zone and we let

0:06:51.618 --> 0:06:54.058
<v Speaker 2>him pick us apart underneath. And that's what they went

0:06:54.097 --> 0:06:55.978
<v Speaker 2>out there and did, and I thought the defense really

0:06:56.058 --> 0:06:59.298
<v Speaker 2>executed the game plan flawlessly in the passing game. There

0:06:59.337 --> 0:07:02.017
<v Speaker 2>was obviously issues in the run game, but seventeen points

0:07:02.058 --> 0:07:04.938
<v Speaker 2>allowed in one hundred and fifty six passing yards for

0:07:05.018 --> 0:07:07.777
<v Speaker 2>Josh Allen. I'll take that any day of the week,

0:07:07.818 --> 0:07:10.498
<v Speaker 2>Like that's a game that you will absolutely take against

0:07:10.538 --> 0:07:11.258
<v Speaker 2>that quarterback.

0:07:11.498 --> 0:07:14.498
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think this is remember the uh is the

0:07:14.578 --> 0:07:18.018
<v Speaker 4>dress blue and black or white and gold? Remember that

0:07:18.098 --> 0:07:19.938
<v Speaker 4>thing from the internet. I think this game is kind

0:07:19.938 --> 0:07:22.178
<v Speaker 4>of that with the coaching and in reality it's both.

0:07:22.218 --> 0:07:24.338
<v Speaker 4>But everybody's gonna fall on one side of the street.

0:07:24.578 --> 0:07:27.018
<v Speaker 4>I agree with everything you said from the game plan side,

0:07:27.018 --> 0:07:28.857
<v Speaker 4>and this is we didn't disagree on it. We were

0:07:28.898 --> 0:07:31.098
<v Speaker 4>just focused on different things. I agree with you hundred

0:07:31.098 --> 0:07:31.417
<v Speaker 4>percent on.

0:07:31.418 --> 0:07:32.538
<v Speaker 2>The game plan side.

0:07:32.618 --> 0:07:34.698
<v Speaker 4>I thought they came in with a good plan offensively

0:07:34.778 --> 0:07:37.938
<v Speaker 4>and defensively. Offensively, as the game went on, it maybe didn't.

0:07:37.938 --> 0:07:40.098
<v Speaker 4>They didn't adapt as well as they could have. Defensively,

0:07:40.138 --> 0:07:43.057
<v Speaker 4>I think they did. It helped that the Bills just

0:07:43.098 --> 0:07:45.498
<v Speaker 4>refused to run the ball, which is hilarious. Let's not

0:07:45.498 --> 0:07:48.098
<v Speaker 4>give Sean McDermott too much credit here, But I thought

0:07:48.098 --> 0:07:50.018
<v Speaker 4>they came in with a good plan. I thought the

0:07:50.058 --> 0:07:52.137
<v Speaker 4>team looked prepared. The team came in with that energy.

0:07:52.178 --> 0:07:54.858
<v Speaker 4>The team came in ready to go, which coming off

0:07:54.857 --> 0:07:57.658
<v Speaker 4>that Cardinals game was night and day, so the preparation

0:07:57.818 --> 0:07:59.338
<v Speaker 4>the week leading up to it. I think the coaching

0:07:59.338 --> 0:08:01.058
<v Speaker 4>staff deserves a ton of credit for the plan they

0:08:01.058 --> 0:08:04.818
<v Speaker 4>put together. The flip side is the game management stuff

0:08:04.818 --> 0:08:07.778
<v Speaker 4>still needs work. Some of the punt non punt decisions.

0:08:08.058 --> 0:08:11.258
<v Speaker 4>I thought they missed a good shot at challenging a play,

0:08:12.218 --> 0:08:17.018
<v Speaker 4>some of the clock management that is still where there

0:08:17.138 --> 0:08:19.178
<v Speaker 4>is room to grow. And look, it's good to see

0:08:19.538 --> 0:08:22.258
<v Speaker 4>the game plan stuff, and I'm not discounting any of that.

0:08:22.818 --> 0:08:25.618
<v Speaker 4>I just think that it's weird because I thought the

0:08:25.658 --> 0:08:28.218
<v Speaker 4>most encouraging thing from this game was the coaching in

0:08:28.298 --> 0:08:30.817
<v Speaker 4>terms of the game plan. The least encouraging thing was

0:08:30.857 --> 0:08:32.818
<v Speaker 4>the coaching in terms of the end game management. So

0:08:33.338 --> 0:08:35.298
<v Speaker 4>kind of both sides of the street for them. The

0:08:35.338 --> 0:08:37.618
<v Speaker 4>game management stuff you can learn, you can get better at,

0:08:37.737 --> 0:08:39.257
<v Speaker 4>but there is room to grow there.

0:08:39.698 --> 0:08:40.818
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a fair take.

0:08:40.938 --> 0:08:43.017
<v Speaker 4>I just you just don't care about the game management stuff,

0:08:43.018 --> 0:08:44.218
<v Speaker 4>so you'll out the window.

0:08:44.338 --> 0:08:47.857
<v Speaker 2>I don't because I don't see you for this team

0:08:47.977 --> 0:08:50.618
<v Speaker 2>right now. I'm not sure what it matters, like the

0:08:50.658 --> 0:08:52.938
<v Speaker 2>most important thing for this team right but it's.

0:08:52.778 --> 0:08:55.378
<v Speaker 4>Not about right now. Again, it's about that projection. At

0:08:55.418 --> 0:08:57.178
<v Speaker 4>a certain point, they're gonna have to get better at that.

0:08:57.498 --> 0:08:59.338
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but you can develop that skill.

0:08:59.418 --> 0:09:02.497
<v Speaker 4>I just it's the most important. You've seen them develop

0:09:02.538 --> 0:09:04.018
<v Speaker 4>it over the course of this year.

0:09:04.298 --> 0:09:06.658
<v Speaker 2>No, but the most important thing to me right now

0:09:06.737 --> 0:09:09.298
<v Speaker 2>is winning during the week, Like, can you win Monday

0:09:09.298 --> 0:09:09.857
<v Speaker 2>through Saturday?

0:09:09.938 --> 0:09:11.658
<v Speaker 4>I think the most important thing is winning on Sunday,

0:09:11.698 --> 0:09:13.338
<v Speaker 4>and you do that by winning during the week.

0:09:13.418 --> 0:09:15.418
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, you can't just say you do it.

0:09:15.497 --> 0:09:17.178
<v Speaker 4>I hate, Well, we had a good week of practice

0:09:17.178 --> 0:09:19.578
<v Speaker 4>and we lost so well, Like, no, there is ways

0:09:19.617 --> 0:09:21.258
<v Speaker 4>they can be better during the game too.

0:09:21.418 --> 0:09:24.177
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't disagree with that. I just I think

0:09:24.218 --> 0:09:28.178
<v Speaker 2>as a three win rebuilding operation, the most important thing

0:09:28.298 --> 0:09:31.657
<v Speaker 2>is proving that you can put together game plan, practice

0:09:31.698 --> 0:09:33.818
<v Speaker 2>it during the week, take it from the classroom to

0:09:33.857 --> 0:09:36.418
<v Speaker 2>the practice field to the game field, and go out

0:09:36.418 --> 0:09:38.857
<v Speaker 2>there and play a competitive product of football. Like if

0:09:38.898 --> 0:09:40.898
<v Speaker 2>you want to sit here and nitpick that they punted,

0:09:41.178 --> 0:09:43.538
<v Speaker 2>you know, the fourth down punt in the fourth quarter

0:09:43.617 --> 0:09:46.658
<v Speaker 2>that everybody's going crazy about, then sure, like I understand

0:09:46.658 --> 0:09:50.657
<v Speaker 2>that that's you know, it was not an aggressive decision, right,

0:09:50.698 --> 0:09:54.537
<v Speaker 2>that was for a lot of people. I would say

0:09:54.578 --> 0:09:57.338
<v Speaker 2>that decision to punt there was to keep the game close,

0:09:57.538 --> 0:09:59.818
<v Speaker 2>so that on the scoreboard, they weren't getting blown out

0:09:59.818 --> 0:10:03.298
<v Speaker 2>by seventeen points. And maybe that's true, but I just

0:10:03.778 --> 0:10:06.458
<v Speaker 2>again what I come back to with this coaching staff

0:10:06.857 --> 0:10:11.177
<v Speaker 2>is I am far more concerned with Monday through Saturday

0:10:11.418 --> 0:10:14.617
<v Speaker 2>with this team right now. Can you go out there

0:10:15.218 --> 0:10:18.458
<v Speaker 2>and know what you need to do? You know, it's

0:10:18.497 --> 0:10:20.938
<v Speaker 2>one of those things with Bill where he would you know,

0:10:20.977 --> 0:10:23.377
<v Speaker 2>always get up in front of the team and he

0:10:23.418 --> 0:10:26.618
<v Speaker 2>would have like three things, four things for us to

0:10:26.658 --> 0:10:29.418
<v Speaker 2>win this game. We absolutely need to check these four

0:10:29.458 --> 0:10:32.737
<v Speaker 2>boxes right. And I'm not talking about like the catch

0:10:32.818 --> 0:10:35.098
<v Speaker 2>alls like don't turn the ball over, and like those

0:10:35.137 --> 0:10:36.898
<v Speaker 2>are all every week. You don't want to turn the

0:10:36.938 --> 0:10:39.258
<v Speaker 2>ball over and you don't want to beat yourself. But

0:10:39.617 --> 0:10:42.737
<v Speaker 2>I'm talking more about you know, really minutia, exs and no's,

0:10:42.857 --> 0:10:46.018
<v Speaker 2>Like we are going to keep Josh Allen contained in

0:10:46.058 --> 0:10:49.218
<v Speaker 2>the pocket, and this is exactly how we're gonna do it.

0:10:49.458 --> 0:10:52.458
<v Speaker 2>Whether it's a four man rush, mush rush, or it's

0:10:52.737 --> 0:10:55.098
<v Speaker 2>a rush one guy gets to rush because we're gonna

0:10:55.098 --> 0:10:57.298
<v Speaker 2>funnel him out of the pocket this way, and then

0:10:57.298 --> 0:10:59.498
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna have a spy that's gonna close the pocket,

0:10:59.497 --> 0:11:01.058
<v Speaker 2>which is what they did a lot in this game

0:11:01.098 --> 0:11:04.058
<v Speaker 2>with Josh Allen was you know, using guys like Brandon

0:11:04.098 --> 0:11:07.697
<v Speaker 2>Schooler as a spy on the quarterback and then allowing

0:11:07.778 --> 0:11:11.418
<v Speaker 2>like one rusher to tee off right and the other

0:11:11.458 --> 0:11:15.058
<v Speaker 2>three guys their job or their responsibility was to try

0:11:15.058 --> 0:11:17.698
<v Speaker 2>to push him in a certain direction, and then Schooler

0:11:17.778 --> 0:11:20.417
<v Speaker 2>came wrapped around in that direction and sort of closed

0:11:20.458 --> 0:11:24.538
<v Speaker 2>the pocket. Like the coordination of that rush plan don't

0:11:24.578 --> 0:11:27.098
<v Speaker 2>look like to me with this pass rush, I know

0:11:27.137 --> 0:11:28.657
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people are making a big deal to

0:11:28.737 --> 0:11:31.498
<v Speaker 2>sort of out a key on Whitez, like let's slide

0:11:31.578 --> 0:11:33.898
<v Speaker 2>here that he hasn't been as productive, Like to me,

0:11:34.137 --> 0:11:36.657
<v Speaker 2>this is not this was not about that, Like you're

0:11:36.698 --> 0:11:40.857
<v Speaker 2>not grading this game looking at quarterback pressures in sack numbers.

0:11:40.938 --> 0:11:45.098
<v Speaker 2>Like to me, they went into this game defensively and

0:11:45.137 --> 0:11:48.537
<v Speaker 2>they said, we probably aren't gonna sack Josh Allen like

0:11:48.658 --> 0:11:51.218
<v Speaker 2>he's he's probably he's hard. He's hard enough to sack

0:11:51.257 --> 0:11:53.378
<v Speaker 2>as it is because of his mobility and his size.

0:11:53.538 --> 0:11:56.058
<v Speaker 2>They have a good offensive line, they get the ball

0:11:56.098 --> 0:11:59.018
<v Speaker 2>out quickly, and there's the nature of this offense. We're

0:11:59.017 --> 0:12:01.737
<v Speaker 2>not gonna necessarily get after Josh Allen in this game,

0:12:01.938 --> 0:12:03.818
<v Speaker 2>so we're just gonna try to contain them and keep

0:12:03.898 --> 0:12:05.857
<v Speaker 2>him in the pocket and make him meet us from

0:12:05.898 --> 0:12:08.298
<v Speaker 2>the pocket, and then we're gonna take the receivers out.

0:12:08.338 --> 0:12:11.578
<v Speaker 2>And they went out there and they did that offensively.

0:12:11.778 --> 0:12:13.538
<v Speaker 2>It was great to see some of the throws down

0:12:13.538 --> 0:12:15.098
<v Speaker 2>the field. It was great to see a couple of

0:12:15.137 --> 0:12:18.578
<v Speaker 2>design quarterback runs for Drake may So. Yeah, like, do

0:12:18.617 --> 0:12:20.777
<v Speaker 2>you want to you know, the punt, Like you didn't

0:12:20.857 --> 0:12:22.178
<v Speaker 2>like the punt? Okay, like what else?

0:12:22.298 --> 0:12:22.378
<v Speaker 5>Like?

0:12:22.418 --> 0:12:24.258
<v Speaker 2>I guess what else didn't you like about the game

0:12:24.298 --> 0:12:27.938
<v Speaker 2>management stuff? Specifically the punt I didn't love.

0:12:28.377 --> 0:12:29.497
<v Speaker 4>I would have challenged.

0:12:29.538 --> 0:12:31.218
<v Speaker 2>So the third.

0:12:30.898 --> 0:12:35.898
<v Speaker 4>Down, not on the fake punt, drive the drive before

0:12:36.178 --> 0:12:42.218
<v Speaker 4>second quarter incomplete, incomplete. Kendrick Bourne catches a comeback. He's

0:12:42.257 --> 0:12:44.257
<v Speaker 4>like in mid air when he catches the defender drives

0:12:44.298 --> 0:12:46.298
<v Speaker 4>him back. They marked him a full yard short, and

0:12:46.338 --> 0:12:47.977
<v Speaker 4>I know those players are tough to overturn, but it's

0:12:47.977 --> 0:12:50.058
<v Speaker 4>the first half out of challenge. I think there's a

0:12:50.098 --> 0:12:51.818
<v Speaker 4>chance he got it. Even if he didn't get it,

0:12:51.857 --> 0:12:54.698
<v Speaker 4>you're inches away. Maybe they're more inclined to go for it.

0:12:54.778 --> 0:12:58.218
<v Speaker 4>We know they had that fake punt I didn't love

0:12:58.298 --> 0:13:00.538
<v Speaker 4>just as a whole, and it burned them one time

0:13:00.578 --> 0:13:03.618
<v Speaker 4>burned them. So after the fake punt, they have to

0:13:03.617 --> 0:13:05.778
<v Speaker 4>call time out instead of taking delay because they didn't

0:13:05.778 --> 0:13:08.698
<v Speaker 4>get the special teams off and the offense on on time.

0:13:09.257 --> 0:13:11.617
<v Speaker 4>And it's the second week in row something like that's happened.

0:13:11.617 --> 0:13:14.258
<v Speaker 4>They had the twenty nine yard run form Antonio Gibson

0:13:14.298 --> 0:13:16.218
<v Speaker 4>last week and have to call time out immediately after

0:13:16.218 --> 0:13:17.737
<v Speaker 4>because they can't get the play in. And it's like,

0:13:18.538 --> 0:13:21.137
<v Speaker 4>when you have these big plays, you want to keep

0:13:21.137 --> 0:13:22.658
<v Speaker 4>the defense on their heels. You want to keep them

0:13:22.658 --> 0:13:25.377
<v Speaker 4>backed up, especially after a fake punt the defense comes

0:13:25.418 --> 0:13:27.178
<v Speaker 4>off the field, I think they're done. They're kind of

0:13:27.218 --> 0:13:29.138
<v Speaker 4>resetting now. They got all of a sudden run back on.

0:13:29.617 --> 0:13:31.378
<v Speaker 4>When you call time out, you sort of lose some

0:13:31.418 --> 0:13:33.617
<v Speaker 4>of that momentum. And there were other instances in the game.

0:13:33.698 --> 0:13:36.018
<v Speaker 4>That was the most glaring, but there were other instances

0:13:36.017 --> 0:13:38.738
<v Speaker 4>in the game where they're either calling timeouts or they're

0:13:38.778 --> 0:13:41.058
<v Speaker 4>getting to the line with six seven seconds on the

0:13:41.058 --> 0:13:42.578
<v Speaker 4>play clock, Like you can't.

0:13:42.298 --> 0:13:42.898
<v Speaker 2>Be doing that.

0:13:43.857 --> 0:13:45.658
<v Speaker 4>It was almost Mike McDaniel.

0:13:45.298 --> 0:13:48.058
<v Speaker 2>Esku so I you just had to take a shot

0:13:48.058 --> 0:13:48.257
<v Speaker 2>at me.

0:13:48.377 --> 0:13:50.938
<v Speaker 4>I mean, had that game in Buffalo, that playoff game,

0:13:51.017 --> 0:13:53.378
<v Speaker 4>was that was so bad? How does he not figure

0:13:53.377 --> 0:13:56.098
<v Speaker 4>out the entire game? Just called the play earlier and

0:13:56.178 --> 0:13:58.897
<v Speaker 4>it's anyway you got to be able to get the

0:13:58.898 --> 0:14:01.818
<v Speaker 4>play calls on time. Like this is basic operational stuff

0:14:01.898 --> 0:14:05.137
<v Speaker 4>that Do they win the game? I don't know, but

0:14:05.178 --> 0:14:08.098
<v Speaker 4>it will help them be competitive and it cuts down

0:14:08.098 --> 0:14:08.537
<v Speaker 4>on some of.

0:14:08.497 --> 0:14:11.898
<v Speaker 2>That margin forrer. I like, I don't know, do they

0:14:11.898 --> 0:14:14.098
<v Speaker 2>win the game? Maybe maybe not? Certainly the one after

0:14:14.137 --> 0:14:16.138
<v Speaker 2>the fake punt you get the defense really back on

0:14:16.178 --> 0:14:17.218
<v Speaker 2>their heels. That helps.

0:14:17.257 --> 0:14:19.938
<v Speaker 4>Instead they punt again three plays later, so the fake

0:14:20.018 --> 0:14:21.138
<v Speaker 4>he kind of burned for nothing.

0:14:21.818 --> 0:14:25.458
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I hear what you're saying. I agree with a

0:14:25.498 --> 0:14:28.578
<v Speaker 2>lot of what you're saying. I guess I just to me,

0:14:29.018 --> 0:14:32.618
<v Speaker 2>you know, the stuff that you're talking about is I

0:14:32.658 --> 0:14:34.778
<v Speaker 2>will be more concerned about that kind of stuff like

0:14:34.818 --> 0:14:36.938
<v Speaker 2>a year or two from now when they are actually

0:14:37.018 --> 0:14:38.098
<v Speaker 2>supposed to be competing.

0:14:38.098 --> 0:14:40.498
<v Speaker 4>Okay, but why can't why can't they work on the

0:14:40.578 --> 0:14:42.538
<v Speaker 4>during the week stuff and the in game stuff. Why

0:14:42.618 --> 0:14:45.458
<v Speaker 4>can't we be talking about both improving simultaneously. It's not like,

0:14:45.498 --> 0:14:47.578
<v Speaker 4>all right, we're good where we are during the week, Now,

0:14:47.658 --> 0:14:50.098
<v Speaker 4>let's figure out this game day stuff. That's not how

0:14:50.138 --> 0:14:52.258
<v Speaker 4>it should be they should be working on improving the

0:14:52.418 --> 0:14:54.057
<v Speaker 4>entire operation at once.

0:14:53.978 --> 0:14:56.778
<v Speaker 2>Because I don't think that that stuff that you're talking about.

0:14:57.338 --> 0:15:00.578
<v Speaker 2>If we had to like split up winning into like

0:15:00.618 --> 0:15:04.498
<v Speaker 2>a pie of like percentages, I think that your stuff

0:15:04.538 --> 0:15:07.938
<v Speaker 2>is probably about twenty to twenty five percent more, and

0:15:08.098 --> 0:15:09.218
<v Speaker 2>my stuff is seventy five.

0:15:09.058 --> 0:15:12.498
<v Speaker 4>Bits more than that, especially once you go up against

0:15:12.898 --> 0:15:14.898
<v Speaker 4>maybe in a game like that where they're so outmatched

0:15:14.898 --> 0:15:19.018
<v Speaker 4>talent wise, once the roster is more even, it's gonna

0:15:19.018 --> 0:15:21.498
<v Speaker 4>matter a lot more than that. We saw that here.

0:15:21.498 --> 0:15:23.898
<v Speaker 4>For years there were good teams that the Patriots would play.

0:15:23.938 --> 0:15:27.178
<v Speaker 2>The Patriots were beating teams before the team even got

0:15:27.178 --> 0:15:30.417
<v Speaker 2>off the bus like that. That's that's what it was.

0:15:30.538 --> 0:15:32.778
<v Speaker 4>Because they were more tightened up, and other teams would

0:15:32.778 --> 0:15:35.178
<v Speaker 4>get in a panic about playing the Patriots and they

0:15:35.178 --> 0:15:38.018
<v Speaker 4>would stumble over the details, the end game details. No,

0:15:38.058 --> 0:15:39.898
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry, that's stuff. I'm not gonna let you say

0:15:39.898 --> 0:15:42.258
<v Speaker 4>that stuff doesn't decide football games. It absolutely does.

0:15:42.378 --> 0:15:44.778
<v Speaker 2>It decides a lot of one score games. I agree

0:15:44.818 --> 0:15:45.738
<v Speaker 2>with you, but I don't.

0:15:45.578 --> 0:15:47.978
<v Speaker 4>Necessarily most most games in the NFL at one score games.

0:15:48.058 --> 0:15:49.858
<v Speaker 2>I just don't think it matters as much as you do.

0:15:49.938 --> 0:15:52.698
<v Speaker 2>I don't. I don't. I think it matters. I think

0:15:52.698 --> 0:15:53.698
<v Speaker 2>it's a part of the game.

0:15:54.138 --> 0:15:56.058
<v Speaker 4>I'm not Shanahan and all the Super Bowl rings how

0:15:56.138 --> 0:15:56.618
<v Speaker 4>much it matters.

0:15:56.698 --> 0:15:58.778
<v Speaker 2>Oh, come on, man, he's been like two bounces from

0:15:58.778 --> 0:16:02.938
<v Speaker 2>the super Bowl, Like if he was a little better

0:16:02.978 --> 0:16:07.657
<v Speaker 2>on the market games, Jimmy hits Emmanuel decision was Jimmy

0:16:07.658 --> 0:16:10.537
<v Speaker 2>Garoppolo throw. So it's it's his problem, his fault that

0:16:10.578 --> 0:16:12.858
<v Speaker 2>he missed a wide open receiver for a decision.

0:16:14.658 --> 0:16:19.218
<v Speaker 4>You know what, Jimmy Garoppolo is dress It matters. It

0:16:19.738 --> 0:16:23.138
<v Speaker 4>absolutely decides games. And I'd rather them not wait to

0:16:23.178 --> 0:16:23.938
<v Speaker 4>get better at it.

0:16:24.298 --> 0:16:26.698
<v Speaker 2>I'm not asking them to wait to get better at it.

0:16:26.858 --> 0:16:29.657
<v Speaker 2>I just think that it's more important, especially coming off

0:16:29.658 --> 0:16:32.458
<v Speaker 2>a game like they play in Arizona, where I just

0:16:32.498 --> 0:16:35.458
<v Speaker 2>thought their entire approach was off. No, I mean even

0:16:35.538 --> 0:16:39.098
<v Speaker 2>much better. Even John Medison on Tuesday that their effort

0:16:39.138 --> 0:16:40.177
<v Speaker 2>in Arizona wasn't good.

0:16:40.258 --> 0:16:40.458
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:16:40.538 --> 0:16:42.218
<v Speaker 4>No, And I'm giving them credit. They were much better

0:16:42.258 --> 0:16:44.458
<v Speaker 4>in that regard. But this stuff is part of the

0:16:44.458 --> 0:16:46.177
<v Speaker 4>game too. This stuff is part of coaching too. I

0:16:46.218 --> 0:16:47.537
<v Speaker 4>think it's as much of the game.

0:16:47.618 --> 0:16:48.058
<v Speaker 2>Day stuff.

0:16:48.098 --> 0:16:49.738
<v Speaker 4>To me, is as much a part you can come

0:16:49.738 --> 0:16:52.018
<v Speaker 4>in with a great plan. If you can't get play

0:16:52.058 --> 0:16:55.138
<v Speaker 4>calls in and you're committing bad penalties and you're burning

0:16:55.178 --> 0:16:57.018
<v Speaker 4>timeouts you don't need to burn, and letting the clock

0:16:57.098 --> 0:16:59.298
<v Speaker 4>run when it doesn't need to run, you're still gonna

0:16:59.338 --> 0:17:01.538
<v Speaker 4>even with a good plan, you're still going to have

0:17:01.538 --> 0:17:03.458
<v Speaker 4>a hard time winning games in this league because so

0:17:03.538 --> 0:17:04.978
<v Speaker 4>many of these games are so close.

0:17:05.858 --> 0:17:07.657
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, we're not going to agree to this

0:17:07.938 --> 0:17:10.737
<v Speaker 2>on this one, so I'm gonna move it along. But

0:17:10.778 --> 0:17:13.778
<v Speaker 2>I do the one big thing that I definitely look

0:17:13.818 --> 0:17:16.858
<v Speaker 2>at now as we come off of this Bills game.

0:17:17.338 --> 0:17:19.538
<v Speaker 2>It's cool to do it once, and we're saying do

0:17:19.538 --> 0:17:21.698
<v Speaker 2>it once they even win the freaking game. It's cool

0:17:21.818 --> 0:17:25.538
<v Speaker 2>to come, you know and watch this film and feel

0:17:25.658 --> 0:17:27.778
<v Speaker 2>some pretty good about some of the things that they did,

0:17:28.138 --> 0:17:30.618
<v Speaker 2>you know, in terms of the past defense and the

0:17:30.658 --> 0:17:33.818
<v Speaker 2>start on offense. But the two you know kind of

0:17:33.858 --> 0:17:36.218
<v Speaker 2>things that come from this now one you got to

0:17:36.258 --> 0:17:38.618
<v Speaker 2>stack it right, like you gotta do it again against

0:17:38.618 --> 0:17:40.578
<v Speaker 2>the Chargers on Saturday. If they just if this is

0:17:40.658 --> 0:17:43.018
<v Speaker 2>just a one off performance by this group down the

0:17:43.018 --> 0:17:45.898
<v Speaker 2>stretch here and we don't see that team on Saturday

0:17:45.938 --> 0:17:48.298
<v Speaker 2>against the Chargers, I would throw it all out. I

0:17:48.298 --> 0:17:50.578
<v Speaker 2>would say all the flowers I gave you last week,

0:17:50.618 --> 0:17:52.938
<v Speaker 2>you just set them on fire, right, Like, I will

0:17:52.978 --> 0:17:55.338
<v Speaker 2>not care about this Bills game if they go out

0:17:55.378 --> 0:17:58.218
<v Speaker 2>and play like they did in Arizona on Saturday against

0:17:58.218 --> 0:18:00.498
<v Speaker 2>the Chargers. Now, if they play the same way they

0:18:00.538 --> 0:18:03.178
<v Speaker 2>didn't against Buffalo, and maybe you know, to your point,

0:18:03.258 --> 0:18:05.058
<v Speaker 2>some of those in game things go their way, or

0:18:05.058 --> 0:18:07.538
<v Speaker 2>they're clean those things up, or some of the bounces

0:18:07.658 --> 0:18:09.458
<v Speaker 2>just are better this week, and they actually win this

0:18:09.538 --> 0:18:12.258
<v Speaker 2>game against the Chargers, then I would feel like, Okay,

0:18:12.338 --> 0:18:15.657
<v Speaker 2>we're starting to stack here a little bit. Now. With

0:18:15.738 --> 0:18:18.578
<v Speaker 2>that being said, Week eighteen against the Bills, I'm throwing

0:18:18.618 --> 0:18:20.898
<v Speaker 2>out I don't think that game is gonna matter for Buffalo.

0:18:21.218 --> 0:18:23.458
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't be surprised if we see Mitch Trubisky in

0:18:23.498 --> 0:18:23.818
<v Speaker 2>that game.

0:18:23.898 --> 0:18:27.738
<v Speaker 4>I'm not throwing that out because of what you just said.

0:18:27.818 --> 0:18:32.578
<v Speaker 4>Like you date, if they're not competitive against the Bill's team,

0:18:32.618 --> 0:18:35.218
<v Speaker 4>that's half assing it. That's a really bad sign.

0:18:35.578 --> 0:18:38.218
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I agree with that. I just I guess I

0:18:38.218 --> 0:18:41.338
<v Speaker 2>don't know this is this goes into like a you know,

0:18:42.298 --> 0:18:45.418
<v Speaker 2>personnel level versus player level, Like the players aren't gonna

0:18:45.418 --> 0:18:47.378
<v Speaker 2>go out there and tank for the team. Right, They're

0:18:47.378 --> 0:18:49.498
<v Speaker 2>not gonna do that. But I do think that there's

0:18:49.538 --> 0:18:52.818
<v Speaker 2>an element in week eighteen of thinking about that. I do.

0:18:53.338 --> 0:18:58.218
<v Speaker 4>I think for no I again, the game management stuff,

0:18:58.218 --> 0:19:00.618
<v Speaker 4>the operational stuff, like you need to prove you can

0:19:00.658 --> 0:19:03.818
<v Speaker 4>be a tight operation, and it doesn't matter who the

0:19:03.858 --> 0:19:04.578
<v Speaker 4>opponent is.

0:19:04.498 --> 0:19:06.818
<v Speaker 2>Like, so you don't care that if they win a

0:19:06.858 --> 0:19:09.258
<v Speaker 2>meaningless game against the Bills in Week eighteen, they could

0:19:09.298 --> 0:19:11.218
<v Speaker 2>go from like the second overall pick to like the

0:19:11.258 --> 0:19:13.618
<v Speaker 2>eighth overall pick. I think winning is more important. You

0:19:13.658 --> 0:19:16.698
<v Speaker 2>think winning one game against mister Bisky is more important? Yep.

0:19:16.898 --> 0:19:20.218
<v Speaker 4>I think for the you don't want losing to become

0:19:20.258 --> 0:19:22.178
<v Speaker 4>habitual for the culture of it. They're also not going

0:19:22.218 --> 0:19:23.898
<v Speaker 4>to fall to eight. I think that if they lose,

0:19:24.098 --> 0:19:26.338
<v Speaker 4>like if they lose one of the next two, the

0:19:26.418 --> 0:19:27.937
<v Speaker 4>Charge are a good team. I don't think they can

0:19:27.978 --> 0:19:28.938
<v Speaker 4>fall past like six.

0:19:29.738 --> 0:19:31.818
<v Speaker 2>Well, there's but I don't know what all the tie

0:19:31.818 --> 0:19:33.818
<v Speaker 2>breakers are because we don't know, like this we're gonna have.

0:19:33.938 --> 0:19:36.618
<v Speaker 4>We're gonna have the tie breakers because their strength schedules

0:19:36.618 --> 0:19:37.898
<v Speaker 4>so blow everybody else's.

0:19:38.018 --> 0:19:42.138
<v Speaker 2>Well, there's a bunch of four win teams in three

0:19:42.138 --> 0:19:43.738
<v Speaker 2>win teams in the league. A bunch of them play

0:19:43.738 --> 0:19:47.098
<v Speaker 2>each other though, Okay, I mean even if it's two

0:19:47.098 --> 0:19:48.778
<v Speaker 2>to six or two to seven, I think that that.

0:19:48.978 --> 0:19:51.538
<v Speaker 2>I also on this draft especially, I think that's bad.

0:19:52.218 --> 0:19:54.538
<v Speaker 4>I'm a proponent of them trading down so you don't

0:19:54.538 --> 0:19:55.778
<v Speaker 4>get the Hall, but you still end up with the

0:19:55.818 --> 0:19:58.618
<v Speaker 4>same player. I don't know, I'd like to see them.

0:19:58.938 --> 0:20:00.178
<v Speaker 4>I don't think they're gonna tank.

0:20:00.738 --> 0:20:02.778
<v Speaker 2>Because they're not gonna purposely.

0:20:02.578 --> 0:20:05.298
<v Speaker 4>Right, And I just think that operational stuff, and I

0:20:05.338 --> 0:20:08.778
<v Speaker 4>think like ending the season on a high note is important.

0:20:09.058 --> 0:20:10.858
<v Speaker 4>I know, like what to do for the Jets last year,

0:20:10.858 --> 0:20:13.218
<v Speaker 4>but that's the Jets. Yeah, you know, like I think

0:20:13.298 --> 0:20:14.978
<v Speaker 4>ending the season on a high note is important. Yeah,

0:20:15.058 --> 0:20:16.978
<v Speaker 4>Jet winning one game was not gonna help the Jets.

0:20:16.978 --> 0:20:18.738
<v Speaker 4>The Jets are so far beyond one game.

0:20:19.018 --> 0:20:22.578
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So that's one. They gotta stack it together against

0:20:22.618 --> 0:20:26.778
<v Speaker 2>the Chargers. The second thing is we're we're still seeing

0:20:26.818 --> 0:20:28.378
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the same mistakes. And I know you

0:20:28.458 --> 0:20:31.018
<v Speaker 2>kind of already broke down the coaching at and that

0:20:31.818 --> 0:20:35.458
<v Speaker 2>this isn't necessarily not coaching, it's just in terms of

0:20:35.458 --> 0:20:38.498
<v Speaker 2>the execution. The run defense is still a major problem

0:20:38.498 --> 0:20:41.098
<v Speaker 2>with this team at this point, they're probably not going

0:20:41.178 --> 0:20:43.858
<v Speaker 2>to fix the run defense until next year and hopefully

0:20:43.938 --> 0:20:47.498
<v Speaker 2>you get a Christian Barmore, Juwan Bentley. You know, maybe

0:20:47.538 --> 0:20:49.658
<v Speaker 2>you draft a few guys to sign a few guys

0:20:49.698 --> 0:20:53.458
<v Speaker 2>on defense that are stouter against the run. Their run

0:20:53.538 --> 0:20:57.098
<v Speaker 2>defense is, in my mind, other than the offensive line,

0:20:57.178 --> 0:20:59.978
<v Speaker 2>the worst part of the team. And in terms of

0:21:00.018 --> 0:21:05.218
<v Speaker 2>like the offensive line, they're so talent depleted on the

0:21:05.258 --> 0:21:08.298
<v Speaker 2>offensive line that I almost feel more disappointed in the

0:21:08.378 --> 0:21:10.938
<v Speaker 2>run defense than I do in the line play because

0:21:11.098 --> 0:21:15.658
<v Speaker 2>you're not expecting much out of your starting tackles being

0:21:15.658 --> 0:21:18.058
<v Speaker 2>Trey Jacobs and Vederian low right, Like, you're just not

0:21:18.458 --> 0:21:21.738
<v Speaker 2>expecting that group to be great defensively. I still think

0:21:21.778 --> 0:21:25.298
<v Speaker 2>they have enough good players on defense to not be

0:21:25.938 --> 0:21:29.417
<v Speaker 2>a horrible run defense, and at times they are a

0:21:29.498 --> 0:21:32.978
<v Speaker 2>horrible run defense. And it's the big plays, it's the

0:21:32.978 --> 0:21:35.538
<v Speaker 2>forty six yard touchdown by James Cook, but it's also

0:21:35.578 --> 0:21:39.218
<v Speaker 2>these little runs where you know, this game, they missed

0:21:39.218 --> 0:21:42.218
<v Speaker 2>eight tackles against the run. Four of them I counted

0:21:42.258 --> 0:21:45.298
<v Speaker 2>could have been TFLs, and they're just they're missing these

0:21:45.338 --> 0:21:47.938
<v Speaker 2>tackles and not only could they have been TFLs, but

0:21:47.978 --> 0:21:50.458
<v Speaker 2>then they don't rally to the football, so like the

0:21:50.538 --> 0:21:53.618
<v Speaker 2>ball carrier ends up squeaking out for four or five yards.

0:21:53.858 --> 0:21:56.378
<v Speaker 2>It's not even just that they missed the play behind

0:21:56.418 --> 0:21:58.778
<v Speaker 2>the line of scrimmage. They then don't make the play

0:21:58.978 --> 0:22:01.058
<v Speaker 2>at the line of scrimmage either, like you see other

0:22:01.098 --> 0:22:03.978
<v Speaker 2>teams when they play the run. It's okay, we whiffed

0:22:03.978 --> 0:22:06.298
<v Speaker 2>on a TfL, but then we have three hats that

0:22:06.338 --> 0:22:08.538
<v Speaker 2>are just like flying to the ball. So no, we

0:22:08.578 --> 0:22:10.538
<v Speaker 2>didn't get the two yard loss, but we got a

0:22:10.538 --> 0:22:13.778
<v Speaker 2>no gain out of this play because somebody contacted the

0:22:13.778 --> 0:22:16.418
<v Speaker 2>ball behind the line of scrimmage and slowed the ball down.

0:22:16.978 --> 0:22:19.098
<v Speaker 2>With the Patriots, they can slow the ball down behind

0:22:19.098 --> 0:22:21.458
<v Speaker 2>the line of scrimmage and then the guy still gains

0:22:21.498 --> 0:22:24.458
<v Speaker 2>five yards, and those body blows just add up over

0:22:24.498 --> 0:22:27.058
<v Speaker 2>the course of time. That to me has been the

0:22:27.058 --> 0:22:30.538
<v Speaker 2>most disappointing part about their run defense. Maybe the physical

0:22:30.738 --> 0:22:32.578
<v Speaker 2>at the point of attack and that type of stuff

0:22:32.618 --> 0:22:35.978
<v Speaker 2>is personnel, uh, But in terms of like their just

0:22:36.138 --> 0:22:39.258
<v Speaker 2>effort and the fact that they just don't rally or

0:22:39.298 --> 0:22:43.498
<v Speaker 2>bring hats to the football consistently, uh to to bottle

0:22:43.578 --> 0:22:46.498
<v Speaker 2>up runners, yea, it's a lot of one on one

0:22:47.138 --> 0:22:49.578
<v Speaker 2>in space, Like if that guy doesn't make the tackle,

0:22:49.658 --> 0:22:52.058
<v Speaker 2>then nobody might make the tackle any sort of thing.

0:22:52.538 --> 0:22:55.178
<v Speaker 2>Uh that It's been probably the most frustrating part of

0:22:55.218 --> 0:22:57.298
<v Speaker 2>the team for me personally to watch on film every

0:22:57.378 --> 0:23:02.298
<v Speaker 2>Monday is their fits, their their their inability to play blocks,

0:23:02.578 --> 0:23:06.138
<v Speaker 2>their angles, and like their ability to leverage or you know,

0:23:06.458 --> 0:23:09.218
<v Speaker 2>push runners back into the teeth of the defense, to

0:23:09.298 --> 0:23:12.938
<v Speaker 2>the numbers of the defense. They just do not play fundamentally, just.

0:23:12.858 --> 0:23:15.218
<v Speaker 4>The tackling, just the number of times that even when

0:23:15.258 --> 0:23:16.697
<v Speaker 4>they are in the right place at the right time,

0:23:16.778 --> 0:23:18.818
<v Speaker 4>they can't bring the guy down. A lot of run

0:23:19.618 --> 0:23:21.498
<v Speaker 4>You probably hate this. I don't know how you feel

0:23:21.498 --> 0:23:23.618
<v Speaker 4>about this cliche. I do believe in it to an extent.

0:23:23.698 --> 0:23:27.578
<v Speaker 4>A lot of run defenses just want to It's just effort. No,

0:23:27.858 --> 0:23:31.538
<v Speaker 4>it would just being bigger, meaner, stronger than the guy

0:23:31.578 --> 0:23:34.658
<v Speaker 4>opposite you who wants it more. And when you can't

0:23:34.698 --> 0:23:36.938
<v Speaker 4>stop the run, it kind of reflects that way. Also,

0:23:36.978 --> 0:23:38.658
<v Speaker 4>just backtrack real quick, because I see the chat is

0:23:38.698 --> 0:23:41.858
<v Speaker 4>pissed to make. I'm not saying that, oh, the Patriots

0:23:42.018 --> 0:23:44.538
<v Speaker 4>help their draft stock by winning that last game. I'm saying,

0:23:44.698 --> 0:23:48.578
<v Speaker 4>don't expect anybody in that building to say no, we

0:23:48.618 --> 0:23:50.218
<v Speaker 4>need to go out and lose for the draft. I'm

0:23:50.258 --> 0:23:53.418
<v Speaker 4>saying internally, they are not looked. They should not be

0:23:53.498 --> 0:23:55.378
<v Speaker 4>looking at that as we want to lose this game

0:23:55.418 --> 0:23:57.258
<v Speaker 4>for the draft. They should be wanting to pull out

0:23:57.258 --> 0:23:59.618
<v Speaker 4>every win they can. Obviously, yes, it's better for the

0:23:59.698 --> 0:24:03.778
<v Speaker 4>draft positioning if they lose. I ideally, you play a close,

0:24:03.858 --> 0:24:05.978
<v Speaker 4>competitive game and you lose, so you still have something

0:24:05.978 --> 0:24:08.178
<v Speaker 4>to build on. But people are saying, I just want

0:24:08.178 --> 0:24:09.658
<v Speaker 4>to be clear, I'm not saying it's better for them

0:24:10.138 --> 0:24:12.657
<v Speaker 4>in the draft if they win that game. It's obviously not.

0:24:12.778 --> 0:24:15.338
<v Speaker 4>I just don't expect them to. They're not gonna be

0:24:15.538 --> 0:24:17.538
<v Speaker 4>going into that game thinking about the draft. Norse should

0:24:17.538 --> 0:24:21.218
<v Speaker 4>they they're at the.

0:24:20.578 --> 0:24:23.578
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you know, yeah exactly. Just to clear that up.

0:24:24.538 --> 0:24:26.258
<v Speaker 2>I love it when the check gets on you, though,

0:24:26.378 --> 0:24:31.098
<v Speaker 2>I do like it. But yeah, I'm not suggesting that

0:24:31.138 --> 0:24:33.098
<v Speaker 2>they're going to go out there and take by any

0:24:33.138 --> 0:24:35.898
<v Speaker 2>means like, that's not That's not what any team. I

0:24:35.938 --> 0:24:39.938
<v Speaker 2>truly believe, that's not what any team does. Now. Executives

0:24:39.938 --> 0:24:41.898
<v Speaker 2>and did owners maybe from.

0:24:41.778 --> 0:24:42.778
<v Speaker 4>The GM level up.

0:24:42.978 --> 0:24:46.098
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and and that's it. It's not an individual game. Hey,

0:24:46.098 --> 0:24:47.138
<v Speaker 2>we need to go lose this thing.

0:24:47.218 --> 0:24:50.138
<v Speaker 4>It's the hey, like, we're not going to invest a

0:24:50.138 --> 0:24:51.898
<v Speaker 4>ton in this roster because we need to reset. We

0:24:51.938 --> 0:24:53.938
<v Speaker 4>need the draft picks, we need to reset the cap,

0:24:54.058 --> 0:24:54.618
<v Speaker 4>like we're.

0:24:54.458 --> 0:24:57.698
<v Speaker 2>Going to go into this season. You don't get, don't

0:24:58.258 --> 0:24:58.698
<v Speaker 2>You don't get.

0:24:58.698 --> 0:25:00.658
<v Speaker 4>Maybe at the trade deadline you decide like, hey, we're

0:25:00.658 --> 0:25:02.698
<v Speaker 4>going to sell off guys. That's more so in other

0:25:02.738 --> 0:25:05.018
<v Speaker 4>sports than football. You don't get to Week eighteen and.

0:25:05.018 --> 0:25:07.058
<v Speaker 2>Say we need to lose this game. Lose this Get's

0:25:07.098 --> 0:25:10.258
<v Speaker 2>not how it works. Yeah, No, I just I think

0:25:10.298 --> 0:25:12.658
<v Speaker 2>about the draft pick because I don't coach or play

0:25:12.778 --> 0:25:14.938
<v Speaker 2>in the game. So I'm going to consider and.

0:25:14.898 --> 0:25:16.498
<v Speaker 4>Look who you're talking to about, don't think of the

0:25:16.538 --> 0:25:18.738
<v Speaker 4>draft pick. Right that Jets game last year, I was

0:25:18.778 --> 0:25:21.098
<v Speaker 4>up there. I'm picturing Drake May the whole time. I'm

0:25:21.098 --> 0:25:21.658
<v Speaker 4>not gonna lie.

0:25:21.858 --> 0:25:25.898
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So the other element of this Bills game just

0:25:25.898 --> 0:25:27.298
<v Speaker 2>to go back there and then we'll do three up,

0:25:27.298 --> 0:25:29.458
<v Speaker 2>three down. I know everybody wants us to talk off season,

0:25:29.578 --> 0:25:33.058
<v Speaker 2>so we'll get to in the second. But the other

0:25:33.098 --> 0:25:37.578
<v Speaker 2>element of this game that I have found myself being

0:25:38.338 --> 0:25:43.657
<v Speaker 2>like lowercase C concerned about, is there. I used this

0:25:43.698 --> 0:25:47.298
<v Speaker 2>take earlier for the Celtics lowercase c' I'm not big

0:25:47.338 --> 0:25:50.338
<v Speaker 2>C yet, Like I'm not like really worried about it yet.

0:25:50.418 --> 0:25:53.098
<v Speaker 4>But I'm just this take or the Celtics has nothing

0:25:53.098 --> 0:25:55.338
<v Speaker 4>to do with Celtics lower case W or upper case W.

0:25:55.338 --> 0:25:59.098
<v Speaker 4>Worried about Celtics lowercase like the smallest case me too.

0:25:59.338 --> 0:25:59.538
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:26:00.818 --> 0:26:04.378
<v Speaker 2>In terms of the Patriots though back to the show,

0:26:05.378 --> 0:26:11.858
<v Speaker 2>this is a lowercase W worried about Drake May in

0:26:11.898 --> 0:26:15.698
<v Speaker 2>the red zone and just their red zone offense in general. Now,

0:26:16.178 --> 0:26:19.418
<v Speaker 2>the Drake May in the red zone angle probably improves

0:26:19.858 --> 0:26:23.417
<v Speaker 2>when he has better supporting cast, right, like that, that

0:26:23.538 --> 0:26:28.298
<v Speaker 2>element of it, I will totally allow for the The

0:26:28.298 --> 0:26:32.618
<v Speaker 2>The concern that I have with it is two things. One,

0:26:32.738 --> 0:26:35.578
<v Speaker 2>there was some of this at North Carolina. They had

0:26:35.578 --> 0:26:39.538
<v Speaker 2>some issues finishing drives at North Carolina too, And he

0:26:39.658 --> 0:26:44.258
<v Speaker 2>had some issues with blit zero turnovers in the red

0:26:44.338 --> 0:26:47.578
<v Speaker 2>zone like that kind of stuff. So this is probably

0:26:48.658 --> 0:26:53.178
<v Speaker 2>in reality the more important development for him. Then. Like

0:26:53.218 --> 0:26:55.378
<v Speaker 2>people making the big deal out of the footwork and

0:26:55.418 --> 0:26:58.258
<v Speaker 2>like all that stuff, I thought I always thought, you

0:26:58.298 --> 0:27:01.538
<v Speaker 2>know that, I always thought that was kind of way overblown.

0:27:02.178 --> 0:27:04.698
<v Speaker 2>This type of stuff, though I don't think is as

0:27:04.738 --> 0:27:09.018
<v Speaker 2>overblown with him in college to the pros. And it

0:27:09.098 --> 0:27:12.698
<v Speaker 2>doesn't help that he doesn't have the most creative play caller.

0:27:13.018 --> 0:27:15.338
<v Speaker 2>When you get down there, you need to be creative.

0:27:15.738 --> 0:27:17.938
<v Speaker 2>I'm not talking about like double passes and stuff. I'm

0:27:17.978 --> 0:27:21.178
<v Speaker 2>just talking about scheme and motion and stretching the field

0:27:21.178 --> 0:27:23.538
<v Speaker 2>horizontally and knowing how to use the space of the

0:27:23.538 --> 0:27:26.738
<v Speaker 2>field and all that kind of stuff. But you also

0:27:26.858 --> 0:27:29.498
<v Speaker 2>have to look at it and you know, it took

0:27:29.538 --> 0:27:33.338
<v Speaker 2>them ten plays to score from the eight yard line

0:27:33.938 --> 0:27:36.658
<v Speaker 2>at the end of the game, and the Bills are

0:27:36.698 --> 0:27:40.738
<v Speaker 2>just sending the house and they just can't get a

0:27:40.778 --> 0:27:44.498
<v Speaker 2>cover zero beater. Now he had one on the play

0:27:44.538 --> 0:27:47.738
<v Speaker 2>that he dropped the snap, which was the one time

0:27:48.058 --> 0:27:50.698
<v Speaker 2>where I thought that he was a little shaky in

0:27:50.738 --> 0:27:53.778
<v Speaker 2>this game. And so you have that situation at the

0:27:53.858 --> 0:27:56.058
<v Speaker 2>end of the game where if they score before the

0:27:56.058 --> 0:27:58.858
<v Speaker 2>two minute warning, like now they're they're in business with

0:27:59.298 --> 0:28:02.698
<v Speaker 2>three timeouts and the two minute warning down by three,

0:28:02.858 --> 0:28:04.738
<v Speaker 2>at least, you're putting the Bills in a position where

0:28:04.738 --> 0:28:06.938
<v Speaker 2>they have to put a drive together to close out

0:28:06.938 --> 0:28:09.058
<v Speaker 2>the game. And it's not just one first down and

0:28:09.098 --> 0:28:13.658
<v Speaker 2>the game is over. The interception I don't. There's a

0:28:13.698 --> 0:28:18.658
<v Speaker 2>lot of fault on that interception. The route combination obviously,

0:28:18.938 --> 0:28:22.178
<v Speaker 2>you know, Kendrick Bourne and Austin Hooper like that. It

0:28:22.498 --> 0:28:27.058
<v Speaker 2>was an ugly route combination in terms of the execution

0:28:27.138 --> 0:28:29.378
<v Speaker 2>on that play. Don't mind. The route combination is actually,

0:28:29.618 --> 0:28:31.738
<v Speaker 2>you know, scissors is actually a pretty good red zone

0:28:31.818 --> 0:28:34.498
<v Speaker 2>high red zone play that a lot of teams run,

0:28:34.938 --> 0:28:37.218
<v Speaker 2>but it just wasn't executed great. But the thing that

0:28:37.258 --> 0:28:39.538
<v Speaker 2>I see with Drake in the red zone is that

0:28:39.658 --> 0:28:44.058
<v Speaker 2>he's a big like anticipatory thrower, and he likes to

0:28:44.058 --> 0:28:46.858
<v Speaker 2>see the space in the defense, right like, here are

0:28:46.898 --> 0:28:49.658
<v Speaker 2>the voids in what I'm looking at, and I'm just

0:28:49.698 --> 0:28:54.218
<v Speaker 2>gonna anticipate that Austin Hooper is going to run into

0:28:54.258 --> 0:28:57.938
<v Speaker 2>this void. But the problem is is that a lot

0:28:57.978 --> 0:29:00.658
<v Speaker 2>of things have to go right then from the time

0:29:00.698 --> 0:29:03.578
<v Speaker 2>he releases the ball to the time that the ball

0:29:03.658 --> 0:29:06.618
<v Speaker 2>arrives at the target, you know, like the routes hitting correctly,

0:29:06.938 --> 0:29:09.178
<v Speaker 2>like Austin Hooper reading the play the same way that

0:29:09.218 --> 0:29:12.378
<v Speaker 2>he reads the play, and in the open field between

0:29:12.378 --> 0:29:15.298
<v Speaker 2>the twenties, those types of throws, if he makes that

0:29:15.378 --> 0:29:17.778
<v Speaker 2>exact same throw, that might just be an incomplete pass.

0:29:18.138 --> 0:29:20.738
<v Speaker 2>But because the space is so condensed in the red zone,

0:29:20.978 --> 0:29:23.338
<v Speaker 2>that middle of the field safety, it's a pretty it's

0:29:23.378 --> 0:29:25.658
<v Speaker 2>an easier play for him to get to the sideline

0:29:25.698 --> 0:29:29.938
<v Speaker 2>there and make that play. So it's a lowercase W

0:29:30.258 --> 0:29:32.618
<v Speaker 2>like I'm not I'm not trying to be panicky or

0:29:32.618 --> 0:29:36.018
<v Speaker 2>anything about it just yet. But they've struggled in the

0:29:36.018 --> 0:29:39.138
<v Speaker 2>red zone all's a year long. But also with Drake

0:29:39.258 --> 0:29:42.258
<v Speaker 2>at quarterback, it's probably the one area where they haven't

0:29:42.298 --> 0:29:45.618
<v Speaker 2>shown real improvement with Drake. Like everything else is up,

0:29:45.658 --> 0:29:49.898
<v Speaker 2>like yards points, everything else is up with Drake at quarterback,

0:29:49.978 --> 0:29:52.898
<v Speaker 2>but the one thing that isn't is their red zone efficiency.

0:29:52.938 --> 0:29:55.098
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think just talent will fix some of that.

0:29:55.178 --> 0:29:57.538
<v Speaker 4>He'll have more time there. I agree, that's not just

0:29:57.578 --> 0:29:59.738
<v Speaker 4>a Drake may thing. A lot of young quarterbacks like

0:29:59.778 --> 0:30:01.258
<v Speaker 4>the red zone is kind of one of the last

0:30:01.258 --> 0:30:03.338
<v Speaker 4>things to come. Having a better run game would be

0:30:03.338 --> 0:30:05.618
<v Speaker 4>a big way to help him. But if you remember,

0:30:05.618 --> 0:30:07.938
<v Speaker 4>remember I take after the Titans game on Drake May Like,

0:30:08.058 --> 0:30:10.378
<v Speaker 4>he plays with an inner dialogue of fine, I'll do

0:30:10.458 --> 0:30:12.978
<v Speaker 4>it myself. Yeah, I guess I'll have to do it myself.

0:30:13.658 --> 0:30:16.258
<v Speaker 4>He's been better about that the last few weeks. Except

0:30:16.298 --> 0:30:18.578
<v Speaker 4>in the red zone, and he even said after the

0:30:18.618 --> 0:30:20.458
<v Speaker 4>game you could tell he's frustrated. He said, yeah, you know,

0:30:20.458 --> 0:30:22.618
<v Speaker 4>a lot of time, the red zone ultimately comes back

0:30:22.618 --> 0:30:24.458
<v Speaker 4>to the quarterback. I've got to be better, And yes,

0:30:24.498 --> 0:30:26.418
<v Speaker 4>he can be better in the red zone. But I

0:30:26.498 --> 0:30:29.618
<v Speaker 4>do feel like he there is room for him to

0:30:29.698 --> 0:30:31.978
<v Speaker 4>trust others to make plays down there. And I get

0:30:31.978 --> 0:30:34.418
<v Speaker 4>why maybe he doesn't based on the way this year

0:30:34.498 --> 0:30:36.538
<v Speaker 4>is gone. But when you get we'll do offseason.

0:30:36.698 --> 0:30:36.938
<v Speaker 2>Ono.

0:30:37.058 --> 0:30:40.058
<v Speaker 4>Do you hear the clip on the Athletic Football podcast

0:30:40.058 --> 0:30:42.698
<v Speaker 4>this week about a certain receiver that we've talked about

0:30:42.738 --> 0:30:44.818
<v Speaker 4>on the show. We'll get to that. When you get him,

0:30:44.818 --> 0:30:46.938
<v Speaker 4>a guy like that, I think things will start to

0:30:46.938 --> 0:30:47.578
<v Speaker 4>open up for him.

0:30:47.818 --> 0:30:50.698
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of things that are personnel driven in

0:30:50.738 --> 0:30:53.698
<v Speaker 2>this offense, and like I said, I when it comes

0:30:53.738 --> 0:30:57.338
<v Speaker 2>to red zone, especially Van Pelt shares in a lot

0:30:57.378 --> 0:30:59.818
<v Speaker 2>of the blame. And it took him. Of course, it

0:30:59.858 --> 0:31:03.218
<v Speaker 2>took until week seventeen for them to run Drake in

0:31:03.298 --> 0:31:06.258
<v Speaker 2>the red zone like that's not his fault, that's what

0:31:06.338 --> 0:31:08.778
<v Speaker 2>they're calling for him to run. And I think one

0:31:08.778 --> 0:31:11.538
<v Speaker 2>of the elements you know with Van Pelt that I've

0:31:11.578 --> 0:31:14.418
<v Speaker 2>had you know, criticisms of with the red zone stuff

0:31:14.818 --> 0:31:17.218
<v Speaker 2>is that a lot of it is progression based reads

0:31:17.498 --> 0:31:21.138
<v Speaker 2>for Drake in a condensed area where things happen a

0:31:21.138 --> 0:31:24.538
<v Speaker 2>lot faster down there. And like you said, young quarterbacks,

0:31:26.138 --> 0:31:29.098
<v Speaker 2>this tends to be the last frontier for young quarterbacks

0:31:29.138 --> 0:31:31.378
<v Speaker 2>is throwing in the red zone. So you know, you

0:31:31.418 --> 0:31:35.178
<v Speaker 2>have a young quarterback that isn't you know, exactly there

0:31:35.258 --> 0:31:38.018
<v Speaker 2>yet in terms of the red zone, and instead of

0:31:38.098 --> 0:31:41.738
<v Speaker 2>running you know, some read options, some RPO, you know,

0:31:41.818 --> 0:31:46.178
<v Speaker 2>some more creative type play calls to just sort of

0:31:46.178 --> 0:31:48.778
<v Speaker 2>take him out of dropback mode, right, Like that's what

0:31:48.858 --> 0:31:51.258
<v Speaker 2>I see the most of is like you're asking him

0:31:51.298 --> 0:31:53.898
<v Speaker 2>to drop back pass all the time. Yeah, you know,

0:31:54.498 --> 0:31:57.658
<v Speaker 2>and if you were willing to run the quarterback a

0:31:57.658 --> 0:32:00.778
<v Speaker 2>little bit, you know, great red zone plays like for Philly,

0:32:00.858 --> 0:32:03.498
<v Speaker 2>like their quarterback draw play out of empty is one

0:32:03.538 --> 0:32:06.538
<v Speaker 2>of their dynamite red zone plays, right you just empty

0:32:06.578 --> 0:32:09.538
<v Speaker 2>the backfield. You usually get five in the box against

0:32:09.538 --> 0:32:12.578
<v Speaker 2>five blockers and Jalen Hurts just runs the ball down there.

0:32:12.898 --> 0:32:15.818
<v Speaker 2>Like those are the types of things that if they

0:32:15.818 --> 0:32:18.378
<v Speaker 2>were doing more of those things, then he wouldn't have

0:32:18.458 --> 0:32:20.458
<v Speaker 2>to always try to throw the ball into the end

0:32:20.538 --> 0:32:23.938
<v Speaker 2>zone from a drop back situation and they just don't

0:32:23.938 --> 0:32:26.378
<v Speaker 2>do those types of things. So that that's been frustrating

0:32:26.418 --> 0:32:30.418
<v Speaker 2>to me from a red zone perspective is they should

0:32:30.418 --> 0:32:32.578
<v Speaker 2>be finishing more of these drives. I mean, what was

0:32:32.578 --> 0:32:34.218
<v Speaker 2>it. It was the Colts game that they were two for

0:32:34.298 --> 0:32:37.378
<v Speaker 2>six in the red zone I believe it was. And

0:32:37.418 --> 0:32:40.778
<v Speaker 2>then you know this game were the Cardinals game either, Yeah,

0:32:40.778 --> 0:32:42.858
<v Speaker 2>this game it's been tough too, you know with the Bills.

0:32:42.898 --> 0:32:45.738
<v Speaker 2>So those would be my two biggest nippicks. You know,

0:32:45.778 --> 0:32:48.218
<v Speaker 2>obviously there's individual players, which we'll get to now with

0:32:48.298 --> 0:32:52.218
<v Speaker 2>three up, three down, But in terms of conceptually run defense,

0:32:52.338 --> 0:32:54.178
<v Speaker 2>I think at this point is what it is and

0:32:54.338 --> 0:32:56.338
<v Speaker 2>that's the next season problem. I would like to see

0:32:56.338 --> 0:32:59.058
<v Speaker 2>them be a little bit more buttoned up in the

0:32:59.058 --> 0:33:01.058
<v Speaker 2>red zone in these last two games, like can you

0:33:01.098 --> 0:33:03.898
<v Speaker 2>get some stuff that makes you feel better about how

0:33:03.938 --> 0:33:06.298
<v Speaker 2>they look down in the red area, And it's it's

0:33:06.338 --> 0:33:08.738
<v Speaker 2>a big part of Alex Van Pelts evaluation for me,

0:33:08.818 --> 0:33:11.898
<v Speaker 2>because they're down in red zone that that's where that's

0:33:11.898 --> 0:33:13.218
<v Speaker 2>where coordinators make their mind.

0:33:13.298 --> 0:33:15.258
<v Speaker 4>We'll say this though, you know who the best red

0:33:15.338 --> 0:33:18.658
<v Speaker 4>zone defense is in the NFL. The Chargers, Los Angeles

0:33:18.738 --> 0:33:20.538
<v Speaker 4>Chargers for touchdowns.

0:33:20.618 --> 0:33:22.978
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, big reason why. Then we'll talk a little Chargers.

0:33:23.338 --> 0:33:25.138
<v Speaker 2>The big reason why they're really good in the red

0:33:25.218 --> 0:33:28.258
<v Speaker 2>zone their defensive.

0:33:27.778 --> 0:33:29.738
<v Speaker 4>Tous Edwards just ruled out JK.

0:33:29.818 --> 0:33:33.138
<v Speaker 2>Dobbins question. Okay, I think we should get the Patriots

0:33:33.178 --> 0:33:37.418
<v Speaker 2>then shortly. The big thing, the big reason why they're

0:33:37.618 --> 0:33:40.298
<v Speaker 2>they're a really good red zone defense, Jesse mint Or

0:33:40.338 --> 0:33:43.978
<v Speaker 2>their defensive coordinator is really really good at keying on

0:33:44.058 --> 0:33:46.498
<v Speaker 2>your tendencies on early downs and putting you in long

0:33:46.578 --> 0:33:49.538
<v Speaker 2>down and distance. So if you get into the red

0:33:49.658 --> 0:33:51.698
<v Speaker 2>zone and he kind of knows what you're gonna do

0:33:51.738 --> 0:33:54.018
<v Speaker 2>on first and second down, and now you're in third

0:33:54.018 --> 0:33:55.778
<v Speaker 2>and pass in the red zone all the time. That's

0:33:55.858 --> 0:33:57.458
<v Speaker 2>that's a tough way to live, Like, you don't want

0:33:57.458 --> 0:33:59.098
<v Speaker 2>to live in third and pass. And I think the

0:33:59.098 --> 0:34:02.178
<v Speaker 2>Patriots get into those situations a lot, where they're in

0:34:02.378 --> 0:34:06.578
<v Speaker 2>laid down passing situations from like the low red area,

0:34:06.698 --> 0:34:08.777
<v Speaker 2>which is a really tough place to be. I mean,

0:34:08.817 --> 0:34:12.058
<v Speaker 2>we saw that against Buffalo, just setting everybody and putting

0:34:12.058 --> 0:34:15.098
<v Speaker 2>them in tough spots in there, that situation and that

0:34:15.218 --> 0:34:17.658
<v Speaker 2>drive how many I think it was three defensive pass

0:34:17.658 --> 0:34:21.258
<v Speaker 2>interferences that extended that drive, so they the Patriots need

0:34:21.297 --> 0:34:23.377
<v Speaker 2>to clean that up. Let's do three up, three down.

0:34:23.658 --> 0:34:26.338
<v Speaker 2>We'll talk a little chargers and a little draft as always,

0:34:26.777 --> 0:34:28.218
<v Speaker 2>but do you want to start us off on three up,

0:34:28.258 --> 0:34:30.098
<v Speaker 2>three down? You prepared this week? I am prepared because

0:34:30.138 --> 0:34:32.018
<v Speaker 2>already this sweet Well it's funny because we kind of

0:34:32.058 --> 0:34:36.258
<v Speaker 2>just did the same show you did on Tuesday, Sports Like, Yeah, anyways,

0:34:37.018 --> 0:34:38.698
<v Speaker 2>so I I'll do this a little different because that

0:34:38.738 --> 0:34:40.378
<v Speaker 2>one had to be three up, three down, actually a

0:34:40.418 --> 0:34:44.978
<v Speaker 2>two up, five down. Oh wow, five down you're critical, Yeah.

0:34:44.818 --> 0:34:46.498
<v Speaker 4>A little bit one of them you might have a

0:34:46.538 --> 0:34:46.938
<v Speaker 4>problem with.

0:34:47.018 --> 0:34:48.578
<v Speaker 2>But oh boy. Uh.

0:34:49.578 --> 0:34:52.578
<v Speaker 4>First up, Christian Ellis, who I feel like has been

0:34:52.578 --> 0:34:53.498
<v Speaker 4>on here weekly for me.

0:34:54.018 --> 0:34:55.538
<v Speaker 2>You have him as a up. I have him as

0:34:55.538 --> 0:34:57.418
<v Speaker 2>a up. You have miss down. No, I just don't.

0:34:57.498 --> 0:34:58.418
<v Speaker 2>I didn't think about him.

0:34:58.538 --> 0:35:01.738
<v Speaker 4>I thought that he made one good play in space

0:35:01.778 --> 0:35:04.098
<v Speaker 4>early in the game, good tackle in space. He had

0:35:04.098 --> 0:35:06.378
<v Speaker 4>the pass break up. I mean, for what it was,

0:35:06.458 --> 0:35:07.858
<v Speaker 4>the ball hit off the back of his helmet, but

0:35:07.898 --> 0:35:09.018
<v Speaker 4>he was right there in coverage.

0:35:09.138 --> 0:35:09.538
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:35:09.578 --> 0:35:12.018
<v Speaker 4>A couple other plays where I thought he was in

0:35:12.058 --> 0:35:14.538
<v Speaker 4>the right spot defending the run. They were maybe bigger

0:35:14.618 --> 0:35:17.218
<v Speaker 4>run plays because there were other holes for the back

0:35:17.258 --> 0:35:21.138
<v Speaker 4>to find secondary holes. But and this maybe says more

0:35:21.218 --> 0:35:24.698
<v Speaker 4>about the Patriots current roster than it does about Christianellis.

0:35:25.738 --> 0:35:28.297
<v Speaker 2>He's just been steady. He's been I.

0:35:28.218 --> 0:35:30.178
<v Speaker 4>Don't know how many plays he's like gone out and

0:35:30.258 --> 0:35:33.818
<v Speaker 4>made right creative might play he's created. But there haven't

0:35:34.098 --> 0:35:35.898
<v Speaker 4>really been a ton of instances where he's doing the

0:35:35.978 --> 0:35:37.618
<v Speaker 4>wrong thing either. He just always seems to be in

0:35:37.618 --> 0:35:40.658
<v Speaker 4>the right place, right time, makes the plays that are

0:35:40.658 --> 0:35:43.258
<v Speaker 4>there to be made. And especially on defense this year,

0:35:43.338 --> 0:35:45.738
<v Speaker 4>there's not that many guys you can say that about

0:35:45.778 --> 0:35:48.098
<v Speaker 4>on this team. Like if we were to talk about

0:35:48.538 --> 0:35:52.898
<v Speaker 4>just output for this season, Christian Elli's top fifteen player

0:35:52.898 --> 0:35:54.418
<v Speaker 4>on the team, top ten.

0:35:54.698 --> 0:35:55.777
<v Speaker 2>Like says a lot.

0:35:56.258 --> 0:35:58.498
<v Speaker 4>And again I acknowledge this maybe says more about the

0:35:58.578 --> 0:36:01.178
<v Speaker 4>Rosson does about Ellis. Yeah, who's been more impressive this

0:36:01.258 --> 0:36:02.338
<v Speaker 4>year Christian Ellis, Kyle.

0:36:02.258 --> 0:36:05.658
<v Speaker 2>Loger, Yeah. I mean, look, I think with Ellis, the

0:36:05.658 --> 0:36:07.698
<v Speaker 2>biggest thing that I see is that he has a role.

0:36:07.858 --> 0:36:09.857
<v Speaker 2>You know, he's gonna I think he has a role

0:36:09.898 --> 0:36:12.978
<v Speaker 2>on an NFL roster as a passing downs linebacker. Yeah,

0:36:13.098 --> 0:36:15.018
<v Speaker 2>I do. Now they have to use him a little

0:36:15.018 --> 0:36:16.898
<v Speaker 2>bit more on early downs than he's probably built for.

0:36:17.178 --> 0:36:19.138
<v Speaker 4>But even when he's in those situations, again, he hasn't

0:36:19.178 --> 0:36:22.018
<v Speaker 4>been great, but he hasn't been I don't really seem

0:36:22.098 --> 0:36:22.858
<v Speaker 4>getting exposed.

0:36:23.138 --> 0:36:25.058
<v Speaker 2>He just can't get off blocks in the running game.

0:36:25.098 --> 0:36:28.058
<v Speaker 2>He's just too small, right, And some of that's you know,

0:36:28.058 --> 0:36:30.138
<v Speaker 2>we've talked about this in the past of the run defense.

0:36:30.818 --> 0:36:32.618
<v Speaker 2>I don't love how they play the run with this

0:36:32.738 --> 0:36:35.658
<v Speaker 2>personnel because they're still trying to two gap and they're

0:36:35.658 --> 0:36:38.218
<v Speaker 2>still trying to get their linebackers to take on blockers

0:36:38.218 --> 0:36:41.258
<v Speaker 2>and things like that. And Christian Ellis is what two

0:36:41.298 --> 0:36:43.618
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty two hundred and thirty five pounds. Yeah,

0:36:43.618 --> 0:36:46.258
<v Speaker 2>see only Taki Taki another guy who's a smaller guy

0:36:46.418 --> 0:36:49.418
<v Speaker 2>that's more gonna win with athleticism and smarts than he

0:36:49.538 --> 0:36:53.297
<v Speaker 2>is with physicality. So I don't necessarily put it on

0:36:53.338 --> 0:36:56.298
<v Speaker 2>Ellis that they're asking Ellis to stand over the bubble

0:36:56.298 --> 0:36:58.498
<v Speaker 2>and then take on a guard, you know, at the

0:36:58.538 --> 0:37:01.618
<v Speaker 2>point of attack. Like, that's not Christian Ellis problem. That's

0:37:01.618 --> 0:37:03.738
<v Speaker 2>a DeMarcus Covington and girod Meo problem.

0:37:03.818 --> 0:37:06.298
<v Speaker 4>So no, I think he had another solid game, and

0:37:06.338 --> 0:37:07.658
<v Speaker 4>I think he's had a solid year.

0:37:07.898 --> 0:37:12.618
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay, fair enough. My first up was Jonathan Jones. Yeah.

0:37:12.658 --> 0:37:15.218
<v Speaker 2>I thought Jonathan Jones was fantastic in this game, the

0:37:15.258 --> 0:37:17.058
<v Speaker 2>best game of the year, best game I've seen him

0:37:17.098 --> 0:37:20.698
<v Speaker 2>play in quite a bit. Look, clear, Shakir is now

0:37:20.738 --> 0:37:23.178
<v Speaker 2>the Bills engine of that offense. He's the straw that

0:37:23.218 --> 0:37:26.698
<v Speaker 2>stirs the drink. It's very Edelman esque, I would say,

0:37:26.978 --> 0:37:29.178
<v Speaker 2>in terms of how they run that offense through him

0:37:29.218 --> 0:37:33.138
<v Speaker 2>in the slot. Jonathan Jones on a twelve routes in

0:37:33.218 --> 0:37:36.738
<v Speaker 2>man to man coverage against Khalil Shaker allowed one catch.

0:37:37.218 --> 0:37:39.218
<v Speaker 2>It was that little drag route over the middle of

0:37:39.218 --> 0:37:42.098
<v Speaker 2>the field in the second half, one catch in twelve yards.

0:37:42.098 --> 0:37:44.298
<v Speaker 2>And guess what on that one catch, he forced a

0:37:44.298 --> 0:37:48.658
<v Speaker 2>fumble on the one catch that he allows. Yeah, peanut punch.

0:37:48.738 --> 0:37:50.297
<v Speaker 2>So even though he gave up a catch, he still

0:37:50.338 --> 0:37:52.418
<v Speaker 2>made a play on the ball. On that play he

0:37:52.458 --> 0:37:54.218
<v Speaker 2>had to pass breakup in the end zone, which was

0:37:54.258 --> 0:37:57.658
<v Speaker 2>just perfect trail coverage, trail man coverage. I just thought

0:37:57.738 --> 0:38:00.458
<v Speaker 2>he was all over Khalil Shakir in this game. And

0:38:00.498 --> 0:38:05.138
<v Speaker 2>maybe the most the most sort of just stamp of

0:38:05.178 --> 0:38:08.738
<v Speaker 2>this game plan against Buffalo was how well prepared they

0:38:08.778 --> 0:38:11.938
<v Speaker 2>were for Shakir and his route tree. It really seemed

0:38:11.978 --> 0:38:14.538
<v Speaker 2>like Jonathan Jones knew the route that Shakira was gonna

0:38:14.578 --> 0:38:17.178
<v Speaker 2>run before he ran it. Kudos to him for his

0:38:17.298 --> 0:38:20.778
<v Speaker 2>preparation on Shakir, but I also would imagine that that

0:38:20.898 --> 0:38:22.578
<v Speaker 2>had a lot to do with what the coaches in

0:38:22.658 --> 0:38:25.858
<v Speaker 2>the game plan was as well. So they recognized, you know,

0:38:25.898 --> 0:38:28.898
<v Speaker 2>Shakier is an inbreaking route runner. He's gonna run crossers,

0:38:28.938 --> 0:38:31.138
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna run slants, he's gonna run things over the

0:38:31.178 --> 0:38:34.418
<v Speaker 2>middle of the field. So they just put Jonathan Jones

0:38:34.738 --> 0:38:37.218
<v Speaker 2>and an inside trail technique and had him just shadow

0:38:37.298 --> 0:38:39.218
<v Speaker 2>him across the field and then they would put his

0:38:39.258 --> 0:38:40.978
<v Speaker 2>safety up over the top of him so that if

0:38:40.978 --> 0:38:43.418
<v Speaker 2>they went deep, he would have that safety help over

0:38:43.458 --> 0:38:46.378
<v Speaker 2>the top. And he was just in his shirt all

0:38:46.458 --> 0:38:50.698
<v Speaker 2>day long. I mean, really great coverage, Jonathan Jones. Yeah, absolutely,

0:38:52.938 --> 0:38:55.618
<v Speaker 2>Nell Johns, you only had two. Really, I would have put.

0:38:55.538 --> 0:38:57.738
<v Speaker 4>Drake May, but he threw the pick and I didn't

0:38:57.778 --> 0:39:00.337
<v Speaker 4>love him dropping the ball on that snap in the red.

0:39:00.938 --> 0:39:03.578
<v Speaker 2>I was like, I considered Drake May.

0:39:03.658 --> 0:39:06.418
<v Speaker 4>He was like close to up but not up.

0:39:06.818 --> 0:39:09.618
<v Speaker 2>So the sticky thing about Drake and I'm with you,

0:39:09.698 --> 0:39:12.498
<v Speaker 2>I considered it because the tough thing about him is

0:39:12.538 --> 0:39:14.618
<v Speaker 2>that it feels like they wouldn't be in these games.

0:39:14.658 --> 0:39:16.738
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't for him, but they also feels like he's

0:39:16.778 --> 0:39:18.978
<v Speaker 2>making some critical errors, so it's hard to put him

0:39:18.978 --> 0:39:21.058
<v Speaker 2>on the ups. But like the same time, you have

0:39:21.098 --> 0:39:23.297
<v Speaker 2>to recognize he's the most valuable player on the team.

0:39:23.338 --> 0:39:25.258
<v Speaker 4>So this is where I was at with Drake basically

0:39:25.258 --> 0:39:27.218
<v Speaker 4>in this game, and we didn't talk about this in

0:39:27.258 --> 0:39:28.898
<v Speaker 4>the open. I wanted to talk about this, yet we're

0:39:28.898 --> 0:39:32.058
<v Speaker 4>getting to it. And I said this with Greg on Tuesday.

0:39:32.218 --> 0:39:35.738
<v Speaker 4>Just for him to go into that environment, both handling

0:39:35.738 --> 0:39:39.218
<v Speaker 4>the coldest game in his career Buffalo, It's loud, it

0:39:39.298 --> 0:39:41.738
<v Speaker 4>was kind of later in the day, just all those

0:39:41.778 --> 0:39:44.658
<v Speaker 4>like that was a big game environment. It obviously wasn't

0:39:44.698 --> 0:39:47.578
<v Speaker 4>a big game for the Patriots at at three and eleven,

0:39:47.738 --> 0:39:50.378
<v Speaker 4>but that was a big game environment, and you don't

0:39:50.418 --> 0:39:51.938
<v Speaker 4>know how these guys are gonna handle it, especially a

0:39:51.938 --> 0:39:53.978
<v Speaker 4>guy that was in the ACC. We're seeing the college

0:39:53.978 --> 0:39:56.258
<v Speaker 4>football playoff right now, like what these kids look like

0:39:56.298 --> 0:39:58.698
<v Speaker 4>when they go into a real road playoff game. R

0:39:58.698 --> 0:40:00.498
<v Speaker 4>I think that's a big reason the games are lopsided

0:40:00.578 --> 0:40:04.058
<v Speaker 4>last week. So you don't know what he's gonna look like.

0:40:04.098 --> 0:40:05.777
<v Speaker 4>And he went in there and he like they showed

0:40:05.818 --> 0:40:06.618
<v Speaker 4>him on TV earlier.

0:40:06.658 --> 0:40:08.178
<v Speaker 2>I thought he looks cold.

0:40:08.418 --> 0:40:13.458
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he looks but it it may have bothered him,

0:40:13.738 --> 0:40:17.618
<v Speaker 4>but it didn't impact him, and that's really all that matters.

0:40:17.858 --> 0:40:19.817
<v Speaker 4>In the noise, like the play some of the play

0:40:19.818 --> 0:40:21.698
<v Speaker 4>calls gotten late, but there were also times he was

0:40:21.738 --> 0:40:23.578
<v Speaker 4>able to handle it and make it work and things

0:40:23.618 --> 0:40:27.458
<v Speaker 4>like that. If we're talking about the long term five

0:40:27.458 --> 0:40:30.978
<v Speaker 4>to ten year window, that game was incredibly encouraging for

0:40:31.058 --> 0:40:33.138
<v Speaker 4>Drake May because, look, the games are gonna get bigger

0:40:33.258 --> 0:40:35.777
<v Speaker 4>and we'll see but as much of a big game

0:40:35.898 --> 0:40:37.578
<v Speaker 4>environment as he's had in the NFL, that was a

0:40:37.578 --> 0:40:40.777
<v Speaker 4>pretty legit environment. He handled it well. So you have

0:40:40.898 --> 0:40:43.578
<v Speaker 4>a quarterback that can go into that environment and handle it.

0:40:43.978 --> 0:40:46.658
<v Speaker 4>Five ten year window, great game for Drake May. If

0:40:46.698 --> 0:40:49.578
<v Speaker 4>we are just talking about who played the best technical

0:40:49.618 --> 0:40:53.858
<v Speaker 4>football game on Sunday, he's not towards the top of

0:40:53.858 --> 0:40:56.298
<v Speaker 4>the list because he had his issues. But for a

0:40:56.378 --> 0:41:00.018
<v Speaker 4>rookie in that spot, the issues he had you live

0:41:00.098 --> 0:41:02.538
<v Speaker 4>with and you say, okay, overall he did. He did

0:41:02.578 --> 0:41:04.738
<v Speaker 4>what he needed to do in this game for what

0:41:04.898 --> 0:41:05.777
<v Speaker 4>this game was.

0:41:05.978 --> 0:41:08.938
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a great point, and I believe it was.

0:41:09.098 --> 0:41:10.978
<v Speaker 2>Van Pelt right then mentioned that it was good for

0:41:11.018 --> 0:41:14.018
<v Speaker 2>the younger players. Yeah, he talked about that today, to

0:41:14.058 --> 0:41:16.218
<v Speaker 2>play in Buffalo for the first time and get that

0:41:16.378 --> 0:41:19.338
<v Speaker 2>first game under their belt. And I agree. And in

0:41:19.418 --> 0:41:22.058
<v Speaker 2>some ways, you know, granted, they they're going to have

0:41:22.138 --> 0:41:23.817
<v Speaker 2>to do it when the stakes are higher and that's

0:41:23.818 --> 0:41:25.858
<v Speaker 2>gonna be a different kind of pressure. But to have

0:41:25.938 --> 0:41:28.298
<v Speaker 2>it be sort of a low pressure situation for the

0:41:28.338 --> 0:41:29.018
<v Speaker 2>first time.

0:41:29.058 --> 0:41:32.018
<v Speaker 4>Low pressure of a high pressure pressure situation, as you

0:41:32.018 --> 0:41:32.458
<v Speaker 4>can get it.

0:41:32.498 --> 0:41:34.777
<v Speaker 2>Wasn't maybe the worst thing in the world that it

0:41:34.858 --> 0:41:36.698
<v Speaker 2>wasn't a game that they had to win for a

0:41:36.738 --> 0:41:38.297
<v Speaker 2>playoff seed or something like that.

0:41:38.298 --> 0:41:41.297
<v Speaker 4>That's a valuable game for young team and the coaches too,

0:41:41.338 --> 0:41:44.298
<v Speaker 4>nuts players coaches, Yeah, that's a valuable game for a

0:41:44.338 --> 0:41:45.898
<v Speaker 4>young team. In the fact that was as close as

0:41:45.898 --> 0:41:48.297
<v Speaker 4>it was is a So this and this goes back

0:41:48.338 --> 0:41:49.658
<v Speaker 4>to what we set off the top. You're talking about

0:41:49.658 --> 0:41:51.178
<v Speaker 4>the game playing stuff now the handle it. I'm talking

0:41:51.178 --> 0:41:54.218
<v Speaker 4>about the end game. Yeah, like five ten year projection.

0:41:54.698 --> 0:41:57.458
<v Speaker 4>You feel really good about that game. You feel better

0:41:57.498 --> 0:41:59.458
<v Speaker 4>about that game in the five ten year window than

0:41:59.498 --> 0:42:02.018
<v Speaker 4>you do the actual football product we saw on Sunday,

0:42:02.178 --> 0:42:03.938
<v Speaker 4>which is not necessarily a bad thing for where this

0:42:03.978 --> 0:42:04.498
<v Speaker 4>team is at.

0:42:04.658 --> 0:42:06.578
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would just say the other thing with Drake

0:42:06.658 --> 0:42:09.458
<v Speaker 2>May the reason why I you know, look, he made

0:42:09.498 --> 0:42:12.538
<v Speaker 2>some fantastic throws in this game. Obviously, the touchdown to

0:42:12.538 --> 0:42:15.498
<v Speaker 2>Booty is just that that's an unbelievab beautiful throw.

0:42:15.618 --> 0:42:17.777
<v Speaker 4>He had one to Hunter Henry two on third down

0:42:17.778 --> 0:42:19.738
<v Speaker 4>on an out that he threw before Henry got out

0:42:19.778 --> 0:42:22.458
<v Speaker 4>of the break. That was like, that's an NFL That's

0:42:22.498 --> 0:42:24.058
<v Speaker 4>an NFL third down throw right there.

0:42:24.138 --> 0:42:26.018
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, No, I mean he made he made several

0:42:26.058 --> 0:42:29.777
<v Speaker 2>great plays in this game. But the the reason why

0:42:29.818 --> 0:42:32.018
<v Speaker 2>I didn't go put him on the ups. Yeah, this

0:42:32.098 --> 0:42:34.378
<v Speaker 2>game felt a little North Carolina eat to me in

0:42:34.458 --> 0:42:38.578
<v Speaker 2>terms of his performance, where there's five or six throws

0:42:38.578 --> 0:42:41.178
<v Speaker 2>that he made in this game that make your jaw drop,

0:42:41.418 --> 0:42:43.698
<v Speaker 2>But then there was also the turnovers and some you know,

0:42:43.938 --> 0:42:45.178
<v Speaker 2>real critical miscuse.

0:42:45.338 --> 0:42:48.218
<v Speaker 4>Looked more Josh Allen than Josh Allen did in this game.

0:42:48.218 --> 0:42:51.858
<v Speaker 4>You're gonna hate me saying that, but yeah, it's or

0:42:51.858 --> 0:42:54.258
<v Speaker 4>do you agree? Uh, he looked more like Josh Allen

0:42:54.298 --> 0:42:56.098
<v Speaker 4>than Josh Josh Allen looked Timid.

0:42:57.178 --> 0:42:59.578
<v Speaker 2>He We'll get to Josh Allen in a second. I

0:43:00.178 --> 0:43:02.618
<v Speaker 2>would just say that, I mean the spin move on

0:43:02.658 --> 0:43:05.138
<v Speaker 2>the first down run, that's Josh Allen. Yeah. I would

0:43:05.138 --> 0:43:08.498
<v Speaker 2>just say that if you're if you you could see

0:43:08.498 --> 0:43:10.658
<v Speaker 2>this game with Drake May anyway you want to see it,

0:43:11.018 --> 0:43:13.857
<v Speaker 2>you could watch this game and you could say, look

0:43:13.898 --> 0:43:15.338
<v Speaker 2>at this throw. You know, the throw he made to

0:43:15.338 --> 0:43:17.338
<v Speaker 2>Booty over the middle of the field, you know, when

0:43:17.378 --> 0:43:19.218
<v Speaker 2>the blitz came and they had to abort the play

0:43:19.218 --> 0:43:21.618
<v Speaker 2>action fake and he just rolls out and uh, you

0:43:21.618 --> 0:43:24.978
<v Speaker 2>know with his body weight, you know, flying right, he

0:43:25.058 --> 0:43:27.298
<v Speaker 2>throws back into the middle of the field left. Like

0:43:27.378 --> 0:43:32.218
<v Speaker 2>that throw is crazy. That's a crazy Josh Allen, Patrick

0:43:32.258 --> 0:43:36.538
<v Speaker 2>Mahomes like unreal throw. Right, the touchdown to Booty is

0:43:36.578 --> 0:43:38.777
<v Speaker 2>a great throw. Some of the third down throws that

0:43:38.818 --> 0:43:41.138
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned, you know, Crosser to Hunter Henry early on

0:43:41.178 --> 0:43:44.258
<v Speaker 2>in the game opening drive, scrambles for another first down

0:43:44.258 --> 0:43:46.777
<v Speaker 2>when there was nobody open. I like those types of

0:43:46.818 --> 0:43:50.738
<v Speaker 2>players are him adding to the to the situation, like

0:43:50.778 --> 0:43:53.738
<v Speaker 2>he's elevating the product, like Kaishan Boody no offense, But

0:43:53.858 --> 0:43:57.498
<v Speaker 2>like that's not He's not Randy Moss right and he

0:43:57.578 --> 0:44:00.618
<v Speaker 2>made such a perfect throw on the touchdown to Kaishan

0:44:00.658 --> 0:44:02.777
<v Speaker 2>Boody that Kashan Budy had no choice but to catch

0:44:02.818 --> 0:44:05.098
<v Speaker 2>it right. It was literally it was literally right in

0:44:05.138 --> 0:44:07.098
<v Speaker 2>his hands, like there is no way he was gonna

0:44:07.578 --> 0:44:09.978
<v Speaker 2>not come away with the football. The other thing I

0:44:10.018 --> 0:44:12.377
<v Speaker 2>would say about Drake May that almost put him on

0:44:12.498 --> 0:44:14.298
<v Speaker 2>the ups for me. I don't know about you, but

0:44:14.338 --> 0:44:16.458
<v Speaker 2>I had some people from Buffalo reach out to me

0:44:16.498 --> 0:44:19.098
<v Speaker 2>after the game that say that they're they're capital w

0:44:19.098 --> 0:44:21.618
<v Speaker 2>worried about how good Drake May played in that game.

0:44:21.818 --> 0:44:23.777
<v Speaker 4>I know they're also capital w worried about their own

0:44:23.778 --> 0:44:26.018
<v Speaker 4>football team. They were not happy about that.

0:44:26.138 --> 0:44:29.418
<v Speaker 2>No, there was boo birds at halftime, them off the field.

0:44:29.698 --> 0:44:31.898
<v Speaker 2>But a lot of people that I know in Buffalo,

0:44:31.938 --> 0:44:33.897
<v Speaker 2>you know, friends of mine, and I'm sure your friends

0:44:33.898 --> 0:44:35.937
<v Speaker 2>said the same thing. We went to school and upper

0:44:36.058 --> 0:44:37.858
<v Speaker 2>Upstate New York, so we all have we all have

0:44:37.858 --> 0:44:43.418
<v Speaker 2>friends that was more just mad about Yeah. You know

0:44:43.578 --> 0:44:45.938
<v Speaker 2>a lot of Patriots can't believe it. But a lot

0:44:45.978 --> 0:44:48.098
<v Speaker 2>of people I think in Buffalo are like, well, now

0:44:48.138 --> 0:44:50.938
<v Speaker 2>they have their own Josh Allen, so if they get

0:44:50.938 --> 0:44:54.578
<v Speaker 2>this situation around it correct. Anyways, let's get back to

0:44:54.658 --> 0:44:58.098
<v Speaker 2>the actual list here. So my number two up was

0:44:58.178 --> 0:45:01.898
<v Speaker 2>Jeremiah Farms, basically a one man pass rush in this game.

0:45:02.298 --> 0:45:04.857
<v Speaker 2>He had five quarterback pressures. Nobody else on the team

0:45:04.898 --> 0:45:07.938
<v Speaker 2>had more than one, So it was really Jeremiah Farms

0:45:08.058 --> 0:45:10.258
<v Speaker 2>getting pressure on the quarterback. I do think that was

0:45:10.298 --> 0:45:13.658
<v Speaker 2>by design that they were willing to let Jeremiah Farms

0:45:14.018 --> 0:45:18.258
<v Speaker 2>rush Josh Allen, expecting Josh Allen to go out out

0:45:18.378 --> 0:45:20.538
<v Speaker 2>of the back of the pocket rather than going up

0:45:20.578 --> 0:45:22.777
<v Speaker 2>through the middle of the pocket. So if you let

0:45:22.818 --> 0:45:25.218
<v Speaker 2>those interior guys kind of tee off a little bit

0:45:25.538 --> 0:45:27.738
<v Speaker 2>and then you keep the edges, you know, firm and

0:45:27.778 --> 0:45:30.458
<v Speaker 2>make him stay in the pocket, you have some opportunity.

0:45:30.618 --> 0:45:32.258
<v Speaker 2>He had the sack when he kind of you know,

0:45:32.338 --> 0:45:34.937
<v Speaker 2>ran into him. But I thought he was the one

0:45:35.018 --> 0:45:38.138
<v Speaker 2>guy that had impactful pressures in this game and was

0:45:38.138 --> 0:45:40.658
<v Speaker 2>getting after the quarterback a little bit. Yeah, I thought

0:45:40.858 --> 0:45:43.178
<v Speaker 2>I thought he saw a game n number three. I

0:45:43.218 --> 0:45:46.538
<v Speaker 2>did put Kaishan Boudi on here. I thought Kishan Boudi

0:45:47.098 --> 0:45:50.218
<v Speaker 2>was really good in this game. Twenty eight yard touchdown. Obviously,

0:45:50.298 --> 0:45:52.378
<v Speaker 2>he had the twenty two yarder on the crosser that

0:45:52.418 --> 0:45:55.058
<v Speaker 2>I was just talking about, where Drake May the off

0:45:55.098 --> 0:45:57.777
<v Speaker 2>platform throw, and then he had another chunk play that

0:45:57.858 --> 0:45:59.618
<v Speaker 2>was left on the field that Drake, one of his

0:45:59.698 --> 0:46:02.378
<v Speaker 2>sprays in this game, you know, missed him coming across

0:46:02.378 --> 0:46:05.538
<v Speaker 2>the field. That probably would have been another twenty twenty

0:46:05.578 --> 0:46:07.777
<v Speaker 2>five yard game at least if he hits him in

0:46:07.818 --> 0:46:10.218
<v Speaker 2>stride there. So it almost makes up for the fact

0:46:10.218 --> 0:46:12.698
<v Speaker 2>that thirty one of his yards came on a garbage

0:46:12.698 --> 0:46:14.858
<v Speaker 2>play ten and a half because he should have had

0:46:14.978 --> 0:46:17.578
<v Speaker 2>you know, the play on the chunk play that Drake

0:46:17.658 --> 0:46:20.458
<v Speaker 2>May missed him. So I thought Kai Shan Boody has

0:46:20.498 --> 0:46:24.297
<v Speaker 2>continued to show that he belongs in an NFL receiver room. Yeah.

0:46:24.338 --> 0:46:26.218
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if he's a starting X receiver in

0:46:26.218 --> 0:46:28.818
<v Speaker 2>the league, but he is a receiver in the league.

0:46:28.898 --> 0:46:31.857
<v Speaker 4>He's still just so inconsistent. Yeah, it's tough to count

0:46:31.898 --> 0:46:33.978
<v Speaker 4>on him for anything. If he's your fourth or fifth receiver.

0:46:34.458 --> 0:46:36.898
<v Speaker 4>Throwing him out there ten fifteen snaps a game kind

0:46:36.898 --> 0:46:39.778
<v Speaker 4>of his insurance. I think that's probably the role for him.

0:46:40.258 --> 0:46:42.298
<v Speaker 4>This is kind of what we've seen from him his

0:46:42.578 --> 0:46:45.178
<v Speaker 4>whole two years here. There's moments where he looks great,

0:46:45.258 --> 0:46:48.178
<v Speaker 4>but there's just not enough of them strung together.

0:46:48.778 --> 0:46:50.698
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's fair. All right, let's go to the downs.

0:46:50.858 --> 0:46:53.337
<v Speaker 2>You got seventeen of them, So Harry, I have five.

0:46:53.378 --> 0:46:57.818
<v Speaker 4>It's really for ramondre Stevenson number one. I so we

0:46:57.858 --> 0:46:58.898
<v Speaker 4>haven't talked about.

0:46:58.738 --> 0:47:00.658
<v Speaker 2>It was tough for me. Sorry to cut you off,

0:47:00.658 --> 0:47:04.138
<v Speaker 2>but he also had a ridiculous fourteen yard touchdown run. Yeah,

0:47:04.458 --> 0:47:06.458
<v Speaker 2>so I was. I kind of love the defense about him.

0:47:06.938 --> 0:47:11.658
<v Speaker 4>So through his first I think he's too. Have this

0:47:11.698 --> 0:47:14.337
<v Speaker 4>written down through his first two hundred and ninety nine

0:47:14.418 --> 0:47:17.378
<v Speaker 4>career care I'll do it this way. Through his first three.

0:47:17.338 --> 0:47:21.857
<v Speaker 2>NFL seasons, Yes, he had seven fumbles. Yeah, this year

0:47:22.618 --> 0:47:25.377
<v Speaker 2>he has seven fumbles. Yeah, it's it's a real Yeah.

0:47:25.378 --> 0:47:28.058
<v Speaker 4>In his first three hundred and ninety nine career carries,

0:47:28.098 --> 0:47:29.938
<v Speaker 4>he had seven fumbles. In the last two hundred five,

0:47:29.978 --> 0:47:32.418
<v Speaker 4>he has seven, almost hat like twice the fumble rate.

0:47:33.018 --> 0:47:36.138
<v Speaker 2>I also, so we haven't talked about the backwards lateral

0:47:36.138 --> 0:47:37.858
<v Speaker 2>play yet.

0:47:37.898 --> 0:47:41.378
<v Speaker 4>I call me a sucker if you want. I kind

0:47:41.418 --> 0:47:43.658
<v Speaker 4>of believe Alex van Pelt. I take his side on this.

0:47:44.098 --> 0:47:45.138
<v Speaker 4>Is it a great play to call?

0:47:45.178 --> 0:47:45.297
<v Speaker 2>There?

0:47:45.418 --> 0:47:48.138
<v Speaker 4>No, I see what they're going for. The Bills are

0:47:48.138 --> 0:47:50.618
<v Speaker 4>getting really aggressive in their rush. They're trying to catch

0:47:50.618 --> 0:47:53.498
<v Speaker 4>the Bills coming upfield, throw something quick behind him and

0:47:53.538 --> 0:47:57.857
<v Speaker 4>get going. I would have probably called just a traditional

0:47:58.458 --> 0:48:01.698
<v Speaker 4>half back slip screen, will slip screen. I think that

0:48:02.178 --> 0:48:05.297
<v Speaker 4>is less risky. It achieves the same goal. Now that

0:48:05.338 --> 0:48:08.938
<v Speaker 4>being said, every why would you call backwards pass in

0:48:08.978 --> 0:48:11.817
<v Speaker 4>that situation? It's not supposed to be a backwards pass.

0:48:12.218 --> 0:48:15.978
<v Speaker 4>Ramandre Stevenson sunk his rat. Why did Ramandre Stevenson sink

0:48:16.018 --> 0:48:18.338
<v Speaker 4>his route? I'm gonna combine my first two downs because

0:48:18.378 --> 0:48:21.458
<v Speaker 4>Demandre Jacobs, who's the other one, misses the cut block,

0:48:21.538 --> 0:48:24.698
<v Speaker 4>and Stevenson sens is the pressure steps back. Something of

0:48:24.698 --> 0:48:26.777
<v Speaker 4>this is on Drake two. You got to either lead

0:48:26.858 --> 0:48:28.498
<v Speaker 4>him forward or throw that ball at his feet or

0:48:28.538 --> 0:48:31.058
<v Speaker 4>throw it away. Should van Pel, I'll have a better

0:48:31.098 --> 0:48:33.858
<v Speaker 4>read on the personnel. You're asking Demontrey Jacobs, who's had

0:48:33.898 --> 0:48:36.377
<v Speaker 4>a rough game to cut block a great edge rusher, Like, yeah,

0:48:36.538 --> 0:48:39.138
<v Speaker 4>Van Pel's not innocent in this either, But let's not

0:48:39.258 --> 0:48:40.938
<v Speaker 4>act like they were like, Oh, yeah, we're gonna throw

0:48:40.978 --> 0:48:43.618
<v Speaker 4>the ball backwards four yards because that's a good play. Yeah,

0:48:43.658 --> 0:48:48.138
<v Speaker 4>it's supposed to be a very basic half back flat route.

0:48:48.538 --> 0:48:52.937
<v Speaker 4>The execution I don't know. I couldn't think that word.

0:48:53.058 --> 0:48:56.218
<v Speaker 4>The execution is blown at three levels and I think

0:48:56.258 --> 0:48:58.178
<v Speaker 4>that and on top of that, I know we got hit,

0:48:58.258 --> 0:49:00.698
<v Speaker 4>but my rule ball hits in both hands, catch it,

0:49:01.218 --> 0:49:03.698
<v Speaker 4>and that goes to there are some drops elsewhere in

0:49:03.698 --> 0:49:06.458
<v Speaker 4>the game, frankly goes to Drake May's fumble too, Like

0:49:07.018 --> 0:49:09.698
<v Speaker 4>I thought, ste if I'm assigning blame on that play

0:49:09.818 --> 0:49:14.058
<v Speaker 4>to Monterrey, Jacobs is number one to me, Stevenson's number two,

0:49:14.658 --> 0:49:17.857
<v Speaker 4>then Van Pelt, then Drake. Was it the best play call?

0:49:18.058 --> 0:49:18.098
<v Speaker 6>No?

0:49:19.538 --> 0:49:21.498
<v Speaker 4>And this is a line we've kind of walked this

0:49:21.618 --> 0:49:25.578
<v Speaker 4>year where on one hand, you say, okay, but know

0:49:25.618 --> 0:49:27.897
<v Speaker 4>who your personnel are. If you can't execute it, don't

0:49:27.898 --> 0:49:31.698
<v Speaker 4>call it. But if you're in that camp, you can't

0:49:31.738 --> 0:49:35.658
<v Speaker 4>complain that the play callings to Vanilla, right, because if

0:49:35.698 --> 0:49:38.538
<v Speaker 4>you're just calling off the talent, that leaves a lot

0:49:38.538 --> 0:49:41.897
<v Speaker 4>of things off your play sheet. So for what they are,

0:49:42.058 --> 0:49:43.898
<v Speaker 4>a three and eleven team trying to pull an upset again,

0:49:43.938 --> 0:49:48.218
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't have called that exact play, but they tried something.

0:49:48.458 --> 0:49:51.538
<v Speaker 4>They they took a shot at something. I don't fault

0:49:51.578 --> 0:49:54.458
<v Speaker 4>the play call a ton there a little bit because

0:49:54.458 --> 0:49:56.377
<v Speaker 4>I think could have been better, but not a ton

0:49:56.418 --> 0:49:58.058
<v Speaker 4>because if you're only gonna call, you can do off

0:49:58.058 --> 0:49:59.978
<v Speaker 4>the personnel. They're really just not gonna be running that

0:50:00.018 --> 0:50:00.578
<v Speaker 4>many plays.

0:50:00.898 --> 0:50:04.218
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I did in the moment. The reason why

0:50:04.258 --> 0:50:07.378
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't like totally critical of it was because they

0:50:07.378 --> 0:50:10.618
<v Speaker 2>had a drive earlier after the Mapu interception where they

0:50:10.618 --> 0:50:14.058
<v Speaker 2>were backed up and Drake May threw two really solid

0:50:14.138 --> 0:50:16.618
<v Speaker 2>passes backed up in his own end zone, one of

0:50:16.658 --> 0:50:18.458
<v Speaker 2>them with his feet in the end zone to get

0:50:19.178 --> 0:50:22.618
<v Speaker 2>is that the great throat? Yeah, that was a great

0:50:22.698 --> 0:50:24.698
<v Speaker 2>throw and the third down throat. He was really good.

0:50:24.978 --> 0:50:27.018
<v Speaker 4>Sorry just on Drakes, you didn't touch on it. He

0:50:27.098 --> 0:50:29.178
<v Speaker 4>was really good outside the numbers in this game, which

0:50:29.218 --> 0:50:29.817
<v Speaker 4>is a ton of fun.

0:50:29.898 --> 0:50:33.018
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. He made a throw on third down to Austin

0:50:33.058 --> 0:50:35.538
<v Speaker 2>Hooper on a little stick route where he throws it before,

0:50:35.738 --> 0:50:39.178
<v Speaker 2>like with anticipation, before Hooper came out of his break

0:50:39.378 --> 0:50:41.978
<v Speaker 2>from like his five yard line. Like, that's a ballsy throw,

0:50:42.258 --> 0:50:44.817
<v Speaker 2>right for a rookie quarterback to to just let that

0:50:44.858 --> 0:50:47.698
<v Speaker 2>thing go and trust that your receiver is gonna get

0:50:47.738 --> 0:50:50.378
<v Speaker 2>open and that it's gonna hit off, you know, correctly.

0:50:50.418 --> 0:50:53.938
<v Speaker 2>So watching how poised he was in that situation earlier

0:50:53.938 --> 0:50:56.218
<v Speaker 2>on in the game, I had no problem with him

0:50:56.258 --> 0:50:59.098
<v Speaker 2>trying to throw later on in the game because he

0:50:59.138 --> 0:51:01.258
<v Speaker 2>already proved that he could do it in this environment.

0:51:01.778 --> 0:51:04.858
<v Speaker 2>The only the only little nitpick that I had of

0:51:04.938 --> 0:51:07.538
<v Speaker 2>Drake May, and I thought Van Pelt said it well

0:51:07.618 --> 0:51:10.818
<v Speaker 2>about the fumble. It was he was a little fast,

0:51:10.938 --> 0:51:13.138
<v Speaker 2>like that's probably one, yeah, that he was a little

0:51:13.138 --> 0:51:15.458
<v Speaker 2>sped up on. And you should probably at least confirm

0:51:15.578 --> 0:51:17.898
<v Speaker 2>that the end is cut before you throw the ball,

0:51:18.258 --> 0:51:20.298
<v Speaker 2>because if you're Drake May, and I've heard, you know,

0:51:20.338 --> 0:51:22.698
<v Speaker 2>Brian Hoyer said throw it at his feet. Well, it's

0:51:22.738 --> 0:51:24.698
<v Speaker 2>a backward pass. Have you thrown at his feet? Right?

0:51:24.698 --> 0:51:26.618
<v Speaker 2>He likes either way, it's a fumble.

0:51:26.778 --> 0:51:29.018
<v Speaker 4>When you throw a roll out, throw it at a bounds,

0:51:29.058 --> 0:51:30.618
<v Speaker 4>you probably have somebody in the backs.

0:51:30.858 --> 0:51:33.618
<v Speaker 2>Like run it for a no gain sack or something,

0:51:33.618 --> 0:51:35.938
<v Speaker 2>you know what I mean. Like, there's other options to

0:51:35.978 --> 0:51:37.897
<v Speaker 2>eat it without throwing it behind the line.

0:51:37.898 --> 0:51:40.138
<v Speaker 4>One other take on that Drake May did this once.

0:51:40.898 --> 0:51:43.298
<v Speaker 4>But I saw this a ton in the NFL the

0:51:43.378 --> 0:51:46.018
<v Speaker 4>last few weeks and in college. Have you noticed this

0:51:46.178 --> 0:51:49.218
<v Speaker 4>rising trend of quarterbacks running out of bounds behind the

0:51:49.218 --> 0:51:49.898
<v Speaker 4>line of scrimmage?

0:51:51.298 --> 0:51:53.218
<v Speaker 2>It was it this week or in Arizona. That is

0:51:53.258 --> 0:51:53.618
<v Speaker 2>this week.

0:51:53.698 --> 0:51:55.618
<v Speaker 4>You might have done in Arizona too, but it happened

0:51:55.658 --> 0:51:57.658
<v Speaker 4>a couple of times in the college games. It happened.

0:51:58.458 --> 0:51:59.378
<v Speaker 2>I think CJ.

0:51:59.498 --> 0:52:00.058
<v Speaker 4>Stroud did it.

0:52:00.058 --> 0:52:02.258
<v Speaker 2>Against the Chiefs last week. I hate it. I actually

0:52:02.298 --> 0:52:04.777
<v Speaker 2>might have counted it as a minus player and I

0:52:04.778 --> 0:52:05.138
<v Speaker 2>hate it.

0:52:05.178 --> 0:52:06.778
<v Speaker 4>I don't know why this is suddenly a thing. I

0:52:06.778 --> 0:52:08.378
<v Speaker 4>don't know if it's stat padding, I don't know what

0:52:08.418 --> 0:52:10.978
<v Speaker 4>it is. If you're like toe on the line, just

0:52:11.098 --> 0:52:13.018
<v Speaker 4>flick it, just flick it out of bounds.

0:52:13.258 --> 0:52:14.938
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't know what it is, but I mean

0:52:14.978 --> 0:52:17.058
<v Speaker 2>in this game it was a one yard loss. Compared

0:52:17.098 --> 0:52:18.938
<v Speaker 2>to it, he wasn't as egregious as some of the

0:52:18.978 --> 0:52:21.098
<v Speaker 2>other ones I've seen. Anyway, that was a side. You know,

0:52:21.098 --> 0:52:23.178
<v Speaker 2>he has done it a couple of times. We're being

0:52:23.178 --> 0:52:26.218
<v Speaker 2>a little critical on Drake though, so it's gonna reel back. No.

0:52:26.218 --> 0:52:29.498
<v Speaker 4>No, I honestly, I really meant that as like there

0:52:29.498 --> 0:52:31.658
<v Speaker 4>were some not Drake. It just made me think of it,

0:52:31.698 --> 0:52:35.378
<v Speaker 4>some really egregious ones elsewhere around the league. This has

0:52:35.378 --> 0:52:37.458
<v Speaker 4>been a trend. Like I really think the whole year,

0:52:37.618 --> 0:52:38.898
<v Speaker 4>I didn't see Mahomes do it.

0:52:38.978 --> 0:52:41.458
<v Speaker 2>Bad coaching. What do we do it. Yeah. Yeah, a

0:52:41.498 --> 0:52:43.818
<v Speaker 2>lot of these quarterbacks, I think too, you know that

0:52:43.858 --> 0:52:47.218
<v Speaker 2>are mobile. Everybody's mobile now at that position for the

0:52:47.218 --> 0:52:50.297
<v Speaker 2>most part. And so I wonder how much of it

0:52:50.338 --> 0:52:53.098
<v Speaker 2>is is that they get out the pocket, have their

0:52:53.138 --> 0:52:55.218
<v Speaker 2>eyes downfield trying to make a play, and they kind

0:52:55.218 --> 0:52:58.698
<v Speaker 2>of lose where they are relative to the line of scrimmage,

0:52:58.778 --> 0:53:01.298
<v Speaker 2>you know what I mean. I think that's an element

0:53:01.338 --> 0:53:03.777
<v Speaker 2>of it. Two. And like, if you're in that situation,

0:53:04.978 --> 0:53:07.818
<v Speaker 2>if you're running up the field, like you feel yourself

0:53:07.898 --> 0:53:09.938
<v Speaker 2>running up the field right, so you can probably think

0:53:09.938 --> 0:53:11.938
<v Speaker 2>to yourself, oh, I'm definitely pass the line of scrimmage

0:53:11.938 --> 0:53:14.258
<v Speaker 2>at this point, when you're really not because you drop

0:53:14.338 --> 0:53:16.898
<v Speaker 2>back so far right, you lost so much ground in

0:53:16.938 --> 0:53:19.978
<v Speaker 2>your drop. Anyways, I still had Drake for eleven plus

0:53:20.058 --> 0:53:22.138
<v Speaker 2>place to seven minus. He was still in that positive

0:53:22.178 --> 0:53:23.898
<v Speaker 2>in this game. So I don't want to make it

0:53:23.938 --> 0:53:26.337
<v Speaker 2>sound like we're ragging on him too much. But now

0:53:26.378 --> 0:53:28.458
<v Speaker 2>that they get into these games, to your point about

0:53:28.458 --> 0:53:31.658
<v Speaker 2>the in game coaching, like these these four or five plays,

0:53:31.898 --> 0:53:33.938
<v Speaker 2>I think that was another thing that Mayor Van Pelt

0:53:33.978 --> 0:53:37.098
<v Speaker 2>said today. They basically lost this game because of like

0:53:37.138 --> 0:53:39.338
<v Speaker 2>four or five plays, right, and that. That's what it

0:53:39.378 --> 0:53:42.058
<v Speaker 2>comes down to. My number one down in this game.

0:53:42.098 --> 0:53:46.058
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned him already was Trey Jacobs. Was this was tough.

0:53:46.098 --> 0:53:48.138
<v Speaker 2>This was a tough go of it for Trey Jacobs.

0:53:48.578 --> 0:53:52.538
<v Speaker 2>Five quarterback pressures, two quarterback hits, two false starts, and

0:53:52.618 --> 0:53:55.738
<v Speaker 2>the blown chop block also cut block whatever you want

0:53:55.738 --> 0:53:57.338
<v Speaker 2>to call it. I call it cut block as a

0:53:57.378 --> 0:54:01.378
<v Speaker 2>chop box. I legal cut block on Greg Russo on

0:54:01.378 --> 0:54:06.417
<v Speaker 2>the fumble six. So just some really non competitive reps too.

0:54:06.738 --> 0:54:09.018
<v Speaker 2>I think that's what stood out the most to me. Look,

0:54:09.058 --> 0:54:11.458
<v Speaker 2>five pressures isn't the worst game I've ever seen from

0:54:11.458 --> 0:54:13.378
<v Speaker 2>a tackle. I mean there's been times the guys have

0:54:13.418 --> 0:54:16.857
<v Speaker 2>been in the double digits, so it's not horrible in

0:54:16.858 --> 0:54:20.098
<v Speaker 2>that respect. But he had four or five reps against

0:54:20.138 --> 0:54:22.458
<v Speaker 2>von Miller where he didn't even get his hand on

0:54:22.578 --> 0:54:24.618
<v Speaker 2>von Miller as he was coming around the edge, Like

0:54:24.698 --> 0:54:28.378
<v Speaker 2>just non competitive blowbys. Those can't happen, Like you have

0:54:28.458 --> 0:54:30.858
<v Speaker 2>to at least be a traffic on right, You have

0:54:30.898 --> 0:54:33.858
<v Speaker 2>to at least get him to go and widen the

0:54:33.938 --> 0:54:36.738
<v Speaker 2>rush a little bit, Like you can't just have these

0:54:36.778 --> 0:54:39.858
<v Speaker 2>no contest rushes like he did in this game. So

0:54:41.178 --> 0:54:43.698
<v Speaker 2>Kidden Wallace if if he's starting to heat up a

0:54:43.698 --> 0:54:46.458
<v Speaker 2>little bit in practice. I definitely do think that this

0:54:46.818 --> 0:54:49.618
<v Speaker 2>is the type of game where you could consider making

0:54:49.618 --> 0:54:51.258
<v Speaker 2>a move. Now, they're going to have a new center

0:54:51.378 --> 0:54:54.378
<v Speaker 2>already in cal Strange it sounds like for Sunday, so

0:54:54.418 --> 0:54:56.857
<v Speaker 2>that would be two new starters. But look, you're three

0:54:56.938 --> 0:54:59.058
<v Speaker 2>and three and twelve and you have two games to

0:54:59.098 --> 0:55:03.618
<v Speaker 2>go in the season. It's not really right whatever point, Yeah,

0:55:03.618 --> 0:55:04.938
<v Speaker 2>all right, number two down.

0:55:06.138 --> 0:55:08.938
<v Speaker 4>Well, so I had steems in Jacob's Kyle Duggar. Yeah,

0:55:09.178 --> 0:55:13.297
<v Speaker 4>he had one play in this game where I think

0:55:13.338 --> 0:55:15.898
<v Speaker 4>it was knocks catches the pass and the flat and

0:55:15.938 --> 0:55:18.418
<v Speaker 4>Dugger runs right up and sticks him. Yeah, no, shars,

0:55:18.618 --> 0:55:20.938
<v Speaker 4>Where has that guy been? Yeah, that's the Kyle Dugger

0:55:20.978 --> 0:55:23.698
<v Speaker 4>I know. But missed another couple more tackles. He just

0:55:23.738 --> 0:55:24.738
<v Speaker 4>he still doesn't look right.

0:55:25.578 --> 0:55:28.018
<v Speaker 2>He's playing through something. I think that's pretty clear at

0:55:28.018 --> 0:55:30.658
<v Speaker 2>this point. I just had my number two, and I

0:55:30.698 --> 0:55:32.338
<v Speaker 2>just had the run defense as a whole. I just

0:55:32.418 --> 0:55:36.738
<v Speaker 2>think everybody just stunk in that regard. You know, eight misstackles,

0:55:36.738 --> 0:55:39.178
<v Speaker 2>like I mentioned earlier, in the run game, four of

0:55:39.178 --> 0:55:41.378
<v Speaker 2>them would have been tackles for loss. You give up

0:55:41.378 --> 0:55:44.458
<v Speaker 2>a forty six yard touchdown in this game. In the

0:55:44.538 --> 0:55:47.258
<v Speaker 2>run game, and to your point, the Bills could have

0:55:47.338 --> 0:55:48.218
<v Speaker 2>ran the ball all day long.

0:55:48.258 --> 0:55:48.618
<v Speaker 4>I don't know why.

0:55:48.938 --> 0:55:51.018
<v Speaker 2>I don't know why they didn't either. I don't I

0:55:51.298 --> 0:55:53.418
<v Speaker 2>expect the Chargers to run the ball all day long

0:55:53.458 --> 0:55:56.698
<v Speaker 2>on Saturday. Like this run defense is just it's just bad.

0:55:56.898 --> 0:55:59.618
<v Speaker 2>Like it's just a bad run defense. So I would

0:55:59.658 --> 0:56:02.258
<v Speaker 2>definitely anticipate the Chargers to run the ball a ton.

0:56:02.338 --> 0:56:03.618
<v Speaker 2>All Right, what else do you got?

0:56:03.978 --> 0:56:06.297
<v Speaker 4>I had Marte Mopu just for running the interception out.

0:56:06.338 --> 0:56:08.698
<v Speaker 4>He didn't have a bad game, that was he had.

0:56:09.298 --> 0:56:12.218
<v Speaker 2>He had one of the most eventful games. I think

0:56:12.258 --> 0:56:14.218
<v Speaker 2>that was a good way to put it. I've ever charted.

0:56:14.298 --> 0:56:17.578
<v Speaker 2>Like there was some plays where he was just really

0:56:17.618 --> 0:56:20.858
<v Speaker 2>good on the play right, like the crosser that he

0:56:20.938 --> 0:56:23.338
<v Speaker 2>undercut where he almost picked it off again on the

0:56:23.378 --> 0:56:27.138
<v Speaker 2>next drive after the interception, was a really good coverage rep. Like,

0:56:27.178 --> 0:56:29.898
<v Speaker 2>that's a really good rep. He had some really high

0:56:30.018 --> 0:56:33.058
<v Speaker 2>level play in this game, even the interception, Like does

0:56:33.098 --> 0:56:35.178
<v Speaker 2>a nice job of playing the post and you know,

0:56:35.378 --> 0:56:38.738
<v Speaker 2>just not getting baited out or anything like that and

0:56:38.818 --> 0:56:40.297
<v Speaker 2>just sit there and wait for the ball to come

0:56:40.298 --> 0:56:42.658
<v Speaker 2>to you. Some really good plays in this game. And

0:56:42.698 --> 0:56:45.898
<v Speaker 2>then he also had some really knucklehead plays in this game,

0:56:46.458 --> 0:56:49.098
<v Speaker 2>so he was a tough one. Yeah, and then I just.

0:56:49.018 --> 0:56:51.458
<v Speaker 4>Had the game management, which we already talked about.

0:56:51.498 --> 0:56:53.897
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so I have one more down that you're gonna love,

0:56:54.018 --> 0:56:56.578
<v Speaker 2>Oh boy, Josh Allen. I have one more down that

0:56:56.618 --> 0:57:00.978
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna love, Josh Allen. Josh Allen. Let's go, Josh Allen.

0:57:01.138 --> 0:57:05.898
<v Speaker 2>And I don't mean to like, you know, glasshouses, right,

0:57:06.018 --> 0:57:08.538
<v Speaker 2>I get it, but I'm a big Josh Allen fan,

0:57:08.778 --> 0:57:12.777
<v Speaker 2>as you know, much to your chagrin, this was one

0:57:12.778 --> 0:57:14.777
<v Speaker 2>of the worst Josh Allen games I've seen him play

0:57:14.818 --> 0:57:17.538
<v Speaker 2>against the Patriots since he became Josh Allen. Right, we're

0:57:17.578 --> 0:57:21.738
<v Speaker 2>talking about rookie year Josh Allen, second year Josh Allen.

0:57:22.218 --> 0:57:25.058
<v Speaker 2>With this game. He missed a lot of plays in

0:57:25.098 --> 0:57:27.218
<v Speaker 2>this game. He left a lot of plays on the field.

0:57:27.498 --> 0:57:31.058
<v Speaker 2>You know, some egregiously wide open receiver type misses a

0:57:31.098 --> 0:57:34.098
<v Speaker 2>couple of times. And I just felt like the Patriots,

0:57:34.458 --> 0:57:37.098
<v Speaker 2>to their credit, baited him into playing a lot of

0:57:37.138 --> 0:57:40.498
<v Speaker 2>hero ball in this game. You know, old Josh Allen

0:57:40.578 --> 0:57:43.418
<v Speaker 2>gonna roll right, chuck it, you know, twenty forty five,

0:57:43.618 --> 0:57:46.698
<v Speaker 2>fifty yards down the field, you know, low percentage throws.

0:57:46.738 --> 0:57:49.058
<v Speaker 2>He had one on the wheel. You mentioned that Christian

0:57:49.098 --> 0:57:51.578
<v Speaker 2>Ellis was in good position on he had a couple

0:57:51.658 --> 0:57:54.618
<v Speaker 2>to Shakir that just had no chance of being cat.

0:57:54.818 --> 0:57:56.578
<v Speaker 2>I don't care that it's an arm punt, Like the

0:57:56.658 --> 0:57:59.738
<v Speaker 2>interception was another one where you know, find a profit.

0:57:59.858 --> 0:58:01.738
<v Speaker 4>Let's the CBS said, what an arm punt?

0:58:01.738 --> 0:58:01.938
<v Speaker 2>Wow?

0:58:01.978 --> 0:58:03.898
<v Speaker 4>Because you can't you can't say Josh threw a pick.

0:58:04.218 --> 0:58:07.498
<v Speaker 2>So on the one hand, I tested you this on Monday,

0:58:08.058 --> 0:58:10.898
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots finally got a bad Josh Allen game, Like,

0:58:10.978 --> 0:58:13.578
<v Speaker 2>this was the first bad Josh Allen game that I

0:58:13.618 --> 0:58:15.858
<v Speaker 2>think I've seen him have against the Pats in a

0:58:15.898 --> 0:58:19.378
<v Speaker 2>long long time. Now, the downside is they didn't win it, right,

0:58:19.218 --> 0:58:21.978
<v Speaker 2>Like he kind of handed him an off game by

0:58:22.018 --> 0:58:24.658
<v Speaker 2>his standards, and they still didn't win the game, which

0:58:24.738 --> 0:58:27.538
<v Speaker 2>is a bummer. But I was I was disappointed in

0:58:27.618 --> 0:58:29.458
<v Speaker 2>my guy. He did not play well in this game.

0:58:30.098 --> 0:58:33.938
<v Speaker 2>So I had Josh Allen. Yeah. Also, like you know,

0:58:34.338 --> 0:58:38.578
<v Speaker 2>a couple honorable mentions, Joe Brady honorable mention, another guy

0:58:38.578 --> 0:58:41.378
<v Speaker 2>that I really like. The one thing I'll give them,

0:58:41.778 --> 0:58:43.818
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they necessarily thought they had to run

0:58:43.898 --> 0:58:46.138
<v Speaker 2>Josh Allen in this game to win it, so they

0:58:46.178 --> 0:58:48.498
<v Speaker 2>kind of put the quarterback run stuff on the back

0:58:48.538 --> 0:58:50.058
<v Speaker 2>burner and to get him through the.

0:58:50.018 --> 0:58:51.658
<v Speaker 4>Game could have run traditional runs.

0:58:51.738 --> 0:58:56.418
<v Speaker 2>So that wasn't completely the Bills offense unleashed like we

0:58:56.458 --> 0:58:59.058
<v Speaker 2>saw against the Rams and the Lions. That was sort

0:58:59.058 --> 0:59:01.258
<v Speaker 2>of like a watered down version of the Bills offense.

0:59:01.298 --> 0:59:03.698
<v Speaker 2>But I thought that was a big reason why they

0:59:03.698 --> 0:59:05.458
<v Speaker 2>got off to such a bad start in this game

0:59:05.618 --> 0:59:07.778
<v Speaker 2>was because they didn't really play their game. They sort

0:59:07.818 --> 0:59:10.178
<v Speaker 2>of just put in the four corners offense and thought

0:59:10.218 --> 0:59:13.178
<v Speaker 2>that they were gonna roll because the Patriots stink, you know,

0:59:13.258 --> 0:59:15.338
<v Speaker 2>like and they they did in the second half to

0:59:16.218 --> 0:59:19.578
<v Speaker 2>some degree, but still they left that door open to

0:59:19.578 --> 0:59:21.978
<v Speaker 2>get upset in a game they had no business to lose,

0:59:22.418 --> 0:59:24.178
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of that I felt like was on

0:59:24.218 --> 0:59:28.178
<v Speaker 2>the quarterback and the offensive play caller a couple, you know.

0:59:28.218 --> 0:59:31.378
<v Speaker 2>I thought that Rumandra Stevenson was another one that I considered.

0:59:31.738 --> 0:59:33.738
<v Speaker 2>The reason why I didn't put Remandre on my list

0:59:33.818 --> 0:59:35.578
<v Speaker 2>is because the fourteen yard touchdown run was.

0:59:35.578 --> 0:59:39.378
<v Speaker 4>Just I considered not but I just with if it

0:59:39.418 --> 0:59:40.738
<v Speaker 4>was like a second or third fund of the year,

0:59:40.738 --> 0:59:43.538
<v Speaker 4>I probably wouldn't have, but yeah, because he has faster.

0:59:43.858 --> 0:59:48.538
<v Speaker 2>Yep. So that concludes three up, three down. I do

0:59:48.618 --> 0:59:51.138
<v Speaker 2>want to discuss a couple of other things with the Patriots,

0:59:51.138 --> 0:59:53.178
<v Speaker 2>but I know we have you know, callers and stuff

0:59:53.178 --> 0:59:55.298
<v Speaker 2>like that, so we'll get to you guys here in

0:59:55.458 --> 0:59:58.178
<v Speaker 2>just a second. But at first, Bridgestone, the official tire

0:59:58.218 --> 1:00:01.138
<v Speaker 2>the New England Patriots, is proud to partner with Sullivan Tyre,

1:00:01.218 --> 1:00:05.178
<v Speaker 2>New England's headquarters for quality Bridgestone tires. Visit Sullivantire dot

1:00:05.178 --> 1:00:07.858
<v Speaker 2>com to find a location near you. And the new

1:00:07.938 --> 1:00:10.218
<v Speaker 2>year is almost here, it's time to get a first

1:00:10.538 --> 1:00:14.018
<v Speaker 2>start with Bob's Discount's Furniture. Start your twenty twenty five

1:00:14.658 --> 1:00:18.058
<v Speaker 2>off right by picking up stylish storage that will take

1:00:18.098 --> 1:00:20.658
<v Speaker 2>care of that junk pile haunting your hull, and when

1:00:20.658 --> 1:00:23.098
<v Speaker 2>you're done organizing, get a great night's sleep thanks to

1:00:23.138 --> 1:00:27.138
<v Speaker 2>the quality and comfort of a brand new bobb Apedic mattress.

1:00:27.178 --> 1:00:29.218
<v Speaker 2>So stop in and stock up for the new year

1:00:29.538 --> 1:00:32.378
<v Speaker 2>at Bob's Discount Furniture, the official furniture store of the

1:00:32.378 --> 1:00:34.698
<v Speaker 2>Newland Patriots. I might need one of those storage units

1:00:34.698 --> 1:00:36.898
<v Speaker 2>like we got we have, like you know our we

1:00:36.978 --> 1:00:40.858
<v Speaker 2>have like an office slash second bedroom situation, and man,

1:00:40.898 --> 1:00:43.178
<v Speaker 2>there's stuff everywhere in that room. So maybe i'll I'll

1:00:43.218 --> 1:00:45.378
<v Speaker 2>go to bots try to buy a storage union. All right,

1:00:45.458 --> 1:00:49.098
<v Speaker 2>let's get to the phones here, Patty is an aguam.

1:00:49.138 --> 1:00:49.858
<v Speaker 2>What's up? Patty?

1:00:51.898 --> 1:00:52.938
<v Speaker 7>Hey guys, it's going on.

1:00:53.178 --> 1:00:54.218
<v Speaker 2>Hey, what's up?

1:00:55.738 --> 1:00:58.258
<v Speaker 7>So my question you were just talking about the guy

1:00:58.298 --> 1:01:01.218
<v Speaker 7>I was gonna ask a question about, which is Remandre Stevenson.

1:01:02.778 --> 1:01:05.978
<v Speaker 7>I know it's not really a team friendly contract, but

1:01:06.018 --> 1:01:08.618
<v Speaker 7>it's a decent enough contract. Where do you guys think

1:01:09.658 --> 1:01:11.538
<v Speaker 7>they have there's a chance that might move on from

1:01:11.578 --> 1:01:15.778
<v Speaker 7>them after this year, do to his bumbling problems or

1:01:16.498 --> 1:01:17.738
<v Speaker 7>or do you think they try and get him some

1:01:17.778 --> 1:01:20.018
<v Speaker 7>help in the off season, Like I had the idea

1:01:20.978 --> 1:01:24.218
<v Speaker 7>on John Rook Show on Tuesday, maybe looking them up

1:01:24.258 --> 1:01:27.618
<v Speaker 7>with somebody like Peaky Barber who had bumbling problems early

1:01:27.658 --> 1:01:30.258
<v Speaker 7>in his career. And then I don't know what he did,

1:01:30.298 --> 1:01:33.098
<v Speaker 7>but like he shored it up, and that's all I got.

1:01:33.098 --> 1:01:36.818
<v Speaker 7>I'll take it off the year, guys, and happy holidays.

1:01:36.258 --> 1:01:39.618
<v Speaker 2>Man, Thanks Patty, thanks for the call. Yeah, and happy

1:01:39.658 --> 1:01:42.378
<v Speaker 2>holidays to you too. Look, the Remondre thing is uh

1:01:42.578 --> 1:01:46.458
<v Speaker 2>is a concern with the fumbles. It's not even early

1:01:46.498 --> 1:01:48.058
<v Speaker 2>on in his career though, Like I feel like Tiki

1:01:48.098 --> 1:01:51.058
<v Speaker 2>Barber was right out of the gate. Againmondre had as

1:01:51.138 --> 1:01:53.138
<v Speaker 2>many fumbles in his first three years as he did

1:01:53.138 --> 1:01:54.978
<v Speaker 2>this year. This is kind of new. Yeah, it's a

1:01:55.018 --> 1:01:57.698
<v Speaker 2>new thing. I don't know what it is. You know,

1:01:57.778 --> 1:02:00.938
<v Speaker 2>his running style, he does invite a crowd, and I

1:02:00.978 --> 1:02:03.818
<v Speaker 2>think now people know that. So when you have two

1:02:03.858 --> 1:02:06.538
<v Speaker 2>three guys around the ball, not everybody has to tackle him,

1:02:06.578 --> 1:02:08.738
<v Speaker 2>so they some guys are going to start punching for

1:02:08.778 --> 1:02:11.778
<v Speaker 2>the ball and start doing that sort of thing. I

1:02:12.178 --> 1:02:15.898
<v Speaker 2>like Antonio Gibson, I do. I think Antonio Gibson's a solid,

1:02:16.018 --> 1:02:20.378
<v Speaker 2>uh change of pace back. So I don't know what

1:02:20.418 --> 1:02:22.738
<v Speaker 2>the answer is, Like maybe maybe you get a third

1:02:22.778 --> 1:02:25.378
<v Speaker 2>running back in here. But you know, now you're really

1:02:25.458 --> 1:02:28.778
<v Speaker 2>talking about replacing Ramandre Stevenson, hoping that that draft pick

1:02:28.858 --> 1:02:31.338
<v Speaker 2>is better, you know, Like, I don't think that that's

1:02:31.418 --> 1:02:34.658
<v Speaker 2>necessarily so much about helping him, Like I think Gibson's

1:02:34.698 --> 1:02:35.578
<v Speaker 2>been enough of help.

1:02:36.338 --> 1:02:38.938
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's it's he's already been a spellback. You're not

1:02:38.938 --> 1:02:40.738
<v Speaker 4>gonna spell him anymore. He can't really get out of

1:02:40.738 --> 1:02:43.378
<v Speaker 4>that contract. You're not gonna sit him on that contract. Yeah,

1:02:43.698 --> 1:02:46.058
<v Speaker 4>he just has to work through it. Like he's gonna

1:02:46.058 --> 1:02:47.858
<v Speaker 4>be here and after next year it's another conversation, but

1:02:47.858 --> 1:02:49.938
<v Speaker 4>he's gonna be here next year, and there really is

1:02:50.058 --> 1:02:51.818
<v Speaker 4>much of an option besides him working through it.

1:02:52.338 --> 1:02:55.258
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, Colleen is in Houston. What's up, Colleen?

1:02:57.298 --> 1:02:58.418
<v Speaker 5>Hey, guys, can you hear me?

1:02:58.578 --> 1:02:59.178
<v Speaker 2>Hey? Yes?

1:03:00.818 --> 1:03:01.298
<v Speaker 8>Perfect?

1:03:01.458 --> 1:03:05.138
<v Speaker 6>Okay, So I have a couple comments and then questions.

1:03:05.178 --> 1:03:09.978
<v Speaker 6>So my comment is I would agree with Alex about

1:03:10.178 --> 1:03:16.098
<v Speaker 6>like getting a winning record or not record, but oh,

1:03:16.138 --> 1:03:21.858
<v Speaker 6>winning DNA is great. But if they win against Mitch Trubisky,

1:03:22.018 --> 1:03:28.338
<v Speaker 6>who sucks like, that's not gonna give the locker room

1:03:28.418 --> 1:03:32.538
<v Speaker 6>a boost anyway. But my question is, so you guys

1:03:32.618 --> 1:03:38.018
<v Speaker 6>like Will Campbell, which is great, but he apparently is

1:03:38.178 --> 1:03:42.138
<v Speaker 6>small arms, So how do you feel about Kelvin Banks?

1:03:42.378 --> 1:03:47.938
<v Speaker 6>And then also, Joe Tooney is currently playing left tackle

1:03:48.418 --> 1:03:49.578
<v Speaker 6>with short arms.

1:03:49.698 --> 1:03:50.818
<v Speaker 5>How do you feel about that?

1:03:51.218 --> 1:03:54.538
<v Speaker 2>Okay, thanks guys, Thanks Colin. I appreciate the call. And

1:03:54.818 --> 1:03:56.458
<v Speaker 2>you know, to the Joe Touney thing, Joe Tony is

1:03:56.458 --> 1:03:58.658
<v Speaker 2>like a cyborg. That guy's an alien. You can play

1:03:58.738 --> 1:04:00.298
<v Speaker 2>him at left guard, you could play him at left

1:04:00.298 --> 1:04:01.938
<v Speaker 2>tackle and he's gonna just block people.

1:04:01.978 --> 1:04:02.218
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

1:04:02.258 --> 1:04:04.418
<v Speaker 4>And it's also I mean, he's been in the NFL

1:04:04.418 --> 1:04:06.458
<v Speaker 4>for years and years and years. He knows how it works.

1:04:06.498 --> 1:04:08.938
<v Speaker 4>He's not trying to make that jump like he's been

1:04:08.938 --> 1:04:10.498
<v Speaker 4>blocking NFL rushers for a while.

1:04:10.578 --> 1:04:10.778
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

1:04:10.778 --> 1:04:12.858
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what his arm length is exactly, just

1:04:12.858 --> 1:04:16.018
<v Speaker 2>pulled up quarter okay, because he played tackle in college. Yeah,

1:04:16.058 --> 1:04:18.018
<v Speaker 2>Joe Toney did, and then they moved him inside when

1:04:18.018 --> 1:04:20.818
<v Speaker 2>he got to the NFL. Uh with Will Campbell in

1:04:20.858 --> 1:04:23.498
<v Speaker 2>his arm length and you know, we'll see, we'll see

1:04:23.498 --> 1:04:25.658
<v Speaker 2>what it is in Indie. I thought Calvin Banks showed

1:04:25.658 --> 1:04:28.618
<v Speaker 2>really well against Clemson. Now Clemson was totally overmatched in

1:04:28.658 --> 1:04:29.018
<v Speaker 2>that game.

1:04:29.538 --> 1:04:31.178
<v Speaker 4>It's Clemson. They always have a good defense.

1:04:31.458 --> 1:04:33.698
<v Speaker 2>And we'll get to the college football playoff here at

1:04:33.698 --> 1:04:35.138
<v Speaker 2>a second, because I know we want to do those

1:04:35.178 --> 1:04:38.778
<v Speaker 2>takes too. But look, we're gonna debate the Will Campbell

1:04:39.138 --> 1:04:42.858
<v Speaker 2>short arm not short arm left tackle guard conversation for

1:04:42.978 --> 1:04:45.858
<v Speaker 2>months and months and months, And at this point, he

1:04:45.858 --> 1:04:49.098
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have any any film that I haven't seen, right, Like,

1:04:49.138 --> 1:04:51.138
<v Speaker 2>there's no new film. I don't know. I think is

1:04:51.178 --> 1:04:53.778
<v Speaker 2>he gonna play in their bowl game? I doubt it.

1:04:53.898 --> 1:04:55.778
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think he already said he might have already

1:04:55.818 --> 1:04:56.858
<v Speaker 4>said he's not, but I doubt it.

1:04:56.978 --> 1:04:58.658
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, right, So, like there's not a ton of new

1:04:58.698 --> 1:05:02.098
<v Speaker 2>film for him at this point, So it really comes

1:05:02.098 --> 1:05:04.978
<v Speaker 2>down to what the measurements and what we see in Indianapolis.

1:05:04.978 --> 1:05:07.738
<v Speaker 2>Like that the combine is gonna be the determining factor

1:05:07.738 --> 1:05:08.898
<v Speaker 2>for him. And I thought it was interesting.

1:05:08.898 --> 1:05:11.738
<v Speaker 4>Scott Peters said, was it last week that thirty three

1:05:11.738 --> 1:05:14.298
<v Speaker 4>inches is not a definite cutoff?

1:05:14.378 --> 1:05:14.578
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

1:05:14.618 --> 1:05:16.738
<v Speaker 4>Him, Like, you've got to be really good and know

1:05:16.818 --> 1:05:20.178
<v Speaker 4>what you're doing if you're under thirty three. But even

1:05:20.218 --> 1:05:22.018
<v Speaker 4>if he gets close, there's a lot to think about there.

1:05:22.178 --> 1:05:23.898
<v Speaker 2>All right, we're gonna take a quick break and then

1:05:23.898 --> 1:05:25.658
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna come back and now we're gonna take all

1:05:25.698 --> 1:05:28.258
<v Speaker 2>your calls and emails and do some draft in college

1:05:28.298 --> 1:05:30.178
<v Speaker 2>football tox Soles, See you guys in a second.

1:05:31.698 --> 1:05:33.738
<v Speaker 10>Isn't it time to get exactly what you want?

1:05:34.178 --> 1:05:37.018
<v Speaker 11>Welcome to red Hot Deal Days from Verizon, where you

1:05:37.058 --> 1:05:39.898
<v Speaker 11>get your pick of our best deals like My Plan,

1:05:40.098 --> 1:05:42.018
<v Speaker 11>where you can pick the perse you want and save

1:05:42.098 --> 1:05:45.218
<v Speaker 11>on everyone for limited time. Bring your own phones to

1:05:45.258 --> 1:05:47.418
<v Speaker 11>a Verizon store and you can get my plan for

1:05:47.498 --> 1:05:50.538
<v Speaker 11>our best price ever. Get exactly what you want on

1:05:50.578 --> 1:05:52.458
<v Speaker 11>your phone plan and only pay for what you need.

1:05:52.938 --> 1:05:55.538
<v Speaker 11>Bring your phones to your Verizon store today and get

1:05:55.578 --> 1:05:58.698
<v Speaker 11>my plan. These deals won't last. It's your Verizon.

1:06:01.618 --> 1:06:04.018
<v Speaker 12>With FedEx one rate, you can ship to your student

1:06:04.098 --> 1:06:07.658
<v Speaker 12>for a simple, predictable flat rate. Send a box full

1:06:07.698 --> 1:06:10.698
<v Speaker 12>of home baked treats that say your father and I

1:06:10.818 --> 1:06:13.898
<v Speaker 12>miss you, or send a box full of instant noodles

1:06:13.898 --> 1:06:16.578
<v Speaker 12>that says your father and I would like you to

1:06:16.618 --> 1:06:21.778
<v Speaker 12>stop asking us for money. Either way, one rate fits all.

1:06:22.098 --> 1:06:25.618
<v Speaker 12>FedEx one rate two day shipping, one flat rate starting

1:06:25.618 --> 1:06:28.618
<v Speaker 12>at fourteen fifty. Visit FedEx dot com slash one rate

1:06:28.658 --> 1:06:30.098
<v Speaker 12>for details. Exclusions apply.

1:06:32.298 --> 1:06:34.298
<v Speaker 10>Isn't it time to get exactly what you want?

1:06:34.818 --> 1:06:37.618
<v Speaker 11>Welcome to red Hot Deal Days from Verizon, where you

1:06:37.658 --> 1:06:40.498
<v Speaker 11>get your pick of our best deals like my Plan,

1:06:40.698 --> 1:06:42.618
<v Speaker 11>where you can pick the pers you want and save

1:06:42.698 --> 1:06:45.818
<v Speaker 11>on everyone for limited time. Bring your own phones to

1:06:45.858 --> 1:06:48.058
<v Speaker 11>a Verizon store and you can get my plan for

1:06:48.098 --> 1:06:51.138
<v Speaker 11>our best price ever. Get exactly what you want on

1:06:51.178 --> 1:06:53.098
<v Speaker 11>your phone plan and only pay for what you need.

1:06:53.538 --> 1:06:55.898
<v Speaker 11>Bring your phone to your Verizon store to day and

1:06:55.978 --> 1:06:59.738
<v Speaker 11>get my plan. These deals won't last. It's your Verizon.

1:07:02.218 --> 1:07:04.618
<v Speaker 12>With FedEx one rate, you can ship to your student

1:07:04.738 --> 1:07:08.258
<v Speaker 12>for a simple, predictable flat rate. Send a box full

1:07:08.298 --> 1:07:11.298
<v Speaker 12>of home baked treats that say your father and I

1:07:11.418 --> 1:07:14.498
<v Speaker 12>miss you, or send a box full of instant noodles

1:07:14.498 --> 1:07:17.178
<v Speaker 12>that says your father and I would like you to

1:07:17.218 --> 1:07:22.378
<v Speaker 12>stop asking us for money. Either way, one rate fits all.

1:07:22.698 --> 1:07:26.218
<v Speaker 12>FedEx one rate, two day shipping, one flat rate starting

1:07:26.218 --> 1:07:28.978
<v Speaker 12>at fourteen fifty Is it FedEx dot com slash one

1:07:29.058 --> 1:07:30.498
<v Speaker 12>rate for details exclusions of.

1:07:32.938 --> 1:07:34.938
<v Speaker 10>Isn't it time to get exactly what you want?

1:07:35.418 --> 1:07:38.218
<v Speaker 11>Welcome to red Hot Deal Days from Verizon, where you

1:07:38.258 --> 1:07:41.098
<v Speaker 11>get your pick of our best deals like my Plan,

1:07:41.298 --> 1:07:43.258
<v Speaker 11>where you can pick the perse you want and save

1:07:43.338 --> 1:07:46.418
<v Speaker 11>on everyone for limited time. Bring your own phones to

1:07:46.458 --> 1:07:48.658
<v Speaker 11>a Verizon store and you can get my plan for

1:07:48.698 --> 1:07:51.738
<v Speaker 11>our best price ever. Get exactly what you want on

1:07:51.778 --> 1:07:53.698
<v Speaker 11>your phone plan and only pay for what you need.

1:07:54.138 --> 1:07:56.778
<v Speaker 11>Bring your phones to your Verizon store today and get

1:07:56.778 --> 1:07:59.898
<v Speaker 11>my plan. These deals won't last. It's your Verizon.

1:08:02.818 --> 1:08:05.218
<v Speaker 12>With FedEx one rate, you can ship to your student

1:08:05.338 --> 1:08:08.858
<v Speaker 12>for a simple predictable flat rate. Send a box full

1:08:08.898 --> 1:08:11.858
<v Speaker 12>of home baked treats that say your father and I

1:08:12.018 --> 1:08:15.098
<v Speaker 12>miss you, or send a box full of instant noodles

1:08:15.098 --> 1:08:17.777
<v Speaker 12>that says your father and I would like you to

1:08:17.858 --> 1:08:19.497
<v Speaker 12>stop asking us for money.

1:08:21.018 --> 1:08:21.537
<v Speaker 5>Either way.

1:08:21.898 --> 1:08:25.178
<v Speaker 12>One rate fits all. FedEx one rate, two day shipping,

1:08:25.378 --> 1:08:28.938
<v Speaker 12>one flat rate starting at fourteen fifty. Visit FedEx dot

1:08:28.938 --> 1:08:31.298
<v Speaker 12>com splash one rate for details. Exclusions apply.

1:08:33.537 --> 1:08:35.577
<v Speaker 10>Isn't it time to get exactly what you want?

1:08:36.018 --> 1:08:38.818
<v Speaker 11>Welcome to red Hot Deal Days from Verizon, where you

1:08:38.858 --> 1:08:41.697
<v Speaker 11>get your pick of our best deals like my Plan,

1:08:41.898 --> 1:08:43.857
<v Speaker 11>where you can pick the perse you want and save

1:08:43.938 --> 1:08:47.017
<v Speaker 11>on everyone for limited time. Bring your own phones to

1:08:47.098 --> 1:08:49.258
<v Speaker 11>a Verizon store and you can get my plan for

1:08:49.298 --> 1:08:52.378
<v Speaker 11>our best price ever. Get exactly what you want on

1:08:52.378 --> 1:08:54.298
<v Speaker 11>your phone plan and only pay for what you need.

1:08:54.777 --> 1:08:57.378
<v Speaker 11>Bring your phones to your Verizon store today and get

1:08:57.418 --> 1:09:00.537
<v Speaker 11>my plan. These deals won't last. It's your Verizon.

1:09:03.418 --> 1:09:05.857
<v Speaker 12>With FedEx one rate, you can ship to your student

1:09:05.937 --> 1:09:09.497
<v Speaker 12>for a simple, predictable flat rate. Send a box full

1:09:09.497 --> 1:09:12.458
<v Speaker 12>of home baked treats that say your father and I

1:09:12.657 --> 1:09:15.697
<v Speaker 12>miss you, or send a box full of instant noodles

1:09:15.737 --> 1:09:18.418
<v Speaker 12>that says your father and I would like you to

1:09:18.458 --> 1:09:23.577
<v Speaker 12>stop asking us for money. Either way. One rate fits all.

1:09:23.897 --> 1:09:27.418
<v Speaker 12>Feedex one rate, two day shipping, one flat rate starting

1:09:27.458 --> 1:09:30.418
<v Speaker 12>at fourteen fifty. Visit FedEx dot com splash one rate

1:09:30.497 --> 1:09:31.897
<v Speaker 12>for details. Exclusions apply.

1:09:36.497 --> 1:09:39.577
<v Speaker 2>We're back, all right, We're back. You're good. Yeah, we're good.

1:09:39.897 --> 1:09:42.577
<v Speaker 2>All right. It's been a long day for you, it

1:09:42.617 --> 1:09:45.338
<v Speaker 2>has in your day. Your day is still going after this.

1:09:46.058 --> 1:09:48.817
<v Speaker 4>I got one more show and then oh yeah, I'm

1:09:48.817 --> 1:09:49.137
<v Speaker 4>a writer.

1:09:49.258 --> 1:09:52.937
<v Speaker 2>I got it, hardest working guy in Boston.

1:09:53.018 --> 1:09:55.017
<v Speaker 4>And then I'm on back on the radio ten am tomorrow.

1:09:55.138 --> 1:09:57.657
<v Speaker 2>So I'm but but this is a big week for you.

1:09:57.857 --> 1:09:59.937
<v Speaker 4>No, I love it, like I take you know what

1:10:00.018 --> 1:10:00.817
<v Speaker 4>I do this all the time.

1:10:00.857 --> 1:10:03.537
<v Speaker 2>Oh, poor Alex. She used to talk about football all day.

1:10:03.537 --> 1:10:06.817
<v Speaker 2>What a toll life like? No, what you are doing

1:10:06.817 --> 1:10:07.897
<v Speaker 2>the world smalest violin.

1:10:08.338 --> 1:10:10.338
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't trade it. Well, but I can admit that

1:10:10.418 --> 1:10:13.338
<v Speaker 4>I like you, who genuinely complains, I wouldn't trade it.

1:10:13.378 --> 1:10:16.657
<v Speaker 4>That being said, I cannot wait to like get a

1:10:16.697 --> 1:10:20.857
<v Speaker 4>good like fifteen hours night of sleep the day like

1:10:21.178 --> 1:10:23.897
<v Speaker 4>so the season ends, but like the seat when the

1:10:23.897 --> 1:10:26.497
<v Speaker 4>seats and the season will end for us next Sunday. Right, yes,

1:10:26.497 --> 1:10:28.378
<v Speaker 4>but that's not like when the season ends, because you

1:10:28.378 --> 1:10:31.378
<v Speaker 4>have like it's usually not the whole week like Monday, Tuesday,

1:10:31.418 --> 1:10:34.177
<v Speaker 4>Wednesday's recap stuff. You'll do like here's who they're playing

1:10:34.218 --> 1:10:37.097
<v Speaker 4>next year, Here's who the free agents are, blah blah blah.

1:10:37.098 --> 1:10:40.737
<v Speaker 4>But like that, honestly that Thursday will love the show. Yeah,

1:10:40.737 --> 1:10:43.338
<v Speaker 4>and I'm probably gonna go home and sleep until the

1:10:43.338 --> 1:10:46.657
<v Speaker 4>playoff games starts Saturday afternoon. I'll probably sleep until Saturday afternoon.

1:10:46.697 --> 1:10:50.418
<v Speaker 2>I look, I get it, And yeah, you know, I'll

1:10:50.458 --> 1:10:53.857
<v Speaker 2>still do like my film review on Monday from week eighteen,

1:10:53.937 --> 1:10:57.017
<v Speaker 2>that will still do one. So really you're talking about

1:10:57.058 --> 1:11:00.938
<v Speaker 2>like Tuesday or Wednesday for the season to officially the usually.

1:11:00.617 --> 1:11:02.897
<v Speaker 4>Like Wednesday night, I'm starting to wrap it up. We

1:11:02.978 --> 1:11:04.857
<v Speaker 4>have the show Thursday, so it's like yeah time.

1:11:05.098 --> 1:11:08.138
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's true. Yeah, so maybe a Thursday when the

1:11:08.138 --> 1:11:13.017
<v Speaker 2>show's over, nice, we'll both feel like it's uh and

1:11:13.058 --> 1:11:16.378
<v Speaker 2>then I'll be in mobile like two weeks later. Right,

1:11:16.777 --> 1:11:17.657
<v Speaker 2>it's not I think.

1:11:18.058 --> 1:11:20.338
<v Speaker 4>I can't like, I can't rest for too long because

1:11:20.338 --> 1:11:21.897
<v Speaker 4>then it gets st her crazy. Yeah, I need to

1:11:21.897 --> 1:11:24.617
<v Speaker 4>do something, so like four or five days about where

1:11:24.617 --> 1:11:25.017
<v Speaker 4>I'm at.

1:11:25.378 --> 1:11:28.577
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, back to football. Yeah, and I do

1:11:28.617 --> 1:11:30.458
<v Speaker 2>want to talk a little bit of college football playoffs.

1:11:30.817 --> 1:11:32.897
<v Speaker 2>And you said we had to do a segment on

1:11:32.897 --> 1:11:35.657
<v Speaker 2>college football Playoffs. So here's our segment on it. I'm

1:11:35.657 --> 1:11:37.537
<v Speaker 2>not gonna get on you about the fact that these

1:11:37.537 --> 1:11:38.737
<v Speaker 2>games were not competitive.

1:11:39.018 --> 1:11:41.617
<v Speaker 4>Can I say this, what a weird weekend for me

1:11:41.817 --> 1:11:44.937
<v Speaker 4>because two of my big takes, especially on the show,

1:11:45.178 --> 1:11:48.857
<v Speaker 4>are you underrate college football and you overrate Josh Allen.

1:11:49.218 --> 1:11:52.897
<v Speaker 4>And I'm sitting there watching those games, like, man, this

1:11:53.497 --> 1:11:56.777
<v Speaker 4>what a sucky weekend. None of these games are good.

1:11:57.058 --> 1:12:00.057
<v Speaker 4>I gotta watch Josh Allen tear up the Patriots tomorrow.

1:12:00.138 --> 1:12:03.458
<v Speaker 4>This just and then out of nowhere, Josh Allen just

1:12:03.777 --> 1:12:06.697
<v Speaker 4>turns back into pre Brian Daveall Josh Allen. I'm like,

1:12:07.218 --> 1:12:09.777
<v Speaker 4>all right, I kind of figured everything wasn't gonna go

1:12:09.897 --> 1:12:12.258
<v Speaker 4>my way this weekend, but if that's the one that does,

1:12:12.298 --> 1:12:13.817
<v Speaker 4>I will absolutely take that.

1:12:14.378 --> 1:12:17.258
<v Speaker 2>A complete roller coaster of a weekend for me. So

1:12:17.657 --> 1:12:20.577
<v Speaker 2>I'm texting you during the college football games on Saturday,

1:12:20.937 --> 1:12:23.537
<v Speaker 2>just killing you about how you know, oh cool, we

1:12:23.617 --> 1:12:26.497
<v Speaker 2>got to watch everybody get blown out by four touchdowns

1:12:26.537 --> 1:12:29.458
<v Speaker 2>by much better teams. This was really fun. Really glad

1:12:29.458 --> 1:12:31.418
<v Speaker 2>that we put you know some you in the college

1:12:31.458 --> 1:12:34.458
<v Speaker 2>football playoffs, and Indiana like, good for you. You got

1:12:34.497 --> 1:12:37.617
<v Speaker 2>your participation trophy. You deserve to be there. Well, there

1:12:37.697 --> 1:12:37.977
<v Speaker 2>we go.

1:12:38.058 --> 1:12:39.777
<v Speaker 4>Hang on, if you're gonna do that rant. First of all,

1:12:39.817 --> 1:12:42.097
<v Speaker 4>Indiana had the closest game of any team in the playoffs.

1:12:42.138 --> 1:12:45.057
<v Speaker 2>Oh but what was it? What was the final? Yeah

1:12:45.178 --> 1:12:47.418
<v Speaker 2>it was ten points? But like not really?

1:12:47.458 --> 1:12:50.857
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So you mentioned SMU. Okay, Kirk Kurbstreet and look,

1:12:50.897 --> 1:12:52.897
<v Speaker 4>I love Kirk. I love Kirk, but I hate him

1:12:52.897 --> 1:12:55.737
<v Speaker 4>and the rest of ESPN. He's spot on, he's he's

1:12:55.777 --> 1:12:58.298
<v Speaker 4>being a company man for ESPN, but he's not. You

1:12:58.338 --> 1:13:03.017
<v Speaker 4>mentioned ESPN or you mentioned SMU, you mentioned Indiana. You

1:13:03.058 --> 1:13:05.657
<v Speaker 4>didn't mention the team that had the biggest loss of

1:13:05.697 --> 1:13:09.817
<v Speaker 4>any this weekend. I wonder why that is. That's Tennessee.

1:13:10.298 --> 1:13:12.377
<v Speaker 4>Oh that's sec Darling Tennessee.

1:13:12.458 --> 1:13:15.458
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but they also played one of the best teams.

1:13:15.817 --> 1:13:17.737
<v Speaker 2>They all played the best teams. It's the playoffs now,

1:13:18.378 --> 1:13:20.338
<v Speaker 2>it's not the best teams. That's my point.

1:13:20.418 --> 1:13:23.577
<v Speaker 4>They all played Penny State's not one of the best teams.

1:13:23.697 --> 1:13:27.818
<v Speaker 2>Yes, but Notre Dame. I don't think was in the playoffs.

1:13:27.817 --> 1:13:31.617
<v Speaker 2>Your argument, dissipation trophy, here's a ribbon. You made it.

1:13:31.657 --> 1:13:35.458
<v Speaker 4>You deserve your argument the whole time. Why can't we

1:13:35.497 --> 1:13:37.057
<v Speaker 4>get a big boy team like Alabama.

1:13:37.058 --> 1:13:37.817
<v Speaker 2>In the playoff ye.

1:13:38.098 --> 1:13:42.178
<v Speaker 4>Miss album, Alabama lost to Tennessee, who got spanked by

1:13:42.178 --> 1:13:42.697
<v Speaker 4>old Miss.

1:13:42.737 --> 1:13:45.017
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but I don't like that. It's not about the

1:13:45.298 --> 1:13:49.537
<v Speaker 2>Alabama property. No, but it's not a transitive property. Because

1:13:50.697 --> 1:13:56.458
<v Speaker 2>Alabama played Tennessee third Saturday in October. It's December. So

1:13:56.497 --> 1:14:00.018
<v Speaker 2>you're telling me that Alabama hasn't gotten any better since October.

1:14:00.098 --> 1:14:02.817
<v Speaker 4>No, they've actually pretty much gotten continually worse as the

1:14:02.857 --> 1:14:04.497
<v Speaker 4>years GOO, as the year has gone on. It's been

1:14:04.577 --> 1:14:08.697
<v Speaker 4>very concerning, frankly. But the point I'm making is what

1:14:08.817 --> 1:14:11.137
<v Speaker 4>I think happened. I don't think it was about the teams,

1:14:11.378 --> 1:14:13.697
<v Speaker 4>and it goes back to something we actually talked about.

1:14:13.458 --> 1:14:16.057
<v Speaker 2>With Drake May. Yeah. There.

1:14:16.418 --> 1:14:19.138
<v Speaker 4>I think there's never been games like this. This was

1:14:19.178 --> 1:14:23.217
<v Speaker 4>the first on campus, true postseason game college football history

1:14:23.218 --> 1:14:24.298
<v Speaker 4>since nineteen o two.

1:14:24.378 --> 1:14:27.737
<v Speaker 2>It's a yeah, it is.

1:14:27.978 --> 1:14:30.178
<v Speaker 4>It's I think the environments for too were too big,

1:14:30.218 --> 1:14:32.418
<v Speaker 4>and for a team like SMU. I think for a

1:14:32.458 --> 1:14:35.857
<v Speaker 4>team like Tennessee the cold, that Tennessee team was not

1:14:35.897 --> 1:14:37.097
<v Speaker 4>ready to go in that environment.

1:14:37.458 --> 1:14:39.857
<v Speaker 2>I can't believe you're blaming a bunch of children, a

1:14:39.897 --> 1:14:40.218
<v Speaker 2>bunch of.

1:14:40.258 --> 1:14:44.938
<v Speaker 4>Eighteen Well, it's a lot for kids to handle. And ultimately,

1:14:44.978 --> 1:14:46.537
<v Speaker 4>you know what, it's gonna be a good thing for

1:14:46.577 --> 1:14:49.537
<v Speaker 4>the NFL because when we talk about a rookie quarterback

1:14:49.577 --> 1:14:52.178
<v Speaker 4>first time in this environment, what's gonna be like, Like

1:14:52.418 --> 1:14:55.057
<v Speaker 4>Nico's gonna be from Tennessee's gonna be an NFL quarterback

1:14:55.058 --> 1:14:56.098
<v Speaker 4>at some point. I know he had a bad game,

1:14:56.098 --> 1:14:58.777
<v Speaker 4>He's gonna be a NFL quarterback. His first playoff game

1:14:59.138 --> 1:15:01.058
<v Speaker 4>is gonna be a lot easier. Haven't been to the

1:15:01.058 --> 1:15:04.298
<v Speaker 4>shoe for what that was, so I don't And and

1:15:04.338 --> 1:15:06.697
<v Speaker 4>it also we're gonna talk about, well, playoff caliber game

1:15:06.777 --> 1:15:10.097
<v Speaker 4>should be close. The NFL had a pair of whatever

1:15:10.178 --> 1:15:12.097
<v Speaker 4>essentially playoff matchups this weekend.

1:15:12.378 --> 1:15:15.657
<v Speaker 2>How close were those games? So were the first round

1:15:15.657 --> 1:15:19.338
<v Speaker 2>games duds? Absolutely? Absolutely they were? And you know what, Frank,

1:15:20.537 --> 1:15:22.977
<v Speaker 2>it's probably good. It's probably gonna be that way for

1:15:23.018 --> 1:15:25.218
<v Speaker 2>the next few years. I don't think. I don't think

1:15:25.218 --> 1:15:25.937
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't worth it.

1:15:25.937 --> 1:15:28.697
<v Speaker 4>All it was because here's the thing. I don't think

1:15:28.697 --> 1:15:30.098
<v Speaker 4>we'll get all four being duds all the time. But

1:15:30.098 --> 1:15:31.697
<v Speaker 4>there's gonn be duds in there, because that's what happens

1:15:31.697 --> 1:15:33.977
<v Speaker 4>in the playoffs. It happens in the NFL. The average

1:15:34.018 --> 1:15:37.537
<v Speaker 4>scoring margin for the first round was only two points

1:15:37.577 --> 1:15:39.617
<v Speaker 4>higher than it was for wild Card weekend last year.

1:15:39.897 --> 1:15:41.577
<v Speaker 4>And don't tell me that it's called because that one

1:15:41.577 --> 1:15:45.977
<v Speaker 4>blowout because the Cowboys Packers blowing out the Cowboys. Cowboys

1:15:45.978 --> 1:15:48.937
<v Speaker 4>scored two garbage time touchdowns. The other thing is the

1:15:48.937 --> 1:15:50.897
<v Speaker 4>the round of eight games are gonna be awesome, Like

1:15:51.218 --> 1:15:54.218
<v Speaker 4>Oregon Ohio State to me is the national championship. And

1:15:54.497 --> 1:15:55.817
<v Speaker 4>I think you said that too.

1:15:55.817 --> 1:15:58.057
<v Speaker 2>Which I don't like because that game is it's only

1:15:58.058 --> 1:16:01.338
<v Speaker 2>a quarterfinal game. Oh but that that happens all the time?

1:16:01.338 --> 1:16:03.857
<v Speaker 2>How many times? But Oregon Ohio State to me like that,

1:16:05.018 --> 1:16:08.338
<v Speaker 2>it just feels like that should be a game that

1:16:08.458 --> 1:16:10.458
<v Speaker 2>was played later on in this playoff and it's not

1:16:10.537 --> 1:16:13.897
<v Speaker 2>because of the format of the bye weeks for teams

1:16:13.937 --> 1:16:17.657
<v Speaker 2>like Arizona States. That doesn't the other team that has

1:16:17.697 --> 1:16:22.418
<v Speaker 2>the buy that shouldn't BYU no boise boise I received,

1:16:22.697 --> 1:16:24.977
<v Speaker 2>I would receve I know where BYU came, I would.

1:16:24.817 --> 1:16:26.617
<v Speaker 4>Receed after the first round because they were supposed to

1:16:26.617 --> 1:16:27.937
<v Speaker 4>be in it. They're supposed to win the Big twelve.

1:16:28.537 --> 1:16:33.458
<v Speaker 4>I think that if that happs all how many times?

1:16:33.857 --> 1:16:36.297
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but if they didn't have a bye. These stupid

1:16:36.338 --> 1:16:38.617
<v Speaker 2>bye week set up right where it's not done by

1:16:38.657 --> 1:16:40.857
<v Speaker 2>the seed, it's done by winning your conference. Just just

1:16:40.937 --> 1:16:42.458
<v Speaker 2>let me finish it. If they don't. If they didn't

1:16:42.497 --> 1:16:45.977
<v Speaker 2>have that, then teams like Ohio State, like Ohio State

1:16:46.058 --> 1:16:47.817
<v Speaker 2>would have been one of the top four teams.

1:16:48.338 --> 1:16:51.137
<v Speaker 4>They finished ranked fifth.

1:16:51.178 --> 1:16:53.138
<v Speaker 2>I think they finished Okay, Well, then they're still not

1:16:53.178 --> 1:16:56.098
<v Speaker 2>playing Oregon, is my point. No, you're not getting the

1:16:56.098 --> 1:16:57.337
<v Speaker 2>two best teams in the playoffs.

1:16:57.338 --> 1:17:00.137
<v Speaker 4>And I would go back to the original seeding after

1:17:00.178 --> 1:17:02.138
<v Speaker 4>the first round. That is a change they should make.

1:17:02.418 --> 1:17:04.937
<v Speaker 4>I do like the winning your conference having a bye

1:17:05.018 --> 1:17:08.258
<v Speaker 4>because it makes winning your conference worth something, which I

1:17:08.338 --> 1:17:11.297
<v Speaker 4>think is important because it keeps the regular season relevant.

1:17:11.657 --> 1:17:15.777
<v Speaker 4>But like, how many times did the Patriots did Brady

1:17:15.777 --> 1:17:18.017
<v Speaker 4>and Manning meet in the divisional round? And you know,

1:17:18.338 --> 1:17:20.258
<v Speaker 4>like when he was with the Broncos and there were

1:17:20.258 --> 1:17:24.017
<v Speaker 4>those Andrew Locke no Defense Colts teams that were still

1:17:24.058 --> 1:17:26.697
<v Speaker 4>getting to the AFC Championship, but we knew Brady Manning

1:17:26.737 --> 1:17:28.737
<v Speaker 4>in the divisional round, like yeah, this is this is it,

1:17:28.937 --> 1:17:30.138
<v Speaker 4>and we didn't complain about it.

1:17:30.138 --> 1:17:32.018
<v Speaker 2>I think it happened. I think Brady Manning and the

1:17:32.058 --> 1:17:32.817
<v Speaker 2>division around happened.

1:17:33.018 --> 1:17:34.378
<v Speaker 4>That happened, but there were a number of other There

1:17:34.378 --> 1:17:36.057
<v Speaker 4>were sometimes when they met the Ravens in the division,

1:17:36.258 --> 1:17:38.657
<v Speaker 4>it happened with the Ravens and Reknew like, all right,

1:17:38.817 --> 1:17:41.497
<v Speaker 4>and you had the t Bow Broncos or whatever in

1:17:41.537 --> 1:17:43.857
<v Speaker 4>the next round. It was like, I that's just kind

1:17:43.857 --> 1:17:45.617
<v Speaker 4>of how these things work. I don't really care where

1:17:45.657 --> 1:17:48.057
<v Speaker 4>the game happens. As long as it happens. There's gonna

1:17:48.058 --> 1:17:49.617
<v Speaker 4>be some other games in this next round two that

1:17:49.657 --> 1:17:52.657
<v Speaker 4>are good for reasons that we don't need to spend

1:17:52.697 --> 1:17:54.857
<v Speaker 4>a ton of time on. You were never going to

1:17:54.857 --> 1:17:57.777
<v Speaker 4>get eight teams. It was going to be four, twelve

1:17:57.937 --> 1:18:01.338
<v Speaker 4>or sixteen. Sixteen is too many. We all know four

1:18:01.458 --> 1:18:04.338
<v Speaker 4>was not enough. I will pay what's eight? What's wrong

1:18:04.378 --> 1:18:07.897
<v Speaker 4>with eight? It has to do with you have to

1:18:08.218 --> 1:18:10.178
<v Speaker 4>the SEC and Big ten kind of run it. But

1:18:10.218 --> 1:18:12.217
<v Speaker 4>you do have to get the other conference on board

1:18:12.258 --> 1:18:15.177
<v Speaker 4>to a certain extent, and the limited at large bids

1:18:15.218 --> 1:18:17.937
<v Speaker 4>they didn't feel like they would get properly represented, and

1:18:17.937 --> 1:18:19.297
<v Speaker 4>blah blah blah blah blah.

1:18:19.338 --> 1:18:22.617
<v Speaker 2>This is college football's problem. It's this is it right here?

1:18:22.657 --> 1:18:25.057
<v Speaker 2>That's the crux of the problem is that this is all.

1:18:25.497 --> 1:18:28.777
<v Speaker 2>At some respect, this is because and I get it,

1:18:29.058 --> 1:18:32.298
<v Speaker 2>but at some in some points, this is a participation

1:18:32.418 --> 1:18:36.178
<v Speaker 2>trophy because there's so much money to be made for

1:18:36.218 --> 1:18:39.298
<v Speaker 2>a program like SMU from being in this game, or

1:18:39.338 --> 1:18:41.817
<v Speaker 2>a program like Indiana that's trying to be up and

1:18:41.817 --> 1:18:44.298
<v Speaker 2>coming and is trying to build. Like, there's so much

1:18:44.338 --> 1:18:46.977
<v Speaker 2>at stake for those types of teams to be included

1:18:47.018 --> 1:18:50.497
<v Speaker 2>in the playoff that it becomes a situation of we're

1:18:50.537 --> 1:18:52.737
<v Speaker 2>just putting this team in the playoff because they have

1:18:52.777 --> 1:18:56.058
<v Speaker 2>the resume for it, but also because we want to partu.

1:18:55.978 --> 1:18:59.497
<v Speaker 4>Q March madness. We celebrate cinderellas. Why can't we do

1:18:59.537 --> 1:19:00.137
<v Speaker 4>that here.

1:18:59.978 --> 1:19:02.578
<v Speaker 2>Because there aren't going to be any cinderellas.

1:19:02.058 --> 1:19:04.177
<v Speaker 4>Until there is. It took how many years for sixteen

1:19:04.178 --> 1:19:05.777
<v Speaker 4>to be to one? They said, what never happened a sixteen?

1:19:06.178 --> 1:19:07.857
<v Speaker 2>No, but I wish not to give you that.

1:19:08.817 --> 1:19:11.218
<v Speaker 4>I will give you this it eventually it will because

1:19:11.218 --> 1:19:13.617
<v Speaker 4>they'll they'll see it wrong. It would be a twelve

1:19:13.657 --> 1:19:18.537
<v Speaker 4>that should be at twelve. I think college football's biggest

1:19:18.537 --> 1:19:21.458
<v Speaker 4>strength and its biggest weakness are the same thing, which

1:19:21.497 --> 1:19:26.298
<v Speaker 4>is there is basically no overarching governing body in some

1:19:26.458 --> 1:19:29.458
<v Speaker 4>ways that makes call because, like the NFL, a lot

1:19:29.458 --> 1:19:31.577
<v Speaker 4>of the issues with the NFL there's a lot of

1:19:31.697 --> 1:19:34.497
<v Speaker 4>uniformity to it. Yeah, and the college football does not

1:19:34.537 --> 1:19:37.297
<v Speaker 4>have uniformity. And in some ways that's a big strength,

1:19:37.338 --> 1:19:39.338
<v Speaker 4>but in an instance like this, it's a big weakness.

1:19:39.378 --> 1:19:42.217
<v Speaker 4>I don't think the playoffs perfect. I don't think four

1:19:42.298 --> 1:19:45.177
<v Speaker 4>bad games it's unfortunate, but I don't think four bad

1:19:45.218 --> 1:19:48.337
<v Speaker 4>games off the jump are enough to damn the whole tournament.

1:19:48.737 --> 1:19:52.817
<v Speaker 2>Okay. So that being said, the other big l let's

1:19:52.817 --> 1:19:55.338
<v Speaker 2>get into some draft stuff. Yeah, I have a I

1:19:55.458 --> 1:19:58.177
<v Speaker 2>might have a very hot draft take on the playoff

1:19:58.258 --> 1:20:00.218
<v Speaker 2>that you're either gonna love or hate. Okay. So the

1:20:00.258 --> 1:20:02.577
<v Speaker 2>other big element of this is obviously what I'm doing,

1:20:02.617 --> 1:20:04.937
<v Speaker 2>which is watching these games for the purposes of the

1:20:05.018 --> 1:20:08.137
<v Speaker 2>draft and evaluating guys in the draft. The two biggest

1:20:08.138 --> 1:20:10.258
<v Speaker 2>takeaways that I have in this game wasn't a big

1:20:10.298 --> 1:20:13.977
<v Speaker 2>Abdul Carter week. I didn't feel like but I watched

1:20:13.978 --> 1:20:15.497
<v Speaker 2>some of the film back and it seemed like he

1:20:15.577 --> 1:20:16.657
<v Speaker 2>was better on film than they.

1:20:16.697 --> 1:20:21.697
<v Speaker 4>Was watchin smu to a fault made a point in

1:20:21.737 --> 1:20:24.178
<v Speaker 4>that game of saying we're not gonna go near Abdul Carter.

1:20:24.378 --> 1:20:26.737
<v Speaker 4>Yeah and yeah, I mean I understand why they did it,

1:20:26.817 --> 1:20:28.897
<v Speaker 4>but they had when he needed to show up, he

1:20:28.937 --> 1:20:30.897
<v Speaker 4>showed up. So they had four trips to the red zone.

1:20:31.018 --> 1:20:33.258
<v Speaker 4>That should have been a close game because they had

1:20:33.258 --> 1:20:35.378
<v Speaker 4>four trips to When I say that that, I don't

1:20:35.378 --> 1:20:38.338
<v Speaker 4>mean like they had four trips to the red zone. Yes,

1:20:38.418 --> 1:20:42.178
<v Speaker 4>they scored three total points. Okay, Penn State's defense came up.

1:20:42.338 --> 1:20:42.458
<v Speaker 5>Oh.

1:20:42.497 --> 1:20:43.937
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, one more thing before we get to the draft.

1:20:44.218 --> 1:20:46.698
<v Speaker 4>Kurt Signetti, Indiana, what do you think of that punt.

1:20:47.138 --> 1:20:48.697
<v Speaker 2>The fourth and nine? I think that guy's a kook.

1:20:49.138 --> 1:20:52.577
<v Speaker 4>That's your national coach of the year. Yeah, consensus national

1:20:52.577 --> 1:20:55.378
<v Speaker 4>coach here. You don't think Bill Belichick's gonna run circles

1:20:55.418 --> 1:20:55.977
<v Speaker 4>through this thing.

1:20:56.617 --> 1:20:58.497
<v Speaker 2>He's doing well in the portal. Anyway, back to the draft,

1:20:58.537 --> 1:21:04.218
<v Speaker 2>Abdual North Carolina Football. I can't wait Abdull Carter. So

1:21:04.298 --> 1:21:07.657
<v Speaker 2>I thought Abdul Carter looked better than I was expecting.

1:21:07.697 --> 1:21:11.058
<v Speaker 2>And I agree with your general premise that do you

1:21:11.218 --> 1:21:14.137
<v Speaker 2>big game planned obviously for a guy like Abdill Carter

1:21:14.218 --> 1:21:16.338
<v Speaker 2>and sort of or saying we are not going to

1:21:16.458 --> 1:21:19.338
<v Speaker 2>let him take over the game. And although that might

1:21:19.418 --> 1:21:21.937
<v Speaker 2>hurt his you know, down to down production a little

1:21:21.978 --> 1:21:25.617
<v Speaker 2>bit like that's in itself. The case to draft him,

1:21:25.697 --> 1:21:28.577
<v Speaker 2>right is that he is a game planned player. He's

1:21:28.617 --> 1:21:31.177
<v Speaker 2>a Tuesday player that you have to then go out

1:21:31.218 --> 1:21:35.497
<v Speaker 2>and devise a blocking plan, a pass blocking plan for

1:21:35.617 --> 1:21:38.178
<v Speaker 2>how are we going to take, you know, prevent him

1:21:38.178 --> 1:21:42.897
<v Speaker 2>from taking over games. That opens up opportunities for other people. Now,

1:21:43.138 --> 1:21:46.017
<v Speaker 2>Christian Barmore eats Kean White, eats you know whatever. Like

1:21:46.058 --> 1:21:48.378
<v Speaker 2>I'm just using Patriots for an again, and I'll just

1:21:48.418 --> 1:21:48.777
<v Speaker 2>add this.

1:21:48.897 --> 1:21:53.097
<v Speaker 4>And obviously everybody saw what he did on Saturday going

1:21:53.138 --> 1:21:57.577
<v Speaker 4>into that game. Yeah, abdul Carter, not Abdul Carter, Kevin Jennings,

1:21:57.577 --> 1:22:00.697
<v Speaker 4>one of the Heisman favorites for next year. And I

1:22:00.697 --> 1:22:03.617
<v Speaker 4>don't look like correct response. And I think some of

1:22:03.617 --> 1:22:05.218
<v Speaker 4>that was the moment was just too big for me

1:22:05.218 --> 1:22:07.298
<v Speaker 4>and he needs to grow. But part of it he's

1:22:07.338 --> 1:22:10.657
<v Speaker 4>incredibly mobile. He's incredibly good getting around the pocket. So

1:22:10.697 --> 1:22:12.857
<v Speaker 4>they had a guy that kind of could counter Abdul

1:22:12.897 --> 1:22:15.017
<v Speaker 4>Carter and they just said, nevermind, we're not gonna touch him.

1:22:15.098 --> 1:22:18.378
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they were afraid of him. I would say that

1:22:18.378 --> 1:22:21.338
<v Speaker 2>that's the least my takeaway from it. I'm just pulling

1:22:21.418 --> 1:22:24.218
<v Speaker 2>up real quick. His actual pressure is because I think

1:22:24.218 --> 1:22:27.418
<v Speaker 2>that they were better than maybe what people would have

1:22:27.458 --> 1:22:29.897
<v Speaker 2>expected watching live in that game.

1:22:30.098 --> 1:22:34.218
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you think he was the best, And we'll get

1:22:34.258 --> 1:22:35.697
<v Speaker 4>to Kelvin Banks. I want to put the cap on,

1:22:35.737 --> 1:22:37.777
<v Speaker 4>which is what we stall here, and look it up.

1:22:38.138 --> 1:22:39.817
<v Speaker 4>Did you think he was the best of like the

1:22:39.817 --> 1:22:40.817
<v Speaker 4>top of the draft guys?

1:22:40.857 --> 1:22:42.218
<v Speaker 2>No, so I was actually going to get to that.

1:22:42.577 --> 1:22:47.338
<v Speaker 2>So Abdual Carter in this game against four pressures? Yeah,

1:22:47.378 --> 1:22:50.817
<v Speaker 2>four pressures? So oh no, sorry, five pressures. So it's

1:22:50.777 --> 1:22:53.657
<v Speaker 2>still pretty good, right, I mean like it was definitely

1:22:53.657 --> 1:22:55.857
<v Speaker 2>one of those games where you had to watch, Yeah,

1:22:55.857 --> 1:22:57.617
<v Speaker 2>and you're not going to look at the box score

1:22:57.657 --> 1:22:59.937
<v Speaker 2>and say, oh, Abdul Carter had a huge game, but

1:23:00.298 --> 1:23:03.458
<v Speaker 2>I'm expecting him to continue to pop and he just

1:23:04.258 --> 1:23:06.298
<v Speaker 2>look when you're trying to stack this board and we're

1:23:06.298 --> 1:23:08.777
<v Speaker 2>trying to figure out who are just the best overall

1:23:08.937 --> 1:23:12.657
<v Speaker 2>talents in this draft. I still think Travis Hunter is

1:23:12.737 --> 1:23:14.737
<v Speaker 2>on a planet of his own in terms of pure

1:23:14.777 --> 1:23:17.937
<v Speaker 2>talent on a football field, But I feel like Abdull

1:23:17.978 --> 1:23:19.977
<v Speaker 2>Carter is in that next thing you have to talk

1:23:20.018 --> 1:23:22.298
<v Speaker 2>about Abdul Carter, Yeah, Like you absolutely have to talk

1:23:22.338 --> 1:23:26.177
<v Speaker 2>about him. That being said, I thought Kelvin Banks was awesome.

1:23:26.897 --> 1:23:29.897
<v Speaker 2>I thought he was really really good. His run blocking

1:23:29.937 --> 1:23:32.338
<v Speaker 2>continues to be his best trait to me. He's a

1:23:32.378 --> 1:23:36.777
<v Speaker 2>people moving run blocker. It's not necessarily like dominant like J. C.

1:23:37.018 --> 1:23:39.657
<v Speaker 2>Latham man strength, you know, like it's not necessarily that.

1:23:40.258 --> 1:23:43.458
<v Speaker 2>But he's just very, very good in the running game.

1:23:43.857 --> 1:23:45.857
<v Speaker 2>And they do a lot of different things with Sark

1:23:45.937 --> 1:23:48.017
<v Speaker 2>in the run game and move their tackles a lot

1:23:48.138 --> 1:23:50.537
<v Speaker 2>and ask him to make some high level blocks that

1:23:50.617 --> 1:23:52.537
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna have to make at the NFL level, So

1:23:52.577 --> 1:23:57.418
<v Speaker 2>there's translatable stuff there. I look, I'm I'm weary of

1:23:57.458 --> 1:24:00.097
<v Speaker 2>the both these tackles for different reasons. You know, Campbell

1:24:00.098 --> 1:24:02.897
<v Speaker 2>obviously has the length issue, and Kelvin Banks I don't

1:24:02.937 --> 1:24:05.897
<v Speaker 2>think is quite as nimble as his feet in pass

1:24:05.937 --> 1:24:09.057
<v Speaker 2>protection as I would want my left tackle to be ideally.

1:24:09.737 --> 1:24:12.258
<v Speaker 2>But he's he's a talent, you know, he's a really

1:24:12.298 --> 1:24:16.737
<v Speaker 2>really good football player, and I'm starting to come around

1:24:16.857 --> 1:24:18.737
<v Speaker 2>to him if he plays like this the rest of

1:24:18.777 --> 1:24:22.017
<v Speaker 2>the playoff. Now, Will Campbell doesn't have this opportunity, right Like,

1:24:22.058 --> 1:24:24.137
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't have the opportunity to play in the playoff

1:24:24.178 --> 1:24:26.897
<v Speaker 2>and show out. But if Kelvin Banks plays this way

1:24:26.978 --> 1:24:28.697
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the playoffs, and I think there's gonna

1:24:28.737 --> 1:24:31.817
<v Speaker 2>be a lot of OT one conversations that he's going

1:24:31.857 --> 1:24:33.577
<v Speaker 2>to be the clear cut number one time and.

1:24:33.537 --> 1:24:38.258
<v Speaker 4>He's got So they have Arizona State, which is.

1:24:38.817 --> 1:24:41.218
<v Speaker 2>Uh, might as well be a double A team.

1:24:41.537 --> 1:24:43.657
<v Speaker 4>No, they have some NFL talented out that he's gonna

1:24:43.657 --> 1:24:45.418
<v Speaker 4>be going up again, so that that one doesn't help

1:24:45.458 --> 1:24:47.857
<v Speaker 4>him a ton. Assuming they win, though, they get Ohio

1:24:47.937 --> 1:24:50.218
<v Speaker 4>State of Oregon, and he is going to have a

1:24:50.338 --> 1:24:52.657
<v Speaker 4>chance to make some serious money. It's gonna be the

1:24:52.657 --> 1:24:54.577
<v Speaker 4>Cotton Bowl. Yeah, he's going to have a chance to

1:24:54.577 --> 1:24:58.137
<v Speaker 4>make some serious, serious money in that game. I don't

1:24:58.138 --> 1:24:59.617
<v Speaker 4>know if you want to talk about any of the

1:24:59.657 --> 1:25:00.218
<v Speaker 4>other top guys.

1:25:00.657 --> 1:25:03.697
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I was just curious now because I obviously was

1:25:03.737 --> 1:25:06.378
<v Speaker 2>watching those two specifically. Is there anybody else that stood

1:25:06.378 --> 1:25:08.897
<v Speaker 2>out to you from the this weekend past weekend?

1:25:09.058 --> 1:25:11.697
<v Speaker 4>Uh, there weren't a ton of guys going at least

1:25:11.697 --> 1:25:13.777
<v Speaker 4>from the top of the board. There's mid level guys.

1:25:14.178 --> 1:25:16.737
<v Speaker 4>Tyler Warren had a good game against SMU. Yeah, you know,

1:25:16.777 --> 1:25:19.257
<v Speaker 4>I'm interested to see the Georgia. The Georgia pass rushers.

1:25:19.258 --> 1:25:22.177
<v Speaker 4>Obviously we didn't see them. They had the buye.

1:25:22.657 --> 1:25:25.257
<v Speaker 2>I would love to see Banks get another crack at Georgia.

1:25:25.418 --> 1:25:26.418
<v Speaker 2>I would too.

1:25:26.657 --> 1:25:28.777
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, here's kind of where my hot take was. This

1:25:28.857 --> 1:25:31.178
<v Speaker 4>is more league league take, but this could impact the

1:25:31.218 --> 1:25:33.697
<v Speaker 4>Patriots especially. We talked about what might happen if they

1:25:33.697 --> 1:25:35.737
<v Speaker 4>win another game in the draft, and it's a two

1:25:35.817 --> 1:25:38.418
<v Speaker 4>quarterback draft right now, right so you figure one two

1:25:38.418 --> 1:25:42.017
<v Speaker 4>when it's gonna be Giants Raiders if that honestly him

1:25:42.058 --> 1:25:44.977
<v Speaker 4>Ward's playing in the pop Tart Bowl, which is kind

1:25:44.978 --> 1:25:45.697
<v Speaker 4>of surprising you.

1:25:46.777 --> 1:25:50.577
<v Speaker 2>I do love the pop Tart pole, the pop.

1:25:50.378 --> 1:25:53.178
<v Speaker 4>Tart, It's an edible mascot. What's not to love?

1:25:53.537 --> 1:25:54.577
<v Speaker 2>What flavor are you picking?

1:25:54.617 --> 1:25:57.937
<v Speaker 4>So the MVP of the winning team, there's three flavors

1:25:57.937 --> 1:25:59.617
<v Speaker 4>this year, gets to pick the flavor.

1:25:59.418 --> 1:26:02.737
<v Speaker 2>Brown cinnamon, sugar. I'm a classic pop tart guy. I

1:26:02.937 --> 1:26:05.098
<v Speaker 2>I I do like s'mores a lot too, Like if

1:26:05.098 --> 1:26:07.218
<v Speaker 2>I had to, you know, Smores is a great pop tart,

1:26:07.577 --> 1:26:11.137
<v Speaker 2>But I'm a classic brown cinnamon and sugar pop tart guy.

1:26:12.098 --> 1:26:18.378
<v Speaker 4>This year, wild berry hot fudge Sunday, Come on, I

1:26:18.378 --> 1:26:20.937
<v Speaker 4>thought they were There was a oh, frosted cinnon roll

1:26:21.018 --> 1:26:22.697
<v Speaker 4>is the mystery flavor.

1:26:22.458 --> 1:26:24.817
<v Speaker 2>Of course, freaking gen z Man. They just gotta make

1:26:24.857 --> 1:26:27.338
<v Speaker 2>everything like, can we just go back to the classics?

1:26:27.537 --> 1:26:29.338
<v Speaker 2>Can we go back to brown cinnamon sugar? And can

1:26:29.378 --> 1:26:32.178
<v Speaker 2>we go get s'mores up there? Because frosted cinnamon role,

1:26:32.178 --> 1:26:34.937
<v Speaker 2>that's brown cinnamon sugar single. They have to call it

1:26:35.018 --> 1:26:37.857
<v Speaker 2>frosted cinnamon role now because brown cinnamon sugar is not

1:26:37.897 --> 1:26:40.218
<v Speaker 2>a cool enough name for it, so they yes, they

1:26:40.258 --> 1:26:41.418
<v Speaker 2>have to spice up the name.

1:26:41.497 --> 1:26:44.417
<v Speaker 4>That's what go back to the take. Let's say Patriots

1:26:44.458 --> 1:26:46.737
<v Speaker 4>win another game, right, they moved down a little bit?

1:26:46.857 --> 1:26:47.097
<v Speaker 2>Yep?

1:26:48.218 --> 1:26:50.777
<v Speaker 4>Could they still be in a position where teams trying

1:26:50.777 --> 1:26:52.178
<v Speaker 4>to move up for quarterback.

1:26:52.058 --> 1:26:54.577
<v Speaker 2>Or maybe even maybe even they.

1:26:54.617 --> 1:26:56.458
<v Speaker 4>End up like thirty four, a team's trying to move

1:26:56.537 --> 1:26:58.458
<v Speaker 4>up into a Will Levis where, Yeah, we think this

1:26:58.537 --> 1:26:59.897
<v Speaker 4>guy might be the guy, but we don't want to

1:26:59.897 --> 1:27:00.897
<v Speaker 4>bet our first round pipon us.

1:27:00.897 --> 1:27:02.097
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna get him the top of the second.

1:27:02.218 --> 1:27:06.897
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, how did you feel about Will Howard's performance on

1:27:07.018 --> 1:27:07.697
<v Speaker 4>Saturday Night?

1:27:08.138 --> 1:27:11.497
<v Speaker 2>Didn't love it? I love him as a prospect.

1:27:11.537 --> 1:27:14.697
<v Speaker 4>I thought he's pretty good. Ohio State's quarterbacks.

1:27:14.298 --> 1:27:17.297
<v Speaker 2>Are being yeah, yeah, yeah, he's had a really good

1:27:17.737 --> 1:27:21.097
<v Speaker 2>close to the season. I probably can't. He was awful

1:27:21.138 --> 1:27:21.937
<v Speaker 2>against Michigan.

1:27:22.897 --> 1:27:24.057
<v Speaker 4>He was terrible against Michigan.

1:27:24.138 --> 1:27:26.737
<v Speaker 2>But besides that, he played well down the stretch. Here's

1:27:26.737 --> 1:27:29.458
<v Speaker 2>my point. So using the big board that we use

1:27:29.537 --> 1:27:31.418
<v Speaker 2>right now, here are the guy that he is right

1:27:31.458 --> 1:27:35.258
<v Speaker 2>around or behind? Okay, tell me how many of these

1:27:35.298 --> 1:27:38.258
<v Speaker 2>guys you think he can realistically jump. Kyle McCord from Syracuse.

1:27:38.497 --> 1:27:39.897
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, definitely can jump.

1:27:40.178 --> 1:27:41.458
<v Speaker 4>Riley Leonard from Notre Dame.

1:27:41.697 --> 1:27:44.938
<v Speaker 2>Oh god, he's still geez. Yes, he's just glorified.

1:27:45.338 --> 1:27:47.177
<v Speaker 4>What's his name from Texas? He played for the Colts,

1:27:47.617 --> 1:27:49.817
<v Speaker 4>Cole McCoy. No, Sam Allinger?

1:27:49.978 --> 1:27:50.218
<v Speaker 2>Sam?

1:27:50.418 --> 1:27:52.458
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So that's who's behind him. This is on the

1:27:52.458 --> 1:27:55.618
<v Speaker 4>big board. Yeah, Jylen Milroe.

1:27:55.897 --> 1:27:57.937
<v Speaker 2>See, that was the one that I was gonna mention.

1:27:58.258 --> 1:28:02.418
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, because he's done the Hayes in the barn with him.

1:28:02.537 --> 1:28:04.777
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I doubt he's gonna play the game. I don't

1:28:04.777 --> 1:28:07.897
<v Speaker 2>think he's gonna right, he can't. Well, he won't play

1:28:07.897 --> 1:28:09.697
<v Speaker 2>in the bowl game. Now. You know Bryce Young played

1:28:09.697 --> 1:28:12.057
<v Speaker 2>in the Sugar Bowl. Yeah, a couple of years ago.

1:28:13.298 --> 1:28:16.017
<v Speaker 2>That was a huge game for Bryce Young. No, yeah,

1:28:16.058 --> 1:28:19.258
<v Speaker 2>that's true. He lit Kansas State on fire. He had

1:28:19.258 --> 1:28:21.298
<v Speaker 2>a huge, huge game that was probably the game that

1:28:21.378 --> 1:28:26.618
<v Speaker 2>made it consensus number one overall. Pick. Maybe Jayleen Milroe.

1:28:26.897 --> 1:28:28.418
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if he was on that team, like

1:28:28.458 --> 1:28:32.217
<v Speaker 2>as a backup or anything like that, but maybe Philip

1:28:32.338 --> 1:28:36.017
<v Speaker 2>Leaves follows a similar game plan. Milroe, though, I think,

1:28:36.138 --> 1:28:39.138
<v Speaker 2>is the one to me that I would maybe take

1:28:39.178 --> 1:28:39.617
<v Speaker 2>a chance on.

1:28:39.937 --> 1:28:41.497
<v Speaker 4>Jayalen Miller is playing the Bowl game.

1:28:41.537 --> 1:28:44.977
<v Speaker 2>Actually, Okay, I'm not surprised because I I guys have,

1:28:45.298 --> 1:28:48.617
<v Speaker 2>especially at that position, have really really helped their stock

1:28:48.817 --> 1:28:49.897
<v Speaker 2>in the in the bowl games.

1:28:49.897 --> 1:28:51.577
<v Speaker 4>All right, I'll give you a couple more here. Play

1:28:51.577 --> 1:28:54.618
<v Speaker 4>maybe Milroe Michigan's rematch of the National Championship.

1:28:54.657 --> 1:28:57.057
<v Speaker 2>I feel like that is in the because Michigan's defense

1:28:57.138 --> 1:29:00.817
<v Speaker 2>is still good and Michigan's defense still, like schematically is,

1:29:01.058 --> 1:29:03.338
<v Speaker 2>is creative and uh, you know, it can do some

1:29:03.418 --> 1:29:06.537
<v Speaker 2>different things that NFL teams do. So like you still

1:29:06.537 --> 1:29:09.817
<v Speaker 2>go into that game thinking that you're playing a pseudo

1:29:10.657 --> 1:29:13.977
<v Speaker 2>legit defense and if he puts up numbers, then that's

1:29:14.018 --> 1:29:14.577
<v Speaker 2>gonna help him.

1:29:14.777 --> 1:29:17.777
<v Speaker 4>Last year, Michigan Alabama's national championship. This year it is

1:29:17.817 --> 1:29:20.218
<v Speaker 4>the Relyaquest Bowl, formerly the Outback Bowl.

1:29:20.218 --> 1:29:21.017
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so you think.

1:29:20.897 --> 1:29:24.097
<v Speaker 4>Maybe Will Howard, now there's no more outa anymore, maybe

1:29:24.178 --> 1:29:25.937
<v Speaker 4>Jalen Mirrow finishes that. I know, you usuld to get

1:29:25.937 --> 1:29:30.897
<v Speaker 4>free blooming onions like that. Carson, I think without an elbow.

1:29:31.018 --> 1:29:36.058
<v Speaker 2>I think Carson best going on draft, I think so yeah, yeah, yeah.

1:29:35.857 --> 1:29:41.098
<v Speaker 4>Quin yours, quin yours or Will Howard quin yours?

1:29:41.138 --> 1:29:44.458
<v Speaker 2>Really? You know, I don't like quin yours. I want

1:29:44.697 --> 1:29:44.897
<v Speaker 2>just a.

1:29:44.978 --> 1:29:49.418
<v Speaker 4>More physically built so Will Howard six four to two

1:29:49.458 --> 1:29:49.937
<v Speaker 4>thirty five.

1:29:50.098 --> 1:29:53.217
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't know. Man, he played awful against Michigan

1:29:53.258 --> 1:29:54.777
<v Speaker 2>and I can't get that out of my head. All right.

1:29:55.298 --> 1:29:58.217
<v Speaker 4>That's the thing about the playoffs against Oregon. I organize

1:29:58.258 --> 1:29:58.977
<v Speaker 4>a very good defense.

1:29:59.058 --> 1:30:01.497
<v Speaker 2>I still feel like, and I understand that. You know,

1:30:01.537 --> 1:30:06.617
<v Speaker 2>in hindsight, that was a really talented Texas offense last year. Yeah,

1:30:06.657 --> 1:30:08.897
<v Speaker 2>but really, when you think about it, like, it's not

1:30:09.058 --> 1:30:11.458
<v Speaker 2>like Xavier Worthy or eighty Mitchell's really lit the world

1:30:11.497 --> 1:30:13.577
<v Speaker 2>on fire on the NFL either, you know what I mean?

1:30:13.697 --> 1:30:15.737
<v Speaker 2>So you could go both ways with that. And I

1:30:15.777 --> 1:30:18.857
<v Speaker 2>do think that some teams are eight team will convince themselves,

1:30:18.857 --> 1:30:21.258
<v Speaker 2>not like top ten pick or anything, but I think

1:30:21.298 --> 1:30:24.017
<v Speaker 2>eight team will convince themselves that they can get last

1:30:24.058 --> 1:30:25.697
<v Speaker 2>year's Quene Wars right right.

1:30:25.857 --> 1:30:27.897
<v Speaker 4>And then the last one ahead of him is Jackson Dark.

1:30:29.657 --> 1:30:31.617
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Jackson I feel like is more of like a

1:30:31.657 --> 1:30:33.897
<v Speaker 2>folk hero than he is a quarterback across. That is

1:30:33.937 --> 1:30:35.937
<v Speaker 2>a great way to put it. He's a college quarterback.

1:30:36.018 --> 1:30:39.218
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So all right, maybe Jalen Milroe maybe put in yours.

1:30:39.258 --> 1:30:42.577
<v Speaker 4>I will say, Will Howard is going to Senior Bowl. Okay,

1:30:42.617 --> 1:30:45.777
<v Speaker 4>so we will have that one of Maybe it's yours,

1:30:45.817 --> 1:30:49.017
<v Speaker 4>then maybe it's Howard, maybe it's Milroe in the Relyaquest Bowl.

1:30:49.418 --> 1:30:52.017
<v Speaker 4>I'm still not locking in this being a two quarterback draft.

1:30:52.018 --> 1:30:54.657
<v Speaker 4>If Will Howard plays well in this playoff, and that's

1:30:54.697 --> 1:30:56.178
<v Speaker 4>the thing for I guess it is true for you

1:30:56.258 --> 1:30:58.697
<v Speaker 4>or to yours too. But you look at it. What

1:30:58.857 --> 1:31:01.737
<v Speaker 4>Will Howard will have had to have done? Blown out

1:31:01.777 --> 1:31:05.817
<v Speaker 4>Tennessee and he put up numbers against an SEC defense

1:31:05.817 --> 1:31:07.937
<v Speaker 4>twenty four to twenty nine, three hundred eleven yards.

1:31:07.697 --> 1:31:08.458
<v Speaker 2>Two touchdowns.

1:31:08.737 --> 1:31:11.338
<v Speaker 4>He will have blown out in SEC defense. He will

1:31:11.338 --> 1:31:13.378
<v Speaker 4>have beat the number one team in the country in Oregon,

1:31:13.378 --> 1:31:16.137
<v Speaker 4>which is another number one defense, another top defense. Yeah,

1:31:16.218 --> 1:31:19.218
<v Speaker 4>all odds are unless Arizona State pulls off something spectacular,

1:31:19.218 --> 1:31:22.737
<v Speaker 4>he'll beat Texas. That'll be his second SEC win and

1:31:22.737 --> 1:31:24.418
<v Speaker 4>then if he gets one more win, now he gets

1:31:24.418 --> 1:31:26.777
<v Speaker 4>throw that national champion tag on top of it. I'm

1:31:26.777 --> 1:31:29.018
<v Speaker 4>not saying that he's gonna be a great NFL quarterback,

1:31:29.258 --> 1:31:31.977
<v Speaker 4>but isn't that kind of resume teams are looking for

1:31:32.018 --> 1:31:33.058
<v Speaker 4>when they draft.

1:31:32.737 --> 1:31:35.897
<v Speaker 2>The guy sounds JJ McCarthy, JJ.

1:31:35.777 --> 1:31:38.937
<v Speaker 4>McCarthy, Jac Jones. Yeah, and maybe that's who he is

1:31:38.978 --> 1:31:41.338
<v Speaker 4>in the NFL, but we know teams make wrong picks

1:31:41.378 --> 1:31:44.177
<v Speaker 4>all the time. So I just I think Will Howard

1:31:44.178 --> 1:31:47.137
<v Speaker 4>has some room to rise, which could be and maybe

1:31:47.218 --> 1:31:49.017
<v Speaker 4>Jalen Milroe does too. We can throw them this take.

1:31:49.777 --> 1:31:52.218
<v Speaker 4>That is a factor when we talk about if the

1:31:52.218 --> 1:31:54.617
<v Speaker 4>Patriots win another game where their pick is, because maybe

1:31:54.657 --> 1:31:57.017
<v Speaker 4>there's a third quarterback that's not going third like last

1:31:57.058 --> 1:31:59.617
<v Speaker 4>year one, two, three, but maybe fifth, sixth, seventh, the

1:31:59.657 --> 1:32:01.298
<v Speaker 4>team's moving up to take them.

1:32:01.338 --> 1:32:03.937
<v Speaker 2>So I like Milroe a little bit, and I don't

1:32:03.937 --> 1:32:07.097
<v Speaker 2>meet the stereotype, but like there's obviously the Jalen Hurts thing. Yeah,

1:32:07.338 --> 1:32:11.178
<v Speaker 2>and I see some of that comparison with with with Milroe.

1:32:11.258 --> 1:32:14.418
<v Speaker 2>I also think that as a passer he got better

1:32:14.458 --> 1:32:14.857
<v Speaker 2>this year.

1:32:14.937 --> 1:32:16.017
<v Speaker 4>He did get much better.

1:32:16.218 --> 1:32:19.018
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And there's a lot of athleticism there. There's a

1:32:19.058 --> 1:32:22.418
<v Speaker 2>lot of arm talent there, uh there, if you build

1:32:22.458 --> 1:32:24.977
<v Speaker 2>it like the Eagles have built it for Hurts and

1:32:25.018 --> 1:32:28.258
<v Speaker 2>you built it a certain way. I believe that that

1:32:28.378 --> 1:32:31.497
<v Speaker 2>Jalen Milroe could potentially be a starting quarterback in the NFL.

1:32:32.098 --> 1:32:34.937
<v Speaker 2>But is that enough for him to go in the

1:32:34.937 --> 1:32:37.058
<v Speaker 2>first round. I don't know, but it's probably enough for

1:32:37.138 --> 1:32:38.737
<v Speaker 2>him to go in the second, right, Like.

1:32:40.178 --> 1:32:41.817
<v Speaker 4>And look, it's too easy for these things, but we

1:32:41.897 --> 1:32:44.937
<v Speaker 4>like this database. Yeah, Dave Jylen Miller going six overall?

1:32:45.018 --> 1:32:46.977
<v Speaker 2>Right now? Oh yeah, no, I mean that's not happening

1:32:47.098 --> 1:32:49.937
<v Speaker 2>unless he I know, I can't. He would have to

1:32:50.138 --> 1:32:52.537
<v Speaker 2>light up the bowl game, light up the pre draft

1:32:52.577 --> 1:32:54.138
<v Speaker 2>process like that would would He is.

1:32:54.138 --> 1:32:56.057
<v Speaker 4>Going to be impressive, and he's one of the few

1:32:56.138 --> 1:32:59.057
<v Speaker 4>guys like usually top quarterbacks don't do stuff.

1:32:59.298 --> 1:33:00.897
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I wouldn't be surprized if he.

1:33:00.978 --> 1:33:03.298
<v Speaker 4>Runs at the combine and throws and does the whole

1:33:03.338 --> 1:33:05.257
<v Speaker 4>because he's going to dominate the combine.

1:33:05.338 --> 1:33:08.218
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's why that's why I like him. You know,

1:33:08.298 --> 1:33:11.098
<v Speaker 2>I could he be sort of like and again I

1:33:11.098 --> 1:33:13.017
<v Speaker 2>don't mean the stereotype, but like, could he be sort

1:33:13.018 --> 1:33:15.897
<v Speaker 2>of like an Anthony Richardson. Jalen hurts like type of process.

1:33:16.018 --> 1:33:18.657
<v Speaker 2>Not that big though he's not as big as Richardson. No,

1:33:18.897 --> 1:33:22.218
<v Speaker 2>he's not even as like he's hurts his short shorter right,

1:33:22.298 --> 1:33:26.577
<v Speaker 2>which hurts like two which like Milro's taller.

1:33:26.857 --> 1:33:28.897
<v Speaker 4>He's listening to two twenty. Wow, I would not have

1:33:28.937 --> 1:33:30.898
<v Speaker 4>guessed that I run around.

1:33:30.937 --> 1:33:32.258
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I think he's kind of built a little bit

1:33:32.298 --> 1:33:35.857
<v Speaker 2>like Jalen Hurts. All I doesn't look like it. But yeah,

1:33:35.978 --> 1:33:38.097
<v Speaker 2>all right, let's take these phone calls and I want

1:33:38.098 --> 1:33:40.497
<v Speaker 2>to talk a little bit Chargers before we wrap up

1:33:40.537 --> 1:33:43.977
<v Speaker 2>the show. Here. Justin is in North Carolina. What's up? Justin?

1:33:44.058 --> 1:33:46.697
<v Speaker 5>I didn't know at first, you know, I was like, hey, how.

1:33:46.657 --> 1:33:48.658
<v Speaker 2>Do you going good? How are you?

1:33:49.577 --> 1:33:54.817
<v Speaker 5>I'm good. My problem is that after they had back

1:33:54.897 --> 1:33:58.258
<v Speaker 5>such a terrible game, and then they had such a

1:33:58.418 --> 1:34:02.057
<v Speaker 5>good day, then they had such a good game. It's

1:34:02.178 --> 1:34:08.577
<v Speaker 5>like everybody was really complaining Drake May. Everybody would say,

1:34:08.617 --> 1:34:12.177
<v Speaker 5>Drake May just stops, you know, ninety Drake May lost

1:34:12.218 --> 1:34:19.617
<v Speaker 5>the game, and and then and then there's saying, you

1:34:19.657 --> 1:34:25.058
<v Speaker 5>know that Ramondre was, you know, got our hands and

1:34:25.098 --> 1:34:26.057
<v Speaker 5>all that kind of stuff.

1:34:26.138 --> 1:34:27.458
<v Speaker 2>It means he did run good.

1:34:27.577 --> 1:34:31.857
<v Speaker 5>I mean he bumbled once and then in that gatteral play,

1:34:31.937 --> 1:34:33.777
<v Speaker 5>which was property because they were in the back of

1:34:33.777 --> 1:34:36.737
<v Speaker 5>the end zone. It's just that they were just and

1:34:36.777 --> 1:34:39.338
<v Speaker 5>now they're ready to trade them. I mean, I think

1:34:39.338 --> 1:34:42.617
<v Speaker 5>he played a better game. He made more yards and

1:34:42.737 --> 1:34:46.057
<v Speaker 5>played and played a better game as far as running

1:34:46.537 --> 1:34:51.817
<v Speaker 5>than he has this all year. And you know, now,

1:34:52.258 --> 1:34:55.697
<v Speaker 5>I know it's a problem that it's fumble, but gifts

1:34:55.697 --> 1:34:59.897
<v Speaker 5>the fumble as well, and I just I just now

1:35:00.657 --> 1:35:03.577
<v Speaker 5>and if they had to even though they did not win,

1:35:03.657 --> 1:35:05.897
<v Speaker 5>which whoever, I know, that's what a lot of people wanted.

1:35:06.897 --> 1:35:12.057
<v Speaker 5>They played so good against the Bill that that took

1:35:12.418 --> 1:35:17.017
<v Speaker 5>away from the m v P status of Josh Allen.

1:35:17.617 --> 1:35:21.258
<v Speaker 5>So I mean, if they did do good, they did

1:35:21.657 --> 1:35:24.777
<v Speaker 5>show a good front. And I just don't understand why

1:35:24.817 --> 1:35:26.737
<v Speaker 5>they don't. I guess I can see they just don't

1:35:26.737 --> 1:35:30.458
<v Speaker 5>want to be over overly confident, because it's all it's

1:35:30.537 --> 1:35:33.178
<v Speaker 5>get up and down. I just I just want to

1:35:33.178 --> 1:35:35.298
<v Speaker 5>give him a little break, you know.

1:35:36.298 --> 1:35:39.338
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's that's fair. Just yeah, yes, I know this.

1:35:39.458 --> 1:35:41.577
<v Speaker 4>For the segment she's talking about on the Sports Ub,

1:35:41.617 --> 1:35:43.737
<v Speaker 4>Matt McCarthy did the lightning round where he just had

1:35:43.777 --> 1:35:46.298
<v Speaker 4>as many people calling as possible, did Drake May cost

1:35:46.378 --> 1:35:49.057
<v Speaker 4>Patriots the game? Yes or no? He said yes. They

1:35:49.098 --> 1:35:51.458
<v Speaker 4>were like, I think it was like twenty two to

1:35:51.537 --> 1:35:54.577
<v Speaker 4>three callers saying no. So he just got put in

1:35:54.657 --> 1:35:55.097
<v Speaker 4>his place.

1:35:55.937 --> 1:35:59.378
<v Speaker 2>That's a that's a very Matt McCarthy thing to do,

1:36:00.058 --> 1:36:02.977
<v Speaker 2>which I say with all due respect, he just likes

1:36:02.978 --> 1:36:04.777
<v Speaker 2>to poke the bear a little bit. Oh yeah, yeah,

1:36:04.817 --> 1:36:08.497
<v Speaker 2>that's absolutely But I think the biggest thing to me

1:36:08.577 --> 1:36:09.617
<v Speaker 2>with Drake May, by the.

1:36:09.617 --> 1:36:12.378
<v Speaker 4>Way Patriots of World Marcus Jones out Ben Brown is

1:36:12.418 --> 1:36:14.057
<v Speaker 4>one of eleven that are questioned.

1:36:14.138 --> 1:36:16.857
<v Speaker 2>Yes, so Ben Brown still has a chance in the protocol,

1:36:16.857 --> 1:36:18.977
<v Speaker 2>which is going to be tough. This regime, though, has

1:36:18.978 --> 1:36:21.097
<v Speaker 2>done it right. Drake May cleared protocol.

1:36:21.258 --> 1:36:24.657
<v Speaker 4>Remember there's like a not loophole, but it's easier for

1:36:24.737 --> 1:36:26.257
<v Speaker 4>quarterbacks to get out of the protocol.

1:36:26.378 --> 1:36:29.137
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I also wonder too, you know, if Cold Strange

1:36:29.178 --> 1:36:32.977
<v Speaker 2>is ready, you probably want to see Cole Strange at

1:36:32.978 --> 1:36:35.378
<v Speaker 2>some point play this year, and this is probably the

1:36:35.418 --> 1:36:38.338
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to do it. Like Ben Brown doesn't deserve to

1:36:38.338 --> 1:36:40.458
<v Speaker 2>get bench based off of the tape, like he played

1:36:40.458 --> 1:36:43.097
<v Speaker 2>pretty well in this game last week. Besides the snaps

1:36:43.098 --> 1:36:45.537
<v Speaker 2>which have continued been an issue. That's why I was

1:36:45.537 --> 1:36:48.378
<v Speaker 2>a little bit surprised that it was a concussion because

1:36:48.378 --> 1:36:49.977
<v Speaker 2>it's two weeks in a row now that he's had

1:36:49.978 --> 1:36:52.178
<v Speaker 2>some snapping issues, and I actually thought that maybe there

1:36:52.258 --> 1:36:55.138
<v Speaker 2>was something physically, you know, like an ailment, like a

1:36:55.338 --> 1:36:58.258
<v Speaker 2>core issue, or like an upper body type injury that

1:36:58.897 --> 1:37:02.737
<v Speaker 2>or was causing it. But it's a concussion, so it

1:37:02.777 --> 1:37:05.977
<v Speaker 2>still has a chance to play. Back to Justina's point, though,

1:37:06.058 --> 1:37:09.497
<v Speaker 2>I think the biggest thing with Drake May there's so

1:37:09.617 --> 1:37:12.458
<v Speaker 2>much good on the film with him, there's so much good,

1:37:12.777 --> 1:37:15.017
<v Speaker 2>you know, a lot of really great, high level throws.

1:37:15.298 --> 1:37:17.497
<v Speaker 2>I think he sees space in the defense and reads

1:37:17.537 --> 1:37:20.737
<v Speaker 2>zone coverage extremely well, just kind of knows where the

1:37:20.777 --> 1:37:22.458
<v Speaker 2>voids are going to be and where the pockets are

1:37:22.497 --> 1:37:24.857
<v Speaker 2>going to be. And he has great ball placement against

1:37:24.857 --> 1:37:26.737
<v Speaker 2>man coverage for the most part, which is how you

1:37:26.777 --> 1:37:28.418
<v Speaker 2>beat man right. You got to put the ball in

1:37:28.458 --> 1:37:31.218
<v Speaker 2>a place away from the defender for the receiver to

1:37:31.258 --> 1:37:34.017
<v Speaker 2>make the catch. I thought the early third down to

1:37:34.098 --> 1:37:36.937
<v Speaker 2>Hunter Henry was a perfect example of that. That's pretty

1:37:36.937 --> 1:37:39.857
<v Speaker 2>good coverage. That is a muddied pocket. There's pressure on

1:37:39.978 --> 1:37:42.577
<v Speaker 2>him in that pocket. He stands in that pocket, and

1:37:42.617 --> 1:37:44.577
<v Speaker 2>he puts the ball on Henry and makes the play,

1:37:44.617 --> 1:37:46.577
<v Speaker 2>and they move the chains and they stay on the field.

1:37:46.937 --> 1:37:48.657
<v Speaker 2>So there's a lot of great things. I think, you

1:37:48.697 --> 1:37:52.418
<v Speaker 2>know what we're all looking for. One this fan base,

1:37:52.577 --> 1:37:55.858
<v Speaker 2>and understandably so has some Mac Jones rookie season PTSD,

1:37:56.098 --> 1:37:58.697
<v Speaker 2>right that just exists within this fan base. We saw

1:37:58.737 --> 1:38:01.977
<v Speaker 2>a quarterback, a young quarterback not too long ago, played

1:38:02.018 --> 1:38:04.298
<v Speaker 2>some really good football as a rookie, and then it

1:38:04.378 --> 1:38:07.298
<v Speaker 2>completely fell off after that. So there are certain people

1:38:07.378 --> 1:38:10.338
<v Speaker 2>that are just setting themselves up for failure right like

1:38:10.378 --> 1:38:13.657
<v Speaker 2>that are trying to protect their own feelings from that. Again,

1:38:14.138 --> 1:38:16.577
<v Speaker 2>the second thing is is that it's fair to say

1:38:16.937 --> 1:38:18.977
<v Speaker 2>they're still not winning these games that Drake May is

1:38:18.978 --> 1:38:21.817
<v Speaker 2>playing it. Yeah, he has won from wire to wire.

1:38:21.897 --> 1:38:24.977
<v Speaker 2>He's won one game against the Bears since he took

1:38:25.018 --> 1:38:28.297
<v Speaker 2>over as the starter, So just where can he improve?

1:38:28.617 --> 1:38:31.097
<v Speaker 2>It's not everyone sees it, like I think, all, well, everyone,

1:38:31.458 --> 1:38:33.857
<v Speaker 2>you can't deny that everyone sees the talent like that

1:38:33.978 --> 1:38:37.737
<v Speaker 2>is undeniable that this guy is a franchise quarterback talent.

1:38:38.258 --> 1:38:41.458
<v Speaker 2>But now it's on the Patriots and on this organization

1:38:41.497 --> 1:38:44.057
<v Speaker 2>as a whole to develop that talent, it's to get

1:38:44.138 --> 1:38:47.137
<v Speaker 2>him developed. It's to get the situation around him to develop.

1:38:47.138 --> 1:38:49.497
<v Speaker 2>It's to get him with the right coaches, the right receivers.

1:38:49.777 --> 1:38:51.897
<v Speaker 2>I get him an offensive line. Like, there's a lot

1:38:51.937 --> 1:38:54.137
<v Speaker 2>that goes into that, and that's where we're at. We've

1:38:54.218 --> 1:38:58.217
<v Speaker 2>checked the box of is Drake may a starting quarterback

1:38:58.218 --> 1:39:00.697
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL? I think the physical talent checks that

1:39:00.777 --> 1:39:03.418
<v Speaker 2>box for you. Now the question is is you know,

1:39:03.897 --> 1:39:06.218
<v Speaker 2>can he be better? Right? Can he be even better

1:39:06.258 --> 1:39:07.617
<v Speaker 2>than this? I'll touch on one other thing.

1:39:07.697 --> 1:39:10.857
<v Speaker 4>She said, Yeah, the Patriots ended Josh Allen's MVP chanswer

1:39:10.897 --> 1:39:13.017
<v Speaker 4>impact his MVP chances? Who's your MVP?

1:39:13.098 --> 1:39:18.138
<v Speaker 2>Evan? He was damn good yesterday, Lamar. You know this

1:39:18.258 --> 1:39:21.777
<v Speaker 2>is truly like deciding. I bet you this is how

1:39:21.897 --> 1:39:25.537
<v Speaker 2>parents feel about deciding between children, because I you know,

1:39:25.577 --> 1:39:33.577
<v Speaker 2>I love both guys. Oh, come on, I probably give

1:39:33.577 --> 1:39:37.017
<v Speaker 2>it to Josh Allen. Still cut really yeah, first.

1:39:36.897 --> 1:39:39.137
<v Speaker 4>Off, what he did against this Patriots defense.

1:39:39.418 --> 1:39:43.257
<v Speaker 2>Second of all, okay, that's such. Don't don't be recency biased,

1:39:43.258 --> 1:39:45.218
<v Speaker 2>don't don't fine, don't look at what.

1:39:45.218 --> 1:39:47.617
<v Speaker 4>He did against the Texans and look at what Lamar

1:39:47.657 --> 1:39:48.298
<v Speaker 4>did against Texan.

1:39:48.418 --> 1:39:50.937
<v Speaker 2>Do you remember the reaction after that Texans game, because

1:39:50.937 --> 1:39:53.458
<v Speaker 2>this is also another version of like, oh when did

1:39:53.458 --> 1:39:56.418
<v Speaker 2>they play Tennessee October? Like, okay, so he played the

1:39:56.777 --> 1:39:59.458
<v Speaker 2>Texans four months ago and then this Texans team played

1:39:59.537 --> 1:40:02.657
<v Speaker 2>Lamar yesterday Like those are not it's not the same.

1:40:03.817 --> 1:40:07.178
<v Speaker 2>And Lamar has been awesome Lamar, I have no doubt

1:40:07.178 --> 1:40:11.657
<v Speaker 2>about that. I do wonder. Look what it comes down

1:40:11.657 --> 1:40:15.058
<v Speaker 2>to when I'm evaluating m VP, and maybe this is

1:40:15.098 --> 1:40:17.777
<v Speaker 2>an argument for Lamar and that I'm making without me knowing.

1:40:18.378 --> 1:40:20.817
<v Speaker 2>It's basically which if you took the player off the team,

1:40:20.817 --> 1:40:23.057
<v Speaker 2>how much worse would they get? Right like that? That's

1:40:23.098 --> 1:40:28.057
<v Speaker 2>what we're talking about here. My thing with Lamar, and

1:40:28.098 --> 1:40:30.098
<v Speaker 2>this is one of your guys, like Derrick Henry is

1:40:30.098 --> 1:40:32.617
<v Speaker 2>there now and he's had a great scene now, Lamar

1:40:32.697 --> 1:40:34.817
<v Speaker 2>is letting him do a lot of it right like that.

1:40:34.937 --> 1:40:36.937
<v Speaker 2>It's a lot of it is because of Lamar that

1:40:36.978 --> 1:40:38.577
<v Speaker 2>Derek Henry has been there.

1:40:38.657 --> 1:40:40.777
<v Speaker 4>Lamar still has like forty total touchdowns.

1:40:40.857 --> 1:40:43.298
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's like forty four to four in terms of

1:40:43.298 --> 1:40:44.937
<v Speaker 2>touchdowns interceptions right now.

1:40:45.098 --> 1:40:47.497
<v Speaker 4>Really, really Burrow should be in the conversation too, but

1:40:47.537 --> 1:40:49.737
<v Speaker 4>the Bengals just suck. Yeah, But because if you talk

1:40:49.737 --> 1:40:51.937
<v Speaker 4>about take him off the team. Whose team gets worse,

1:40:52.817 --> 1:40:55.617
<v Speaker 4>it's Joe Burrow. I just the Bengals seems nothing without him.

1:40:55.657 --> 1:40:57.378
<v Speaker 2>Watching the Bills up close, and it was a bad

1:40:57.458 --> 1:40:59.017
<v Speaker 2>I put him on the downs list. It was a

1:40:59.018 --> 1:41:01.657
<v Speaker 2>bad Josh Allen game, There's no doubt about that. But

1:41:01.817 --> 1:41:07.097
<v Speaker 2>watching the Bills up close, Josh Allen does not have

1:41:07.897 --> 1:41:10.577
<v Speaker 2>a great supporting cast. He has a good supporting cast,

1:41:11.258 --> 1:41:15.657
<v Speaker 2>but those receivers are nothing special. Like it's washed Amari Cooper,

1:41:16.458 --> 1:41:19.098
<v Speaker 2>it's Khalil Shakiro, who's a really good slot receiver, but

1:41:19.098 --> 1:41:22.418
<v Speaker 2>that's what he is, right, And it's Keon Coleman, who

1:41:22.697 --> 1:41:25.017
<v Speaker 2>you know how I feel about Keon Coleman. And I

1:41:25.058 --> 1:41:27.777
<v Speaker 2>said it at the time when they drafted Dalton Kinkaid,

1:41:28.098 --> 1:41:31.057
<v Speaker 2>Dalond Kinkaid was that was a bad draft pick in

1:41:31.058 --> 1:41:34.858
<v Speaker 2>my mind. Is his career so far has been exactly

1:41:34.897 --> 1:41:37.017
<v Speaker 2>like a lot of tight ends like early in the draft,

1:41:37.018 --> 1:41:40.057
<v Speaker 2>aar like not all of them are gonna be brock Bowers, right,

1:41:40.098 --> 1:41:43.097
<v Speaker 2>Like he's not brock Bowers. Yeah, And Dalton kin Kid

1:41:43.098 --> 1:41:45.338
<v Speaker 2>has like I think, like four hundred and fifty five

1:41:45.418 --> 1:41:47.977
<v Speaker 2>hundred yards this year. In year two had about the

1:41:48.018 --> 1:41:51.977
<v Speaker 2>same last year, Like, that's not that's not a ton.

1:41:52.138 --> 1:41:52.857
<v Speaker 2>That's not a ton.

1:41:53.138 --> 1:41:58.298
<v Speaker 4>How about the the strength schedule. Josh Allen's playing the afcast,

1:41:58.298 --> 1:41:58.897
<v Speaker 4>He's playing.

1:41:59.018 --> 1:42:01.018
<v Speaker 2>I'm not gonna if they give it to Lamar Jackson, Like,

1:42:01.058 --> 1:42:04.138
<v Speaker 2>I'm not gonna argue, Like Lamar Jackson's awesome, right, if

1:42:04.178 --> 1:42:06.177
<v Speaker 2>they give it to Lamar Jackson, I'm not gonna argue.

1:42:06.537 --> 1:42:08.577
<v Speaker 2>It's probably a little bit of voter fatigue. And we

1:42:08.577 --> 1:42:10.817
<v Speaker 2>could look back on this and it's like, you know,

1:42:10.937 --> 1:42:14.617
<v Speaker 2>Joel Embiid's MVP instead of Nikola Jokic, Like Jokich was

1:42:14.657 --> 1:42:15.737
<v Speaker 2>probably the MVP of the league.

1:42:15.777 --> 1:42:18.298
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's it's that thing where like we dealt with

1:42:18.298 --> 1:42:20.658
<v Speaker 4>this for Brady for years. You win a couple MVPs,

1:42:20.657 --> 1:42:22.537
<v Speaker 4>and now it's not just you have to be the

1:42:22.537 --> 1:42:24.097
<v Speaker 4>best player in the league. You have to be better

1:42:24.138 --> 1:42:27.657
<v Speaker 4>than your average year at being said Josh Allen winning

1:42:27.697 --> 1:42:30.378
<v Speaker 4>it to your point about Jokic, Like I've compared the

1:42:30.458 --> 1:42:32.977
<v Speaker 4>Bills to the Sixers for a long time. This would

1:42:32.978 --> 1:42:35.537
<v Speaker 4>do the fraudulent Joelle and beat MVP.

1:42:35.897 --> 1:42:39.737
<v Speaker 2>It would be very Sixers esque. His numbers, Lamar's numbers

1:42:39.777 --> 1:42:42.617
<v Speaker 2>this year are better than they were last year. Last

1:42:42.697 --> 1:42:45.577
<v Speaker 2>year though, probably was like a water down year for MVP.

1:42:46.218 --> 1:42:48.218
<v Speaker 2>It was really you know, unless he wanted to give

1:42:48.258 --> 1:42:50.497
<v Speaker 2>it to like Christian McCaffrey, Like there wasn't a whole

1:42:50.497 --> 1:42:52.697
<v Speaker 2>lot of options outside of the Mamar Jackson fel SA,

1:42:53.218 --> 1:42:56.338
<v Speaker 2>I know how you feel. But in the conversation, he's

1:42:56.338 --> 1:42:58.817
<v Speaker 2>in the top five, like he just deserves votes. Yeah,

1:42:58.817 --> 1:43:00.617
<v Speaker 2>but he doesn't. He's not gonna win it. He shouldn't

1:43:00.617 --> 1:43:00.897
<v Speaker 2>win it.

1:43:01.378 --> 1:43:03.697
<v Speaker 4>Who whose team is forget? Take him off the team?

1:43:03.697 --> 1:43:04.617
<v Speaker 4>Which team becomes worse?

1:43:04.937 --> 1:43:05.497
<v Speaker 2>Who?

1:43:05.697 --> 1:43:07.817
<v Speaker 4>Which team is a better team? Which team would you

1:43:08.058 --> 1:43:09.697
<v Speaker 4>less want to play? The Ravens or the Bills?

1:43:11.218 --> 1:43:13.977
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. It's so such recency biased because we

1:43:14.098 --> 1:43:16.577
<v Speaker 2>both we just watched the Bills kind of be in

1:43:16.577 --> 1:43:18.378
<v Speaker 2>a game with the Patriots, and then we just watched

1:43:18.378 --> 1:43:19.617
<v Speaker 2>the Ravens wax the text.

1:43:19.697 --> 1:43:21.737
<v Speaker 4>I know the Bills have a better record that Ravens team.

1:43:21.978 --> 1:43:24.537
<v Speaker 4>I think they're like the danger team. That's the team

1:43:24.577 --> 1:43:26.138
<v Speaker 4>you do not want to see going to the playoffs.

1:43:26.178 --> 1:43:28.537
<v Speaker 2>I really hope Lamar Jackson wins the Super Bowl. I

1:43:28.537 --> 1:43:31.338
<v Speaker 2>would love to see Lamar Jackson win a Super so

1:43:31.697 --> 1:43:33.458
<v Speaker 2>I would not like to see the Bills winning.

1:43:33.418 --> 1:43:35.497
<v Speaker 4>That is one of the few on your yeah you

1:43:35.537 --> 1:43:37.537
<v Speaker 4>do no, yeah, do you want Josh to win one?

1:43:37.577 --> 1:43:41.418
<v Speaker 2>So we'll shut up? No, No, I would be perfectly

1:43:41.458 --> 1:43:45.537
<v Speaker 2>content with Josh Allen being a more enjoyable Joel Embiid

1:43:45.697 --> 1:43:47.497
<v Speaker 2>like same resume, but just.

1:43:47.577 --> 1:43:51.577
<v Speaker 4>Not you know what, you know what I want for

1:43:51.657 --> 1:43:54.217
<v Speaker 4>Josh Allen. And this is gonna surprise some people. But again,

1:43:54.258 --> 1:43:56.258
<v Speaker 4>it's nobody understands what my real take is.

1:43:56.258 --> 1:43:58.338
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, that's because you're really like when you

1:43:58.378 --> 1:44:00.617
<v Speaker 2>say nobody understands your real take, it means you're doing

1:44:00.617 --> 1:44:02.138
<v Speaker 2>a bad job. No, I'm all right.

1:44:02.298 --> 1:44:03.977
<v Speaker 4>I've tried to explain a number of times. I want

1:44:04.058 --> 1:44:07.458
<v Speaker 4>Josh Allen to be Matthew Stafford. I want him to

1:44:07.497 --> 1:44:10.257
<v Speaker 4>go win somewhere else. I would love to see Josh Allen.

1:44:10.018 --> 1:44:11.977
<v Speaker 2>Win a super Bowl and not Buffalo. Yeah, that's fair,

1:44:12.138 --> 1:44:14.057
<v Speaker 2>that's fine. I'm good with that. I can't the Bills

1:44:14.058 --> 1:44:16.338
<v Speaker 2>can't win a super Bowl, and we're never gonna be

1:44:16.338 --> 1:44:17.418
<v Speaker 2>on the same page about Coyle Shanahan.

1:44:17.537 --> 1:44:18.777
<v Speaker 4>But he's not gonna win it this year, so you

1:44:18.817 --> 1:44:20.897
<v Speaker 4>don't have to deal with him blowing the Super Bowl

1:44:20.978 --> 1:44:21.378
<v Speaker 4>late again.

1:44:21.458 --> 1:44:25.857
<v Speaker 2>Congratulations all right, Kendall is in North Carolina. What's we're

1:44:25.897 --> 1:44:28.098
<v Speaker 2>big in North Carolina? Told me what, Kendall is not

1:44:28.138 --> 1:44:30.338
<v Speaker 2>gonna win. It's the Bill Belichick effect. It's the Drake

1:44:30.577 --> 1:44:32.898
<v Speaker 2>Bill Belichick effect. Good good.

1:44:34.258 --> 1:44:36.897
<v Speaker 6>Of course was for and Alex.

1:44:37.978 --> 1:44:40.017
<v Speaker 5>If we do win another game and whatnot? Where would

1:44:40.058 --> 1:44:42.817
<v Speaker 5>you all draft Luther Burden? That would you draft him

1:44:42.817 --> 1:44:44.617
<v Speaker 5>in the top pano maybe outside top?

1:44:45.258 --> 1:44:46.058
<v Speaker 11>And I take it up.

1:44:46.218 --> 1:44:48.977
<v Speaker 2>Oh that's a good question, thanks Kendall. Yeah, because you

1:44:49.577 --> 1:44:51.697
<v Speaker 2>good quick. We did this the other week. You raved

1:44:51.737 --> 1:44:52.298
<v Speaker 2>about Luthor.

1:44:52.697 --> 1:44:56.497
<v Speaker 4>You're ruling about Luthor Burden, and then you basically ended

1:44:56.497 --> 1:44:57.418
<v Speaker 4>the segment saying, and.

1:44:57.458 --> 1:44:59.497
<v Speaker 2>He's the third best receiver in the draft. I didn't

1:44:59.497 --> 1:45:02.177
<v Speaker 2>say third is second? Where Drift Hunter?

1:45:03.018 --> 1:45:03.138
<v Speaker 5>Uh?

1:45:03.577 --> 1:45:07.097
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I guess. But I'm I'm sort of coming around

1:45:07.138 --> 1:45:09.418
<v Speaker 2>just to listen to some of the reporting out there

1:45:09.577 --> 1:45:12.737
<v Speaker 2>by the insiders. It definitely does seem like jams around

1:45:12.737 --> 1:45:14.418
<v Speaker 2>the league. Think Travis Hunters is going to say, what

1:45:14.418 --> 1:45:17.097
<v Speaker 2>do you make of that? Jay Glazer report? Probably pretty accurate.

1:45:17.138 --> 1:45:20.137
<v Speaker 2>So all right, so you you you drooled over Luthor Burden.

1:45:20.817 --> 1:45:23.537
<v Speaker 2>You talked about how tentative you were on Tet McMillan.

1:45:23.577 --> 1:45:25.097
<v Speaker 2>But then he said, but Tet mcmill is my wide

1:45:25.138 --> 1:45:30.258
<v Speaker 2>receiver one. I tried not to let my stylistic biases

1:45:30.777 --> 1:45:36.977
<v Speaker 2>creep into my rankings too much, because I always have

1:45:37.138 --> 1:45:40.177
<v Speaker 2>this sort of back and forth internally with myself about

1:45:40.178 --> 1:45:42.418
<v Speaker 2>how to treat the draft in terms of rankings, Like

1:45:42.458 --> 1:45:45.617
<v Speaker 2>am I ranking as if I was Elliott Wolf? Or

1:45:45.617 --> 1:45:48.137
<v Speaker 2>am I just ranking to be right about the players?

1:45:48.218 --> 1:45:48.817
<v Speaker 2>You know what I mean?

1:45:48.897 --> 1:45:48.977
<v Speaker 5>Like?

1:45:49.018 --> 1:45:50.977
<v Speaker 2>Am I ranking it as if I am just a

1:45:51.018 --> 1:45:54.338
<v Speaker 2>generic NFL football team and just who's the best football player?

1:45:54.817 --> 1:45:58.258
<v Speaker 2>Like if I'm ranking it with just who's the best

1:45:58.258 --> 1:46:01.178
<v Speaker 2>football players? Like I try to take my biases of

1:46:01.617 --> 1:46:04.017
<v Speaker 2>this guy's just not really my cup of tea out

1:46:04.058 --> 1:46:07.777
<v Speaker 2>of it unless I'm really convicted that, like Quinton Johnson,

1:46:07.857 --> 1:46:10.097
<v Speaker 2>Like I just did not see it with Quinton Johnston,

1:46:10.418 --> 1:46:13.057
<v Speaker 2>and so I wasn't gonna allow myself to rank him,

1:46:13.138 --> 1:46:16.057
<v Speaker 2>you know, highly, because of that. But with Ted McMillan,

1:46:16.138 --> 1:46:18.777
<v Speaker 2>I see what everybody else sees. It's just I wouldn't

1:46:18.817 --> 1:46:21.857
<v Speaker 2>build my offense around a player like that, Okay, I

1:46:21.897 --> 1:46:25.017
<v Speaker 2>would build my offense around to Luther Burden. Are you

1:46:25.018 --> 1:46:26.937
<v Speaker 2>taking Luther? I think he's a top twenty pick in

1:46:27.018 --> 1:46:28.137
<v Speaker 2>this draft. Top twenty.

1:46:28.178 --> 1:46:31.977
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so even if the Patriots win is both games, Yeah,

1:46:32.018 --> 1:46:34.298
<v Speaker 4>it's still probably a trade down situation for you.

1:46:34.537 --> 1:46:37.777
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and look, I would love if because we had

1:46:37.817 --> 1:46:40.018
<v Speaker 2>a caller. I think it was on Peu. Like, I

1:46:40.497 --> 1:46:42.657
<v Speaker 2>would love if they could be in a situation where

1:46:42.697 --> 1:46:45.097
<v Speaker 2>they trade back up from the top of the second

1:46:45.178 --> 1:46:47.218
<v Speaker 2>round to grab a guy like Luther Burden. I just

1:46:47.218 --> 1:46:48.537
<v Speaker 2>don't think he's gonna fall that far.

1:46:48.657 --> 1:46:49.897
<v Speaker 4>So all right, let me ask you if you say

1:46:49.897 --> 1:46:52.857
<v Speaker 4>his top twenty pick. Yeah, let's say in this draft,

1:46:52.937 --> 1:46:55.137
<v Speaker 4>like in this draft, yep, yep, yep. Yeah, let's say

1:46:55.178 --> 1:46:55.737
<v Speaker 4>I'm looking at.

1:46:55.697 --> 1:46:58.817
<v Speaker 2>The teams here. Oh, here's a good one.

1:46:58.897 --> 1:47:03.097
<v Speaker 4>Okay, the Bengals at fourteen, they lose t Higgins. They

1:47:03.138 --> 1:47:05.737
<v Speaker 4>need to add juice for Joe Burrow. Yeah, you know,

1:47:06.018 --> 1:47:09.418
<v Speaker 4>you get in Tell the Bengals are taking Luther Burden

1:47:09.458 --> 1:47:14.378
<v Speaker 4>at fourteen? Would you take him somewhere ten through thirteen?

1:47:14.857 --> 1:47:17.258
<v Speaker 2>I think about that. Yeah, I would know that, like,

1:47:17.298 --> 1:47:18.817
<v Speaker 2>all right, we're not gonna get him if we wait

1:47:18.857 --> 1:47:21.657
<v Speaker 2>till eighteen nineteen twenty. Yeah, I would. I would. I

1:47:21.657 --> 1:47:27.097
<v Speaker 2>I in this draft in particular now, and that might

1:47:27.138 --> 1:47:30.578
<v Speaker 2>be trade down trade. Does the board does the board

1:47:30.737 --> 1:47:33.257
<v Speaker 2>just for the fact that it's not a great receiver class.

1:47:34.338 --> 1:47:36.137
<v Speaker 2>And well that's what I'm saying. So, like a couple

1:47:36.138 --> 1:47:38.497
<v Speaker 2>of years ago, right when Jay Flowers and Jackson Smith

1:47:38.537 --> 1:47:41.378
<v Speaker 2>and Jigba and Jordan Addison came out, they had the

1:47:41.458 --> 1:47:44.378
<v Speaker 2>league adjusted for the fact that it wasn't Malik Neighbors,

1:47:44.378 --> 1:47:47.338
<v Speaker 2>Marvin Harrison Junior and Romadonza right like they got drafted

1:47:47.338 --> 1:47:49.338
<v Speaker 2>in the twenties. Yeah, I think they all went with

1:47:49.378 --> 1:47:52.298
<v Speaker 2>four straight picks if I'm not mistaken. Yeah, in twenty

1:47:52.338 --> 1:47:56.537
<v Speaker 2>twenty two or twenty three. Which draft was that? Twenty three,

1:47:56.577 --> 1:47:58.857
<v Speaker 2>twenty three? Yep, yeah, sorry, twenty three, So Zay Flower,

1:47:58.897 --> 1:48:02.737
<v Speaker 2>it was JSN, Zay Flowers, Addison, Quentin Johnson I think

1:48:02.777 --> 1:48:05.178
<v Speaker 2>in that order, and they went with four picks in

1:48:05.178 --> 1:48:07.137
<v Speaker 2>a row or like four or five picks or something

1:48:07.178 --> 1:48:07.458
<v Speaker 2>like that.

1:48:07.777 --> 1:48:10.657
<v Speaker 4>It was four picks in a row, js N, Johnston, Flowers, Addison.

1:48:10.777 --> 1:48:12.817
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, I thought Flowers went ahead of Johnson for

1:48:12.817 --> 1:48:16.178
<v Speaker 2>some reason. No idiots, Uh, anyways, that man him on

1:48:16.258 --> 1:48:20.257
<v Speaker 2>this Chargers team. Yeah, I mean whatever, Yeah, just draft

1:48:20.298 --> 1:48:25.298
<v Speaker 2>stiff receivers. It's fine. So you look at this draft,

1:48:25.338 --> 1:48:29.017
<v Speaker 2>I could I see that happening with Luther Burden, the

1:48:29.098 --> 1:48:31.458
<v Speaker 2>kid from Ohiose Sate to BUCA. Right, like those types

1:48:31.458 --> 1:48:33.697
<v Speaker 2>of players, you know, some of the guys, you know,

1:48:33.857 --> 1:48:37.098
<v Speaker 2>Tory Horton or the kid from Texas, you know, like

1:48:37.138 --> 1:48:39.737
<v Speaker 2>those guys. I could see that happening that the league

1:48:39.817 --> 1:48:43.378
<v Speaker 2>is like in other years, this guy, we have to

1:48:43.418 --> 1:48:45.697
<v Speaker 2>take the guy where he's worth on the board. Now

1:48:45.978 --> 1:48:48.138
<v Speaker 2>in mis draft, I think Luther Burden could be in

1:48:48.178 --> 1:48:50.737
<v Speaker 2>the top fifteen because he's the second best receiver in

1:48:50.737 --> 1:48:51.097
<v Speaker 2>the draft.

1:48:51.098 --> 1:48:53.817
<v Speaker 4>And the other thing is so in that draft, the

1:48:53.937 --> 1:48:56.137
<v Speaker 4>kind of the consensus was in none of those guys

1:48:56.138 --> 1:48:59.338
<v Speaker 4>were top picks. Yeah, so they fell. This one's a

1:48:59.378 --> 1:49:03.937
<v Speaker 4>little different because bias aside. Is Ted McMillan going to

1:49:04.018 --> 1:49:05.418
<v Speaker 4>go in the top six picks?

1:49:05.777 --> 1:49:07.977
<v Speaker 2>I think he's top ten at least, right, Yeah, he's

1:49:07.978 --> 1:49:10.897
<v Speaker 2>gonna ten. Ten is his floor? Right? Right? Yeah, he's

1:49:10.937 --> 1:49:14.258
<v Speaker 2>gonna go. And now it's well, we got to get

1:49:14.258 --> 1:49:14.977
<v Speaker 2>the next receiver.

1:49:15.378 --> 1:49:18.697
<v Speaker 4>We need a receiver. So maybe Burden is a twenty

1:49:18.737 --> 1:49:23.218
<v Speaker 4>to twenty five pick. But are are we really going

1:49:23.258 --> 1:49:24.737
<v Speaker 4>to see in the first round of the draft where

1:49:24.737 --> 1:49:28.218
<v Speaker 4>wide receivers go so often? Are fifteen picks going to

1:49:28.298 --> 1:49:32.258
<v Speaker 4>go without a wide receiver going. When's the last time? Honestly, well,

1:49:32.298 --> 1:49:34.138
<v Speaker 4>I guess that year that got to the twenties. But

1:49:34.657 --> 1:49:36.777
<v Speaker 4>after the first receiver, when's the last time we went

1:49:36.857 --> 1:49:40.298
<v Speaker 4>fifteen picks in the first round without another wide receiver taken?

1:49:41.937 --> 1:49:42.977
<v Speaker 4>They always go in bunches.

1:49:43.178 --> 1:49:44.098
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right.

1:49:44.138 --> 1:49:47.418
<v Speaker 4>Twenty twenty two is another example. You had five wide

1:49:47.458 --> 1:49:49.737
<v Speaker 4>receivers going in the first round. Right, six wide receivers

1:49:49.737 --> 1:49:52.097
<v Speaker 4>go in the first round. They went in the span

1:49:52.178 --> 1:49:56.537
<v Speaker 4>of ten picks. Drake London went eighth, Treylon Burks went eighteenth. Yeah,

1:49:56.577 --> 1:49:58.777
<v Speaker 4>so you had same thing at twenty twenty one. A

1:49:58.777 --> 1:50:02.017
<v Speaker 4>bunch of wide receivers went five, six, ten, and then

1:50:02.018 --> 1:50:04.298
<v Speaker 4>you jumped to twenty in twenty seven. So there was

1:50:04.338 --> 1:50:06.057
<v Speaker 4>a little bit of a jump there. But it's like

1:50:06.857 --> 1:50:09.298
<v Speaker 4>McMillan's gonna go and teams unless there's a team that

1:50:09.338 --> 1:50:11.617
<v Speaker 4>fused Hunter as a wide receiver, and maybe that exkews it.

1:50:11.697 --> 1:50:13.378
<v Speaker 4>But this is going to be so hard to read

1:50:13.378 --> 1:50:15.737
<v Speaker 4>the board this year. Travis Hunter, it's gonna make it.

1:50:15.777 --> 1:50:18.138
<v Speaker 4>I'm realizing, like in real time he's good off he

1:50:18.178 --> 1:50:18.817
<v Speaker 4>makes the draft.

1:50:18.897 --> 1:50:20.577
<v Speaker 2>No, I mean, he's going to be a top five pick.

1:50:20.657 --> 1:50:23.698
<v Speaker 4>So I, well, but the trickle down, right.

1:50:23.657 --> 1:50:25.857
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, But I still feel like Teed McMillan is still

1:50:25.897 --> 1:50:28.657
<v Speaker 2>a top ten pick even if the team treats Travis Hunters.

1:50:28.777 --> 1:50:30.897
<v Speaker 4>Sure, but no, But I mean it's like, if Travis

1:50:30.978 --> 1:50:34.137
<v Speaker 4>hunter goes, are more teams panicking about the corners going

1:50:34.178 --> 1:50:37.257
<v Speaker 4>early or more teams panicking about the receivers going early corners?

1:50:37.378 --> 1:50:39.777
<v Speaker 2>I think that because it's really just him and Will Johnson.

1:50:39.857 --> 1:50:42.577
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so, but the point being like, I don't think

1:50:42.617 --> 1:50:44.258
<v Speaker 4>team is gonna wait around that long to take the

1:50:44.258 --> 1:50:44.897
<v Speaker 4>second receiver.

1:50:45.298 --> 1:50:49.617
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and receivers like Luther Burden that have that kind

1:50:49.617 --> 1:50:52.777
<v Speaker 2>of explosiveness and that kind of big playability really at

1:50:52.817 --> 1:50:54.937
<v Speaker 2>all three levels where you can like scheme touch him

1:50:55.018 --> 1:50:56.657
<v Speaker 2>or you can throw the ball on a vertical down

1:50:56.697 --> 1:50:58.577
<v Speaker 2>the field. Like those types of guys don't last long

1:50:58.617 --> 1:50:59.418
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL draft.

1:50:59.458 --> 1:51:00.937
<v Speaker 4>I still think that Chiefs are going to give up

1:51:00.978 --> 1:51:02.338
<v Speaker 4>a ton to move up and get him to.

1:51:02.378 --> 1:51:05.057
<v Speaker 2>Be a good pick. All right, Eldred is in North Carolina?

1:51:05.098 --> 1:51:13.018
<v Speaker 2>What's up, Eldred? There? It is Christmas? Thank you?

1:51:13.098 --> 1:51:18.458
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, yes, sir, I'm kind of kind of count of

1:51:18.737 --> 1:51:25.098
<v Speaker 8>fun a little bit with I Like, he's got this burnspeed.

1:51:26.098 --> 1:51:28.617
<v Speaker 8>But Travis huntert y'all wouldn't try to make him a

1:51:28.617 --> 1:51:32.497
<v Speaker 8>wide receiver instead of a corner first.

1:51:32.777 --> 1:51:35.258
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we've talked about that in the past, Eldred and

1:51:35.338 --> 1:51:38.657
<v Speaker 2>I definitely would think about it. You know, if that's

1:51:38.657 --> 1:51:40.497
<v Speaker 2>the side of the ball that he wants to play

1:51:40.817 --> 1:51:43.058
<v Speaker 2>and he's more committed to being a receiver, I'm not

1:51:43.058 --> 1:51:45.418
<v Speaker 2>gonna tell him that he can't be right like it's

1:51:45.458 --> 1:51:46.497
<v Speaker 2>it's that sort of thing to me.

1:51:46.537 --> 1:51:49.497
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't play him both ways if I think, if

1:51:49.497 --> 1:51:51.537
<v Speaker 4>you're the Patriots, it makes much more sense if you're

1:51:51.537 --> 1:51:53.378
<v Speaker 4>gonna draft him, to draft him as a receiver. And

1:51:53.697 --> 1:51:55.497
<v Speaker 4>we kind of talked to him about him being like

1:51:55.537 --> 1:51:59.137
<v Speaker 4>a third down corner. Yeah, maybe or a spot corner.

1:51:59.857 --> 1:52:02.137
<v Speaker 4>But based on all the reporting right now, it sounds

1:52:02.138 --> 1:52:05.337
<v Speaker 4>like the majority of the teams see him as a cornerback.

1:52:05.418 --> 1:52:08.017
<v Speaker 4>I understand why. I think his ceiling is higher both.

1:52:08.058 --> 1:52:10.218
<v Speaker 4>I think his football ceiling. I think his caliber of

1:52:10.218 --> 1:52:13.697
<v Speaker 4>a players hires a corner, And honestly, if I'm advising him,

1:52:14.258 --> 1:52:16.057
<v Speaker 4>I think he makes more money as a corner in.

1:52:16.018 --> 1:52:18.178
<v Speaker 2>The NFL too. That's the biggest thing to so the

1:52:18.218 --> 1:52:21.977
<v Speaker 2>wide receiver contract, the big wide receiver contract is worth

1:52:22.018 --> 1:52:23.698
<v Speaker 2>more in the biggest corner contract.

1:52:23.737 --> 1:52:26.418
<v Speaker 4>But you look at the way he's built. He's gonna

1:52:26.458 --> 1:52:30.657
<v Speaker 4>get one, maybe two big contracts as a receiver. He

1:52:30.777 --> 1:52:32.937
<v Speaker 4>might get three as a corner. Like he'll last a

1:52:32.937 --> 1:52:35.817
<v Speaker 4>lot longer as a corner. I think he makes more money,

1:52:35.857 --> 1:52:37.497
<v Speaker 4>honestly if he plays corner than receiver.

1:52:38.218 --> 1:52:41.298
<v Speaker 8>Okay, one more, one more question. Let y'all go, yeah,

1:52:41.617 --> 1:52:44.617
<v Speaker 8>and I take it off there. Do you trust Wolf

1:52:44.978 --> 1:52:47.138
<v Speaker 8>to make the right move? I didn't trust them last year.

1:52:47.178 --> 1:52:48.418
<v Speaker 8>I don't think I trust him this year.

1:52:50.697 --> 1:52:55.537
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Eldred, Yeah, thank you. Love the horn. I think

1:52:55.577 --> 1:52:59.178
<v Speaker 2>we're getting into the territory now where we've talked a

1:52:59.258 --> 1:53:00.537
<v Speaker 2>lot about the coaching.

1:53:00.258 --> 1:53:02.057
<v Speaker 4>Right, it's trying to start talking about the front office

1:53:02.058 --> 1:53:02.258
<v Speaker 4>and a.

1:53:02.258 --> 1:53:05.338
<v Speaker 2>Lot about Gid Mayo. And just my two cents, this

1:53:05.418 --> 1:53:08.857
<v Speaker 2>is just my opinion. We're probably in the territory now

1:53:08.897 --> 1:53:10.897
<v Speaker 2>at Girod Mayo where he's going to get a second year.

1:53:10.978 --> 1:53:13.058
<v Speaker 2>It seems to be that way. Yeah, I would be

1:53:13.098 --> 1:53:16.657
<v Speaker 2>pretty shocked. They would have to have like they would

1:53:16.737 --> 1:53:19.497
<v Speaker 2>have to lose forty five to nothing to I think

1:53:19.497 --> 1:53:20.937
<v Speaker 2>it's more than that. I think you would have to

1:53:20.978 --> 1:53:23.418
<v Speaker 2>see like fights on the sideline. Yeah, it would have

1:53:23.497 --> 1:53:27.378
<v Speaker 2>to have a complete implosion at this point for Girod

1:53:27.458 --> 1:53:30.338
<v Speaker 2>Mayo to not be back for a second season. It

1:53:30.537 --> 1:53:33.378
<v Speaker 2>is that the best thing we could debate that, you know,

1:53:33.458 --> 1:53:37.338
<v Speaker 2>Like I understand that there's multiple size of this. I

1:53:37.418 --> 1:53:40.697
<v Speaker 2>really also then feel, and I feel pretty strongly about this.

1:53:41.897 --> 1:53:44.857
<v Speaker 2>Scapegoating Alex van Pelt for what's gone on here, I

1:53:44.937 --> 1:53:45.897
<v Speaker 2>think would be a mistake.

1:53:45.978 --> 1:53:47.258
<v Speaker 4>I could not agree with you more.

1:53:47.298 --> 1:53:50.177
<v Speaker 2>I actually think that the person that's done the best

1:53:50.298 --> 1:53:53.617
<v Speaker 2>job at his job on the coaching staff is probably Vampel.

1:53:53.737 --> 1:53:55.937
<v Speaker 2>Doesn't mean he can't make changes below him, yeah, And

1:53:55.978 --> 1:53:58.657
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't mean he's been perfect. Yeah, certainly hasn't. Like

1:53:58.697 --> 1:54:01.097
<v Speaker 2>I've had a lot of criticism of his play calling,

1:54:01.897 --> 1:54:04.897
<v Speaker 2>mostly the play design and the creativity of the offense,

1:54:05.218 --> 1:54:07.097
<v Speaker 2>and then the red zone stuff we talked about earlier.

1:54:07.098 --> 1:54:09.537
<v Speaker 2>I put that as much on Vapelt as anybody. But

1:54:09.777 --> 1:54:12.258
<v Speaker 2>at the same time, he's done a nice job with

1:54:12.338 --> 1:54:15.777
<v Speaker 2>Drake may They seem to have a good relationship working together.

1:54:16.138 --> 1:54:18.977
<v Speaker 2>There's enough there from a base offense that I see

1:54:18.978 --> 1:54:21.458
<v Speaker 2>that if they had better personnel what they are trying

1:54:21.497 --> 1:54:24.097
<v Speaker 2>to execute and how they would be able to do it,

1:54:24.697 --> 1:54:26.657
<v Speaker 2>and at the end of the day, like, what message

1:54:26.697 --> 1:54:29.218
<v Speaker 2>does that kind of send to the organization that the

1:54:29.258 --> 1:54:32.338
<v Speaker 2>guy that actually did the best job, right, because some

1:54:32.458 --> 1:54:34.538
<v Speaker 2>head has to roll for three and twelve or three

1:54:34.538 --> 1:54:36.738
<v Speaker 2>and thirteen or whatever. The frick the math is now

1:54:37.498 --> 1:54:40.618
<v Speaker 2>three and fourteen because some head has to roll for that,

1:54:40.658 --> 1:54:43.057
<v Speaker 2>We're just gonna We're gonna can they know that's done

1:54:43.098 --> 1:54:43.618
<v Speaker 2>the best job?

1:54:43.698 --> 1:54:45.937
<v Speaker 4>What message does is cent to potential candidates if you're

1:54:45.978 --> 1:54:48.338
<v Speaker 4>looking for somebody to upgrade, like they know they're not

1:54:48.338 --> 1:54:49.698
<v Speaker 4>coming in a ton of job security.

1:54:49.858 --> 1:54:51.418
<v Speaker 2>No, I completely agree with you, And that's not say

1:54:51.418 --> 1:54:54.057
<v Speaker 2>Alex em Pelt should be offensive coordinator for life. Yeah,

1:54:54.218 --> 1:54:55.818
<v Speaker 2>he's just earned a second year.

1:54:55.858 --> 1:54:58.058
<v Speaker 4>I'll say this on the Elliott Wolf thing, and I

1:54:58.178 --> 1:55:00.378
<v Speaker 4>know that people might laugh at me saying this. When

1:55:00.418 --> 1:55:03.538
<v Speaker 4>it comes to the Patriots in their draft history, I

1:55:03.578 --> 1:55:06.498
<v Speaker 4>think there are certainly some So I assume he's asked

1:55:06.498 --> 1:55:09.378
<v Speaker 4>about the draft getting right, bigger picture, free agencies and another story.

1:55:09.378 --> 1:55:12.418
<v Speaker 4>But when we're talking about that top draft pick, how

1:55:12.418 --> 1:55:16.937
<v Speaker 4>many wrong picks really are there? There's definitely some picks

1:55:16.937 --> 1:55:20.338
<v Speaker 4>that are better than others, but you look at the

1:55:20.378 --> 1:55:24.498
<v Speaker 4>majority of the board Travis Hunter would be a good pick.

1:55:24.978 --> 1:55:27.738
<v Speaker 4>We're not gonna complain if they draft Travis Hunter. Abdul

1:55:27.818 --> 1:55:29.658
<v Speaker 4>Carter would be a good pick. We're not gonna complain

1:55:29.698 --> 1:55:32.658
<v Speaker 4>if they draft at to Carter. I will say Ted McMillan.

1:55:32.298 --> 1:55:34.897
<v Speaker 2>Would be a good pick. Yeah, like pending free agency,

1:55:34.897 --> 1:55:38.578
<v Speaker 2>and I will be nervous. It's a good so I

1:55:38.698 --> 1:55:41.937
<v Speaker 2>left him. There's some picks that are better than others. Yeah,

1:55:41.978 --> 1:55:44.937
<v Speaker 2>how many Will Carr Will Campbell would be a good pick?

1:55:46.258 --> 1:55:49.578
<v Speaker 4>How many like bad picks really are there? Because they

1:55:49.578 --> 1:55:50.978
<v Speaker 4>have so many needs.

1:55:50.858 --> 1:55:52.498
<v Speaker 2>Right, there's not a lot of bad paces at the

1:55:52.498 --> 1:55:54.578
<v Speaker 2>top of the first I agree with you, And it's

1:55:54.618 --> 1:55:57.218
<v Speaker 2>pretty hard to miss on a pick that high.

1:55:57.298 --> 1:55:59.378
<v Speaker 4>The only guy I look at that I'm like, I

1:55:59.458 --> 1:56:01.058
<v Speaker 4>really hope they don't draft him at the top. And

1:56:01.098 --> 1:56:02.578
<v Speaker 4>it's not even that he's a bad player. I just

1:56:02.618 --> 1:56:05.097
<v Speaker 4>don't think there's a spot for him. And we talked

1:56:05.098 --> 1:56:06.218
<v Speaker 4>about this, I think it was last week.

1:56:06.338 --> 1:56:07.017
<v Speaker 2>Is Mason Graham?

1:56:07.098 --> 1:56:09.658
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he too redundant with Christian Barmore. It's one of

1:56:09.738 --> 1:56:12.217
<v Speaker 4>the few spots you have a good player, you really can't.

1:56:12.298 --> 1:56:14.418
<v Speaker 4>It's not like even if they took Will Johnson, like

1:56:14.498 --> 1:56:16.338
<v Speaker 4>you can play him a Gonzalez at the same time.

1:56:16.338 --> 1:56:20.098
<v Speaker 4>It's gonna be very hard to play Mason Graham and

1:56:21.138 --> 1:56:24.057
<v Speaker 4>Christian Barmore at the same time. That's really the only

1:56:24.098 --> 1:56:25.458
<v Speaker 4>guy I look at when I look at the top

1:56:25.458 --> 1:56:27.338
<v Speaker 4>of this list, and obviously the quarterbacks, but they're not

1:56:27.378 --> 1:56:30.057
<v Speaker 4>going to do that. Mason Graham is the only guy

1:56:30.098 --> 1:56:32.498
<v Speaker 4>I looking at the top of this list and say like, yeah,

1:56:32.498 --> 1:56:34.937
<v Speaker 4>I'd be unhappy if they draft him. I'd be happier

1:56:34.978 --> 1:56:38.498
<v Speaker 4>with some than others, but there aren't a lot of

1:56:38.578 --> 1:56:39.658
<v Speaker 4>bad picks on the board.

1:56:39.858 --> 1:56:42.538
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So really quickly on Wolf. What's that on your sleeve?

1:56:42.578 --> 1:56:46.017
<v Speaker 2>By the way, why don get me started? And got

1:56:46.058 --> 1:56:48.658
<v Speaker 2>pain on it? All right? Anyways, really quickly on Wolf

1:56:48.698 --> 1:56:50.098
<v Speaker 2>and then we gotta get out of here. So I

1:56:50.178 --> 1:56:52.778
<v Speaker 2>just want to do two seconds on the Chargers. Uh.

1:56:52.818 --> 1:56:56.378
<v Speaker 2>The biggest thing to me with Wolf moving forward is

1:56:56.458 --> 1:57:00.338
<v Speaker 2>really one closing in free agency. I think that's gonna

1:57:00.378 --> 1:57:06.618
<v Speaker 2>be harder than just in terms of evaluating who they

1:57:06.658 --> 1:57:09.778
<v Speaker 2>should go after. I believe that part is kind of

1:57:09.778 --> 1:57:11.738
<v Speaker 2>easy to be honest with you, like, who are the

1:57:11.738 --> 1:57:14.618
<v Speaker 2>players you want? Is not the hard part. The hard

1:57:14.658 --> 1:57:17.298
<v Speaker 2>part is getting the contract signed and across the finish

1:57:17.338 --> 1:57:19.498
<v Speaker 2>line and getting that player in your building. Well, it's closing.

1:57:19.937 --> 1:57:21.298
<v Speaker 4>I know we got a wrap, but like I think

1:57:21.378 --> 1:57:24.858
<v Speaker 4>it's not just honestly, they need to make trades. They're

1:57:24.858 --> 1:57:27.017
<v Speaker 4>not gonna get everything they want for agency. I've said this,

1:57:27.058 --> 1:57:29.698
<v Speaker 4>I think t Higgins is going back to Cincinnati. It's

1:57:29.778 --> 1:57:31.818
<v Speaker 4>dk Metcalf and I don't know if you saw the

1:57:31.858 --> 1:57:33.978
<v Speaker 4>Athletic Football Podcast.

1:57:33.538 --> 1:57:37.138
<v Speaker 2>This week, it was Robert these people are giving you

1:57:37.178 --> 1:57:38.057
<v Speaker 2>credence here.

1:57:38.018 --> 1:57:41.097
<v Speaker 4>Robert Mas and Dereklass and we're both talking about, Yeah,

1:57:41.178 --> 1:57:44.578
<v Speaker 4>the Seahawks and move Metcalf. Like, I still think he's

1:57:44.618 --> 1:57:46.578
<v Speaker 4>gonna be the best guy available at that position.

1:57:46.738 --> 1:57:50.138
<v Speaker 2>So I'm not as concerned about them being able to

1:57:50.218 --> 1:57:52.897
<v Speaker 2>identify the players that they want in free agency. I'm

1:57:52.937 --> 1:57:55.178
<v Speaker 2>more concerned about them getting the players that they want

1:57:55.218 --> 1:57:55.937
<v Speaker 2>in free agency.

1:57:56.018 --> 1:57:58.618
<v Speaker 4>A little breaking news to Sean Jackson named the head coach.

1:57:58.458 --> 1:58:02.017
<v Speaker 2>At uh this is what you interrupt me for Delaware State,

1:58:02.058 --> 1:58:05.298
<v Speaker 2>DeShawn that's mike Vic DeShawn Jackson. That's kind of cool.

1:58:05.618 --> 1:58:05.738
<v Speaker 5>Uh.

1:58:06.418 --> 1:58:09.578
<v Speaker 2>So that's the biggest thing to me because they they

1:58:09.578 --> 1:58:13.178
<v Speaker 2>are still not like a great destination. They're they're more

1:58:13.178 --> 1:58:15.378
<v Speaker 2>attractive than they were a year ago because of Drake

1:58:15.418 --> 1:58:18.257
<v Speaker 2>May for an offensive player of T Higgins or DK

1:58:18.378 --> 1:58:21.258
<v Speaker 2>Metcalf or whatever. But those guys are gonna have tons

1:58:21.298 --> 1:58:24.218
<v Speaker 2>of options. They're gonna have tons of options that are

1:58:24.258 --> 1:58:26.818
<v Speaker 2>gonna pay him tons of money. So it's not your

1:58:26.858 --> 1:58:29.258
<v Speaker 2>money is not going to just be the only reason

1:58:29.258 --> 1:58:31.498
<v Speaker 2>why you get the player. Don't get the player. So

1:58:31.498 --> 1:58:35.977
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna have to sell that player on something. And

1:58:36.018 --> 1:58:38.258
<v Speaker 2>that's on Elliott Wolf, Like, that's on that staff and

1:58:38.338 --> 1:58:43.897
<v Speaker 2>girodmeyo a little bit too to persuade Elliott Wolf to

1:58:43.937 --> 1:58:46.897
<v Speaker 2>persuade T Higgins or whoever it is to sign with the Patriots.

1:58:47.178 --> 1:58:51.178
<v Speaker 2>Just a quick story aside. You know in in Tennessee,

1:58:51.458 --> 1:58:53.378
<v Speaker 2>you know, big thing that I had heard from a

1:58:53.418 --> 1:58:55.458
<v Speaker 2>lot of their beat writers and stuff like that about

1:58:55.458 --> 1:58:59.138
<v Speaker 2>the Calvin Ridley sweepstakes. Ran Carthin, their GM is this

1:58:59.218 --> 1:59:02.977
<v Speaker 2>sort of closer like he's like, do you ever watch suits? No,

1:59:03.058 --> 1:59:05.738
<v Speaker 2>But I understand that he's Harvey Spector right, Like he

1:59:05.818 --> 1:59:09.698
<v Speaker 2>comes in and he gets the deal done, and that

1:59:10.937 --> 1:59:13.177
<v Speaker 2>might have been the difference. Now there was other things

1:59:13.218 --> 1:59:15.778
<v Speaker 2>like you know, the whole location and money and all that.

1:59:15.858 --> 1:59:18.937
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure, but ran Carthin apparently is this guy that

1:59:19.058 --> 1:59:20.578
<v Speaker 2>just comes in and closes deals.

1:59:20.418 --> 1:59:22.818
<v Speaker 4>Something to make those something that makes those things like

1:59:23.058 --> 1:59:24.858
<v Speaker 4>a factor is how it's pitched right.

1:59:25.138 --> 1:59:27.258
<v Speaker 2>So that's that's a big thing to me. And then

1:59:27.458 --> 1:59:30.298
<v Speaker 2>in the draft, it's all about what you do in

1:59:30.698 --> 1:59:34.538
<v Speaker 2>two through seven. I'm not trying to totally take credit

1:59:34.578 --> 1:59:36.738
<v Speaker 2>away from them for taking a guy like Drake may.

1:59:36.658 --> 1:59:39.498
<v Speaker 4>We took too many calls on Marvin Harrison to he

1:59:39.578 --> 1:59:40.498
<v Speaker 4>was a slam dunk pick.

1:59:40.538 --> 1:59:43.498
<v Speaker 2>Right, But it's sort of similar now where you're gonna

1:59:43.498 --> 1:59:45.538
<v Speaker 2>have you're gonna pick two overall, you're gonna have a

1:59:45.538 --> 1:59:47.498
<v Speaker 2>board of four or five guys, and all four or

1:59:47.538 --> 1:59:49.778
<v Speaker 2>five you have a really strong case to make the pick.

1:59:50.298 --> 1:59:52.378
<v Speaker 2>So it's not gonna be the hardest pick in the

1:59:52.378 --> 1:59:57.738
<v Speaker 2>world in the first round. Jalen Polk, Kendon Wallace, Javon Baker, like,

1:59:57.778 --> 2:00:00.378
<v Speaker 2>those are the guys that make you gms great like

2:00:00.418 --> 2:00:03.218
<v Speaker 2>those are. That's how Howie Roseman is one of the

2:00:03.218 --> 2:00:05.618
<v Speaker 2>best GMS in football. That's how Brett Viach is one

2:00:05.618 --> 2:00:08.618
<v Speaker 2>of the best gms in football. Those guys make their

2:00:08.738 --> 2:00:11.937
<v Speaker 2>money on Days two and three in the draft. Yeah,

2:00:12.018 --> 2:00:15.137
<v Speaker 2>and so that's gonna be big for Wolf. He's gonna

2:00:15.138 --> 2:00:17.137
<v Speaker 2>get it, Like just like Girod's gonna get the second

2:00:17.178 --> 2:00:19.498
<v Speaker 2>year as the head coach. Elliott Wolf is gonna be

2:00:19.498 --> 2:00:22.258
<v Speaker 2>the one picking the groceries and the offseason for the Patriots.

2:00:22.897 --> 2:00:25.898
<v Speaker 2>His future with this team will be decided by this offseason.

2:00:26.138 --> 2:00:28.738
<v Speaker 2>If he strikes out this offseason, he's he's probably gonna

2:00:28.738 --> 2:00:32.778
<v Speaker 2>be I. They both problem. Yeah, So really quickly on

2:00:32.858 --> 2:00:36.098
<v Speaker 2>the Chargers, my big uh, you know the thing I'm

2:00:36.418 --> 2:00:40.977
<v Speaker 2>looking for in this game, really really good defensive mind

2:00:41.258 --> 2:00:44.338
<v Speaker 2>coming here with the Chargers. Jesse Minter probably gonna be

2:00:44.338 --> 2:00:47.818
<v Speaker 2>a head coach in the league, not before long. Really

2:00:48.058 --> 2:00:50.258
<v Speaker 2>one of those He's a tighte pants guy on the

2:00:50.258 --> 2:00:52.738
<v Speaker 2>defense side of the ball, right, Like he's he's Mike McDonald,

2:00:52.858 --> 2:00:56.097
<v Speaker 2>he's Demiko Ryans. Like he's one of those types of guys.

2:00:56.897 --> 2:01:02.977
<v Speaker 2>Uh maybet better than Stale, but he's one of those guys.

2:01:02.978 --> 2:01:05.418
<v Speaker 2>It's a schemer, like he's a mastermind. Right, he's gonna

2:01:05.418 --> 2:01:07.418
<v Speaker 2>come in. He's gonna be really good on the x's

2:01:07.418 --> 2:01:09.057
<v Speaker 2>and o's. He's gonna be really good at knowing your

2:01:09.098 --> 2:01:12.458
<v Speaker 2>ten season situational tend and seas in particular. So that

2:01:12.578 --> 2:01:15.378
<v Speaker 2>is a really tough matchup for Alex fann Pelt. We

2:01:15.418 --> 2:01:17.658
<v Speaker 2>talk about him getting his second year here and all

2:01:17.658 --> 2:01:19.458
<v Speaker 2>that kind of stuff. You know, this is one of

2:01:19.498 --> 2:01:21.658
<v Speaker 2>those games I thought the Bills are kind of a

2:01:21.738 --> 2:01:23.618
<v Speaker 2>do what you do type of defense. You sort of

2:01:23.698 --> 2:01:25.538
<v Speaker 2>know you're gonna get four to three over, you're gonna

2:01:25.538 --> 2:01:27.818
<v Speaker 2>get Cover two, you're gonna get Manta man. You kind

2:01:27.818 --> 2:01:29.897
<v Speaker 2>of know what the Bills are gonna do. Uh, this

2:01:30.538 --> 2:01:32.498
<v Speaker 2>Chargers team is gonna spin the dial a lot more

2:01:32.538 --> 2:01:35.178
<v Speaker 2>on Drake May. So big game for Alex van Pelt,

2:01:35.258 --> 2:01:37.818
<v Speaker 2>big game for Drake May going up against a pretty

2:01:37.858 --> 2:01:41.858
<v Speaker 2>good Chargers defense to show some chops there. But defensively

2:01:41.897 --> 2:01:45.098
<v Speaker 2>for the Patriots, I still feel like this is a

2:01:45.138 --> 2:01:47.538
<v Speaker 2>game that they can compete in like they did against Buffalo.

2:01:47.778 --> 2:01:50.778
<v Speaker 2>I look at this Chargers offense. It's Lad McConkie, like

2:01:50.818 --> 2:01:51.938
<v Speaker 2>it's Lad McConkie.

2:01:52.418 --> 2:01:55.418
<v Speaker 4>And Will Disley's their second leading receiver and he's hurt.

2:01:56.098 --> 2:02:01.738
<v Speaker 2>It's really not a passing offense. Great quarterback, one really

2:02:01.738 --> 2:02:04.578
<v Speaker 2>good receiver. They just played a great quarterback and one

2:02:04.618 --> 2:02:07.258
<v Speaker 2>really good receiver, and Josh Allen and Khalil Shakir and

2:02:07.298 --> 2:02:10.458
<v Speaker 2>did a really good job this game. To me, defensively

2:02:10.458 --> 2:02:13.338
<v Speaker 2>has a ton of carryover. The one caveat is that

2:02:13.458 --> 2:02:17.017
<v Speaker 2>the Chargers will run the ball. They will not. They

2:02:17.058 --> 2:02:20.418
<v Speaker 2>won't pull a Joe Brady Josh Allen and get baited

2:02:20.458 --> 2:02:22.498
<v Speaker 2>into throwing the ball forty times in a game. They

2:02:22.498 --> 2:02:24.578
<v Speaker 2>don't need to be throwing the ball forty times. They're

2:02:24.618 --> 2:02:26.498
<v Speaker 2>gonna be two back. They're gonna put a full back

2:02:26.538 --> 2:02:29.858
<v Speaker 2>in the backfield. They're gonna put Justin Herbert under center

2:02:30.058 --> 2:02:31.897
<v Speaker 2>or in the still and they're gonna run the ball,

2:02:32.218 --> 2:02:34.298
<v Speaker 2>and if the Patriots can't stop it and get them

2:02:34.298 --> 2:02:38.538
<v Speaker 2>into third down situations, then it will be a Charger game.

2:02:38.618 --> 2:02:41.258
<v Speaker 2>Like the Chargers will control the game. Yeah, I agree

2:02:41.258 --> 2:02:42.138
<v Speaker 2>with a lot of that. I know we've got to

2:02:42.138 --> 2:02:42.578
<v Speaker 2>get out of here.

2:02:42.618 --> 2:02:45.177
<v Speaker 4>I just I think it's a tougher team than the Bills,

2:02:45.178 --> 2:02:46.578
<v Speaker 4>and they're gonna have to win it if they can

2:02:46.858 --> 2:02:48.378
<v Speaker 4>win at the line of scrimmag which is than if

2:02:48.378 --> 2:02:49.498
<v Speaker 4>with this team, if they can win at the line

2:02:49.498 --> 2:02:50.698
<v Speaker 4>of scrimmage. I don't know if they win, but they

2:02:50.738 --> 2:02:52.338
<v Speaker 4>keep it close. I know some people look at it

2:02:52.458 --> 2:02:54.418
<v Speaker 4>as four and a half as the number is being

2:02:54.738 --> 2:02:57.258
<v Speaker 4>you know, surprised it's that low. You also have the

2:02:57.258 --> 2:02:59.897
<v Speaker 4>whole thing about West Coast Dome team coming to the Northeast.

2:03:00.178 --> 2:03:02.897
<v Speaker 4>Herbert has not been good here in Jillette Stadium, especially

2:03:03.018 --> 2:03:05.458
<v Speaker 4>late in the year. I think the Chargers are probably

2:03:05.498 --> 2:03:07.498
<v Speaker 4>trying to win this game, like thirteen to ten.

2:03:07.658 --> 2:03:11.057
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would also say they the Chargers don't run

2:03:11.098 --> 2:03:13.858
<v Speaker 2>away from you and the scoreboard necessarily like the Bills can.

2:03:13.937 --> 2:03:16.057
<v Speaker 2>The Bills can be a wagon and they can hang

2:03:16.138 --> 2:03:18.017
<v Speaker 2>forty five on you and just run away from you.

2:03:18.378 --> 2:03:21.177
<v Speaker 2>This Chargers team is nineteenth in the points per game.

2:03:21.498 --> 2:03:24.338
<v Speaker 2>They're fifteenth in DVOA. On offense. They have a really

2:03:24.378 --> 2:03:27.298
<v Speaker 2>good quarterback, but they're not a great offense yet they

2:03:27.298 --> 2:03:30.658
<v Speaker 2>still have holes. Receiving corps is still not scaring a

2:03:30.658 --> 2:03:34.658
<v Speaker 2>lot of people. So this Charger game could be a

2:03:34.698 --> 2:03:39.057
<v Speaker 2>Patriots style game where it's twenty to seventeen, right, seventeen fourteen,

2:03:39.138 --> 2:03:41.858
<v Speaker 2>twenty to seventeen. I think I paid twenty fourteen on

2:03:42.018 --> 2:03:44.498
<v Speaker 2>PU Like that's a score that the Patriots could win

2:03:44.538 --> 2:03:46.937
<v Speaker 2>a game within. The Bills are a little bit different.

2:03:46.978 --> 2:03:48.858
<v Speaker 2>The Bills you had to score and you knew it.

2:03:48.978 --> 2:03:52.897
<v Speaker 2>So that's the Chargers on Sunday. I hope our Saturday.

2:03:52.937 --> 2:03:55.738
<v Speaker 2>Excuse me, open the future we do shows again where

2:03:55.778 --> 2:03:59.338
<v Speaker 2>we have like a long game preview segment. It just

2:03:59.618 --> 2:04:02.217
<v Speaker 2>it feels like we haven't really cared about the games

2:04:02.458 --> 2:04:04.818
<v Speaker 2>in a while, and I hope that changes here soon.

2:04:05.298 --> 2:04:08.057
<v Speaker 2>But we'll be back next week, one more regular season

2:04:08.098 --> 2:04:10.178
<v Speaker 2>to go, game to go against the Bills here at

2:04:10.218 --> 2:04:13.218
<v Speaker 2>Jillette Stadium. We'll obviously talk plenty of draft in the

2:04:13.218 --> 2:04:16.177
<v Speaker 2>offseason as well at that point, but until then, bud

2:04:16.258 --> 2:04:18.818
<v Speaker 2>Light Easy to Drink, Easy to Enjoy, the official beer

2:04:18.858 --> 2:04:21.218
<v Speaker 2>sponsor of the New England Patriots. Had to get that

2:04:21.338 --> 2:04:23.538
<v Speaker 2>in there, and we'll see you guys next week.

2:04:26.778 --> 2:04:30.618
<v Speaker 9>Thank you for downloading this podcast, Subscribe on Apple, Google, Playday,

2:04:30.698 --> 2:04:33.698
<v Speaker 9>and everywhere else you listen. Like the show, Please rate

2:04:33.778 --> 2:04:36.897
<v Speaker 9>and review us. Listener comments and ratings help keep us

2:04:36.937 --> 2:04:40.137
<v Speaker 9>high on the podcast rankings so new listeners can find us.

2:04:40.258 --> 2:04:43.337
<v Speaker 9>Be sure to check Patriots dot com for more news

2:04:43.378 --> 2:04:44.738
<v Speaker 9>and more podcasts.

2:04:51.738 --> 2:04:53.297
<v Speaker 3>Patriots Postgame Show.

2:04:54.738 --> 2:04:57.818
<v Speaker 1>Join Battsmith along with Patriots dot Com Paul Parrillo and

2:04:57.858 --> 2:05:01.738
<v Speaker 1>Mike Desso as they offer instant analysis after every Patriots game.

2:05:02.018 --> 2:05:04.498
<v Speaker 3>We bring you the good, the bad, and the injured

2:05:04.538 --> 2:05:05.137
<v Speaker 3>from each game.

2:05:05.458 --> 2:05:09.097
<v Speaker 1>Plus you'll hear press conferences, exclusive player interviews, and more

2:05:09.138 --> 2:05:12.778
<v Speaker 1>on the Patriots Postgame Show. Search for Patriots Postgame anywhere

2:05:12.778 --> 2:05:13.858
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts.